Skip to main content
Science Advances logoLink to Science Advances
. 2026 Aug 19;12(34):eaeg5747. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aeg5747

Ice-sheet dynamics drive glacial-interglacial shifts in North Atlantic seawater neodymium isotopes

Antao Xu 1,*, Kira Just 1, Alexander M Piotrowski 2, Jonathan Stohl 1, Norbert Frank 1
PMCID: PMC13488906  PMID: 42616870

Abstract

Radiogenic neodymium (Nd) isotopic composition (εNd) of seawater is widely used to reconstruct past ocean circulation, assuming quasi-constant end-member signatures throughout the Quaternary. However, the εNd signature of Glacial North Atlantic Intermediate Water deviated markedly from its modern value, challenging this assumption, and the driving mechanisms remain debated. Here, we show that the upper Glacial North Atlantic Intermediate Water was consistently more radiogenic (−7.2) than interglacial values (−13.4) over the past 230,000 years and that pronounced glacial-interglacial εNd variability closely followed global ice-volume fluctuations (r = 0.80). This variability was primarily reconciled with Icelandic volcanic Nd inputs, modulated by the advance and retreat of the Icelandic Ice Sheet. A forward model reproduces the observed εNd evolution and reveals a nonlinear response of Nd export to ice-sheet dynamics, yielding a mean glacial Icelandic Nd input flux of 2.4 × 108 grams per year. Our results highlight the pivotal role of high-latitude ice-sheet systems in regulating North Atlantic seawater chemistry during glacial periods.

INTRODUCTION

Radiogenic neodymium (Nd) isotopic compositions (expressed as εNd; see Materials and Methods) are a useful tracer of sediment provenance and the origin and mixing of water masses, serving as proxies for past changes in ocean circulation (15). This is enabled by the quasi-conservative behavior of dissolved Nd in seawater and its shorter oceanic residence time of 300 to 1000 years compared to global seawater mixing time (68). In the modern Atlantic, northern-sourced water (NSW) and southern-sourced water (SSW) masses display distinct εNd fingerprinting signatures. In particular, NSWs such as upper and lower North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW) have a εNd of ∼−14 to −12 (912) because of weathering input of old, unradiogenic continental rocks around the North Atlantic (13), whereas SSWs, including Antarctic Intermediate Water (AAIW) and Antarctic Bottom Water (AABW), are more radiogenic with εNd values around −8 reflecting the admixture of Atlantic and Pacific waters (1416).

The application of εNd as a tracer of past ocean circulation relies on the assumption that the end-member signatures of major water masses (e.g., NADW and AABW) either remained quasi-constant over glacial-interglacial timescales and comparable to their modern values (17, 18) or can be accurately reconstructed for the past interval considered. However, the assumption of quasi-constant end-members is debated for periods of major climatic reorganization such as the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), when shifts in continental weathering inputs and ocean circulation likely modified the εNd signatures of NSW (1923). For example, authigenic εNd records at ∼40°N indicate that the glacial NADW end-member [referred to as Glacial North Atlantic Intermediate Water (GNAIW)] became more radiogenic, with εNd values around −10.0 during the LGM resulting from reduced weathering input of unradiogenic Nd from North American continent (24). Waters from the Labrador Sea (εNd = −31 to −14) and the Nordic Seas (εNd = −15 to −12) during the LGM were too unradiogenic to account for this shift and were thus ruled out as major contributors (25, 26). However, the potential contribution of more radiogenic northeast (NE) Atlantic seawater to the GNAIW end-member was largely overlooked (27). Because deep-water formation shifted possibly southeastward to the Iceland Basin with a stronger southeastern recirculation during the LGM (28), any seawater εNd signature changes in the NE Atlantic could have been incorporated into GNAIW and subsequently exported southward with the overturning circulation, thereby influencing the εNd of underlying and downstream water masses (29).

To constrain the long-term evolution of the εNd signature and seawater chemistry of NE Atlantic thermocline and intermediate waters (upper GNAIW), we present new paired authigenic and residual εNd records from ODP Site 982 on the Rockall Plateau (1135 m; Fig. 1). The results show that the upper GNAIW end-member was consistently more radiogenic (∼−7) than modern and interglacial values (−14 to −13) throughout all glacial periods of the past 230,000 years, closely tracking global ice-volume fluctuations. We demonstrate that this pronounced glacial-interglacial variability in seawater εNd was primarily regulated by volcanic Nd inputs from Iceland, the dominant radiogenic source in the region, and was strongly modulated by the cyclical advance and retreat of the Icelandic Ice Sheet. These findings reveal a previously overlooked coupling between ice-sheet dynamics, volcanic inputs, and seawater εNd in the North Atlantic, with implications for how glacial water-mass end-members are defined and interpreted.

Fig. 1. North Atlantic sites and water circulation.

Fig. 1.

(A) Locations of seawater (blue dots) and sediment core (orange dots) sites, with section transects (SEC 1, SEC 2, and SEC 3) shown as gray and orange dashed lines. Major intermediate and deep-water masses are indicated by colored arrows, including DSOW (Denmark Strait overflow water), ISOW, LSW, DWBC (Deep Western Boundary Current), WNAWD and ENADW (Western and Eastern North Atlantic Deep Water), AABW, and LDW (Lower Deep Water). (B) Bathymetric map of the Iceland Basin showing sampling sites of sediment cores (white dots). Reported εNd values for the Greenland-Iceland-Faroe Ridge and the British Isles are indicated. Icelandic bedrock exhibits highly radiogenic εNd signatures (+6 to +8) (49, 61). (C) Modern seawater εNd distribution along SEC 1 from the Nordic Seas to the central North Atlantic. ODP 982 (yellow square) samples are within water masses characterized by unradiogenic εNd (−13 to −14). Referencing sediment cores are shown nearby as orange open squares. (D) Modern seawater εNd distribution along SEC 2 from the Nordic Seas to the western Atlantic, with referencing sediment core sites indicated by orange open squares. (E) Sediment-reconstructed modern (core-top) εNd along SEC 3 from the Nordic Seas to the NE Atlantic. (F) Sediment-reconstructed LGM εNd distribution along SEC 3. Nd isotope data are compiled from previous studies (9, 12, 2527, 50). The map was created using Ocean Data View (102).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Variability and reliability of reconstructed NE Atlantic seawater Nd isotopes

The downcore record of authigenic εNd from ODP Site 982 reveals pronounced glacial-interglacial variability over the past ∼230,000 years (Fig. 2D). Values of εNd range from highly unradiogenic signatures of −12.9 ± 0.2 (n = 3, ±1 SD) in Holocene, −13.4 ± 0.03 (n = 3, ±1 SD) at Marine isotope stage (MIS) 5e, and −12.8 at MIS 7c to the most radiogenic (positive) signatures of −7.2 ± 0.5 (n = 3, ±1 SD) during the MIS 2 and MIS 6 glacial maxima. Other εNd values fall between these extremes. More unradiogenic (negative) εNd values during interglacial and interstadial periods are similar to values of −13.5 to −14.0 in present-day Labrador Sea–derived water masses, likely Labrador Seawater (LSW) and/or Subpolar Mode Water at comparable depths near Site 982 (12). By contrast, εNd values shift markedly toward more positive during the LGM (εNd = −7.7 to −7.9) and MIS 6 glacial maximum (εNd = −6.7 to −7.7), coinciding with the periods of maximum global ice volume. The glacial-interglacial εNd variations closely track the LR04 benthic δ18O stack, the reconstructed global mean sea level, and the ODP 982 magnetic susceptibility record (Figs. 2 and 3). More positive εNd values coincide with glacial conditions (high δ18O and magnetic susceptibility), whereas more negative values occur during interglacials. These relationships are strong and robust (Pearson r = 0.80 for δ18O and r = 0.82 for magnetic susceptibility) and remain essentially unchanged when analytical and age uncertainties are propagated using Monte Carlo (MC) ensembles (r = 0.78 ± 0.05 for both proxies). This coupling persists even on stadial and interstadial timescales, thus suggesting that εNd variability was paced by processes linked to the cyclic growth and decay of global ice volume and climate conditions.

Fig. 2. Reconstructed NE Atlantic seawater εNd over the past 230,000 years.

Fig. 2.

(A) LR04 benthic δ18O stack (91). (B) Reconstructed global mean sea level (GMSL) (103). (C) ODP 982 magnetic susceptibility record (104). (D) Authigenic εNd record from ODP 982 (red dots) together with residual (blue squares) and clay-size residual fractions (orange squares). Age uncertainty was estimated by the Monte Carlo framework and the details in Materials and Methods and the Supplementary Materials (fig. S2). (E) Authigenic εNd record from IODP U1313 (80, 105108) and ODP 1063 (3, 4, 109111), shown as blue circles and gray diamonds, respectively. (F) IRD counts from ODP 982 and ODP 983 sediment cores (112, 113).

Fig. 3. Robustness of εNd-climate correlations assessed through Monte Carlo (MC) uncertainty propagation.

Fig. 3.

(A) εNd versus LR04 δ18O (blue points). The gray cloud represents a subsample of MC realizations (joint age and εNd uncertainty). The solid line shows the least-squares fit to the data. (B) Same as (A) but for εNd versus magnetic susceptibility. (C and D) Monte Carlo distributions of Pearson’s r for εNd-LR04 δ18O (C) and εNd-magnetic susceptibility (D), showing the mean values (solid line) and 95% CI (dashed).

To verify that this variability truly reflects past seawater composition rather than diagenetic overprinting in sediment (30), we further assess the reliability of the reconstructed authigenic εNd record. The uppermost samples (top 25 to 40 cm) of this core, as well as the samples from MIS 5e and MIS 7c, closely match modern εNd values of seawater in the NE Atlantic (offsets <1 εNd unit) (12) and the previously reconstructed Holocene values (27, 31, 32), demonstrating the reliability of the reconstructed seawater εNd for the warm climate periods. The residual and clay-size residual εNd values of ODP 982 are less positive compared to the Rockall Trough slope sediments of −10.4 ± 1.4 (31) but consistent through glacial-interglacial cycles of −12.7 ± 0.6 (n = 8, ±1 SD) for residue and −13.1 ± 0.7 (n = 7, ±1 SD) for clay-size residue. This consistency indicates an absence of substantial reactive radiogenic Nd sources in sediments, ruling out diagenetic modification as the cause of the more positive authigenic εNd signals (27, 33, 34). Thus, the positive shifts in εNd of the authigenic phase during glacial periods primarily reflect changes in seawater isotopic composition rather than sedimentary overprinting. Although glacial sediments may contain higher proportions of ice-rafted debris (IRD) or volcanic particles, and sediment-porewater-bottom water Nd exchange could contribute to this pattern, these processes alone are unlikely to account for the basin-scale, depth-integrated, and climate-paced εNd shifts observed (27). The seawater origin of the Nd isotope signal is further supported by rare earth element (REE) patterns and element ratios of the leachates, which show a middle-REE bulge, negative cerium anomaly, and low aluminum-to-Nd ratios (525), well below the threshold of 100 (fig. S1) (35, 36). These characteristics confirm minimal detrital contamination and a dominantly authigenic phase that faithfully records ambient seawater isotopic composition.

Challenges to a water mass mixing explanation for εNd variability

Under the assumption of fixed end-member compositions commonly used in paleoceanographic reconstruction, the highly radiogenic values (−7.2 ± 0.5) observed in the upper GNAIW during glacials cannot be explained by any known water mass in either the modern or glacial North Atlantic (Table 1). LSW is far too unradiogenic (εNd = −14) to contribute to the positive shift (9, 37, 38). To evaluate whether other radiogenic water masses could account for the glacial εNd signatures at Site 982, we consider potential contributions from the south (e.g., AAIW), the Mediterranean [Mediterranean Outflow Water (MOW)], and the Nordic Seas [Iceland-Scotland Overflow Water (ISOW)] (Table 1). Modern AAIW has a εNd value of ∼−8 (14, 15), but its signal becomes strongly diluted northward and its influence was further diminished in the tropical Atlantic during the LGM (3941), making its penetration into the NE Atlantic highly improbable. Similarly, MOW, characterized by εNd values typically ranging from −9 to −10 in modern and glacial conditions (4247), would have undergone strong dilution along its northward pathway to the Iceland. Consequently, it is highly unlikely that SSWs (i.e., AAIW and MOW) are responsible for the findings at ODP 982.

Table 1. Neodymium isotopic signatures (εNd) of the different end-members.

Seawater/authigenic εNd Detrital/residual εNd
Modern/Holocene (<5 ka) LGM (18–23 ka) Modern/Holocene (<5 ka) LGM (18–23 ka)
Labrador Seawater −13.7 ± 0.9 (9), −13.9 ± 0.4 (37)
Antarctic Intermediate Water −8.1 ± 0.2 (14)
Mediterranean Outflow Water −9.8 ± 0.6 (115), −9.4 ± 0.5 (43) −9.1 ∼ −8.9 (44)
Iceland-Scotland Overflow Water −8.2 ± 0.6 (50)
Upper and lower North Atlantic Deep Water −13.2 ± 1.0, −12.4 ± 0.4 (9)
Labrador Sea (reconstruction) −15.8 ∼ −14.0 (56, 57) −30.6 ∼ −13.7 (56, 57) −19.3 ∼ −18.7 (57) −28.8 ∼ −20.0 (57)
Norwegian and Greenland Seas (reconstruction) −10.8 ∼ −9.7 (25, 26) −14.7 ∼ −12.1 (25, 26) −12.7 ∼ −12.6 (25) −14.7 ∼ −14.0 (25)
Mid-depth North Atlantic (reconstruction) −14.3 ∼ −14.1 (24) −10.2 ∼ −9.6 (24) −12.6 (24) −10.5 ∼ −9.3 (24)
Deep North Atlantic (reconstruction) −15.9 ∼ −13.3 (3, 106, 110) −12.6 ∼ −10.6 (3, 106, 107, 110, 111)
NE Atlantic: ODP Site 982 (1135 m, this study) −13.0 ∼ −12.7 −7.7 −12.3 −13.0
NE Atlantic: BOFS (1000–4000 m) −13.7 ∼ −11.1 (27) −9.6 ∼ −4.2 (27) −12.7 ∼ −10.7 (6–7 ka) (27) −12.6 ∼ −11.4 (27)
Iceland input +4 ∼ −8 (27, 49, 61, 63) +4 ∼ −8 (27, 49, 61, 63)

Another candidate is ISOW, with present-day εNd values of −8.2 ± 0.6 for pure ISOW, reflecting boundary exchange with radiogenic basaltic bedrock (εNd = +6 to +8) of the Greenland-Iceland-Faroe Ridge (4850). However, even a 100% ISOW contribution cannot reproduce the most positive values at Site 982 (−6.7) or nearby BOFS cores (−4.2) (27). Hence, ISOW with its modern isotopic composition cannot account for the observed glacial εNd shifts. Even if ISOW possibly acquired a more radiogenic signature in glacial periods via prolonged seawater-margin/boundary interaction (51, 52), because of diminished formation and slower overflow export during glacial periods (53), subsequent mixing would strongly dilute its signature. As observed today, ISOW typically attains εNd values of −10.5 to −11.5 in the NE Atlantic after entrainment with overlying Atlantic waters and LSW (Fig. 1C) (12, 50). Given this inevitable dilution forced by the Bernoulli effect, it is mechanically improbable that a weaker overflow could dominate radiogenic εNd signatures throughout the 1000- to 4000-m water column (Fig. 4B) (27). Moreover, explaining the entire water column εNd shifts with single ISOW would require vigorous vertical mixing, which is contradicted by strong stratification during the LGM indicated by biological proxies (54). Therefore, the observed εNd variability at Site 982 cannot be explained solely by varying proportions of known water masses (Table 1), requiring the addition of an external radiogenic Nd source.

Fig. 4. Comparison of NE Atlantic εNd with other regional sediment cores over the past 50,000 years.

Fig. 4.

(A) Authigenic εNd record from ODP Site 982 (red dots) and corresponding residual (blue squares) and clay-size residual fractions (orange squares). (B) Authigenic εNd records from BOFS sediment cores (27) and ODP Site 980 (55). All core data are smoothed (blue line). (C) Authigenic εNd records from the Labrador Sea (56, 57). Data from Sites U1305 and SGR were smoothed by the blue line, while other core data were smoothed by the dashed line. (D) Authigenic εNd records from mid-depth and deep North Atlantic sites (24, 106). (E) Authigenic εNd records from the Norwegian and Greenland Seas (25, 26). Blue lines with shaded bands show smoothed εNd; the shaded area denotes the P10-to-P90 range (10th to 90th percentiles) from bootstrap + Monte Carlo resampling based on εNd measurement uncertainties.

Ice sheet–modulated volcanic erosion inputs as drivers of seawater εNd evolution

The external radiogenic Nd source previously proposed for nearby BOFS cores is volcanic IRD from Iceland (Fig. 4) (27). Several observations, however, indicate that IRD pulses alone cannot explain the εNd structure at ODP Site 982: (i) The most positive εNd shifts in the BOFS records occur during the LGM rather than aligning with individual Heinrich IRD events. If IRD delivery were the primary control, peak εNd should coincide with discrete IRD pulses and exhibit rapid, high-amplitude fluctuations. Instead, at Site 982, we observe no clear relationship between IRD counts in the Iceland Basin (ODP 982/983) and authigenic εNd (Fig. 2F). This is consistent with three constraints: (i) IRD can only transiently “relabel” seawater εNd because debris sink rapidly, and any imprint on authigenic phases is expected to be confined to discrete IRD-rich layers (27, 5557); (ii) radiogenic Nd released from Icelandic basaltic IRD (εNd > +4) and unradiogenic Nd associated with Laurentide-derived IRD (εNd < −20) can partly offset each other on a regional scale, damping the net seawater signal; and (iii) low sedimentation rates at ODP Site 982 [2.1 ± 1.0 cm per thousand years (ka), 1 SD, n = 54] combined with 1-cm-thick sample slices imply that each authigenic Nd sample integrates seawater signals over several hundred years, potentially exceeding ∼1000 years during glacial maxima, thereby smoothing short-lived IRD-driven variability. (2) Neither BOFS nor Site 982 shows a robust relationship between volcanic IRD abundance and authigenic εNd on glacial-interglacial timescales, implying that the mere presence of volcanic debris is not the dominant control on the long-term seawater signal. (3) Instead, ODP 982 εNd correlates strongly with global ice volume (Fig. 3), suggesting that εNd responds to processes whose intensity scales with ice-sheet growth and decay. We do not exclude local, short-lived IRD impacts: In BOFS 5K, ODP 980, and Labrador Sea records, unradiogenic εNd excursions coincide with Heinrich events (Fig. 4, B and C), likely reflecting strong Laurentide or British-Irish ice-sheet inputs when these IRD fluxes overwhelm Icelandic contributions. However, these signals are spatially restricted to the IRD belt and are too brief to explain the persistent, climate-paced εNd structure at Site 982. Collectively, the evidence points to a more continuous radiogenic Nd supply modulated by ice-sheet evolution and climate-driven changes in reactive Nd supply (58). Volcanic ash may contribute intermittently; however, mean eruption rates increased after deglaciation at ∼12 ka because of ice-sheet unloading (59), which does not necessarily translate into stronger radiogenic inputs to the NE Atlantic, because glacial erosion, comminution, and sediment transport pathways were reduced relative to full-glacial conditions. A small positive εNd excursion observed at BOFS 17K may reflect a localized response to enhanced volcanic activity during this interval. In contrast, neither Site 982 nor the other BOFS records show a distinct basin-wide radiogenic peak around ∼12 ka, suggesting that such signals were either attenuated by low sedimentation rates and limited sampling resolution or restricted to spatially limited regions (60).

In the North Atlantic, Iceland represents the most plausible and dominant source of radiogenic lithogenic material, with εNd values of +4 to +8 reported for Icelandic bedrock, volcanic debris, and detrital sediments (49, 6163). Modern observations demonstrate that basaltic inputs can strongly modify seawater εNd: Icelandic particles can shift Atlantic-derived waters from ∼− 15 to −16 toward −6 to −3 accompanied by a >50% increase in dissolved Nd concentrations, although this influence is largely confined to nearshore regions by coastal circulation (60). In the Denmark Strait, intense seawater-margin exchange yields seawater εNd of ∼−4 to −2 at 0 to 300 m above the Iceland shelf (64), illustrating that when exchange and circulation pathways are favorable, Icelandic inputs can substantially reshape regional seawater εNd distribution. During the LGM, the Icelandic Ice Sheet likely amplified this effect by enhancing the production and export of reactive basaltic material, while the lowered sea level expanded shelf exposure and promoted more efficient seawater-margin exchange. Reconstructions suggest a large maximum ice-sheet extent with relatively shallow geometry and widespread basal sliding (65), conditions that promote efficient subglacial erosion, high sediment yields, and rapid export via ice streams. Geological and seismic evidence further indicates maximum sediment delivery when the ice margin advanced to the shelf-slope break, associated with intense erosion and the deposition of thick glacigenic wedges (66). Mineralogical and magnetic constraints also support enhanced Iceland-sourced sediment contributions during the LGM, delivered to the Denmark Strait via ice-stream discharge and iceberg calving (67). Consistent with this mechanism, Site 982 εNd covaries with available reconstructions of Icelandic ice-sheet evolution over the past ∼120,000 years (fig. S3) (68).

The transfer of this Iceland-sourced radiogenic Nd to NE Atlantic seawater likely involved multiple, synergistic pathways. The dominant mechanism was partial dissolution of subglacially derived reactive particles in the water column. Subglacial comminution produces large amounts of such material, particularly fine-grained glacial flour with high-specific-surface-area and reactive coatings and elevated trace-element leachability (20, 69). Although εNd data specific to this fine fraction remain limited, Nd isotopes show no marked grain-size dependence within a given provenance, so glacial flour is expected to share the same radiogenic signature as coarser detrital sediments derived from the same basaltic source (+4 to +8) (49, 6163). Because Icelandic basalt is Nd-rich and highly radiogenic, relatively modest fluxes of such reactive material can disproportionately shift seawater εNd (61, 70). Once exported to the ocean, these particles undergo partial dissolution during settling, imprinting a radiogenic signature on ambient waters at multiple depth levels on timescales of days to months (71). Benthic flux and boundary exchange along the Icelandic margin (30, 34, 50) further contributed by labeling bottom waters in contact with a reactive basaltic substrate, although these bottom-up processes alone cannot account for the tight correlation between εNd and ice-volume proxies or the disproportionately radiogenic values during rapid glaciation intervals (MIS 6). At Site 982, residual εNd remains comparatively stable through glacial-interglacial cycles (−12.7 ± 0.6 for bulk residue; −13.1 ± 0.7 for clay-size residue), indicating limited changes in local detrital provenance. The pronounced decoupling between stable detrital εNd and strongly varying seawater εNd suggests that the seawater signal is not governed by local detrital inputs at the site. Instead, the radiogenic shift is more consistent with upstream modification of seawater εNd closer to Iceland, with the modified water masses subsequently advected to the Rockall Plateau. The near-uniform glacial εNd shift observed across the ∼4000-m water column in the NE Atlantic further points to a critical amplifying role of deep-water formation, whereby surface and intermediate waters that had acquired a radiogenic signature were subsequently downwelled as deep-water formation shifted southward during the LGM (28), efficiently transmitting the signal throughout the water column. Particle-driven reversible scavenging may have further assisted in redistributing the radiogenic signal to deeper levels (72).

We synthesize these processes in Fig. 5. In the modern ocean, the North Atlantic Current (NAC) bifurcates around Iceland, routing surface waters eastward toward the Iceland-Faroe Ridge or westward toward the Irminger Sea, with part of the flow continuing into the Nordic Seas (Fig. 5A). This circulation geometry helps confine Iceland input to nearshore regions and maintain a basin-scale εNd gradient, with less radiogenic values (−14 to −13) south of the Ridge and more radiogenic values (−11 to −9) in the Nordic Seas, sustained by basaltic margin exchange and water-mass mixing (Fig. 1, C to E). During the LGM, this gradient was reversed (Fig. 1F), indicating a redistribution (“see-saw”) of Iceland’s geochemical influence between the Iceland Basin and the Nordic Seas. We attribute this reversal to the coupling of ice-sheet dynamics and glacial circulation: (i) Expanded sea ice reduced northward NAC transport (at least seasonally) (73), favoring the retention of subglacially derived material and meltwater inputs within the Iceland Basin rather than export to the Nordic Seas; (ii) the lower sea level exposed a broader Icelandic shelf, enlarging the source area for both particle delivery and seawater-basalt contact; and (iii) deep-water formation shifted southward toward the Iceland Basin (74, 75), providing the convective pathway that transferred the radiogenic signal to depth, as discussed above. A relatively weakened Atlantic overturning circulation likely prolonged water-mass residence times (28, 76), enhancing seawater εNd relabeling. In parallel, weathering from Scandinavian and Barents ice sheets supplied unradiogenic Nd to the Nordic Seas (25), reinforcing the basin-scale contrast.

Fig. 5. Conceptual diagram illustrating Icelandic control on NE Atlantic εNd evolution.

Fig. 5.

Schematic representation of surface and intermediate currents and Nd source dynamics under (A and B) interglacial and (C and D) glacial maximum conditions. Surface and intermediate currents include NAC, IC (Irminger Current), FC (Faroe Current), NICC (North Icelandic Irminger Current), and EIC (East Icelandic Current). In (C), white arrows show streamlines of sea-ice drift (114). During interglacials, limited Icelandic erosion and weak volcanic material input, together with vigorous surface inflow from the Atlantic to the Nordic Seas, result in less radiogenic εNd in the NE Atlantic. During glacials, intensified glacial erosion, subglacial supply, IRD relabeling, and boundary exchange increase Icelandic Nd export, yielding more radiogenic seawater εNd. Simultaneously, reduced northward transport of the NAC and southward shifts in deep-water formation enhance the influence of Iceland-derived Nd. This framework links high-latitude cryospheric and volcanic fluxes to basin-scale Nd isotope evolution across glacial-interglacial cycles. The figure was created using Ocean Data View (102).

To test whether the observed glacial-interglacial εNd variability in the NE Atlantic can be explained simply as a linear response to Iceland Ice Sheet evolution, we developed a forward mixing model with MC uncertainty propagation. The model treats seawater εNd as binary mixing between an NE Atlantic seawater background (εNd = −13.8 for interglacial periods; varied from −16.0 to −10.0 during glacials to account for potential shifts in the εNd value of North Atlantic seawater) and an Icelandic volcanic end-member (εNd = +4 to +8), with the Icelandic contribution scaled by a glaciality index derived from the LR04 benthic δ18O stack. Rather than explicitly resolving water-mass fluxes or circulation geometry, which remains poorly constrained for glacial periods, the model parameterizes the net Icelandic influence as an effective mixing fraction that scales with ice volume, allowing us to test whether ice volume–paced Icelandic inputs alone are sufficient to reproduce the observed εNd evolution and to quantify the relative Icelandic contribution and its uncertainty. Because a continuous, high-resolution reconstruction of Icelandic Ice Sheet variability is not available for the full interval and as the growth and retreat of the Icelandic Ice Sheet were broadly synchronous with global ice-volume fluctuations (66, 67, 77), we use the LR04 benthic δ18O stack as a first-order glaciality index, acknowledging that LR04 integrates global ice volume and deep-ocean temperature and may not capture the full regional dynamics of the Icelandic Ice Sheet. After normalization and scaling to the LGM εNd target (−7.7; gray dashed line in Fig. 6A), the baseline captures the overall amplitude but underestimates the MIS 6 maximum and remains systematically too positive during MIS 5–3 (R2 = 0.53; fig. S4). These mismatches suggest that the Icelandic imprint is not strictly linear with global glaciality, likely reflecting the combined effects of regional ice dynamics, circulation geometry (e.g., NAC strength and pathway), and age uncertainty. We therefore introduce a physically motivated nonlinear modulation that reduces the Icelandic contribution during MIS 5–3 and enhances it during MIS 6, with additional amplification during intervals of rapid glaciation inferred from LR04 δ18O change rates (Fig. 6C). We propagate age, analytical, and end-member uncertainties using a 2000-member MC ensemble. The model reproduces the observed εNd evolution [RMSE (root-mean-square error) = 0.91; R2 = 0.72] and captures the full range within the P10-to-P90 envelope (Fig. 6). Notably, the ensemble indicates that rapid ice expansion superimposed on cold background conditions leads to a disproportionate increase in the Icelandic contribution. This behavior coincides with the most positive εNd values observed during MIS 6 and occurs synchronously with the interval of maximum and rapidly increasing magnetic susceptibility at ODP Site 983 (fig. S5), located upstream and closer to Iceland than ODP 982. The temporal alignment between enhanced lithogenic input at ODP 983 and peak εNd at ODP 982 strongly supports our interpretation that fast glaciation promotes intensified erosion, comminution, and export of Icelandic material, resulting in a nonlinear and pulse-like Icelandic imprint on downstream seawater εNd. Conversely, the weaker-than-expected imprint during MIS 5–3 is consistent with reduced lithogenic export and/or circulation conditions that limit the transfer of Icelandic inputs into the NE Atlantic. The nonlinear behavior could arise from a shelf-edge control, with maximal comminution and export occurring when the Icelandic Ice Sheet reached the continental shelf, whereas rapid retreat onto land would sharply reduce the downstream εNd impact. Overall, the results support the view that ice sheet–modulated Icelandic inputs, interacting with glacial circulation, are sufficient to drive the coherent, ice volume–paced εNd signal observed at Site 982. Consistent relationships between seawater εNd and global ice volume have also been documented on much longer timescales, extending back to the past 1.7 million years, suggesting that ice sheet–regulated weathering and circulation processes exert a persistent control on North Atlantic εNd evolution (58).

Fig. 6. NE Atlantic εNd variability and relative Icelandic Nd flux: Baseline model and Monte Carlo ensemble.

Fig. 6.

(A) εNd time series showing the LR04-based baseline (gray dashed line), the deterministic LR04 with dual modulation (orange dashed line), the MC percentile band P10 to P90 with median P50 (blue), and observations with 2 SD uncertainties (green points). (B) Observed εNd versus MC median prediction with asymmetric MC uncertainty (P10 to P90) and 2 SD analytical errors; the 1:1 line and an ordinary-least-squares fit are shown. (C) LR04 diagnostics: smoothed δ18O (gray line) and expansion rate referred from δ18O change rates (red line) with “fast glaciation” highlighted where positive rates exceed the 70th percentile. kyr, thousand years. (D) Relative Icelandic Nd flux from the MC ensemble (P10 to P90 and P50). The model quantifies the relative Icelandic radiogenic Nd contribution required to reproduce the observed εNd variability and indicates how Icelandic ice-sheet dynamics modulate NE Atlantic seawater chemistry. Further details are provided in Materials and Methods and the Supplementary Materials (tables S1 to S3).

Implications for glacial NE Atlantic trace element cycling

Our results, together with those of Roberts and Piotrowski (27), demonstrate that Iceland exerted a strong and systematic control on the isotopic composition of glacial NE Atlantic waters feeding GNAIW. Although the ODP 982 record represents only the upper GNAIW, the BOFS cores covering the entire 1000- to 4000-m water column, albeit restricted to the past 40,000 years, show the same pattern. Together, these datasets indicate that much of the NE Atlantic water column became more radiogenic during glacial periods, in phase with global ice growth and decay. This Icelandic Ice Sheet–regulated radiogenic input therefore represents a key, previously left unnoticed component of the glacial northern end-member. If ice sheet–modulated Iceland inputs exerted such a strong control on seawater εNd in the NE Atlantic, similar processes are likely to have operated in other high-latitude ice-sheet systems. This view is supported by observations from the Norwegian Sea, where seawater εNd shifted toward less negative values of −12 to −15 during the LGM (Fig. 4E and Table 1), consistent with enhanced weathering inputs from the Svalbard-Barents Ice Sheets (25). A comparable signal is observed in the Labrador Sea, where bottom-water εNd values reached −16 ± 1 during the LGM (Fig. 4C) (56). While this negative shift has been attributed to the influence of water sourced from Nordic Seas, it may also reflect contributions from Laurentide Ice Sheet. These observations motivate the hypothesis that glacial GNAIW was not isotopically homogeneous but instead comprised at least two regional end-members (78): a more radiogenic eastern component influenced by Icelandic volcanic inputs and a less radiogenic western component shaped by Laurentide and Greenland ice sheet contributions. Such east-west heterogeneity provides a coherent framework for reconciling εNd distribution in the glacial NE Atlantic and Labrador Sea, as well as GNAIW εNd values of ∼−10 in the mid-depth North Atlantic (24), reflecting mixing of eastern and western GNAIW components during southward advection. We explore the plausibility of this hypothesis using sensitivity experiments with the Global Neodymium Ocean Model (GNOM) (79). In a first experiment, we prescribe a radiogenic NSW mass (εNd = −7) in the NE Atlantic. This experiment yields εNd values of −9.0 to −8.5 in the mid-depth and deep Atlantic (fig. S7), more radiogenic than the reported GNAIW benchmark value of ∼−10 (24), implying the presence of an additional less radiogenic Nd source counterbalancing the Icelandic contribution. To account for this missing component, we conduct a second experiment in which we introduce a strongly unradiogenic NSW mass (εNd = −28) in Baffin Bay, representing enhanced erosion and weathering associated with the Laurentide and Greenland ice sheets, supported by the presence of Archean-aged Laurentian detrital carbonates in the North Atlantic region, which constitute a highly unradiogenic and potentially reactive Nd source (56). Under these combined eastern-western boundary conditions, GNOM reproduces intermediate εNd values of ∼−10.5 to −9.5 in the mid-depth and deep Atlantic (fig. S8), consistent with sedimentary reconstructions (3, 21, 24). Although these experiments are intentionally simplified and rely on modern circulation geometry and present-day source-sink parameterizations (see the Supplementary Materials for details), they demonstrate that the coexistence of a radiogenic eastern GNAIW component and an unradiogenic western component offers a physically plausible mechanism for explaining downstream εNd signatures during glacial periods.

This revised perspective may reshape the interpretation of seawater εNd records also from the South and deep Atlantic. Previous studies of deep Atlantic sites (e.g., IODP U1313 at 3414 m, ODP 1063 at 4584 m, and GGC 17 at 5010 m; Figs. 2E and 4D) document a shift to more positive εNd values (∼−10) during glacials, which has typically been interpreted as a reduction in NSW production and an enhanced influence of SSW (3, 4, 80). However, if the glacial NSW itself was relatively more positive because of the Icelandic inputs, these deep-Atlantic data can equally reflect a substantial persistence of NSWs. Independent constraints also indicate that NSW contributed more than 50% to the deep North Atlantic during the LGM (81). Therefore, the pervasive radiogenic εNd signature of the glacial Atlantic likely reflects a combination of both a changed northern end-member and sustained NSW mass proportions, rather than its wholesale replacement by SSW.

In view of the potentially large Nd contributions from Iceland systems revealed in our study, particularly during glacial periods, we quantified the Nd flux from Iceland via a simple steady-state box model (fig. S9). The model was constrained by a mean glacial GNAIW εNd value of −7.2 and a mean Icelandic end-member value (εNd = +6), with Atlantic inflow characterized by εNd = −14.5, similar to modern conditions (12, 82). Assuming a water-mass transport of 10 sverdrups, representative of typical glacial GNAIW volume transport (83), this yields an Icelandic Nd input flux of ∼3.9 × 108 g year−1. To further evaluate the uncertainty of this estimate, we propagated plausible end-member ranges of NE Atlantic surface seawater εNd (−16.0 to −10.0) in glacial and Icelandic source εNd (+4 to +8), together with a bracketing range of effective water-mass transport (5 to 10 sverdrups), using 20,000 Latin hypercube samples. The resulting flux distribution gives a median Icelandic Nd flux of 2.4 [1.0, 4.8] × 108 g year−1 [95% confidence interval (CI)] (fig. S10). A key uncertainty in the calculation is the effective transport of NSWs that acquired an Icelandic radiogenic imprint before being exported southward. Because the fractional contribution of the eastern component cannot be independently constrained, we do not assume that the full glacial GNAIW transport experienced Icelandic modification. Instead, we bracket the effective transport through the Iceland-influenced formation/exchange region by 5 to 10 sverdrups. The upper bound (10 sverdrups) corresponds to a typical estimate for glacial GNAIW transport, whereas the lower bound (5 sverdrups) reflects the likelihood that only a subset of this transport was ventilated and substantially modified in the NE Atlantic close to Iceland. Notably, radiogenic εNd values (−8 to −4) observed across much of the NE Atlantic water column (1000 to 4000 m) during glacial periods imply that our intermediate water–based flux estimates are conservative lower bounds. The derived flux of 2.4 [1.0, 4.8] × 108 g year−1 is comparable to the estimated global dust Nd input (2 × 108 to 4 × 108 g year−1) and represents 2.7% [1.1 to 5.3%] of the global Nd input to the oceans of 9 × 109 g year−1 or 4.4% [1.8 to 8.7%] if a smaller global input of 5.5 × 109 g year−1 is adopted (6, 84, 85). Although the glacial global Nd budget remains uncertain, this magnitude indicates that the Icelandic flux constituted an important component of the glacial North Atlantic Nd cycle.

The strong coupling among Icelandic Ice Sheet dynamics, volcanic Nd input, and seawater εNd evolution has further implications for trace element cycling in the glacial NE Atlantic. Enhanced subglacial erosion and comminution of basaltic bedrock during glacial maxima likely produced highly reactive detritus rich in iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), and other micronutrients, which would have been released to surrounding waters during partial dissolution (71). This interpretation agrees with modern evidence showing that ice-sheet systems are important sources of both macronutrients [nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and silicon (Si)] and micronutrients such as Fe (8689). Although the net effect of such inputs on primary productivity depends on additional controls including macronutrient availability, light, and temperature, reconstructed LGM productivity south of Iceland and off southern Greenland is comparable to modern values in both summer and winter (90). Constraining the coupled processes of ice-sheet dynamics and oceanic trace element cycling is therefore essential for reconstructing glacial trace element and isotope budgets and for assessing their role in modulating nutrient availability and climate feedbacks in the North Atlantic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Core information and chronology

ODP Site 982 was drilled in 1995 during Leg 162 of the Ocean Drilling Program. The site lies on the Rockall Plateau in the eastern North Atlantic (57°30.992N, 15°52.001W; 1135-m water depth) between the Halton Bank and Rockall Bank (Shipboard Scientific Party, 1996). Sediment samples from Hole A were taken in 5- to 10-cm intervals. Chronological control was established by tuning benthic foraminiferal δ18O (Cibicidoides spp.) to the global LR04 (91, 92). To assess how uncertainties in this tuning propagate into the Nd isotope record, we developed an MC framework (3000 realizations) that incorporates (i) analytical δ18O errors (±0.18‰), (ii) sampling-resolution limitations evaluated against high-frequency LR04 variability, and (iii) ±1-cm depth uncertainties in Nd sampling resulting from repeated historical sampling and foam refilling of the core. This ensemble approach highlights that the δ18O measurement error dominates during steep glacial-interglacial transitions, whereas coarse sampling resolution contributes the most in flat δ18O intervals (e.g., interglacials). As a result, tie-point age uncertainties are typically ∼1 to 2 ka, and Nd samples carry broader uncertainties of ∼2 to 4 ka (95% CI). This probabilistic age-depth framework ensures that our interpretations of Nd isotope variability are grounded in a robust assessment of chronological uncertainty. Full methodological details are provided in the Supplementary Materials (fig. S2).

Sample treatment

Sediment samples were freeze dried and homogenized before weighing. Approximately 0.4 to 0.5 g of sediment was treated first with >18.2-MΩ grade deionized water to remove any exchangeable ions (93). Sediment was then treated with a weak reductive solution (0.005 M hydroxylamine hydrochloride/1.5% acetic acid/0.03 M Na-EDTA solution buffered to pH 4 with trace metal clean class ammonia) for 10 s following Huang et al. (93) for extracting the authigenic Fe-Mn oxyhydroxide fraction. Total procedural blanks were below 0.25 ng for Nd (n = 6), which is well below 0.1% of sample yields, and were hence negligible. The reproducibility was monitored by leaching two repeat samples with εNd values of −12.0 ± 0.16 (±2 SD, n = 3) and −10.9 ± 0.05 (±2 SD, n = 4), respectively. Carbonate was removed using a Na acetate solution buffer to pH 4 with acetic acid (Merck Suprapur) following Gutjahr et al. (94). These sequential extraction steps do not dissolve silicate phases; any reactive Icelandic basaltic material present in the sediment would therefore be retained in the residual fraction. After centrifugation and decanting of the supernatant, the sediment sample was triple rinsed in >18.2-MΩ water. The sediments were then treated with a strong reductive solution (0.05 M hydroxylamine hydrochloride/15% acetic acid/0.03 M Na-EDTA solution buffered to pH 4 with trace metal clean class ammonia) overnight to completely remove residual Fe-Mn oxyhydroxides following the method applied by Gutjahr et al. (94). The residual samples were dried at a low temperature (<45°C) in an oven and homogenized before alkaline fusion following Bayon et al. (95). To obtain the Nd isotopic signature of clay-size residual samples, several same depth/age samples were selected and treated with the same procedure above (i.e., deionized water, weak reductive solution, and decarbonated, strong reductive solution) but separated into clay and silt fractions following the method of Bretschneider et al. (96) before alkaline fusion. The accuracy and reproducibility of the fusion technique were monitored by processing reference materials including the USGS reference material BHVO-2 (n = 3) and repeat sediment samples, as shown in data S1. Total procedural blanks were below 0.3 ng for Nd (n = 3) and are therefore negligible.

Nd isotope analyses

The REEs of samples were separated from matrix elements using cation exchange chromatography (AG 50W-X8) following the scheme of Stichel et al. (14). Nd was further separated from the other REEs for isotope measurements using Eichrom LN-Spec resin following the procedure of Pin and Zalduegui (97). The 143Nd/144Nd ratios were measured on a Neptune Plus MC-ICP-MS at the Institute of Environmental Physics of Heidelberg University and were corrected for instrumental mass bias to 146Nd/144Nd = 0.7219 following the approach of Vance and Thirlwall (98). During the measurement, the normalized argon index was monitored and was higher than 0.25 to obtain a hot plasma for decreasing the nonexponential mass fractionation of Nd analyses following Yu et al. (99). The 143Nd/144Nd ratios of all samples were normalized to bracketing analyses of the GSB 04-3258-2015 standard with a value of 0.512438 (100). The secondary standard solution NIST 3135a, USGS reference material NOD-A-1, and internal reference HeiNds were run with authigenic samples, and the USGS reference material BHVO-2 was run with residual samples to check the accuracy and external reproducibility of the procedure for Nd isotope measurements (data S1). The external reproducibility of the Nd isotope measurements of samples was determined using standard solutions with concentrations matching those of the measured samples in the range of 0.15 to 0.18 εNd units (2 SD). The Nd isotopic composition is expressed as εNd = [(143Nd/144Nd)sample/(143Nd/144Nd)CHUR − 1] × 104 with CHUR (chondritic uniform reservoir) = 0.512638 (101). The pooled 2 SD of the secondary standard NIST, NOD-A-1, and HeiNds is used to illustrate the reproducibility of measured Nd isotopic compositions in all figures and is shown in data S1.

Forward mixing model for NE Atlantic εNd variability

We developed a forward mixing model with MC uncertainty propagation to reconstruct NE Atlantic εNd variability and quantify the relative contribution of Iceland-sourced Nd. The model is physically constrained by the LR04 benthic δ18O stack and calibrated to the LGM εNd value of −7.7 at ODP Site 982, incorporating both deterministic relationships and comprehensive uncertainty propagation. In the first stage, we established a deterministic LR04-based projection that translates the LR04 stack into Icelandic flux variations. We defined a glacial index S(t) through min-max scaling of the δ18O record (Eq. 1)

S(t)=δ(t)δ(min)δ(max)δ(min)[0,1] (1)

The raw Icelandic fraction Fraw(t) was set equal to S(t), with a scaling factor λ determined to reproduce the target LGM εNd. End-member values were based on modern water mass characteristics: εbg = −13.8 (NE Atlantic Seawater at ∼1000-m depth) and εI = +6 (mean value of Icelandic input). The predicted εNdpred(t)] follows below mixing (Eq. 2)

εpred (t)=εbg[1λFraw(t)]+εIλFraw(t) (2)

To capture suborbital variability not explained by simple ice-volume forcing, we implemented a time-dependent modulation scheme M(t) applied to Fraw before λ-scaling. This dual modulation incorporates time-variable transport efficiencies: (i) buffering during 30 to 120 ka primarily weighted by the δ18O-derived ice-growth rate (85%) with a secondary absolute-δ18O term (15%) and (ii) enhancement during 170 to 195 ka with similar weighting. Fast-glaciation events (growth rates in top 30%, δ18O ≥ 4.0‰, duration ≥1 ka) received special treatment: protection from excessive attenuation during buffering and amplification during enhancement. The effective Icelandic fraction [F(t)] becomes (Eq. 3)

F(t)=clip {λ·clip[Fraw(t) M(t), 0, 1],0,1} (3)

In the second stage, we propagated uncertainties through an MC ensemble (N = 2000). Each realization incorporated Nd age uncertainties, Icelandic end-member variability (εI = +4 to +8), and state-dependent background εNd (interglacials: −13.8; glacials: −16.0 to −10.0). Ensemble predictions were interpolated to original Nd ages and summarized as P10/P50/P90 percentiles. Model performance was evaluated using both R2 and RMSE between the median predictions and observations. Further parameter ranges and details are provided in the Supplementary Materials (tables S1 to S3 and fig. S4).

Acknowledgments

Sediment samples from ODP Site 982 were provided by the ODP/IODP core repository in Bremen, Germany. We are particularly grateful to T. Liu and N. Zhao for valuable discussions and to B. Pasquier, K. Li, and S. Hines for assistance with the application of GNOM. We thank E. Hathorne for the help on detrital Nd isotope measurements. We thank the reviewers for constructive comments and the editor for the careful handling of the manuscript, which helped improve its clarity and quality. For the publication fee, we acknowledge financial support by Heidelberg University.

Funding:

This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, no. 527457453) through financial support to A.X.

Author contributions:

Conceptualization: A.X. and N.F. Methodology: A.X., K.J., and N.F. Investigation: A.X. and K.J. Data curation: A.X. Software: A.X. Formal analysis: A.X. and N.F. Validation: A.X., J.S., and N.F. Visualization: A.X. Resources: N.F. Funding acquisition: N.F. Project administration: A.X. and N.F. Supervision: A.X. and N.F. Writing—original draft: A.X. Writing—review and editing: A.X., K.J., A.P., J.S., and N.F.

Competing interests:

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Data, code, and materials availability:

All data and code needed to evaluate and reproduce the results in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. This study did not generate new materials. All geochemical data and forward mixing model code generated in this study have been deposited in the Zenodo repository (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20081557) and are available on PANGAEA (https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.994032; https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.994033; https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.994034). The GNOM, which was reused in this study, is published and openly available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6118414). The sediment core samples used in this study are archived at the IODP Bremen Core Repository (Germany). Researchers may request samples by creating a free account in the IODP Sample, Data, and Research Request Manager (SDRM; https://web.iodp.tamu.edu/SDRM/) and submitting a sample request. Requests are subject to review and approval by the repository curator in accordance with repository policies. Further enquiries can be directed to BCR@marum.de.

Supplementary Materials

The PDF file includes:

Supplementary Text

Figs. S1 to S10

Tables S1 to S4

Legend for data S1

sciadv.aeg5747_sm.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

Other Supplementary Material for this manuscript includes the following:

Data S1

REFERENCES

  • 1.Frank M., Radiogenic isotopes: Tracers of past ocean circulation and erosional input. Rev. Geophys. 40, 1–38 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rahlf P., Hathorne E., Laukert G., Gutjahr M., Weldeab S., Frank M., Tracing water mass mixing and continental inputs in the southeastern Atlantic Ocean with dissolved neodymium isotopes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 530, 115944 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Roberts N. L., Piotrowski A. M., McManus J. F., Keigwin L. D., Synchronous deglacial overturning and water mass source changes. Science 327, 75–78 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Böhm E., Lippold J., Gutjahr M., Frank M., Blaser P., Antz B., Fohlmeister J., Frank N., Andersen M. B., Deininger M., Strong and deep Atlantic meridional overturning circulation during the last glacial cycle. Nature 517, 73–76 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Xu A., Hathorne E., Laukert G., Frank M., Overlooked riverine contributions of dissolved neodymium and hafnium to the Amazon estuary and oceans. Nat. Commun. 14, 4156 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tachikawa K., Athias V., Jeandel C., Neodymium budget in the modern ocean and paleo-oceanographic implications. J. Geophys. Res. 108, C8 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pöppelmeier F., Scheen J., Blaser P., Lippold J., Gutjahr M., Stocker T. F., Influence of elevated Nd fluxes on the Northern Nd isotope end member of the atlantic during the early holocene. Paleoceanogr. Paleoclimatol. 35, e2020PA003973 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Robinson S., Ivanovic R. F., Gregoire L. J., Tindall J., van de Flierdt T., Plancherel Y., Pöppelmeier F., Tachikawa K., Valdes P. J., Simulating marine neodymium isotope distributions using Nd v1.0 coupled to the ocean component of the FAMOUS–MOSES1 climate model: Sensitivities to reversible scavenging efficiency and benthic source distributions. Geosci. Model Dev. 16, 1231–1264 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lambelet M., van de Flierdt T., Crocket K., Rehkämper M., Kreissig K., Coles B., Rijkenberg M. J. A., Gerringa L. J. A., de Baar H. J. W., Steinfeldt R., Neodymium isotopic composition and concentration in the western North Atlantic Ocean: Results from the GEOTRACES GA02 section. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 177, 1–29 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Piepgras D. J., Wasserburg G. J., Rare earth element transport in the western North Atlantic inferred from Nd isotopic observations. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 51, 1257–1271 (1987). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tachikawa K., Arsouze T., Bayon G., Bory A., Colin C., Dutay J.-C., Frank N., Giraud X., Gourlan A. T., Jeandel C., Lacan F., Meynadier L., Montagna P., Piotrowski A. M., Plancherel Y., Pucéat E., Roy-Barman M., Waelbroeck C., The large-scale evolution of neodymium isotopic composition in the global modern and Holocene ocean revealed from seawater and archive data. Chem. Geol. 457, 131–148 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dubois-Dauphin Q., Colin C., Bonneau L., Montagna P., Wu Q., Van Rooij D., Reverdin G., Douville E., Thil F., Waldner A., Frank N., Fingerprinting Northeast Atlantic water masses using neodymium isotopes. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 210, 267–288 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jeandel C., Arsouze T., Lacan F., Téchiné P., Dutay J. C., Isotopic Nd compositions and concentrations of the lithogenic inputs into the ocean: A compilation, with an emphasis on the margins. Chem. Geol. 239, 156–164 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Stichel T., Frank M., Rickli J., Haley B. A., The hafnium and neodymium isotope composition of seawater in the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 317, 282–294 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wu Y., Pena L. D., Anderson R. F., Hartman A. E., Bolge L. L., Basak C., Kim J., Rijkenberg M. J. A., de Baar H. J. W., Goldstein S. L., Assessing neodymium isotopes as an ocean circulation tracer in the Southwest Atlantic. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 599, 117846 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Griffiths A., Lambelet M., Crocket K., Abell R., Coles B. J., Kreissig K., Porter D., Nitsche F. O., Rehkämper M., van de Flierdt T., Neodymium isotope composition and rare earth element distribution of East Antarctic continental shelf and deep waters. Chem. Geol. 653, 122039 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Foster G. L., Vance D., Prytulak J., No change in the neodymium isotope composition of deep water exported from the North Atlantic on glacial-interglacial time scales. Geology 35, 37–40 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.van de Flierdt T., Robinson L. F., Adkins J. F., Hemming S. R., Goldstein S. L., Temporal stability of the neodymium isotope signature of the Holocene to glacial North Atlantic. Paleoceanography 21, PA4102 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Oppo D. W., Lehman S. J., Mid-depth circulation of the subpolar North Atlantic during the last glacial maximum. Science 259, 1148–1152 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Prestrud Anderson S., Drever J. I., Humphrey N. F., Chemical weathering in glacial environments. Geology 25, 399–402 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gutjahr M., Frank M., Stirling C. H., Keigwin L. D., Halliday A. N., Tracing the Nd isotope evolution of North Atlantic Deep and Intermediate Waters in the western North Atlantic since the Last Glacial Maximum from Blake Ridge sediments. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 266, 61–77 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Xie R. C., Marcantonio F., Schmidt M. W., Reconstruction of intermediate water circulation in the tropical North Atlantic during the past 22,000 years. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 140, 455–467 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hallmaier M., Ruckert E. M., Chen Y., Link J. M., Lizio R., Lohmann G., Gutjahr M., Frank N., Glacial Southern Ocean deep water Nd isotopic composition dominated by benthic modification. Sci. Rep. 15, 2586 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhao N., Oppo D. W., Huang K. F., Howe J. N. W., Blusztajn J., Keigwin L. D., Glacial-interglacial Nd isotope variability of North Atlantic deep water modulated by North American ice sheet. Nat. Commun. 10, 5773 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Struve T., Roberts N. L., Frank M., Piotrowski A. M., Spielhagen R. F., Gutjahr M., Teschner C., Bauch H. A., Ice-sheet driven weathering input and water mass mixing in the Nordic Seas during the last 25,000 years. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 514, 108–118 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Larkin C. S., Ezat M. M., Roberts N. L., Bauch H. A., Spielhagen R. F., Noormets R., Polyak L., Moreton S. G., Rasmussen T. L., Sarnthein M., Tipper E. T., Piotrowski A. M., Active Nordic Seas deep-water formation during the last glacial maximum. Nat. Geosci. 15, 925–931 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Roberts N. L., Piotrowski A. M., Radiogenic Nd isotope labeling of the northern NE Atlantic during MIS 2. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 423, 125–133 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gu S., Liu Z., Ng H. C., Lynch-Stieglitz J., McManus J. F., Spall M., Jahn A., He C., Li L., Yan M., Wu L., Open ocean convection drives enhanced eastern pathway of the Glacial Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 121, e2405051121 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Du J., Haley B. A., Mix A. C., Evolution of the Global Overturning Circulation since the Last Glacial Maximum based on marine authigenic neodymium isotopes. Quat. Sci. Rev. 241, 106396 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Abbott A. N., Haley B. A., McManus J., Bottoms up: Sedimentary control of the deep North Pacific Ocean’s εNd signature. Geology 43, 1035–1035 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Colin C., Frank N., Copard K., Douville E., Neodymium isotopic composition of deep-sea corals from the NE Atlantic: Implications for past hydrological changes during the Holocene. Quat. Sci. Rev. 29, 2509–2517 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Copard K., Colin C., Henderson G. M., Scholten J., Douville E., Sicre M. A., Frank N., Late Holocene intermediate water variability in the northeastern Atlantic as recorded by deep-sea corals. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 313-314, 34–44 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xu A., Hathorne E., Scholz F., Ling C., Koschinsky A., Frank M., Sediment resuspension and reductive dissolution of terrigenous Fe-Mn oxides control dissolved neodymium and hafnium inputs from the Amazon shelf. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 416, 1–16 (2026). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Paul S. A. L., Gutjahr M., Xu A., Fröhberg N., Hathorne E., Scholz F., Frank M., The Nd isotope composition of oxic pore waters of marine sediments and implications for its use as a past water mass proxy. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 410, 141–159 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Blaser P., Lippold J., Gutjahr M., Frank N., Link J. M., Frank M., Extracting foraminiferal seawater Nd isotope signatures from bulk deep sea sediment by chemical leaching. Chem. Geol. 439, 189–204 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Martin E. E., Blair S. W., Kamenov G. D., Scher H. D., Bourbon E., Basak C., Newkirk D. N., Extraction of Nd isotopes from bulk deep sea sediments for paleoceanographic studies on Cenozoic time scales. Chem. Geol. 269, 414–431 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lacan F., Jeandel C., Acquisition of the neodymium isotopic composition of the North Atlantic deep water. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 6, Q12008 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Filippova A., Frank M., Kienast M., Rickli J., Hathorne E., Yashayaev I. M., Pahnke K., Water mass circulation and weathering inputs in the Labrador Sea based on coupled Hf–Nd isotope compositions and rare earth element distributions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 199, 164–184 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Howe J. N., Piotrowski A. M., Oppo D. W., Huang K. F., Mulitza S., Chiessi C. M., Blusztajn J., Antarctic intermediate water circulation in the South Atlantic over the past 25,000 years. Paleoceanography 31, 1302–1314 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Xie R. C., Marcantonio F., Schmidt M. W., Deglacial variability of Antarctic Intermediate Water penetration into the North Atlantic from authigenic neodymium isotope ratios. Paleoceanography 27, PA3221 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zahn R., Stüber A., Suborbital intermediate water variability inferred from paired benthic foraminiferal Cd/Ca and δ13C in the tropical West Atlantic and linking with North Atlantic climates. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 200, 191–205 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tachikawa K., Roy-Barman M., Michard A., Thouron D., Yeghicheyan D., Jeandel C., Neodymium isotopes in the Mediterranean Sea: Comparison between seawater and sediment signals. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 68, 3095–3106 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Spivack A. J., Wasserburg G., Neodymium isotopic composition of the Mediterranean outflow and the eastern North Atlantic. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 52, 2767–2773 (1988). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Stumpf R., Frank M., Schönfeld J., Haley B. A., Late quaternary variability of Mediterranean outflow water from radiogenic Nd and Pb isotopes. Quat. Sci. Rev. 29, 2462–2472 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dubois-Dauphin Q., Bonneau L., Colin C., Montero-Serrano J. C., Montagna P., Blamart D., Hebbeln D., Van Rooij D., Pons-Branchu E., Hemsing F., Wefing A. M., Frank N., South Atlantic intermediate water advances into the North-east Atlantic with reduced Atlantic meridional overturning circulation during the last glacial period. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 17, 2336–2353 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Dubois-Dauphin Q., Montagna P., Siani G., Douville E., Wienberg C., Hebbeln D., Liu Z., Kallel N., Dapoigny A., Revel M., Pons-Branchu E., Taviani M., Colin C., Hydrological variations of the intermediate water masses of the western Mediterranean Sea during the past 20 ka inferred from neodymium isotopic composition in foraminifera and cold-water corals. Clim. Past 13, 17–37 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Copard K., Colin C., Frank N., Jeandel C., Montero-Serrano J.-C., Reverdin G., Ferron B., Nd isotopic composition of water masses and dilution of the Mediterranean outflow along the southwest European margin. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 12, Q06020 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mertz D. F., Devey C. W., Todt W., Stoffers P., Hofmann A. W., Sr-Nd-Pb isotope evidence against plume-asthenosphere mixing north of Iceland. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 107, 243–255 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Holm P. M., Hald N., Waagstein R., Geochemical and Pb–Sr–Nd isotopic evidence for separate hot depleted and Iceland plume mantle sources for the Paleogene basalts of the Faroe Islands. Chem. Geol. 178, 95–125 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lacan F., Jeandel C., Neodymium isotopic composition and rare earth element concentrations in the deep and intermediate Nordic Seas: Constraints on the Iceland Scotland Overflow Water signature. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 5, Q11006 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Du J., Haley B. A., Mix A. C., Neodymium isotopes in authigenic phases, bottom waters and detrital sediments in the Gulf of Alaska and their implications for paleo-circulation reconstruction. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 193, 14–35 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pöppelmeier F., Lippold J., Blaser P., Gutjahr M., Frank M., Stocker T. F., Neodymium isotopes as a paleo-water mass tracer: A model-data reassessment. Quat. Sci. Rev. 279, 107404 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Grützner J., Higgins S. M., Threshold behavior of millennial scale variability in deep water hydrography inferred from a 1.1 Ma long record of sediment provenance at the southern Gardar Drift. Paleoceanography 25, PA4204 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yu J., Elderfield H., Piotrowski A. M., Seawater carbonate ion-δ13C systematics and application to glacial–interglacial North Atlantic ocean circulation. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 271, 209–220 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Crocker A. J., Chalk T. B., Bailey I., Spencer M. R., Gutjahr M., Foster G. L., Wilson P. A., Geochemical response of the mid-depth Northeast Atlantic Ocean to freshwater input during Heinrich events 1 to 4. Quat. Sci. Rev. 151, 236–254 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Blaser P., Gutjahr M., Pöppelmeier F., Frank M., Kaboth-Bahr S., Lippold J., Labrador Sea bottom water provenance and REE exchange during the past 35,000 years. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 542, 116479 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Filippova A., Frank M., Kienast M., Gutjahr M., Hathorne E. C., Hillaire-Marcel C., Authigenic and detrital carbonate Nd isotope records reflect pulses of detrital material input to the Labrador Sea during the Heinrich stadials. Paleoceanogr. Paleoclimatol. 38, e2022PA004470 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Williams T. J., Piotrowski A. M., Howe J. N. W., Hillenbrand C.-D., Allen C. S., Clegg J. A., The role of ocean circulation and regolith removal in triggering the Mid-Pleistocene Transition: Insights from authigenic Nd isotopes. Quat. Sci. Rev. 345, 109055 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Maclennan J., Jull M., McKenzie D., Slater L., Grönvold K., The link between volcanism and deglaciation in Iceland. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 3, 1–25 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Morrison R., Waldner A., Hathorne E. C., Rahlf P., Zieringer M., Montagna P., Colin C., Frank N., Frank M., Limited influence of basalt weathering inputs on the seawater neodymium isotope composition of the northern Iceland Basin. Chem. Geol. 511, 358–370 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Shorttle O., Maclennan J., Piotrowski A. M., Geochemical provincialism in the Iceland plume. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 122, 363–397 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Condomines M., Grönvold K., Hooker P. J., Muehlenbachs K., O’Nions R. K., Oskarsson N., Oxburgh E. R., Helium, oxygen, strontium and neodymium isotopic relationships in Icelandic volcanics. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 66, 125–136 (1983). [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Farmer G. L., Barber D., Andrews J., Provenance of Late Quaternary ice-proximal sediments in the North Atlantic: Nd, Sr and Pb isotopic evidence. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 209, 227–243 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 64.S. Espinosa-Paz, I. Regada, S. Campderrós, M. Navarro-Buigues, E. Garcia-Solsona, E. Paredes-Paredes, M. Arjona-Camas, M. Cerdà-Domènech, J. Frigola, G. Lastras, “Neodymium isotopes (εNd) in the Denmark Strait: Insights into water mass processes,” in Goldschmidt 2025 Conference (GOLDSCHMIDT, Prague, 2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hubbard A., Sugden D., Dugmore A., Norddahl H., Pétursson H. G., A modelling insight into the Icelandic Last Glacial Maximum ice sheet. Quat. Sci. Rev. 25, 2283–2296 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Syvitski J. P., Jennings A. E., Andrews J. T., High-resolution seismic evidence for multiple glaciation across the Southwest Iceland Shelf. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 31, 50–57 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Andrews J. T., The role of the Iceland Ice Sheet in the North Atlantic during the late Quaternary: A review and evidence from Denmark Strait. J. Quat. Sci. 23, 3–20 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Goffin A. A., Tarasov L., Benediktsson Í. Ö., Licciardi J. M., Growth and decay of the Iceland Ice Sheet through the last glacial cycle. Clim. Past 22, 825–843 (2026). [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Hallet B., Hunter L., Bogen J., Rates of erosion and sediment evacuation by glaciers: A review of field data and their implications. Global Planet. Change 12, 213–235 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Robinson S., Ivanovic R., van de Flierdt T., Blanchet C. L., Tachikawa K., Martin E. E., Cook C. P., Williams T., Gregoire L., Plancherel Y., Jeandel C., Arsouze T., Global continental and marine detrital εNd: An updated compilation for use in understanding marine Nd cycling. Chem. Geol. 567, 120119 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Pearce C. R., Jones M. T., Oelkers E. H., Pradoux C., Jeandel C., The effect of particulate dissolution on the neodymium (Nd) isotope and Rare Earth Element (REE) composition of seawater. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 369-370, 138–147 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Vogt-Vincent N., Lippold J., Kaboth-Bahr S., Blaser P., Ice-rafted debris as a source of non-conservative behaviour for the εNd palaeotracer: Insights from a simple model. Geo-Mar. Lett. 40, 325–340 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Pflaumann U., Sarnthein M., Chapman M., d’Abreu L., Funnell B., Huels M., Kiefer T., Maslin M., Schulz H., Swallow J., van Kreveld S., Vautravers M., Vogelsang E., Weinelt M., Glacial North Atlantic: Sea-surface conditions reconstructed by GLAMAP 2000. Paleoceanography 18, 1065 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Duplessy J.-C., Moyes J., Pujol C., Deep water formation in the North Atlantic Ocean during the last ice age. Nature 286, 479–482 (1980). [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Rahmstorf S., Ocean circulation and climate during the past 120,000 years. Nature 419, 207–214 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Poppelmeier F., Jeltsch-Thommes A., Lippold J., Joos F., Stocker T. F., Multi-proxy constraints on Atlantic circulation dynamics since the last ice age. Nat. Geosci. 16, 349–356 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Geirsdóttir Á., Miller G. H., Andrews J. T., Glaciation, erosion, and landscape evolution of Iceland. J. Geodyn. 43, 170–186 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Keigwin L. D., Swift S. A., Carbon isotope evidence for a northern source of deep water in the glacial western North Atlantic. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 2831–2835 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Pasquier B., Hines S. K. V., Liang H., Wu Y., Goldstein S. L., John S. G., GNOM v1.0: An optimized steady-state model of the modern marine neodymium cycle. Geosci. Model Dev. 15, 4625–4656 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Lippold J., Gutjahr M., Blaser P., Christner E., de Carvalho Ferreira M. L., Mulitza S., Christl M., Wombacher F., Böhm E., Antz B., Cartapanis O., Vogel H., Jaccard S. L., Deep water provenance and dynamics of the (de)glacial Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 445, 68–78 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Howe J. N. W., Piotrowski A. M., Noble T. L., Mulitza S., Chiessi C. M., Bayon G., North Atlantic deep water production during the last glacial maximum. Nat. Commun. 7, 11765 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Dubois-Dauphin Q., Colin C., Elliot M., Förstel J., Haurine F., Pinna R., Douville E., Frank N., The spatial and temporal distribution of neodymium isotopic composition within the Rockall Trough. Prog. Oceanogr. 218, 103127 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Paul A., Schäfer-Neth C., Modeling the water masses of the Atlantic Ocean at the Last Glacial Maximum. Paleoceanography 18, 1058 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Rempfer J., Stocker T. F., Joos F., Dutay J.-C., Siddall M., Modelling Nd-isotopes with a coarse resolution ocean circulation model: Sensitivities to model parameters and source/sink distributions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 5927–5950 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Gu S., Liu Z., Jahn A., Rempfer J., Zhang J., Joos F., Modeling neodymium isotopes in the ocean component of the Community Earth System Model (CESM1). J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 11, 624–640 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Hawkings J. R., Wadham J. L., Tranter M., Raiswell R., Benning L. G., Statham P. J., Tedstone A., Nienow P., Lee K., Telling J., Ice sheets as a significant source of highly reactive nanoparticulate iron to the oceans. Nat. Commun. 5, 3929 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hodson A., Anesio A. M., Tranter M., Fountain A., Osborn M., Priscu J., Laybourn-Parry J., Sattler B., Glacial ecosystems. Ecol. Monogr. 78, 41–67 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Hawkings J. R., Wadham J. L., Benning L. G., Hendry K. R., Tranter M., Tedstone A., Nienow P., Raiswell R., Ice sheets as a missing source of silica to the polar oceans. Nat. Commun. 8, 14198 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Forsch K. O., Ruacho A., Aarons S. M., Tidewater cycle drives alpine glacial sediment plume geochemistry. Nat. Commun. 16, 9211 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Radi T., de Vernal A., Last glacial maximum (LGM) primary productivity in the northern North Atlantic Ocean. Can. J. Earth Sci. 45, 1299–1316 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Lisiecki L. E., Raymo M. E., A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records. Paleoceanography 20, PA1003 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Venz K. A., Hodell D. A., Stanton C., Warnke D. A., A 1.0 Myr record of glacial North Atlantic intermediate water variability from ODP Site 982 in the Northeast Atlantic. Paleoceanography 14, 42–52 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Huang H., Gutjahr M., Kuhn G., Hathorne E. C., Eisenhauer A., Efficient extraction of past seawater Pb and Nd isotope signatures from southern ocean sediments. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 22, e2020GC009287 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Gutjahr M., Frank M., Stirling C. H., Klemm V., van de Flierdt T., Halliday A. N., Reliable extraction of a deepwater trace metal isotope signal from Fe–Mn oxyhydroxide coatings of marine sediments. Chem. Geol. 242, 351–370 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Bayon G., Barrat J. A., Etoubleau J., Benoit M., Bollinger C., Révillon S., Determination of rare earth elements, Sc, Y, Zr, Ba, Hf and Th in geological samples by ICP-MS after Tm addition and alkaline fusion. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 33, 51–62 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Bretschneider L., Hathorne E. C., Huang H., Lübbers J., Kochhann K. G. D., Holbourn A., Kuhnt W., Thiede R., Gebregiorgis D., Giosan L., Frank M., Provenance and weathering of clays delivered to the bay of Bengal during the middle Miocene: Linkages to tectonics and monsoonal climate. Paleoceanogr. Paleoclimatol. 36, e2020PA003917 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Pin C., Zalduegui J. S., Sequential separation of light rare-earth elements, thorium and uranium by miniaturized extraction chromatography: Application to isotopic analyses of silicate rocks. Anal. Chim. Acta 339, 79–89 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Vance D., Thirlwall M., An assessment of mass discrimination in MC-ICPMS using Nd isotopes. Chem. Geol. 185, 227–240 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Yu Y., Hathorne E., Siebert C., Gutjahr M., Fietzke J., Frank M., Unravelling instrumental mass fractionation of MC-ICP-MS using neodymium isotopes. Chem. Geol. 662, 122220 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Li J., Tang S.-h., Zhu X.-k., Pan C.-x., Production and certification of the reference material GSB 04-3258-2015 as a 143Nd/144Nd isotope ratio reference. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 41, 255–262 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Jacobsen S. B., Wasserburg G. J., Sm-Nd isotopic evolution of chondrites. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 50, 139–155 (1980). [Google Scholar]
  • 102.R. Schlitzer, Ocean data view (2020); https://odv.awi.de/.
  • 103.Spratt R. M., Lisiecki L. E., A Late Pleistocene sea level stack. Clim. Past 12, 1079–1092 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 104.E. Jansen, P. Blum, Shipboard Scientific Party, Magnetic susceptibility on ODP Hole 162-982A [dataset]. PANGAEA (2005); 10.1594/PANGAEA.265945. [DOI]
  • 105.Pöppelmeier F., Gutjahr M., Blaser P., Schulz H., Süfke F., Lippold J., Stable Atlantic deep water mass sourcing on glacial-interglacial timescales. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2021GL092722 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Pöppelmeier F., Gutjahr M., Blaser P., Keigwin L. D., Lippold J., Origin of abyssal NW Atlantic water masses since the last glacial maximum. Paleoceanogr. Paleoclimatol. 33, 530–543 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Lang D. C., Bailey I., Wilson P. A., Chalk T. B., Foster G. L., Gutjahr M., Incursions of southern-sourced water into the deep North Atlantic during late Pliocene glacial intensification. Nat. Geosci. 9, 375–379 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Kim J., Goldstein S. L., Pena L. D., Jaume-Seguí M., Knudson K. P., Yehudai M., Bolge L., North Atlantic Deep Water during Pleistocene interglacials and glacials. Quat. Sci. Rev. 269, 107146 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 109.J. M. Link, “Atlantic deep circulation during Marine Isotope Stage 11 and the last one million years inferred from neodymium isotopes,” thesis, Heidelberg University (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Lippold J., Pöppelmeier F., Süfke F., Gutjahr M., Goepfert T. J., Blaser P., Friedrich O., Link J. M., Wacker L., Rheinberger S., Jaccard S. L., Constraining the variability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation during the Holocene. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 11338–11346 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Gutjahr M., Lippold J., Early arrival of southern source water in the deep North Atlantic prior to Heinrich event 2. Paleoceanography 26, PA2101 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  • 112.R. Huber, K.-H. Baumann, Summary of foraminifer and ice rafted debris counts from ODP Site 162-982 [dataset], PANGAEA (2017); 10.1594/PANGAEA.884356. [DOI]
  • 113.Barker S., Chen J., Gong X., Jonkers L., Knorr G., Thornalley D., Icebergs not the trigger for North Atlantic cold events. Nature 520, 333–336 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Stärz M., Gong X., Stein R., Darby D. A., Kauker F., Lohmann G., Glacial shortcut of Arctic sea-ice transport. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 357-358, 257–267 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Piepgras D. J., Wasserburg G. J., Influence of the Mediterranean outflow on the isotopic composition of neodymium in waters of the North Atlantic. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 88, 5997–6006 (1983). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Text

Figs. S1 to S10

Tables S1 to S4

Legend for data S1

sciadv.aeg5747_sm.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

Data S1

Data Availability Statement

All data and code needed to evaluate and reproduce the results in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. This study did not generate new materials. All geochemical data and forward mixing model code generated in this study have been deposited in the Zenodo repository (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20081557) and are available on PANGAEA (https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.994032; https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.994033; https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.994034). The GNOM, which was reused in this study, is published and openly available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6118414). The sediment core samples used in this study are archived at the IODP Bremen Core Repository (Germany). Researchers may request samples by creating a free account in the IODP Sample, Data, and Research Request Manager (SDRM; https://web.iodp.tamu.edu/SDRM/) and submitting a sample request. Requests are subject to review and approval by the repository curator in accordance with repository policies. Further enquiries can be directed to BCR@marum.de.


Articles from Science Advances are provided here courtesy of American Association for the Advancement of Science

RESOURCES