Abstract
The tumor suppressor PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) dephosphorylates PIP3 (phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)‐trisphosphate) at the plasma membrane and protects genomic integrity in the nucleus; thus, regulation of PTEN subcellular localization is crucial. Previous studies have shown that the PTEN350 fragment is markedly enriched in the nucleus, a feature not explained by the N‐terminal nuclear localization signal. In this study, we generated PTEN fragments of various lengths and identified PTEN348 (residues 1–348), which showed prominent nuclear localization. Furthermore, the replacement of threonine 348 (Thr348) with other amino acids reduced the nuclear localization of the PTEN348 and PTEN350 fragments. Moreover, we found that PTENA4 and PTENK13R,A4 localized predominantly to the nucleus and plasma membrane, respectively, and that substitution of Thr348 with aspartic acid resulted in cytoplasmic localization in both mutants. Collectively, these results indicate that Thr348 is a key contributor to the regulation of PTEN subcellular localization.
Keywords: C2 domain, nucleus, plasma membrane, PTEN, subcellular localization, threonine 348
Thr348 in the C2 domain is a key contributor to PTEN subcellular localization. The PTEN350 fragment and PTENA4 accumulated in the nucleus, whereas PTENK13R,A4 predominantly localized to the plasma membrane. In contrast, substitution of Thr348 with Asp (T348D) disrupted these characteristic localization patterns, resulting in predominant cytoplasmic localization.

Abbreviations
- AKT
protein kinase B (PKB)
- CK2
casein kinase 2
- DMEM
Dulbecco's modified Eagle Medium
- FBS
fetal bovine serum
- HEK293T
human embryonic kidney 293T
- NES
nuclear export signal
- NLS
nuclear localization signal
- PIP2
phosphatidylinositol (4,5)‐bisphosphate
- PIP3
phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)‐trisphosphate
- PTEN
phosphatase and tensin homolog
- SUMO
small ubiquitin‐like modifier
PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) is a lipid and protein phosphatase that functions as a tumor suppressor by dephosphorylating phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)‐trisphosphate (PIP3) to phosphatidylinositol (4,5)‐bisphosphate (PIP2) at the plasma membrane, thereby negatively regulating the AKT (protein kinase B, PKB) signaling pathway [1, 2]. In addition to this well‐established role at the plasma membrane, PTEN has important nuclear functions, including the maintenance of genomic integrity [3, 4, 5]. Thus, regulation of PTEN subcellular localization is critical for its functional diversity.
PTEN consists of several distinct domains, including an N‐terminal PIP2‐binding motif, a phosphatase domain, a lipid‐binding C2 domain, a C‐terminal tail domain, and a PDZ‐binding motif [6, 7]. Two regions are critical for regulating PTEN subcellular localization. The first is lysine 13 (K13), whose mono‐ubiquitination is required for nuclear import [3, 8, 9]. Accordingly, substitution of K13 with arginine (K13R) prevented PTENK13R from entering the nucleus. The second region comprises four residues in the C‐terminal tail (Ser380/Thr382/Thr383/Ser385), whose phosphorylation promotes the cytoplasmic retention of PTEN [8, 10]. This C‐terminal region plays a critical role in regulating the conformation, stability, and activity of PTEN. Phosphorylation of these four residues promotes intramolecular interactions between the C‐terminal tail and the phosphatase–C2 core, thereby stabilizing the closed conformation of PTEN [11, 12, 13]. In contrast, the dephosphorylation of these four residues favors an open conformation that enhances membrane association. PTENA4, in which these residues are substituted with alanine (A4), cannot be phosphorylated and therefore predominantly accumulates in the nucleus [8, 12, 13]. Structural transitions between the open and closed conformations can influence the accessibility of regulatory motifs and may also affect the subcellular trafficking of PTEN, including its nuclear import and export. In addition, the PTEN351 fragment, comprising residues 1–351, also shows strong nuclear localization [14]. The core domain of PTEN is generally considered to extend to residue 350 [15, 16]; therefore, PTEN350 was used as the core domain construct in this study. PTEN350 is markedly enriched in the nucleus. Although nuclear localization signals have been proposed at the N‐terminus, including K13 [17, 18], the mechanisms governing PTEN nuclear import remain unclear. For example, PTEN32, which consists of the first 32 residues of the N terminus, exhibits considerably lower nuclear localization than PTEN350. These findings suggest that additional elements are required for nuclear localization of the core domain.
In this study, we identified the essential regions and critical amino acid residues required for the nuclear localization of PTEN350. We also examined whether these key residues are necessary for the nuclear localization of PTENA4. In addition, PTENK13R,A4, a double mutant harboring both K13R and A4 substitutions, exhibits strong plasma membrane localization [8]. We further investigated whether these residues are necessary for the plasma membrane localization of PTENK13R,A4.
Results
Threonine 348 is a critical residue for the nuclear localization of PTEN
PTEN and its fragments were fused to mCherry. Full‐length PTEN localized to both the cytoplasm and nucleus, with approximately twofold higher fluorescence intensity in the cytoplasm than in the nucleus (Fig. 1A). However, PTEN350 prominently accumulated in the nuclei of HEK293T cells (Fig. 1A). PTEN32 has been reported to localize to the nucleus via its N‐terminal signal [19]; however, its nuclear accumulation was markedly weaker than that of PTEN350 (Fig. 1B). These observations indicated that the nuclear localization of PTEN350 cannot be attributed solely to the N‐terminal nuclear localization signal, suggesting the presence of additional residues required for its nuclear localization. To determine whether other PTEN fragments exhibit similar localization patterns, we generated a series of truncation mutants, PTEN185, PTEN250, PTEN275, PTEN300, PTEN340, and PTEN345, in addition to PTEN32. These fragments were predominantly localized in the cytoplasm (Fig. 1B). Therefore, additional residues were sequentially added to PTEN345 to generate PTEN346–PTEN349. Although PTEN346 remained in the cytoplasm, PTEN347 showed increased nuclear accumulation. Importantly, PTEN348 was prominently localized in the nucleus (Fig. 1B). Statistical analysis revealed that the nuclear localization level of PTEN348 was not significantly different from that of PTEN350 (Fig. 1C).
Fig. 1.

Threonine 348 is required for the nuclear translocation of PTEN350. (A) Full‐length phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and PTEN350 fused with mCherry were merged with Hoechst 33342 nuclear staining (B) Subcellular localization of PTEN fragments up to residue 350 in live HEK293T cells. (C) Quantification of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic fluorescence intensity ratio of each PTEN fragment fused with mCherry. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). (PTEN, n = 61; PTEN32, n = 61; PTEN185, n = 35; PTEN250, n = 64; PTEN275, n = 64; PTEN300, n = 76; PTEN340, n = 71; PTEN345, n = 55; PTEN346, n = 45; PTEN347, n = 80; PTEN348, n = 49; PTEN349, n = 66; PTEN350, n = 52 cells from three independent experiments). Representative images from three independent experiments are shown. Scale bar, 10 μm. One‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett's test (vs PTEN350). *P < 0.05; ****P < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
PTEN347 exhibited increased nuclear accumulation; however, its nuclear localization level was markedly lower than that of PTEN348. These findings suggest that Phe347 may contribute to PTEN nuclear localization, whereas Thr348 appears to play a more prominent role in the predominant nuclear accumulation observed in PTEN350. Therefore, we focused on Thr348 and examined its contribution to nuclear localization.
Effects of Thr348 substitutions on subcellular localization
To determine whether the role of Thr348 in nuclear localization depends on its chemical properties or its potential phosphorylation, we substituted Thr348 with serine, arginine, alanine, or aspartic acid in PTEN348 and PTEN350. Serine was used as a structurally similar substitute for threonine, whereas alanine was used as an uncharged substitute. In addition, aspartic acid was introduced as a negatively charged phosphomimetic residue, and arginine was introduced as a positively charged substitute. We first examined the localization of the T348S, T348A, T348R, and T348D mutants of PTEN348. While the T348S mutant was predominantly localized in the nucleus, the other mutants showed reduced nuclear accumulation (Fig. 2A). Quantification of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic fluorescence intensity ratios confirmed a significant reduction in the nuclear localization of T348A, T348R, and T348D (Fig. 2B). Subsequently, the same mutations were introduced into PTEN350. Consistent with the results from the PTEN348 fragment, the T348S mutation had minimal or no effect on subcellular localization, whereas representative images showed reduced nuclear accumulation in the T348A, T348R, and T348D mutants (Fig. 2A). Notably, significant differences were observed between the serine/threonine group and the other substituted residues at this position (Fig. 2C).
Fig. 2.

Subcellular localization of PTEN mutants with substitutions at threonine 348. (A) Subcellular localization of PTEN348 and PTEN350 mutants in live HEK293T cells. Representative images from three independent experiments are shown. Scale bar, 10 μm. (B) Quantification of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic fluorescence intensity ratio of PTEN348 mutants fused with mCherry. Data are presented as mean ± SD. (wild‐type (WT), n = 48; T348S, n = 49; T348R, n = 46; T348A, n = 69; T348D, n = 74 cells from three independent experiments). (C) Quantification of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic fluorescence intensity ratio of PTEN350 mutants fused with mCherry. Data are presented as mean ± SD. (WT, n = 57; T348S, n = 57; T348R, n = 66; T348A, n = 61; T348D, n = 69 cells from three independent experiments). Statistical analysis was performed using one‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test against the corresponding wild‐type PTEN fragments in (B) and (C), respectively. ****P < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
Thr348 is required for the nuclear localization of PTENA4
In the next set of experiments, we investigated the effects of these mutations (T348S, T348R, T348A, and T348D) on full‐length PTEN and PTENA4. Initially, these mutations were introduced into PTEN, and their subcellular localization was examined. These mutations had no appreciable effect on the nuclear accumulation of wild‐type PTEN (Fig. 3A,B). Next, the effects of the Thr348 substitutions on the subcellular localization of PTENA4, a variant previously shown to accumulate in the nucleus, were investigated. PTENA4 has been reported to adopt an open conformation owing to disruption of intramolecular interactions between the C‐terminal tail and the phosphatase–C2 core [11, 14, 20]. Next, the T348S, T348R, T348A, and T348D mutations were introduced into PTENA4, and their effects on its subcellular localization were examined. As expected, PTENT348S,A4 showed nuclear localization similar to that of PTENA4 (Fig. 3A). However, nuclear localization was reduced in PTENT348R,A4 and PTENT348A,A4, whereas PTENT348D,A4 was predominantly localized in the cytoplasm rather than the nucleus. Quantitative analysis confirmed these observations, revealing significant differences in nuclear localization between the serine/threonine substitutions and the mutants carrying other substitutions at position 348 (Fig. 3C). These results suggest that Thr348 plays an important role in the nuclear localization of PTENA4.
Fig. 3.

T348 substitution reduces the nuclear localization of full‐length PTEN and PTENA4. (A) Subcellular localization of PTEN mutants in live HEK293T cells. Representative images from three independent experiments are shown. Scale bar, 10 μm. (B) Quantification of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic fluorescence intensity ratio of PTEN mutants fused with mCherry. Data are presented as mean ± SD. (PTEN, n = 44; PTENT348S, n = 63; PTENT348R, n = 63; PTENT348A, n = 77; PTENT348D, n = 59 cells from three independent experiments). (C) Quantification of the nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic fluorescence intensity ratio of PTENA4 mutants fused with mCherry. Data are presented as mean ± SD. (PTENA4, n = 57; PTENT348S,A4, n = 64; PTENT348R,A4, n = 63; PTENT348A,A4, n = 42; PTENT348D,A4, n = 93 cells from three independent experiments). – indicates that the mutation was not introduced. Statistical analysis was performed using one‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test, with PTEN in (B) and PTENA4 in (C), respectively. ****P < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
Position 348 side‐chain chemistry contributes to plasma membrane localization of PTENK13R,A4
To determine whether Thr348 contributes to the formation of a conformation conducive to lipid binding, we investigated how Thr348 affects the plasma membrane localization of PTENK13R,A4. PTENK13R,A4 possesses an open C2 domain because of the A4 mutations, whereas the K13R mutation impairs nuclear localization, resulting in the preferential localization of PTENK13R,A4 to the plasma membrane. Next, the T348 mutations were introduced into PTENK13R,A4, and we assessed whether these variants retained plasma membrane localization. As shown in Fig. 4A, PTENK13R,A4 and PTENK13R,T348S,A4 predominantly localized to the plasma membrane. In contrast, PTENK13R,T348A,A4 and PTENK13R,T348D,A4 predominantly localized in the cytoplasm rather than at the plasma membrane. Quantitative analysis of the plasma membrane‐to‐cytoplasmic fluorescence intensity ratios demonstrated that PTENK13R,T348A,A4 and PTENK13R,T348D,A4 exhibited significantly reduced plasma membrane localization compared with PTENK13R,A4 (Fig. 4B). Taken together, these findings suggest that the presence of a hydroxyl group at position 348 contributes to plasma membrane localization of PTENK13R,A4 and may facilitate its association with membrane lipids.
Fig. 4.

T348 substitution in PTENK13R,A4 alters its localization to the plasma membrane. (A) Subcellular localization of PTEN mutants in live HEK293T cells. Representative images from three independent experiments are shown. Scale bar, 10 μm. (B) Quantification of the membrane‐to‐cytoplasmic fluorescence intensity ratio of PTEN mutants fused with mCherry. Data are presented as mean ± SD. (PTENK13R, n = 43; PTENK13R,A4, n = 48; PTENK13R,T348S,A4, n = 42; PTENK13R,T348R,A4, n = 50; PTENK13R,T348A,A4, n = 49; PTENK13R,T348D,A4, n = 54 cells from three independent experiments). – indicates that the mutation was not introduced. One‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test (vs PTENK13R,A4). ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001; ns, not significant.
Discussion
In the present study, we demonstrated that Thr348 represents a key regulatory element involved in the control of PTEN nuclear localization. Thr348 is located within the C2 domain, the principal lipid‐binding module [21, 22]. Given the importance of PTEN–lipid interactions in membrane association, we hypothesized that Thr348 contributes to the association of PTEN350 and PTENA4 with nuclear membrane lipids. Consistent with this hypothesis, the T348D substitution markedly diminished the plasma membrane localization of PTENK13R,A4, suggesting that Thr348 is important for membrane association. In contrast, the full‐length PTEN adopts a closed conformation via intramolecular interactions between its C‐terminal tail and C2 domains. This conformation is likely to mask Thr348, thereby limiting its membrane association and contributing to the diffuse intracellular distribution of wild‐type PTEN. Given that the nuclear envelope is a lipid bilayer, the effect of Thr348 on membrane association may be related to its nuclear accumulation. Consistent with this possibility, the substitution of Thr348 with aspartic acid or arginine significantly impaired the nuclear accumulation of PTEN350. These findings suggest that Thr348‐mediated membrane association contributes not only to plasma membrane localization but also to nuclear localization.
Nuclear transport of PTEN is critical for its tumor‐suppressive functions and has attracted considerable interest from a mechanistic perspective, given the central role of PTEN as a lipid and protein phosphatase. Importin‐11 has been identified as a nuclear import receptor for PTEN, and this process requires the ubiquitin‐conjugated enzyme UBE2E1 [23]. However, the molecular features of PTEN that facilitate its recognition by the nuclear import machinery remain poorly understood. Our findings suggest that Thr348 may represent one such determinant by promoting membrane interactions that facilitate nuclear localization. Future studies aimed at defining the structural and biochemical basis of Thr348‐dependent membrane association, as well as its contribution to PTEN–lipid interactions, will provide further insights into the mechanisms governing PTEN nuclear transport.
PTEN contains multiple phosphorylation sites, among which those in the C‐terminal tail—Ser380, Thr382, Thr383, and Ser385—have received particular attention. The phosphorylation of these residues by casein kinase 2 is essential for maintaining the closed conformation of PTEN. Consequently, PTEN becomes less accessible to E3 ubiquitin ligases, enabling it to evade proteasomal degradation [24]. Casein kinase 2 also phosphorylates Ser370, which promotes the phosphorylation of Ser362 and Thr366 by glycogen synthase kinase 3. Although these modifications have been implicated in the stability and cytoplasmic distribution of PTEN, their precise functional significance remains unclear [25]. Phosphorylation within the C2 domain has also been reported. In particular, phosphorylation of Tyr240 and Tyr315 by Src kinase induces protein instability and diminishes PTEN's affinity for the plasma membrane [25]. However, the underlying mechanisms and the associated conformational changes remain unclear [26]. Whether Thr348 is phosphorylated and, if so, whether its phosphorylation correlates with conformational transitions, subcellular distribution, or PTEN function remains unclear. Future studies aimed at identifying the kinase(s) responsible for Thr348 phosphorylation and determining how this modification influences PTEN conformation, membrane association, and nuclear transport are crucial for understanding the mechanisms regulating PTEN activity and its tumor‐suppressive functions.
Since nuclear accumulation may reflect alterations in either nuclear import or export, we cannot distinguish between these mechanisms based solely on localization data. Although computational analysis did not identify a canonical NES near Thr348 and previous reviews have not reported a well‐defined export signal in this region [27], we cannot formally exclude the possibility that Thr348 influences nuclear export through indirect or non‐canonical mechanisms.
Alternatively, the observed effects of Thr348 substitutions on nuclear accumulation may reflect altered nuclear import efficiency. Whether Thr348 primarily affects nuclear import, nuclear export, or both remains to be determined.
In the present study, we demonstrated the importance of Thr348 in the nuclear localization of PTEN. However, several questions remained unanswered. Notably, PTEN347 retained partial nuclear localization despite the loss of Thr348, suggesting that Phe347 may also contribute to PTEN nuclear localization. Future studies are needed to determine the functional contribution of Phe347 and to clarify its relationship with Thr348 in regulating PTEN nuclear localization. In addition, although the T348D substitution significantly reduced the nuclear accumulation of PTEN350, detectable nuclear localization was still observed for PTEN350,T348D. Although the T348D substitution significantly reduced the nuclear accumulation of PTEN350, detectable nuclear localization was still observed for PTEN350,T348D. The mechanism underlying this residual nuclear localization remains unclear and warrants further investigation.
Notably, the addition of the C‐terminal tail to PTEN350,T348D resulted in predominantly cytoplasmic localization, a phenomenon observed not only in PTEN but also in PTENA4. These findings suggest that the C‐terminal tail contains elements that promote cytoplasmic localization. This effect was retained even in PTENA4, in which the canonical Ser380/Thr382/Thr383/Ser385 phosphorylation motif was disrupted. Whether this phenomenon reflects a size‐dependent effect of the C‐terminal tail or the presence of specific regulatory sequences outside the Ser380/Thr382/Thr383/Ser385 motif remains to be determined.
A slight increase in nuclear localization was observed in the PTEN275 fragment compared to that in PTEN250. This modest increase may reflect the influence of additional regulatory elements in this region. Notably, the two major SUMOylation sites, K254 and K266, are located between residues 250 and 275 [7, 28]. SUMOylation at K254 impairs nuclear export in DNA‐damaged cells [29], whereas SUMOylation at K266 promotes the association between PTEN and the plasma membrane via electrostatic interactions [30]. Therefore, these modifications may have contributed to the enhanced nuclear accumulation observed in PTEN275. Because the present study was conducted under non‐stressed conditions, only a minor increase was detected; however, more pronounced nuclear accumulation might be expected under conditions of DNA damage.
The subcellular localization of PTEN has been extensively characterized, and its significance in diverse cellular functions has become increasingly evident. Given the distinct roles of PTEN in the nucleus, cytoplasm, and plasma membrane, elucidating the molecular mechanisms governing its subcellular localization is of critical importance. In addition to the established mechanisms regulating PTEN localization, our findings identify Thr348 within the C2 domain as an important contributor to nuclear translocation of PTEN. Further mechanistic insights into how this residue participates in the regulatory network controlling PTEN localization will be essential to define its broader biological significance.
Materials and methods
Plasmids
The pmCherry‐N1 plasmid was provided by Dr. Nakamura (Kyoto University) [31, 32]. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐amplified PTEN fragments and their mutants were cloned into the pmCherry‐N1 vector to generate the corresponding constructs. PCR was performed using ExPremier DNA Polymerase (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan), and all constructs were verified by DNA sequencing (Eurofins Genomics, Tokyo, Japan). Restriction enzymes and T4 DNA ligase were purchased from Nippon Gene (Toyama, Japan) and New England Biolabs (M0202; Ipswich, MA, USA), respectively.
Cell culture and transfection
Human embryonic kidney 293T (HEK293T; RRID:CVCL_0063) cells were kindly provided by Dr. Nonaka [33] and maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; 043‐30085, FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical, Osaka, Japan) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (A525671; Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA). The HEK293T cells were authenticated by short tandem repeat (STR) profiling through Promega Corporation (Madison, WI, USA). The obtained STR profile was consistent with reference HEK293T cells profiles registered in the JCRB Cell Bank and ATCC databases. Mycoplasma contamination was assessed by microscopic observation and PCR‐based Mycoplasma Detection Set (6601; Takara Bio). No evidence of mycoplasma contamination was detected. Cells were transfected with plasmid constructs using Lipofectamine 3000 (L3000015; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Live cell imaging
The day after transfection, samples were imaged using an Olympus FV1000 laser‐scanning confocal microscope equipped with a 60× oil‐immersion objective lens (NA 1.35) and fv1000‐asw software (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan). All imaging experiments were independently repeated three times with similar results. Representative images are shown in the figures.
Signal quantification and statistical analysis
Quantification of fluorescent signals was performed using fiji (imagej; NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). Nuclear and cytosolic fluorescence intensities were quantified as the mean fluorescence intensity within manually defined nuclear and cytosolic regions of interest, respectively. Background fluorescence was confirmed to be negligible (approximately zero); therefore, no background subtraction was performed. To measure the signal intensity along the plasma membrane, a line was drawn across individual cells, and the fluorescence intensity along the line was quantified using the Plot Profile function in fiji. The regions corresponding to the plasma membrane and cytoplasm were defined based on the intensity profile, and the membrane‐to‐cytoplasm ratio was calculated. The analysis workflow is shown in Fig. S1.
Statistical analyses were performed using graphpad prism 10 software (GraphPad Software, Inc.).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Author contributions
TK was responsible for study conception and design, experimental performance, analysis and interpretation of the results, and manuscript preparation. ST and MO performed the experiments and contributed to the data analysis and interpretation.
Supporting information
Fig. S1. Subcellular localization of each PTEN mutant was quantified by measuring fluorescence intensity at the plasma membrane and in the cytosol.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing. During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used chatgpt (openai) for assistant with language refinement. The authors reviewed and edited the content and take full responsibility for the final manuscript. This work was supported by Yasuda Women's University Scientific Research Aid and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Number 22K07035.
Edited by Beata Vertessy
Data accessibility
Data generated in this study is available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
- 1. Carnero A, Blanco‐Aparicio C, Renner O, Link W and Leal JF (2008) The PTEN/PI3K/AKT signalling pathway in cancer, therapeutic implications. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 8, 187–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Vazquez F and Devreotes P (2006) Regulation of PTEN function as a PIP3 gatekeeper through membrane interaction. Cell Cycle 5, 1523–1527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kato T, Yamada T, Nakamura H, Igarashi A, Anders RA, Sesaki H and Iijima M (2020) The loss of nuclear PTEN increases tumorigenesis in a preclinical mouse model for hepatocellular carcinoma. iScience 23, 101548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Igarashi A, Kato T, Sesaki H and Iijima M (2021) Nuclear PTEN deficiency and heterozygous PTEN loss have distinct impacts on brain and lymph node size. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 555, 81–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ho J, Cruise ES, Dowling RJO and Stambolic V (2020) PTEN nuclear functions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 10, a036079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Wang X and Jiang X (2008) PTEN: a default gate‐keeping tumor suppressor with a versatile tail. Cell Res 18, 807–816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Chen CY, Chen J, He L and Stiles BL (2018) PTEN: tumor suppressor and metabolic regulator. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 9, 338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kato T, Igarashi A, Sesaki H and Iijima M (2021) Generating a new mouse model for nuclear PTEN deficiency by a single K13R mutation. Genes Cells 26, 1014–1022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Zhao J, Yin L, Jiang L, Hou L, He L and Zhang C (2021) PTEN nuclear translocation enhances neuronal injury after hypoxia‐ischemia via modulation of the nuclear factor‐κB signaling pathway. Aging (Albany NY) 13, 16165–16177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kato T (2022) Immunofluorescence detection of plasma membranous PTEN in cultured cells. J Histochem Cytochem 70, 289–297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Nguyen HN, Yang JM, Miyamoto T, Itoh K, Rho E, Zhang Q, Inoue T, Devreotes PN, Sesaki H and Iijima M (2015) Opening the conformation is a master switch for the dual localization and phosphatase activity of PTEN. Sci Rep 5, 12600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Bolduc D, Rahdar M, Tu‐Sekine B, Sivakumaren SC, Raben D, Amzel LM, Devreotes P, Gabelli SB and Cole P (2013) Phosphorylation‐mediated PTEN conformational closure and deactivation revealed with protein semisynthesis. elife 2, e00691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Lima‐Fernandes E, Misticone S, Boularan C, Paradis JS, Enslen H, Roux PP, Bouvier M, Baillie GS, Marullo S and Scott MGH (2014) A biosensor to monitor dynamic regulation and function of tumour suppressor PTEN in living cells. Nat Commun 5, 4431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Rahdar M, Inoue T, Meyer T, Zhang J, Vazquez F and Devreotes PN (2009) A phosphorylation‐dependent intramolecular interaction regulates the membrane association and activity of the tumor suppressor PTEN. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 480–485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Dawson JE, Smith IN, Tushar AM and Eng C (2025) Elucidating PTEN conformational dynamics and phosphatase regulation via integrative modeling and mutation prediction. Structure 33, 1533–1546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Jang H, Smith IN, Eng C and Nussinov R (2021) The mechanism of full activation of tumor suppressor PTEN at the phosphoinositide‐enriched membrane. iScience 24, 102438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Liu F, Wagner S, Campbell RB, Nickerson JA, Schiffer CA and Ross AH (2005) PTEN enters the nucleus by diffusion. J Cell Biochem 96, 221–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Gil A, Rodríguez‐Escudero I, Stumpf M, Molina M, Cid VJ and Pulido R (2015) A functional dissection of PTEN N‐terminus: implications in PTEN subcellular targeting and tumor suppressor activity. PLoS One 10, e0119287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Gil A, Andrés‐Pons A, Fernández E, Valiente M, Torres J, Cervera J and Pulido R (2006) Nuclear localization of PTEN by a ran‐dependent mechanism enhances apoptosis: involvement of an N‐terminal nuclear localization domain and multiple nuclear exclusion motifs. Mol Biol Cell 17, 4002–4013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Nguyen HN, Yang JM, Afkari Y, Park BH, Sesaki H, Devreotes PN and Iijima M (2014) Engineering ePTEN, an enhanced PTEN with increased tumor suppressor activities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111, E2684–E2693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Vazquez F, Ramaswamy S, Nakamura N and Sellers WR (2000) Phosphorylation of the PTEN tail regulates protein stability and function. Mol Cell Biol 20, 5010–5018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Vazquez F, Grossman SR, Takahashi Y, Rokas MV, Nakamura N and Sellers WR (2001) Phosphorylation of the PTEN tail acts as an inhibitory switch by preventing its recruitment into a protein complex. J Biol Chem 276, 48627–48630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Chen M, Nowak DG, Narula N, Robinson B, Watrud K, Ambrico A, Herzka TM, Zeeman ME, Minderer M, Zheng W et al. (2017) The nuclear transport receptor Importin‐11 is a tumor suppressor that maintains PTEN protein. J Cell Biol 216, 641–656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Maccario H, Perera NM, Gray A, Downes CP and Leslie NR (2010) Ubiquitination of PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) inhibits phosphatase activity and is enhanced by membrane targeting and hyperosmotic stress. J Biol Chem 285, 12620–12628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Masson GR and Williams RL (2020) Structural mechanisms of PTEN regulation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 10, a036152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Nussinov R, Zhang M, Tsai CJ and Jang H (2021) Phosphorylation and driver mutations in PI3Kα and PTEN autoinhibition. Mol Cancer Res 19, 543–548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Milella M, Falcone I, Conciatori F, Cesta Incani U, Del Curatolo A, Inzerilli N, Nuzzo CM, Vaccaro V, Vari S, Cognetti F et al. (2015) PTEN: multiple functions in human malignant tumors. Front Oncol 5, 24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Wang K, Liu J, Li YJ, Li JP and Zhang R (2022) Ubiquitination/de‐ubiquitination: a promising therapeutic target for PTEN reactivation in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 1877, 188723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Bassi C, Ho J, Srikumar T, Dowling RJO, Gorrini C, Miller SJ, Mak TW, Neel BG, Raught B and Stambolic V (2013) Nuclear PTEN controls DNA repair and sensitivity to genotoxic stress. Science 341, 395–399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Huang J, Yan J, Zhang J, Zhu S, Wang Y, Shi T, Zhu C, Chen C, Liu X, Cheng J et al. (2012) SUMO1 modification of PTEN regulates tumorigenesis by controlling its association with the plasma membrane. Nat Commun 3, 911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Nakamura H, Lee AA, Afshar AS, Watanabe S, Rho E, Razavi S, Suarez A, Lin YC, Tanigawa M, BHuang B et al. (2018) Intracellular production of hydrogels and synthetic RNA granules by multivalent molecular interactions. Nat Mater 17, 79–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Nakamura H, Rho E, Lee CT, Itoh K, Deng D, Watanabe S, Razavi S, Matsubayashi HT, Zhu C, Jung E et al. (2023) ActuAtor, a listeria‐inspired molecular tool for physical manipulation of intracellular organizations through de novo actin polymerization. Cell Rep 42, 113089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Nonaka S and Naknishi H (2020) Secreted gingipains from Porphyromonas gingivalis induce microglia migration through endosomal signaling by protease‐activated receptor 2. Neurochem Int 140, 104840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Fig. S1. Subcellular localization of each PTEN mutant was quantified by measuring fluorescence intensity at the plasma membrane and in the cytosol.
Data Availability Statement
Data generated in this study is available from the corresponding author upon request.
