Correction to: BMC Cancer 25, 451 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13897-4
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in the data where three facilities out of 268 were inadvertently counted twice. This resulted to a slight discrepancy in the reported response rate (less than 1%).
With this, the Tables and Figures and data in the main text should be updated as presented below.
| Page | Part of the Article | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Abstract, result section | 268 | 265 |
| 1 | 58.0% | 57.4% | |
| 1 | 244 (91.0%) | 242 (91.3%) | |
| 1 | 155 (63.5%) | 154 (63.6%) | |
| 1 | 76.2% (n = 16) | 75.0% (n = 15) | |
| 3 | Main text, Result section | 268 | 265 |
| 3 | 58.0% | 57.4% | |
| 3 | 78 | 75 | |
| 3 | n = 160; 59.7% | n = 158; 59.6% | |
| 3 | n = 244, 91.0% | n = 241, 90.9% | |
| 4 | n = 226, 84.3% | n = 224, 84.5% | |
| 4 |
Main text, Result, Hospitals that implemented cancer rehabilitation in the PCU section |
91.0% (n = 244) | 91.3% (n = 242) |
| 4 | 155 (63.5%) | 154 (63.6%) | |
| 4 | n = 134, 86.5% | n = 133, 86.4% | |
| 4 | n = 105, 67.7% | n = 104, 67.5% | |
| 4 | Main text, Result, Barriers to the implementation of cancer rehabilitation in PCUs section | n = 21, 7.8% | n = 20, 7.5% |
| 4 | n = 16, 76.2% | n = 15, 75.0% | |
| 4 | 76.2% | 75.0% | |
| 4 | n = 16 | n = 15 | |
| 4 | n = 8, 50.0% | n = 7, 43.8% | |
| 4 | n = 7, 43.8% | n = 6, 37.5% |
Incorrect Fig. 1
Fig. 1.

Flow diagram
Correct Fig. 1
Fig. 1.

Flow diagram
Incorrect Table 1
Table 1.
Characteristics of facility and rehabilitation staff
| Type of facilities | |
| University hospital | 6 (2.2%) |
| Cancer center | 10 (3.7%) |
| General hospital | 244 (91.0%) |
| Other | 4 (1.5%) |
| No answer | 4 (1.5%) |
| Number of total beds | |
| <300 beds | 120 (44.8%) |
| 301–600 beds | 119 (44.4%) |
| 601–1000beds | 25 (9.3%) |
| >1001beds | 4 (1.5%) |
| Number of PCU beds | |
| 0 bed | 2 (0.7%) |
| 1–10 beds | 11 (4.1%) |
| 11–30 beds | 226 (84.3%) |
| 31–60 beds | 19 (7.1%) |
| >61beds | 1 (0.4%) |
| No answer | 9 (3.4%) |
| Existence of physiatrists | |
| Yes | 99 (36.9%) |
| No | 166 (61.9%) |
| Number of rehabilitation staffs | |
| PT | 16 [10–27] |
| OT | 7 [4–14] |
| ST | 4 [2–6] |
| Number of rehabilitation staffs who had completed the CAREER program | |
| PT | 6 [2–10] |
| OT | 2 [1–5] |
| ST | 1 [0–3] |
CAREER Cancer Rehabilitation Educational program for Rehabilitation teams, OT occupational therapists, PCU palliative care units, PT physical therapists, ST speech and language therapists
Correct Table 1
Table 1.
Characteristics of facility and rehabilitation staff
| Type of facilities | |
| University hospital | 6 (2.3%) |
| Cancer center | 10 (3.8%) |
| General hospital | 241 (90.9%) |
| Other | 4 (1.5%) |
| No answer | 4 (1.5%) |
| Number of total beds | |
| <300 beds | 118 (44.5%) |
| 301–600 beds | 118 (44.5%) |
| 601–1000beds | 25 (9.5%) |
| >1001beds | 4 (1.5%) |
| Number of PCU beds | |
| 0 bed | 2 (0.8%) |
| 1–10 beds | 10 (3.8%) |
| 11–30 beds | 224 (84.5%) |
| 31–60 beds | 19 (7.2%) |
| >61beds | 1 (0.4%) |
| No answer | 9 (3.4%) |
| Existence of physiatrists | |
| Yes | 98 (37.0%) |
| No | 164 (61.9%) |
| No answer | 3 (1.1%) |
| Number of rehabilitation staffs | |
| PT | 16 [10–27] |
| OT | 7 [4–14] |
| ST | 4 [2–6] |
| Number of rehabilitation staffs who had completed the CAREER program | |
| PT | 6 [1–11] |
| OT | 3 [0–5] |
| ST | 1 [0–3] |
CAREER Cancer Rehabilitation Educational program for Rehabilitation teams, OT occupational therapists, PCU palliative care units, PT physical therapists, ST speech and language therapists
Incorrect Table 2
Table 2.
Implementation status of cancer rehabilitation in the PCU
| Implementation status of cancer rehabilitation in the PCU | |
| Implementation | 244 (91.0%) |
| Not implemented | 21 (7.8%) |
| No answer | 3 (1.1%) |
| Is inpatient cancer rehabilitation sufficiently implemented? | |
| Sufficient | 86 (35.2%) |
| Insufficient | 155 (63.5%) |
| No answer | 3 (1.2%) |
| Reasons for insufficient cancer rehabilitation in the PCU (multiple answers allowed) | |
| Ineligibility for medical fees for rehabilitation of diseases | 134 (86.5%) |
| Lack of rehabilitation staff with the requisite knowledge/skills | 30 (19.4%) |
| Lack of rehabilitation staff | 105 (67.7%) |
| Not referred to rehabilitation unit | 13 (8.4%) |
| Inadequate facilities and equipment | 4 (2.6%) |
| Others | 9 (5.8%) |
PCU palliative care units
Correct Table 2
Table 2.
Implementation status of cancer rehabilitation in the PCU
| Implementation status of cancer rehabilitation in the PCU | |
| Implementation | 242 (91.3%) |
| Not implemented | 20 (7.5%) |
| No answer | 3 (1.1%) |
| Is cancer rehabilitation sufficiently implemented in the PCU? | |
| Sufficient | 85 (35.1%) |
| Insufficient | 154 (63.6%) |
| No answer | 3 (1.2%) |
| Reasons for insufficient cancer rehabilitation in the PCU (multiple answers allowed) | |
| Ineligibility for medical fees for rehabilitation of diseases | 133 (86.4%) |
| Lack of rehabilitation staff with the requisite knowledge/skills | 30 (19.5%) |
| Lack of rehabilitation staff | 104 (67.5%) |
| Not referred to rehabilitation unit | 13 (8.4%) |
| Inadequate facilities and equipment | 4 (2.6%) |
| Others | 8 (5.2%) |
PCU palliative care units
Incorrect Table 3
Table 3.
Reasons and need for cancer rehabilitation in the PCU
| Reasons for not implementing cancer rehabilitation in the PCU (multiple answers allowed) | |
| Ineligibility for medical fees for rehabilitation of diseases | 16 (76.2%) |
| Lack of rehabilitation staff with the requisite knowledge/skills | 1 (4.8%) |
| Lack of rehabilitation staff | 11 (52.4%) |
| Not referred to rehabilitation unit | 1 (4.8%) |
| Inadequate facilities and equipment | 2 (9.5%) |
| Others | 5 (23.8%) |
| Is there a need for cancer rehabilitation in the PCU? | |
| Yes | 16 (76.2%) |
| No | 5 (23.8%) |
| Reasons for the need for cancer rehabilitation in the PCU among the not implemented hospitals (Top 3 answers are allowed) | |
| Relief from physical symptoms | 8 (50.0%) |
| Relief from psychological distress | 12 (75.0%) |
| Maintenance and improve physical function | 4 (25.0%) |
| Maintenance and improve ADL | 6 (37.5%) |
| Maintenance and improve QoL | 8 (50.0%) |
| Relief from psychological distress and caregiving guidance for family members | 7 (43.8%) |
| Returning to home support | 7 (43.8%) |
ADL activities of daily living, PCU palliative care units, QoL quality of life
Correct Table 3
Table 3.
Reasons and need for cancer rehabilitation in the PCU
| Reasons for not implementing cancer rehabilitation in the PCU(multiple answers allowed) | |
| Ineligibility for medical fees for rehabilitation of diseases | 15 (75.0%) |
| Lack of rehabilitation staff with the requisite knowledge/skills | 1 (4.8%) |
| Lack of rehabilitation staff | 11 (52.4%) |
| Not referred to rehabilitation unit | 1 (4.8%) |
| Inadequate facilities and equipment | 2 (9.5%) |
| Others | 5 (23.8%) |
| Is there a need for cancer rehabilitation in the PCU? | |
| Yes | 15 (75.0%) |
| No | 5 (25.0%) |
| Reasons for the need for cancer rehabilitation in the PCU among the not implemented hospitals(Top 3 answers are allowed) | |
| Relief from physical symptoms | 7 (43.8%) |
| Relief from psychological distress | 12 (75.0%) |
| Maintenance and improve physical function | 4 (25.0%) |
| Maintenance and improve ADL | 5 (31.3%) |
| Maintenance and improve QoL | 8 (50.0%) |
| Relief from psychological distress and caregiving guidance for family members | 6 (37.5%) |
| Returning to home support | 7 (43.8%) |
ADL activities of daily living, PCU palliative care units, QoL quality of life
References
- 1.Fukushima T, Tsuji T, Takashima K, et al. The current status of cancer rehabilitation provided by palliative care units in Japan: a nationwide survey. BMC Cancer. 2025;25:451. 10.1186/s12885-025-13897-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
