Skip to main content
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2026 Aug 14;105(33):e50151. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000050151

The protective efficacy of inactivated vaccine against hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome: A meta-analysis: Erratum

Weiting Wu, Jie Liu, Shicheng Guo, Han Zhao, Xuli Yang
PMCID: PMC13480682  PMID: 42601781

In the article “The protective efficacy of inactivated vaccine against hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome: A meta-analysis”,[1] which appears in Volume 104, Issue 20 of Medicine, the text changes have been made in three sections of the article. (1) The number “ten” has been changed to “thirteen” in section (3.1. Selection of study), second paragraph, first sentence: “Of the 15 [12,17-30] articles included, only two were foreign articles, and both were from South Korea, while the remaining ten were from China;” (2) In 3.4 sub-section, the second sentence “The protection rate of HFRS inactivated vaccine in China was 86% (95% CI: 70%–93%)” has been deleted; and (3) In the Discussion section, in final paragraph: ‘not’ deleted from the first sentence “The inactivated HFRS vaccine has not been included in the national immunization program in China”.

Reference

  • 1.Wu W, Liu J, Guo S, Zhao H, Yang X. The protective efficacy of inactivated vaccine against hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025;104:e42463. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES