Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1975 Nov;252(3):603–626. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011161

Further studies on the control of ACh sensitivity by muscle activity in the rat.

T Lomo, R H Westgaard
PMCID: PMC1348486  PMID: 1206569

Abstract

1. Denervated rat soleus muscles were stimulated directly through chronically implanted electrodes and the influence of different amounts and patterns of stimuli on the acetylcholine (ACh) sensitivity of the muscle was studied. The number of stimuli was varied by giving similar trains of stimuli (10 Hz for 10 sec) at different intervals (0 to 12 hr). The pattern of stimulation was varied by giving different trains of stimuli (100 Hz for 1 sec, 10 Hz for 10 sec and 1 Hz continuously) as the same average frequency of stimulation (1 Hz). 2. Stimulation usually started 5 days after the denervation when ACh hypersensitivity was fully developed. Most stimulation procedures reduced extrajunctional ACh sensitivity to normal or below normal values within 5-21 days, and these levels were maintained on prolonged stimulation. 3. The rate at which ACh hypersensitivity disappeared increased with increasing amount and frequency of stimulation. However, as few as 100 stimuli given every 5-5 hr for 3 weeks caused a tenfold reduction of sensitivity. 4. The stimulation had little or no effect on the ACh sensitivity at the end plate. Along the rest of the fibre the sensitivity was reduced at approximately the same rate except near the tendons where it appeared to fall more slowly in some fibres. 5. The stimulation restored the resting membrane potential of the denervated fibres to normal.

Full text

PDF
603

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADRIAN R. H. The effect of internal and external potassium concentration on the membrane potential of frog muscle. J Physiol. 1956 Sep 27;133(3):631–658. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. AXELSSON J., THESLEFF S. A study of supersensitivity in denervated mammalian skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1959 Jun 23;147(1):178–193. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Albuquerque E. X., McIsaac R. J. Fast and slow mammalian muscles after denervation. Exp Neurol. 1970 Jan;26(1):183–202. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(70)90099-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Albuquerque E. X., Thesleff S. A comparative study of membrane properties of innervated and chronically denervated fast and slow skeletal muscles of the rat. Acta Physiol Scand. 1968 Aug;73(4):471–480. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-201x.1968.tb10886.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Belmar J., Eyzaguirre C. Pacemaker site of fibrillation potentials in denervated mammmalian muscle. J Neurophysiol. 1966 May;29(3):425–441. doi: 10.1152/jn.1966.29.3.425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buckley G. A., Heaton J. A quantitative study of cholinesterase in myoneural junctions from rat and guinea-pig extraocular muscles. J Physiol. 1968 Dec;199(3):743–749. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. CLOSE R. DYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF FAST AND SLOW SKELETAL MUSCLES OF THE RAT DURING DEVELOPMENT. J Physiol. 1964 Sep;173:74–95. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chowdhury T. K. Fabrication of extremely fine glass micropipette electrodes. J Sci Instrum. 1969 Dec;2(12):1087–1090. doi: 10.1088/0022-3735/2/12/319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Close R. I. Dynamic properties of mammalian skeletal muscles. Physiol Rev. 1972 Jan;52(1):129–197. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1972.52.1.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohen S. A., Fischbach G. D. Regulation of muscle acetylcholine sensitivity by muscle activity in cell culture. Science. 1973 Jul 6;181(4094):76–78. doi: 10.1126/science.181.4094.76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Drachman D. B. Trophic functions of the neuron. 3. Mechanisms of neurotrophic interactions. The role of acetylcholine as a neurotropic transmitter. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1974 Mar 22;228(0):160–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1974.tb20508.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Drachman D. B., Witzke F. Trophic regulation of acetylcholine sensitivity of muscle: effect of electrical stimulation. Science. 1972 May 5;176(4034):514–516. doi: 10.1126/science.176.4034.514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dreyer F., Peper K. The spread of acetylcholine sensitivity after denervation of frog skeletal muscle fibers. Pflugers Arch. 1974 May 6;348(4):287–292. doi: 10.1007/BF00589218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. EMMELIN N., MALM L. DEVELOPMENT OF SUPERSENSITIVITY AS DEPENDENT ON THE LENGTH OF DEGENERATING NERVE FIBRES. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1965 Apr;50:142–145. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1965.sp001776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fambrough D. M. Acetylcholine sensitivity of muscle fiber membranes: mechanism of regulation by motoneurons. Science. 1970 Apr 17;168(3929):372–373. doi: 10.1126/science.168.3929.372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fischbach G. D., Robbins N. Changes in contractile properties of disused soleus muscles. J Physiol. 1969 Apr;201(2):305–320. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fischbach G. D., Robbins N. Effect of chronic disuse of rat soleus neuromuscular junctions on postsynaptic membrane. J Neurophysiol. 1971 Jul;34(4):562–569. doi: 10.1152/jn.1971.34.4.562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Frank E., Jansen J. K., Lomo T., Westgaard R. H. The interaction between foreign and original motor nerves innervating the soleus muscle of rats. J Physiol. 1975 Jun;247(3):725–743. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gonzenbach H. R., Waser P. G. Electron microscopic studies of degeneration and regeneration of rat neuromuscular junctions. Brain Res. 1973 Dec 7;63:167–174. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90085-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Harris A. J., Heinemann S., Schubert D., Tarakis H. Trophic interaction between cloned tissue culture lines of nerve and muscle. Nature. 1971 Jun 4;231(5301):296–301. doi: 10.1038/231296a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. JOHNS T. R., THESLEFF S. Effects of motor inactivation on the chemical sensitivity of skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand. 1961 Feb-Mar;51:136–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1961.tb02121.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jansen J. K., Lomo T., Nicolaysen K., Westgaard R. H. Hyperinnervation of skeletal muscle fibers: dependence on muscle activity. Science. 1973 Aug 10;181(4099):559–561. doi: 10.1126/science.181.4099.559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jones R., Vrbová G. Effect of muscle activity on denervation hypersensitivity. J Physiol. 1970 Sep;210(2):144P–145P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jones R., Vrbová G. Two factors responsible for the development of denervation hypersensitivity. J Physiol. 1974 Feb;236(3):517–538. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. KATZ B., MILEDI R. FURTHER OBSERVATIONS ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF ACTYLCHOLINE-REACTIVE SITES IN SKELETAL MUSCLE. J Physiol. 1964 Mar;170:379–388. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. LUCO J. V., EYZAGUIRRE C. Fibrillation and hypersensitivity to ACh in denervated muscle: effect of length of degenerating nerve fibers. J Neurophysiol. 1955 Jan;18(1):65–73. doi: 10.1152/jn.1955.18.1.65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Landmesser L. Pharmacological properties, cholinesterase activity and anatomy of nerve-muscle junctions in vagus-innervated frog sartorius. J Physiol. 1972 Jan;220(1):243–256. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lomo T. Neurotrophic control of colchicine effects on muscle? Nature. 1974 May 31;249(456):473–474. doi: 10.1038/249473a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lomo T., Rosenthal J. Control of ACh sensitivity by muscle activity in the rat. J Physiol. 1972 Mar;221(2):493–513. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lomo T., Westgaard R. H., Dahl H. A. Contractile properties of muscle: control by pattern of muscle activity in the rat. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1974 Aug 27;187(1086):99–103. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1974.0064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. MILEDI R. The acetylcholine sensitivity of frog muscle fibres after complete or partial devervation. J Physiol. 1960 Apr;151:1–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Miledi R., Slater C. R. Electrophysiology and electron-microscopy of rat neuromuscular junctions after nerve degeneration. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1968 Feb 27;169(1016):289–306. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1968.0012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Miledi R., Zelená J. Sensitivity to acetylcholine in rat slow muscle. Nature. 1966 May 21;210(5038):855–856. doi: 10.1038/210855a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Purves D., Sakmann B. The effect of contractile activity on fibrillation and extrajunctional acetylcholine-sensitivity in rat muscle maintained in organ culture. J Physiol. 1974 Feb;237(1):157–182. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Steinbach J. H. Role of muscle activity in nerve-muscle interaction in vitro. Nature. 1974 Mar 1;248(5443):70–71. doi: 10.1038/248070a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Thesleff S. Trophic functions of the neuron. II. Denervation and regulation of muscle. Physiological effects of denervation of muscle. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1974 Mar 22;228(0):89–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1974.tb20504.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Westgaard R. H. Influence of activity on the passive electrical properties of denervated soleus muscle fibres in the rat. J Physiol. 1975 Oct;251(3):683–697. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES