Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1970 Mar;207(1):51–61. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009047

Some effects of nerve stimulation and hemicholinium on quantal transmitter release at the mammalian neuromuscular junction

S F Jones, Suthiwan Kwanbunbumpen
PMCID: PMC1348691  PMID: 4323273

Abstract

1. Rat phrenic nerve—diaphragm preparations have been used to assess some effects of prolonged nerve stimulation on transmitter release.

2. The amplitude of the end-plate potentials evoked by prolonged repetitive nerve stimulation fell gradually during stimulation. Most of this fall was due to a reduction in the number of transmitter quanta released by each nerve impulse; however there was also a small reduction in the muscle cell depolarization produced by each quantum of transmitter.

3. Repetitive nerve stimulation also produced a small reduction in the amplitude of the miniature end-plate potentials. Recovery of amplitude occurred within about 7-8 min of ceasing stimulation.

4. A much greater reduction in miniature end-plate potential amplitude accompanied prolonged nerve stimulation if hemicholinium was present in the bathing solution.

5. Estimates of the `readily available transmitter' (Elmqvist & Quastel, 1965b) were made at intervals following prolonged nerve stimulation. Readily available transmitter was reduced, and recovered over approximately 15 min.

6. The relationship of these changes to the changes in nerve terminal synaptic vesicle numbers and volumes induced by similar prolonged nerve stimulation (Jones & Kwanbunbumpen, 1970) is discussed.

Full text

PDF
51

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Biophysical aspects of neuro-muscular transmission. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 1956;6:121–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Local activity at a depolarized nerve-muscle junction. J Physiol. 1955 May 27;128(2):396–411. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. The effect of magnesium on the activity of motor nerve endings. J Physiol. 1954 Jun 28;124(3):553–559. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. ELMQVIST D., QUASTEL D. M. PRESYNAPTIC ACTION OF HEMICHOLINIUM AT THE NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTION. J Physiol. 1965 Apr;177:463–482. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Elmqvist D., Quastel D. M. A quantitative study of end-plate potentials in isolated human muscle. J Physiol. 1965 Jun;178(3):505–529. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HUBBARD J. I. REPETITIVE STIMULATION AT THE MAMMALIAN NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTION, AND THE MOBILIZATION OF TRANSMITTER. J Physiol. 1963 Dec;169:641–662. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hubbard J. I., Jones S. F., Landau E. M. An examination of the effects of osmotic pressure changes upon transmitter release from mammalian motor nerve terminals. J Physiol. 1968 Aug;197(3):639–657. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hubbard J. I., Kwanbunbumpen S. Evidence for the vesicle hypothesis. J Physiol. 1968 Feb;194(2):407–420. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jones S. F., Kwanbunbumpen S. The effects of nerve stimulation and hemicholinium on synaptic vesicles at the mammalian euromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1970 Mar;207(1):31–50. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. LILEY A. W., NORTH K. A. An electrical investigation of effects of repetitive stimulation on mammalian neuromuscular junction. J Neurophysiol. 1953 Sep;16(5):509–527. doi: 10.1152/jn.1953.16.5.509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Landau E. M., Kwanbunbumpen S. Morphology of motor nerve terminals subjected to polarizing currents. Nature. 1969 Jan 18;221(5177):271–272. doi: 10.1038/221271a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MARTIN A. R. A further study of the statistical composition on the end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1955 Oct 28;130(1):114–122. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. OTSUKA M., ENDO M., NONOMURA Y. Presynaptic nature of neuromuscular depression. Jpn J Physiol. 1962 Dec 15;12:573–584. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.12.573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. ROBERTSON J. D. The ultrastructure of a reptilian myoneural junction. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1956 Jul 25;2(4):381–394. doi: 10.1083/jcb.2.4.381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. TAKEUCHI A., TAKEUCHI N. On the permeability of end-plate membrane during the action of transmitter. J Physiol. 1960 Nov;154:52–67. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES