Skip to main content
Genome Biology logoLink to Genome Biology
. 2002 Sep 23;3(10):research0056.1–research0056.24. doi: 10.1186/gb-2002-3-10-research0056

Analysis of EF-hand-containing proteins in Arabidopsis

Irene S Day 1, Vaka S Reddy 1, Gul Shad Ali 1, ASN Reddy 1,
PMCID: PMC134623  PMID: 12372144

Short abstract

Three out of the four classes of Ca2+-binding proteins in plants contain Ca 2+ -binding EF-hand motif(s). A maximum of 250 proteins possibly having EF-hands were identified. Diverse proteins, including enzymes, proteins involved in transcription and translation, protein- and nucleic-acid-binding proteins and a large number of unknown proteins, have one or more putative EF-hands.

Abstract

Background

In plants, calcium (Ca2+) has emerged as an important messenger mediating the action of many hormonal and environmental signals, including biotic and abiotic stresses. Many different signals raise cytosolic calcium concentration ([Ca2+]cyt), which in turn is thought to regulate cellular and developmental processes via Ca2+-binding proteins. Three out of the four classes of Ca2+-binding proteins in plants contain Ca2+-binding EF-hand motif(s). This motif is a conserved helix-loop-helix structure that can bind a single Ca2+ ion. To identify all EF-hand-containing proteins in Arabidopsis, we analyzed its completed genome sequence for genes encoding EF-hand-containing proteins.

Results

A maximum of 250 proteins possibly having EF-hands were identified. Diverse proteins, including enzymes, proteins involved in transcription and translation, protein- and nucleic-acid-binding proteins and a large number of unknown proteins, have one or more putative EF-hands. Phylogenetic analysis identified six major groups that contain some families of proteins.

Conclusions

The presence of EF-hand motif(s) in a diversity of proteins is consistent with the involvement of Ca2+ in regulating many cellular and developmental processes. Thus far, only 47 of the possible 250 EF-hand proteins have been reported in the literature. Various domains that we identified in many of the uncharacterized EF-hand-containing proteins should help in elucidating their cellular role(s). Our analyses suggest that the Ca2+ messenger system is widely used in plants and that EF-hand-containing proteins are likely to be the key transducers mediating Ca2+ action.

Background

Organisms must be able to respond to their environment to survive. In plants, mechanisms have evolved for sensing and responding to hormonal and environmental signals, both biotic (for example, pathogens) and abiotic (for example, heat, cold, light and salt/drought stresses). To elicit a response, the perceived signal must be conveyed to the cellular machinery. Messengers such as Ca2+, cyclic nucleotides (cAMP and cGMP), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and nitric oxide transduce the perceived stimulus to proteins that initiate a response. Ca2+ is one of the important messengers that mediate plant responses to hormones, developmental cues and external stimuli [1,2,3]. It is implicated in regulating such diverse and fundamental cellular process as cytoplasmic streaming, thigmotropism, gravitropism, cell division, cell elongation, cell differentiation, cell polarity, photomorphogenesis and plant defense and stress responses [1,3,4]. The Ca2+ concentration in the cytoplasm ([Ca2+]cyt) is maintained in the nanomolar range (approximately 100-200 nM), whereas the concentration in organelles and cell wall is in the millimolar range [1,3,5,6]. Several signals (hormonal, abiotic and biotic) have been shown to cause transient elevation of [Ca2+]cyt [1,2,5,6,7]. This transient increase in [Ca2+]cyt is sensed by Ca2+-binding proteins [4,8,9]. The conformation of the Ca2+-binding protein changes on binding Ca2+, resulting in modulation of its activity or its ability to interact with other proteins or nucleic acids and modulate their function or activity. The Ca2+ sensors in plants can be broadly divided into four major classes [2,9]: calmodulin (CAM) (class A), CAM-like and other EF-hand-containing Ca2+-binding proteins (class B), Ca2+-regulated protein kinases (class C) and Ca2+-binding proteins without EF-hand motifs (class D).

Three classes (A, B, and C) contain proteins with EF-hand motifs. This motif is a helix-loop-helix structure that binds a single Ca2+ ion [10]. The loop consists of 12 residues with the pattern X*Y*Z*-Y*-X**-Z. The residues X, Y, Z, -Y, -X, -Z participate in binding Ca2+and the intervening residues are represented by asterisks (*). Asp or Asn is usually found at X and Y; Asp, Asn, or Ser at Z; a variety of residues at -Y; usually Asp, Asn, or Ser at -X, but this position is more variable; and usually Glu at -Z [11]. The helix-loop-helix is only 29 residues long, the E α-helix being residues 1-10, the loop 10-21, and the F α-helix 19-29 [11]. Residue 1 is often Glu (E), and a Gly at residue 15 is highly conserved, as is Ile at residue 17. It has been reported that some of the EF-hand domains do not bind Ca2+ [11].

In quiescent cells, proteins with EF-hands are in an apoprotein form; when [Ca2+]cyt increases they bind Ca2+ and change their conformation. Some EF-hands can also bind Mg2+ (for example, the third and fourth EF-hands of troponin C bind Ca2+/Mg2+, whereas the first and second EF-hands are Ca2+ specific [12]). Ca2+/Mg2+ discrimination relies on the affinities of the EF-hands for these cations, which is dependent on the types of amino-acid residues in the binding loop [11,13].

EF-hands can be present in proteins with no other known domains, as is the case for CAM, or in proteins with other domains such as a protein kinase. In most cases EF-hand motifs are found in pairs, and proteins with four EF-hands usually have two domains with a pair of EF-hands in each. Calpain is an exception to the pairing rule. It comprises a large subunit with five EF-hands at the carboxyl terminus and a small subunit that also has five EF-hands. The two unpaired hands in these subunits pair to form a heterodimer [14]. The large superfamily of EF-hand proteins has been divided into 66 subfamilies on the basis of differences in number and organization of EF-hand pairs, amino-acid sequences within or outside the motifs, affinity for Ca2+ and/or selectivity and affinity for target proteins [11]. Of the subfamilies, 28 consist of a unique single member. The EF-hand proteins used in the classification by Nakayama et al. [11] include proteins from animals, plants, fungi and protists, with plants represented in only nine of the 66 subfamilies.

Several EF-hand proteins have been identified in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, including several CAMs [15,16,17,18], a Ca2+-binding protein (CaBP-22)[19], touch-induced proteins TCH2 and TCH3 [20], centrin [21], Ca2+-dependent protein kinases (CPKs) [22], calcineurin B-like proteins/salt-overly-sensitive3 family (CBLs/SOS3) [23,24], fimbrins [25], respiratory burst oxidase homologs (Rbohs) [26,27], a phospholipase [28,29], channel proteins [30,31], a NAD(H)-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase [32], a protein phosphatase [33,34], a NaCl-inducible protein [35], and a Ca2+-binding protein in pollen [36]. Some have been identified by screening with animal homologs whereas others have been identified by sequencing the genes induced in response to biotic and abiotic signals. The first method would miss plant-specific EF-hand proteins and the second method relies on comprehensive analysis of all genes that might be induced or activated by various signals. With the recent completion of the sequencing of the A. thaliana genome, the first plant genome to be sequenced, new methods of identifying genes encoding proteins with specific domains have become possible [37]. Insight into the function of the proteins can be gained by identifying and characterizing EF-hand proteins encoded in the Arabidopsis genome. Classification of the EF-hand-containing proteins can be a starting point in identification of Ca2+-binding proteins that might be involved in a particular cell process. With this in mind, we searched the Arabidopsis genome for genes encoding proteins with EF-hand motifs. We used three approaches to identify EF-hand-containing proteins in Arabidopsis. First, we analyzed data from the Munich Information Center for Protein Sequences (MIPS) A. thaliana database (MAtDB) [38,39]; second, we carried out BLAST searches using different known EF-hand sequences (nucleotide and amino acid) against the Arabidopsis genome database and third, we searched the literature. We identified 250 EF-hand or putative EF-hand proteins. This estimate represents a maximum number of possible EF-hand-containing proteins in the Arabidopsis genome as our analysis was very inclusive. Of these 250 proteins, only 47 have been reported in the literature. Of the 250, 73 were identified by only one prediction program as having an EF-hand and the rest were identified by two or more programs. Further study is needed to verify Ca2+-binding activity of many of these proteins. Each protein sequence was analyzed for domains other than EF-hands. Several have a variety of domains, which may be useful in determining protein function.

Results and discussion

Identification of EF-hand-containing proteins

To identify EF-hand-containing proteins in Arabidopsis, the protein sequences listed as having EF-hands in the InterPro Domain Table at MAtDB [39] were retrieved. Each protein sequence was then analyzed for the presence of an EF-hand motif and other domain(s) using InterProScan [40]. There are many databases for analyzing proteins using different approaches to search for patterns, profiles and hidden Markov models [41]. InterProScan was chosen because it integrates SWISS-PROT, PROSITE, PRINTS, Pfam, ProDom, SMART and TIGRFAMs programs into a single comprehensive format. Therefore, scanning one site is the equivalent of scanning seven databases that use different approaches [40]. The Inter-Pro Domain Table at MAtDB listed 219 proteins as having EF-hands. Eighteen sequences did not have EF-hands identifiable by InterProScan and so were eliminated from our analysis. We also did sequence-similarity searches using three different EF-hand proteins that have been characterized in Arabidopsis. The nucleotide and protein sequences of Arabidopsis CAM4, a protein containing four EF-hands, were used to do BLAST searches (TbIastN, BlastP) against the Arabidopsis genome at MAtDB [39]. We also used the protein sequences of a Ca2+-dependent protein kinase (CPK1) and a small protein with one EF-hand domain (At2g46600). Proteins showing similarity to these proteins were checked for the presence of EF-hands using InterProScan as above. Additional EF-hand proteins were found that had not been included in the MAtDB Inter-Pro domain table. We also searched the literature for reports of EF-hand-containing proteins in Arabidopsis that had been identified by various experimental approaches. Additional EF-hand proteins were identified from this search. Together, these searches resulted in identification of a possible total of 250 EF-hand-containing proteins (Tables 1,2,3). Seventy-three of the EF-hands were identified by only one of the seven prediction programs included in InterProScan. These proteins, which are indicated in bold in Table 1, could be false positives. Further studies are needed to verify the Ca2+-binding ability of these putative EF-hands. It is, however, worth noting that the activity of two of the proteins in this category (AtPLC1 and KCO1) has been shown to be dependent on Ca2+ [31,42]. All proteins are listed by their protein ID number except CAM6, which has not been assigned an ID number. CPKs and closely related CRKs (CPK-related protein kinases) are listed in Table 2, as this is a large family of proteins that has been relatively well studied in Arabidopsis.

Table 1.

EF-hand-containing proteins (excluding CPKs and CRKs) in Arabidopsis

ID number§ Size (amino acids) Number of EF hands Domains*/remarks Targeting Published name References
Group I
At1g02150 638 1 PPR repeats, NLS sc (.616)
At1g06220 987 2 Elongation factor aEF-2
At5g25230 973 1 ATP_GTP_A, EFG_C, GTP_EFTU(_D2)
At1g17090 93 1 - sc (.944)
At1g55040 849 1 Zn-finger in Ranbp and others ch (.823)
At1g74430 271 1 Myb DNA-binding domain
At2g03150 1276 1 - mt (.870)
At5g40690 210 1 - mt (.656)
At3g13500 110 1 -
At1g69030 320 1 -
 At3g59820 755 1 - mt (.666)
 At1g73440 254 2 Josephin, UIM ch (.941)
At3g07740 548 1 Zinc finger, Myb DNA-binding, GatC
At5g06260 424 1 -
At4g00140 257 1 - ch (.792)
 At1g20760 1019 2 EPS15 repeat, pfkB
 At1g21630 1181 4 EPS15 repeat
 At3g20290 485 2 ATP_GTP_A, EPS15, NLS_BP
 At4g05520 514 1 EPS15 repeat, dynamin family
At1g47550 861 1 NLS_BP
At1g47560 1564 1 NLS_BP
At3g59270 335 1 -
At5g41840 540 1 F-box domain
 Group II
 At1g02270 484 1 -
 At5g54130 232 1 -
At5g46830 511 1 bHLH
 At1g05150 808 1 Zinc finger, TPR/put O-GlcNAc transferase
 At2g32450 802 1 Zinc finger, TPR/put O-GlcNAc transferase
At2g35380 336 1 Plant peroxidase sc (.960)
At1g20490 530 1 AMP-dependent synthetase and ligase
At1g20510 546 1 - ch (.747)
At1g21540 550 1 AMP-dependent synthetase and ligase
At1g23160 578 1 -
At3g04860 289 1 - ch (.666)
At5g28150 289 1 - ch (.651)
At1g44780 471 1 NLS_BP
At3g01780 1192 1 -
At3g02270 676 1 eIF4-gamma/eIF
At5g64060 356 1 No apical meristem protein
At4g05110 394 1 Nucleoside_tran
At4g05120 418 1 Nucleoside_tran
At4g05140 419 1 Nucleoside_tran
At5g22840 538 1 Eukaryotic protein kinase
At5g12120 619 1 Ubiquitin-associated domain ch (.811)
 At1g64850 162 1 -
At3g46220 804 1 Biotin operon repressor
At3g44330 565 1 - sc (.697)
At5g21130 281 1 ATP synthase alpha and beta subunit
At3g14270 1791 1 FYVE, PIP5K
At3g32010 603 1 ATHILA
At3g32880 503 1 ATHILA
At3g32970 289 1 ATHILA
At4g08080 561 1 -
At4g08050 1428 1 -
At4g03790 1064 1 ATHILA
At1g80680 1032 1 Aminoacyl-transfer RNA syn class II
At2g30110 1080 1 UBACT, ThiF_family
At5g46360 260 1 Potassium channel/KCO1-like
At5g46370 443 1 Potassium channel/KCO1-like
At5g55630 363 1 Potassium channel ch (.772) KCO1 [31]
 At2g35800 844 1 Mitoch_carrier
 At5g07320 479 4 Mitoch_carrier, Graves disease
 At5g51050 487 2 Mitoch_carrier, Adptrnslcase ch (.621)
 At5g61810 476 4 Mitoch_carrier
At1g33790 745 1 Jacalin-related lectin domain
At5g28340 390 2 PPR repeats
At5g28380 283 2 PPR repeats
At5g58670 559 1 PIPLC AtPLC1 [29,42]
At4g26700 687 1 Calponin homology ATFIM1 [25]
At5g55400 714 1 Calponin homology
Group III
 At1g03960 534 1 /protein phosphatase 2A group
 At5g44090 538 2 /protein phosphatase 2A group [58]
 At1g54450 535 2 /protein phosphatase 2A group
 At5g28850 536 3 /protein phosphatase 2A group
 At5g28900 536 3 /protein phosphatase 2A group
 At5g18580 464 3 NLS_BP
 At5g49480 160 3 /NaCl-inducible Ca2+ binding protein-like AtCP1 [35]
At1g32410 1048 1 PPR repeats sc (.813)
 At3g18430 175 1 -
 At1g64480 214 3 Recoverin CBL8 [13]
 At5g24270 222 3 - CBL4 [51]
 At4g33000 246 3 Recoverin/CBL-like sc (.931)
 At4g16350 227¥ 3# - CBL6 [13]
 At5g55990 226 3 - CBL3 [23]
 At4g26560 214 3 Recoverin CBL7 [13]
 At4g26570 226 3 - CBL2 [23]
 At4g17615 252 3 Recoverin CBL1 [23]
 At5g47100 213 2 Recoverin CBL9 [13]
 At4g01420 192 3 - CBL5 [13]
 At1g54530 127 1 -
 At2g44310 142 2 -
 At5g28830 324 2 -
At5g22760 1516 1 PHD-finger, DDT domain
 At4g38810 375 2 -
 At4g13440 154 2 -
 At4g32060 498 4 -
At4g39420 781 1 -
 At1g29020 1062 4 - sc (.939)
 At2g34020 462 2 sc (.965)
 At2g34030 423 2 mt (.648)
 At1g53210 574 2 - sc (.907)
 At4g25970 628 2 PS_Dcrbxylase, Porpobil_deam ch (.849)
 At5g57190 615 4 PS_Dcrbxylase, Porpobil_deam
 At2g46600 135f 1 - KIC Unpublished
 At4g27280 130 1 -
 At5g54490 127 1 -
 At3g17470 570 2 -
At5g62250 549 1 -
 At4g27790 345 6 ER_TARGET sc (.941)
 At5g08580 391 4 - sc (.631)
Group IV
 At1g05990 150 4 -
 At4g03290 154 4 -
 At2g43290 169 4 -
 At3g59440 195 4 - sc (.844)
 At3g59450 148 1 -
 At3g07490 153 4 -
 At4g12860 152 4 -
 At1g18210 170 4 -
 At1g73630 163 4 -
 At1g66400 157 4 Calflagin
 At5g37770 161 4 - TCH2 [20]
 At2g36180 146 4 -
 At5g17470 146 4 Calflagin
 At3g03400 137 3 -
 At3g03410 131 4 -
 At2g15680 187 4 Recoverin ch (.725)
 At1g21550 155 3 -
 At4g20780 191 3 -
 At5g44460 181 3 -
 At1g12310 148 3 -
 At1g62820 148 3 -
 At1g66410 149 4 EPS15 repeat CaM4 [17]
 At5g37780 149 4 - CaM1 [16]
 At2g27030 149 4 EPS15 repeat CaM5 [17]
 At2g41110 149 4 EPS15 repeat CaM2 [16]
 At3g56800 149 4 EPS15 repeat CaM3 [15]
 At3g43810 149 4 EPS15 repeat CaM7 [18]
 N/A 149 4 EPS15 repeat CaM6 [17]
 At2g41090 191 4 - CaBP-22 [17]
 At3g22930 173 4 - mt (.702)
 At4g14640 151 4 - CaM8 [18]
 At2g41100 324 6 - TCH-3 [20]
 At3g51920 151 4 - CaM9 [18]
 At3g50360 169 4 - mt (.609) Centrin [21]
 At4g37010 167 4 /caltractin(centrin)-like mt (.809)
 At1g18530 157 4 Calflagin
 At3g25600 161 4 Calflagin
 At1g32250 166 4 Calflagin, recoverin
 At3g03000 165 4 Calflagin
 At2g41410 216 4 - ch (.770) PM129 [64]
 At3g10190 209 4 -
 At3g03430 83 2 Recoverin/pollen allergenBra r II
 At5g17480 83 2 /Calcium-binding protein in pollen APC1 [36]
 At1g76640 159 4 -
 At1g76650 177 3 -
 At3g01830 146 2 -
 At3g50770 205 4 - ch (.970)
 At5g42380 185 3 - ch (.742)
 At3g29000 194 2 S-100/ICaBP type CBP sc (.954)
 At5g39670 193 2 - sc (.877)
 At3g47480 183 2 Recoverin sc (.956)
 At1g24620 186 4 Calflagin
 At3g24110 229 2 -
 At4g26470 248 4 -
Group V
 At2g27480 186 2 -
 At3g10300 330 2 -
 At5g04170 354 2 -
Group VI
 At1g09090 838 2 Cytb-245 hc, Ferric_reduct/rboh-like RbohB [26]
 At4g25090 863 2 Cytb-245 hc, Ferric_reduct/rboh-like
 At5g51060 905 1 Cytb-245 hc, Ferric_reduct/rboh-like RbohC [26]
 At5g07390 902 1 Cytb-245 hc, Ferric_reduct/rboh-like RbohA [26]
 At5g47910 921 2 Cytb-245 hc, Ferric_reduct/rboh-like RbohD [26]
 At1g64060 929 1 Cytb-245 hc, Ferric_reduct/rboh-like RbohF [26,27]
 At1g19230 926 1 Cytb-245 hc, Ferric_reduct/rboh-like RbohE [26]
 At3g45810 835 1 Cytb-245 hc, Ferric_reduct/rboh-like
 At5g60010 839 2 Cytb-245 hc, Ferric_reduct/rboh-like
At2g47860 635 1 PTM, NPH3 ch (.809)
At3g44820 661 1 BTB/POZ domain
At5g05180 432 1 -
At5g13260 576 1 - ch (.666)
At5g13960 624 1 SET-domain of transcriptional regulators
 At3g05310 648 2 Small GTPase
 At5g27540 648 2 Small GTPase
 At3g63150 676 1 Small GTPase
 At2g20800 582 1 Pyr_redox
 At4g05020 583 1 FAD_pyr_redox
 At4g28220 559 1 Pyr_redox mt (.880)
At4g08000 609 1 En/Spm-like transposon proteins
 At4g03560 724 2 Cation (ca, na) pore region, HLH_Myc
At1g02960 553 1 PTS_HPR_SER, NLS
At5g59230 186 1 -
At4g39560 343 1 F-box, Kelch repeat
At4g26080 434 1 Protein phosphatase 2C subfamily ABI1 [34,78]
At5g07440 411 1 NAD-binding site, GLFV_dehydrog mt (.680) GDH2 [32]
At1g76250 434 1 - sc (.648)
At5g44620 519 1 Cytochrome P450 enzyme, HLH_Myc
At1g01280 510 1 Cytochrome P450 enzyme sc (.725)

The table is arranged by groups.*Domains as identified by InterProScan [40]. Remarks are from MAtDB [39] or the reference. Based on TargetP predictions [44]. Only signals with scores of 0.600 or above were included. mt, mitochondria; ch, chloroplast; sc, secretory pathway. §EF-hand motifs identified by only one database in InterProScan are in bold. Only one EF-hand found by InterProScan but two identified by Czempinski et al. [31]. ¥Kudla et al. [23] report different protein sequence whose size and number of EF-hand domains varies from the MIPS database information. #There is a discrepancy between the MIPS database sequence and the experimentally determined size. N/A, not available; Adptrnslcase, adenine nucleotide translocator 1; ATHILA, Arabidopsis retrotransposon (ATHILA) ORF-1; ATP_GTP_A, ATP/GTP-binding site motif A; bHLH, basic helix-loop-helix dimerization domain; Calflagin, flagellar calcium-binding protein; Cytb-245 hc, cytochrome B-245 heavy chain; EFG_C, elongation factor G, carboxyl terminus; ER_TARGET, endoplasmic reticulum targeting seq; FAD_pyr_redox, FAD-dependent pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase; Ferric_reduct, ferric reductase-like transmembrane component; FYVE, FYVE An-finger, rabphilin/VPS27/FABI type; GatC, glutamyl-tRNA amidotransferase C subunit; GLFV_dehydrog, glutamate/leucine/phenylalanine/valine dehydrogenase; GTP_EFTU_D2, elongation factor Tu domain 2; HLH_Myc, Myc-type helix-loop-helix dimerization domain; Mitoch_carrier, mitochondrial energy transfer proteins; NLS_BP, nuclear localization signal, bipartite; Nucleoside_tran, delayed-early response protein/equilibrative nucleoside transporter; PIP5K, phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate-5-kinase; PIPLC, phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase; pfkB, pfkB family of carbohydrate kinases; Porpobil_deam, porphobilinogen deaminase; PS_Dcrbxylase, phosphatidylserine decarboxylase; PTM, phosphopantetheine attachment site; PTS_HPR_SER, serine phosphorylation site in HPr protein; Pyr_redox, pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase; TM, transmembrane; ThiF_family, UBA/THIF-type NAD/FAD-binding fold; TPR, tetratricopeptide repeat; UBACT, ubiquitin-activating enzyme; UIM, ubiquitin-interacting motif.

Table 2.

Summary of the CPKs and CRKs in the Arabidopsis genome

Gene ID Size (amino acids) Number of EF hands Targeting signal Other names References
CDPKs
 At1g18890 545 4 ch (.877) CPK10, AtCDPK1 [71,74]
 At1g35670 495 4 CPK11 *, AtCDPK2
 At1g50700 521 4 CPK33
 At1g61950 547 4 CPK19 *
 At1g74740 567 4 CPK30, AtCDPK1a
 At1g76040 534 4 CPK29 *
 At2g17290 540 4 CPK6, CDPK3 [66,71]
 At2g17890 571 4 ch (.93) CPK16
 At2g31500 582 4 ch (.93) CPK24
 At2g35890 520 1 CPK25
 At2g38910 583 4 CPK20
 At2g41860 530 4 CPK14
 At3g10660 646 4 CPK2, CDPK2
 At3g20410 541 4 CPK9 [66,82]
 At3g51850 503 4 CPK13
 At3g57530 560 4 CPK32
 At4g04700 494 4 CPK27 *
 At4g04710 575 5 CPK22 *
 At4g04720 531 4 CPK21
 At4g04740 520 4 CPK23 *
 At4g09570 501 4 CPK4 [66]
 At4g21940 554 4 ch (.731) CPK15
 At4g23650 529 4 ch (.949) CPK3, CDPK6
 At4g35310 556 4 CPK5
 At4g36070 536 4 CPK18 *
 At4g38230 484 4 CPK26
 T19J18 7-m 453 4 CPK31 *, g5732059
 At5g04870 610 4 CPK1, AK1 [83]
 At5g12180 528 4 CPK17
 At5g12480 535 4 CPK7 [6]
 At5g19360 523 4 CPK34
 At5g19450 533 4 CPK8, CDPK19 [66,69]
 At5g23580 490 4 mt (.662) CPK12, CDPK9 [66,69]
 At5g66210 523 4 ch (.78) CPK28
CRKs
 At1g49580 606 1 CRK8
 At2g46700 595 1 CRK3
 At3g50530 601 1 CRK5

The EF-hands were analyzed using InterProScan. Target signals are according to Target P (ch, chloroplast; mt, mitochondria). Only signals with scores of 0.600 or above were included. All CPKs and CRKs have variable numbers of transmembrane domains (2-7) and N-myristoylation site(s). The asterisks (*) indicate size incorrectly annotated in MAtDB; the corrected sizes are available at [65].

Table 3.

Plant proteins not identified as EF-hand-containing proteins using InterProScan but known to bind Ca2+

ID number Size (amino acids) Number of EF-hands* Other domains Targeting Published name References
Caleosins
 At1g70670 195 1 - Clo4 [46]
 At1g70680 192 1 -
 At1g23240 184 1 - Clo5 [46]
 At2g33380 236 1 - Clo3 [46]
 At4g26740 245 1 - Clo1 [46]
 At5g55240 243 1 - Clo2 [46,47]
14-3-3s
 At1g78300 259 1 14-3-3 GF14 [48,49]
 At1g35160 267 1 14-3-3
 At4g09000 267 1 14-3-3
 At3g02520 265 1 14-3-3
 At5g38480 255 1 14-3-3
 At5g16050 268 1 14-3-3
 At5g10450 273 1 14-3-3
 At5g65430 246 1 14-3-3
SUBs
 At4g08810 552 2 Serpin SUB1 [50]
 At2g04280 568 2 mt(0.838) SUL2 [50]
 At4g12700 561 2 mt(0.749) SUL1 [50]

*Number of EF-hands reported; TargetP prediction; short under blue light.

The InterPro domain table also lists the EF-hand-containing proteins for Saccharomyces cerevisiae (29), Caenorhabditis elegans (139) and Drosophila melanogaster (132). The number of EF-hand proteins in the human genome was given as 83, with a note that the number may be an underestimate as a result of the stringent E-value cutoff used for the analysis [43]. Figure 1a shows a comparison of the number of EF-hand-containing proteins in sequenced eukaryotic organisms and the percentage of the total number of genes represented by genes encoding EF-hand proteins. Our analysis revealed that there is possibly a very large number of EF-hand proteins in Arabidopsis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) A comparison of the number of genes encoding putative EF-hand proteins (green) in different species and their percentage of the total number of genes (blue). At, Arabidopsis thaliana; Ce, Caenorhabditis elegans; Dm, Drosophila melanogaster; Sc, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Hs, Homo sapiens. (b) The number of Arabidopsis proteins having 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 EF-hands.

We used TargetP [44] to identify cellular targeting signals in all the EF-hand proteins. The results from this analysis show that EF-hand proteins are present in all major subcellular compartments (Tables 1,2,3).

Ca2+-binding proteins with no recognized EF-hand

Table 3 lists proteins that were reported in the literature as proteins containing EF-hand-like domains but where the InterProScan of these proteins did not identify any. However, the proteins were shown to bind Ca+. We included proteins with sequence similarity to these proteins in Table 3. We did not include these proteins in the total number of EF-hand proteins nor in the phylogenetic analysis.

Caleosins are proteins with similarity to a rice protein that was shown to bind Ca2+ [45]. A localization study in rapeseed, using an antibody to AtClo1, showed the presence of this protein in the ER and lipid bodies [46]. Clo3 was shown to be induced by abscisic acid and to bind Ca2+ [47].

The InterPro documentation IPR000308 for 14-3-3 proteins describes them as a large family of proteins that are primarily homo- or heterodimeric within all eukaryotic cells. They appear to effect intracellular signaling by regulating the catalytic activity of the bound protein, by regulating interactions between the bound protein and other proteins, or by controlling the localization of the bound protein. The 14-3-3 protein GF14ω was shown to bind Ca2+ and the binding was localized to loop 8 of GF14ω [48,49]. Seven other proteins showing strong similarity to GF14ω have the exact sequence in the loop considered to be the EF-hand and so were included in Table 3. Several other proteins showing similarity were divergent in this loop and so were not included.

SUB1 was identified as a protein involved in the cryptochrome and phytochrome signaling pathways [50]. Guo et al. [50] identified two EF-hand-like domains and demonstrated binding of Ca2+ by SUB1. SUL1 and 2 are proteins showing similarity to SUB1 but their sequences diverge somewhat in the EF-hand domains.

Number of EF hands

The number of EF-hands in each protein varied from one to six. Figure 1b shows the number and percentage of proteins having a specific number of EF-hands. As stated above, most EF-hand proteins have pairs of EF-hands, which facilitate binding of Ca2+ [11]. There are a large number of proteins with an odd number of EF-hand motifs (1, 3 or 5). Several possibilities are suggested by this observation. The proteins with an odd number of EF-hand domains may function as homo- or heterodimers, they may bind Ca2+ in a weaker manner, there may be another 'cryptic' Ca2+-binding motif that is not identifiable, but is functional, or they may not bind Ca2+ at all. Many of the proteins containing a single EF-hand motif were identified by only one prediction program and could be false positives.

Examples of these possibilities can be seen in EF-hand proteins that have been isolated and characterized previously. The K+ channel protein (KCO1) has one identifiable EF-hand but another region within the protein also shows similarity to an EF-hand. Although Ca2+-binding of KCO1 was not tested, the activity of the channel was shown to be Ca2+-dependent [31]. AtPLC1, one of a small family of phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase Cs (PLCs), has a putative EF-hand but Ca2+ binding was not evaluated [42]. No other AtPLC has an EF-hand domain but the amino-terminal sequences of several other family members have two sets of a helices that may correspond to EF-hand domains [29]. The putative EF-hand loop of AtPLC1 lies between two of the a helices. The actin-binding activity of most fimbrins is inhibited by Ca2+ [51]. AtFIM2 was shown to be Ca2+ independent, suggesting this single-EF-hand protein does not bind Ca2+ [25,51]. The respiratory burst oxidase family (see Table 1) has nine members in Arabidopsis that have either one or two EF-hands [26,27]. An alignment (data not shown) of these proteins, however, shows the presence of EF-hand like sequences for the missing EF-hand domain in the one-EF-hand proteins. Keller et al. [27] identified two EF-hand domains in RbohA which both bind Ca2+in vitro (RbohF in this report and Torres et al. [26]) although only one is recognized by InterProScan. The ability to bind Ca2+ was not addressed for single-EF-hand proteins ABI1 or GDH2 [32,33]. The CBL/SOS3 family of proteins (see Table 1) shows the presence of three EF-hand domains [23,52]. Kudla et al. [23], however, identified a sequence that represents a variation of the EF-hand domain that may be a fourth EF-hand. AtCP1 a protein with three EF-hand domains, also has a fourth EF-hand-like sequence at the end of the protein but it is truncated and may not be functional [35].

The reported proteins with two EF-hand domains include two pollen-associated proteins and the Rboh proteins (see Table 1). Three of the proteins with two possible EF-hands were identified by only one prediction program. The CAM family and proteins closely related to CAM - CaBP-22, PM129, TCH2 and centrin (Table 1) - and most of the CPKs (Table 2) have four EF-hand domains. The two proteins with six EF-hands are TCH3 and an unknown protein (At4g27790) which are only 13% similar and thus are not likely to represent duplicate genes. Although the significance of the number of EF-hand domains in various proteins is not known, they may differ in their affinity for Ca2+ and, thereby, function to fine tune Ca2+-mediated cellular activities.

Identification of other domains in EF-hand-containing proteins

Table 4 lists the other domains found in the EF-hand-containing proteins, their InterProScan accession numbers and general type of protein or domain. As shown in Table 1, some of the proteins predicted to have other domains have putative EF-hand motifs identified by only one prediction program (shown in bold in Table 1). Schematic diagrams of representative EF-hand proteins are shown in Figure 2. As can be seen, the calmodulin-like proteins have the EF-hands distributed throughout the protein and no other domain is present. Other proteins have the EF-hands at one end or the other, or in the middle of the protein with enzymatic or regulatory domains preceding or following the EF-hands.

Table 4.

Summary of various domains present in Arabidopsis EF-hand-containing proteins and their InterPro accession numbers

Domain* Accession number Protein type
ATP_GTP_A IPR001687 Binding site motif
Calflagin IPR003299 Calcium-binding
Recoverin IPR002048 Calcium-binding
S-100/ICaBP type CBP IPR001751 Calcium-binding
Adptrnslcase IPR000213 Carrier
Cation (ca, na) pore region IPR001682 Carrier
Graves disease IPR002167 Carrier
Mitoch_carrier IPR002067 Carrier
Potassium channel IPR001622 Carrier
PTM IPR003880 Carrier
bHLH IPR001092 Dimerization
BTB/POZ domain IPR000210 Dimerization
Biotin operon repressor IPR004209 DNA interaction
DDT domain IPR004022 DNA binding
HLH_Myc IPR003015 DNA binding
Myb DNA binding domain IPR001005 DNA binding
Elongation factor aEF-2 IPR004543 Elongation factor
EFG_C IPR000640 Elongation factor
GTP_EFTU(_D2) IPR004161 Elongation factor
pfkB IPR002173 Enzyme
Aminoacyl-transfer RNA syn class II IPR002106 Enzyme
AMP-dependent synthetase and ligase IPR000873 Enzyme
ATP synthase alpha and beta subunit IPR000194 Enzyme
Cytb-245 hc IPR000778 Enzyme
Cytochrome P450 enzyme IPR001128 Enzyme
Euk protein kinase IPR000719 Enzyme
FAD_pyr_redox IPR001237 Enzyme
Ferric_reduct IPR002916 Enzyme
GatC IPR004415 Enzyme
GLFV_dehydrog IPR001625 Enzyme
PIP5K IPR002498 Enzyme
PIPLC IPR001992 Enzyme
Plant peroxidase IPR000823 Enzyme
Protein phosphatase 2C subfamily IPR000222 Enzyme
PS_Darbxylase, Porpobil_deam IPR003817 Enzyme
Pyr_redox IPR001237 Enzyme
Small GTPase IPR001806 Enzyme
ThiF_family IPR000594 Enzyme
UBACT IPR000127 Enzyme
Jacalin-related lectin domain IPR001229 Lectin
Dynamin family IPR001401 Microtubule associated
NAD-binding site IPR000205 NAD binding
No apical meristem protein IPR003441 Plant development
Domain* Accession Protein type
Serpin IPR000215 Protease inhibitor
14-3-3 IPR000308 Protein interaction
Calponin homology IPR001715 Protein interaction
EPS15 repeat IPR000261 Protein interaction
F-box domain IPR001810 Protein interaction
SET-domain of transcriptional regulators IPR001214 Protein interaction
Ubiquitin-associated domain IPR003903 Protein interaction
Zn-finger-ZZ type IPR000433 Protein interaction
Zn-finger-FYVE IPR000306 Protein interaction
Zn-finger-Ra-binding IPR001876 Protein interaction
PPR repeats IPR000285 Repeat
TPR IPR001440 Repeat
Josephin, UIM IPR002950 Repeat
Kelch repeat IPR001798 Repeat
ATHILA IPR004312 Retrotransposon
NPH3 IPR004249 Signal transduction
ER_TARGET IPR000886 Targeting
NLS_BP IPR001472 Targeting
PHD-finger IPR001965 Transcription
eIF4-gamma/eIF IPR003307 Translation
PTS_HPR_SER IPR002114 Transport
Nucleoside_tran IPR002259 Transport
En/Spm-like transposon proteins IPR004242 Transposon

*See Table 1 for explanation of domain abbreviations.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Schematic diagrams of representative EF-hand proteins. The number of amino acids is given at the end of each diagram. Domain names are written above the domain except as given in the key. PI-PLC-X(Y) and C2, phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C subdomains. ABI1, ABA-insensitive 1; APC1, Arabidopsis pollenCa2+-binding protein; AtCP1, Arabidopsis thaliana Ca2+-binding protein; AtFIM1, Arabidopsis thaliana fimbrin 1; AtPLC1, Arabidopsis thaliana phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C; CAM2, calmodulin 2; CaBP22, 22 kd Ca2+-binding protein; CBL/SOS3, calcineurinB-like, salt-overly-sensitive protein; CH, calponin homology; CLO1, caleosin1; CPK, Ca2+-dependent protein kinase; CRK, CPK-related kinase; GDH2, NAD(H)-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase; GTPase, small GTPase-like protein (At3g63150); KCO1, potassium channel outwardly rectifying protein 1; KIC, KCBP-interacting CCD-1-like protein; MCP, mitochondrial carrier protein (At5g61810); PM129, protein isolated from plasma-membrane enriched library; PPA, protein phosphatase 2A-like protein (At1g03960); PYR, pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase (At2g20800); RbohA, respiratory burst oxidase homology; TCH2 and TCH3, touch-induced proteins. // indicates a break in the protein.

Some of the domains listed in Table 4 either contain an EF-hand within the domain or are a specific type of EF-hand. These include EPS15 repeats, calflagin, recoverin and S100/IcaBP. EPS15 repeats are protein-protein interaction modules of about 95 residues that were first identified in tyrosine kinase substrates EPS15 and 15R. The first of three sub-domains in EPS15 may include a Ca2+-binding domain of the EF-hand type. Calflagins are flagellar Ca2+-binding proteins found in Trypanosoma cruzi and T. brucei that have motifs similar to EF-hands. Recoverin is a retinal Ca2+-binding protein that belongs in the EF-hand family of proteins.

Some of the EF-hand proteins contain an Arabidopsis retrotransposon (ATHILA) ORF-1 protein domain and one has an En/Spm-like transposon protein domain. As shown in Table 4, domains found in various enzymes are present in many of the EF-hand proteins. Because of the presence of EF-hand motifs in these proteins, regulation of these putative enzymes is likely to be Ca2+-dependent. The diversity of enzymes that contain EF-hand(s) indicates that a wide range of cellular processes is likely to be regulated by Ca2+. It is also of interest that some proteins in a family have EF-hands and others do not, suggesting differential regulation of protein family members.

Several identified domains indicate that some EF-hand proteins interact with other proteins (or themselves) or with nucleic acids. Table 4 lists domains that are involved in interaction with protein or DNA. Cell processes that EF-hand proteins may be involved in are suggested by domains found in transcription or translation proteins including elongation factors and the bHLH domain found in transcription factors. Domains such as potassium channels, pollen allergen Bra r II, mitochondrial carrier proteins, the cation (Ca2+ and Na+) pore region and nucleoside transporters suggest possible functions. One EF-hand protein has a domain found in NPH3 protein, a photoreceptor-interacting protein that is essential for phototropism. Another EF-hand protein has a jacalin domain found in lectins. These domains in EF-hand proteins should help in evaluating the function of these proteins. For instance, the EF-hand protein identified as having a pollen allergen Bra r II domain is similar to an EF-hand protein from pollen (APC1) isolated by Rozwadowski et al. [36]. They showed APC1's affinity for Ca2+ and the potential for a Ca2+-dependent conformational change.

Motifs such as the ATP/GTP-binding region suggest that the proteins containing them interact with or bind to certain molecules. PTM is the site for attachment of phosphopantetheine (the prosthetic group of acyl carrier proteins in some multienzyme complexes), PTS_HPR_SER is a serine phosphorylation site found in HPr (a protein in the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent sugar phosphotransferase system in bacteria) and UIM (ubiquitin interaction motif) is a receptor for polyubiquitination of polypeptide chains.

Phylogenetic analysis of EF-hand-containing proteins

The full-length sequences of all proteins identified by Inter-ProScan as containing an EF-hand (including those identified by only one database) were aligned using MEGALIGN (DNAstar). Phylogenetic analysis was carried out by PAUP 4.08a using a heuristic search method. A consensus tree was generated from all saved trees. This tree was used to identify groups of EF-hand proteins and closely related proteins. Five major groups of proteins could be identified. Figure 3 shows the overall tree with a few representative members of each group. A sixth group includes members that did not fall into the other five groups. Figures 4,5,6,7,8,9 are the expanded trees for each group.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Phylogenetic tree showing the overall relatedness of the EF-hand proteins. All EF-hand proteins were aligned using MEGALIGN (DNAstar) and analyzed using a heuristic method in PAUP 4.08a. Numbers represent the number of times the branch appeared in 100 saved trees. The tree was reduced by hand to show a few representative proteins for each major group. The expanded groups are shown in Figures 4,5,6,7,8,9.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Group I tree showing all proteins included in this group. None has been published in the literature.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Group II tree showing all proteins included in this group. Proteins published in the literature are in color.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Group III tree showing all proteins included in this group. Proteins published in the literature in color.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Group IV tree showing all proteins included in this group. Proteins published in the literature are in color.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Group V tree showing all proteins included in this group. CPKs are in red and CRKs are in green. Subgroups are named as in Figure 10.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Group VI tree showing all proteins included in this group. Proteins published in the literature are in color.

Group I proteins

None of the proteins in group I (Figure 4) has been reported in the literature. Some of them contain domains that give clues to their function, including elongation factors, DNA-, protein- or ATP/GTP-binding proteins and others (Tables 1 and 4).

Group II proteins

Group II includes KCO1, AtPLC1 and the two fimbrins (Figure 5) that have been reported in the literature (Table 1). Two other proteins show similarity to KCO1 and may also be Ca2+-regulated K+ channels. A family of phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase Cs have been isolated, but only one of them, AtPLC1, has an EF-hand domain (Figure 2, and see also [29,42]). AtPLC1, a protein isolated as a dehydration and salt stress-induced gene, was able to hydrolyze phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate and the activity was completely dependent on Ca2+ [42]. AtFIM1 was identified as an EF-hand-containing protein (Figure 2), however, Kovar et al. [51] found that AtFIM1 was Ca2+-independent and so this may be a non-functional EF-hand as pointed out by McCurdy and Kim [25]. Four other proteins in the MatDB are similar to AtFIM1 but only one has an EF-hand motif.

Two small subgroups, nucleoside transporters and mitochondrial carrier proteins, also fell into group II (Figures 2, 5). As far as we know, Ca2+-binding studies have not been done for these proteins.

Group III proteins

CBL/SOS3S fall into group III (Figure 6). The first CBL/SOS3 was isolated as a protein involved in salt stress (SOS3) and as a calcineurin B-like protein (CBL1) [23,24]. Ten CBL/SOS3S have been identified [13]. Expression of CBL4 is induced by drought, cold and wounding stress. In animals, calcineurin is a heterodimer composed of a regulatory B subunit and a protein phosphatase catalytic A subunit. CBL/SOS3S show similarity to the B subunit (Figure 2). SOS3 was, however, shown to interact with a protein kinase [53] and a family of interacting protein kinases has been identified [54,55,56]. Both Albrecht et al. [55] and Kim et al. [54] have identified the domain in the kinases required for the interactions of protein kinase with CBL/SOS3.

AtCP1, which contains three EF-hands (Figure 2), is another NaCl-stress-induced protein that has been shown to bind Ca2+ [35]. A bean homolog of AtCP1 has been shown to be associated with the hypersensitive response [57]. A subgroup of proteins identified in this search show similarity to the protein phosphatase 2A regulatory B subunit. One of these, At5g44090 (AF165429), was reported in the literature [58]. They have one EF-hand domain but contain no other identifiable domains (Figure 2). One other protein of interest in this group, KIC (KCBP-interacting CCD-1-like protein), was identified as a protein that interacts with KCBP (kinesin-like calmodulin-binding protein), a protein known to interact with and be regulated by Ca2+/calmodulin [59,60]. KIC has only one EF-hand (Figure 2) and is similar to a wheat Ca2+-binding protein (CCD-1) [61].

Group IV proteins

Group IV contains the calmodulins (CAMs) and closely related proteins such as CaBP-22, centrin and the TCH gene proteins (Figures 7). CAMs are highly conserved small-molecular-weight acidic proteins of 148 amino acids (listed as 149, the starting Met is cleaved following translation). The four EF-hands (two pairs connected by a central helix) bind four molecules of Ca2+ [11,14]. Binding of Ca2+ to CAM results in a conformational change which then allows CAM to interact with target proteins to modulate their activity or function [3,18,62].

Nine Arabidopsis CAMs have been reported in the literature [15,16,17,18,20]. Seven of these are highly conserved, having 148 amino acids (CAMs 1-7) with only 1-4 amino-acid differences between them. CAM6 has not been given a protein identification number. BLAST searches with CAM6 pick CAM7 as the closest sequence. However, at the nucleotide level they are only 86% identical. There are two ESTs that are 83 and 94% identical to CAM6 but only 72 and 86% identical, respectively, to CAM7. CAM8 and CAM9 are divergent CAMs. They have 151 rather than 148 amino acids and vary considerably in the fourth EF-hand domain. Although they complemented a yeast calmodulin (CMD1) mutant, they did lot form a complex with a basic amphiphilic helical peptide in the presence of Ca2+, unlike conventional CAMs that do [18]. As can be seen in Figure 7, they do not fall into the same group as the other CAMs, with CAM9 being more divergent than CAM8. No other EF-hand proteins have 149 amino acids, although others do have a few more or less (Table 1). Expression studies of the Arabidopsis CAM genes show that they are differentially expressed in different tissues and circumstances. For CAM1, CAM2, and CAM3, CAM1 was the only one expressed in roots and CAM3 could not be detected in floral stocks; CAM1, CAM2, and CAM3 are inducible by touch stimulation but at different levels and with different kinetics [15]. CAM4, CAM5 and CAM6 were all expressed in leaves, but only CAM4 and CAM5 were detected in siliques [17]. Different Arabidopsis CAM isoforms also differ in their affinity for the same protein [60,63].

Two proteins induced by touch, rain, wind, wounding, and darkness, TCH2 and TCH3, are also in group IV and are related to the CAMs. TCH2 has 161 amino acids with four EF-hands and TCH3 has 324 amino acids with six EF-hands. Another CAM-like protein, CaBP-22, is closely related to the conventional CAMs (Figure 7). It has 191 amino acids, 66% ammo-acid sequence identity with CAM (79% in the EF-hand domains) and has been shown to bind Ca2+ [19]. Centrins are a little more distantly related to CAMs (Figure 7). An Arabidopsis centrin gene (ap3.3a) was isolated as a gene rapidly induced after pathogen inoculation [21]. One other EF-hand protein is 65% similar to centrin, suggesting there are two centrin genes in Arabidopsis.

Two proteins reported in the literature fall into a subgroup of CAM-like proteins. A novel EF-hand protein (PM129, Figure 2) was isolated from a cDNA library that over-represents plasma-membrane-associated proteins [64]. The other protein, APC1, is a pollen Ca2+-binding protein that is a member of the pollen allergen family [36]. Another protein, At3g03430, is 89% similar to APC1. They are the smallest of the EF-hand proteins having only 83 amino acids (Figure 2).

Group V proteins

The 34 CPKs and three CPK-related protein kinases (CRKs) make up almost all of group V (Figure 8). The other three proteins in the group do not have any other identifiable domains. CPKs are serine/threonine protein kinases with a CAM-like domain (CLD) usually containing four EF-hands (with two exceptions) (Table 2, Figure 2). These kinases have been called CDPKs; however, we use the most recent designation, namely CPKs [22,65,66]. Three of the eight CRKs in Arabidopsis have one EF-hand domain. However, sequence alignment of the EF-hand regions of CPKs and CRKs revealed that CRKs contain degenerate EF-hand motifs (Figure 2). CPKs are present only in plants and some protozoans. The PlantsP database [65] reports that most of the CPKs and CRKs contain transmembrane and N-myristoylation domains. TargetP predicts that some CPKs and CRKs are targeted to the chloroplast or mitochondria [44]. The cellular localization for most of these protein kinases needs to be confirmed experimentally.

CPKs range from 453 to 646 amino acids (Table 2) with four distinct domains; a variable region at the amino terminus (approximately 22-184 amino acids), a serine/threonine protein kinase domain (approximately 275 amino acids), an autoinhibitory domain (also called the junction region) (approximately 31 amino acids) and the regulatory CLD (approximately 165 amino acids) (Figure 2). The auto-inhibitory domain is involved in inhibiting the enzyme activity in the absence of Ca2+ whereas the variable region at the amino terminus may account for their substrate specificity and/or localization [22]. CRKs have similar domain organization as compared to CPKs (Figure 2). Most of the CPKs contain fatty-acylation sites, including those for myristoylation and palmitoylation, which seem to be necessary for targeting to membranes and for protein-protein interactions [67]. The protein kinase domain in CRKs shows strong sequence similarity to the kinase domain in CPKs, but the autoinhibitory and CLDs in CRKs show weak sequence similarity to the corresponding domains in CPKs.

CPKs have basal activities in the absence of Ca2+ as a result of the presence of the autoinhibitory region. Ca2+ binds the EF-hands of the CLD, which results in intramolecular rearrangement and relief of autoinhibition [22,68]. Eight CPK isoforms have been shown to be activated by Ca2+ [66,69,70,71]. The presence of multiple isoforms of CPKs in the Arabidopsis genome implies that they may be involved in specific Ca2+-signaling networks, may respond differentially to changes in oscillation, frequency, magnitude and duration of Ca2+ signal, or may have temporal and spatial patterns of expression and localization. Little is known about the function and substrates for CPKs in Arabidopsis. CPK1 is known to interact with 14-3-3 proteins [72] and is involved in the inactivation of a Ca2+ pump [73]. Expression of CPK10 and 11 is inducible by cold and drought [70,74,75]. An Arabidopsis CPK phosphorylates tonoplast intrinsic protein, α-TIP, a putative water-channel protein [76]. Substrates of CPKs in other plants have been identified and can be used to deduce the function of homologs in Arabidopsis. The PlantsP website database [65] is a valuable source of information on CPKs.

Besides the inclusion of the full-length sequences of CPKs and CRKs in the overall phylogenetic analysis, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the protein sequence of the CLD region of CPKs and CRKs (Figure 10). Similar trees were obtained using either full-length CPKs/CRKs (Figure 8) or the CLD region of the CPKS/CRKs (Figure 10). As shown in Figure 10, the CPKs form five distinct subgroups (I-V). The CRKs are most closely related to subgroup IV. The tree made using full-length sequences (Figure 8) has four subgroups (members of subgroups III and V in Figure 10 fall into one subgroup in Figure 8).

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Phylogenetic analysis of CPK, CRK and CCaMK. The EF-hand domains of CPKs, CRKs and other plant and protist protein kinases were aligned in MEGALIGN (DNAstar) and analyzed using a bootstrap method. Numbers are the percentage of bootstrap replicates showing the branch. The accession numbers are listed here in brackets for EtCDPK (CAA96439; 332-487 amino acids), TgTPK4 (AAC02532; 355-501 amino acids), LiCCaMK (AAC49008; 339-520 amino acids) and NtCCaMK (AAD28791; 336-517 amino acids). Et, Eimeria tenella; Li, Lilium longiflorum; Nt, Nicotiana tabacum; Tg, Toxoplasma gondii.

Group VI

Figure 9 shows the remaining proteins that do not fall into one of the other five groups. It includes the respiratory burst oxidase homology proteins (Rbohs) ABI1, GDH2, and TPC1. Plant defense responses include production of reactive oxygen species (oxidative burst) [77]. Torres et al. and Keller et al. [26,27] isolated Arabidopsis homologs (Rbohs) to the gp91phox subunit of the neutrophil NADPH oxidase, which generates a similar oxidative burst in neutrophils. Six Rbohs (A-F) have been isolated experimentally and three others have been identified in the Arabidopsis genome (Figures 2 and 9). RbohF (called RbohA in Keller et al. [27]), like animal Rboh enzymes, is an intrinsic plasma membrane protein but, unlike animal Rboh, it has EF-hands that were shown to bind Ca2+ [27]. Both Leung et al. and Meyer et al. isolated the ABI1 gene [33,34]. ABI1 is similar to serine/threonine phosphatase 2C, which in animals is Mg2+ or Mn2+ but not Ca2+-dependent (Figure 2). ABI1 is induced by abscisic acid and was shown to regulate stomatal aperture in leaves and mitotic activity in root meristems [33,34]. A second ABI gene (ABI2) was isolated using ABI1 as a probe [78]. The protein encoded by the cDNA had an eight-residue insertion in the EF-hand domain that does not conform to the EF-hand signature. A similar situation holds for glutamate dehydrogenases. Two genes were isolated; one coded for a dehydrogenase with an EF-hand (GDH2) (Figure 2) and the other one without (GDH1) [32]. Studies by Furuichi et al. [30] indicate that TPC1 is a two-pore channel that mediates Ca2+ influx. It has two EF-hand-like motifs located in a hydrophilic domain that connects the two transmembrane regions containing the pores [30]. Ca2+ binding was not shown experimentally for ABI1, GDH2, or TPC1.

Three proteins in this group have a domain present in a small GTPase protein (Figure 2 and Gtp in Figure 9). Another three-member group (Pyr in Figure 9) of proteins has a domain for FAD-dependent pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase (FAD_pyr_redox) (Figures 2 and 9).

Conclusions

A plant's adaptively variable behavior or plasticity during its lifetime has been described as 'plant intelligence' [79] and Ca2+ and its sensors are key players in this adaptive behavior. The large number of potential EF-hand-containing proteins indicates how [Ca2+]cyt changes can profoundly affect a wide array of cellular processes. Plants seem to have a large number of EF-hand-containing proteins, some of which have homologs in non-plant systems whereas others are unique to plants. In addition, plants also have unique sets of proteins that interact with Ca2+ sensors [80]. Signals from stresses such as pathogens, drought, cold and salt are mediated by EF-hand proteins [20,23,3,42,57]. Hormones induce EF-hand proteins [46,78] as do pathogen attacks [21,26]. Some EF-hand proteins, such as small GTPases and potassium channels, are involved in signaling [31]. Others appear to be involved in developmental pathways. For example, the S-100 domain proteins are involved in cell growth and differentiation, cell-cycle regulation and metabolic control [40]. The wide variety of domains in EF-hand proteins also shows the diversity of the processes in which Ca2+ is involved. However, many of the EF-hand proteins give little clue as to their function and may lead us in many other directions as their functions are elucidated.

The complexity of the Ca2+ messenger system is increased through the existence of families of proteins. At the first level, calmodulin adds complexity first in the number of isoforms present in Arabidopsis. The regulation of expression and the kinetics of interaction of these isoforms with different proteins can lend complexity to cell signaling. A second level of complexity is the number of proteins identified that interact with calmodulin. At least 100 calmodulin-binding proteins (CBPs) have been identified in Arabidopsis [80]. Differential expression of these proteins in cell types, developmental periods and in response to signals adds more complexity to the pathways that can be regulated by CAM.

The CPKs, a very large family of protein kinases, also add complexity to Ca2+ regulation. Although the mechanism of regulation may be similar in each CPK, Arabidopsis CPKs may differ in their affinity for Ca2+ in general and in the presence of their specific substrate in particular. CPK's affinity for Ca2+ is many times higher in the presence of substrate than in its absence [22]. The involvement of only specific CPKs in stress responses has already been shown [74]. Identification of the substrates for each CPK and their temporal and spatial expression will be needed for elucidating the pathways of Ca2+ control in plants.

Other families, such as the phosphatases, Rbohs and CBL/SOS3S, also contribute to the complexity of Ca2+ involvement in the regulation of many processes. Characterization of more Ca2+-binding proteins will lead to further understanding of the roles of Ca2+ and cross-talk among various components of Ca2+-signaling and other messengers in plants.

Materials and methods

Identification of EF-hand-containing proteins

Proteins containing EF hands were first identified using the InterPro Domain Table at MIPS A. thaliana database (MAtDB) [39]. The protein sequences of the 219 proteins listed at MAtDB were obtained and analyzed for EF-hands and other domains using InterProScan [40]. Proteins not showing EF-hand domains were eliminated from the list. To identify proteins not listed in the InterPro Domain Table at MAtDB, BLAST searches were done with three different EF-hand-containing proteins: calmodulin, KIC, and a Ca2+-dependent protein kinase (CPK1). BlastP searches were done for KIC and CDPK and BlastP and TbIastN for calmodulin [39]. Sequences for proteins showing sequence similarity to these proteins were also checked by InterProScan and any protein containing an EF-hand domain but not found on the InterPro Domain Table was added to the list. A literature search for Arabidopsis proteins containing EF-hands was also done using PubMed at NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) [81].

Identification of domains and organellar targeting signals

Information about domains other than the EF-hand domain was collected from the InterProScan searches done for each protein sequence. Targeting information for each protein was obtained from the MAtDB general report that includes the results of TargetP [39].

Phylogenetic analysis

The full-length sequences of all proteins identified by InterProScan as containing an EF-hand (including those that are identified by only one prediction program) were aligned using MEGALIGN. A heuristic method using PAUP 4.08a generated 100 trees. A majority-rules consensus tree was computed from the 100 trees. For the CPKs and CRKs, a second alignment was done using the CAM-like domains. A bootstrap method of PAUP.4.06a with 100 bootstraps was used to generate the tree.

References

  1. Trewavas AJ, Malho R. Ca2+ signaling in plant cells: the big network! Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1998;1:428–433. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(98)80268-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Poovaiah BW, Reddy ASN. Calcium and signal transduction in plants. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci. 1993;12:185–211. doi: 10.1080/07352689309701901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Reddy ASN. Calcium: silver bullet in signaling. Plant Sci. 2000;160:381–404. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9452(00)00386-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Zielinski RE. Calmodulin and calmodulin-binding proteins in plants. Annu Rev Pl Physiol Pl Mol Biol. 1998;49:697–725. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. White PJ. Calcium channels in higher plants. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1465:171–189. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(00)00137-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Knight H. Calcium signaling during abiotic stress in plants. Int Rev Cytol. 2000;195:269–324. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62707-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Reddy ASN, Reddy V. Calcium as a messenger in stress signal transduction. In: Pessarakali M, editor. Handbook of Plant and Crop Physiology. New York: Mercel Dekker; 2001. pp. 697–732. [Google Scholar]
  8. Snedden WA, Fromm H. Calmodulin, calmodulin-related proteins and plant responses to the environment. Trends Plant Sci. 1998;3:299–304. [Google Scholar]
  9. Roberts DM, Harmon AC. Calcium modulated proteins: targets of intracellular calcium signals in higher plants. Annu Rev Pl Physiol Pl Mol Biol. 1992;43:375–414. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kretsinger RH, Nockolds CE. Carp muscle calcium-binding protein. II. Structure determination and general description. J Biol Chem. 1973;248:3313–3326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nakayama S, Kawasaki H, Kretsinger R. Evolution of EF-hand proteins. In: Carafoli E, Krebs J, editor. Calcium Homeostasis. New York: Springer; 2000. pp. 29–58. [Google Scholar]
  12. Allouche D, Parello J, Sanejouand YH. Ca2+/Mg2+ exchange in parvalbumin and other EF-hand proteins. A theoretical study. J Mol Biol. 1999;285:857–73. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Luan S, Kudla J, Rodriguez-Concepcion M, Yalovsky S, Gruissem W. Calmodulins and calcineurin B-like proteins: calcium sensors for specific signal response coupling in plants. Plant Cell. 2002;(Suppl):S389–S400. doi: 10.1105/tpc.001115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lewit-Bentley A, Rety S. EF-hand calcium-binding proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2000;10:637–643. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(00)00142-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Perera IY, Zielinski E. Structure and expression of the Arabidopsis CaM-3 calmodulin gene. Plant Mol Biol. 1992;19:649–664. doi: 10.1007/BF00026791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ling V, Perea I, Zielinski RE. Primary structures of Arabidopsis calmodulin isoforms deduced from the sequences of cDNA clones. Plant Physiol. 1991;96:1196–1212. doi: 10.1104/pp.96.4.1196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gawienowski MC, Szymanski D, Perera IY, Zielinski RE. Calmodulin isoforms in Arabidopsis encoded by multiple divergent mRNAs. Plant Mol Biol. 1993;22:215–25. doi: 10.1007/BF00014930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zielinski RE. Characterization of three new members of the Arabidopsis thaliana calmodulin gene family: conserved and highly diverged members of the gene family functionally complement a yeast calmodulin null. Planta. 2002;214:446–455. doi: 10.1007/s004250100636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ling V, Zielinski RE. Isolation of an Arabidopsis cDNA sequence encoding a 22 kDa calcium-binding protein (CaBP-22) related to calmodulin. Plant Mol Biol. 1993;22:207–214. doi: 10.1007/BF00014929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Braam J, Davis RW. Rain-, wind-, and touch-induced expression of calmodulin and calmodulin-related genes in Arabidopsis. Cell. 1990;60:357–364. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90587-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cordeiro MC, Piqueras R, de Oliveira DE, Castresana C. Characterization of early induced genes in Arabidopsis thaliana responding to bacterial inoculation: identification of centrin and of a novel protein with two regions related to kinase domains. FEBS Lett. 1998;434:387–393. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)01015-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Harmon AC, Gribskov M, Harper JF. CDPKs - a kinase for every Ca2+ signal? Trends Plant Sci. 2000;5:154–159. doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(00)01577-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kudla J, Xu Q, Harter K, Gruissem W, Luan S. Genes for calcineurin B-like proteins in Arabidopsis are differentially regulated by stress signals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:4718–4123. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu J, Zhu JK. A calcium sensor homolog required for plant salt tolerance. Science. 1998;280:1943–1945. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5371.1943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. McCurdy DW, Kim M. Molecular cloning of a novel fimbrin-like cDNA from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol. 1998;36:23–31. doi: 10.1023/a:1005884112192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Torres MA, Onouchi H, Hamada S, Machida C, Hammond-Kosack KE, Jones JD. Six Arabidopsis thaliana homologues of the human respiratory burst oxidase (gp91phox). Plant J. 1998;14:365–370. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00136.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Keller T, Damude HG, Werner D, Doerner P, Dixon RA, Lamb C. A plant homolog of the neutrophil NADPH oxidase gp91phox subunit gene encodes a plasma membrane protein with Ca2+ binding motifs. Plant Cell. 1998;10:255–266. doi: 10.1105/tpc.10.2.255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hirayama T, Mitsukawa N, Shibata D, Shinozaki K. AtPLC2, a gene encoding phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C, is constitutively expressed in vegetative and floral tissues in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol. 1997;34:175–180. doi: 10.1023/a:1005885230896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Otterhag L, Sommarin M, Pical C. N-terminal EF-hand-like domain is required for phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C activity in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett. 2001;497:165–170. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(01)02453-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Furuichi T, Cunningham KW, Muto S. A putative two pore channel AtTPC1 mediates Ca2+ flux in Arabidopsis leaf cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001;42:900–905. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pce145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Czempinski K, Zimmermann S, Ehrhardt T, Muller-Rober B. New structure and function in plant K+ channels: KCO1, an outward rectifier with a steep Ca2+ dependency. EMBO J. 1997;16:2565–2575. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.10.2565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Turano FJ, Thakkar SS, Fang T, Weisemann JM. Characterization and expression of NAD(H)-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 1997;113:1329–1341. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.4.1329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Leung J, Bouvier-Durand M, Morris PC, Guerrier D, Chefdor F, Giraudat J. Arabidopsis ABA response gene ABI1: features of a calcium-modulated protein phosphatase. Science. 1994;264:1448–1452. doi: 10.1126/science.7910981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Meyer K, Leube MP, Grill E. A protein phosphatase 2C involved in ABA signal transduction in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science. 1994;264:1452–1455. doi: 10.1126/science.8197457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jang HJ, Pih KT, Kang SG, Lim JH, Jin JB, Piao HL, Hwang I. Molecular cloning of a novel Ca2+-binding protein that is induced by NaCl stress. Plant Mol Biol. 1998;37:839–847. doi: 10.1023/a:1006043006211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rozwadowski K, Zhao R, Jackman L, Huebert T, Burkhart WE, Hemmingsen SM, Greenwood J, Rothstein SJ. Characterization and immunolocalization of a cytosolic calcium-binding protein from Brassica napus and Arabidopsis pollen. Plant Physiol. 1999;120:787–798. doi: 10.1104/pp.120.3.787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 2000;408:796–815. doi: 10.1038/35048692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Munich Information Center for Protein Sequences http://www.mips.biochem.mpg.de
  39. Schoof H, Zaccaria P, Gundlach H, Lemcke K, Rudd S, Kolesov G, Arnold R, Mewes HW, Mayer KF. MIPS Arabidopsis thaliana database (MAtDB): an integrated biological knowledge resource based on the first complete plant genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:91–93. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.1.91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Apweiler R, Attwood TK, Bairoch A, Bateman A, Birney E, Biswas M, Bucher P, Cerutti L, Corpet F, Croning MD, et al. The InterPro database, an integrated documentation resource for protein families, domains and functional sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:37–40. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.1.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mulder NJ, Apweiler R. Tools and resources for identifying protein families, domains and motifs. Genome Biol. 2002;3:1–2001. doi: 10.1186/gb-2001-3-1-reviews2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hirayama T, Ohto C, Mizoguchi T, Shinozaki K. A gene encoding a phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C is induced by dehydration and salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:3903–3907. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.9.3903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, Li PW, Mural RJ, Sutton GG, Smith HO, Yandell M, Evans CA, Holt RA, et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science. 2001;291:1304–1351. doi: 10.1126/science.1058040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. TargetP v1.01 http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/
  45. Frandsen G, Muller-Uri F, Nielsen M, Mundy J, Skriver K. Novel plant Ca(2+)-binding protein expressed in response to abscisic acid and osmotic stress. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:343–348. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.1.343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Naested H, Frandsen GI, Jauh GY, Hernandez-Pinzon I, Nielsen HB, Murphy DJ, Rogers JC, Mundy J. Caleosins: Ca2+-binding proteins associated with lipid bodies. Plant Mol Biol. 2000;44:463–476. doi: 10.1023/a:1026564411918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Takahashi S, Katagiri T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. An Arabidopsis gene encoding a Ca2+-binding protein is induced by abscisic acid during dehydration. Plant Cell Physiol. 2000;41:898–903. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcd010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lu G, Sehnke PC, Ferl RJ. Phosphorylation and calcium binding properties of an Arabidopsis GF14 brain protein homolog. Plant Cell. 1994;6:501–510. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.4.501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Athwal GS, Huber S. Divalent cations and polyamines bind to loop 8 of 14-3-3 proteins, modulating their interaction with phosphorylated nitrate reductase. Plant J. 2002;29:119–129. doi: 10.1046/j.0960-7412.2001.01200.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Guo H, Mockler T, Duong H, Lin C. SUB1, an Arabidopsis Ca2+-binding protein involved in cryptochrome and phytochrome coaction. Science. 2002;291:487–490. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5503.487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kovar DR, Staiger CJ, Weaver EA, McCurdy DW. AtFim1 is an actin filament crosslinking protein from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2000;24:625–636. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00907.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Guo Y, Halfter U, Ishitani M, Zhu JK. Molecular characterization of functional domains in the protein kinase SOS2 that is required for plant salt tolerance. Plant Cell. 2001;13:1383–1400. doi: 10.1105/tpc.13.6.1383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Halfter U, Ishitani M, Zhu JK. The Arabidopsis SOS2 protein kinase physically interacts with and is activated by the calcium-binding protein SOS3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:3735–3740. doi: 10.1073/pnas.040577697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Kim KN, Cheong YH, Gupta R, Luan S. Interaction specificity of Arabidopsis calcineurin B-like calcium sensors and their target kinases. Plant Physiol. 2000;124:1844–1853. doi: 10.1104/pp.124.4.1844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Albrecht V, Ritz O, Linder S, Harter K, Kudla J. The NAF domain defines a novel protein-protein interaction module conserved in Ca2+-regulated kinases. EMBO J. 2001;20:1051–1063. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.5.1051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. The Arabidopsis Functional Genomics Network www.bio.uni-frankfurt.de/botanik/mcb/AFGN/kudla.html
  57. Jakobek JL, Smith-Becker JA, Lindgren PB. A bean cDNA expressed during a hypersensitive reaction encodes a putative calcium-binding protein. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1999;12:712–719. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.1999.12.8.712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Hendershot JD, III, Esmon CA, Lumb JE, Rundle SJ. Identification and characterization of sequences encoding a 62-kilodalton B' regulatory subunit of Arabidopsis protein phosphatase 2A. Plant Physiol. 1999;121:311. [Google Scholar]
  59. Reddy ASN, Safadi F, Narasimhulu SB, Golovkin M, Hu X. A novel plant calmodulin-binding protein with a kinesin heavy chain motor domain. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:7052–7060. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.12.7052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Reddy V, Safadi F, Zielinski RE, Reddy ASN. Interaction of a kinesin-like protein with calmodulin isoforms from Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:31727–31733. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.44.31727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Takezawa D. A rapid induction by elicitors of the mRNA encoding CCD-1, a 14 kDa Ca2+-binding protein in wheat cultured cells. Plant Mol Biol. 2000;42:807–817. doi: 10.1023/a:1006431724090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. O'Neil KT, DeGrado WF. How calmodulin binds its targets: sequence-independent recognition of amphiphilic α-helices. Trends Biochem Sci. 1990;15:59–64. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(90)90177-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Liao B, Gawienowski MC, Zielinski RE. Differential stimulation of NAD kinase and binding of peptide substrates by wild-type and mutant plant calmodulin isoforms. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1996;327:53–60. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1996.0092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Bartling D, Butler H, Weiler EW. Arabidopsis thaliana cDNA encoding a novel member of the EF-hand superfamily of calcium-binding proteins. Plant Physiol. 1993;102:1059–1060. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.3.1059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. PlantsP http://plantsP.sdsc.edu
  66. Hrabak EM, Dickmann LJ, Satterlee JS, Sussman MR. Characterization of eight new members of the calmodulin-like domain protein kinase gene family from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol. 1996;31:405–412. doi: 10.1007/BF00021802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Hrabak E. Calcium-dependent protein kinases and their relatives. In: Krie M, Walker J, editor. Advances in Botanical Research Incorporating Advances in Plant Pathology. Vol. 32. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc; 2000. pp. 185–223. [Google Scholar]
  68. Weljie AM, Clarke TE, Juffer AH, Harmon AC, Vogel HJ. Comparative modeling studies of the calmodulin-like domain of calcium-dependent protein kinase from soybean. Proteins. 2000;39:343–357. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(20000601)39:4<343::aid-prot70>3.0.co;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Hong Y, Takano M, Liu CM, Gasch A, Chye ML, Chua NH. Expression of three members of the calcium-dependent protein kinase gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol. 1996;30:1259–1275. doi: 10.1007/BF00019557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Urao T, Katagiri T, Mizoguchi T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Hayashida N, Shinozaki K. Two genes that encode Ca2+-dependent protein kinases are induced by drought and high-salt stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet. 1994;244:331–340. doi: 10.1007/BF00286684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Urao T, Katagiri T, Mizoguchi T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Hayashida N, Shinozaki K. An Arabidopsis thaliana cDNA encoding Ca2+-dependent protein kinase. Plant Physiol. 1994;105:1461–1462. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.4.1461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Camoni L, Harper JF, Palmgren MG. 14-3-3 proteins activate a plant calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK). FEBS Lett. 1998;430:381–384. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)00696-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Hwang I, Sze H, Harper JF. A calcium-dependent protein kinase can inhibit a calmodulin-stimulated Ca2+ pump (ACA2) located in the endoplasmic reticulum of Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:6224–6229. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.11.6224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Sheen J. Ca2+-dependent protein kinases and stress signal transduction in plants. Science. 1996;274:1900–1902. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5294.1900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Tahtiharju S, Sangwan V, Monory AF, Dhindsa RS, Borg M. The induction of kin genes in cold-acclimating Arabidopsis thaliana: Evidence of a role for calcium. Planta. 1997;203:442–447. doi: 10.1007/s004250050212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Johnson KD, Chrispeels MJ. Tonoplast-bound protein kinase phosphorylates tonoplast intrinsic protein. Plant Physiol. 1992;100:1787–1795. doi: 10.1104/pp.100.4.1787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Lamb CJ, Dixon RA. The oxidative burst in plant disease resistance. Annu Rev Pl Physiol Pl Mol Biol. 1997;48:251–275. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Leung J, Merlot S, Giraudat J. The Arabidopsis ABSCISIC ACID-INSENSITIVE2 (ABI2) and ABI1 genes encode homologous protein phosphatases 2C involved in abscisic acid signal transduction. Plant Cell. 1997;9:759–771. doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.5.759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Trewavas A. Mindless mastery. Nature. 2002;425:841. doi: 10.1038/415841a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Reddy VS, Ali GS, Reddy ASN. Genes encoding calmodulin-binding proteins in the Arabidopsis genome. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:9840–9852. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111626200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed/
  82. Romeis T, Piedras P, Jones JD. Resistance gene-dependent activation of a calcium-dependent protein kinase in the plant defense response. Plant Cell. 2000;12:803–816. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.5.803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Harper JF, Huang JF, Lloyd SJ. Genetic identification of an autoinhibitor in CDPK, a protein kinase with a calmodulin-like domain. Biochemistry. 1994;33:7267–7277. doi: 10.1021/bi00189a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Biology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES