Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1985 May;43(3):365–381. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-365

The role of observing and attention in establishing stimulus control.

J A Dinsmoor
PMCID: PMC1348149  PMID: 3894561

Abstract

Early theorists (Skinner, Spence) interpreted discrimination learning in terms of the strengthening of the response to one stimulus and its weakening to the other. But this analysis does not account for the increasing independence of the two performances as training continues or for increases in control by dimensions of a stimulus other than the one used in training. Correlation of stimuli with different densities of reinforcement produces an increase in the behavior necessary to observe them, and greater observing of and attending to the relevant stimuli may account for the increase in control by these stimuli. The observing analysis also encompasses errorless training, and the selective nature of observing explains the feature-positive effect and the relatively shallow gradients of generalization generated by negative discriminative stimuli. The effectiveness of the observing analysis in handling these special cases adds to the converging lines of evidence supporting its integrative power and thus its validity.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Auge R. J. Context, observing behavior, and conditioned reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Nov;22(3):525–533. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BONEAU C. A., HONIG W. K. OPPOSED GENERALIZATION GRADIENTS BASED UPON CONDITIONAL DISCRIMINATION TRAINING. J Exp Psychol. 1964 Jul;68:89–93. doi: 10.1037/h0045926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BUSH R. R., MOSTELLER F. A model for stimulus generalization and discrimination. Psychol Rev. 1951 Nov;58(6):413–423. doi: 10.1037/h0054576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bower G., McLean J., Meacham J. Value of knowing when reinforcement is due. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1966 Oct;62(2):184–192. doi: 10.1037/h0023682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DINSMOOR J. A. A quantitative comparison of the discriminative and reinforcing functions of a stimulus. J Exp Psychol. 1950 Aug;40(4):458–472. doi: 10.1037/h0056266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DINSMOOR J. A. The effect of periodic reinforcement of bar-pressing in the presence of a discriminative stimulus. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1951 Aug;44(4):354–361. doi: 10.1037/h0060006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Depaulo P., Dewald L., Yarczower M. General attentiveness effects of discriminative training. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Mar;27(2):245–253. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dinsmoor J. A., Bowe C. A., Dout D. L., Martin L. T., Mueller K. L., Workman J. D. Separating the effects of salience and disparity on the rate of observing. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Nov;40(3):253–264. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dinsmoor J. A., Mueller K. L., Martin L. T., Bowe C. A. The acquisition of observing. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Nov;38(3):249–263. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dinsmoor J. A., Mulvaney D. E., Jwaideh A. R. Conditioned reinforcement as a function of duration of stimulus. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Jul;36(1):41–49. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Driscoll J. M., Lanzetta J. T., McMichael J. S. Preference for information under varying conditions of outcome uncertainty, intensity, and delay. Psychol Rep. 1967 Oct;21(2):473–479. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1967.21.2.473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Eimas P. D. Observing responses, attention, and the overtraining reversal effect. J Exp Psychol. 1969 Dec;82(3):499–502. doi: 10.1037/h0028421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. FERSTER C. B. The effect on extinction responding of stimuli continuously present during conditioning. J Exp Psychol. 1951 Dec;42(6):443–449. doi: 10.1037/h0055675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fantino E., Case D. A. Human observing: Maintained by stimuli correlated with reinforcement but not extinction. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Sep;40(2):193–210. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Farthing G. W. Discrimination of compound stimuli involving the presence or absence of a distinctive visual feature. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Nov;16(3):327–336. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Green L., Rachlin H. Pigeons' preferences for stimulus information: effects of amount of information. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Mar;27(2):255–263. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. HEINEMANN E. G., RUDOLPH R. L. THE EFFECT OF DISCRIMINATIVE TRAINING ON THE GRADIENT OF STIMULUS-GENERALIZATION. Am J Psychol. 1963 Dec;76:653–658. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. HULL C. L. Simple qualitative discrimination learning. Psychol Rev. 1950 Sep;57(5):303–313. doi: 10.1037/h0062099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hearst E., Besley S., Farthing G. W. Inhibition and the stimulus control of operant behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Nov;14(3 Pt 2 Suppl):373–409. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-s373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hearst E. Discrimination learning as the summation of excitation and inhibition. Science. 1968 Dec 13;162(3859):1303–1306. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hirota T. T. The Wyckoff observing response-a reappraisal. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Sep;18(2):263–276. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Honig W. K. The role of discrimination training in the generalization of punishment. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Jul;9(4):377–384. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Honig W. K., Urcuioli P. J. The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): Twenty-five years of research on stimulus generalization. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Nov;36(3):405–445. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. JENKINS H. M., HARRISON R. H. Effect of discrimination training on auditory generalization. J Exp Psychol. 1960 Apr;59:246–253. doi: 10.1037/h0041661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. JENKINS H. M., HARRISON R. H. Generalization gradients of inhibition following auditory discrimination learning. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:435–441. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. KELLEHER R. T., RIDDLE W. C., COOK L. Observing responses in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Jan;5:3–13. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. KENDALL S. B. THE DISTRIBUTION OF OBSERVING RESPONSES IN A MIXED FI-FR SCHEDULE. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Sep;8:305–312. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Karpicke J., Hearst E. Inhibitory control and errorless discrimination learning. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Mar;23(2):159–166. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kendall S. B. Effects of two procedures for varying information transmission on observing responses. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jul;20(1):73–83. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. LAWRENCE D. H. The transfer of a discrimination along a continuum. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1952 Dec;45(6):511–516. doi: 10.1037/h0057135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lanzetta J. T., Driscoll J. M. Preference for information about an uncertain but unavoidable outcome. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1966 Jan;3(1):96–102. doi: 10.1037/h0022674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Maki W. S., Jr, Leith C. R. Shared attention in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Mar;19(2):345–349. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Marsh G. Prediction of the peak shift in pigeons from gradients of excitation and inhibition. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1972 Nov;81(2):262–266. doi: 10.1037/h0033538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. NEWMAN F. L., BARON M. R. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION ALONG THE DIMENSION OF ANGULARITY: A COMPARISON OF TRAINING PROCEDURES. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1965 Aug;60:59–63. doi: 10.1037/h0022334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Newman J., Wolff W. T., Hearst E. The feature-positive effect in adult human subjects. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1980 Sep;6(5):630–650. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. PROKASY W. F., Jr The acquisition of observing responses in the absence of differential external reinforcement. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1956 Apr;49(2):131–134. doi: 10.1037/h0046740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. RESTLE F. A theory of discrimination learning. Psychol Rev. 1955 Jan;62(1):11–19. doi: 10.1037/h0046642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rand J. F. Behaviors observed during S- in a simple discrimination learning task. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Jan;27(1):103–117. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychol Bull. 1978 May;85(3):618–660. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rilling M., Caplan H. J., Howard R. C., Brown C. H. Inhibitory stimulus control following errorless discrimination learning. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Sep;24(2):121–133. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sainsbury R. S. Effect of proximity of elements on the feature-positive effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Nov;16(3):315–325. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sidman M. Generalization gradients and stimulus control in delayed matching-to-sample. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Sep;12(5):745–757. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Singh N. N., Beale I. L. Attentional changes during discrimination learning by retarded children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 May;29(3):527–533. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Skinner B. F. A Discrimination without Previous Conditioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1934 Sep;20(9):532–536. doi: 10.1073/pnas.20.9.532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Switalski R. W., Lyons J., Thomas D. R. Effects of interdimensional training on stimulus generalization. J Exp Psychol. 1966 Nov;72(5):661–666. doi: 10.1037/h0023795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. TERRACE H. S. Discrimination learning with and without "errors". J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jan;6:1–27. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. TERRACE H. S. Errorless transfer of a discrimination across two continua. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6:223–232. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Thomas E. L. Movements of the eye. Sci Am. 1968 Aug;219(2):88–95. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0868-88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Vetter G. H., Hearst E. Generalization and discrimination of shape orientation in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):753–765. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. WYCKOFF L. B., Jr The role of observing responses in discrimination learning. Psychol Rev. 1952 Nov;59(6):431–442. doi: 10.1037/h0053932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wasserman E. A., Anderson P. A. Differential autoshaping to common and distinctive elements of positive and negative discriminative stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Nov;22(3):491–496. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wilton R. N., Clements R. O. Observing responses and informative stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Mar;15(2):199–204. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES