Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2026 Jul 22;15(8):e00307-26. doi: 10.1128/mra.00307-26

High-quality draft genome sequence of Cryobacterium sp. AP23 isolated from ancient Alaskan permafrost

Hazael C Lemus-Cisneros 1,2, Robyn A Barbato 3, Anne McCarthy 4, Samuel N Blisard 5, Jaimee R Compton 5, Quincy Faber 3, Dagmar Leary 5, Victor A Roman 1,2, Blake W Stamps 1,✉
Editor: J Cameron Thrash6
PMCID: PMC13460141  PMID: 42484320

ABSTRACT

The high-quality draft genome of AP23, a novel Cryobacterium species isolated from Alaskan permafrost with aromatic compound degradation genes, is presented here. Additional analyses are required to confirm its placement within the Cryobacterium genus; nevertheless, AP23 represents a useful candidate for industrially relevant low-temperature protein research.

KEYWORDS: cold-active, Cryobacterium, aromatic compound degradation, psychrophiles, permafrost

ANNOUNCEMENT

The expanding human footprint in Arctic regions has led to waste accumulation (e.g., plastics, fuels, lubricants, paper-based products, and other organic contaminants commonly treated at wastewater treatment plants) (1–4). The low temperatures in those regions represent a significant challenge for established wastewater treatment methods (5, 6). Psychrophilic microbes such as those within the Cryobacterium genus (7) offer a potential solution given their known aromatic and petroleum-derived compound degradation capabilities (8–11).

Permafrost core samples were collected in June 2024 from the U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory Permafrost Tunnel in Fox, AK, USA (64.9528, −147.6178) as previously described (12, 13), with the exception that a 0.5 m stainless steel barrel was used (cleaned with 70% ethanol, DNA Away, and RNase Away), rendering sub-sampling unnecessary. Single-colony samples were suspended in sterile phosphate-buffered saline, plated on LB agar, and incubated at 4°C. After the third passage, samples were preserved in glycerol and stored at −80°C. Fresh axenic culture was grown at room temperature (shaking, 200 RPM, LB broth). After 18 h, 1 mL of culture was centrifuged (13,000 × RCF, 1 min). Genomic DNA was isolated from the recovered pellet using the Quick-DNA Fungal/Bacterial Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions (14). DNA was quantified using the Qubit dsDNA HS Quantification Assay Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). This extracted DNA was used for both libraries. Long-read libraries were prepared using the Oxford Nanopore Rapid Barcoding Kit (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) with 200 ng of DNA as input according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA was not size-selected prior to enzymatic fragmentation using the kit. This library was sequenced on a Nanopore GridION Mk1 equipment and an R10.4.1 flow cell. Basecalling was done onboard the GridION (Dorado V. 7.4.13); a total of 50,798 raw reads, with an N50 of 3,354, were obtained according to NanoStat (v.1.6.0) (15). Short-read libraries were prepared using the Illumina DNA Prep kit (Illumina, California, USA) with 150 ng of DNA as input, and sequenced using a NextSeq 2000 P4 flowcell using PE150 chemistry, producing 12,386,740 reads, with a read length of 35–151 bp, as determined by FastQC (v.0.12.1) (16).

Default parameters were used for all listed software, unless otherwise specified. Raw reads were trimmed using fastp (v.0.22.0) (17). Long-reads were error corrected (--only-error-correction), then paired with the short-read data for hybrid assembly (--only-assembler –isolate -k 31,51,71,91,121) using SPAdes (v.4.2.0) (18) (Fig. 1). Post-assembly quality and marker-gene completion were evaluated using QUAST (v5.3.0) (19) and CheckM2 (v1.1.0; database Uniref100/KO) (20), respectively. Taxonomic identification via 16S rRNA gene BLAST (21) returned Cryobacterium soli GCJ02 (GCF_003611035.1) (22) as the best hit (100% query coverage; 99.80% identity). Nevertheless, average nucleotide identity analysis of AP23 via skani (v0.2.2; database r226 04/2025) (23) returned Cryobacterium sp. RYN_54 (GCA_025463825.1) (24) as best hit (88.36% identity; over GCJ02, with 86.16%), highlighting the need for further chemotaxonomic characterization.

Fig 1.

Circular genome map of Cryobacterium sp. AP23, contig 1 at 4.2 Mbp, showing CDS, tRNA, rRNA, ncRNA, GC content, and GC skew rings with the oriC marked.

Circular representation of the Cryobacterium sp. AP23 genome. This scheme is purely illustrative; no circularization of the genome was performed. From outermost to innermost ring, the features displayed are (i) genomic position (Mb), (ii) genes encoded on the forward strand, (iii) genes encoded on the reverse strand, (iv) GC content (red = above average, green = below average), and (v) GC skew (orange/blue). This map was generated using pyCirclize (v1.9.0) (25) through Bakta (v1.11.0) (26).

Annotation through the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (2025-05-06.build7983, see Table 1) (27) revealed aromatic compound degradation enzymes like aromatic ring-opening dioxygenase, protocatechuate 3,4-dioxygenase, and extradiol aromatic ring-opening family dioxygenase.

TABLE 1.

General assembly and annotation overview

Features Description
Size 4,242,373 Mb
Topology Linear
Min. contig length 1 kbp
Contigs 1
Coverage 77.89×
N 50 4,242,373
CheckM2 completion 99.99%
CheckM2 contamination 0.98%
G + C content 68.55%
CDSs (with protein) 3,904
RNA 62
rRNA (5S, 16S, 23S) 4, 3, 3
tRNA 49
ncRNA 3

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Air Force Research Laboratory in collaboration with the US Naval Research Laboratory, and Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) as part of the Identification and Characterization of Environmental Biocatalysts from Remote Cold Regions (ICEBRCR) grant (FA8650-22-F-5401, Office of Naval Research).

This manuscript has been cleared for public release under AFRL-2026-3133.

Contributor Information

Blake W. Stamps, Email: blake.stamps.1@us.af.mil.

J. Cameron Thrash, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

DATA AVAILABILITY

This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited in GenBank under accession number JBSQBY000000000, as BioProject PRJNA1333436, and Biosample SAMN51795667. The assembly is available at GenBank through accession number GCA_054075385.1. Short- and long-raw reads are available at SRX32022346 and SRX32115231, respectively. The isolate has been deposited in the CRREL ICE COLD (Innovative, Collaborative, Exploratory Cold Regions Organism Library for Discovery in Biotechnology; https://icecold-library.github.io/).

REFERENCES

  • 1. Bergmann Melanie, Collard F, Fabres J, Gabrielsen GW, Provencher JF, Rochman CM, van Sebille E, Tekman MB. 2022. Plastic pollution in the Arctic. Nat Rev Earth Environ 3:323–337. doi: 10.1038/s43017-022-00279-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bergmann M, Lutz B, Tekman MB, Gutow L. 2017. Citizen scientists reveal: marine litter pollutes Arctic beaches and affects wild life. Mar Pollut Bull 125:535–540. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.09.055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Cózar A, Martí E, Duarte CM, García-de-Lomas J, van Sebille E, Ballatore TJ, Eguíluz VM, González-Gordillo JI, Pedrotti ML, Echevarría F, et al. 2017. The Arctic ocean as a dead end for floating plastics in the North Atlantic branch of the thermohaline circulation. Sci Adv 3:e1600582. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Borgå K, Fisk AT, Hoekstra PE, Muir DCG. 2004. Biological and chemical factors of importance in the bioaccumulation and trophic transfer of persistent organochlorine contaminants in Arctic marine food webs. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:2367–2385. doi: 10.1897/03-518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Wittgren HB, Mæhlum T. 1997. Wastewater treatment wetlands in cold climates. Water Sci Technol 35:45–53. doi: 10.2166/wst.1997.0162 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Gunnarsdóttir R, Jenssen PD, Erland Jensen P, Villumsen A, Kallenborn R. 2013. A review of wastewater handling in the Arctic with special reference to pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and microbial pollution. Ecol Eng 50:76–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.04.025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Suzuki K-I, Sasaki J, Uramoto M, Nakase T, Komagata K. 1997. Cryobacterium psychrophilum gen. nov., sp. nov., nom. rev., comb. nov., an obligately psychrophilic actinomycete to accommodate “Curtobacterium psychrophilum” Inoue and Komagata 1976. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47:474–478. doi: 10.1099/00207713-47-2-474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lo Giudice A, Casella P, Caruso C, Mangano S, Bruni V, De Domenico M, Michaud L. 2010. Occurrence and characterization of psychrotolerant hydrocarbon-oxidizing bacteria from surface seawater along the Victoria Land coast (Antarctica). Polar Biol 33:929–943. doi: 10.1007/s00300-010-0770-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. de la Cueva SC, Rodríguez CH, Cruz NOS, Contreras JAR, Miranda JL. 2016. Changes in bacterial populations during bioremediation of soil contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons. Water Air Soil Pollut 227:91. doi: 10.1007/s11270-016-2789-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Liu Y, Shen L, Zeng Y, Xing T, Xu B, Wang N. 2020. Genomic insights of Cryobacterium isolated from ice core reveal genome dynamics for adaptation in glacier. Front Microbiol 11:1530. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Urbanek AK, Rymowicz W, Mirończuk AM. 2018. Degradation of plastics and plastic-degrading bacteria in cold marine habitats. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:7669–7678. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9195-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Barbato RA, Jones RM, Douglas TA, Doherty SJ, Messan K, Foley KL, Perkins EJ, Thurston AK, Garcia-Reyero N. 2022. Not all permafrost microbiomes are created equal: influence of permafrost thaw on the soil microbiome in a laboratory incubation study. Soil Biol Biochem 167:108605. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108605 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Barbato RA, Garcia-Reyero N, Foley K, Jones R, Courville Z, Douglas T, Perkins E, Reynolds CM. 2016. Removal of exogenous materials from the outer portion of frozen cores to investigate the ancient biological communities harbored inside. J Vis Exp:54091. doi: 10.3791/54091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Research Z. 2026. Quick-DNA fungal/bacterial miniprep kit instruction manual.
  • 15. De Coster W, D’Hert S, Schultz DT, Cruts M, Van Broeckhoven C. 2018. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics 34:2666–2669. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
  • 17. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. 2018. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Andrey P, Dmitry A, Dmitry M, Alla L, Anton K. 2020. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 70:e102. doi: 10.1002/cpbi.102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Chklovski A, Parks DH, Woodcroft BJ, Tyson GW. 2023. CheckM2: a rapid, scalable and accurate tool for assessing microbial genome quality using machine learning. Nat Methods 20:1203–1212. doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-01940-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Gong C, Lai Q, Cai H, Jiang Y, Liao H, Liu Y, Xue D. 2020. Cryobacterium soli sp. nov., isolated from forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:675–679. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Shaw J, Yu YW. 2023. Fast and robust metagenomic sequence comparison through sparse chaining with skani. Nat Methods 20:1661–1665. doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-02018-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Nelson AR, Narrowe AB, Rhoades CC, Fegel TS, Daly RA, Roth HK, Chu RK, Amundson KK, Young RB, Steindorff AS, et al. 2022. Wildfire-dependent changes in soil microbiome diversity and function. Nat Microbiol 7:1419–1430. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01203-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Shimoyama Y. 2022. pyCirclize: circular visualization in python. Available from: https://moshi4.github.io/pyCirclize/
  • 26. Schwengers O, Jelonek L, Dieckmann MA, Beyvers S, Blom J, Goesmann A. 2021. Bakta: rapid and standardized annotation of bacterial genomes via alignment-free sequence identification. Microb Genom 7:000685. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited in GenBank under accession number JBSQBY000000000, as BioProject PRJNA1333436, and Biosample SAMN51795667. The assembly is available at GenBank through accession number GCA_054075385.1. Short- and long-raw reads are available at SRX32022346 and SRX32115231, respectively. The isolate has been deposited in the CRREL ICE COLD (Innovative, Collaborative, Exploratory Cold Regions Organism Library for Discovery in Biotechnology; https://icecold-library.github.io/).


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES