Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Jun 23;65(34):e7890563. doi: 10.1002/anie.7890563

Cooperative Redox Catalysis of N2O Decomposition by Short‐Range RhO x and CeO x Anchored to Co3O4

Daniel C Cano‐Blanco 1,2, Silvio Bellomi 3, Daniele Bonavia 1, Ivo Alxneit 1, Kirill A Lomachenko 4, Karin Föttinger 3, Oliver Kröcher 1,2, Davide Ferri 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13480521  PMID: 42333868

ABSTRACT

Hybrid materials based upon mixed metal oxides provide an effective strategy to boost catalytic performance through redox‐induced interfacial engineering. Herein, we present an efficient catalyst toward N2O decomposition containing short‐range ordered RhO x and CeO x species anchored to the Co3O4 spinel. The activity enhancement relative to Co3O4 is non‐additive with respect to the RhO x /Co3O4 and CeO x /Co3O4 interfaces and is uniquely linked to the modulation of the Co and Rh oxidation states at a synergistic Rh–O–Co–O–Ce interface. This ensemble provides increased redox flexibility and facilitated lattice oxygen activation, resulting in markedly enhanced N2O decomposition. Kinetic analysis and operando modulated excitation x‐ray absorption spectroscopy (ME‐XAS) provide direct mechanistic evidence that N2O decomposition proceeds via a multi‐site, cooperative Mars‐van Krevelen pathway, in which Co3O4–CeO2 acts as an oxygen reservoir enabling the redox cycling of RhO x species. This study highlights the ability of mixed metal oxide catalysts to exploit interfacial effects to achieve improved activity in redox‐mediated reactions and offers a rationale for the engineering of metal oxide–metal oxide catalysts guided by operando spectroscopy.

Keywords: cooperative redox mechanism, modulated excitation XAS, N2O decomposition, spinel oxides


A short‐range Rh–O–Co–O–Ce interfacial moiety drives low‐temperature N2O decomposition via a cooperative redox cycle. Operando modulated‐excitation XAS with phase‐sensitive detection (ME‐XAS + PSD) tracks rapid, reversible Rh oxidation coupled to Co reduction. Combined kinetics and DFT rationalize the activity trends and identify the Rh–O–Co interface as a key descriptor.

graphic file with name ANIE-65-e7890563-g006.jpg

1. Introduction

Noble metals (NM) are scarce and costly, yet they present unique catalytic properties across a wide range of catalytically driven chemical transformations [1, 2]. To improve their utilization, large research efforts have been devoted to the design of catalysts, evolving from nanoparticles to short‐range ordered structures and, ultimately, to single‐atom catalysts [3]. While these approaches improve atom efficiency and often enhance activity, they also pose challenges in terms of stability, electronic control, and unambiguous identification of active sites [4].

In this context, metal oxide‐metal oxide hybrid materials have emerged as promising support materials for noble metals to address these limitations, because these systems often display markedly interfacial metal–support effects [5, 6, 7]. These interactions can effectively impact catalytic performance [8, 9, 10, 11], while simultaneously providing a platform for catalysts engineering, as they can stabilize noble metal atoms anchored at the oxide interface [12, 13]. These effects have been extensively rationalized in terms of tuning of the metal d‐band centers [5, 14].

Cobalt oxide (Co3O4) is a particularly attractive metal oxide support owing to its mixed‐valence (Co2+, Co3+) spinel structure, intrinsic redox activity, and tunable d‐orbital occupancy [15, 16]. Noble metals (Pt [11, 12, 17, 18], Pd [12], Ir [19], Ag [20], Au [21, 22], Rh [23, 24]) supported on Co3O4 have drawn increasing attention due to the tunable NM/Co3O4 interface, and have shown promise in reactions such as CO oxidation [11, 17, 21, 22], H3NBH3 hydrolysis [18], and VOC oxidation reactions (e.g., toluene, benzene, etc.) [25]. Moreover, short‐range‐ordered NM species anchored on Co3O4 are highly effective motifs for oxygen evolution reactions [26, 27, 28]. Beyond interfacial effects, bulk substitution strategies (Co3O4‐X, X = Zn, Al, Mg, Mn, Ni, Ce, Cr, etc.) can further tailor the electronic and redox properties of Co3O4 [29, 30, 31, 32, 33].

Despite advances in the design of Co3O4‐based catalysts, disentangling the roles of individual elements and precisely identifying the redox‐active sites under realistic conditions have proven difficult, as subtle changes are often masked by the bulk Co3O4 response [11, 16, 24, 28, 34]. Operando transient methods, particularly modulated excitation (ME) with phase‐sensitive detection (PSD), have therefore emerged as powerful tool for gaining molecular‐level insights into the structural and electronic dynamics of complex catalytic systems that are otherwise inaccessible using conventional methods [35, 36].

Direct N2O decomposition into harmless N2 and O2 serves as an ideal probe reaction to interrogate interfacial properties in Co3O4‐X‐supported noble metal catalysts. Its mechanism is governed by structural, electronic, and redox properties of active sites that can be modulated at the metal–Co3O4 interface [37, 38]. Beyond the mechanistic relevance, its chemistry has remarkable environmental importance: N2O is a potent greenhouse gas with a global warming potential ca. 310 times greater than CO2 [39], and its emission has been identified as a key challenge in the future of carbon neutral transportation and energy sectors [40, 41]. Notably, the introduction of N2O among regulated pollutants in the Euro VII emissions standards [42] and its potential formation in next‐generation combustion engines [40, 43, 44], highlights both its environmental significance and the technical challenges of its abatement. Hence, the development of effective technologies for N2O mitigation has become crucial [44, 45].

In this work, we designed a mixed‐oxide RhO x /Co3O4‐CeO2 catalyst, exploiting the complementary role of its components. Rh provides highly active sites for N─O bond activation [46, 47], while Co3O4‐CeO2 offers a redox‐active structure with tunable properties of the Rh/oxide interface [46, 48, 49, 50, 51]. To disentangle these contributions, we systematically investigated Co3O4, Co3O4‐CeO2, RhO x /Co3O4, and RhO x /Co3O4‐CeO2 catalysts using complementary ex situ characterization, DFT modeling, kinetic analyses, and N2O decomposition as the probe reaction. By coupling operando x‐ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS)—mass spectrometry (MS) with ME‐PSD, we identify a cooperative reaction mechanism between RhO x sites and Co ions sites on the most active catalyst in the series, RhO x /Co3O4‐CeO2.

2. Results and Discussions

2.1. Structural Characterization and Local Geometry

All catalysts exhibit the crystal structure of the cubic Co3O4 spinel (PDF#74‐1656; Fd‐3m space group symmetry; labeled as Co in Figure 1a), and display type‐IV adsorption–desorption isotherms (Figure S3). BET surface areas range from 64.9 m2 g−1 to 133.2 m2 g−1 (Table S1), increasing upon Ce incorporation (Co3O4‐CeO2, labeled as CoCe) and decreasing after Rh impregnation (Rh/Co3O4, Rh/Co; Rh/Co3O4‐CeO2, Rh/CoCe). No distinct reflections attributable to Rh‐containing phases are observed as indication of the high dispersion of Rh. Also, no CeO2 phase is detected, but the characteristic peaks of Co3O4 broaden due to the decrease in crystallite size and increase in density of defect sites upon addition of Ce [52, 53]. Along this line, experimental pair distribution function (PDF; Figure 1b) confirms that the short‐atomic correlations correspond to the crystal structure of Co3O4 [54] (Figure S4) and provides direct evidence that Ce addition decreases the coherent domain size in CoCe and Rh/CoCe, due to the presence of a more defective, distorted lattice [55, 56]. Rh and Ce also have no significant effect on the Raman spectra (Figure 1c), which display the characteristic phonon modes of the Co3O4 spinel [57], dominated by the vibration of Co3+‐O units in octahedral coordination (CoOh; A1g, 690 cm−1). Only this A1g band redshifts and loses symmetry in Ce‐containing samples, consistent with the structural distortions in the Co3O4 lattice supported by powder x‐ray diffraction (PXRD) and PDF analysis. The observed changes reflect a modification of the local bonding environment of CoOh sites induced by CeO x , resulting in more strained and oxidized Co sites [50]. Incorporation of Ce into the Co3O4 or formation of a mixed solution is unlikely due to the marked difference in ionic radii between Co3+ (55–61 pm) and Ce4+ (101–114 pm) [50, 58].

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

(a) PXRD patterns, (b) pair distribution function data (PDF), and (c) Raman spectra of Co, CoCe, Rh/Co, and Rh/CoCe. (d and e) HAADF‐STEM images of Rh/CoCe, and (f) EDX maps for Rh, Ce, and Co. The white circles in (e) highlight regions of higher contrast.

High‐angle annular dark‐field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF‐STEM) images of Rh/CoCe (Figure 1d) show that the material is composed of well‐crystallized Co3O4 host‐domains. The lattice spacing of ca. 0.241 nm in the HAADF‐STEM images and the corresponding inverse fast Fourier‐transform (IFFT) is assigned to the (311) planes of Co3O4. Instead of distinct RhO x or CeO2 nanoparticles, the isolated bright spots (high Z contrast) that are often aligned along the (311) lattice planes (Figure 1e) correspond to individual Rh or Ce atoms or very small clusters anchored to the surface of the spinel. Energy‐dispersive x‐ray (EDX) elemental maps (Figures 1f and S5) further confirm the high dispersion of Rh and Ce throughout the support. Together, the data confirms high dispersion and the absence of crystalline RhO x or CeO x domains. The short‐range nature of RhO x and Rh+ species anchored on Co3O4 is further corroborated by the infrared spectra of adsorbed CO (Figure S6).

Qualitative analysis of the edge position and pre‐edge features of Co K‐edge x‐ray absorption near edge spectra (XANES, Figure 2a) measured at ambient conditions indicates a mixed‐valence state of Co between +2 and +3. Both Ce and Rh shift the average valence state of Co toward a more oxidized character compared to Co3O4, in the order Rh/CoCe ∼ CoCe > Rh/Co > Co, that is confirmed by the increased white‐line intensity. The intensity of the pre‐edge feature, which characterizes symmetry effects in the 1s→3d transition and is sensitive to local coordination symmetry, also decreases for the Ce‐ and Rh‐containing samples relative to Co3O4, suggesting increased centrosymmetry and reduced 3d–4p mixing in the local Co coordination environment [59]. Three main coordination shells in the Co K‐edge Fourier‐transformed (FT) extended x‐ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectra of all samples (Figure 2b) are assigned to Co─O bonds (R = 1.55 Å), CoOh–CoOh pairs (2.57 Å), and CoTd–CoTd pairs (3.1 Å), consistent with a mixed‐valence Co3O4 spinel structure [32, 50]. Rh and especially Ce cause a slightly higher Co–O coordination number (N = 5.4–6) compared to Co3O4 (5.2; Figures S7 and S8; Table S2), indicating a more fully developed octahedral Co environment, in line with the pre‐edge observations. This is consistent with a higher average Co oxidation state and stronger Co–O covalency, likely due to Co charge re‐distribution following electron transfer from Co3O4 to Ce [50, 60]. Therefore, while the average structure of the spinel lattice is preserved, Ce and Rh induce local structural distortion in the Co3O4 lattice [50], in agreement with the above structural characterization (Figure 1). The similar Rh‐K edge XANES spectra of Rh/Co and Rh/CoCe (Figure 2c) display an absorption edge at higher energies than that of Rh2O3, revealing an average oxidation state higher than +3 [47, 61]. Furthermore, the higher oxidation state in Rh/CoCe than in Rh/Co indicates that Ce can act as an electron reservoir facilitating charge transfer between Rh and Co sites [62], leading to a higher oxidation state of Rh and Co. The corresponding Rh K‐edge FT‐EXAFS spectra (Figure 2d) are dominated by a first coordination shell of oxygen neighbors (phase‐uncorrected R = 1.91 Å). Both Rh‐impregnated samples show comparable Rh‐O shell intensities with coordination numbers of ca. 5.4 ± 0.4 (Figures S9 and S10; Table S3). A second coordination shell emerges at higher R values (phase‐uncorrected R = 2.4 Å) that is distinct from the Rh–Rh scattering of metallic Rh, suggesting the presence of Rh–Co and Rh–Ce interactions. Wavelet‐transform (WT)‐EXAFS analysis of Rh/Co and Rh/CoCe (Figure 2e) confirms this hypothesis and reveals two distinct intensity regions. The first corresponds to a Rh–O coordination shell with a local maximum at k = 7.74 Å−1 and R = 1.56 Å, aligning with Rh2O3 and pointing toward the oxidized state of Rh. A second domain at k = 8.51 Å−1 and R = 2.49 Å disagrees with the characteristic Rh–Rh scattering of metallic Rh (k = 10.37 Å−1 and R = 2.37 Å), suggesting a second‐shell contribution from backscattering by lighter neighboring atoms [19, 24, 59]. In the case of Rh/CoCe, the latter maximum shifts to k = 8.06 Å−1 and R = 2.49 Å, indicative of an enhanced contribution of Rh‐Co(Ce) interactions, likely arising from stronger interface interactions and a higher degree of Rh dispersion. Because Rh–O–Ce neighbors are expected at values of R = 3.64 Å and at higher k, the observed results are more consistent with a dominant Rh–O–Co contribution [63, 64]. Notably, EXAFS fitting (Figures S9 and S10; Table S3) is well described by explicit Rh–Co and Rh–O–Co scattering paths, further supporting short‐range RhO x species rather than pure Rh–Rh contributions. The effect of Ce is reflected in a slightly longer Rh–Co distance (2.906 Å for Rh/Co vs. 2.920 Å for Rh/CoCe), consistent with the presence of a Rh–O–Co–O–Ce interface.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

(a) Normalized Co K‐edge XANES spectra and (b) corresponding phase‐uncorrected k 3‐weighted magnitude of the FT‐EXAFS spectra of Co, CoCe, Rh/Co, Rh/CoCe, and reference samples (LaCoO3 and CoAl2O4). (c) Normalized Rh K‐edge XANES and (d) k 3‐weighted magnitude of FT‐EXAFS spectra of Rh/Co, Rh/CoCe, and reference spectra (Rh foil, scaled five times (/5), and Rh2O3), and (e) their corresponding k 3‐weighted wavelet‐transforms (WT).

2.2. Electronic Structure and Reducibility Properties

The decomposition of N2O is considered to proceed via a redox mechanism, in which the desorption of surface oxygen (O2) is critical. Therefore, catalyst reducibility and the nature of surface oxygen species are key parameters to rationalize the catalyst behavior.

The two distinct reduction events in the H2 temperature‐programmed reduction (H2‐TPR) thermogram of Co3O4 (Figure 3a) characterize the reduction of Co3+ to Co2+ (Co3O4 → CoO, ca. 265°C) and the subsequent reduction of Co2+ to metallic Co (ca. 355°C) [65]. The shift of the former peak to lower temperature (Co3O4 → CoO, ca. 257°C) in CoCe [51, 65, 66] is associated with redox interactions between Co3+/Co2+ and Ce4+/Ce3+ redox couples [56, 66, 67], and is accompanied by a broadening of the high‐temperature reduction peak, suggesting decreased reducibility of Co2+ [65], but also a possible contribution from the reduction of Ce4+ that is facilitated by H2 spillover from Co. These findings are consistent with the Raman spectra [68, 69, 70] (Figure 1c), indicating that Ce primarily affects the Co3+–O environment (CoOh coordination) [71]. To confirm this, the incorporation of Rh in bulk Co3O4 was investigated by comparing the substitution of octahedral and tetrahedral sites (Figure S11). DFT simulations showed that the octahedral coordination of Rh is favored by 1.87 eV relative to the tetrahedral environment. This yields an oxidation state (+3.1) comparable to the XAS results, in contrast to that of the Rh in tetrahedral coordination (+2.7). Nonetheless, in line with previous studies [29, 32], the simulations also demonstrate that the incorporation of octahedral Rh induces a modification of the Co2+–O environment, specifically a slight contraction (average of 0.015 Å) of the surrounding tetrahedral Co2+–O bonds. However, this effect is expected to be limited, in agreement with the previous characterization results.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

(a) H2 temperature programmed reduction (H2‐TPR) of Co, CoCe, Rh/Co, and Rh/CoCe. (b) O 1s XPS spectra of Co, CoCe, Rh/Co, and Rh/CoCe and (c) Rh 3d XPS spectra of Rh/Co and Rh/CoCe.

The Rh‐containing catalysts (Rh/Co and Rh/CoCe) exhibit an additional low‐temperature feature due to reduction of RhO x species [72, 73]. This peak appears at a lower temperature for Rh/CoCe than for Rh/Co, suggesting further improved reducibility due to the interaction between Rh, Co, and Ce. In both catalysts, the characteristic Co3O4 reduction peaks (Co3+ → Co2+ → Co0) collapse into a broader, single feature that shifts to lower temperature [74, 75]. This indicates enhanced oxygen mobility within the Co3O4 host lattice, as well as a promotional effect of Rh on the redox properties of Co (and Ce) species, likely due to Rh–Co(Ce) interactions [76, 77]. H2 spillover from Rh to Co3O4 may also promote the migration of bulk oxygen to the surface [78].

The low temperature region of the O2 temperature‐programmed desorption profiles (<400°C, O2‐TPD, Figure S12) corresponds to the desorption of surface oxygen species (Oads, i.e. O2− and O−), while high‐temperature desorption (>400–700°C) is associated with the release of lattice oxygen (Olatt) [79, 80]. Focusing on Oads, the incorporation of both Ce and especially Rh lowers the onset temperature for oxygen desorption. This implies a readier supply of active oxygen species at the surface, which is favorable for N2O decomposition, as it reflects the ability to recombine and remove O atoms formed during reaction [46]. Consistently, the oxygen‐desorption capacity obtained from integration of the thermograms follows the same order as the reducibility observed in the H2‐TPR profiles: Rh/CoCe > Rh/Co > CoCe > Co.

The oxidation state and oxygen lability were probed by x‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Figure 3b,c). The Co 2p spectra (Figure S13 and Table S4) display the characteristic spinel doublet consisting of components assigned to Co3+ (ca. 779.2 eV) and Co2+ (ca. 780.8–781.9 eV) and their satellites at ca. 10 and 6 eV from the main line, respectively [81]. The weak Co2+ satellite supports the predominant presence of a spinel Co3O4 phase [81, 82], consistent with the structural characterization. The surface Co2+/Co3+ ratio follows the order: Co (1.10) > Rh/Co (1.00) > CoCe (0.81) > Rh/CoCe (0.75), mirroring that obtained from Co K‐edge XANES, H2‐TPR, and O2‐TPD. This suggests that Rh and Ce stabilize Co3+ at the surface, enhancing oxygen mobility and the ability of the material to participate in Mars‐van Krevelen‐type reactions, involving lattice oxygen [33, 68, 83]. Three components were used to fit the O 1s spectra (Figure 3c and Table S5): lattice oxygen (OI, 529.5 eV), surface chemisorbed oxygen (OII, 530.5 eV), and hydroxyls (OIII, 533.0 eV) [68, 83]. The OI component of Co3O4 (529.41 eV) shifts to lower energy upon addition of Rh (529.31 eV in Rh/Co) and Ce (529.33 eV in CoCe), while Rh/CoCe possesses the lowest OI value (529.19 eV). Overall, these changes indicate the formation of more reactive and covalent metal–oxygen bonds [66], corroborating the above characterization.

The influence of Ce on the surface redox behavior is evident. In the Ce 3d region of both CoCe and Rh/CoCe, the fit of the signals using a combination of Ce3+ and Ce4+ components reveals partially reduced CeO x (Figure S14 and Table S6) [84]. The spectra resemble those characteristic of ceria (CeO2), clearly differing from the signature of atomically dispersed Ce [85], in agreement with the observation from XRD and PDF that Ce does not incorporate in the spinel lattice, but forms well‐dispersed CeO x agglomerates visible by HAADF‐STEM but not large enough to be captured by XRD. In the presence of Rh, the Ce3+ fraction increases moderately from 0.36 (CoCe) to 0.40 (Rh/CoCe), pointing to an electronic coupling between Rh and the CeO2 agglomerates. The magnitude of this change argues against a structure in which Rh is hosted on these CeO2 domains [63]. Based on the structural characterization, the observed change is more consistent with a short‐range interaction between Rh and neighboring CeO2, known for its dynamic redox behavior and ability to act as electron reservoir [86], with both phases mutually influencing their respective redox properties. The Rh 3d spectra can be fit with only Rh3+ (ca. 309 eV) and Rh4+ (ca. 310 eV) components [87, 88], with Rh3+/Rh4+ ratios (Rh/Co, 9.59; Rh/CoCe, 1.37) demonstrating that Ce increases the Rh4+ content (Table S4) and the electronic coupling between Rh and CeO2.

DFT calculations were performed to gain atomic‐level insights into the experimentally observed redox behavior and to develop a rationale for the progressive reorganization of the electronic structure of Co3O4 upon addition of Ce and Rh, which ultimately impacts the surface and catalytic properties. Based on experimental characterization, CeO x agglomerates on the Co3O4 surface were modeled as Ce4O7 clusters, while oxidized Rh was represented as atomically dispersed on the spinel host. The relative position of RhO x and CeO x was determined by systematically screening different configurations (Figure S1), with the most stable arrangement forming Rh─O─Co─O─Ce bonds. This configuration confirms the hypothesis of short‐range interfacial interactions between RhO x and CeO x , providing a structural basis to interpret the electronic coupling observed experimentally. Furthermore, the excellent agreement between the fitted EXAFS results (Figures S7–S10) and the calculated scattering paths from the DFT structures indicates that the proposed models are consistent with the local structures proposed based on the experimental data. The projected density of states (PDOS) of the surfaces was analyzed, focusing on the band centers of the different elements (O 2p, Co 3d, Rh 4d, and Ce 4f), which are considered descriptors of the oxygen lability and redox flexibility in metal oxides [89, 90]. The PDOS data are shown in Figure 4a, and the corresponding structural models in Figure 4b.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Electronic structure analysis. (a) Projected density of states (PDOS) and (b) structural models of Co, CoCe, Rh/Co, and Rh/CoCe. (c) Relation between the oxidation state of Rh from the Bader charges (DFT) and XPS data of Figure 3. (d) Correlation between the centroid of the O 2p band (ε O2p) from DFT and the lattice oxygen signal from the O 1s XPS narrow scans. The atoms in the DFT structures are identified in the legend.

The electronic structure of Co3O4 (Figure 4a) is dominated by Co─O─Co bonds. In a pristine spinel framework, the O 2p band lies well below the Fermi level (EF) (ε 2p = −4.03 eV), and the Co 3d states split into a bonding (ε 3d = −3.21 eV) and an upper band (ε 3d* = +2.02 eV). This electronic configuration matches a partially covalent Co–O interaction and a moderate lattice oxygen mobility [89, 90], mirroring the structural characterization. In CoCe, interfacial Co─O─Ce bonds form with localized unoccupied Ce 4f manifolds (ε 4f* = +1.09 eV) located between the occupied O 2p (ε 2p = −3.87 eV) and the unoccupied Co 3d (ε 3d* = +2.01 eV) states. These Ce 4f states act as electron buffer, providing intermediate electron‐accepting reservoirs that reduce the effective metal‐oxygen gap [90]. The result is enhanced activation of metal─oxygen bonds, supported by the XPS and H2‐TPR/O2‐TPD data.

When RhO x anchors to the surface of Co3O4, Rh–O–Co bridges are formed, leading to the reorganization of the electronic structure around the Rh states. In proximity of E F, a high density of occupied Rh 4d states is observed compared to Co 3d (ε 3d = −3.29 eV), implying that less energy is required for RhO x to participate in electron transfer [68]. The O 2p band shifts upwards (ε 2p = −3.71 eV), and the low‐lying Rh 4d antibonding states (ε 4d* = +1.15 eV) effectively become the lowest unoccupied levels (Co 3d ε 3d* = +2.20 eV). This decreases the effective metal–oxygen gap and improves the redox flexibility and mobility of oxygen [89, 90].

The most substantial restructuring of the electronic structure occurs when RhO x and CeO x coexist, and Rh–O–Co–O–Ce motifs are formed. The density of occupied Rh 4d states close to E F increases with respect to Rh/Co, and the O 2p (ε 2p = −3.71 eV) and Co 3d (ε 3d = −3.02 eV) levels move upwards. The onset of the antibonding Rh 4d states located right above EF lowers the upper‐band centroid (ε4d* = +1.05 eV) and decreases the effective metal‐oxygen gap further. The Ce 4f states appear at higher energy (ε4f * = +1.52 eV), followed by the Co 3d (ε3d * = +2.26 eV). The proximity of the Ce 4f and Rh 4d states, mediated by bridging oxygen atoms, effectively couples Ce to Rh, in agreement with the increased content of Ce3+ sites observed from XPS. In a similar manner, the upward displacement of the Ce 4f* level toward the Co 3d* states strengthens the Ce–Co antibonding overlap, with the interconnecting oxygen atoms enabling efficient redox communication. Altogether, Rh 4d unoccupied states are now the lowest‐energy electron reservoir available for metal‐oxygen transfer, and Ce acts as a mediator of short‐range hybridization between Co and Rh [90]. This produces a single, integrated network in which electron redistribution between Rh, Ce and Co is energetically favored, stabilizing Rh in a higher, more reactive, oxidation state. The increase of the average Rh oxidation state from +3.09 (Rh/Co) to +3.42 (Rh/CoCe) observed in XPS is consistent with the values obtained from the DFT Bader charges of +3.11 (Rh/Co) and +3.27 (Rh/CoCe) (Figures 4c and S15).

The different bonding patterns and the resulting electronic coupling greatly impact the activation of metal–oxygen bonds and the reactivity of oxygen, which is experimentally probed by O2‐TPD and H2‐TPR. The O 2p states, representing the valence electrons most involved in metal‐oxygen bonding, shift upward from Co (−4.04 eV) to Rh/CoCe (−3.72 eV), indicating more reactive and delocalized electrons, correlating with a smaller energy gap with the metal bands and stronger hybridization [86]. These more delocalized and energetic electrons can screen the photoelectric core‐hole generated in the O 1s orbital more effectively, lowering the resulting binding energy [91], as reflected by the linear correlation observed between the DFT ε 2p and the XPS binding energies of the O 1s main photoemission line (Figure 4d). DFT thus demonstrates that Rh and Ce generate a synergistic mixed framework in which bond‐specific interactions induce cooperative electronic effects. The progression from Co–O to Co–O–Ce and to Co–O–Rh–O–Ce represents a systematic expansion of the metal–oxygen connectivity, defining the enhanced redox flexibility and lattice oxygen activation of Rh/CoCe.

2.3. N2O Decomposition and Reaction Kinetics

We next investigate the effects of the formation of the Rh–O–Co–(O–Ce) interface on Co3O4 and establish structure–activity relationships for the N2O decomposition (Figure 5a). Co3O4 exhibits moderate activity, with N2O conversion commencing at ca. 275°C and a light‐off temperature (T 50) of ca. 412°C. CoCe shows significantly earlier onset temperature at ca. 250°C, and a value of T 50 of ca. 339°C, indicating improved redox behavior due to the increased oxygen mobility. Rh/Co further decreases the onset temperature (ca. 200°C) with a T 50 value of ca. 312°C, and the highest activity is observed for Rh/CoCe, which reaches complete N2O conversion in the 325°C–525°C temperature window, with an onset temperature of ca. 175°C and a T 50 value of ca. 250°C. The order of reactivity suggested by the light‐off curves is corroborated by reaction rate values measured under differential reaction conditions (χN2O < 30%; Figure 5b and Table S7), allowing comparison among the samples in the absence of mass transport limitations. Relative to the Co3O4 spinel (0.67 mmol N2O gcat −1 h−1), CoCe exhibits a 3.5‐fold activity enhancement (2.38 mmol N2O gcat −1 h−1), Rh impregnation delivers a 4.3‐fold increase (3.01 mmol N2O gcat −1 h−1), and Rh/CoCe shows a ca. 20‐fold increase (12.96 mmol N2O gcat −1 h−1). These values align with, and in some cases surpass, previous data (Table S8), underscoring the critical role of Rh and CeO2 in promoting N2O decomposition. The pronounced variations in activity correlate with the differences in redox and structural properties among the catalysts, including enhanced lattice oxygen activation and covalency.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Catalytic behavior of Co, CoCe, Rh/Co, and Rh/CoCe. (a) N2O conversion as a function of reaction temperature. (b) Reaction rates measured under differential reactor conditions at 375°C. (c) Arrhenius plots derived from N2O light‐off curves and (d) effect of N2O partial pressure on reaction rates. Unless otherwise stated, all experiments were conducted with 500 ppmv N2O, 2 vol% O2, N2 balance, at 1 atm, total flow rate of 100 mL min−1, and variable catalyst mass (0–50 mg). E a,app is expressed in kJ mol−1.

This does not seem to be able to counteract the typical inhibitory effect of water and oxygen (Figure S16). H2O (10 vol%) suppresses Rh/CoCe activity, shifting T 50 from 250°C to 430°C (Figure S16a), while O2 (10 vol%) lowers N2O conversion by ca. 33% at 250°C (Figure S16b). Consistent with the O2 inhibitory effect, Rh/CoCe loses also ca. 30% of N2O conversion after 78 h on stream (Figure S17), likely due to accumulation of oxygen containing surface species [90, 92].

Arrhenius plots (Figure 5c) show consistently higher rates for Rh/CoCe across the examined temperature range. The apparent pre‐exponential factor (ln A pp; Table S7) increases from 14.1 (Co3O4) to 15.6 (CoCe), consistent with structural differences influencing the effective collision frequency and/or exposed site density for N2O at active Co sites. In contrast, the similar ln A pp values for Rh/Co and Rh/CoCe (14.9) suggest a comparable Rh speciation/ensemble. Apparent activation energies (E a,app) for the Co3O4 spinel (78.2 kJ mol−1) align with reported values (Table S9) [65, 68, 93]. CoCe and Co3O4 show comparable E a,app values (ca. 78 kJ mol−1), suggesting that the same family of active sites is involved in N2O decomposition over these materials and that the rate‐determining step (RDS) is not affected by CeO2. In contrast, Rh in Rh/Co induces a significant decrease of E a,app to ca. 69.5 kJ mol−1; we associate this change with a modification in the nature of the active sites and the mechanistic pathway. This value decreases further to 64.1 kJ mol−1 for Rh/CoCe, pointing toward a more efficient reaction pathway following the interaction between Rh and CeO2.

Because N2O decomposition operates at elevated temperatures, entropic effects are non‐negligible [48, 94]. Thus, we complemented the Arrhenius analysis with transition‐state theory using Eyring plots (Figure S18). For all catalysts, the enthalpy of reaction (∆H ‡) values agree with the apparent Arrhenius E a,app in the studied temperature range, consistent with a single dominant RDS. Rh/CoCe and Rh/Co exhibit essentially identical ∆H ‡ (ca. 63 kJ mol−1) and apparent ∆S ‡ values (ca. −135 J mol−1 K−1), indicating similar per‐site kinetics; the higher overall rate therefore arises from greater accessible site density and/or coverage effects related to the Rh–O–Co–O–Ce interfacial effects discussed earlier, rather than from a reduced enthalpic barrier. By contrast, Co and CoCe display comparable ∆H ‡ values (73 kJ mol−1) but measurably different apparent ∆S ‡ (−142 vs. −128 J mol−1 K−1). With the mechanism/RDS unchanged, the less negative apparent ∆S ‡ of CoCe indicates a less constrained transition‐state ensemble, consistent with the improved lattice oxygen activation, accounting for the activity difference of Figure 5a,b.

To gain insights into the mechanism of N2O decomposition, we evaluated the apparent reaction orders by examining the influence of the N2O partial pressure on the reaction rates under kinetic control (Figure 5d). Typically, N2O decomposition exhibits first‐order behavior in N2O when the RDS involves N2O dissociation. Deviations from first‐order kinetics are generally attributed to the influence of subsequent surface oxygen recombination [65, 95, 96]. Both Co and CoCe show apparent reaction order values of ca. 0.9, consistent with N2O dissociation as the RDS, with minimal influence from the subsequent oxygen evolution step. Therefore, as observed from the Arrhenius analysis, Ce addition does not alter significantly the fundamental reaction pathway but modulates the structural and electronic properties of Co3O4 by improving reducibility and weakening Co─O bonds. Conversely, Rh reduces the apparent reaction order to ca. 0.74 for both Rh/Co and Rh/CoCe, in agreement with Rh‐based catalysts [47, 61, 88]. The deviation from first‐order kinetics suggests a mechanistic shift in the nature of the active sites and/or the RDS. While Rh is known to facilitate N‐O dissociation, it can also promote surface–oxygen accumulation, hindering O2 desorption and rendering the recombination of surface oxygen species the new RDS. This variation highlights the critical role of Rh in altering the reaction pathway. Overall, the results are consistent with the Arrhenius parameters, confirming that Rh dictates the reaction pathway, whereas CeO2 primarily influences the structural and electronic environment of the active sites. In summary, Rh and Ce exist as highly dispersed, short‐range species anchored to the Co3O4 host, with Rh in an oxidized (RhO x ) state. Both components modulate the oxidation state and local coordination of Co via defects and strong electronic interactions at the Rh–O–Co–O–Ce interface.

2.4. Operando X‐Ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS) and Reaction Mechanism

Having established the structural and electronic properties of the most active catalyst in the series, we investigated the behavior of Rh/CoCe during N2O decomposition using operando modulated excitation XAS experiments (ME‐XAS). Alternated cycles of N2O/He (8000 ppm) and He mimic the redox nature of the N2O decomposition reaction, comprising an oxidation‐half‐cycle (OHC) and a reduction‐half‐cycle (RHC). Because the apparent N2O reaction order for Rh/CoCe indicates that Rh is responsible for N2O activation and decomposition, the interaction of N2O with the highly dispersed RhO x species was probed by Rh K‐edge XANES. The average time‐resolved Rh K‐edge XANES spectra (Figure 6a, top) show a subtle positive shift of the absorption edge under N2O‐rich conditions, consistent with oxidation of RhO x (RhO x → Rh n +1O x +1) and a shift to lower energy during the He half‐cycle, indicating reduction of Rh n +1O x +1 to RhO x . Phase‐sensitive detection (PSD; Figure 6a, bottom) enhances the sensitivity to these subtle changes providing unambiguous evidence of a reversible redox process (Figure S19), wherein N2O induces the oxidation of Rh (2N2O → 2N2 + 2O; OHC), which is marked by a positive feature at ca. 23231 eV, followed by the recombination/desorption of O2 that drives auto‐reduction of Rh (2O → O2; RHC) [47, 61, 88], in agreement with the rapid N2 evolution (m/z = 28) in the OHC and a slower O2 release (m/z = 32) in the RHC (Figures S20 and S21). This behavior further points toward the RHC as RDS. Similar results were obtained for Rh/Co, albeit with lower PSD amplitude (Figure S22), validating the Rh‐mediated redox cycle consistent with the similar kinetic fingerprints of Rh/Co and Rh/CoCe (Figure 5c,d).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Modulated excitation experiments with alternate N2O/He and He cycles over Rh/CoCe. (a) Time‐resolved Rh K‐edge XANES spectra (top) and phase‐resolved spectra (bottom). (b) Time‐resolved Co K‐edge XANES spectra (top) and phase‐resolved spectra (bottom). The dashed line is the scaled difference between the spectra of Co3O4 and CoAl2O4 references. (c) Rh K‐edge phase‐uncorrected k 2‐weighted magnitude of the FT‐EXAFS spectra of Rh/CoCe in N2O/He and He environments. (d) Co K‐edge phase‐uncorrected k 2‐weighted FT‐EXAFS spectra in N2O/He and He environments. Conditions: 8000 ppm N2O, balance He, 1 atm, total flow rate of 100 mL min−1, catalyst mass of 25 mg.

The intensity of the signal emphasized by PSD at 23231 eV scales linearly with N2O partial pressure (p N2O; n N2O = 0.37; Figures S23 and S24), consistent with the measured reaction orders (n N2O < 0.9) and the rate‐determining nature of the RHC, reflecting the inhibitory effect of surface O‐species accumulation at increasing p N2O values [96]. Complete suppression of the PSD response in an identical ME‐PSD experiment conducted in excess of O2 in the feed (Figure S25) further verifies that, on Rh‐based catalysts, the RHC is dominated by inhibition of the Rh redox cycle due to oxygen build‐up, in line with the catalytic experiments (Figure S16b) [74, 97].

In identical ME‐XAS experiments at the Co K‐edge (Figure 6b, top), N2O induces a shift of the absorption edge toward lower energies, thus reduction of Co species, while in He the edge shifts to higher energies, indicating reoxidation. The PSD data clearly demonstrates the reversible nature of this process (Figure 6b, bottom) with spectral features closely resembling the spectral difference between Co3O4 and CoAl2O4. Therefore, Co species cycle between Co3+ (CoOh) and Co2+ (CoTd) environments during N2O decomposition on Rh/CoCe.

Remarkably, the response at the Co K‐edge made visible by PSD is shifted by about 130° relative to that at the Rh K‐edge (Figure S26) providing direct operando evidence of a coupled Rh–O–Co redox mechanism, wherein RhO x and CoO x species undergo sequential oxidation–reduction events, beginning with oxidation of RhO x followed by reduction of CoO x . This cooperative mechanism is consistent with the interfacial effects inferred from the structural, electronic, and surface characterization results.

Variations in the local environment during N2O decomposition were probed by EXAFS. As shown in Figure 6c, the magnitude of the k 2‐weighted Rh K‐edge spectra of Rh/CoCe reveals that upon N2O introduction, the Rh–O contribution slightly increases, consistent with the oxidation of RhO x species in the N2O‐rich period and a higher Rh–O coordination number, likely arising from oxygen deposition following N─O bond cleavage. More pronounced structural changes were observed in the magnitude of the k 2‐weighted Co K‐edge spectra (Figure 6d). The amplitude of the Co–O contribution decreases upon contact with N2O, concomitant with an increase in the Co–CoTd scattering contribution. The attenuation of the Co–O path agrees with the partial reduction of Co3+ Oh sites indicated by XANES, together with increased disorder and/or a lowered average coordination associated with defect formation. The gain in Co‐CoTd is ascribed to lattice rearrangement upon formation of oxygen vacancies (VO) [60]. These results indicate that Co3O4 experiences dynamic and reversible structural changes that are complementary, though reciprocal, to those of Rh, underscoring their coupled redox behavior during N2O decomposition.

Based on our kinetic analysis and operando ME‐XAS, and supported by previous studies [47, 74, 88, 98, 99], we propose a cooperative RhO x /CoO x reaction mechanism for N2O decomposition over Rh/CoCe (Equations (1), (2), (3)). N2O decomposition initiates with the OHC via dissociative adsorption of N2O on RhO x (Rh3+/Rh4+), leading to N─O bond cleavage, N2 release, and oxidation of RhO x (1). The RHC proceeds via auto‐reduction of oxygen‐rich RhO x species (Rh n +1O x +1) through a hetero‐recombination step, in which lattice oxygen from Co─O bonds in Co3O4 reacts with Rh‐bound oxygen to form O2, alongside reduction of Rh and creation of an oxygen vacancy (VO) (2). Finally, regeneration of the Co3O4 lattice through replenishment of VO by N2O produces the second N2 molecule (3).

Rh−Ox+N2O→Rh−Ox+1+N2 (1)
Rh−Ox+1+Co3+−Olatt→Rh−Ox+Co2+−VO+O2 (2)
Co2+−VO+N2O→Co3+−Olatt+N2 (3)

This cooperative Rh/Co sequence is consistent with a Mars‐van Krevelen mechanism, previously reported in the context of CO oxidation on Co3O4 and N2O decomposition on CuO‐Co3O4 catalysts [100].

To further clarify the role of CeO x , we used DFT to track charge redistribution along the key steps of the catalytic cycle on Rh/CoCe and, for comparison, on Rh/Co (Figure S27a,b). For both catalysts, Rh is oxidized upon N2O adsorption and cleavage (Equation 1) and reduced during O2 desorption (Equation 2), in agreement with the experimental evidence. However, the presence of CeO x significantly modifies the electronic structure along the reaction sequence. On the clean slab, Rh is more oxidized in Rh/CoCe (+1.26 |e|) than in RhCo (+1.20 |e|), leading to a more favorable N2O adsorption by 1.43 eV. Following N─O bond cleavage (Equation 1), N2 evolves and the remaining oxygen atom migrates to the surface forming a Rh–O–O–Co peroxide intermediate involving the Co3+ Oh sites of Co3O4 [68, 69, 70].

While this peroxide intermediate forms on both catalysts, it is more stabilized on Rh/CoCe, where the peroxo species binds to Rh through a single bond. Upon N2O activation, the Ce3+/Ce4+ redox couple undergoes partial reduction (average Ce charge changes from +2.28 |e| to +2.18 |e|), with Rh and Co mediating charge transfer from CeO x to the peroxo intermediate, resulting in more reduced oxygen species (average per O atom: −0.80 |e| and −0.37 |e| for Rh/CoCe and Rh/Co, respectively). Subsequently, after O2 desorption, CeO x moderates the reduction of interfacial Co3+ Oh sites, enabling them to retain a higher oxidation state compared to Rh/Co (+1.34 |e| vs. +1.16 |e|). This stabilization of both the initial and the final state lowers the thermodynamic cost of O2 release (Equation 2) by 0.71 eV compared to Rh/Co (Figure S27c). Taken together, these results show that, while Rh3+/Rh4+ sites drive N2O activation, CeO x promotes interfacial charge transfer via bridging oxygen atoms in the Co3O4 host, sustaining the redox cycle and enhancing catalytic activity.

3. Conclusion

The tunable structure and electronic properties of spinel metal oxides enable the design of a RhO x /Co3O4‐CeO2 catalyst with RhO x and CeO x species anchored and stabilized at short‐range on Co3O4. This engineered interface facilitates the formation of an expanded metal oxygen Rh–O–Co–O–Ce connectivity that enhances redox properties, promoting the weakening of the Co─O bonds and the activation of the lattice oxygen, delivering an efficient catalyst for the N2O decomposition. Distinct reaction pathways for Rh‐containing catalysts compared to Co3O4 and Co3O4‐CeO2 highlight the central role of Rh in the reaction mechanism in facilitating N‐O bond dissociation and modifying the rate‐determining step. Operando XAS measurements confirm a cooperative RhO x ‐CoO x Mars‐van Krevelen mechanism, in which the Rh redox cycle is sustained by electron/oxygen exchange with the Co3O4‐(CeO x ) matrix, underscoring the role of operando techniques enhanced by advanced experimental protocols for uncovering surface processes and revealing mechanistic details in complex catalysts. This work emphasizes the importance of engineered metal oxide–metal oxide interfacial interactions in the design of effective catalysts for industrially relevant redox reactions and provides a platform for the development of improved oxygen‐based catalysts.

Author Contributions

Daniel C. Cano‐Blanco: conceptualization, investigation, writing – original draft, methodology, formal analysis, data curation, writing – review and editing. Silvio Bellomi: conceptualization, investigation, writing – original draft, methodology, formal analysis, writing – review and editing. Daniele Bonavia: formal analysis, investigation, writing – original draft, data curation, writing – review and editing. Ivo Alxneit: investigation, formal analysis, writing – review and editing. Kirill A. Lomachenko: investigation, writing – review and editing. Karin Föttinger: writing – review and editing, supervision, funding acquisition. Oliver Kröcher: writing – review and editing, supervision. Davide Ferri: supervision, project administration, writing – review and editing, funding acquisition, conceptualization.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

The authors have cited additional references within the Supporting Information [99, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125]. Supporting File: anie73090‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.

ANIE-65-e7890563-s001.docx (184.2MB, docx)

Acknowledgments

This report is the scientific result of a research project undertaken and funded by the FVV, performed by the Laboratory for Sustainable Energy Carriers and Processes at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), and headed by Prof. Dr. O. Kröcher. We thank the Swiss Federal Office of Energy (SFOE) for co‐funding the project. This research was funded in part by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) 10.55776/F8100. For open access purposes, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright license to any author accepted manuscript version arising from this submission. We acknowledge the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) for provision of synchrotron radiation facilities under proposal number MA‐6214 (BM23 beamline). We thank Dr S. Checchia for PDF measurements at beamline ID15 of the ESRF. We acknowledge the Analytical Instrumentation Center (AIC) at TU Wien for the analysis time. The computational results have been achieved using the Austrian Scientific Computing (ASC) infrastructure.

Open access publishing facilitated by ETH‐Bereich Forschungsanstalten, as part of the Wiley ‐ ETH‐Bereich Forschungsanstalten agreement via the Consortium Of Swiss Academic Libraries.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Liu L. and Corma A., “Metal Catalysts for Heterogeneous Catalysis: From Single Atoms to Nanoclusters and Nanoparticles,” Chemical Reviews 118 (2018): 4981–5079, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Hunt S. T. and Román‐Leshkov Y., “Principles and Methods for the Rational Design of Core–Shell Nanoparticle Catalysts With Ultralow Noble Metal Loadings,” Accounts of Chemical Research 51 (2018): 1054–1062, 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Yang X.‐F., Wang A., Qiao B., Li J., Liu J., and Zhang T., “Single‐Atom Catalysts: A New Frontier in Heterogeneous Catalysis,” Accounts of Chemical Research 46 (2013): 1740–1748, 10.1021/ar300361m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Li X., Yang X., Huang Y., Zhang T., and Liu B., “Supported Noble‐Metal Single Atoms for Heterogeneous Catalysis,” Advanced Materials 31 (2019): 1902031, 10.1002/adma.201902031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Strayer M. E., Senftle T. P., Winterstein J. P., et al., “Charge Transfer Stabilization of Late Transition Metal Oxide Nanoparticles on a Layered Niobate Support,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 137 (2015): 16216–16224, 10.1021/jacs.5b11230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Li Y., Zhang Y., Qian K., and Huang W., “Metal–Support Interactions in Metal/Oxide Catalysts and Oxide–Metal Interactions in Oxide/Metal Inverse Catalysts,” ACS Catalysis 12 (2022): 1268–1287, 10.1021/acscatal.1c04854. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Tauster S. J., Fung S. C., Baker R. T. K., and Horsley J. A., “Strong Interactions in Supported‐Metal Catalysts,” Science 211 (1981): 1121–1125, 10.1126/science.211.4487.1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Liu K., Qin R., and Zheng N., “Insights into the Interfacial Effects in Heterogeneous Metal Nanocatalysts Toward Selective Hydrogenation,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 143 (2021): 4483–4499, 10.1021/jacs.0c13185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Tauster S. J., Fung S. C., and Garten R. L., “Strong Metal‐Support Interactions. Group 8 Noble Metals Supported on Titanium Dioxide,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 100 (1978): 170–175, 10.1021/ja00469a029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Hernández Mejía C., van Deelen T. W., and de Jong K. P., “Activity Enhancement of Cobalt Catalysts by Tuning Metal–Support Interactions,” Nature Communications 9 (2018): 4459, 10.1038/s41467-018-06903-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. An K., Alayoglu S., Musselwhite N., et al., “Enhanced CO Oxidation Rates at the Interface of Mesoporous Oxides and Pt Nanoparticles,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 135 (2013): 16689–16696, 10.1021/ja4088743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Li J., Guan Q., Wu H., et al., “Highly Active and Stable Metal Single‐Atom Catalysts Achieved by Strong Electronic Metal–Support Interactions,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 141 (2019): 14515–14519, 10.1021/jacs.9b06482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Farmer J. A. and Campbell C. T., “Ceria Maintains Smaller Metal Catalyst Particles by Strong Metal–Support Bonding,” Science 329 (2010): 933–936, 10.1126/science.1191778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Acerbi N., Tsang S. C. E., Jones G., Golunski S., and Collier P., “Rationalization of Interactions in Precious Metal/Ceria Catalysts Using the D‐Band Center Model,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 52 (2013): 7737–7741, 10.1002/anie.201300130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Tao F. F., Shan J.‐J., Nguyen L., et al., “Understanding Complete Oxidation of Methane on Spinel Oxides at a Molecular Level,” Nature Communications 6 (2015): 7798, 10.1038/ncomms8798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Liu S., Wang Y., Liu Y., et al., “Tailored Ozone Activation on Geometrical‐Site‐Dependent Cobalt With Selective Coordination,” Nature Communications 16 (2025): 5921, 10.1038/s41467-025-61181-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kim D., Park D., Song H. C., et al., “Metal Encapsulation‐Driven Strong Metal–Support Interaction on Pt/Co3O4 during CO Oxidation,” ACS Catalysis 13 (2023): 5326–5335, 10.1021/acscatal.3c00262. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Li M., Zhang S., Zhao J., and Wang H., “Maximizing Metal–Support Interactions in Pt/Co3O4 Nanocages to Simultaneously Boost Hydrogen Production Activity and Durability,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 13 (2021): 57362–57371, 10.1021/acsami.1c18403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Bellomi S., Cano‐Blanco D. C., Barlocco I., et al., “Probing the Metal/Oxide Interface of IrCoCeOx in N2H4·H2O Decomposition: An Experimental and Computational Study,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 16 (2024): 54897–54906, 10.1021/acsami.4c12306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Li L., Yang Q., Zhang C., Yan J., Peng Y., and Li J., “Hollow‐Structural Ag/Co3O4 Nanocatalyst for CO Oxidation: Interfacial Synergistic Effect,” ACS Applied Nano Materials 2 (2019): 3480–3489. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Haruta M., Tsubota S., Kobayashi T., Kageyama H., Genet M. J., and Delmon B., “Low‐Temperature Oxidation of CO over Gold Supported on TiO2, α‐Fe2O3, and Co3O4 ,” Journal of Catalysis 144 (1993): 175–192, 10.1006/jcat.1993.1322. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Yao Y., Gu L. L., Jiang W., et al., “Enhanced Low Temperature CO Oxidation by Pretreatment: Specialty of the Au–Co3O4 Oxide Interfacial Structures,” Catalysis Science & Technology 6 (2016): 2349–2360, 10.1039/C5CY01351H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Wang L., Zhang S., Zhu Y., et al., “Catalysis and In Situ Studies of Rh1/Co3O4 Nanorods in Reduction of NO with H2 ,” ACS Catalysis 3 (2013): 1011–1019, 10.1021/cs300816u. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Hu J., Wang X., Zhou Y., et al., “Asymmetric Rh–O–Co Bridge Sites Enable Superior Bifunctional Catalysis for Hydrazine‐Assisted Hydrogen Production,” Chemical Science 16 (2025): 1837–1848, 10.1039/D4SC07442D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Xiong G., Feng C., Chen H.‐C., et al., “Atomically Dispersed Pt‐Doped Co3O4 Spinel Nanoparticles Embedded in Polyhedron Frames for Robust Propane Oxidation at Low Temperature,” Small Methods 7 (2023): 2300121, 10.1002/smtd.202300121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Shan J., Ye C., Chen S., et al., “Short‐Range Ordered Iridium Single Atoms Integrated into Cobalt Oxide Spinel Structure for Highly Efficient Electrocatalytic Water Oxidation,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 143 (2021): 5201–5211, 10.1021/jacs.1c01525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Chang J., Shi Y., Wu H., et al., “Oxygen Radical Coupling on Short‐Range Ordered Ru Atom Arrays Enables Exceptional Activity and Stability for Acidic Water Oxidation,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 146 (2024): 12958–12968, 10.1021/jacs.3c13248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Zhu W., Yao F., Cheng K., et al., “Direct Dioxygen Radical Coupling Driven by Octahedral Ruthenium–Oxygen–Cobalt Collaborative Coordination for Acidic Oxygen Evolution Reaction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 145 (2023): 17995–18006, 10.1021/jacs.3c05556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Stelmachowski P., Maniak G., Kaczmarczyk J., et al., “Mg and Al Substituted Cobalt Spinels as Catalysts for Low Temperature deN2O—Evidence for Octahedral Cobalt Active Sites,” Applied Catalysis B 146 (2014): 105–111, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.05.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Russo N., Fino D., Saracco G., and Specchia V., “N2O Catalytic Decomposition Over Various Spinel‐Type Oxides,” Catalysis Today 119 (2007): 228–232, 10.1016/j.cattod.2006.08.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Li B., Duan X., Zhao T., et al., “Boosting N2O Catalytic Decomposition by the Synergistic Effect of Multiple Elements in Cobalt‐Based High‐Entropy Oxides,” Environmental Science & Technology 58 (2024): 2153–2161, 10.1021/acs.est.3c09741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Wu J., Wang X., Zheng W., et al., “Identifying and Interpreting Geometric Configuration‐Dependent Activity of Spinel Catalysts for Water Reduction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 144 (2022): 19163–19172, 10.1021/jacs.2c08726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Cano‐Blanco D. C., van Aubel J., Bellomi S., et al., “Comparative Study of Multi‐Element Modification and Rhodium Promotion of Co3O4‐Based Spinel Catalysts for N2O Decomposition,” Applied Catalysis A 710 (2026): 120681, 10.1016/j.apcata.2025.120681. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Beck A., Huang X., Artiglia L., et al., “The Dynamics of Overlayer Formation on Catalyst Nanoparticles and Strong Metal‐Support Interaction,” Nature Communications 11 (2020): 3220, 10.1038/s41467-020-17070-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Bañares M. A., “Operando Methodology: Combination of In Situ Spectroscopy and Simultaneous Activity Measurements Under Catalytic Reaction Conditions,” Catalysis Today 100 (2005): 71–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Urakawa A., Ferri D., and Nuguid R. J. G., Springer Handbook of Advanced Catalyst Characterization, ed. Wachs I. E. and Bañares M. A. (Springer International Publishing, 2023), 967–977. [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Long Y., Peng Y., Bai Y., Li X., Gao C., and Li J., “Lattice Oxygen Activation Through Redox‐Induced δ‐MnO2/Co3‐x Mnx O4 Interfaces for Enhanced N2O Decomposition,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64 (2025): e202516326, 10.1002/anie.202516326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Zhang N., He C., Jing Y., et al., “Steam‐Activated Lattice Oxygen Enhances Interfacial Redox Stability for Low‐Temperature N2O Decomposition over Rh/CeO2 ,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 64 (2025): e202517403, 10.1002/anie.202517403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Jones M. W., Peters G. P., Gasser T., et al., “National Contributions to Climate Change Due to Historical Emissions of Carbon Dioxide, Methane, and Nitrous Oxide Since 1850,” Scientific Data 10 (2023): 155, 10.1038/s41597-023-02041-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Tian H., Xu R., Canadell J. G., et al., “A Comprehensive Quantification of Global Nitrous Oxide Sources and Sinks,” Nature 586 (2020): 248–256, 10.1038/s41586-020-2780-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Stolz B., Held M., Georges G., and Boulouchos K., “Techno‐Economic Analysis of Renewable Fuels for Ships Carrying Bulk Cargo in Europe,” Nature Energy 7 (2022): 203–212, 10.1038/s41560-021-00957-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.E. P. a. t. C. o. t. E. Union, 2024, pp. OJ L 1257, 1258 May 2024.
  • 43. Esquivel‐Elizondo S., Walkowiak B., Sartzetakis S. S., and Buma B., “Climate Impact of Direct and Indirect N2O Emissions From the Ammonia Marine Fuel Value Chain,” Environmental Science & Technology 59 (2025): 9037–9048, 10.1021/acs.est.4c13135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Park Y.‐K. and Kim B.‐S., “Catalytic Removal of Nitrogen Oxides (NO, NO2, N2O) From Ammonia‐Fueled Combustion Exhaust: A Review of Applicable Technologies,” Chemical Engineering Journal 461 (2023): 141958, 10.1016/j.cej.2023.141958. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Wu X., Du J., Gao Y., et al., “Progress and Challenges in Nitrous Oxide Decomposition and Valorization,” Chemical Society Reviews 53 (2024): 8379–8423, 10.1039/D3CS00919J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Konsolakis M., “Recent Advances on Nitrous Oxide (N2O) Decomposition Over Non‐Noble‐Metal Oxide Catalysts: Catalytic Performance, Mechanistic Considerations, and Surface Chemistry Aspects,” ACS Catalysis 5 (2015): 6397–6421, 10.1021/acscatal.5b01605. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Jing Y., Taketoshi K., Zhang N., et al., “Catalytic Decomposition of N2O in the Presence of O2 Through Redox of Rh Oxide in a RhOx/ZrO2 Catalyst,” ACS Catalysis 12 (2022): 6325–6333, 10.1021/acscatal.2c01321. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Long Y., Zhu X., Gao C., Si W., Li J., and Peng Y., “Modulation of Co Spin state at Co3O4 Crystalline‐Amorphous Interfaces for CO Oxidation and N2O Decomposition,” Nature Communications 16 (2025): 1048, 10.1038/s41467-025-56487-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Liotta L. F., Di Carlo G., Pantaleo G., Venezia A. M., and Deganello G., “Co3O4/CeO2 composite Oxides for Methane Emissions Abatement: Relationship Between Co3O4–CeO2 Interaction and Catalytic Activity,” Applied Catalysis B 66 (2006): 217–227, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2006.03.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Huang J., Sheng H., Ross R. D., et al., “Modifying Redox Properties and Local Bonding of CO3O4 By CeO2 Enhances Oxygen Evolution Catalysis in Acid,” Nature Communication 12 (2021): 3036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Xue L., Zhang C., He H., and Teraoka Y., “Promotion Effect of Residual K on the Decomposition of N2O over Cobalt–Cerium Mixed Oxide Catalyst,” Catalysis Today 126 (2007): 449–455, 10.1016/j.cattod.2007.06.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Himabindu B., Latha Devi N. S. M. P., and Rajini Kanth B., “Microstructural Parameters From X‐Ray Peak Profile Analysis by Williamson–Hall Models; a Review,” Materials Today: Proceedings 47 (2021): 4891–4896, 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.256. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Falk T., Budiyanto E., Dreyer M., et al., “Doping of Nanostructured Co3O4 with Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, and Cu for the Selective Oxidation of 2‐Propanol,” Nano Materials 5 (2022): 17783–17794. [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Armatas G. S., Katsoulidis A. P., Petrakis D. E., Pomonis P. J., and Kanatzidis M. G., “Nanocasting of Ordered Mesoporous Co3O4‐Based Polyoxometalate Composite Frameworks,” Chemistry of Materials 22 (2010): 5739–5746, 10.1021/cm101972h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Cui M., Guo R., Zhou Y., et al., “Asymmetric Site‐Enabled O–O Coupling in Co3O4 for Oxygen Evolution Reaction,” ACS Catalysis 14 (2024): 16353–16362, 10.1021/acscatal.4c04164. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. He C., Li A., and Liu Z., “Investigation of Co3O4–CeO2 Composite Oxide as Catalyst for the Decomposition of N2O,” Catalysis Surveys From Asia 24 (2020): 232–238, 10.1007/s10563-020-09303-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Xiao Z., Huang Y.‐C., Dong C.‐L., et al., “Operando Identification of the Dynamic Behavior of Oxygen Vacancy‐Rich Co3O4 for Oxygen Evolution Reaction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 142 (2020): 12087–12095, 10.1021/jacs.0c00257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Shannon R. D., “Revised Effective Ionic Radii and Systematic Studies of Interatomic Distances in Halides and Chalcogenides,” Acta Crystallographica Section A 32 (1976): 751–767, 10.1107/S0567739476001551. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Jacobs G., Ji Y., Davis B. H., Cronauer D., Kropf A. J., and Marshall C. L., “Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis: Temperature Programmed EXAFS/XANES Investigation of the Influence of Support Type, Cobalt Loading, and Noble Metal Promoter Addition to the Reduction Behavior of Cobalt Oxide Particles,” Applied Catalysis A 333 (2007): 177–191, 10.1016/j.apcata.2007.07.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Zhang K., Li N., Weng Y., et al., “Navigating Covalency of Cobalt Oxides for Enhanced Oxygen Evolution,” Advanced Functional Materials 35 (2026): 2507212, 10.1002/adfm.202507212. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Zhang N., He C., Jing Y., et al., “Enhanced Nitrous Oxide Decomposition on Zirconium‐Supported Rhodium Catalysts by Iridium Augmentation,” Environmental Science & Technology 59 (2025): 1598–1607, 10.1021/acs.est.4c08083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Khivantsev K., Pham H., Engelhard M. H., et al., “Transforming Ceria into 2D Clusters Enhances Catalytic Activity,” Nature 640 (2025): 947–953, 10.1038/s41586-025-08684-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Zhao L., Liu D., Wang Y., et al., “Ceria‐Trapped Single‐Atom Rhodium Catalysts for Efficient Ethanol Steam Reforming to Hydrogen,” Catalysis Science & Technology 15 (2025): 3613–3625, 10.1039/D5CY00025D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Zhang Y., Cao N., Wang K., Yan M., Zhang X., and Xie P., “Atomically Dispersed Rh–O–V Pairs Promote Methane Dry Reforming With Sustained Catalytic Activity,” ACS Catalysis 15 (2025): 8833–8845, 10.1021/acscatal.5c00625. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Xue L., Zhang C., He H., and Teraoka Y., “Catalytic Decomposition of N2O over CeO2 Promoted Co3O4 Spinel Catalyst,” Applied Catalysis B 75 (2007): 167–174, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.04.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Jin X., Duan Y., Liu D., et al., “CO Oxidation Catalyzed by Two‐Dimensional Co3O4/CeO2 Nanosheets,” ACS Applied Nano Materials Journal 2 (2019): 5769–5778, 10.1021/acsanm.9b01225. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Li W., Feng X., Zhang Z., Jin X., Liu D., and Zhang Y., “A Controllable Surface Etching Strategy for Well‐Defined Spiny Yolk@Shell CuO@CeO2 Cubes and Their Catalytic Performance Boost,” Advanced Functional Materials 28 (2018): 1802559, 10.1002/adfm.201802559. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Ou H., Yue Y., Yang T., et al., “Hydroxyl‐Induced Electronic Structure and Electron Transfer for Improved N2O Decomposition Activity of Co3O4 ,” ACS ES&T Engineering Journal 5 (2025): 1032–1042, 10.1021/acsestengg.4c00791. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Pan L., Mi Q., Wang M., et al., “In Situ Elucidations of the Mechanism for Inert Molecular N2O Decomposition at Low Temperature Catalyzed by High‐Index Interfacial Exposed Co3O4 ,” Advancement of Science 13 (2026): e74735, 10.1002/advs.74735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Sun Y., Wu Y., Wang H., and Wu Z., “Single‐Atom Ru on CeO2 Nanorods for Efficient N2O Decomposition: Mechanistic Insights and Multipollutant Control,” Environmental Science & Technology 59 (2025): 24777–24785, 10.1021/acs.est.5c11651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Qiu B., Wang C., Zhang N., Cai L., Xiong Y., and Chai Y., “CeO2‐Induced Interfacial Co2+ Octahedral Sites and Oxygen Vacancies for Water Oxidation,” ACS Catalysis 9 (2019): 6484–6490, 10.1021/acscatal.9b01819. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Li Y., Sundermann A., Gerlach O., et al., “Catalytic Decomposition of N2O on Supported Rh Catalysts,” Catalysis Today 355 (2020): 608–619, 10.1016/j.cattod.2019.04.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Imamura S., Tadani J.‐I., Saito Y., Okamoto Y., Jindai H., and Kaito C., “Decomposition of N2O on Rh‐Loaded Pr/Ce Composite Oxides,” Applied Catalysis A 201 (2000): 121–127, 10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00431-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Parres‐Esclapez S., Illán‐Gómez M. J., de Lecea C. S.‐M., and Bueno‐López A., “On the Importance of the Catalyst Redox Properties in the N2O Decomposition Over Alumina and Ceria Supported Rh, Pd and Pt,” Applied Catalysis B 96 (2010): 370–378, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.02.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Silvestre‐Albero J., Rodríguez‐Reinoso F., and Sepúlveda‐Escribano A., “Improved Metal‐Support Interaction in Pt/CeO2/SiO2 Catalysts After Zinc Addition,” Journal of Catalysis 210 (2002): 127–136, 10.1006/jcat.2002.3670. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Xie S., Kim D., Ye K., Tetard L., and Liu F., “Regulating Local Coordination Environment of Rhodium Single Atoms in Rh/CeO2 Catalysts for N2O Decomposition,” Journal of Rare Earths 41 (2023): 941–951, 10.1016/j.jre.2023.01.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Gorylewski D., Zasada F., Słowik G., et al., “Modulation of the Electronic Properties of Co3O4 Through Bi Octahedral Doping for Enhanced Activity in the Oxygen Evolution Reaction,” ACS Catalysis 15 (2025): 4746–4758, 10.1021/acscatal.4c07911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Bai B. and Li J., “Positive Effects of K+ Ions on Three‐Dimensional Mesoporous Ag/Co3O4 Catalyst for HCHO Oxidation,” ACS Catalysis 4 (2014): 2753–2762, 10.1021/cs5006663. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Liu S., Xue W., Ji Y., et al., “Interfacial Oxygen Vacancies at Co3O4‐CeO2 Heterointerfaces Boost the Catalytic Reduction of NO by CO in the Presence of O2 ,” Applied Catalysis B 323 (2023): 122151, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.122151. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Cui B., Zhou L., Li K., et al., “Holey Co‐Ce Oxide Nanosheets as a Highly Efficient Catalyst for Diesel Soot Combustion,” Applied Catalysis B 267 (2020): 118670, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118670. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Biesinger M. C., Payne B. P., Grosvenor A. P., Lau L. W. M., Gerson A. R., and Smart R. S. C., “Resolving Surface Chemical States in XPS Analysis of First Row Transition Metals, Oxides and Hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni,” Applied Surface Science 257 (2011): 2717–2730, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Yang J., Liu H., Martens W. N., and Frost R. L., “Synthesis and Characterization of Cobalt Hydroxide, Cobalt Oxyhydroxide, and Cobalt Oxide Nanodiscs,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C 114 (2010): 111–119, 10.1021/jp908548f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Wang X., Duan R., Li Z., et al., “The Critical Role of Oxygen Vacancies in N2O Decomposition Over Cobalt‐Doped CeO2 Catalysts,” Environmental Science & Technology 59 (2025): 5839–5847, 10.1021/acs.est.5c00180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Lukashuk L., Föttinger K., Kolar E., et al., “Operando XAS and NAP‐XPS Studies of Preferential CO Oxidation on Co3O4 and CeO2‐Co3O4 Catalysts,” Journal of Catalysis 344 (2016): 1–15, 10.1016/j.jcat.2016.09.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Kumar K., Jain S., Panchakarla L. S., and Nagarkar S. S., “CeVO4 Nanosheets as Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Glycerol Oxidation and Hydrogen Peroxide Sensing,” ACS Applied Nano Materials 7 (2024): 17578–17587. [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Li J., “Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Energy Conversion and Storage: Design Strategies Under and Beyond the Energy Scaling Relationship,” Nano‐Micro Letters 14 (2022): 112, 10.1007/s40820-022-00857-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Kibis L. S., Stadnichenko A. I., Koscheev S. V., Zaikovskii V. I., and Boronin A. I., “XPS Study of Nanostructured Rhodium Oxide Film Comprising Rh4+ Species,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C 120 (2016): 19142–19150, 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b05219. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Jing Y., He C., Zhang N., et al., “Promotional Effect of Ag on the Catalytic Decomposition of N2O in the Presence of O2 over the Al2O3‐Supported Rh Catalyst,” ACS Catalysis 13 (2023): 12983–12993, 10.1021/acscatal.3c02446. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Zhai Y., Jin C., Xia Q., et al., “Atomically Confined Ru Sites in Octahedral Co3O4 for High‐Efficiency Hydrazine Oxidation,” Advanced Functional Materials 34 (2024): 2311063, 10.1002/adfm.202311063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Li M., Wang X., Liu K., et al., “Reinforcing Co–O Covalency via Ce(4f)─O(2p)─Co(3d) Gradient Orbital Coupling for High‐Efficiency Oxygen Evolution,” Advanced Materials 35 (2023): 2302462, 10.1002/adma.202302462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Hüfner S., Photoelectron Spectroscopy: Principles and Applications, ed. Hüfner S. (Springer, 2003), 347–409. [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Centi G., Dall′Olio L., and Perathoner S., “Room Temperature Decomposition of N2O in the Presence of Gaseous Oxygen on Prereduced Rh Supported Catalysts,” Catalysis Letters 67 (2000): 107–112, 10.1023/A:1019029908363. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Yu H., Li Y., Pan Y., et al., “Dy and K Double‐Additive Modified Co3O4 Catalyst With High Resistance to NO for Catalyzing N2O Decomposition,” Chemical Engineering Journal 504 (2025): 159032, 10.1016/j.cej.2024.159032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Yu H. and Wang X., “Apparent Activation Energies and Reaction Rates of N2O Decomposition Via Different Routes over Co3O4 ,” Catalysis Communications 106 (2018): 40–43, 10.1016/j.catcom.2017.12.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Xiong S., Chen J., Huang N., Yang S., Peng Y., and Li J., “Balance between Reducibility and N2O Adsorption Capacity for the N2O Decomposition: CuxCoy Catalysts as an Example,” Environmental Science & Technology 53 (2019): 10379–10386, 10.1021/acs.est.9b02892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Nowakowski L., Hudy C., Zasada F., et al., “N2O Decomposition on Singly and Doubly (K and Li)‐Doped Co3O4 Nanocubes─Establishing Key Factors Governing Redox Behavior of Catalysts,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 146 (2024): 24450–24466, 10.1021/jacs.4c06587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Parres‐Esclapez S., Illán‐Gómez M. J., Lecea C. S.‐M. D., and Bueno‐López A., “Preparation and Characterisation of γ‐Al2O3 Particles‐Supported Rh/Ce0.9Pr0.1O2 Catalyst for N2O Decomposition in the Presence of O2, H2O and NOx,” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 11 (2012): 251–261, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.09.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Parres‐Esclapez S., Such‐Basañez I., Illán‐Gómez M. J., Salinas‐Martínez de Lecea C., and Bueno‐López A., “Study by Isotopic Gases and In Situ Spectroscopies (DRIFTS, XPS and Raman) of the N2O Decomposition Mechanism on Rh/CeO2 and Rh/γ‐Al2O3 Catalysts,” Journal of Catalysis 276 (2010): 390–401, 10.1016/j.jcat.2010.10.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Liu H., Yang S., Mi J., Sun C., Chen J., and Li J., “4d–2p–4f Gradient Orbital Coupling Enables Tandem Catalysis for Simultaneous Abatement of N2O and CO on Atomically Dispersed Rh/CeO2 Catalyst,” Environmental Science & Technology 58 (2024): 17125–17136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Guan X., Asakura H., Han R., et al., “Cascade NH3 Oxidation and N2O Decomposition Via Bifunctional Co and Cu Catalysts,” ACS Catalysis 13 (2023): 13816–13827, 10.1021/acscatal.3c02392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Juhas P., Davis T., Farrow C. L., and Billinge S. J. L., “PDFgetX3: A Rapid and Highly Automatable Program for Processing Powder Diffraction Data into Total Scattering Pair Distribution Functions,” Journal of Applied Crystallography 46 (2013): 560–566, 10.1107/S0021889813005190. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Mathon O., Beteva A., Borrel J., et al., “The Time‐Resolved and Extreme Conditions XAS (TEXAS) Facility at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility: The General‐Purpose EXAFS Bending‐Magnet Beamline BM23,” Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 22 (2015): 1548–1554, 10.1107/S1600577515017786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Ravel B. and Newville M., “ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: Data Analysis for X‐Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Using IFEFFIT,” Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 12 (2005): 537–541, 10.1107/S0909049505012719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Newville M., “Larch: An Analysis Package for XAFS and Related Spectroscopies,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 430 (2013): 012007. [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Nuguid R. J. G., Ferri D., and Kröcher O., “Design of a Reactor Cell for Modulated Excitation Raman and Diffuse Reflectance Studies of Selective Catalytic Reduction Catalysts,” Emission Control Science and Technology 5 (2019): 307–316, 10.1007/s40825-019-00141-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Chiarello G. L., Nachtegaal M., Marchionni V., Quaroni L., and Ferri D., “Adding Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform Spectroscopy Capability to Extended X‐Ray‐Absorption Fine Structure in a New Cell to Study Solid Catalysts in Combination With a Modulation Approach,” Review of Scientific Instruments 85 (2014): 074102, 10.1063/1.4890668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Kresse G. and Furthmüller J., “Efficient Iterative Schemes for Ab Initio Total‐Energy Calculations Using a Plane‐Wave Basis Set,” Physical Review B 54 (1996): 11169–11186, 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Kresse G. and Furthmüller J., “Efficiency of Ab‐Initio Total Energy Calculations for Metals and Semiconductors Using a Plane‐Wave Basis Set,” Computer Materials Science 6 (1996): 15–50, 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Perdew J. P., Burke K., and Ernzerhof M., “Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple,” Physical Review Letter 77 (1996): 3865–3868, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Dudarev S. L., Botton G. A., Savrasov S. Y., Humphreys C. J., and Sutton A. P., “Electron‐Energy‐Loss Spectra and the Structural Stability of Nickel Oxide: An LSDA+U Study,” Physical Review B 57 (1998): 1505–1509, 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.1505. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Liu J.‐X., Su Y., Filot I. A. W., and Hensen E. J. M., “A Linear Scaling Relation for CO Oxidation on CeO2‐Supported Pd,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 140 (2018): 4580–4587, 10.1021/jacs.7b13624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Chen J. and Selloni A., “Electronic States and Magnetic Structure at the Co3O4 (110) Surface: A First‐Principles Study,” Physical Review B 85 (2012): 085306, 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.085306. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Selcuk S. and Selloni A., “DFT+U Study of the Surface Structure and Stability of Co3O4 (110): Dependence on U,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C 119 (2015): 9973–9979, 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02298. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Graciani J., Mudiyanselage K., Xu F., et al., “Highly Active Copper‐Ceria and Copper‐Ceria‐Titania Catalysts for Methanol Synthesis From CO2 ,” Science 345 (2014): 546–550, 10.1126/science.1253057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Shi J., Ren Q., and Gao Y., “Accelerating Global Optimization of Cerium Oxide Nanocluster Structures With High‐Dimensional Neural Network Potential,” Journal of Physical Chemistry A 129 (2025): 2190–2199, 10.1021/acs.jpca.4c07840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Grimme S., Antony J., Ehrlich S., and Krieg H., “A Consistent and Accurate Ab Initio Parametrization of Density Functional Dispersion Correction (DFT‐D) for the 94 Elements H‐Pu,” Journal of Chemical Physics 132 (2010): 154104, 10.1063/1.3382344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Roth W. L., “The Magnetic Structure of Co3O4 ,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 25 (1964): 1–10, 10.1016/0022-3697(64)90156-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Monkhorst H. J. and Pack J. D., “Special Points for Brillouin‐Zone Integrations,” Physical Review B 13 (1976): 5188–5192, 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Yu H., Tursun M., Wang X., and Wu X., “Pb0.04Co Catalyst for N2O Decomposition in Presence of Impurity Gases,” Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy 185 (2016): 110–118, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.12.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Wang R., Zheng K., Hu S., et al., “Volcano‐Type Trend Between Precipitation pH and Catalytic Performance of Co‐Ce Catalysts Towards N2O Decomposition,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds 1030 (2025): 180875, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.180875. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Wójcik S., Grzybek G., Stelmachowski P., Sojka Z., and Kotarba A., “Bulk, Surface and Interface Promotion of Co3O4 for the Low‐Temperature N2O Decomposition Catalysis,” Catalysts 10 (2020): 41. [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Zhang Y., Dong Q., Zhang J., Zhang T., and Li J., “Unveiling Intrinsic Active Sites and Pivotal Intermediate Species in N2O Decomposition over Co3O4‐based Catalysts,” Catalysis Science & Technology 15 (2025): 3848–3858, 10.1039/D5CY00381D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Ho P. H., Jabłońska M., Palkovits R., et al., “N2O Catalytic Decomposition on Electrodeposited Rh‐Based Open‐Cell Metallic Foams,” Chemical Engineering Journal 379 (2020): 122259, 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122259. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Sarma B. B., Neukum D., Doronkin D. E., et al., “Understanding the Role of Supported Rh Atoms and Clusters During Hydroformylation and CO Hydrogenation Reactions With In Situ/Operando XAS and DRIFT Spectroscopy,” Chemical Science 15 (2024): 12369–12379, 10.1039/D4SC02907K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Matsubu J. C., Yang V. N., and Christopher P., “Isolated Metal Active Site Concentration and Stability Control Catalytic CO2 Reduction Selectivity,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 137 (2015): 3076–3084, 10.1021/ja5128133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

The authors have cited additional references within the Supporting Information [99, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125]. Supporting File: anie73090‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.

ANIE-65-e7890563-s001.docx (184.2MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES