Skip to main content
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology logoLink to International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
. 2026 Aug 10;76(8):007250. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.007250

Altererythrobacter chaiwopuensis sp. nov., a novel alphaproteobacterial strain isolated from sediment of the Chaiwopu Lake

Xin-Yao Li 1,2, Yi-Fei Yang 1, Yi-Wen Liang 3, Ze-Xian Wu 3, Xu-Rui Li 1,4, Shuai Li 1,4, Yong-Hong Liu 1,4, Lei Gao 1,4,5, Ting-Ting She 3, Bao-Zhu Fang 1,4,*, Wen-Jun Li 1,4,5,*
PMCID: PMC13460513  PMID: 42579338

Abstract

Two alphaproteobacterial strains, designated EGI L300112T and EGI L300120, were isolated from sediment collected from Chaiwopu Lake in Xinjiang, China. The taxonomic position of the two strains was determined using polyphasic taxonomic analysis and phylogenomic analysis. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities, strain EGI L300112T and EGI L300120 were both closely related to Pelagerythrobacter rhizovicinus AY-3RT and shared the highest sequence identities of 96.2% and 96.3%, respectively. However, phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene and genomes clearly demonstrated that the two strains formed a distinct clade with validly published species of the genus Altererythrobacter. Furthermore, the two strains exhibited distinct phenotypic, physiological and genotypic characteristics that differentiate them from other related type species of the genus Altererythrobacter and related species in the family Erythrobacteraceae. Cells of the two strains were aerobic, Gram-stain negative, non-motile and rod-shaped. Optimal growth conditions for EGI L300112T and EGI L300120 occurred on marine agar 2216 at pH 7 at 30 °C. The major respiratory quinone was Q-10. The detected polar lipids of two strains included diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylmethylethanolamine, phosphatidylcholine and unidentified phospholipids. The major fatty acids (>10%) were identified as summed feature 3 (C16 : 1ω7 c/C16 : 1ω6 c) and summed feature 8 (C18 : 1ω7 c). The G+C content of strain EGI L300112T and EGI L300120 was 61.2% and 61.4%, respectively. Based on differential phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of the two strains and related species in the genus Altererythrobacter, the two strains should be classified as representing a new species of this genus, for which the name Altererythrobacter chaiwopuensis sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is EGI L300112T (=MCCC 1K09432T=KCTC 8712T).

Keywords: Altererythrobacter chaiwopuensis sp. nov, chaiwopu lake, Erythrobacteraceae, polyphasic taxonomy

Introduction

The genus Altererythrobacter of the family Erythrobacteraceae, order Sphingomonadales, class Alphaproteobacteria and phylum Pseudomonadota, was first proposed by Kae et al. in 2007 [1] and was reclassified by Xu et al. [2]. It currently comprises ten validly published species, including Altererythrobacter aquiaggeris, Altererythrobacter arenosus, Altererythrobacter epoxidivorans, Altererythrobacter flavalbus, Altererythrobacter insulae, Altererythrobacter ishigakiensis, Altererythrobacter litoralis, Altererythrobacter lutimaris, Altererythrobacter rubellus and Altererythrobacter xiamenensis. Members of this genus are Gram-stain-negative, aerobic and non-motile [2]. Strains belonging to the genus Altererythrobacter were isolated from various habitats, including river water [3], sand [4], marine sediment [5], tidal flat sediment [6], seawater [7], farmland soil [8] and red tide seawater [9]. Chemotaxonomically, species of Altererythrobacter typically contain ubiquinone Q-10 as the predominant respiratory quinone, and the major cellular fatty acid is usually summed feature 8 (C18 : 1 ω6c and/or C18 : 1 ω7c). Some members of this genus produce β-etherases with potential applications in lignin depolymerization [10] and the esterase Ali5 [11], which displays high resistance to metal ions and various organic solvents, and some Altererythrobacter strains can metabolize benzo[a]pyrene as the sole carbon and energy source [12].

Microorganisms in lake sediment play an important role in the process of the element cycle, humus decomposition and synthesis. To investigate the microbial diversity of lake sediment, we collected the lake sediment samples of Chaiwopu Lake, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China. During a study of the diversity of cultivable micro-organisms in this lake sediment, two alphaproteobacterial strains designated as EGI L300112T and EGI L300120 were isolated from the lake sediment samples. The analysis results based on 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that the two strains belonged to the genus Altererythrobacter with a low sequence identity (≤97%). This study was conducted to determine the taxonomic status of the two novel strains with comparative analyses based on the phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and molecular characteristics between the two strains and related reference species in this genus.

Methods

Sample collection and bacterial isolation

The lake sediment samples were collected using sterile sampling devices. Samples were transported without temperature control and stored at 4 ℃. The samples were serially diluted in sterile water to 10−4 and a suspension (200 µl) was then spread onto marine agar 2216 plates [13]. The plates were incubated at 30 ℃ for 5 days. Single colonies were picked and purified by repeatedly streaking on the same medium. The purified strains EGI L300112T and EGI L300120 were found to show low 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities compared to other validly published species and were chosen for detailed characterization later. Then, purified strains were stored in glycerol suspensions (20%, v/v) at −80 ℃.

Morphological and physiological characterization

Gram staining was performed with a Gram stain kit (Solarbio), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The morphological features of strains EGI L300112T and EGI L300120 were observed by using transmission electron microscopy (JEM-1400FLASH, JEOL) after growing on the marine agar 2216 (Hopebio) at 30 ℃ for 3 days. Growth of the strains at different temperatures (4, 15, 20, 28, 30, 37, 45 and 50 ℃) and NaCl tolerance (0–8.0%, at intervals of 1.0 %, w/v) were tested on marine agar 2216 without NaCl for 7 days. The pH range (4.0–10.0, at intervals of 1.0 pH unit) for growth was determined on marine 2216 medium using the buffer system described by Xu et al. [14]. The presence of turbidity in a tube containing a semi-solid marine 2216 medium was utilized to assess the motility of cells [15]. Activities of catalase, oxidase and urease, hydrolysis of Tween (20, 40, 60 and 80), milk coagulation and peptonization, H2S production and starch hydrolysis were determined according to the conventional procedures as previously described by Fang et al. [16]. Substrate utilization of strains was tested using the Biolog GEN III (BIOLOGs) microplate system according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Other physiological and biochemical characteristics were determined using API ZYM (bioMérieux) and API 20 NE (bioMérieux) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Chemotaxonomic characterization

Chemotaxonomic characterization of two strains was observed using several standard methods under similar conditions. The biomass for fatty acids was harvested from marine 2216 agar. According to the standard protocol of the Microbial Identification System (Sherlock version 6.1; MIDI database: TSBA6), the cellular fatty acids were extracted and determined. Menaquinones were extracted from lyophilized cells [17], and the extracts were purified and analysed by HPLC [18]. The polar lipids were extracted and separated by using two-dimensional TLC [19] based on the previous methods [20].

Phylogenetic and genomic analyses

Genomic DNA was extracted and the 16S rRNA genes were amplified according to the method described by Xu et al. [21]. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified by using the universal primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGAC-3′). The sequences were compared with available 16S rRNA gene sequences of the validly published species in the EzBioCloud server [21]. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted using mega 11 software [22] and subsequent to the multiple alignment of sequences performed by the clustal_w program [23]. The phylogenetic trees based on 16S rRNA gene sequences were constructed with neighbour-joining [24], maximum-likelihood [25] and maximum-parsimony [26] methods. The bootstrap based on 1,000 replications was employed to assess the reliability of each branch [27].

Whole-genome sequences of strains EGI L300112T and EGI L300120 were performed by using the paired-end sequencing method with the Illumina platform at Novogene Biotech (Suzhou, PR China). Raw data were filtered using the quality-control software ‘sickle’ v1.33 before being assembled with SPAdes v3.15.5 with the parameters (--single -k 21, 33, 55, 77, 99) [28], and genome completeness and contamination of genomes of two strains were assessed utilizing CheckM [29]. The G+C contents were determined based on the genome sequences. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) and average amino acid sequence identity (AAI) of two strains with other related type species were computed with an online ANI calculator (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/tools/ani) [30] and JSpecies software [31], respectively. The digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values between strains EGI L300112T and EGI L300120 and closely related type strains were calculated using the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator 3.0 web server. For the phylogenomic analysis, GTDB-Tk v.2.3.0was used to create a multiple sequence alignment of 120 conserved bacterial marker genes. Then, IQ-TREE v.1.6.12 was employed to construct the phylogenetic tree [32], with bootstrap support values set at 1,000. The phylogenomic tree was visualized by the interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) [33]. Related genes of two strains were predicted using Prodigal v2.6.3 and annotated through DIAMOND v2.1.7.161 (e-value <1e-5, query coverage >60%) against KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) and COG (Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins) databases [34, 35].

Results and discussion

Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene

The nearly complete 16S rRNA gene sequences of strain EGI L300112T (1,501 bp) and EGI L300120 (1,501 bp) were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers PX884856 and PX893118, respectively. Analysis of sequences using the EzBioCloud server revealed that strains EGI L300112T and EGI L300120 were closely related to Pelagerythrobacter rhizovicinus AY-3RT (96.2% and 96.3%, sequence similarity), Tsuneonella amylolytica NS1T (96.2% and 96.2%) and Parerythrobacter lacustris RS5-5T (96.1% and 96.2%). Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences using the maximum-likelihood algorithm showed that strains EGI L300112ᵀ and EGI L300120 formed a distinct clade, including validly published species of the genus Altererythrobacter, as well as Pelagerythrobacter marensis KCTC 22370ᵀ, Parerythrobacter lacustris Hiromi 1ᵀ and Erythrobacter sanguineus DSM 11032ᵀ, and was clearly separated from other members of the family Erythrobacteraceae (Fig. 1). The topological structure of the two strains with other related species in the neighbour-joining and maximum-parsimony trees was the same but different from the maximum-likelihood tree (Fig. S2). To further clarify the evolutionary relationships of the two strains, the genome-based topological analysis results could comprehensively elucidate their phylogenetic connections with the genus Altererythrobacter and other related genera.

Fig. 1. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the phylogenetic relationships between strains EGI L300112ᵀ and EGI L300120, the type strains of Altererythrobacter species and representatives of related taxa. Bootstrap values (>50%) based on 1,000 resamplings are shown at the branch nodes. Paludibaculum fermentans P105ᵀ (KJ461654) was used as the outgroup. Bar, 0.05 substitutions per nucleotide position.

Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA gene sequences placing EGI L300112 and EGI L300120 within Altererythrobacter relatives, with bootstrap values above 50% shown at nodes.

Genomic characteristics and phylogenomic analysis

The draft genome sequence of strain EGI L300112T (GenBank accession JBTXJF000000000) was 2,682,049 bp in 25 scaffolds with N50 scaffold length of 1887,887, while the genome size of strain EGI L300120 (GenBank accession JBTXJG000000000) was 2,682,049 bp in 34 scaffolds, with N50 scaffold length of 2170,281. The completeness of the assembly genomes of strains EGI L300112T and EGI L300120 was 99.5% and 99.4%, with contamination rates of 0.2% and 0.4%, respectively. The two strains had 2,579 and 2,586 protein-coding genes, respectively. The G+C content of the two strains was 61.2% and 61.4%, respectively. The ANI values between strains EGI L300112ᵀ and EGI L300120 and A. litoralis AY-3Rᵀ were 63.3% and 63.2%, respectively. The ANI values between the two strains and validly published species of the genus Altererythrobacter ranged from 37.5 to 63.3%, while the ANI value between the two strains themselves was 98.23%, which was above the generally species-level threshold (95–96%) (Fig. S3). To further clarify their taxonomic position, additional genome-based comparisons were performed with representatives of closely related genera within the family Erythrobacteraceae, including Tsuneonella, Erythrobacter, Parerythrobacter and Croceicoccus. Similarly, the AAI values between the two strains and related reference species of the genus Altererythrobacter ranged from 73.8 to 81.0% (Fig. S4). In addition, dDDH values between strains EGI L300112ᵀ and EGI L300120 and their closest relatives, including members of Altererythrobacter and other related genera, were all well below the 70% threshold for species delineation (Fig. S5). In all cases, ANI, AAI and dDDH values remained well below the species threshold, and the two strains represented one novel species of the genus Altererythrobacter. Furthermore, the phylogenomic tree based on the concatenated alignment of 120 marker genes showed that EGI L300112T and EGI L300120 formed a distinct clade with other validly published species of the genus Altererythrobacter, and separated from other species of the family Erythrobacteraceae (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Phylogenomic tree reconstructed from 120 single-copy marker proteins showing the phylogenetic relationships of strains EGI L300112ᵀ and EGI L300120 with the type strains of Altererythrobacter species and representatives of related taxa. The two strains formed a distinct clade separate from those of the other described species with available genome sequences. Bootstrap values (≥50%) based on 1,000 replicates are shown at the branch nodes. Woodsholea maritima CM243ᵀ (GCA_000382325.1) was used as the outgroup.

Phylogenomic tree of 120 single-copy marker proteins showing EGI L300112 and EGI L300120 forming a distinct clade within Altererythrobacter, separate from related genera, with bootstrap values at branch nodes.

COG categories distributions for the genes were presented in Table S1 (available in the online Supplementary Material). The most abundantly represented CDSs in the two strains were lipid transport and metabolism (I), translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis (J), amino acid transport and metabolism (E), energy production and conversion (C), inorganic ion transport and metabolism (P) and posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones (O). Two novel strains had a large number of CDS for inorganic ion transport and metabolism (P). This abundance may be because these strains were isolated from a saline environment, where their survival likely required the regulation of internal osmotic balance through the active transport of inorganic ions.

The distribution of KEGG functional pathways of the genes is outlined in Table S2. The most abundantly represented KEGG pathways in strains EGI L300112T and EGI L300120 were carbohydrate metabolism, followed by amino acid metabolism, energy metabolism and metabolism of cofactors and vitamins. Specifically, according to the KEGG annotation results, strains EGI L300112T and EGI L300120 possess complete pentose phosphate pathway (non-oxidative phase) and TCA cycle pathways. Moreover, the pentose phosphate pathway compensates for glycolysis (Embden–Meyerhof pathway), enabling its full functionality. KEGG annotation revealed that the genomes of strains EGI L300112ᵀ and EGI L300120 harbour the gene K00370 encoding a putative nitrate reductase alpha subunit. This genomic feature is consistent with the positive nitrate reduction phenotype observed in physiological tests, suggesting a potential capacity for nitrate reduction in these strains.

Phenotypic characteristics

Cells of strains EGI L300112T and EGI L300120 were Gram-stain-negative, non-motile and aerobic. The colonies were yellow, circular and convex with regular edges after 5 days of incubation on isolation medium at 28 ℃. Strain EGI L300112T and EGI L300120 could grow on marine agar 2216, Reasoner’s 2A agar, Luria–Bertani agar, nutrient agar and tryptic soy agar, while no colonies were observed on other tested media at 28 ℃ for 15 days. Cells of strain EGI L300112T and EGI L300120 were rod-shaped, with ~0.4–0.6 µm width and 0.9–1.5 µm length (Fig. S1). Strains EGI L300112T and EGI L300120 were able to grow at 15–37 °C (optimum 28 °C), pH 6.0–8.0 (optimum pH 7.0) and in the presence of 0–7% (w/v) NaCl (optimum, 2 %, w/v). Strain EGI L300112T and strain EGI L300120 were positive for catalase and hydrolysis of Tweens 20, 60 and 80. Strains EGI L300112T and EGI L300120 were negative for oxidase and H2S generation. In the commercial kit API 20 NE, all strains exhibited positive results for glucosidase and galactosidase. For enzyme activity detected using API ZYM, the two strains tested positive for esterase, esterase lipase, leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, cystine arylamidase, trypsin, chymotrypsin, acid phosphatase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase and α-glucosidase. Differences in physiological characteristics between EGI L300112T, EGI L300120 and reference type species were presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Differentiating characteristics of strain EGI L300112T, EGI L300120 and their closely related type strains of the genus Altererythrobacter.

1, EGI L300112T; 2, EGI L300120; 3. A. litoralis 1XM1-14T [36]; 4, P. rhizovicinus Ery12T [37]; 5, Croceicoccus marinus E4A9 T [38]; 6, Tsuneonella dongtanensis JM27 T [6]; 7, Erythrobacter longus Och01 T [39, 40].

Characteristic 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Temperature range (℃) 15.0–37.0 15.0–37.0 10.0–35.0 10.0–42.0 4.0–42.0 10.0–37.0 20.0–45.0
pH range 6.0–8.0 6.0–8.0 5.0–9.0 5.0–9.5 6.0–9.0 6.0–10.0 6.0–9.0
NaCl range (%, w/v) 0–7.0 0–7.0 1.0–4.0 0–10.0 0–10.0 0–1.0 0–8.0
Colony colour Yellow Yellow Yellow Yellow Yellow Yellow Orange
Cell size (width×length; μm) 0.4–0.6×0.9–1.5 0.4–0.6×0.9–1.5 0.4–0.6×0.8–1.2 0.4–0.6×1.5–2.3 0.8–1.0×0.8–1.0 0.4–0.5×0.5–1.1 0.4–0.7×2.7–3.2
Cell shape Rod Rod Rod Rod Cocci Rod Rod
API 20NE
 β-Glucosidase + + + nd + − +
 NO3- to NO2- + + nd − nd − −
 Aesculin hydrolysis + + + + + − +
API ZYM
 Oxidase − − + + − − +
 β-Galactosidase + + − − − + +
 Esterase + + + nd nd + +
 Lipase − − + − nd − −
 α-Chymotrypsin + + + w nd − +
Biolog GEN III
 d-Cellobiose + + nd + − nd −
 d-Glucose − − − − + + nd
 d-Mannitol − − nd + − − nd
 Glycerol − − nd nd + nd −
 l-Rhamnose − − nd w − nd −
 Sucrose − − nd nd + nd nd
 l-Arabinose − − nd − − − nd
 Citrate − − nd nd − − −
 myo-Inositol − − nd nd − nd nd
Chemotaxonomic characteristics
 Fatty acids Summed feature 3 and summed feature 8 Summed feature 3 and summed feature 8 Summed feature 8, C17 : 1 ω6c, and C16 : 0 C18  :  1ω7c, C17  :  1ω6c and summed feature 3 anteiso-C15  :  0, iso-C14  :  0 and iso-C15  :  0 C18  :  1ω7c and C17  :  1ω6c Summed feature 8 and iso-C18  :  0
 Quinone Q-10 Q-10 Q-10 Q-10 Q-10 Q-10 Q-10, Q-9
 Major polar lipids DPG, PG, PC, PME, PL DPG, PG, PC, PME, PL PC, PE, DPG, PG, PL SGL, PG, DPG, PE, PC, AGL, GL, PL PG, GL, PC, PL DPG, PE, PG PG, PE, AGL, PL
 G+C content (%) 61.23 61.39 62.71 60.80 71.50 66.40 61.60
 Isolation source Lake sediment Lake sediment Tidal flat sediment Overlying water Deep-sea sediment Tidal flat Intertidal surface seawater

Note: +, positive reaction; −, negative reaction; w, weakly positive; nd, not data available. Summed feature 3: C16 : 1 ω7c and/or C16 : 1 ω6c; summed feature 8: C18 : 1 ω6c and/or C18 : 1 ω7c.

Data were obtained using API 20NE, API ZYM and Biolog GEN III systems.

DPG, diphosphatidylglycerol; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; PL, unidentified phospholipids; PME, phosphatidylmethylethanolamine.

Chemotaxonomic analysis

The polar lipid profiles of two strains were composed of diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylmethylethanolamine, phosphatidylcholine and two unidentified phospholipids (Fig. S6). The major fatty acids (>10%) of strains EGI L300112T and EGI L300120 were identified as summed feature 3 (C16 : 1 ω7c and/or C16 : 1 ω6c) and summed feature 8 (C18 : 1 ω6c and/or C18 : 1 ω7c). The detailed profile of fatty acids is provided in Table 2. The predominant respiratory quinone is ubiquinone Q-10.

Table 2. Cellular fatty acid profiles of strain EGI L300112T, EGI L300120 and their closely related type strains of the genus Altererythrobacter.

1, EGI L300112T; 2, EGI L300120; 3, A. litoralis 1XM1-14T [36] 4, P. rhizovicinus Ery12T [37].

Fatty acid 1 2 3 4
Straighted
C11 : 0 – – – –
C12 : 0 tr tr 0.6
C14 : 0 tr 0.5 1.9 –
C16 : 0 5.5 10.8 12.0 4.4
C17 : 0 tr tr 1.5 –
C18 : 0 tr tr tr –
Branched
iso C10 : 0 tr tr – –
iso C15 : 0 1.1 1.0 – –
iso C16 : 0 – – – –
iso C17 : 0 – – – –
iso C18 : 0 – – – –
anteiso C14 : 0 1.5 5.5 – –
anteiso C15 : 0 – – – –
10-methyl C19 : 0 – – – –
Hydroxy
C14 : 0 2-OH 5.1 5.3 3.2 9.6
C16 : 0 2-OH 1.0 1.2 tr tr
C18 : 0 3-OH – – – –
C18 : 1 2-OH tr tr – –
Unsaturated
C15 : 1 ω6c tr tr – –
C16 : 1 ω5c 0.8 0.7 1.3 tr
C17 : 1 ω8c tr tr 1.2 –
C17 : 1 ω6c 5.3 5.0 21.7 1.3
C18 : 1 ω5c 1.2 1.2 0.5 1.7
C18 : 3 ω6c tr tr – –
C20 : 1 ω7c – – – –
C20 : 1 ω9c – – – –
C19 : 0 cyclo ω8c 0.7 2.8 tr –
11-methyl C18 : 1 ω7c – – 1.0 –
Summed feature
3 18.0 16.0 9.4 5.6
8 54.9 45.4 30.1 72.8
9 1.1 1.4 0.6 –

tr, Trace (<0.5 %); –, not detected. Summed feature 3, C16:1 ω7c and/or C16:1 ω6c; summed feature 8; summed feature 9. Fatty acids amounting to more than 5% are highlighted in bold.

Conclusion

The morphological, chemotaxonomic, phylogenetic and phylogenomic analyses consistently demonstrate that strains EGI L300112ᵀ and EGI L300120 represent a novel species within the genus Altererythrobacter. The two strains form a distinct lineage within the genus Altererythrobacter based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and phylogenomic inference. In addition, the ANI and AAI values between the two strains and the closest related species of the genus Altererythrobacter are below the species-level thresholds, supporting their classification as a novel species of this genus. Furthermore, strains EGI L300112ᵀ and EGI L300120 can be clearly differentiated from related species of the genus Altererythrobacter by a combination of phenotypic, physiological and chemotaxonomic characteristics (Table 1). Based on the polyphasic taxonomic evidence, strains EGI L300112ᵀ and EGI L300120 are proposed to represent a novel species of the genus Altererythrobacter, for which the name Altererythrobacter chaiwopuensis sp. nov. is proposed.

Description of Altererythrobacter chaiwopuensis sp. nov.

Altererythrobacter chaiwopuensis (chai.wo.pu.en’sis. N.L. masc. adj. chaiwopuensis of or belonging to Chaiwopu lake, a lake in Urumqi city, north-west China, where the strain was isolated).

Cells are aerobic, Gram-stain negative, non-motile and rod-shaped (0.4–0.6 µm×0.9–1.5 µm). Colonies on marine agar 2216 are yellow, circular and convex. Growth occurs at 15–37 ℃ (optimum, 28 ℃), pH 6.0–8.0 (optimum, pH 7.0) and with 0–7.0% (w/v) NaCl (optimum, 2.0 %, w/v). Catalase-positive and oxidase-negative. Tweens 20, 60 and 80 are hydrolysed, while H₂S production is negative. In API 20 NE tests, β-glucosidase and β-galactosidase activities are positive. API ZYM assays show activities of esterase (C4), esterase lipase (C8), leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, cystine arylamidase, trypsin, chymotrypsin, acid phosphatase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase and α-glucosidase. The sole respiratory quinone is ubiquinone Q-10. The major polar lipids are diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylmethylethanolamine, phosphatidylcholine and two unidentified phospholipids. The major fatty acids (>10 %) are summed feature 3 (C16 : 1 ω7c and/or C16 : 1 ω6c) and summed feature 8 (C18 : 1 ω6c and/or C18 : 1 ω7c). The DNA G+C content of the type strain is 61.2% based on the genome.

The type strain is EGI L300112ᵀ (=MCCC 1K09432ᵀ=KCTC 8712ᵀ), isolated from sediment of Chaiwopu Lake, Xinjiang, China. The GenBank accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequence and draft genome sequence of strain EGI L300112T are PX884856 and JBTXJF000000000, respectively.

Supplementary material

Supplementary Material 1.
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.007250

Abbreviations

AAI

amino acid sequence identity

ANI

average nucleotide identity

dDDH

digital DNA–DNA hybridization

PME

phosphatidylmethylethanolamine

Footnotes

Funding: This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (32570148), the Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (2022D01A154), the Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program of China (2025FY100500), the Science and Technology Major Project of Xizang (Program No. XZ202501ZY0019) and the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (no. 2022B0202110001).

Author contributions: W.J.L. and B.Z.F. designed research and project outline. Y.F.Y. and L.G. obtained the lake sediment sample. X.Y.L., Z.X.W., Y.W.L., Y.H.L., X.R.L. and S.L. performed isolation, deposition and polyphasic taxonomy. X.Y.L. and T.T.S. performed genome analysis. X.Y.L., B.Z.F. and W.J.L. drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethical statement: This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals.

GenBank accession no.: The accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene of strains EGI L300112T and EGI L300120 are PX884856 and PX893118, respectively. The Whole Genome Shotgun projects of strains EGI L300112T and EGI L300120 have been deposited at GenBank under accession nos. JBTXJF000000000 and JBTXJG000000000, respectively.

Contributor Information

Xin-Yao Li, Email: lixinyao24@mails.ucas.ac.cn.

Yi-Fei Yang, Email: 2926462116@qq.com.

Yi-Wen Liang, Email: 1851799127@qq.com.

Ze-Xian Wu, Email: 2155098499@qq.com.

Xu-Rui Li, Email: lixurui@ms.xjb.ac.cn.

Shuai Li, Email: lishuai@ms.xjb.ac.cn.

Yong-Hong Liu, Email: liuyh@ms.xjb.ac.cn.

Lei Gao, Email: gaolei29@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Ting-Ting She, Email: 359780069@qq.com.

Bao-Zhu Fang, Email: fangbaozhu@ms.xjb.ac.cn.

Wen-Jun Li, Email: liwenjun3@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

References

  • 1.Kwon KK, Woo J-H, Yang S-H, Kang J-H, Kang SG, et al. Altererythrobacter epoxidivorans gen. nov., sp. nov., an epoxide hydrolase-active, mesophilic marine bacterium isolated from cold-seep sediment, and reclassification of Erythrobacter luteolus Yoon et al. 2005 as Altererythrobacter luteolus comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:2207–2211. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64863-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Xu L, Sun C, Fang C, Oren A, Xu XW. Genomic-based taxonomic classification of the family Erythrobacteraceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:4470–4495. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jung YT, Park S, Lee JS, Yoon JH. Altererythrobacter aquiaggeris sp. nov., isolated from water of an estuary bank. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:3410–3416. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhao Q, Li H-R, Han Q-Q, He A-L, Nie C-Y, et al. Altererythrobacter soli sp. nov., isolated from desert sand. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:454–459. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ahn S, Lee Y, Weerawongwiwat V, Kim J-H, Lee J-S, et al. Altererythrobacter arenosus sp. nov., isolated from marine sediment. Curr Microbiol. 2025;82:13. doi: 10.1007/s00284-024-03995-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fan Z-Y, Xiao Y-P, Hui W, Tian G-R, Lee J-S, et al. Altererythrobacter dongtanensis sp. nov., isolated from a tidal flat. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2011;61:2035–2039. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.024380-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yoon J, Ryu J. Altererythrobacter rubellus sp. nov., a marine alphaproteobacterium isolated from seawater. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2019;366:fnz131. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnz131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lee JC, Whang KS. Altererythrobacter segetis sp. nov., isolated from farmland soil. Curr Microbiol. 2021;78:389–396. doi: 10.1007/s00284-020-02294-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lei X, Li Y, Chen Z, Zheng W, Lai Q, et al. Altererythrobacter xiamenensis sp. nov., an algicidal bacterium isolated from red tide seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:631–637. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.057257-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Robles-Machuca M, Aviles-Mejía L, Romero-Soto IC, Rodríguez JA, Armenta-Pérez VP, et al. Cloning, expression, and biochemical characterization of β-etherase LigF from Altererythrobacter sp. B11. Heliyon. 2023;9:e21006. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hong L-G, Jian S-L, Huo Y-Y, Cheng H, Hu X-J, et al. A novel SGNH family hydrolase Ali5 with thioesterase activity and a GNSL motif but without a classic GDSL motif from Altererythrobacter ishigakiensis. Biotechnol Lett. 2019;41:591–604. doi: 10.1007/s10529-019-02662-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li Z-Y, Wu Y-H, Huo Y-Y, Cheng H, Wang C-S, et al. Complete genome sequence of a benzo[a]pyrene-degrading bacterium Altererythrobacter epoxidivorans CGMCC 1.7731T. Mar Genomics. 2016;25:39–41. doi: 10.1016/j.margen.2015.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yang Z-W, Lian Z-H, Liu L, Fang B-Z, Li W-J, et al. Cultivation strategies for prokaryotes from extreme environments. Imeta. 2023;2:e123. doi: 10.1002/imt2.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xu P, Li W-J, Tang S-K, Zhang Y-Q, Chen G-Z, et al. Naxibacter alkalitolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family ‘Oxalobacteraceae’ isolated from China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005;55:1149–1153. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63407-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jiang K, Yuan B, Cao C, Zhang C, Liu Y, et al. Orrella daihaiensis sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from Daihai Lake in Inner Mongolia. Arch Microbiol. 2022;204:427. doi: 10.1007/s00203-022-03056-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fang B-Z, Xie Y-G, Zhou X-K, Zhang X-T, Liu L, et al. Lysobacter prati sp. nov., isolated from a plateau meadow sample. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2020;113:763–772. doi: 10.1007/s10482-020-01386-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol. 1977;100:221–230. doi: 10.1099/00221287-100-2-221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kroppenstedt RM. Separation of bacterial menaquinones by HPLC using reverse phase (RP18) and a silver loaded ion exchanger as stationary phases. J Liq Chromatogr. 1982;5:2359–2367. doi: 10.1080/01483918208067640. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Collins MD, Jones D. Lipids in the classification and identification of coryneform bacteria containing peptidoglycans based on 2, 4‐diaminobutyric acid. J Appl Bacteriol. 1980;48:459–470. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1980.tb01036.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M, et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods. 1984;2:233–241. doi: 10.1016/0167-7012(84)90018-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:1613–1617. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38:3022–3027. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Aiyar A. Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols. Vol. 132. New Jersey: Humana Press; 1999. The use of CLUSTAL W and CLUSTAL X for multiple sequence alignment; pp. 221–241. vol. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4:406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 1981;17:368–376. doi: 10.1007/BF01734359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kannan L, Wheeler WC. Maximum parsimony on phylogenetic networks. Algorithms Mol Biol. 2012;7:9. doi: 10.1186/1748-7188-7-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980;16:111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2017;110:1281–1286. doi: 10.1007/s10482-017-0844-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:929–931. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chaumeil PA, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:1925–1927. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:W293–W296. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D457–D462. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Liu Y, Pei T, Du J, Zhang M, Zhu H. Altererythrobacter litoralis sp. nov., a new carotenoid-producing member of the family Erythrobacteraceae, isolated from a tidal flat sediment. Curr Microbiol. 2024;81 doi: 10.1007/s00284-024-03714-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gao Y, Li G, Fang C, Shao Z, Wu Y-H, et al. Tsuneonella suprasediminis sp. nov., isolated from the Pacific Ocean. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2019;71 doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Xu X-W, Wu Y-H, Wang C-S, Wang X-G, Oren A, et al. Croceicoccus marinus gen. nov., sp. nov., a yellow-pigmented bacterium from deep-sea sediment, and emended description of the family Erythrobacteraceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59:2247–2253. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.004267-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Galperin MY, Kristensen DM, Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. Microbial genome analysis: the COG approach. Brief Bioinform. 2019;20:1063–1070. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shiba T, Simidu U. Erythrobacter longus gen. nov., sp. nov., an aerobic bacterium which contains bacteriochlorophyll a. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1982;32:211–217. doi: 10.1099/00207713-32-2-211. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1.
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.007250

Articles from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Society for General Microbiology and the International Union of Microbiological Societies

RESOURCES