Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1984 Nov;42(3):511–522. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-511

Rate dependency, behavioral mechanisms, and behavioral pharmacology.

M N Branch
PMCID: PMC1348121  PMID: 6520580

Abstract

Behavioral pharmacology has become increasingly independent of the experimental analysis of behavior. At its beginning, behavioral pharmacology was closely related to the experimental analysis of behavior, with developments in each field aiding the other. Early attempts to systematize data in behavioral pharmacology culminated with the development of the rate-dependency concept, but as this principle was found to have more limited generality than originally was hoped, a theoretical void developed. This circumstance was followed by increased reliance on pharmacological theory as a basis for experimentation and interpretation, with an attendant decrease in emphasis on environmental variables and behavioral interpretations. Lack of interplay between behavioral pharmacology and the experimental analysis of behavior is detrimental to both disciplines because each could contribute significantly to the other. The current trend might be reversed if more research were directed at elucidating behavioral mechanisms of drug action.

Full text

PDF
511

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barrett J. E. Effects of alcohol, chlordiazepoxide, cocaine and pentobarbital on responding maintained under fixed-interval schedules of food or shock presentation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1976 Mar;196(3):605–615. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Branch M. N., Gollub L. R. A detailed analysis of the effects of d-amphetamine on behavior under fixed-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):519–539. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Branch M. N., Nicholson G., Dworkin S. I. Punishment-specific effects of pentobarbital: dependency on the type of punisher. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Nov;28(3):285–293. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.28-285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Byrd L. D. Modification of the effects of chlorpromazine on behavior in the chimpanzee. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1974 Apr;189(1):24–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. COOK L., CATANIA A. C. EFFECTS OF DRUGS ON AVOIDANCE AND ESCAPE BEHAVIOR. Fed Proc. 1964 Jul-Aug;23:818–835. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Catania A. C., Reynolds G. S. A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3 Suppl):327–383. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-s327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Colpaert F. C. Discriminative stimulus properties of narcotic analgesic drugs. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1978 Dec;9(6):863–887. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(78)90370-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. DEWS P. B. A BEHAVIORAL EFFECT OF AMOBARBITAL. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol. 1964 Jun 22;248:296–307. doi: 10.1007/BF00246347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. DEWS P. B. Studies on behavior. I. Differential sensitivity to pentobarbital of pecking performance in pigeons depending on the schedule of reward. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1955 Apr;113(4):393–401. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. DEWS P. B. Studies on behavior. IV. Stimulant actions of methamphetamine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1958 Jan;122(1):137–147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Goldberg S. R., Spealman R. D., Risner M. E., Henningfield J. E. Control of behavior by intravenous nicotine injections in laboratory animals. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1983 Dec;19(6):1011–1020. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(83)90408-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gonzalez F. A., Byrd L. D. Mathematics underlying the rate-dependency hypothesis. Science. 1977 Feb 11;195(4278):546–550. doi: 10.1126/science.402028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. KELLEHER R. T., MORSE W. H. ESCAPE BEHAVIOR AND PUNISHED BEHAVIOR. Fed Proc. 1964 Jul-Aug;23:808–817. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kelleher R. T., Morse W. H. Determinants of the specificity of behavioral effects of drugs. Ergeb Physiol. 1968;60:1–56. doi: 10.1007/BFb0107250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kuhn D. M., Appel J. B., Greenberg I. An analysis of some discriminative properties of d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacologia. 1974;39(1):57–66. doi: 10.1007/BF00421458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Laties V. G., Weiss B. Influence of drugs on behavior controlled by internal and external stimuli. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1966 Jun;152(3):388–396. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Martin W. R., Eades C. G., Thompson J. A., Huppler R. E., Gilbert P. E. The effects of morphine- and nalorphine- like drugs in the nondependent and morphine-dependent chronic spinal dog. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1976 Jun;197(3):517–532. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McDowell J. J., Kessel R. A multivariate rate equation for variable-interval performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Mar;31(2):267–283. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McKearney J. W., Barrett J. E. Punished behavior: increases in responding after d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacologia. 1975;41(1):23–26. doi: 10.1007/BF00421301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McKearney J. W. Effects of d-amphetamine, morphine and chlorpromazine on responding under fixed-interval schedules of food presentation or electric shock presentation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1974 Jul;190(1):141–153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McKearney J. W. Rate-dependent effects of drugs: modification by discriminative stimuli of the effects of amobarbital on schedule-controlled behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Sep;14(2):167–175. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Morse W. H. Effect of amobarbital and chlorpromazine on punished behavior in the pigeon. Psychopharmacologia. 1964 Oct 14;6(4):286–294. doi: 10.1007/BF00413158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nevin J. A. Response strength in multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):389–408. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Overton D. A. Discriminable effects of antimuscarinics: dose response and substitution test studies. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1977 Jun;6(6):659–666. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(77)90091-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Peffer-Smith P. G., Smith E. O., Byrd L. D. Effects of d-amphetamine on self-aggression and posturing in stumptail macaques. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Nov;40(3):313–320. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. SKINNER B. F. Are theories of learning necessary? Psychol Rev. 1950 Jul;57(4):193–216. doi: 10.1037/h0054367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Snyder S. H. Drug and neurotransmitter receptors in the brain. Science. 1984 Apr 6;224(4644):22–31. doi: 10.1126/science.6322304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. TERRACE H. S. Errorless discrimination learning inthe pigeon: effects of chlorpromazine and impiramine. Science. 1963 Apr 19;140(3564):318–319. doi: 10.1126/science.140.3564.318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Thompson D. M., Moerschbaecher J. M., Winsauer P. J. Drug effects on repeated acquisition: comparison of cumulative and non-cumulative dosing. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jan;39(1):175–184. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. WALLER M. B., WALLER P. F. Effects of chlorpromazine on appetitive and aversive components of a multiple schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Apr;5:259–264. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wenger G. R. Cumulative dose-response curves in behavioral pharmacology. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1980 Nov;13(5):647–651. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(80)90007-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES