Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1969 Nov;205(2):377–391. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008972

A study of the action of picrotoxin on the inhibitory neuromuscular junction of the crayfish

A Takeuchi, Noriko Takeuchi
PMCID: PMC1348609  PMID: 5357245

Abstract

1. The effect of picrotoxin on the neuromuscular junction of the crayfish (Cambarus clarkii) was investigated. The potential changes were recorded intracellularly and extracellularly with micro-electrodes. The membrane conductance of the muscle fibre was also measured.

2. Picrotoxin depressed the amplitudes of the inhibitory junctional potentials and the potential changes produced by iontophoretically applied γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), but had no appreciable effect on the excitatory junctional potentials and the potential changes produced by L-glutamate.

3. The presynaptic action of GABA and the neural transmitter was depressed by picrotoxin. The presynaptic action of β-guanidinopropionic acid was also depressed by picrotoxin.

4. The increase in the membrane conductance produced by the addition of GABA in the bath fluid was depressed by picrotoxin. The dose—response relation showed that picrotoxin depressed the conductance increase produced by GABA in a non-competitive manner. The action of picrotoxin on the conductance increase produced by GABA was more effective in low Cl- solution.

5. The analysis of the dose—response curves showed that the action of picrotoxin was well expressed by the Michaelis—Menten equation, but the slope of the dose—response curve of GABA was steeper than this relation. It is proposed that the conductance of the junctional membrane was increased by the combination of two molecules of GABA with a receptor, and the attachment of one molecule of picrotoxin to a specific site depressed the conductance increase.

Full text

PDF
377

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. DUDEL J., KUFFLER S. W. Presynaptic inhibition at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1961 Mar;155:543–562. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ECCLES J. C., SCHMIDT R., WILLIS W. D. PHARMACOLOGICAL STUDIES ON PRESYNAPTIC INHIBITION. J Physiol. 1963 Oct;168:500–530. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. ELLIOTT K. A., FLOREY E. Factor I--inhibitory factor from brain; assay; conditions in brain; simulating and antagonizing substances. J Neurochem. 1956 Dec;1(2):181–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1956.tb12071.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GRUNDFEST H., REUBEN J. P., RICKLES W. H., Jr The electrophysiology and pharmacology of lobster neuromuscular synapses. J Gen Physiol. 1959 Jul 20;42(6):1301–1323. doi: 10.1085/jgp.42.6.1301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Krnjević K., Schwartz S. The action of gamma-aminobutyric acid on cortical neurones. Exp Brain Res. 1967;3(4):320–336. doi: 10.1007/BF00237558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MARTIN A. R. A further study of the statistical composition on the end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1955 Oct 28;130(1):114–122. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Otsuka M., Iversen L. L., Hall Z. W., Kravitz E. A. Release of gamma-aminobutyric acid from inhibitory nerves of lobster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966 Oct;56(4):1110–1115. doi: 10.1073/pnas.56.4.1110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. ROBBINS J. The excitation and inhibition of crustacean muscle by amino acids. J Physiol. 1959 Oct;148:39–50. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. ROBBINS J., VAN DER KLOOT W. G. The effect of picrotoxin on peripheral inhibition in the crayfish. J Physiol. 1958 Oct 31;143(3):541–552. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. TAKEUCHI A., TAKEUCHI N. LOCALIZED ACTION OF GAMMA-AMINOBUTYRIC ACID ON THE CRAYFISH MUSCLE. J Physiol. 1965 Mar;177:225–238. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. TAKEUCHI A., TAKEUCHI N. THE EFFECT ON CRAYFISH MUSCLE OF IONTOPHORETICALLY APPLIED GLUTAMATE. J Physiol. 1964 Mar;170:296–317. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Takeuchi A., Takeuchi N. Anion permeability of the inhibitory post-synaptic membrane of the crayfish neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1967 Aug;191(3):575–590. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. USHERWOOD P. N., GRUNDFEST H. PERIPHERAL INHIBITION IN SKELETAL MUSCLE OF INSECTS. J Neurophysiol. 1965 May;28:497–518. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.3.497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. VAN DER KLOOT W. G., ROBBINS J. The effects of gamma-aminobutyric acid and picrotoxin on the junctional potential and the contraction of crayfish muscle. Experientia. 1959 Jan 15;15(1):35–36. doi: 10.1007/BF02157093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES