Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1970 May;207(3):803–821. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009096

An examination of nerve-mediated, hyoscine-resistant excitation of the guinea-pig colon

J B Furness
PMCID: PMC1348743  PMID: 5499747

Abstract

1. The mechanical and electrical activity of the smooth muscle of the distal colon of the guinea-pig has been recorded in experiments designed to determine the nature of the nerve-mediated excitation of the muscle.

2. The spontaneous contractions of the colon, normally observed in vitro, were similarly antagonized by hyoscine or tetrodotoxin. However, neither drug caused complete cessation of the spontaneous activity.

3. The contractile responses of the colon to repetitive stimulation of intramural nerve fibres were of two types, a primary contraction which occurred within 1 sec of the beginning of stimulation and a secondary contraction which occurred after stimulation. The primary contraction was blocked by hyoscine, usually revealing an inhibitory response to stimulation, but the secondary contraction persisted. Similar primary contractions were observed in response to stimulation of the pelvic and sometimes of the periarterial nerves.

4. An initial relaxation during, and a secondary contraction after, stimulation were sometimes obtained when the periarterial nerves were stimulated. Propranolol completely blocked both the initial relaxation and the secondary contraction in response to sympathetic stimulation but did not affect either the relaxation or the secondary contraction in response to transmural stimulation.

5. The direct effects of noradrenaline and adenosine triphosphate on the mechanical activity of the colon were studied. Both drugs caused a relaxation of the colon. Washout of either drug after a short exposure was followed by a period of increased activity. Especially in preparations of low tone, the initial relaxation and the secondary contraction in response to transmural stimulation could be mimicked by the application and washout of either noradrenaline or adenosine triphosphate.

6. Two types of potential change were evoked in the muscle cells of the colon, either separately or in combination, when the intramural nerve fibres were stimulated: excitatory junction potentials (EJPs), which were blocked by hyoscine, and inhibitory junction potentials (IJPs). When the membrane potential recovered following an IJP, it was common to observe action potentials in muscle cells that were initially quiescent. A similar secondary firing of action potentials was initiated by hyperpolarizing the muscle cells with anodal current pulses in the presence of tetrodotoxin in sufficient concentration to block nerve-mediated responses.

7. The results reported in this paper lead to the conclusion that the muscle cells of the distal colon of the guinea-pig are influenced by three sets of nerves: cholinergic excitatory, adrenergic inhibitory and intrinsic inhibitory fibres releasing a non-adrenergic transmitter substance. The secondary non-cholinergic excitation arises from a non-specific reaction of the muscle cells to a preceding inhibition.

Full text

PDF
803

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ambache N., Freeman M. A. Atropine-resistant longitudinal muscle spasms due to excitation of non-cholinergic neurones in Auerbach's plexus. J Physiol. 1968 Dec;199(3):705–727. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Axelsson J., Holmberg B. The effects of extracellularly applied ATP and related compounds on electrical and mechanical activity of the smooth muscle taenia coli from the guinea-pig. Acta Physiol Scand. 1969 Jan-Feb;75(1):149–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1969.tb04366.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BULBRING E. Changes in configuration of spontaneously discharged spike potentials from smooth muscle of the guinea-pig's taenia coli; the effect of electrotonic currents and of adrenaline, acetylcholine and histamine. J Physiol. 1957 Feb 15;135(2):412–425. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BURNSTOCK G., CAMPBELL G., BENNETT M., HOLMAN M. E. INHIBITION OF THE SMOOTH MUSCLE ON THE TAENIA COLI. Nature. 1963 Nov 9;200:581–582. doi: 10.1038/200581a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BURNSTOCK G. The action of adrenaline on excitability and membrane potential in the taenia coli of the guinea-pig and the effect of DNP on this action and on the action of acetylcholine. J Physiol. 1958 Aug 29;143(1):183–194. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bayliss W. M., Starling E. H. The movements and the innervation of the large intestine. J Physiol. 1900 Dec 31;26(1-2):107–118. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1900.sp000825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bennett A., Fleshler B. A hyoscine-resistant excitatory nerve pathway in guinea-pig colon. J Physiol. 1969 Jul;203(1):62P–63P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bennett M. R., Burnstock G., Holman M. Transmission from intramural inhibitory nerves to the smooth muscle of the guinea-pig taenia coli. J Physiol. 1966 Feb;182(3):541–558. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bennett M. R. Rebound excitation of the smooth muscle cells of the guinea-pig taenia coli after stimulation of intramural inhibitory nerves. J Physiol. 1966 Jul;185(1):124–131. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bianchi C., Beani L., Frigo G. M., Crema A. Further evidence for the presence of non-adrenergic inhibitory structures in the guinea-pig colon. Eur J Pharmacol. 1968 Aug;4(1):51–61. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(68)90009-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Campbell G. Nerve-mediated excitation of the taenia of the guinea-pig caecum. J Physiol. 1966 Jul;185(1):148–159. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Del Tacca M., Lecchini S., Frigo G. M., Crema A., Benzi G. Antagonism of atropine towards endogenous and exogenous acetylcholine before and after sympathetic system blockade in the isolated distal guinea-pig colon. Eur J Pharmacol. 1968 Sep;4(2):188–197. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(68)90176-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. FUELGRAFF G., SCHMIDT L. UBER DIE HEMMUNG EINER ATROPINRESISTENTEN, NICHT ADRENERGISCHEN NEUROMUSKULAEREN UBERTRAGUNG DURCH GUANETHIDIN. Med Exp Int J Exp Med. 1963;9:371–377. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Furness J. B. An electrophysiological study of the innervation of the smooth muscle of the colon. J Physiol. 1969 Dec;205(3):549–562. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. GILLESPIE J. S. Spontaneous mechanical and electrical activity of stretched and unstretched intestinal smooth muscle cells and their response to sympathetic-nerve stimulation. J Physiol. 1962 Jun;162:54–75. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gillespie J. H. The biological significance of the linkages in adenosine triphosphoric acid. J Physiol. 1934 Feb 28;80(4):345–359. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1934.sp003095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. HOLMAN M. E., HUGHES J. R. INHIBITION OF INTESTINAL SMOOTH MUSCLE. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1965 Jun;43:277–290. doi: 10.1038/icb.1965.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. HOSHIKO T., SPERELAKIS N. Prepotentials and unidirectional propagation in myocardium. Am J Physiol. 1961 Nov;201:873–880. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1961.201.5.873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Langley J. N., Magnus R. Some observations of the movements of the intestine before and after degenerative section of the mesenteric nerves. J Physiol. 1905 Sep 8;33(1):34–51. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1905.sp001108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Langley J. N. On Inhibitory Fibres in the Vagus for the end of the OEsophagus and the Stomach. J Physiol. 1898 Dec 30;23(5):407–414. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1898.sp000737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES