Abstract
NK cells are promising candidates for adoptive cell therapy; however, their proliferative capacity and functional persistence may be limited. Genetic modification with hTERT enhances their proliferative potential, while co-expression of the iCASP9 suicide gene provides a safety mechanism based on late-stage apoptosis induction by chemical dimerizer (CID). Whether hTERT overexpression interferes with iCasp9-mediated cell death remains unclear, and the non-canonical functions of telomerase in this context are poorly understood. This study served a dual purpose: to assess the efficacy of the iCasp9 “suicide switch” in NK cells, and to investigate a non-canonical role of telomerase in NK cell-mediated evasion from cell death. Here, we demonstrate that hTERT-modified NK cells exhibit significant resistance to CID-induced apoptosis, an effect independent of telomerase catalytic activity, as confirmed using a dominant-negative hTERT (DN-hTERT) mutant. Transcriptomic profiling revealed that both CID-resistant iCasp9-NK cells and hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells share common gene expression signatures: upregulation of cell cycle-associated genes and downregulation of splicing-related factors, including HNRNPH1 and SNRPD3, accompanied by shared patterns of alternative splicing. Among apoptosis-related transcripts, BIRC3, which encodes c-IAP-2, a direct inhibitor of caspase 9, was consistently elevated in both “resistant” and “survived” NK cells. However, shRNA-mediated knockdown of BIRC3 failed to restore sensitivity to CID, indicating that BIRC3 upregulation is not the unique determinant of resistance and suggesting involvement of additional compensatory pathways. Overall, our findings define specific transcriptional signatures associated with evasion of NK cells from iCasp9-mediated apoptosis, implying the contribution of cell cycle progression, enhanced anti-apoptotic signaling, and alterations in splicing regulation, and highlighting the complex role of non-canonical hTERT functions in these adaptations. In the rational design of next-generation gene-modified NK cell therapies with improved safety and persistence, the uncovered insights should be considered.
Subject terms: Transcriptional regulatory elements, Immunotherapy, RNA splicing, Gene regulation, Gene regulation in immune cells
Introduction
NK cells are a promising platform for cancer immunotherapy due to their ability to eliminate malignant cells without prior sensitization. While allogeneic application is possible [1], obtaining therapeutic numbers of cells remains challenging [2–4]. Genetic modification to enforce sustained expression of the catalytic subunit of human telomerase (hTERT) extends NK cell replicative capacity, preserves effector function, and enhances persistence in vitro and in vivo [5–7]. Beyond telomere maintenance [8–10], hTERT exerts non-canonical functions affecting transcription [11, 12], splicing, mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum stress responses [13–15], intracellular signaling [16, 17], and has been associated with enhanced cell survival [18, 19]. Although hTERT is typically downregulated in resting lymphocytes, it can be timely induced following cytokine stimulation or target recognition [20–22].
Enhanced function of engineered cells may increase risks of unintended toxicity [23] and malignant transformation, as reported for mesenchymal and induced pluripotent stem cells [24]. The inducible caspase-9 (iCasp9) suicide switch provides a clinically validated elimination mechanism [25–27]. Upon exposure to a chemical inducer of dimerization (CID), iCasp9 rapidly activates apoptosis [28–30]. However, incomplete elimination has been observed, notably in NK cells [31–33], potentially compromising safety. Since hTERT enhances pro-survival pathways, it may attenuate iCasp9-mediated apoptosis by elevating Bcl-2 [32] and Bcl‑XL expression in mature NK cells [34]. Here, we examined whether hTERT overexpression impairs iCasp9-mediated apoptosis in primary human NK cells. Co-expressing hTERT and iCasp9, we assessed CID-induced elimination and identified determinants of incomplete cell death. Integrative analyses revealed convergent pro-survival signatures shared between CID-resistant iCasp9-NK cells and hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells. Our findings demonstrate that hTERT confers resistance to iCasp9-mediated apoptosis independently of telomerase activity, uncovering a non-canonical pro-survival function that undermines this safety switch.
Results
hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells are more resistant to apoptosis induction upon CID treatment compared to iCasp9-NK cells
NK cells retrovirally modified for stable expression of hTERT and/or iCasp9 were tested for the effectiveness of iCasp9-mediated cell elimination. Even though hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells and iCasp9-NK cells demonstrated comparable levels of the iCASP9 transgene expression, hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells were more resistant to apoptosis upon 10 nM or 100 nM CID treatment for 24 h (less than 19%, mean 10%) in comparison with iCasp9-NK cells (up to 56%, mean 28.6%) (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 2).
Fig. 1. Evaluation of the effectiveness of cell death induction by iCasp9 suicide construct in NK cells transduced with iCASP9, hTERT and DN-hTERT genes.
a Reduction in the proportion of live NK cells after treatment with 10 nM and 100 nM CID for 24 h, normalized on the percentage of live NK cells in the control group incubated in the presence of DMSO, the CID solvent. Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used to compare untransduced NK cells, n = 5; hTERT-NK cells, n = 5; iCasp9-NK cells, n = 14; hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells n = 11; DN-hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells, n = 8. Means +/- SEM. b Representative plots of NK cells stained with AnnexinV-PE and SYTOX-AADvanced after 24 h of CID treatment.
hTERT overexpression may counteract cell death induction by its non-canonical functions [35, 36]. DN-hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells, as well as hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells, showed resistance to cell death induction upon 10 nM or 100 nM CID treatment (Fig. 1).
NK cells with different types of transgenes (hTERT, hTERT + iCASP9, iCASP9) regulate apoptotic signaling differently
mRNA levels of: (1) hTERT and iCASP9 transgenes, (2) EOMES and TBX21 encoding the Eomes and T-bet transcription factors, (3) DIABLO, BAX, and BAD pro-apoptotic genes, (4) BIRC5, MCL1, BCL2 and BCL2L1 pro-survival genes were analyzed in NK cells via qPCR. However, no statistical differences were observed between four groups of NK cells: untransduced, hTERT-NK cells, hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells and iCasp9-NK cells (Supplementary Fig. 2). As transgene levels and apoptotic gene expression levels can be dependent on each other, we searched for associations between pro-survival and pro-apoptotic genes by correlational analysis. (Fig. 2). Untransduced NK cells formed a cluster of positively associated genes, including DIABLO, EOMES, BIRC5, BAX, and MCL1 (associated with BAX and BIRC5). This cluster likely describes the life-death balance of pro-survival and pro-apoptotic factors determined by environmental conditions, including the availability of cytokines and growth factors (Fig. 2a). In hTERT-NK cells, correlational analysis revealed a positive relationship between BCL2 and BAX mRNA levels, while hTERT showed a tendency to negatively correlate with DIABLO (Fig. 2b). Within iCasp9-NK cells, the gene cluster observed in untransduced NK cells was partially preserved and included EOMES, BIRC5, BAD and BCL2. In addition, iCASP9 was positively associated with DIABLO, which in turn positively correlated with TBX21. We also noticed a strong positive correlation for hTERT and BCL2L1, and separately for BCL2 correlated with MCL1 (Fig. 2c). Within hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells, hTERT and iCASP9 showed mutual influence, revealing two clusters: one included iCASP9, BAD, BAX, BCL2, and MCL1; the second included DIABLO, EOMES, BCL2L1, BIRC5, and TBX21 with a tendency for positive association with hTERT (Fig. 2d).
Fig. 2. Interrelations of the expression levels of BAD, BAX, DIABLO, BCL2, BCL2L1 (Bcl-XL), MCL1, BIRC5 apoptotic genes, hTERT and iCASP9 transgenes and EOMES and TBX21 genes encoding transcriptional factors Eomes and T-bet in NK cells.
The upper right corner of each plot represents clustered correlation matrices, and the lower left corner stands for a graphic representation of data (abs(r)>0.3). Correlations of gene expression levels are shown for: a untransduced NK cell, n = 10; b hTERT-NK cells, n = 7; c iCasp9-NK cells, n = 9; d hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells, n = 7. Spearman’s correlation test. P-value > 0.05 is signed by a cross on the correlation plot.
Thus, introduction of iCASP9 generally increased pro-apoptotic gene expression, such as DIABLO or BAD, whereas hTERT expression rose simultaneously with pro-survival factors expression (BCL2L1 and BIRC5) and negatively correlated with DIABLO. For hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells, we noticed the most evident separation of transcript levels of studied genes into two clusters, indicating an independent effect of each of the transgenes in tuning NK cell survival.
(CID)-iCasp9-NK cells and hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells had altered transcriptional profiles compared to iCasp9-NK cells, characterized by activation of pro-survival genes
We investigated transgene-related transcriptomic changes in NK cells using RNAseq. Additional characteristics of NK cells that underwent RNAseq analysis are presented in Supplementary Fig. 3. We studied 3 sets of modified NK cells: hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells, iCasp9-NK cells and (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells (iCasp9-NK cells survived after 24 h 100 nM CID exposure) to reveal factors providing enhanced resistance toward iCasp9-induced apoptosis.
Comparison of (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells with iCasp9-NK cells revealed 402 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (p-adj<0.05 and abs(Log2FC)>0.58), of which 251 DEGs were upregulated (upDEGs) and 151 DEGs were downregulated (downDEGs) (Fig. 3a, b). ZC3HC1, CDC25A, CCNE2, ESCO2 associated with cell division were among the most significantly upregulated genes. We also observed downregulation of IFIT3, whose protein product protects from mitochondria-mediated apoptosis [37]. ZNF550, encoding the transcription factor with predicted DNA-binding activity, was also significantly elevated, whereas FOSB was downregulated. Among apoptosis-associated factors, BIRC3 and FADD were upregulated, whereas NAIP, FOS, CTSK, iCASP9, NFKBIA and DDIT3 were downregulated. Thus, “survived” (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells showed a large number of DEGs in intracellular signaling pathways capable of compensating the destructive effects of iCasp9 (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 4).
Fig. 3. Transcriptional profiles of three groups of comparison.
Enhanced volcano plot for comparisons: a “survived” iCasp9-NK cells that underwent incubation with 100 nM CID for 24 h compared vs “susceptible” iCasp9-NK cells, c “resistant” hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells vs “susceptible” iCasp9-NK cells. P-adj<0.05 and abs(Log2FC)>0.58. b The table representing Top 10 (5 upDEGs and 5 downDEGs) for both comparisons presented on the volcano plot. d The representation of RNA seq data for iCasp9-NK cells, iCasp9-hTERT-NK cells and “survived” iCasp9-NK cells that underwent incubation with 100 nM CID for 24 h. DEGs (p-adj<0.05 and abs(Log2FC)>0.58). Dotplot of GeneOntology gene set enrichment analysis, where the y-axis represents GO molecular pathways, namely, Biological Processes (BP). The greater the size of a circle, the greater the number of genes involved in a pathway. The circles are colored based on p-adjusted values.
When comparing hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells and iCasp9-NK cells, we determined 63 upDEGs and 13 downDEGs (Fig. 3b, c). Among upDEGs, we confirmed the overexpression of TERT and observed several genes associated with the cell cycle: NCAPH, TTK, and CDCA5. The IFNG transcripts were also accumulated within hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells. EIF3L, encoding a factor linked to translation initiation, was upregulated. Among downDEGs, we observed HNRNPH1 and SNRPD3 encoding proteins participating in RNA splicing. DNAJB14, encoding a protein involved in chaperone protein refolding, was downregulated in hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 5). Therefore, hTERT overexpression is associated with upregulation of cell cycle-promoting genes, transcription activity and modulation of splicing within NK cells.
We conducted parallel comparisons of transcriptomic data of (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells vs iCasp9-NK cells and hTERT-iCasp-NK cells vs iCasp9-NK cells. (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells upregulated a multitude of genes involved in DNA binding and DNA replication. For hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells, a large number of DEGs corresponded to pathways regulating cell cycle and cell division. Altogether, most of the DEGs observed in both groups refer to intranuclei protein-encoding transcripts (Fig. 3d). Using Gene Ontology gene set enrichment analysis we found significant suppression of cell developmental programs and cell death regulation pathways in (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells and activation of pathways involved in cell cycle regulation in hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells. So, (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells and hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells were characterized by differently directed transcriptomic changes relative to iCasp9-NK cells (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Figs. 6, 7).
We precisely studied the transcript levels of genes linked to apoptotic pathways in these three cell types. (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells had altered expression levels of both pro-survival and pro-apoptotic genes compared to iCasp9-NK cells. Among cell death-associated genes, TNF receptor signaling genes and genes encoding BIM (BCL2L11), caspases 3, 2, and 10 were upregulated, while caspase 9 showed a reduced expression level. Among pro-survival genes, the NFKB1 gene and its target BIRC3 and TRAF2 were upregulated (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 8). In the comparison of hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells vs iCasp9-NK cells, BIRC3 was also enhanced. We also verified the levels of BIRC3 transcripts in NK cells by qPCR. BIRC3 expression was elevated in NK cells with hTERT overexpression (hTERT- and hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells) compared with untransduced and iCasp9-modified NK cells (Fig. 4b). Since iCasp9 acts at late stages of apoptosis, the upregulation of BIRC3 (encoding c-IAP2) can mitigate caspase 9-induced apoptosis and may contribute to the NK cell resistance to iCasp9-mediated cell death. We incorporated the U6-shBIRC3-cPPT sequence into existing vectors to reduce BIRC3 transcript levels in modified NK cells. The shBIRC3-modified iCasp9-, hTERT-iCasp9-, and DN-hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells were treated with CID and evaluated for cell death induction. We did not detect any significant changes in the proportions of dead cells between the shBIRC3-modified cells and corresponding controls (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 9). These results suggest that a variety of hTERT non-canonical functions modulate cell survival by protecting NK cells in an indirect manner.
Fig. 4. The investigation of iCasp9-mediated cell death induction in NK cells with BIRC3 knockdown.
a Evaluation of the effectiveness of iCasp9-mediated cell death in NK cells modified with hTERT, DN-hTERT, iCASP9 genes and shBIRC3 construct. Using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database, normalized counts of genes corresponding to the apoptosis pathway “Hsa04210” with p-adj<0.05 from (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells vs iCasp9-NK cells comparison were extracted for all NK cell populations and plotted on a heatmap. Row Z-score normalized data is presented. Red stands for transcripts with increased expression and blue for decreased expression. b Relative mRNA expression of BIRC3 measured by qPCR in untransduced NK cells and transduced with hTERT, hTERT + iCASP9 and iCASP9. Mann-Whitney test for merged data from untransduced + iCasp9-NK cells (n = 19), compared to hTERT-NK cells + hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells (n = 12). The groups were defined regarding hTERT expression within cells. Untransduced and iCasp9-NK cells are characterised with low hTERT expression compared to hTERT-overexpressing hTERT-NK cells and hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells. Median +/- SEM. c Decrease in the proportion of live NK cells after 10 nM and 100 nM CID treatment for 24 h normalized on the counts and percentage of live NK cells in the control group incubated in the presence of DMSO, CID solvent. Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. 10 populations of transduced cells from 8 donors (iCasp9-NK cells, n = 9; hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells, n = 5; DN-hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells, n = 9; iCasp9-shBIRC3-NK cells, n = 8; hTERT-iCasp9-shBIRC3-NK cells, n = 3; DN-hTERT-iCasp9-shBIRC3-NK cells, n = 6). Mean +/- SEM.
hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells and CID-treated iCasp9-NK cells share common transcriptomic patterns
We investigated common signatures among (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells and hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells via RNAseq analysis. Pathways acting in a similar way (activation or downregulation) were extracted from the data obtained from (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells vs iCasp9-NK cells and hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells vs iCasp9-NK cells comparisons.
We compared the obtained DEGs using a Venn diagram. 1096 genes with p-adj<0.05 from (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells vs iCasp9-NK cells comparison were opposed to 266 genes with p-adj<0.05 from comparison hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells vs iCasp9-NK cells. 126 genes were shared by NK cells susceptible to iCasp9-mediated apoptosis induction. We determined 17 genes upregulated in both comparisons (Fig. 5a, c) and 2 common downDEGs that stand for RNA processing in ribonucleoprotein particles (Fig. 5b, c). The upregulated common genes are described to be involved in biological processes such as cell division, immunologic processes, and cell migration; and their products possess serine-threonine kinase, histone-modifying and histone kinase, or protein serine kinase activities (Supplementary Fig. 10). 126 common genes (p-adj<0.05) from the Venn diagram were subjected to analysis (Fig. 5e and Supplementary Fig. 10), ranked on corresponding Log2FC levels from (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells vs iCasp9-NK cells comparison (Fig. 5e and Supplementary Fig. 10). Common pathways related to cell migration and calcium homeostasis were suppressed, whereas pathways associated with cell cycle progression were enhanced (Fig. 5d, e).
Fig. 5. The representation of RNA seq data of “resistant” iCasp9-hTERT-NK cells and “survived” iCasp9-NK cells that underwent incubation with 100 nM CID for 24 h, compared to “susceptible” iCasp9-NK cells.
DEGs (p-adj<0.05 and abs(Log2FC)>0.58) where upDEGs (p-adj<0.05 and Log2FC > 0.58) and downDEGs (p-adj<0.05 and Log2FC < 0.58). Two-circle Venn diagrams for common a upDEGs and b downDEGs. c Normalized counts for common upDEGs and downDEGS were extracted for all NK cell populations and plotted on a heatmap. Row Z-score normalized data is presented. Red stands for transcripts with increased expression and blue – for decreased expression. d GSEA comparison dotplot of GeneOntology gene set enrichment analysis of GO molecular pathways, namely, Biological Processes (BP). For (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells vs iCasp9-NK cells comparison and for hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells vs iCasp9-NK cells comparison Top 10 common pathways of both comparisons with NES > 0.9 percentile. Pathways with negative NES are blue and with positive NES are yellow. The greater the size of a circle, the greater significance. e The representation of RNA seq data of “resistant” iCasp9-hTERT-NK cells and “survived” iCasp9-NK cells that underwent incubation with 100 nM CID for 24 h compared vs “susceptible” iCasp9-NK cells. Common 126 DE genes with p-adj<0.05 from both comparisons were analyzed using gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and GeneOntology gene set enrichment analysis (gseGO). The corresponding Log2FC values were taken from “survived” (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells vs “susceptible” iCasp9-NK cells. gseGO represents GO molecular pathways, namely, Biological Processes (BP). The greater the size of a circle, the greater the number of genes involved in a pathway. The circles are colored based on p-adjusted values. On the X-axis, suppressed and activated pathways are shown. Bar plots represent normalized enrichment scores (NES) of GSEA for f Hallmark pathways, g Reactome pathways, h transcription factor targets (TFT). For plots (f, g, h) blue lines crop significantly changed pathways in accordance with p-adj.
Hallmark pathways showed enrichment in E2F target genes that are responsible for cell cycle regulation and involved in DNA replication (Fig. 5f and supplementary Fig. 11). Similar results were observed when examining Reactome pathways, where an increase in “cell cycle mitotic” was revealed (Fig. 5g and Supplementary Fig. 11). The “Hallmark TNFa signaling via NFkB” pathway along with “Reactome signaling via NTRKS”, “Reactome nuclear events kinase and transcription factor activation”, and “Reactome signaling by receptor tyrosine kinase” were significantly reduced (Fig. 5f, g). We also identified involvement of a number of transcription factors by their upregulated or downregulated target genes. Thus, the activation of genes involved in transcriptional regulation, such as HSD17D8, ASH1L, BARX2, FOXD2, ZNF350 and CEBPZ, and the suppression of TATAAA TATA 01 may orchestrate the NK cell intrinsic processes responsible for their survival (Fig. 5h and Supplementary Fig. 12).
NK cells resistant to CID-mediated apoptosis induction showed upregulation of cell cycle-promoting genes
“Survived” (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells upregulated cell cycle genes throughout the whole cell cycle, while hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells were more precisely regulated in the G2 stage. Regarding E2F targets, a vast majority of genes changed their expression in the same direction compared to (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells and hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells. However, genes such as LRB, LUC7L3, NUP153, CDKN1B, MYC and ING3, which are involved in the regulation of cell proliferation and nuclear processes, changed their mRNA expression differently in hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells and iCasp9-NK cells compared to (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6. The representation of transcriptomic changes of cell cycle related genes for “resistant” hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells and “survived” iCasp9-NK cells that underwent incubation with 100 nM CID for 24 h compared with “susceptible” iCasp9-NK cells.
a Using Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database normalized counts of genes corresponding to cell cycle pathway “Hsa04110” with p-adj<0.05 from (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells vs iCasp9-NK cells comparison were extracted for all NK cell populations and plotted on a heatmap. Row Z-score normalized data is presented. Red stands for transcripts with increased transcripts and blue – for decreased expression. b KEGG pathview plot for cell cycle pathway “Hsa04110” for “survived” (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells vs “susceptible” iCasp9-NK cells. c KEGG pathview plot for cell cycle pathway “Hsa04110” for“resistant” iCasp9-hTERT-NK cells vs “susceptible” iCasp9-NK cells.
“Survived” and “resistant” NK cells share several alternatively spliced transcripts
To investigate splicing-related changes that can mediate cell survival, we applied analysis of splicing variants in 3 groups of comparison: (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells vs iCasp9-NK cells, hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells vs iCasp9-NK cells and hTERT-NK cells vs iCasp9-NK cells. We also applied hTERT-NK cells vs iCasp9-NK cells comparison to highlight the role of hTERT overexpression in splicing changes. For all three comparison groups, we defined 5 common alternatively spliced transcripts (SUPT4H1, RFC3, SRSF3, TAPBPL, RPN2) compared to iCasp9-NK cells, which may be attributed to the increased TERT levels. The products of these genes are primarily involved in fundamental processes of gene expression and cellular metabolism. Next, we observed 12 transcripts (PSMF1, CEBPB, ERCC5, RBM8A, VPS18, PLAAT4, ZNF706, HDHD3, AKAP11, NCK2, MED24, AARS1) with splicing changes common among “survived” and “resistant” NK cells and are associated with a lower tendency for these cells to undergo apoptosis (Fig. 7 and Supplementary Fig. 13). Collectively, they play a key role in maintaining cellular homeostasis, stress response, and genome integrity. We also observed NMD-sensitive (Nonsense Mediated Decay) isoforms that are susceptible to degradation (Fig. 7 and Supplementary Fig. 13). Thus, we specified a profile of differently expressed splicing isoforms, the balance of which determines the expression levels of functional proteins.
Fig. 7. The alternatively spliced transcripts were evaluated for NK cell populations of “resistant” hTERT-overexpressing hTERT-NK cells, hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells and “survived” iCasp9-NK cells that underwent incubation with 100 nM CID for 24 h compared vs “susceptible” iCasp9-NK cells.
a The common splicing events were analyzed using Venn diagrams. b Representative plots for genes listed in red are presented in the counter boxes of the Venn diagram. Upper graphs represent the most abundant isoforms detected, with some highlighted domains. The lower line shows from left to right: Gene expression, Isoform expression and Isoform usage. Gray bars stand for (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells and hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells and black bars reflect iCasp9-NK cells. The analysis was performed on the Galaxy platform following the manual https://training.galaxyproject.org/training-material/topics/transcriptomics/tutorials/differential-isoform-expression/tutorial.html.
Discussion
Although NK cells are promising for immunotherapy, expanding them without functional loss remains difficult. We generated hTERT-overexpressing NK cells with an iCasp9 suicide switch, but hTERT-iCasp9 cells showed incomplete CID-induced apoptosis. Similar incomplete elimination was reported in iCasp9-HeLa cells [31]. Despite 10 nM CID being sufficient to trigger iCasp9 cell death [32], even 100 nM CID failed to fully eliminate hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells. Catalytically inactive DN-hTERT conferred similar resistance, indicating a telomere-independent, non-canonical TERT effect [38, 39].
To elucidate the reasons for the partial resistance of hTERT-iCasp9-cells to apoptosis, we studied associations of various pro- and anti-apoptotic factors in cells transduced with iCASP9 and/or hTERT genes. Notably, in hTERT‑iCasp9‑NK cells, the level of hTERT correlated positively with BCL2L1 (Bcl‑XL), BIRC5 (survivin), and EOMES, whereas iCasp9 correlated positively with BAX, BAD, and DIABLO. DIABLO is a direct p53 target and, together with BAD, participates in cellular stress responses [40, 41]. These correlation patterns suggest that hTERT‑iCasp9‑NK and iCasp9‑NK cells experienced elevated cellular stress compared to untransduced or hTERT‑NK cells.
Both “resistant” and “survived” cells exhibited elevated BIRC3 (c‑IAP2), but not BIRC4 or BIRC5 transcripts, confirmed by RNAseq and qPCR. c‑IAP2 is a direct caspase‑9 inhibitor [42, 43] and an NF‑κB/Rel-responsive gene; its upregulation may reflect pro‑survival NF‑κB pathway activation [44]. In agreement with Mishima et al. [45], we observed that hTERT upregulation induced TNF-NFκB signaling and anti-apoptotic genes. However, shRNA-mediated BIRC3 knockdown failed to restore CID sensitivity, suggesting redundant or parallel pathways in primary NK cells compensate for BIRC3 loss via BIRC4- and BIRC5-independent mechanisms. “Survived” cells uniquely suppressed multiple developmental programs, possibly reflecting selection for cells with enhanced survival capabilities. Moreover, since both catalytically active hTERT and inactive DN‑hTERT conferred similar resistance, this effect is attributable to a non‑canonical function of TERT.
One of telomerase's non-canonical functions is the ability to modulate transcription activity [12, 46, 47]. This TERT function is highlighted by alterations in several pathways in both “survived” (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells and “resistant” hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells, linked to cell cycle progression and DNA replication (upregulated), and homeostasis and migration (downregulated). STMN1 activates the PI3K/Akt pathway to suppress apoptosis, whereas its knockdown elevates caspase‑3 levels and susceptibility to apoptosis [48]; PIK3R3 silencing reduces Akt phosphorylation and thus chemoresistance in sarcoma stem‑like cells [49]. Importantly, Akt directly phosphorylates pro‑caspase‑9 at Ser196, inhibiting its protease activity, and a Ser196Ala mutation renders caspase‑9 resistant to Akt‑mediated suppression [50]. Our observation of increased PIK3R3 and STMN1 suggests that signaling through PI3K/Akt may dampen iCasp9 effector function. Introducing a mutation at the corresponding Ser196Ala site of caspase 9 in the iCasp9 construct might potentially restore CID sensitivity in hTERT‑overexpressing therapeutic NK cells.
According to the transcription target database, we noted enrichment in genes associated with the ASH1L, BARX2, FOXD2, ZNF350, and CEBPZ transcription factors and TATA-box-associated factors linked to apoptosis and proliferation among both “survived” and “resistant’ NK cells. ASH1L, a histone methyltransferase maintaining active chromatin, suppresses apoptosis via downregulation of CASP3 and BAX; its knockdown increases apoptotic rates [51]. FOXD2 facilitates MLL4-dependent enhancer reprogramming via chromatin remodeling and modulates p53-responsive gene expression [52]. BARX2-related genes are implicated in immune cell function and tissue development [53]. CEBPZ promotes S-phase entry by suppressing C/EBPα and enhancing Pol II recruitment [54, 55]. ZNF350 (ZBRK1) functions within BRCA1-regulated transcriptional repression complexes controlling cell cycle checkpoints [56]. We previously reported that hTERT‑modified NK cells are enriched in the T‑BET⁺ subset, whereas iCasp9‑modified cells contain a larger EOMES⁺ fraction [57]. EOMES is linked to hTERT via the β‑catenin/Wnt pathway and can regulate apoptosis‑related genes; T‑bet modulates cell cycle through mTORC signaling [12, 34, 58]. Thus, positive cross‑regulation between EOMES and TBX21 may contribute to the attenuated apoptosis observed in iCasp9‑expressing NK cells upon CID challenge. Collectively, these data demonstrate overlapping transcriptional programs for “survived” and “resistant” NK cells, favoring proliferation and survival and potentially influenced by chromatin-remodeling pathways.
Another common feature for these cells was downregulation of HNRNPH1 and SNRPD3, encoding core splicing regulators whose knockdown impairs proliferation and induces cell death [59–61]. We identified a set of transcripts coherently spliced in “survived”, “resistant”, and hTERT‑NK cells compared to “susceptible” iCasp9‑NK control: SUPT4H1, RFC3, SRSF3, TAPBPL, and RPN2. SRSF3 promotes growth and DNA repair [62–64]. SUPT4H1 regulates transcription activity by tuning Pol II [65]. RFC3 is a replication factor C subunit essential for DNA replication [66] that regulates the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway [64]. The knockdown of RFC3 halts cell viability and proliferation [66]. RPN2 maintains ER homeostasis and correlates with drug resistance [67]. TAPBPL influences antigen presentation [68]. The appearance of identical isoforms in both hTERT‑NK cells and CID‑selected survivors implicates hTERT in orchestrating a pro‑survival splicing programme independent of its catalytic activity.
A broader set of alternatively spliced genes, including PSMF1 (PI31), CEBPB, ERCC5, RBM8A, VPS18, and PLAAT4, was common to “survived” (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells and “resistant” hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells compared against “susceptible” iCasp9-NK cells. Overall, transcripts of RBM8A [69], NCK2 [70], CEBPB [71] are known to encode prosurvival factors. NCK2 adaptor proteins enhance proliferation [70]. For some transcripts, namely PLAAT4, the enrichment in NMD-sensitive isoform was shown, which may reflect a regulative mechanism of fine-tuning of intracellular protein concentrations [72]. These differences may display compensatory responses to apoptotic pressure caused by basal spontaneous iCasp9 dimerization rather than by direct hTERT activity. Still, we cannot exclude the possible role of telomerase in these splicing changes, since iCasp9-NK cells might obtain nonzero levels of endogenous telomerase activity.
While our data align with reports linking PI3K/Akt signaling to caspase-9 inhibition and splicing dysregulation to survival, several findings diverged from expectations. shRNA-mediated BIRC3 knockdown failed to restore CID sensitivity. SNRPD3 downregulation assumes a regulatory axis possibly involving hTERT itself or upstream stress signaling. Telomerase itself is regulated by splicing, and it is possible that the effects we observe are part of a compensatory effect on telomerase overexpression. Finally, our observation that both hTERT- and DN‑hTERT confer equivalent resistance, together with the correlation and splicing data, provides compelling evidence that hTERT modulates NK cell survival through non‑canonical, transcription‑related and splicing‑related mechanisms independent of telomere elongation.
In summary, CID-survived iCasp9-NK cells and hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells share extensive transcriptional and splicing signatures centered on cell cycle activation, PI3K/Akt signaling, and altered DNA/RNA processing. Some of these changes are consistent with known hTERT non-canonical functions. Others likely represent convergent adaptations to apoptotic stress. These findings highlight the complexity of apoptosis regulation in gene-modified NK cells and underscore the need to consider chromatin remodeling, kinase-mediated post-translational modulation and splicing rewiring when designing suicide switch-equipped cellular therapies.
Methods
Cell lines
K562-mbIL21 cells (expressing mbIL-21, CD64, CD86, CD137L, and CD19 fragment) [21] were provided by Dr. Dean Lee (MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA). Raji was obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). Both cell lines were cultured in RPMI-1640 complete medium (PanEco, Russia) with 10% FCS (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA), 2mM L-glutamine (PanEco), and 2 mM antibiotic‑antimycotic (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Phoenix Ampho (HEK293‑derived; ATCC) cells were maintained in DMEM complete medium (PanEco) with 10% FCS, 2mM L-glutamine, 2 mM sodium pyruvate (PanEco), and 2 mM antibiotic‑antimycotic.
NK cells
Peripheral blood from healthy volunteers was obtained with informed written consent approved by the Ethics Committee of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University. Blood from 15 healthy volunteers was applied in order to get at least 3 replicates in each experiment condition. NK cells were isolated from PBMC by negative magnetic separation (NK Cell Isolation Kit, Miltenyi Biotec, Germany). Cells were stimulated with γ‑irradiated K562‑mbIL21 feeders and 100 U/mL IL‑2 (Sci-Store, Russian Federation) [21] and cultured in medium: 10% FCS, 45% NK MACS (with supplement, Miltenyi Biotec), and 45% complete DMEM.
Plasmids
Plasmids used: hTERT (xlox(GFP)hTERT, Addgene #69809) and iCasp9 (pMSCV‑F‑del‑Casp9.IRES.GFP, Addgene #15567). We made xlox‑TERT‑PGK-iCasp9‑IRES‑GFP [57] and DN‑hTERT constructs. For cloning strategy see Supplementary methods. shBIRC3 was assembled in pLKO‑1‑TRC. Primer design used Primer‑BLAST (NCBI, MD, USA) and SnapGene v3.2.1 (GSL Biotech, IL, USA).
Transfection and concentration of viral particles
Phoenix Ampho cells were transfected using the calcium phosphate transfection kit (Biospecifica, Russian Federation). Viral supernatant was harvested at 48 h, 72 h and 96 h post-transfection and concentrated by centrifugation (21000 × g, 2.5 h, 4°C).
Transduction and cell sorting
The viral suspension was centrifuged (2–4 h, 1800 × g, 4 °С) in the retronectin-coated (Clontech/Takara, CA, USA) plate. Transduction efficiency was assessed by GFP fluorescence using MACSQuant 10 (Miltenyi Biotec, 405/488/635 nm lasers) and sorting on Sony SH800S (Sony Biothechnology, SJ, USA; 405/488/643 nm lasers). Sorting purity was verified (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Cell death induction in NK cells by a chemical inductor of dimerization
Сells were treated for 24 h with 10 nM or 100 nM of CID AP20187 (MedChemExpress, NJ, USA). Control cells were incubated with DMSO at an equivalent of 100 nM CID concentration. Cells were stained with AnnexinV-PE (Invitrogen, San Jose, CA, USA) and SYTOX AADvanced (Invitrogen, San Jose, CA, USA).
qPCR analysis
Total RNA was extracted using ExtractRNA reagent (Evrogen, Russian Federation) and purified using TURBO DNA-free™ Kit (Invitrogen). cDNA was obtained with MMLV revertase (Evrogen).
Expression of ACTB, BAD, BAX, BCL2, BCL2L1, BIRC5, BIRC3, DIABLO, EOMES, iCASP9, MCL1, TBX21 and hTERT was quantified by CFX Connect Real-Time System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA, USA) using the 2-ΔΔCq method with ACTB normalization.
RNAseq analysis
One month after isolation, modified NK cells were harvested in the RLT buffer. Surviving AnnexinV-PE– SYTOX-AADvanced– GFP+ (CID)-iCasp9-NK cells were sorted. RNAseq libraries were prepared with KAPA RNA HyperPrep Kit and KAPA UDI Primer Mixes (Roche) and sequenced on Illumina NovaSeq X (paired‑end). Analysis used the UseGalaxy platform (https://usegalaxy.eu) with alignment to hgGRCh38, and pipeline: trimmomatic, salmon, DESeq2. Splicing analysis followed the Galaxy tutorial (https://training.galaxyproject.org/training-material/topics/transcriptomics/tutorials/differential-isoform-expression/tutorial.html).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism 8.4 (StatSoft Inc., OK, USA) software, Python and R packages. For multiple comparisons, 2-ANOVA analysis with Tukey’s multiple comparisons was applied. For data that did not pass, the normality test was subjected to Spearman’s correlation test and the Mann-Whitney test. P-value: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. For RNA seq data, DEGs (P-adj<0.05, Log2FC > 0.58) were defined.
Supplementary information
Comparison hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells vs iCasp9-NK cells
Comparison CID-iCasp9-NK cells vs iCasp9-NK cells
Acknowledgements
The Galaxy server used for some calculations is partly funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, BMBF (project no. 031 A538A de. NBI-RBC) and the Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts, Baden-Württemberg (MWK) within the framework of LIBIS/de.NBI Freiburg.
Author contributions
The study was conceived by AIP and MAS. The funding was acquired by AIP, MOU, RAV and JDV. MVG established the methodology, collected the data, performed the formal analysis, validated and visualized the data. EIK supervised the project. The first draft of the manuscript was written by MAS and MOU, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Fundings
The work was carried out with the financial support of a grant from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation No. 075-15-2024-536.
Data availability
The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article are openly available under the BioProject ID PRJNA1423915 at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject.
Competing interests
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (protocol #252 from 25 June 2025).
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41420-026-03183-y.
References
- 1.Islam R, Pupovac A, Evtimov V, Boyd N, Shu R, Boyd R, et al. Enhancing a natural killer: modification of NK cells for cancer immunotherapy. Cells. 2021;10:1058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gong Y, Klein Wolterink RGJ, Wang J, Bos GMJ, Germeraad WTV. Chimeric antigen receptor natural killer (CAR-NK) cell design and engineering for cancer therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14:73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Heipertz EL, Zynda ER, Stav-Noraas TE, Hungler AD, Boucher SE, Kaur N, et al. Current perspectives on “Off-The-Shelf” allogeneic NK and CAR-NK cell therapies. Front Immunol. 2021;12:732135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Basar R, Daher M, Rezvani K. Next-generation cell therapies: the emerging role of CAR-NK cells. Blood Adv. 2020;4:5868–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fujisaki H, Kakuda H, Imai C, Mullighan CG, Campana D. Replicative potential of human natural killer cells. Br J Haematol. 2009;145:606–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Streltsova MA, Ustiuzhanina MO, Barsov EV, Kust SA, Velichinskii RA, Kovalenko EI. Telomerase reverse transcriptase increases the proliferation and lifespan of human NK cells without immortalization. Biomedicines. 2021;9:662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fujisaki H, Kakuda H, Shimasaki N, Imai C, Ma J, Lockey T, et al. Expansion of highly cytotoxic human natural killer cells for cancer cell therapy. Cancer Res. 2009;69:4010–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Xu L, Li S, Stohr BA. The role of telomere biology in cancer. Annu Rev Pathol. 2013;8:49–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hayflick L. The limited in vitro lifetime of human diploid cell strains. Exp Cell Res. 1965;37:614–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rufer N, Migliaccio M, Antonchuk J, Humphries RK, Roosnek E, Lansdorp PM. Transfer of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene into T lymphocytes results in extension of replicative potential. Blood. 2001;98:597–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ghosh A, Saginc G, Leow SC, Khattar E, Shin EM, Yan TD, et al. Telomerase directly regulates NF-κB-dependent transcription. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14:1270–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Park J-I, Venteicher AS, Hong JY, Choi J, Jun S, Shkreli M, et al. Telomerase modulates Wnt signalling by association with target gene chromatin. Nature. 2009;460:66–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Indran IR, Hande MP, Pervaiz S. hTERT overexpression alleviates intracellular ROS production, improves mitochondrial function, and inhibits ROS-mediated apoptosis in cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2011;71:266–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Santos JH, Meyer JN, Skorvaga M, Annab LA, Van Houten B. Mitochondrial hTERT exacerbates free-radical-mediated mtDNA damage. Aging Cell. 2004;3:399–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cao Y, Li H, Deb S, Liu J-P. TERT regulates cell survival independent of telomerase enzymatic activity. Oncogene. 2002;21:3130–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rahman R, Latonen L, Wiman KG. hTERT antagonizes p53-induced apoptosis independently of telomerase activity. Oncogene. 2005;24:1320–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Benslimane Y, Sánchez-Osuna M, Coulombe-Huntington J, Bertomeu T, Henry D, Huard C, et al. A novel p53 regulator, C16ORF72/TAPR1, buffers against telomerase inhibition. Aging Cell. 2021;20:e13331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bermudez Y, Erasso D, Johnson NC, Alfonso MY, Lowell NE, Kruk PA. Telomerase confers resistance to caspase-mediated apoptosis. Clin Inter Aging. 2006;1:155–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jin Y, You L, Kim HJ, Lee H-W. Telomerase reverse transcriptase contains a BH3-like motif and interacts with BCL-2 family members. Mol Cells. 2018;41:684–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hodes RJ, Hathcock KS, Weng N. Telomeres in T and B cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:699–706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Denman CJ, Senyukov VV, Somanchi SS, Phatarpekar PV, Kopp LM, Johnson JL, et al. Membrane-bound IL-21 promotes sustained ex vivo proliferation of human natural killer cells. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e30264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Watkinson F, Nayar SK, Rani A, Sakellariou CA, Elhage O, Papaevangelou E, et al. IL-15 Upregulates telomerase expression and potently increases proliferative capacity of NK, NKT-like, and CD8 T cells. Front Immunol. 2020;11:594620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhao Y, Bennett AD, Zheng Z, Wang QJ, Robbins PF, Yu LYL, et al. High-affinity TCRs generated by phage display provide CD4 + T cells with the ability to recognize and kill tumor cell lines. J Immunol. 2007;179:5845–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rossignoli F, Grisendi G, Spano C, Golinelli G, Recchia A, Rovesti G, et al. Inducible Caspase9-mediated suicide gene for MSC-based cancer gene therapy. Cancer Gene Ther. 2019;26:11–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Marin D, Li Y, Basar R, Rafei H, Daher M, Dou J, et al. Safety, efficacy and determinants of response of allogeneic CD19-specific CAR-NK cells in CD19 + B cell tumors: a phase 1/2 trial. Nat Med. 2024;30:772–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Di Stasi A, Tey S-K, Dotti G, Fujita Y, Kennedy-Nasser A, Martinez C, et al. Inducible apoptosis as a safety switch for adoptive cell therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1673–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hu Y, Tian Z-G, Zhang C. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-transduced natural killer cells in tumor immunotherapy. Acta Pharm Sin. 2018;39:167–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li P, Zhou L, Zhao T, Liu X, Zhang P, Liu Y, et al. Caspase-9: structure, mechanisms and clinical application. Oncotarget. 2017;8:23996–4008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Marin V, Cribioli E, Philip B, Tettamanti S, Pizzitola I, Biondi A, et al. Comparison of different suicide-gene strategies for the safety improvement of genetically manipulated T cells. Hum Gene Ther Methods. 2012;23:376–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tey S-K. Adoptive T-cell therapy: adverse events and safety switches. Clin Transl Immunol. 2014;3:e17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yuan Y, Ren H, Li Y, Qin S, Yang X, Tang C. Cell-to-cell variability in inducible Caspase9-mediated cell death. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Barese CN, Felizardo TC, Sellers SE, Keyvanfar K, Di Stasi A, Metzger ME, et al. Regulated apoptosis of genetically modified hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells via an inducible caspase-9 suicide gene in rhesus macaques. Stem Cells. 2015;33:91–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Palamarchuk AI, Alekseeva NA, Streltsova MA, Ustiuzhanina MO, Kobyzeva PA, Kust SA, et al. Increased susceptibility of the CD57- NK cells expressing KIR2DL2/3 and NKG2C to iCasp9 gene retroviral transduction and the relationships with proliferative potential, activation degree, and death induction response. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:13326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhang J, Le Gras S, Pouxvielh K, Faure F, Fallone L, Kern N, et al. Sequential actions of EOMES and T-BET promote stepwise maturation of natural killer cells. Nat Commun. 2021;12:5446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Arish N, Cohen PY, Golan-Gerstl R, Fridlender Z, Dayan MR, Zisman P, et al. Overexpression of telomerase protects human and murine lung epithelial cells from fas- and bleomycin-induced apoptosis via FLIP upregulation. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0126730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Liu M-Y, Nemes A, Zhou Q-G. The emerging roles for telomerase in the central nervous system. Front Mol Neurosci. 2018;11:160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wu R, Yang H, Liu C. IFIT3: a crucial mediator in innate immunity and tumor progression with therapeutic implications. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1515718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Koh CM, Khattar E, Leow SC, Liu CY, Muller J, Ang WX, et al. Telomerase regulates MYC-driven oncogenesis independent of its reverse transcriptase activity. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:2109–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Masutomi K, Possemato R, Wong JMY, Currier JL, Tothova Z, Manola JB, et al. The telomerase reverse transcriptase regulates chromatin state and DNA damage responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:8222–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hao Q, Chen J, Lu H, Zhou X. The ARTS of p53-dependent mitochondrial apoptosis. J Mol Cell Biol. 2023;14:mjac074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fischer M. Census and evaluation of p53 target genes. Oncogene. 2017;36:3943–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ekert PG, Silke J, Vaux DL. Caspase inhibitors. Cell Death Differ. 1999;6:1081–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dubrez-Daloz L, Dupoux A, Cartier J. IAPs: more than just inhibitors of apoptosis proteins. Cell Cycle. 2008;7:1036–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chu ZL, McKinsey TA, Liu L, Gentry JJ, Malim MH, Ballard DW. Suppression of tumor necrosis factor-induced cell death by inhibitor of apoptosis c-IAP2 is under NF-kappaB control. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:10057–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mishima M, Takai A, Takeda H, Iguchi E, Nakano S, Fujii Y, et al. TERT upregulation promotes cell proliferation via degradation of p21 and increases carcinogenic potential. J Pathol. 2024;264:318–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Choi J, Southworth LK, Sarin KY, Venteicher AS, Ma W, Chang W, et al. TERT promotes epithelial proliferation through transcriptional control of a Myc- and Wnt-related developmental program. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Roh J-I, Kim Y, Oh J, Kim Y, Lee J, Lee J, et al. Hexokinase 2 is a molecular bridge linking telomerase and autophagy. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0193182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yang P, Zou Z, Gao X. STMN1 promotes the proliferation and inhibits the apoptosis of acute myeloid leukemia cells by activating the PI3K/Akt pathway. Biocell. 2022;46:207–18. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Yoon C, Lu J, Ryeom SW, Simon MC, Yoon SS. PIK3R3, part of the regulatory domain of PI3K, is upregulated in sarcoma stem-like cells and promotes invasion, migration, and chemotherapy resistance. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 50.Cardone MH, Roy N, Stennicke HR, Salvesen GS, Franke TF, Stanbridge E, et al. Regulation of cell death protease caspase-9 by phosphorylation. Science. 1998;282:1318–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Cui L-X, Tian Y-Q, Hao H-S, Zou H-Y, Pang Y-W, Zhao S-J, et al. Knockdown of ASH1L methyltransferase induced apoptosis inhibiting proliferation and H3K36 methylation in bovine cumulus cells. Theriogenology. 2021;161:65–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kim H-M, Kang B, Park S, Park H, Kim CJ, Lee H, et al. Forkhead box protein D2 suppresses colorectal cancer by reprogramming enhancer interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:6143–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yu S, Yang Y, Yang H, Peng L, Wu Z, Sun L, et al. Pancancer analysis of oncogenic BARX2 identifying its prognostic value and immunological function in liver hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2023;13:7560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Chen Y, Gao L, Lin T, Pei X, Gao Q, Chen J, et al. C/EBPZ modulates the differentiation and proliferation of preadipocytes. Int J Obes (Lond). 2022;46:523–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Imbriano C, Bolognese F, Gurtner A, Piaggio G, Mantovani R. HSP-CBF is an NF-Y-dependent coactivator of the heat shock promoters CCAAT boxes. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:26332–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zheng L, Pan H, Li S, Flesken-Nikitin A, Chen PL, Boyer TG, et al. Sequence-specific transcriptional corepressor function for BRCA1 through a novel zinc finger protein, ZBRK1. Mol Cell. 2000;6:757–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Palamarchuk AI, Kovalenko EI, Streltsova MA. The hTERT and iCasp9 transgenes affect EOMES and T-BET levels in NK cells, and the introduction of both genes improves NK cell proliferation in response to IL2 and IL15 stimulation. Biomedicines. 2024;12:650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Katoh M. Multi‑layered prevention and treatment of chronic inflammation, organ fibrosis and cancer associated with canonical WNT/β‑catenin signaling activation (Review). Int J Mol Med. 2018;42:713–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Koedoot E, van Steijn E, Vermeer M, González-Prieto R, Vertegaal ACO, Martens JWM, et al. Splicing factors control triple-negative breast cancer cell mitosis through SUN2 interaction and sororin intron retention. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021;40:82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Liu M, Yang L, Liu X, Nie Z, Zhang X, Lu Y, et al. HNRNPH1 is a novel regulator of cellular proliferation and disease progression in chronic myeloid leukemia. Front Oncol. 2021;11:682859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Hofmann JC, Husedzinovic A, Gruss OJ. The function of spliceosome components in open mitosis. Nucleus. 2010;1:447–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Song X, Wan X, Huang T, Zeng C, Sastry N, Wu B, et al. SRSF3-regulated RNA alternative splicing promotes glioblastoma tumorigenicity by affecting multiple cellular processes. Cancer Res. 2019;79:5288–301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Xiong J, Chen Y, Wang W, Sun J. Biological function and molecular mechanism of SRSF3 in cancer and beyond. Oncol Lett. 2022;23:21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.He X, Zhang P. Serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 3 (SRSF3) regulates homologous recombination-mediated DNA repair. Mol Cancer. 2015;14:158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Naguib A, Sandmann T, Yi F, Watts RJ, Lewcock JW, Dowdle WE. SUPT4H1 depletion leads to a global reduction in RNA. Cell Rep. 2019;26:45–53.e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Yao Z, Hu K, Huang H, Xu S, Wang Q, Zhang P, et al. shRNA-mediated silencing of the RFC3 gene suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation. Int J Mol Med. 2015;36:1393–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Yuan T-M, Liang R-Y, Chueh PJ, Chuang S-M. Role of ribophorin II in the response to anticancer drugs in gastric cancer cell lines. Oncol Lett. 2015;9:1861–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Sari G, Rock KL. Tumor immune evasion through loss of MHC class-I antigen presentation. Curr Opin Immunol. 2023;83:102329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Song T, Zhang H. RBM8A depletion decreases the cisplatin resistance and represses the proliferation and metastasis of breast cancer cells via akt/mtor pathway. Breast J. 2022;2022:4576789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Alfaidi M, Scott ML, Orr AW. Sinner or saint? nck adaptor proteins in vascular biology. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:688388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Matherne MG, Phillips ES, Embrey SJ, Burke CM, Machado HL. Emerging functions of C/EBPβ in breast cancer. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1111522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zhao J-Y, Yuan X-K, Luo R-Z, Wang L-X, Gu W, Yamane D, et al. Phospholipase A and acyltransferase 4/retinoic acid receptor responder 3 at the intersection of tumor suppression and pathogen restriction. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1107239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Comparison hTERT-iCasp9-NK cells vs iCasp9-NK cells
Comparison CID-iCasp9-NK cells vs iCasp9-NK cells
Data Availability Statement
The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article are openly available under the BioProject ID PRJNA1423915 at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject.







