Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1986 Nov;46(3):381–394. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-381

Similarities in the rate-altering effects of white noise and cocaine.

L L Howell, L D Byrd, M J Marr
PMCID: PMC1348274  PMID: 3805977

Abstract

The effects of white noise and cocaine on squirrel monkeys' fixed-interval responding were compared to determine whether the presentation of an exteroceptive stimulus could produce rate-altering effects of the type typically observed following drug administration. To investigate the relationship between control response rate and response rate in the presence of drug or noise, the monkeys were trained under a fixed-interval 300-s stimulus-shock termination schedule in order to generate a wide range of local response rates. A light illuminated the experimental chamber during the interval and, after 300 s elapsed, a lever press during a 3-s period terminated the light and precluded the occurrence of a harmless electrical stimulus that otherwise was delivered at the end of the 3-s period. Each interval was followed by a 30-s timeout during which the chamber was darkened and responses had no consequences. Following intramuscular administration of cocaine, different rates of responding characteristic of control performance converged toward a common rate and, at an appropriately high dose, response rate during the fixed interval became more uniform. When white noise was presented continuously during a given session, different response rates also converged toward a common rate and, at an appropriate intensity, response rate became more uniform. Interactions were obtained when cocaine and white noise were presented together, indicating the possibility of a common behavioral mechanism of action. The results suggest that rate-altering drug effects may be, in part, a result of the ability of drugs to produce nonspecific stimulus effects similar to those observed for exteroceptive stimuli.

Full text

PDF
381

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALEXANDER M., ISAAC W. EFFECT OF ILLUMINATION AND D-AMPHETAMINE ON THE ACTIVITY OF THE RHESUS MACAQUE. Psychol Rep. 1965 Feb;16:311–313. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1965.16.1.311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beecher M. D. Letter: Pure-tone thresholds of the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). J Acoust Soc Am. 1974 Jan;55(1):196–198. doi: 10.1121/1.1928152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Byrd L. D. The behavioral effects of cocaine: rate dependency or rate constancy. Eur J Pharmacol. 1979 Jul 1;56(4):355–362. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(79)90266-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cole S. O., Gay P. E. Effects of drug-state change on discrimination performance. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1976 May 5;47(1):43–47. doi: 10.1007/BF00428699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davis M., Wagner A. R. Habituation of startle response under incremental sequence of stimulus intensities. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1969 Apr;67(4):486–492. doi: 10.1037/h0027308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Delay E. R., Steiner N. O., Isaac W. Effects of d-amphetamine and methylphenidate upon auditory threshold in the squirrel monkey. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1979 Jun;10(6):861–864. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(79)90058-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gonzalez F. A., Byrd L. D. Mathematics underlying the rate-dependency hypothesis. Science. 1977 Feb 11;195(4278):546–550. doi: 10.1126/science.402028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Green S. Auditory sensitivity and equal loudness in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Mar;23(2):255–264. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HAKE D. F., AZRIN N. H. An apparatus for delivering pain shock to monkevs. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6:297–298. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. ISAAC W., DEVITO J. L. Effect of sensory stimulation on the activity of normal and prefrontal-lobectomized monkeys. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1958 Apr;51(2):172–174. doi: 10.1037/h0041433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ksir C. Rate dependent drug effects: possible state dependency. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1976 Feb;4(2):165–168. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(76)90009-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mapou R. L., Borowiec F. M., Richards J. B., Byrd L. D. Microcomputer control of behavior and the acquisition of digital and analog data. Comput Programs Biomed. 1984 Feb-Apr;18(1-2):61–75. doi: 10.1016/0010-468x(84)90024-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McKim W. A. The effects of scopolamine on fixed-interval behaviour in the rat: a rate-dependency effect. Psychopharmacologia. 1973 Sep 28;32(3):255–264. doi: 10.1007/BF00422147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McMillan D. E. Drugs and punished responding. I. Rate-dependent effects under multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jan;19(1):133–145. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES