Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1984 Jul;42(1):19–36. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-19

Accuracy versus speed in the generalized effort of learning-disabled children.

R Eisenberger, M Mitchell, M McDermitt, F A Masterson
PMCID: PMC1348042  PMID: 6481298

Abstract

Reinforcement of effortful performance in a given academic task has been found to increase the subsequent performance of other academic tasks. The learned-effort hypothesis assumes that individuals learn which dimensions of task performance are correlated with reinforcement of high effort, and generalize across tasks. Therefore, reinforcement of increased effort in a given dimension of one task should result in greater generalized effort in the same dimension of transfer performance than in another dimension. In accord with this view, preadolescent learning-disabled students who received points for high reading accuracy subsequently produced more accurate drawings and stories than did students whose points had been based upon high reading speed or upon mere completion of the reading task. Students who received points for high reading speed subsequently constructed stories more quickly than did children whose points had been based upon high reading accuracy or upon reading-task completion. Consistent with the more explicit and frequent feedback for accuracy than for speed in most academic tasks, generalized accuracy was much more durable than generalized speed.

Full text

PDF
19

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Eisenberger R., Heerdt W. A., Hamdi M., Zimet S., Bruckmeir G. Transfer of persistence across behaviors. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1979 Sep;5(5):522–530. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Eisenberger R., Leonard J. M. Effects of conceptual task difficulty on generalized persistence. Am J Psychol. 1980 Jun;93(2):285–298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eisenberger R., McDermitt M., Masterson F. A., Over S. Discriminative control of generalized effort. Am J Psychol. 1983 Fall;96(3):353–364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fowler J. W., Peterson P. L. Increasing reading persistence and altering attributional style of learned helpless children. J Educ Psychol. 1981 Apr;73(2):251–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. LOGAN F. A. A micromolar approach to behavior theory. Psychol Rev. 1956 Jan;63(1):63–73. doi: 10.1037/h0044334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nation J. R., Cooney J. B., Gartrell K. E. Durability and generalizability of persistence training. J Abnorm Psychol. 1979 Apr;88(2):121–136. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.88.2.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Spear N. E., Pavlik W. B. Percentage of reinforcement and reward magnitude effects in a T MAZE: between and within subjects. J Exp Psychol. 1966 Apr;71(4):521–528. doi: 10.1037/h0023014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES