Skip to main content
Science Advances logoLink to Science Advances
. 2026 Aug 14;12(33):eaeg1691. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aeg1691

Separation of xylene isomers in an adaptable metal-organic framework

Jiaqi Li 1,2,†, Rundao Chen 1,†, Lidong Guo 1,†, Haoran Sun 1, Jialei Yan 1, Ying Liu 1, Fuxing Shen 3, Qiwei Yang 1,3,*, Zhiguo Zhang 1,3, Qilong Ren 1,3, Dan Zhao 2,*, Zongbi Bao 1,3,*
PMCID: PMC13475607  PMID: 42600023

Abstract

Efficient separation of xylene isomers by adsorption remains challenging due to insufficient selectivity arising from their molecular similarity. We report an adaptable metal-organic framework, Ni(BIC)2 [1-H-benzimidazole-5-carboxylic acid (HBIC)], that exhibits high selectivity for para-xylene over other xylene isomers. Ni(BIC)2 features a guest-adaptive one-dimensional channel that precisely matches the molecular projection dimensions of para-xylene, enabling sieving from a quaternary mixture of xylene isomers. The structural transformation of Ni(BIC)2 upon guest adsorption substantially widens the disparity in binding energies between para-xylene and its counterparts. Weakly adsorbed components are converted into nonadsorbed entities, leading to temperature-independent para-xylene uptake while excluding meta-xylene and ortho-xylene. Breakthrough experiments demonstrate remarkable dynamic selectivity, delivering high-purity para-xylene within a single fixed-bed adsorption process. Simulated moving bed (SMB) process analysis demonstrates that Ni(BIC)2 delivers a 3.2-fold increase in production efficiency relative to conventional zeolite under milder operating conditions.

INTRODUCTION

Para-xylene (PX) is an essential raw material for polyester production (1). PX is typically obtained from the catalytic reforming of naphtha, which produces a mixture of C8 aromatic compounds. This mixture mainly consists of PX along with meta-xylene (MX), ortho-xylene (OX), and ethylbenzene (EB) (2). The separation and purification of PX from this blend of highly similar isomers represent a substantial but technologically challenging process (3). Separating all four isomers through distillation is practically unfeasible due to their close boiling points (table S1) (4). While PX could ideally be isolated by fractional crystallization, this method requires considerable energy input to maintain cryogenic temperatures for PX crystallization (5). Now, more than 75% of industrial PX production relies on simulated moving bed (SMB) technology using FAU (Faujasite) zeolites as adsorbents at high temperatures ranging from 393 to 523 K (6, 7). While elevated temperatures are necessary to achieve sufficient mass-transfer rates for bulky adsorbates such as xylene, they inevitably reduce the selectivity and adsorption capacity of zeolites (8, 9). This trade-off between selectivity/capacity and temperature arises from the lack of structural tunability and flexibility in zeolite frameworks (10). Furthermore, the strong binding interactions between xylenes and zeolite lead to problematic coadsorption and reduced working capacities. Therefore, designing advanced adsorbents is crucial for developing more energy-efficient separation processes for xylene mixtures.

Solid adsorbents, such as modified zeolites (11–13), organic cages (14), metal complexes (15–17), and molecular crystals (18, 19), have garnered extensive research interest for their potential in the efficient separation of xylene isomers. Among these, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) stand out as a promising class of materials due to their exceptional structural versatility and flexibility (20, 21). This includes features like reversible “breathing” (22, 23), “pore opening” (24, 25), “shape memory” (26), and dynamic “gating flexibility” (10, 27, 28). These characteristics enable precise molecular recognition of many industrially relevant mixtures (29–33) and the effective separation of xylene isomers (34–36). Despite these advances, achieving complete PX sieving from its C8 aromatic counterparts at high temperatures remains an unsolved challenge.

We propose an approach that leverages differences in adsorption enthalpy, similar to how activation energy differences are exploited in chemical reactions. For a rigid framework, the total adsorption enthalpy corresponds to the interaction energy (Fig. 1A). However, within a flexible framework, the total adsorption enthalpy encompasses both the interaction energy and the framework deformation energy (Fig. 1B) (26, 37, 38). Thus, when the interaction energy between guest molecules and the framework is generally high, a portion of this interaction energy can be counterbalanced by the deformation energy of the flexible framework. This concept is demonstrated in an adaptable MOF, termed Ni(BIC)2 [1-H-benzimidazole-5-carboxylic acid (HBIC)] (39), which features one-dimensional channels capable of guest-adaptive lattice transformations (Fig. 1C and fig. S1). By imposing a thermodynamic penalty on interaction through framework deformation, weakly adsorbed components tend to behave as excluded components as they are less likely to surmount the energy barrier necessary for structural transformation. We term this mechanism “contrast enhancement,” inspired by analogous techniques in photography where image details are amplified by reducing the intensities of bright pixels, serving as a powerful demonstration of pore-opening principles (37) for a multicomponent separation task. In Ni(BIC)2, such an induced-fit mechanism akin to enzyme-substrate binding facilitates exceptional PX selectivity, thereby overcoming the constraints of previous adsorbents.

Fig. 1. Mechanistic illustrations for the efficient separation of xylene isomers.

Fig. 1.

(A and B) Schematic representation of contrast enhancement strategy used to amplify the difference of ΔEtot between typical (A) rigid and (B) flexible frameworks, where ΔEint is the interaction energy between guest and framework, ΔEdef is the framework deformation energy, and ΔEtot is the total adsorption energy. These schematics illustrate an idealized and qualitative description of the contrast enhancement mechanism, rather than quantitative calculated energy values. (C) Illustration of shape matching between xylene isomers and the transformed channel of Ni(BIC)2. Variations in shape matching between isomers and channels lead to corresponding differences in interaction energy, ultimately resulting in distinct adsorption behaviors. PX shows the best shape fitness and readily enters the pore, whereas poorly matched isomers show limited accessibility, hindered by the deformation energy barrier.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Green obelisk-like crystals of Ni(BIC)2 (where BIC stands for Benzimidazole-5-carboxylic acid) were synthesized by solvothermal reaction between nickel(II) nitrate hexahydrate and HBIC under autogenous pressure (fig. S2). Single-crystal x-ray diffraction (SCXRD) revealed that Ni(BIC)2 crystallizes in the tetragonal P43212 space group, with an asymmetric unit containing two BIC linkers and one Ni2+ ion (table S2). Each Ni2+ is octahedrally coordinated by two pairs of bidentate chelating carboxylate oxygen atoms from two HBIC linkers and two nitrogen atoms from another two HBIC linkers, forming an infinite helical chain propagating along the c axis. Three of these helical polymer chains twist together, creating tetragonal channels with dimensions of ∼5 Å by 5 Å. These channels are lined with benzimidazole groups from the HBIC linkers and share edges with each other to construct a three-dimensional supramolecular porous network (fig. S3). Topologically, the framework can be represented as a unimodal 4-connected network with dia topology, having a vertex symbol of {66} (fig. S4). Upon exposure of C8 aromatic guest molecules except OX, Ni(BIC)2 underwent a single-crystal–to–single-crystal (SCSC) transformation from a P43212 tetragonal phase [denoted as Ni(BIC)2 (1)] to a C2221 orthorhombic phase [denoted as Ni(BIC)2 (2)] (Fig. 2A and table S2). Powder x-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns confirmed the phase purity of the as-synthesized Ni(BIC)2, with the experimental pattern showing excellent agreement with the simulated pattern calculated from the single-crystal data (fig. S5). Variable temperature PXRD patterns and thermogravimetric analysis verified the remarkable thermal stability of Ni(BIC)2 up to 673 K under nitrogen atmosphere (fig. S6). The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area of Ni(BIC)2 was estimated to be 319 m2 g−1 based on CO2 adsorption isotherm at 195 K (fig. S7).

Fig. 2. Crystallographic structure transformation and adsorption behavior of xylene isomers on Ni(BIC)2.

Fig. 2.

(A) Crystal structure of Ni(BIC)2 and the single-crystal–to–single-crystal (SCSC) transition of Ni(BIC)2 during xylene adsorption (color code: Ni, blue; C, gray; O, red; N, dark blue; H, white). The right figure is the Connolly surface of Ni(BIC)2 on the ab plane with a probe radius of 1 Å. (B) Single-component adsorption isotherms of PX vapor on Ni(BIC)2 at 303 to 393 K. (C) Single-component adsorption isotherms of MX on Ni(BIC)2 at 303 to 393 K. (D) Comparison of single-component vapor adsorption of xylene isomers at 393 K. (E) Adsorption equilibrium of binary solutions of PX/OX, PX/MX, and PX/EB on Ni(BIC)2 at 393 K, with a total capacity in a range of 1.70 to 1.76 mmol g−1. (F) Gas chromatograms of adsorbed phase on Ni(BIC)2 equilibrated with equimolar binary liquid mixtures of PX/MX, PX/OX, PX/EB, and quaternary mixture of PX/MX/OX/EB with a molar ratio of 22/50/22/6 at 393 K, as well as standard sample of EB, PX, MX, and OX, respectively. a.u., arbitrary units. (G) Comparison of SPX/(MX+OX)-PX capacity performance on zeolites, experimental MOFs, and HTCS MOFs. Data are collected from reported adsorbents (table S3), with the highest reported selectivity for each material adopted for comparison. Material names are numbered as listed in table S3.

The vapor adsorption isotherms of PX, MX, OX, and EB on Ni(BIC)2 were measured at 303 to 393 K (Fig. 2, B and C, and fig. S8). Ni(BIC)2 shows strong preferential affinity for PX at all temperatures, with uptake reaching 1.8 mmol g−1 (∼191 mg g−1) at 1.2 kPa. Even at 393 K, PX uptake remains high (1.86 mmol g−1), surpassing commercial zeolites such as BaX (0.98 mmol g−1) (12) and ZSM-5 (1.34 mmol g−1) (13), as well as most MOFs (table S3). In contrast, MX, OX, and EB display temperature-dependent, stepwise adsorption, with saturated uptakes decreasing markedly with temperature, MX (95.1%), OX (92.2%), and EB (33.2%), whereas PX uptake remains nearly constant.

The isotherm shapes also vary with temperature, from steep rises at low temperature to S-shaped profiles at higher temperature, indicating guest-specific structural transitions in Ni(BIC)2. A notable “pressure-reducing” phenomenon appears in MX isotherms at 303 and 333 K, suggesting a temporary deviation from the equilibrium pressure due to crystal cell expansion. Ni(BIC)2 adsorbs negligible OX except at 303 K, implying OX exclusion across 303 to 393 K and simultaneous MX and OX exclusion at ≥363 K (Fig. 2C and fig. S9). This temperature-dependent thermodynamic sieving, together with a PX shape-matching channel, underpins the framework’s unique selectivity. To preliminarily assess the separation performance, the separation potential (Δq) (40, 41) of Ni(BIC)2 was calculated to be 9.36 at 393 K (table S4). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) confirms these trends, with heats of adsorption of PX (−74.5 kJ mol−1), EB (−55.1 kJ mol−1), MX (−44.5 kJ mol−1), and negligible for OX (fig. S10).

To understand the diffusion behavior and kinetics of C8 aromatics adsorption in Ni(BIC)2, vapor-phase adsorption kinetics experiments were conducted simultaneously with the isotherm measurements. The adsorption uptake curves as a function of time (fig. S11) were fitted with the linear driving force model (42) to extract the mass-transfer coefficient (ksap, s−1) (table S5). At 303 K, the ksap value for PX was estimated to be 6.49 × 10−5 s−1, which is approximately an order of magnitude higher than that of MX (4.14 × 10−6 s−1). This substantial difference in diffusion rates results in a high PX/MX kinetic selectivity of 15.7 at 303 K, consistent with the comparison of PXRD patterns of Ni(BIC)2 samples loaded with different isomers for soaking time of 15 min and 12 hours (fig. S12). These results indicate that, in addition to thermodynamic molecular sieving effects, faster diffusion kinetics also facilitate effective separation of PX from MX at lower temperatures in Ni(BIC)2. The rapid PX diffusion kinetics were maintained at higher temperatures as well, with the ksap reaching 5.83 × 10−4 s−1 at 393 K, outperforming the value of 2.09 × 10−5 s−1 at the same temperature for zeolite ADS-37 used in the UOP Parex process (fig. S11). This represents nearly an order of magnitude increase compared to 303 K, highlighting the advantage of high-temperature operation.

To assess the liquid-phase separation performance of Ni(BIC)2 for xylene isomers, adsorption experiments were conducted on binary, ternary, and quaternary mixtures (Fig. 2, E and F; figs. S13 to S16; and table S6). In binary systems (PX/OX, PX/MX, and PX/EB) at 333 and 393 K, equilibrium data fitted well with the Stuart model (43), with mean deviations below 3.3% (Fig. 2E, fig. S17, and table S7). The average separation factors (αavg) reached 176.8 (PX/OX), 32.8 (PX/MX), and 3.7 (PX/EB), consistent with batch adsorption experiments (SPX/OX = 56.1, SPX/MX = 21.8, and SPX/EB = 3.1). For equimolar ternary PX/MX/OX mixtures, PX selectivity increased with temperature, from 32.8/3.4/1 at 303 K to 77.1/4.4/1 at 393 K. Figure 2G compares the SPX/(MX+OX)-PX capacity performance of Ni(BIC)2 with reported zeolites, experimental MOFs, and HTCS (High-Throughput Computational Screening) MOFs. In quaternary mixtures mimicking industrial feeds (PX/MX/OX/EB = 22/50/22/6), Ni(BIC)2 preferentially adsorbed PX with selectivities of 57.8/3.8/1/23.3 at 303 K and 155.5/7.1/1/49.0 at 393 K (table S6), comparing favorably with benchmark adsorbents such as AgLClO4 (24/3.9/1/2.4) and Zn-MOF (50/4.2/1/7.9) (table S3).

To elucidate the C8 separation mechanism on Ni(BIC)2, we used a combination of SCXRD, microcrystal electron diffraction (MicroED), Rietveld refinement, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), and in situ PXRD to investigate the structural transformation of Ni(BIC)2 upon exposure to C8 isomers. Initially, SCXRD revealed that the as-synthesized Ni(BIC)2 crystallizes in the P43212 space group with cell parameters of a = b = 14.9659(7) Å, c = 8.3925(4) Å, and α = β = γ = 90° [Ni(BIC)2 (1)] (table S2). To verify the structural changes, high-resolution electron diffraction (ED) data were collected from guest-adsorbed Ni(BIC)2 crystals using MicroED. The results showed that Ni(BIC)2 underwent a SCSC transformation from a tetragonal lattice in space group P43212 (1) to an orthorhombic lattice in space group C2221 with a = 20.69 Å, b = 23.88 Å, and c = 7.84 Å [Ni(BIC)2 (2)] (Fig. 2A and table S2), indicating that the channel shape adapts to the guest molecules and the primitive cell expands by 1.3%. Notably, across all C8 isomers investigated, only these two framework phases (1) and (2) were observed. If we draw an analogy between the adsorption process and a reversible chemical reaction, then the ratio of deformed to nondeformed crystal can be analogous to the chemical equilibrium constant K of the reactants. To confirm the transformation ratios, Rietveld refinement was conducted with the PXRD pattern of Ni(BIC)2 after exposure to PX and EB (figs. S18 and S19). The ratio of 2/1 after PX adsorption was 7.9, whereas that after EB adsorption was 2.4, which well explains the intriguing guest-dependent adsorption behavior of Ni(BIC)2.

Furthermore, HRTEM images of 1 and 2 (before and after PX adsorption) were compared to verify the crystal transformation. HRTEM images and fast Fourier transform images (Fig. 3, A to D) show the lattice fringes of ·1 and·2 with 0.5ddia spacing distributions of ∼5.4 (0.5ddia·1) and 5.9 Å (0.5ddia·2) and 0.5dpore of 3.8 (0.5dpore·1) and 3.9 Å (0.5dpore·2), respectively (where ddia and dpore represent length of the pore-diagonal and the pore size, respectively). These values are in good agreement with the changes in 2θ [2θdia, 16.42° (1) to 14.82° (2); 2θpore, 23.30° (1) to 22.72° (2)] and d spacing [0.5ddia, 5.395 (1) to 5.970 Å (2); 0.5dpore, 3.815 (1) to 3.909 Å (2)] obtained from the MicroED-obtained structure models of 1 and 2. The alterations in lattice spacing observed in ddia and dpore represent the elongation of the pore-diagonal and the pore size of Ni(BIC)2 after PX adsorption. To complement these findings, in situ PXRD measurements were conducted under an atmosphere switched from nitrogen to PX vapor (fig. S20). Notably, the predominant (200) diffraction peak of Ni(BIC)2 (1) vanished markedly upon PX introduction, while a new peak emerged at 2θ = 11.3°, corresponding to a d-spacing of 7.8 Å [attributed to the (220) plane of Ni(BIC)2 (2)]. These changes signify the transformation of Ni(BIC)2 from a tetragonal to an orthorhombic lattice, indicating adaptation into the molecular projection shape channel via a solid-state guest-induced crystal transformation.

Fig. 3. Guest-specific structural transformation of Ni(BIC)2.

Fig. 3.

(A to D) HRTEM images along the direction of pore-diagonal (A) before and (B) after PX adsorption, and the fast Fourier transform images along the direction of pore diameter (C) before and (D) after PX adsorption. (E to H) DFT calculated adsorption binding sites and interaction energy (ΔEint) between xylene isomer molecules and frameworks for (E) PX, (F) EB, (G) MX, and (H) OX, respectively (color code: Ni, purple; C, gray; O, red; N, blue; H, white. The unit of distance is angstrom). (I) Total adsorption energy (ΔEtot) and framework deformation energy (ΔEdef) diagram of xylene isomers on Ni(BIC)2 (color code: PX, blue; EB, green; MX, yellow; OX, gray). (J and K) Illustration of desorption mechanisms in (J) flexible and (K) rigid frameworks. Noted that the adsorption/desorption process is illustrated in two steps, with [Ni(BIC)2(x)] denoting different framework states: [Ni(BIC)2(1)] for the undeformed, guest-free framework; [Ni(BIC)2(2)]‡ for the deformed, guest-free framework; and [Ni(BIC)2(2)] for the deformed, guest-loaded framework. In the real adsorption/desorption process, these two steps are supposed to occur simultaneously, and [Ni(BIC)2(2)]‡ is a hypothetical state.

To unravel the mechanism behind the PX preference in Ni(BIC)2 and illustrate our contrast enhancement strategy, we established the adsorption state of C8 aromatics in Ni(BIC)2 using first principles dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT-D) calculations (Fig. 3, E to I). The optimized C8 molecules were placed in the channel along the longer diagonal direction, which was consistent with the electronic density distribution in the crystal structure obtained by MicroED. The structure [Ni(BIC)2@guest] was then optimized by relaxing the guest positions while holding the host framework fixed. The DFT-D calculations confirmed the presence of multiple weak interactions between the guest molecules and the framework, including C─H⋯O, C─H⋯N, and C─H⋯π interactions. To quantify the guest-specific response, we analyzed the guest interaction energy (ΔEint), framework deformation energy (ΔEdef), and total adsorption energy (ΔEtot), where ΔEtot is calculated as the sum of ΔEint and ΔEdef. The calculated ΔEint values for PX, EB, MX, and OX were calculated to be −104.0, −86.2, −81.7, and −71.7 kJ mol−1, respectively (Fig. 3, E to H, and table S8). The higher negative value of ΔEint for PX compared to EB, MX, and OX indicates much stronger host-guest interactions. However, the differences in ΔEint alone were insufficient to explain the selective PX adsorption.

Crucially, the flexibility of Ni(BIC)2 imposed a ΔEdef of 81.1 kJ mol−1 required for framework deformation. The occurrence of a SCSC transition is indicated when ΔEint dominates over ΔEdef, resulting in a negative ΔEtot. Consequently, ΔEtot values for PX, EB, MX, and OX were calculated to be −22.9, −5.1, −0.6, and 9.4 kJ mol−1, respectively, thereby amplifying the differences in ΔEtot between PX and other isomers, making PX the energetically favorable guest for inducing the dynamic structural transformation from the tetragonal (1) to orthorhombic phase (2) (Fig. 3I, table S8, and fig. S21). For EB, MX, and OX, the lower magnitude of ΔEtot meant that they could not overcome the energy barrier of structural change, resulting in their exclusion from PX. These density functional theory (DFT) results provide insights into how the integration of binding interactions and framework flexibility enables targeted molecular recognition in Ni(BIC)2.

The guest-specific structural transformation reveals the mechanism of molecular projection shape discrimination. The projection shape can be quantified by the minimum and second-minimum dimensions (“MIN-1” and “MIN-2”) (44). While PX, MX, and OX have similar MIN-1 values (3.810, 3.949, and 3.834 Å, respectively), their MIN-2 differs, making it the decisive factor (PX of 6.618 Å versus MX of 7.258 Å and OX of 7.269 Å). The channel diagonal (7 Å) lies between these values, allowing PX with the smaller MIN-2 to be preferentially trapped. In contrast, PX and EB share similar MIN-2 (6.618 versus 6.625 Å), but EB’s larger MIN-1 (5.285 versus 3.810 Å) renders it unfavorable for channel transformation (fig. S1 and table S9). This enables complete PX/EB separation by tuning temperature. Thus, the PX preference of Ni(BIC)2 arises from the synergy of projection shape matching and framework flexibility.

We further elucidated how structural flexibility controls the desorption step. The contrast between flexible and rigid frameworks is akin to a balloon and a glass vessel. In Ni(BIC)2, elastic recovery drives xylene release, while rigid frameworks desorb only via displacement (Fig. 3J). Under identical conditions, thermogravimetric measurements show faster desorption from Ni(BIC)2 than from zeolite (fig. S22), demonstrating the intrinsic productivity advantage of flexibility (45).

To evaluate the separation capacity of Ni(BIC)2 for mixed C8 aromatics, fixed-bed dynamic breakthrough and desorption experiments were conducted with binary, ternary, and quaternary feeds (Fig. 4, A to C, and figs. S23 to S27). A Ni(BIC)2-packed column [4.6 mm inside diameter (ID) by 30 mm] was tested at 15 ml min−1. The breakthrough curves confirmed superior PX purification consistent with single-component adsorption isotherms and kinetics. Ni(BIC)2 achieved molecular sieving of PX from PX/MX/OX at 303 K and, notably, extracted PX from PX/MX/OX/EB mixtures at 393 K (22/50/22/6, identical to the UOP Parex feed), demonstrating the feasibility of efficient PX isolation (Fig. 4A). The dynamic selectivities at 393 K (SPX/MX = 38.8, SPX/OX = 116.9, and SPX/EB = 11.7) compare favorably with Mn-dhbq (24.0, 47.8, and 1.4) and ADS-37 (2.3, 2.3, and 1.8) (Fig. 4C and fig. S28) and demonstrate competitive performance for MOF-based quaternary separation (figs. S29 and S30). These dynamic selectivities are much higher than the static ones (21.8, 56.1, and 3.1), reflecting the synergy of thermodynamics and kinetics: PX combines higher capacity with faster diffusion. To provide a more comprehensive comparison, the SPX/(MX+OX+EB)-PX capacity plot is shown in Fig. 4B. It should be noted that the PX uptake of Ni(BIC)2 is moderate compared to some reported materials but remains competitive as many high-capacity materials are evaluated at near-ambient temperatures, whereas Ni(BIC)2 is measured under elevated temperatures. Desorption under N2 at 423 K yielded PX with 95% purity and 69% recovery from the quaternary mixture in a single cycle (fig. S31). Moreover, liquid-phase breakthrough experiments at 393 K revealed excellent separation of PX from a quaternary C8 aromatic mixture, with PX exhibiting substantially longer retention than MX, OX, and EB (Fig. 4C), representing the first reported MOF-based quaternary xylene separation in the liquid phase.

Fig. 4. Separation performance and SMB process simulation results of Ni(BIC)2 for xylene isomer mixtures.

Fig. 4.

(A) Vapor breakthrough curves of PX/MX/OX/EB mixtures with a molar ratio of 22:50:22:6 on Ni(BIC)2 at 393 K. (B) Comparison of PX separation performance using an SPX/(MX+OX+EB)-PX capacity plot. Data are collected from reported adsorbents (table S3), with the highest reported selectivity for each material adopted for comparison. (C) Liquid phase breakthrough curve on Ni(BIC)2 column under 393 K. (D) The liquid adsorption isotherms of PX, MX, OX, EB, and PDEB on Ni(BIC)2 column at 393 K. (E) Pulse curves of PX, MX, OX, and EB on Ni(BIC)2 column at 393 K. (F) Schematic illustration of the four-zone SMB process and downstream PX/pDEB distillation. (G) Internal concentration profiles across the 24 beds at cyclic steady state of the SMB process on Ni(BIC)2. (H) Comparison of productivities, desorbent consumptions, and energy duties in the SMB process on Ni(BIC)2 and FAU zeolite.

To benchmark Ni(BIC)2 against FAU-type zeolite, we conducted comprehensive SMB process simulations using experimentally determined parameters (Fig. 4, D to G). Single-batch experiments confirmed retention of high PX selectivity (PX/MX/OX/EB = 76.9/3.3/1/19.0) in 50% p-diethylbenzene (pDEB) solution (figs. S32 and S33). Liquid-phase isotherms and mass-transfer coefficients extracted from chromatographic analysis (Fig. 4, D and E, and tables S10 and S11) enabled rigorous SMB modeling via Aspen Chromatography (Fig. 4F and figs. S34 and S35). Parallel simulations of 24-bed FAU zeolite systems used established parameters from the literature (table S12) (46, 47). Under substantially milder conditions (393 K versus 453 K), Ni(BIC)2 achieved productivity of 214.78 kg of PX hour−1 m−3 and processing capacity of 1.1652 m3 of xylene hour−1 m−3, representing 3.2-fold and 3.0-fold improvements over FAU zeolites, respectively (Fig. 4H and table S12). Critically, these performance gains were achieved while maintaining industrial specifications: 99.98% purity, 99.95% recovery, and competitive solvent consumption (7.6 liters kg−1 PX versus 11.7 liter kg−1 PX for FAU) (Fig. 4F). Upon the SMB results, distillation simulations were further conducted to quantify the energy required for PX/pDEB separation in the downstream step. The Ni(BIC)2-based process exhibited significantly lower energy consumption (2.11 MJ kg−1 PX) than the conventional zeolite-based process (2.52 MJ kg−1 PX) (Fig. 4H and table S13).

Ni(BIC)2 showed high stability in the presence of PX and air as the crystallinity of Ni(BIC)2 samples remained intact after immersion in pure PX and a quaternary xylenes mixture at 393 K for 1 week, after 30 cycles, and even exposure to air for 3 months (figs. S36 and S37). Recyclability tests for PX adsorption-desorption were conducted on Ni(BIC)2 samples in both liquid and vapor phases at 393 K. These tests confirmed that Ni(BIC)2 could be regenerated at 453 K without PX uptake loss in either phase. Additionally, the long-term liquid-phase adsorption cycling experiments with a hexanary mixture of PX/MX/OX/EB/pDEB/toluene (mass ratio, 11/25/11/3/49.25/0.75) demonstrated that Ni(BIC)2 maintained its PX selectivity and capacity over 30 cycles (fig. S38).

In summary, this work presents Ni(BIC)2, an adaptable MOF that exhibits high PX selectivity for C8 aromatic isomers at elevated temperatures. The framework has a shape-matching channel that enables preferential binding of PX. The framework’s flexibility significantly amplifies total adsorption energy differences between PX and other isomers through a contrast enhancement mechanism. This synergy between shape matching and dynamic structural transformations allows Ni(BIC)2 to achieve high PX separation performance. Temperature-independent PX uptake, complete OX exclusion up to 393 K, and competitive selectivities for multicomponent mixtures demonstrate promising performance relative to traditional adsorbents. This rational design approach helps address the selectivity-temperature trade-off commonly encountered in conventional adsorbents and provides a promising platform for developing next-generation adsorbents for efficient xylene separation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

All reagents and solvents were obtained from commercial sources and used as received without further purification. HBIC (99%) was purchased from TCI (Japan). Nickel(II) nitrate hexahydrate [Ni(NO3)2·6H2O, 99%], acetonitrile (CH3CN; 99%), formic acid (HCOOH; 99%), methanol (CH3OH; 99%), hydrochloric acid (HCl; 12 M), and dichloromethane (CH2Cl2; 99%) were purchased from Sinopharm (China). The C8 isomers, including PX (99%), OX (99%), MX (99%), EB (99%), and pDEB (98%), as well as toluene (Tol; 99.9%), were provided by Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Ultrahigh-purity gases, including carbon dioxide (99.999%), helium (99.999%), and nitrogen (99.999%), were supplied by Jingong Industiral Co. (China).

Methods

Synthesis of Ni(BIC)2·2.5H2O

The Ni(BIC)2·2.5H2O material was synthesized using a modified version of a method previously reported (39). Specifically, Ni(NO3)2·6H2O (0.1 mmol, 29.1 mg) and HBIC (0.1 mmol, 16.3 mg) were dissolved in a mixture of H2O (3 ml) and CH3CN (3 ml). To this solution, a small volume of HCOOH (6 μl) was added to improve the phase purity of the resulting material. The mixture underwent ultrasonic treatment for 20 min, after which it was sealed in a 20-ml Teflon-lined reactor. The reactor was then placed in a preheated oven at 433 K for 48 hours. Following this incubation, the autoclave was cooled down to room temperature. The resulting green, rod-shaped crystals were thoroughly washed with water and methanol, and then dried in air. The product yield was 49.4%.

Characterization

PXRD patterns were collected on a SmartLab SE diffractometer (Rigaku, Japan) using Cu Kα radiation. Rietveld refinements were performed using the TOPAS package (48). Variable-temperature PXRD (VT-PXRD) and in situ PXRD measurements were conducted on a Rigaku SmartLab diffractometer equipped with a rotating-anode Cu Kα source and a ReactorX sample chamber. VT-PXRD data were collected from 303 to 773 K under flowing N2, while in situ PXRD measurements were performed during exposure to PX vapor at 303 K after activation of the samples at 423 K under vacuum. Thermogravimetric analysis was carried out on an SDT 650 simultaneous thermal analyzer (TA Instruments, USA) under N2. CO2 adsorption-desorption isotherms at 195 K were measured on an ASAP 2020 analyzer (Micromeritics, USA) for surface area and pore analysis. SCXRD data were collected on a Bruker D8 Venture diffractometer at 170 K, and structures were solved and refined using Olex2, SHELXT, and SHELXL (49–51). Scanning electron microscopy and HRTEM images were acquired using Hitachi S-3400 and JEOL JEM-2100F microscopes, respectively. Additional instrumental parameters are provided in the Supplementary Text.

Vapor adsorption experiments

Approximately 40 mg of the as-synthesized sample was transferred into an empty, preweighted sample tube and degassed at 423 K under high vacuum for 24 hours to ensure complete activation. The tube containing the activated sample was reweighed to determine the precise amount of the activated adsorbent. The activated sample was then used to acquire single-component xylene adsorption isotherms at 303, 333, 363, and 393 K on a BELSORP MAX II vapor adsorption analyzer (MicrotracBEL, Japan). Vapor adsorption kinetics were measured concurrently during the single-component adsorption experiments using the built-in kinetic measurement function of the instrument. Throughout the adsorption experiments, the vapor source and manifold system were maintained at 323 K. Temperature regulation during adsorption was achieved via a thermostatically controlled heating mantle encasing the sample tube.

Adsorption heats of xylenes on Ni(BIC)2

The adsorption heats of xylene isomers on Ni(BIC)2 were determined using DSC on a SDT 650 simultaneous thermal analyzer (TA Instruments, USA). Before the adsorption measurements, the thermal analyzer was calibrated to establish a stable heat flow baseline, using an inert atmosphere of high-purity nitrogen at 303 K. Following this, the activated adsorbent, weighing ∼5 mg, was exposed to a diluted mixture of xylene isomers in nitrogen. This mixture was prepared by sparging the nitrogen carrier gas through a liquid xylene isomer-filled bubbler, ensuring a consistent vapor-phase introduction to the sample chamber, also maintained at 303 K. The real-time data acquisition of both DSC and thermogravimetric signals facilitated the simultaneous determination of the adsorption amount and the corresponding heats of adsorption for the xylene isomers.

Vapor-phase multicomponent breakthrough measurements

Vapor-phase breakthrough experiments were conducted using binary, ternary, and quaternary mixtures of xylene isomers as the feed. Before each measurement, Ni(BIC)2 was activated at 423 K under ultrahigh vacuum for 24 hours and packed into a stainless-steel column (4.6 mm ID by 30 mm, 0.4 g of adsorbent) in an N2-filled glovebox. A nitrogen carrier gas (99.999%) was introduced at 15 ml min−1 to deliver xylene vapors generated from bubblers maintained at 298 K. For the quaternary mixture, the partial pressure ratio of PX/MX/OX/EB was set at 22/50/22/6, while equimolar compositions were used for ternary and binary mixtures. The outlet stream was analyzed using a GC-2010 Pro gas chromatograph (Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with an FID detector and a PEG-20 M capillary column. After each run, the sample was regenerated under flowing N2 at 423 K for 48 hours. Additional details are provided in the Supplementary Text.

Multicomponent liquid-phase breakthrough experiments

Liquid-phase breakthrough experiments were conducted using mixtures of xylene isomers dissolved in 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (TMB) as the feed. Before measurement, the Ni(BIC)2-packed column (4.6 mm ID by 25 mm) was flushed with pure TMB at 393 K to establish equilibrium. Following equilibration, a feed solution containing PX, MX, OX, and EB with a molar ratio of 22/50/22/6 and a total concentration of 0.19 M in TMB was continuously introduced using a high-performance liquid chromatography pump at a flow rate of 0.1 ml min−1 at 393 K. Effluent samples were collected from the column outlet at fixed time intervals and analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) under conditions identical to those used for vapor-phase breakthrough measurements. Breakthrough curves were recorded until the outlet concentration of each xylene isomer approached that of the inlet feed.

Calculation of ternary selectivity SPX/(MX+OX) and quaternary selectivity SPX/(MX+OX+EB)

To provide a more consistent comparison of PX-selective separation performance across different reported materials, combined ternary and quaternary selectivities were calculated from the reported pairwise selectivities obtained under the same multicomponent conditions. The ternary selectivity SPX/(MX+OX) was calculated according to

SPX/(MX+OX)=xMX+xOXxMXSPX/MX+xOXSPX/OX

where xi represents the mole fraction of component i in the feed mixture and SPX/i is the reported pairwise selectivity between PX and component i.

Similarly, the quaternary selectivity SPX/(MX+OX+EB) was calculated as

SPX/(MX+OX+EB)=xMX+xOX+xEBxMXSPX/MX+xOXSPX/OX+xEBSPX/EB

For materials reported under equimolar feed conditions, the corresponding feed compositions were assumed to be equal unless otherwise specified in the original literature.

Structure determination by ED

For ED analysis, activated samples were contacted with PX, EB, MX, or OX and dispersed onto carbon-coated copper grids, followed by cryogenic preservation in liquid nitrogen. Data were collected at 77 K on a JEOL JEM-2100Plus transmission electron microscope operated at 200 kV and equipped with a direct electron detector. Diffraction datasets were processed using REDp (52), XDS (53), and Coeus software (ReadCrystal Tech, China), and structure models were solved using SHELXT (50). Additional experimental details are provided in the Supplementary Text.

DFT calculations

DFT calculations were carried out using the CASTEP code (54). The Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof functional within the generalized gradient approximation was used to describe the exchange-correlation interactions (55). Dispersion interactions were described using the semi-empirical Grimme G06 correction scheme as implemented in CASTEP, with the default short-range damping function applied (56). A 1 × 1 × 2 supercell was constructed to accommodate the xylene molecules within the pore channels as the molecular length exceeds the dimensions of the primitive unit cell. A plane-wave cutoff energy of 544 eV and a 2 × 2 × 2 k-point mesh were adopted. Detailed convergence tests are provided in the Supplementary Materials.

For the evaluation of ΔEint, the framework structures were taken from experimentally determined MicroED models. In particular, the deformed Ni(BIC)2 (2) structure obtained from ED measurements was used after removal of the guest molecules. Then, xylene molecules were introduced into the channels to construct initial adsorption configurations. Last, constrained geometry optimizations were subsequently performed, in which the framework atoms were kept fixed and only the guest molecules were allowed to relax, yielding the host-guest interaction energies. ΔEint was calculated using the equation ΔEint = E(absorbed adsorbent+xylene) − E(xylene) − E(absorbed adsorbent). The structural deformation energy (ΔEdef) was calculated as the energy difference between the experimentally determined Ni(BIC)2 (1) and Ni(BIC)2 (2) framework structures, with equation ΔEdef = E(adsorbed adsorbent) − E(activated adsorbent). The total adsorption energy (ΔEtot) was then obtained as the sum of ΔEint and ΔEdef, with equation ΔEtot = ΔEint + ΔEdef.

Here, ΔEdef represents the energetic cost associated with framework deformation during the structural transformation process. Experimental structural characterization indicates that different xylene isomers induce the same framework transformation from Ni(BIC)2 (1) to Ni(BIC)2 (2) and, therefore, are expected to experience similar deformation barriers associated with this common structural transition. In this case, the selective adsorption behavior is associated with whether the host-guest interaction energy is sufficient to overcome this common energetic threshold. The DFT calculations at 0 K are used to capture relative energetic trends underlying the selective transformation behavior, rather than to provide exact quantitative predictions of finite-temperature adsorption uptake.

Batch adsorption-desorption experiments in eluent

The potential application of Ni(BIC)2 within SMB processes was assessed through liquid-phase adsorption and desorption experiments using pDEB as an eluent. An activated sample of Ni(BIC)2, weighing ∼200 mg, underwent activation under vacuum conditions at 423 K for 24 hours. This activated sample was then immersed in a 10-ml mixture of PX/MX/OX/EB/pDEB with varying mass ratios: 11/25/11/3/50, 4.4/10/4.4/1.2/80, 2.2/5/2.2/0.6/90, and 1.1/2.5/1.1/0.3/95 at 393 K for 3 hours. Following immersion, the samples from the mixture with a mass composition of 11/25/11/3/50 were filtered and then air-dried at room temperature for 2 hours to conduct the desorption experiment. Subsequently, 10 mg of the resultant sample was digested with 2 ml of 12 M hydrochloric acid overnight. Aromatics were extracted from the digestion solution using 2 ml of dichloromethane, and the isolated organic phase was analyzed by GC to determine the mass ratios of the aromatics. The overall uptake amount was quantified by TG analysis, and the adsorption selectivity in the presence of the eluent was calculated using eq. S15. Following adsorption, elution experiments were conducted by agitating 100 mg of the adsorption-saturated adsorbents in 5 ml of pure pDEB at 393 K for 2 hours. The mixture was then filtered using a 0.22-μm organic membrane to separate the supernatants from the adsorbent. The solid residue, after air-drying for 2 hours, was subjected to the same digestion and extraction protocol as in the adsorption phase. Both the organic extract and the supernatants, before and after elution, were analyzed under identical GC conditions to determine the purity and recovery rate of PX during a single elution cycle.

Liquid-phase adsorption and mass-transfer measurements

Liquid-phase adsorption isotherms were measured using a fixed-bed chromatographic method following reported procedures (57, 58). A stainless-steel column (15 cm by 0.46 cm ID) packed with Ni(BIC)2 (2.1 g, 300 mesh) was operated at 393 K using TMB as the mobile phase. Feed solutions containing xylene isomers were continuously introduced until equilibrium was reached, and adsorbed amounts were determined from desorption mass balances. Equilibrium data were fitted using Langmuir and extended Langmuir models (59). Mass-transfer kinetics were evaluated by pulse chromatography on a Ni(BIC)2-packed column using TMB as the carrier fluid at 393 K. Kinetic parameters were obtained by fitting pulse-response curves with an axial-dispersion model coupled with linear driving-force mass transfer (60, 61). Additional experimental details and equations are provided in the Supplementary Text.

SMB process simulation

A four-zone SMB process with 24 columns was simulated in Aspen Chromatography to evaluate PX separation performance using Ni(BIC)2 and FAU zeolite adsorbents (62–66). The model considered adsorption equilibrium, axial dispersion, and mass-transfer resistance using experimentally determined thermodynamic and kinetic parameters. Operating windows were first estimated using triangle theory and then optimized by dynamic simulations. Product purity, recovery, productivity, solvent consumption, and processing capacity were used as performance metrics. Full model equations and simulation details are provided in the Supplementary Text.

PX/PDEB distillation simulation

Steady-state distillation simulations for PX/PDEB separation were performed in Aspen Plus V11 using the RadFrac model with the NRTL thermodynamic method (67). Feed conditions were based on the SMB extract stream, and operating parameters were optimized to achieve target PX purity while minimizing energy consumption. Additional simulation details are provided in the Supplementary Text.

Stability and recyclability tests

The stability of Ni(BIC)2 was evaluated after exposure to pure PX, quaternary PX/MX/OX/EB mixtures, and ambient air under representative conditions, followed by PXRD analysis to examine structural integrity. Recyclability was assessed through repeated adsorption-desorption cycles in both vapor and liquid phases at 393 K. In vapor-phase cycling, PX adsorption and thermal regeneration were conducted under flowing N2 using a thermogravimetric analyzer. In liquid-phase cycling, PX-loaded samples were regenerated thermally after adsorption. Long-term cycling performance was further examined using a multicomponent aromatic mixture containing xylene isomers, toluene, and pDEB. Adsorption capacities and selectivities during cycling were monitored by TG and GC analyses. Additional experimental details are provided in the Supplementary Text.

Acknowledgments

We thank all collaborators for helpful discussions.

Funding:

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22288102 to Q.R., 22225802 to Z.B., 22421004 to Z.B., and 223B2803 to R.C.) and by the National Research Foundation Singapore (NRF-CRP26-2021RS-0002 and NRF-NRFI08-2022-0008, both to D.Z.).

Author contributions:

Conceptualization: Z.B. Methodology: Z.B., Q.Y., and D.Z. Investigation: J.L., L.G., R.C., H.S., F.S., and J.Y. Visualization: J.L., R.C., and Y.L. Funding acquisition: Z.B., Q.Y., Q.R., Z.Z., and D.Z. Project administration: Z.B. Supervision: Z.B., Q.Y., Q.R., Z.Z., and D.Z. Writing—original draft: J.L. and R.C. Writing—review and editing: Z.B. and D.Z.

Competing interests:

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Data, code, and materials availability:

Crystallographic data for the structures reported in this article have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre under deposition numbers CCDC 2266103 [Ni(BIC)2], 2266102 [Ni(BIC)2·1], and 2266101 [Ni(BIC)2·2]. Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures/. All data and code needed to evaluate and reproduce the results in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. All materials used in this study are commercially available. This study did not generate any new materials.

Supplementary Materials

The PDF file includes:

Supplementary Text

Figs. S1 to S40

Tables S1 to S16

Legends for data S1 and S2

References

sciadv.aeg1691_sm.pdf (18.3MB, pdf)

Other Supplementary Material for this manuscript includes the following:

Data S1 and S2

REFERENCES

  • 1.J. Fabri, U. Graeser, T. A. Simo, Ullman’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (Wiley-VCH, 2000). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhang G., Ding Y., Hashem A., Fakim A., Khashab N. M., Xylene isomer separations by intrinsically porous molecular materials. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2, 100470 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sholl D. S., Lively R. P., Seven chemical separations to change the world. Nature 532, 435–437 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhang Z., Peh S. B., Kang C., Chai K., Zhao D., Metal-organic frameworks for C6-C8 hydrocarbon separations. EnergyChem 3, 100057 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Krishna R., Separating mixtures by exploiting molecular packing effects in microporous materials. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 39–59 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Minceva M., Rodrigues A. E., Understanding and revamping of industrial scale SMB units for p-xylene separation. AIChE J. 53, 138–149 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shi Q., Gonçalves J. C., Ferreira A. F. P., Rodrigues A. E., A review of advances in production and separation of xylene isomers. Chem. Eng. Process. 169, 108603 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yang Y., Bai P., Guo X., Separation of xylene isomers: A review of recent advances in materials. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 56, 14725–14753 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.L. S. Cheng, J. A. Johnson, “Adsorbents with improved mass transfer properties and their use in the adsorptive separation of para-xylene,” US Patent 8,609,925 (2013).
  • 10.Ye Z.-M., Zhang X.-F., Liu D.-X., Xu Y.-T., Wang C., Zheng K., Zhou D.-D., He C.-T., Zhang J.-P., A gating ultramicroporous metal-organic framework showing high adsorption selectivity, capacity and rate for xylene separation. Sci. China Chem. 65, 1552–1558 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mellot C., Simonot-Grange M.-H., Pilverdier E., Bellat J.-P., Espinat D., Adsorption of gaseous p- or m-xylene in BaX zeolite: Correlation between thermodynamic and crystallographic studies. Langmuir 11, 1726–1730 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rasouli M., Yaghobi N., Allahgholipour F., Atashi H., Para-xylene adsorption separation process using nano-zeolite Ba-X. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 92, 1192–1199 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rasouli M., Yaghobi N., Chitsazan S., Sayyar M. H., Influence of monovalent cations ion-exchange on zeolite ZSM-5 in separation of para-xylene from xylene mixture. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 150, 47–54 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Moosa B., Alimi L. O., Shkurenko A., Fakim A., Bhatt P. M., Zhang G., Eddaoudi M., Khashab N. M., A polymorphic azobenzene cage for energy-efficient and highly selective p-xylene separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 59, 21367–21371 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lusi M., Barbour L. J., Solid-vapor sorption of xylenes: Prioritized selectivity as a means of separating all three isomers using a single substrate. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 51, 3928–3931 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.du Plessis M., Nikolayenko V. I., Barbour L. J., Record-setting selectivity for p-xylene by an intrinsically porous zero-dimensional metallocycle. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 4529–4533 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sun N., Wang S.-Q., Zou R., Cui W.-G., Zhang A., Zhang T., Li Q., Zhuang Z.-Z., Zhang Y.-H., Xu J., Zaworotko M. J., Bu X.-H., Benchmark selectivity p-xylene separation by a non-porous molecular solid through liquid or vapor extraction. Chem. Sci. 10, 8850–8854 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang G., Emwas A.-H., Hameed U. F. S., Arold S. T., Yang P., Chen A., Xiang J.-F., Khashab N. M., Shape-induced selective separation of ortho-substituted benzene isomers enabled by cucurbit[7]uril host macrocycles. Chem 6, 1082–1096 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jie K., Liu M., Zhou Y., Little M. A., Pulido A., Chong S. Y., Stephenson A., Hughes A. R., Sakakibara F., Ogoshi T., Blanc F., Day G. M., Huang F., Cooper A. I., Near-ideal xylene selectivity in adaptive molecular pillar[n]arene crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 6921–6930 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schneemann A., Bon V., Schwedler I., Senkovska I., Kaskel S., Fischer R. A., Flexible metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 6062–6096 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li J. R., Kuppler R. J., Zhou H. C., Selective gas adsorption and separation in metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 1477–1504 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Alaerts L., Kirschhock C. E. A., Maes M., van der Veen M. A., Finsy V., Depla A., Martens J. A., Baron G. V., Jacobs P. A., Denayer J. F. M., De Vos D. E., Selective adsorption and separation of xylene isomers and ethylbenzene with the microporous vanadium(IV) terephthalate MIL-47. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 46, 4293–4297 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Idrees K. B., Li Z., Xie H., Kirlikovali K. O., Kazem-Rostami M., Wang X., Wang X., Tai T.-Y., Islamoglu T., Stoddart J. F., Snurr R. Q., Farha O. K., Separation of aromatic hydrocarbons in porous materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 12212–12218 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mukherjee S., Joarder B., Manna B., Desai A. V., Chaudhari A. K., Ghosh S. K., Framework-flexibility driven selective sorption of p-xylene over other isomers by a dynamic metal-organic framework. Sci. Rep. 4, 5761 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li L., Guo L., Olson D. H., Xian S., Zhang Z., Yang Q., Wu K., Yang Y., Bao Z., Ren Q., Li J., Discrimination of xylene isomers in a stacked coordination polymer. Science 377, 335–339 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yang X., Zhou H.-L., He C.-T., Mo Z.-W., Ye J.-W., Chen X.-M., Zhang J.-P., Flexibility of metal-organic framework tunable by crystal size at the micrometer to submillimeter scale for efficient xylene isomer separation. Research 2019, 9463719 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dong Q., Zhang X., Liu S., Lin R.-B., Guo Y., Ma Y., Yonezu A., Krishna R., Liu G., Duan J., Matsuda R., Jin W., Chen B., Tuning gate-opening of a flexible metal-organic framework for ternary gas sieving separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 59, 22756–22762 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhang X., Zhou D., Zhang J., Tuning the gating energy barrier of metal-organic framework for molecular sieving. Chem 7, 1006–1019 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen K.-J., Madden D. G., Mukherjee S., Pham T., Forrest K. A., Kumar A., Space B., Kong J., Zhang Q.-Y., Zaworotko M. J., Synergistic sorbent separation for one-step ethylene purification from a four-component mixture. Science 366, 241–246 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Su Y., K.-i. Otake, Zheng J.-J., Horike S., Kitagawa S., Gu C., Separating water isotopologues using diffusion-regulatory porous materials. Nature 611, 289–294 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zeng H., Xie M., Wang T., Wei R.-J., Xie X.-J., Zhao Y., Lu W., Li D., Orthogonal-array dynamic molecular sieving of propylene/propane mixtures. Nature 595, 542–548 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mason J. A., Oktawiec J., Taylor M. K., Hudson M. R., Rodriguez J., Bachman J. E., Gonzalez M. I., Cervellino A., Guagliardi A., Brown C. M., Llewellyn P. L., Masciocchi N., Long J. R., Methane storage in flexible metal-organic frameworks with intrinsic thermal management. Nature 527, 357–361 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Antypov D., Shkurenko A., Bhatt P. M., Belmabkhout Y., Adil K., Cadiau A., Suyetin M., Eddaoudi M., Rosseinsky M. J., Dyer M. S., Differential guest location by host dynamics enhances propylene/propane separation in a metal-organic framework. Nat. Commun. 11, 6099 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gonzalez M. I., Kapelewski M. T., Bloch E. D., Milner P. J., Reed D. A., Hudson M. R., Mason J. A., Barin G., Brown C. M., Long J. R., Separation of xylene isomers through multiple metal site interactions in metal-organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 3412–3422 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li X., Wang J., Bai N., Zhang X., Han X., da Silva I., Morris C. G., Xu S., Wilary D. M., Sun Y., Cheng Y., Murray C. A., Tang C. C., Frogley M. D., Cinque G., Lowe T., Zhang H., Ramirez-Cuesta A. J., Thomas K. M., Bolton L. W., Yang S., Schröder M., Refinement of pore size at sub-angstrom precision in robust metal-organic frameworks for separation of xylenes. Nat. Commun. 11, 4280 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang S.-Q., Mukherjee S., Patyk-Kaźmierczak E., Darwish S., Bajpai A., Yang Q.-Y., Zaworotko M. J., Highly selective, high-capacity separation of o-xylene from C8 aromatics by a switching adsorbent layered material. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 131, 6702–6706 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhou D. D., Zhang J. P., On the role of flexibility for adsorptive separation. Acc. Chem. Res. 55, 2966–2977 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Krause S., Hosono N., Kitagawa S., Chemistry of soft porous crystals: Structural dynamics and gas adsorption properties. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 59, 15325–15341 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wu L., Xue M., Huang L., Qiu S. L., Hydrothermal synthesis, structure, fluorescence property of a novel 3D metal-organic framework with high thermal stability. Sci. China Chem. 54, 1441–1445 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Krishna R., Screening metal-organic frameworks for mixture separations in fixed-bed adsorbers using a combined selectivity/capacity metric. RSC Adv. 7, 35724–35737 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yoon J. W., Lee J. S., Piburn G. W., Cho K. H., Jeon K., Lim H. K., Kim H., Jun C. H., Humphrey S. M., Krishna R., Chang J. S., Highly selective adsorption of p-xylene over other C8 aromatic hydrocarbons by Co-CUK-1: A combined experimental and theoretical assessment. Dalton Trans. 46, 16096–16101 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Glueckauf E., Theory of chromatography. Part 10.—Formulæ for diffusion into spheres and their application to chromatography. Trans. Faraday Soc. 51, 1540–1551 (1955). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Stuart E. B., Coull J., Liquid-phase adsorption equilibria. AIChE J. 4, 383–388 (1958). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Webster C. E., Drago R. S., Zerner M. C., Molecular dimensions for adsorptives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 5509–5516 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kundu T., Shah B. B., Bolinois L., Zhao D., Functionalization-induced breathing control in metal-organic frameworks for methane storage with high deliverable capacity. Chem. Mater. 31, 2842–2847 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Minceva M., Rodrigues A. E., Modeling and simulation of a simulated moving bed for the separation of p-xylene. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41, 3454–3461 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Minceva M., Rodrigues A. E., Influence of the transfer line dead volume on the performance of an industrial scale simulated moving bed for p-xylene separation. Sep. Sci. Technol. 38, 1463–1497 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.R. E. Dinnebier, A. Leineweber, J. S. O. Evans, Rietveld Refinement: Practical Powder Diffraction Pattern Analysis Using TOPAS (De Gruyter, 2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dolomanov O. V., Bourhis L. J., Gildea R. J., Howard J. A. K., Puschmann H., OLEX2: A complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sheldrick G. M., SHELXT-integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Adv. 71, 3–8 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sheldrick G. M., Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C Struct. Chem. 71, 3–8 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wan W., Sun J., Su J., Hovmoller S., Zou X., Three-dimensional rotation electron diffraction: Software RED for automated data collection and data processing. J. Appl. Cryst. 46, 1863–1873 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kabsch W., XDS. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 125–132 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Clark S. J., Segall M. D., Pickard C. J., Hasnip P. J., Probert M. I. J., Refson K., Payne M. C., First principles methods using CASTEP. Z. Kristall. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater. 220, 567–570 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Perdew J. P., Burke K., Ernzerhof M., Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Grimme S., Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J. Comput. Chem. 27, 1787–1799 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Silva M. S. P., Moreira M. A., Ferreira A. F. P., Santos J. C., Silva V. M. T. M., Gomes P. S., Minceva M., Mota J. P. B., Rodrigues A. E., Adsorbent evaluation based on experimental breakthrough curves: Separation of p-xylene from C8 isomers. Chem. Eng. Technol. 35, 1777–1785 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Silva M. S. P., Mota J. P. B., Rodrigues A. E., Fixed-bed adsorption of aromatic C-8 isomers: Breakthrough experiments, modeling and simulation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 90, 246–256 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kapoor A., Ritter J. A., Yang R. T., An extended Langmuir model for adsorption of gas mixtures on heterogeneous surfaces. Langmuir 6, 660–664 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Minceva M., Rodrigues A. E., Two-level optimization of an existing SMB for p-xylene separation. Comput. Chem. Eng. 29, 2215–2228 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Santacesaria E., Morbidelli M., Danise P., Mercenari M., Carra S., Separation of xylenes on Y zeolite. Part 1. Determination of the adsorption equilibrium parameters, selectivities and mass transfer coefficients through finite bath experiments. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 21, 440–445 (1982). [Google Scholar]
  • 62.A. Seidel-Morgenstern, H. Schmidt-Traub, M. Michel, A. Epping, A. Jupke, “Modeling and model parameters,” in Preparative Chromatography, H. Schmidt-Traub, Ed. (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2012), pp. 321–424. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.A. E. Rodrigues, C. Pereira, M. Minceva, L. S. Pais, A. M. Ribeiro, A. Ribeiro, M. Silva, N. Gra, A. J. C. Santos, Simulated Moving Bed Technology (Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, ed. 1, 2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zabka M., Minceva M., Gornes P. S., Rodrigues A. E., Chiral separation of R,S-alpha-tetralol by simulated moving bed. Sep. Sci. Technol. 43, 727–765 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Mazzotti M., Storti G., Morbidelli M., Optimal operation of simulated moving bed units for nonlinear chromatographic separations. J. Chromatogr. A 769, 3–24 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Mazzotti M., Storti G., Morbidelli M., Robust design of countercurrent adsorption separation processes: 2 Multicomponent systems. AIChE J. 40, 1825–1842 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Renon H., Prausnitz J. M., Local compositions in thermodynamic excess functions for liquid mixtures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 7, 220–225 (1968). [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Minceva M., Rodrigues A. E., Adsorption of xylenes on faujasite-type zeolite. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 82, 667–681 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Tournier H., Barreau A., Tavitian B., Le Roux D., Moïse J.-C., Bellat J.-P., Paulin C., Adsorption equilibrium of xylene isomers and p-diethylbenzene on a prehydrated BaX zeolite. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 40, 5983–5990 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Rasouli M., Yaghobi N., Gilani S. Z. M., Atashi H., Rasouli M., Influence of monovalent alkaline metal cations on binder-free nano-zeolite X in para-xylene separation. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 23, 64–70 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gu Z., Jiang D., Wang H., Cui X., Yan X., Adsorption and separation of xylene isomers and ethylbenzene on two Zn-terephthalate metal-organic frameworks. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 311–316 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Warren J. E., Perkins C. G., Jelfs K. E., Boldrin P., Chater P. A., Miller G. J., Manning T. D., Briggs M. E., Stylianou K. C., Claridge J. B., Rosseinsky M. J., Shape selectivity by guest-driven restructuring of a porous material. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 53, 4592–4596 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Lannoeye J., Van de Voorde B., Bozbiyik B., Reinsch H., Denayer J., De Vos D., An aliphatic copper metal-organic framework as versatile shape selective adsorbent in liquid phase separations. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 226, 292–298 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Moreira M. A., Santos M. P. S., Silva C. G., Loureiro J. M., Chang J.-S., Serre C., Ferreira A. F. P., Rodrigues A. E., Adsorption equilibrium of xylene isomers and ethylbenzene on MIL-125(Ti)-NH2: The temperature influence on the para-selectivity. Adsorption 24, 715–724 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kim S. I., Lee S., Chung Y. G., Bae Y. S., The origin of p-xylene selectivity in a dabco pillar-layered metal-organic framework: A combined experimental and computational investigation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 31227–31236 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Lee J., Kim Y., Son Y., Kim H., Choi Y. N., D'Alessandro D., Rao P. C., Yoon M., Breathing-assisted selective adsorption of C8 alkyl aromatics in Zn-based metal-organic frameworks. Chem. A Eur. J. 27, 14851–14857 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Bae H. J., Kim S. I., Choi Y., Kim K. M., Bae Y. S., High p-xylene selectivity in aluminum-based metal-organic framework with 1-D channels. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 117, 333–341 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Gee J. A., Zhang K., Bhattacharyya S., Bentley J., Rungta M., Abichandani J. S., Sholl D. S., Nair S., Computational identification and experimental evaluation of metal-organic frameworks for xylene enrichment. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 12075–12082 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Li J., Sheng B., Chen R., Wu H., Zhou W., Zheng F., Liu B., Yang Q., Zhang Z., Yang Y., Ren Q., Bao Z., An adaptive metal-organic framework discriminates xylene isomers by shape-responsive deformation. Adv. Mater. 37, 2413506 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Yu L., Zhang J., Ullah S., Yao J., Luo H., Huang J., Xia Q., Thonhauser T., Li J., Wang H., Separating xylene isomers with a calcium metal-organic framework. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 62, e202310672 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Peralta D., Chaplais G., Paillaud J.-L., Simon-Masseron A., Barthelet K., Pirngruber G. D., The separation of xylene isomers by ZIF-8: A demonstration of the extraordinary flexibility of the ZIF-8 framework. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 173, 1–5 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Lin J. M., He C. T., Liao P. Q., Lin R. B., Zhang J. P., Structural, energetic, and dynamic insights into the abnormal xylene separation behavior of hierarchical porous crystal. Sci. Rep. 5, 11537 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Guo G., Chen H., Long Y., Separation of p-xylene from C8 aromatics on binder-free hydrophobic adsorbent of MFI zeolite. I. Studies on static equilibrium. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 39, 149–161 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Torres-Knoop A., Krishna R., Dubbeldam D., Separating xylene isomers by commensurate stacking of p-xylene within channels of MAF-X8. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 53, 7774–7778 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Saccoccia B., Bohnsack A. M., Waggoner N. W., Cho K. H., Lee J. S., Hong D.-Y., Lynch V. M., Chang J.-S., Humphrey S. M., Separation of p-divinylbenzene by selective room-temperature adsorption inside Mg-CUK-1 prepared by aqueous microwave synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54, 5394–5398 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Mohamed S. A., Zheng R., Zhu N., Zhao D., Jiang J., A systematic approach for incorporating structural flexibility in high-throughput computational screening of metal-organic frameworks for xylene separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 12251–12262 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Qiao Z., Yan Y., Tang Y., Liang H., Jiang J., Metal-organic frameworks for xylene separation: From computational screening to machine learning. J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 7839–7848 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Halder P., Singh J. K., Screening of hypothetical metal-organic frameworks for xylene isomers and ethylbenzene separation. Energy Fuel 37, 2230–2236 (2023). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Text

Figs. S1 to S40

Tables S1 to S16

Legends for data S1 and S2

References

sciadv.aeg1691_sm.pdf (18.3MB, pdf)

Data S1 and S2

Data Availability Statement

Crystallographic data for the structures reported in this article have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre under deposition numbers CCDC 2266103 [Ni(BIC)2], 2266102 [Ni(BIC)2·1], and 2266101 [Ni(BIC)2·2]. Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures/. All data and code needed to evaluate and reproduce the results in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. All materials used in this study are commercially available. This study did not generate any new materials.


Articles from Science Advances are provided here courtesy of American Association for the Advancement of Science

RESOURCES