Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1987 May;47(3):261–271. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-261

Superstitious behavior in humans

Koichi Ono
PMCID: PMC1348309  PMID: 16812480

Abstract

Twenty undergraduate students were exposed to single response-independent schedules of reinforcer presentation, fixed-time or variable-time, each with values of 30 and 60 s. The reinforcer was a point on a counter accompanied by a red lamp and a brief buzzer. Three color signals were presented, without consistent relation to reinforcer or to the subjects' behavior. Three large levers were available, but the subjects were not asked to perform any particular behavior. Three of the 20 subjects developed persistent superstitious behavior. One engaged in a pattern of lever-pulling responses that consisted of long pulls after a few short pulls; the second touched many things in the experimental booth; the third showed biased responding called sensory superstition. However, most subjects did not show consistent superstitious behavior. Reinforcers can operate effectively on human behavior even in the absence of a response-reinforcer contingency and can, in some cases, shape stable superstitious patterns. However, superstitious behavior is not a consistent outcome of exposure of human subjects to response-independent reinforcer deliveries.

Keywords: superstitious behavior, response-independent reinforcers, fixed-time schedules, variable-time schedules, lever pulling, humans

Full text

PDF
261

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. APPEL J. B., HISS R. H. The discrimination of contingent from noncontingent reinforcement. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1962 Feb;55:37–39. doi: 10.1037/h0044613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BRUNER A., REVUSKY S. H. Collateral behavior in humans. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Oct;4:349–350. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blue S., Sherman J. G., Pierrel R. Differential responding as a function of auditory stimulus intensity without differential reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 May;15(3):371–377. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown P. L., Jenkins H. M. Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jan;11(1):1–8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CATANIA A. C., CUTTS D. Experimental control of superstitious responding inhumans. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6:203–208. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Falk J. L. Conditions producing psychogenic polydipsia in animals. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1969 May 15;157(2):569–593. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1969.tb12908.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Falk J. L. The nature and determinants of adjunctive behavior. Physiol Behav. 1971 May;6(5):577–588. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(71)90209-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. KIEFFER J. D. DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE RATES CORRELATED WITH THE PRESENCE OF "NEUTRAL" STIMULI. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Jul;8:227–229. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kello J. E., Innis N. K., Staddon J. E. Eccentric stimuli on multiple fixed-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Mar;23(2):233–240. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Killeen P. R. Superstition: a matter of bias, not detectability. Science. 1978 Jan 6;199(4324):88–90. doi: 10.1126/science.199.4324.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lachter G. D., Cole B. K., Schoenfeld W. N. Response rate under varying frequency of non-contingent reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Mar;15(2):233–236. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lachter G. D. Some temporal parameters of non-contingent reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Sep;16(2):207–217. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lander D. G. Stimulus bias in the absence of food reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):711–714. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lattal K. A. Combinations of response-reinforcer dependence and independence. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Sep;22(2):357–362. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lattal K. A. Reponse-reinforcer independence and conventional extinction after fixed-interval and variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Jul;18(1):133–140. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lattal K. A. Response-reinforcer dependence and independence in multiple and mixed schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Sep;20(2):265–271. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. MORSE W. H., SKINNER B. F. A second type of superstition in the pigeon. Am J Psychol. 1957 Jun;70(2):308–311. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Neuringer A. J. Superstitious key pecking after three peck-produced reinforcements. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):127–134. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sizemore O. J., Lattal K. A. Unsignalled delay of reinforcement in variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Sep;30(2):169–175. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Starr B. C., Staddon J. E. Sensory superstition on multiple interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Mar;37(2):267–280. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Timberlake W., Lucas G. A. The basis of superstitious behavior: chance contingency, stimulus substitution, or appetitive behavior? J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Nov;44(3):279–299. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wasserman E. A., Neunaber D. J. College students' responding to and rating of contingency relations: The role of temporal contiguity. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Jul;46(1):15–35. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zeiler M. D. Fixed and variable schedules of response-independent reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jul;11(4):405–414. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES