ABSTRACT
Genomic data on clinically relevant bacteria of public health concern from sub-Saharan Africa are limited. In this study, we present the phenotypic profiles and genomic characteristics of four Shigella flexneri isolates recovered from untreated community wastewater samples in Ghana.
KEYWORDS: Shigella flexneri, Ghana, wastewater, antimicrobial resistance, Africa, genome
ANNOUNCEMENT
Wastewater surveillance combined with whole-genome sequencing enables high-resolution monitoring of antimicrobial resistance and supports public health responses (1–7). In Africa, Shigella flexneri isolates show widespread extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) production and high levels of multidrug and carbapenem resistance (8). Here, we report on the draft genome sequences and antibiogram of four S. flexneri recovered from untreated community wastewater samples.
A total of 277 untreated community wastewater samples were archived from 13 sentinel sites across seven regions in Ghana. These samples were concentrated at the Virology Department of the NMIMR and stored in 2 mL cryovials for poliovirus detection. The 277 archived concentrates were then retrieved and cultured on MacConkey agar (Oxoid, UK) and incubated at 37°C for 18–24 hours. The isolates obtained were subcultured onto nutrient agar (Oxoid, UK) and identified to the species level using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (Bruker Daltonics, Germany). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed on isolates using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method with 13 antimicrobial agents. Detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase production was performed using the double-disk diffusion method. Measured zone sizes were interpreted using CLSI (2024) guidelines (9).
DNA extraction and purification were performed using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Quantification of DNA was done using a Qubit 4.0 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Libraries were prepared using the Illumina DNA Preparation (M) Tagmentation Kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The process included the enzymatic fragmentation of DNA using bead-linked transposons, index addition, amplification, and bead-based size selection. Library fragment sizes and concentrations were assessed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, USA) and quantitative PCR (KAPA SYBR Fast qPCR kit), respectively. Libraries were normalized to 2 nM, pooled, and then sequenced using 2 × 150 bp paired-end chemistry on the Illumina NextSeq 2000 system (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Indexes and reads with quality scores <20 were trimmed using Trimmomatic v0.39 (10), quality-checked with FastQC v1.0 (11), and assembled using Unicycler v0.5.0 (12). The assemblies were evaluated using Quast v5.2.0 (13). All genomes met established quality thresholds (Q ≥ 20, ≥20× coverage, and contig length ≥200 bp). Species confirmation, virulence profiling, plasmid identification, and multilocus sequence typing were performed using KmerFinder v3.0.2 (14), VirulenceFinder v2.0.5 (15), PlasmidFinder v2.0.1 (16), and MLST v2.0.9 (17), respectively. Antibiotic resistance was determined using ResFinder v4.7.2 (18) and CARD v4.0.1 (19). Genome annotation was performed using NCBI PGAP v6.10 (20). Default settings were utilized except where mentioned. Table 1 presents a summary of the results.
TABLE 1.
Antimicrobial resistance profiles and genomic characteristics of isolatesa
| Characteristics | Isolate information | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample ID | 470_24_S308 | 543_24_S307 | 511_23_S251 | 636_23_S239 |
| Strain ID | SF001 | SF002 | SF003 | SF004 |
| Geographical location | Nima Freetown (5.58° North Latitude and 0.2° West Longitude) | Ahinsan (6.66° North Latitude and −1.6° West Longitude) | Sunyani Zongo (7.34° North Latitude and −2.32° West Longitude) | Shiabu (5.53° North Latitude and −0.25° West Longitude) |
| Antimicrobial agents (Zone diameters/mm) | ||||
| Amikacin (30 µg) | 20 (S) | 20 (S) | 18 (I) | 18 (I) |
| Ampicillin (10 µg) | 6 (R) | 6 (R) | 6 (R) | 6 (R) |
| Cefotaxime (30 µg) | 10 (R) | 10 (R) | 10 (R) | 10 (R) |
| Cefoxitin (30 µg) | 6 (R) | 26 (S) | 25 (S) | 8 (R) |
| Ceftazidime (30 µg) | 18 (I) | 17 (R) | 18 (I) | 6 (R) |
| Cefuroxime (30 µg) | 6 (R) | 6 (R) | 6 (R) | 6 (R) |
| Chloramphenicol (30 µg) | 18 (S) | 24 (S) | 26 (S) | 25 (S) |
| Ciprofloxacin (5 µg) | 19 (R) | 20 (R) | 14 (R) | 21 (R) |
| Gentamicin (10 µg) | 19 (S) | 17 (I) | 18 (S) | 15 (I) |
| Meropenem (10 µg) | 22 (I) | 30 (S) | 34 (S) | 11 (R) |
| Norfloxacin (10 µg) | 23 (S) | 15 (I) | 20 (S) | 20 (S) |
| Tetracycline (30 µg) | 6 (S) | 7 (S) | 6 (R) | 7 (R) |
| Trimethoprim- Sulfamethoxazole (25 µg) |
6 (R) | 6 (R) | 6 (R) | 28 (S) |
| ESBL | Positive | Positive | Positive | Negative |
| Resistance genes | ||||
| Aminoglycosides | aph (6)-ld, aph(3II)-lb, and aadA5 | ND | aph (6)-Id and aph(3'')-Ib | ND |
| β-Lactams | blaCTX-M-15 | blaCTX-M-15 | blaCTX-M-15 and blaTEM-1B | blaTEM-1B |
| Folate pathway antagonists | sul2, sul1, and dfrA17 | ND | sul2 and dfrA14 | ND |
| Macrolides | erm(B) and mph(A) | ND | ND | ND |
| Quinolones | qnrD1, qnrS1, emrR, and emrB | qnrS1, emrR, emrA, emrB, and mdtB | qnrS1, emrB, emrR, and mdtH | qnrS1, emrB, and emrR |
| Tetracyclines | tet(A) and emrY | tet(A) | tet(A) and emrY | tet(A) |
| Nitroimidazole | msbA | msbA | msbA | msbA |
| Peptide | bacA and pmrF | pmrF | yojI, pmrF, and bacA | |
| Disinfecting agents and antiseptics | qacEdelta1 | ND | ND | ND |
| Phosphonic acid | mdtG | ND | mdtG | mdtG |
| Multiple drugsb | acrS, gadX, mdtE, evgA, acrA, acrB, cpxA, and marA | acrS, acrE, acrA, acrB, mdtN, mdtP, cpxA, gadX, mdtF, mdtE, and marA | evgA, marA, acrE, acrS, mdtE, acrB, acrA, and cpxA | mdtP, mdtN, acrE, acrA, acrB, cpxA, gadX, mdtF, mdtE, marA, and evgA |
| Plasmids | Col3M, IncFIA, IncFIB, IncFII, and IncR | ND | IncY | IncY |
| Virulence genes |
anr, capU, csgA, fdeC, gad, hha, hlyE, iss, nlpl, sitA, terC, traT, yehA, yehB, yehC, and yehD |
capU, csgA, fdeC, gad, hha, hlyE, iss, nlpI, sitA, terC, yehA, yehB, yehC, yehD, and yghJ | capU, csgA, fdeC, fimH, gad, hlyE, nlpI, terC, yehA, yehB, yehC, yehD, and yghJ | clpK1, csgA, fdeC, fimH, gad, hha, hlyE, nlpI, sitA, terC, and yghJ |
| Genome size (bp) | 4,743,972 | 4,586,942 | 4,817,493 | 4,510,260 |
| Sequence type | ST1598 | ST1421 | ST224 | ST46 |
| N50 (bp) | 82,775 | 82,809 | 86,580 | 84,358 |
| GC content (%) | 50.73 | 50.82 | 50.83 | 50.78 |
| No. of reads | 7,576,788 | 7,329,186 | 6,642,772 | 8,680,358 |
| No. of contigs | 279 | 198 | 77 | 145 |
| Size of largest contig (bp) | 278,327 | 229,652 | 977,979 | 235,020 |
| No. of coding sequences | 4,473 | 4,263 | 4,430 | 4,186 |
| No. of rRNAs | 9 | 3 | 9 | 2 |
| No. of tRNAs | 80 | 80 | 80 | 77 |
| Coverage (×) | 241 | 241 | 208 | 291 |
| BioProject accession no. | PRJNA1338482 | PRJNA1338482 | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1338482 PRJNA1338482 | PRJNA1338482 |
| Genome accession no. | JBRNXC000000000 | JBRNXB000000000 | JBSCCP000000000 | JBSCCM000000000 |
| BioSample accession no. | SAMN52447488 | SAMN52447489 | SAMN53088219 | SAMN53088222 |
| SRA accession no. | SRR35793167 | SRR35793166 | SRR35980169 | SRR35980168 |
R, resistant; I, intermediate; S, susceptible; ND, not detected.
