Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 May 14;115(9):1953–1958. doi: 10.1111/apa.70591

Cerebral Oxygen Saturation During Less‐Invasive Surfactant Administration Using a High‐Pressure CPAP Respiratory Support Delivery Room Protocol—A Cohort Study

Jan Trieschmann 1,✉, Anika Verhoef 1, Angela Kribs 1, Katrin Mehler 1, Benjamin Kuehne 1, André Oberthuer 1
PMCID: PMC13460713  PMID: 42136053

ABSTRACT

Aim

To describe changes in peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and regional cerebral oxygenation (rcSO2) during less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) in a high‐level continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) respiratory support delivery room protocol in very low birth weight infants (VLBW).

Methods

This is a secondary analysis of data from the randomized‐controlled Extrauterine Placental Transfusion in Resuscitation of VLBW infants (EXPLAIN) trial. In total, 38 patients were included. The pressure and changes in heart rate, SpO2 and rcSO2 were assessed 10 min before until 10 min after the LISA procedure. Basic outcome data for the patient collective were collected.

Results

Mean gestational age was 27 + 6 weeks (±15 days), and mean birth weight was 995.8 g (±298.8). All infants were eligible for LISA. During LISA, heart rate, SpO2 and rcSO2 decreased significantly (mean change 32.4 (± 27.5) bpm, −14.5 (± 10.7) % and −11.9 (± 9.1) %, respectively; all p < 0.001). Moreover, two infants developed a pneumothorax and three infants required endotracheal intubation within 72 h after birth.

Conclusions

With the approach of a high‐level CPAP setting, we observed transient decreases in heart rate and oxygenation levels during LISA. The magnitude of these decreases was within the expected or potentially favourable range compared with prior studies.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT03916159

Keywords: bronchopulmonary dysplasia, lung recruitment, preterm infant, respiratory distress syndrome, surfactant

Summary

This study evaluated high‐level continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during less invasive surfactant administration using a Benveniste valve as a CPAP generator in very low birth weight infants. Significant transient decreases in heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation and regional cerebral oxygenation were observed but remained within expected or favourable ranges compared with previous studies. Also low rates of intubation and pneumothoraxes indicate the safety of this approach.


Abbreviations

BPD

bronchopulmonary dysplasia

CPAP

continuous positive airway pressure

FRC

functional residual capacity

LISA

less invasive surfactant application

MAP

mean airway pressure

PEEP

positive end expiratory pressure

rcSO2

regional cerebral oxygen saturation

RDS

respiratory distress syndrome

SpO2

peripheral oxygen saturation

VLBW

very low birth weight

1. Introduction

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) remains a major cause of morbidity in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) in spontaneous breathing infants on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) support has been adopted as first‐line therapy for RDS, improving short‐ and long‐term outcomes [1]. Surfactant administration, irrespective of the technique, represents a period of physiological instability. Several studies have reported transient drops in peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and cerebral regional oxygen saturation (rcSO2) during less invasive surfactant administration [2, 3, 4], raising questions about how best to optimize lung volume and respiratory drive before and during LISA in order to minimize fluctuations in systemic and cerebral oxygen delivery that could affect the long‐term neurodevelopment [5, 6, 7].

During initial lung recruitment and LISA, current guidelines recommend the use of CPAP with pressure levels at levels of initially 6 cm H2O [1]. However, experimental data suggest that a high‐pressure approach with a gradual increase in pressure in the range of 7–25 cmH2O may lead to improved functional residual capacity (FRC) without an increase of adverse side effects [8, 9]. Preliminary small clinical studies have reported that a high‐level CPAP approach facilitates postnatal adaptation in VLBW infants [10, 11], but large trials are still ongoing [12]. To date, though, high‐level CPAP concepts have mainly been evaluated in the context of respiratory and cardiovascular stabilization during foetal to neonatal transition and the impact of high‐level CPAP on subsequent procedures such as LISA, particularly with respect to SpO2 and rcSO2 dynamics, has not been systematically studied.

This observational study therefore aimed to investigate the effects of a high‐level CPAP approach during LISA on SpO2 and rcSO2 in VLBW infants. The present study reports on prespecified secondary outcomes from the Extrauterine Placental Transfusion in Resuscitation of Very Low Birth Weight Infants (EXPLAIN) study.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Side and Recruitment

This study presents an analysis of prespecified secondary outcome data from infants enrolled in the EXPLAIN study, a single‐centre, randomized controlled trial conducted at the University Hospital of Cologne, Germany, between 2019 and 2021 [13]. Infants born by caesarean delivery with birth weight < 1500 g and gestational age > 23 + 6 weeks of gestation were eligible for the EXPLAIN trial. The exclusion criteria for the primary study included vaginal delivery; foetal or maternal risks; placental abruption or placenta previa with haemorrhage; placental anomalies; monochorionic multiples; and congenital anomalies after discharge. All study data were collected from maternal and infant medical records and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at the University of Cologne. REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) is a secure, web‐based software platform designed to support data capture for research studies. This article follows the current Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guidelines.

2.2. Procedures

After Caesarean delivery, infants were transferred to the resuscitation unit, where neonatal staff supported the infant's transition essentially as described by Mehler et al. [11]. CPAP was provided via face mask with a variable flow CPAP device (Benveniste valve, Dameca, Copenhagen, Denmark) [14, 15]. FiO2 was initially set in the range of 0.21–0.30 in infants less than 28 weeks' gestational age, and a gas flow of 14 L/min was used resulting in a pressure of approximately 8–10 cm H2O. Depending on the infants' breathing efforts, heart rate and SpO2, gas flow was increased every 30 s by 2 L/min to a maximum of 22 L/min, resulting in a maximum pressure of approximately 30 cmH2O [13]. Supplemental oxygen was adjusted according to SpO2 targets based on the reference ranges reported by Dawson et al. [16]. After the primary stabilization, the CPAP interface was switched from the face mask to a nasopharyngeal tube and when eupnoeic spontaneous breathing was established, the flow was reduced stepwise. Caffeine citrate was administered at a dose of 20 mg/kg body weight after establishing peripheral venous access [17]. The LISA procedure was performed on stable and spontaneous breathing infants when pre‐defined criteria were met (Silverman score > 5 or FiO2 > 0.3 or > 14 L of gas flow, corresponding to a pressure of approximately 12 cm H2O). Surfactant (CUROSURF, Chiesi Pharmaceuticals Parma, Italy) was applied with 200 mg/kg body weight by laryngoscopy with a specific catheter (LISACath, Chiesi, Parma, Italy or surfcath, Vygon, Aachen, Germany) directly into the trachea [11]. In case of instability FiO2 and flow were increased. Prior to the LISA procedure, all infants were manually held in a facilitated tucking position by a nurse for several minutes and were kept in this position during LISA. In addition, non‐nutritive sucking on a swab with 20% glucose was performed as a non‐pharmacological measure in some infants [18]. A few infants received 0.5–1.0 mg/kg of ketamine as an analgesic and sedative measure prior to the LISA procedure. The indication for ketamine was determined individually at the discretion of the attending neonatologist orientating at the COMFORTneo score [19].

2.3. Data Collection

SpO2 and heart rate were measured with a Masimo 7 SET pulse‐oximeter (Masimo Radical, Masimo Corporation, Irvine, California, USA). Cerebral oxygenation was measured by near‐infrared spectroscopy (FORESIGHT, Casmed, Branford, Connecticut, USA), with sensors placed on infants' foreheads after transferring to a resuscitation bed. Regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rcSO2) was recorded synchronously with cardiorespiratory parameters. These data and respiratory rate and airway pressure were recorded with the New Life Box ALD resuscitation monitor (Advanced Life Diagnostics, Weener, Germany) with 200 Hz. The data was analyzed in combination with a synchronized video of the procedure to detect relevant intervention. Every 30 s, the values were averaged over an interval of 10 s and checked for artefacts. The onset of the successful laryngoscopy for the surfactant administration via LISA was determined as time zero. Small for gestational age (SGA) was defined as birth weight below the 10th percentile. IVH was staged according to the criteria of Papile et al. [20]. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia was categorized according to the definition of Walsh et al. [21].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh, Version 30/31 (IBM Corp, New York, USA). Data are presented as mean and standard deviation (SD), as median and interquartile range (IQR), or absolute and relative frequencies. The changes of the parameters were compared to the baseline before the procedure. Because the data did not show a normal distribution, the Wilcoxon rank‐sum test was used for paired comparisons. A two‐tailed p‐value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. No sample size calculation was performed because this study used data for predefined secondary outcome.

2.5. Ethics

The EXPLAIN study was approved by the local ethics committee of the medical faculty of the University of Cologne (18–232). Parents of all enrolled infants provided verbal and written informed consent prior to participation. The study was registered in clinicalTrials.gov (NCT03916159).

3. Results

A total of 38 infants from the original trial had complete recordings of cardiorespiratory function monitoring and were included in the analysis (Figure 1). Out of these 38 patients, 19 were female and 19 were male; the mean (± standard deviation [SD]) gestational age was 27 + 6 weeks (±15 days); the average weight was 995.8 (±298.8) g. Intravenous Caffeine was given within a mean of 18.8 (± 5.6) minutes after birth. LISA was performed at a mean of 41.8 (± 9.5) minutes after birth, with an average of 73.3 (± 25.4) seconds from the beginning of the laryngoscopy until the completed application.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Flowchart patient recruitment.

Following LISA, significant changes were observed in all measured vital parameters. Heart rate decreased from baseline (mean over the 10 min prior to successful surfactant administration) of 166.2 (± 14.1) bpm to a mean minimum of 133.8 (± 28.5) bpm, corresponding to a mean reduction of 32.4 (± 27.5) bpm (p < 0.001). SpO2 declined from a mean of 91.4 (± 3.8) % at baseline to a nadir mean of 77.0 (± 11.3) % at the minimal value, representing a mean decrease of 14.5 (± 10.7) % (p < 0.001). Regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rcSO2) similarly decreased from a mean of 84.0 (± 5.3) % to 72.1 (± 10.1) %, with a mean decline of 11.9 (± 9.1) % (p < 0.001) (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Data presented as means and 95% CIs. X‐axis: Minutes before/after the intervention. (A) Heart rate in beats per minute. (B) Peripheral oxygenation (SpO2) in % (C) Cerebral oxygen saturation (rcSO2) in % (D) FiO2.

In 25 infants (65.8%) LISA was successful on the first attempt. In 8 infants (21.0%) two attempts, and in 4 infants (10.5%), three attempts were necessary. Ketamine was administered in 4 infants (10.5%). In the delivery room, no intubation was necessary; within the first 72 h, three patients required invasive mechanical ventilation (7.9%). Pneumothoraxes occurred in two patients (5.3%) of whom only one required drainage (2.6%) with no pneumothoraxes in the first 24 h. Further basic clinical outcomes are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Patient data and basic outcome.

Categories
Gestational age, mean (± SD) 27 + 6 weeks (±15)
Sex
Female, n (%) 19 (50%)
Male, n (%) 19 (50%)
Birth weight, mean (± SD) 995.8 g (±298.8)
Apgar
1 min, median (IQR) 6 (5 to 7)
5 min, median (IQR) 8 (7 to 8)
10 min, median (IQR) 8 (8 to 9)
Intubation, n (%) 8 (21.1%)
Delivery room (%) 0 (0%)
Within first 72 h, (%) 3 (7.9%)
Survival, n (%) 37 (97.4%)
Pneumothoraxes, n (%) 2 (5.3%)
BPD
Mild, n (%) 22 (57.9%)
Moderate, n (%) 1 (2.6%)
Severe, n (%) 0 (0%)
FIP, n (%) 6 (15.8%)
NEC, n (%) 2 (5.3%)
IVH
I°, n (%) 7 (18.4%)
II°, n (%) 1 (2.6%)
III°, n (%) 1 (2.6%)
PVL, n (%) 1 (2.6%)
ROP (treatment necessary), n (%) 1 (2.6%)

Mean CPAP level measured between the Benveniste valve and the pharyngeal tube within 10 min prior to the surfactant administration until 10 min after the intervention was 23.7 (± 3.0) cmH2O. The mean FiO2 until the intervention was 30.4 (± 11.6)%, during the procedure, an increase of FiO2 was necessary with a mean maximal FiO2 of 42.1 (± 18.9)%. 10 min after the surfactant administration an average FiO2 of 27.7 (± 7.2)% was observed.

4. Discussion

The present study assessed the impact of LISA combined with non‐invasive high‐level CPAP support on systemic and cerebral oxygenation in VLBW infants. To our knowledge, this is the first study to specifically evaluate changes in peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and cerebral oxygenation (rcSO2) in this setting. We observed significant, transient decreases in both parameters, with mean declines of 14.5% in SpO2 and 11.9% in rcSO2.

A high‐level CPAP strategy with early lung recruitment may improve respiratory stability by promoting functional residual capacity and maintaining alveolar recruitment during LISA. This aligns with evidence suggesting that higher or dynamic MAP strategies are not associated with lung injury when excessive inflation pressures are avoided. In animal models, it has been shown that high inflation pressure was more injurious than dynamic pressure up to 15 cm H2O [22]. Similarly, a cohort study reported lower delivery room intubation rates with a dynamic pressure approach compared with positive pressure ventilation using pressure levels of 6–8 cm H2O [23]. In a retrospective cohort study, Kanaan et al. also described improved outcomes after implementing a dynamic pressure with sustained inflation protocol [24]. Furthermore, positive pressure ventilation has been shown to generate higher tidal volumes than spontaneous breathing [25]. Although the pressure levels in these studies were lower than the high‐level CPAP approach applied here, the overall data supports the concept that limiting high inflation pressures while using adequate pressure to sustain recruitment may reduce lung injury.

Supporting this, all infants included in this study were eligible for LISA and none required delivery room intubation. Furthermore, the outcome in the studied cohort was favourable (Table 1). Despite the use of high‐level CPAP, pneumothorax occurred in 5.3% of infants but without any pneumothoraxes in the delivery room, which is within the expected range reported in the literature [26]. These findings suggest that combining LISA with lung recruitment using dynamic high‐level CPAP may represent a safe and effective approach for initial respiratory stabilization and surfactant administration in VLBW infants [11].

Comparative studies assessing cerebral oxygenation during LISA performed with CPAP levels of 5–8 cm H20 have reported heterogeneous results. Bertini et al. described a pronounced decrease in rcSO2 of 30.1% (from 75.6% to 45.5%, n = 10) at pressure levels of 5–8 cm H2O, in a comparable cohort of preterm infants with mean gestational age of 30.2 weeks and a mean birth weight of 1399 g4. Hanke et al. reported that 30% of the infants experienced an rcSO2 drop of > 20%. However, no mean changes were reported here, limiting direct comparability [27]. In contrast, Li et al. observed a reduction in rcSO2 of only 4.9% (from 82.3% to 77.4%; n = 22) using binasal CPAP with pressure levels of 5–8 cm H2O in VLBW infants [3]. Notably, Li et al. quantified the change over the first 5 min after the procedure, whereas we assessed the maximal decrease over the full observation period.

In this context, the 11.9% decrease in rcSO2 observed in the present study lies within the mid‐range of values reported in the literature, suggesting that LISA under a high‐level CPAP approach is feasible without evidence of a greater decline in rcSO2 than reported in published cohorts. This is clinically relevant, as previous studies have demonstrated that decreases in rcSO2 are more frequently observed in patients with adverse outcomes, indicating a potential association between cerebral desaturation and impaired neurological or overall clinical prognosis [7]. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to study the clinical relevance of different CPAP levels during LISA.

With regard to sedation, there was no statistically significant difference in the magnitude of SpO2 or rcSO2 decline between infants receiving ketamine and those managed with non‐pharmacological measures. However, in several of those infants, oxygen saturation decreased prior to laryngoscopy because of transient hypo‐ or apnoeic episodes following drug administration. Given the small number of infants within expected or favourable ranges compared with previous studies receiving ketamine (n = 4), a robust analysis of post‐ketamine hypo/apnea was beyond the scope of this study and should be addressed in adequately powered future trials [28].

5. Strengths and Limitations

To our knowledge, this is the first study to report detailed systemic and cerebral oxygenation changes during LISA performed within a delivery room high‐level CPAP lung‐recruitment protocol in VLBW infants using continuously recorded physiologic parameters. Using this high‐level CPAP strategy, none of the 38 analyzed infants required delivery room intubation, which is notable given the degree of prematurity in this population.

However, there are relevant limitations: First, this study does not provide a direct within‐centre comparison but relates our local standard to data from other studies; therefore, differences in the clinical conditions (e.g., only Caesarean delivery), procedural details and equipment may have influenced the measured parameters. Second, the protocol did not standardize the operator performing LISA, and inter‐operator variability (including differences in experience) may have contributed to variability in the magnitude of measured parameter changes. Third, CPAP generation using the Benveniste valve may not be directly transferable to CPAP generation with T‐piece devices.

In addition, recordings of the LISA procedure were unavailable for 21 of 59 infants. Consequently, these infants were excluded from the present analysis because key procedural time points and measurement intervals could not be reliably ascertained retrospectively. Although baseline characteristics and neonatal outcomes of these infants appeared comparable, there is a potential for selection bias.

6. Conclusion

In summary, this study demonstrates that combining LISA with non‐invasive lung recruitment using a high‐level CPAP strategy is feasible and appears safe in VLBW infants. Although transient declines in heart rate, peripheral and cerebral oxygenation occurred during the procedure, the magnitude of these decreases was within the range of values reported in the literature. Importantly, the use of high‐level CPAP was associated with a low complication rate. No delivery room intubations were required, subsequent invasive ventilation during the hospital course was uncommon, and pneumothorax rates were at a level expected for the degree of prematurity of the infants. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to determine the impact of different CPAP level strategies during LISA on cerebral oxygenation, respiratory outcomes and long‐term neurodevelopment.

Author Contributions

Angela Kribs: conceptualization, investigation, supervision, project administration, writing – review and editing. Anika Verhoef: investigation, data curation, writing – review and editing, formal analysis. André Oberthuer: conceptualization, investigation, supervision, writing – review and editing, project administration. Katrin Mehler: investigation, writing – review and editing. Jan Trieschmann: investigation, writing – review and editing, writing – original draft, formal analysis, visualization. Benjamin Kuehne: conceptualization, investigation, writing – review and editing, supervision, project administration, methodology, funding acquisition, data curation, formal analysis, visualization, writing – original draft.

Funding

The study was supported in part by research grant no. 210‐01.01‐19 from the Marga and Walter Boll‐Stiftung (Kerpen, Germany) and by a research grant from the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (Deutsche Interdisziplinaere Vereinigung für Intensiv‐ und Notfallmedizin, Hamburg, Germany).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to the participating families; to the staff of the Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics of the University Hospital Cologne, Germany for their cooperation and contribution to the data collection; to the EXPLAIN research team members: Ms. Vogt‐Weigeldt and Mr. Bernhard Roth. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Sweet D. G., Carnielli V. P., Greisen G., et al., “European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome: 2025,” Neonatology (2026): 1–26, 10.1159/000551062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Wolfsberger C. H., Bruckner M., Schlatzer C., et al., “Surfactant Administration and Cerebral Oxygenation and Perfusion in Preterm Neonates—A Systematic Review of Literature,” Paediatric Respiratory Reviews 55 (2024): 59–67, 10.1016/j.prrv.2024.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Fang L. X., Ting C. T., Lian G. R., et al., “Effects of Different Surfactant Administrations on Cerebral Autoregulation in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome,” Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical Sciences 36, no. 6 (2016): 801–805, 10.1007/s11596-016-1665-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bertini G., Coviello C., Gozzini E., et al., “Change of Cerebral Oxygenation During Surfactant Treatment in Preterm Infants: “LISA” Versus “InSurE” Procedures,” Neuropediatrics 48 (2017): 98–103, 10.1055/s-0037-1598647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Poets C. F., Roberts R. S., Schmidt B., et al., “Association Between Intermittent Hypoxemia or Bradycardia and Late Death or Disability in Extremely Preterm Infants,” Journal of the American Medical Association 314, no. 6 (2015): 595–603, 10.1001/jama.2015.8841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Alderliesten T., van Bel F., van der Aa N. E., et al., “Low Cerebral Oxygenation in Preterm Infants Is Associated With Adverse Neurodevelopmental Outcome,” Journal of Pediatrics 207 (2019): 109–116, 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.11.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Wolfsberger C. H., Pichler‐Stachl E., Höller N., et al., “Cerebral Oxygenation Immediately After Birth and Long‐Term Outcome in Preterm Neonates—A Retrospective Analysis,” BMC Pediatrics 23 (2023): 145, 10.1186/s12887-023-03960-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Martherus T., Croughan M. K., Crossley K. J., et al., “Higher CPAP Levels Improve Functional Residual Capacity at Birth in Preterm Rabbits,” Pediatric Research 91, no. 7 (2022): 1686–1694, 10.1038/s41390-021-01647-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Cannata E. R., Crossley K. J., McGillick E. V., et al., “Optimising CPAP and Oxygen Levels to Support Spontaneous Breathing in Preterm Rabbits,” Pediatric Research 99, no. 4 (2025): 1–8, 10.1038/s41390-025-03802-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Martherus T., Oberthuer A., Dekker J., et al., “Comparison of Two Respiratory Support Strategies for Stabilization of Very Preterm Infants at Birth: A Matched‐Pairs Analysis,” Frontiers in Pediatrics 7 (2019): 7, 10.3389/fped.2019.00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Mehler K., Grimme J., Abele J., Huenseler C., Roth B., and Kribs A., “Outcome of Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborns After Introduction of a Revised Protocol to Assist Preterm Infants in Their Transition to Extrauterine Life,” Acta Paediatrica 101, no. 12 (2012): 1232–1239, 10.1111/apa.12015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Murdoch Childrens Research Institute , “Positive End‐Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) Levels During Resuscitation of Preterm Infants at Birth (The POLAR Trial),” (2025), https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04372953.
  • 13. Kuehne B., Grüttner B., Hellmich M., Hero B., Kribs A., and Oberthuer A., “Extrauterine Placental Perfusion and Oxygenation in Infants With Very Low Birth Weight: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” JAMA Network Open 6, no. 11 (2023): e2340597, 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.40597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Benveniste D. and Pedersen J. E. P., “A Valve Substitute With No Moving Parts, for Artificial Ventilation in Newborn and Small Infants,” British Journal of Anaesthesia 40, no. 6 (1968): 464–470, 10.1093/bja/40.6.464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Benveniste D., Berg O., and Poul Pedersen J. E., “A Technique for Delivery of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure to the Neonate,” Journal of Pediatrics 88, no. 6 (1976): 1015–1019, 10.1016/S0022-3476(76)81066-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Dawson J. A. and Morley C. J., “Monitoring Oxygen Saturation and Heart Rate in the Early Neonatal Period,” Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 15, no. 4 (2010): 203–207, 10.1016/j.siny.2010.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Katheria A. C., Sauberan J. B., Akotia D., Rich W., Durham J., and Finer N. N., “A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Early Versus Routine Caffeine in Extremely Premature Infants,” American Journal of Perinatology 32 (2015): 879–886, 10.1055/s-0034-1543981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Pichler K., Kuehne B., Dekker J., et al., “Assessment of Comfort During Less Invasive Surfactant Administration in Very Preterm Infants: A Multicenter Study,” Neonatology 120, no. 4 (2023): 473–481, 10.1159/000530333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. van Dijk M., Roofthooft D. W. E., Anand K. J. S., et al., “Taking up the Challenge of Measuring Prolonged Pain in (Premature) Neonates: The COMFORTneo Scale Seems Promising,” Clinical Journal of Pain 25, no. 7 (2009): 607–616, 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181a5b52a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Papile L. A., Burstein J., Burstein R., and Koffler H., “Incidence and Evolution of Subependymal and Intraventricular Hemorrhage: A Study of Infants With Birth Weights Less Than 1,500 Gm,” Journal of Pediatrics 92, no. 4 (1978): 529–534, 10.1016/S0022-3476(78)80282-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Walsh M. C., Yao Q., Gettner P., et al., “Impact of a Physiologic Definition on Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Rates,” Pediatrics 114, no. 5 (2004): 1305–1311, 10.1542/peds.2004-0204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Tingay D. G., Fatmous M., Kenna K., et al., “Inflating Pressure and Not Expiratory Pressure Initiates Lung Injury at Birth in Preterm Lambs,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 208, no. 5 (2023): 589–599, 10.1164/rccm.202301-0104OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Song S., Zhu Y., Li J., et al., “Individualized Dynamic PEEP (dynPEEP) Versus Positive Pressure Ventilation in Delivery Room Management: A Retrospective Cohort Study,” Frontiers in Pediatrics 10 (2023): 10, 10.3389/fped.2022.1007632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Kanaan Z., Bloch‐Queyrat C., Boubaya M., Lévy V., Bolot P., and Waszak P., “Feasibility of Combining Two Individualized Lung Recruitment Maneuvers at Birth for Very Low Gestational Age Infants: A Retrospective Cohort Study,” BMC Pediatrics 20 (2020): 144, 10.1186/s12887-020-02055-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Kaufman J., Schmölzer G. M., Kamlin C. O. F., and Davis P. G., “Mask Ventilation of Preterm Infants in the Delivery Room,” Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 98, no. 5 (2013): F405–F410, 10.1136/archdischild-2012-303313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Farghaly M. A. A., Ali M. A. M., Acun C., et al., “Pneumothorax in Newborns: A Cohort Study From Three NICUs,” Journal of Perinatology 46, no. 4 (2025): 1–7, 10.1038/s41372-025-02408-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Hanke K., Rausch T. K., Paul P., et al., “The Effect of Less Invasive Surfactant Administration on Cerebral Oxygenation in Preterm Infants,” Acta Paediatrica 109, no. 2 (2020): 291–299, 10.1111/apa.14939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Krajewski P., Szpecht D., and Hożejowski R., “Premedication Practices for Less Invasive Surfactant Administration—Results From a Nationwide Cohort Study,” Journal of Maternal‐Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 35, no. 24 (2022): 4750–4754, 10.1080/14767058.2020.1863365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Acta Paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES