Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2026 Aug 11;21(8):e0354482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0354482

Exploring the Role of Nesprin1 in isoproterenol-induced heart failure: Insights into pathogenesis and therapeutic implications

Qin Qin 1,2,#, Cenyuan Dong 1,2,#, Ziyi Zhou 1,2, Yangyuanzhi Liu 1,2, Mengpan Liu 1,2, Chunyu Cao 3, Lin Teng 1,4,*
Editor: Wei Hsum Yap5
PMCID: PMC13460607  PMID: 42579703

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the role of Nesprin-1 in the development and progression of isoproterenol (ISO)-induced heart failure (HF) and to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms.

Methods

HF was induced in mice via daily intraperitoneal injections of ISO (5 mg/kg/day) for 24 consecutive days. Cardiac function was evaluated using transthoracic echocardiography to measure diastolic left ventricular diameters (LVDd), systolic left ventricular end diameter (LVDs), ejection fraction (EF), and fractional shortening (FS). The HF model was validated through gross cardiac observation, WGA staining, and Western blot analysis of B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP). Histological changes were assessed via H&E staining. Oxidative stress was evaluated by quantifying malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity. The expression and localization of Nesprin-1, Connexin 43 (Cx43), DNA damage markers (53BP1, γH2AX), and epigenetic markers (H3K9me3, H3K27me3) were examined using immunofluorescence and Western blotting. The activation of the ERK signaling pathway was also analyzed.

Results

Compared with the control group, ISO-induced HF mice exhibited significant increases in body/heart weight and cardiomyocyte cross-sectional area, alongside elevated BNP expression (P < 0.01). Echocardiography revealed increased LVDd and LVDs with markedly reduced EF and FS (P < 0.01). Histopathologically, the model group showed disorganized myocardial structures, vascular proliferation, and hemorrhage. Crucially, Nesprin-1 expression was significantly downregulated (P < 0.01), accompanied by abnormal nuclear membrane localization and morphological changes in myocardial cell nuclei. Significant nuclear distortions in the model group included increased area, perimeter, and length-to-diameter ratio alongside reduced roundness. Parallel to these changes, the model group showed increased malondialdehyde levels and decreased superoxide dismutase activity (P < 0.05). Notably, several markers showed highly significant differences (P < 0.01), including the downregulation of Connexin 43 and the upregulation of DNA damage markers γH2AX and 53BP1. Significant epigenetic remodeling, characterized by elevated H3K9me3 and H3K27me3, was also observed. Finally, a marked hyperactivation of the ERK signaling pathway was recorded, also reaching statistical significance at (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that the downregulation of Nesprin-1 is closely associated with HF pathogenesis. In the ISO-induced HF model, diminished Nesprin-1 expression correlated with disrupted nuclear homeostasis, reduced Cx43 expression, severe oxidative stress, DNA damage accumulation, and epigenetic disturbances, which may be mediated through the abnormal activation of the ERK signaling pathway.

Introduction

Heart failure (HF), or cardiac failure, signifies the heart’s diminished capacity to efficiently pump blood, resulting in venous congestion and inadequate arterial perfusion due to compromised systolic and/or diastolic functions [1–4]. This condition represents the terminal phase of heart disease and stands as a leading cause of cardiovascular-related mortality worldwide. HF affects approximately 1% to 2% of the global population, with a notably higher prevalence among the elderly [5–7]. Sympathetic nervous system (SNS) overactivity is a hallmark of HF, correlating with disease severity and prognosis. Under normal circumstances, the cardiac sympathetic nervous system enhances cardiac output, gene transcription, and metabolism by releasing neurotransmitters and engaging β-adrenergic receptors (β-AR) [8,9]. However, excessive SNS activation detrimentally affects the cardiovascular system, potentially precipitating or exacerbating HF [10,11]. This overdrive leads to heightened heart rate and contractility, inducing a sustained high-load state that depletes cardiac energy reserves, impeding cardiac function. Furthermore, it promotes adverse structural cardiac changes such as ventricular hypertrophy and atrial dilation, diminishing cardiac pump efficiency [12–14]. Increased arterial vasoconstriction further strains the heart by elevating vascular tension. Excessive sympathetic stimulation also incites inflammation and oxidative stress, damaging myocardial cells and hastening disease progression. Disruption of neuroendocrine system balance, including the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, can exacerbate fluid retention and increase blood volume, exacerbating cardiac workload [15–18]. Current HF management strategies primarily target the sympathetic nervous system with medications like β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, and aldosterone receptor antagonists. Despite these interventions, HF incidence, readmission rates, and mortality remain high, underscoring the need for novel therapeutic approaches [19–23].

Traditionally, HF research focused on intracellular factors, neglecting the nuclear envelope’s role. The nuclear envelope (NE) is pivotal, spatially segregating nuclear genetic material and regulating macromolecular transport [24]. The Linker of Nucleoskeleton and Cytoskeleton (LINC) complex, anchored to the NE, includes Nesprin proteins, which bridge the nuclear and cytoskeletal proteins, contributing to cellular structure and function. Nesprin mutations are implicated in various diseases, including Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM) and Emery-Dreifuss Muscular Dystrophy (EDMD), highlighting their importance in muscle physiology [25–27]. Nesprin family proteins, integral to the NE, include Nesprin-1 and Nesprin-2, which interact with actin, intermediate filaments, and the nuclear envelope, influencing cell signaling, morphology, and mechanical properties [28]. These proteins regulate gene expression, chromatin structure, and epigenetic modifications, impacting cell function and pathology. Mutations in Nesprin-1 and Nesprin-2 are associated with abnormal nuclear morphology, positioning, and chromatin organization, contributing to DCM and EDMD. Nesprin alterations also affect intercalated disc protein localization, leading to conduction defects in Nesprin-associated cardiomyopathies [27,29,30].

Given this background, we hypothesize that the downregulation of Nesprin-1 disrupts the structural linkage between the nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton. This disruption likely impairs nuclear homeostasis, interferes with intracellular signal transduction, and causes abnormal transcriptional regulation, ultimately driving adverse myocardial remodeling, contractile dysfunction, and the progression of heart failure.

Materials and methods

Drugs and Chemicals

MedChemExpress provided isoproterenol (HY-B0468) and isoflurane, while Biosharp supplied 4% paraformaldehyde (BP003), hematoxylin-eosin staining (BP019), and other staining-related reagents. Sinopharm Chemical Reagent offered basic reagents such as paraffin (69019361) and xylene (10023418). Antibodies were mainly sourced from Boster, including Cx43 antibody (A00599), BNP antibody (M01186-3), 53BP1 antibody (BM5099), γH2AX antibody (BM4148), H3K9me3 antibody (BM5079), H3K27me3 antibody (BM4341), and ERK antibody (BM4156). Protein-related reagents were primarily obtained from Beyotime, including RIPA lysis buffer (P0013B) and BCA protein assay kit (P0010). Additionally, Amresco provided electrophoresis reagents such as TEMED (Amresco 0761) and acrylamide (Exp2016109), while Jackson supplied HRP-labeled secondary antibodies, specifically HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (BA1054), HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-goat (BA1060), HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse (BA1051), and HRP-conjugated goat anti-rat (BA1058). Other essential reagents included WGA stock solution (BBL-0351) from Sigma-Aldrich, DAPI stock solution (C1002) from Solarbio, and cytoplasmic/nuclear protein extraction kit (KGP150) from Nanjing KeyGen Biotech.

Establishment of Isoproterenol-Induced Heart Failure Model in Mice

The male C57BL/6 mice weighing 20-22g were purchased from the Animal Experimental Center of China Three Gorges University. All mice were housed in specific pathogen-free (SPF) animal facilities at China Three Gorges University (Yichang, Hubei, China). Twenty-four C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into two groups: model group and control group. In the model group, mice were administered intraperitoneal injections of isoproterenol (ISO) at a dosage of 5 mg/kg. In the control group, mice were administered intraperitoneal injections of an equivalent volume of medical-grade physiological saline. Two groups received intraperitoneal injections continuously for 24 days.

Cardiac function assessment

Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane, and after achieving stable anesthesia, the hair in the chest area was removed. The mice were then placed in a supine position and fixed on an ultrasound examination table. Ultrasound coupling agent was applied to the chest area. Using small animal ultrasound, M-mode images of the long axis and short axis of the mouse heart were obtained. Parameters including ejection fraction (EF), fractional shortening (FS), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd), and left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESd) were measured and calculated to assess cardiac function in mice. Statistical analysis was performed to analyze the cardiac function of mice.

Measurement of Body and Heart Weight

All animal procedures were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health guidelines and were approved by the Committee of Animal Experiments at the China Three Gorgers University (No. 2023660H). Throughout the 24-day isoproterenol administration period, all mice were strictly monitored daily. To minimize suffering, humane endpoints were pre-established; however, no animals reached these endpoints prior to the scheduled conclusion of the study. All intraperitoneal injections and handling were performed by trained personnel to minimize stress. At the end of the experiment (at least 24 hours after the final dose), mice were deeply anesthetized via inhalation of 3% isoflurane. The adequacy of anesthesia was confirmed by the absence of the pedal withdrawal reflex. Following confirmed deep anesthesia, mice were euthanized via cervical dislocation, which served as a secondary physical method to ensure a humane death. The hearts were immediately harvested, rinsed in ice-cold physiological saline, and trimmed of excess connective tissue and vessels. Total heart weight was recorded. Myocardial samples were either snap-frozen in dry ice and stored at −80°C for molecular analysis or fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for histological evaluation. All efforts were made to minimize suffering in the animal experiments.

Pathological Section Staining

HE staining: After dehydration, embedding, and sectioning of tissue fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, the paraffin sections were dewaxed to water. Stain with hematoxylin for 4 minutes, followed by 2-minute rinsing with tap water to remove excess stain. The sections were then differentiated with 0.8% hydrochloric acid alcohol for 2 seconds, rinsed again with tap water, immersed in eosin solution for 20 seconds, adjusted with 95% ethanol for 5 seconds, and dehydrated with anhydrous ethanol for 2 minutes. Finally, the sections are sealed with a transparent environmental agent and observed under a microscope.

WGA staining: The paraffin sections were sequentially dewaxed with eco-friendly degreasing agents (1), (2), and (3) for 10 minutes each, followed by 5-minute immersion in anhydrous ethanol, 95% ethanol, and 75% ethanol respectively. The sections underwent three 3-minute rinses with distilled water. Antigen retrieval was performed by high-pressure treatment of the sections in boiling citric acid (pH6.0) solution for 2 minutes. After cooling, the sections were immersed in distilled water for three 5-minute washes. A circular mark was made on the section using a histological pen, then it was immersed in TBST buffer. A 1:200 diluted WGA working solution (50 uL/section) was added and incubated under light protection for 30 minutes, followed by three 5-minute TBST washes. After removing TBST, a 1:500 diluted DAPI working solution (50 uL/section) was applied to stain nuclei for 5 minutes. Following TBST rinsing, the sections were mounted with anti-fluorescence quenching medium and stored at 4°C under light protection. Finally, microscopic examination and image analysis were conducted.

Detection of oxidative stress indicators using biochemical kits

Sample Preparation: Myocardial tissue was mixed with PBS buffer at ratios of 1:10 (for MDA detection) and 1:9 (for SOD detection), homogenized, and centrifuged at 10,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected for subsequent analysis.

Reagent Preparation: MDA detection working solution (including probe working solution and standard) and SOD detection working solution (including enzyme reaction solution) were prepared according to the kit instructions.

MDA Measurement: The sample was mixed with the detection working solution, incubated at 95 °C for 40 min, cooled on ice for 5 min, and centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min. The supernatant was measured at 532 nm absorbance.

Calculation formula:

MDA (μmol/gprot)=[(Asample−A{blank})/(Astandard−A{blank})]×C{standard}×dilution factor / protein concentration

SOD Measurement: 20 uL of sample was added, incubated at 37 °C for 20 min, and measured at 450 nm absorbance.

Calculation formulas:

SOD inhibition rate  (%)=[(ΔAcontrol−ΔAsample)/ΔAcontrol]×100%
SOD activity (U/mg prot)=Inhibition rate/(100%−Inhibition rate×12/protein concentration

*(Note: In the formulas, Cstandard is the standard concentration, ΔA is the absorbance difference, and 12 is the conversion factor for reaction volume/sample volume.)*

Immunofluorescence staining protocol for mouse cardiac tissue

Initially, tissues fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde were processed through dehydration, embedding, and sectioning, followed by dewaxing the paraffin sections to water. Antigen retrieval was then performed by incubating the sections in preheated 95°C sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0) under high-pressure heating for 10 minutes. After natural cooling, the sections were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 3 minutes each. Excess moisture was removed using absorbent paper, and the tissue areas were circled with an immunohistochemical pen before applying diluted normal goat serum for 30-minute blocking at room temperature. After blocking, excess liquid was removed (without washing), and diluted primary antibody was directly applied for overnight incubation at 4 °C in a humidified chamber. The following day, sections were thoroughly washed with PBS (≥3 times, 3 minutes each), dried, and treated with diluted fluorescent secondary antibody for 1-hour incubation at 25 °C in a humidified chamber, followed by four additional PBS washes (3 minutes each). For nuclear staining, DAPI was applied under light-protected conditions for 5 minutes, followed by four PBS washes (5 minutes each) to remove excess dye. Finally, sections were dried and mounted with anti-fade mounting medium for observation and image acquisition under a fluorescence microscope.

Western blot experimental procedure

Protein extraction was first performed by mincing tissue samples in a 2mL homogenizer, followed by adding 400 uL lysis buffer containing PMSF for ice-cold homogenization with repeated processing at 5-minute intervals until complete tissue disruption was achieved. After 30 minutes of lysis, the lysate was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 minutes at 4 °C, and the supernatant was aliquoted and stored at −20 °C. Protein concentration was determined using the BCA method: samples were diluted 1:19 with PBS, and a standard curve (0.2–1 mg/mL BSA) was prepared and loaded onto a 96-well plate alongside samples (standards in duplicate, samples in triplicate). After adding BCA working solution, the plate was incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes protected from light, and absorbance at 568 nm was measured to calculate protein concentration. Protein samples were mixed with 5 × loading buffer and denatured by boiling for 10 minutes before storage.

For electrophoresis, separating and stacking gels were prepared, and 40 μg total protein was loaded per well. Initial electrophoresis was performed at 80V until samples entered the separating gel, then switched to 120V for approximately 1.5 hours until the bromophenol blue reached the gel bottom. Prior to transfer, PVDF membranes were cut and activated with methanol, and the transfer sandwich was assembled in the order of “negative plate-fiber pad-filter paper-gel-membrane-filter paper-fiber pad-positive plate” for constant current transfer. After transfer, membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk in TBST (2% BSA for phosphoproteins) at room temperature for 2 hours.

Following overnight primary antibody incubation at 4 °C, membranes were washed 6 times with TBST, then incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody at 37 °C for 2 hours, followed by 5 additional TBST washes. For ECL detection, enhanced solution and peroxidase solution were mixed in equal proportions and applied to membranes. After several minutes of reaction, X-ray films were exposed and processed through development and fixation to obtain results. Throughout the procedure, care was taken to maintain samples at low temperatures, ensure bubble-free transfer, and keep membranes moist during antibody incubations.

Statistical analysis

All quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (X ± SD). The comparison between the two groups was evaluated using the t-test. P value <0.05 indicated statistically significant differences. The data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 10.0 software.

3. Resuls

3.1. Establishment and Validation of the Isoproterenol-Induced Heart Failure Mouse Model

Echocardiographic evaluation revealed notable alterations in cardiac parameters across the two experimental groups (Fig 1A-1B). Mice in the model group displayed significant increases in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd) and left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESd) compared to the control groups (Fig 1C-1D) (P < 0.01). Conversely, ejection fraction (EF) and fractional shortening (FS) were markedly reduced in the model group (Fig 1E-1F) (P < 0.01). These findings underscore the effectiveness of the isoproterenol-induced myocardial hypertrophy model in inducing structural and functional changes in the heart.

Fig 1. Isoproterenol-induced Decrease in Cardiac Function in Mice.

Fig 1

A: Echocardiogram of the control group mice; B: Echocardiogram of the model group mice; C-F: Left ventricular diameter (LVDd), left ventricular diameter at systole (LVDs), ejection fraction (EF), and fractional shortening (FS) of the left ventricle in mice; n ≥ 4; Compared to the control group, **P < 0.01.

Assessment of cardiac weight provided additional insights into physiological changes among the experimental groups. Mice in the isoproterenol-induced heart failure model group exhibited a significant increase in body weight starting from day 13 of drug administration, compared to controls (Fig 2A). Moreover, body weight and cardiac weight significantly increased in the model group after 24 days of isoproterenol administration, indicative of myocardial hypertrophy (Fig 2B-2C) (P < 0.01). WGA staining demonstrated a significant increase in cardiomyocyte cross-sectional area in the model group compared to controls (Fig 2D-2E) (P < 0.01). By examining BNP in both groups using Western Blot, we found that BNP was significantly elevated in the model group compared to the control group (Fig 2F-2G) (P < 0.01). These findings highlight the capacity of isoproterenol to induce cardiac hypertrophy in mice.

Fig 2. Isoproterenol-induced heart failure in mice.

Fig 2

A: Graph of changes in mouse body weight; B-C: Body and cardiac weights of the two groups of mice; n = 12; D-E: Myocardial WGA staining of mice; n = 5; F-G: BNP protein expression levels of the two groups of mice; n = 3. Compared with the control group, **P < 0.01.

Morphological and pathological staining of the heart in mice revealed significant differences in myocardial structure between the two groups (Fig 3A). Compared to the control group, the model group mice exhibited a significantly larger heart volume (Fig 3A). A comparison of cross-sectional images from the hearts of the two groups showed that the ventricular cavity in the model group mice was notably enlarged (Fig 3B). HE staining results indicated that the model group mice exhibited disordered myocardial structure, vascular proliferation, and myocardial hemorrhage (Fig 3C-D). These findings collectively highlight the pathological changes in myocardial hypertrophy induced by isoproterenol in mice.

Fig 3. Gross view and pathological staining of mouse heart.

Fig 3

A: Gross view of mouse heart; B: Coronary section of mouse heart; C-D: HE staining of mouse myocardial tissue; n = 5.

3.2. Downregulation of Nesprin-1 Expression in the Myocardium of Isoproterenol-Induced Heart Failure Mice

The immunofluorescence analysis revealed a significant decrease in Nesprin-1 expression in the hearts of mice induced with isoproterenol-induced heart failure (Fig 4A) (P < 0.01). By fluorescent staining of Nesprin-1 with specific antibodies, we observed that Nesprin-1 was mainly located at the nuclear membrane of cardiomyocytes (Fig 4A). This localization is consistent with its function in maintaining nuclear membrane structure and nuclear-cell skeleton connection.

Fig 4. Expression changes of Nesprin-1 in myocardial tissue.

Fig 4

A-B: Immunofluorescence staining of Nesprin in mouse myocardial tissue; n = 5; Compared with the control group, **P < 0.01.

3.3. Disruption of Nuclear Homeostasis in Heart Failure Mice with Reduced Nesprin-1 Expression

In our experimental study, we employed immunofluorescence to investigate the effects of Nesprin-1 expression changes on nuclear homeostasis in cardiomyocytes. By randomly selecting 40 fluorescently stained pathological sections from five model groups, we obtained 40 tissue micrographs. Ten nuclei were randomly selected from each image and analyzed using ImageJ software for morphological parameters including nuclear area, perimeter, and aspect ratio. Results demonstrated that compared with the control group, the nuclear morphology of cardiomyocytes in the model group exhibited significant abnormalities, characterized by marked increases in nuclear area, perimeter, and aspect ratio, along with a notable reduction in nuclear roundness (Fig 5A) (P < 0.01). Furthermore, immunofluorescence staining revealed partial or complete absence of Nesprin-1 on the nuclear membrane in some cardiomyocytes of the model group (Fig 5B) (P < 0.01). These results indicate that dysregulated expression of Nesprin-1 may contribute to cardiac homeostasis abnormalities in heart failure mice, suggesting a potential causal relationship between the two, though the exact mechanism requires further investigation.

Fig 5. Nuclear Homeostasis Disruption in Heart Failure Mice.

Fig 5

A: Changes in nuclear morphology; B: Nesprin-1 immunofluorescence staining; C-G: Nuclear area, nuclear perimeter, nuclear roundness, and aspect ratio of the two groups of mice; n = 5; Compared to the control group, **P < 0.01.

3.4. Exacerbation of Oxidative Stress in the Nesprin-1 Downregulated Heart Failure Model

Oxidative stress, characterized by an imbalance between oxidizing agents and antioxidant defenses, predisposes tissues to oxidation. This imbalance fuels neutrophilic inflammation, upregulates protease secretion, and fosters the generation of various oxidative intermediates. Acknowledged as a detrimental factor contributing to aging and various diseases, oxidative stress primarily stems from the overproduction of free radicals within the body. In line with this, Nesprin-1 depletion in Drosophila melanogaster has been correlated with mitochondrial dysfunction, thereby inducing oxidative stress [31]. To investigate this phenomenon, we evaluated the expression levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) in cardiac tissue. Notably, compared to the control groups, the model group exhibited heightened MDA activity and diminished SOD content (Fig 6A-6B) (P < 0.05). These results indicate that oxidative stress levels were significantly increased and antioxidant capacity was inhibited in the Nesprin-1 dysregulated HF model.

Fig 6. Oxidative stress aggravation in heart failure mice.

Fig 6

A-B: Quantitative analysis of MDA and SOD in mouse myocardium; MDA: malondialdehyde; SOD: superoxide dismutase; n = 3; compared with the control group, *P < 0.05.

3.5. The expression of Cx43 was downregulated in the myocardium of mice with dysregulation of Nesprin-1 expression in heart failure

Conduction dysfunction is a hallmark feature observed in the isoproterenol-induced heart failure mouse model. Cx43, primarily localized at the intercalated discs within mature cardiac myocytes, plays a pivotal role in facilitating electrical conduction among myocytes and enabling chemical signaling and energy substrate exchange, essential for coordinating cellular function [32]. Through immunofluorescence analysis, we investigated the expression levels of Cx43 in mice from each experimental group. Our results demonstrate a significant reduction in Cx43 expression specifically within the model group (Fig 7A-7B) (P < 0.01). In addition, combined with our previous studies, this result will provide a reliable experimental basis for our further study on how the reduction of Nesprin-1 expression affects the localization and function of Cx43 and jointly participates in the occurrence of conduction dysfunction in ISO-induced HF model.

Fig 7. Expression of Cx43 in both groups of mice.

Fig 7

A: Cx43 expression was detected by immunofluorescence; B Quantitative analysis of the Cx43; n = 5; compared with the control group, **P < 0.01.

3.6. Exacerbation of Myocardial DNA Damage in Heart Failure Mice

In the mouse model of heart failure induced by isoproterenol, the activation of cell DNA damage was observed when Nesprin-1 expression was reduced. Nesprin plays a crucial role in maintaining genomic integrity, and its reduction may lead to impaired DNA repair mechanisms [33]. To investigate this phenomenon, immunofluorescence and Western blot analyses were conducted to assess the expression levels of 53 BP1 and γH2AX in cardiac tissue. Our results reveal an increased expression of 53 BP1 and γH2AX in the model group compared to the control groups (Fig 8A-8D) (P < 0.01). In agreement with this, Western blot indicated elevated levels of DNA damage in Nesprin-deficient hearts (Fig 9A-9C) (P < 0.01). These results suggest that the decrease in Nesprin-1 expression may interact with the accumulation of DNA damage in the occurrence of HF.

Fig 8. Increased DNA damage in myocardium of mice with heart failure.

Fig 8

A-D: Detection of expression of 53 BP1 and γH2AX by immunofluorescence; 53 BP1: P53 binding protein 1; γH2AX: phosphorylated histone; n = 5; compared with the control group, **P < 0.01.

Fig 9. Increased DNA damage in myocardium of mice with heart failure.

Fig 9

A-C: Protein quantitative analysis of 53 BP1 and γH2AX; 53 BP1: P53 binding protein 1; γH2AX: phosphorylated histone; n = 3; compared with the control group, **P < 0.01.

3.7. Abnormal Histone Methylation in the Myocardial Tissue of Heart Failure Mice

Histone methylation represents a critical modification that alters chromosome structure. Recent studies have highlighted the pivotal role of histone methylation modifications in myocardial hypertrophy, fibrosis, and cardiac function [34,35]. Through immunofluorescence and Western blot analysis, we assessed the expression levels of H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 in mice from each experimental group. As depicted in the figures, the model group exhibited significantly increase expression levels of H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 compared to the control groups (Fig 10A-10D) (P < 0.01). This result is consistent with the Western blot results (Fig 11A-11C) (P < 0.01). These findings suggest that the histone methylation pattern disorder in the isoproterenol induced heart failure mouse model may be associated with the decreased level of Nesprin-1.

Fig 10. Changes in chromatin recombination in the myocardium of heart failure mice.

Fig 10

A-D: Immunofluorescence detection of H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 expression; H3K9me3: trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 9; H3K27me3: trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27; n = 5; compared to the control group, **P < 0.01.

Fig 11. Changes in chromatin recombination in the myocardium of heart failure mice.

Fig 11

A-C: Quantitative analysis of H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 proteins; H3K9me3: trimethylation of lysine 9 on histone H3; H3K27me3: trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone H3; n = 3; compared with the control group,**P < 0.01.

3.8. Activation of the ERK Signaling Pathway in the Heart Failure Mouse Model

The ERK pathway is recognized as a pivotal regulator in the development of myocardial hypertrophy. Studies have elucidated the formation of Nesprin-2/ERK complexes at sites of DNA damage in aortic smooth muscle cells, indicating a potential role of Nesprin proteins in modulating ERK signaling [36]. To investigate this phenomenon in the context of heart failure, we employed Western blot analysis to evaluate the expression levels of ERK in cardiac tissue samples from mice in each experimental group. Strikingly, our results revealed a notable increase in ERK expression in the model group compared to the control group, indicative of the activation of the ERK pathway in the cardiac tissue of the isoproterenol-induced heart failure mouse model (Fig 12A-12C) (P < 0.01). Combined with the reduced expression of Nesprin-1 in iprindel induced heart failure mice, we speculate that the reduced expression of Nesprin-1 may be associated with the activation of ERK pathway.

Fig 12. Activation of ERK1/2 expression in myocardium of mice with heart failure.

Fig 12

A-C: Detection of ERK1/2 expression by protein immunoblotting; ERK: extracellular regulated protein kinase; n = 3; compared with the control group, **P < 0.01.

Discussion

Heart failure stands as an enduring challenge within global healthcare systems, presenting a formidable burden characterized by its pervasive prevalence, grim prognostic outlook, and profound detriment to patients’ quality of life. Despite notable strides in HF management witnessed over recent decades, including the advent of neurohormonal blockade, device-based interventions, and cardiac transplantation, the persistently high rates of mortality and morbidity underscore the insufficiency of current therapeutic strategies [37–39]. Consequently, there exists an imperative mandate for sustained investigative efforts directed towards unraveling the intricate molecular mechanisms governing HF pathogenesis.

In this study, we induced myocardial hypertrophy in mice by intraperitoneal injection of ISO. Our findings indicate that the administration of ISO successfully induced myocardial hypertrophy, characterized by significant changes in heart weight, body weight, and WGA pathological staining results compared to the control group mice, consistent with previous studies [40,41]. Long-term stimulation by pathological factors can lead to persistent changes in cardiac structure, resulting in HF [42]. HE staining showed that the myocardial structure of the mice with Nesprin-1 deficiency was disordered, and the blood vessels were proliferated and the myocardial was hemorrhagic. Additionally, cardiac function tests confirmed the onset of HF in the mice, with significant changes in LVEDd, LVESd, EF, and FS. When myocardial cell volume and pressure overload occur, ventricular muscle cells release BNP, which exerts sodium-losing, diuretic, vasodilatory, and antihypertensive effects [43]. BNP is a crucial biomarker for the clinical diagnosis of HF. Western blotting detected a significant increase in BNP in the myocardial tissue of mice induced by isoproterenol, providing a more reliable basis for confirming the onset of HF in mice.

Nesprin are giant scaffolding proteins located at the NE that play essential roles in maintaining nuclear structure and regulating various cellular processes, including nuclear positioning, cytoskeletal organization, and gene expression [27,44–48]. While previous research has primarily focused on the role of Nesprin in skeletal and muscular diseases, their involvement in cardiac pathology, particularly HF, remains poorly understood. In this study, we used the ISO-induced mouse heart failure model to initially assess the changes in Nesprin-1 expression and its potential links with nuclear structure, signaling pathways, and gene expression regulation. The ISO-induced HF mouse model established and validated in this study provides new insights into the pathophysiology of heart failure and the role of Nesprin-1 in cardiac function.

Our research has revealed that, compared to the control group, the expression of Nesprin-1 in the myocardium of ISO-induced HF mice is significantly reduced. This finding suggests that changes in Nesprin-1 expression may be linked to pathological remodeling processes associated with HF, such as myocardial hypertrophy and dysfunction. The downregulation of Nesprin-1 may be related to abnormalities in the morphology, nuclear localization, and structural integrity of myocardial cells, which have been preliminarily observed through histopathological examination. However, the specific molecular mechanisms still require further investigation. Additionally, the dysregulation of Nesprin-1 expression may affect nuclear stability by disrupting the integrity of the nuclear membrane, potentially leading to cellular dysfunction. These findings suggest that, as a key component of the nuclear scaffold and cytoskeletal connection complex, changes in Nesprin-1 expression may be associated with nuclear instability and abnormal cell signaling.

The exact mechanisms underlying Nesprin-1-mediated pathogenesis in HF remain incompletely understood, but our study has shed light on several potential avenues for further investigation. Our findings elucidate the multifaceted role of Nesprin-1 in HF pathogenesis, encompassing oxidative stress, electrical conduction abnormalities, and epigenetic dysregulation. First, Nesprin-1 may affect cardiac morphology through interactions with cytoskeletal elements and extracellular matrix proteins, thereby regulating the signaling pathways involved in fibroblast activation. However, the causal relationship between Nesprin-1 and these processes has not been directly demonstrated. For example, further research is needed to determine how Nesprin-1 affects fibroblast activation by influencing cardiac morphology through interactions with cytoskeletal components and extracellular matrix proteins.

Additionally, in the ISO-induced heart failure model, reduced Nesprin expression was observed to be associated with enhanced oxidative stress, manifested as alterations in oxidative stress markers (e.g., elevated malondialdehyde levels and decreased superoxide dismutase content). Concurrently, increased expression of DNA damage repair proteins (such as γH2AX and 53 BP1) in this model further suggests that Nesprin may play a critical role in maintaining genomic integrity and protecting against oxidative stress-induced cardiac injury. Furthermore, the observed reduction in connexin 43 expression in Nesprin-deficient hearts highlights Nesprin’s involvement in regulating cardiac conduction and electromechanical coupling. Diminished Cx43 expression may contribute to conduction abnormalities and arrhythmias commonly observed in HF, emphasizing Nesprin’s role in regulating both structural and functional aspects of cardiac tissue. Lastly, alterations in histone methylation patterns, specifically changes in H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 levels in Nesprin-deficient hearts, suggest dysregulated epigenetic regulation in HF pathogenesis. These findings underscore the intricate interplay between Nesprin and epigenetic regulatory mechanisms in maintaining cardiac homeostasis.

Activation of the ERK pathway has been implicated in various hypertrophic stimuli and is known to regulate gene expression, protein synthesis, and cell survival in cardiomyocytes [49–51]. Our study elucidates the involvement of the ERK signaling pathway may be involved in mediating Nesprin-1-induced cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling in response to isoproterenol stimulation. Activation of the ERK pathway has been implicated in various cellular processes, including cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival [52–54]. Here, we demonstrate a significant increase in ERK expression in the cardiac tissue of mice subjected to isoproterenol-induced heart failure, suggesting the activation of the ERK pathway in response to cardiac stress. The observed upregulation of ERK signaling in Nesprin-deficient hearts highlights a potential interaction between Nesprin and the ERK pathway in regulating cardiac function. Previous studies have indicated the formation of Nesprin-2/ERK complexes at sites of DNA damage, implicating Nesprin proteins in the modulation of ERK signaling in other cellular contexts [36]. Our findings extend this understanding to the cardiac setting, where Nesprin deficiency may contribute to ERK pathway activation, thereby exacerbating myocardial injury and dysfunction. The activation of the ERK pathway in response to cardiac stressors, such as isoproterenol administration, suggests a role of ERK signaling in mediating pathological remodeling and maladaptive responses in the heart. Future studies aimed at elucidating the precise mechanisms underlying the crosstalk between Nesprin and the ERK pathway may provide further insights into the molecular mechanisms of heart failure pathogenesis.

The identification of Nesprin-1 as a potential regulator of HF pathogenesis opens up new avenues for therapeutic intervention. Targeting Nesprin-1 and its associated signaling pathways may offer novel strategies for preventing or attenuating adverse cardiac remodeling and dysfunction in HF [55–58]. Small molecule inhibitors, gene therapy approaches, or gene editing techniques could be explored to modulate Nesprin-1 expression or activity selectively in the heart. Additionally, our study underscores the importance of further research into the molecular mechanisms governing nuclear envelope dynamics and their contribution to cardiovascular disease. In conclusion, our study provides compelling evidence implicating Nesprin-1 in the pathogenesis of HF induced by isoproterenol. By elucidating the role of Nesprin-1 in cardiac remodeling and electrical conduction, we have shed light on novel molecular mechanisms underlying HF pathophysiology. Further investigation into the functional significance of Nesprin-1 and its interactions with key signaling pathways may yield valuable insights into disease progression and facilitate the development of targeted therapies for HF. Ultimately, our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the complex molecular networks driving HF and offer hope for improved outcomes for patients afflicted with this devastating condition. This comprehensive discussion highlights the significance of our findings and provides a roadmap for future research endeavors aimed at unraveling the intricate molecular mechanisms of HF pathogenesis and identifying innovative therapeutic strategies to combat this disease.

However, this study has several limitations. First, our findings regarding the association between decreased Nesprin-1 expression and various pathological features—such as myocardial structural disorder, oxidative stress, DNA damage, and epigenetic alterations—remain observational and correlational. Due to the current lack of specific Nesprin-1 inhibitors and the methodological challenges associated with generating Nesprin-1 knockout models, we could not establish a direct causal relationship or elucidate the precise downstream molecular mechanisms, including its exact interaction with the ERK signaling pathway. Second, our study relied exclusively on an isoproterenol (ISO)-induced HF mouse model. Future studies incorporating diverse HF models, such as transverse aortic constriction (TAC) or myocardial infarction (MI), are necessary to validate the generalizability of these findings. In future research, we aim to employ Nesprin-1-specific knockout models combined with multi-omics analyses to comprehensively decipher its exact functional role and mechanistic pathways in HF pathogenesis

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Original uncropped western blot images.

(ZIP)

pone.0354482.s001.zip (844.9KB, zip)
S1 Table. Raw data of mouse body weight.

(XLSX)

pone.0354482.s002.xlsx (13.6KB, xlsx)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

T.L. received funding from the Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation Project (Grant No. 2024AFD143). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Tanai E, Frantz S. Pathophysiology of heart failure. Compr Physiol. 2015;6(1):187–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2022;75(6):523. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2022.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bozkurt B, Coats AJS, Tsutsui H. Universal Definition and Classification of Heart Failure. Journal of Cardiac Failure. 2021;27(4):387–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kemp CD, Conte JV. The pathophysiology of heart failure. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2012;21(5):365–71. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2011.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ghionzoli N, Gentile F, Del Franco AM, Castiglione V, Aimo A, Giannoni A, et al. Current and emerging drug targets in heart failure treatment. Heart Fail Rev. 2022;27(4):1119–36. doi: 10.1007/s10741-021-10137-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Savarese G, Becher PM, Lund LH, Seferovic P, Rosano GMC, Coats AJS. Global burden of heart failure: a comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology. Cardiovasc Res. 2023;118(17):3272–87. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvac013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shahim B, Kapelios CJ, Savarese G. Global public health burden of heart failure: an updated review. Card Fail Rev. 2023;9:e11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Borovac JA, D’Amario D, Bozic J, Glavas D. Sympathetic nervous system activation and heart failure: Current state of evidence and the pathophysiology in the light of novel biomarkers. World J Cardiol. 2020;12(8):373–408. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v12.i8.373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bencivenga L, Palaia ME, Sepe I, Gambino G, Komici K, Cannavo A, et al. Why Do We Not Assess Sympathetic Nervous System Activity in Heart Failure Management: Might GRK2 Serve as a New Biomarker?. Cells. 2021;10(2):457. doi: 10.3390/cells10020457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang J, Dai M, Cao Q, Yu Q, Luo Q, Shu L, et al. Carotid baroreceptor stimulation suppresses ventricular fibrillation in canines with chronic heart failure. Basic Res Cardiol. 2019;114(6):41. doi: 10.1007/s00395-019-0750-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Huang Y, Liu YW, Pan HZ. Transthoracic pulmonary artery denervation for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2019;39(4):704–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Triposkiadis F, Briasoulis A, Kitai T, Magouliotis D, Athanasiou T, Skoularigis J, et al. The sympathetic nervous system in heart failure revisited. Heart Fail Rev. 2024;29(2):355–65. doi: 10.1007/s10741-023-10345-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Grassi G, Mancia G, Esler M. Central and peripheral sympathetic activation in heart failure. Cardiovasc Res. 2022;118(8):1857–71. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvab222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gronda E, Dusi V, D’Elia E, Iacoviello M, Benvenuto E, Vanoli E. Sympathetic activation in heart failure. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2022;24(Suppl E):E4–11. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suac030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Muñoz-Durango N, Fuentes CA, Castillo AE, González-Gómez LM, Vecchiola A, Fardella CE, et al. Role of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System beyond Blood Pressure Regulation: Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms Involved in End-Organ Damage during Arterial Hypertension. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(7):797. doi: 10.3390/ijms17070797 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pugliese NR, Masi S, Taddei S. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system: a crossroad from arterial hypertension to heart failure. Heart Fail Rev. 2020;25(1):31–42. doi: 10.1007/s10741-019-09855-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ferreira NS, Tostes RC, Paradis P. Aldosterone, inflammation, immune system, and hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2021;34(1):15–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Weir MR, Dzau VJ. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system: a specific target for hypertension management. Am J Hypertens. 1999;12(12 Pt 3):205S-213S. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(99)00103-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen Y, He Q, Mo D-C, Chen L, Lu J-L, Li R-X, et al. The angiotensin receptor and neprilysin inhibitor, LCZ696, in heart failure: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(41):e30904. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, Allen LA, Byun JJ, Colvin MM, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79(17):e263–421. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lachowska K, Gruchała M, Narkiewicz K, Hering D. Sympathetic Activation in Chronic Heart Failure: Potential Benefits of Interventional Therapies. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2016;18(7):51. doi: 10.1007/s11906-016-0660-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.von Lueder TG, Kotecha D, Atar D. Neurohormonal blockade in heart failure. Card Fail Rev. 2017;3(1):19–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ghionzoli N, Gentile F, Del Franco AM, Castiglione V, Aimo A, Giannoni A, et al. Current and emerging drug targets in heart failure treatment. Heart Fail Rev. 2022;27(4):1119–36. doi: 10.1007/s10741-021-10137-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Crisp M, Liu Q, Roux K, Rattner JB, Shanahan C, Burke B, et al. Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: role of the LINC complex. J Cell Biol. 2006;172(1):41–53. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200509124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Meinke P, Nguyen TD, Wehnert MS. The LINC complex and human disease. Biochem Soc Trans. 2011;39(6):1693–7. doi: 10.1042/BST20110658 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.De Silva S, Catibog N, Shanahan C, Zhang Q. Investigating novel roles for nesprin-1 and the LINC complex in Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Cardiovascular Research. 2022;118(Supplement_1). doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvac066.138 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhou C, Li C, Zhou B, Sun H, Koullourou V, Holt I, et al. Novel nesprin-1 mutations associated with dilated cardiomyopathy cause nuclear envelope disruption and defects in myogenesis. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26(12):2258–76. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shanahan CM, Weissberg PL, Metcalfe JC. Isolation of gene markers of differentiated and proliferating vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 1993;73(1):193–204. doi: 10.1161/01.res.73.1.193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen Z, Ren Z, Mei W, Ma Q, Shi Y, Zhang Y, et al. A novel SYNE1 gene mutation in a Chinese family of Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy-like. BMC Med Genet. 2017;18(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12881-017-0424-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stroud MJ, Banerjee I, Veevers J, Chen J. Linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton complex proteins in cardiac structure, function, and disease. Circ Res. 2014;114(3):538–48. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.301236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lindenboim L, Grozki D, Amsalem-Zafran AR, Peña-Blanco A, Gundersen GG, Borner C, et al. Apoptotic stress induces Bax-dependent, caspase-independent redistribution of LINC complex nesprins. Cell Death Discov. 2020;6(1):90. doi: 10.1038/s41420-020-00327-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Boengler K, Rohrbach S, Weissmann N, Schulz R. Importance of Cx43 for Right Ventricular Function. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(3):987. doi: 10.3390/ijms22030987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sur-Erdem I, Hussain MS, Asif M, Pınarbası N, Aksu AC, Noegel AA. Nesprin-1 impact on tumorigenic cell phenotypes. Mol Biol Rep. 2020;47(2):921–34. doi: 10.1007/s11033-019-05184-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yao L, He F, Zhao Q. Spatial multiplexed protein profiling of cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury. Circ Res. 2023;133(1):86–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li J, Sha Z, Zhu X, Xu W, Yuan W, Yang T, et al. Targeting miR-30d reverses pathological cardiac hypertrophy. EBioMedicine. 2022;81:104108. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Warren DT, Tajsic T, Porter LJ, Minaisah RM, Cobb A, Jacob A, et al. Nesprin-2-dependent ERK1/2 compartmentalisation regulates the DNA damage response in vascular smooth muscle cell ageing. Cell Death Differ. 2015;22(9):1540–50. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2015.12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.G B D R F. Global burden and strength of evidence for 88 risk factors in 204 countries and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2024;403(10440):2162–203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Savarese G, Lund LH. Global public health burden of heart failure. Card Fail Rev. 2017;3(1):7–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sapna F, Raveena F, Chandio M, Bai K, Sayyar M, Varrassi G, et al. Advancements in Heart Failure Management: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Emerging Therapies. Cureus. 2023;15(10):e46486. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Aimo A, Gaggin H K, Barison A, et al. Imaging, Biomarker, and Clinical Predictors of Cardiac Remodeling in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction [J]. JACC Heart Fail, 2019, 7(9): 782–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Goetze JP, Bruneau BG, Ramos HR, Ogawa T, de Bold MK, de Bold AJ. Cardiac natriuretic peptides. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17(11):698–717. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0381-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Salah K, Stienen S, Pinto YM, Eurlings LW, Metra M, Bayes-Genis A, et al. Prognosis and NT-proBNP in heart failure patients with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction. Heart. 2019;105(15):1182–9. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Apel ED, Lewis RM, Grady RM, Sanes JR. Syne-1, a dystrophin- and Klarsicht-related protein associated with synaptic nuclei at the neuromuscular junction. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(41):31986–95. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M004775200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.De Silva S, Fan Z, Kang B, Shanahan CM, Zhang Q. Nesprin-1: novel regulator of striated muscle nuclear positioning and mechanotransduction. Biochem Soc Trans. 2023;51(3):1331–45. doi: 10.1042/BST20221541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Leong EL, Khaing NT, Cadot B, Hong WL, Kozlov S, Werner H, et al. Nesprin-1 LINC complexes recruit microtubule cytoskeleton proteins and drive pathology in Lmna-mutant striated muscle. Hum Mol Genet. 2023;32(2):177–91. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddac179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhang Q, Ragnauth CD, Skepper JN, Worth NF, Warren DT, Roberts RG, et al. Nesprin-2 is a multi-isomeric protein that binds lamin and emerin at the nuclear envelope and forms a subcellular network in skeletal muscle. J Cell Sci. 2005;118(Pt 4):673–87. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rajgor D, Shanahan CM. Nesprins: from the nuclear envelope and beyond. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2013;15:e5. doi: 10.1017/erm.2013.6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zi-Yi Z, Qin Q, Fei Z, Cun-Yu C, Lin T. Nesprin proteins: bridging nuclear envelope dynamics to muscular dysfunction. Cell Commun Signal. 2024;22(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12964-024-01593-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gallo S, Vitacolonna A, Bonzano A, Comoglio P, Crepaldi T. ERK: A Key Player in the Pathophysiology of Cardiac Hypertrophy. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(9):2164. doi: 10.3390/ijms20092164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mutlak M, Kehat I. Extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 as regulators of cardiac hypertrophy. Front Pharmacol. 2015;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2015.00149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ramos-Kuri M, Meka SH, Salamanca-Buentello F, Hajjar RJ, Lipskaia L, Chemaly ER. Molecules linked to Ras signaling as therapeutic targets in cardiac pathologies. Biol Res. 2021;54(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40659-021-00342-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sugiura R, Satoh R, Takasaki T. ERK: A Double-Edged Sword in Cancer. ERK-Dependent Apoptosis as a Potential Therapeutic Strategy for Cancer. Cells. 2021;10(10):2509. doi: 10.3390/cells10102509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Deschênes-Simard X, Malleshaiah M, Ferbeyre G. Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinases: One Pathway, Multiple Fates [J ]. Cancers (Basel), 2023, 16(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wu J, Chen Y, Li R, Guan Y, Chen M, Yin H, et al. Synergistic anticancer effect by targeting CDK2 and EGFR-ERK signaling. J Cell Biol. 2024;223(1):e202203005. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202203005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Li Y-L, Cheng X-N, Lu T, Shao M, Shi D-L. Syne2b/Nesprin-2 Is Required for Actin Organization and Epithelial Integrity During Epiboly Movement in Zebrafish. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:671887. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.671887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Davidson PM, Battistella A, Déjardin T, Betz T, Plastino J, Borghi N, et al. Nesprin-2 accumulates at the front of the nucleus during confined cell migration. EMBO Rep. 2020;21(7):e49910. doi: 10.15252/embr.201949910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chen SN, Sbaizero O, Taylor MRG. Lamin A/C cardiomyopathy: implications for treatment. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019;21(12):160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Nicolas HA, Hua K, Quigley H, Ivare J, Tesson F, Akimenko M-A. A CRISPR/Cas9 zebrafish lamin A/C mutant model of muscular laminopathy. Dev Dyn. 2022;251(4):645–61. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Wei Hsum Yap

4 Jun 2025

Dear Dr. Teng,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

The submission presented by Lin Teng et al. evaluated the role of Nesprin1 in isoproterenol-induced heart failure and its implications for cardiac pathogenesis mechanism. The results provide potential implications for understanding the molecular mechanisms of cardiac dysfunction. Overall, the study have used multiple experimental approaches, including echocardiography, immunofluorescence, Western blotting, and histological analysis, which strengthens the study. Nevertheless, there are areas that could be improved to enhance clarity, readability, and scientific rigor. Specifically, the claim on the causative role of Nespirin1 in HF is unsupported with specific experimental validation, where the findings suggested correlational implications. Suggest revising the manuscript according to reviewers comments and improve the overall paper interpretations.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 19 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Wei Hsum Yap

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1.Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. To comply with PLOS ONE submissions requirements, in your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the experiments involving animals and ensure you have included details on (1) methods of sacrifice, and (2) efforts to alleviate suffering.

3. Please note that funding information should not appear in any section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript.

4. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

“This research was funded by the Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation Project (Joint Fund Project, Project No.: 2024AFD143).”

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: All relevant data are within the manuscript and in Supporting Information files.

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

6. When completing the data availability statement of the submission form, you indicated that you will make your data available on acceptance. We strongly recommend all authors decide on a data sharing plan before acceptance, as the process can be lengthy and hold up publication timelines. Please note that, though access restrictions are acceptable now, your entire data will need to be made freely accessible if your manuscript is accepted for publication. This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If you are unable to adhere to our open data policy, please kindly revise your statement to explain your reasoning and we will seek the editor's input on an exemption. Please be assured that, once you have provided your new statement, the assessment of your exemption will not hold up the peer review process.

7. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager.

8. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well.

9. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

10. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

Additional Editor Comments:

The submission presented by Lin Teng et al. evaluated the role of Nesprin1 in isoproterenol-induced heart failure and its implications for cardiac pathogenesis mechanism. The results provide potential implications for understanding the molecular mechanisms of cardiac dysfunction. Overall, the study have used multiple experimental approaches, including echocardiography, immunofluorescence, Western blotting, and histological analysis, which strengthens the study. Nevertheless, there are areas that could be improved to enhance clarity, readability, and scientific rigor. Specifically, the claim on the causative role of Nespirin1 in HF is unsupported with specific experimental validation, where the findings suggested correlational implications. Suggest revising the manuscript according to reviewers comments and improve the overall paper interpretations.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: In their study, Lin Teng et al. assessed the role of Nesprin1 in isoproterenol-induced heart failure and its implications for cardiac pathogenesis mechanism, which results provide potential implications for understanding the molecular mechanisms of cardiac dysfunction.

Overall, the study appears to be well-structured and scientifically sound. Authors used multiple experimental approaches, including echocardiography, immunofluorescence, Western blotting, and histological analysis, which strengthens the study, but there are areas that could be improved to enhance clarity, readability, and scientific rigor, and improve the overall paper.

Minors comments

Throughout the manuscript:

The English is understandable, but not highly polished. Many sentences are wordy and awkwardly structured, and some terms are misused. A professional language review is needed to improve fluency and scientific clarity.

Exemple L221. The authors wrote: "The ross and pathological examination". did they mean "The gross pathological examination"?

Many other places.

Exemple L364 “significantly reduction” should be corrected to “significant reduction.” A careful proofreading of the section for grammatical accuracy is recommended.

In the result presentation, the authors mention "significant" differences. These sentences should explicitly state the precise p-values and statistical tests.

Overall, and specifically in the discussion section:

Some sentences are complex and could benefit from restructuring to enhance readability. For example, the transition between the introduction of Nesprin1 and its connection to HF pathogenesis could be smoother.

Ensure that the argument follows a logical progression, from the established burden of HF to the novel contributions of this study, in the discussion section.

Major comments:

The authors suggest that Nesprin1 downregulation is causative, but this is not experimentally proven, unless I did not read correctly (authors did not use genetic knockdown or RNAi), wherease, the findings are correlational (i.e., Nesprin1 is reduced in heart failure). Would suggest the authors to clarify this limitation.

The Authors suggest that reduced Nesprin1 leads to ERK activation. Would you please elaborate with more mechanistic evidence?

While increased MDA and decreased SOD suggest oxidative stress, the study does not establish whether oxidative stress is the cause or consequence of Nesprin1 downregulation.

I understand the discussion highlights the significance of Nesprin1, however, it would be beneficial to include a comparison with other known mechanisms of HF progression. More explicit connections between previous research and the current findings could strengthen the justification for Nesprin1’s role.

I would suggest the authors to add more reference to prior studies when applicable) regarding the discussion on Nesprin1’s involvement in oxidative stress, nuclear homeostasis, and the ERK pathway.

Overall, the study is scientifically sound but needs improved language, better statistical transparency, and stronger mechanistic evidence to fully support its conclusions.

Major revisions are recommended to improve the manuscript’s clarity, presentation, and interpretation of findings.

Reviewer #2: Abstract:

1. BNP should be spelled out as the term was stated the first time in the article

2. CX43 and Nesprin 1 expression were both determined using immunofluorescence analysis, hence can be stated in one sentence.

3. BNP, CX43 and Nesprin 1 should be briefly introduced in the abstract.

4. Please state the cardiac parameters examined.

5. Any gene manipulation done before the conclusion made by stating that “This study elucidates the critical role of Nesprin1 in isoproterenol-induced……” ?

Introduction

The background and rationale were sufficiently addressed

Materials and Methods:

General comments: Technical details are not sufficient

Drugs and Chemicals

Catalog no. of the chemicals/products used were not stated

Establishment of Isoproterenol-Induced Heart Failure Model in Mice

Sex and Age of the animals were not stated

Cardiac Function Assessment

Specific name of the statistical test was not stated

Measurement of Body and Heart Weight

Clarify the timing of which the mice were anesthetized

The Biochemical Kits Detects The Oxidative Stress Indicators

Please simplify the demonstration of protein concentration calculation

Immunofluorescence Staining Protocol for Mouse Cardiac Tissue

The model of the microscope and the software were not stated

Western Blot Experimental Procedure

1. The catalog no and the company which RIPA buffer, phosphate and protease inhibitors were purchased from should be stated

2. Details of gel documentation system and densitometry analysis software should be stated

Results:

1. Sample size determination (animal numbers) was not demonstrated/explained

2. Western blot in Figure 2 was not labelled.

3. Specific statistical test for each assay was not stated clearly

4. Importantly knockdown of Nesprin 1 was not demonstrated and hence the data doesn’t support the stated results

Discussion:

The data provided doesn’t support the discussion as knockdown model of Nesprin 1 was not used

Declarations:

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Animal ethics approval no. was not stated in the main text

Availability of Data and Material:

While original western blots were provided, other minimal data sets were not included in the supplement information sheet

**********

what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review?  For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reviewer Comments PLOS ONE.pdf

pone.0354482.s003.pdf (69.5KB, pdf)
PLoS One. 2026 Aug 11;21(8):e0354482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0354482.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


19 Nov 2025

Dear Editor,

We sincerely thank you and the reviewers for valuable comments and the support extended to our manuscript. We deeply appreciate your dedication and professionalism throughout this process. In accordance with the guidelines, we have provided detailed responses to the reviewers' comments point by point below(Changes are marked in red in the manuscript).

Reviewer #1

Minor comment:

Comment 1: Throughout the manuscript:The English is understandable, but not highly polished. Many sentences are wordy and awkwardly structured, and some terms are misused. A professional language review is needed to improve fluency and scientific clarity.Exemple L221. The authors wrote: "The ross and pathological examination". did they mean "The gross pathological examination"?Many other places.Exemple L364 “significantly reduction” should be corrected to “significant reduction.” A careful proofreading of the section for grammatical accuracy is recommended.

Response 1:Thanks for your constructive feedback on our manuscript. We appreciate your careful assessment of the grammar and language issues. Each sentence has been carefully checked and revised to improve readability.The red indicates the modified text.

Comment 2: In the result presentation, the authors mention "significant" differences. These sentences should explicitly state the precise p-values and statistical tests.

Response 2:Thank you very much for your valuable suggestions. We have made changes to the original text according to your suggestions.

Comment 3: Overall, and specifically in the discussion section:Some sentences are complex and could benefit from restructuring to enhance readability. For example, the transition between the introduction of Nesprin1 and its connection to HF pathogenesis could be smoother.

Response 3: We feel great thanks for your professional review work on our article.We have made corresponding modifications to the discussion section according to your suggestions. You can see the specific modifications in the original text.

Comment 4: Ensure that the argument follows a logical progression, from the established burden of HF to the novel contributions of this study, in the discussion section.

Response 4:We sincerely thank you for your careful reading.In the discussion section, we first outlined the significant risks of heart failure and the necessity of conducting research on it. We then confirmed the successful construction of the heart failure mouse model by analyzing the basic physiological parameters, pathological staining, and cardiac color Doppler ultrasound results in mice. Next, by analyzing various pathological manifestations in heart failure mice, we explored potential directions for the role of Nesprin-1 in the disease process. Finally, we summarized the innovations and limitations of this study.

Major comments:

Comment 1: The authors suggest that Nesprin1 downregulation is causative, but this is not experimentally proven, unless I did not read correctly (authors did not use genetic knockdown or RNAi), wherease, the findings are correlational (i.e., Nesprin1 is reduced in heart failure). Would suggest the authors to clarify this limitation.

Response 1:Thank you for your valuable and practical suggestions. As you understand, this study has confirmed a series of pathological phenomena in heart failure mice with reduced Nesprin1 levels, which may be associated with the downregulation of Nesprin-1. However, due to certain objective reasons, this conclusion has not been experimentally verified. This limitation is addressed in the revised discussion. We will use additional techniques in future studies to further investigate this area.

Comment 2: The Authors suggest that reduced Nesprin1 leads to ERK activation. Would you please elaborate with more mechanistic evidence? I understand the discussion highlights the significance of Nesprin1, however, it would be beneficial to include a comparison with other known mechanisms of HF progression. More explicit connections between previous research and the current findings could strengthen the justification for Nesprin1’s role.I would suggest the authors to add more reference to prior studies when applicable) regarding the discussion on Nesprin1’s involvement in oxidative stress, nuclear homeostasis, and the ERK pathway.

Response 2: Sincerely thank you for your insights into the paper. I understand the rationality of your suggestion to add a comparison of Nesprin1 with other mechanisms of heart failure and a more detailed explanation of the mechanism. After careful discussion by the team, we believe that this study is the first exploratory work to reveal the expression changes of Nesprin1 in ISO-induced heart failure models and its association with nuclear homeostasis imbalance and oxidative stress. Maintaining the existing discussion framework will better highlight the original value of this new finding.Regarding the molecular mechanism of Nesprin1 down-regulation and ERK activation, this is indeed a question of great scientific value, but considering that this study mainly focuses on establishing phenotypic associations, detailed mechanism analysis will be the focus of our follow-up research using the gene knockout animal model we are building. Your valuable suggestions have pointed to important follow-up research directions for us, including systematic comparison of the relationship between Nesprin1 and other heart failure pathways, and in-depth analysis of the molecular mechanisms of its regulation of ERK pathways.

We earnestly hope that you will understand the limitations of the current research phase, and we commit to further exploring these key scientific questions in future work.

Comment 3: While increased MDA and decreased SOD suggest oxidative stress, the study does not establish whether oxidative stress is the cause or consequence of Nesprin1 downregulation.

Response 3:I sincerely appreciate this insightful comment. My data demonstrate that ISO-induced heart failure mice with Nesprin-1 downregulation exhibit increased MDA and decreased SOD activity, indicating enhanced oxidative stress. However, as the reviewer astutely noted, the current study cannot definitively determine whether oxidative stress drives or results from Nesprin-1 suppression.

I recognize that Nesprin-1’s role in cardiac pathology remains underexplored, with limited existing literature. Nevertheless, given heart failure’s clinical significance and prior evidence of Nesprin-1’s functional importance in other disease contexts, along with its myocardial-specific isoform expression patterns, this study was designed to investigate three key aspects: Nesprin-1’s expression profile in ISO-induced HF, its potential functional contributions to disease progression, and possible mechanistic pathways.

These findings establish an initial association between Nesprin-1 dysregulation and oxidative stress in HF, creating a foundation for future mechanistic studies. I am currently generating Nesprin-1 knockout mice to specifically examine the causal relationship between Nesprin-1 deficiency and oxidative stress, elucidate the involved molecular pathways, and characterize its precise regulatory role in HF pathogenesis. I look forward to sharing these more definitive results in future work.

Comment 4:Overall, the study is scientifically sound but needs improved language, better statistical transparency, and stronger mechanistic evidence to fully support its conclusions.

Response 4:Thank you for your valuable comments. I have made the corresponding changes.

Comment 5:Major revisions are recommended to improve the manuscript’s clarity, presentation, and interpretation of findings.

Response 5:Thank you very much for your valuable suggestions. In the original text, I have selected a clearer picture and modified the language expression and result explanation of the whole text to improve the readability of the article.

Reviewer #2:

Comment 1:Abstract:

1. BNP should be spelled out as the term was stated the first time in the article

2. CX43 and Nesprin 1 expression were both determined using immunofluorescence analysis, hence can be stated in one sentence.

3. BNP, CX43 and Nesprin 1 should be briefly introduced in the abstract.

4. Please state the cardiac parameters examined.

5. Any gene manipulation done before the conclusion made by stating that “This study elucidates the critical role of Nesprin1 in isoproterenol-induced……” ?

Response 1:Thank you very much for your suggestions and questions. Firstly, the issues with the wording in the abstract have been corrected in the original text. Secondly, regarding whether gene manipulation was performed, my response is that although gene mice were constructed, this experiment did not include this part. The primary goal of this study is to provide a research foundation for further studies on the specific mechanisms of Nesprin-1 in the development of heart failure. Therefore, no gene manipulation was conducted in this study.

Comment 2:Introduction

The background and rationale were sufficiently addressed

Response 2:I sincerely thank you for your full affirmation of the background and argumentation basis in the introduction of this study. I am very glad that the scientific basis and clinical relevance of this study have been clearly and effectively expounded.

Comment 3:Materials and Methods:

General comments: Technical details are not sufficient

Response 3:Thank you for your valuable suggestions. Under your guidance, I have modified the details of the materials and methods section in the article. See the red font for the specific content.

Comment 4:Drugs and Chemicals

Catalog no. of the chemicals/products used were not stated

Response 4:Thank you for pointing this out. I have added the catalogue number of the important chemicals/products in the relevant section.

Comment 5:Establishment of Isoproterenol-Induced Heart Failure Model in Mice

Sex and Age of the animals were not stated

Response 5:Thank you for your suggestion. In line 140 of the article, it has been stated that the animals used in this study are male C57BL/6 mice with a weight of 20-22g.

Comment 6:Cardiac Function Assessment

Specific name of the statistical test was not stated

Response 6:Thank you for your suggestion. The relevant testing methods have been explained in the last part of the methodology.

Comment 7:Measurement of Body and Heart Weight

Clarify the timing of which the mice were anesthetized

Response 7:Thank you for raising this concern. In this study, mouse body weight was measured using an electronic scale while the animals were conscious, thereby avoiding the effects of repeated anesthesia. All mice were euthanized 24 hours after the final administration, followed by cardiac tissue collection and weighing. No anesthetic agents were used during any body weight measurements throughout the study.

Comment 8:The Biochemical Kits Detects The Oxidative Stress Indicators

Please simplify the demonstration of protein concentration calculation

Response 8:Thank you! I have simplified the MDA/SOD calculation formula in the original text.

Comment 9:Immunofluorescence Staining Protocol for Mouse Cardiac Tissue

The model of the microscope and the software were not stated

Response 9:Thank you for your insightful comments on the manuscript.I have updated the microscope model and software used for immunofluorescence in this article.

Comment 10:Western Blot Experimental Procedure:1. The catalog no and the company which RIPA buffer, phosphate and protease inhibitors were purchased from should be stated. 2. Details of gel documentation system and densitometry analysis software should be stated

Response 10:Thank you for your very meaningful suggestion. According to your instructions, the relevant parts have been described in the section of Materials and Methods respectively.

Comment 11:Results:1. Sample size determination (animal numbers) was not demonstrated/explained2. Western blot in Figure 2 was not labelled.3. Specific statistical test for each assay was not stated clearly4. Importantly knockdown of Nesprin 1 was not demonstrated and hence the data doesn’t support the stated results.Discussion:The data provided doesn’t support the discussion as knockdown model of Nesprin 1 was not used

Response 11:I sincerely appreciate your valuable comments on our manuscript. We have carefully examined all the issues you raised and made corresponding revisions. Regarding the sample size, we have supplemented the figure legends in the Results section to clarify that the sample size meets statistical requirements. For the oversight in labeling Figure 2 Western Blot, we have re-examined the original data and improved the labeling of experimental groups, molecular weight markers, and internal reference protein bands.

In terms of statistical methods, we have added clarification that two-sample t-tests were used for normally distributed data (confirmed by Shapiro-Wilk test) and Mann-Whitney U tests for non-normally distributed data. We fully understand your concern regarding the validation of Nesprin 1 knockdown efficiency. This study primarily focuses on preliminary exploration of Nesprin-1 expression changes and their pathological significance in the ISO-induced heart failure model. We are currently developing Nesprin-1 knockout mouse models to enable more systematic mechanistic studies in the future.

The key findings of this study include: significant downregulation of Nesprin-1 expression in the ISO-induced heart failure model, accompanied by pathological phenomena such as nuclear homeostasis imbalance and aggravated oxidative stress, which may be related to ERK signaling pathway activation. We sincerely accept your suggestions, which are invaluable for improving the completeness of this research. While this study has certain limitations, it establishes an important foundation for subsequent mechanistic investigations. We are fully prepared to provide any additional materials as needed.

Comment 12:Declarations:Ethics approval and consent to participate;Animal ethics approval no. was not stated in the main text;Availability of Data and Material:While original western blots were provided, other minimal data sets were not included in the supplement information sheet

Response 12: I sincerely appreciate your valuable feedback regarding ethical approval and data accessibility in this paper. Your suggestions to enhance research transparency and reproducibility are of great importance to me. Concerning the animal ethics review, I have supplemented complete information in the "Materials and Methods" section: "All mice were housed in a Specific Pathogen-Free (SPF) facility at China's Three Gorges University (Yichang, Hubei Province). The experimental animal quality certification number is 42010200009428, and the experimental animal use permit number is 00305510. All procedures complied with international standards for laboratory animal care and use." Regarding data availability, although I have provided all Western blot raw images in the supplementary materials, I recognize the importance of additional data. The foundational datasets supporting key research findings have been systematically organized and are available to corresponding authors upon request. This clarification has been incorporated into the "Data Availability Statement" section of the paper. Thank you for your attention to these critical aspects of my work, and I hope this explanation addresses your concerns. If any other supplementary materials are required, I will provide them at any time.

We have carefully considered all the comments and suggestions and have made the necessary revisions to improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. We hope that the changes we've made address the concerns raised by the reviewers to your satisfaction. Simultaneously, we are also eagerly looking forward to your reply.

Thank you once again for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Teng Lin

Department of Cardiology/Yichang centre people's hospital

The First College of China Three Gorges University

No.183, Yiling Road, Yichang, 443003, China

Email:tenglin@ctgu.edu.cn

Decision Letter 1

Wei Hsum Yap

19 Dec 2025

Dear Dr. Teng,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

While the authors have made some amendments in the revision, there are still several major flaws in the manuscript which require attention:

1. The ethics application and review board for the project was not included, specifically the institutional ethics review board (IACUC) was not mentioned. In addition, there were discrepancy and confusion in the information provided: the manuscript indicated that The experimental animal quality certification number is 42010200009428 and The experimental animal use permit number is 00305510, but the information provided to the journal submission was as below: The animal review number is 2023660H. All experimental animals were euthanized after being anesthetized with anesthetic drugs. Please review and revise accordingly.

2. The manuscript have not addressed to the comments from both reviewers to indicate that reduced expression of Nesprin-1 is an observation, not a causative outcome from the ISO-induced HF model. Though the authors have included a paragraph indicating the limitations, there were multiple occurrences where the sentences constructed led to misinterpretation and overclaim. Please review and revise.

3. There were numerous grammar errors noted in the manuscript, suggest proofreading the article for enhanced clarity.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 02 2026 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Wei Hsum Yap

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Journal Requirements:

If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

Additional Editor Comments:

While the authors have made some amendments in the revision, there are still several major flaws in the manuscript which require attention:

1. The ethics application and review board for the project was not included, specifically the institutional ethics review board (IACUC) was not mentioned. In addition, there were discrepancy and confusion in the information provided: the manuscript indicated that The experimental animal quality certification number is 42010200009428 and The experimental animal use permit number is 00305510, but the information provided to the journal submission was as below: The animal review number is 2023660H. All experimental animals were euthanized after being anesthetized with anesthetic drugs. Please review and revise accordingly.

2. The manuscript have not addressed to the comments from both reviewers to indicate that reduced expression of Nesprin-1 is an observation, not a causative outcome from the ISO-induced HF model. Though the authors have included a paragraph indicating the limitations, there were multiple occurrences where the sentences constructed led to misinterpretation and overclaim. Please review and revise.

3. There were numerous grammar errors noted in the manuscript, suggest proofreading the article for enhanced clarity.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

To ensure your figures meet our technical requirements, please review our figure guidelines: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures

You may also use PLOS’s free figure tool, NAAS, to help you prepare publication quality figures: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-tools-for-figure-preparation.

NAAS will assess whether your figures meet our technical requirements by comparing each figure against our figure specifications.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-25-08527_R1.pdf

pone.0354482.s004.pdf (10.2MB, pdf)
PLoS One. 2026 Aug 11;21(8):e0354482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0354482.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 2


20 Apr 2026

Response to Editorial Office Requests

Manuscript ID: PONE-D-25-08527R2

Title: Exploring the Role of Nesprin-1 in Isoproterenol-Induced Heart Failure: Insights into Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Implications

Dear Editor,

Thank you for the opportunity to revise our manuscript to meet PLOS ONE’s submission requirements. We have carefully addressed all the issues raised in your email. Please find our point-by-point responses below.

Point 1: Please upload a Response to Reviewers letter which should include a point by point response to each of the points made by the Editor and / or Reviewers.

Response: We have prepared and uploaded this point-by-point response letter as requested.

Reviewer #1

Minor comment:

Comment 1: Throughout the manuscript:The English is understandable, but not highly polished. Many sentences are wordy and awkwardly structured, and some terms are misused. A professional language review is needed to improve fluency and scientific clarity.Exemple L221. The authors wrote: "The ross and pathological examination". did they mean "The gross pathological examination"?Many other places.Exemple L364 “significantly reduction” should be corrected to “significant reduction.” A careful proofreading of the section for grammatical accuracy is recommended.

Response 1:Thanks for your constructive feedback on our manuscript. We appreciate your careful assessment of the grammar and language issues. Each sentence has been carefully checked and revised to improve readability.The red indicates the modified text.

Comment 2: In the result presentation, the authors mention "significant" differences. These sentences should explicitly state the precise p-values and statistical tests.

Response 2:Thank you very much for your valuable suggestions. We have made changes to the original text according to your suggestions.

Comment 3: Overall, and specifically in the discussion section:Some sentences are complex and could benefit from restructuring to enhance readability. For example, the transition between the introduction of Nesprin1 and its connection to HF pathogenesis could be smoother.

Response 3: We feel great thanks for your professional review work on our article.We have made corresponding modifications to the discussion section according to your suggestions. You can see the specific modifications in the original text.

Comment 4: Ensure that the argument follows a logical progression, from the established burden of HF to the novel contributions of this study, in the discussion section.

Response 4:We sincerely thank you for your careful reading.In the discussion section, we first outlined the significant risks of heart failure and the necessity of conducting research on it. We then confirmed the successful construction of the heart failure mouse model by analyzing the basic physiological parameters, pathological staining, and cardiac color Doppler ultrasound results in mice. Next, by analyzing various pathological manifestations in heart failure mice, we explored potential directions for the role of Nesprin-1 in the disease process. Finally, we summarized the innovations and limitations of this study.

Major comments:

Comment 1: The authors suggest that Nesprin1 downregulation is causative, but this is not experimentally proven, unless I did not read correctly (authors did not use genetic knockdown or RNAi), wherease, the findings are correlational (i.e., Nesprin1 is reduced in heart failure). Would suggest the authors to clarify this limitation.

Response 1:Thank you for your valuable and practical suggestions. As you understand, this study has confirmed a series of pathological phenomena in heart failure mice with reduced Nesprin1 levels, which may be associated with the downregulation of Nesprin-1. However, due to certain objective reasons, this conclusion has not been experimentally verified. This limitation is addressed in the revised discussion. We will use additional techniques in future studies to further investigate this area.

Comment 2: The Authors suggest that reduced Nesprin1 leads to ERK activation. Would you please elaborate with more mechanistic evidence? I understand the discussion highlights the significance of Nesprin1, however, it would be beneficial to include a comparison with other known mechanisms of HF progression. More explicit connections between previous research and the current findings could strengthen the justification for Nesprin1’s role.I would suggest the authors to add more reference to prior studies when applicable) regarding the discussion on Nesprin1’s involvement in oxidative stress, nuclear homeostasis, and the ERK pathway.

Response 2: Sincerely thank you for your insights into the paper. I understand the rationality of your suggestion to add a comparison of Nesprin1 with other mechanisms of heart failure and a more detailed explanation of the mechanism. After careful discussion by the team, we believe that this study is the first exploratory work to reveal the expression changes of Nesprin1 in ISO-induced heart failure models and its association with nuclear homeostasis imbalance and oxidative stress. Maintaining the existing discussion framework will better highlight the original value of this new finding.Regarding the molecular mechanism of Nesprin1 down-regulation and ERK activation, this is indeed a question of great scientific value, but considering that this study mainly focuses on establishing phenotypic associations, detailed mechanism analysis will be the focus of our follow-up research using the gene knockout animal model we are building. Your valuable suggestions have pointed to important follow-up research directions for us, including systematic comparison of the relationship between Nesprin1 and other heart failure pathways, and in-depth analysis of the molecular mechanisms of its regulation of ERK pathways.

We earnestly hope that you will understand the limitations of the current research phase, and we commit to further exploring these key scientific questions in future work.

Comment 3: While increased MDA and decreased SOD suggest oxidative stress, the study does not establish whether oxidative stress is the cause or consequence of Nesprin1 downregulation.

Response 3:I sincerely appreciate this insightful comment. My data demonstrate that ISO-induced heart failure mice with Nesprin-1 downregulation exhibit increased MDA and decreased SOD activity, indicating enhanced oxidative stress. However, as the reviewer astutely noted, the current study cannot definitively determine whether oxidative stress drives or results from Nesprin-1 suppression.

I recognize that Nesprin-1’s role in cardiac pathology remains underexplored, with limited existing literature. Nevertheless, given heart failure’s clinical significance and prior evidence of Nesprin-1’s functional importance in other disease contexts, along with its myocardial-specific isoform expression patterns, this study was designed to investigate three key aspects: Nesprin-1’s expression profile in ISO-induced HF, its potential functional contributions to disease progression, and possible mechanistic pathways.

These findings establish an initial association between Nesprin-1 dysregulation and oxidative stress in HF, creating a foundation for future mechanistic studies. I am currently generating Nesprin-1 knockout mice to specifically examine the causal relationship between Nesprin-1 deficiency and oxidative stress, elucidate the involved molecular pathways, and characterize its precise regulatory role in HF pathogenesis. I look forward to sharing these more definitive results in future work.

Comment 4:Overall, the study is scientifically sound but needs improved language, better statistical transparency, and stronger mechanistic evidence to fully support its conclusions.

Response 4:Thank you for your valuable comments. I have made the corresponding changes.

Comment 5:Major revisions are recommended to improve the manuscript’s clarity, presentation, and interpretation of findings.

Response 5:Thank you very much for your valuable suggestions. In the original text, I have selected a clearer picture and modified the language expression and result explanation of the whole text to improve the readability of the article.

Reviewer #2:

Comment 1:Abstract:

1. BNP should be spelled out as the term was stated the first time in the article

2. CX43 and Nesprin 1 expression were both determined using immunofluorescence analysis, hence can be stated in one sentence.

3. BNP, CX43 and Nesprin 1 should be briefly introduced in the abstract.

4. Please state the cardiac parameters examined.

5. Any gene manipulation done before the conclusion made by stating that “This study elucidates the critical role of Nesprin1 in isoproterenol-induced……” ?

Response 1:Thank you very much for your suggestions and questions. Firstly, the issues with the wording in the abstract have been corrected in the original text. Secondly, regarding whether gene manipulation was performed, my response is that although gene mice were constructed, this experiment did not include this part. The primary goal of this study is to provide a research foundation for further studies on the specific mechanisms of Nesprin-1 in the development of heart failure. Therefore, no gene manipulation was conducted in this study.

Comment 2:Introduction

The background and rationale were sufficiently addressed

Response 2:I sincerely thank you for your full affirmation of the background and argumentation basis in the introduction of this study. I am very glad that the scientific basis and clinical relevance of this study have been clearly and effectively expounded.

Comment 3:Materials and Methods:

General comments: Technical details are not sufficient

Response 3:Thank you for your valuable suggestions. Under your guidance, I have modified the details of the materials and methods section in the article. See the red font for the specific content.

Comment 4:Drugs and Chemicals

Catalog no. of the chemicals/products used were not stated

Response 4:Thank you for pointing this out. I have added the catalogue number of the important chemicals/products in the relevant section.

Comment 5:Establishment of Isoproterenol-Induced Heart Failure Model in Mice

Sex and Age of the animals were not stated

Response 5:Thank you for your suggestion. In line 140 of the article, it has been stated that the animals used in this study are male C57BL/6 mice with a weight of 20-22g.

Comment 6:Cardiac Function Assessment

Specific name of the statistical test was not stated

Response 6:Thank you for your suggestion. The relevant testing methods have been explained in the last part of the methodology.

Comment 7:Measurement of Body and Heart Weight

Clarify the timing of which the mice were anesthetized

Response 7:Thank you for raising this concern. In this study, mouse body weight was measured using an electronic scale while the animals were conscious, thereby avoiding the effects of repeated anesthesia. All mice were euthanized 24 hours after the final administration, followed by cardiac tissue collection and weighing. No anesthetic agents were used during any body weight measurements throughout the study.

Comment 8:The Biochemical Kits Detects The Oxidative Stress Indicators

Please simplify the demonstration of protein concentration calculation

Response 8:Thank you! I have simplified the MDA/SOD calculation formula in the original text.

Comment 9:Immunofluorescence Staining Protocol for Mouse Cardiac Tissue

The model of the microscope and the software were not stated

Response 9:Thank you for your insightful comments on the manuscript.I have updated the microscope model and software used for immunofluorescence in this article.

Comment 10:Western Blot Experimental Procedure:1. The catalog no and the company which RIPA buffer, phosphate and protease inhibitors were purchased from should be stated. 2. Details of gel documentation system and densitometry analysis software should be stated

Response 10:Thank you for your very meaningful suggestion. According to your instructions, the relevant parts have been described in the section of Materials and Methods respectively.

Comment 11:Results:1. Sample size determination (animal numbers) was not demonstrated/explained2. Western blot in Figure 2 was not labelled.3. Specific statistical test for each assay was not stated clearly4. Importantly knockdown of Nesprin 1 was not demonstrated and hence the data doesn’t support the stated results.Discussion:The data provided doesn’t support the discussion as knockdown model of Nesprin 1 was not used

Response 11:I sincerely appreciate your valuable comments on our manuscript. We have carefully examined all the issues you raised and made corresponding revisions. Regarding the sample size, we have supplemented the figure legends in the Results section to clarify that the sample size meets statistical requirements. For the oversight in labeling Figure 2 Western Blot, we have re-examined the original data and improved the labeling of experimental groups, molecular weight markers, and internal reference protein bands.

In terms of statistical methods, we have added clarification that two-sample t-tests were used for normally distributed data (confirmed by Shapiro-Wilk test) and Mann-Whitney U tests for non-normally distributed data. We fully understand your concern regarding the validation of Nesprin 1 knockdown efficiency. This study primarily focuses on preliminary exploration of Nesprin-1 expression changes and their pathological significance in the ISO-induced heart failure model. We are currently developing Nesprin-1 knockout mouse models to enable more systematic mechanistic studies in the future.

The key findings of this study include: significant downregulation of Nesprin-1 expression in the ISO-induced heart failure model, accompanied by pathological phenomena such as nuclear homeostasis imbalance and aggravated oxidative stress, which may be related to ERK signaling pathway activation. We sincerely accept your suggestions, which are invaluable for improving the completeness of this research. While this study has certain limitations, it establishes an important foundation for subsequent mechanistic investigations. We are fully prepared to provide any additional materials as needed.

Comment 12:Declarations:Ethics approval and consent to participate;Animal ethics approval no. was not stated in the main text;Availability of Data and Material:While original western blots were provided, other minimal data sets were not included in the supplement information sheet

Response 12: I sincerely appreciate your valuable feedback regarding ethical approval and data accessibility in this paper. Your suggestions to enhance research transparency and reproducibility are of great importance to me. Concerning the animal ethics review, I have supplemented complete information in the "Materials and Methods" section: "All mice were housed in a Specific Pathogen-Free (SPF) facility at China's Three Gorges University (Yichang, Hubei Province). The experimental animal quality certification number is 42010200009428, and the experimental animal use permit number is 00305510. All procedures complied with international standards for laboratory animal care and use." Regarding data availability, although I have provided all Western blot raw images in the supplementary materials, I recognize the importance of additional data. The foundational datasets supporting key research findings have been systematically organized and are available to corresponding authors upon request. This clarification has been incorporated into the "Data Availability Statement" section of the paper. Thank you for your attention to these critical aspects of my work, and I hope this explanation addresses your concerns. If any other supplementary materials are required, I will provide them at any time.

Point 2: Your abstract cannot contain citations. Please remove any existing citations from the abstract section. You may only include citations in the body text of the manuscript, and please ensure that they remain in ascending numerical order on first mention.

Response: We have thoroughly checked the manuscript and completely removed all citations from th

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0354482.s005.docx (27.5KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Wei Hsum Yap

5 May 2026

Dear Dr. Teng,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 19 2026 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

As the corresponding author, your ORCID iD is verified in the submission system and will appear in the published article. PLOS supports the use of ORCID, and we encourage all coauthors to register for an ORCID iD and use it as well. Please encourage your coauthors to verify their ORCID iD within the submission system before final acceptance, as unverified ORCID iDs will not appear in the published article. Only  the individual author can complete the verification step; PLOS staff cannot  verify ORCID iDs on behalf of authors.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Wei Hsum Yap

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Journal Requirements:

If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

The authors have addressed the mechanistic weakness or lack of causality limitations in their results analysis and discussion. Nevertheless, the manuscript still requires professional language editing where there are confusion in the subtitles of the results section, as well as the revised sections in the discussion (duplications and repetition in the limitations of current study). This has resulted in difficulty in following through the manuscript flow and scientific concepts. Please have the manuscript edited by a professional English language editing service prior to resubmission.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

To ensure your figures meet our technical requirements, please review our figure guidelines: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures

You may also use PLOS’s free figure tool, NAAS, to help you prepare publication quality figures: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-tools-for-figure-preparation.

NAAS will assess whether your figures meet our technical requirements by comparing each figure against our figure specifications.

PLoS One. 2026 Aug 11;21(8):e0354482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0354482.r006

Author response to Decision Letter 3


19 Jun 2026

Dear Editor,

Thank you for providing us with the opportunity to resubmit our manuscript titled "Exploring the Role of Nesprin-1 in Isoproterenol-Induced Heart Failure: Insights into Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Implications" (Manuscript ID: PONE-D-25-08527R2).

We have carefully addressed all the technical and language concerns raised in the previous editorial correspondence. In addition to the requested revisions, we would like to clarify three specific administrative changes:

1. Reinstatement of the Manuscript

First, we sincerely apologize for a technical error during the submission process. The "Decline to Resubmit" option was accidentally selected. We have since reinstated the submission and wish to confirm our continued commitment to the publication process in PLOS ONE. We apologize for any confusion this may have caused the editorial office.

2. Update to Institutional Affiliation

The nomenclature of the primary institution has been updated to " Department of Cardiology, The First College of Clinical Medical Science, China Three Gorges University & Yichang Central People's Hospital, Yichang, China". This change was made to strictly adhere to the latest official standardized naming conventions issued by our university for all newly published research.

3. Response to Editorial and Language Comments

3.1. "The manuscript still requires professional language editing..."

Response: We entirely agree. Prior to this resubmission, the entire manuscript underwent comprehensive professional English language editing. We have corrected grammatical errors, resolved tense inconsistencies particularly in the Methods section , fixed plural/singular misuses, and eliminated awkward phrasing to ensure scientific concepts are communicated clearly and accurately.

3.2. "...where there are confusion in the subtitles of the results section..."

Response: Thank you for pointing this out. We reviewed the subtitles in the Results section and found that their formatting was indeed inconsistent. We have now standardized all subtitles in the Results section into concise, unified noun phrases to improve readability and structural flow.

3.3. "...as well as the revised sections in the discussion (duplications and repetition in the limitations of current study). This has resulted in difficulty in following through the manuscript flow and scientific concepts."

Response: We apologize for the redundancy in our previous draft. We have carefully reviewed and rewritten the Discussion section, with a specific focus on the "Limitations" paragraph. We removed the repetitive statements regarding the lack of direct causality and the observational nature of the study. The revised Discussion is now more concise, and the logical flow connecting Nesprin-1 downregulation to specific pathological features has been significantly improved. Sentence fragments and structural redundancies have been fully resolved.

4. Response to Journal Requirements:

4.1. Reference List Review:

Response: As requested, we have thoroughly reviewed our reference list. We confirm that the reference list is complete, properly formatted, and correct. We have verified that none of the cited papers have been retracted.

4.2. Figure Guidelines Check:

Response: We have reviewed all figures against the journal's technical requirements using the provided guidelines and the PLOS figure tool (NAAS). All figures have been checked to ensure they meet the publication quality standards regarding resolution, format, and legibility.

We hope that these comprehensive revisions have satisfactorily addressed your concerns and that the manuscript is now suitable for publication in your journal. Thank you again for your time and continuous support.

5. Update to Authorship

We have added one co-author, mengpan liu, to the manuscript. This individual provided significant intellectual contributions during this revision stage, particularly in the extensive professional language editing, structural reorganization of the Results and Discussion sections, and critical review of the final version. Crucially, we wish to state that all original authors have reached a unanimous consensus regarding this addition. There are no disputes over authorship. If required by the Editorial Office, we are prepared to provide a formal document signed by all authors to verify this agreement.

Best regards,

Dr. Teng Lin

Department of Cardiology, Yichang Central People's Hospital

College of Basic Medical Sciences, China Three Gorges University

E-mail: tenglin@ctgu.edu.cn

Attachment

Submitted filename: response.docx

pone.0354482.s006.docx (16.7KB, docx)

Decision Letter 3

Wei Hsum Yap

8 Jul 2026

Exploring the Role of Nesprin1 in Isoproterenol-Induced Heart Failure�Insights into Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Implications

PONE-D-25-08527R3

Dear Dr. Teng,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Wei Hsum Yap

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Wei Hsum Yap

PONE-D-25-08527R3

PLOS One

Dear Dr. Teng,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS One. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Wei Hsum Yap

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Original uncropped western blot images.

    (ZIP)

    pone.0354482.s001.zip (844.9KB, zip)
    S1 Table. Raw data of mouse body weight.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0354482.s002.xlsx (13.6KB, xlsx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewer Comments PLOS ONE.pdf

    pone.0354482.s003.pdf (69.5KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-25-08527_R1.pdf

    pone.0354482.s004.pdf (10.2MB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0354482.s005.docx (27.5KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: response.docx

    pone.0354482.s006.docx (16.7KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES