ABSTRACT
Shigella species frequently cause bacillary dysentery and remain a major public health concern in low- and middle-income countries. We report draft genomes of 22 Senegalese Shigella isolates including S. sonnei, S. flexneri, and S. boydii. Genome sizes range from 4.34 to 5.54 Mb, with GC contents ranging from 50.25% to 50.73%. These data provide a resource for genomic epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance of Shigella in West Africa.
KEYWORDS: Shigella, genomes, Senegal, West Africa
ANNOUNCEMENT
Species of the genus Shigella are among the leading bacterial causes of diarrheal disease worldwide, particularly affecting young children in low- and middle-income countries (1, 2). Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides high-resolution insights into pathogen population structure, transmission dynamics, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and is increasingly used for public health surveillance (3, 4).
Despite the recognized public health importance of shigellosis, genomic data from West Africa remain limited. Recent studies from other African settings, including Ethiopia, have demonstrated the utility of WGS for characterizing circulating Shigella lineages and antimicrobial resistance determinants, highlighting the growing application of genomics on the continent (5). In parallel, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis underscored the high burden of Shigella infections and substantial antimicrobial resistance across Africa, reinforcing the need for expanded genomic surveillance efforts (6).
In this study, 22 Shigella isolates were recovered from stool samples of patients presenting with diarrhea at sentinel surveillance sites in Senegal between 2020 and 2021. A loopful of each stool sample was directly streaked onto Salmonella-Shigella (SS) agar (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK) and Hektoen-Enteric agar (Liofilchem S.r.l., Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy) and incubated at 37°C for 18–24 h. In parallel, a portion of each sample was inoculated into 9 mL of buffered peptone water for enrichment before subsequent subculture onto the same selective media. Presumptive isolates were identified using matrix-assisted-laser-desorption-ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (Biotyper Sirius, Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany).
Bacterial genomic DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA concentrations were measured using a Qubit 4 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Sequencing libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Libraries were generated by tagmentation, indexed using IDT for Illumina PCR Unique Dual Indexes, purified with Agencourt AMPure XP beads, quantified, normalized, and pooled. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on an Illumina NextSeq 550 platform using a high-output 300-cycle kit, generating paired-end reads of 2 × 150 bp. Sequencing produced high coverage across all isolates, ranging from approximately 119× to 180×.
Raw reads were quality-checked using FastQC v0.11.9 (7) and trimmed using fastp v0.23.2 (8). Default parameters were used unless otherwise specified. Trimmed reads were assembled de novo using SPAdes v3.15.5 (9). Assembly quality was assessed using QUAST v5.2.0 (10). Genome completeness and contamination were evaluated using CheckM v1.1.3 (11), and taxonomic assignment was confirmed using Kraken2 v2.1.2 (12). Genome annotation was automatically generated by the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) during genome submission to GenBank. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was performed using the MLST tool (v2.12.0) with the Escherichia/Shigella MLST scheme available in the PubMLST database to assign sequence types (STs).
The draft genome assemblies consisted of 752 to 2,396 contigs (≥500 bp), with N50 values ranging from 17,079 to 29,912 bp. Genome sizes ranged from 4.34 Mb to 5.54 Mb, with GC contents between 50.25% and 50.73%. All assemblies met quality thresholds, with completeness ≥90% and contamination <5%.
The data set included Shigella flexneri (n = 12), Shigella sonnei (n = 7), and Shigella boydii (n = 3), representing diverse strains circulating in Senegal.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This project is funded by the Department of Health and Social Care’s Fleming Fund using UK aid and performed under the auspices of the SeqAfrica project. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the UK Department of Health and Social Care or its Management Agent, Mott MacDonald.
Contributor Information
Cheikh Ibrahima Lo, Email: cheikhibrahima.lo@pasteur.sn.
André O. Hudson, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, USA
DATA AVAILABILITY
These Whole Genome Shotgun projects have been deposited in GenBank under BioProject PRJNA1376263. The corresponding raw sequencing reads are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the same BioProject. Individual SRA run accession numbers (SRR) are listed in Table 1, together with the genome accession numbers.
TABLE 1.
Genome assembly metrics of 22 Shigella isolates sequenced in this study
| Isolate ID | Species | ST | Genome size (bp) | GC (mol%) | Coverage (×) | Number of contigs | Largest contigs | N50 | L50 | Assembly accession | SRA run accession |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAK01014 | Shigella sonnei | 152 | 4,586,069 | 50.48 | 173 | 542 | 88,193 | 23,353 | 57 | GCA_056643295.1 | SRR39062455 |
| DAK02010 | Shigella sonnei | 152 | 4,590,191 | 50.50 | 137 | 575 | 88,199 | 23,265 | 59 | GCA_056643275.1 | SRR39062454 |
| DAK02013 | Shigella flexneri | 245 | 4,512,244 | 50.51 | 180 | 478 | 95,711 | 29,650 | 45 | GCA_056643255.1 | SRR39062443 |
| DAK02014 | Shigella flexneri | 245 | 4,468,602 | 50.48 | 170 | 473 | 78,897 | 29,911 | 47 | GCA_056643235.1 | SRR39062439 |
| DAK02015 | Shigella flexneri | 245 | 4,514,973 | 50.50 | 154 | 464 | 95,711 | 29,912 | 45 | GCA_056643215.1 | SRR39062438 |
| DAK02018 | Shigella flexneri | 245 | 4,504,314 | 50.51 | 172 | 454 | 95,711 | 29,582 | 46 | GCA_056643195.1 | SRR39062437 |
| DAK02022 | Shigella flexneri | 245 | 4,511,697 | 50.50 | 149 | 441 | 95,711 | 29,912 | 45 | GCA_056643175.1 | SRR39062436 |
| DAK02023 | Shigella sonnei | 152 | 4,576,024 | 50.49 | 163 | 522 | 88,194 | 23,352 | 57 | GCA_056643615.1 | SRR39062435 |
| DAK02024 | Shigella flexneri | 245 | 4,609,642 | 50.46 | 163 | 893 | 79,191 | 29,348 | 49 | GCA_056643595.1 | SRR39062434 |
| DAK02031 | Shigella flexneri | 6,918 | 4,374,695 | 50.50 | 155 | 457 | 94,756 | 27,269 | 48 | GCA_056643575.1 | SRR39062433 |
| DAK02034 | Shigella flexneri | 245 | 4,513,160 | 50.50 | 153 | 444 | 95,711 | 30,069 | 44 | GCA_056643555.1 | SRR39062453 |
| DAK02059 | Shigella boydii | 145 | 4,376,029 | 50.63 | 168 | 499 | 107,787 | 20,574 | 63 | GCA_056643535.1 | SRR39062452 |
| DAK02072 | Shigella sonnei | 152 | 4,705,658 | 50.53 | 141 | 566 | 88,196 | 23,963 | 58 | GCA_056643515.1 | SRR39062451 |
| DAK02084 | Shigella flexneri | 245 | 4,528,028 | 50.45 | 119 | 464 | 95,640 | 29,650 | 46 | GCA_056643475.1 | SRR39062450 |
| DAK03008 | Shigella flexneri | 145 | 4,472,541 | 50.73 | 160 | 590 | 90,346 | 19,991 | 66 | GCA_056643495.1 | SRR39062449 |
| DAK03009 | Shigella flexneri | 245 | 4,461,913 | 50.48 | 160 | 456 | 79,191 | 30,827 | 46 | GCA_056643455.1 | SRR39062448 |
| DAK03011 | Shigella sonnei | 152 | 4,601,768 | 50.50 | 161 | 525 | 88,194 | 23,963 | 57 | GCA_056643415.1 | SRR39062447 |
| FAT07026 | Shigella flexneri | 245 | 5,544,605 | 50.25 | 134 | 1,972 | 95,656 | 22,394 | 67 | GCA_056643435.1 | SRR39062446 |
| KAO05004 | Shigella sonnei | 152 | 4,583,510 | 50.49 | 159 | 550 | 88,199 | 23,232 | 59 | GCA_056643395.1 | SRR39062445 |
| KMR16022 | Shigella sonnei | 152 | 4,554,467 | 50.51 | 147 | 545 | 88,197 | 23,353 | 58 | GCA_056643375.1 | SRR39062444 |
| STL11028 | Shigella boydii | 243 | 4,343,724 | 50.63 | 163 | 598 | 69,921 | 17,545 | 72 | GCA_056643355.1 | SRR39062442 |
| TAM13030 | Shigella boydii | 152 | 4,574,898 | 50.47 | 166 | 563 | 88,186 | 23,233 | 58 | GCA_056643335.1 | SRR39062441 |
ETHICS APPROVAL
This study was approved by the Senegalese National Ethics Committee for Health Research (CNERS) under approval number SEN19/53.
REFERENCES
- 1. Kotloff KL, Riddle MS, Platts-Mills JA, Pavlinac P, Zaidi AKM. 2018. Shigellosis. The Lancet 391:801–812. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33296-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Troeger C, Blacker BF, Khalil IA, Rao PC, Cao S, Zimsen SR, Albertson SB, Stanaway JD, Deshpande A, Abebe Z, et al. 2018. Estimates of the global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of diarrhoea in 195 countries: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Infect Dis 18:1211–1228. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30362-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Baker KS, Dallman TJ, Ashton PM, Day M, Hughes G, Crook PD, Gilbart VL, Zittermann S, Allen VG, Howden BP, et al. 2015. Intercontinental dissemination of azithromycin-resistant shigellosis through sexual transmission: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Infect Dis 15:913–921. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00002-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Hawkey J, Paranagama K, Baker KS, Bengtsson RJ, Weill F-X, Thomson NR, Baker S, Cerdeira L, Iqbal Z, Hunt M, Ingle DJ, Dallman TJ, Jenkins C, Williamson DA, Holt KE. 2021. Global population structure and genotyping framework for genomic surveillance of the major dysentery pathogen, Shigella sonnei. Nat Commun 12:2684. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22700-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ayele B, Mihret A, Mekonnen Z, Sisay Tessema T, Melaku K, Nassir MF, Ayele A, Alemayehu DH, Beyene G. 2024. Whole genome sequencing and antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of Shigella sonnei in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PLoS One 19:e0313310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ayele B, Beyene G, Mekonnen Z, Esmael A, Ayele A, Alemayehu DH, Beyene GT. 2025. Whole genome sequencing analysis of antibiotic resistant genes of Shigella species: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 20:e0334701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0334701 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Babraham Bioinformatics. Available from: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ [Google Scholar]
- 8. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. 2018. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Wood DE, Lu J, Langmead B. 2019. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol 20:257. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1891-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
These Whole Genome Shotgun projects have been deposited in GenBank under BioProject PRJNA1376263. The corresponding raw sequencing reads are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the same BioProject. Individual SRA run accession numbers (SRR) are listed in Table 1, together with the genome accession numbers.
TABLE 1.
Genome assembly metrics of 22 Shigella isolates sequenced in this study
| Isolate ID | Species | ST | Genome size (bp) | GC (mol%) | Coverage (×) | Number of contigs | Largest contigs | N50 | L50 | Assembly accession | SRA run accession |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAK01014 | Shigella sonnei | 152 | 4,586,069 | 50.48 | 173 | 542 | 88,193 | 23,353 | 57 | GCA_056643295.1 | SRR39062455 |
| DAK02010 | Shigella sonnei | 152 | 4,590,191 | 50.50 | 137 | 575 | 88,199 | 23,265 | 59 | GCA_056643275.1 | SRR39062454 |
| DAK02013 | Shigella flexneri | 245 | 4,512,244 | 50.51 | 180 | 478 | 95,711 | 29,650 | 45 | GCA_056643255.1 | SRR39062443 |
| DAK02014 | Shigella flexneri | 245 | 4,468,602 | 50.48 | 170 | 473 | 78,897 | 29,911 | 47 | GCA_056643235.1 | SRR39062439 |
| DAK02015 | Shigella flexneri | 245 | 4,514,973 | 50.50 | 154 | 464 | 95,711 | 29,912 | 45 | GCA_056643215.1 | SRR39062438 |
| DAK02018 | Shigella flexneri | 245 | 4,504,314 | 50.51 | 172 | 454 | 95,711 | 29,582 | 46 | GCA_056643195.1 | SRR39062437 |
| DAK02022 | Shigella flexneri | 245 | 4,511,697 | 50.50 | 149 | 441 | 95,711 | 29,912 | 45 | GCA_056643175.1 | SRR39062436 |
| DAK02023 | Shigella sonnei | 152 | 4,576,024 | 50.49 | 163 | 522 | 88,194 | 23,352 | 57 | GCA_056643615.1 | SRR39062435 |
| DAK02024 | Shigella flexneri | 245 | 4,609,642 | 50.46 | 163 | 893 | 79,191 | 29,348 | 49 | GCA_056643595.1 | SRR39062434 |
| DAK02031 | Shigella flexneri | 6,918 | 4,374,695 | 50.50 | 155 | 457 | 94,756 | 27,269 | 48 | GCA_056643575.1 | SRR39062433 |
| DAK02034 | Shigella flexneri | 245 | 4,513,160 | 50.50 | 153 | 444 | 95,711 | 30,069 | 44 | GCA_056643555.1 | SRR39062453 |
| DAK02059 | Shigella boydii | 145 | 4,376,029 | 50.63 | 168 | 499 | 107,787 | 20,574 | 63 | GCA_056643535.1 | SRR39062452 |
| DAK02072 | Shigella sonnei | 152 | 4,705,658 | 50.53 | 141 | 566 | 88,196 | 23,963 | 58 | GCA_056643515.1 | SRR39062451 |
| DAK02084 | Shigella flexneri | 245 | 4,528,028 | 50.45 | 119 | 464 | 95,640 | 29,650 | 46 | GCA_056643475.1 | SRR39062450 |
| DAK03008 | Shigella flexneri | 145 | 4,472,541 | 50.73 | 160 | 590 | 90,346 | 19,991 | 66 | GCA_056643495.1 | SRR39062449 |
| DAK03009 | Shigella flexneri | 245 | 4,461,913 | 50.48 | 160 | 456 | 79,191 | 30,827 | 46 | GCA_056643455.1 | SRR39062448 |
| DAK03011 | Shigella sonnei | 152 | 4,601,768 | 50.50 | 161 | 525 | 88,194 | 23,963 | 57 | GCA_056643415.1 | SRR39062447 |
| FAT07026 | Shigella flexneri | 245 | 5,544,605 | 50.25 | 134 | 1,972 | 95,656 | 22,394 | 67 | GCA_056643435.1 | SRR39062446 |
| KAO05004 | Shigella sonnei | 152 | 4,583,510 | 50.49 | 159 | 550 | 88,199 | 23,232 | 59 | GCA_056643395.1 | SRR39062445 |
| KMR16022 | Shigella sonnei | 152 | 4,554,467 | 50.51 | 147 | 545 | 88,197 | 23,353 | 58 | GCA_056643375.1 | SRR39062444 |
| STL11028 | Shigella boydii | 243 | 4,343,724 | 50.63 | 163 | 598 | 69,921 | 17,545 | 72 | GCA_056643355.1 | SRR39062442 |
| TAM13030 | Shigella boydii | 152 | 4,574,898 | 50.47 | 166 | 563 | 88,186 | 23,233 | 58 | GCA_056643335.1 | SRR39062441 |
