Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most common cause of death in women. Early identification of CVD risk factors in women is often overlooked by physicians leading to delays in diagnosis and treatment of CVD with subsequent morbidity and mortality. There may be a correlation between declining hormone levels during menopause and the prevalence of CVD during midlife. Alterations in the CVD risk profile of women throughout the menopause transition (MT) are multifactorial and include changes to arterial stiffness, endothelial function, lipid metabolism, insulin resistance and adipose fat distribution. Menopausal Hormonal Therapy (THM) is a potential therapy to reduce CVD risk, though clinical trials have shown conflicting results, with some trials reporting an increase in CVD events with THM. A holistic approach to care for women going through the MT could be beneficial to improve their CVD risk profile and quality of life. This would include early identification of risk factors in individual patients and raising public and professional awareness of CVD risk burden in this patient population. Improving the knowledge of healthcare professionals and the public that women going through the MT are at an increased risk of CVD is a key target area to improve cardiovascular health in women. Current risk assessment scores for CVD do not include sex-specific risk factors. Guidelines and National Health Systems are beginning to recognise the importance of reproductive history in women’s cardiovascular health. In this review, we aim to discuss traditional and sex specific risk factors for CVD in menopausal women, current guidelines on THM, gaps in knowledge and strategies to reduce CVD in women.
Keywords: Coronary Angiography, Coronary Artery Disease, Metabolic Syndrome
Introduction
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most common cause of death among women worldwide.1 Despite improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of CVD over the last few decades, there continues to be gender imbalance in accessing healthcare for CVD. These inequities particularly affect women from ethnic minorities and/or poorer countries, and those facing social deprivation.1 Menopause is the period in a woman’s life where they undergo permanent cessation of menstruation and ovarian function. The average age of onset of the menopause is 51 years of age with a range of between 40 and 60 years.2 There are sex differences in the incidence of CVD with lower rates seen in premenopausal women thought to be largely related to the protective effects of oestrogen.3 The role of oestrogen in the regulation of blood pressure, vascular function and cardiac function is well established.4 5 The decline in oestrogen throughout the menopause transition (MT) is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. In addition, declining oestrogen levels can have a deleterious effect on cognitive function and the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease.6
The Lancet Women and Cardiovascular Disease Commission highlighted the need to reduce the global burden of CVD in women by 2030.7 The commission highlighted gaps in access to care for women, knowledge related to CVD prevention and on-going research. The American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guidelines recognise that premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) (which is ovarian insufficiency under 40 years) increases CVD risk but this has not been fully supported by the European guidelines.8 9 In the UK, there has been recognition by the National Health Service (NHS) that menopause questions should be incorporated into NHS health checks, raising awareness and helping women to be directed to appropriate services, information and treatment options for symptom relief.10 This review examines the impact of menopause on cardiovascular risk, the underlying mechanisms, clinical implications and prevention strategies.
CVD in women
Data from over 15 years ago suggested women present up to 10 years later with CVD than men.11 More recent data from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study investigated this. The study concluded that at 35 years old, sex differences emerge in CVD risk. Moreover, it found that there was a 2% cumulative incidence of men developing coronary heart disease (CHD) 10 years earlier than women, which is in accordance with previous data.12 In a study of young patients aged 35–54 years presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), hospitalisations with AMI were more common among women and women were less likely to receive guideline based therapies.13 A large study reported by Zhu and colleagues showed an association between age at menopause and the incidence of CVD. There was a higher cardiovascular risk in women presenting with menopause before 50 years of age and a significantly reduced cardiovascular risk in women reaching menopause after 51 years of age. The association was strongest in POI and early menopausal women (menopause at 44 years or younger) up to 60 years of age, with no significant association seen once the women reached 70 years of age.14 These findings reinforce the need to raise awareness of CVD in young women and incorporate female-specific variables in assessing risk. A recent study investigated acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in premenopausal women and highlighted a major challenge in correctly diagnosing and treating young women with CVD, resulting in frequent misdiagnosis and mistreatment in this patient group. Furthermore, the study argued that risk assessment in young women should involve components such as pregnancy history, lipoprotein(a) and history of familial hypercholesterolaemia as well as traditional CVD risk factors. This study highlighted some future directions for the management of premenopausal women with ACS, such as establishing sex-specific reference values for intracoronary imaging, implementing strategies to increase female participation in trials and policies to address social determinants of health that affect CVD risk.15 Shin et al reported an association between POI (<40 years) and the incidence of heart failure and atrial fibrillation.16 These studies highlight the importance of assessing a woman’s reproductive history as well as traditional risk factors when assessing cardiovascular risk.
Epidemiology
POI is a clinically distinct condition from early menopause and affects 1% of women under the age of 40. It is defined as the loss of normal ovarian function before the age of 40, and is characterised by infrequent or absent menstrual periods as well as elevated gonadotrophins and low estradiol.17 18 In contrast, early menopause is defined as the permanent cessation of ovarian function between the ages of 40 and 44 years. POI puts women at an increased risk of ischaemic heart disease (IHD), myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke.18 19 The increase in CVD risk is attributed to a lack of endogenous oestrogen and worsening of cardiovascular risk factors such as endothelial dysfunction and adverse lipid profiles.19 Menopausal Hormonal Therapy (THM) is strongly recommended for the prevention of CVD in women with POI when initiated promptly at the time of diagnosis and maintained until the average age of natural menopause.19 20 THM works to restore the normal serum oestrogen concentration. In addition to THM, patients should be educated on the importance of lifestyle modification to further prevent CVD.20
POI and early menopause are associated with increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) due to earlier development of cardiometabolic syndrome.9 In a study of 46 238 women with a mean age of 62.1 years, CVD was higher in women with POI and early menopause compared with those who reached menopause between 50 and 52 years.21 A meta-analysis reported a 1.7-fold increase in fatal or non-fatal IHD risk in POI patients.22 A recent prospective study has shown that women with POI face a 40% higher lifetime risk of CHD (fatal and non-fatal MI).23
Surgical menopause is when both ovaries are removed prior to natural menopause. It is performed for the treatment of benign or malignant conditions, such as endometriosis or to reduce the risk of breast and ovarian cancer. In surgical menopause, sex hormone levels fall drastically as opposed to natural menopause, where they decline more gradually. Surgical menopause is associated with a higher risk of developing CVD. The InterLACE consortium reported pooled data on 203 767 postmenopausal women and found that surgical menopause was associated with a higher risk of CVD than natural menopause.24 This observation was also confirmed in a UK Biobank cohort study of 144 260 women who had undergone surgical menopause or POI.25 This observation was not seen in a study of prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy patients for ovarian cancer who underwent CT coronary artery calcium (CAC) to evaluate CVD risk.26 Oophorectomy is often performed as part of a hysterectomy procedure for benign conditions such as uterine fibroids or endometriosis. These conditions are found to coexist with other metabolic conditions that increase CVD risk and can be associated with changes in lipid metabolism.27 28
Pathophysiological mechanisms
There are many pathophysiological mechanisms that contribute to a change in the CVD risk profile of women undergoing the menopause (figure 1). These include changes to arterial stiffness, endothelial dysfunction, lipid metabolism, insulin resistance and adipose fat distribution. A recent mouse model study has shown that asprosin levels (a glucogenic adipokine secreted by white adipose tissue) were higher in mice with long-term ovariectomy. Asprosin was found to potentiate vasoconstriction and lead to arterial stiffness.29 As oestrogen levels reduce during menopause, the vasodilating part of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) may decrease, and the vasoconstrictive arm may increase in activity. Those alterations in the RAAS are found throughout many tissues, including brain, heart, adipose tissue and kidney.30 RAAS also impacts thrombosis (through tissue factor VIIa) and inflammation (mainly by interleukin (IL)-6), which contribute to CVD.31 IL-6 can also increase the fibrinogen level to enhance thrombosis.32 33 Women tend to have higher fibrinogen levels than men, including in the setting of premature coronary artery disease (CAD), although the reasons for this difference are not fully understood. Importantly, higher fibrinogen levels are associated with more extensive coronary atherosclerosis in women with CAD.34 Ageing leads to arterial stiffness but what remains unclear is the role of menopause in the progression of arterial stiffness. A cross-sectional study including 52 891 women from the UK Biobank assessed the arterial stiffness index changes over the MT. The investigators found that menopausal women had a higher arterial stiffness index as compared with premenopausal women. The study concluded that menopause is associated with increased arterial stiffness independent of traditional risk factors.35 In addition, one study showed that the incidence of CVD is similar in both perimenopausal and postmenopausal women, whereas follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinising hormone, estradiol, total cholesterol (TC) and low density lipoprotein (LDL) are significantly different in different age groups. It indicated that increasing age was associated with a higher risk of CVD.36 During menopause there are changes in endothelial function which may have a direct effect on vasodilatation of smooth muscle cells by the reduced synthesis of nitric oxide and increased synthesis of endothelin 1, leading to vasoconstriction.37 Endothelial dysfunction occurs across the stages of the menopause. In a cross-sectional study of 132 women, flow mediated dilatation (FMD) was assessed across different stages of menopause. The study found that declining endothelial function was seen in the early stages of menopause and worsened after loss of ovarian function and prolonged oestrogen deficiency.38 39 Declining ovarian function is associated with increased proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1, IL-6 and tissue necrosis factor alpha. The Women’s Ischaemia Syndrome Evaluation study demonstrated higher serologic T helper type 1 cytokines in premenopausal women with premature obstructive CAD.9 40
Figure 1. Pathophysiological mechanisms. IL-1, interleukin 1; IL-6, interleukin-6; RAAS, renin angiotensin aldosterone system; TNF, tumour necrosis factor.
In addition to ageing and endothelial dysfunction, there are some genetic determinants that impact CAD in women. Although many susceptibility loci are shared between men and women, their phenotypic expression may differ according to sex.41 42 The distinction may be particularly relevant in female premature CAD, where genetic predisposition may interact with female-specific exposures, including hormonal changes during pregnancy and the MT.43 This may reflect sex-specific biological mechanisms, potentially involving mitochondrial DNA variation or genes located on the X chromosome.44
Incorporating menopause specific cardiovascular risk factors into routine cardiovascular practice
Clinical assessment including reproductive history
An important strategy for clinicians to improve cardiovascular outcomes in women is recognising menopause as a sex-specific period during which cardiovascular risk accelerates. Clinicians should incorporate a comprehensive reproductive history into a standard cardiovascular risk assessment. This would include recording the age of onset of menopause and determining if this was POI or early menopause both of which increase the risk of a woman developing CHD. They should also determine the type of menopause, whether this was natural or a surgical menopause. The latter causes a sudden cessation of estradiol which can lead to increased cardiovascular risk. Other important questions during the clinical assessment should include a history of adverse pregnancy associated outcomes (APOs) and details on current or previous hormone therapy. Collation of this data into electronic patient record can provide important information relevant to cardiovascular risk assessment.
APOs including gestational diabetes, preterm birth, placental abruption, small for gestational age and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are increasingly recognised as female specific cardiovascular risk factors.45 Women with APOs are at greater risk of CAD, stroke, heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension.46 The prevalence of APOs in women is almost 30%.47 The AHA recognises the importance of identifying these APOs in the risk assessment of CVD, so as to identify women who may require more aggressive primary prevention for CVD.45 APOs can have a long-lasting effect on CVD risk. The Swedish National Cohort Study found that women who experienced an APO had an increased risk of IHD up to 46 years after delivery.48 This highlights the importance of regular follow-up and monitoring of CVD risk profile in this group.
Menopause-associated cardiometabolic changes for monitoring
Metabolic syndrome
Women who are in the MT should be monitored for changes in their cardiometabolic profile. Declining estradiol levels can lead to changes in the metabolic and vascular profile in women increasing CVD risk. Menopause has not been found to be independently linked to hypertension and increases in insulin or glucose beyond natural ageing. However, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome has been found to increase with the MT beyond the scope of natural ageing.8 A study of 32 959 women of which 5210 were postmenopausal concluded that postmenopausal women with metabolic syndrome had significantly higher risks of CVD. Women at early menopause or with elevated fasting glucose had the highest risk. The study highlighted the importance of early detection of metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal women.49 The features of metabolic syndrome, such as increased glucose and insulin levels, central intra-abdominal body fat and changes in lipid profile, may be a direct result of ovarian failure or may be a consequence of central fat redistribution with a decline in oestrogen.50
Dyslipidaemia
During the MT, there are many changes seen in lipid metabolism, namely a reduction in high density lipoprotein (HDL), an increase in LDL and an increase in TC and triglycerides. These lipid changes have a causal relationship with declining estradiol levels and age and are largely mediated by changes in lipid metabolism during the MT. The pathogenetic mechanisms include alterations of HDL cardioprotective properties, increases in proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, LDL and lipoprotein A levels.51 These lipid changes, in turn, could be a risk enhancer for ASCVD. The Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN) investigated metabolic changes in the HDL pathway using the cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) as a surrogate marker. A high CEC would normally be cardiovascular protective in premenopausal women; however, during the MT a high level did not indicate cardiovascular protective properties. This would indicate HDL may be dysfunctional during the MT.52
The role of lipid lowering medication in menopausal women has been evaluated in hyperlipidaemic postmenopausal women. The Beyond Endorsed Lipid Lowering with Electron-beam tomography Scanning study investigated intensive versus moderate statin therapy and evaluated CAC using electron-beam tomography. The study showed a greater reduction in LDL cholesterol levels with higher statin therapy but did not relate to CAC score.53 Lipid lowering therapy is recommended to women who meet specific criteria for high cardiovascular risk or with familial hypercholesterolaemia. Despite these recommendations to implement lipid lowering therapy, women are less likely to be offered this treatment than men.54
Hypertension
Blood pressure should be routinely monitored during the MT. The prevalence of hypertension increases during MT.55 With vascular ageing, changes occur in endothelial function, arterial stiffness and activation of the RAAS.56 Systolic blood pressure is lower in women than in men at younger ages, however the rate of increase in systolic blood pressure among women is much more rapid than in men as age increases.57 This is likely due to overactivation of the RAAS. However, it remains unclear whether the menopause independently contributes to hypertension or if chronological ageing and adverse changes in body composition are primarily responsible.58 The AHA Scientific Statement from 2020 on Menopause Transition and Cardiovascular Disease Risk highlights that hypertension is the most significant and modifiable CVD risk factor in women.8 Women often receive suboptimal management of their hypertension and therefore frequent monitoring of blood pressure during the MT may help to reduce the incidence of stroke and CVD.59
Insulin resistance and diabetes
Changes in body shape are frequently seen in women during the MT with a more central distribution of body fat. Visceral fat is less sensitive to insulin and women going through the MT need assessment of their glycaemic control. Women with T2DM have a 25–50% greater risk of CVD compared with men with T2DM.57 Insulin resistance is a risk factor for the development of T2DM and CVD. Metabolic syndrome, which has insulin resistance as one of its components, has been found to be linked to the MT and the development of CVD. Biological sex differences, mainly driven by female sex hormones such as oestrogen, have a protective effect on developing cardiometabolic disorders.60 Oestrogen has a protective effect by maintaining the insulin sensitivity of the tissues. Insulin resistance is due to the inability to regulate the uptake of glucose by tissues. The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition InterAct study found that earlier age at menopause was associated with an increased risk of T2DM. The hazard of T2DM was 32% higher in menopause before the age of 40 than menopause at 50–54 years. This may be attributable to a shortened exposure to oestrogen.61
Weight gain
Weight gain is a well-established risk factor for the development of CVD. The MT is often associated with adverse changes in body composition and weight gain, with adipose tissue accumulating in the central and visceral areas of the body, and a reduction in lean muscle mass.62 63 The pathophysiology behind this change is uncertain; however, it has been hypothesised that normal ageing, a decline in oestrogen and behavioural factors all contribute to this.64 The Framingham Heart Study found that an earlier age of menopause was associated with increased body mass index (BMI), waist circumference and overall obesity.65 However, this was not replicated in the SWAN study which concluded that the MT does affect BMI, but other variables such as ethnicity and physical inactivity, may be more important factors.66 A study of 3876 women found that women who had reached the menopause had 6% increased odds of central obesity compared with women who had not reached the menopause. The study concluded that menopause changes the central fat distribution in women.67 The SWAN cardiovascular fat ancillary study found that late peri and postmenopausal women had more total heart adipose tissue than premenopausal and early perimenopausal women independent of other covariates.68 These studies have confirmed that during the MT, there are changes in adipose fat tissue distribution, namely being more central and affecting the visceral organs.
Vasomotor symptoms
Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are the most common symptom experienced by women throughout the MT. The British Menopause Society estimate that 70–80% of midlife women experience VMS.69 It is important for clinicians to incorporate questions about VMS during cardiovascular risk assessment as they are a cardiovascular risk enhancer in women going through the MT. VMS consist of hot flushes and night sweats experienced primarily around the head, neck, chest and upper back.70 The cause of VMS is not fully understood and is likely to be due to multiple factors. Reproductive hormones play an important role in the development of VMS.71 VMS are associated with risk factors predisposing to CVD such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia and diabetes. Certain risk factors such as obesity and smoking can predispose women to develop more frequent or severe VMS.72 Furthermore, subclinical CVD such as carotid intima media thickness, brachial artery FMD and aortic calcification have been linked to frequent and severe VMS.73 74 The SWAN study found that frequent and or persistent VMS increased the risk of fatal and non-fatal CVD events. The study evaluated 3083 women aged 42–52 years at baseline and found an association of frequent and persistent VMS with CVD events.75 This provides further evidence that VMS are a sex specific cardiovascular risk factor in menopausal women. VMS develop due to overstimulation of the neurones involved in the thermoregulatory pathway during estradiol withdrawal. VMS have also been shown to affect autonomic nervous system cardiac control, alterations in the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis and changes to procoagulant profiles76 (figure 2).
Figure 2. Cardiovascular risk factors during the menopausal transition. CVD, cardiovascular disease; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; MT, menopause transition; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Estradiol therapy is a longstanding treatment used for the management of VMS.77 Although THM remains an effective treatment for VMS, it is not suitable for all women and non-hormonal therapies can play an important role in the management of VMS in this patient group. Among these, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) are prescribed for the management of VMS. Currently, low dose paroxetine is the only US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved SSRI for the management of VMS. Other SSRIs and SNRIs can be prescribed off label for the same purpose.77 Non-hormonal therapies proved a potential way to manage VMS in patients who are unable to or do not want to take hormonal treatment options.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend the use of fezolinetant 45 mg once daily as a non-hormonal treatment option for moderate-to-severe VMS when THM is unsuitable.78 Fezolinetant is a neurokinin-3 antagonist and works via targeting hypothalamic neurokinin receptors that modulate thermoregulatory pathways.77 Two major randomised control trials provided the evidence for the NICE recommendation, they concluded that fezolinetant was effective in reducing the frequency and severity of VMS compared with the placebo group.79–81
Recent trials have investigated the use of a specific non-hormonal therapy, elinzanetant, to manage VMS. Elinzanetant is a dual neurokinin-1,3 receptor antagonist which works by targeting hypothalamic pathways responsible for thermoregulation.82 The OASIS 1 and 2 randomised control trials investigated the efficacy and safety of elinzanetant. They concluded that elinzanetant had a favourable safety profile and was effective in reducing VMS frequency and severity.83 In July 2025 the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency was the first regulator worldwide to approve the use of elinzanetant for moderate-to-severe VMS.84 Since July 2025 elinzanetant has been approved in various areas worldwide. A recent review carried out an indirect comparison of elinzanetant to other non-hormonal treatments for the management of VMS and concluded that elinzanetant had favourable properties to other non-hormonal therapies such as paroxetine, fezolinetant, desvenlafaxine and gabapentin.85 VMS are a risk enhancer for CVD and therefore non-hormonal therapies may be a potential therapeutic option to control this.
Hormone therapy for menopause and CVD
Current guidelines indicate a holistic approach and the use of THM to improve symptoms of the menopause.86 87 The Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) randomised control trial did not report a reduction in cardiovascular events with the use of THM but an increase in stroke and venous thromboembolism as well as breast cancer.88 89 These risks were associated with the use of conjugated equine oestrogen (CEE) with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in an older population, further from menopause than is typical for current THM initiation.90 91 Therefore, the results of the WHI should not be generalised to all THM regimes. This trial has caused uncertainty among clinicians in prescribing THM in the past despite current evidence indicating the valuable use of THM in certain patient groups.90 THM replaces sex hormones that decline during the MT. The loss of oestrogen and progesterone hormones are associated with adverse vascular and myocardial changes.92 The timing of initiation of THM in relation to the onset of the MT is arguably crucial to its effectiveness in reducing CVD risk. The timing hypothesis is built on the theory that when oestrogen acts on a normal healthy blood vessel endothelium, commonly seen in younger women, it encourages the dilatation of the blood vessel via the production of nitric oxide and reduces inflammation. These positive effects are not necessarily seen when oestrogen therapy is used in older women. In women with advanced atherosclerosis the protective effects of oestrogen may be absent, instead there may be an increased risk of atherosclerotic plaque rupture and thrombotic event.93 It has now been established that THM commenced within 10 years of onset of perimenopause has many health benefits without affecting CVD risk in patients under 60.63 The 2015 Cochrane Review concluded that patients who started THM within 10 years of menopause had a lower mortality rate, lower CHD risk but an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) than others. In comparison patients who began THM more than 10 years post menopause had no change in mortality or CHD rate but an increased risk of stroke.94 In a secondary analysis of the WHI, Rossouw et al concluded that in women aged 50–59 years of age, both CEE and CEE with MPA treatments were effective in reducing VMS without affecting ASCVD risk. However, this was not replicated in over 70 year old patients whose risk of ASCVD was increased.95 These findings are in accordance with current guideline recommendations for the hormonal treatment of VMS.96 The Early versus Late Postmenopausal Treatment with Estradiol randomised control trial which evaluated early versus late postmenopausal treatment with estradiol, involved 643 women and found that oral estradiol therapy commenced within 6 years of menopause was associated with less subclinical atherosclerosis than women randomised to the placebo arm. These results were not observed in women given THM 10 years post menopause.97 In contrast, the Kronos Early Oestrogen Prevention Study randomised control trial, which investigated the use of THM among postmenopausal women, only found improvements in mood, hot flushes, sleep and bone mineral density. There was no signal to indicate a reduction in carotid intima medial thickness but interpretation of this study needs to be cautious as the populations were different in the two studies.98 The Heart and Oestrogen/progestin Replacement Study included 2763 postmenopausal women and found that THM did not affect the primary outcome of non-fatal MI or CHD death.99 THM has also been shown to reduce the risk of CVD in surgical menopause under the age of 50 years. In a pooled cohort of patients from the InterLACE study, women undergoing surgical menopause before the age of 50 who were taking HRT had a lower risk of CVD than women who were not using HRT.24
The route of administration of sex hormone is important and can also influence CVD risk. Estradiol can be administered in two major forms, orally or transdermally. Oral estradiol has been associated with an increased risk of stroke or thrombotic event due to oral estradiol undergoing first-pass hepatic metabolism and activating the coagulation pathway. Transdermal estradiol avoids the hepatic first-pass metabolism therefore avoiding unwanted coagulation activation.100 101 Transdermal estradiol does not elevate a woman’s risk of VTE or stroke. Transdermal estradiol is recommended as first choice in women at risk of CVD or thrombotic event.100 An important point to acknowledge and to consider when prescribing THM is use of systemic oral estradiol has been found to be associated with an increased risk of VTE.88 A WHI Observational Prospective Cohort Study evaluated different types of estradiol and routes of administration. Oral estradiol was associated with a lower risk of stroke and transdermal estradiol was associated with a lower risk of CHD, but statistical power was limited in this study102 (table 1).
Table 1. Summary of THM trials.
| Trial name | Sample size | Population | Type of THM | Comparator | Study design | Primary outcome | Follow-up | Main results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHI Oestrogen plus Progestin89 | 16 608 | Postmenopausal women with intact uterus, aged 50–79 years old | 0.625 mg oral CEE plus 2.5 mg MPA | Placebo | Randomised controlled primary prevention trial | CHD (non-fatal MI and CHD death). Invasive breast cancer primary adverse outcome. Global index of risks. |
Mean 5.2 years (trial terminated early due to safety concerns) | Health risks exceeded benefits. Oestrogen plus progestin should not be used for primary prevention of CHD, due to persistent adverse effects in CVD. |
| HERS99 | 2763 | Postmenopausal women with intact uterus with established coronary disease, <80 years old. Mean age: 66.7 years |
0.625 mg o-CEE plus 2.5 mg of MPA in one tablet daily | Placebo | Randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled secondary prevention trial | Non-fatal MI or CHD death. | Mean 4.1 years | No significant difference in non-fatal MI or CHD death between groups. No significant differences in secondary CVD outcomes. |
| KEEPS98 | 727 | Healthy recently postmenopausal women (within 6 months to 3 years of natural menopause) Aged 42–58 years 80% non-Hispanic white |
0.45 mg o-CEE or 50 µg t-E2. Both groups 200 mg micronised progesterone for first 12 days of each month. |
Placebo | Randomised, double blinded, placebo-controlled trial | CIMT progression. | 4 years | No significant difference in CIMT progression in either group. Oral oestrogen (p=0.43). Transdermal oestrogen (p=0.64). |
| ELITE97 | 643 | Healthy postmenopausal women classified into <6 years (early post menopause) or >10 years (late post menopause) | Oral 17β-estradiol 1 mg per day plus 45 mg progesterone vaginal gel administered sequentially | Placebo | Randomised double blinded placebo-controlled trial | CIMT progression. | Median 5 years | Less CIMT progression in early post menopause group (p=0.008), no significant change to CIMT in late post menopause group (p=0.29) |
| WHI Estrogen-alone102 | 10 739 | Postmenopausal women with prior hysterectomy, aged 50–79 23% minority race/ethnicity |
0.625 mg CEE | Placebo | Randomised double-blinded, placebo-controlled disease prevention trial | CHD incidence (non-fatal MI or CHD death). Invasive breast cancer primary safety outcome. Global index of risks. |
6.8 years (intervention phase of trial ended early) | Use of CEE increases risk of stroke, does not influence CHD incidence among this patient group. |
CEE, conjugated equine oestrogen; CHD, coronary heart disease; CIMT, Carotid-Artery Intima-Media Thickness; CVD, cardiovascular disease; ELITE, Early versus Late Post Menopausal Treatment with Estradiol; HERS, Heart Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study; KEEPS, Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study; MI, myocardial infarction; MPA, medroxyprogesterone acetate; o-CEE, oral conjugated equine estrogens; t-E2, transdermal 17β-estradiol; THM, Menopausal Hormonal Therapy; WHI, Women’s Health Initiative.
In addition, the choice of progestin influences cardiovascular risk. Micronised progesterone is often recommended and preferred in Europe due to the improved safety profile with regards to breast cancer, thrombotic disease and CVD risk compared with other forms of progestin. The choice of regime of THM should be tailored to the individual, taking into account CVD and breast cancer risk to formulate the safest approach for the patient.103
A major development in THM was the FDA’s decision to remove black box labelling on THM products in 2025. Black box labelling was introduced in response to findings from the WHI and led to risk averse prescribing of THM due to concerns of complications such as breast cancer, thromboembolism, dementia and CVD.89 90 The decision to remove these labels was due to the information on the box labelling no longer being in line with current evidence on THM.90 It has now been established that THM commenced within 10 years of onset of perimenopause has many health benefits without affecting CVD risk in patients under 60.90 104 The removal of the FDA box labelling has important future implications. It promotes a shift towards patient centred, individualised medicine that is influenced by factors such as type of hormone preparation, age and time since the MT.90
The European Society of Cardiology Consensus Document has summarised potential benefits and risks for women on THM in relation to CVD following an extensive review of the literature.63 These benefits included THM use in women under 60 years of age and within 10 years of menopause may reduce the risk of CVD; furthermore, the earlier the commencement of THM, the greater the benefit for cardiovascular health. Potential risks have been noted such as a slight increased risk of VTE with oral estradiol compared with transdermal. The risk of stroke is slightly elevated with oral estradiol therapy and THM is not recommended to women after a prior CVD event or women at high cardiovascular risk.
Clinical implications
Members of the public and healthcare professionals do not routinely acknowledge the importance of menopause on CVD. In this review, we have discussed the importance of detailing the reproductive history during cardiovascular risk assessment and potential modifiable risk enhancers for clinicians to monitor and treat appropriately. There is a movement to change this by NHS England with the recent addition of menopause-related questions to the NHS health check. This will provide an important risk assessment during the MT in addition to evaluating traditional risk factors for CVD. This approach aims to provide a window for early intervention and lifestyle modification to improve the health of menopausal women.
Regular physical activity, a balanced nutritional diet, smoking cessation, good blood pressure control and maintaining a healthy weight are key strategies to reduce the incidence of CVD. Recent research has shown that lifestyle modification can also have an impact on the development of CVD in sex-specific populations, such as women affected by menopause. The New South Wales prospective study involving 46 238 women aged 45 years or over found that lifestyle modification was associated with a consistent reduction in CVD.21 Furthermore, the SWAN study developed a Healthy Lifestyle Score (HLS) derived from self-reported data on smoking, diet and physical activity.105 In a subsequent study, the SWAN investigators reported an association of the HLS and the development of subclinical ASCVD in menopausal women.106 In addition, the WHI investigated the association of a Healthy Lifestyle Index (HLI) with CVD; those in higher HLI quintiles had a lower risk of CVD.107 These studies highlight that in sex-specific conditions such as the menopause, there is a clear association between healthy lifestyle and the development of CVD. This underpins the need to raise awareness about risk factor modification in the public and healthcare professional domains.
Screening for CVD disease
Breast arterial calcification (BAC) assessment may provide a novel way of screening for patients at risk of CVD.57 Currently, the NHS invites women for breast screening from the age of 50–53 years, and thereafter every 3 years up until the age of 71 years. BAC is commonly seen on mammograms but is not routinely reported to be an adverse clinical indicator. A single centre retrospective study involving 18 092 women quantified BAC using artificial intelligence and found that BAC was independently associated with mortality and CVD.108 A cohort study of 5059 women also found that BAC was associated with an increased risk of ASCVD.109 This work is hypothesis generating and could be a potential screening target to identify women at increased risk of CVD.
Gaps in knowledge and future directions
Risk stratification for menopausal women may be a mechanism for identifying women at risk of CVD. Analysis of the WHI randomised control trial concluded that CVD risk scores can be more effective in identifying postmenopausal women at higher risk of CVD than age or time since menopause. The clinical risk scores used in this study were the AHA/ACC and the Framingham Heart Study Risk Scores.110
Due to the lack of consensus from clinical trials and observational studies in reducing CVD risk with THM, it is currently not recommended for primary or secondary prevention of CVD. It is important to evaluate the pre-existing CVD risk in all women who are being considered for THM. One tool that is used to assess ASCVD risk is the 2013 ACC/AHA pooled cohort risk equation. This assesses the risk over 10 years of developing ASCVD in patients between the age of 40 and 79 years.111 Patients who are considered intermediate risk or higher following the evaluation with the risk calculator may be advised to avoid THM.112
Risk prediction for ASCVD could include the assessment of factors such as family history of premature ASCVD, primary hypercholesterolaemia, high risk race/ethnicity, metabolic syndrome, abnormalities in lipid profile as well as other factors defined in 2019 AHA/ACC guideline on the prevention of CVD.113
A multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach can be used to provide specialist input for women at risk of CVD throughout the MT. This model of care is well established in chronic disease management and can help reduce disease-specific morbidity and mortality. A good example of the success of multidisciplinary care is a heart team approach to managing heart disease in pregnancy.114 A holistic approach of multidisciplinary care could involve various specialists such as cardiologists, gynaecologists, general practitioners, endocrinologists, physiotherapists, nurses and dieticians to help in the risk assessment, screening, identification and treatment of CVD in middle-aged women throughout their midlife course. The MDT team would acknowledge the importance of risk factor reduction and sex-specific differences in CVD risk and presentation.
The Journal of the American College of Cardiology expert panel has proposed a clinical practice model for screening and management of CVD among menopausal women. The four steps involve: (1) initial evaluation and menopause questionnaires; (2) ASCVD risk stratification and THM candidacy; (3) additional risk stratification for intermediate/high risk patients such as measurement of lipoprotein(a) levels and CAC scoring, and (4) defining high risk patients for THM.115 The expert panel also proposed more didactic and experiential menopause training for healthcare professionals involved in the management of women in the MT.
There are sex differences in the quality of care for patients with CVD. An example of this is that women are less likely to receive primary and secondary preventative therapy for CVD than men.116 117 To promote change and allow greater access to treatment and services to reduce CVD risk for women, there needs to be increased representation in the enrolment of women in cardiovascular research. This will help provide the evidence required to guide clinicians and other healthcare professionals in managing women at risk of CVD and reduce the burden of disease. Approaches such as broadening recruitment populations, creating accessible platforms and community recruitment can help to achieve this goal. A review of global burden of CVD in women highlighted the unmet need for clinical trials testing treatments in sex predominant CVD.1
Conclusion
We propose that menopause specific cardiovascular risk factors are incorporated into the assessment of cardiovascular risk for women. The association of CVD and the MT is complex and multifactorial. As circulating oestrogen levels fall during the menopause, this leads to changes in the metabolic profile of women, lipid abnormalities, arterial stiffness, endothelial dysfunction and an increase in central obesity, which are risk factors for developing CVD. The role of THM in reducing CVD risk is not clear and therefore has not been adopted into current guidelines. It is clear that women going through menopause require close monitoring and risk assessment. Treatment strategies should include tight control of cardiovascular risk factors to prevent ASCVD. A focus on menopausal women in clinical trials can help address this and promote active investigation, diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors ultimately reducing the CVD burden. Clinician and patient awareness of menopause specific risk factors during risk assessment is vital for the identification of women at risk of CVD. This approach is fundamental to reducing CVD in women.
Resources
This review has a particular focus on cardiovascular risk factors, hormone replacement therapy and clinical implications. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar and major cardiovascular journals. Searches contained combinations of key words and phrases.
Footnotes
Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Data availability free text: Review article.
Patient consent for publication: Not applicable.
Ethics approval: Not applicable.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement
No data are available.
References
- 1.Vervoort D, Wang R, Li G, et al. Addressing the Global Burden of Cardiovascular Disease in Women: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;83:2690–707. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Morabia A, Costanza MC, WHOCSo N. International variability in ages at menarche, first livebirth, and menopause. World Health Organization Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:1195–205. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xiang D, Liu Y, Zhou S, et al. Protective Effects of Estrogen on Cardiovascular Disease Mediated by Oxidative Stress. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021;2021:5523516. doi: 10.1155/2021/5523516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Visniauskas B, Kilanowski-Doroh I, Ogola BO, et al. Estrogen-mediated mechanisms in hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases. J Hum Hypertens. 2023;37:609–18. doi: 10.1038/s41371-022-00771-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Murphy E. Estrogen signaling and cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2011;109:687–96. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.236687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Briceno Silva G, Arvelaez Pascucci J, Karim H, et al. Influence of the Onset of Menopause on the Risk of Developing Alzheimer’s Disease. Cureus. 2024;16:e69124. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Vogel B, Acevedo M, Appelman Y, et al. The Lancet women and cardiovascular disease Commission: reducing the global burden by 2030. Lancet. 2021;397:2385–438. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00684-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.El Khoudary SR, Aggarwal B, Beckie TM, et al. Menopause Transition and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Implications for Timing of Early Prevention: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;142:e506–32. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Torbati T, Shufelt C, Wei J, et al. Premature menopause and cardiovascular disease: can we blame estrogen? Eur Heart J. 2022;43:4158–60. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Department of Health and Social Care Major NHS update brings menopause into routine health checks. 2025.
- 11.Maas AHEM, Appelman YEA. Gender differences in coronary heart disease. Neth Heart J. 2010;18:598–602. doi: 10.1007/s12471-010-0841-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Freedman AA, Colangelo LA, Ning H, et al. Sex Differences in Age of Onset of Premature Cardiovascular Disease and Subtypes: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2026;15:e044922. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.125.044922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Arora S, Stouffer GA, Kucharska-Newton AM, et al. Twenty Year Trends and Sex Differences in Young Adults Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. 2019;139:1047–56. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhu D, Chung H-F, Dobson AJ, et al. Age at natural menopause and risk of incident cardiovascular disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Public Health. 2019;4:e553–64. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30155-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kovacic JC, Reynolds HR, Alasnag M, et al. Acute Coronary Syndromes in Premenopausal Women: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2026;153:e89–108. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shin J, Han K, Jung J-H, et al. Age at menopause and risk of heart failure and atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:4148–57. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Panay N, Anderson RA, Bennie A, et al. Evidence-based guideline: premature ovarian insufficiency. Hum Reprod Open. 2024;2024:hoae065. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoae065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dave A, Patel DJ, Shrivastava D, et al. Considerations in Premature Menopause: A Review. Cureus. 2024;16:e69744. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Podfigurna A, Męczekalski B. Cardiovascular health in patients with premature ovarian insufficiency. Management of long-term consequences. Prz Menopauzalny. 2018;17:109–11. doi: 10.5114/pm.2018.78551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Machura P, Grymowicz M, Rudnicka E, et al. Premature ovarian insufficiency - hormone replacement therapy and management of long-term consequences. Prz Menopauzalny. 2018;17:135–8. doi: 10.5114/pm.2018.78559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pant A, Gibson AA, Marschner S, et al. Age of menopause, healthy lifestyle and cardiovascular disease in women: a prospective cohort study. Heart. 2025;111:262–8. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Roeters van Lennep JE, Heida KY, Bots ML, et al. Cardiovascular disease risk in women with premature ovarian insufficiency: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;23:178–86. doi: 10.1177/2047487314556004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Freaney PM, Ning H, Carnethon M, et al. Premature Menopause and Lifetime Risk of Coronary Heart Disease. JAMA Cardiol. 2026;11:455–8. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2026.0212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhu D, Chung H-F, Dobson AJ, et al. Type of menopause, age of menopause and variations in the risk of incident cardiovascular disease: pooled analysis of individual data from 10 international studies. Hum Reprod. 2020;35:1933–43. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Honigberg MC, Zekavat SM, Aragam K, et al. Association of Premature Natural and Surgical Menopause With Incident Cardiovascular Disease. JAMA. 2019;322:2411–21. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.19191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Beekman MJ, Terra L, Heemskerk-Gerritsen BAM, et al. Coronary Artery Calcium Scores After Prophylactic Premenopausal Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy. JACC CardioOncol. 2024;6:922–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2024.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Uimari O, Auvinen J, Jokelainen J, et al. Uterine fibroids and cardiovascular risk. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2689–703. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Marchandot B, Curtiaud A, Matsushita K, et al. Endometriosis and cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J Open. 2022;2:oeac001. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeac001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chacko N, Shah M, Thomas R, et al. Elevated asprosin in postmenopause is associated with vasculometabolic complications. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2026;330:H1293–301. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00042.2026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gersh FL, O’Keefe JH, Lavie CJ, et al. The Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System in Postmenopausal Women: The Promise of Hormone Therapy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021;96:3130–41. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Levi M, van der Poll T, Büller HR. Bidirectional relation between inflammation and coagulation. Circulation. 2004;109:2698–704. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000131660.51520.9A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Woods A, Brull DJ, Humphries SE, et al. Genetics of inflammation and risk of coronary artery disease: the central role of interleukin-6. Eur Heart J. 2000;21:1574–83. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1999.2207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Green D, Foiles N, Chan C, et al. Elevated fibrinogen levels and subsequent subclinical atherosclerosis: the CARDIA Study. Atherosclerosis. 2009;202:623–31. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.05.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kryczka KE, Kruk M, Demkow M, et al. Fibrinogen and a Triad of Thrombosis, Inflammation, and the Renin-Angiotensin System in Premature Coronary Artery Disease in Women: A New Insight into Sex-Related Differences in the Pathogenesis of the Disease. Biomolecules. 2021;11:1036. doi: 10.3390/biom11071036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vallée A. Menopause and arterial stiffness index: insights from the women’s UK Biobank cohort. Maturitas. 2025;198:108608. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mou H, Zhang J, Guo Y, et al. Effects of key physiological parameters on cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis risk in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Sci Rep. 2025;15:2814. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86613-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nair AR, Pillai AJ, Nair N. Cardiovascular Changes in Menopause. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2021;17:e230421187681. doi: 10.2174/1573403X16666201106141811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Moreau KL, Hildreth KL, Meditz AL, et al. Endothelial function is impaired across the stages of the menopause transition in healthy women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:4692–700. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mathew D, Wang W, Kunadian V. Coronary microvascular dysfunction in menopausal women. Heart. 2026:heartjnl-2026-328124. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2026-328124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fu X, Wang H, Zhang X. Genetic aspects of early menopause. J Bio-X Res. 2019;02:105–11. doi: 10.1097/JBR.0000000000000043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.McPherson R, Pertsemlidis A, Kavaslar N, et al. A common allele on chromosome 9 associated with coronary heart disease. Science. 2007;316:1488–91. doi: 10.1126/science.1142447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Migliore L, Nicolì V, Stoccoro A. Gender Specific Differences in Disease Susceptibility: The Role of Epigenetics. Biomedicines. 2021;9:652. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9060652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Li F, Hong D, Yang M, et al. Premature coronary artery disease in women: sex-specific risk factors, pathogenetic mechanisms and clinical implications. Ann Med. 2026;58:2613563. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2026.2613563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tharayil SP, Rasal S, Gawde U, et al. Relation of mitochondrial DNA copy number and variants with the clinical characteristics of polycystic ovary syndrome. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2024;594:112386. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2024.112386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Parikh NI, Gonzalez JM, Anderson CAM, et al. Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Unique Opportunities for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Women: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143:e902–16. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.De Backer J, Haugaa KH, Hasselberg NE, et al. 2025 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease and pregnancy. Eur Heart J. 2025;46:4462–568. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Crump C, Sundquist J, Sundquist K. Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Long-Term Mortality in Women. JAMA Intern Med. 2024;184:631–40. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Crump C, Sundquist J, McLaughlin MA, et al. Adverse pregnancy outcomes and long term risk of ischemic heart disease in mothers: national cohort and co-sibling study. BMJ. 2023;380:e072112. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Tao J, Li B, Sun H, et al. Association between metabolic syndrome and risk of cardiovascular disease among postmenopausal women: A cohort study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2026;28:1004–12. doi: 10.1111/dom.70272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Carr MC. The emergence of the metabolic syndrome with menopause. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:2404–11. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-030242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.van Oortmerssen JAE, Mulder JWCM, Kavousi M, et al. Lipid metabolism in women: A review. Atherosclerosis. 2025;405:119213. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2025.119213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.El Khoudary SR, Matuk J, Brooks M, et al. High-Density Lipoprotein Cardioprotection Function Deteriorates as Women Transition Through Menopause: The SWAN HDL Study. JACC Adv. 2025;4:102131. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Raggi P, Davidson M, Callister TQ, et al. Aggressive versus moderate lipid-lowering therapy in hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women: Beyond Endorsed Lipid Lowering with EBT Scanning (BELLES) Circulation. 2005;112:563–71. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.512681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Witting C, Devareddy A, Rodriguez F. Review of Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Women from Reproductive to Postmenopausal Years. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022;23:183. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2305183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133:e38–360. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Connelly PJ, Casey H, Montezano AC, et al. Sex steroids receptors, hypertension, and vascular ageing. J Hum Hypertens. 2022;36:120–5. doi: 10.1038/s41371-021-00576-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Appelman Y, Gulati M, Roeters van Lennep JE, et al. Cardiovascular disease in women: traditional and sex-specific risk factors. Eur Heart J. 2026;47:2750–65. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf1001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Uddenberg ER, Safwan N, Saadedine M, et al. Menopause transition and cardiovascular disease risk. Maturitas. 2024;185:107974. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.107974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Connelly PJ, Currie G, Delles C. Sex Differences in the Prevalence, Outcomes and Management of Hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2022;24:185–92. doi: 10.1007/s11906-022-01183-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.De Paoli M, Zakharia A, Werstuck GH. The Role of Estrogen in Insulin Resistance: A Review of Clinical and Preclinical Data. Am J Pathol. 2021;191:1490–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2021.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Brand JS, van der Schouw YT, Onland-Moret NC, et al. Age at menopause, reproductive life span, and type 2 diabetes risk: results from the EPIC-InterAct study. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:1012–9. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Greendale GA, Sternfeld B, Huang M, et al. Changes in body composition and weight during the menopause transition. JCI Insight. 2019;4:e124865. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.124865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Maas AHEM, Rosano G, Cifkova R, et al. Cardiovascular health after menopause transition, pregnancy disorders, and other gynaecologic conditions: a consensus document from European cardiologists, gynaecologists, and endocrinologists. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:967–84. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa1044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kodoth V, Scaccia S, Aggarwal B. Adverse Changes in Body Composition During the Menopausal Transition and Relation to Cardiovascular Risk: A Contemporary Review. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle) 2022;3:573–81. doi: 10.1089/whr.2021.0119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Trikudanathan S, Pedley A, Massaro JM, et al. Association of female reproductive factors with body composition: the Framingham Heart Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:236–44. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-1785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Matthews KA, Abrams B, Crawford S, et al. Body mass index in mid-life women: relative influence of menopause, hormone use, and ethnicity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25:863–73. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Farahmand M, Bahri Khomamid M, Rahmati M, et al. Aging and changes in adiposity indices: the impact of menopause. J Endocrinol Invest. 2022;45:69–77. doi: 10.1007/s40618-021-01616-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.El Khoudary SR, Shields KJ, Janssen I, et al. Cardiovascular Fat, Menopause, and Sex Hormones in Women: The SWAN Cardiovascular Fat Ancillary Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:3304–12. doi: 10.1210/JC.2015-2110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.British Menopause Society What is the menopause? 2023.
- 70.Thurston RC, Joffe H. Vasomotor symptoms and menopause: findings from the Study of Women’s Health across the Nation. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2011;38:489–501. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2011.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Avis NE, Crawford SL, Green R. Vasomotor Symptoms Across the Menopause Transition: Differences Among Women. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2018;45:629–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2018.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Anderson DJ, Chung H-F, Seib CA, et al. Obesity, smoking, and risk of vasomotor menopausal symptoms: a pooled analysis of eight cohort studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222:478. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.10.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Thurston RC, Chang Y, Barinas-Mitchell E, et al. Menopausal Hot Flashes and Carotid Intima Media Thickness Among Midlife Women. Stroke. 2016;47:2910–5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Thurston RC, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Everson-Rose SA, et al. Hot flashes and subclinical cardiovascular disease: findings from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation Heart Study. Circulation. 2008;118:1234–40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.776823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Thurston RC, Aslanidou Vlachos HE, Derby CA, et al. Menopausal Vasomotor Symptoms and Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Disease Events in SWAN. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10:e017416. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Carson MY, Thurston RC. Vasomotor symptoms and their links to cardiovascular disease risk. Curr Opin Endocr Metab Res. 2023;30:100448. doi: 10.1016/j.coemr.2023.100448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Huang AJ, Faubion S, Grady D. Nonhormonal Treatment of Menopausal Vasomotor Symptoms. JAMA Intern Med. 2025;185:874–5. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.0990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.NICE Fezolinetant for treating moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause. Technology appraisal guidance. 2026. p. 4. [PubMed]
- 79.Lederman S, Ottery FD, Cano A, et al. Fezolinetant for treatment of moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause (SKYLIGHT 1): a phase 3 randomised controlled study. Lancet. 2023;401:1091–102. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00085-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Shapiro C M M, Wu X, Wang X, et al. Effect of fezolinetant on patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes: Data from a phase 3b study (DAYLIGHT) of the treatment of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause in women considered unsuitable for hormone therapy. Maturitas. 2025;193 doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.108159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Schaudig K, Wang X, Bouchard C, et al. Efficacy and safety of fezolinetant for moderate-severe vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause in individuals unsuitable for hormone therapy: phase 3b randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2024;387:e079525. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-079525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Miller L. Elinzanetant: A Nonhormonal Treatment Option for Vasomotor Symptoms Associated With Menopause. J Pharm Technol. 2026;42:87551225261436749. doi: 10.1177/87551225261436749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Pinkerton JV, Simon JA, Joffe H, et al. Elinzanetant for the Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms Associated With Menopause: OASIS 1 and 2 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA. 2024;332:1343–54. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.14618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.MHRA MHRA approves elinzanetant to treat moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (hot flushes) caused by menopause. 2025.
- 85.Wojciechowski P, Kolonko K, Giannopoulou A, et al. Comparative Efficacy of Elinzanetant Versus Other Non-Hormonal Pharmaceutical Therapies for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Vasomotor Symptoms Associated With Menopause: A Network Meta-Analysis. BJOG. 2026 doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.70213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Lumsden MA, Dekkers OM, Faubion SS, et al. European society of endocrinology clinical practice guideline for evaluation and management of menopause and the perimenopause. Eur J Endocrinol. 2025;193:G49–81. doi: 10.1093/ejendo/lvaf206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Blackburn I, Kunadian V. Hormone replacement therapy and cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal women. Eur Heart J Open. 2026;6:oeag054. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeag054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Goldštajn MŠ, Mikuš M, Ferrari FA, et al. Effects of transdermal versus oral hormone replacement therapy in postmenopause: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;307:1727–45. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06647-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:321–33. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.3.321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Makary MA, Nguyen CP, Høeg TB, et al. Updated Labeling for Menopausal Hormone Therapy. JAMA. 2026;335:117–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.22259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Manson JE, Chlebowski RT, Stefanick ML, et al. Menopausal hormone therapy and health outcomes during the intervention and extended poststopping phases of the Women’s Health Initiative randomized trials. JAMA. 2013;310:1353–68. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Gersh F, O’Keefe JH, Elagizi A, et al. Estrogen and cardiovascular disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2024;84:60–7. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2024.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Manson JE. The “timing hypothesis” for estrogen therapy in menopausal symptom management. Womens Health (Lond) 2015;11:437–40. doi: 10.2217/WHE.15.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Boardman HMP, Hartley L, Eisinga A, et al. Hormone therapy for preventing cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015:CD002229. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002229.pub4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Rossouw JE, Aragaki AK, Manson JE, et al. Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases in Women With Vasomotor Symptoms: A Secondary Analysis of the Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Intern Med. 2025;185:1330–9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.4510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Stuenkel CA, Davis SR, Gompel A, et al. Treatment of Symptoms of the Menopause: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:3975–4011. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-2236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Hodis HN, Mack WJ, Henderson VW, et al. Vascular Effects of Early versus Late Postmenopausal Treatment with Estradiol. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1221–31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Miller VM, Naftolin F, Asthana S, et al. The Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS): what have we learned? Menopause. 2019;26:1071–84. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Hulley S, Grady D, Bush T, et al. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. JAMA. 1998;280:605–13. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.7.605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Stevenson JC. Type and route of estrogen administration. Climacteric. 2009;12 Suppl 1:86–90. doi: 10.1080/13697130903007389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Cho L, Kaunitz AM, Faubion SS, et al. Rethinking Menopausal Hormone Therapy: For Whom, What, When, and How Long? Circulation. 2023;147:597–610. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Shufelt CL, Merz CNB, Prentice RL, et al. Hormone therapy dose, formulation, route of delivery, and risk of cardiovascular events in women: findings from the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. Menopause. 2014;21:260–6. doi: 10.1097/GME.0b013e31829a64f9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Stevenson JC, Rozenberg S, Maffei S, et al. Progestogens as a component of menopausal hormone therapy: the right molecule makes the difference. Drugs Context. 2020;9:2020-10-1. doi: 10.7573/dic.2020-10-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Zeeshan F, Saqlain A. FDA’s 2025 removal of black box warnings on menopausal hormone therapy. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2026;88:2222–3. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000004749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Sternfeld B, Colvin A, Stewart A, et al. The Effect of a Healthy Lifestyle on Future Physical Functioning in Midlife Women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49:274–82. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Wang D, Jackson EA, Karvonen-Gutierrez CA, et al. Healthy Lifestyle During the Midlife Is Prospectively Associated With Less Subclinical Carotid Atherosclerosis: The Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e010405. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Peila R, Xue X, Qi Q, et al. Healthy Lifestyle Index and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Among Postmenopausal Women With Normal Body Mass Index. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12:e029111. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.029111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Allen TS, Bui QM, Petersen GM, et al. Automated Breast Arterial Calcification Score Is Associated With Cardiovascular Outcomes and Mortality. JACC Adv. 2024;3:101283. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Iribarren C, Chandra M, Lee C, et al. Breast Arterial Calcification: a Novel Cardiovascular Risk Enhancer Among Postmenopausal Women. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15:e013526. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.121.013526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Wild RA, Hovey KM, Andrews C, et al. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk scores, age, or years since menopause to predict cardiovascular disease in the Women’s Health Initiative. Menopause. 2021;28:610–8. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Goff DC, Jr, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:S49–73. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000437741.48606.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Lundberg G, Wu P, Wenger N. Menopausal Hormone Therapy: a Comprehensive Review. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2020;22:33. doi: 10.1007/s11883-020-00854-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140:e596–646. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Lucà F, Colivicchi F, Parrini I, et al. The role of the pregnancy heart team in clinical practice. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1135294. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1135294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Dastmalchi LN, Gulati M, Thurston RC, et al. Improving Cardiovascular Clinical Competencies for the Menopausal Transition: A Focus on Cardiometabolic Health in Midlife. JACC Adv. 2025;4:101791. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Betai D, Ahmed AS, Saxena P, et al. Gender Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease and Their Management: A Review. Cureus. 2024;16:e59663. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Gao Z, Chen Z, Sun A, et al. Gender differences in cardiovascular disease. Med Nov Technol Devices. 2019;4:100025. doi: 10.1016/j.medntd.2019.100025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No data are available.


