Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1983 Jan;39(1):7–23. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-7

Analysis of discriminative control by social behavioral stimuli

Don F Hake, Tom Donaldson, Cloyd Hyten
PMCID: PMC1347880  PMID: 16812313

Abstract

Visual discriminative control of the behavior of one rat by the behavior of another was studied in a two-compartment chamber. Each rat's compartment had a food cup and two response keys arranged vertically next to the clear partition that separated the two rats. Illumination of the leader's key lights signaled a “search” period when a response by the leader on the unsignaled and randomly selected correct key for that trial illuminated the follower's keys. Then, a response by the follower on the corresponding key was reinforced, or a response on the incorrect key terminated the trial without reinforcement. Accuracy of following the leader increased to 85% within 15 sessions. Blocking the view of the leader reduced accuracy but not to chance levels. Apparent control by visual behavioral stimuli was also affected by auditory stimuli and a correction procedure. When white noise eliminated auditory cues, social learning was not acquired as fast nor as completely. A reductionistic position holds that behavioral stimuli are the same as nonsocial stimuli; however, that does not mean that they do not require any separate treatment. Behavioral stimuli are usually more variable than nonsocial stimuli, and further study is required to disentangle behavioral and nonsocial contributions to the stimulus control of social interactions.

Keywords: behavioral stimulus, visual social stimulus, matched-dependent learning, social learning, following, imitation, auditory social stimulus, behavior as a discriminative stimulus, rats

Full text

PDF
7

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AZRIN N. H., LINDSLEY O. R. The reinforcement of cooperation between children. J Abnorm Psychol. 1956 Jan;52(1):100–102. doi: 10.1037/h0042490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BARON A., LITTMAN R. A. Studies of individual and paired interactional problem-solving behavior of rats: II. Solitary and social controls. Genet Psychol Monogr. 1961 Aug;64:129–209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boren J. J. An experimental social relation between two monkeys. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Nov;9(6):691–700. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CHURCH R. M. Effects of a competitive situation on the speed of response. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1961 Apr;54:162–166. doi: 10.1037/h0042286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Danson C., Creed T. Rate of response as a visual social stimulus. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):233–242. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Epstein R., Lanza R. P., Skinner B. F. Symbolic Communication Between Two Pigeons, (Columba livia domestica). Science. 1980 Feb 1;207(4430):543–545. doi: 10.1126/science.207.4430.543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grott R., Neuringer A. Group behavior of rats under schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Sep;22(2):311–321. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hake D. F., Laws D. R. Social facilitation of responses during a stimulus paired with electric shock. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Jul;10(4):387–392. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hake D. F., Vukelich R. A classification and review of cooperation procedures. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Sep;18(2):333–343. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Husted J. R., McKenna F. S. The use of rats as discriminative stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Nov;9(6):677–679. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Marcucella H., Owens K. Cooperative problem solving by albino rats: a re-evaluation. Psychol Rep. 1975 Oct;37(2):591–598. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1975.37.2.591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Millard W. J. Stimulus properties of conspecific behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Nov;32(3):283–296. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Morgan M. J. Effects of random reinforcement sequences. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Sep;22(2):301–310. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pierrel R., Sherman J. G., Blue S., Hegge F. W. Auditory discrimination: a three-variable analysis of intensity effects. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Jan;13(1):17–35. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Raslear T. G. Differential responding without differential reinforcement: Intensity difference, continuum position, and reinforcement density effects. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Jan;35(1):79–91. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. SKINNER B. Two 'synthetic social relations'. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:531–533. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schmitt D. R., Marwell G. Stimulus control in the experimental study of cooperation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Sep;11(5):571–574. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Vogler R. E. Possibility of artifact in studies of cooperation. Psychol Rep. 1968 Aug;23(1):9–10. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1968.23.1.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES