ABSTRACT
Mycobacterium abscessus is a clinically important multidrug-resistant pathogen for which genetic manipulation remains challenging. Here, we developed a second-generation genetic toolbox based on leucine auxotrophy that enables antibiotic-free positive selection. A ΔleuB mutant, lacking the gene encoding isopropyl malate dehydrogenase in the leucine biosynthesis pathway, was generated by targeted gene deletion. This mutant requires exogenous leucine for growth and can be complemented by plasmid-borne leuB, establishing a robust auxotrophy-based selection system. To support genetic manipulation, we constructed a suite of second-generation vectors, including a multicopy replicative vector (pRep-amp-leuB), a single-copy integrative vector (pInt-amp-leuB), and a suicide vector (pSuc-amp-leuB) for allelic replacement. These vectors enable gene overexpression, complementation, and targeted gene deletion, respectively, without reliance on aminoglycoside resistance markers. Using this system, we demonstrate efficient transformation and functional complementation of the ΔleuB mutant, achieving high transformation efficiencies and near-zero background growth under leucine selection. In contrast to antibiotic-based systems, this approach eliminates nonspecific background and avoids activation of stress response pathways, such as the whiB7 regulon. Overall, this auxotrophy-based toolbox provides a versatile platform for precise genetic manipulation in M. abscessus, improving selection stringency and enabling antibiotic-free functional genomics approaches, as demonstrated by deleting aac(2′), eis2, and a 19-kb fragment of the gpl locus.
IMPORTANCE
The development of a leucine auxotroph-based genetic system for Mycobacterium abscessus addresses critical challenges in mycobacterial genetics. By avoiding established antibiotic resistance markers, this approach reduces selective pressure for antibiotic-resistant transformants, supports antibiotic stewardship, and minimizes costly disposal from laboratory waste. It also avoids unintended activation of whiB7, a master regulator of approximately 100 genes, particularly those involved in antibiotic stress responses, thereby improving the accuracy of phenotypic drug susceptibility testing. The versatile genetic toolbox developed here, including novel replicative, integrative, and suicide plasmids, provides precise control over functional studies, overexpression, complementation, and gene deletion. It significantly reduces dependency on antibiotics for genetic manipulation, aligning with the goals of sustainable research and offering new opportunities for studying this clinically significant pathogen. This approach represents a critical advance in microbial genetics, enhancing our capacity to explore the molecular basis of pathogenesis and drug resistance in M. abscessus.
KEYWORDS: Mycobacterium abscessus, auxotrophic marker, genetic tool, leucine auxotroph, aminoglycoside resistance
INTRODUCTION
Mycobacterium abscessus is a rapidly growing, multidrug-resistant, non-tuberculous mycobacterium (NTM) that is associated with severe pulmonary infections, particularly in individuals with underlying lung conditions such as cystic fibrosis (1, 2) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (3). This opportunistic pathogen belongs to risk group 2 (4) due to its ability to cause nosocomial infections and its intrinsic resistance to multiple antibiotics (5). The low permeability of the waxy and hydrophobic mycobacterial cell wall, drug export systems, and drug- and drug target-modifying enzymes contribute to its resistance to tuberculosis first-line drugs rifampicin and isoniazid, most β-lactams, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides, and macrolides (6). This has led to the recognition of M. abscessus as a major cause of concern in the field of medicine, often referred to as the antibiotic and clinical nightmare (7, 8).
The treatment of M. abscessus infections is a highly challenging endeavor, often necessitating prolonged and complex antibiotic regimens with limited success rates (9). M. abscessus can be further divided into three subspecies: M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, M. abscessus subsp. bolletti, and M. abscessus subsp. massiliense. Subspecies identification is clinically relevant, as M. abscessus subsp. massiliense harbors a non-functional erm(41) gene, resulting in susceptibility to macrolides and consequently positively influencing treatment outcome (10), while the other two subspecies possess a functional erm(41). The erm(41) encodes an erythromycin ribosomal methylase that methylates adenine 2058 in the 23S rRNA, thereby preventing macrolides from binding to their ribosomal target site (11). Expression of erm(41) is inducible and activated upon exposure to macrolides (11) in a whiB7-dependent manner. Currently, an established standard recommendation for treating M. abscessus infection does not exist (12). The American Thoracic Society has recommended clarithromycin, amikacin, and cefoxitin for initial therapy (up to 3 months), followed by the use of tigecycline, clofazimine, and linezolid for the continuous phase (12 months and more after culture conversion) (13). Clinically acquired resistance to amikacin and macrolides is frequently attributable to mutations in the drug target sites rrs and rrl, encoding 16S rRNA and 23S rRNA, respectively (6). In light of mounting concerns regarding antimicrobial use and resistance, the stewardship of antibiotics has emerged as a pivotal facet of microbiological research and clinical management of M. abscessus (14). The regulation of heat-stable antibiotics, along with the legally mandated systems for their collection and disposal, is a critical part, but also costly, of the global effort to minimize environmental contamination and antimicrobial resistance.
Genetic manipulation of M. abscessus and characterization of isogenic mutants has been essential for understanding its pathogenicity, resistance mechanisms, and the therapeutic outcome (15). The present genetic toolkit for this microbe principally relies on antibiotic selection markers for plasmid maintenance and chromosomal integration (16, 17). These include resistance genes for animal-used and laboratory antibiotics, such as apramycin, kanamycin, hygromycin, and zeocin, which enable the positive selection for transformed bacteria (18–20). In the context of generating deletion mutants, the KatG-dependent isoniazid counterselection or sucrose-dependent (sacB) method is employed (16, 21). The continued use or environmental presence of certain antibiotics can maintain or promote resistance not only to those drugs but also to other clinically important antibiotics, due to genetic linkage of resistance genes (co-selection) or mechanisms that act across antibiotic classes (cross-resistance). Despite its widespread use, antibiotic selection in genetic studies of M. abscessus still is challenging and requires additional screening due to high background levels from spontaneous resistance. The use of antibiotics increases the environmental burden and is associated with increasing costs for disposal of antibiotic waste material.
The whiB7 regulon in M. abscessus represents a key regulatory system involved in the bacterial response to antibiotic stress (22, 23). It encodes a transcriptional regulator that is induced by a broad range of antibiotics, including aminoglycosides and macrolides, as well as additional stress conditions. Upon activation, WhiB7 upregulates the expression of numerous resistance-associated genes, including efflux systems, ribosomal protection factors, aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes, and the erm(41) macrolide resistance determinant (24). Through this coordinated response, the whiB7 regulon contributes to intrinsic multidrug resistance and adaptive tolerance mechanisms in M. abscessus. While induction of this regulon does not inherently invalidate antibiotic susceptibility testing, prior exposure to inducing agents may influence bacterial physiology and gene expression states. As a result, antibiotic-based selection strategies may introduce context-dependent effects in downstream phenotypic assays, particularly in studies of antimicrobial response and stress adaptation.
Intrinsic resistance to aminoglycosides in M. abscessus is primarily mediated by aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes, many of which exhibit overlapping substrate specificities (25). The aac(2′), in particular, encodes an aminoglycoside acetyltransferase, a key enzyme that modifies and inactivates aminoglycosides, such as kanamycin B and tobramycin, thereby reducing their efficacy (25). The eis2 encodes an enhanced intracellular survival protein, belonging to the Eis protein family, which was shown in Mycobacterium tuberculosis to be involved in resistance toward amikacin and kanamycin A (26). This broad-spectrum N-acetyl transferase modifies multiple aminoglycosides, including the clinically important amikacin, thereby contributing to resistance and affecting treatment outcomes in pre-clinical models of M. abscessus infection (27). The presence of these resistance determinants and their regulators complicates antibiotic-based selection strategies and underscores the need for alternative selection methods.
Furthermore, the management of waste materials containing antibiotics is a critical concern in research and is subject to hazardous waste legislation. In Europe, this includes the EU Waste Framework Directive (2008/98/EC), as well as chemical safety regulations such as REACH. In the United States, it falls under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). A significant proportion of antibiotics used for laboratory selection are heat-stable, meaning they are not inactivated by autoclaving. This necessitates specialized disposal procedures, thereby imposing additional logistical and financial burdens on research activities. Consequently, there is a considerable need to simplify waste management and reduce antibiotic consumption to achieve more sustainable research practices.
To address all the challenges, we propose a new leucine auxotrophic marker system for M. abscessus genetic manipulation. While leucine auxotrophy has frequently been generated by targeting the leuCD genes, we chose to focus on leuB. The leuB gene encodes a single, non-redundant enzyme in the leucine biosynthesis pathway, allowing the generation of a stable auxotrophic phenotype through disruption of a single genetic locus. This strategy minimizes genetic perturbation and facilitates precise genetic complementation compared with multi-gene deletions. This alternative selection strategy aims to minimize the use of antibiotics, reduce background growth issues, and streamline waste management. By leveraging auxotroph-based selection, a reliable and environmentally sustainable genetic system for M. abscessus research can be established. This study details the construction and validation of a leucine auxotrophic M. abscessus mutant of the widely used M. abscessus ATCC 19977 strain and application of leucine prototrophy (Leu+) as a selectable marker for genetic engineering.
RESULTS
Selection of a metabolic pathway for auxotrophy in Mycobacterium abscessus
The objective of this study is to engineer an auxotrophic M. abscessus ATCC-derived strain and to develop the appropriate genetic toolbox for manipulating this auxotroph. This new setup will reduce the amount of antibiotics used in cloning. An auxotrophic strain is a mutant organism that has lost the ability to synthesize an essential metabolite, such as an amino acid, nucleotide, or vitamin, required for growth. Consequently, the growth of an auxotroph depends on an external supply of the missing compound in the growth medium. We focused on identifying a pathway amenable to complementation through external supplementation of its terminal metabolite. Numerous documented auxotrophic M. tuberculosis strains deficient in synthesizing amino acids, particularly in the synthesis of branched amino acids, have been engineered (28). These have been successfully attenuated to yield a viable strain. The enzymes involved in the synthesis of branched amino acids are currently being discussed and evaluated as valuable drug targets (28). Corresponding M. abscessus mutants have only recently been described (29). In light of these findings, we have opted to target the synthesis pathway of one of the three branched amino acids, L-leucine (Fig. 1). A total of eight enzymes have been identified for branched amino acid biosynthesis, of which four are shared, and three are exclusively involved in L-leucine biosynthesis (LeuA, LeuB, and LeuCD). The leuA–leuD genes are widely conserved across the bacterial phyla, and the enzymes they encode exhibit significant sequence and structural similarities, reflecting the critical role of leucine biosynthesis in bacterial metabolism (30, 31). Several groups have succeeded in creating leucine auxotrophic bacteria by targeting leuCD (32). In contrast, our approach was to target leuB, which encodes isopropyl malate dehydrogenase, the enzyme that converts the product of LeuCD, 3-isopropylmalate, to 2-ketoisocaproate.
Fig 1.

Leucine biosynthesis pathway and corresponding genes of M. abscessus. leuA, leuCD, and leuB are genes involved in the biosynthesis of L-leucine and are not shared by the synthetic pathway of the other branched amino acids like valine or isoleucine. The leucine pathway is provided with 2-oxoisovalerate mainly from the valine biosynthetic pathway, the terminal intermediate (with pyruvate as the starting molecule), or from degradation of valine itself. leuB converts 3-isopropylmaleate to 2-ketoisocaproate by first alcohol oxidation followed by spontaneous decarboxylation and tautomerization.
Generation of M. abscessus MAB_3303c (leuB) deletion mutant
The generation of a leucine auxotrophic M. abscessus strain necessitates the deletion of the essential leuB by conventional techniques, for example, using antibiotic selection. The M. abscessus ΔleuB mutant was constructed by transformation of M. abscessus ATCC 19977 with leuB targeting plasmid pKH-Apr-DsRed2-KatG-MAB_3303c, applying the apramycin-DsRed2 positive selection and a KatG-dependent isoniazid counterselection strategy (17). The successful deletion of leuB was verified by PCR and confirmed by Southern blot analysis (Fig. 2a and b) as well as whole-genome sequencing (Fig. S1). Phenotypic characterization revealed that the leuB deletion mutant was auxotrophic for leucine, exhibiting growth only on agar plates supplemented with leucine (Fig. 2c). The leuB gene is part of a two-gene operon, where serA is the upstream gene and leuB the downstream gene. A complemented mutant strain was generated by transforming M. abscessus ΔleuB with the integrative plasmid pMV361-Apr-leuB, which contains the two-gene operon (serA and leuB) as well as the native promoter. Initial selection was done on plates containing apramycin while being supplemented with L-leucine. At the genetic level, complementation was confirmed by PCR and Southern blot analysis (Fig. 2a and b). Phenotypically, the complemented strain restored growth on leucine-free medium, consistent with the functional complementation of leuB (Fig. 2c). The complemented mutant strain is henceforth referred to as M. abscessus ΔleuB::leuB.
Fig 2.

Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of M. abscessus ΔleuB. (a) Schematic genomic events. (b) Southern blot analysis of leuB deletion mutant. Genomic DNA of M. abscessus parental strain (WT, lane 1), after first homologous recombination (SCO, lane 2), after isoniazid counterselection (ΔleuB, lane 3), and complementation with either pMV361-Apr-leuB (lane 4) or pInt-leuB (lane 5) were digested with SexAI. Probe was designed to bind in the flanking region of leuB in the ORF of MAB_3302 (green dot). Expected fragments were for WT 4,194 bp (lane 1), 5′ SCO 4,194 and 2,968 bp (lane 2), ΔleuB 3,180 bp (lane 3), for pMV361-Apr-leuB complementation 3,180 and 8,522 bp (lane 4), and for pInt-Amp-leuB complementation 3,180 and 5,348 bp (lane 5), respectively. All expected fragments were detected. (c) Phenotypic characterization of ΔleuB mutant (leu−) on agar plates.
Leucine auxotrophic selection marker reduces the overall background after transformation
The generation of the leuB deletion mutant and the successful genetic complementation enabled us to compare conventional antibiotic selection using apramycin with selection based on the restoration of leucine prototrophy. To this end, we used the complementation plasmid pMV361-Apr-leuB, which carries a functional copy of the disrupted leuB gene alongside an apramycin (Apr) resistance cassette. As controls, we included the pMV361-Apr vector backbone containing only the apramycin resistance cassette and the polyG-Apr vector backbone (which also confers apramycin resistance). These plasmids were transformed into both the parental M. abscessus ATCC 19977 strain (WT) and the ΔleuB mutant. Following electroporation, the cells were recovered in leucine-supplemented medium and plated on 7H10 agar, containing either apramycin (50 mg/L) or apramycin and L-leucine (200 mg/L), as well as on LB agar containing apramycin and L-leucine.
Comparing the transformation of M. abscessus WT and the leucine-auxotrophic ΔleuB mutant revealed profound differences in both transformation efficiency and background growth across antibiotic and leucine-based selection. The WT strains transformed with the apramycin-resistance plasmids pMV361-Apr, pMV361-Apr-leuB, and polyG-Apr displayed transformation rates consistently in the 4–9 × 10³ CFU µg⁻¹ (Table 1). These transformation efficiencies were accompanied by substantial spontaneous background growth ranging from 11% to 20%, depending on the plasmid and plating condition (e.g., on 7H10–Apr background levels of 12.5% ± 3.3% for pMV361-Apr and 17.4% ± 7.4% for polyG-Apr were observed). In contrast, the ΔleuB strain showed minimal residual background growth (≤0.09%) when grown either under leucine-supplemented conditions or leucine-free conditions when functional complementation of leuB is required (Table 1), indicating a drastic reduction in non-specific colony formation compared with WT.
TABLE 1.
Transformation efficacy (TE) and background (BG) of M. abscessus under selective conditionsa
| Strain | Plasmid | LB Apr Leu | 7H10 Apr | 7H10 Apr Leu | 7H10 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TE | BG | TE | BG | TE | BG | TE | BG | ||
| WT | pMV361-AprR | 9.4 × 103 ± 3.4 × 103 | 11.2 ± 5.2 | 6 × 103 ± 1.8 × 103 | 12.5 ± 3.3 | 7.5 × 103 ± 2.1 × 103 | 11.2 ± 4.1 | n.d. | n.d. |
| ΔleuB | 1.7 × 105 ± 3.6 × 104 | 0.06 ± 0.05 | 0 ± 0 | 0 | 1.2 × 105 ± 4.0 × 104 | 0.07 ± 0.07 | 0 ± 0 | 0 | |
| WT | pMV361-leuB | 9.2 × 103 ± 1.6 × 103 | 11.0 ± 4.2 | 6.8 × 103 ± 3.2 × 103 | 11.9 ± 5.0 | 6.3 × 103 ± 4.0 × 102 | 13.0 ± 2.7 | n.d. | n.d. |
| ΔleuB | 1.6 × 105 ± 6.8 × 104 | 0.07 ± 0.07 | 1.1 × 105 ± 3.7 × 104 | 0 | 1.1 × 105 ± 3.7 × 104 | 0.09 ± 0.08 | 1.2 × 105 ± 5.3 × 104 | 0 | |
| WT | polyG-AprR | 5.8 × 103 ± 1.5 × 103 | 17.3 ± 7.2 | 4.5 × 103 ± 2.1 × 103 | 17.4 ± 7.4 | 3.8 × 103 ± 1.2 × 103 | 20.8 ± 2.1 | n.d. | n.d. |
| ΔleuB | 1.2 × 105 ± 2.5 × 104 | 0.07 ± 0.06 | 0 ± 0 | 0 | 1.3 × 105 ± 2.2 × 104 | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0 ± 0 | 0 | |
TE (in CFU/µg) and BG (%) were calculated based on CFU of WT/ΔleuB transformed without DNA. Apr, apramycin; AprR, aac(3)IV, Apr resistance; Leu, L-leucine; n.d., not done.
To quantitatively compare transformation efficiencies (TE) while accounting for differences in background growth (BG), CFUs were normalized as log10(TE + 1) − log10(BG + 1), followed by two-way ANOVA, including genotype and growth condition as factors. Across all three plasmid types, a significant effect of strain genotype and plating condition, as well as a significant interaction between both factors, was observed (P < 0.001). Under non-selective conditions (7H10), WT exhibited confluent growth exceeding the quantifiable range, whereas the ΔleuB strain failed to grow, preventing meaningful statistical comparison. Similarly, under selective conditions lacking leucine supplementation (7H10–Apr), no transformants were detected for the ΔleuB strain, while WT retained measurable transformation activity, highlighting the strict dependence of the knockout mutant on leucine availability. Strikingly, under permissive conditions (7H10–Apr–Leu and LB–Apr-Leu), the ΔleuB strain consistently exhibited a significantly higher normalized transformation efficiency compared with WT across all plasmids tested. This increase amounted to approximately 2 log units (~100-fold) and was highly significant in all pairwise comparisons between WT and ΔleuB (Bonferroni post test, P < 0.001), seen in Fig. S2.
Notably, when ΔleuB was transformed with pMV361-Apr-leuB and plated on 7H10, robust transformant recovery (1.2 ± 0.53 × 10⁵ CFU µg⁻¹, Table 1) was observed in the complete absence of antibiotic selection. While background growth remained strictly absent for all plasmids lacking leuB under the same condition (Table 1).
Together, these data demonstrate that leucine auxotrophy provides a highly stringent and virtually background-free selection system in M. abscessus, outperforming traditional antibiotic selection. Furthermore, complementation of ΔleuB enables efficient recovery of transformants without antibiotic pressure, highlighting the potential of this system for high-fidelity genetic manipulation.
Construction of second-generation vectors for genetic manipulation of M. abscessus
Following proof-of-concept study, we developed a set of second-generation vectors exploiting leucine auxotrophy as a positive selection marker. A key motivation was to reduce reliance on aminoglycoside selection, which is known to induce the whiB7 regulon, a central regulator of antibiotic stress responses in M. abscessus. Although transient induction of whiB7 does not necessarily interfere with downstream assays once selective pressure is removed, exposure to inducing antibiotics during strain construction or maintenance may continue to affect gene expression profiles and influence subsequent phenotypic analyses. By replacing aminoglycoside-based selection with leucine auxotrophy, this potential confounding source can be minimized. Based on this rationale, we constructed a new suite of plasmids: pRep-Amp-leuB, a replicative vector containing an ampicillin resistance cassette (for selection in E. coli) and the leuB gene, designed to replace the original polyG-Apr vector; pInt-Amp-leuB, an integrative vector containing an ampicillin resistance cassette, integrase, attP phage integration site, and leuB, serving as a substitute for pMV361-Apr; and pSuc-Amp-leuB, a suicide vector backbone for targeted gene deletion, carrying leuB for positive selection, along with DsRed2 (red fluorescent protein) and katG as a negative selection marker as a substitute for pKH-Apr-KatG vector (Fig. 3a).
Fig 3.

Phenotypic characterization of transformants with the second generation of vectors using leucine auxotrophy. (a) The old vector on the left versus the new vector on the right; we exchanged the apramycin resistance cassette for ampicillin resistance cassette and added leuB to complement and restore the leucine prototrophy. (b) Growth of leucine auxotroph M. abscessus transformed with new and old vectors on different agar plate. From left top to bottom right are following conditions depicted: 7H10, 7H10 with apramycin, 7H10 with L-leucine, and 7H10 with apramycin and L-leucine.
Phenotypic characterization of leucine auxotrophic M. abscessus transformants
To functionally validate the constructs, the newly developed pRep and pInt vectors were transformed into an M. abscessus ΔleuB strain, alongside their apramycin-based predecessors (polyG-Apr, pMV361-Apr and pMV361-Apr-leuB, respectively). Transformants were plated on various 7H10 agar, with apramycin, with L-leucine, and with apramycin and L-leucine, respectively.
Figure 3b illustrates the growth of the different transformants on the respective selective agar plates: #1 represents the parental M. abscessus strain ATCC 19977, which grows on 7H10 and on 7H10 supplemented with leucine, reflecting its apramycin sensitivity (AprS) and leucine prototrophy (Leu+). #2 corresponds to the leuB single cross-over strain generated by the first homologous recombination of the deletion plasmid pKH-Apr-DsRed2-KatG-MAB_3303c. This strain grows on all media, consistent with apramycin resistance (AprR) and leucine prototrophy (Leu+). #3 shows the MABΔleuB strain, which requires leucine supplementation for growth. Accordingly, growth is observed only on 7H10 agar supplemented with leucine (AprS, leucine auxotroph = Leu-). #4 and #5 depict the ΔleuB strain transformed with the previously used integrative plasmids pMV361-Apr and pMV361-Apr-leuB, respectively. In #4, growth is observed only on leucine-supplemented 7H10 agar, consistent with the leucine-auxotrophic background of the ΔleuB strain. In contrast, #5 shows growth on all agar plates, indicating restoration of leucine prototrophy through plasmid-borne leuB. #6 represents the ΔleuB strain transformed with the newly constructed integrative plasmid pInt-Amp-leuB. Growth is observed on 7H10 and leucine-supplemented 7H10 agar, but not on apramycin-containing plates, resembling the wild-type phenotype (AprS, Leu+). #7 and #8 show the ΔleuB strain transformed with the previously used replicative vector polyG-Apr and the newly constructed replicative vector pRep-Amp-leuB, respectively. While the strain in #7 grows exclusively on leucine-supplemented agar (AprR, Leu−), the strain in #8 grows on both 7H10 and leucine-supplemented 7H10 agar (AprS, Leu+), similar to the parental strain.
Taken together, transformants carrying second-generation vectors did not grow on apramycin-containing plates (#6 and #8), confirming the absence of an aminoglycoside resistance cassette. In contrast, these strains showed robust growth on standard leucine-free 7H10 agar, indicating successful complementation of the leuB deletion. Conversely, transformants harboring vectors lacking a functional leuB grew only on L-leucine–supplemented plates, again validating the leucine-dependent selection system.
Construction of M. abscessus deletion mutants involved in aminoglycoside resistance
We previously described genes involved in innate aminoglycoside resistance (25). Deletion of the aac(2′) encoding for an acetyltransferase in M. abscessus confers resistance to tobramycin, kanamycin B, dibekacin, and gentamicin C, whereas the deletion of eis2 encoding the intracellular survival protein 2, also an acetyltransferase, confers resistance to capreomycin, hygromycin B, amikacin, and kanamycin B. To further challenge the leucine auxotrophy as a strong selection marker, we intended to generate deletion mutants of aac(2′) (MAB_4395) and eis2 (MAB_4532c) in the ΔleuB strain. We constructed pSuc-derived suicide vectors (pSuc-Amp-leuB-Δaac(2′), pSuc-Amp-leuB-Δeis2, respectively) that target the corresponding genes and then transformed these vectors into an M. abscessus ΔleuB. Rather than using apramycin to select transformants (17), we employed leucine prototrophy as the selective marker. Following PCR confirmation, the single cross-over transformants were subjected to KatG counterselection on agar plates supplemented with leucine and isoniazid. The deletion mutants were verified by PCR, Southern blot analysis (Fig. S3), and whole-genome sequencing (Fig. S4). The genetic characterization for vector-based markers was followed by phenotypic characterization on selective agar plates (Fig. S5). This process yielded the M. abscessus strains ΔleuBΔaac(2′) [MabΔleuBΔaac(2′)] and ΔleuBΔeis2 (MabΔleuBΔeis2). The deleted genes of interest [aac(2′) and eis2] were then complemented using pInt-Amp-leuB-aac(2′) and pInt-Amp-leuB-eis2, respectively.
Drug susceptibility testing of newly constructed M. abscessus deletion mutants
The susceptibility of Mab∆leuB∆aac(2′), MabΔleuBΔeis2 toward kanamycin B, amikacin, kanamycin A, hygromycin B, and, as a control unaffected by Eis2 or AAC(2′), apramycin, was tested in CAMH-Broth and compared with MabΔleuB, Mab∆leuB∆aac(2′), and Mab∆leuB∆eis2 complemented with vector backbone pInt-Amp-leuB. Growth was visually determined on day 3, 5, 7, and after 12 days of incubation. Table 2 shows the median MIC value at day 5; MIC values for all time points are found in the supplement (Fig. S6).
TABLE 2.
MICs for newly generated M. abscessus deletion mutantsa
| Compound | MIC (mg/L) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ∆leuB::leuB | ∆leuB∆aac(2′)::leuB | ∆leuB∆aac(2′)::leuB,aac(2′) | ∆leuB∆eis2::leuB | ∆leuB∆eis2::leuB,eis2 | |
| KanB | 8 | 0.125 | 8 | 2 | 8 |
| Amk | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0.25 | 2 |
| KanA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.25 | 1 |
| HygB | >256 | >256 | >256 | 16 | 256 |
| Apr | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Depicted values are the medians on day 5. For the complete overview of MIC results from three independent experiments at days 3, 5, 7, and 12, see Fig. S6. KanB, kanamycin B; Amk, amikacin; KanA, kanamycin A; HygB, hygromycin B; Apr, apramycin.
The deletion and complementation of leuB had no influence on overall susceptibility; the values are similar to those we previously published (25) for the M. abscessus ATCC 19977. Comparing the ΔleuB::leuB strain with the ΔleuBΔaac(2′)::leuB strain, we observe a 64-fold reduction of the MIC for kanamycin B. For the ΔleuBΔeis2::leuB strain, we observe a reduction of MIC for kanamycin B (fourfold), amikacin (eightfold), kanamycin A (fourfold), and hygromycin B (>16-fold). Comparing the effect of Δaac(2′) and Δeis2, we notice that AAC(2′) specifically increases the MIC of kanamycin B, while Eis2 exhibits a broader substrate spectrum, capable of increasing MICs of several aminoglycosides. By complementing the Δaac(2′) strain with pInt-Amp-leuB-aac(2′) as well as the Δeis2 strain with pInt-Amp-leuB-eis2, respectively, we restored the observed phenotypes back to the initial level of the ΔleuB::leuB (same as WT) level. The susceptibility of the control drug apramycin was not affected by either AAC(2′) or Eis2. The obtained MIC values for the aac(2′) and eis2 deletion mutants are in accordance with our previously published data (25).
Deletion of glycopeptidolipid (GPL) biosynthesis genes using leucine auxotrophy-based selection
In a clinical context, the transition from the smooth to the rough morphotype in M. abscessus is associated with increased virulence, enhanced intracellular survival, and resistance to phagocytosis (33). Smooth variants are usually found in early-stage infections and are characterized by GPL-mediated sliding motility and biofilm formation, whereas rough variants are prevalent in chronic infections and associated with severe pulmonary disease progression (33). To show the robustness of leucine auxotrophy as a selection system that goes beyond antibiotic resistance, we targeted the glycopeptidolipid biosynthesis locus in M. abscessus. This locus is essential for maintaining the smooth colony morphotype. Using the ∆leuB background strain (Fig. 4a and b), we constructed the suicide vector pSuc-Amp-LeuB-ΔGPL for deleting the entire GPL operon (MAB_4099c–MAB_4097c, deletion of 18 kbp), which encodes two non-ribosomal peptide synthases (mps1 and mps2) and an integral membrane protein (gap) required for GPL translocation. We employed leucine prototrophy as the primary positive selective marker. Following PCR confirmation, the SCO transformants were subjected to KatG counterselection in presence of leucine. The resulting strain, M. abscessus∆leuB ∆mps1-mps2-gap (further Mab∆leuB∆GPL), exhibited a rough colony morphotype on leucine-supplemented 7H10 agar (Fig. 4c and d), consistent with the loss of surface GPLs. This deletion was confirmed by PCR and whole-genome sequencing (Fig. S7), as well as by inspecting the morphotype on agar plates. Our results demonstrate that leucine auxotrophy enables the efficient and antibiotic-free genetic manipulation of clinically relevant loci in M. abscessus.
Fig 4.

Morphology of GPL deletion mutant. (a and b) The parental M. abscessus ∆leu strain as a single colony and group image, respectively, which shows a “smooth” morphotype. (c and d) The ∆GPL mutant, lacking the glycopeptidolipid synthesis cluster, resulting in a “rough” morphotype. Images were taken after 6 days of incubation at 37°C with a Leica M80/MC170 HD microscope. 500 px corresponds to 4.27 mm.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we present a novel genetic manipulation system and toolbox for M. abscessus that is based on leucine auxotrophy. This system offers a robust, antibiotic-free alternative for positive selection. This approach tackles several key issues in mycobacterial genetics, such as high background levels during transformation and the unintended activation of antibiotic stress responses, including the whiB7 regulon (24). This study demonstrates that the apramycin-based transformation of M. abscessus ATCC 19977 results in transformation efficiencies that range from 10³ to 10⁴ CFU µg⁻¹, which is consistent with the previously reported efficiencies for this organism. Indeed, M. abscessus has historically been considered challenging to transform due to its restrictive cell envelope and active restriction–modification systems. Published studies describe transformation efficiencies as highly variable but generally low, often substantially below those achieved in M. smegmatis or M. tuberculosis, with plasmid mass, selection marker, and electroporation conditions being critical determinants of success (34, 35).
Quantitative analysis incorporating normalization of transformation efficiency (TE) to background growth (BG) [log10(TE + 1) − log10(BG + 1)] revealed that the ΔleuB mutant exhibits a marked increase in apparent transformation efficiency under permissive conditions. Specifically, two-way ANOVA demonstrated a highly significant effect of genotype and growth condition, as well as a significant interaction between both factors (P < 0.001). Post-hoc comparisons confirmed that under leucine-complemented conditions (7H10-Apr-Leu and LB-Apr-Leu), the ΔleuB mutant consistently displayed an approximately 2-log (~100-fold) higher normalized transformation efficiency compared with WT (Bonferroni posttest, P < 0.001). This effect was reproducible across all tested plasmids, indicating that it reflects a general physiological property of the mutant rather than a plasmid-specific phenomenon. Importantly, under non-permissive conditions lacking leucine supplementation (7H10-Apr), the ΔleuB strain failed to yield transformants, further emphasizing the strict dependence of this mutant on leucine availability. This conditional growth defect highlights a fundamental limitation of antibiotic-based selection systems, where background growth and antibiotic tolerance can obscure true transformation events.
A significant benefit of the leucine-based selection system is its remarkably low background level. The spontaneous background frequencies observed in the WT strain following apramycin selection ranged from 11% to 20%, whereas the ΔleuB strain demonstrated virtually background-free selection (≤ 0.09%) when selecting for leucine prototrophy. This high degree of selection stringency likely contributes to the observed increase in normalized transformation efficiency and underscores the advantage of auxotrophic selection systems in minimizing false-positive colony formation.
Aminoglycoside antibiotics frequently permit low-level spontaneous resistant colonies or non-specific growth of M. abscessus, as has been documented in multiple studies addressing transformation challenges in fast-growing NTMs (34, 35). In contrast, the auxotrophy-based system described here effectively eliminates background growth, thereby improving the reliability and interpretability of transformation assays. In this context, the transformation efficiencies observed for the ΔleuB mutant, which reach approximately 10⁵ CFU µg⁻¹ under permissive conditions, represent an enhancement of one to two orders of magnitude compared with WT under matched conditions. While recent advancements such as ultra-high field electroporation have yielded improvements in transformation efficiency, these approaches require specialized instrumentation and extensive optimization. The leucine auxotrophy-based system presented here achieves comparable improvements in effective transformation output under standard electroporation conditions, without the need for specialized equipment or protocol modification (34, 35).
We specifically targeted leuB, which encodes isopropyl malate dehydrogenase, because of its central role in leucine biosynthesis (28). Although leucine auxotrophy is commonly engineered by deletion of leuCD (36, 37), we chose to delete leuB to obtain a leucine-auxotrophic strain. leuB encodes an essential, non-redundant enzyme in the leucine biosynthesis pathway, and its deletion results in a stable and well-defined auxotrophic phenotype. Targeting a single gene minimizes genetic perturbation and reduces the risk of polar or pleiotropic effects associated with multigene deletions such as leuCD. In addition, retention of the upstream steps of the pathway avoids potential accumulation of aberrant intermediates and facilitates clean genetic complementation, making leuB deletion a suitable and controlled strategy for generating leucine auxotrophy. Of note, the complementation vector still carries an ampicillin selection marker, which however is only used in E. coli. Overall, the leucine auxotrophy system improves the efficiency of genetic manipulation of M. abscessus and reduces reliance on antibiotics during cloning. This supports antibiotic stewardship and minimizes the environmental impact of antibiotic use in research.
For complementation, the two-gene operon consisting of serA (upstream), leuB (downstream), and its native promoter (upstream) was introduced. The overlapping genomic organization of serA and leuB suggests that their expression is co-regulated. Consistent with this, attempts to complement ΔleuB using leuB alone were unsuccessful, indicating that proper expression depends on the promoter of the upstream gene. While serA is known to be associated with metabolic phenotypes, we did not observe any additional phenotypic effects beyond restoration of leucine prototrophy under the conditions tested. Although we cannot completely exclude subtle contributions from serA or local regulatory effects, the observed phenotype is most parsimoniously explained by restoration of leuB function.
The whiB7 regulon represents a central regulatory node controlling intrinsic resistance to multiple ribosome-targeting antibiotics in M. abscessus (23). Upon exposure to macrolides, aminoglycosides, and additional stressors, whiB7 is induced and activates a broad set of downstream genes, including erm(41), eis2, and ABC-F ribosome-associated rescue factors (22, 24). These collectively contribute to inducible resistance and cross-protection against structurally diverse antibiotics. While many genetic workflows rely on transient antibiotic selection followed by propagation under non-selective conditions, it is important to consider that prior exposure to inducing antibiotics may influence bacterial physiology and transcriptional states. Induction of stress-response regulons, such as whiB7, may persist or alter baseline expression of resistance-associated pathways, potentially affecting the interpretation of phenotypic assays under certain experimental conditions. In this context, the use of leucine auxotrophy as a selection system provides a distinct advantage by eliminating the need for antibiotic pressure during strain construction and maintenance. This reduces the likelihood of unintended regulatory activation and enables more controlled assessment of bacterial phenotypes, particularly in studies focusing on antimicrobial susceptibility, stress responses, or gene function. Recent work by Hurst-Hess et al. used ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq and mapped over 50 WhiB7-binding sites in clinical and laboratory strains. The study showed that WhiB7 acts exclusively as a transcriptional activator at promoters dependent on either σA or σB, and that multi-resistance emerges as the cumulative effect of both major and minor effectors in the regulon. Studies of clinical isolates also reveal that the dynamics of erm(41) and whiB7 expression differ between isolates, with azithromycin inducing erm(41) more rapidly than clarithromycin in vivo. We do not imply that antibiotic-based selection universally biases susceptibility testing; rather, our approach minimizes a potential source of variability and provides an alternative strategy for experiments requiring tightly controlled physiological conditions. By eliminating this confounding factor induced by antibiotic selection, we can potentially obtain more accurate phenotypic analysis of recombinant strains (deletion mutant, complemented mutant), particularly with regard to MIC testing and drug susceptibility profiling. Given the clinical importance of M. abscessus as a multidrug-resistant pathogen, this refinement is potentially significant for translational research and therapeutic development (38). In addition to improving selection fidelity, our system also reduces the volume of heat-stable antibiotics required for routine cloning and selection. This lowers the environmental burden associated with antibiotic use in research. By replacing antibiotics with metabolic complementation, our system adheres to the principles of green microbiology (39), thereby reducing the ecological footprint of microbial genetics research. This genetic toolbox, which includes the replicative (pRep-Amp-leuB), integrative (pInt-Amp-leuB), and suicide (pSuc-Amp-leuB) vectors, provides a flexible and versatile platform for generating deletion mutants, complementing those knockout mutants, and conducting functional genomic studies in M. abscessus.
Not only did we target aminoglycoside resistance genes for deletion, but we also targeted the glycopeptidolipid biosynthesis locus. This allowed us to induce a morphotype switch from smooth to rough by deleting a 19 kbp large genomic segment, a transition that has profound implications for pathogenicity. The smooth morphotype is characterized by the presence of surface GPLs, and is associated with sliding motility, biofilm formation, and reduced immune activation (40, 41). Conversely, the rough morphotype lacks GPLs, exhibits enhanced aggregation, and is associated with increased virulence, including improved intracellular survival and resistance to phagocytosis by macrophages (42). This morphotypic switch is not merely a phenotypic curiosity but rather reflects a critical adaptation during chronic infection. Rough variants are frequently isolated from patients with advanced pulmonary disease and are associated with poor clinical outcomes (43, 44). Therefore, the ability to genetically engineer this transition independently of aminoglycoside resistance markers opens new avenues for studying M. abscessus pathogenesis under clinically relevant conditions. Of note, recent research indicates differences in the essential gene set of smooth and rough strains (45).
An additional advantage of the selection system described here is its potential applicability beyond M. abscessus. The vectors used in this study contain a mycobacterial origin of replication (OriM) and chromosomal attachment site (attP), respectively, which is known to support replication and integration across a range of mycobacterial species. This suggests that, in principle, the auxotrophy-based selection system could be extended to other mycobacteria, provided that suitable leucine auxotrophic strains can be generated. Leucine auxotrophs have previously been described in related species such as M. tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis BCG (46), indicating that this metabolic dependency can be engineered across different members of the genus. Consequently, the combination of OriM-based/attP vectors with auxotrophic selection represents a broadly transferable genetic toolkit. This approach may be particularly advantageous in the context of drug susceptibility testing. Unlike antibiotic resistance markers, which can influence bacterial physiology and activate stress response pathways, such as the whiB7 regulon, auxotrophic complementation provides a selection system that is independent of antimicrobial pressure. As a result, this strategy minimizes confounding effects on intrinsic drug susceptibility and enables more accurate assessment of antibiotic responses.
Looking to the future, leucine auxotrophy-based selection provides a basis for more advanced genetic applications, such as Tn mutagenesis, CRISPR-based editing, high-throughput mutagenesis. A potential limitation of the leucine auxotrophy-based system is its restricted applicability in in vivo infection models. Previous studies in M. tuberculosis have demonstrated that leucine auxotrophic mutants are unable to replicate in macrophages and are severely attenuated in animal models, likely due to limited availability of leucine within host tissues (32, 46, 47). Consequently, such mutants are often rapidly cleared or fail to establish productive infections in vivo. These findings suggest that the ΔleuB strain described here will primarily be suitable for in vitro and ex vivo applications, including macrophage infection studies and genetic manipulation, but may have limited utility for studying virulence or persistence in animal models. Alternatively, complementation of the mycobacterial leuB strains with pInt-Amp-leuB may also rescue the in vivo phenotype.
Our approach supports the dual goals of scientific rigor and environmental responsibility, addressing longstanding challenges in mycobacterial genetics while enabling more sustainable and precise research.
In summary, the genetic toolbox developed in this study is a significant step forward in mycobacterial genetics. It provides a robust and sustainable alternative to traditional antibiotic-based selection systems. By combining scientific rigor with environmental responsibility, this approach addresses key challenges in microbial genetic manipulation and contributes to more sustainable research practices. While it is currently only applicable to engineered ∆leuB strains and cannot be used directly with wild-type M. abscessus, the ATCC reference strain is widely used in research, and deletion or complementation of leuB does not further affect its phenotype. This supports the usefulness and reliability of the system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains and growing conditions
Escherichia coli strains were cultivated in LB broth at 37°C while shaking overnight. Antibiotics were added at the indicated concentrations when appropriate. E. coli XL1-Blue MRF was used for all cloning procedures. M. abscessus strains were routinely cultured in Middlebrook 7H9 liquid medium at 37°C with shaking or on Middlebrook 7H10 agar plates for solid growth and phenotypic assays. For auxotrophic selection and complementation experiments, 7H10 agar was used as the standard medium. Where indicated, media were supplemented with L-leucine (200 mg/L) to support growth of leucine auxotrophic strains. Leucine-free medium refers to 7H10 agar without L-leucine supplementation and was used to select for strains complemented with leuB. When required, apramycin was added to a final concentration of 50 mg/L. LB agar was used only for specific experimental steps, as a rich medium and supplemented with extra leucine where indicated, which is explicitly stated in the corresponding sections.
A list of all bacterial strains used in this study is provided in Fig. S8 and Table S1.
Preparation of electrocompetent M. abscessus
A total of 400 mL of a dense M. abscessus culture (OD₆₀₀ = 0.4–0.8) was harvested by centrifugation at 4°C for 20 min. The supernatant was then discarded, and the cell pellet resuspended in 10% (vol/vol) ice-cold glycerol. This washing step was repeated several times, reducing the resuspension volume by half each time to progressively concentrate the cells. Washing continued until a final volume of 2 mL was reached. The resulting cell suspension was divided into 100-µL portions, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C until used.
Deletion and complementation of MAB_3303c (leuB) in M. abscessus
The flanking regions of Mab-leuB (MAB_3303c) were amplified by PCR using genomic DNA from M. abscessus ATCC 19977. The 5′ upstream and 3′ downstream fragments were generated using primers p1/p2 and p3/p4, respectively, with MunI/PvuI and PvuI/MunI restriction sites incorporated as overhangs. The two PCR fragments (approx. 1.5 kbp each) were then assembled into the linearized deletion vector pKH-Apr-DsRed2-KatG (digested with MunI and PvuI) using Gibson Assembly. The resulting suicide plasmid, pKH-Apr-DsRed2-KatG-MAB3303c, carries an apramycin resistance cassette [aac(3′)IV] for positive selection, as well as katG, which confers sensitivity to isoniazid (a prodrug requiring KatG activation), and acts as a counterselectable marker. The recombinant plasmid was then transformed into M. abscessus ATCC 19977 electrocompetent cells. For selection steps involving the ΔleuB strain, media were supplemented with L-leucine (200 mg/L), unless otherwise specified. After 5 h of recovery at 37°C with shaking, the cells were diluted and plated onto LB agar containing apramycin (50mg/L) and supplemented with L-leucine (200mg/L). Transformants undergoing a single homologous recombination event (single crossover, SCO) were identified by PCR screening. These SCO transformants were then subjected to counterselection on LB agar plates containing isoniazid (32 mg/L) and L-leucine (200 mg/L) to select for double crossover (DCO) events through intra-molecular recombination. Individual colonies were screened by PCR for the deletion of leuB, and the genotype was confirmed by Southern blot analysis using a 0.5-kb SexAI 5′ leuB DNA probe as well as WGS (Fig. S1).
For complementation, the two gene operon consisting of leuB (MAB_3303c), serA (MAB_3304c), and its putative promoter was amplified by PCR from genomic DNA of M. abscessus ATCC 19977 using primers modified with a KpnI linker (p13/p14). The fragment was ligated to the linearized integrative vector pMV361-Apr via Gibson Assembly. pMV361-Apr carries the int and attP sites required for phage L5-mediated integration at the chromosomal attB locus (48, 49), as well as the aac(3′)IV that confers apramycin resistance. The pMV361-Apr-leuB construct was verified by Sanger sequencing and introduced into M. abscessus ΔleuB electrocompetent cells. Transformants were selected on LB agar containing apramycin (50 mg/L), and the integration of leuB at the attB locus was confirmed by PCR and Southern blot analysis. The inclusion of the whole operon was intended to preserve the native promoter as leuB and serA partially overlap and likely form an operon. Complementation attempts using leuB alone were not successful.
A comprehensive list of plasmids and primers used in this study is provided in Tables S2 and S3.
Determination of transformation efficiency
To determine the transformation efficiency and selectivity of various plasmids, they were introduced into electrocompetent M. abscessus ATCC 19977 wild type (WT) and leucine auxotrophic (ΔleuB) strains. Following electroporation, the cells were plated onto Middlebrook 7H10 agar that had been supplemented with either apramycin (50 mg/L) or L-leucine (200 mg/L), or both. In addition, cells were plated on LB agar containing apramycin (50 mg/L) and supplemented with L-leucine (200 mg/L). To compare apramycin- and LeuB-based selection, the following plasmids were used: pMV361-Apr, pMV361-Apr-leuB, and polyG-Apr. A total of 500 ng of plasmid DNA was transformed into 100 μL of electrocompetent cells using 4-mm cuvettes. Electroporation was performed using a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser with the following settings: 2,500 V, 25 μF capacitance, and 1,000 Ω resistance. Immediately after electroporation, 900 µL of pre-warmed Middlebrook 7H9 medium supplemented with L-leucine (200 mg/L) was added, and the cells were incubated for 5 h at 37°C with shaking at 1,000 rpm in a ThermoMixer C (Eppendorf). The recovered cells were then washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) and resuspended in 7H9 medium or LB medium, respectively (1-mL final volume). Serial 10-fold dilutions (1:10, 1:100, and 1:1,000) were prepared, and 100 μL of each dilution was spotted onto the selective 7H10 or LB agar plates described above. The plates were then incubated for 5 days at 37°C, and the colony-forming units (CFUs) were counted to determine the transformation efficiency according to equation 1:
| (1) |
where C is counted colonies, Vt is volume total, Vp is volume plated, Df is dilution factor, and DNA is transformed DNA in μg. For statistical analysis, transformation efficiency (TE) and background (BG) values were log-transformed after addition of a pseudo count of 1 to avoid undefined values:
| (2) |
where TE is transformation efficiency, BG is background, and ε = 1.
For each transformed vector (pMV361-Apr, pMV361-Apr-leuB, and polyG-Apr), a two-way ANOVA was performed to assess the effects of genotype (WT vs leuB) and growth condition (7H10, 7H10-Apr, 7H10-Apr-Leu, LB-Apr-Leu). Multiple comparisons between genotypes within each condition were conducted using Bonferroni’s post hoc test, as seen in Fig. S2. Confluent growth (lawn formation) was observed for WT under non-selective conditions (7H10). As these values exceeded the quantifiable range, they were conservatively approximated for statistical analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (version 5).
Generation of second-generation vectors exploiting leucine auxotrophy
The plasmid pRep-Amp-leuB was constructed as follows: the ampicillin resistance cassette was amplified by PCR from the pBluescript-Int vector (50) using the primer pair p22/p23 to introduce HpaI and MunI restriction sites, respectively. The leuB gene was amplified from the wild-type M. abscessus genomic DNA using primer pair p24/p25, which introduced PcaI and HpaI linkers, respectively. The E. coli plasmid origin of replication (OriE) was amplified from the polyG-Apr vector using the primer pair p26, which contains a PcaI linker, and p27. The mycobacterial origin of replication (Alori) was amplified from the polyG-Apr vector using the primer pair p28/p29; the p29 primer introduced a MunI linker. All PCR fragments were assembled using Gibson Assembly according to the manufacturer’s protocol. One microliter of the assembly mix was transformed into electrocompetent E. coli XL1-Blue cells. Electroporation was performed at 1,800 V, 2 μF, and 200 Ω using 1-mm cuvettes. After electroporation, 1 mL of pre-warmed LB medium was added, and the cells were incubated at 37°C for 40 min with shaking at 1,000 rpm. The transformed cells were plated onto LB agar containing 100 mg/L ampicillin. Plasmid DNA was then isolated from the resulting ampicillin-resistant colonies and verified by Sanger sequencing.
The plasmid pInt-Amp-leuB was constructed as follows: the ampicillin resistance cassette was amplified by PCR from the pBluescript-Int vector (50) using the primer pair p30/p31 HpaI linker for p31 fragment. The leuB gene was amplified from the wild-type M. abscessus genomic DNA using primer pair p32/p33 with HpaI linker for p33 fragment. The Integrase (int)—E. coli Origin of replication (OriE)—attP fragment was amplified from vector pMV361-Apr vector with primer pair p34/p35. All PCR fragments were assembled using Gibson Assembly according to the manufacturer’s protocol. One microliter of the assembly mix was transformed into electrocompetent E. coli XL1-Blue cells. Electroporation, selection, and plasmid verification were conducted as described above.
The plasmid pSuc-Amp-leuB was constructed as follows: the ampicillin resistance cassette was amplified by PCR from the pBluescript-Int vector (50) using the primer pair p36/p37 with HpaI/MunI linker, respectively. leuB was amplified from the wild-type M. abscessus genomic DNA using primer pair p38/p39 with PcaI/HpaI linker, respectively. E. coli Origin of replication was amplified from pMV361-Apr vector with primer pair p40/p41 with Eco105I/Eco72I linker, respectively. The katG gene was amplified from pSE vector with primer pair p42/p43 with Eco72I/PcaI linker, respectively. DsRed2 was amplified from plasmid pMSP12 with primer pair p44/p45 withMunI/Eco105I linker, respectively. All PCR fragments were assembled using Gibson Assembly according to the manufacturer’s protocol. One microliter of the assembly mix was transformed into electrocompetent E. coli XL1-Blue cells. Electroporation, selection, and plasmid verification were conducted as described above.
Phenotypic characterization on selective agar plates
The growth of various M. abscessus strains harboring newly constructed or previously established vectors was visually assessed under different culture conditions. The following strains were included: wild-type (WT); single-crossover (SCO; pKH-Apr-leuB); ΔleuB; ΔleuB::pMV361-Apr; ΔleuB::pMV361-Apr-leuB; ΔleuB::pInt-Amp-leuB; ΔleuB::polyG-Apr; and ΔleuB::pRep-Amp-leuB. All strains were pre-cultured in Middlebrook 7H9 medium, supplemented with either L-leucine (200 mg/L) or apramycin (50 mg/L) as required. The cultures were then washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4), and 10 μL of each cell suspension was streaked onto Middlebrook 7H10 agar plates, which were supplemented with either apramycin (50 mg/L), L-leucine (200 mg/L), or both. The plates were then incubated for 5 days at 37°C, and the colony growth was documented using a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc XRS imaging system. The same procedure was applied for phenotypic characterization of the following strains: ΔleuB, Δaac(2′), SCO (pKH and pSuc vectors); ΔleuBΔaac(2′); ΔleuBΔaac(2′)::pInt-Amp-leuB-aac(2′), and vector backbone; ΔleuB, Δeis2, SCO (pKH-Δeis2 and pSuc-Δeis2 vectors); ΔleuBΔeis2; ΔleuBΔeis2::pInt-Amp-leuB-eis2, and vector backbone. Representative results are shown in Fig. S5a and b, respectively.
Deletion and complementation of MAB_4395 [aac(2′)] in M. abscessus ∆leuB
The plasmid pSuc-Amp-leuB-∆aac(2′) was constructed as follows: The flanking region of Mab-aac(2′) (MAB_4395) was amplified by PCR from pKH-Apr-DsRed2-Δaac(2′) with primer pair p46/p47. The pSuc-Amp-leuB was linearized by HpaI overnight digestion at 37°C and purified with Qiagen gel purification kit. All fragments were assembled using Gibson Assembly according to the manufacturer’s protocol. One μL of the assembly mix was transformed into electrocompetent E. coli XL1-Blue cells. Electroporation was performed at 1,800 V, 2 µF, and 200 Ω using 0.1-mm cuvettes. After electroporation, 1 mL of pre-warmed LB medium was added, and the cells were incubated at 37°C for 40 min with shaking at 800 rpm. The transformed cells were plated onto LB agar containing 100 mg/L ampicillin. Plasmid DNA was then isolated from the resulting ampicillin-resistant colonies and verified by Sanger sequencing. This vector was transformed into M. abscessus ∆leuB electrocompetent cells, and after 5 h of recovery at 37°C shaking, cells were diluted and plated out on selective LB agar (200 mg/L L-leucine). Selected transformants, which underwent intermolecular recombination, were identified by PCR. Single crossover transformants were subjected to counterselection on LB agar plates containing isoniazid (32 mg/L) and L-leucine (200 mg/L). Single colonies were screened for deletion of aac(2′) by PCR, and the genotype was confirmed by Southern blot analysis with a 0.3-kbp Van91I 3′-aac(2′) DNA probe (Fig. S3a) as well as WGS (Fig. S4a).
The plasmid pInt-Amp-leuB-aac(2′) was constructed as follows: aac(2′), including the native promoter, was amplified by PCR from genomic DNA of M. abscessus ATCC 19977 using HpaI linker-modified primers (p52/p53). The pInt-Amp-leuB plasmid (carrying integrase and attP for integration at the mycobacterial phage L5 attB locus in the genome of M. abscessus) was linearized with HpaI. Vector assembly, electroporation, selection, and plasmid and genotype verification were conducted as described above.
Deletion and complementation of MAB_4532c (eis2) in M. abscessus ∆leuB
The plasmid pSuc-Amp-leuB-∆eis2 was constructed as follows: the flanking region of eis2 (MAB_4532c) was amplified by PCR from pKH-Apr-DsRed2-Δeis2 vector with primer pair p54/p55. The pSuc-Amp-leuB was linearized by HpaI overnight digestion at 37°C and purified with Qiagen gel purification kit. Vector assembly, electroporation, selection, and plasmid verification were conducted as described above. This vector was transformed into M. abscessus ∆leuB electrocompetent cells, and after 5 hours of recovery at 37°C shaking, cells were diluted and plated out on selective LB agar (200mg/L L-leucine). Selected transformants, which underwent intermolecular recombination, were identified by PCR. Single crossover transformants were subjected to counterselection on LB agar plates containing isoniazid (32 mg/L) and L-leucine (200 mg/L). Single colonies were screened for deletion of eis2 by PCR, and the genotype was confirmed by Southern blot analysis with a 0.3-kbp Van91I 3′-eis2 DNA probe (Fig. S3b) as well as WGS (Fig. S4b).
The plasmid pInt-Amp-leuB-eis2 was constructed as follows: eis2, including the native promoter, was amplified by PCR from genomic DNA of M. abscessus ATCC 19977 using HpaI linker-modified primers (p60/p61). The pInt-Amp-leuB plasmid was linearized with HpaI. The two fragments were assembled using Gibson Assembly according to the manufacturer’s protocol. One microliter of the assembly mix was transformed into electrocompetent E. coli XL1-Blue cells. Vector assembly, electroporation, selection, and plasmid and genotype verification were conducted as described above.
Drug susceptibility testing of aac(2′) and eis2 deletion mutant
Stock solutions of kanamycin B, amikacin, kanamycin A, apramycin, and hygromycin B (all from Sigma-Aldrich) were prepared by dissolving each antibiotic in sterile distilled water according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The solutions were filter-sterilized, divided into smaller quantities (aliquots), and stored at −20°C until use. MIC assays were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and as previously described (17). Briefly, working solutions of the antibiotics were prepared by diluting the stock solutions in cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton broth (CAMH-Broth; pH 7.4; Becton Dickinson, Switzerland) to twice the desired final concentration. Twofold serial dilutions were then prepared in sterile 96-well microtiter plates. Each plate included a positive growth control (no antibiotic) and a negative control (CAMH-Broth only). Bacterial inocula were prepared by transferring 3–4 colonies from freshly grown LB agar plates into 2 mL of 0.9% (wt/vol) NaCl using sterile cotton swabs. The suspensions were adjusted to a turbidity equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard, yielding a final inoculum density of 1–5 × 10⁵ CFU/mL after dilution in CAMHB. Each well contained a total volume of 100 μL. Inoculum titers were verified by plating serial dilutions on LB agar.
The plates were sealed with adhesive covers and incubated at 37°C. MIC readings were recorded on days 3, 5, 7, and 12 for M. abscessus strains. All assays were performed in triplicate to ensure reproducibility. Representative data are shown in Fig. S6.
Construction of the pSuc-Amp-leuB-ΔGPL plasmid and generation of the ΔGPL mutant
The plasmid pSuc-Amp-leuB-ΔGPL was constructed as follows: The flanking regions of the GPL operon (MAB_4099c–MAB_4097c) were amplified by PCR using genomic DNA from M. abscessus ATCC 19977 as a template. The 5′ (upstream) and 3′ (downstream) fragments were generated using primer pair p62/63 respectively p64/65 containing HpaI restriction site overhangs. The plasmid pSuc-Amp-leuB was linearized by HpaI digestion overnight at 37°C, then purified using a Qiagen Gel Extraction Kit. Vector assembly, electroporation, selection, and plasmid verification were conducted as described above. The confirmed pSuc-Amp-leuB-ΔGPL plasmid was then transformed into M. abscessus ΔleuB cells, followed by selection, respectively counterselection, as described above. Individual colonies were screened for the deletion of the GPL operon by PCR, and successful gene deletion was confirmed by morphology on agar plates. In addition, we performed WGS analysis of the ΔGPL mutant (Fig. S7).
Phenotypic characterization of the ΔGPL mutant
For phenotypic analysis, the colony morphology of M. abscessus ΔleuB ΔGPL was compared with that of the parental M. abscessus ΔleuB strain. Bacterial suspensions were streaked on leucine-supplemented 7H10 agar. After incubation for 6 days at 37°C, colony morphology was documented using a Leica M80/MC170 HD microscope.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We gratefully acknowledge the Swiss National Science Foundation (#310030-197699/1), Joint Program Initiative Antimicrobial Resistance (JPIAMR) 2022-050, Federal Office of Public Health FOPH (#3643080304), and Cystische Fibrose Schweiz (CFCH) for financial support.
Contributor Information
Tizian Griesser, Email: tizian.griesser@uzh.ch.
Peter Sander, Email: psander@imm.uzh.ch.
Julia C. van Kessel, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
DATA AVAILABILITY
All the data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. Raw reads from WGS analysis for the used M. abscessus strains have been deposited at the NCBI under BioProject accession number PRJNA1436954.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00712-26.
Fig. S1 to S8; Tables S1 to S3.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Roux A-L, Viljoen A, Bah A, Simeone R, Bernut A, Laencina L, Deramaudt T, Rottman M, Gaillard J-L, Majlessi L, Brosch R, Girard-Misguich F, Vergne I, de Chastellier C, Kremer L, Herrmann J-L. 2016. The distinct fate of smooth and rough Mycobacterium abscessus variants inside macrophages. Open Biol 6:160185. doi: 10.1098/rsob.160185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Baker EJ, Allcott G, Cox JAG. 2024. Polymicrobial infection in cystic fibrosis and future perspectives for improving Mycobacterium abscessus drug discovery. NPJ Antimicrob Resist 2:38. doi: 10.1038/s44259-024-00060-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kattamuri L, Zambrano A, Duvvuru SR, Sharma K, Deoker A. 2025. Concurrent coccidioidomycosis and Mycobacterium abscessus infection in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep 13:23247096251334229. doi: 10.1177/23247096251334229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Cortes MAM, Nessar R, Singh AK. 2010. Laboratory maintenance of Mycobacterium abscessus. Curr Protoc Microbiol Chapter 10:1. doi: 10.1002/9780471729259.mc10d01s18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Johansen MD, Herrmann J-L, Kremer L. 2020. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria and the rise of Mycobacterium abscessus. Nat Rev Microbiol 18:392–407. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0331-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Luthra S, Rominski A, Sander P. 2018. The role of antibiotic-target-modifying and antibiotic-modifying enzymes in Mycobacterium abscessus drug resistance. Front Microbiol 9:2179. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Nessar R, Cambau E, Reyrat JM, Murray A, Gicquel B. 2012. Mycobacterium abscessus: a new antibiotic nightmare. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:810–818. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr578 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Lopeman RC, Harrison J, Desai M, Cox JAG. 2019. Mycobacterium abscessus: environmental bacterium turned clinical nightmare. Microorganisms 7:90. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7030090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Longo BM, Trunfio M, Calcagno A. 2024. Dual β-lactams for the treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus: a review of the evidence and a call to act against an antibiotic nightmare. J Antimicrob Chemother 79:2731–2741. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Tortoli E, Kohl TA, Brown-Elliott BA, Trovato A, Leão SC, Garcia MJ, Vasireddy S, Turenne CY, Griffith DE, Philley JV, Baldan R, Campana S, Cariani L, Colombo C, Taccetti G, Teri A, Niemann S, Wallace RJ, Cirillo DM. 2016. Emended description of Mycobacterium abscessus, Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus and Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. bolletii and designation of Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. massiliense comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:4471–4479. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Richard M, Gutiérrez AV, Kremer L. 2020. Dissecting erm(41)-mediated macrolide-inducible resistance in Mycobacterium abscessus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e01879-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01879-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Griffith DE, Daley CL. 2022. Treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus pulmonary disease. Chest 161:64–75. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.07.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kurz SG, Zha BS, Herman DD, Holt MR, Daley CL, Ruminjo JK, Thomson CC. 2020. Summary for clinicians: 2020 clinical practice guideline summary for the treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc 17:1033–1039. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202003-222CME [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Manesh A, Varghese GM, CENDRIC Investigators and Collaborators . 2021. Rising antimicrobial resistance: an evolving epidemic in a pandemic. Lancet Microbe 2:e419–e420. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00173-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Chimukuche NM, Williams MJ. 2021. Genetic manipulation of non-tuberculosis mycobacteria. Front Microbiol 12:633510. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.633510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Gagliardi A, Selchow P, Luthra S, Schäfle D, Schulthess B, Sander P. 2020. KatG as counterselection marker for nontuberculous mycobacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e02508-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02508-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Rominski A, Roditscheff A, Selchow P, Böttger EC, Sander P. 2017. Intrinsic rifamycin resistance of Mycobacterium abscessus is mediated by ADP-ribosyltransferase MAB_0591. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:376–384. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw466 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Rominski A, Schulthess B, Müller DM, Keller PM, Sander P. 2017. Effect of β-lactamase production and β-lactam instability on MIC testing results for Mycobacterium abscessus. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:3070–3078. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Nessar R, Reyrat JM, Murray A, Gicquel B. 2011. Genetic analysis of new 16S rRNA mutations conferring aminoglycoside resistance in Mycobacterium abscessus. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:1719–1724. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Garbe TR, Barathi J, Barnini S, Zhang Y, Abou-Zeid C, Tang D, Mukherjee R, Young DB. 1994. Transformation of mycobacterial species using hygromycin resistance as selectable marker. Microbiology (Reading) 140:133–138. doi: 10.1099/13500872-140-1-133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Medjahed H, Reyrat J-M. 2009. Construction of Mycobacterium abscessus defined glycopeptidolipid mutants: comparison of genetic tools. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:1331–1338. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01914-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Hurst-Hess K, Rudra P, Ghosh P. 2017. Mycobacterium abscessus WhiB7 regulates a species-specific repertoire of genes to confer extreme antibiotic resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e01347-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01347-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Corley JM, Congel JH, Haist KC, Ochoa AE, Malcolm KC, Janssen WJ, Nick JA, Hisert KB. 2025. Tobramycin enhances Mycobacterium abscessus fitness through whiB7 induction. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2025.10.01.679559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 24. Hurst-Hess K, McManaman C, Yang Y, Gupta S, Ghosh P. 2023. Hierarchy and interconnected networks in the WhiB7 mediated transcriptional response to antibiotic stress in Mycobacterium abscessus. PLoS Genet 19:e1011060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Rominski A, Selchow P, Becker K, Brülle JK, Dal Molin M, Sander P. 2017. Elucidation of Mycobacterium abscessus aminoglycoside and capreomycin resistance by targeted deletion of three putative resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:2191–2200. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Zaunbrecher MA, Sikes RD, Metchock B, Shinnick TM, Posey JE. 2009. Overexpression of the chromosomally encoded aminoglycoside acetyltransferase eis confers kanamycin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:20004–20009. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907925106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Nicola F, Cirillo DM, Lorè NI. 2023. Preclinical murine models to study lung infection with Mycobacterium abscessus complex. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 138:102301. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2022.102301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Amorim Franco TM, Blanchard JS. 2017. Bacterial branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis: structures, mechanisms, and drugability. Biochemistry 56:5849–5865. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00849 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Bernard C, Liu Y, Larrouy-Maumus G, Guilhot C, Cam K, Chalut C. 2024. Altered serine metabolism promotes drug tolerance in Mycobacterium abscessus via a WhiB7-mediated adaptive stress response. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 68:e0145623. doi: 10.1128/aac.01456-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Omelchenko MV, Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Rogozin IB, Koonin EV. 2003. Evolution of mosaic operons by horizontal gene transfer and gene displacement in situ. Genome Biol 4:R55. doi: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-9-r55 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Orasch T, Dietl A-M, Shadkchan Y, Binder U, Bauer I, Lass-Flörl C, Osherov N, Haas H. 2019. The leucine biosynthetic pathway is crucial for adaptation to iron starvation and virulence in Aspergillus fumigatus. Virulence 10:925–934. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2019.1682760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. McAdam RA, Weisbrod TR, Martin J, Scuderi JD, Brown AM, Cirillo JD, Bloom BR, Jacobs WR. 1995. In vivo growth characteristics of leucine and methionine auxotrophic mutants of Mycobacterium bovis BCG generated by transposon mutagenesis. Infect Immun 63:1004–1012. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.3.1004-1012.1995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Hershko Y, Adler A, Barkan D, Meir M. 2023. Glycopeptidolipid defects leading to rough morphotypes of Mycobacterium abscessus do not confer clinical antibiotic resistance. Microbiol Spectr 11:e0527022. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.05270-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Tang D, Wang M, Wang D, Yang D, Cai Y, Luo T, He J, Wang Q. 2025. Ultra-high field strength electroporation enables efficient DNA transformation and genome editing in nontuberculous mycobacteria. Microbiol Spectr 13:e0194425. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01944-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Zakhareva EV, Martini BA, Salina EG. 2025. Optimization of transformation conditions by electroporation for Mycobacterium abscessus. Appl Biochem Microbiol 61:908–913. doi: 10.1134/S0003683825601507 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Dellagostin OA, Borsuk S, Oliveira TL, Seixas FK. 2022. Auxotrophic Mycobacterium bovis BCG: updates and perspectives. Vaccines (Basel) 10:802. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10050802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Borsuk S, Mendum TA, Fagundes MQ, Michelon M, Cunha CW, McFadden J, Dellagostin OA. 2007. Auxotrophic complementation as a selectable marker for stable expression of foreign antigens in Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 87:474–480. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2007.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Alcaraz M, Edwards TE, Kremer L. 2023. New therapeutic strategies for Mycobacterium abscessus pulmonary diseases - untapping the mycolic acid pathway. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 21:813–829. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2023.2224563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Akinsemolu AA. 2023. Principles of green microbiology: the microbial blueprint for sustainable development. Environ Adv 14:100440. doi: 10.1016/j.envadv.2023.100440 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Malmsheimer S, Daher W, Tasrini Y, Hamela C, Aguilera-Correa JJ, Chalut C, Hatfull GF, Kremer L. 2024. Trehalose polyphleates participate in Mycobacterium abscessus fitness and pathogenesis. mBio 15:e0297024. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02970-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Lian E, Belardinelli JM, De K, Pandurangan AP, Angala SK, Palčeková Z, Grzegorzewicz AE, Bryant JM, Blundell TL, Parkhill J, Floto RA, Wheat WH, Jackson M. 2025. Cell envelope polysaccharide modifications alter the surface properties and interactions of Mycobacterium abscessus with innate immune cells in a morphotype-dependent manner. mBio 16:e0032225. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00322-25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Rüger K, Hampel A, Billig S, Rücker N, Suerbaum S, Bange F-C. 2014. Characterization of rough and smooth morphotypes of Mycobacterium abscessus isolates from clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 52:244–250. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01249-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Clary G, Sasindran SJ, Nesbitt N, Mason L, Cole S, Azad A, McCoy K, Schlesinger LS, Hall-Stoodley L. 2018. Mycobacterium abscessus smooth and rough morphotypes form antimicrobial-tolerant biofilm phenotypes but are killed by acetic acid. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01782-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01782-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Dedrick RM, Smith BE, Garlena RA, Russell DA, Aull HG, Mahalingam V, Divens AM, Guerrero-Bustamante CA, Zack KM, Abad L, Gauthier CH, Jacobs-Sera D, Hatfull GF. 2021. Mycobacterium abscessus strain morphotype determines phage susceptibility, the repertoire of therapeutically useful phages, and phage resistance. mBio 12:e03431-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.03431-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Ross BN, Evans E, Diggle F, Briaud P, Whiteley M. 2025. The role of colony morphotype in shaping gene essentiality in Mycobacteroides abscessus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 122:e2500719122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2500719122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Sampson SL, Dascher CC, Sambandamurthy VK, Russell RG, Jacobs WR, Bloom BR, Hondalus MK. 2004. Protection elicited by a double leucine and pantothenate auxotroph of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in guinea pigs. Infect Immun 72:3031–3037. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.5.3031-3037.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Hondalus MK, Bardarov S, Russell R, Chan J, Jacobs WR, Bloom BR. 2000. Attenuation of and protection induced by a leucine auxotroph of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun 68:2888–2898. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.5.2888-2898.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Lee MH, Pascopella L, Jacobs WR, Hatfull GF. 1991. Site-specific integration of mycobacteriophage L5: integration-proficient vectors for Mycobacterium smegmatis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and bacille Calmette-Guérin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:3111–3115. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.8.3111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Peña CE, Stoner JE, Hatfull GF. 1996. Positions of strand exchange in mycobacteriophage L5 integration and characterization of the attB site. J Bacteriol 178:5533–5536. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.18.5533-5536.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Springer B, Sander P, Sedlacek L, Ellrott K, Böttger EC. 2001. Instability and site-specific excision of integration-proficient mycobacteriophage L5 plasmids: development of stably maintained integrative vectors. Int J Med Microbiol 290:669–675. doi: 10.1016/S1438-4221(01)80004-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Fig. S1 to S8; Tables S1 to S3.
Data Availability Statement
All the data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. Raw reads from WGS analysis for the used M. abscessus strains have been deposited at the NCBI under BioProject accession number PRJNA1436954.
