Abstract
The experimental analysis of behavior has lagged far behind mainstream psychology, particularly cognitive psychology, in the study of complex behavior—remembering, thinking, imaging, problem solving, and the like. Yet it is the study of these kinds of behavior that will provide the greatest justification of our continued existence in the community of behavioral scientists. Focusing primarily on remembering as a complex performance, aspects of (1) radical behaviorism, (2) the methodology of the experimental analysis of behavior, and (3) the special contributions of B. F. Skinner are assessed as explicitly or implicitly discouraging the experimental treatment of such complex behavior. Although there are encouraging signs of advancement into the present domains of cognitive psychology, future success of the experimental analysis of behavior in this endeavor will require aggressive pursuit by investigators and more effective training of their students.
Keywords: methodology, radical behaviorism, cognitive psychology, memory, verbal behavior
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Branch M. N. On the role of "memory" in the analysis of behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Sep;28(2):171–179. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.28-171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Day W. F. Radical behaviorism in reconciliation with phenomenology. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Mar;12(2):315–328. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- SKINNER B. F. Are theories of learning necessary? Psychol Rev. 1950 Jul;57(4):193–216. doi: 10.1037/h0054367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]