ABSTRACT
Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infection is a rising global concern and a severe opportunistic waterborne infectious disease. NTM has frequently been found in municipally treated water. Distinct colony morphotypes of NTM have different cell structure properties and, therefore, different resistance to disinfectants, which has given rise to the need to further explore mechanisms that underlie mycobacterial damage by ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Several studies have investigated NTM response to 254 nm UV, but their reaction to 222 nm is largely unknown. This study investigated the treatment efficiency of different UV wavelengths (222 nm emitted by a KrCl excimer lamp and 254 nm emitted by a low-pressure Hg lamp) on inactivating non-pathogenic NTM (Mycobacterium smegmatis) and clinically relevant Mycobacterium intracellulare, and damaging rpoB and hsp65 genes in smooth and rough morphotypes of these two NTM species. Results indicated that non-clinically relevant M. smegmatis grows faster than clinically relevant M. intracellulare and is less resistant to both UV wavelengths. Cell structure was found to play an important role in the resistance of NTM to UV, where rough morphotypes without glycopeptide lipids were more resistant. Gene damage analyzed by quantification of rpoB and hsp65 genes indicated that 222 nm caused slightly more gene damage than 254 nm, and smooth morphotypes exhibited higher gene damage than rough morphotypes. Exploring UV mechanisms across different NTM species, morphotypes, and their genes will enhance monitoring and control of NTM in water systems, as well as targeting UV development toward specific pathogens to minimize health threats posed by NTM.
IMPORTANCE
Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are found naturally in the environment and in treated water. NTM can cause opportunistic pathogen infections, which are a growing waterborne public health burden. Disinfection by ultraviolet (UV) light is a possible solution. Here, we showed that cell colony morphotype contributed to UV disinfection resistance, where rough morphotypes without glycopeptide lipids were more resistant to both disinfection and gene damage by both wavelengths we studied. Among wavelengths, 222 nm caused slightly more gene damage than 254 nm. Understanding the response of different NTM cell types and components to different wavelengths of UV light will inform the design and optimization of effective and efficient water treatment systems.
KEYWORDS: UV disinfection, far-UVC disinfection, nontuberculous mycobacteria, morphology, clinically relevant
INTRODUCTION
Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are opportunistic pathogens (OPs) that are widely distributed in the environment, particularly in water sources (1–3). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention identified NTM as a predominant cause of hospitalizations and mortality. In 2024, NTM represented the highest cost among waterborne infectious diseases in the United States, with an estimated economic burden of $1.53 billion (4, 5). Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infections have been shown to most frequently cause pulmonary disease (6, 7). A closely related species of MAC, Mycobacterium intracellulare, often presents with higher severity and more prevalent lung disease (8). NTM has been isolated from diverse sources, including primarily aquatic environments, can multiply in water distribution systems when they persist after water treatments, and can increase in prevalence with distance from the treatment facility (9–11). The unique characteristics of NTM, including their waxy, hydrophobic, and lipid-rich cell wall with low permeability and their ability to form biofilms, facilitate their persistence in environments and confer resistance to disinfectants (12). The enrichment of mycolic acids in mycobacterial cell walls and membranes consists of lipids, glycolipids, and secreted proteins that promote adherence to surfaces and aggregation in liquid media (13). The glycopeptidolipids (GPLs) in some strains of NTM cell walls consist of a lipopeptide core and a long-chain fatty or mycolic acid and contribute to their pathogenicity and persistence, including antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation (10, 12, 14–16). The extracellular matrix of biofilms acts as a physical barrier to prevent the penetration of disinfectants and reduce NTM’s susceptibility (17). Both Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium smegmatis exhibit sliding motility, which has also been linked to their ability to form biofilms on water distribution system surfaces (14). Phthiocerol dimycocerosates (PDIMs) and acyl trehalose glycolipids located in the outer membrane of Mycobacterium tuberculosis act as critical virulence factors. PDIMs create an impermeable barrier, mask the bacteria, and interfere with host immune signaling pathways. PDIM, together with trehalose dimycolate, disrupts phagosome-lysosome fusion and necrotizes granuloma, facilitating bacilli release into the airways for subsequent exhalation and transmission (18). In response to disinfectants in drinking water systems, NTM have also been shown to evade and replicate inside certain free-living amoebae species (1, 3, 12, 19).
M. smegmatis has been used as a model to study NTM due to its non-pathogenic and fast-growing nature (20). Rapidly growing M. smegmatis accumulates high levels of GPLs (21). Some NTM isolates exhibit distinct or multiple colony morphologies, commonly appearing as smooth and rough morphotypes, which are related to GPL. Smooth morphotypes have a uniform and glossy appearance and have GPLs, while rough morphotypes have an irregular, dry, and corded appearance and lack GPLs. Both M. smegmatis and MAC exhibit multiple colony morphologies (14, 22). Research suggests that smooth M. avium strains exhibit increased GPL production and greater sliding motility, resulting in more pronounced biofilm formation compared to rough variants (23).
Inhalation of mycobacteria aerosols from environmental sources, such as the persistence of NTM in water supply systems, is the primary exposure route of pulmonary infection (24–27). Studies have also shown that CT scans of over 90% of patients with pulmonary NTM infection exhibit evidence of gastric content aspiration (8). A previous study found a positive association between MAC pulmonary disease and NTM isolated from shower aerosols (28). Common approaches such as filtration, monochloramine, chlorine, and ozone prove effective against various waterborne fecal pathogens (29). However, OPs, such as Legionella pneumophila, Mycobacterium avium, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, are commonly found in plumbing systems and can increase in prevalence with distance from treatment plants (9, 30, 31). These organisms are associated with human infections, including pulmonary infections that may occur through inhalation of contaminated aerosols. The significance of biofilms in water distribution systems and premise plumbing is recognized for the persistent colonization and proliferation associated with OPs (3, 32), particularly mycobacteria (33). Both biofilms and certain free-living amoebae species can protect NTM from residual disinfectants in water distribution systems and building plumbing, limiting the efficacy of disinfectants like chlorine against these pathogens (34).
Ultraviolet (UV) light has the ability to penetrate the cell wall of microorganisms and be absorbed by the proteins and nucleotides constituting the cell’s components. Proteins, which comprise a large proportion of microbial cells, preferentially absorb UV at wavelengths below 230 nm (35), which can result in irreparable damage by direct absorption of UV photons by amino acids through the formation of protein-protein crosslinks and oxidation of amino acid chains (36–38), while nucleic acids primarily absorb light at a wavelength of 260 nm, which results in DNA or RNA damage that renders cells unable to reproduce but may be repaired (39). UV-C radiation at 254 nm emitted by conventional mercury lamps has demonstrated well-known efficacy in fatally harming microbial biomolecules, inducing thymine cross-linking residues in nucleotides, and disrupting the proliferation of microorganisms (40). Excimer lamps present a promising technology as a potentially safer alternative to conventional mercury lamps (41), with 222 nm emission from KrCl lamps proving comparable inactivation efficiency on bacteria and viruses (38, 42–44) and higher inactivation efficiency to adenovirus, which has a higher proportion and infection importance of proteins (36). Several studies have evaluated the effectiveness of UV irradiation for inactivating NTM species. Early work by Bohrerova and Linden investigated DNA damage and repair in Mycobacterium terrae following exposure to low- and medium-pressure mercury UV lamps, highlighting the role of UV-induced DNA damage in inactivation mechanisms. More recent studies have explored alternative UV sources, such as UV-LEDs, with Song et al. reporting inactivation kinetics of Mycobacterium abscessus using 280 nm UV-LEDs in water. Other studies have focused on clinically relevant species in drinking water systems; for example, Schiavano et al. examined the disinfection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies hominissuis using low-pressure UV lamps. In addition, Lee et al. evaluated the UV inactivation of multiple mycobacterial species, including M. avium, Mycobacterium fortuitum, M. intracellulare, and Mycobacterium lentiflavum, under both low- and medium-pressure UV irradiation (24–27).
Despite their clinical significance and ubiquity, existing studies on UV inactivation of NTM remain limited in scope. Prior work has primarily focused on conventional low- and medium-pressure UV systems, with no attention to emerging wavelengths such as 222 nm. In addition, comparative evaluations across different colony morphotypes and between clinically relevant and non-pathogenic NTM species are lacking. This work evaluated the effects of two UV wavelengths (222 nm and 254 nm) on the inactivation of two NTM species, nonpathogenic M. smegmatis and the clinically relevant M. intracellulare, and examined damage to the rpoB and hsp65 genes in both smooth and rough morphotypes. To provide a visual overview of the study design and experimental workflow, the graphical abstract has been included in the supplemental material. This study addressed the research gap by investigating the effects of different UV wavelengths on NTM at cellular and biomolecular levels and explored variations among colony morphotypes, strains, and clinical relevance of the species. By understanding the properties of NTM and their interaction with UV wavelengths, potential implications for public health and environmental management strategies can be applied.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
NTM strains and M. intracellulare morphotypes
In this study, we utilized two strains of non-pathogenic BSL-1 Mycobacterium smegmatis displaying a smooth morphotype, namely M. smegmatis 19420 (ATCC) and M. smegmatis 14468 (ATCC), and three colony morphotypes (parent, smooth, and rough) of pathogenic clinical isolates of Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare (M. intracellulare). M. intracellulare isolates were obtained as previously described (45) under approved protocols from children who had an abscess removed (parent strain, consisting of a mixture of rough and smooth colony morphotypes) and subsequently selectively cultured to generate smooth and rough colony morphotypes.
Growth medium preparation and bacterial cultivation
Glycerol stocks of M. smegmatis strains were prepared according to ATCC protocols and were stored at −80°C. M. smegmatis and M. intracellulare were grown on Difco Middlebrook 7H9 broth and 7H10 agar. To make 7H9 broth, 4.7 g 7H9 agar powder and 900 mL deionized water were combined in a glass bottle and autoclaved on a liquid cycle at 121°C for 10 min. After cooling to around 50°C–55°C, 100 mL of filtered OADC (oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase) enrichment was aseptically added mixed with 2.5 mL of Tween 80 to prevent cell aggregation. For 7H10 agar, 5 mL glycerol was added aseptically into 19 g of 7H10 agar powder and 900 mL deionized water in a glass bottle and boiled for 60 s before being autoclaved at 121°C for 10 min. A total of 100 mL of filtered OADC enrichment was added aseptically when cooled to around 50°C–55°C. A total of 12 mL of 7H10 agar broth was added to 100 mm × 15 mm plates. Broth and agar plates were stored at 2°C–8°C until use for culture or enumeration of colony-forming units (CFU), or used fresh for the rough morphotype of M. intracellulare. A 0.01 mL of bacterial glycerol stocks was added to a 6 mL aliquot of 7H9 broth to an individual Erlenmeyer flask and incubated at 37°C in a shaking incubator. For growth characterization, bacterial cultures were incubated at 37°C in a shaking incubator. Flasks were wrapped in aluminum foil to maintain dark conditions and prevent photoreactivation. Growth was monitored over approximately one week using optical density (OD) measurements. In parallel, samples were periodically collected and quantified using spot plating to establish growth curves. Detailed sampling time points and corresponding data are provided in the Supplemental Information (Tables S3 to S9).
Optical density
OD was measured using the Thermo Scientific NanoDrop 2000/2000c Spectrophotometer at each time point throughout the experiment. A total of 20 mL of samples from each bacterial flask were transferred aseptically to PCR tubes, and 2 mL of each sample were used to measure OD at 600 nm at each timepoint, as detailed in Tables S3 to S7. All studies used 7H9 growth liquid medium as the negative control to confirm sterility, and OD600 for the negative control was subtracted from the samples. Figure S1 illustrates the temporal variations of optical density over time.
Microorganism enumeration
CFU were measured concurrently with OD600 throughout growth curve experiments. Sterile normal saline solution was used to prepare serial dilutions. A total of 10 mL of each dilution was spotted on 7H10 agar plates, with 10 replicate spots for each dilution (46). The plates were then incubated at 37°C, followed by the quantification of CFUs after approximately 35 h for M. smegmatis and 175 h for M. intracellulare. The averaged CFU values for each replicate of M. smegmatis and M. intracellulare are summarized in Tables S8 and S9. Figure S2 illustrates the temporal variations of cell counts over time.
UV dose determination
Standardized polychromatic UV dose calculations described by Linden and Darby (47), Bolton and Linden (48), and available in an open-source protocol (49) were used to calculate sample exposure times. After pre-warming lamps, total incident irradiance was measured using an International Light ILT-5000 radiometer set to the appropriate factor for peak emission wavelength with a SED240W photodetector and corrected for several factors, including the Petri Factor to compensate for non-uniformity across the sample surface, correcting for beam divergence according to experimental geometry, accounting for polychromatic sample absorbance (Agilent Cary 4000 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer), accounting for reflection factor at peak wavelength, and accounting for polychromatic lamp emission measured by Ocean Optics HDX UV-VIS Spectroradiometer (Fig. 1). These adjustments were used to calculate exposure times necessary to achieve specific pre-determined UV doses.
Fig 1.

Emission spectra from low-pressure (LP) mercury lamp (254 nm) and krypton-chloride excimer (KrCl*) lamps (222 nm).
UV exposures
M. smegmatis was grown for approximately 35 h, and M. intracellulare was cultured for 175 h until reaching the exponential phase before using them for UV exposure. Exponential phase cells were exposed to UV fluences ranging from 0 to 120 mJ/cm2 with a target starting concentration at around 107 CFU/mL. Cultures were individually transferred into 50 mL centrifuge tubes and centrifuged at 5,000 rpm for 5 min. After discarding the supernatant and washing the pellets with 10 mL of PBS by vortexing, the tubes were centrifuged for an additional 5 min. Subsequently, 50 mL of PBS was added to the centrifuge tubes containing the pellet, followed by vortexing. Working solutions were prepared by adding 10 mL of the resuspended samples into 100 mL of PBS. A total of 5 mL of the working solution was added to each 35 × 10 mm Petri dish, which was placed on a stir plate with quiescent stirring for the calculated time to achieve a given UV dose for a given lamp. Unexposed samples were used as the 0 mJ/cm2 dose condition. UV experiments were conducted fully in the dark environment, and samples were covered by aluminum foil to avoid photo repair before transferring samples or plating. Aliquots of samples with and without UV exposure were serially diluted, and 10 μL samples were immediately plated on 7H10 agar plates, and aliquots of samples were transferred into labeled centrifuge tubes, covered with aluminum foil to prevent photo repair, and stored at −20°C until DNA extraction. For culture-based enumeration, the detection limit was determined based on a minimum detectable count of 1 colony, corresponding to 100 CFU/mL (49).
DNA extraction and qualitative PCR
DNA was extracted using the extraction protocol previously outlined (50), modified to use phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol. Qualitative PCR (qPCR) was employed to assess damage to target genes, including RNA polymerase β subunit (rpoB) (723 bp) and heat shock protein 65 (hsp65) (441 bp), by examining their reduced amplification compared to samples without UV exposure. Qubit Fluorometer with 1× dsDNA high sensitivity assay kits was used to quantify the DNA concentration at each UV dose for 254 nm and 222 nm wavelengths. DNA concentration change was summarized in Fig. S7. All qPCR assays were conducted in triplicate using the QuantStudio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Amplicon length and primer information for both genes are summarized in Table S10. Reaction preparation protocol for rpoB gene and hsp65 gene followed a previous study (51, 52). The qPCR cycling protocols are listed in Tables S11 and S12. Standard curves (gBlocks, IDT) were designed and used to determine the copy numbers of each target rpoB gene and hsp65 gene (Text S1) and to determine amplification efficiency using the slope of the standard curves fitted to a linear model, equal to 10(−slope) − 1. The efficiencies for rpoB and hsp65 were 0.93 and 1.16, which are in the typical amplification efficiency range. Log inactivation was calculated as log10 (N0/N), where N0 and N represent gene copy numbers before and after UV exposure, respectively, as determined by qPCR. Rapid sequencing DNA V14- barcoding (SQK-RBK114.96) was used for library preparation and loaded to a flowcell in MK1C sequencer for sequencing, following the protocols provided on the Nanopore website. The wf-amplicon workflow (https://labs.epi2me.io/workflows/wf-amplicon/) was used to analyze the reads created after sequencing with default settings for parameters including minimum read length (300) and minimum coverage (20). Amplicon length under each dose with 254 nm and 222 nm for each species was summarized in Fig. S8 and S9.
Dose response modeling
Growth and disinfection (inactivation and gene damage) data were fit to a log-logistic model (Equation 1), setting c as 0 in R using the “drm” function from the “drc” package (R Version 3.0-1) (53). LI is Log10 inactivation for cell inactivation or Log10 gene damage for qPCR quantification; b is the slope of the curve at the middle point (e); c is the minimum value that could be obtained at 0 dose, which we set to 0, resulting in a three-parameter rather than a four-parameter model; and d is the maximum value. Parameters of b, d, and e with their standard errors obtained from regression models are summarized in Tables S1, S13 and S14. Statistical significance of differences was assessed through the lack of overlap between the range of standard errors of model parameters.
| (1) |
Based on the fitted model parameters, D1 and D2 were calculated as the UV fluences required to achieve 1-log₁₀ (90%) and 2-log₁₀ (99%) reductions in inactivation or gene damage, respectively. The corresponding inactivation rate constants (k1 and k2) were defined as the reciprocals of D1 and D2.
Electrical efficiency
The formula for the electrical energy per order (EEO, kWh/m3/order) calculation is
| (2) |
as previously calculated by reference 54. Here, A represents the irradiated surface area in square centimeter calculated by the diameter of the Petri dish (9.62 cm2). V is the sample volume in liters (0.003 L). DN is the UV dose (mJ/cm2) required for obtaining a specific log reduction, which is the same as D1 or D2 for 1 or 2 log, respectively, of cells or gene damage, as summarized in Tables S13 and S14. C is the wall plug efficiency given by the manufacturer (0.035 for 254 nm, and 0.1 for 222 nm [54–61]). WF is the water factor, accounting for the UV absorbance and depth of the water, which we averaged across three biological duplicate UV experiments. The factor 3.6 × 106 converts between hours and seconds, milliwatt and kilowatt, and liter and cubic meter.
RESULTS
Inactivation of non-pathogenic Mycobacterium smegmatis strains and clinically relevant Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare morphotypes
To explore the mechanisms that underlie differences in UV disinfection resistance between NTM species, strains, and colony morphotypes, we conducted collimated beam UV experiments with exponential phase cells under 254 nm or 222 nm within the range of 0 to 120 mJ/cm2. Figure 2 shows the UV dose curves for M. smegmatis, while Fig. 3 shows the UV dose curves for M. intracellulare. Parameters of fitted log-logistic models with their standard errors are summarized in Table S13 for M. smegmatis and M. intracellulare. Rate constant k1 for 1-log reduction was plotted in Fig. 4.
Fig 2.

UV dose response (222 nm, red vs 254 nm, blue) with log-logistic model for log10 reduction of M. smegmatis 19420 and 14468. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM) of three biological replicates at each UV dose. The solid line represents M. smegmatis 19420, while the dotted dashed line represents M. smegmatis 14468.
Fig 3.

UV dose response (222 nm, red vs 254 nm, blue) with log-logistic model for log10 reduction of morphotypes of M. intracellulare (M. intracellulare_Parent [left], M. intracellulare_Rough [middle], M. intracellulare_Smooth [right]). Error bars represent SEM of three biological replicates at each UV dose.
Fig 4.

k1 for 1-log10 reduction of M. smegmatis and M. intracellulare inactivation, rpoB and hsp65 gene damage with 254 nm (blue) and 222 nm (red) UV.
For nonpathogenic M. smegmatis strains, which have smooth morphotypes and contain GPL, the UV dose responses did not statistically significantly differ between the two strains. For M. smegmatis 19420, 9.24 mJ/cm2 of 254 nm (k1 = 0.11 cm2/mJ) and 11.26 mJ/cm2 (k1 = 0.09 cm2/mJ) of 222 nm were needed for 1-log reduction (D1). For M. smegmatis 14468, 9.88 mJ/cm2 of 254 nm (k1 = 0.10 cm2/mJ) and 10.07 mJ/cm2 (k1 = 0.10 cm2/mJ) of 222 nm were needed for 1-log reduction inactivation. D2 even had a smaller difference among the strains and wavelengths (Table S13). The maximum log inactivation due to tailing effects was higher for 254 nm (4.04 and 3.57) than 222 nm (3.03 and 3.33) for both M. smegmatis, indicated by parameter d in Table S13.
For M. intracellulare, the smooth morphotype (9.91 mJ/cm2) was more significantly sensitive to 254 nm UV than both parent (12.72 mJ/cm2) and rough (12.89 mJ/cm2) morphotypes, which were similar to each other, and smooth had similar UV sensitivity to both strains M. smegmatis, based on D1 and k1 (Table S13 and Fig. 4). When comparing k2 (Tables S13 and S14), however, differences were not significant due to the nonlinearity of dose responses, indicating the importance of checking multiple kinetic parameters to capture all the variations. Sensitivity to 222 nm UV was similar among the three morphotypes, as they had similar D1 and k1 (Table S13 and Fig. 4). However, rough (36.94 mJ/cm2) required a significantly higher fluence to obtain a 2-log reduction (D2) compared to parent (17.15 mJ/cm2) and smooth (15.95 mJ/cm2) morphotypes.
Comparing D1 (Table S13) among M. smegmatis or M. intracellulare between wavelengths, D1 was lower at 254 nm for M. smegmatis than at 222 nm, indicating the higher sensitivity of M. smegmatis to 254 nm. D1 was similar for all MAC strains between 254 nm and 222 nm, except M. intracellulare_Smooth at 254 nm, with a lower value. Comparing k1 between M. smegmatis and M. intracellulare, the sensitivity of both strains of M. smegmatis was similar to smooth M. intracellulare, and together these smooth NTM morphotypes were more sensitive than both rough and parent morphotypes. These findings suggest that, within the two NTM species examined in this study, differences between species did not result in substantial variation in UV sensitivity, whereas cell properties related to GPL contents and resulting colony morphotype appeared to play a more influential role. Tailing effects shown in dose responses and modeled by d in Table S13 showed that smooth at 254 nm had a higher maximum log reduction of 3.67 compared to 222 nm (2.99). While rough indicated a higher maximum log reduction of 3.86 by 222 nm over 254 nm (2.61).
DNA damage of non-pathogenic Mycobacterium smegmatis strains and clinically relevant M. intracellulare morphotypes
qPCR was employed to assess damage to target genes with rpoB and hsp65 by examining their reduced amplification. Standard curves with serially diluted extracted DNA from NTM stocks and gblock standards are shown in Fig. S3 and S4 for rpoB and hsp65, respectively. Parameters of fitted log logistic models with their standard errors are summarized in Table S14 for M. smegmatis and M. intracellulare. Gene damage for rpoB and hsp65 for M. smegmatis and M. intracellulare is shown in Fig. S5 and S6. Both rpoB and hsp65 DNA damage of M. smegmatis and M. intracellulare increased with increasing doses for both wavelengths. Rate constant k1 for 1-log reduction was plotted in Fig. 4.
For nonpathogenic M. smegmatis, gene damage by 222 nm and 254 nm was initially rapid up to 20 mJ/cm2. Comparing D1 for both rpoB and hsp65, UV fluence required by 222 nm was much lower for both strains of M. smegmatis indicating the more effective impacts on rpoB and hsp65 by 222 nm over 254 nm, although 2-log reduction needs higher UV doses to achieve or is hard to achieve for either wavelength, indicated by d and e in Table S14. Comparing rate constant kinetics k1 among rpoB and hsp65 (Fig. 4), in M. smegmatis 19420, 254 nm had a lower rate constant with higher doses required for both rpoB and hsp65 damage, while in M. smegmatis 14468, hsp65 was damaged similarly by 222 nm and 254 nm, but rpoB was more resistant to 254 nm.
Among M. intracellulare morphotypes, due to the irregularity of the rpoB gene damage log logistic dose response for M. intracellulare parent at 254 nm, we also used linear regression to estimate the rate constant as 0.0072 cm2/mJ. Comparing k1 for rpoB between 254 nm and 222 nm for M. intracellulare (Fig. 4), k1 by 222 nm (0.01 cm2/mJ) was higher than 254 nm (0.005 cm2/mJ) for smooth, k1 by 222 nm (0.05 cm2/mJ) was higher than 254 nm (0.007 cm2/mJ) for parent while rough had similar kinetics for 222 nm (0.016 cm2/mJ) and 254 nm (0.013 cm2/mJ). For hsp65, the rate constant was similar for smooth and parent around 0.01 mJ/cm2 for both 254 nm and 222 nm, while rough had a higher rate constant k1 (0.021 cm2/mJ) at 222 nm than at 254 nm (0.007 cm2/mJ). The parent also had a higher rate constant k1 (0.014 cm2/mJ) at 222 nm than at 254 nm (0.009 cm2/mJ).
Comparing M. smegmatis with M. intracellulare morphotypes, for hsp65 treated by 254 nm, k1 of M. intracellulare parent or smooth (~0.01 cm2/mJ) was higher than M. smegmatis 19420 (0.006 cm2/mJ) and similar to M. smegmatis 14468 (0.013 cm2/mJ), and k1 of M. intracellulare rough (0.007 cm2/mJ) was similar to M. smegmatis 19420 (0.006 cm2/mJ). k1 at 222 nm was similar for M. smegmatis 19420 and M. intracellulare parent or smooth (~0.014 cm2/mJ), and k1 at 222 nm for M. intracellulare rough (0.021 cm2/mJ) was similar to M. smegmatis 14468 (0.018 cm2/mJ). For rpoB treated by 254 nm, k1 of M. intracellulare rough (~0.013 cm2/mJ) was similar to both M. smegmatis 19420 and M. smegmatis 14468. For k1 of M. intracellulare parent (0.007 cm2/mJ) or smooth (0.005 cm2/mJ), they were lower than M. intracellulare rough and both M. smegmatis. For rpoB treated by 222 nm, k1 of M. intracellulare parent (0.045 cm2/mJ), M. smegmatis 19420 (0.027 cm2/mJ), and M. smegmatis 14468 (0.040 cm2/mJ) were higher than M. intracellulare smooth (0.010 cm2/mJ) and rough (0.016 cm2/mJ; Table S14 and Fig. 4). Again, these findings indicated the minor effect on UV dose damage by strain. Rate constants k1 for hsp65 at 222 nm were lower than rpoB for both M. smegmatis and M. intracellulare morphotypes, indicating higher UV sensitivity of rpoB. One important observation was that DNA concentration decreased following UV exposure (Fig. S7), suggesting increasing UV-associated DNA damage or fragmentation, which should be considered when understanding UV effects. However, no substantial change in amplicon read length distribution was observed after UV exposure (Fig. S8 and S9). Further investigation is needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying DNA damage and to determine whether cellular characteristics or other factors may influence these observations.
Electrical energy comparisons
EEO at 1-log reduction for NTM cell inactivation and rpoB or hsp65 gene damage is summarized in Fig. 5, and the energy consumption for all conditions was between 0.003 and 0.108 kWh/m3. NTM inactivation took lower energy consumption compared to gene damage for all NTM strains. Energy consumption was similar for rpoB and hsp65 gene. Energy efficiency for 222 nm was lower than 254 nm within the variations of EEO at 254 nm overlapped with EEO at 222 nm.
Fig 5.

Electrical energy per order at D1 of M. smegmatis and M. intracellulare inactivation, rpoB and hsp65 gene damage with 254 nm (blue) and 222 nm (red) UV.
DISCUSSION
Sensitivity of different NTM to different UV wavelengths
Understanding the mechanisms underlying NTM response to UV wavelengths is crucial for various applications, including disinfection processes and environmental control. Several studies utilizing 254 nm have been conducted with Mycobacterium spp. For example, secondary wastewater effluent spiked with M. terrae (smooth morphotype) was exposed to 254 nm low-pressure (LP) UV ranging from 5 to 60 mJ/cm² (62), where the rate constant was 0.16 cm²/mJ, which was slightly higher than the rate constant for our study (around 0.1 cm²/mJ for both M. smegmatis and M. intracellulare). Tailing also slightly differed and was observed after 20 mJ/cm² in the previous study and around 13 mJ/cm2 in our study (Table S13). Tailing is commonly observed in mycobacteria disinfection dose responses and may be attributed to aggregation due to the unique cell walls containing fatty mycolic acid. In another study where tap water was spiked with 14 strains of M. avium subspecies hominissuis exhibiting smooth colonies and exposed to submerged 254 nm UV doses of 0–192 mJ/cm2, susceptibility varied among strains, while in our study, non-pathogenic M. smegmatis and M. intracellulare_Smooth were similar to each other and more sensitive to UV than M. intracellulare_Parent and M. intracellulare_Rough. For five strains, 3-log reduction occurred at ≤32 mJ/cm2, and 13 of the 14 strains were disinfected below detection from the initial concentration of 105 CFU/mL. In our study, 3-log reduction occurred at around 16 mJ/cm2, but no strain or morphotype was disinfected below detection from the initial concentration of 107 CFU/mL due to tailing. Instead of doing a collimated beam study as we did to ensure highly standardized and repeatable results (48), the previous study immersed UV lamps onto cylindrical glass tubes in which the UV light disperses in all directions and provides broad exposure to water. The differences in reactor configuration and lower initial concentration in their study could explain the lack of tailing in their study. In another study, water spiked with clinical isolates of M. abscessus, M. avium, and Mycobacterium chimaera indicated that two different point-of-use 254 nm UV systems achieved an average NTM log reduction of 0.89 and 1.86 with an exposure time of 90 s, by the suspended and submerged systems, respectively (40). In our study, a comparable exposure time corresponded to an irradiance of 8–16 mJ/cm² for 254 nm and 4–8 mJ/cm² for 222 nm. For cell inactivation, these approximate exposure times caused log reductions ranging from 1 to 3 under 254 nm and 0.5–1 under 222 nm for M. smegmatis, and 1–2 under 254 nm and around 0.2–0.6 under 222 nm for M. intracellulare.
Earlier studies also explored UV disinfection of Mycobacterium spp. in water by LP and multi-wavelength medium-pressure (MP) UV irradiation (63, 64). Zuzana et al. treated M. terrae with LP and MP and found linear rate constants of 0.16 cm²/mJ and 0.17 cm²/mJ, respectively, which did not significantly differ despite wavelength differences. These rate constants are within the same order of magnitude of our rate constants (at 1-log reduction, we observed an average value of 0.1 cm²/mJ across both M. smegmatis and M. intracellulare calculated by D1), but M. terrae was more sensitive than M. smegmatis and M. intracellulare in our study, as 10 mJ/cm² resulted in a 2-log reduction by both UV lamps. In another study by Shin et al. with LP disinfection, no significant differences were observed between two morphotypes (smooth transparent and smooth opaque) of clinical isolates of M. avium subsp. hominissuis HMC02 with an initial concentration of 106 CFU/mL, where a 4-log reduction required approximately 24 mJ/cm² for WT and 23 mJ/cm² for WO. A 6 mJ/cm2 was used for 1-log reduction with a corresponding k1 around 0.17 cm²/mJ. In our study, 4-log inactivation was not achieved due to tailing effects, likely due to our higher initial concentration. The rate constants across these studies were similar, which indicated the relatively consistent resistance of NTM to UV.
Recent studies have examined the use of light-emitting diodes (LED) for disinfecting NTM. One study utilized 280 nm UV-LED to disinfect pathogenic M. abscessus (Rough) in water, achieving a 2-log reduction at 10 mJ/cm², whereas here, approximately 16–20 mJ/cm² were needed to obtain a 2-log reduction for M. smegmatis and M. intracellulare with 254 nm and 222 nm. Both shouldering and tailing appeared in their UV LED dose responses, whereas we only observed tailing and no significant shouldering with LP and KrCl lamp exposures. Their inactivation rate constants of 0.36 and 0.37 cm²/mJ, determined by linear regression and Geeraerd modeling (65), were higher than the rate constant in our study for both 254 nm and 222 nm modeled with log-logistic regression. This suggests a decreased resistance of M. smegmatis and M. intracellulare to 254 nm and 222 nm UV radiation compared to M. abscessus to 280 nm UV radiation. Additionally, Ma et al. used 222 nm to inactivate some common pathogens and surrogates, including M. smegmatis 14468 that we tested here (66). The rate constant for M. smegmatis 14468 was around 0.015 (±0.006) cm2/mJ for 1-log reduction after fitting to a second-order polynomial regression model, which overlaps with its value in our study (k1 = 0.099 cm2/mJ).
Previous investigations for inactivating bacteria and viruses also indicated comparative energy efficiency between 222 nm KrCl excimer lamps and 254 nm LP UV lamps; they also had higher energy efficiency compared to UV LED (54, 55). EEO was also calculated (Tables S13 and S14), and the values were similar between 254 nm and 222 nm, while M. intracellulare _Rough, M. intracellulare_Smooth, and M. smegmatis 19420 at 222 nm required slightly higher energy.
Structural properties and gene damage
In the NTM inactivation study, we demonstrated that smooth morphotypes containing GPL, including both M. smegmatis and M. intracellulare, are more sensitive to UV light than morphotypes lacking GPL, and 254 nm was more effective than 222 nm for rough NTM. A previous study indicated that the rough morphotype of M. intracellulare was associated with higher virulence and pathogenicity compared to the smooth morphotype (15), which aligns with our observation of higher resistance of M. intracellulare _Rough and higher resistance of pathogenic M. intracellulare.
So far, no study has explored the UV interactions with GPLs. We observed that the different UV sensitivity between smooth and rough M. intracellulare was more significant than between M. smegmatis and M. intracellulare species, which may indicate the association of disinfection resistance with the differences in cell structure (with or without GPLs). However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. While differences in GPL composition may contribute to this observation, other structural or physiological factors may also play a role. Different morphotypes also impact virulence, where rough morphotypes of M. abscessus are more infectious and persistent (15). Different morphotypes have been associated with variations in cell surface structure and physiological behavior. In this study, rough morphotypes exhibited higher UV resistance compared to smooth morphotypes, which may be related to differences in cell envelope composition. In addition, the relatively high GC content of NTM species (e.g., 69% in M. avium and 67% in M. smegmatis) may contribute to overall resistance to UV disinfection due to increased DNA stability and nucleotide photoreactivity. Additionally, high GC content of 69% in M. avium (67) and 67% in M. smegmatis (68) may contribute to overall resistance to UV disinfection due to increased DNA stability and nucleotide photoreactivity with the presence of more stable triple hydrogen bonds connecting G-C and more photoreactive TC and TT sites (69, 70). Covered by cellular components with high GC content, less UV irradiation will penetrate and reach the genome for DNA damage, which contributed to the lower observed dose response in our study. Further explorations between UV and NTM cell structures could be done to complete our understanding of UV disinfection on NTM at the molecular levels.
Compared with cell inactivation, the rate constant of NTM damage was much lower, indicating the importance of understanding the molecular interactions with UV. According to the authors’ knowledge, no study so far has explored UV effects on rpoB and hsp65 gene damage or quantified the UV gene damage and indicated higher UV sensitivity of rpoB over hsp65, although previous studies have focused on the improved ability of these genes over 16S rRNA in sequencing to distinguish mycobacterial species in biofilms and water distribution systems (71–73). The housekeeping rpoB gene, which is responsible for coding the RNA polymerase subunit, evolved more rapidly than ribosomal genes (74). The hsp65 gene encodes the 65 kDa heat shock protein and is responsible for protein folding and stress response (75). Previous studies mainly focused on the role of rpoB or hsp65 as phylogenetic markers to identify mycobacterial species, while no study so far has explored the role of rpoB or hsp65 in resistance to UV and the properties related to resistance, such as function, coding location, amplicon length, etc. In this study, rpoB and hsp65 were selected as representative gene targets due to their conserved presence and widespread use in mycobacterial identification, enabling assessment of UV-induced gene damage at the molecular level. This study provided a first glance at the difference in UV sensitivity between them and indicated higher resistance by hsp65, which more in-depth research could be done in the future to deepen our understanding of NTM and their resilience to UV exposure (76–78). A comprehensive understanding of the sensitivity of these and other genes to different UV wavelengths in NTM, alongside understanding how other unique cell properties of NTM interact with UV wavelengths, will help limit the distribution of NTM in water. This knowledge will prompt the development of NTM pathogen-specific disinfection protocols, optimizing water treatment for specific microorganisms.
Implications for water treatment
A commonly required UV dose in the United States is 22 mJ/cm2 in drinking water to ensure 4-log inactivation of waterborne protozoa (79), while 40 mJ/cm2 is widely regarded to provide 4-log inactivation for most waterborne enteric pathogens (80), but higher doses are required for more resistant microorganisms (81). Previous studies regarding pathogen regulation with UV mainly focus on 254 nm and fecal pathogens, where Escherichia coli was the main indicator (82); however, our results and previous literature indicate lower inactivation efficiency, especially tailing, for NTM, which can be OP that may pose a great threat to human health. NTM infection is not a nationally notifiable disease (83), and NTM monitoring and reporting for drinking water is not required in the U.S. or other countries, making it difficult to fully understand the magnitude of its prevalence and quantify risks to human health due to NTM. The high resistance and prevalence of NTM in environments or in engineered water systems, as well as the lack of surveillance of NTM prevalence and health outcomes, indicate the need for greater study to comprehensively understand these OPs to develop and apply UV technology to control NTM and minimize risks to human health.
In summary, this study provides several novel insights into UV inactivation of NTM that extend beyond prior work focused primarily on conventional UV systems. By systematically comparing two UV wavelengths (222 nm and 254 nm) across both a non-pathogenic model organism (M. smegmatis) and a clinically relevant species (M. intracellulare), we demonstrate that species-specific differences play a critical role in UV susceptibility, with M. intracellulare exhibiting greater resistance. Furthermore, our results highlight the importance of cell structure, showing that rough morphotypes lacking glycopeptidolipids exhibit increased resistance to UV exposure.
In addition, gene damage analysis revealed wavelength- and morphotype-dependent responses, with 222 nm inducing slightly greater damage to target genes (rpoB and hsp65) compared to 254 nm, and smooth morphotypes showing higher levels of gene damage than rough morphotypes. Together, these findings provide new evidence that both cellular structure and physiological characteristics influence UV disinfection outcomes and underscore the need to consider species and morphotype variability when evaluating emerging UV technologies for controlling NTM in water systems. It should be noted that this study was conducted in PBS as a simplified and controlled matrix to isolate the effects of UV exposure; however, it does not fully capture the complexity of real drinking water systems, where factors such as natural organic matter, particles, and biofilm formation may influence disinfection efficiency. Therefore, the results presented here may not fully represent in situ conditions and should be interpreted with consideration of these limitations. Future studies incorporating more representative water matrices are needed to further evaluate the applicability of these findings.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Dr. Oscar Rosas-Mejia for NTM growth training. This study could not be completed without help from undergraduate students Erica Babusci and Lilly Des Rosiers.
Contributor Information
Natalie Hull, Email: nataliehull@boisestate.edu.
Julia C. van Kessel, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
FUNDING
The study was funded by startup funds to Dr. Hull and Dr. Robinson from The Ohio State University. Sequencing was additionally funded by Water Research Foundation project 5213.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The raw Nanopore amplicon sequencing reads generated in this study have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under BioProject accession number PRJNA1491417 and SRA accession numbers SRR39505669–SRR39505828.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01078-26.
Graphical abstract, Tables S1 to S14, Text S1, and Fig. S1 to S9.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Gan Y, Rahmatika I, Kurisu F, Furumai H, Simazaki D, Fukano H, Hoshino Y, Kasuga I. 2022. The fate and risk of nontuberculous mycobacteria in the water supply system: a review. H2Open Journal 5:180–197. doi: 10.2166/h2oj.2022.144 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Amha YM, Anwar MZ, Kumaraswamy R, Henschel A, Ahmad F. 2017. Mycobacteria in municipal wastewater treatment and reuse: microbial diversity for screening the occurrence of clinically and environmentally relevant species in arid regions. Environ Sci Technol 51:3048–3056. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b05580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Dowdell K, Haig S-J, Caverly LJ, Shen Y, LiPuma JJ, Raskin L. 2019. Nontuberculous mycobacteria in drinking water systems - the challenges of characterization and risk mitigation. Curr Opin Biotechnol 57:127–136. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.03.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Collier SA, Deng L, Adam EA, Benedict KM, Beshearse EM, Blackstock AJ, Bruce BB, Derado G, Edens C, Fullerton KE, Gargano JW, Geissler AL, Hall AJ, Havelaar AH, Hill VR, Hoekstra RM, Reddy SC, Scallan E, Stokes EK, Yoder JS, Beach MJ. 2021. Estimate of burden and direct healthcare cost of infectious waterborne disease in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis 27:140–149. doi: 10.3201/eid2701.190676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Gerdes ME, Miko S, Kunz JM, Hannapel EJ, Hlavsa MC, Hughes MJ, Stuckey MJ, Francois Watkins LK, Cope JR, Yoder JS, Hill VR, Collier SA. 2023. Estimating waterborne infectious disease burden by exposure route, United States, 2014. Emerg Infect Dis 29:1357–1366. doi: 10.3201/eid2907.230231 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Daley CL, Iaccarino JM, Lange C, Cambau E, Wallace RJ Jr, Andrejak C, Böttger EC, Brozek J, Griffith DE, Guglielmetti L, Huitt GA, Knight SL, Leitman P, Marras TK, Olivier KN, Santin M, Stout JE, Tortoli E, van Ingen J, Wagner D, Winthrop KL. 2020. Treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: an official ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA clinical practice guideline. Clin Infect Dis 71:e1–e36. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Adjemian J, Olivier KN, Seitz AE, Holland SM, Prevots DR. 2012. Prevalence of nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease in U.S. medicare beneficiaries. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 185:881–886. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201111-2016OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Lande L, Whealon S, Singer E, Greenspon LW, Rains E, Kwait R, Buckley M, Peng W, Sawicki J, Falkinham JO, Williams MD, Peterson DD. 2025. Bronchoscopic detection of aspiration in patients with bronchiectasis and Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary infection. Respir Med Res 87:101166. doi: 10.1016/j.resmer.2025.101166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Falkinham JO, Pruden A, Edwards M. 2015. Opportunistic premise plumbing pathogens: increasingly important pathogens in drinking water. Pathogens 4:373–386. doi: 10.3390/pathogens4020373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Claeys TA, Robinson RT. 2018. The many lives of nontuberculous mycobacteria. J Bacteriol 200:e00739-17. doi: 10.1128/JB.00739-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Bohrerova Z, Linden KG. 2006. Ultraviolet and chlorine disinfection of mycobacterium in wastewater: effect of aggregation. Water Environ Res 78:565–571. doi: 10.2175/106143006x99795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Pereira AC, Ramos B, Reis AC, Cunha MV. 2020. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria: molecular and physiological bases of virulence and adaptation to ecological niches. Microorganisms 8:1380. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8091380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Batt SM, Minnikin DE, Besra GS. 2020. The thick waxy coat of mycobacteria, a protective layer against antibiotics and the host’s immune system. Biochem J 477:1983–2006. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20200194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Schorey JS, Sweet L. 2008. The mycobacterial glycopeptidolipids: structure, function, and their role in pathogenesis. Glycobiology 18:832–841. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwn076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Pawlik A, Garnier G, Orgeur M, Tong P, Lohan A, Le Chevalier F, Sapriel G, Roux A-L, Conlon K, Honoré N, Dillies M-A, Ma L, Bouchier C, Coppée J-Y, Gaillard J-L, Gordon SV, Loftus B, Brosch R, Herrmann JL. 2013. Identification and characterization of the genetic changes responsible for the characteristic smooth-to-rough morphotype alterations of clinically persistent Mycobacterium abscessus. Mol Microbiol 90:612–629. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Tran T, Bonham AJ, Chan ED, Honda JR. 2019. A paucity of knowledge regarding nontuberculous mycobacterial lipids compared to the tubercle bacillus. Tuberculosis 115:96–107. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2019.02.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Uruén C, Chopo-Escuin G, Tommassen J, Mainar-Jaime RC, Arenas J. 2020. Biofilms as promoters of bacterial antibiotic resistance and tolerance. Antibiotics (Basel) 10:3. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10010003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Dulberger CL, Rubin EJ, Boutte CC. 2020. The mycobacterial cell envelope - a moving target. Nat Rev Microbiol 18:47–59. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0273-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Falkinham JO. 2016. Nontuberculous mycobacteria: community and nosocomial waterborne opportunistic pathogens. Clin Microbiol Newsl 38:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinmicnews.2015.12.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Koh W-J, Jeong B-H, Jeon K, Lee NY, Lee KS, Woo SY, Shin SJ, Kwon OJ. 2012. Clinical significance of the differentiation between Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare in M avium complex lung disease. Chest 142:1482–1488. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-0494 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ratna S, Daniel J. 2023. Stress-induced non-replicating Mycobacterium smegmatis incorporates exogenous fatty acids into glycopeptidolipids. Microb Pathog 174:105943. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105943 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. T J, J R, Rajan A, Shankar V. 2020. Features of the biochemistry of Mycobacterium smegmatis, as a possible model for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Infect Public Health 13:1255–1264. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.06.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Martínez A, Torello S, Kolter R. 1999. Sliding motility in mycobacteria. J Bacteriol 181:7331–7338. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.23.7331-7338.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Schiavano GF, De Santi M, Sisti M, Amagliani G, Brandi G. 2018. Disinfection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies hominissuis in drinking tap water using ultraviolet germicidal irradiation. Environ Technol 39:3221–3227. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2017.1375028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Lee ES, Yoon TH, Lee MY, Han SH, Ka JO. 2010. Inactivation of environmental mycobacteria by free chlorine and UV. Water Res 44:1329–1334. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.10.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Bohrerova Z, Linden KG. 2006. Assessment of DNA damage and repair in Mycobacterium terrae after exposure to UV irradiation. J Appl Microbiol 101:995–1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03023.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Song JJX, Oguma K, Takizawa S. 2023. Inactivation kinetics of 280 nm UV-LEDs against Mycobacterium abscessus in water. Sci Rep 13:2186. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29338-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Tzou CL, Dirac MA, Becker AL, Beck NK, Weigel KM, Meschke JS, Cangelosi GA. 2020. Association between Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease and mycobacteria in home water and soil. Ann Am Thorac Soc 17:57–62. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201812-915OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Lanrewaju AA, Enitan-Folami AM, Sabiu S, Swalaha FM. 2022. A review on disinfection methods for inactivation of waterborne viruses. Front Microbiol 13:991856. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.991856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Leslie E, Hinds J, Hai FI. 2021. Causes, factors, and control measures of opportunistic premise plumbing pathogens—a critical review. Applied Sciences 11:4474. doi: 10.3390/app11104474 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Hull NM, Holinger EP, Ross KA, Robertson CE, Harris JK, Stevens MJ, Pace NR. 2017. Longitudinal and source-to-tap New Orleans, LA, U.S.A. drinking water microbiology. Environ Sci Technol 51:4220–4229. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b06064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Tang W, Li Q, Chen L, Zhang W, Wang H. 2021. Biofilm community structures and opportunistic pathogen gene markers in drinking water mains and the role of pipe materials. ACS EST Water 1:630–640. doi: 10.1021/acsestwater.0c00137 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Chen J, Li W, Zhang J, Qi W, Li Y, Chen S, Zhou W. 2020. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes in drinking water and biofilms: the correlation with the microbial community and opportunistic pathogens. Chemosphere 259:127483. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Falkinham JO III, Hilborn ED, Arduino MJ, Pruden A, Edwards MA. 2015. Epidemiology and ecology of opportunistic premise plumbing pathogens: legionella pneumophila, Mycobacterium avium, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ Health Perspect 123:749–758. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1408692 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Liu P-F, Avramova LV, Park C. 2009. Revisiting absorbance at 230nm as a protein unfolding probe. Anal Biochem 389:165–170. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.03.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Oh C, Sun PP, Araud E, Nguyen TH. 2020. Mechanism and efficacy of virus inactivation by a microplasma UV lamp generating monochromatic UV irradiation at 222 nm. Water Res 186:116386. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Santos AL, Moreirinha C, Lopes D, Esteves AC, Henriques I, Almeida A, Domingues MRM, Delgadillo I, Correia A, Cunha A. 2013. Effects of UV radiation on the lipids and proteins of bacteria studied by mid-infrared spectroscopy. Environ Sci Technol 47:6306–6315. doi: 10.1021/es400660g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Kang JW, Kim SS, Kang DH. 2018. Inactivation dynamics of 222 nm krypton-chlorine excilamp irradiation on gram-positive and gram-negative foodborne pathogenic bacteria. Food Res Int 109:325–333. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.04.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Gray NF. 2013. Ultraviolet disinfectionmicrobiology of waterborne diseases: microbiological aspects and risks . Second Edition. Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
- 40. Norton GJ, Williams M, Falkinham JO, Honda JR. 2020. Physical measures to reduce exposure to tap water-associated nontuberculous mycobacteria. Front Public Health 8:190. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Blatchley ER, Brenner DJ, Claus H, Cowan TE, Linden KG, Liu Y, Mao T, Park S-J, Piper PJ, Simons RM, Sliney DH. 2022. Far UV-C radiation: an emerging tool for pandemic control. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol:1–21. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2022.2084315 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Xu J, Huang C-H. 2023. Enhanced direct photolysis of organic micropollutants by far-UVC light at 222 nm from KrCl* excilamps. Environ Sci Technol Lett 10:543–548. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Narita K, Asano K, Naito K, Ohashi H, Sasaki M, Morimoto Y, Igarashi T, Nakane A. 2020. Ultraviolet C light with wavelength of 222 nm inactivates a wide spectrum of microbial pathogens. Journal of Hospital Infection 105:459–467. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.03.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Robinson RT, Mahfooz N, Rosas-Mejia O, Liu Y, Hull NM. 2022. UV222 disinfection of SARS-CoV-2 in solution. Sci Rep 12:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18385-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Claeys TA, Liu Y, Prigodich A, Peck E, Gokul E, Reed-Mera N, Tuah A, Wirekoh A, Quinn K, Rosas Mejia O, Clary G, Sasindran S, Dellos-Nolan S, Gloag E, Huppler AR, Hull NM, Jude BA, Robinson RT. 2025. Mycobacterium intracellulare ABSURDO is a novel clinical isolate with three colony morphotypes that vary in pathogenicity and sequence at the PKS and MtrA loci. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.03.636325 [DOI]
- 46. Beck NK, Callahan K, Nappier SP, Kim H, Sobsey MD, Meschke JS. 2009. Development of a spot‐titer culture assay for quantifying bacteria and viral indicators. Rapid Methods Automation Mic 17:455–464. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-4581.2009.00182.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Linden KG, Darby JL. 1997. Estimating effective germicidal dose from medium pressure UV lamps. J Environ Eng 123:1142–1149. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1997)123:11(1142) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Bolton JR, Linden KG. 2003. Standardization of methods for fluence (UV Dose) determination in bench-scale UV experiments. J Environ Eng 129:209–215. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2003)129:3(209) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Ma D, Hull N. 2023. Polychromatic UV fluence (Dose) response determination v3. UV Dose Spreadsheet Preparation of UV Light Source. doi: 10.17504/protocols.io.n92ldzqoov5b/v3 [DOI]
- 50. Hull NM, Reens AL, Robertson CE, Stanish LF, Harris JK, Stevens MJ, Frank DN, Kotter C, Pace NR. 2015. Molecular analysis of single room humidifier bacteriology. Water Res 69:318–327. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.11.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Meghdadi H, Khosravi AD, Hashemzadeh M, Tabandeh MR. 2022. New design of multilocus sequence analysis of rpoB, ssrA, tuf, atpE, ku, and dnaK for identification of Mycobacterium species. Mol Biol Rep 49:7967–7977. doi: 10.1007/s11033-022-07638-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. van der Wielen PWJJ, Heijnen L, van der Kooij D. 2013. Pyrosequence analysis of the hsp65 genes of nontuberculous mycobacterium communities in unchlorinated drinking water in the Netherlands. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:6160–6166. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01591-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Sholtes K, Linden KG. 2019. Pulsed and continuous light UV LED: microbial inactivation, electrical, and time efficiency. Water Res 165:114965. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.114965 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Beck SE, Ryu H, Boczek LA, Cashdollar JL, Jeanis KM, Rosenblum JS, Lawal OR, Linden KG. 2017. Evaluating UV-C LED disinfection performance and investigating potential dual-wavelength synergy. Water Res 109:207–216. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Hull NM, Linden KG. 2018. Synergy of MS2 disinfection by sequential exposure to tailored UV wavelengths. Water Res 143:292–300. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.06.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Schalk S, Adam V, Arnold E, Brieden K, Voronov A, Witzke H. 2005. UV lamps for disinfection and advanced oxidation: lamp types, technologies and applications. IUVA News 8:32–37. [Google Scholar]
- 57. Schaefer R, Grapperhaus M, Schaefer I, Linden K. 2007. Pulsed UV lamp performance and comparison with UV mercury lamps. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science 6:303–310. doi: 10.1139/s06-068 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Luo X, Zhang B, Lu Y, Mei Y, Shen L. 2022. Advances in application of ultraviolet irradiation for biofilm control in water and wastewater infrastructure. J Hazard Mater 421:126682. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Wan Q, Wen G, Cao R, Xu X, Zhao H, Li K, Wang J, Huang T. 2020. Comparison of UV-LEDs and LPUV on inactivation and subsequent reactivation of waterborne fungal spores. Water Res 173:115553. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Ahlawat K, Jangra R, Ish A, Jain N, Prakash R. 2024. A dielectric barrier discharge based low pressure narrow band far UV-C 222 nm excimer lamp and its efficiency analysis. Phys Scr 99:025018. doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ad1cb9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Sun W, Jing Z, Zhao Z, Yin R, Santoro D, Mao T, Lu Z. 2023. Dose–response behavior of pathogens and surrogate microorganisms across the ultraviolet-C spectrum: inactivation efficiencies, action spectra, and mechanisms. Environ Sci Technol 57:10891–10900. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c00518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Bohrerova Z, Linden KG. 2006a. Ultraviolet and chlorine disinfection of mycobacterium in wastewater: effect of aggregation. Water Environ Res 78:565–571. doi: 10.2175/106143006x99795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Shin GA, Lee JK, Freeman R, Cangelosi GA. 2008. Inactivation of Mycobacterium avium complex by UV irradiation. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:7067–7069. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00457-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Bohrerova Z, Linden KG. 2006b. Assessment of DNA damage and repair in Mycobacterium terrae after exposure to UV irradiation. J Appl Microbiol 101:995–1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03023.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Geeraerd AH, Herremans CH, Van Impe JF. 2000. Structural model requirements to describe microbial inactivation during a mild heat treatment. Int J Food Microbiol 59:185–209. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00362-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Ma B, Bright K, Ikner L, Ley C, Seyedi S, Gerba CP, Sobsey MD, Piper P, Linden KG. 2023. UV inactivation of common pathogens and surrogates under 222 nm irradiation from KrCl* excimer lamps. Photochem Photobiol 99:975–982. doi: 10.1111/php.13724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Jia X, Yang L, Li C, Xu Y, Yang Q, Chen F. 2021. Combining comparative genomic analysis with machine learning reveals some promising diagnostic markers to identify five common pathogenic non‐tuberculous mycobacteria. Microb Biotechnol 14:1539–1549. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Pope WH, Jacobs-Sera D, Russell DA, Rubin DHF, Kajee A, Msibi ZNP, Larsen MH, Jacobs WR, Lawrence JG, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF. 2014. Genomics and proteomics of mycobacteriophage patience, an accidental tourist in the Mycobacterium neighborhood. mBio 5:e02145. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02145-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Hsiao S-S, Hsu C-Y, Ananthakrishnan B, Hsu M-H, Chien Y-T, Wang L-P, Tung H-H. 2023. Ozone micron bubble pretreatment for antibiotic resistance genes reduction in hospital wastewater treatment. Sustain Environ Res 33:40. doi: 10.1186/s42834-023-00203-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Pullerits K, Ahlinder J, Holmer L, Salomonsson E, Öhrman C, Jacobsson K, Dryselius R, Forsman M, Paul CJ, Rådström P. 2020. Impact of UV irradiation at full scale on bacterial communities in drinking water. NPJ Clean Water 3:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41545-020-0057-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Blanc SM, Robinson D, Fahrenfeld NL. 2021. Potential for nontuberculous mycobacteria proliferation in natural and engineered water systems due to climate change: a literature review. City and Environment Interactions 11:100070. doi: 10.1016/j.cacint.2021.100070 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 72. van der Wielen PWJJ, van der Kooij D. 2013. Nontuberculous mycobacteria, fungi, and opportunistic pathogens in unchlorinated drinking water in The Netherlands. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:825–834. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02748-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Kim SH, Shin JH. 2018. Identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria using multilocous sequence analysis of 16S rRNA, hsp65, and rpoB. J Clin Lab Anal 32:e22184. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Adékambi T, Colson P, Drancourt M. 2003. rpoB-based identification of nonpigmented and late-pigmenting rapidly growing mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol 41:5699–5708. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.12.5699-5708.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Sakai T, Hisaeda H, Ishikawa H, Maekawa Y, Zhang M, Nakao Y, Takeuchi T, Matsumoto K, Good RA, Himeno K. 1999. Expression and role of heat-shock protein 65 (HSP65) in macrophages during Trypanosoma cruzi infection: involvement of HSP65 in prevention of apoptosis of macrophages. Microbes Infect 1:419–427. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(99)80045-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Tortone CA, Zumárraga MJ, Gioffr AK, Oriani DS. 2018. Utilization of molecular and conventional methods for the identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from different water sources. Int J Mycobacteriol 7:53–60. doi: 10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_192_17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Turenne CY. 2019. Nontuberculous mycobacteria: Insights on taxonomy and evolution. Infect Genet Evol 72:159–168. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2019.01.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Kim M-J, Kim K-M, Shin J-I, Ha J-H, Lee D-H, Choi J-G, Park J-S, Byun J-H, Yoo J-W, Eum S, Jung M, Baik SC, Lee WK, Kang HL, Shin M-K. 2021. Identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria in patients with pulmonary diseases in Gyeongnam, Korea, using multiplex PCR and multigene sequence-based analysis. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology 2021:1–13. doi: 10.1155/2021/8844306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. U. EPA. 2003. Long term 2 enhanced surface water treatment rule. Toolbox Guidance Manual, United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington [Google Scholar]
- 80. Hijnen WAM, Beerendonk EF, Medema GJ. 2006. Inactivation credit of UV radiation for viruses, bacteria and protozoan (oo)cysts in water: a review. Water Res 40:3–22. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.10.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Pirnie M, Linden KG, JPJr M. 2006. Ultraviolet disinfection guidance manual for the final long term 2 enhanced surface water treatment rule. Environmental Protection 2:1–436. [Google Scholar]
- 82. Berruti I, Nahim-Granados S, Abeledo-Lameiro MJ, Oller I, Polo-López MI. 2021. UV-C peroxymonosulfate activation for wastewater regeneration: simultaneous inactivation of pathogens and degradation of contaminants of emerging concern. Molecules 26:4890. doi: 10.3390/molecules26164890 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Saunders KE, Reyes JM, Cyril L, Mitchell M, Colter S, Erskine J, McNamara KX, Hunter JC, Perkins KM, Charles A. 2024. Notes from the field: nontuberculous mycobacteria infections after cosmetic surgery procedures in Florida - nine states, 2022-2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 73:66–67. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7303a4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Graphical abstract, Tables S1 to S14, Text S1, and Fig. S1 to S9.
Data Availability Statement
The raw Nanopore amplicon sequencing reads generated in this study have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under BioProject accession number PRJNA1491417 and SRA accession numbers SRR39505669–SRR39505828.
