Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Apr 17;33(4):e70471. doi: 10.1111/iju.70471

Correction to “Buccal Epithelium Expanded and Encapsulated in Scaffold‐Hybrid Approach to Urethral Stricture (BEES‐HAUS) Procedure: A Novel Cell Therapy‐Based Pilot Study”

PMCID: PMC13484241  PMID: 41999072

S. P. Vaddi, V. B. Reddy, and S. J. Abraham. “Buccal Epithelium Expanded and Encapsulated in Scaffold‐Hybrid Approach to Urethral Stricture (BEES‐HAUS) Procedure: A Novel Cell Therapy‐Based Pilot Study,” International Journal of Urology 26 (2019): 253–257.

In Table 1, the follow‐up duration for the 6th patient is mentioned as 10 months; however, the correct value is 24 months. The correct version of the table 1 is provided below.

TABLE 1.

Patient characteristics and procedure details.

Sl no. Etiology Age (years) Prior interventions Graft size (cm) Initial cell count (million) Final cell count (million) Stricture length (cm) Follow‐up (months) Auxiliary procedure
1 Idiopathic 38 Endoscopic urethrotomy (twice) 0.5 × 0.5 0.3 1.4 2.5 18 Buccal substitution urethroplasty
2 Idiopathic 28 2 × 1 1.57 11.6 2 40
3 Idiopathic 70 Buccal substitution 2.5 × 1.5 0.76 10 2 39
4 Idiopathic 37 2 × 1.5 2.24 9.2 2.5 36
5 Idiopathic 45 Endoscopic urethrotomy 2 × 1.5 1.2 8.06 3.5 36
6 Idiopathic 32 2 × 1.5 2.2 18.5 2 24 Buccal substitution urethroplasty

We apologize for this error.


Articles from International Journal of Urology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES