Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1983 Sep;40(2):99–111. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-99

Choice, experience, and the generalized matching law.

J C Todorov, J M de Oliveira Castro, E S Hanna, M C Bittencourt de Sa, M Q Barreto
PMCID: PMC1347900  PMID: 6631314

Abstract

Five pigeons were exposed to different pairs of concurrent variable-interval, variable-interval schedules on nine experimental conditions of 30 sessions each. For every session, the parameters of the generalized matching equation were computed for the first five, six, seven, eight, and nine experimental conditions. The exponent a, both for response and time distribution, tended to decrease with increases in number of experimental conditions and to increase with number of sessions per condition, but values of k (bias) varied unsystematically. When the subjects were exposed to five new pairs of schedules, with 55 sessions per condition, the findings were confirmed. Data from the literature on the generalized matching law suggest that the variability of exponent values may be explained in part by the use of naive or experienced subjects in different investigations and by the variability in number of experimental conditions and in number of sessions per condition.

Full text

PDF
99

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bacotti A. V. Matching under concurrent fixed-ratio variable-interval schedules of food presentation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Jan;27(1):171–182. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baum W. M. Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Sep;32(2):269–281. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baum W. M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231–242. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baum W. M., Rachlin H. C. Choice as time allocation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):861–874. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baum W. M. Time allocation and negative reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Nov;20(3):313–322. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baum W. M. Time-based and count-based measurement of preference. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Jul;26(1):27–35. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bauman R. A., Shull R. L., Brownstein A. J. Time allocation on concurrent schedules with asymmetrical response requirements. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Jul;24(1):53–57. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Beautrais P. G., Davison M. C. Response and time allocation in concurrent second-order schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Jan;27(1):61–69. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bourland G., Miller J. T. The role of discriminative stimuli in concurrent performances. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Sep;36(2):231–239. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. CATANIA A. C. Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6:253–263. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. CUMMING W. W., BERRYMAN R. Some data on matching behavior in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:281–284. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cliffe M. J., Parry S. J. Matching to reinforcer value: human concurrent variable-interval performance. Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Nov;32(4):557–570. doi: 10.1080/14640748008401845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Davison M. C., Hunter I. W. Performance on variable-interval schedules arranged singly and concurrently. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 May;25(3):335–345. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Davison M., Ferguson A. The effects of different component response requirements in multiple and concurrent schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Mar;29(2):283–295. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fantino E., Squires N., Delbrück N., Peterson C. Choice behavior and the accessibility of the reinforcer. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Jul;18(1):35–43. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Farley J. Reinforcement and punishment effects in concurrent schedules: A test of two models. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 May;33(3):311–326. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Graft D. A., Lea S. E., Whitworth T. L. The matching law in and within groups of rats. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Jan;27(1):183–194. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Guilkey M., Shull R. L., Brownstein A. J. Response-rate invariance in concurrent schedules: effects of different changeover contingencies. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Jul;24(1):43–52. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. HERRNSTEIN R. J. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:267–272. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Herrnstein R. J., Heyman G. M. Is matching compatible with reinforcement maximization on concurrent variable interval variable ratio? J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Mar;31(2):209–223. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hollard V., Davison M. C. Preference for qualitatively different reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Nov;16(3):375–380. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hutton L., Gardner E. T., Lewis P. Matching with a key-peck response in concurrent negative reinforcement schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Sep;30(2):225–230. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Labounty C. E., Reynolds G. S. An analysis of response and time matching to reinforcement in concurrent ratio-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jan;19(1):155–166. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Leigland S. M. Deviations from matching as a measure of preference for alternatives in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Jul;32(1):1–13. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lobb B., Davison M. C. Performance in concurrent interval schedules: a systematic replication. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Sep;24(2):191–197. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Logue A. W., De Villiers P. A. Matching in concurrent variable-interval avoidance schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Jan;29(1):61–66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Marcucella H., Margolius G. Time allocation in concurrent schedules: the effect of signalled reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 May;29(3):419–430. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. McSweeney F. K. Matching and contrast on several concurrent treadle-press schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Mar;23(2):193–198. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. McSweeney F. K., Melville C. L., Buck M. A., Whipple J. E. Local rates of responding and reinforcement during concurrent schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jul;40(1):79–98. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Menlove R. L. Local patterns of responding maintained by concurrent and multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 May;23(3):309–337. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Moffitt M., Shimp C. P. Two-key concurrent paced variable-interval paced variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Jul;16(1):39–49. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nevin J. A. Rates and patterns of responding with concurrent fixed-interval and variable-interval reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Sep;16(2):241–247. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Norman W. D., McSweeney F. K. Matching, contrast, and equalizing in the concurrent lever-press responding of rats. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 May;29(3):453–462. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pliskoff S. S., Brown T. G. Matching with a trio of concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Jan;25(1):69–73. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pliskoff S. S., Fetterman J. G. Undermatching and overmatching: The fixed-ratio changeover requirement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Jul;36(1):21–27. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Poling A. Performance of rats under concurrent variable-interval schedules of negative reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Jul;30(1):31–36. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rodewald H. K. Concurrent random-interval schedules and the matching law. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Nov;30(3):301–306. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Schroeder S. R., Holland J. G. Reinforcement of eye movement with concurrent schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):897–903. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Stubbs D. A., Pliskoff S. S. Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):887–895. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Trevett A. J., Davison M. C., Williams R. J. Performance in concurrent interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 May;17(3):369–374. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Vaughan W. Melioration, matching, and maximization. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Sep;36(2):141–149. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wheatley K. L., Engberg L. A. Choice performance in several concurrent key-peck treadle-press reinforcement schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Mar;29(2):181–190. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES