Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1983 Mar;39(2):227–240. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-227

Spatial and temporal relations in conditioned reinforcement and observing behavior

Craig A Bowe, James A Dinsmoor
PMCID: PMC1347916  PMID: 16812316

Abstract

In Experiment 1, depressing one perch produced stimuli indicating which of two keys, if pecked, could produce food (spatial information) and depressing the other perch produced stimuli indicating whether a variable-interval or an extinction schedule was operating (temporal information). The pigeons increased the time they spent depressing the perch that produced the temporal information but did not increase the time they spent depressing the perch that produced the spatial information. In Experiment 2, pigeons that were allowed to produce combined spatial and temporal information did not acquire the perch pressing any faster or maintain it at a higher level than pigeons allowed to produce only temporal information. Later, when perching produced only spatial information, the time spent depressing the perch eventually declined. The results are not those implied by the statement that information concerning biologically important events is reinforcing but are consistent with an interpretation in terms of the acquisition of reinforcing properties by a stimulus associated with a higher density of primary reinforcement.

Keywords: spatial, temporal, discrimination, observing, information, conditioned reinforcement, key pecking, pigeons

Full text

PDF
227

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. DINSMOOR J. A. A quantitative comparison of the discriminative and reinforcing functions of a stimulus. J Exp Psychol. 1950 Aug;40(4):458–472. doi: 10.1037/h0056266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dinsmoor J. A., Clayton M. H. A conditioned reinforcer maintained by temporal association with the termination of shock. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Sep;9(5):547–552. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dinsmoor J. A., Mueller K. L., Martin L. T., Bowe C. A. The acquisition of observing. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Nov;38(3):249–263. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jenkins H. M., Boakes R. A. Observing stimulus sources that signal food or no food. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Sep;20(2):197–207. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. PROKASY W. F., Jr The acquisition of observing responses in the absence of differential external reinforcement. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1956 Apr;49(2):131–134. doi: 10.1037/h0046740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. STEIN L. Secondary reinforcement established with subcortical stimulation. Science. 1958 Feb 28;127(3296):466–467. doi: 10.1126/science.127.3296.466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. WYCKOFF L. B. Toward a quantitative theory of secondary reinforcement. Psychol Rev. 1959 Jan;66(1):68–78. doi: 10.1037/h0046882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES