Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1985 Sep;44(2):245–270. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-245

The quantal nature of controlling stimulus-response relations as measured in tests of stimulus generalization.

W K Bickel, B C Etzel
PMCID: PMC1348181  PMID: 4067497

Abstract

This paper is a selective review of research that addresses the validity of two interpretations of stimulus generalization. One interpretation, referred to as the descriptive stimulus-control interpretation, proposes that during stimulus generalization a continuous relation exists between stimulus and response dimensions. The other interpretation, referred to as the quantal interpretation, proposes that a stimulus-response relation functions as a unit that may or may not occur. From the latter viewpoint, the continuity typically obtained during generalization tests is deemed to be artifactual and to result from averaging across multiple controlling stimulus-response relations. Studies examining the contribution of these multiple relations to generalization gradients are reviewed. With few exceptions, the quantal interpretation appears to better characterize the results of these studies. Implications for peak shift, selection of analytical level, and identification of the behavioral unit are discussed, as well as factors that may determine the acceptability of the quantal interpretation.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barrett J. E., Stanley J. A. Effects of ethanol on multiple fixed-interval fixed-ratio schedule performances: dynamic interactions at different fixed-ratio values. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Sep;34(2):185–198. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bickel W. K., Stella M. E., Etzel B. C. A reevaluation of stimulus overselectivity: restricted stimulus control or stimulus control hierarchies. J Autism Dev Disord. 1984 Jun;14(2):136–157. doi: 10.1007/BF02409657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blough D. S. Generalization gradient shape and summation in steady-state tests. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jan;12(1):91–104. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blough D. S. Interresponse time as a function of continuous variables: a new method and some data. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6(2):237–246. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blough P. M., Blough D. S. The reaction-time/luminance relationship for pigeons to lights of different spectral compositions. Percept Psychophys. 1978 Jun;23(6):468–474. doi: 10.3758/bf03199521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Branch M. N. On the role of "memory" in the analysis of behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Sep;28(2):171–179. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.28-171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. CATANIA A. C. Independence of concurrent responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Apr;5:175–184. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. CROSS D. V., LANE H. L. On the discriminative control of concurrent responses: the relations among response frequency, latency, and topography in auditory generalization. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:487–496. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Crites R. J., Harris R. T., Rosenquist H., Thomas D. R. Response patterning during stimulus generalization in the rat. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Mar;10(2):165–168. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Crowley M. A. The allocation of time to temporally defined behaviors: responding during stimulus generalization. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Sep;32(2):191–197. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. FRY W., KELLEHER R. T., COOK L. A mathematical index of performance on fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1960 Jul;3:193–199. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1960.3-193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. GOLLUB L. R. THE RELATIONS AMONG MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE ON FIXED-INTERVAL SCHEDULES. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Sep;7:337–343. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. GUTTMAN N., KALISH H. I. Discriminability and stimulus generalization. J Exp Psychol. 1956 Jan;51(1):79–88. doi: 10.1037/h0046219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Galloway W. D. Stimulus control in a two-choice discrimination procedure. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Nov;20(3):473–482. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gentry G. D., Weiss B., Laties V. G. The microanalysis of fixed-interval responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Mar;39(2):327–343. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gray V. A. Stimulus control of differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Mar;25(2):199–207. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. HANSON H. M. Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. J Exp Psychol. 1959 Nov;58:321–334. doi: 10.1037/h0042606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. HERRNSTEIN R. J., VAN SOMMERS P. Method for sensory scaling with animals. Science. 1962 Jan 5;135(3497):40–41. doi: 10.1126/science.135.3497.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hearst E., Besley S., Farthing G. W. Inhibition and the stimulus control of operant behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Nov;14(3 Pt 2 Suppl):373–409. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-s373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Honig W. K., Urcuioli P. J. The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): Twenty-five years of research on stimulus generalization. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Nov;36(3):405–445. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. MIGLER B. EFFECTS OF AVERAGING DATA DURING STIMULUS GENERALIZATION. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jul;7:303–307. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Migler B., Millenson J. R. Analysis of response rates during stimulus generalization. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jan;12(1):81–87. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. NEVIN J. A., BERRYMAN R. A note on chaining and temporal discrimination. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jan;6:109–113. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. PROKASY W. F., HALL J. F. Primary stimulus generalization. Psychol Rev. 1963 Jul;70:310–322. doi: 10.1037/h0049354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. RISLEY T. GENERALIZATION GRADIENTS FOLLOWING TWO-RESPONSE DISCRIMINATION TRAINING. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Mar;7:199–204. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rand J. F. Behaviors observed during S- in a simple discrimination learning task. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Jan;27(1):103–117. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ray B. A. Selective attention: the effects of combining stimuli which control incompatible behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jul;12(4):539–550. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Scheuerman K. V., Wildemann D. G., Holland J. G. A clarification of continuous repertoire development. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Sep;30(2):197–203. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schneider B. A. A two-state analysis of fixed-interval responding in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Sep;12(5):677–687. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shimp C. P., Hawkes L. Time-allocation, matching, and contrast. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):1–10. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sidman M. A note on the measurement of conditional discrimination. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Mar;33(2):285–289. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sidman M. Generalization gradients and stimulus control in delayed matching-to-sample. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Sep;12(5):745–757. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Staddon J. E. Asymptotic behavior: the concept of the operant. Psychol Rev. 1967 Sep;74(5):377–391. doi: 10.1037/h0024877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Stoddard L. T., Sidman M. Stimulus control after intradimensional discrimination training. Psychol Rep. 1971 Feb;28(1):147–157. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1971.28.1.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Stoddard L. T., Sidman M. The removal and restoration of stimulus control. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Sep;16(2):143–154. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Touchette P. E. Tilted lines as complex stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Mar;12(2):211–214. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wildemann D. G., Holland J. G. Control of a continuous response dimension by a continuous stimulus dimension. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Nov;18(3):419–434. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wilkie D. M. Stimulus control of responding during a fixed-interval reinforcement schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):425–432. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Yarczower M., Dickson J. F., Gollub L. R. Some effects on generalization gradients of tandem schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Nov;9(6):631–639. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zeiler M. D. Editorial. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Jan;27(1):1–2. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES