Skip to main content
ZooKeys logoLink to ZooKeys
. 2026 Aug 11;1289:159–184. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1289.198411

A new species of Niceforonia (Amphibia, Anura, Strabomantidae) from the Serranía de los Paraguas, Colombia, with the description of a new phenotypic synapomorphy for the Niceforonia nigrovittata species group

Jhon Jairo Ospina-Sarria 1,✉, Andrés Felipe Rodríguez-Betancourt 1,2, Ximena Gómez-Sepúlveda 1, Iván Darío Morales-Vertel 3, Valentina Vélez-Franco 4, Nayely Gallego-Posada 5,6, Jose Daniel Herrera-Rengifo 7, John Edison Grajales Escobar 8, Irene Ceballos-Castro 1,9,10, Isabella García-Gómez 1,11, David Andrés Velásquez-Trujillo 1,12, Ayda Susana Ortiz Baez 1,13, Javier Mendez Narvaez 1,14
PMCID: PMC13487511  PMID: 42621855

Abstract

A new species of Niceforonia is described from the montane cloud forests of southwestern Colombia. The new species is distinguished from all congeners by possessing dorsolateral folds, a visible tympanic membrane, a fleshy lip swelling in adult males, nuptial pads, circumferential grooves on all fingers, a reddish-brown to grayish dorsal coloration, yellow ventral and hidden surfaces, and dark supra-inguinal spots. Molecularly, the new species differs from all congeners by an uncorrected p-distance of > 7% for the 16S rRNA gene fragment. Furthermore, the possession of dark supra-inguinal spots optimizes unambiguously as a synapomorphy for two clades within Strabomantidae. The first clade comprises members of the genus Niceforonia and includes N. brunnea, N. dracula, N. elassodiscus, N. mantipus, N. nigrovittata, N. quilloturo, N. peraccai, four candidate species, and the new species described herein. This clade is referred to as the Niceforonia nigrovittata species group, diagnosed by the presence of dark supra-inguinal spots. By retaining this name, we ensure taxonomic stability and honor the well-established historical use of the nomenclature in literature. The second clade comprises members of the subfamily Holoadeninae, including the genera Bahius, Barycholos, Phyllonastes, and Urkuphryne. A previous study already proposed a phenotypic synapomorphy for the group composed of Phyllonastes + Barycholos. Consequently, the available evidence corroborates the monophyly of both the group comprising these four holoadenine genera and the Phyllonastes + Barycholos group. This congruence provides a robust, nested phylogenetic resolution and precise taxonomic diagnoses, demonstrating how the integration of molecular and phenotypic evidence is a powerful tool for testing evolutionary hypotheses in brachycephaloid frogs.

Key words: Brachycephaloid frogs, Cerro El Inglés, evolution, Key Biodiversity Area (KBA), taxonomy

Introduction

Among the direct-developing frogs of the superfamily Brachycephaloidea, many species have enlarged discs on the tips of their digits (Lynch 1989; Lynch and Duellman 1997; Duellman and Lehr 2009). Accordingly, the uncommon occurrence of narrow discs on the digits has been used to define infrageneric units within the superfamily Brachycephaloidea (e.g., Lynch 1975, 1976). One of these infrageneric units was the Eleutherodactylus discoidalis species group, which included species distributed over the Amazonian Andean versant in Bolivia, southern Peru, northern Ecuador, and Andean foothills in northern Argentina (Lynch 1976). It was not until the late 80’s that Lynch (1989) separated the E. discoidalis species group into three infrageneric units, E. discoidalis, E. dolops, and E. nigrovittatus species groups.

Decades later, the inclusion of molecular data in phylogenetic analyses corroborated the proposal of Lynch (1989) and refined the systematics of these groups. For example, Padial et al. (2008) demonstrated that species of the E. discoidalis group belong to the genus Oreobates, whereas Hedges et al. (2008a) demonstrated that species of the E. dolops and E. nigrovittatus groups (see also Lynch and Duellman 1997; Duellman and Pramuk 1999; Lehr 2005), with species formerly placed in Phrynopus, form a monophyletic group distinct from both Eleutherodactylus and Phrynopus. Consequently, the genus Isodactylus Hedges, Duellman & Heinicke, 2008a was proposed to accommodate them. The generic name Isodactylus was found to be a junior homonym and was subsequently replaced with Hypodactylus by Hedges et al. (2008b). This replacement name derives from the Greek hypo (less than) and daktylos (toe), referring to the narrow digital discs that are characteristic of the genus (Hedges et al. 2008b).

A decade later, the systematic arrangement of the genus was further modified when additional lineages were evaluated. Acosta-Galvis et al. (2018) demonstrated that Niceforonia nanaGoin & Cochran, 1963 is nested within Hypodactylus; consequently, the genus Hypodactylus was synonymized with Niceforonia. Currently, Niceforonia is diagnosed solely through molecular data. Therefore, when molecular data are missing, species are assigned to the genus based on overall morphological similarity, with narrow digital discs serving as a primary diagnostic character. However, Ospina-Sarria and Grant (2022) demonstrated that the traditional coding of digital discs in Brachycephaloidea conflates several independent characters, including the presence of discs on digits, their shape, and their degree of lateral expansion (e.g., narrow vs broad digital discs), which in turn can vary independently across different digits. Consequently, until the variation obscured by this traditional coding system is evaluated within a framework of transformational independence, its phylogenetic significance will remain unknown.

More recently, Reyes-Puig et al. (2026) described two Niceforonia species from Ecuador and highlighted the existence of additional undescribed taxa. The genus is currently composed of 17 species distributed from the three Colombian Cordilleras southwards through Ecuador to the Cordillera Oriental in central Peru, and eastward into the Amazonian Basin of Ecuador and northern Peru. Given the reliance on molecular data for diagnosing Niceforonia and the limited understanding of its phenotypic evolution, we herein investigate the phylogenetic significance of dark supra-inguinal spots, a character first reported in N. nigrovittata (Andersson, 1945) and N. mantipus (Boulenger, 1908) by Lynch and Duellman (1980) and Lynch (1989). This analysis aims to evaluate the phylogenetic significance of dark supra-inguinal spots in Niceforonia and related genera. Additionally, we included samples of Niceforonia mantipus from several localities (including the type locality) in our analysis and describe a new species of Niceforonia from the Serranía de los Paraguas, Colombia.

Materials and methods

Field surveys and specimen collection

We visited two sites in the Cordillera Occidental of Colombia, the Reserva Natural Comunitaria Cerro El Inglés (4°45'N, 76°17'W) during two fieldwork expeditions (18–28 October 2024 and 18–28 April 2025) and the Bosque de San Antonio (also known as Cerro de la Horqueta, 3°29'N, 76°37'W) during a fieldwork expedition (11 November 2024) (Fig. 1). These surveys were carried out under the framework of our long-term project for the study and conservation of amphibian diversity from the Key Biodiversity Area (KBA) Serranía de los Paraguas. The Reserva Natural Comunitaria Cerro El Inglés is a cloud forest ecosystem in the Serranía de los Paraguas KBA between the western Andes and the biogeographical Chocó with an approximate extension of 1000 hectares located in the municipality El Cairo, Department of Valle del Cauca, Colombia. The Bosque de San Antonio is a montane summit within the San Antonio Forest/Km 18 KBA in the Cordillera Occidental covering ca 800 hectares, located 15 km west of Cali along the road to Buenaventura, Colombia.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Map of southwestern Colombia (inset) showing the distribution of Niceforonia mantipus (circles) and Niceforonia tempestuosa (stars). Black symbols represent the type localities of N. mantipus (Bosque de San Antonio) and Niceforonia tempestuosa (Cerro El Inglés) in Valle del Cauca. White circle indicates additional record for N. mantipus in Reserva Natural Bremen (Filandia, Quindío). The white star represents the record for Niceforonia tempestuosa in El Mirador (Balsal, Versalles, Valle del Cauca).

A team of ten researchers conducted the fieldwork. Diurnal searches were performed from 10:00 to 14:00 h, and nocturnal surveys from 20:00 to 02:00 h. We performed visual encounter surveys in riparian zones, forest edges, and interiors, where leaf-litter shifting was employed to locate cryptic or leaf-dwelling individuals. Upon encounter, frogs were captured by hand in plastic bags, their geographical coordinates were recorded with a Garmin Global Positioning System (GPS) unit, and individuals were immediately transferred to a clear area for photographic documentation with a Nikon D90 camera. Subsequently, upon the team’s return to the base camp, the frogs were euthanized with an intraperitoneal injection of Xylocaine (lidocaine hydrochloride). Tissue samples (a piece of muscle) were removed and stored in 95% ethanol for molecular analyses, before preservation of the specimens. Specimens were individually tagged and fixed in 10% formalin. Upon returning to the laboratory, specimens were rinsed in several changes of water and finally transferred to 70% ethanol for long-term storage. All specimens were deposited in the Colección de Anfibios y Reptiles de la Universidad del Quindío, Armenia, Colombia (ARUQ).

Morphology

Terminology for phenotypic characters and standardized format for definitions follows Lynch and Duellman (1980, 1997) and Duellman and Lehr (2009). To estimate lengths of toes III and V, we adpressed both toes against toe IV, and for lengths of fingers I and II, we appressed those fingers against each other. Maturity in males was judged by the presence of enlarged testes and secondary sexual characters (vocal slits and non-spinous nuptial pads) while maturity in females was assumed if the oviducts were large and convoluted and/or if enlarged ova were evident. Color pattern in life was taken from direct observation of the specimens after capture and high definition color digital photographs. The following standard abbreviations are used for convenience: SVL (snout-to-vent length), HW (head width), E-N (eye-nostril distance), and IOD (interorbital distance). Measurements were made using digital calipers to the nearest 0.1 mm, under a Carl Zeiss Stemi 2000-C stereoscopic microscope. Institutional abbreviations are: AMNH (American Museum of Natural History, Division of Vertebrate Zoology, New York 10024, USA), ARUQ (Colección de Anfibios y Reptiles de la Universidad del Quindío, Armenia, Colombia), ICN (Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá), KU (Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas), MHN-UIS (Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia), USNM (National Museum of Natural History, Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, Washington), and UTA (University of Texas at Arlington, Department of Biological Sciences, Arlington). All specimens examined are listed in Suppl. material 1.

Molecular phylogenetic analyses

We conducted a phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences from two mitochondrial (12S and 16S, 2866 bp) and two nuclear (recombinase activation 1 RAG-1, 631 bp, and tyrosinase TYR, 531 bp) genes. Sequences were obtained from GenBank or sequenced for this study. Total genomic DNA was extracted from ethanol-preserved muscle tissue using the GeneJET Genomic DNA Purification kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. PCR amplification was carried out following the protocols of Santos et al. (2003). The mitochondrial gene 16S was amplified using the primers 16SCL-16SDH (Santos et al. 2003). Purified PCR products were sequenced in a single direction using an automated sequencer (Macrogen Inc., South Korea). The resulting chromatograms were automatically evaluated using the quality-flagging features in Sequencher v.5.0.1 (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Low-confidence positions, ambiguous peaks, and low-quality terminal regions at both ends were visually inspected and manually trimmed before alignment. Complete sequences were edited with the software GENEIOUS PRO v.6.1.6 (Kearse et al. 2012).

For the phylogenetic analyses, we included representative sequences of all known species of Niceforonia for which sequences are available in GenBank (i.e., N. brunnea Lynch, 1975, N. draculaReyes-Puig et al. 2026, N. elassodiscus Lynch, 1973, N. nana, N. nigrovittata, N. quilloturo Reyes-Puig et al., 2026, N. peraccai Lynch, 1975, and N. philippi Jiménez de la Espada, 1875). Furthermore, our dataset incorporates the four candidate species and the complex of N. nigrovittata reported by Reyes-Puig et al. (2026). Additionally, we provided new molecular data for Niceforonia mantipus and the new species described herein. We followed the family classification of Hedges et al. (2008a) and Heinicke et al. (2018). Outgroup sampling was designed to test the monophyly of Niceforonia and the polarity of morphological character states, including all genera recognized within Strabomantidae (a total of 198 terminals were included in the analysis). A species of the family Craugastoridae (Craugastor longirostris Boulenger, 1898) was included to root the trees. GenBank accession numbers and voucher specimens for all taxa and molecular markers used in this study are listed in Suppl. material 2.

Sequences were aligned using the online server of MAFFT software v.7 (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/large.html) (Katoh and Toh 2008; Katoh et al. 2019) under the strategy E-INS-i (for the 12S and 16S fragments) and G-INS-i (the remaining fragments) with default parameters for gap opening and extension. Phylogenetic relationships were inferred using Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Parsimony approaches. ML analyses were conducted in IQ-TREE v.3.1.1 (Wong et al. 2025), employing ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017) to determine the optimal partition scheme and substitution models. The best partition scheme included three subsets (see Table 1). Nodal support was assessed via 1,000 ultrafast bootstrap (UFBoot) replicates (Hoang et al. 2018), incorporating a nearest-neighbor interchange search (-bnni) to mitigate the overestimation of branch support. The parsimony analysis was performed in TNT v.1.6 (Goloboff et al. 2008; Goloboff and Morales 2023), using the New Technology Search algorithms. Gaps were considered as a fifth state and transformation events were equally weighted. Parsimony jackknife support (absolute frequencies) was calculated with 1,000 replicates, each employing 50 random addition sequences and TBR branch swapping. These support values were mapped onto the Most Parsimonious Trees obtained from an initial driven search of 100 hits using the New Technology search algorithms of Nixon (1999) and Goloboff (1999). We favored parsimony as the optimality criterion (gaps treated as a fifth state), as this minimizes the number of required transformations and generates the most parsimonious hypotheses, which are more readily subject to falsification (Kluge 2005; Kluge and Grant 2006). The resulting trees were visualized and edited through the iTOL phylogenetic tree viewer (Letunic and Bork 2007) and INKSCAPE (XQuartz v.2.8.1, http://www.inkscape.org/).

Table 1.

Best partition scheme and best-fit models selected by ModelFinder for the IQ-TREE analysis.

Subset Data blocks Model
1 Nuclear coding: Rag1 (1st, 2nd) + Tyr (2nd, 3rd) TPM3u+F+I+R3
2 Nuclear coding: Rag1 (3rd) + Tyr (1st) TIM+R3
3 Non-coding mitochondrial (12S, 16S, Val-tRNA) GTR+F+R8

Uncorrected p-distances of the 16S gene sequences were calculated using the software PAUP v.4.0 (Swofford 2002) for a dataset with all sequences having the same length and no missing data (472 bp including gaps) and containing only sequences from genus Niceforonia. Due to their limited length (< 263 bp), Niceforonia nana, one specimen of N. nigrovittata (CORBIDI9547), one of N. peraccai (QCAZA57536), and one of Niceforonia sp 3 (QCAZA68992) were excluded from the p-distance matrix to avoid biased estimates resulting from insufficient overlap. The sequences were aligned using the software MAFFT in GENEIOUS PRO v.6.1.6 under the strategy G-INS-i with default parameters for gap opening and extension.

Evaluation of diagnostic character states

We evaluated the distribution of dark supra-inguinal spots across Niceforonia and related genera using evidence collected from museum specimens, literature reviews, and field observations. The supra-inguinal region is located on the posterior flank, immediately dorsal to the groin. Although the dark supra-inguinal spots may merge with the dark dorsolateral pattern, they should be treated as independent characters, as their distributions are not coextensive. This character was originally reported by Lynch and Duellman (1980) and Lynch (1989) for N. nigrovittata and N. mantipus. Details regarding the taxonomic distribution of this character and their respective sources are provided in Suppl. material 1. We used YBYRÁ (Machado 2015) and TNT v.1.6 (Goloboff and Morales 2023) to identify and plot unambiguously optimized synapomorphies shared across all optimal trees. YBYRÁ generates color-coded boxes to indicate if a derived state occurs only in the clade in question (non-homoplastic) or also occurs in other clades (homoplastic) and if it is shared by all terminals of the clade (unique) or is subsequently transformed into one. The phylogenetic significance of dark supra-inguinal spots was also discussed in the context of the systematics proposed by Portik et al. (2023) and Ortega et al. (2025).

The definition of the morphological character and its states is as follows: occurrence of dark supra-inguinal spots: state 0, absent; state 1, present (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Dorsal view showing the variation of dark supra-inguinal spots (white arrows) across representative species of the family Strabomantidae. A. Niceforonia nana (KU 169125, SVL 19.2 mm, dark supra-inguinal spots absent); B. N. nigrovittata (KU 123546, SVL 25.0 mm); C. N. elassodiscus (ICN 49666, SVL not available); D. Barycholos pulcher (KU 146044, SVL 21.0 mm); E. Phyllonastes lochites (KU 147070, SVL 14.9 mm); F. Phyllonastes myrmecoides (KU 220578, SVL 11.0 mm).

Results

Molecular phylogeny

The phylogenetic analysis using parsimony as optimality criterion (gaps treated as a fifth state) resulted in 97 most-parsimonious trees of 24,174 steps. One of these trees is shown in Fig. 3. The conflict between these optimal trees involves relationships among congeners of Bryophryne, Lynchius, Microkayla, Noblella, Phyllonastes as well as among conspecific specimens of Niceforonia mantipus and N. nigrovittata. Our molecular phylogeny recovered Niceforonia as a monophyletic group with low support (Jackknife < 56%). Similarly, its sister-group relationship with Holoadeninae received only low support (Jackknife = 11%). The relationship between Niceforonia (Hypodactylinae) + Holoadeninae, and the subfamily Pristimantinae showed low support (Jackknife = 20%). Furthermore, a highly supported sister-group relationship (Jackknife = 100%) was recovered between Strabomantinae and the clade composed of Hypodactylinae, Holoadeninae, and Pristimantinae.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Phylogenetic relationships of Niceforonia and outgroups recovered in one of the 97 most-parsimonious trees of 24,174 steps from a parsimony analysis in TNT treating gaps as a fifth state. Some genera are shown as collapsed clades; the complete tree is provided in Suppl. material 3. Black dot indicates nodes that collapse in the strict consensus. Numbers on nodes are Parsimony jackknife absolute frequencies values. Nodes without values indicate a value < 70% of the jackknife value and an asterisk indicates a 100%. Character states with primitive-derived states are indicated within the squares (see text and Suppl. material 1 for character definitions). Color-coding: red and blue highlight the genus Niceforonia and a clade comprising of Bahius, Barycholos, Phyllonastes, and Urkuphryne, respectively; red squares indicate unique, homoplastic.

Comparison between parsimony and ML topologies revealed topological conflicts among species within the same genus; however, deeper nodes representing intergeneric relationships were robustly recovered and congruent across both analyses (Fig. 3; Suppl. materials 3, 4). The only exceptions to the intergeneric congruence involved the placement of Niceforonia (Hypodactylinae), Barycholos and the relationships within the Qosqophryne–Noblella–Microkayla clade. Notably, the positions of all these clades were poorly supported (Jackknife < 70%; UFB < 95%). Under parsimony, Niceforonia was recovered as sister to Holoadeninae, whereas Maximum Likelihood (ML) placed it as sister to Pristimantinae. Conversely, Barycholos was recovered as sister to the Urkuphryne + Phyllonastes clade in the parsimony analysis, whereas Maximum Likelihood (ML) placed it as sister to a broader clade including Bahius, Urkuphryne, and Phyllonastes. Finally, the position of Microkayla shifted from being sister to Qosqophryne + Noblella in the parsimony analysis to being recovered as sister to Qosqophryne (with this pair being sister to Noblella) in the ML tree (Fig. 3; Suppl. materials 3, 4).

Phylogenetic relationships within Niceforonia were congruent across both analytical approaches (Fig. 3; Suppl. materials 3, 4), with the sole exception of the relative positions of N. dracula, N. brunnea, and N. elassodiscus. Under parsimony, N. dracula is sister to N. brunnea, which are in turn sister to N. elassodiscus. In contrast, in the Maximum Likelihood (ML) analysis, N. dracula is sister to N. elassodiscus, and this clade is sister to N. brunnea. In both analyses, the new species was recovered as sister to N. mantipus. The uncorrected p-distances for the 16S gene showed a relatively high genetic differentiation among species of the genus Niceforonia (Table 2). On the basis of phenotypic and molecular evidence, below we provide a formal description of a new species of Niceforonia from the Serranía de los Paraguas, Colombia.

Table 2.

Percentage of uncorrected p-distances of the 16S gene of Niceforonia species. Niceforonia tempestuosa is shown in bold.

Taxon (n) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
1 N. brunnea 0.00
2 N. dracula (2) 6.07–6.29 0.00
3 N. elassodiscus 5.84 5.65–5.86 0.00
4 N. mantipus (3) 10.54 10.34 11.01 0.00
5 N. nigrovittata Clade A (2) 11.01 12.14–12.35 13.20 12.29 0.00
6 N. nigrovittata Clade C (2) 8.02–8.20 9.19–9.38 8.49–8.67 9.2–9.37 9.52–9.58 0.00
7 N. nigrovittata Clade D (2) 8.41–8.45 9.13–9.17 8.43–8.46 10.03–10.07 9.72–9.75 1.33–1.78 0.00
8 N. quilloturo (2) 6.07–6.51 6.53–6.75 5.65–5.86 11.91–12.35 12.79–13.23 10.34–10.94 10.30–10.71 0.00
9 N. peraccai 5.42 6.53–6.75 5.20 10.13 11.71 8.96–9.14 8.68–8.71 4.12–4.56 0.00
10 N. philippi 17.60 16.79–17.01 17.36 18.12 17.36 16.67–16.75 15.98–16.04 17.62–18.06 17.01 0.00
11 N. sp 1 (3) 5.46–5.83 6.52–6.94 7.35–7.36 10.30–10.33 12.12–12.31 8.88–9.13 9.09–9.29 7.15–7.59 6.71–6.73 17.83–17.85 0.00
12 N. sp 2 (2) 6.49–8.00 7.61–9.57 5.85–7.58 11.90–13.21 14.06–14.71 10.04–10.99 9.81–10.55 4.55–6.06 4.11–5.85 17.18–18.05 7.79–9.10 0.00
13 N. sp 4 5.85 6.10–6.31 6.28 11.92 6.50 10.56–10.72 10.48–10.52 1.30–1.73 4.78 16.97 6.50 3.90–5.20 0.00
14 N. tempestuosa (2) 12.52–12.55 13.86–13.90 13.22–13.25 7.44–7.45 13.62–13.64 10.00–10.08 10.00–10.05 14.78–15.25 12.79–12.82 18.29–18.33 12.50–12.56 14.08–15.01 14.78–14.81 0.00

Systematics

Family: Strabomantidae Hedges, Duellman & Heinicke, 2008a

Genus: NiceforoniaGoin & Cochran, 1963

Niceforonia tempestuosa sp. nov.

0B85AE96-8721-5775-A880-D63DF730612D

https://zoobank.org/D5331657-A4E6-4A86-992D-ABCD98FB6A78

Figs 4A–D, 5A–C, 6A, 6C

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Living specimens of Niceforonia tempestuosa and N. mantipus. Dorsal and ventral views of adult males of Niceforonia tempestuosa. A, C. ARUQ-1885, SVL 24.5 mm; B, D. ARUQ-1882, SVL 23.8 mm and N. mantipus; E, G. Specimen not collected; F, H. ARUQ-1881, SVL 23.5 mm.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Dorsal, ventral, and lateral views of Niceforonia tempestuosa. A–C. Holotype (ARUQ-1885, SVL 24.5 mm); D–F. Niceforonia mantipus (ARUQ-1881, SVL 23.5 mm).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Ventral views of the hand and foot of preserved adult male specimens of Niceforonia tempestuosa and N. mantipus. A, C. Hand and foot of Niceforonia tempestuosa (ARUQ-1883); B, D. N. mantipus (ARUQ-1881). Scale bar: 6 mm.

Proposed standard Spanish name.

Rana de los bosques montanos nublados.

Proposed standard English name.

Montane cloud forest frog.

Type material.

Holotype. • ARUQ-1885 (field no. JJS 702), an adult male from an interior forest at a site named “Corazón” within the Reserva Natural Comunitaria Cerro El Inglés (4°45'N, 76°17'W, 2261 m), Municipality of El Cairo, Valle del Cauca, Colombia; collected by Jhon Jairo Ospina-Sarria, Andrés Felipe Rodríguez-Betancourt, Ximena Gómez-Sepúlveda, Iván Darío Morales-Vertel, Valentina Vélez-Franco, Irene Ceballos-Castro, and Isabella García-Gómez on 25 October 2024. Paratypes. A total of 11 specimens. • ARUQ-1882 (adult male) and ARUQ-1883 (juvenile male), collected on 24 October 2024; • ARUQ-1884 (adult male), collected with the holotype on 25 October 2024; • ARUQ-1889, 1891, 1893 (adult males), ARUQ-1892 (subadult male), ARUQ-1890 (subadult female), and ARUQ-1886 (juvenile male), collected on 25 April 2025; all from Corazón, Reserva Natural Comunitaria Cerro El Inglés. • ARUQ-1887 (adult female) and ARUQ-1888 (subadult female), collected on 20 April 2025 from Bosque Puente Quebrada Las Amarillas, Reserva Natural Comunitaria Cerro El Inglés.

Diagnosis.

Niceforonia tempestuosa is diagnosed by the following combination of characters: (1) skin of dorsum smooth with scattered small warts; dorsolateral and \ /-shaped scapular folds present; venter smooth, discoidal fold absent; (2) tympanic membrane differentiated, upright-oval to round; its length 33.3–44.8% of eye length in six adult males and 47% in one adult female; prominent tympanic annulus, its upper edge covered by supratympanic fold, extending only just posterior to tympanic annulus; (3) snout subacuminate in dorsal view, rounded in profile; a fleshy swelling of lip in adult males; canthus rostralis straight; (4) upper eyelid bearing minute tubercles, narrower than IOD (62.0–85.1% IOD); interocular tubercle absent; cranial crest absent; (5) choanae small, ovoid; partially concealed by palatal shelf of maxillary arch; dentigerous processes of vomers prominent, triangular in outline, separated medially for a distance equal to half the width of the visible dentigerous process, positioned posterior to level of choanae, each dentigerous process of vomers bearing five to seven teeth; (6) males lacking vocal slits, small non-spinous nuptial pads on median surface of thumb above joint with metacarpal; (7) first finger equal or slightly longer than second; circumferential grooves present on all fingers; discs slightly wider than digits, disc on finger I equal to disc on finger II and these in turn smaller than discs on fingers III and IV; morphology of the ungual flap on fingers pointed; (8) fingers with lateral fringes, weakly defined on outer side of finger 4; palmar tubercle bifid (inner lobe largest); thenar tubercle oval, slightly smaller than inner lobe of palmar tubercle; supernumerary tubercles prominent, two on thumb and third finger and one on second and fourth; subarticular tubercles present; subarticular tubercles projecting, with elongate base and larger than supernumerary tubercles; (9) three low ulnar tubercles not coalesced; antebrachial tubercle present; (10) small tubercles on heel and outer edge of tarsus; inner tarsal fold absent; (11) elongate inner metatarsal tubercle, its length twice its width; protuberant, conical outer metatarsal tubercle one-half size of inner metatarsal tubercle; supernumerary plantar tubercles absent; subarticular tubercles present; subarticular tubercles projecting, with elongate base; (12) toes bearing prominent lateral fringes, in finger III and IV only visible in the distal part of digits; toe webbing absent; toe III much longer than toe V; toe III extending to penultimate subarticular tubercle of toe IV; toe V reaching two-thirds between basal and penultimate subarticular tubercles of toe IV; discs and circumferential grooves present on all toes; discs of toes II–IV larger than discs on fingers I and V; (13) color in life: dorsum reddish-brown to grayish, with or without two dark brown marks originating at the snout, extending through the loreal region and upper eyelids, and continuing along the \ /-shaped scapular folds to converge at the sacral region. Supratympanic fold with a dark mark extending to the upper edge of the cream-colored postrictal ridge. A broad dark mark, bordered by a cream coloration, extends along the outer edge of the dorsolateral folds; it becomes wider at the posterior ends, where the supra-inguinal spots are located. Black anal patch present. Diffuse brown labial bars and marked transverse brown bars on the arms and legs. The groin, and anterior and posterior surfaces of the thighs are reddish-orange, the anterior part of flanks is yellow, and the ventral surfaces of thighs, belly, and arms are yellow. The throat is brown with silvery-gray flecks, featuring a superficial yellow coloration restricted to its medial portion that does not extend to the margins. However, the intensity of this yellow and orange coloration may vary among individuals; specifically, it can be much less intense (paler) in juveniles, subadults, and some females. Ventral surfaces of hands and feet, dark. Iris bright copper with black flecks; (14) males smaller than females; SVL in adult males 21.5–25.1 mm (mean ± 1 SD = 23.7 ± 1.3 mm; n = 6) and 31.1 mm in one female.

Comparisons with congeners.

Niceforonia tempestuosa is distinctive in the genus by having dorsolateral folds, tympanic membrane, fleshy swelling of lip in adult males, nuptial pads, circumferential grooves on all fingers, black facemask on loreal region, dorsum reddish-brown to grayish with two dark brown marks, ventral surfaces of thighs, belly, and arms, yellow, black anal patch, and dark supra-inguinal spots. Niceforonia tempestuosa most closely resembles N. mantipus and N. nigrovittata by having dorsolateral folds and \ /-shaped scapular folds, tympanic membrane, snout subacuminate in dorsal view, fleshy swelling of lip in adult males, dark supra-inguinal spots, venter smooth and by lacking discoidal fold and vocal slits. Nevertheless, Niceforonia tempestuosa is distinguished by having a yellow belly and ventral surfaces of the arms and thighs (light gray background with silvery flecks in N. mantipus), and a reddish-orange coloration on the groin and the anterior and posterior surfaces of the thighs (dark brown with silvery and coppery-red flecks in N. mantipus). Furthermore, males of the new species exhibit a brown throat with silvery-gray flecks and a superficial yellow coloration restricted to its medial portion that does not extend to the margins, whereas males of N. mantipus have a light gray throat with silvery flecks and two well-defined, large dark blotches on the lateral base of the throat (Figs 4, 5). Additionally, Niceforonia tempestuosa is distinguished by having nuptial pads (absent in N. nigrovittata) and a reddish-orange posterior surface of the thighs (brown with cream flecks in N. nigrovittata) (Lynch and Duellman 1980).

Niceforonia tempestuosa can be distinguished from the remaining species of the genus by having circumferential grooves on all fingers (absent in fingers I and II in N. adenobrachiaArdila-Robayo, Ruiz-Carranza & Barrera-Rodriguez, 1996, N. brunnea, N. latens Lynch, 1989, N. nana, and N. peraccai). Furthermore, Niceforonia tempestuosa is distinguished from N. adenobrachia, N. brunnea, and N. peraccai by having a black anal patch, and from N. latens and N. nana by the presence of a tympanic membrane. The development of dorsolateral folds distinguishes N. tempestuosa from N. aderca (Lynch, 2003), N. elassodiscus, N. fallaciosa (Duellman, 2000), and N. philippi. Additionally, N. tempestuosa lacks vocal slits (present in N. aderca, N. dracula, N. philippi, and N. quilloturo) and discoidal fold (present in N. dracula, N. elassodiscus, N. fallaciosa, N. quilloturo) (Reyes-Puig et al. 2026). The presence of dark supra-inguinal spots distinguishes N. tempestuosa from N. babax (Lynch, 1989) and N. lucida (Cannatella, 1984); these species further differ from N. tempestuosa by having vocal slits. Niceforonia tempestuosa differs from N. columbiana (Werner, 1899) by lacking basal webbing (Lynch 1975), and from N. araiodactyla (Duellman & Pramuk, 1999) and N. elassodiscus by lacking a discoidal fold (Duellman and Pramuk 1999). Furthermore, the presence of scattered small warts on a smooth dorsum distinguishes N. tempestuosa from N. araiodactyla, which has uniformly smooth dorsal skin (Duellman and Pramuk 1999). Additionally, the reddish-orange coloration on the posterior surface of the thighs distinguishes N. tempestuosa from N. elassodiscus (which has a uniform gray to brown coloration on the posterior surface). Finally, Niceforonia tempestuosa is genetically highly divergent from all other species in the genus, with uncorrected p-distances in 16S gene ranging from 7.44–18.33% (Table 2).

Descriptions of the holotype.

An adult male with head slightly wider than body; HW 40.8% of SVL; HL 35.1% of SVL; snout long, subacuminate in dorsal view, rounded in profile; eye-nostril distance 82.7% of diameter of eye; nostrils protuberant, directed slightly back. Canthus rostralis straight in dorsal view, not elevated; loreal region depressed; top of head flat; upper eyelid bearing minute tubercles, its width 62.1% of IOD; supratympanic fold extending only just posterior to tympanic annulus; tympanic membrane present, upper edge of tympanic annulus covered by supratympanic fold; postrictal tubercles fused into ridge. Choanae small, ovoid; partially concealed by palatal shelf of maxillary arch; dentigerous processes of vomers prominent, each process bearing seven teeth; tongue longer than wide, its posterior border not notched, posterior fourth not adherent to floor of mouth; vocal slits absent.

Skin of dorsum smooth with scattered small warts; dorsolateral and \ /-shaped scapular folds present; skin on belly, and throat smooth (Figs 4A–D, 5A–C); discoidal fold absent, no tubercles in the cloacal region. Three low ulnar tubercles on the ventrolateral edge of the forearm, not coalesced; palmar tubercle bifid (inner lobe largest); thenar tubercle oval, slightly smaller than inner lobe of palmar tubercle; subarticular tubercles projecting, with elongate base, one on thumb and second finger and two on third and fourth fingers, and larger than supernumerary tubercles; supernumerary tubercles prominent, two on thumb and third finger and one on second and fourth. Small nuptial pads on median surface of thumb above joint with metacarpal.

Fingers having lateral fringes, weakly defined on outer side of finger 4; relative lengths of fingers I > II < IV < III, all fingers having terminal ventral pads well defined by circumferential grooves; disc on thumb equal to disc on finger II; discs on fingers III and IV smaller than tympanic membrane; morphology of the ungual flap on fingers pointed. Short robust hind limbs; when hind limbs flexed against axis of body, heels touching or barely overlapping; tibia length 54.7% of SVL; foot length 55.9% of SVL; heel and outer edge of tarsus having small tubercles; inner tarsal fold absent; inner metatarsal tubercle elongate, its length twice its width; conical outer metatarsal tubercle one-half size of inner metatarsal tubercle; toes bearing lateral fringes and discs on expanded pads; webbing absent; relative lengths of toes I < II < V < III < IV, toe III much longer than toe V, toe III extending to penultimate subarticular tubercle of toe IV, toe V reaching two thirds between basal and penultimate subarticular tubercles of toe IV (Figs 5B, 6C), all toes having terminal ventral pads well defined by circumferential grooves; discs of toes II–IV larger than discs on fingers I and V; subarticular tubercles projecting, with elongate base, one on toes I and II, two on toes III and V, and three on toe IV; supernumerary plantar tubercles absent.

In life, dorsum brown with two dark brown marks originating at the snout and extending through the loreal region and upper eyelids, where they become diffuse, and continuing along the \ /-shaped scapular folds (without converging). A weak dark mark, bordered by a cream coloration, extends along the outer edge of the dorsolateral folds; it becomes wider at the posterior ends, where the supra-inguinal spots are located. Postrictal ridge cream-colored; labial bars diffuse and brown; arms and legs with marked transverse brown bars. Black anal patch bordered by a cream coloration. Groin, and anterior and posterior surfaces of thighs, reddish-orange; anterior part of flanks, yellow. Ventral surfaces of thighs, belly, and arms, yellow with uniformly distributed dark brown marks (more abundant on the flanks and anterior part of the belly). The throat is brown with silvery-gray flecks, featuring a superficial yellow coloration restricted to its medial portion that does not extend to the margins (Fig. 4C, D). Iris bright copper with black flecks (Fig. 4A, B).

Measurements of holotype (mm).

SVL 24.5, tibia length 13.4, foot length 13.7, HL 8.7, HW 9.9, IOD 2.9, tympanum diameter 1.3, internarial distance 3.0, width of upper eyelid 1.8, diameter of eye 2.9, eye-nostril distance 2.4.

Variation.

Sexual dimorphism in size, with adult females being larger than adult males (Table 3). Dorsal coloration also varies, ranging from reddish-brown to grayish-brown. The same applies to the longitudinal dark markings extending from the snout to the sacral region, which are present in some specimens. We also noted variation in the yellow and orange coloration of ventral surfaces can be much less intense (paler) in juveniles, subadults, and some females. In contrast, the dark supra-inguinal spots are consistently present in all specimens. The fleshy swelling of the lip is only evident in adult males.

Table 3.

Selected meristic, mensural (in mm), and proportional (in percentages) data from the type series of Niceforonia tempestuosa.

Character Male (n = 6) Female (n = 1)
Snout-vent length 21.5–25.1 (23.7 ± 1.3) 31.1
Head width 8.6–10.0 (9.5 ± 0.5) 11.8
Head length 7.8–8.7 (8.4 ± 0.3) 10.8
Interorbital distance 2.1–2.9 (2.4 ± 0.3) 2.7
Upper eyelid width 1.5–1.8 (1.7 ± 0.1) 2.3
Eye diameter 2.4–2.9 (2.6 ± 0.1) 3.4
Eye-nostril distance 2.0–2.4 (2.1 ± 0.1) 2.3
Internarial distance 2.6–3.0 (2.8 ± 0.2) 3.5
Tympanum diameter 0.9–1.3 (1.0 ± 0.1) 1.6
Tibia length 11.9–14.1 (12.9 ± 0.7) 16.2
Foot length 12.0–13.7 (13.1 ± 0.6) 16.8
Head length / Snout–vent length 34.6–35.7 34.7
Head width / Snout–vent length 39.0–40.8 37.9
Eye diameter / Head length 30.7–33.3 31.4
Eye-nostril distance / Eye diameter 74.0–87.5 67.6
Upper eyelid width / Interorbital distance 62.0–80.9 85.1
Interorbital distance / Head width 22.8–29.2 22.8
Tympanum diameter / Eye diameter 33.3–44.8 47.0
Tibia length / Snout–vent length 52.5–56.1 52.0
Foot length / Snout–vent length 54.1–55.9 54.0
Distribution and ecology.

The species is known only from two localities in humid montane forests of the central part of the Cordillera Occidental of Colombia, within the Key Biodiversity Area (KBA) Serranía de los Paraguas: Reserva Natural Comunitaria Cerro El Inglés (El Cairo, Valle del Cauca) and El Mirador (Balsal, Versalles, Valle del Cauca, 4°40'N, 76°17'W), between 2169–2294 m (Fig. 1). The species inhabits the leaf litter of well-preserved forest interiors, where it can be found by disturbing the substrate during the day or actively foraging at night. The species exhibits a preference for sloping over level microhabitats. Individuals have also been observed within crevices formed by the buttress roots of large trees and among the stilt roots of Wettinia sp. palms (Fig. 7). As a leaf-litter dweller, this species is syntopic with Strabomantis cerastes, another inhabitant of the forest floor in the Serranía de los Paraguas.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Habitat of Niceforonia tempestuosa at the type locality. The habitat is characterized by the presence of large tree buttresses and stilt roots of Wettinia sp. palms, with the forest floor covered by abundant leaf litter.

Etymology.

The specific epithet is the feminine adjective tempestuosa (meaning “stormy”), derived from the Latin noun tempestas (meaning “storm” or “weather”). This name was chosen for local communities as a metaphor for the global climate emergency, referring to the increased frequency and intensity of extreme weather events—symbolized by the “storm”—which represent a growing threat to global biodiversity. The discovery of this new species in the Key Biodiversity Area (KBA) Serranía de los Paraguas underscores the resilience of this biodiversity hotspot amidst the current climate crisis, safeguarded by the persistent efforts of local communities and biodiversity guardians.

Remarks.

Lynch and Duellman (1980), Lynch (1989), and Lynch (2003) reported the occurrence of a fleshy swelling of the upper lip in adult males of N. nigrovittata, N. mantipus, and N. aderca, respectively, followed more recently by Reyes-Puig et al. (2026) for N. quilloturo. We herein report this character in males of Niceforonia latens and Niceforonia tempestuosa. According to Lynch (2003), the presence of this character exclusively in males suggests an involvement in either courtship or the excavation of egg burrows. Among brachycephaloid frogs, a character resembling the fleshy swelling of the upper lip found in Niceforonia occurs in species of the genus Eleutherodactylus, subgenus Pelorius (Hedges et al. 2008a). As noted by Hedges et al. (2008a), species possessing shovel-shaped snouts are specialized in constructing enclosed underground chambers for vocalization and, presumably, oviposition. To date, the courtship and nesting behaviors of Niceforonia species remain unknown; therefore, the functional implications of this labial swelling warrant further investigation.

Conservation and threats

The Key Biodiversity Area (KBA) Serranía de los Paraguas hosts more than 100 amphibian species, 32 of which are threatened with extinction according to the IUCN Red List. Although amphibians in this area have been studied since the 1980s, new localities within this biodiversity hotspot have only recently begun to be explored. Given this, both a greater amphibian diversity and a broader distribution for Niceforonia tempestuosa could exist within the region. This area is currently impacted by habitat loss driven by illicit crop expansion, logging, agricultural frontier expansion (e.g., Hass avocado farming), and increasing pressure from large-scale mining interests. These extractive projects are deceptively promoted under the narrative of local development, masking their severe ecological toll and long-term socio-environmental damage. These threats have escalated in recent years, largely driven by institutional absence and persistent socio-political challenges in Colombia. To confront all these challenges, a joint conservation initiative led by Fundación Calima and the local community organization Corporación Serraniagua has been ongoing since 2019, supported by The Rufford Foundation, the Prince Bernhard Nature Fund (PBNF), and the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF). This initiative combines acoustic, climatic, and field monitoring, basic research, the identification and protection of breeding habitats, and community outreach activities. These efforts specifically aim to empower local populations with the knowledge needed to make informed decisions regarding development projects proposed within their territories. Among the actions performed to protect habitats and increase the resilience of amphibian diversity in this hotspot, zoning strategies have been implemented to regulate the impact of scientific research and ecotourism. Specifically for Niceforonia tempestuosa, these measures focus on restricting foot traffic in areas with dense leaf litter, where the species reaches its highest population densities. Furthermore, in coordination with local landowners, fences are being installed to safeguard riparian forests and streams from the encroachment of the agricultural and livestock frontier, complemented by signage that informs visitors of mitigation protocols in these sensitive areas.

Evaluation of diagnostic character states

In the context of the phylogenetic hypothesis favored herein (Fig. 3), we found that the occurrence of dark supra-inguinal spots is optimized as a synapomorphy of a clade within the genus Niceforonia that includes N. brunnea, N. dracula, N. elassodiscus, N. mantipus, N. nigrovittata, N. quilloturo, N. peraccai, four candidate species, and N. tempestuosa. The occurrence of dark supra-inguinal spots also optimizes as a synapomorphy of a well-supported clade (Jackknife = 99%) within Holoadeninae composed of the genera Bahius, Barycholos, Phyllonastes, and Urkuphryne (Fig. 3). These optimizations are also supported by the ML topology (Suppl. material 4).

Discussion and conclusions

The phylogenetic position of Niceforonia within the superfamily Brachycephaloidea has been shown to be unstable. For example, it was recognized within the subfamily Strabomantinae by Hedges et al. (2008a), albeit with low nodal support. Subsequently, Pyron and Wiens (2011) recovered it as sister to a clade comprising the genus Strabomantis (Strabomantinae) and the family Craugastoridae, although this relationship was weakly supported. Padial et al. (2014) later assigned it to the subfamily Holoadeninae, a placement that received high nodal support. Furthermore, it was recovered as a member of the newly recognized subfamily Hypodactylinae, which was placed as sister to a clade composed of the subfamilies Strabomantinae, Holoadeninae, and Pristimantinae by Heinicke et al. (2018), a placement that received strong nodal support. More recently, Portik et al. (2023) recovered it as a sister clade to Strabomantinae, a relationship that received moderate support. Within this context, our phylogeny shows that Niceforonia is not part of the subfamilies Holoadeninae or Strabomantinae. This is consistent with the findings of Pyron and Wiens (2011), Heinicke et al. (2018), and Portik et al. (2023), although the relationships among these subfamilies remain contentious. Analyzed together, this evidence clearly indicates a genuine evolutionary or methodological conflict rather than a mere lack of phylogenetic resolution, an issue that must be tested more rigorously. This will involve not only increased taxon sampling but also the essential incorporation of phenotypic data into total evidence analyses. Such an integration is critical, as combining phenotypic and molecular evidence is a useful approach for dealing with phylogenetic incongruence (e.g., Koch and Thompson 2020; Neumann et al. 2020), a necessity highlighted by the conflicting phylogenetic signals regarding the genus Niceforonia.

While resolving the deep-level placement of the genus remains a macro-systematic challenge, fine-scale evolutionary relationships within Niceforonia also exhibit subtle variations across studies. When comparing our in-group topology with the most recent contribution by Reyes-Puig et al. (2026), we find a high degree of overall topological congruence, with differences restricted to only two specific clades (Fig. 3). First, regarding the relationships of N. peraccai, Reyes-Puig et al. (2026) recovered this taxon as sister to N. sp. 2. In contrast, our phylogeny places N. peraccai as sister to a broader clade composed of N. sp. 2, N. sp. 3, N. sp. 4, and N. quilloturo. Second, we observe a discrepancy in the relationships among N. brunnea, N. dracula, and N. elassodiscus. Reyes-Puig et al. (2026) recovered N. elassodiscus as sister to N. dracula, which together form the sister group to a clade comprising N. brunnea, N. peraccai, N. sp. 2, N. sp. 3, N. sp. 4, and N. quilloturo. Conversely, in our phylogeny, N. elassodiscus is sister to a clade composed of N. brunnea and N. dracula, which in turn is sister to the clade containing N. peraccai, N. sp. 2, N. sp. 3, N. sp. 4, and N. quilloturo.

These topological and phylogenetic discrepancies, which may be attributed to differences in taxon and character sampling, as well as the distinct inference methods employed, further highlight the necessity of pursuing a comprehensive taxonomic revision of the genus Niceforonia. As demonstrated by the recent findings of Reyes-Puig et al. (2026) in Ecuador, it is highly likely that undescribed, cryptic species remain hidden under the names of already recognized taxa. In the case of Colombia, the species we describe herein was long recognized as Niceforonia mantipus, a widely distributed Colombian species. To refine the delimitation of N. mantipus, we incorporated, for the first time, samples from the Valle del Cauca (Western Cordillera) and Quindío (Central Cordillera) departments in Colombia, including material from the type locality. These samples were recovered as closely related (Fig. 3). Given that N. mantipus also occurs in the south (Cauca) and north (Antioquia), further assessment of the taxonomic status of these populations is necessary. In this context, integrating phenotypic and molecular evidence is essential for a taxonomic revision of Niceforonia, as it allows for the delimitation of cryptic species and ensures that the nomenclature accurately reflects both its diversity and evolutionary history.

Phylogenetic significance of dark supra-inguinal spots in Strabomantidae

Our results demonstrate that the occurrence of dark supra-inguinal spots is phylogenetically informative, diagnosing two clades within the family Strabomantidae. The first clade appears within the genus Niceforonia and includes N. brunnea, N. dracula, N. elassodiscus, N. mantipus, N. nigrovittata, N. quilloturo, N. peraccai, four candidate species, and N. tempestuosa (Fig. 3). This character optimization is consistent with the topology proposed by Portik et al. (2023), where N. brunnea, N. peraccai, and N. nigrovittata form a clade that does not include N. nana and N. philippi, and the genus Niceforonia is sister to Strabomantis. Following the proposal of Lynch (1989), we maintain the name Niceforonia nigrovittata species group to recognize this clade, diagnosed by the occurrence of dark supra-inguinal spots, thus maintaining stability and the well-established historical use of this name in the literature. We also assessed the distribution of dark supra-inguinal spots among Niceforonia species for which molecular data are not available, finding that this character appears in N. aderca and N. fallaciosa. Consequently, we propose including these two species in the N. nigrovittata species group. The inclusion of these species in the group is tentative and requires rigorous testing using molecular data, as current evidence suggests that supra-inguinal spots also occur in genera other than Niceforonia, such as Barycholos, Noblella, Phrynopus, and Phyllonastes within the family Strabomantidae.

The second clade where the occurrence of dark supra-inguinal spots optimizes as a synapomorphy appears within the subfamily Holoadeninae and includes the genera Bahius, Barycholos, Phyllonastes, and Urkuphryne (Fig. 3). This character optimization is consistent with the recent work of Ortega et al. (2025), whose topology at the level of relationships among genera for Holoadeninae was also recovered in our analysis. Regarding the clade composed of these four genera, Ospina-Sarria and Grant (2022) previously proposed a synapomorphy for a clade composed of Phyllonastes + Barycholos based on the posterior origin of the m. iliacus externus on the iliac shaft. Considering this evidence, it is necessary to assess the origin of the m. iliacus externus in the recently described genus Urkuphryne, which will clarify the distribution of this nested phenotypic synapomorphy within the subfamily Holoadeninae. Analyzed together, anatomical (origin of the m. iliacus externus), molecular (DNA sequences), and morphological (dark supra-inguinal spots) evidence corroborates the monophyly of this group within the subfamily Holoadeninae, granting multi-level resolution and precise taxonomic diagnoses that demonstrate the integration of molecular and phenotypic evidence as a powerful tool for testing phylogenetic hypotheses in brachycephaloid frogs.

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Niceforonia tempestuosa

Acknowledgements

We thank the Corporación Serraniagua, the Gómez-Bolívar family at Cerro El Inglés, and Gean Carlos Franco and Cesar Steven Montoya in Versalles for their collaboration and assistance during our expeditions to Serranía de los Paraguas, Colombia. We are grateful to J.D. Lynch, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Instituto de Ciencias Naturales (ICN); R. Brown, R. Glor, L. Welton, and W.E. Duellman (deceased), University of Kansas Museum of Natural History (KU); D.A. Kizirian, American Museum of Natural History (AMNH), and Martha Patricia Ramirez and Elson Meneses-Pelayo, Universidad Industrial de Santander for loans, workspace and additional help with specimens. This research was carried out under the authorization of the Autoridad Nacional de Licencias Ambientales (ANLA) of Colombia, under research permit No. 001349 of 5 July 2024.

Citation

Ospina-Sarria JJ, Rodríguez-Betancourt AF, Gómez-Sepúlveda X, Morales-Vertel ID, Vélez-Franco V, Gallego-Posada N, Herrera-Rengifo JD, Grajales Escobar JE, Ceballos-Castro I, García-Gómez I, Velásquez-Trujillo DA, Ortiz Baez AS, Mendez Narvaez J (2026) A new species of Niceforonia (Amphibia, Anura, Strabomantidae) from the Serranía de los Paraguas, Colombia, with the description of a new phenotypic synapomorphy for the Niceforonia nigrovittata species group. ZooKeys 1289: 159–184. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1289.198411

Funding Statement

Prince Bernhard Nature Fund (PBNF) Idea Wild

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

The research protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Fundación Calima for biodiversity research, which aligns with the recommendations provided by the IUCN Amphibian Specialist Group. Fieldwork was conducted following the institution's strict protocol established to prevent infections, minimize stress, and avoid habitat alterations in wild amphibian populations.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) use

The authors accept full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the disclosure of any use of AI.

No AI tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Rufford Foundation (grant numbers 50033-B, 27658-1 and 35562-2), Idea Wild, the Prince Bernhard Nature Fund (PBNF), the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund - CEPF (grant numbers 112968 and 115870), and Conservation Connect. Irene C.C. acknowledges support from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Brazil (FAPESP procs. #2018/15425-0 and CEPID #2021/10639-5), Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (ANPCyT, PICT 346/2019 and 059/2021), and CONICET (PIP 2800). Molecular sequences of Niceforonia mantipus from Reserva Natural Bremen (Quindío) was obtained with support of the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP Procs. 2014/03585-2 and 2016/25070-0).

Author contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, validation, data collection, writing: JJOS, AFRB, ICC, IGG, DAVT, ASOB, JMN; data collection, data curation: XGS, IDM, VVF; field survey: JJOS, AFRB, XGS, IDM, VVF, NGP, JDHR, JEGE, ICC, IGG; supervision: JJOS.

Author ORCIDs

J.J. Ospina-Sarria https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9099-7793

A.F. Rodríguez-Betancourt https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0298-0677

X. Gómez-Sepúlveda https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5582-0709

I.D. Morales-Vertel https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4465-4432

V. Vélez-Franco https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3148-2831

N. Gallego-Posada https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5113-7531

J.D. Herrera-Rengifo https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5683-6558

J.E. Grajales Escobar https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0271-7285

I. Ceballos-Castro https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7478-7836

I. García-Gómez https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3326-0290

D.A. Velásquez-Trujillo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9971-8431

A.S. Ortiz Baez https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0080-0633

J. Mendez Narvaez https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6127-3377

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1

List of examined specimens

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Jhon Jairo Ospina-Sarria, Andrés Felipe Rodríguez-Betancourt, Ximena Gómez-Sepúlveda, Iván Darío Morales-Vertel, Valentina Vélez-Franco, Nayely Gallego-Posada, Jose Daniel Herrera-Rengifo, John Edison Grajales Escobar, Irene Ceballos-Castro, Isabella García-Gómez, David Andrés Velásquez-Trujillo, Ayda Susana Ortiz Baez, Javier Mendez Narvaez

Data type

docx

Explanation note

List of examined specimens (specimens with institutional collection numbers were physically examined by the lead author), taxonomic distribution of dark supra-inguinal spots, and data sources.

Supplementary material 2

GenBank accession numbers, voucher specimens, and molecular markers

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Jhon Jairo Ospina-Sarria, Andrés Felipe Rodríguez-Betancourt, Ximena Gómez-Sepúlveda, Iván Darío Morales-Vertel, Valentina Vélez-Franco, Nayely Gallego-Posada, Jose Daniel Herrera-Rengifo, John Edison Grajales Escobar, Irene Ceballos-Castro, Isabella García-Gómez, David Andrés Velásquez-Trujillo, Ayda Susana Ortiz Baez, Javier Mendez Narvaez

Data type

docx

Explanation note

GenBank accession numbers, voucher specimens, and molecular markers used in this study. New sequences generated for this study are indicated in bold.

Supplementary material 3

Phylogenetic relationships of Niceforonia and outgroups

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Jhon Jairo Ospina-Sarria, Andrés Felipe Rodríguez-Betancourt, Ximena Gómez-Sepúlveda, Iván Darío Morales-Vertel, Valentina Vélez-Franco, Nayely Gallego-Posada, Jose Daniel Herrera-Rengifo, John Edison Grajales Escobar, Irene Ceballos-Castro, Isabella García-Gómez, David Andrés Velásquez-Trujillo, Ayda Susana Ortiz Baez, Javier Mendez Narvaez

Data type

pdf

Explanation note

Phylogenetic relationships of Niceforonia and outgroups recovered in one of the 97 most-parsimonious trees of 24,174 steps from a parsimony analysis in TNT treating gaps as a fifth state. Numbers on nodes are Parsimony jackknife absolute frequencies values. Nodes without values indicate value < 70% of jackknife value. Character states with primitive-derived states are indicated within the squares (see text and Suppl. material 1 for character definitions). Color-coding: red and blue highlight the genus Niceforonia and a clade comprising of Bahius, Barycholos, Phyllonastes, and Urkuphryne, respectively; red squares indicate unique, homoplastic.

Supplementary material 4

Phylogenetic relationships of Niceforonia and outgroups recovered in the maximum likelihood analysis with IQ-TREE

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Jhon Jairo Ospina-Sarria, Andrés Felipe Rodríguez-Betancourt, Ximena Gómez-Sepúlveda, Iván Darío Morales-Vertel, Valentina Vélez-Franco, Nayely Gallego-Posada, Jose Daniel Herrera-Rengifo, John Edison Grajales Escobar, Irene Ceballos-Castro, Isabella García-Gómez, David Andrés Velásquez-Trujillo, Ayda Susana Ortiz Baez, Javier Mendez Narvaez

Data type

pdf

Explanation note

Phylogenetic relationships of Niceforonia and outgroups recovered in the maximum likelihood analysis with IQ-TREE (log-likelihood of the best ML tree: -105312.6350). Numbers around nodes are the ultrafast bootstrap support values. Color-coding: red and blue highlight the genus Niceforonia and a clade comprising of Bahius, Barycholos, Phyllonastes and Urkuphryne, respectively.

References

  1. Acosta-Galvis AR, Streicher JW, Manuelli L, Cuddy T, de Sá RO (2018) Molecular insights into the phylogenetic placement of the poorly known genus Niceforonia Goin & Cochran, 1963 (Anura: Brachycephaloidea). Zootaxa 4514: 487–500. 10.11646/zootaxa.4514.4.3 [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Andersson LG (1945) Batrachians from East Ecuador, collected 1937, 1938 by Wm. Clarke-Macintyre and Rolf Blomberg. Arkiv för Zoologi. Stockholm 37A(2): 1–88.
  3. Ardila-Robayo MC, Ruiz-Carranza P, Barrera-Rodriguez M (1996) Una nueva especie de Phrynopus (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae) de La Cordillera Central Colombiana. Lozania. Bogotá 67: 1–10.
  4. Boulenger GA (1898) An account of the reptiles and batrachians collected by Mr. W. F. H. Rosenberg in Western Ecuador. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1898: 107–126. 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1898.tb03134.x [DOI]
  5. Boulenger GA (1908) Descriptions of new batrachians and reptiles discovered by Mr. M.G. Palmer in south-western Colombia. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 8 2: 515–522. 10.1080/00222930808692531 [DOI]
  6. Cannatella DC (1984) Two new species of the leptodactylid frog genus Phrynopus, with comments on the phylogeny of the genus. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas 113: 1–16. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/30207
  7. Duellman WE (2000) Leptodactylid frogs of the genus Phrynopus in northern Peru with descriptions of three new species. Herpetologica 56: 273–285. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3893405
  8. Duellman WE, Lehr E (2009) Terrestrial-breeding frogs (Strabomantidae) in Peru. Nature und Tier Verlag, Münster, Germany, 382 pp.
  9. Duellman WE, Pramuk JB (1999) Frogs of the genus Eleutherodactylus (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in the Andes of Northern Peru. The University of Kansas, Natural History Museum Scientific Papers 13: 1–78. 10.5962/bhl.title.16169 [DOI]
  10. Goin CJ, Cochran DM (1963) Two new genera of leptodactylid frogs from Colombia. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, 4th Series 31: 499–505.
  11. Goloboff PA (1999) Analyzing large data sets in reasonable times: Solutions for composite optima. Cladistics 15: 415428. 10.1006/clad.1999.0122 [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Goloboff PA, Morales ME (2023) TNT version 1.6, with a graphical interface for MacOS and Linux, including new routines in parallel. Cladistics 39(2): 144–153. 10.1111/cla.12524 [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Goloboff PA, Farris JS, Nixon K (2008) TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24: 774786. 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00217.x [DOI]
  14. Hedges SB, Duellman WE, Heinicke MP (2008a) New world direct-developing frogs (Anura: Terrarana): molecular phylogeny, classification, biogeography, and conservation. Zootaxa 1737: 1–182. 10.11646/zootaxa.1737.1.1 [DOI]
  15. Hedges SB, Duellman WE, Heinicke MP (2008b) A replacement name for Isodactylus Hedges, Duellman, and Heinicke, 2008. Zootaxa 1795: 67–68. 10.11646/zootaxa.1795.1.5 [DOI]
  16. Heinicke MP, Lemmon AR, Lemmon EM, McGrath K, Hedges SB (2018) Phylogenomic support for evolutionary relationships of New World direct-developing frogs (Anura: Terraranae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 118: 145–155. 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.09.021 [DOI] [PubMed]
  17. Hoang DT, Chernomor O, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS (2018) UFBoot2: Improving the Ultrafast Bootstrap Approximation. molecular Biology and Evolution 35: 518–522. 10.1093/molbev/msx281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  18. Jiménez de la Espada M (1875) Vertebrados del Viaje al Pacífico Verificado de 1862 a 1865 por una Comisión de Naturalistas Enviada por el Gobierno Español. Batracios. Madrid: A. Miguel Ginesta. 10.5962/bhl.title.5769 [DOI]
  19. Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TK, Von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS (2017) ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature methods 14(6): 587–589. 10.1038/nmeth.4285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  20. Katoh K, Toh H (2008) Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Briefing in Bioinformatics 9: 276–285. [DOI] [PubMed]
  21. Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD (2019) MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Briefings in Bioinformatics 20(4): 11601166. 10.1093/bib/bbn013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  22. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A (2012) Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28: 1647–1649. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  23. Kluge AG (2005) What is the rationale for 'Ockham’s razor’ (a.k.a parsimony) in phylogenetic inference. In: Albert V (ed) Parsimony, phylogeny, and genomics. New York: Oxford University Press, 15–42. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297306.003.0002 [DOI]
  24. Kluge AG, Grant T (2006) From conviction to anti-superfluity: old and new justifications of parsimony in phylogenetic inference. Cladistics 22(3): 276–288. 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2006.00100.x [DOI]
  25. Koch NM, Thompson JR (2020) A Total-Evidence Dated Phylogeny of Echinoidea Combining Phylogenomic and Paleontological Data. Systematic Biology 70(3): 421–439. 10.1093/sysbio/syaa069 [DOI] [PubMed]
  26. Lehr E (2005) A new species of the Eleutherodactylus nigrovittatus group (Anura: Leptodactylidae) from Andean Peru. Herpetologica 61: 199–208. 10.1655/04-33 [DOI]
  27. Letunic I, Bork P (2007) Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Bioinformatics 23(1): 127–128. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl529 [DOI] [PubMed]
  28. Lynch JD (1973) A new narrow-toed frog from Andean Ecuador (Leptodactylidae: Eleutherodactylus). Copeia 1973: 222–225. 10.2307/1442960 [DOI]
  29. Lynch JD (1975) A review of the Andean leptodactylid frog genus Phrynopus. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas 35: 1–51. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/6233
  30. Lynch JD (1976) The species groups of the South American frogs of the genus Eleutherodactylus (Leptodactylidae). Occasional Papers of the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas 61: 1–24. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/4009
  31. Lynch JD (1989) Intrageneric relationships of mainland Eleutherodactylus (Leptodactylidae). I. A review of the frogs assigned to the Eleutherodactylus discoidalis species group. Contributions in Biology and Geology. Milwaukee Public Museum 79: 1–25. 10.18257/raccefyn.21(80).1997.2986 [DOI]
  32. Lynch JD (2003) A new species of frog from northeastern Colombia (genus Eleutherodactylus: Leptodactylidae). Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 27: 287–289. 10.18257/raccefyn.27(103).2003.2069 [DOI]
  33. Lynch JD, Duellman WE (1980) The Eleutherodactylus of the Amazonian slopes of the Ecuadorian Andes (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Miscellaneous Publication. Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas 69: 1–86. 10.5962/bhl.title.16222 [DOI]
  34. Lynch JD, Duellman WE (1997) Frogs of the genus Eleutherodactylus in western Ecuador. Systematics, ecology, and biogeography. Special Publication. Natural History Museum, University of Kansas 23: 1–236. 10.5962/bhl.title.7951 [DOI]
  35. Machado DJ (2015) YBYRÁ facilitates comparison of large phylogenetic trees. BMC Bioinformatics 16(1): 1–4. 10.1186/s12859-015-0642-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  36. Neumann JS, DeSalle R, Narechania A, Schierwater B, Tessler M (2020) Morphological characters can strongly influence early animal relationships inferred from phylogenomic datasets. Systematic Biology 70(2): 360–375. 10.1093/sysbio/syaa038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  37. Nixon KC (1999) The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15: 407–414. 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1999.tb00277.x [DOI] [PubMed]
  38. Ortega JA, Cisneros-Heredia DF, Camper JD, Romero-Carvajal A, Negrete L, Ron SR (2025) Systematics of minute strabomantid frogs allocated to the genus Noblella (Amphibia: Anura) with description of a new genus, seven new species, and insights into historical biogeography. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 203: 1–60. 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlae162 [DOI]
  39. Ospina-Sarria JJ, Grant T (2022) New phenotypic synapomorphies delimit three molecular-based clades of New World direct-developing frogs (Amphibia: Anura: Brachycephaloidea). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 195: 976–994. 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab071 [DOI]
  40. Padial JM, Chaparro JC, De la Riva I (2008) Systematics of Oreobates and the Eleutherodactylus discoidalis species group (Amphibia, Anura), based on two mitochondrial DNA genes and external morphology. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 152: 737–773. 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2007.00372.x [DOI]
  41. Padial JM, Grant T, Frost DR (2014) Molecular systematics of terraranas (Anura: Brachycephaloidea) with an assessment of the effects of alignment and optimality criteria. Zootaxa 3825: 1–132. 10.11646/zootaxa.3825.1.1 [DOI] [PubMed]
  42. Portik DM, Streicher JW, Wiens JJ (2023) Frog phylogeny: A time-calibrated, species-level tree based on hundreds of loci and 5,242 species. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 188(107907): 1–72. 10.1016/j.ympev.2023.107907 [DOI] [PubMed]
  43. Pyron RA, Wiens JJ (2011) A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of advanced frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 61: 543–583. 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.06.012 [DOI] [PubMed]
  44. Reyes-Puig JP, Yánez-Muñoz MH, Urgilés-Merchán MA, Libke Z, Ron SR, Carrión-Olmedo JC (2026) Two new terrestrial narrow-toed frogs (Niceforonia: Strabomantidae, Anura) from remote unexplored mountains in the Ecuadorian Andes. PeerJ 14(e21182): 1–30. 10.7717/peerj.21182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  45. Santos JC, Coloma LA, Cannatella DC (2003) Multiple, recurring origins of aposematism and diet specialization in poison frogs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 12792–12797. 10.1073/pnas.2133521100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  46. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland, Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts.
  47. Werner F (1899) Ueber Reptilien und Batrachier aus Columbien und Trinidad. Verhandlungen des Zoologisch-Botanischen Vereins in Wien 49: 470–484. 10.5962/bhl.part.24106 [DOI]
  48. Wong TK, Ly-Trong N, Ren H, Baños H, Roger AJ, Susko E, Bielow C, De Maio N, Goldman N, Hahn MW, Huttley G (2025) IQ-TREE 3: phylogenomic inference software using complex evolutionary models. 10.32942/X2P62N [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Niceforonia tempestuosa
Supplementary material 1

List of examined specimens

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Jhon Jairo Ospina-Sarria, Andrés Felipe Rodríguez-Betancourt, Ximena Gómez-Sepúlveda, Iván Darío Morales-Vertel, Valentina Vélez-Franco, Nayely Gallego-Posada, Jose Daniel Herrera-Rengifo, John Edison Grajales Escobar, Irene Ceballos-Castro, Isabella García-Gómez, David Andrés Velásquez-Trujillo, Ayda Susana Ortiz Baez, Javier Mendez Narvaez

Data type

docx

Explanation note

List of examined specimens (specimens with institutional collection numbers were physically examined by the lead author), taxonomic distribution of dark supra-inguinal spots, and data sources.

Supplementary material 2

GenBank accession numbers, voucher specimens, and molecular markers

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Jhon Jairo Ospina-Sarria, Andrés Felipe Rodríguez-Betancourt, Ximena Gómez-Sepúlveda, Iván Darío Morales-Vertel, Valentina Vélez-Franco, Nayely Gallego-Posada, Jose Daniel Herrera-Rengifo, John Edison Grajales Escobar, Irene Ceballos-Castro, Isabella García-Gómez, David Andrés Velásquez-Trujillo, Ayda Susana Ortiz Baez, Javier Mendez Narvaez

Data type

docx

Explanation note

GenBank accession numbers, voucher specimens, and molecular markers used in this study. New sequences generated for this study are indicated in bold.

Supplementary material 3

Phylogenetic relationships of Niceforonia and outgroups

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Jhon Jairo Ospina-Sarria, Andrés Felipe Rodríguez-Betancourt, Ximena Gómez-Sepúlveda, Iván Darío Morales-Vertel, Valentina Vélez-Franco, Nayely Gallego-Posada, Jose Daniel Herrera-Rengifo, John Edison Grajales Escobar, Irene Ceballos-Castro, Isabella García-Gómez, David Andrés Velásquez-Trujillo, Ayda Susana Ortiz Baez, Javier Mendez Narvaez

Data type

pdf

Explanation note

Phylogenetic relationships of Niceforonia and outgroups recovered in one of the 97 most-parsimonious trees of 24,174 steps from a parsimony analysis in TNT treating gaps as a fifth state. Numbers on nodes are Parsimony jackknife absolute frequencies values. Nodes without values indicate value < 70% of jackknife value. Character states with primitive-derived states are indicated within the squares (see text and Suppl. material 1 for character definitions). Color-coding: red and blue highlight the genus Niceforonia and a clade comprising of Bahius, Barycholos, Phyllonastes, and Urkuphryne, respectively; red squares indicate unique, homoplastic.

Supplementary material 4

Phylogenetic relationships of Niceforonia and outgroups recovered in the maximum likelihood analysis with IQ-TREE

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Jhon Jairo Ospina-Sarria, Andrés Felipe Rodríguez-Betancourt, Ximena Gómez-Sepúlveda, Iván Darío Morales-Vertel, Valentina Vélez-Franco, Nayely Gallego-Posada, Jose Daniel Herrera-Rengifo, John Edison Grajales Escobar, Irene Ceballos-Castro, Isabella García-Gómez, David Andrés Velásquez-Trujillo, Ayda Susana Ortiz Baez, Javier Mendez Narvaez

Data type

pdf

Explanation note

Phylogenetic relationships of Niceforonia and outgroups recovered in the maximum likelihood analysis with IQ-TREE (log-likelihood of the best ML tree: -105312.6350). Numbers around nodes are the ultrafast bootstrap support values. Color-coding: red and blue highlight the genus Niceforonia and a clade comprising of Bahius, Barycholos, Phyllonastes and Urkuphryne, respectively.

Data Availability Statement

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.


Articles from ZooKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES