Abstract
Selenium (Se) is an essential micronutrient that participates in redox regulation and cellular homeostasis. Selenium-containing ionic liquids (ILsSe) have emerged as hybrid compounds combining the properties of organoselenium molecules with the tunable features of ionic liquids. In this study, we evaluated the cytotoxicity, interaction with mercury (Hg2+), pharmacokinetic profile, and antiproliferative activity of three ILsSe (C1, C2, and C3). Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were used to assess cytotoxicity, showing that ILsSe were generally well tolerated at low micromolar concentrations, although their effects were dependent on exposure time and dose. The interaction of ILsSe with Hg2+ was investigated using a thiol oxidase assay, with diphenyl diselenide (DPDS) as a reference compound. The results indicate that ILsSe can interact with Hg2+, likely through the formation of Se–Hg species. In parallel, in silico absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) analysis suggested that these compounds have physicochemical properties compatible with central nervous system exposure, including predicted blood–brain barrier permeability. In U87-MG glioblastoma cells, compound C3 exhibited concentration and time-dependent antiproliferative effects at low micromolar concentrations. These effects were associated with alterations in redox homeostasis, modulation of cell cycle progression, and induction of late-stage cell death. In general, ILsSe are biologically active compounds whose effects depend on dose and exposure time, warranting further investigation to clarify their toxicological profile and mechanisms of action. This study highlights the importance and biological potential of selenium-containing compounds.
1 ∣. Introduction
Selenium (Se) is an essential trace element for humans and other living organisms, incorporated as selenocysteine into at least 25 selenoproteins involved in key physiological processes, including antioxidant defense, thyroid hormone metabolism, and redox homeostasis (Hariharan and Dharmaraj 2020; Shahidin et al. 2025; Labunskyy et al. 2014).
Organic Se compounds have attracted considerable attention due to their biological activities, among which are redox modulation, antiproliferative effects, and their ability to interact with electrophilic mercury species (Barbosa et al. 2017, 2024; de Freitas et al. 2009; Harmanci et al. 2017; Pablo Andrei Nogara et al. 2021; Nogueira et al. 2021; Radomska et al. 2021; Tinggi and Perkins 2022; Shahidin et al. 2025).
Ionic liquids (ILs) are salts composed of organic cations and organic or inorganic anions, typically with melting points below 100°C, whose physicochemical properties have enabled applications in electrochemistry, biochemistry, and pharmaceutical development (Beaven et al. 2024). In addition, ILs have been reported to exhibit biological activities, including antimicrobial and antitumor effects (Novello et al. 2024).
The combination of these features with Se bioactivity has led to the development of Se-containing ionic liquids (ILsSe) (Alberto et al. 2011; Klauke et al. 2018). However, despite their potential, information regarding their safety profile and biological effects remains limited (Che et al. 2025; Neves et al. 2023; Zhang et al. 2023).
In this context, the present study aimed to evaluate the biological effects of water-soluble ILsSe (Alberto et al. 2012). Specifically, we investigated their cytotoxicity in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), a well-established model for toxicity assessment (He et al. 2004; de Souza Prestes et al. 2023), as well as their interaction with Hg2+. In addition, we assessed their antiproliferative activity in U87-MG human glioblastoma cells and performed in silico absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADMET) analyses to provide an initial evaluation of their pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties.
2 ∣. Material and Methods
2.1 ∣. Chemicals and Reagents
Fetal bovine serum (FBS) and RPMI medium were obtained from Vitrocell Embriolife (Campinas, SP, Brazil). Antibiotic-antimycotic (100×) was obtained from Gibco, by Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY, USA). All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The ILsSe liquids 1 and 3 (Figure 1) evaluated in this work were synthesized and provided by Professor Eduardo Eliezer Alberto, from the Chemistry Department of the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG). The synthesis of compounds 1 (C1) and 3 (C3) evaluated in this work has been previously reported (Alberto et al. 2012).
FIGURE 1 ∣.

Chemical structure of the selenium compounds 1 (C1), 2 (C2), and 3 (C3).
Procedure for the synthesis of 2 (C2): A one-neck, round-bottomed flask was charged with alcohol 4 (0.186 mg, 0.5 mmol), acetic acid (5 mL), and 48% hydrobromic acid (3 mL). The resulting mixture was heated at 90°C for 3.5 h and then cooled to ambient temperature. Aqueous Na2CO3 was added to neutralize the reaction mixture, which was then extracted with Et2O (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic extracts were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered through Celite, concentrated, and dried under vacuum. Crude product 5 was used in the next reaction without further purification.
The tetrahydrofuran (THF, 2.5 mL) was added to the flask containing 5, followed by 1-butylimidazole (0.26 mL, 1.1 mmol). The resulting solution was stirred at ambient temperature. Within 20 min of the addition of the imidazole, the formation of an orange oil could be observed. After 4 h of reaction, Et2O (10 mL) was added, and the resulting mixture was stirred for an additional 10 min. The oil in the reaction mixture was allowed to settle, and the organic layer was decanted. The supernatant solvent was removed, and an additional 10 mL of Et2O was added, repeating the previous steps a total of three times. After drying the orange oil under vacuum, 297 mg (80% yield) of the diselenide 2 was obtained (Scheme 1A).
SCHEME 1 ∣.

(A) Reaction sequence for the synthesis of selenium-containing ionic liquid 2. (B) Reaction between Se and Hg2+, forming a stable complex.
Characterization data for C2: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ = 10.25 (s, 1H); 7.64 (s, 1H); 7.58–7.52 (m, 2H); 7.46 (s, 1H); 7.42–7.38 (m, 1H); 7.28–7.24 (m, 1H); 5.67 (s, 2H); 4.35 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H); 1.92–1.84 (m, 2H); 1.40–1.31 (m, 2H); 0.92 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ = 137.5, 136.8, 136.1, 131.3, 130.7, 130.6, 130.3, 122.7, 122.4, 52.9, 49.8, 32.1, 19.4, 13.5; 77Se NMR (CDCl3, 76 MHz) δ = 459.7. HRMS (ESI, positive mode) calculated for C14H18N2Se [M]+: 294.0630, found 294.0632.
2.2 ∣. Human Subjects and Blood Collection
Peripheral blood was collected from healthy volunteers (three men, three women, mean age of 30 ± 10 years). Exclusion criteria included alcohol abuse or drug dependence, diagnosis of acute or chronic diseases, and any drug treatment for a period of 15 days. The blood collection protocol was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee (CAAE 67825122.1.0000.5346). All participants provided informed consent, and samples were coded and anonymized to ensure confidentiality.
2.3 ∣. PBMCs Isolation and Treatments
PBMCs were isolated following the methodology described by Böyum (1968), with some modifications. The peripheral blood (20 mL) was collected from each volunteer under aseptic conditions into tubes coated with sodium heparin (Hipolabor Farmacêutica Ltda, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil). Whole blood was diluted 1:1 with PBS buffer (136-mM NaCl, 2.68-mM KCl, 1.47-mM KH2PO4, 8.1-mM Na2HPO4, and pH 7.4) and layered over Ficoll-Paque Plus (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA) before centrifugation at 577 × g for 30 min to separate PBMCs. Cells were washed three times with PBS, followed by sequential centrifugation steps at 400 × g for 10 min, 256 × g for 10 min, and 178 × g for 5 min. Cells were then cultured in RPMI media supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% antibiotic-antimycotic, in the presence of the compounds under investigation at concentrations ranging from 1 to 200 μM and mercury chloride (HgCl2) from 5 to 100 μM, for 24, 48, and 72 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. Water was used as a vehicle. PBMCs were seeded at 1.25 × 106 PBMCs/mL ELISA microplates for each experimental group.
Mercury experiments were conducted in accordance with institutional safety regulations in a biosafety level 2 laboratory using appropriate containment systems and personal protective equipment. Mercury waste was collected in labeled hazardous waste containers and disposed of by an authorized institutional service in accordance with environmental and occupational safety regulations.
2.4 ∣. U87-MG Cell Culture and Treatments
Human glioblastoma cells were purchased from the Rio de Janeiro Cell Bank (BCRJ) at passage 139. For assays, cells were cultured between passage 142–146 in DMEM (Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's medium; Gibco) containing 1 g/L of D-glucose, L-glutamine, 110-mg/mL sodium pyruvate and supplemented with 10% heat inactivated (30 min, 56°C) FBS (Gibco) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco) in a humidified incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2. Mycoplasma contamination was assessed by PCR-based detection, following the protocol described by Uphoff and Drexler (2014). Molecular analyses were performed at the Multipurpose Laboratory of Molecular Biology (Institute of Basic Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil). No evidence of Mycoplasma contamination was detected in the cell cultures used for the experiments. The concentration used in this study was determined based on half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values obtained from concentration–response curves using the MTT reduction assay at three exposure times (24, 48, and 72 h). Among these, the 72-h time point was selected for subsequent mechanistic experiments because it showed the most pronounced biological response.
It is well established that IC50 values derived from the MTT assay may be influenced by changes in cellular redox state and mitochondrial metabolic activity, as tetrazolium reduction depends on metabolically active cells (Berridge et al. 2005). Therefore, to provide a complementary assessment of cytotoxicity, the IC50 was also determined at 72 h using the Trypan Blue exclusion assay.
The IC50 obtained by Trypan Blue was 2.4 μM, whereas the IC50 determined by MTT at the same time point was 11.27 μM. This discrepancy is expected, as the assays evaluate distinct biological parameters. Trypan Blue staining reflects loss of plasma membrane integrity and thus irreversible cell death (Strober 2015), while the MTT assay measures mitochondrial metabolic activity through the reduction of tetrazolium salts by cellular dehydrogenases (Stockert et al. 2012).
Considering that the aim of the subsequent experiments was to investigate metabolic and biochemical responses, an intermediate concentration (IC50-Int) between the mean of two IC50 values was selected. Therefore, a concentration of approximately 6.8 μM was used in the mechanistic experiments at 72 h of exposure. This approach enables the detection of molecular and metabolic alterations while preserving sufficient cell viability, thereby minimizing confounding effects associated with extensive cell death.
For all concentrations evaluated, stock solutions were prepared in advance to avoid alterations in the composition of the culture medium (DMEM). The treatment concentrations were standardized, and the vehicle control group (type I ultrapure water) was maintained at a constant proportion of 0.2% of the final volume in each well. In subsequent experiments using the intermediate concentration, the vehicle group was used as the control condition, hereafter referred to as Ctrl (H2O).
2.5 ∣. Cell Viability by Trypan Blue Method
The cell viability was determined using the Trypan Blue exclusion method, which assumes that nonviable cells are stained blue (Mishell and Shiigi 1980). Briefly, 10 μL of the 0.4% Trypan Blue reagent was added to 10 μL of PBMC suspension treated with 10 to 200 μM of the target compounds (C1, C2, and C3) for 24, 48, or 72 h. From the mixture, a 10-μL aliquot was placed in a Neubauer chamber, and the viable and nonviable cells were counted microscopically. After, concentration–response curves using lower concentrations (1, 5, and 10 μM) were performed at 24 and 72 h. Additionally, the potential interaction between 5 μM of the compounds and 10 μM of HgCl2 was evaluated after the same time of incubation. Cell viability was expressed as the percentage of viable cells.
2.6 ∣. Dehydrogenase Activity by MTT Assay
Determination of cellular toxicity of the compounds in PBMCS and U87-MG was also performed by MTT assay, following the methodology described by Mosmann (1983), with some modifications. Glioblastoma cells (5 × 103) were seeded in 96-well plates (Kasvi) and incubated at 37°C for 48 h to allow adequate adhesion to the plates (confluence between 70% and 90%) according to Bramatti et al. (2024), Cwiklowska et al. (2018), and Rieder et al. (2026), with minor modifications. The method is based on the enzymatic reduction of MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthia zol2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) to formazan crystals by intracellular dehydrogenases. In addition, PBMCs (1.25 × 106 PBMCs/mL per group) were exposed to the compounds at concentrations of 1 to 200 μM, and the U87-MG cells were exposed to the concentrations of 1, 5, 10, and 50 μM (dissolved in type I ultrapure water), both for 24, 48, and 72 h, under the conditions described before. The potential interaction between 5 μM of the compounds and 10 μM of HgCl2 was also evaluated in PBMCs. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) at a final concentration of 1 mM was used as a positive toxicity control in the experiments with U87-MG cells. After treatment, MTT was added to the medium, and the samples were incubated for 4 h at 37°C, protected from light. Subsequently, the samples were centrifuged, the supernatant was discarded, and the formazan crystals were solubilized with DMSO p.a. After, the samples were readied at 540 nm in a SpectraMax M5 reader. Results were expressed as % of the control.
2.7 ∣. Thiol Oxidase Assay: Colorimetric Assay
The thiol oxidase assay was assessed according to the method previously described by Nogara et al. (2023). The ability of a thiol to reduce the Se–Se bond was measured indirectly by the Ellman method (Nogara et al. 2023; Ellman et al. 1961). The reaction medium (5% water) containing 1-mM dithiothreitol (DTT; a thiol source), 50 μM (PhSe)2, 50 μM Compound C3, and 50-μM mercury chloride (HgCl2) was incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Aliquots (20 μL) were collected at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 24 h for the colorimetric reaction. In the colorimetric assay, aliquots were mixed with 180 μL of 2-mM 5,5′-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB; chromophore agent), and the absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically at 412 nm.
2.8 ∣. Biochemical Assays
2.8.1 ∣. Preparation of Total Cell Lysates
Total U87-MG cell lysis was performed according to the method described by Rieder et al. (2026), Bramatti et al. (2024), and Pires et al. (2022), with some minor modifications. Briefly, cells were grown in 6-well plates (Kasvi) until they reached 80%–90% confluence. After the expected confluence, we removed the old medium and added a new medium with the treatments. Based on previous assays, we decided to continue with only the following groups for subsequent assays: (1) control—water vehicle, (2) C3 in IC50-Int (6.8 μM). After 72 h of exposure, the treatment media were removed, and the cells were washed with 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). After washing, to transfer the cells to microtubes, trypsin was added for 5 min to detach the cells, and inactivated with DMEM (10% FBS and 1% penstrep). Then, the contents obtained from each well were transferred to a microtube and centrifuged at 1000 × g for 5 min at 4°C. Subsequently, the supernatant was discarded, and the cell pellet was exposed for 10 min to a Triton solution (0.05%). The samples were then lysed by moving them “up and down” in a 1-mL insulin syringe. The samples were then centrifuged (1000 × g for 10 min at 4°C), and the supernatant was separated for protein measurement and biochemical tests. The protein content of the homogenate was determined using a Thermo Scientific NanoDrop Lite and normalized to ensure equal protein loading across all conditions prior to the enzymatic assay.
2.8.2 ∣. Determination of the Total Thiol Content
The total thiol level was determined according to the method previously described by Ellman et al. (1961). The reaction system consisted of 170 μL of 0.1-M KPB (pH 7.4), 20 μL of sample, and 10 μL of 10-mM DTNB. Blank samples were prepared by adding the same amount of tissue in the absence of DTNB. After 60 min of incubation at 37°C in the dark, absorbance was measured at 412 nm using a SpectraMax M5 reader. The reaction of DTNB with the thiol groups was analyzed by measuring the mean absorbance minus blank. Results were expressed as % of the control.
2.8.3 ∣. Glutathione Peroxidase Activity
The glutathione peroxidase activity (GPx activity) was determined according to the method previously described by Sattar et al. (2024), with some minor modifications. The reaction system consisted of 180 μL of 0.1-M KPB (pH 7.4), 10 μL of 10-mM EDTA, 10 μL of 10-mM Azide, 5 μL of 10-mM Tertiary-butyl hydroperoxide (TBuOOH), and 10 μL of the sample. After preparing the KBP-EDTA-azide-tBuOOH system, we added 5 μL of 10-mM GSH and incubated it for 180 min at 37°C. After incubation, 16.25 μL of HNa2OP4 (80 mg/mL) was added, followed by 20 μL of 20-mM DTNB. The absorbance was measured at 412 nm using a SpectraMax M5 reader. The reaction of DTNB was analyzed by mean absorbance minus blank. Results were expressed as % of the control.
2.9 ∣. Measurement of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Generation
ROS production was measured using DCFH-DA. Cells were incubated with 5-μM DCFH-DA for 30 min at 37°C in the dark. After staining, cells were washed twice with PBS and immediately analyzed by flow cytometry. Data acquisition was performed using a BD Accuri C6 flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Viable cells were initially identified based on forward scatter (FSC) versus side scatter (SSC) parameters. Doublets were excluded using FSC-A versus FSC-H plots. For each sample, 10,000 events were acquired in the viable cells gate. Unstained cells were used as negative controls for gating.
2.10 ∣. Annexin V-FITC/Propidium Iodide (PI) and Cell Cycle Analysis
To evaluate cell death and cell cycle, 1.5 × 105 U87-MG cells/well were cultured in 6-well plates. After 48 h, cells were treated with Int-Conc of C3 (6.8 μM) for 72 h, under standard cell culture conditions (37°C, 5% CO2). Apoptotic and/or necrotic cells were quantified with Annexin V FITC/PI double staining kit following the manufacturer's guidelines (BD Biosciences, San Diego, USA, cat#556547). The U87-MG cells (105 cells/mL) were suspended in a buffer comprising Annexin V-FITC and PI for 15 min. For cell cycle analysis, U87-MG cells (106 cells/mL) were suspended in 300-μL staining solution containing Tris–HCl (0.5 mM, pH 7.6), trisodium citrate (3.5 mM), Nonidet P 40 (0.1% v/v), RNase (100 μg/mL, cat#R6513, Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA) and PI (50 μg/mL, cat#P4170 Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA), for 15 min in the dark. Data were acquired by a flow cytometer (BD Accuri BD Biosciences, USA), and analyzed using FlowJo v10.9.0 software (BD Biosciences, New Jersey, USA).
For apoptotic cell death, cells were classified as follows: viable cells (Annexin V and PI negative), early apoptotic cells (Annexin V positive and PI negative), and late apoptotic or necrotic cells (Annexin V and PI positive or Annexin V negative and PI positive).
2.11 ∣. ADMET Simulation Analysis
The pkCSM pharmacokinetic was used to predict the druggability of the compounds based on Lipinski's rule of five and different pharmacokinetic classes (Daina et al. 2017; Kappenberg et al. 2023; Pires et al. 2015). ADMET properties were predicted using the pkCSM webserver based on the SMILES representation of compounds C1, C2, and C3 (including their counterions), DPDS, and imidazole (1-butylimidazole). The analysis was performed using the pkCSM platform (accessed in September 2025).
2.12 ∣. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 8.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Data are presented as mean ± SD of 3–4 independent biological experiments. Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test, and homogeneity of variances was verified before applying parametric tests. For comparisons involving two groups, an unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test was used. For multiple group comparisons, one- or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was applied, as appropriate. Differences were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05. Exact p-values are reported for statistically significant differences.
3 ∣. Results
3.1 ∣. Influence of ILs Containing Se on the Cell Viability of PBMCs
Firstly, concentration–response curves were generated for Se-containing ionic compounds at 10, 50, 100, and 200 μM, as well as for HgCl2 at 5, 10, 50, and 100 μM, across different time points (24, 48, and 72 h) (Figure 2A-C), to determine their respective IC50 values (Table 1). Subsequently, the effects of compounds C1, C2, and C3 at lower concentrations (1, 5, and 10 μM) on PBMCs viability were analyzed after 24 and 72 h of exposure using the Trypan Blue exclusion assay (Figure 2D,E). After 24 h (Figure 2D), no significant differences in cell viability were observed between treated groups and the control, with all conditions maintaining viability close to 100%, indicating the absence of acute cytotoxic effects at the tested concentrations. After 72 h (Figure 2E), most treatments still preserved high cell viability, similar to the control group (Ctrl). However, exposure to compound C3 at 10 μM significantly reduced PBMCs viability compared with the control group (p = 0.0016), demonstrating a time- and concentration-dependent cytotoxic effect for this compound at the highest concentration tested. Overall, the results indicate that compounds C1 and C2 were well tolerated under all tested conditions, whereas C3 displayed moderate cytotoxicity only after prolonged exposure at higher concentrations.
FIGURE 2 ∣.

Cell viability of PBMCs assessed by the Trypan Blue method. To determine the IC50 values, concentration–response curves were first generated for ILsSe and HgCl2. Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of the percentage of viable cells after 24 (A), 48 (B), and 72 h (C) of exposure to the compounds at 10, 50, 100, and 200 μM, and mercury at 5, 10, 50, and 100. Subsequently, additional concentration–response curves using lower doses (1, 5, and 10 μM) were performed at 24 (D) and 72 h (E). Statistical differences were assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. All comparisons shown in the graph are relative to the respective control group (Ctrl), and exact p-values for significant differences are reported in the figure. Colored circles indicate the biological variability among donors within each group.
TABLE 1 ∣.
IC50 values of selenium-containing ionic compounds (C1–C3) and HgCl2 in PBMCs. IC50 values (μM) were determined after 24, 48, and 72 h of exposure using the Trypan Blue exclusion assay.
| Compound | IC50 value (μM) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | |
| C1 | > 200 | > 200 | > 200 |
| C2 | 197.30 | 138.5 | 118.5 |
| C3 | 29.64 | 20.21 | 16.33 |
| HgCl2 | 112.70 | 76.04 | 63.72 |
3.2 ∣. ILsSe Differentially Affect Dehydrogenase Activity of PBMCs
Intracellular dehydrogenase activity in PBMCs showed time- and concentration-dependent effects after exposure to ILsSe (C1–C3) and HgCl2. At 24 h, ILsSe did not cause relevant effects. HgCl2 already reduced activity significantly at 50 and 100 μM (p = 0.002 and p < 0.0001, respectively). At 48 h, ILsSe induced decreases mainly at higher concentrations (≥ 50–200 μM), especially for C2 and C3. HgCl2 showed marked cytotoxicity starting at 10 μM (p = 0.0170), with stronger effects at 50 and 100 μM (p < 0.0001). At 72 h, ILsSe significantly reduced activity at intermediate to high concentrations, with stronger effects for C2 and C3. HgCl2 caused pronounced reductions at all concentrations tested (p ≤ 0.0011). At lower concentrations (1–10 μM), ILsSe had minimal effects at 24 h, except for C2 at 10 μM (p = 0.0023). After 72 h (Figure 3E), no significant differences were detected among the experimental groups. Overall, these findings indicate that compounds C1 and C3 were generally well tolerated, while C2 induced a transient reduction in PBMCs metabolic activity at the highest concentration after short-term exposure.
FIGURE 3 ∣.

Intracellular dehydrogenase activity of PBMCs by MTT assay. Concentration–response curves were first performed for ILsSe and HgCl2. In this case, after 24 (A), 48 (B), and 72 h (C) of exposure to the compounds at 10, 50, 100, and 200 μM, and mercury at 5, 10, 50, and 100 μM, results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of the percentage of viable cells. Subsequently, additional concentration–response curves using lower doses (1, 5, and 10 μM) were performed at 24 (D) and 72 h (E), and these results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of the percentage of viable cells. Statistical differences were assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. All comparisons shown in the graph are relative to the respective control group (Ctrl), and exact p-values for significant differences are reported in the figure. Colored circles indicate the biological variability among donors within each group.
3.3 ∣. ILsSe Do Not Protect Against Hg2+ Toxicity in PBMCs
After verifying the potential cytotoxicity induced by ILsSe in PBMCs, the interaction between these compounds (5 μM) and Hg2+ (10 μM) was evaluated. In the Trypan Blue assay (Figure 4), no significant changes were observed after 24 h (Figure 4A), with all groups maintaining values close to the control (Ctrl). After 72 h (Figure 4B), HgCl2 alone reduced PBMCs viability, whereas co-exposure with the ILsSe further modulated this effect. The combination of C2 (5 μM) with HgCl2 significantly decreased viability compared with the control (p = 0.0368), while the association of C3 (5 μM) with HgCl2 produced the most pronounced reduction in viability (p = 0.0011). These findings indicate that prolonged exposure enhanced mercury toxicity, particularly in the presence of C2 and C3.
FIGURE 4 ∣.

Evaluation of the interaction of 5-μM ionic liquids containing selenium with 10-μM mercury (Hg2+) toxicity in PBMCs by Trypan Blue method. The results are expressed as the mean ± SD of the percentage of viable cells of three independent experiments, after 24 (A) or 72 h (B) of exposure to the compounds. Statistical differences were assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. All comparisons shown in the graph are relative to the control group (Ctrl), and exact p-values for significant differences are reported in the figure. The colored circles indicate the biological variability among each donor for each group.
In the MTT assay (Figure 5), after 24 h (Figure 5A), most groups showed metabolic activity comparable to the control. However, the combination of C3 (5 μM) with HgCl2 significantly reduced intracellular dehydrogenase activity (p = 0.0386), suggesting an early impairment of mitochondrial/metabolic function. After 72 h (Figure 5B), a stronger effect was observed: co-exposure with C2 (5 μM) and HgCl2 decreased dehydrogenase activity relative to the control (p = 0.0385), while the remaining groups showed reduced values without statistical relevance. Overall, the data demonstrate that mercury toxicity became more evident after prolonged exposure and that its interaction with ILsSe was compound-dependent. Among the tested compounds, C2 and especially C3 potentiated the deleterious effects of Hg2+ on PBMCs viability and metabolic activity.
FIGURE 5 ∣.

Evaluation of the interaction of 5-μM ionic liquids containing selenium with 10 μM mercury (Hg2+) in dehydrogenase activity of PBMCs by MTT method. The results are expressed as the mean + SD of the percentage of viable cells of three independent experiments, after 24 (A) or 72 h (B) of exposure to the compounds. The data were normalized to Ctrl and reported as a percentage of dehydrogenase activity. The results were expressed as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test. All comparisons shown in the graph are relative to the control group (Ctrl), and exact p-values for significant differences are reported in the figure. The colored circles indicate the biological variability among each donor for each group.
3.4 ∣. ILsSe and Diphenyl Diselenide Reduced Intermediates Interact With Hg2+ and Inactivate Their Thiol Oxidase Activity
In the thiol oxidase assay (Figure 6), to verify whether reduced intermediates of ILsSe interacts with Hg2+ after its reduction to its selenol intermediate, diphenyl diselenide, (DPDS), an organoselenic compound well characterized in the literature for interacting with Hg2+, and compound C3 were used. Both compounds demonstrated interaction with Hg2+. Notably, no decrease in DTT absorbance was observed in the Hg2+ + DTT group, indicating that Hg2+ alone does not promote changes in DTT absorbance under these conditions. Similarly, in the cotreatment groups (C3 or DPDS + Hg2+ + DTT), the absorbance of DTT remained stable. In contrast, in the absence of Hg2+ (C3 or DPDS + DTT), a rapid decrease in DTT absorbance was observed within the first few hours, indicating a strong oxidation of DTT thiol groups. Taken together, these results suggest that ILsSe form a stable complex with Hg2+, since in the presence of DTT and Hg2+ there is no decrease in the absorbance of DTT.
FIGURE 6 ∣.

Thiol oxidase activity of C3, DPDS, and HgCl2. Time course of thiol oxidase activity measured as absorbance at 412 nm over 24 h. The group (dark blue) containing C3, HgCl2, and DTT demonstrates the ability of C3 to interact with HgCl2 and prevent DTT oxidation, whereas in the group (light blue) containing only C3 and DTT, oxidation of DTT occurs within the first few hours. Similar behavior was observed at 25 μM for C3, DPDS, and Hg species, although these data are not shown to avoid overloading the figure.
3.5 ∣. ILs Containing Se Exhibit Cytotoxic Effects in Glioblastoma Cells
After evaluating the toxicity and interaction with Hg2+ of ILsSe in PBMCs, their antiproliferative potential was assessed in human glioblastoma cells (U87-MG) using MTT and trypan blue viability assays. Among the evaluated compounds, we identified that C3 (Figure 7C), at a concentration of 50 μM, reduced the viability of tumor cells. Subsequently, we performed a concentration–response curve (1, 5, 10, and 50 μM) of C3 across three time points (24, 48, and 72 h, Figure 8A-C, respectively). The curves demonstrated that C3 still exhibits cytotoxicity capacity against U87-MG cells up to a concentration of 10 μM. The concentration used in the mechanistic experiments was defined based on IC50 values obtained by MTT and Trypan Blue assays after 72 h of exposure (Figure 9), the time point that showed the strongest biological response. Therefore, an intermediate concentration (6.8 μM) was selected for the subsequent investigations performed in glioblastoma cells.
FIGURE 7 ∣.

Evaluation of the citotoxicity capacity of ionic liquids containing selenium in human glioblastoma cells (U87-MG) by dehydrogenase activity using the MTT assay. U87-MG cells were exposed to the compounds for 24 h at a single concentration of 50 μM (A, B, and C). Only compound C3 showed the ability to reduce the cell volatility of glioblastoma cells at a concentration of 50 μM. The data were normalized to Ctrl and reported as a percentage. The results were expressed as the mean ± SD of dehydrogenase activity 24 h after exposure to ionic liquids containing Se. Statistical differences were assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. All comparisons shown in the graph are relative to the vehicle control group, and exact p-values for significant differences are reported in the figure.
FIGURE 8 ∣.

Cytotoxic effects of compound C3 in U87-MG cells. After identifying C3 as the only compound exhibiting cytotoxic activity at 50 μM, its potency was further evaluated using a concentration–response curve (1, 5, 10, and 50 μM) at different time points: (A) 24, (B) 48, and (C) 72 h. IC50 values were determined for each time point and showed a time-dependent decrease. Notably, C3 significantly reduced cell viability at 10 μM across all evaluated time points. Data are expressed as percentage of control (Ctrl) and presented as mean ± SD of independent biological replicates (n = 3–4). Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. All comparisons are relative to the vehicle control group (H2O), and exact p-values are indicated in the graphs.
FIGURE 9 ∣.

(A) Table with IC50 values (μM) of compound C3 in glioblastoma cells after 72 h of exposure, determined by MTT and Trypan Blue assays, with the corresponding intermediate concentration (6.8 μM). The table highlights the difference in IC50 values obtained by the two methods. Based on this discrepancy, the intermediate concentration was defined as the mean of the IC50 values from both assays. (B) Cell viability of glioblastoma (U87-MG) cells after 72 h of exposure to compound C3, assessed by the Trypan Blue exclusion assay. Cells were treated with increasing concentrations of C3 (1, 10, and 50 μM), and viability is expressed as percentage of control (Ctrl). The IC50 value determined by this method was 2.40 μM. Data are presented as mean ± SD of independent biological replicates (n = 3–4). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. All comparisons are relative to the control group (H2O), and exact p-values are indicated in the graph, with a significant reduction in cell viability observed at higher concentrations.
3.6 ∣. ILsSe C3 Decreased Total Thiol Levels in Glioblastoma Cells
U87-MG cells treated with an intermediate concentration of C3 (6.8 μM) showed a significant reduction in total thiol content compared to the control group (p = 0.0468) (Figure 10A).
FIGURE 10 ∣.

Effects of C3 on thiol content and glutathione peroxidase activity (GPx) in U87-MG cells after 72-h exposure. Cells were treated with C3 (6.8 μM) and compared to control (H2O). (A) Total thiol levels (% of control). (B) Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity (% of control). C3 treatment significantly reduced total thiol levels (p = 0.0468) while increasing GPx activity (p = 0.0066). Data are presented as mean ± SD of independent biological replicates (n = 3–4) and analyzed by unpaired Student's t-test. Exact p-values are indicated in the figure.
3.7 ∣. ILsSe C3 Increased GPx Activity in Glioblastoma Cells
U87-MG cells treated with an intermediate concentration of C3 (6.8 μM) showed a significant increase in GPx activity compared to the control group (p = 0.0066) (Figure 10B).
3.8 ∣. ILsSe C3 Exhibit Antioxidant Potential by Reducing ROS Levels in Glioblastoma Cells
U87-MG cells treated with an intermediate concentration of C3 (6.8 μM) showed a significant reduction in ROS production compared to the control group (p = 0.0007) (Figure 11A-C).
FIGURE 11 ∣.

Effects of C3 on intracellular ROS levels in U87-MG cells after 72-h exposure. (A) Representative flow cytometry plots detailing the gating strategy. Debris was removed from the analysis based on forward and side scatter profiling (FSC × SSC). The gate was refined on single cells (FSC-A × FSC-H). Cells were treated with C3 (6.8 μM) and compared to the control (H2O). Intracellular ROS levels were assessed using the DCFH-DA assay and expressed as median fluorescence intensity (MFI). (B) C3 treatment significantly reduced ROS levels compared to the control group (p = 0.0007). (C) Representative histogram from flow cytometry. Data are presented as mean ± SD of independent biological replicates (n = 3–4) and analyzed by unpaired Student's t-test. Exact p-values are indicated in the figure.
3.9 ∣. ILsSe C3 Induces G2/M Cell Cycle Arrest and Late Apoptotic Cell Death in U87-MG Glioblastoma Cells
The compound C3 (6.8 μM) promoted cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase (p = 0.0461) (Figure 12A,B) and increased late apoptosis/necrosis (p = 0.0178) in U87-MG cells, with no changes in early apoptosis (Figure 12C,D).
FIGURE 12 ∣.

C3 modulates cell cycle progression and induces cell death in U87-MG cells after 72-h exposure. (A) Cell cycle of U87-MG cells after 72 h of treatment with C3 (6.8 μM). Analysis shows a significant increase in the SubG1 population compared to control (p = 0.0461), while no significant differences were observed in G1, S, and G2/M phases. (B) Representative histogram from flow cytometry. (C) Cell death was assessed by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining after 72 h of treatment and analyzed by flow cytometry. Quantification revealed a significant increase in total cell death in C3-treated cells (6.8 μM) compared to control (p = 0.0178), mainly driven by late apoptosis/necrosis. No significant differences were observed in early apoptosis between groups. (D) Dot plot illustrates the viable cells (lower left quadrant), early-phase apoptotic cells (upper left quadrant), and late-phase apoptotic/necrotic cells (lower and upper right quadrant). The left panel represents the control group, and the right panel represents C3-treated cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD of independent biological replicates (n = 3–4) and analyzed by Student's t-test analysis or by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. Exact p-values for significant differences are reported in the figure.
3.10 ∣. ADMET Simulation Analysis: ILs Containing Se Exhibit Similar ADMET Properties to DPDS
ADMET analysis was performed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties of compounds C1, C2, C3, DPDS, and the imidazole group (Table 2). The prediction parameters were analyzed using pkCSM software (Pires et al. 2015). All compounds showed low water solubility, low skin permeability, and high intestinal absorption, and all tested positive for the substrate, including the P-glycoprotein inhibitor. The studied compounds showed high permeability values across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and the central nervous system (CNS). Regarding cytochrome metabolism, they showed similar interactions with the respective isoforms evaluated here. Furthermore, positive values for the renal OCT2 substrate were observed. Additionally, the assessed compounds showed no toxicity in the AMES test or hepatotoxicity. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was low for all compounds. Finally, they were considered inhibitors of the hERG II potassium channel. Regarding the LD50 and LOAEL evaluation, all compounds presented similar values.
TABLE 2 ∣.
ADMET analysis of compounds C1, C2, and C3. Abbreviations: VDss: steady-state volume of distribution. BBB: blood–brain barrier permeability. CNS: central nervous system permeability. CYP2D6/CYP3A4: cytochrome P450 substrate/inhibitor. Renal OCT2: renal organic cation transporter 2. hERG: potassium channel. AMES toxicity: predicted mutagenic potential.
| ADMET prediction parameters |
C1 | C2 | C3 | DPDS | Imidazole |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water solubility (log mol/L) | −2.891 (medium) | −2.885 (medium) | −2.892 (medium) | −2.773 (medium) | −1.645 (high) |
| Intestinal absorption (%) | 86.206 (high) | 86.449 (high) | 79.899 (high) | 82.44 (high) | 100 (high) |
| Skin permeability (log Kp) | −2.735 (low) | −2.735 (low) | −2.735 (low) | −1.958 (low) | −2.743 (low) |
| P-glycoprotein substrate | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| P-glycoprotein I inhibitor | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| P-glycoprotein II inhibitor | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| VDss (log L/kg) | 0.043 (medium) | 0.106 (medium) | 0.031 (medium) | 0.357 (medium) | −0.134 (medium) |
| Fraction unbound (Fu) | 0.261 | 0.204 | 0.228 | 0.13 | 0.674 |
| BBB permeability (log BB) | 0.732 (high) | 0.678 (high) | 1.066 (high) | 0.389 (high) | 0.095 (medium) |
| CNS permeability (log PS) | −1.407 (high) | −1.439 (high) | −1.342 (high) | −1.314 (high) | −2.747 (medium) |
| CYP2D6 substrate | No | No | No | No | No |
| CYP3A4 substrate | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| CYP1A2 inhibitor | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| CYP2C19 inhibitor | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| CYP2C9 inhibitor | No | No | Yes | No | No |
| CYP2D6 inhibitor | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| CYP3A4 inhibitor | Yes | Yes | No | No | No |
| Total clearance (log ml/min/kg) | 1.414 | 1.969 | 2.414 | 1.64 | 0.933 |
| Renal OCT2 substrate | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| AMES toxicity | No | No | No | No | No |
| Max tolerated dose (log mg/kg/day) | 0.385 (low) | 0.396 (low) | 0.372 (low) | 0.689 (high) | −0.517 (low) |
| hERG I inhibitor | No | No | No | No | No |
| hERG II inhibitor | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Oral rat acute toxicity (LD50, mol/kg) | 2.479 | 2.526 | 2.47 | 1.721 | 3.192 |
| Oral rat chronic toxicity (LOAEL, log mg/kg_bw/day) | 1.926 | 2.002 | 1.745 | 0.645 | 1.095 |
| Hepatotoxicity | No | No | No | No | No |
4 ∣. Discussion
Given the demand for innovative therapeutic strategies, particularly against aggressive glioblastomas (Teraiya et al. 2023; Weller et al. 2015), the evaluation of both the safety and biological potential of newly synthesized compounds is timely and essential. In this context, the present study investigated water-soluble ILsSe, a class of hybrid molecules that merge the chemical versatility of ILs with the well-recognized biological relevance of organoselenium derivatives. While organoselenium compounds have been extensively explored for their ability to mimic and enhance the functions of human selenoproteins, particularly in redox regulation and cytoprotection, they have also attracted considerable interest for their anticancer properties (Barbosa et al. 2017; Garbo et al. 2023; Pyka et al. 2024; Yakubov et al. 2021; L. He et al. 2024). In parallel, ILs have emerged as promising scaffolds due to their tunable physicochemical properties and growing applications in biomedicine (Beaven et al. 2024; Novello et al. 2024; Alberto et al. 2011). Accordingly, this study evaluated the cytotoxic potential of ILsSe in human PBMCs, their interaction with Hg2+, their pharmacokinetic properties, and their antiproliferative activity in U87-MG glioblastoma cells.
The preparation of compound 2 was performed in a manner analogous to the one previously reported for compounds 1 and 3 (Alberto et al. 2012). The reaction sequence began with the bromination of diselenide 4 using HBr in acetic acid. In this step, bromide 5 was obtained in a quantitative yield. Lastly, treatment of 5 with 1-butylimidazole in THF delivered the target ILsSe 2 in 80% yield.
PBMCs play an important role regulating immune function and are widely used to investigate mechanisms of action of agents with immunological effects (Wildner et al. 2023; da Silva et al. 2024). Of pharmacological significance, Hg2+ is immunotoxic to mammals, and lymphocytes are targets of its cytotoxicity (Maqbool et al. 2017; Schott et al. 2025). In this work, we demonstrate that the ILsSe were generally well tolerated by PBMCs across most tested conditions, without significant effects on cell viability or intracellular dehydrogenase activity at low concentrations (1–10 μM). The absence of cytotoxicity in the Trypan Blue assay indicates preservation of membrane integrity, while the lack of major changes in MTT reduction suggests that cellular metabolic activity was largely maintained (Figures 2 and 3). However, a reduction in viability was observed for compound C3 at 10 μM after 72 h (Figure 2E), indicating a time- and concentration-dependent cytotoxic effect. In addition, compound C2 transiently decreased dehydrogenase activity at 10 μM after 24 h (Figure 3D), suggesting an early metabolic disturbance that was not sustained over prolonged exposure periods.
These findings are consistent with previous reports showing that certain Se-based compounds exhibit low toxicity toward normal human cells at comparable concentrations (Wildner et al. 2023; Golin et al. 2025). Taken together, these findings indicate that ILsSe are generally well tolerated by human PBMCs, but their biological effects appear to be highly dependent on both exposure time and concentration. This behavior is consistent with the well-known narrow therapeutic window of organoselenium compounds, in which small variations in dose or time exposition can shift the balance between beneficial and deleterious effects (Nogueira and Rocha 2011; Radomska et al. 2021). Therefore, although the results support the potential of ILsSe as biologically active molecules, careful consideration of experimental conditions is essential for their safe and effective application.
After assessing the toxicity of the compounds in human PBMCs, their potential interaction with Hg2+ was also explored, given that experimental studies have demonstrated that Se can bind to mercury, forming Se–Hg complexes and modulating the availability of Se for antioxidant enzymes such as glutathione peroxidase (Scheme 1B) (Barbosa et al. 2024, 2017; Tinggi and Perkins 2022). In cultured cells, simultaneous exposure to sodium selenite and HgCl2 has been shown to influence mercury-induced apoptosis, likely through direct Se–Hg interactions (Wang et al. 2001). Additionally, previous studies have highlighted the high affinity of Se for Hg exceeding that of sulfur, which may favor the formation of stable Se–Hg species (Oliveira et al. 2017; Raymond and Ralston 2020; Tinggi and Perkins 2022).
In the present study, our data indicate that the tested ILsSe do not exert a protective effect against Hg2+-induced cytotoxicity in PBMCs. Instead, the observed responses suggest that these compounds may interact with Hg2+, potentially leading to the formation of Se–Hg species under the experimental conditions. This interpretation is supported by the thiol oxidase assay (Figure 6), in which both DPDS and compound C3 accelerated the oxidation of DTT, which was completely blocked by Hg2+. These results indicated that diselenides can be reduced to their selenol intermediates and preferentially interact with mercury (Scheme 1B).
Accordingly, the formation of seleno–mercury complexes is likely to occur because diselenides can be reduced to their corresponding selenolate/selenol forms by enzymes such as thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) and by endogenous thiol-containing molecules, such as glutathione (GSH) (Nogueira et al. 2021; De Freitas and Rocha 2011). The selenolate species is highly nucleophilic and can react with electrophilic mercury compounds, leading to the formation of a stable adduct containing a Se–Hg bond (RSeSeR → RSe−; RSe− + HgCl2 → RSeHgCl + Cl−; RSeHgCl + RSe− → RSeHgSeR) (Gould and Amendola 1955; Konu and Chivers 2010; Barbosa et al. 2017). This seleno–mercury complex may act as a detoxifying agent, reducing mercury levels in the organism and facilitating its excretion. On the other hand, it is also possible that the formed complex acts as a mercury-delivery species via ligand exchange reactions, such as Rabenstein's reaction (RSeHgCl + R′S(e)H → R′S(e) – HgCl + RSeH) (Nogara et al. 2019; Madabeni et al. 2020; Barbosa et al. 2017). In this case, the complex could react with biologically important thiol(selenol)-containing proteins, leading to their inhibition and contributing to the toxic effects. Taken together, these findings support the hypothesis that ILsSe can interact with Hg2+ through the formation of Se–Hg species, although the biological consequences of this interaction appear to be context-dependent and require further investigation.
After assessing toxicity and interactions with mercury, we investigated the antiproliferative effects of these ILsSe in U87-MG human glioblastoma cells (U87-MG) (Figure 7). Notably, C3 at 50 μM significantly reduced glioblastoma U87-MG cell viability, and its efficacy persisted at concentrations as low as 10 μM, indicating concentration- and time-dependent antiproliferative effects (Figure 8). Indeed, IC50 values progressively decreased from 19.98 μM at 24 h to 12.29 μM at 48 h and 11.27 μM at 72 h (Figure 8). Consistently, 10 μM reduced glioblastoma cell viability across all evaluated time points, whereas no comparable effect was observed in PBMCs (Figures 2 and 3), supporting a degree of selectivity toward tumor cells. The superior toxicity of C3 may be related to the size of the alkyl portion bound to the imidazole ring, which could help stabilize interactions between C3 and proteins with hydrophobic pockets, although further studies are needed to confirm this mechanism. These findings are in line with previous studies showing that Se compounds exert anticancer effects in glioma models (Ferreira et al. 2019; Radomska et al. 2021; Berthier et al. 2017; Rieder et al. 2026). For instance, Se compounds have been reported to inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis in glioblastoma cell lines, including U87-MG, at concentrations in the low micromolar range (Ferreira et al. 2019; Rooprai et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2016; Radomska et al. 2021). Various Se derivatives have been found to trigger apoptotic pathways and act in endoplasmatic reticulum stress (ER-stress) signaling, mechanisms implicated in tumor growth suppression (Markouli et al. 2020; Lee et al. 2015; Jehan et al. 2022; Rooprai et al. 2007; Xiang et al. 2009). Moreover, broader reviews emphasize Se's promise as a micronutrient therapeutic in glioblastoma treatment, highlighting its roles in redox balance regulation and tumor microenvironment modulation (Varlamova 2018; Radomska et al. 2021; Yakubov et al. 2021).
Consistently with these observations, our mechanistic analyses provide further insight into the biological effects of C3 in glioblastoma cells. Treatment with C3 reduced total thiol levels (Figure 10A), increased GPx activity (Figure 10B), and decreased intracellular ROS levels (Figure 11), indicating modulation of cellular redox homeostasis. Given the dependence of glioblastoma cells on adaptive antioxidant systems, these alterations suggest disruption of redox homeostasis and induction of redox vulnerability, potentially compromising cell survival (Ranbhise et al. 2025; Olufunmilayo et al. 2023; Liu and Liu 2025).
In addition, C3 altered cell cycle progression by affecting the G2/M phase and significantly increased late apoptosis/necrosis, without affecting early apoptotic events. This pattern suggests that C3 may preferentially promote cell death at later stages, possibly as a consequence of sustained metabolic and redox disturbances, as previously reported for redox-active anticancer agents that induce G2/M arrest and apoptosis (Nie et al. 2023; Sanmartín et al. 2012). Taken together, these findings indicate that the antiproliferative effects of C3 are associated with redox modulation, disruption of cell cycle progression, and induction of late-stage cell death in U87-MG cells.
Furthermore, for comparison purposes, we performed ADMET analyses on DPDS and derivatives. DPDS was included for comparison purposes because it is an organoselenium compound extensively studied in the literature (da Costa et al. 2023; Satoh et al. 2004; de Freitas et al. 2009). Compounds C1, C2, and C3 showed results similar to DPDS in terms of solubility, intestinal absorption, skin permeability, and interaction with different cytochrome P450 isoforms. Nevertheless, C1, C2, and C3 exhibited lower maximum tolerated concentration values compared to DPDS, which displayed lower LOAEL and LD50 values when compared to C1, C2, and C3. Additionally, the properties of the imidazole group were evaluated to determine whether it could confer key features to the new compounds. Overall, the imidazole group alone demonstrated absorption and toxicity profiles comparable to those of the tested compounds. On the other hand, imidazole did not interact with cytochrome P450 isoforms and showed a reduced ability to cross the BBB and penetrate the CNS.
Notably, C1, C2, and C3 were predicted to exhibit high BBB permeability and CNS penetration, which may represent a favorable feature for glioblastoma therapy, as it suggests the potential to reach tumor tissue in vivo (Van Tellingen et al. 2015; Arvanitis et al. 2020). This contrasts with the limited BBB permeability predicted for imidazole alone, highlighting the contribution of the overall molecular structure to this property.
In addition, the compounds were predicted to present a low MTD, which may indicate limited systemic tolerability and suggests the need for careful dose optimization in future studies. This feature could reflect a narrower therapeutic window, a common characteristic of biologically active compounds with cellular effects (Workman et al. 2010; Radomska et al. 2021). Importantly, considering that C3 demonstrated antiproliferative activity at low micromolar concentrations, effective doses may still fall within a tolerable range. Therefore, while the predicted low MTD highlights a potential limitation, it does not preclude the therapeutic potential of these compounds and warrants further in vivo evaluation.
Regarding safety-related parameters, the compounds were not predicted to inhibit hERG I, a key marker of cardiotoxic risk (Sanguinetti and Tristani-Firouzi 2006). However, a positive prediction for hERG II inhibition was observed, suggesting a potential interaction with cardiac ion channels. Therefore, this result should be interpreted with caution, as in silico predictions alone are not sufficient to establish cardiotoxic risk, although it warrants further experimental investigation (Ferri et al. 2013; Raies and Bajic 2016). Finally, it is important to note that all ADMET data presented here are based on in silico predictions (Raies and Bajic 2016). Experimental validation of key physicochemical and pharmacokinetic parameters, such as lipophilicity and solubility, will be required to confirm these findings.
In conclusion, ILsSe were generally well tolerated by human PBMCs at low micromolar concentrations, although their effects depended on exposure time and dose. The data suggest that ILsSe can interact with Hg2+, likely through the formation of Se–Hg species. Among the tested compounds, C3 showed antiproliferative effects in U87-MG glioblastoma cells, associated with alterations in redox balance, cell cycle progression, and induction of late-stage cell death. In silico analyses suggest that compound C3 may be capable of crossing the BBB and reaching the brain, although these predictions require experimental validation. Overall, the findings indicate that ILsSe are biologically active molecules whose effects are strongly influenced by experimental conditions, warranting further investigation to better define their mechanisms of action and potential applications. In this context, the present study highlights the importance of investigating Se-containing compounds and their biological effects.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul and Universidade Federal de Santa Maria. This work was supported by the Brazilian research funding agencies: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brasil and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPQ). J.B.T.R. was supported by CNPq, CAPES, FAPERGS, FINEP and INCT/CNPq Neuroprotection (INCT-NeurPro) (408446/2024-2). G.S.R. was supported by CNPq (141379/2024-3). D.G.S. is supported by the Alzheimer‘s Association (AARF-D-22-928702) and by the Brazilian Initiative of Biomarkers for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Ministry of Health of Brazil (program 30420240118). E.E.A. is grateful to FAPEMIG (grant number APQ-00349-22) and to UFMG‘s Laboratório de Ressonância Magnética de Alta Resolução (LAREMAR) for NMR analysis. The Article Processing Charge for the publication of this research was funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) (ROR identifier: 00x0ma614).
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
References
- Alberto EE, Braga AL, and Detty MR. 2012. “Imidazolium-Containing Diselenides for Catalytic Oxidations With Hydrogen Peroxide and Sodium Bromide in Aqueous Solutions.” Tetrahedron 68, no. 51: 10476–10481. 10.1016/j.tet.2012.08.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Alberto EE, Rossato LL, Alves SH, Alves D, and Braga AL. 2011. “Imidazolium Ionic Liquids Containing Selenium: Synthesis and Antimicrobial Activity.” Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry 9, no. 4: 1001–1003. 10.1039/c0ob01010c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arvanitis CD, Ferraro GB, and Jain RK. 2020. “The Blood–Brain Barrier and Blood–Tumour Barrier in Brain Tumours and Metastases.” Nature Reviews Cancer 20, no. 1: 26–41. 10.1038/s41568-019-0205-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barbosa NV, Aschner M, Tinkov AA, Farina M, and Batista J. 2024. “Should Ebselen Be Considered for the Treatment of Mercury Intoxication? A Minireview.” Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods 34, no. 1: 1–12. 10.1080/15376516.2023.2258958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barbosa NV, Nogueira CW, Nogara PA, De Bem AF, Aschner M, and Rocha BT. 2017. “Selenoproteins and Thiol Modifier Agents †.” Metallomics 9, no. 12: 1703–1734. 10.1039/c7mt00083a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beaven E, Kumar R, An JM, et al. 2024. “Potentials of Ionic Liquids to Overcome Physical and Biological Barriers.” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 204: 115157. 10.1016/j.addr.2023.115157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berridge MV, Herst PM, and Tan AS. 2005. “Tetrazolium Dyes as Tools in Cell Biology: New Insights Into Their Cellular Reduction.” Biotechnology Annual Review 11, no. SUPPL: 127–152. 10.1016/S1387-2656(05)11004-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berthier S, Arnaud J, Champelovier P, et al. 2017. “Anticancer Properties of Sodium Selenite in Human Glioblastoma Cell Cluster Spheroids.” Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology 44: 161–176. 10.1016/j.jtemb.2017.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Böyum A. 1968. “Isolation of Mononuclear Cells and Granulocytes From Human Blood. Isolation of Monuclear Cells by One Centrifugation, and of Granulocytes by Combining Centrifugation and Sedimentation at 1 g.” Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation 97: 77–89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bramatti I, Aschner M, Branco V, and Carvalho C. 2024. “Exposure of Human Glioblastoma Cells to Thimerosal Inhibits the Thioredoxin System and Decreases Tumor Growth-Related Factors.” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 484: 116844. 10.1016/j.taap.2024.116844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Che S, Fan Y, Hu X, Yin L, Fu H, and She Y. 2025. “A Highly Sensitive Fluorescent Probe Based on Functionalised Ionic Liquids for Timely Detection of Trace Hg2+ and CH3Hg+ in Food.” Food Chemistry 463, no. P3: 141343. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cwiklowska K, Westhoff MA, Freisinger S, et al. 2018. “Viability of Glioblastoma Stem Cells Is Effectively Reduced by Diisothiocyanate-Derived Mercapturic Acids.” Oncology Letters 16, no. 5: 6181–6187. 10.3892/ol.2018.9347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- da Costa NS, Lima LS, Oliveira FAM, et al. 2023. “Antiproliferative Effect of Inorganic and Organic Selenium Compounds in Breast Cell Lines.” Biomedicine 11, no. 5: 1–13. 10.3390/biomedicines11051346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- da Silva FD, Galiciolli M. E. d. A., Irioda AC, et al. 2024. “Investigation of the Cytotoxicity, Genotoxicity and Antioxidant Prospects of JM-20 on Human Blood Cells: A Multi-Target Compound With Potential Therapeutic Applications.” Blood Cells, Molecules, and Diseases 106: 102827. 10.1016/j.bcmd.2024.102827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daina A, Michielin O, and Zoete V. 2017. “SwissADME: A Free Web Tool to Evaluate Pharmacokinetics, Drug-Likeness and Medicinal Chemistry Friendliness of Small Molecules.” Scientific Reports 7, no. January: 1–13. 10.1038/srep42717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Freitas AS, Funck VR, Rotta M. d. S., et al. 2009. “Diphenyl Diselenide, a Simple Organoselenium Compound, Decreases Methylmercury-Induced Cerebral, Hepatic and Renal Oxidative Stress and Mercury Deposition in Adult Mice.” Brain Research Bulletin 79, no. 1: 77–84. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Freitas AS, and Rocha JBT. 2011. “Diphenyl Diselenide and Analogs Are Substrates of Cerebral Rat Thioredoxin Reductase: A Pathway for Their Neuroprotective Effects.” Neuroscience Letters 503, no. 1: 1–5. 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.07.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Souza Prestes A, Vargas JLS, dos Santos MM, et al. 2023. “EtHg Is More Toxic Than MeHg to Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells: Involvement of Apoptotic, Mitochondrial, Oxidative and Proliferative Parameters.” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, General Subjects 1867, no. 10: 130446. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2023.130446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ellman GL, Courtney KD, Andres V, and Featherstone RM. 1961. “A New and Rapid Colorimetric Determination of Acetylcholinesterase Activity.” Biochemical Pharmacology 7, no. 2: 88–95. 10.1016/0006-2952(61)90145-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferreira LM, Azambuja JH, da Silveira EF, et al. 2019. “Antitumor Action of Diphenyl Diselenide Nanocapsules: In Vitro Assessments and Preclinical Evidence in an Animal Model of Glioblastoma Multiforme.” Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology 55, no. June: 180–189. 10.1016/j.jtemb.2019.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferri N, Siegl P, Corsini A, Herrmann J, Lerman A, and Benghozi R. 2013. “Drug Attrition During Pre-Clinical and Clinical Development: Understanding and Managing Drug-Induced Cardiotoxicity.” Pharmacology and Therapeutics 138, no. 3: 470–484. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garbo S, Di Giacomo S, Łażewska D, et al. 2023. “Selenium-Containing Agents Acting on Cancer—A New Hope?” Pharmaceutics 15, no. 1: 1–32. 10.3390/pharmaceutics15010104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Golin A, Viana AB, Dressler VL, et al. 2025. “Selenite Protects Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) From CdCl2 Cytotoxicity.” Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology 91: 127734. 10.1016/j.jtemb.2025.127734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gould ES, and Amendola A. 1955. “The Reactions of Two Diaryl Diselenides With Mercury (II) Chloride.” Journal of the American Chemical Society 77, no. 8: 2103–2104. 10.1021/ja01613a020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hariharan S, and Dharmaraj S. 2020. “Selenium and Selenoproteins: It's Role in Regulation of Inflammation.” Inflammopharmacology 28, no. 3: 667–695. 10.1007/s10787-020-00690-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harmanci D, Erbayraktar Z, Sayin O, and Guner GA. 2017. “In Vitro Effects of Selenium on Human Glioblastoma Multiforme Cell Lines: A Preliminary Study.” Acta Clinica Croatica 56, no. 1: 48–57. 10.20471/acc.2017.56.01.08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He L, Zhang L, Peng Y, and He Z. 2024. “Selenium in Cancer Management: Exploring the Therapeutic Potential.” Frontiers in Oncology 14: 1–24. 10.3389/fonc.2024.1490740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He SX, Wu B, Chang XM, Li HX, and Qiao W. 2004. “Effects of Selenium on Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Membrane Fluidity, Interleukin-2 Production and Interleukin-2 Receptor Expression in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis.” World Journal of Gastroenterology 10, no. 23: 3531–3533. 10.3748/wjg.v10.i23.3531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jehan C, Cartier D, Bucharles C, Anouar Y, and Lihrmann I. 2022. “Emerging Roles of ER-Resident Selenoproteins in Brain Physiology and Physiopathology.” Redox Biology 55, no. May: 102412. 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kappenberg YG, Nogara PA, Stefanello FS, et al. 2023. “1,2,3-Triazolo[4,5-b]Aminoquinolines: Design, Synthesis, Structure, Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and Butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) Inhibitory Activity, and Molecular Docking of Novel Modified Tacrines.” Bioorganic Chemistry 139, no. March: 106704. 10.1016/j.bioorg.2023.106704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klauke K, Zaitsau DH, Bülow M, et al. 2018. “Thermodynamic Properties of Selenoether-Functionalized Ionic Liquids and Their Use for the Synthesis of Zinc Selenide Nanoparticles.” Dalton Transactions 47, no. 14: 5083–5097. 10.1039/c8dt00233a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Konu J, and Chivers T. 2010. “Novel Carbon-Centred Reactivity of [(H)C (PPh2Se) 2]- in the Formation of Structurally Diverse Sn (Iv), Te (Iv) and Hg (Ii) Complexes of the Triseleno Ligand [(Se)C (PPh 2Se)2]2.” Chemical Communications 46, no. 9: 1431–1433. 10.1039/b923910c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Labunskyy VM, Hatfield DL, and Gladyshev VN. 2014. “Selenoproteins: Molecular Pathways and Physiological Roles.” Physiological Reviews 94, no. 3: 739–777. 10.1152/physrev.00039.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee JH, Park KJ, Jang JK, et al. 2015. “Selenoprotein S-Dependent Selenoprotein K Binding to P97(VCP) Protein Is Essential for Endoplasmic Reticulum-Associated Degradation.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 290, no. 50: 29941–29952. 10.1074/jbc.M115.680215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu S, and Liu J. 2025. “Oxidative Stress: Signaling Pathways, Biological Functions, and Disease.” MedComm 6: e70268. 10.1002/mco2.70268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Madabeni A, Dalla Tiezza M, Omage FB, et al. 2020. “Chalcogen–Mercury Bond Formation and Disruption in Model Rabenstein's Reactions: A Computational Analysis.” Journal of Computational Chemistry 41, no. 23: 2045–2054. 10.1002/jcc.26371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maqbool F, Niaz K, Hassan FI, Khan F, and Abdollahi M. 2017. “Immunotoxicity of Mercury: Pathological and Toxicological Effects.” 1–42. 10.1080/10590501.2016.1278299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Markouli M, Strepkos D, Papavassiliou AG, and Piperi C. 2020. “Targeting of Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Stress in Gliomas.” Pharmacological Research 157, no. March: 104823. 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mishell BB, and Shiigi SM. 1980. “Biological and Clinical Aspects of Superoxide and Superoxide Dismutase.” 10 (1). [Google Scholar]
- Mosmann T. 1983. “Rapid Colorimetric Assay for Cellular Growth and Survival: Application to Proliferation and Cytotoxicity Assays.” Journal of Immunological Methods 65, no. 1–2: 55–63. 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neves C, Viana T, Almeida R, et al. 2023. “Removal of Mercury by Silica-Supported Ionic Liquids: Efficiency and Ecotoxicological Assessment.” Aquatic Toxicology 261: 106611. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2023.106611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nie S, He X, Sun Z, et al. 2023. “Selenium Speciation-Dependent Cancer Radiosensitization by Induction of G2/M Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis.” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 11: 1–13. 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1168827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nogara PA, Oliveira CS, Madabeni A, Bortoli M, Rocha JBT, and Orian L. 2023. “Thiol Modifier Effects of Diphenyl Diselenides: Insight From Experiment and DFT Calculations.” New Journal of Chemistry 47, no. 12: 5796–5803. 10.1039/d2nj05976b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Nogara PA, Oliveira CS, Schmitz GL, et al. 2019. “Methylmercury's Chemistry: From the Environment to the Mammalian Brain.” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, General Subjects 1863, no. 12: 129284. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2019.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nogara PA, Omage FB, Bolzan GR, et al. 2021. “In Silico Studies on the Interaction Between Mpro and PLpro From SARS-CoV-2 and Ebselen, Its Metabolites and Derivatives.” Molecular Informatics 40: 2100028. 10.1002/minf.202100028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nogueira CW, Barbosa NV, and Rocha JBT. 2021. “Toxicology and Pharmacology of Synthetic Organoselenium Compounds: An Update.” Archives of Toxicology 95: 1179–1226. 10.1007/s00204-021-03003-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nogueira CW, and Rocha JBT. 2011. “Toxicology and Pharmacology of Selenium: Emphasis on Synthetic Organoselenium Compounds.” Archives of Toxicology 85, no. 11: 1313–1359. 10.1007/s00204-011-0720-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Novello E, Scalzo G, D'Agata G, et al. 2024. “Synthesis, Characterisation, and In Vitro Evaluation of Biocompatibility, Antibacterial and Antitumor Activity of Imidazolium Ionic Liquids.” Pharmaceutics 16, no. 5: 642. 10.3390/pharmaceutics16050642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oliveira CS, Piccoli BC, Aschner M, and Rocha JBT. 2017. “Chemical Speciation of Selenium and Mercury as Determinant of Their Neurotoxicity.” Advances in Neurobiology 18: 53–83. 10.1007/978-3-319-60189-2_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Olufunmilayo EO, Gerke-Duncan MB, and Holsinger RMD. 2023. “Oxidative Stress and Antioxidants in Neurodegenerative Disorders.” Antioxidants 12, no. 2: 1–30. 10.3390/antiox12020517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pires DEV, Blundell TL, and Ascher DB. 2015. “PkCSM: Predicting Small-Molecule Pharmacokinetic and Toxicity Properties Using GraphBased Signatures.” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 58, no. 9: 4066–4072. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pires V, Bramatti I, Aschner M, Branco V, and Carvalho C. 2022. “Thioredoxin Reductase Inhibitors as Potential Antitumors: Mercury Compounds Efficacy in Glioma Cells.” Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences 9: 1–11. 10.3389/fmolb.2022.889971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pyka P, Garbo S, Fioravanti R, et al. 2024. “Selenium-Containing Compounds: A New Hope for Innovative Treatments in Alzheimer's Disease and Parkinson's Disease.” Drug Discovery Today 29, no. 8: 104062. 10.1016/j.drudis.2024.104062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Radomska D, Czarnomysy R, Radomski D, and Bielawski K. 2021. “Selenium Compounds as Novel Potential Anticancer Agents.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 3: 1–27. 10.3390/ijms22031009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raies AB, and Bajic VB. 2016. “In Silico Toxicology: Computational Methods for the Prediction of Chemical Toxicity.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science 6, no. April: 147–172. 10.1002/wcms.1240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ranbhise JS, Singh MK, Ju S, et al. 2025. “The Redox Paradox: Cancer's Double-Edged Sword for Malignancy and Therapy.” Antioxidants 14: 1–27. 10.3390/antiox14101187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raymond LJ, and Ralston NVC. 2020. “Mercury: Selenium Interactions and Health Implications.” Neurotoxicology 81, no. 1: 294–299. 10.1016/j.neuro.2020.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rieder GS, Rieder AS, dos L Santos da Silva, et al. 2026. “Diphenyl Diselenide and Temozolomide: Downregulation of Inflammatory, Redox, and Tumor-Associated Pathways in Glioblastoma.” Biological Trace Element Research. 10.1007/s12011-026-05064-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rooprai HK, Kyriazis I, Nuttall RK, et al. 2007. “Inhibition of Invasion and Induction of Apoptosis by Selenium in Human Malignant Brain Tumour Cells In Vitro.” International Journal of Oncology 30, no. 5: 1263–1271. 10.3892/ijo.30.5.1263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanguinetti MC, and Tristani-Firouzi M. 2006. “HERG Potassium Channels and Cardiac Arrhythmia.” Nature 440: 463–469. 10.1038/nature04710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanmartín C, Plano D, Sharma AK, and Palop JA. 2012. “Selenium Compounds, Apoptosis and Other Types of Cell Death: An Overview for Cancer Therapy.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 13, no. 8: 9649–9672. 10.3390/ijms13089649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Satoh T, Ishige K, and Sagara Y. 2004. “Protective Effects on Neuronal Cells of Mouse Afforded by Ebselen Against Oxidative Stress at Multiple Steps.” Neuroscience Letters 371, no. 1: 1–5. 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.04.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sattar AA, Matin AA, Hadwan MH, Hadwan AM, and Mohammed RM. 2024. “Rapid and Effective Protocol to Measure Glutathione Peroxidase Activity.” Bulletin of the National Research Centre 48, no. 1: 100. 10.1186/s42269-024-01250-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Schott M, Assmann CE, Rambo BVC, et al. 2025. “Cytotoxic and Immunotoxic Profile of HgCl2 Involves Alterations in Purinergic Signaling Through the P2X7/NLRP3/CASP-1/IL-1β Pathway: An In Vitro Study Using Human Blood Immune Cells.” Toxicology In Vitro 109: 106131. 10.1016/j.tiv.2025.106131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shahidin Y Wang Y. Wu, et al. 2025. “Selenium and Selenoproteins: Mechanisms, Health Functions, and Emerging Applications.” Molecules 30, no. 3: 437. 10.3390/molecules30030437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stockert JC, Blázquez-Castro A, Cañete M, Horobin RW, and Villanueva Á. 2012. “MTT Assay for Cell Viability: Intracellular Localization of the Formazan Product Is in Lipid Droplets.” Acta Histochemica 114, no. 8: 785–796. 10.1016/j.acthis.2012.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strober W 2015. “Trypan Blue Exclusion Test of Cell Viability.” Current Protocols in Immunology 111, no. 1: A3.B.1–A3.B.3. 10.1002/0471142735.ima03bs111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Teraiya M, Perreault H, and Chen VC. 2023. “An Overview of Glioblastoma Multiforme and Temozolomide Resistance: Can LC-MS-Based Proteomics Reveal the Fundamental Mechanism of Temozolomide Resistance?” Frontiers in Oncology 13: 1166207. 10.3389/fonc.2023.1166207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tinggi U, and Perkins AV. 2022. “Selenium Status: Its Interactions With Dietary Mercury Exposure and Implications in Human Health.” Nutrients 14, no. 24: 1–19. 10.3390/nu14245308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uphoff CC, and Drexler HG. 2014. “Detection of Mycoplasma Contamination in Cell Cultures.” Current Protocols in Molecular Biology 2014, no. April: 1–14. 10.1002/0471142727.mb2804s106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Tellingen O, Yetkin-Arik B, De Gooijer MC, Wesseling P, Wurdinger T, and De Vries HE. 2015. “Overcoming the Blood-Brain Tumor Barrier for Effective Glioblastoma Treatment.” Drug Resistance Updates 19: 1–12. 10.1016/j.drup.2015.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Varlamova EG 2018. “Participation of Selenoproteins Localized in the ER in the Processes Occurring in This Organelle and in the Regulation of Carcinogenesis-Associated Processes.” Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology 48: 172–180. 10.1016/j.jtemb.2018.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang A, Barber D, and Pfeiffer CJ. 2001. “Protective Effects of Selenium Against Mercury Toxicity in Cultured Atlantic Spotted Dolphin (Stenella plagiodon) Renal Cells.” Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 41, no. 4: 403–409. 10.1007/s002440010266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang K, Fu X. t., Li Y, et al. 2016. “Induction of S-Phase Arrest in Human Glioma Cells by Selenocysteine, a Natural Selenium-Containing Agent Via Triggering Reactive Oxygen Species-Mediated DNA Damage and Modulating MAPKs and AKT Pathways.” Neurochemical Research 41, no. 6: 1439–1447. 10.1007/s11064-016-1854-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weller M, Wick W, Aldape K, et al. 2015. “Glioma.” Nature Reviews. Disease Primers 1: 15017. 10.1038/nrdp.2015.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wildner G, Tucci AR, Prestes ADS, et al. 2023. “Ebselen and Diphenyl Diselenide Inhibit SARS-CoV-2 Replication at Non-Toxic Concentrations to Human Cell Lines.” Vaccine 2, no. March 2020: 1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Workman P, Aboagye EO, Balkwill F, et al. 2010. “Guidelines for the Welfare and Use of Animals in Cancer Research.” British Journal of Cancer 102, no. 11: 1555–1577. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiang N, Zhao R, and Zhong W. 2009. “Sodium Selenite Induces Apoptosis by Generation of Superoxide via the Mitochondrial-Dependent Pathway in Human Prostate Cancer Cells.” Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 63, no. 2: 351–362. 10.1007/s00280-008-0745-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yakubov E, Eibl T, Hammer A, Holtmannspötter M, Savaskan N, and Steiner HH. 2021. “Therapeutic Potential of Selenium in Glioblastoma.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 15, no. May: 1–12. 10.3389/fnins.2021.666679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang D, Yang X.-a., Jin C.-z., and Zhang W.-b.. 2023. “Ultrasonic Assisted Magnetic Solid Phase Extraction of Ultra-Trace Mercury With Ionic Liquid Functionalized Materials.” Analytica Chimica Acta 1245, no. January: 340865. 10.1016/j.aca.2023.340865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