Genes conferring resistance to multiple drug classes. The drug classes can be found at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31078558.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Sample collection for poliovirus surveillance was supported by the World Health Organization (WHO). The processing and whole-genome sequencing of Shigella flexneri isolates were funded by the UK Department of Health and Social Care's Fleming Fund and UK International Development through the SeqAfrica project. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policies or positions of the UK Department of Health and Social Care.
Contributor Information
Beverly Egyir, Email: BEgyir@noguchi.ug.edu.gh.
John Kofi Odoom, Email: JOdoom@noguchi.ug.edu.gh.
David Rasko, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The genomes were uploaded to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database under BioProject accession number PRJNA1338482 and assigned unique accession numbers as provided in Table 1.
ETHICS APPROVAL
The study was approved by the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR) Institutional Review Board (FW00001824).
REFERENCES
- 1. Balcazar JL. 2025. Wastewater-based epidemiology as a complementary tool for antimicrobial resistance surveillance: overcoming barriers to integration. BioEssays. WILEY-VCH. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bies.70034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Gholipour S, Shamsizadeh Z, Halabowski D, Gwenzi W, Nikaeen M. 2024. Combating antibiotic resistance using wastewater surveillance: significance, applications, challenges, and future directions. In Science of the total environment. Vol. 908. Elsevier B.V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. World Health Organization . 2024. Wastewater and environmental surveillance for one or more pathogens
- 4. CDC . 2024. US center for disease control and prevention. 2024 [Cited 2025 Sep 4]. About Whole Genome Sequencing. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/pulsenet/php/wgs/?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/pulsenet/pathogens/wgs.html
- 5. He Y, Ong E, Huffman A. 2023. Bacterial whole-genome determination and applications, p 511–525. In Molecular medical microbiology, Third Edition. Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Quainoo S, Coolen JPM, Hijum S, Huynen MA, Melchers WJG, Schaik W, et al. 2017. Whole-genome sequencing of bacterial pathogens: the future of nosocomial outbreak analysis, p 1015–1063. In Clinical microbiology reviews. Vol. 30. American Society for Microbiology. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Aminu S, Ascandari A, Laamarti M, Safdi NEH, El Allali A, Daoud R. 2024. Exploring microbial worlds: a review of whole genome sequencing and its application in characterizing the microbial communities. Crit Rev Microbiol 50:805–829. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2023.2282447 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Somda NS, Nyarkoh R, Tankoano A, Bonkoungou OJI, Tetteh-Quarcoo PB, Donkor ES. 2025. Molecular epidemiology of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and carbapenemases-producing Shigella in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vol. 25. BMC Infectious Diseases. BioMed Central Ltd. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. CLSI . 2024. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. In CLSI M100, 34th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Andrew S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high-throughput sequence data [Internet]. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
- 12. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Hasman H, Saputra D, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Lund O, Svendsen CA, Frimodt-Møller N, Aarestrup FM. 2014. Rapid whole-genome sequencing for detection and characterization of microorganisms directly from clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol 52:139–146. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02452-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Joensen KG, Scheutz F, Lund O, Hasman H, Kaas RS, Nielsen EM, Aarestrup FM. 2014. Real-time whole-genome sequencing for routine typing, surveillance, and outbreak detection of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol 52:1501–1510. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03617-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Carattoli A, Zankari E, García-Fernández A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, Villa L, Møller Aarestrup F, Hasman H. 2014. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Larsen MV, Cosentino S, Rasmussen S, Friis C, Hasman H, Marvig RL, Jelsbak L, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Ussery DW, Aarestrup FM, Lund O. 2012. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 50:1355–1361. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06094-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Florensa AF, Kaas RS, Clausen P, Aytan-Aktug D, Aarestrup FM. 2022. ResFinder - an open online resource for identification of antimicrobial resistance genes in next-generation sequencing data and prediction of phenotypes from genotypes. Microb Genom 8:1–10. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000748 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Alcock BP, Huynh W, Chalil R, Smith KW, Raphenya AR, Wlodarski MA, Edalatmand A, Petkau A, Syed SA, Tsang KK, et al. 2023. CARD 2023: expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 51:D690–D699. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The genomes were uploaded to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database under BioProject accession number PRJNA1338482 and assigned unique accession numbers as provided in Table 1.
