I. T. Mudzingwa, S. J. Prior, P. Griffin, E. Tavender, and V.T Ran, “Acute Suspected Stroke Clinical Pathway Use in Tasmanian Emergency Departments: A Retrospective Study,” Emergency Medicine Australasia 38, no. 2 (2026): e70254, https://doi.org/10.1111/1742‐6723.70254.
In Table 1, the site labelled H1 was incorrectly classified as MM1 and should be correctly classified as MM2. The correct table is shown below. These amendments do not affect the analysis, interpretation or conclusions of the manuscript.
TABLE 1.
Description of included public hospitals.
| Hospital | Modified Monash (MM) ratings (17) | Annual ED presentations 2020–21 (19) | Services/capacity data source: (19, 20) |
|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | MM 2—Regional centre | 71,960 | Largest referral hospital (~501 beds). Statewide specialist emergency care with integrated neurology and stroke pathways, statewide neurosurgery onsite, and comprehensive tertiary services, e.g., ICU/HDU |
| H2 | MM 2—Regional centre | 44,200 | ~401 beds Primary Stroke Centre accreditation; onsite neurology with ED neurological assessment; no onsite neurosurgical surgery. |
| H3 | MM 3—Large rural town | 28,850 | ~160 beds. Acute stroke care with ED, imaging and general medical services; neurology delivered via statewide clinics; no onsite neurosurgery. |
| H4 | MM 3—Large rural town | 24,797 | ~95 beds. Essential regional ED with limited specialty capacity; stabilise‐and‐transfer model for stroke/neurological emergencies; no onsite neurosurgery. |
In addition, the Funding statement requires correction. The statement currently reads:
“This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council, MRF2018041.”
But this should read:
“This work was supported by the Medical Research Future Fund, MRFF 2018041.”
We apologise for these errors.