Abstract
1. Spatial summation curves have been determined under photopic conditions for loci between 5 and 55° from fixation. At each locus the area and Weber fraction for the largest stimulus showing complete summation (Sc) has been estimated. While the area of Sc increases progressively towards the periphery, its Weber fraction remains constant.
2. The invariance of the Weber fraction for Sc, coupled with changes in its area, have been compared with similar findings observed during changes in adaptation level, in impaired fields, and during accommodative and convergence changes. It is suggested that the Weber fraction for Sc may be an important parameter of visual function which is maintained under changing conditions by alterations in the area over which background energy is summated.
3. It has been shown that, for stimulus areas up to at least 1 log unit greater than Sc, all the summation curves from 5 to 55° from fixation can be superimposed by simple displacement along the log area axis. For loci closer together, the superimposition has been shown for larger ranges of areas beyond Sc. This suggests that, so far as spatial summation is concerned, changes in locus serve only to change the spatial scale of the visual system.
4. Comparisons have been made between the area of Sc at various loci and the sizes of the central regions of the receptive fields of retinal ganglion cells determined electrophysiologically in the primate.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BARLOW H. B., FITZHUGH R., KUFFLER S. W. Change of organization in the receptive fields of the cat's retina during dark adaptation. J Physiol. 1957 Aug 6;137(3):338–354. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BARLOW H. B. Increment thresholds at low intensities considered as signal/noise discriminations. J Physiol. 1957 May 23;136(3):469–488. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BARLOW H. B. Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities. J Physiol. 1958 Apr 30;141(2):337–350. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp005978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FANKHAUSER F., SCHMIDT T. Die Untersuchung der räumlichen Summation mit stehender und bewegter Reizmarke nach der Methode der quantitativen Lichtsinnperimetrie. Ophthalmologica. 1958 May-Jun;135(5-6):660–666. doi: 10.1159/000303374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glezer V. D. The receptive fields of the retina. Vision Res. 1965 Oct;5(9):497–525. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(65)90084-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HALLETT P. E. Scotopic acuity and absolute threshold in brief flashes. J Physiol. 1962 Aug;163:175–189. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HUBEL D. H., WIESEL T. N. Receptive fields of optic nerve fibres in the spider monkey. J Physiol. 1960 Dec;154:572–580. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson M. E. Spatial and temporal summation in impaired regions of the visual field. J Physiol. 1967 Apr;189(2):189–208. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]