Abstract
1. An isolated muscle spindle preparation from a tail muscle of cat is described. The afferent response to a ramp-and-hold stretch was recorded in individual axons from identified primary and secondary endings. 2. Primary endings exhibit a prominent dynamic response, including an initial burst. They also show a well-maintained static discharge. Secondary endings also show a well-sustained static discharge but generally have a much lower dynamic sensitivity. The response of primary and secondary endings of the isolated spindle are similar to the typical responses seen in vivo in groups Ia or group II afferent fibres respectively. 3. Following impulse blockade by tetrodotoxin, the receptor potential was recorded from primary and from secondary endings in response to ramp-and-hold stretch. 4. During the dynamic phase the receptor potential of primary endings consists of a depolarization which has two components. (a) An initial component occurs early during ramp stretch, depends in rate of rise and amplitude on velocity of stretch and is reduced on repetitive stretch; it appears to be responsible for the initial burst. (b) A late dynamic component, which follows, is also dependent on stretch velocity and produces the late dynamic discharge. At the end of ramp stretch the receptor potential falls, and may undershoot, the static level. There is a subsequent adaptive fall during hold stretch, then a maintained static level of receptor potential. On release from stretch the membrane is hyperpolarized. 5. Secondary endings usually show a smaller dynamic response, lacking the initial component seen in primary endings. They also generally lack an undershoot following the ramp and have less of a post-release hyperpolarization. 6. Static levels of receptor potential in both primary and secondary endings are related to amplitude of stretch. 7. The receptor potentials of primary and secondary endings account for the major features of the impulse responses of these endings to ramp-and-hold stretch. In primary endings the dynamic frequencies may also depend upon a sensitivity of the impulse initiating site to rate of change of receptor current.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Andrew B. L., Leslie G. C., Thompson J. Distribution and properties of muscle spindles in the caudal segmental muscles of the rat together with some comparisons with hind limb muscle spindles. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1973 Jan;58(1):19–37. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1973.sp002188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown M. C., Engberg I., Matthews P. B. The relative sensitivity to vibration of muscle receptors of the cat. J Physiol. 1967 Oct;192(3):773–800. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- COOPER S. The responses of the primary and secondary endings of muscle spindles with intact motor innervation during applied stretch. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1961 Oct;46:389–398. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1961.sp001558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emonet-Dénand F., Houk J. Some effects of polarizing current on discharges from muscle spindle receptors. Am J Physiol. 1969 Feb;216(2):404–406. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1969.216.2.404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HARVEY R. J., MATTHEWS P. B. The response of de-efferented muscle spindle endings in the cat's soleus to slow extension of the muscle. J Physiol. 1961 Jul;157:370–392. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HUNT C. C. Relation of function to diameter in afferent fibers of muscle nerves. J Gen Physiol. 1954 Sep 20;38(1):117–131. doi: 10.1085/jgp.38.1.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- JANSEN J. K., MATTHEWS P. B. The central control of the dynamic response of muscle spindle receptors. J Physiol. 1962 May;161:357–378. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KATZ B. Depolarization of sensory terminals and the initiation of impulses in the muscle spindle. J Physiol. 1950 Oct 16;111(3-4):261–282. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1950.sp004479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koike H., Brown H. M., Hagiwara S. Hyperpolarization of a barnacle photoreceptor membrane following illumination. J Gen Physiol. 1971 Jun;57(6):723–737. doi: 10.1085/jgp.57.6.723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LIPPOLD O. C., NICHOLLS J. G., REDFEARN J. W. Electrical and mechanical factors in the adaptation of a mammalian muscle spindle. J Physiol. 1960 Sep;153:209–217. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lennerstrand G., Thoden U. Dynamic analysis of muscle spindle endings in the cat using length changes of different length-time relations. Acta Physiol Scand. 1968 May-Jun;73(1):234–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1968.tb04100.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MATTHEWS P. B. THE RESPONSE OF DE-EFFERENTED MUSCLE SPINDLE RECEPTORS TO STRETCHING AT DIFFERENT VELOCITIES. J Physiol. 1963 Oct;168:660–678. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schäfer S. S., Schäfer S. Die Eigenschaften einer primären Muskelspindelafferenz bei rampenförmiger Dehnung und ihre mathematischen Beschreibung. Pflugers Arch. 1969;310(3):206–228. doi: 10.1007/BF00587210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]