Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2026 Jul 16;92(8):e00110-26. doi: 10.1128/aem.00110-26

Metabolic engineering of Komagataella phaffii for enhanced production of heterologous proteins and small molecules: key strategies and future directions

Jiaoyu Xin 1, Lu Zhao 1, Youxin Meng 1, Ziye Tian 1, Kaikai Lv 1, Chenyu Xue 1,✉, Na Dong 1,✉
Editor: Edward G Dudley2
PMCID: PMC13488341  PMID: 42461011

ABSTRACT

Komagataella phaffii (syn. Pichia pastoris) is an important host for the production of recombinant proteins and small molecules, often exhibiting superior performance compared to other heterologous hosts. With advancements in synthetic biology and computational biology, metabolic engineering has become a key strategy for achieving high-level heterologous proteins and small molecules in K. phaffii for industrial and commercial applications. In this review, we provide an overview of advances in K. phaffii metabolic engineering. We first discuss the development of the K. phaffii expression system. Subsequently, we analyze core optimization strategies, including metabolic flux control, metabolic dynamic control, application of system modeling, chassis cell optimization, and recombinant protein and small-molecule production, before finally summarizing the current challenges and future development directions.

KEYWORDS: Komagataella phaffii, Pichia pastoris, heterologous proteins, small molecules, biosynthetic pathways, metabolic engineering

INTRODUCTION

Komagataella phaffii (synonymous with Pichia pastoris), initially identified in the exudate of French chestnut trees, was originally designated Zygosaccharomyces pastoris by the mycologist and cytologist Alexandre Guilliermond (1). In the 1950s, Phaff et al. reclassified it into the genus Pichia, renaming it Pichia pastoris, a name that subsequently saw widespread use in both research and industrial applications (2). At the end of the 20th century, based on ribosomal RNA sequence analysis, Yamada et al. proposed the new genus Komagataella, incorporating the related methanol-assimilating yeasts into this group (3, 4). Therefore, the established name, Pichia pastoris, will be used synonymously to refer to the engineered strains of the Komagataella genus solely in the context of biotechnological applications. In its initial applications, K. phaffii was employed by Phillips Petroleum Company for commercial-scale production, leveraging methanol in high-cell-density fermentation processes to yield single-cell protein (SCP) for animal feed supplementation. Subsequently, it was decided to release it to laboratories for academic research, leading to the rapid development of the K. phaffii expression system (5). K. phaffii’s inherent tolerance to elevated temperatures, acidic or alkaline conditions, and high methanol concentrations has rendered it a focal point of considerable interest in contemporary biotechnological applications.

Metabolic engineering strategies in K. phaffii are designed to optimize its metabolic network via genetic engineering and metabolic flux regulation, thereby enhancing the large-scale production of heterologous proteins and a wide array of small molecules. In recent years, the application of high-throughput omics technologies, including genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics, has facilitated the identification of key genes within the K. phaffii metabolic network and enabled the use of synthetic biology approaches to engineer its biosynthetic pathways (6). Nevertheless, the exponential increase in data volume can introduce analytical complexities, resulting in a “data deluge” that challenges traditional methods. Consequently, both metabolic modeling and machine learning (ML) hold significant potential for supporting metabolic engineering efforts (7, 8). Currently, the main synthetic biology tools for engineering K. phaffii include heterologous gene expression vectors, promoters, terminators, and CRISPR/Cas systems (9). Specifically, CRISPR-Cas systems enable the creation of thousands of targeted mutations throughout metabolic pathways (10). Advancements in synthetic biology and computational biology have fostered promising avenues for employing metabolic engineering in K. phaffii to synthesize commercially valuable compounds.

Building on previous reviews (11–13), the present review synthesizes recent progress in the metabolic engineering of K. phaffii. This review begins by tracing the evolutionary trajectory of the expression systems associated with this yeast strain, with a particular emphasis on genetic engineering technologies. It then elaborates on the key strategies for optimizing the metabolic engineering of K. phaffii. These encompass metabolic flux regulation, dynamic metabolic control, the application of systems modeling, chassis cell optimization, and the production of recombinant proteins and small molecules. Subsequently, the practical applications of this strain in agriculture, industry, food, and pharmaceutical sectors are detailed. The paper concludes by discussing current research challenges and future directions. This review underscores that the core elements for fully realizing the potential of K. phaffii metabolic engineering involve the optimization of metabolic fluxes through rational, targeted modification techniques, enhanced collaboration with computational disciplines, and multi-scale engineering design and optimization spanning the molecular, cellular, and systems levels.

DEVELOPMENT OF THE K. PHAFFII EXPRESSION SYSTEM

Proteins, which are biomolecules comprised of amino acids, execute a diverse array of functions within living organisms. However, naturally sourced proteins often suffer from limited availability, insufficient purity, and high production costs. To circumvent these limitations, Escherichia coli was initially utilized as a host organism for the production of recombinant insulin during the 1980s (14). However, as a prokaryotic organism, E. coli encounters challenges in recombinant protein expression, such as the formation of inclusion bodies composed of misfolded proteins (15). These inclusion bodies can hinder the downstream purification of the recombinant protein. Therefore, the selection of an appropriate host cell is a critical factor for the successful and efficient expression of recombinant proteins.

K. phaffii, a eukaryotic and methylotrophic yeast, possesses the ability to utilize methanol as its sole carbon and energy source (16). In addition to its capacity for high-cell-density growth in simple media, K. phaffii can also thrive in dynamic culture systems, where variables such as dissolved oxygen levels, pH, glucose concentration, and temperature must be carefully controlled (17). Furthermore, the K. phaffii expression system offers advantages, including post-translational modifications, genetic stability, disulfide bond formation, and glycosylation (18–21). Its mature extracellular protein secretion system, combined with the guidance of the α-mating factor (MF) signal sequence, enables K. phaffii to achieve high-yield secretion of heterologous proteins. This efficient targeting dramatically minimizes host-derived background contaminants, consequently enhancing the solubility of the secreted product and streamlining its purification (22). Owing to the distinctive advantages of its expression system, K. phaffii is increasingly becoming one of the preferred microbial hosts for the production of recombinant proteins and small molecules (18).

For decades, researchers have continuously developed new genetic tools to overcome limitations in both research and commercial applications, aiming to construct highly adaptable and productive K. phaffii strains. In 1985, K. phaffii was initially developed as a heterologous protein expression system after the pioneering application of the methanol-inducible AOX1 promoter (PAOX1), which is tightly regulated by methanol (23). However, the PAOX1 has drawbacks, such as methanol toxicity and leaky expression of target genes, thereby limiting its application scope. To address this, the native GAP promoter (PGAP) was used, which, compared to PAOX1, can achieve efficient expression in the absence of methanol. Following transcriptional regulation, enhancing the efficiency of translation and secretion becomes the next critical juncture. To this end, multiple strategies have been widely implemented. These include codon optimization to increase the rate and fidelity of translational elongation (24, 25); replacement of inefficient native signal peptides with sequences that are efficiently recognized and cleaved by K. phaffii to drive high-yield protein secretion (26, 27); and high-throughput screening for strains exhibiting the highest secretory capacity and the lowest background of host proteases, thereby avoiding protein degradation and alleviating cellular burden (28). Collectively, these strategies constitute an effective means to improve the expression level of heterologous proteins. Studies have demonstrated that significantly enhanced α-galactosidase expression in K. phaffii, achieving an extracellular activity of 1,299 U/mL through strategies including codon optimization, replacement of the native signal peptide sequence with the Saccharomyces cerevisiae α-factor signal peptide, and selection of an optimal host strain (29). Rong et al. (30), through a combination of strategies including identifying the optimal expression cassette (PAOX1 with SP0030 signal peptide), optimizing gene copy number, overexpressing protein disulfide isomerase (PDI), and systematically refining fermentation parameters, achieved a final brazzein yield of 639 mg/L. Condition optimization is also an effective strategy to enhance heterologous protein and small-molecule expression levels. For example, this includes controlling methanol concentrations, feeding frequency, and co-feeding supplementary carbon sources (31).

Moreover, it is particularly noteworthy that gene editing can effectively and precisely modify and engineer the K. phaffii genome, offering a customized host expression system for recombinant proteins and small molecules. In K. phaffii, most targeted gene knockouts or knock-ins have been achieved using non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). NHEJ pathway repairs DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by directly ligating the broken ends without requiring a homologous template. This makes it a straightforward and efficient repair mechanism. However, it easily introduces small insertion or deletion mutations, which may cause abnormal function of the target gene or increased genomic instability (32). In contrast to NHEJ, the homologous recombination (HR) pathway utilizes a homologous DNA template for high-fidelity repair. This mechanism not only enables precise gene knockout or knock-in screening but also contributes to enhanced genomic stability (33, 34). While HR efficiency in K. phaffii is lower than that in S. cerevisiae, this bottleneck has been overcome through technical strategies such as double-gene knockout and transient suppression of the homologous gene encoding Ku70, a key DNA end-binding protein in the NHEJ pathway (35).

In recent years, CRISPR/Cas9, a well-established gene editing technology, has been explored for gene modification in K. phaffii. By utilizing a single-guide RNA (sgRNA) plasmid containing an autonomously replicating sequence (ARS) to direct Cas9, a DSB is introduced at the target genomic locus. The subsequent editing efficiency is then primarily dependent on the HR repair pathway (36). CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, driven by the SER promoter for sgRNA expression, has been reported to demonstrate a 10-fold enhancement in editing efficiency, attributed to the plasmid stability conferred by panARS (37). In addition, serial passaging can be employed to eliminate residual sgRNA, thereby enabling complete (100%) genome editing of single-gene targets (38). To further enhance HR efficiency, Gao et al. achieved single-step multi-locus integration by co-overexpressing the exogenous HR key genes RAD52, RAD59, and MRE11 from S. cerevisiae with 40 bp short homology arms. This strategy increased the triple-locus integration efficiency from 45% to 81%, representing a 4.3-fold improvement in HR efficiency (39). Separately, Bai et al. established a tetracycline repressor (TetR)/tetO₂ induction system to regulate the expression of HR-related genes RAD52 and MUS81-MMS4. This system boosted the positive rate for single-gene knockout and the assembly efficiency for multiple loci to 81%, without compromising subsequent cell growth or product synthesis (34). However, existing gene-editing approaches mostly rely on the DSB repair pathway, which is prone to insertions and deletions (indels) and makes precise point mutations difficult to achieve. To overcome the limitations of traditional DSB editing, Wu et al. (40) developed base-editing (BE) tools based on the CRISPR-Cas9 system and screened for the optimal BE construct (PAOX2*-KpA3A-nCas9-KpUGI-DAS1TT), achieving a C-to-T editing efficiency of up to 96.0% and an editing window of 7 nucleotides. Furthermore, by replacing nCas9 with nSpG and nSpRy variants, which have broader protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) compatibility, efficient targeting was achieved at NGN and NRN-PAM sites, respectively, significantly broadening the scope of genome editability. Additionally, by integrating T7 RNA polymerase (T7 RNAP) with the CRISPRa system, inserting a transfer RNA (tRNA) sequence between the T7 promoter and the sgRNA increased the activation efficiency 4.0-fold and allowed for simultaneous multi-gene activation. Based on this, an AND logic gate was constructed, achieving 3.3-fold targeted activation under dual induction by methanol and doxycycline, alongside an OR logic gate, in which dual induction yielded a synergistic efficiency of 3.42-fold compared to single-induction activation. Furthermore, developing an Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) self-responsive system enabled the dynamic regulation of the endogenous transcription factor HAC1, ultimately leading to a patatin yield of 353 mg/L, a 116% increase over that of the original strain (41).

With increasingly refined exploration at the molecular level, multi-omics technologies have become pivotal tools for life science researchers. Since 2009, whole-genome sequencing has been completed for several representative strains of K. phaffii, including GS115, DSMZ 70382, and CBS7435 (42–44). Building upon this genomic foundation, a series of transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic studies have subsequently been conducted, laying the groundwork for a deeper understanding of the advantages and limitations of K. phaffii as a chassis organism for heterologous protein expression and metabolite synthesis (45–47). On this basis, and in conjunction with advances in novel genetic tools and synthetic biology, technical approaches such as glycoengineering, metabolic flux analysis, high-throughput screening, metabolic engineering, and mathematical modeling have collectively propelled the K. phaffii expression system toward breakthrough applications across diverse fields, including agriculture, industry, food, and pharmaceuticals (26, 28, 48–50).

KEY STRATEGIES IN K. PHAFFII METABOLIC ENGINEERING

K. phaffii, as an excellent cell factory, has seen the evolution of its metabolic engineering strategies from static and localized optimizations toward dynamic, systems-level frameworks. Optimization has gradually extended from static manipulation of core metabolic routes (e.g., carbon, nitrogen, and energy fluxes) to dynamic metabolic regulation capable of autonomous homeostasis maintenance and balancing of growth and product formation, thereby overcoming the inherent constraints of static control mechanisms. With the development of synthetic biology and systems biology technologies, systems metabolic engineering involves the holistic design and reprogramming of the cell, integrating organically with chassis strain optimization to build highly efficient cell factories with multi-dimensional synergy, becoming the core direction of current metabolic engineering. Meanwhile, specialized optimization techniques have been developed for critical steps in recombinant protein production, such as glycosylation modification and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) processing. Moreover, this technological advancement is simultaneously broadening its scope to encompass the synthesis of small molecules derived from renewable feedstocks.

Metabolic optimization

Optimization of metabolic flux

During the high-density fermentation of K. phaffii, nutrient and energy provisioning is a critical step for enhancing yeast growth rate and metabolic activity. Methanol, glucose, glycerol, and ammonium sulfate are commonly used as carbon and nitrogen sources in the fermentation process. Carbon source metabolism in K. phaffii encompasses glycerol metabolism, methanol metabolism, sugar metabolism, and lipid metabolism, while nitrogen source metabolism is achieved through the interconversion of ammonia, glutamate, and glutamine, facilitating metabolic regulation. Furthermore, energy metabolism functions as an indispensable synergistic modulator within this process. Consequently, understanding and optimizing these metabolic processes are essential for efficient fermentation.

Optimization of carbon metabolism

The fermentation process of K. phaffii is divided into a glycerol growth phase and a methanol induction phase. In the glycerol growth phase, K. phaffii relies on glycerol as its sole carbon source, which is then metabolized through the glycerol metabolic pathway. Glycerol, under the catalysis of glycerol kinase (GUT1), produces glycerol-3-phosphate (G3P), ultimately leading to the formation of dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (GAP). The latter can enter the Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas (EMP) pathway to form pyruvate, which then enters the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle (Fig. 1) (51). Driven by advancements in gene editing tools, researchers are now targeting specific genes in K. phaffii to improve the performance of desired traits and enhance fermentation efficiency. Research has shown that constructing a constitutive expression system with the PGAP and GUT1 homologous arms and using the GUT1 gene as a targeting integration site allows for efficient screening of K. phaffii strains with high expression of bacterial fumonisin esterase enzyme (CFE) from a single-copy integrant (52). Building upon this concept of targeted modification, researchers have explored altering metabolic pathways to increase the production of various target compounds. For instance, Fina et al. (53) enhanced the production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3-HP) by introducing malonyl-CoA as a metabolic precursor into the 3-HP pathway of K. phaffii and overexpressing acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC), which catalyzes the formation of malonyl-CoA from acetyl-CoA. This highlights the immense potential of metabolic engineering for optimizing target compound production. Moreover, De et al. (54) expressed the Bos taurus lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) gene in the genome of K. phaffii X-33, generating a strain capable of producing L-lactic acid and utilizing glycerol as its sole carbon source. The lactic acid production of this strain increased by 20% under lower oxygen (O2) conditions, with the best strain achieving a lactic acid yield of approximately 0.7 g/g. Although the achieved titer still lags behind that of native lactic acid bacteria, this work demonstrated for the first time that K. phaffii presents a viable alternative for lactic acid production, offering significant feedstock cost reductions. Collectively, these results provide further evidence that targeted regulation of the metabolic processes in K. phaffii can substantially enhance the production efficiency of various high-value compounds.

Fig 1.

Diagram of carbon metabolism in K. phaffii showing glycerol, 3-HP, and methanol entering the cell. Methanol is processed in the peroxisome via AOX and the XuMP cycle. Pathways converge at GAP, leading to pyruvate, the TCA cycle, and FPP synthesis.

Carbon metabolism in K. phaffii. GUT1, glycerol kinase; G3P, glycerol-3-phosphate; DHAP, dihydroxyacetone phosphate; GAP, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; AOX, alcohol oxidase; CAT, catalase; DAS, dihydroxyacetone synthase; FLD, formaldehyde dehydrogenase; FGH, S-formylglutathione hydrolase; FDH, formate dehydrogenase; XuMP, xylulose monophosphate pathway; MVA, mevalonate; IPP, isopentenyl pyrophosphate; DMAPP, dimethylallyl pyrophosphate.

After K. phaffii enters the methanol induction phase, methanol metabolism begins. Specifically, methanol metabolism occurs through alcohol oxidase (AOX), which oxidizes methanol to formaldehyde and hydrogen peroxide. The hydrogen peroxide is then decomposed into O2 and water by catalase (CAT). Formaldehyde is further assimilated in the peroxisomes through dihydroxyacetone synthase (DAS) in the xylulose monophosphate (XuMP) pathway, producing GAP. This G3P then enters the EMP pathway to form pyruvate, which enters central carbon metabolism and provides metabolic products to sustain cell growth. In addition to this assimilation pathway, formaldehyde is also catabolized to carbon dioxide (CO2), producing cytosolic NADH, which is then oxidized in the respiratory chain to generate energy through the catalysis of formaldehyde dehydrogenase (FLD), S-formylglutathione hydrolase (FGH), and formate dehydrogenase (FDH) (Fig. 1) (19, 55, 56). Feng et al. (57) engineered the strain via the co-expression of K. phaffii FLD, S. cerevisiae NADH kinase (Pos5), and the K. phaffii 2-oxoglutarate transporter (Odc1). This strategy aimed to promote formaldehyde assimilation, ensure optimal NAD+/NADH redox balance, and subsequently improve methanol utilization efficiency by 10%. This manipulation channeled increased carbon flux into central metabolic pathways, effectively boosting the specific productivity of xylanase B and resulting in a 101.8% increase in specific productivity and a 93.2% increase in volumetric productivity relative to the control. Given the dual pathways for formaldehyde metabolism, Guo et al. (58) sought to optimize the methanol assimilation pathway. This was accomplished through the knockout of glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (G6PI) in the XuMP cycle to optimize methanol assimilation and through modulation of pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC) activity to block the byproduct pathway for malate synthesis. This reduced NADH consumption and increased the availability of substrates and energy reserves for malate production.

Furthermore, comparative analyses based on transcriptomics and metabolomics showed that the order of gene downregulation in the methanol dissimilation pathway of K. phaffii was proportional to the downregulation of the oxidative phosphorylation pathway. More specifically, when the dissimilation pathway is hindered, the oxidative phosphorylation and assimilation pathways also weakened, leading to a low energy supply and defects in carbon fixation, ultimately affecting biomass accumulation and gene replication efficiency. Among these effects, formaldehyde-induced DNA-protein cross-linking may lead to transcriptional upregulation of the proteasome and autophagy (59). Interestingly, cellular responses to formaldehyde toxicity are varied and complex. In contrast, Berrios et al. found that cells could meet their energy needs by rearranging the pathway flux of EMP and the TCA cycle, thus protecting themselves from the toxic effects of formaldehyde (60).

Notably, optimizing carbon metabolic pathways can also be used to engineer high-yielding K. phaffii strains and further enhance the production and productivity of heterologous proteins and small molecules. After methanol is assimilated to produce pyruvate, it is converted to acetyl-CoA by the pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) complex. This acetyl-CoA then enters the mevalonate (MVA) pathway to produce isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP). Finally, IPP and DMAPP condense to form farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP) (Fig. 1). Xu et al. (61) obtained a high-α-farnesene-producing K. phaffii strain, XF22, by using the PGAP to enhance the overexpression of key genes in the MVA pathway, increasing the supply of cytosolic acetyl-CoA, and reducing the accumulation of competing products of FPP synthesis.

Optimization of nitrogen metabolism

Nitrogen metabolism is essential for the synthesis and degradation of amino acids and proteins. Yeast cells initially convert various nitrogen sources to glutamate and glutamine, which subsequently feed into the central nitrogen metabolism (CNM) pathway. Under the catalysis of NADPH-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH1), ammonia directly couples with α-ketoglutarate to form glutamate (62). Subsequently, glutamine synthetase (GLN1) catalyzes the formation of glutamine from ammonia and glutamate (63, 64). Glutamine can then produce glutamate again under the catalysis of glutamine-oxoglutarate aminotransferase (GOGAT). Additionally, glutamate can be degraded into α-ketoglutarate and ammonia by NAD-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH2) (Fig. 2) (65, 66). Studies have shown that regulating nitrogen metabolism by individually overexpressing GDH1 or GLN1 can increase the total nitrogen content and protein levels in the strain (67). Liu et al. (68) demonstrated that glutamate supplementation modulated the metabolic flux of metabolites and energy at key nodes of central metabolism in K. phaffii, resulting in a 32% enhancement in β-galactosidase yield. Furthermore, analysis via metabolomics and transcriptomics by Hannes et al. (69) revealed that overexpressing amino acid metabolism-related genes enhances recombinant protein yields; specifically, overexpression of the transcription factor GCN4 amplified the titer of the model protein secreted carboxylesterase (CES) by 2.6-fold.

Fig 2.

Diagram of nitrogen metabolism in Komagataella phaffii yeast cells showing uptake of nitrogen sources, conversion to glutamate and glutamine via GDH1, GDH2, GLN1, and GOGAT, and links through the TCA cycle to oxaloacetate and phosphoenolpyruvate.

Central pathways for nitrogen metabolism. GDH1, NADPH-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase; GLN1, glutamine synthetase; GOGAT, glutamine-oxoglutarate aminotransferase; GDH2, NAD-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase; AAT2, aspartate aminotransferase 2; PEPCK, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase.

Interestingly, K. phaffii exhibits a unique glutamate utilization pathway, enabling it to utilize amino acids as the sole source of both nitrogen and carbon. During carbon starvation, K. phaffii induces the synthesis of cytosolic GDH2, aspartate aminotransferase 2 (AAT2), and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) via autophagy. This triggers the post-transcriptional regulatory circuits for these enzymes, whereby the mRNA translation of GDH2 and PEPCK is selectively activated upon induction by their respective metabolic substrates, glutamate and oxaloacetate, thereby fulfilling the cell’s metabolic requirements (70, 71).

However, not all nitrogen sources are utilized efficiently. Nitrogen catabolite repression (NCR) is the regulatory mechanism by which yeast silences the expression of genes involved in the catabolism of less-preferred nitrogen sources (72). In yeast, when the preferred carbon source, glucose, is abundant, the EMP and TCA cycles supply the necessary precursor metabolites and energy required for nitrogen metabolism. Consequently, the NCR pathway is fully activated, leading the cell to prioritize the utilization of readily assimilable nitrogen sources. Upon the addition of a preferred nitrogen source to the growth medium, the transcription of permease genes, which encode proteins responsible for utilizing less preferred nitrogen sources, is suppressed, and their corresponding products are degraded (73). The NCR pathway has been extensively studied in S. cerevisiae, but less so in K. phaffii (74). In S. cerevisiae, NCR is primarily mediated and regulated by four GATA transcription factors, including glutamine metabolism protein (GLN3), GATA-type zinc finger DNA-binding motif protein (GAT1), allantoin pathway protein (DAL80), and GATA zinc finger factor 3 (GZF3)(75).

Despite this research gap, investigating nitrogen limitation in yeasts offers the potential for fermentation enhancement. Some evidence suggests that nitrogen limitation in yeast triggers the use of significant metabolic and translational reserves, enabling a rapid response to alterations in the growth environment. For example, glucose metabolism has over 80% reserve capacity, metabolic super pathways have over half of their metabolic capacity in reserve, gene expression exhibits over half of its translational capacity in reserve (mostly for translating metabolic proteins), and ribosomes have a 30% reserve capacity of sub-stoichiometric ribosomal proteins (76). Thus, further research is warranted to elucidate the regulatory pathways governing the optimization of carbon, nitrogen, and energy metabolism in K. phaffii, offering potential insights for maximizing the efficiency of high-density K. phaffii fermentation.

Optimization of energy metabolism

It has been reported that the production yield of recombinant proteins and small molecules is closely related to the availability of energy. When yeast cells overexpress recombinant proteins or small molecules and experience metabolic burden, not only are their carbon and nitrogen metabolism affected, but their energy metabolism is also significantly impacted (77, 78). Thus, in turn, alterations in the redox cofactor balance can influence the cell growth rate, thereby further affecting the production yield of recombinant proteins and small molecules (79). Therefore, increasing NADPH flux and maintaining a favorable NADPH/NADP+ ratio are key long-term metabolic engineering objectives (80).

The pentose phosphate (PPP) pathway is essential for maintaining the cellular NADPH/NADP+ balance (81). Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (ZWF1) and 6-phosphogluconolactonase (SOL3), which serve as rate-limiting enzymes in the PPP, exhibit synergistic effects. Co-expressing these enzymes causes a significant increase in PPP flux, thereby supplying sufficient energy for the effective accumulation of recombinant proteins and small molecules (82). Altering the redox balance in K. phaffii by overexpressing POS5 from S. cerevisiae leads to changes in flux distribution in its central carbon metabolism. Targeting POS5 to the cytoplasm led to a 2-fold increase in the production of recombinant antibody fragments (Fab). The copy number of Pos5 showed a positive correlation with both the NADPH/NADP+ ratio and Fab productivity (83). Reconstruction of the NADPH and ATP biosynthesis pathways to construct a high α-farnesene-producing K. phaffii strain involved optimizing key enzymes in the PPP, namely ZWF1 and SOL3, to improve NADPH supply. This was followed by low-intensity expression of heterologous Pos5 and further overexpression of endogenous adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (APRT), along with inactivation of NADH-dependent dihydroxyacetone phosphate reductase (GPD1), to increase both ATP and NADH levels. Ultimately, this resulted in an α-farnesene-producing K. phaffii strain with a 41.7% increase in productivity (84).

Dynamic metabolic regulation

In the past few decades, with researchers’ continued advancement of genetic tools, systems biology techniques, and synthetic biology technologies, traditional static metabolic regulation strategies—such as gene knockout, promoter optimization, 5′ untranslated region (5′ UTR) modification, and protein engineering—have become insufficient to meet the demands for microbial metabolite production (85–87). In contrast to statically controlled engineered strains, which are sensitive to changes in the growth environment, dynamic control can sense environmental changes in real time and promptly adjust the flux of metabolic pathways, thereby improving the stability and production efficiency of strains in synthesizing target metabolites (88). Currently, developed dynamic control strategies include two-phase metabolic switching and continuous metabolic control (89).

Two-phase metabolic switching

Two-phase metabolic switching involves a fast growth phase and a product formation phase. During the fast growth phase, the wild-type phenotype of the strain is restored to achieve optimal cell growth rate. In the product formation phase, the focus is on maximizing the flux through the product pathway (90). The transition between the two phases is controlled by a metabolic switch, requiring sufficient stimulation to reach a designated threshold before switching occurs (91). This bistable metabolic switch activates and maintains the stability of the production state (92, 93). Research indicates that adjusting dissolved O2, inducer concentration, and pH can reliably control the completion of the transition between these two phases (94).

Continuous metabolic control

Continuous metabolic regulation enables cells to autonomously perceive signals from both the external environment and internal metabolic states and dynamically modulate the expression of key enzymes, thereby redirecting metabolic flux and enhancing the yield of target products (95). Metabolic pathways are dynamically regulated via signal sensors and control switches to achieve sustained metabolic control. This involves promoter selection, feedback control of enzyme expression in response to endogenous signals, or the coordinated inhibition of upstream pathways that produce toxic intermediates and activation of downstream conversion pathways, thereby achieving metabolic auto-balancing and preventing the accumulation of toxic intermediates (96–101).

Sensors and control switches

A dynamic metabolic control process generally consists of a sensor that detects a signal and a control switch that responds to the signal and converts it into a specific metabolic system output. In this context, dynamic regulation strategies based on signal changes are particularly important in microbial metabolic engineering. Examples of such signals include chemical inducers, nutrient sensing, O2, temperature, light, and pH (97, 102). In K. phaffii, by controlling O2-limited conditions and specific growth rate, the specific product formation rate of Candida rugosa lipase 1 (Crl1) is twice that under normal O2 conditions (103).

Furthermore, optimization of the sensor signals and control switches that respond to metabolic system outputs is also feasible. In Klebsiella thermophila, L-aspartate α-decarboxylase (ADC) catalyzes the decarboxylation of L-aspartate to produce β-alanine. By overexpressing aspartate dehydrogenase to increase ADC gene dosage and further enhancing the supply of the aspartate precursor via phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) carboxylase, a β-alanine concentration of 5.6 g/L was achieved through fed-batch cultivation (104). Zhang et al. replaced the promoters of key glycolytic enzyme genes with a glycerol-inducible promoter, enabling a dynamic switch from cell growth to inositol production, resulting in a 4.9-fold increase in inositol yield (105). However, most reports concerning dynamic metabolic control strategies are focused on E. coli, with few related studies on K. phaffii. This may be due to the complex transcriptional regulatory mechanisms of K. phaffii and the insufficient application of interdisciplinary approaches.

Metabolic model

Currently, the application of systems biology also plays a crucial role in characterizing cell metabolism and guiding key targets for metabolic engineering. Systems biology integrates high-throughput omics data and utilizes computational modeling and analysis to achieve specific desired cellular systems (106). Based on the genome sequencing of K. phaffii (42, 44), genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) of K. phaffii have now been established (107–109). The early construction of GEMs was based on strains DSMZ 70382 and GS115, respectively, resulting in two similarly scaled models named PpaMBEL1254 and iPP668. Although their scales were similar, iPP668 further expanded and refined the methanol utilization pathway and its peroxisome compartment (107, 109). Subsequently, the iLC915 model, constructed from the GS115 strain, represented a significant leap forward. It accomplished the pioneering integration of the complete methanol utilization pathway, peroxisome compartment, glycosylation precursors, and mixed carbon sources utilization into GEM (108). To further enhance the comprehensiveness of the model, researchers constructed a new consensus model, iMT1026, by comparing, integrating, and updating the aforementioned GEMs. This model not only standardized metabolite nomenclature but also encompassed critical metabolic processes, such as protein glycosylation pathways, lipid metabolism, and energy metabolism (49). Research indicates that by analyzing the biomass composition of K. phaffii cultivated under different growth rates and with various carbon sources, the functionality of the iMT1026 model was updated, which significantly enhanced its predictive capability for growth on glycerol and methanol as sole carbon sources. Subash et al. (110) constructed the iAUKM model by merging iMT1026 with a draft model generated from the KEGG database. iAUKM can predict target genes for overexpression or knockout within the TCA cycle, EMP, and PPP pathways. When simulating overexpression targets for S-adenosyl-L-methionine (AdoMet), inorganic pyrophosphatase (IPP) was identified as an effective target, enabling the precise enhancement of recombinant protein synthesis efficiency. The experimental data showed that in media containing glucose and glycerol, AdoMet production increased by 16% and 14%, respectively (111).

However, current GEMs are primarily confined to steady-state metabolic analysis under static conditions, whereas dynamic conditions are often simulated using dynamic GSMs. The GSM, based on the dynamic flux balance analysis (dFBA) framework developed by Sánchez et al. (112), simulates the dynamic metabolic processes of K. phaffii under glucose-limited, aerobic, and fed-batch cultivation conditions via three iterative solving modules: kinetic, metabolic, and dynamic. Model-based prediction and validation revealed that knockout of the gene encoding methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase (MTHFD) increased the volumetric productivity of recombinant human serum albumin (HSA) by 6.3-fold (113).

Fueled by the increasing sophistication of machine learning, researchers are integrating computational tools with experimental work, departing from singular, traditional experimental methods. Relative to traditional modeling, machine learning significantly shortens the design cycle of metabolic pathways by uncovering subtle but interconnected patterns within data and integrating with the metabolic network of GEMs (114). Pentjuss et al. (115) developed a growth-coupled analysis algorithm to systematically explore the GEM of K. phaffii, enabling it to screen for key metabolic reactions affecting heme production. Compared with traditional methods, this method increased the biomass growth rate on glycerol by 50%, and growth on methanol approached the theoretical maximum.

Optimizing chassis cells

K. phaffii, engineered as a chassis organism for sustainable biomanufacturing, produces heterologous proteins and small molecules. A suitable hemoglobin expression system was constructed by overexpressing a single copy of PAOX1 and the transcription activator MIT1, and by deleting the aspartic protease YPS1-1 gene to inhibit hemoglobin degradation. The heme biosynthesis pathway was reconstructed in the cytoplasm, and rate-limiting steps were enhanced, leading to a K. phaffii chassis strain with 37-fold higher productivity compared to the original strain. This improved strain is capable of producing high-activity porcine myoglobin, soybean hemoglobin, erythrocyte hemoglobin, and P450-BM3 (116). Further, a K. phaffii chassis strain optimized for the biosynthesis of L-tyrosine (L-Tyr) precursors was developed. This involved overexpressing feedback-insensitive variants of 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate synthase (ARO4K229L) and chorismate mutase (ARO7G141S) in the shikimate pathway. This metabolic engineering strategy provides an efficient approach for K. phaffii to produce increased amounts of precursors for aromatic compounds, including resveratrol, naringenin, and chlorogenic acid, from glycerol byproducts (117).

Currently, the vast majority of research on K. phaffii chassis strains revolves around the GS115 and X-33 strains. Although the NRRL Y-11430 strain and its derived industrial strains GS115 and X-33 were under commercial restriction, with the expiration of relevant patents, comparative genome sequencing revealed that the openly available NCYC 2543 strain is highly similar to NRRL Y-11430. Furthermore, by introducing a single base pair deletion in the HOC1 gene of the NCYC 2543 strain, the NCYC 2543 HOC1tr-1 mutant was generated; this mutation significantly improved its transformation efficiency and the secretion capacity of some proteins. Based on these findings, researchers developed a strain named OPENPichia and provided a set of synthetic modular expression vector toolkits based on a free end-user distribution license, thus making royalty-free commercial production possible (118). This work not only pioneered new avenues for K. phaffii in metabolic engineering and synthetic biology but also established a robust foundation for its widespread deployment in the future bio-manufacturing industry.

Recombinant protein production

Glycosylation engineering

Glycosylation is one of the most complex and prevalent post-translational modifications (PTMs) of proteins and exerts a determinative influence on protein stability, activity, secretion, and immunogenicity. Glycosylation in eukaryotes is primarily classified into N-linked glycosylation and O-linked glycosylation (119). N-linked glycosylation occurs at asparagine residues and is initiated by the attachment of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) to the consensus sequence Asn-X-Ser/Thr (where X ≠ is proline [Pro]) in the ER, after which it can be elongated into complex, hybrid, or high-mannose forms (120, 121). O-linked glycosylation involves the direct linkage of GalNAc or mannose (Man) to serine/threonine (Ser/Thr) residues, lacks a conserved motif, is predominantly processed in the Golgi apparatus, and results in diverse core structures (122–124).

Compared to prokaryotic organisms (such as E. coli and Bacillus), which inherently lack glycosylation capabilities, and to the production bottlenecks brought by the high cost, susceptibility to contamination, and intricate regulatory networks of mammalian cells (CHO cells), K. phaffii, with both rapid growth and ease of genetic tractability, has become an ideal host for producing recombinant proteins and small molecules. Therefore, glycoengineering strategies to modify K. phaffii by eliminating its endogenous high-mannose-type glycosylation modification and introducing the human glycosylation pathway are critically important for enhancing the competitiveness of K. phaffii in the production of recombinant proteins and small molecules (21).

Over the past two decades, glycoengineering of K. phaffii has achieved significant milestones: the knockout of genes such as OCH1 blocks the high-mannose extension, while the introduction of α-1,2-mannosidase generates Man5GlcNAc2, yielding the commercially viable GlycoSwitch-engineered strains (125). Further advancements involved expressing enzymes like N-acetylglucosaminyltransferases I/II (GnT-I/II) and galactosyltransferases (GalT) to achieve humanized complex-type N-glycans (e.g., Gal2GlcNAc2Man3GlcNAc2). Moreover, some strains achieved terminal biorthogonal sialylation via a single plasmid expressing five genes: UDP-GlcNAc 2-epimerase/N-acetylmannosamine kinase (GNE), N-acetylmannosamine-9-phosphate synthase (SPS), CMP-N-acetylneuraminic acid synthase (CSS), CMP-sialic acid transporter (CST), and α-2,6-sialyltransferase (ST) (126–128). Additionally, by knocking out the ALG3 gene in ΔOCH1 K. phaffii strains, the synthesis of the Lipid-Linked Oligosaccharide (LLO) precursor in the ER is blocked, forming a truncated LLO, which can directly yield the Man3GlcNAc2 core structure, thereby circumventing interference from endogenous Golgi mannosyltransferases and enhancing glycan homogeneity (129, 130). For proteins where glycan function is dispensable, the heterologous expression of Endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidases (ENGases) (e.g., EndoH, EndoT) in K. phaffii can cleave the β-1,4-glycosidic bond of high-mannose or hybrid N-glycans, retaining only a single GlcNAc residue (131, 132).

In O-glycosylation, yeast engineering is mainly achieved by reducing specific O-glycan chains or realizing humanized O-glycan synthesis. In K. phaffii, knocking out the protein Mannosyltransferase 1 (PMT1) gene significantly reduces O-glycosylation of proinsulin precursors; further deletion of PMT2 can potentially shorten the glycan chain length, but cytotoxicity from multiple knockouts must be avoided (133, 134). Alternatively, PMT inhibitors, such as rhodanine-3-acetic acid, can be employed during the induction phase of protein expression (135). Reducing O-glycan chains can also be achieved by expressing specific mannosidases; for instance, expressing α-1,2-mannosidase in the Golgi apparatus can trim O-glycan chains to a monomannose structure. In vitro, complete removal of O-linked mannose can be accomplished using enzymes such as Jack Bean α-1,2/3,6-mannosidase or lysosomal mannosidases (136–138).

In K. phaffii, humanized O-glycosylation engineering primarily targets two major types: mucin-type and α-dystroglycan-type O-glycans. In the mucin-type pathway, protein O-mannosyltransferases (the heterodimeric PMT1/PMT2 or homodimeric PMT4) catalyze the transfer of a Man residue from the dolichol-phosphate-mannose (Dol-P-Man) donor to Ser/Thr residues of target proteins via an α1-O-glycosidic linkage, forming Manα1-O-Ser/Thr. This initial structure is subsequently elongated in the Golgi apparatus by α-1,2-mannosyltransferases (Ktr1/Kre2) and α-1,3-mannosyltransferases, resulting in oligomannose chains (Man2–9) containing 2–9 mannose residues. These chains can be targeted by mannose-binding proteins, such as the macrophage mannose receptor (MR), dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing non-integrin (DC-SIGN), and mannose-binding lectin (MBL). The α-dystroglycan-type O-glycosylation chain strategy is based on K. phaffii strains deficient in phosphorylated and β-mannose structures. By overexpressing the murine protein-O-linked-mannose β-1,2-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase I (PomGnT-I), galactosyltransferase (GalT), and sialyltransferase (SiaT), sialylated O-glycan chains are constructed, achieving a 61% humanization rate of O-glycans in a TNFR2:Fc fusion protein (136, 139).

The camelid variable domain of the heavy-chain-only (VHH) antibodies, as a new class of therapeutic proteins, has advantages such as small molecular size, strong antigen-binding specificity, and high stability. These give them broad application prospects in fields such as tumor-targeted therapy, viral neutralization, and cell-targeted delivery. However, in their natural state, VHH antibodies have very few glycosylation sites, and most of these are located in the antigen-binding complementarity-determining regions (CDRs), which can easily affect antigen binding. By screening potential glycosylation sites (e.g., Q14N-P15A-G16T, G27N-P30T) in the VHH antibody framework regions (non-CDR areas) and expressing the antibodies in the K. phaffii GlycoSwitchM5 strain, homogeneous N-glycosylated products mainly composed of Man5GlcNAc2 were obtained. The site-specific glycosylation occupancy rate reached 71%–96%. Moreover, the modified VHH antibodies still maintained nanomolar antigen-binding affinity and also achieved glycan-dependent targeted uptake by macrophages (140).

The anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 antibody (anti-HER2 antibody) is a first-line therapeutic drug for treating HER2-positive breast cancer and gastric cancer. However, the native O-mannosylation in K. phaffii can lead to increased antibody immunogenicity and protein degradation. Moreover, existing glycosylation engineering efforts have mostly focused on N-glycosylation and lack strains that simultaneously optimize both N- and O-glycosylation. Starting from the low-mannose N-glycosylation-engineered strain GJK01, further knockout of PMT1 resulted in the construction of the dual-optimized strain GJK11-HL (ΔOCH1, ΔPMT1). This reduced the O-mannose content on the antibody from 14 to 5 sites per molecule, decreased the heavy chain degradation bands by 65%, increased expression yield by 24%, and did not cause growth defects (141).

The tetanus toxin fragment C (TetC) is a non-toxic fragment derived from Clostridium tetani and consists of 451 amino acids. It serves as the core subunit of the tetanus toxoid vaccine. Its secretion efficiency and stability are jointly influenced by the number and location of N-glycosylation sites. Five natural N-glycosylation sites on TetC were predicted using the NetNGlyc 1.0 Server. Eight mutants were constructed via site-directed mutagenesis. It was found that the 4Gly mutant, in which the natural site N280Q was deleted while the other four natural sites were retained, exhibited the highest secretion yield. Conversely, glycoengineering that introduced a new N-glycosylation site at position 320 further inhibited secretion (142).

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) engineering

Although K. phaffii has become one of the preferred eukaryotic systems for recombinant protein expression, its high-yield capability is still limited by multiple non-glycosylation factors. The ER, as the primary site for protein synthesis and subsequent folding, often experiences ER stress upon high-level expression of heterologous GlycoVHH—optimal sites for introducing N-glycans on the camelid VHH antibody scaffold and for macrophage delivery—leading to misfolding, aggregation, or degradation. To alleviate this limitation, strategies such as co-expression of molecular chaperones (e.g., the ER-resident Hsp70 family protein KAR2P) and regulation of the unfolded protein response (UPR) pathway (e.g., overexpression of the key transcription factor HAC1p) have been widely adopted, significantly improving secretion efficiency and protein integrity (143, 144).

Recombinant proteins produced commercially in K. phaffii are widely used in biopharmaceuticals and diagnostic reagents. However, the secretion titer of such proteins can vary by tens to hundreds of times, and high-level expression is often limited by a translocation bottleneck. The use of strong promoters or high-copy expression leads to a synthesis rate of nascent polypeptide chains that exceeds the capacity of the post-translational translocation channel, causing polypeptide aggregation and UPR activation. Approximately 60% of the product is degraded via the endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD) pathway, and merely increasing gene copy number can actually reduce the secretion rate. By replacing the MFα signal peptide with co-translational signal peptides such as OST1 and YAP3 to reduce intracellular retention, and by co-expressing components of the SRP/Sec61 complex (e.g., SRP54P and SEC61P), the secretion yield of Fab can be increased 1.5- to 3-fold. Concurrently, reducing gene copy number or using a weaker promoter can decrease the translocation burden (144).

On this basis, by employing push-pull strategies on both the cytoplasmic and ER sides, along with the coordinated regulation of factors participating in the ER Hsp70 chaperone cycle, the translocation, folding, and secretion of recombinant proteins during the translocation step can be increased. This resulted in secretion levels of antigen-binding fragments (Fab) and single-chain variable fragments (scFv) exceeding 1.3 g/L, representing a 5-fold increase compared to the original levels (145).

Recombinant human hyaluronidase PH-20 (rhPH-20) is widely used in pharmaceutical, food, and cosmetic applications. However, extraction from animal sources poses safety risks, and its complex N-glycosylation pattern relies on the eukaryotic post-translational modification system of K. phaffii to maintain activity. Yet, expression in K. phaffii faces issues such as extremely low yield, a high misfolding rate due to hyperglycosylation, and protein intracellular aggregation, and oxidative stress triggered by the traditional MFα signal peptide-mediated post-translational translocation. By constructing an OST1-PROΑ hybrid signal peptide to switch the translocation mode to co-translational, overexpressing the core subunit of the signal recognition particle (SRP) to broaden the translocation pathway, and co-overexpressing SCHAC1P to alleviate ER stress and oxidative damage, a high expression level of 19.8 U/mL was finally achieved in a 5 L fed-batch fermentation (146).

The humanization of N-glycan structures on glycoproteins also relies on translocation and processing within the ER. Truncation of the LLO leads to the absence of glucose residues, which impairs the protein folding quality control mechanism that depends on them. The exposed α1-6-linked mannose is easily recognized by Yos9p, triggering erroneous ERAD. Moreover, a decrease in glycosylation site occupancy exacerbates the aggregation of unglycosylated peptide segments. Introducing a co-translational signal peptide can accelerate the entry of nascent peptides into the ER to reduce aggregation. Overexpressing a single-subunit oligosaccharyltransferase (OST) or ALG6 can improve glycosylation efficiency. Knocking out HRD1 or YOS9 can block the erroneous ERAD pathway. Ultimately, this achieves a balance between glycan humanization and high secretion efficiency (147).

Examples of recombinant proteins

Nutrients

Soy leghemoglobin (LegH) serves not only as a colorant and flavoring ingredient in food products but also as an iron provider for the body, holding considerable application potential in plant-based meat analogs and nutraceuticals. The core challenge in its heterologous expression lies in the need to simultaneously achieve high secretion titers and high heme incorporation rates. Furthermore, the relatively low genomic integration efficiency in K. phaffii often leads to unstable expression of the target gene. Recently, researchers have engineered K. phaffii strains capable of high-level expression of LegH through a series of engineering efforts. By integrating the LEGH gene into K. phaffii, increasing the gene copy number, overexpressing all gene combinations of the heme biosynthesis pathway—including HEM1–4 and HEM12–15—under the regulation of the PAOX1, and supplementing the KU70 gene, the highest reported secretion level of leghemoglobin was achieved in fed-batch high-cell-density fermentation. The LegH titer reached 3.5 g/L, with a heme-binding rate of 93% (148).

Drug

Diosgenin, a plant-originated secondary metabolite, is extensively employed as a precursor for steroidal drug synthesis within the pharmaceutical industry (149). In contrast to the traditional method of producing diosgenin through acid hydrolysis, the recombinant β-glucosidase FBG1 expressed in K. phaffii can efficiently biotransform trillin (diosgenin glucoside) into diosgenin. This recombinant enzyme is characterized by high purity and stability, the absence of environmental pollution, and low cost, offering potential advantages in sustainable production and environmental protection (150). The primary challenges in applying this enzyme stem from its extremely low yield from natural sources and issues such as imbalanced metabolic flux distribution during heterologous expression in K. phaffii, which readily restrict efficient secretion. Heterologous expression of the FBG1 gene from Fusarium sp. CPCC 400709 in K. phaffii GS115, combined with the development of a co-stat fed-batch high-cell-density fermentation strategy combining constant exponential feeding rate (μ-stat) and constant methanol concentration (m-stat), significantly enhanced the high-level expression of recombinant FBG1. The maximum volumetric activity reached 89 × 10⁴ U/L, and the maximum specific activity was 90 × 10² U/g (151).

Interferon α2b (IFNα2b) is a cytokine that specifically interacts with the IFN α/β receptor, activating the JAK-STAT signaling pathway and inducing biological functions such as immune modulation, antiproliferation, and antiviral activity. It is vital to the treatment of viral infections (152), human immunodeficiency diseases (153), various cancers (154), and COVID-19 (155). Traditional fermentation processes are prone to host metabolic imbalance due to fluctuating methanol concentrations, and real-time monitoring of critical parameters is challenging. Currently, recombinant human interferon α2b (huIFNα2b) expressed in K. phaffii was produced using a model-based adaptive proportional-integral (PI) control framework. The framework utilizes a fermentation calorimeter, a CO₂ gas analyzer, and a methanol sensor to monitor the residual methanol concentration in the culture medium in real-time. By employing a fed-batch fermentation process, the methanol concentration was dynamically regulated to optimize huIFNα2b production. This resulted in optimal huIFNα2b production at a methanol concentration of 3 g/L, with a maximum titer of 244.34 mg/L and a maximum productivity of 0.31 mg/g·h (156).

Other

Agricultural residues such as rapeseed straw and corn stover are rich in cellulose and lignin. However, due to the complex physicochemical structures of cellulose and lignin, ruminants have difficulty efficiently digesting and absorbing the nutrients contained in these materials. Therefore, the efficient degradation of these components is a core step for achieving the valorization of agricultural residues. Recombinant laccase (LeLac), a key functional enzyme involved in lignin degradation, offers advantages such as mild reaction conditions and the absence of secondary pollution, making it well aligned with the development trends in sustainable manufacturing. However, native laccases generally exhibit low degradation efficiency toward complex lignin substrates and poor stability, which limits their suitability for large-scale applications. Heterologous expression of LeLac from Lentinula edodes in K. phaffii can cleave bonds in lignin substrates within rapeseed straw, providing sustainable potential for bioenergy and waste utilization in agriculture (157). For example, expression of the Pleurotus ostreatus laccase gene LAC-2 in the K. phaffii strain X-33 resulted in a LeLac with an 18.36% degradation rate of lignin in corn stover (158). As another example, optimization and integration of the laccase gene LAC-1 from Coriolopsis trogii strain Mafic-2001 into K. phaffii strain X-33, combined with process optimization, yielded a recombinant laccase with lignin degradation rates of 24.43%, 50.24%, and 55.49% for palm kernel cake matrix, rice straw, and corn stover, respectively (159).

Small-molecule production

Regulating synthetic pathways

Regulating the biosynthetic pathways of K. phaffii is one of the primary methods for synthesizing various small molecules. Isobutanol represents a promising advanced biofuel and versatile platform chemical. It offers distinct advantages over conventional ethanol, including superior energy density, reduced hygroscopicity, and direct compatibility with existing fuel infrastructure, as well as its utility as a precursor for synthesizing diverse high-value chemicals (160). However, in the natural metabolic pathway of K. phaffii, the intermediate 2-ketoisovalerate is more inclined to flow toward inherent amino acid synthesis, leading to low efficiency in diverting flux to the 2-keto acid degradation (Ehrlich) pathway. Moreover, optimizing a single pathway alone easily causes metabolic imbalance (161). Overexpressing genes in the Ehrlich pathway that add the intermediate 2-ketoisovalerate (KIV), along with upregulating a fraction of the L-valine biosynthesis pathway, can further increase isobutanol production (102, 162).

Furthermore, overexpression of an alcohol O-alkyltransferase with a wide substrate range results in the synthesis of isobutanol and various higher branched-chain alcohol acetates. Isobutyl acetate possesses a fresh, fruity aroma, serving as a key ingredient in the food, cosmetic, and fragrance industries, and is also utilized as an industrial solvent (163). However, conventional strategies involving the integrated expression of alcohol O-acyltransferases often suffer from low catalytic efficiency. Isobutyl acetate possesses a fresh, fruity aroma, serving as a key ingredient in the food, cosmetic, and fragrance industries, and is also utilized as an industrial solvent. However, conventional strategies involving the integrated expression of alcohol O-acyltransferases often suffer from low catalytic efficiency. Among these, isomeric expression of an alcohol O-acyltransferase increased isobutyl acetate production 9-fold compared to the integrative expression (164).

Geraniol, a high-value monoterpenoid compound, finds extensive applications in flavors and fragrances, pharmaceuticals, and agrochemicals, representing significant economic potential (165). However, the heterologous synthesis of geraniol in K. phaffii faces issues such as significant differences in the compatibility of heterologous enzymes across different intracellular compartments (peroxisomes and cytoplasm) and enzyme activity being easily affected by the intracellular microenvironment. Overexpressing the genes (ScERG10, ScERG13, ScERG12, ScERG8, and ScERG19) encoding the remaining enzymes of the MVA pathway from S. cerevisiae in K. phaffii strains GERC8 and GERP8 to elevate the metabolic flux of the geraniol biosynthesis pathway led to a 2.2-fold and 3.0-fold increase for geraniol synthesis in the peroxisomes and cytoplasm, respectively (166).

Renewable substrates

Within the green biomanufacturing platform of K. phaffii for small-molecule production, commonly used renewable substrates include xylose derived from lignocellulosic biomass and CO₂. Sugarcane bagasse is a xylose-rich, economical, and renewable substrate with various sources, but K. phaffii has a limited capacity for assimilating natural xylose. Studies indicate that fermentation by K. phaffii at an optimized glucose-to-xylose ratio of 10% led to a xylitol titer of 86.6 g/L with a conversion rate of 0.75 g/g (167). A heterologous xylose isomerase pathway was introduced into the K. phaffii strain GS115 by overexpressing either the xylose isomerase gene from Orpinomyces spp. or an endogenous glucokinase gene. After 50 generations of continuous culture, this resulted in a recombinant K. phaffii strain with high xylose assimilation capacity and a cell yield nearly 2-fold higher than the starting strain GS115 (168). Furthermore, a metabolic pathway for producing ethylene glycol (EG) from xylose has been constructed in K. phaffii. EG is used to manufacture plastic polymers and serves as an antifreeze, hydraulic oil, and surfactant. However, issues such as metabolic pathway deviation and low xylose utilization efficiency exist. By introducing a novel xylonate dehydratase (xylD-HL), EG production was increased by 30%. Further, by heterologously expressing glyoxylate reductase (ALDR) and adjusting the initial glucose-to-xylose ratio to 50%, the maximum EG titer reached 1.31 g/L (169). Furthermore, xylose can also be utilized for the production of itaconate (2-methylidenebutanedioic acid), which finds extensive applications in the synthesis of resins, fibers, detergents, and bioactive compounds (170). Codon optimization of an overexpressed heterologous cis-aconitate decarboxylase can enhance itaconic acid production from xylose, with the engineered high-producing recombinant strain achieving a titer 28-fold higher than the starting strain (171).

Itaconate production can also be rendered autotrophic by incorporating a CO₂ fixation pathway. An alternative strategy involves the heterologous expression of the CADA gene from Aspergillus terreus and the reconstruction of the Calvin-Benson-Bassham (CBB) cycle. An autotrophic K. phaffii strain capable of using CO2 as the sole carbon source to produce itaconic acid was obtained. Further optimization of process conditions by balancing the co-expression of cis-aconitate decarboxylase (cadA) and the mitochondrial tricarboxylate transporter (mttA) resulted in an autotrophic K. phaffii strain with an itaconic acid yield of 2 g/L (172).

Furthermore, CO₂ can be efficiently converted into methanol via a Chemo-Biological Cascade Conversion (CBCC) system for subsequent product synthesis. The CBCC system integrates a thermocatalytic CO₂-to-methanol process with microbial fermentation. In the thermocatalytic stage, CO₂ is converted to methanol on a large scale over a CuZnAlC catalyst in the presence of H₂, achieving a CO₂ conversion rate of 8.5% and a methanol selectivity of 79% (173). K. phaffii utilizes methanol as a carbon source for the production of high-value chemicals. However, the production of 3-HP in K. phaffii currently faces challenges such as insufficient yield, metabolic flux imbalance, and accumulation of toxic intermediates. To address these issues, the pyruvate carboxylase gene PYC2 was overexpressed to enhance precursor supply, the transporter genes ESBP6/JEN1 were co-expressed to facilitate 3-HP export, and the FDH1 gene was knocked out to reduce toxic intermediate formation. Coupled with strain optimization via CRISPR/Cas9, a titer of 27.0 g/L 3-HP was achieved in pH-controlled (pH 5) fed-batch cultivation, representing a 42% increase in concentration and over 20% improvement in productivity compared to the parental strain (174).

Examples of small molecules

Nutrients

Lycopene, a type of carotenoid, exhibits beneficial effects such as delaying cellular senescence and protecting cardiovascular health, and is extensively employed in the food, health supplement, and cosmetic fields. Conventional methods such as chemical synthesis or plant extraction suffer from drawbacks, including low product purity and high cost, making biosynthesis the preferred route for scalable production. However, this approach faces core challenges such as severe metabolic flux diversion and insufficient NADPH supply. By using and optimizing the CRISPR/Cpf1 system to knock out the DPP1 and LPP1 genes, which encode enzymes in competing pathways that produce farnesol, and by downregulating the ERG9 gene, lycopene production was increased. Additional genomic integration of one extra copy of each of CRTE, CRTB, and CRTI further enhanced lycopene production by creating more pathway variants. Overexpression of POS5 optimized NADPH supply in the energy metabolism pathway, providing sufficient metabolic flux for lycopene production. Transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses guided the overexpression of sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP; Sre), which upregulated the MVA pathway to regulate lipid metabolism and promote lipid synthesis. High-cell-density fermentation in a 5 L fermenter led to a lycopene titer of 7.24 g/L and a dry cell weight of 75.48 mg/g in K. phaffii. This represents the highest lycopene production reported in K. phaffii to date (175).

Drug

Cordycepin (3′-deoxyadenosine), a compound first isolated from the caterpillar fungus Cordyceps militaris in the early 1950s (176), exhibits antibacterial, antiviral (177), antioxidant (178), anti-inflammatory (179), and antitumor activities (180). The traditional method of extracting it from Ophiocordyceps sinensis has drawbacks, such as low yield, high cost, and high resource dependence, making biosynthesis an inevitable choice for its large-scale production. Codon-optimized cordycepin biosynthetic genes CNS1 and CNS2 from C. militaris L5111, placed under the management of the PAOX1 and PFLD1 and integrated into the K. phaffii GS115 genome, have been shown to enhance cordycepin expression. Specifically, through fermentation optimization and transcriptomic analysis targeting methanol assimilation, peroxisome biogenesis, purine metabolism, the PPP pathway, and β-alanine metabolism, cordycepin production was increased. This optimized design led to a cordycepin titer of 2.68 ± 0.04 g/L, with a productivity of approximately 15.95 mg/(L·h) (181). Zhao et al. further engineered a high-yield strain of K. phaffii for cordycepin production. They focused on enhancing methanol assimilation, upregulating cellular energy metabolism, and increasing the availability of precursors such as adenosine and 3′-AMP via genetic engineering and biosynthetic pathway optimization. These combined efforts yielded cordycepin titers of 1,551.44 mg/L in shake flasks and 8.11 g/L in a 10 L fermenter (182). This success underscores the potential of K. phaffii for the production of valuable plant-derived compounds.

CONCLUSIONS

K. phaffii has evolved into a core platform for heterologous proteins and small-molecule production in eukaryotic expression systems over the last 40 years, driven by its distinct capability to utilize the sustainable and renewable carbon source methanol. Through strategies such as metabolic flux analysis, precursor and energy supply enhancement, genome integration, key gene regulation, and dynamic metabolic control, its metabolic pathways have been systematically optimized to enhance its potential for industrial applications. Notably, in the realm of strain tool development, the advent of the openly accessible, royalty-free OPENPichia strain effectively breaks the commercial monopoly restrictions of traditional industrial strains. It provides a viable solution for the low-cost commercial production of heterologous proteins and small molecules in K. phaffii, thereby significantly enhancing the practical utility value of the strain (118).

To date, research advancement toward the metabolic engineering of K. phaffii has primarily relied on traditional genetic tools. The expeditious development of omics technologies and synthetic biology tools has also propelled K. phaffii metabolic engineering research. However, K. phaffii still faces some bottlenecks that hinder its ability to reach higher expression levels. Although the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing tool has seen some application in K. phaffii, the available molecular tools are relatively limited compared to other model organisms. More tools need to be developed to meet future research requirements, such as promoters, terminators, and dynamic regulation tools. Secondly, the advancement of comprehensive GEMs is an essential step for K. phaffii metabolic engineering. Obtaining the large data sets required for genome-scale metabolic models and combining them with mathematical models to predict potential key gene targets within metabolic pathways can more comprehensively optimize overall metabolic pathways and enhance the final yield of target proteins. Furthermore, artificial intelligence (AI) has played an increasingly significant role in metabolic engineering. Compared to conventional experimentation, AI can effectively reduce the cost and time associated with experimental trial-and-error, particularly in the design and construction of new biosynthetic pathways, high-efficiency strains, and self-dynamic regulation systems (183–185).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (2022YFD1300702), the Heilongjiang Province Science and Technology Innovation Base Award Program (JD24A004), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32472934 and 32502939), the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-35), and the Support Project of Young Leading Talents of Northeast Agricultural University (NEAU2023QNLJ-017).

Jiaoyu Xin: Writing–review and editing, Writing–original draft, Visualization, Investigation, Data curation, Conceptualization. Lu Zhao: Writing–review and editing, Conceptualization, Investigation. Youxin Meng: Conceptualization, Investigation. Ziye Tian: Conceptualization, Investigation. Kaikai Lv: Conceptualization, Investigation. Chenyu Xue: Writing–review and editing, Supervision, Project administration. Na Dong: Writing–review and editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition.

During the preparation of this work, the authors used ChatGPT in order to improve readability. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and taketook full responsibility for the content of the publication.

Biographies

graphic file with name aem.00110-26.f003.gif

Jiaoyu Xin is a master’s student at the College of Animal Science and Technology at Northeast Agricultural University. Her research focuses on bioengineering and microbial therapeutics, with a particular focus on microbial metabolic optimization. She aims to develop high-efficiency microbial cell factories for the production of heterologous proteins and small molecules, and to explore application strategies for engineered probiotics in anti-infective therapy. To date, she has published one peer-reviewed academic paper in the fields of biotechnology and biomedical engineering.

graphic file with name aem.00110-26.f004.gif

Lu Zhao is a PhD Candidate in the College of Animal Science and Technology at Northeast Agricultural University. She has been working on bioengineering, microbial therapeutics, etc., with a specific focus on bioengineered bacteria for in vivo drug delivery etc. Her research aims to develop targeted therapies using engineered microorganisms for Anti-infection and chronic diseases and, improve precision medicine approaches, etc. She has published 8 peer-reviewed papers in biotechnology, biomedical engineering.

graphic file with name aem.00110-26.f005.gif

Youxin Meng is a master’s student at the College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University. Her research interests lie in the fields of bioengineering and microbial therapeutics, with a particular focus on the application of engineered probiotics for the treatment of metabolic diseases.

graphic file with name aem.00110-26.f006.gif

Ziye Tian is a graduate student in the College of Animal Science and Technology at Northeast Agricultural University. The main research focuses on the creation and utilization of feed resources, including the production and expression of antimicrobial peptides.

graphic file with name aem.00110-26.f007.gif

Kaikai Lv is a graduate student in the College of Animal Science and Technology at Northeast Agricultural University. His work focuses on microbial fermentation and the structure-function relationships of small molecular proteins, with a particular interest in their heterologous production. He aims to develop targeted therapies for infectious and chronic diseases using engineered microorganisms. Kaikai has published three peer-reviewed papers in the fields of biotechnology and biomedical engineering.

graphic file with name aem.00110-26.f008.gif

Chenyu Xue is an Associate Professor in the College of Animal Science and Technology at Northeast Agricultural University, where he received his Ph.D. degree. His research interests include bioengineering and microbial therapeutics, with a particular focus on immune regulatory mechanisms in disease treatment. He has published 13 peer-reviewed papers in journals including Trends in Immunology and Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins. His research has been supported by programs such as the National Natural Science Foundation of China for Young Scientists.

graphic file with name aem.00110-26.f009.gif

Na Dong is a Professor in the College of Animal Science and Technology at Northeast Agricultural University. She earned her Degree., Ph.D from Northeast Agricultural University. She specializes in bioengineering, microbial therapeutics, etc., particularly focusing on biological material for targeted in vivo drug delivery, immune modulation in disease treatment, etc. She has published 90 peer-reviewed articles in journals such as Biotechnology Advances, ACS Nano, Biomaterials, Acta Biomaterialia, and her work has been supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of the 14th Five-Year Plan, the key support project of the Regional Innovation and Development Joint Fund, and other National Natural Science Foundation of China, etc.

Contributor Information

Chenyu Xue, Email: cyxue@neau.edu.cn.

Na Dong, Email: ndong@neau.edu.cn.

Edward G. Dudley, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA

DATA AVAILABILITY

No data were used for the research described in the article.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Guilliermond A. 1920. Zygosaccharomyces pastori, nouvelle espèce de levures à copulation hétérogamique. Société mycologique de France. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Phaff HJ, Miller MW, Shifrine M. 1956. The taxonomy of yeasts isolated from Drosophila in the yosemite region of california. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 22:145–161. doi: 10.1007/BF02538322 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kurtzman CP. 2005. Description of Komagataella phaffii sp. nov. and the transfer of Pichia pseudopastoris to the methylotrophic yeast genus Komagataella. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:973–976. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63491-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Yamada Y, Matsuda M, Maeda K, Mikata K. 1995. The phylogenetic relationships of methanol-assimilating yeasts based on the partial sequences of 18S and 26S ribosomal RNAs: the proposal of Komagataella gen. nov. (Saccharomycetaceae). Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 59:439–444. doi: 10.1271/bbb.59.439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Higgins DR, Cregg JM. 1998. Introduction to Pichia pastoris. Methods Mol Biol 103:1–15. doi: 10.1385/0-89603-421-6:1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Rahmat E, Kang Y. 2020. Yeast metabolic engineering for the production of pharmaceutically important secondary metabolites. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104:4659–4674. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10587-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Gong Z, Chen J, Jiao X, Gong H, Pan D, Liu L, Zhang Y, Tan T. 2024. Genome-scale metabolic network models for industrial microorganisms metabolic engineering: current advances and future prospects. Biotechnol Adv 72:108319. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2024.108319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Shi S, Chen Y, Nielsen J. 2025. Metabolic engineering of yeast. Annu Rev Biophys 54:101–120. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-070924-103134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Gao J, Jiang L, Lian J. 2021. Development of synthetic biology tools to engineer Pichia pastoris as a chassis for the production of natural products. Synth Syst Biotechnol 6:110–119. doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2021.04.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Bao Z, HamediRad M, Xue P, Xiao H, Tasan I, Chao R, Liang J, Zhao H. 2018. Genome-scale engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with single-nucleotide precision. Nat Biotechnol 36:505–508. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Zha J, Liu D, Ren J, Liu Z, Wu X. 2023. Advances in metabolic engineering of Pichia pastoris strains as powerful cell factories. J Fungi (Basel) 9:1027. doi: 10.3390/jof9101027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Eskandari A, Nezhad NG, Leow TC, Rahman MBA, Oslan SN. 2023. Current achievements, strategies, obstacles, and overcoming the challenges of the protein engineering in Pichia pastoris expression system. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 40:39. doi: 10.1007/s11274-023-03851-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Peña DA, Gasser B, Zanghellini J, Steiger MG, Mattanovich D. 2018. Metabolic engineering of Pichia pastoris. Metab Eng 50:2–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2018.04.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Baeshen NA, Baeshen MN, Sheikh A, Bora RS, Ahmed MMM, Ramadan HAI, Saini KS, Redwan EM. 2014. Cell factories for insulin production. Microb Cell Fact 13:141. doi: 10.1186/s12934-014-0141-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Mital S, Christie G, Dikicioglu D. 2021. Recombinant expression of insoluble enzymes in Escherichia coli: a systematic review of experimental design and its manufacturing implications. Microb Cell Fact 20:208. doi: 10.1186/s12934-021-01698-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Baghban R, Farajnia S, Rajabibazl M, Ghasemi Y, Mafi A, Hoseinpoor R, Rahbarnia L, Aria M. 2019. Yeast expression systems: overview and recent advances. Mol Biotechnol 61:365–384. doi: 10.1007/s12033-019-00164-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Parashar D, Satyanarayana T. 2016. Enhancing the production of recombinant acidic α-amylase and phytase in Pichia pastoris under dual promoters [constitutive (GAP) and inducible (AOX)] in mixed fed batch high cell density cultivation. Process Biochem 51:1315–1322. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2016.07.027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Karbalaei M, Rezaee SA, Farsiani H. 2020. Pichia pastoris: a highly successful expression system for optimal synthesis of heterologous proteins. J Cell Physiol 235:5867–5881. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Schwarzhans J-P, Luttermann T, Geier M, Kalinowski J, Friehs K. 2017. Towards systems metabolic engineering in Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol Adv 35:681–710. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Palma A, Rettenbacher LA, Moilanen A, Saaranen M, Pacheco-Martinez C, Gasser B, Ruddock L. 2023. Biochemical analysis of Komagataella phaffii oxidative folding proposes novel regulatory mechanisms of disulfide bond formation in yeast. Sci Rep 13:14298. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41375-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. De Wachter C, Van Landuyt L, Callewaert N. 2021. Engineering of yeast glycoprotein expression. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 175:93–135. doi: 10.1007/10_2018_69 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Dai H, Zhang C, Wu J, Tang Q, Xie Y, Yu Y, Lin Y, Huang Y. 2024. Optimizing Pichia pastoris protein secretion: role of N-linked glycosylation on the α-mating factor secretion signal leader. J Biotechnol 391:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2024.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Cregg JM, Barringer KJ, Hessler AY, Madden KR. 1985. Pichia pastoris as a host system for transformations. Mol Cell Biol 5:3376–3385. doi: 10.1128/mcb.5.12.3376-3385.1985 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Huang Y, Lin T, Lu L, Cai F, Lin J, Jiang YE, Lin Y. 2021. Codon pair optimization (CPO): a software tool for synthetic gene design based on codon pair bias to improve the expression of recombinant proteins in Pichia pastoris. Microb Cell Fact 20:209. doi: 10.1186/s12934-021-01696-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Liang J, He S, Sun J, Bao H, Cui L. 2024. Secretory production and characterization of a highly effective chitosanase from Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) M145 in Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol J 19:e2300402. doi: 10.1002/biot.202300402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Kang Z, Huang H, Zhang Y, Du G, Chen J. 2017. Recent advances of molecular toolbox construction expand Pichia pastoris in synthetic biology applications. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 33:19. doi: 10.1007/s11274-016-2185-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Li J, Shao Q, Xiang Y, Li J, Chen J, Du G, Kang Z, Wang Y. 2024. High-activity recombinant human carboxypeptidase B expression in Pichia pastoris through rational protein engineering and enhancing secretion from the Golgi apparatus to the plasma membrane. Biotechnol J 19:e2400098. doi: 10.1002/biot.202400098 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Weis R. 2019. High-throughput screening and selection of Pichia pastoris strains. Methods Mol Biol 1923:169–185. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9024-5_7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Zheng X, Fang B, Han D, Yang W, Qi F, Chen H, Li S. 2016. Improving the secretory expression of an α-galactosidase from Aspergillus niger in Pichia pastoris. PLoS One 11:e0161529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161529 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Rong W, Wang X, Shi Z, Liu L, Zhang Z, Fang Y, Sun J, Lin L, Wang G. 2025. Systematic engineering of Komagataella phaffii for efficient production of sweet-tasting protein brazzein. Biotechnol J 20:e70046. doi: 10.1002/biot.70046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Bankefa OE, Wang M, Zhu T, Li Y. 2018. Enhancing the secretion pathway maximizes the effects of mixed feeding strategy for glucose oxidase production in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. Bioresour Bioprocess 5:25. doi: 10.1186/s40643-018-0211-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Lieber MR. 2010. The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. Annu Rev Biochem 79:181–211. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.093131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Scully R, Panday A, Elango R, Willis NA. 2019. DNA double-strand break repair-pathway choice in somatic mammalian cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 20:698–714. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0152-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Bai F, Cai P, Yao L, Shen Y, Li Y, Zhou YJ. 2025. Inducible regulating homologous recombination enables precise genome editing in Pichia pastoris without perturbing cellular fitness. Trends Biotechnol 43:1385–1402. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2025.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Näätsaari L, Mistlberger B, Ruth C, Hajek T, Hartner FS, Glieder A. 2012. Deletion of the Pichia pastoris KU70 homologue facilitates platform strain generation for gene expression and synthetic biology. PLoS One 7:e39720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. García-Calvo L, Kummen C, Rustad S, Rønning SB, Fagerlund A. 2025. A toolkit for facilitating markerless integration of expression cassettes in Komagataella phaffii via CRISPR/Cas9. Microb Cell Fact 24:97. doi: 10.1186/s12934-025-02716-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Gu Y, Gao J, Cao M, Dong C, Lian J, Huang L, Cai J, Xu Z. 2019. Construction of a series of episomal plasmids and their application in the development of an efficient CRISPR/Cas9 system in Pichia pastoris. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 35:79. doi: 10.1007/s11274-019-2654-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Yang Y, Liu G, Chen X, Liu M, Zhan C, Liu X, Bai Z. 2020. High efficiency CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system with an eliminable episomal sgRNA plasmid in Pichia pastoris. Enzyme Microb Technol 138:109556. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2020.109556 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Gao J, Ye C, Cheng J, Jiang L, Yuan X, Lian J. 2022. Enhancing homologous recombination efficiency in Pichia pastoris for multiplex genome integration using short homology arms. ACS Synth Biol 11:547–553. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.1c00366 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Wu L-Y, Xu Y, Yu X-W. 2024. Efficient CRISPR-mediated C-to-T base editing in Komagataella phaffii. Biotechnol J 19:e2400115. doi: 10.1002/biot.202400115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Ruan S, Wang A, Zou H, Lin Y, Ye L, Liang S. 2025. Synthetic genetic circuits enabled in Komagataella phaffii through T7 RNAP/CRISPRa system. Biotechnol J 20:e70036. doi: 10.1002/biot.70036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. De Schutter K, Lin Y-C, Tiels P, Van Hecke A, Glinka S, Weber-Lehmann J, Rouzé P, Van de Peer Y, Callewaert N. 2009. Genome sequence of the recombinant protein production host Pichia pastoris. Nat Biotechnol 27:561–566. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Küberl A, Schneider J, Thallinger GG, Anderl I, Wibberg D, Hajek T, Jaenicke S, Brinkrolf K, Goesmann A, Szczepanowski R, Pühler A, Schwab H, Glieder A, Pichler H. 2011. High-quality genome sequence of Pichia pastoris CBS7435. J Biotechnol 154:312–320. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.04.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Mattanovich D, Callewaert N, Rouzé P, Lin Y-C, Graf A, Redl A, Tiels P, Gasser B, De Schutter K. 2009. Open access to sequence: browsing the Pichia pastoris genome. Microb Cell Fact 8:53. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-8-53 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Liang S, Wang B, Pan L, Ye Y, He M, Han S, Zheng S, Wang X, Lin Y. 2012. Comprehensive structural annotation of Pichia pastoris transcriptome and the response to various carbon sources using deep paired-end RNA sequencing. BMC Genomics 13:738. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Austin RJ, Kuestner RE, Chang DK, Madden KR, Martin DB. 2011. SILAC compatible strain of Pichia pastoris for expression of isotopically labeled protein standards and quantitative proteomics. J Proteome Res 10:5251–5259. doi: 10.1021/pr200551e [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Carnicer M, Ten Pierick A, van Dam J, Heijnen JJ, Albiol J, van Gulik W, Ferrer P. 2012. Quantitative metabolomics analysis of amino acid metabolism in recombinant Pichia pastoris under different oxygen availability conditions. Microb Cell Fact 11:83. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-11-83 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Baghban R, Farajnia S, Ghasemi Y, Mortazavi M, Zarghami N, Samadi N. 2018. New developments in Pichia pastoris expression system, review and update. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 19:451–467. doi: 10.2174/1389201019666180718093037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Tomàs-Gamisans M, Ferrer P, Albiol J. 2016. Integration and validation of the genome-scale metabolic models of Pichia pastoris: a comprehensive update of protein glycosylation pathways, lipid and energy metabolism. PLoS One 11:e0148031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Sun C, Ye C, Li X, Xu J, Yu H, Gao J, Guan C, Cheng J. 2026. Construction and analysis of a cell factory for terpenoid biosynthesis in Pichia pastoris via metabolic engineering and metabolomics. Synth Syst Biotechnol 11:68–75. doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2025.08.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Zhang C, Ma Y, Miao H, Tang X, Xu B, Wu Q, Mu Y, Huang Z. 2020. Transcriptomic analysis of Pichia pastoris (Komagataella phaffii) GS115 during heterologous protein production using a high-cell-density fed-batch cultivation strategy. Front Microbiol 11. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Incze DJ, Poppe L, Bata Z. 2023. Optimization workflow of fumonisin esterase production for biocatalytic degradation of fumonisin B1. Life (Basel) 13:1885. doi: 10.3390/life13091885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Fina A, Brêda GC, Pérez-Trujillo M, Freire DMG, Almeida RV, Albiol J, Ferrer P. 2021. Benchmarking recombinant Pichia pastoris for 3-hydroxypropionic acid production from glycerol. Microb Biotechnol 14:1671–1682. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. de Lima PBA, Mulder KCL, Melo NTM, Carvalho LS, Menino GS, Mulinari E, de Castro VH, Dos Reis TF, Goldman GH, Magalhães BS, Parachin NS. 2016. Novel homologous lactate transporter improves l-lactic acid production from glycerol in recombinant strains of Pichia pastoris. Microb Cell Fact 15:158. doi: 10.1186/s12934-016-0557-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Gao L, Zhang K, Shen Y, Cai P, Zhou YJ. 2024. Engineering a versatile yeast platform for sesquiterpene production from glucose or methanol. Biotechnol J 19:e2400261. doi: 10.1002/biot.202400261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Rußmayer H, Buchetics M, Gruber C, Valli M, Grillitsch K, Modarres G, Guerrasio R, Klavins K, Neubauer S, Drexler H, Steiger M, Troyer C, Al Chalabi A, Krebiehl G, Sonntag D, Zellnig G, Daum G, Graf AB, Altmann F, Koellensperger G, Hann S, Sauer M, Mattanovich D, Gasser B. 2015. Systems-level organization of yeast methylotrophic lifestyle. BMC Biol 13:80. doi: 10.1186/s12915-015-0186-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Feng A, Liu T, Cong W, Zhou H, Zhang J. 2025. Enhanced recombinant xylanase B expression in Komagataella phaffii through metabolic engineering of methanol utilization. Arch Microbiol 207:135. doi: 10.1007/s00203-025-04333-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Guo F, Dai Z, Peng W, Zhang S, Zhou J, Ma J, Dong W, Xin F, Zhang W, Jiang M. 2021. Metabolic engineering of Pichia pastoris for malic acid production from methanol. Biotechnol Bioeng 118:357–371. doi: 10.1002/bit.27575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Yu Y, Yang J, Zhao F, Lin Y, Han S. 2022. Comparative transcriptome and metabolome analyses reveal the methanol dissimilation pathway of Pichia pastoris. BMC Genomics 23:366. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08592-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Berrios J, Theron CW, Steels S, Ponce B, Velastegui E, Bustos C, Altamirano C, Fickers P. 2022. Role of dissimilative pathway of Komagataella phaffii (Pichia pastoris): formaldehyde toxicity and energy metabolism. Microorganisms 10:1466. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10071466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Xu J-Z, Chen S-L, Niu S-Q. 2023. Systematic modulating carbon metabolism to improve α-farnesene production in Pichia pastoris. Fuel Process Technol 247:107757. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2023.107757 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Nagasu T, Hall BD. 1985. Nucleotide sequence of the GDH gene coding for the NADP-specific glutamate dehydrogenase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 37:247–253. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(85)90279-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Mitchell AP, Magasanik B. 1984. Biochemical and physiological aspects of glutamine synthetase inactivation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 259:12054–12062. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(20)71319-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Mitchell AP, Magasanik B. 1983. Purification and properties of glutamine synthetase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 258:119–124. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)33228-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Newman A. 1994. The molecular and cellular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces Vol. 2: gene expression: edited by Elizabeth W. Jones, John R. Pringle and James R. Broach, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1993. (792 pages) cbk $97.00 ISBN 0 87969 357 6 pbk $65.00 ISBN 0 87969 365 7. Trends Cell Biol 4:70–71. doi: 10.1016/0962-8924(94)90020-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Lampitt LH. 1919. Nitrogen metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem J 13:459–486. doi: 10.1042/bj0130459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Meng J, Liu S, Gao L, Hong K, Liu S, Wu X. 2023. Economical production of Pichia pastoris single cell protein from methanol at industrial pilot scale. Microb Cell Fact 22:198. doi: 10.1186/s12934-023-02198-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Liu P, Huang M, Guo M, Qian J, Lin W, Chu J, Zhuang Y, Zhang S. 2016. Combined 13C-assisted metabolomics and metabolic flux analysis reveals the impacts of glutamate on the central metabolism of high β-galactosidase-producing Pichia pastoris. Bioresour Bioprocess 3:47. doi: 10.1186/s40643-016-0124-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Rußmayer H, Buchetics M, Mattanovich M, Neubauer S, Steiger M, Graf AB, Koellensperger G, Hann S, Sauer M, Gasser B, Mattanovich D. 2023. Customizing amino acid metabolism of Pichia pastoris for recombinant protein production. Biotechnol J 18:2300033. doi: 10.1002/biot.202300033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Dey T, Rangarajan PN. 2022. Posttranscriptional regulation of glutamate dehydrogenase 2 and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase in Komagataella phaffii. Yeast 39:337–347. doi: 10.1002/yea.3704 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Rajak N, Dey T, Sharma Y, Bellad V, Rangarajan PN. 2024. Unlocking Nature’s Toolbox: glutamate-inducible recombinant protein production from the Komagatella phaffii PEPCK promoter. Microb Cell Fact 23:66. doi: 10.1186/s12934-024-02340-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Cooper TG, Sumrada RA. 1983. What is the function of nitrogen catabolite repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae? J Bacteriol 155:623–627. doi: 10.1128/jb.155.2.623-627.1983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. ter Schure EG, van Riel NA, Verrips CT. 2000. The role of ammonia metabolism in nitrogen catabolite repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev 24:67–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00533.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Nair A, Sarma SJ. 2021. The impact of carbon and nitrogen catabolite repression in microorganisms. Microbiol Res 251:126831. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2021.126831 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Zhao X, Zou H, Chen J, Du G, Zhou J. 2016. The modification of Gat1p in nitrogen catabolite repression to enhance non-preferred nitrogen utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Sci Rep 6:21603. doi: 10.1038/srep21603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Yu R, Campbell K, Pereira R, Björkeroth J, Qi Q, Vorontsov E, Sihlbom C, Nielsen J. 2020. Nitrogen limitation reveals large reserves in metabolic and translational capacities of yeast. Nat Commun 11:1881. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15749-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Jordà J, Rojas HC, Carnicer M, Wahl A, Ferrer P, Albiol J. 2014. Quantitative metabolomics and instationary 13C-metabolic flux analysis reveals impact of recombinant protein production on trehalose and energy metabolism in Pichia pastoris. Metabolites 4:281–299. doi: 10.3390/metabo4020281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Wu G, Yan Q, Jones JA, Tang YJ, Fong SS, Koffas MAG. 2016. Metabolic burden: cornerstones in synthetic biology and metabolic engineering applications. Trends Biotechnol 34:652–664. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Jia L, Tu T, Huai Q, Sun J, Chen S, Li X, Shi Z, Ding J. 2017. Enhancing monellin production by Pichia pastoris at low cell induction concentration via effectively regulating methanol metabolism patterns and energy utilization efficiency. PLoS One 12:e0184602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Ding N, Yuan Z, Sun L, Yin L. 2024. Dynamic and static regulation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate: strategies, challenges, and future directions in metabolic engineering. Molecules 29:3687. doi: 10.3390/molecules29153687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Moon SJ, Dong W, Stephanopoulos GN, Sikes HD. 2020. Oxidative pentose phosphate pathway and glucose anaplerosis support maintenance of mitochondrial NADPH pool under mitochondrial oxidative stress. Bioeng Transl Med 5:e10184. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Nocon J, Steiger M, Mairinger T, Hohlweg J, Rußmayer H, Hann S, Gasser B, Mattanovich D. 2016. Increasing pentose phosphate pathway flux enhances recombinant protein production in Pichia pastoris. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:5955–5963. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7363-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Tomàs-Gamisans M, Andrade CCP, Maresca F, Monforte S, Ferrer P, Albiol J. 2020. Redox engineering by ectopic overexpression of NADH kinase in recombinant Pichia pastoris (Komagataella phaffii): impact on cell physiology and recombinant production of secreted proteins. Appl Environ Microbiol 86:e02038-19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02038-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Chen S-L, Liu T-S, Zhang W-G, Xu J-Z. 2023. Cofactor engineering for efficient production of α-farnesene by rational modification of NADPH and ATP regeneration pathway in Pichia pastoris. Int J Mol Sci 24:1767. doi: 10.3390/ijms24021767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Feng A, Zhou Z, Cong W, Zhou H, Zhang J. 2025. A fragment in the 5’ untranslated region of alcohol oxidase 1 promoter significantly influencing gene expression of Komagataella phaffii. Gene 969:149745. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2025.149745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Pfleger BF, Pitera DJ, Smolke CD, Keasling JD. 2006. Combinatorial engineering of intergenic regions in operons tunes expression of multiple genes. Nat Biotechnol 24:1027–1032. doi: 10.1038/nbt1226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Li C, Zhang R, Wang J, Wilson LM, Yan Y. 2020. Protein engineering for improving and diversifying natural product biosynthesis. Trends Biotechnol 38:729–744. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Yang Y, Lin Y, Wang J, Wu Y, Zhang R, Cheng M, Shen X, Wang J, Chen Z, Li C, Yuan Q, Yan Y. 2018. Sensor-regulator and RNAi based bifunctional dynamic control network for engineered microbial synthesis. Nat Commun 9:3043. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05466-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Hartline CJ, Schmitz AC, Han Y, Zhang F. 2021. Dynamic control in metabolic engineering: theories, tools, and applications. Metab Eng 63:126–140. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2020.08.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Anesiadis N, Cluett WR, Mahadevan R. 2008. Dynamic metabolic engineering for increasing bioprocess productivity. Metab Eng 10:255–266. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2008.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Venayak N, Anesiadis N, Cluett WR, Mahadevan R. 2015. Engineering metabolism through dynamic control. Curr Opin Biotechnol 34:142–152. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.12.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Bothfeld W, Kapov G, Tyo KEJ. 2017. A glucose-sensing toggle switch for autonomous, high productivity genetic control. ACS Synth Biol 6:1296–1304. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Venayak N, Raj K, Jaydeep R, Mahadevan R. 2018. An optimized bistable metabolic switch to decouple phenotypic states during anaerobic fermentation. ACS Synth Biol 7:2854–2866. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Rosano GL, Ceccarelli EA. 2014. Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: advances and challenges. Front Microbiol 5:172. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Nieto-Taype MA, Garcia-Ortega X, Albiol J, Montesinos-Seguí JL, Valero F. 2020. Continuous cultivation as a tool toward the rational bioprocess development with Pichia pastoris cell factory. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 8:632. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Singh A, Narang A. 2023. PAOX1 expression in mixed-substrate continuous cultures of Komagataella phaffii (Pichia pastoris) is completely determined by methanol consumption regardless of the secondary carbon source. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 11:1123703. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1123703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Gupta A, Reizman IMB, Reisch CR, Prather KLJ. 2017. Dynamic regulation of metabolic flux in engineered bacteria using a pathway-independent quorum-sensing circuit. Nat Biotechnol 35:273–279. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3796 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Soma Y, Hanai T. 2015. Self-induced metabolic state switching by a tunable cell density sensor for microbial isopropanol production. Metab Eng 30:7–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Liu D, Xiao Y, Evans BS, Zhang F. 2015. Negative feedback regulation of fatty acid production based on a malonyl-CoA sensor–actuator. ACS Synth Biol 4:132–140. doi: 10.1021/sb400158w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Dahl RH, Zhang F, Alonso-Gutierrez J, Baidoo E, Batth TS, Redding-Johanson AM, Petzold CJ, Mukhopadhyay A, Lee TS, Adams PD, Keasling JD. 2013. Engineering dynamic pathway regulation using stress-response promoters. Nat Biotechnol 31:1039–1046. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2689 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Xu P, Li L, Zhang F, Stephanopoulos G, Koffas M. 2014. Improving fatty acids production by engineering dynamic pathway regulation and metabolic control. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:11299–11304. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1406401111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Brat D, Weber C, Lorenzen W, Bode HB, Boles E. 2012. Cytosolic re-localization and optimization of valine synthesis and catabolism enables inseased isobutanol production with the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 5:65. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-5-65 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Gao L, Yuan J, Hong K, Ma NL, Liu S, Wu X. 2025. Technological advancement spurs Komagataella phaffii as a next-generation platform for sustainable biomanufacturing. Biotechnol Adv 82:108593. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2025.108593 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Miao L, Li Y, Zhu T. 2021. Metabolic engineering of methylotrophic Pichia pastoris for the production of β-alanine. Bioresour Bioprocess 8:89. doi: 10.1186/s40643-021-00444-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Zhang Q, Wang X, Luo H, Wang Y, Wang Y, Tu T, Qin X, Su X, Huang H, Yao B, Bai Y, Zhang J. 2022. Metabolic engineering of Pichia pastoris for myo-inositol production by dynamic regulation of central metabolism. Microb Cell Fact 21:112. doi: 10.1186/s12934-022-01837-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Otero JM, Nielsen J. 2010. Industrial systems biology. Biotechnol Bioeng 105:439–460. doi: 10.1002/bit.22592 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Chung BK, Selvarasu S, Andrea C, Ryu J, Lee H, Ahn J, Lee H, Lee D-Y. 2010. Genome-scale metabolic reconstruction and in silico analysis of methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris for strain improvement. Microb Cell Fact 9:50. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-9-50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Caspeta L, Shoaie S, Agren R, Nookaew I, Nielsen J. 2012. Genome-scale metabolic reconstructions of Pichia stipitis and Pichia pastoris and in silico evaluation of their potentials. BMC Syst Biol 6:24. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-6-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Sohn SB, Graf AB, Kim TY, Gasser B, Maurer M, Ferrer P, Mattanovich D, Lee SY. 2010. Genome-scale metabolic model of methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris and its use for in silico analysis of heterologous protein production. Biotechnol J 5:705–715. doi: 10.1002/biot.201000078 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Tomàs-Gamisans M, Ferrer P, Albiol J. 2018. Fine-tuning the P. pastoris iMT1026 genome-scale metabolic model for improved prediction of growth on methanol or glycerol as sole carbon sources. Microb Biotechnol 11:224–237. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12871 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Subash Chandra Bose K, Shah MI, Krishna J, Sankaranarayanan M. 2023. Genome-scale metabolic model analysis of Pichia pastoris for enhancing the production of S-adenosyl-L-methionine. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 46:1471–1482. doi: 10.1007/s00449-023-02913-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Sánchez BJ, Pérez-Correa JR, Agosin E. 2014. Construction of robust dynamic genome-scale metabolic model structures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae through iterative re-parameterization. Metab Eng 25:159–173. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2014.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Saitua F, Torres P, Pérez-Correa JR, Agosin E. 2017. Dynamic genome-scale metabolic modeling of the yeast Pichia pastoris. BMC Syst Biol 11:27. doi: 10.1186/s12918-017-0408-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Merzbacher C, Oyarzún DA. 2023. Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in dynamic pathway engineering. Biochem Soc Trans 51:1871–1879. doi: 10.1042/BST20221542 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Pentjuss A, Bolmanis E, Suleiko A, Didrihsone E, Suleiko A, Dubencovs K, Liepins J, Kazaks A, Vanags J. 2023. Pichia pastoris growth—coupled heme biosynthesis analysis using metabolic modelling. Sci Rep 13:15816. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42865-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Yu F, Zhao X, Zhou J, Lu W, Li J, Chen J, Du G. 2023. Biosynthesis of high-active hemoproteins by the efficient heme-supply Pichia pastoris chassis. Adv Sci (Weinh) 10:e2302826. doi: 10.1002/advs.202302826 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Kumokita R, Bamba T, Inokuma K, Yoshida T, Ito Y, Kondo A, Hasunuma T. 2022. Construction of an l-tyrosine chassis in Pichia pastoris enhances aromatic secondary metabolite production from glycerol. ACS Synth Biol 11:2098–2107. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.2c00047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Claes K, Van Herpe D, Vanluchene R, Roels C, Van Moer B, Wyseure E, Vandewalle K, Eeckhaut H, Yilmaz S, Vanmarcke S, Çıtak E, Fijalkowska D, Grootaert H, Lonigro C, Meuris L, Michielsen G, Naessens J, van Schie L, De Rycke R, De Bruyne M, Borghgraef P, Callewaert N. 2024. OPENPichia: licence-free Komagataella phaffii chassis strains and toolkit for protein expression. Nat Microbiol 9:864–876. doi: 10.1038/s41564-023-01574-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Li H, Chen T, Zhang Z, Jiang Q, Yuwen W, Qu L, Fu R, Zhu C, Lei H, Fan D. 2025. Engineering yeast expression platforms: advanced strategies for heterologous protein production and glycosylation modification. Chem Eng J 526:171510. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2025.171510 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Zhao X, Huang Y, Zhou S, Ao J, Cai H, Tanaka K, Ito Y, Ishiwata A, Ding F. 2022. Recent chemical and chemoenzymatic strategies to complex-type N-glycans. Front Chem 10. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2022.880128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Shirakawa A, Manabe Y, Fukase K. 2021. Recent advances in the chemical biology of N-glycans. Molecules 26:1040. doi: 10.3390/molecules26041040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Magalhães A, Duarte HO, Reis CA. 2021. The role of O-glycosylation in human disease. Mol Aspects Med 79:100964. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2021.100964 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Das R, Mukhopadhyay B. 2016. Chemical O-glycosylations: an overview. ChemistryOpen 5:401–433. doi: 10.1002/open.201600043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Li C, Wang L-X. 2018. Chemoenzymatic methods for the synthesis of glycoproteins. Chem Rev 118:8359–8413. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Jacobs PP, Geysens S, Vervecken W, Contreras R, Callewaert N. 2009. Engineering complex-type N-glycosylation in Pichia pastoris using GlycoSwitch technology. Nat Protoc 4:58–70. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Laukens B, Jacobs PP, Geysens K, Martins J, De Wachter C, Ameloot P, Morelle W, Haustraete J, Renauld J-C, Samyn B, Contreras R, Devos S, Callewaert N. 2020. Off-target glycans encountered along the synthetic biology route toward humanized N-glycans in Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol Bioeng 117:2479–2488. doi: 10.1002/bit.27375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Hamilton SR, Davidson RC, Sethuraman N, Nett JH, Jiang Y, Rios S, Bobrowicz P, Stadheim TA, Li H, Choi B-K, Hopkins D, Wischnewski H, Roser J, Mitchell T, Strawbridge RR, Hoopes J, Wildt S, Gerngross TU. 2006. Humanization of yeast to produce complex terminally sialylated glycoproteins. Science 313:1441–1443. doi: 10.1126/science.1130256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Laukens B, De Wachter C, Callewaert N. 2015. Engineering the Pichia pastoris N-glycosylation pathway using the GlycoSwitch technology. Methods Mol Biol 1321:103–122. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2760-9_8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Sharma CB, Knauer R, Lehle L. 2001. Biosynthesis of lipid-linked oligosaccharides in yeast: the ALG3 gene encodes the Dol-P-man:Man5GlcNAc2-PP-Dol mannosyltransferase. Biol Chem 382:321–328. doi: 10.1515/BC.2001.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Davidson RC, Nett JH, Renfer E, Li H, Stadheim TA, Miller BJ, Miele RG, Hamilton SR, Choi B-K, Mitchell TI, Wildt S. 2004. Functional analysis of the ALG3 gene encoding the Dol-P-Man: Man5GlcNAc2-PP-Dol mannosyltransferase enzyme of P. pastoris. Glycobiology 14:399–407. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwh023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Wang F, Wang X, Yu X, Fu L, Liu Y, Ma L, Zhai C. 2015. High-level expression of endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidase H from Streptomyces plicatus in Pichia pastoris and its application for the deglycosylation of glycoproteins. PLoS One 10:e0120458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Stals I, Samyn B, Sergeant K, White T, Hoorelbeke K, Coorevits A, Devreese B, Claeyssens M, Piens K. 2010. Identification of a gene coding for a deglycosylating enzyme in Hypocrea jecorina. FEMS Microbiol Lett 303:9–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01849.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Govindappa N, Hanumanthappa M, Venkatarangaiah K, Kanojia K, Venkatesan K, Chatterjee A, Kusumanchi M, Dave N, Hazra P, Tiwari S, Sastry K. 2013. PMT1 gene plays a major role in O-mannosylation of insulin precursor in Pichia pastoris. Protein Expr Purif 88:164–171. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2012.12.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Nett JH, Cook WJ, Chen M-T, Davidson RC, Bobrowicz P, Kett W, Brevnova E, Potgieter TI, Mellon MT, Prinz B, Choi B-K, Zha D, Burnina I, Bukowski JT, Du M, Wildt S, Hamilton SR. 2013. Characterization of the Pichia pastoris protein-O-mannosyltransferase gene family. PLoS One 8:e68325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Bhatti RS, Shah S, Suresh N, Krishan P, Sandhu JS. 2013. Recent pharmacological developments on rhodanines and 2,4-thiazolidinediones. Int J Med Chem 2013:793260. doi: 10.1155/2013/793260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Hamilton SR, Cook WJ, Gomathinayagam S, Burnina I, Bukowski J, Hopkins D, Schwartz S, Du M, Sharkey NJ, Bobrowicz P, Wildt S, Li H, Stadheim TA, Nett JH. 2013. Production of sialylated O-linked glycans in Pichia pastoris. Glycobiology 23:1192–1203. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwt056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Gnanesh Kumar BS, Pohlentz G, Schulte M, Mormann M, Siva Kumar N. 2014. Jack bean α-mannosidase: amino acid sequencing and N-glycosylation analysis of a valuable glycomics tool. Glycobiology 24:252–261. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwt106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Gomathinayagam S, Hamilton SR. 2014. In vitro enzymatic treatment to remove O-linked mannose from intact glycoproteins. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:2545–2554. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5478-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Liu L, Gomathinayagam S, Hamuro L, Prueksaritanont T, Wang W, Stadheim TA, Hamilton SR. 2013. The impact of glycosylation on the pharmacokinetics of a TNFR2:fc fusion protein expressed in glycoengineered Pichia pastoris. Pharm Res 30:803–812. doi: 10.1007/s11095-012-0921-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. van Schie L, Van Breedam W, Roels C, Schepens B, Frank M, Mehdipour AR, Laukens B, Nerinckx W, Santens F, Devos S, Rossey I, Thooft K, Vanmarcke S, Van Hecke A, Saelens X, Callewaert N. 2023. GlycoVHH: optimal sites for introducing N-glycans on the camelid VHH antibody scaffold and use for macrophage delivery. MAbs 15:2210709. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2023.2210709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Li S, Sun P, Gong X, Chang S, Li E, Xu Y, Wu J, Liu B. 2019. Engineering O-glycosylation in modified N-linked oligosaccharide (Man12GlcNAc2∼Man16GlcNAc2) Pichia pastoris strains. RSC Adv 9:8246–8252. doi: 10.1039/C8RA08121B [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Wang N, Wang KY, Xu F, Li G, Liu D. 2020. The effect of N-glycosylation on the expression of the tetanus toxin fragment C in Pichia pastoris. Protein Expr Purif 166:105503. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2019.105503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Cox JS, Walter P. 1996. A novel mechanism for regulating activity of a transcription factor that controls the unfolded protein response. Cell 87:391–404. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81360-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Raschmanová H, Weninger A, Knejzlík Z, Melzoch K, Kovar K. 2021. Engineering of the unfolded protein response pathway in Pichia pastoris: enhancing production of secreted recombinant proteins. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 105:4397–4414. doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11336-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Zahrl RJ, Prielhofer R, Ata Ö, Baumann K, Mattanovich D, Gasser B. 2022. Pushing and pulling proteins into the yeast secretory pathway enhances recombinant protein secretion. Metab Eng 74:36–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2022.08.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Zhang Y-S, Gong J-S, Jiang J-Y, Xu Z-H, Shi J-S. 2024. Engineering protein translocation and unfolded protein response enhanced human PH-20 secretion in Pichia pastoris. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 108:54. doi: 10.1007/s00253-023-12878-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Piirainen MA, Frey AD. 2022. The impact of glycoengineering on the endoplasmic reticulum quality control system in yeasts. Front Mol Biosci 9:910709. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.910709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Shao Y, Xue C, Liu W, Zuo S, Wei P, Huang L, Lian J, Xu Z. 2022. High-level secretory production of leghemoglobin in Pichia pastoris through enhanced globin expression and heme biosynthesis. Bioresour Technol 363:127884. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Mohammadi M, Mashayekh T, Rashidi-Monfared S, Ebrahimi A, Abedini D. 2020. New insights into diosgenin biosynthesis pathway and its regulation in Trigonella foenum-graecum L. Phytochem Anal PCA 31:229–241. doi: 10.1002/pca.2887 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Onoda K, Kato M, Tsunematsu Y, Eto F, Sato M, Yoshioka Y, Yoshida T, Tamura K, Yao I, Dohra H, Watanabe K, Miyoshi N. 2023. Biosynthetic gene expression and tissue distribution of diosgenin in Dioscorea japonica. J Agric Food Chem 71:4292–4297. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c08478 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Liu W, Xiang H, Zhang T, Pang X, Su J, Liu H, Ma B, Yu L. 2020. Development of a new high-cell density fermentation strategy for enhanced production of a fungus β-glucosidase in Pichia pastoris. Front Microbiol 11. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Li S, Gong M, Zhao F, Shao J, Xie Y, Zhang Y, Chang H. 2018. Type I interferons: distinct biological activities and current applications for viral infection. Cell Physiol Biochem 51:2377–2396. doi: 10.1159/000495897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Adalid-Peralta L, Godot V, Colin C, Krzysiek R, Tran T, Poignard P, Venet A, Hosmalin A, Lebon P, Rouzioux C, Chene G, Emilie D. 2008. Stimulation of the primary anti-HIV antibody response by IFN-α in patients with acute HIV-1 infection. J Leukoc Biol 83:1060–1067. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1007675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Asmana Ningrum R. 2014. Human interferon alpha-2b: a therapeutic protein for cancer treatment. Scientifica (Cairo) 2014:970315. doi: 10.1155/2014/970315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Sodeifian F, Nikfarjam M, Kian N, Mohamed K, Rezaei N. 2022. The role of type I interferon in the treatment of COVID-19. J Med Virol 94:63–81. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Allampalli SSP, Sekhar S, Sivaprakasam S. 2024. Enhanced production of human interferon α2b in glycoengineered Pichia pastoris by robust control of methanol feeding and implications of various control strategies. Biochem Eng J 201:109152. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2023.109152 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Liu C, Zhang W, Qu M, Pan K, Zhao X. 2020. Heterologous expression of laccase from Lentinula edodes in Pichia pastoris and its application in degrading rape straw. Front Microbiol 11:1086. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Song Q, Deng X, Song R-Q. 2020. Expression of Pleurotus ostreatus laccase gene in Pichia pastoris and its degradation of corn stover lignin. Microorganisms 8:601. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8040601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Bao C, Liu Y, Li F, Cao H, Dong B, Cao Y. 2023. Expression and characterization of laccase Lac1 from Coriolopsis trogii strain mafic-2001 in Pichia pastoris and its degradation of lignin. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 195:6150–6167. doi: 10.1007/s12010-023-04390-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Minty JJ, Lesnefsky AA, Lin F, Chen Y, Zaroff TA, Veloso AB, Xie B, McConnell CA, Ward RJ, Schwartz DR, Rouillard J-M, Gao Y, Gulari E, Lin XN. 2011. Evolution combined with genomic study elucidates genetic bases of isobutanol tolerance in Escherichia coli. Microb Cell Fact 10:18. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-10-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Kondo T, Tezuka H, Ishii J, Matsuda F, Ogino C, Kondo A. 2012. Genetic engineering to enhance the Ehrlich pathway and alter carbon flux for increased isobutanol production from glucose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biotechnol 159:32–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.01.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Chen X, Nielsen KF, Borodina I, Kielland-Brandt MC, Karhumaa K. 2011. Increased isobutanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by overexpression of genes in valine metabolism. Biotechnol Biofuels 4:21. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-4-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Koshiba A, Nakano M, Hirata Y, Konishi R, Matsuoka Y, Miwa Y, Mori A, Kondo A, Tanaka T. 2024. Enhanced production of isobutyl and isoamyl acetate using Yarrowia lipolytica. Biotechnol Prog 40:e3499. doi: 10.1002/btpr.3499 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Siripong W, Wolf P, Kusumoputri TP, Downes JJ, Kocharin K, Tanapongpipat S, Runguphan W. 2018. Metabolic engineering of Pichia pastoris for production of isobutanol and isobutyl acetate. Biotechnol Biofuels 11:1. doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-1003-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Wang X, Zhang X, Zhang J, Zhou Y, Wang F, Wang Z, Li X. 2025. Advances in microbial production of geraniol: from metabolic engineering to potential industrial applications. Crit Rev Biotechnol 45:727–742. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2024.2391881 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Ye C, Li M, Gao J, Zuo Y, Xiao F, Jiang X, Cheng J, Huang L, Xu Z, Lian J. 2024. Metabolic engineering of Pichia pastoris for overproduction of cis-trans nepetalactol. Metab Eng 84:83–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2024.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Narisetty V, Castro E, Durgapal S, Coulon F, Jacob S, Kumar D, Kumar Awasthi M, Kishore Pant K, Parameswaran B, Kumar V. 2021. High level xylitol production by Pichia fermentans using non-detoxified xylose-rich sugarcane bagasse and olive pits hydrolysates. Bioresour Technol 342:126005. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Li P, Sun H, Chen Z, Li Y, Zhu T. 2015. Construction of efficient xylose utilizing Pichia pastoris for industrial enzyme production. Microb Cell Fact 14:22. doi: 10.1186/s12934-015-0206-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Carneiro CVGC, Trichez D, Bergmann JC, Reis VCB, Wagner N, Walther T, Almeida JRM de. 2024. Engineering Komagataella phaffii for ethylene glycol production from xylose. AMB Expr 14:131. doi: 10.1186/s13568-024-01795-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Blazeck J, Hill A, Jamoussi M, Pan A, Miller J, Alper HS. 2015. Metabolic engineering of Yarrowia lipolytica for itaconic acid production. Metab Eng 32:66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Qi H, Du Y, Zhou X, Zheng W, Zhang L, Wen J, Liu L. 2017. Engineering a new metabolic pathway for itaconate production in Pichia stipitis from xylose. Biochem Eng J 126:101–108. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2017.06.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Baumschabl M, Ata Ö, Mitic BM, Lutz L, Gassler T, Troyer C, Hann S, Mattanovich D. 2022. Conversion of CO2 into organic acids by engineered autotrophic yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 119:e2211827119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2211827119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Lv X, Cui S, Chen J, Wang L, Liu Y, Li J, Du G, Liu X, Chen J, Ledesma-Amaro R, Liu L. 2023. Cascaded de novo biosynthesis of lacto-proteins from CO2 by engineered Pichia pastoris. Green Chem 25:5460–5469. doi: 10.1039/D3GC00867C [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Àvila-Cabré S, Albiol J, Ferrer P. 2025. Metabolic engineering of Komagataella phaffii for enhanced 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3-HP) production from methanol. J Biol Eng 19:19. doi: 10.1186/s13036-025-00488-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Zhang X, Chen S, Lin Y, Li W, Wang D, Ruan S, Yang Y, Liang S. 2023. Metabolic engineering of Pichia pastoris for high-level production of lycopene. ACS Synth Biol 12:2961–2972. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.3c00294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Cunningham KG, Manson W, Spring FS, Hutchinson SA. 1950. Cordycepin, a metabolic product isolated from cultures of Cordyceps militaris (Linn.) Link. Nature 166:949–949. doi: 10.1038/166949a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Radhi M, Ashraf S, Lawrence S, Tranholm AA, Wellham PAD, Hafeez A, Khamis AS, Thomas R, McWilliams D, de Moor CH. 2021. A systematic review of the biological effects of cordycepin. Molecules 26:5886. doi: 10.3390/molecules26195886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Olatunji OJ, Feng Y, Olatunji OO, Tang J, Ouyang Z, Su Z. 2016. Cordycepin protects PC12 cells against 6-hydroxydopamine induced neurotoxicity via its antioxidant properties. Biomed Pharmacother 81:7–14. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179. Liu W, Zhang L, Sun S, Tang L, He S, Chen A, Yao L, Ren D-L. 2021. Cordycepin inhibits inflammatory responses through suppression of ERK activation in zebrafish. Dev Comp Immunol 124:104178. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2021.104178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180. Khan MA, Tania M. 2023. Cordycepin and kinase inhibition in cancer. Drug Discov Today 28:103481. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2022.103481 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181. Tan H, Wang L, Wang H, Cheng Y, Li X, Wan H, Liu C, Liu T, Li Q. 2023. Engineering Komagataella phaffii to biosynthesize cordycepin from methanol which drives global metabolic alterations at the transcription level. Synth Syst Biotechnol 8:242–252. doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2023.03.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182. Zhao B, Li Y, Zhang Y, Pan M, Zhao G, Guo Y. 2024. Low-carbon and overproduction of cordycepin from methanol using engineered Pichia pastoris cell factory. Bioresour Technol 413:131446. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183. Li H, Yang Y, Hou S, Zhang L, Yang J, Gao B. 2025. Deep learning-driven enzyme engineering in Pichia pastoris: a sustainable platform for high-yield nootkatone biosynthesis. Biofactors 51:e70048. doi: 10.1002/biof.70048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184. Pinto J, Ramos JRC, Costa RS, Oliveira R, Pinto J, Ramos JRC, Costa RS, Oliveira R. 2023. Hybrid deep modeling of a GS115 (Mut+) Pichia pastoris culture with state–space reduction. Fermentation 9:643. doi: 10.3390/fermentation9070643 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 185. Hosseini SN, Javidanbardan A, Khatami M. 2019. Accurate and cost-effective prediction of HBsAg titer in industrial scale fermentation process of recombinant Pichia pastoris by using neural network based soft sensor. Biotech and App Biochem 66:681–689. doi: 10.1002/bab.1785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No data were used for the research described in the article.


Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES