Abstract
We recently demonstrated a dramatic 77-fold increase in brain adenylosuccinate (AdSucc) concentration during ischemia, reaching ~0.56 mM levels. Previously, the role of AdSucc induction under decreased energy charge was attributed to the activation of purine nucleotide (PNC) and the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA). However, careful analysis of metabolomic alterations in the ischemic brain under decreased energy charge did not confirm this role. To begin addressing the additional biological significance of the increased AdSucc under low-energy conditions associated with ischemia, we tested its angiogenic properties. Using a mouse in vivo angiogenesis assay, we discovered that AdSucc, but not its metabolites such as adenosine or AMP accumulated during the assay, promotes angiogenesis in vivo at concentrations found in ischemic tissues. Further, using in vitro angiogenesis assay with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC), we demonstrated that AdSucc promotes the formation of capillary-like structures (tubes) on extracellular matrix support. We also report, for the first time, that AdSucc increases cAMP levels, supporting its signaling role, which may be linked to pro-angiogenic mechanisms. Together, our data indicate a novel mechanism of angiogenesis regulation, in which AdSucc may serve as a new signaling molecule under low-energy conditions. Further studies are required to confirm the role of endogenously produced AdSucc in tissue angiogenesis as an adaptation mechanism to low-energy conditions and repair after injury.
Keywords: Ischemia, Stroke, Brain, Angiogenesis, Adenylosuccinate
Introduction
Adult angiogenesis ensures that the energetic demands of tissue are met during metabolic changes and depending on the availability of circulating oxygen and nutrients. Angiogenesis is also critically important for tissue recovery after injury. It is well documented that recovery from cerebral and myocardial infarction and traumatic injury involves angiogenesis as part of the repair process 1,2 3–11. Given the importance of adult angiogenesis in cerebral and cardiovascular disease and physiological adaptation to changes in O2 and nutrient supply, as well as its pathological role in cancer and age-related degeneration, a deeper mechanistic understanding of adult angiogenesis is warranted.
Recently, we discovered a dramatic 77-fold increase in brain adenylosuccinate (AdSucc) concentration under ischemia, which reached 0.555±0.036 nmol/mg of tissue wet weight (ww, ~0.56mM) 12. Previously, the significance of AdSucc increase under energy depletion caused by brain stimulation or muscle exercise was explained through activation of the purine nucleotide cycle (PNC) to support the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) 13,14. According to this mechanism, aspartate is deaminated to fumarate (Fum) in PNC, and Fum enters TCA, thus increasing its oxidative capacity and tissue energy production 15,16. However, careful examination of metabolome alterations in the ischemic brain did not confirm the role of AdSucc induction in PNC and TCA activation 12.
In the present study, to begin addressing AdSucc alternative roles in ischemic tissues characterized by decreased energy charge, we tested the hypothesis that increased AdSucc may serve as a metabolic signal of decreased energy status and activate an angiogenic response as a compensatory mechanism. We tested AdSucc angiogenic effect in two distinct models, including in vivo and in vitro assays, and validated its signaling properties by measuring the effect of AdSucc on a secondary messenger cAMP.
Results and Discussion
Our in vivo DIVAA data demonstrate that the number of infiltrated endothelial cells was significantly increased by 1.8-fold in angioreactors containing AdSucc at day 10 after implantation compared to control angioreactors (Fig. 1), indicating a strong pro-angiogenic effect of AdSucc. Importantly, the initial AdSucc concentration (1mM) was close to the levels found in ischemic tissues 12. We did not continue the assay beyond 10 days because AdSucc concentrations decreased to levels similar to those in the control-implanted angioreactors at day 3 (Fig. 2).
Figure 1. Adenylosucinnate (AdSucc) promotes angiogenesis in the Directed In Vivo Angiogenesis Assay (DIVAA).

Silicone angioreactors containing 20 μL of VitroGel hydrogel matrix with PBS (control), AdSucc (500 μM), or accumulated products of AdSucc degradation adenosine (0.6 μM) or AMP (20 μM) were subcutaneously implanted in the contralateral flanks of RAG1−/− mice. After 10 days, infiltrating endothelial cells were labeled with FITC-labeled lectin and quantified by fluorescence. A separate set of mice was perfused with Evan’s blue to measure functional perfusion. Data are expressed as relative fluorescent units (RFU) for endothelial cell infiltration, and as normalized to plasma Evan’s blue concentration for angioreactor perfusion. * - significantly different (p<0.05), ** - significantly different (p<0.01) as calculated using two-tailed, paired Student’s t test. Number of biological replicates n=9 for AdSucc treatment, n=8 for adenosine and AMP, and n=6 for perfusion experiments.
Figure 2. Analysis of adenylosuccinate (AdSucc) metabolites in implanted DIVAA angioreactors.

Silicone angioreactors containing 20 μL of VitroGel hydrogel matrix with PBS (control) or AdSucc (500 μM) were implanted in Rag−/− mice for 0 (not implanted), 1, 3, 5, or 10 days, as described. Upon removal, metabolites were analyzed using UPLC-MSe against a stable isotope-labeled internal standards. Data are presented as individual values and mean±standard deviation (n=4). Statistical differences found between AdSucc and PBS containing angioreactors at the same time point are denoted with (#), and differences from the 0-time point are denoted with (*) using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (p<0.05).
Because an increased number of infiltrated endothelial cells does not necessarily indicate an increase in perfused vessels, we measured the effect of AdSucc on blood volume in angioreactors. Using Evan’s blue dye, which binds to albumin and does not penetrate through capillaries under normal conditions 17,18, we found a significant 2.9-fold increase in the normalized Evan’s blue dye concentration in angioreactors containing AdSucc (Fig. 2). Although these data might indicate an increased leakage of newly formed vessels in the presence of AdSucc, together with increased endothelium cell number, they support pro-angiogenic effect of AdSucc in this in vivo assay.
It is possible that products of AdSucc degradation, rather than AdSucc per se, exert the observed pro-angiogenic effect. It is well accepted that AdSucc is rapidly degraded to Fum and adenosine (Ade) monophosphate (AMP) by adenylosuccinate lyase 19,20. AMP might directly exert pro-angiogenic effect through an AMP- activated protein kinase signaling cascade 21 or by cross-activating adenosine receptors 22,23. Fum might also stimulate angiogenesis by stabilizing hypoxia-inducible factors 24, a strong pro-angiogenic regulators 25. AMP is further dephosphorylated to Ade by 5’-nucleotidases such as CD73 or cytosolic isoforms 26, which activates P1 purinergic receptors with a resultant strong stimulation of angiogenesis 27. Alternatively, AMP might be deaminated by AMP deaminases, leading to the production of inosine monophosphate (IMP) 28, or oxidized to form uric acid as a final catabolic product 29. These AdSucc metabolites may affect cellular growth, migration, and adhesion, thereby altering angiogenesis upon AdSucc treatment.
Considering the pro-angiogenic role of AdSucc degradation products, we next performed metabolomics analysis of the hydrogel matrix containing vehicle or AdSucc at different time points after implantation (Fig. 2) and validated their contribution to the observed AdSucc effect on angiogenesis (Fig. 1). AdSucc was progressively decreased after angioreactor implantation, and after day 3 was not significantly different from control angioreactors. The AdSucc decrease might result from washout via diffusion, or from enzymatic degradation. AMP, the major product of AdSucc degradation through lyase reaction, was higher at all time points after transplantation, with an average difference of 20 μM between control and AdSucc-loaded angioreactors. Initial AMP accumulation might be attributable to AdSucc degradation. However, the increased levels in AdSucc-containing angioreactors after day 3 might be due to enhanced cell infiltration driven by potentiated angiogenesis, as AdSucc did not differ between conditions after day 3, and AMP is mainly localized intracellularly. Adding this amount of AMP (20 μM) did not produce an angiogenic effect (Fig. 1). Though Ade was not significantly different between conditions at the same time points (Fig. 2), considering its potent pro-angiogenic effect, we tested the contribution of 0.6 μM of Ade to the AdSucc angiogenic effect, which is the highest difference in Ade concentration between conditions at the same time points. Similar to AMP, it did not have an angiogenic effect at the tested levels (Fig. 1). IMP and Fum were not different between AdSucc-loaded and control angioreactors at any of the time points, while urate was higher on day 10 only, probably becuase of increased cell number associated with potentiated angiogenesis in the AdSucc angioreactors (Fig1 and 2). Together, these data indicate that AdSucc pro-angiogenic effect is independent of its products of degradation under the assay conditions.
To further validate AdSucc angiogenic properties, we next used in vitro tube formation model with cells of human origin. In this assay, HUVECs form tube-like structures when cultured on a matrix of BME 30,31. HUVECs exposed to 500 μM AdSucc for 8 h exhibited a robust pro-angiogenic response compared with vehicle-treated controls (Fig. 3). Quantitative image analysis revealed increases in network maturity and complexity. AdSucc facilitated tube formation through HUVEC adhesion to and modification of BME, evident from a 3.1-fold increase in the number of segments and total segment length and 41% decrease in the number of branches (segments not connected to another structure) 32. It also facilitated migration and cell-to-cell interaction demonstrated by a 3.9-fold increase in branching interval, 5.2-fold increase in number of meshes (area enclosed by structures), and 2.6-fold increase in total mesh area. The number of junctions (places where multiple tubes connect) was also 2.2-fold increased, indicating complex network formation in the presence of AdSucc. The total tube length increase was not statistically significant (p=0.2), likely due to high variability in the control set. Notably, AdSucc effect on tube formation was most pronounced in HUVECs used shortly after thawing from cryopreservation (passage 1) compared to well-recovered cells (data not shown). Because HUVECs are stressed shortly after removal from cryopreservation 33, this observation suggests that AdSucc preferentially enhances angiogenic capacity in stressed or compromised endothelial cells. This is important because AdSucc is increased under ischemia 12 when endothelial cells are under stressful/compromising conditions 34,35, indicating AdSucc potential role in the recovery from ischemic stroke or other conditions in which the endothelium is compromised.
Figure 3. Adenylosuccinate (AdSucc) facilitates the formation of a tube-like network by human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC).

HUVEC suspended in basal medium with 2% serum containing either 500 μM AdSucc or PBS (control, Contr) were plated at passage 3 (passage 1 after cryorecovery) onto basement membrane extract, and the tubular network was imaged using a phase-contrast microscope at 20x magnification. Analysis was performed using FIJI with the angiogenesis analyzer plugin. Nodes are pixels at branch points. Junctions are single or groups of touching nodes. Segments are portions between two junctions. Branches are connected to one junction but no other structures. Master segments lie between two junctions connected to more than one segment. Meshes are enclosed areas formed by segments or master segments. Data are presented as individual values and mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). p-values were determined by two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t test and are shown for all measurements, while p≤0.05 were considered statistically different.
To begin addressing the mechanism of AdSucc pro-angiogenic signaling, we measured its effect on cAMP, an important secondary messenger involved in angiogenesis 36–39. Treatment with 500 μM AdSucc for 8 h, the same conditions used in the tube formation assay, significantly increased cAMP levels in HUVECs, with 1.9- and 2.1-fold increases in cell lysates and conditioned media, respectively, relative to vehicle controls (Fig. 4). These results were not attributable to assay interference from AdSucc because cAMP signal was below detection limits in the presence of 500 μM AdSucc in the blank samples without cells. These data indicate, for the first time, that AdSucc stimulates both intracellular accumulation and extracellular release of cAMP in endothelial cells, providing additional support for AdSucc signaling properties. The ability of AdSucc to stimulate the production of this secondary messenger might outline one of the mechanisms underlying its pro-angiogenic properties, acting through established or novel pro-angiogenic receptors.
Figure 4. AdSucc stimulates cAMP production in primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC).

cAMP levels were measured by ELISA in cell lysate (A) and media (B) collected from HUVECs treated with 500 μM AdSucc or PBS (control) for 8 h in serum-free media. (C): cAMP was measured in the serum free media with or without added AdSucc (N/D: not detected; * - p < 0.05; ** - p < 0.01 using two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t test).
In summary, our data indicate a novel role for AdSucc as a pro-angiogenic signaling molecule. Further studies are required to validate the biological significance of AdSucc in promoting angiogenesis as an adaptation mechanism to low-energy conditions, and during recovery from ischemia-induced injury.
Materials and Methods
Animals
The handling and treatment of mice in this study were conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, a protocol approved by the University of North Dakota IACUC (protocols 2039-0056 and 2403-008), and in compliance with Animal Research: Reporting in In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines 40. Twenty-eight male and female (4-6 month old) Rag1− mice (RRID:IMSR_JAX:002096, Jackson Laboratory) were randomly assigned to experimental groups. Rag1− mice, which lack functional B and T lymphocytes were used in these experiments to minimize the influence of a strong, adaptive immune response on angiogenesis upon surgical angioreactor implantation 41. Mice were provided with a standard laboratory chow diet and water ad libitum. All experiments were conducted during the light cycle.
Directed In Vivo Angiogenesis Assay (DIVAA)
For the in vivo angiogenesis assay, we used a reproducible quantitative mouse Directed In Vivo Angiogenesis Assay (DIVAA) approach as previously described 42. DIVAA utilizes subcutaneously implanted small (20 μL internal volume), semi-closed silicone cylinders (angioreactors) filled with an extracellular matrix extract containing the angiogenic compound – in our case, AdSucc and its metabolites. Sterilized silicone cylinders were filled with VitroGel hydrogel matrix without growth factors (VHM01, TheWell Bioscience, Monmouth Junction, NJ) containing either AdSucc (1 mM), AMP (20 μM), adenosine (Ade, 0.6 μM), or PBS and allowed to solidify for at least 1 h prior to implantation. In our pilot study, AdSucc was mixed with hydrogel and incubated for 7 days at 37 °C, producing no significant change in AdSucc concentration (data not shown), indicating AdSucc chemical stability under DIVAA conditions. Before implantation, mice were treated with sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (10/2 mg, per 100 ml drinking water) (Novitium Pharma LLC, East Windsor, NJ) one day prior to and continued for the duration of the assay. Angioreactors were implanted subcutaneously according to the manufacturer’s instructions under anesthesia with ketamine/xylazine (100/10 mg/kg, i.p.). Angioreactors containing AdSucc, AMP, or Ade were implanted in the contralateral (vs. PBS containing angioreactors) flanks of the mice. Ten days post implantation, mice were anesthetized with Isoflurane (5%) and euthanized via cervical dislocation. Angioreactors were surgically excised and tissue extending from the open end was removed. The closed end of the angioreactor was clipped and the hydrogel was removed by rinsing with 1ml VitroGel cell recovery solution (TheWell Biosciences, Monmouth Junction, NJ). Cell recovery was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions and quantified using fluorescein-labeled Griffonia simplicifolia lectin I isolectin B4 (Vector Laboratories, Newark, CA) 42. Fluorescence was determined at 495/515 nm using a FlexStation 3 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA). To characterize the metabolism of AdSucc in the angioreactors, we analyzed metabolites contained in the angioreactors by UPLC-MS at 0, 1, 3, 5, 10-days post-implantation.
To determine the role of AdSucc in the formation of functional perfused vessels, mice were implanted with angioreactors as described above. Ten days post-implantation, mice were anesthetized with 5% isoflurane and maintained at 2% isoflurane balanced with oxygen. Anesthetized mice were injected with Evan’s blue dye (4% in saline, injected 200 ul, retro-orbitally) and euthanized by cervical dislocation 15 min post-injection. Angioreactors were removed as described above. Contents of angioreactors were mixed with 30 μl of 50% trichloroacetic acid (w/v) in saline and subjected to sonication, followed by centrifugation at 10,000xg for 15 min at room temperature. Twenty μl of extract was transferred to a black-walled, clear-bottom 96-well microplate, and each well was supplemented with 30 μl of 100% ethanol to increase optic pathlength 43. Fluorescence was determined at 620/680nm against a standard curve using a FlexStation 3 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA).
LC-MS Analysis
DIVAA matrix were extracted and analyzed as previously described 12. Briefly, 20 μL of matrix was mixed with 200 μL of MeOH:water (3:1) with 4 μg ATP-13C10 and 4 μg glutamate (Glu)-13C515N (Cambridge Medical Isotopes, Inc., Tewksbury, MA) as internal standards and subjected to sonication (3x 7sec at room temperature, sonic dismembrator with 4C15 probe, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) followed by centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 15 min at room temperature. The supernatant was transferred to microinserts (MicroSolv, Wilmington, NC), and 10 μL extract was analyzed by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography- high resolution mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS).
Nucleotides and amino acids were resolved on a ZIC-pHilic column (5 μm, 150 × 2.1 mm; Millipore Corporation, Burlington, MA) with a ZIC-pHilic Guard cartridge (20 × 2.1 mm; Millipore Corporation, Burlington, MA) at room temperature. The UPLC system consisted of a Waters ACQUITY Premier UPLC pump and well-plate autosampler (Waters, Milford, MA) maintained at 30°C. The binary solvent system consisted of solvent A: water with 10mM ammonium bicarbonate and 0.2% ammonium hydroxide and solvent B: 100% acetonitrile. An LC gradient was as previously described 12.
The UPLC eluent was analyzed with a Waters SYNAPT XS quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA) operating in negative electrospray ionization mode. The mass analyzer was operated in MSE and mass correction was applied using leucine enkephalin (Waters, Milford, MA) (100 pg/μL in ACN:water (1:1) containing 0.1% formic acid), as previously described 12,44,45. Instrument control and acquisition were performed using MassLynx v4.2 (Waters, Milford, MA) and peak integration was performed using QuanLynx software utilizing a 0.02 ppm mass window. AdSucc, AMP, IMP, and urate were quantified against ATP-13C10 internal standard (2 μg/sample), Ade was quantified against Ade-13C5 (20 ng/sample), and Fum was quantified against Glu-13C515N internal standard (2 μg/sample) using corresponding calibration curves.
Cell Cultures
Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Item No. PCS-100-013, ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) at passage 2 and cultured in VascuLife® VEGF endothelial medium complete kit (Item No. LL-0003, Lifeline Cell Technology, Frederick, MD, USA) without the addition of antibiotics at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. For cAMP measurement, cells were used at passage 4 (passage 2 after cryorecovery) and grown to ~80% confluence in a 96-well plate prior to treatment. HUVECs were treated with AdSucc at a final concentration of 500 μM for 8 hours in media without serum or growth factors. Vehicle-treated cells served as controls. For tube formation, HUVECs at passage 3 (passage 1 after cryorecovery) were used.
Tube Formation Assay
HUVECs were seeded at a density of 10,000 cells per well into an ibidi μ-Plate 96 well 3D (Item No. 89646, ibidi USA Inc, Fitchburg, WI, USA) after the inner well was filled with 10 μL of Cultrex Reduced Growth Factor Basement Membrane Extract (Item No. 3433-010-01, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Cells were plated in 50 μL basal medium supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum with either AdSucc with pH adjusted to 7.5 in PBS (Item No. 29696, Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) or phosphate-buffered saline (pH=7.5) as a control. The plate was placed in a stage-top incubator maintained at 5% CO2 and 100% humidity at 37 °C. Cells were imaged using phase-contrast microscopy with a Leica DMi8 Thunder imaging system (Leica Microsystems Inc, Deerfield, IL, USA) at 20X magnification at 8 h.
Analysis was performed using ImageJ software with the Angiogenesis Analyzer plugin 46. Prior to analysis, contrast was enhanced (Enhance Contrast, saturated=0.35), images were converted from 16 bit to RGB color, and a Gaussian blur (1 pixel radius) was applied. Angiogenesis Analyzer creates and measures a map of the structures of tube formation. Nodes are pixels at branch points. Junctions are single or grouped touching nodes. Segments are portions between two junctions. Branches are connected to one node but no other structures. Master segments lie between two junctions connected to more than one segment. Meshes are enclosed areas formed by segments or master segments 47. Angiogenesis Analyzer plugin settings were as follows: Minimum object size: 30 pixels; Minimum branch size: 40 pixels; Artifactual loop size: 850 pixels; Isolated element size threshold: 40 pixels; Master segment size threshold: 150 pixels; Iteration number: 3.
cAMP Analysis
Intracellular and extracellular cAMP levels were quantified using the Cyclic AMP Select ELISA kit (Item No. 501040; Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, after treatment, cells were placed on ice. The media was removed, centrifuged to remove debris, and used for cAMP extracellular analysis. For intracellular cAMP, cells were collected in 100 μL of the supplied ELISA buffer, probe sonicated, and centrifuged to remove debris. cAMP concentrations were calculated from a standard curve. Importantly, cAMP signal was below detection limits in the presence of 500 μM AdSucc in the blank samples without cells, indicating no cross-reactivity between cAMP and AdSucc under the assay conditions.
Statistical Analysis
For pairwise comparison, we used a two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t-test without correction for multiple comparisons. Statistical analysis comparing multiple groups was performed using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. The differences in the DIVAA assay were determined using a two-tailed, paired Student’s t-test. For presentation of DIVAA assay data, relative fluorescent units were normalized against the mean of the control. This normalization method did not alter p-value. Values were considered significant with p≤0.05 and are expressed as mean±SD. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 10 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA).
Funding:
This study was supported by NIH/NINDS grant 5 R01NS119279-05, NIH/NIGM grant P20 GM113123, DaCCoTA CTR NIH grant U54GM128729, and UND SOHS-supported Imaging and Mass Spectrometry Core Facilities.
Abbreviations
- Ade
adenosine
- AMP
adenosine monophosphate
- AdSucc
adenylosuccinate
- DIVAA
directed in vivo angiogenesis assay
- Fum
fumarate
- Glu
glutamate
- HUVEC
human umbilical vein endothelial cells
- IMP
inosine monophosphate
- PBS
phosphate-buffered saline
- PNC
purine nucleotide
- TCA
tricarboxylic acid cycle
Footnotes
Additional Declarations: No competing interests reported.
Data Availability
All data are contained within the manuscript
References
- 1.Wu X., Reboll M.R., Korf-Klingebiel M. & Wollert K.C. Angiogenesis after acute myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc. Res. 117, 1257–1273 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Martín-Bórnez M., et al. New Insights into the Reparative Angiogenesis after Myocardial Infarction. Int J Mol Sci 24(2023). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wei L., Erinjeri J.P., Rovainen C.M. & Woolsey T.A. Collateral Growth and Angiogenesis Around Cortical Stroke. Stroke 32, 2179–2184 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Krupinski J., Kaluza J., Kumar P., Kumar S. & Wang J.M. Role of angiogenesis in patients with cerebral ischemic stroke. Stroke 25, 1794–1798 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Issa R., et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor, KDR, in human brain tissue after ischemic stroke. Lab. Invest. 79, 417–425 (1999). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nag S., Takahashi J.L. & Kilty D.W. Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Blood-Brain Barrier Breakdown and Angiogenesis in Brain Trauma. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 56, 912–921 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Papavassiliou E., et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (vascular permeability factor) expression in injured rat brain. J. Neurosci. Res. 49, 451–460 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Marti H.J.H., et al. Hypoxia-Induced Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression Precedes Neovascularization after Cerebral Ischemia. The American Journal of Pathology 156, 965–976 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Plate K.H., Beck H., Danner S., Allegrini P.R. & Wiessner C. Cell Type Specific Upregulation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in an MCA-occlusion Model of Cerebral Infarct. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 58, 654–666 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Conway E.M., et al. Survivin-Dependent Angiogenesis in Ischemic Brain: Molecular Mechanisms of Hypoxia-Induced Up-Regulation. The American Journal of Pathology 163, 935–946 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chopp M., Zhang Z.G. & Jiang Q. Neurogenesis, Angiogenesis, and MRI Indices of Functional Recovery From Stroke. Stroke 38, 827–831 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Seeger D.R., et al. Brain Adenylosuccinate Is Dramatically Increased Under Global Ischemia Without Evidence for Purine Nucleotide Cycle Activation. J. Neurochem. 169, e70121 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lowenstein J. & Tornheim K. Ammonia Production in Muscle: The Purine Nucleotide Cycle. Science 171, 397 (1971). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Arinze I.J. Facilitating understanding of the purine nucleotide cycle and the one-carbon pool: Part I: The purine nucleotide cycle. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 33, 165–168 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Canela E.I., Ginesta I. & Franco R. Simulation of the purine nucleotide cycle as an anaplerotic process in skeletal muscle. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 254, 142–155 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Aragón J.J. & Lowenstein J.M. The purine-nucleotide cycle. Comparison of the levels of citric acid cycle intermediates with the operation of the purine nucleotide cycle in rat skeletal muscle during exercise and recovery from exercise. Eur. J. Biochem. 110, 371–377 (1980). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rawson R.A. THE BINDING OF T-1824 AND STRUCTURALLY RELATED DIAZO DYES BY THE PLASMA PROTEINS. American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content 138, 708–717 (1943). [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wälchli T., et al. Quantitative assessment of angiogenesis, perfused blood vessels and endothelial tip cells in the postnatal mouse brain. Nat Protoc 10, 53–74 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bridger W.A. & Cohen L.H. The Kinetics of Adenylosuccinate Lyase. J. Biol. Chem. 243, 644–650 (1968). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ray S.P., et al. Structural and biochemical characterization of human adenylosuccinate lyase (ADSL) and the R303C ADSL deficiency-associated mutation. Biochemistry 51, 6701–6713 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ouchi N., Shibata R. & Walsh K. AMP-activated protein kinase signaling stimulates VEGF expression and angiogenesis in skeletal muscle. Circ. Res. 96, 838–846 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rittiner J.E., et al. AMP is an adenosine A1 receptor agonist. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 5301–5309 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Holien J.K., et al. AMP and adenosine are both ligands for adenosine 2B receptor signaling. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 28, 202–206 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.MacKenzie E.D., et al. Cell-permeating alpha-ketoglutarate derivatives alleviate pseudohypoxia in succinate dehydrogenase-deficient cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 3282–3289 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Krock B.L., Skuli N. & Simon M.C. Hypoxia-induced angiogenesis: good and evil. Genes Cancer 2, 1117–1133 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zimmermann H. 5’-Nucleotidase: molecular structure and functional aspects. Biochem. J. 285 (Pt 2), 345–365 (1992). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Burnstock G. Purinergic signaling and vascular cell proliferation and death. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 22, 364–373 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Van den Berghe G., Bontemps F., Vincent M.F. & Van den Bergh F. The purine nucleotide cycle and its molecular defects. Prog. Neurobiol. 39, 547–561 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Miller S.G., et al. Uric acid formation is driven by crosstalk between skeletal muscle and other cell types. JCI Insight 9(2024). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kubota Y., Kleinman H.K., Martin G.R. & Lawley T.J. Role of laminin and basement membrane in the morphological differentiation of human endothelial cells into capillary-like structures. J. Cell Biol. 107, 1589–1598 (1988). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Faulkner A., et al. A thin layer angiogenesis assay: a modified basement matrix assay for assessment of endothelial cell differentiation. BMC Cell Biol 15, 41 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rundhaug J.E. Matrix metalloproteinases and angiogenesis. J Cell Mol Med 9, 267–285 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lehle K., Hoenicka M., Jacobs V.R., Schmid F.X. & Birnbaum D.E. Identification and reduction of cryoinjury in endothelial cells: a first step toward establishing a cell bank for vascular tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 12, 3439–3447 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Andjelkovic A.V., et al. Endothelial Targets in Stroke: Translating Animal Models to Human. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 39, 2240–2247 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yang C., Hawkins K.E., Doré S. & Candelario-Jalil E. Neuroinflammatory mechanisms of blood-brain barrier damage in ischemic stroke. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 316, C135–c153 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Adair T.H., et al. Adenosine infusion increases plasma levels of VEGF in humans. BMC Physiol 5, 10 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Du X., et al. Adenosine A2B receptor stimulates angiogenesis by inducing VEGF and eNOS in human microvascular endothelial cells. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 240, 1472–1479 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Grant M.B., et al. Adenosine receptor activation induces vascular endothelial growth factor in human retinal endothelial cells. Circ. Res. 85, 699–706 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nedvetsky P.I., et al. cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) regulates angiogenesis by modulating tip cell behavior in a Notch-independent manner. Development 143, 3582–3590 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Percie du Sert N., et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology 18, e3000410 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wang T., et al. CD97, an adhesion receptor on inflammatory cells, stimulates angiogenesis through binding integrin counterreceptors on endothelial cells. Blood 105, 2836–2844 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Guedez L., et al. Quantitative assessment of angiogenic responses by the directed in vivo angiogenesis assay. Am. J. Pathol. 162, 1431–1439 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wang H.L. & Lai T.W. Optimization of Evans blue quantitation in limited rat tissue samples. Sci Rep 4, 6588 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Brose S.A., Golovko S.A. & Golovko M.Y. Brain 2-Arachidonoylglycerol Levels Are Dramatically and Rapidly Increased Under Acute Ischemia-Injury Which Is Prevented by Microwave Irradiation. Lipids 51, 487–495 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Golovko S.A. & Golovko M.Y. Plasma Unesterified Fatty-Acid Profile Is Dramatically and Acutely Changed under Ischemic Stroke in the Mouse Model. Lipids 53, 641–645 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Schindelin J., et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9, 676–682 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Carpentier G., Martinelli M., Courty J. & Cascone I. Angiogenesis Analyzer for ImageJ. in 4th ImageJ User and Developer Conference proceedings 198–201 (Mondorf-les-Bains, Luxembourg, 2012). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data are contained within the manuscript
