Abstract
The introduction of long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT scanners marks a major advancement in paediatric nuclear medicine. These systems provide greatly enhanced sensitivity, enabling superior image quality with reduced radiopharmaceutical doses and substantially shorter scan times. This is particularly advantageous in children, who are more radiosensitive and often struggle with prolonged procedures that may require sedation. LAFOV PET/CT allows whole-body imaging in a single bed position, reducing motion artefacts, improving patient comfort, and lessening procedural anxiety. Such benefits align with the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principle, critical for minimising radiation exposure in children given their increased sensitivity and longer life expectancy. Although associated with higher initial costs and increased data demands, LAFOV technology offers significant clinical advantages, including the potential for personalised imaging protocols tailored to each child’s needs. This review discusses the technical attributes of LAFOV PET/CT and its expanding role in paediatric imaging, addressing both opportunities and challenges. By overcoming previous limitations related to scan duration and radiation dose, LAFOV PET/CT is poised to transform paediatric diagnostics, enabling safer, faster and more comprehensive assessments.
Keywords: paediatrics, LAFOV PET/CT, imaging, procedures, clinical applications
Introduction
Paediatric PET/CT imaging presents a distinct set of clinical, technical and ethical challenges that differ considerably from those encountered in adult practice. Children are not simply smaller versions of adults—their unique physiology, behavioural patterns and increased sensitivity to ionising radiation necessitate a bespoke and carefully considered approach to both imaging protocols and patient care.1,2
Traditionally, PET/CT has been underutilised in children, particularly outside oncology, due to logistical challenges, long scan times and concerns over cumulative radiation exposure.3,4 Moreover, young children often find it difficult to remain motionless during lengthy scans, compromising image quality and often necessitating sedation.3–5
Recent technological advances, notably long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT scanners, are transforming paediatric nuclear medicine.6,7 These scanners offer markedly increased sensitivity, permitting high-quality imaging with reduced radiopharmaceutical doses, shorter acquisition times or both.8 This combination not only lowers radiation burden but also reduces motion artefacts and the need for sedation—substantially improving the safety, comfort and efficacy of imaging in children.6
LAFOV systems enable whole-body imaging in a single bed position, particularly advantageous in children, where reduced scan times, improved image alignment and lowered anxiety are essential. These innovations support the ALARA principle—maintaining radiation exposure As Low As Reasonably Achievable—vital due to children’s heightened radiosensitivity and longer life expectancy.9
Additionally, modern PET/CT offers flexibility to tailor imaging strategies10 Whether administering a rapid, slightly higher-dose scan for restless children or ultra-low-dose protocols for cooperative patients, LAFOV systems provide a versatile platform for personalised medicine.
The use of PET/CT has expanded significantly beyond its original role in oncology, now encompassing a wide range of diagnostic applications, including the detection of infectious and inflammatory foci in children presenting with fever of unknown origin.11,12 As its utility broadens, PET/CT is becoming an increasingly important modality in paediatric medicine.
This review examines technical advances and expanding clinical applications of LAFOV PET/CT in paediatric imaging, highlighting how it overcomes long-standing barriers to deliver safer, faster and more comprehensive diagnostics.
Patient preparation
Undergoing a PET/CT scan can be a stressful experience for children and their families. The unfamiliar environment, intravenous injection, the need to remain still and intimidating equipment may induce anxiety or scan failure.13,14 High-quality imaging requires the child to remain motionless; therefore, thorough, age-appropriate preparation for the child and parents is essential.4,15
For example, a technologist or a physician assistant with specific expertise in PET-CT and skills in working with children can play a key role in ensuring that the entire procedure is conducted efficiently and with minimal stress.
Preparation begins with a pre-scan consultation, at least one day prior, explaining the procedure to the child and parents/caretakers and assessing the child’s ability to remain still.
A personalised scan protocol is devised accordingly: higher radiotracer doses and shorter scans for children unable to lie still, or lower doses with longer acquisitions for cooperative children.
Comfort and anxiety reduction strategies are integral, including parental presence during scanning, child-friendly lighting, favourite music and ceiling-projected films.4,14 Flexibility is maintained to adapt protocols based on the child’s condition on the scan day or even during scan acquisition.
Following these preparations, most paediatric PET/CT scans proceed without sedation. When needed, intranasal dexmedetomidine may aid relaxation.16,17 Careful preparations combined with rapid imaging by using the high sensitive LAFOV PET/CT transform paediatric PET/CT into a more accessible, efficient and child-friendly imaging procedure6,18
Technical advantage of LAFOV PET/CT in paediatric imaging
Paediatric PET/CT imaging introduces unique challenges. As there is no standardised protocol, the dose of radiotracer and the acquisition time must be tailored to each child’s age, weight, clinical condition and ability to remain still. The available literature often provides inconsistent findings, underscoring the need for protocol optimisation specific to each system (see Table 1).19–23 Given these challenges, paediatric nuclear imaging requires a careful balance between diagnostic accuracy, minimising radiation exposure and keeping scan duration as short as possible.
Table 1.
Recommended [18F]FDG PET/CT dose in children.
| Source | PET/CT type |
Recommendations: injected activity [MBq], effective scan speed [s/mm], total scan duration for a 70-cm region [min], post-injection delay [min] |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 kg | 10 kg | 20 kg | 40kg | ||
| EANM dose card19,20 | SAFOV1 | 59.5 | 76.2 | 100.6 | 137.1 |
| 1.2-0.7 s/mm, 16.7-9.7 min, 60 min p.i. | |||||
| Cox, 202121 | SAFOV | 18.2 | 34,5 | 65,3 | 123,5 |
| 0,8 s/mm, 14.6 min, 60 min p.i. | |||||
| Tran-Gia, 202422 | SAFOV | 18.5 MBq | 37 MBq | 74 MBq | 148 MBq |
| 1.2-0.7 s/mm, 16.7-9.7 min, 60 min p.i. | |||||
| van der Kaap, 202448 | HS-LAFOV2 | 5.9 | 8.6 | 14.1 | 25.1 |
| 0.3 s/mm, 5 min, 60 min p.i. | |||||
| Mingels, 202418 | TB3 | 2.5 MBq | 5 MBq | 10 MBq | 20 MBq |
| 0.6 s/mm, 20 min, 120 min p.i. | |||||
| Van den Oever, 2025423 | UHS-LAFOV5 | 3.7 MBq | 5 MBq | 5 MBq | 8.3 MBq |
|
|
|
|
||
| 60 min p.i. | |||||
1) SAFOV: short axial field-of-view PET.
2) HS-LAFOV: long axial FOV PET (Biograph Quadra) with a partial acceptance angle capability (i.e., high sensitivity mode).66
3) TB: total-body PET system (uEXPLORER, 194 cm FOV)67
4) Accepted abstract at EANM 2025.
5) UHS-LAFOV: with a full acceptance angle sensitivity (i.e., ultra-high sensitivity mode).
LAFOV PET/CT systems offer a solution to this problem.24–26 They combine very high sensitivity with the ability to scan the entire paediatric body in a single bed position, enabling either a substantial reduction in radiotracer dose or significantly shorter acquisition times (up to a maximum of a few minutes in total).27–29 Both strategies are highly valuable for young, uncooperative or critically ill children, as they improve comfort, reduce motion artefacts and enhance diagnostic quality. Additionally, continuous list-mode acquisition enables retrospective motion correction by allowing movement-affected frames to be excluded and reducing the need for repeat scans. Advanced reconstruction options broaden their utility; for example, extended photon acceptance angle modes allow high-quality imaging at lower doses.30
This enhances patient comfort, improves departmental throughput and adheres to ALARA principles9 LAFOV systems further demonstrate the clinical potential of this technology.
As clinical evidence continues to grow, LAFOV PET/CT is establishing itself as the new standard in paediatric nuclear medicine.31
In contrast, short axial field-of-view (SAFOV) PET/CT systems usually only cover 15–25 cm. This requires multiple bed positions and longer scan times. This can impact workflow efficiency and the patient experience.
As clinical evidence continues to grow, LAFOV PET/CT is establishing itself as the new standard in paediatric nuclear medicine—combining lower radiation exposure, greater comfort and high diagnostic confidence for some of the most vulnerable patient population.
Radiation dose considerations
Ultra-low-dose PET/CT protocols in paediatric nuclear medicine are guided by the ALARA principle, which emphasises minimising radiation exposure wherever possible. Although the cancer risk from doses below 50 mSv remains debated, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) supports the linear no-threshold (LNT) model, which assumes a linear relationship between dose and cancer risk with no safe threshold. This reinforces the necessity for dose optimisation, even at low exposure levels.32
Medical imaging is a significant source of man-made radiation, accounting for approximately 24% of the average annual dose in the Netherlands.33 This underscores the critical need to optimise imaging protocols, particularly for radiosensitive populations such as children. PET/CT imaging, especially with [18F]FDG and other radiotracers such as [18F]DOPA, plays a vital role in diagnosis, staging, treatment planning and follow-up but exposes children to ionising radiation from both the radiotracer and CT.34 Repeated scans can lead to substantial cumulative doses; currently, a single conventional paediatric PET/CT may deliver around 14.5 mSv, nearly twice that of an adult scan.35–37
Children are more vulnerable to radiation’s harmful effects due to their developing tissues and longer life expectancy, which increase the risk of late effects including secondary malignancies such as leukaemia and brain tumours.35,38,39 Survivors of paediatric cancer have consistently demonstrated higher rates of secondary neoplasms, particularly after extensive imaging regimes at a young age.40–44
The recent advances in PET technology support emerging proposals to revise paediatric radiotracer dosing. Recent analysis from the EuroNet PHL-C2 trial suggests a potential reduction in injected [18F]FDG activity for children, recommending a linear dose of 3.7 MBq/kg.22 This is nearly double the typical dose currently used in adults, which highlights the need for dose optimisation in paediatrics. LAFOV PET/CT scans can maintain clinical image quality at doses as low as 6.25–12.5% of standard reference doses in adults, with no significant loss in lesion detectability or tumour-to-background29,45,46 (see Figure 1). This translates into a potential reduction of administered radiotracer activity by approximately 93–98% relative to current EANM guidelines when utilising UHS mode on advanced systems such as the Biograph Vision Quadra.27
Figure 1.

Comparison of total-body PET/CT scans (Quadra) of the same patient taken three years apart. The first scan (A) used 40 MBq [18F]FDG and low-dose CT, resulting in a total effective dose of 3.08 mSv (PET 2.24 mSv, CT 0.84 mSv). The follow-up scan (B), after scanner optimisation, used 11 MBq [18F]FDG and optimised CT, reducing the total dose to 0.77 mSv (PET 0.62 mSv, CT 0.15 mSv). This represents a 75% overall dose reduction while maintaining diagnostic quality, consistent with ICRP 106 guidelines. Both scans addressed the same clinical question in a patient under 10 years old.
A recent national survey in the Netherlands evaluated current PET/CT acquisition and processing protocols, supporting the need for national or internation guidance for PET/CT protocol to be implemented with the best dose-image quality balance in mind.30 The study also indicated large coverage with digital PET/CT technology and modern scanner capacity, enabling dose reduction opportunities beyond the EANM Dose Card.
In a recent study by van der Kaap et al., the dose-reduction potential of LAFOV PET/CT for [18F]FDG imaging in children was preliminarily evaluated, demonstrating a possible reduction in administered activity of over 85% compared to the 2016 EANM Paediatric Dose Card.47,48
One should not forget that a PET/CT scan has two radiation components: internal from the injected PET tracer and external from the X-ray radiation delivered during a CT scan. With the dose reduction achieved by the total body/LAFOV PET technology development, CT’s radiation component in PET/CT becomes more and more prominent.49,50 Advanced X-ray filtering technology (i.e., tin filters) has been recently investigated to lower CT dose for attenuation correction purposes.
Several studies have reported reductions of up to 80–85% in AC-CT with the tin-filter technology in adults.51 However, such a level of dose reduction also results in significant degradation of image quality, which may compromise clinical use of the data.52–54
Additionally, novel approaches such as AI-based attenuation correction and CT-less methods using 176Lu transmission data are under exploration.55–57 While encouraging quantification accuracy has been demonstrated in adults, their feasibility and reliability in children remain to be established. These innovations represent a growing research area that may ultimately complement LAFOV PET/CT to minimise radiation dose while maintaining high diagnostic quality.
Clinical applications and examples
Oncology
Lymphoma is the third most common childhood cancer, comprising 10%–15% of all malignancies in children, surpassed only by leukaemia and central nervous system tumours.58 Many studies over the past decades have focused on risk-stratification and treatment-response adapted therapies, to minimise chemo- and radiation therapy overtreatment, to decrease adverse events and long-term sequela related to treatment.45,46 The use of diagnostic imaging has played a vital role in these efforts given that the stage of disease at presentation helps define the patient’s chemo- and radiation therapy regimen. The intensity of [18F]FDG uptake on PET correlates with the grade of malignancy and can help differentiate residual active disease from post-treatment change. Moreover, especially now with LAFOV PET/CT, a whole-body examination can be performed quickly with ultra-low radiation exposure.
Another important indication for paediatric [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging is post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) (see Figure 2). PTLD is a major complication of immunosuppressive therapy after organ- or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and the most common post-transplant malignancy in children, with a higher reported incidence than in adults59 Early diagnosis of PTLD is challenging, yet essential for guiding treatment, management, and prognosis. While histological confirmation via biopsy is necessary, [18F]FDG PET/CT can support or rule out clinical suspicion of PTLD and help localise lesions suitable for biopsy. For evaluating treatment response, repeated assessment using fast, ultra-low-dose LAFOV [18F]FDG PET/CT provides an effective means for whole-body lesion monitoring.
Figure 2.

Example of a 3-year-old girl (body weight 17 kilograms), post-orthotopic liver transplant, with pancytopenia and rising EBV titres, suspected of PTLD. Scanned on the Biograph Vision Quadra with just 18 MBq [18F]FDG over 5 minutes. Midazolam nasal spray (7.5 mg) was given 10 minutes before scanning. The scan was attended by her parents, who were there to support and comfort her, with her favourite music being played. Images show intensely metabolically active lymphadenopathy above and below the diaphragm, marked splenomegaly with diffuse FDG uptake, and likely reactive bone marrow activity.
Cardiovascular
In paediatric cardiovascular imaging, LAFOV PET/CT application is emerging as a valuable tool, especially for evaluating complex congenital heart disease, cardiovascular inflammation (e.g., myocarditis, vasculitis), infections such as infectious endocarditis (see Figure 3), with the possibility to detect disseminated endocarditis across all body regions in a short acquisition time and 1-bed position, and finally assessing myocardial viability or (multi-organ) perfusion.49,60,61
Figure 3.

[18F]FDG PET scan on the Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT of an 8-year-old boy (body weight 27 kilogram) with suspected endocarditis (S. aureus, mitral valve vegetations). The injected dose was very low at just 12 MBq of [18F]FDG. As the patient was cooperative, no sedation was used. The patient was cooperative, so no sedation was used; distraction techniques included blue lighting and favourite music. Total scan time was 7 minutes. Findings: no endocarditis detected; intense uptake in the right acetabulum suggestive of osteomyelitis without CT substrate. Reactive lung hila and spleen.
In the context of heart disease, LAFOV PET/CT can detect systemic inflammatory or infectious processes that may affect the heart or arise due to cardiac conditions. Furthermore, it also supports decision-making in pre-surgical planning and post-operative monitoring. However, the need for paediatric-specific protocols, limited availability of tracers suited for paediatric cardiac imaging and possible higher costs are still challenges that remain.
Overall, LAFOV PET/CT shows significant promise in improving diagnostic accuracy, patient management and therapy monitoring in children with cardiovascular diseases, particularly when conventional imaging is inconclusive or insufficient.
Infection & inflammation
For infection and inflammation imaging in children, LAFOV PET/CT offers—besides the general benefits in reduction of radiation dose and reduced need for sedation—several important advantages compared to conventional scanners (see Figure 4). The increased sensitivity enables the detection of infections and inflammatory processes that were not detectable using conventional PET/CT scanners due to low metabolic activity of the disease process (chronic low-grade infections, infections with low bacterial load) or due to limited sensitivity (biofilms on prosthetic material, inflammation of cranial vessels, e.g., temporal and maxillary arteries.62 This can be crucial when a clinical diagnostic dilemma arises in the case of prolonged fever of unknown origin. For example, small vessel vasculitis or low-grade osteomyelitis are diagnosed more easily, when otherwise a bone marrow biopsy would have been conducted. Movement of the extremities is no longer an issue since only short-time acquisition is required for sufficient image quality. Due to ultrafast scanning, time outside the paediatric intensive care unit is highly reduced, and evaluation of critically ill children is now feasible. Whole-body parametric imaging opens up new possibilities for research.
Figure 4.

A 9-year-old girl (body weight 26 kilogram). Clinical data: Persistent fever and infection parameters, septic arthritis of the right elbow. Transthoracic echocardiography showed no evidence of endocarditis. A PET/CT scan (Quadra) was performed in 12 minutes with only 15 MBq [18F]FDG and no use of any sedation. Her favourite music was played in the room to make the atmosphere more comfortable for her. Diagnosis: Uptake in the right elbow with known arthritis, no scatter marks or other affected joints. Reactive lymph nodes, right axillary and thymus. Injection artefact left upper arm.
Discussion
LAFOV PET/CT represents a major advancement in paediatric nuclear medicine, addressing several of the unique challenges associated with imaging children. The use of ultra-low-dose [18F]FDG LAFOV PET/CT systems has been shown to provide diagnostically acceptable image quality even at substantially reduced radiotracer activities, without compromising diagnostic accuracy.29 This is particularly important in paediatric patients, who are highly radiosensitive and often undergo repeated imaging for follow-up, increasing cumulative radiation exposure. Recent studies suggest that the use of LAFOV PET/CT systems can achieve reductions in administered radiotracer activity of approximately 93–98% compared to current EANM paediatric guidelines20,47,48
Beyond dose optimisation, LAFOV PET/CT systems with extended axial coverage provide several practical advantages for paediatric imaging (see Table 2):
Table 2.
Opportunities, challenges and solutions of LAFOV PET-CT in paediatric imaging.
| Opportunities | Challenges | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Reduced scan duration minimises sedation need | Patient motion, especially in uncooperative or anxious children | Use child-friendly preparation, distraction techniques, motion correction software |
| Lower radiation dose due to increased sensitivity | Limited availability of LAFOV PET/CT in paediatric centres | Promote multicentre collaboration and funding to improve access |
| Whole-body imaging in a single bed position | Positioning challenges from small size and anatomical variability | Use tailored immobilisation devices and paediatric-specific positioning protocols |
| Enhanced metabolic and functional data | Complex interpretation due to developmental and age-related physiology | Develop age-specific reference databases and consult paediatric imaging specialists |
| Feasibility of dynamic or multi-tracer imaging | Motion artefacts despite faster acquisitions | Integrate real-time motion tracking and gating techniques |
| Shorter procedures reduce stress and improve departmental/examination workflow | High acquisition and maintenance costs | Demonstrate cost-effectiveness through improved throughput and reduced sedation needs |
| Enables safer longitudinal follow-up with reduced cumulative radiation exposure in chronic or oncologic indications | Lack of paediatric-specific normative data complicates quantitative analysis and standardisation | Establish paediatric imaging registries, encourage data sharing and demonstrate cost-effectiveness via improved throughput and reduced sedation |
Whole-body imaging in a single scan: Extended coverage allows for the simultaneous acquisition of the entire body in a single bed position, which is ideal for staging malignancies, detecting metastatic disease, and assessing systemic infections or inflammatory conditions commonly encountered in children.
Reduced scan duration: The high sensitivity of LAFOV systems permits significantly shorter acquisition times. This is especially beneficial for younger or anxious patients, reducing the need for sedation or anaesthesia and enhancing patient throughput in clinical practice.
Flexible protocol design: LAFOV technology supports tailored imaging protocols. Cooperative patients can benefit from ultra-low-dose imaging with longer scan times, while those requiring shorter scans can receive slightly higher doses to maintain image quality and reduce motion artefacts.
Despite these advantages, several challenges remain:
Lack of standardised international protocols: Currently, there is no consensus on ultra-low-dose PET/CT protocols specific to LAFOV systems in paediatric populations. This results in variation between centres and underscores the need for multicentre collaboration to develop validated, harmonised protocols that ensure both safety and diagnostic efficacy.
Limited accessibility: LAFOV PET/CT systems are currently available in a limited number of centres due to high acquisition and operational costs. Further research is needed to determine how similar dose reductions might be achieved on more widely available SAFOV systems with ultra-high sensitivity capabilities.
Heterogeneity of the paediatric population: The wide variation in age, size and developmental stage among paediatric patients necessitates flexible, individualised imaging strategies. Future work should focus on refining personalised protocols to optimise both diagnostic quality and patient safety.
Child-friendly and well-organised imaging environment: This includes a dedicated staff member for paediatric imaging, a specialised team and clear communication with both the child and their parents. Educating referring paediatricians about radiation risks and the value of PET/CT scans supports fully informed decision-making. Small steps—such as explaining the procedure, letting the child choose a movie and providing a familiar face—can reduce anxiety and the need for sedation. This approach can help centres with advanced scanners enhance their paediatric imaging services.
In addition to static imaging, fully dynamic PET studies combined with pharmacokinetic modelling can provide detailed physiological information on tracer kinetics, including delivery, metabolism, cellular transport function and receptor binding.63 Dynamic PET imaging with tracer kinetic modelling is more routinely employed in adult patients; parametric mapping in PET offers advantages like tumour-to-background contrast enhancement, providing quantitative, functional data on biological processes (e.g., blood flow, metabolism) that go beyond conventional static images, enabling earlier and more accurate assessment of disease and treatment response, improved diagnostic potential and a more robust understanding of a tracer’s pharmacokinetics and distribution over time and space64 Its feasibility, accuracy and clinical utility in paediatric populations remain to be systematically investigated, as the application in children requires short acquisition protocols to minimise motion artefacts and avoid sedation.
Finally, LAFOV PET seems to be cost-effective in the adult population compared with SAFOV PET. This may also be the case for the paediatric population, given the specific challenges faced and the limitations to high throughput due to time-intensive patient preparation, including anaesthesia.65
Conclusion
LAFOV PET/CT offers a transformative approach to paediatric nuclear medicine. It enables significant reductions in radiation exposure and scan time, enhances patient comfort and supports a wide range of clinical applications—often without the need for sedation or anaesthesia. As access improves and protocols are standardised, LAFOV PET/CT is likely to play a key role in the future of clinical paediatric imaging.
Contributor Information
Johannes H van Snick, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Oleksandra V Ivashchenko, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Joyce van Sluis, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Limme B de Langen, Department of Paediatrics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Georgiana C van den Oever, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Mostafa Roya, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Andor W J M Glaudemans, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Riemer H J A Slart, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands; Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Funding
None declared.
Conflict of Interest
No conflict of interest for this review.
References
- 1. Krekels EHJ, Calvier EAM, van der Graaf PH, Knibbe CAJ. Children are not small adults, but can we treat them As such? CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol [Internet]. 2019;Jan 1 [cited 2025 Jun 4]8:34-38. Available from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6363065/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Fahey FH, Treves ST, Adelstein SJ. Minimizing and communicating radiation risk in pediatric nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med Technol [Internet]. 2012;Mar [cited 2025 Jun 540:13-24. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21764783/ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kertész H, Beyer T, London K, et al. Reducing radiation exposure to paediatric patients undergoing [18F]FDG-PET/CT imaging. Mol Imaging Biol. 2021;23:775-786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Camoni L, Santos A, Luporsi M, et al. EANM procedural recommendations for managing the paediatric patient in diagnostic nuclear medicine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging [Internet]. 2023;Nov 1 [cited 2025 Jun 450:3862-3879. Available from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10611649/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Mcquattie S. Pediatric PET/CT imaging: Tips and techniques. J Nucl Med Technol [Internet]. 2008;2025 Jun 436:171-180. Available from http://www.snm.org/ce_online [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Dias AH, Andersen KF, Fosbøl MØ, Gormsen LC, Andersen FL, Munk OL. Long axial field-of-view PET/CT: New opportunities for pediatric imaging. Semin Nucl Med. 2025;Jun 555:76-85. Jan 1 [cited Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39542815/ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Slart RHJA, Tsoumpas C, Glaudemans AWJM, et al. Long axial field of view PET scanners: a road map to implementation and new possibilities. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging [Internet]. 2021;Dec 1 [cited 2025 Jun 548:4236-4245. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34136956/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Prenosil GA, Sari H, Fürstner M, et al. Performance characteristics of the biograph vision quadra PET/CT system with a long axial field of view using the NEMA NU 2-2018 standard. Journal of Nuclear Medicine [Internet]. 2022;Mar 1 [cited 2025 Jun 563:476-484. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34301780/ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Yeung AWK. The “As low As reasonably achievable” (ALARA) principle: a brief historical overview and a bibliometric analysis of the most cited publications. Radioprotection [Internet]. 2019;Apr 1 [cited 2025 Jun 1654:103-109. Available from https://www.radioprotection.org/articles/radiopro/full_html/2019/02/radiopro190010/radiopro190010.html [Google Scholar]
- 10. Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Pan L, Sachpekidis C. Long axial field of view (LAFOV) PET-CT: implementation in static and dynamic oncological studies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging [Internet]. 2023;Sep 1 [cited 2025 Jun 1650:3354-3362. Available from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00259-023-06222-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ropers FG, van Mossevelde RMP, Bleeker-Rovers CP, et al. Evaluation of FDG-PET/CT use in children with suspected infection or inflammation. Diagnostics [Internet]. 2020;Sep 1 [cited 2025 Jun 510:715. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32961994/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Pijl JP, Nienhuis PH, Kwee TC, Glaudemans AWJM, Slart RHJA, Gormsen LC. Limitations and pitfalls of FDG-PET/CT in infection and inflammation. Semin Nucl Med. 2021;Nov 1 [cited 2025 Jun 551:633-645. Available from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001299821000404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Czech O, Wrzeciono A, Rutkowska A, Guzik A, Kiper P, Rutkowski S. Virtual reality interventions for Needle-Related procedural pain, fear and Anxiety-A systematic review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2021;Jul 23[cited 2025 Jun 510: Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34362032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Birnie KA, Noel M, Parker JA, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of distraction and hypnosis for needle-related pain and distress in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Psychol. 2014;[cited 2025 Jun 539:783-808. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24891439/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Vali R, Alessio A, Balza R, SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline on Pediatric 18 F-FDG PET/CT for Oncology 1.0. 2021 [cited 2025. Jun 5]; Available from : http://jnm.snmjournals.org/site/misc/permission., et al. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16. Kim SY, Booth JM, Staffa SJ, Kordun A, Yu J, Cravero JP. A dose-ranging pilot trial of dexmedetomidine–propofol in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. J Anesth. 2025;cited 2025 Jun 5]; Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40349256/ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Tu H, Gao J, Bao C, Zhao J, Tang J, Hu Y. Determination of optimal combined doses of oral midazolam and intranasal dexmedetomidine for use in pediatric magnetic resonance imaging. World Journal of Pediatric Surgery [Internet]. 2025;May 28 [cited 2025 Jun 58:e001000. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40444265/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Mingels C, Spencer BA, Nalbant H, et al. Dose reduction in pediatric oncology patients with delayed Total-Body [18F]FDG PET/CT. Journal of Nuclear Medicine [Internet]. 2024;Jul 1 [cited 2025 Jun 565:1101-1106. Available from https://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/65/7/1101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Lassmann M, Treves ST, EANM/SNMMI Paediatric Dosage Harmonization Working Group Paediatric radiopharmaceutical administration: Harmonization of the 2007 EANM paediatric dosage card (version 1.5.2008) and the 2010 North American consensus guidelines. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging [Internet]. 2014;Mar 6 [cited 2025 Jun 541:1036-1041. Available from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00259-014-2731-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Lassmann M, Biassoni L, Monsieurs M, Franzius C, EANM Dosimetry and Paediatrics Committees The new EANM paediatric dosage card: Additional notes with respect to F-18. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging [Internet]. 2008;Jun 24 [cited 2025 Jun 535:1666-1668. Available from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00259-008-0799-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Cox CPW, van Assema DME, Verburg FA, Brabander T, Konijnenberg M, Segbers M. A dedicated paediatric [18F]FDG PET/CT dosage regimen. EJNMMI Res. 2021;[cited 2025 Jun 511:65. Available from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8289942/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Tran-Gia J, Eberlein U, Lassmann M, et al. Analysis of image data from the EuroNet PHL-C2 trial indicates a potential reduction in injected F-18 FDG activities in children: a proposal to update the EANM paediatric dosage card. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging [Internet]. 2024;Jan 1 [cited 2025 Jun 551:405-411. Available from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00259-023-06396-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.EANM 2025 Annual Congress I October 4-8, 2025 [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jun 27]. Available from: https://eanm25.eanm.org/
- 24. Honoré d’Este S, Andersen FL, Schulze C, Saxtoft E, Fischer BM, Andersen KF. QUALIPAED—A Retrospective Quality Control Study Evaluating Pediatric Long Axial Field-of-View Low-Dose FDG-PET/CT. Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine [Internet]. 2024;Jun 244:cited2025. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39355209/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Chen W, Liu L, Li Y, et al. Evaluation of pediatric malignancies using total-body PET/CT with half-dose [18F]-FDG. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging [Internet]. 2022;Oct 1 [cited 2025 Jun 2449:4145-4155. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35788704/ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Li M, Cui X, Yue H, et al. The efficacy of short acquisition time using 18F-FDG total-body PET/CT for the identification of pediatric epileptic foci. EJNMMI Res. 2024;Dec 1 [cited 2025 Jun 2414:21. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38409511/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT Scanner Siemens Healthineers Nederland [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jun 5]. Available from: https://www.siemens-healthineers.com/nl/molecular-imaging/pet-ct/biograph-vision-quadra
- 28.uEXPLORER®: Total-body PET/CT | United-Imaging Healthcare [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jun 5]. Available from: https://usa.united-imaging.com/products/molecular-imaging/uexplorer
- 29. Calderón E, Schmidt FP, Lan W, et al. Image quality and quantitative PET parameters of Low-Dose [18F]FDG PET in a long axial field-of-view PET/CT scanner. Diagnostics. 2023;Oct 1813:3240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Dieckens DBM, van Horssen P, van Gils KAJ, et al. PET/CT acquisition and processing protocols in The Netherlands. EJNMMI Phys. 2025;12:1 [Internet]. 2025 Jun 19 [cited 2025 Jun 1912:57-18. Available from https://ejnmmiphys.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40658-025-00770-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Nadig V, Herrmann K, Mottaghy FM, Schulz V. Hybrid total-body pet scanners—current status and future perspectives. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging [Internet]. 2022;Jan 1 [cited 2025 Jun 2449:445-459. Available from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00259-021-05536-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Laurier D, Billarand Y, Klokov D, Leuraud K. The scientific basis for the use of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model at low doses and dose rates in radiological protection. Journal of Radiological Protection [Internet]. 2023; Jun 29 [cited 202543:024003. Jun 24] Available from https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6498/acdfd7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Eleveld. https://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/861020002.pdf. p. 01–25 Rivm report.
- 34. Elmanzalawy A, Vali RG, Chavhan B, Gupta AA, Omarkhail Y, et al. The impact of 18 F-FDG PET on initial staging and therapy planning of pediatric soft-tissue sarcoma patients. [cited 2025. Aug 22]; Available from : 10.1007/s00247-019-04530-1 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 35. Pauwels EKJ, Bourguignon MH. Radiation dose features and solid cancer induction in pediatric computed tomography. Medical Principles and Practice [Internet]. 2012;[cited 2025 Jun 1921:508-515. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22472997/ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Hall EJ, Brenner DJ. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. British Journal of Radiology [Internet]. 2008;May 1 [cited 2025 Jun 1981:362-378. Available from 10.1259/bjr/01948454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Linet MS, Slovis TL, Miller DL, et al. Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures. CA Cancer J Clin [Internet]. 2012;Mar [cited 2025 Jun 1962:75-100. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22307864/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2012;[cited 2025 Jun 19380:499-505. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22681860/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Linet MS, Kim KP, Rajaraman P. Children’s exposure to diagnostic medical radiation and cancer risk: Epidemiologic and dosimetric considerations. Pediatr Radiol. 2009;Feb 16 [cited 2025 Jun 1939:4-26. SUPPL1Available from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00247-008-1026-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. MacArthur AC, Spinelli JJ, Rogers PC, Goddard KJ, Phillips N, McBride ML. Risk of a second malignant neoplasm among 5-year survivors of cancer in childhood and adolescence in British Columbia, Canada. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007;Apr [cited 2025 Jun 1948:453-459. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16767718/ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Scholz-Kreisel P, Kaatsch P, Spix C, et al. Second malignancies following childhood cancer treatment in Germany from 1980 to 2014. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018; Jun 8 [cited 2025115:385-392. Jun 19]Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29960606/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Hayek S, Dichtiar R, Shohat T, Silverman B, Ifrah A, Boker LK. Risk of second primary neoplasm and mortality in childhood cancer survivors based on a national registry database. Cancer Epidemiol. 2018;Dec 1 [cited 2025 Jun 1957:127-133. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30399484/ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Allodji RS, Hawkins MM, Bright CJ, et al. Risk of subsequent primary leukaemias among 69,460 five-year survivors of childhood cancer diagnosed from 1940 to 2008 in Europe: a cohort study within PanCareSurFup. Eur J Cancer. 2019;Aug 1 [cited 2025 Jun 19117:71-83. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31260818/ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Hauptmann M, Byrnes G, Cardis E, et al. Brain cancer after radiation exposure from CT examinations of children and young adults: results from the EPI-CT cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2023;Jan 1 [cited 2025 Jun 1924:45-53. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36493793/ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Friedman DL, Chen L, Wolden S, et al. Dose-intensive response-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy for children and adolescents with newly diagnosed intermediate-risk Hodgkin lymphoma: a report from the children’s oncology group study AHOD0031. Journal of Clinical Oncology [Internet]. 2014;Nov 10 [cited 2025 Jun 1032:3651-3658. Available from https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri? eid=2-s2.0-84911866817&origin=inward [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- *46. Hall MD, Terezakis SA, Lucas JT, et al. Radiation therapy across pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma research group protocols: a report from the staging, evaluation, and response criteria harmonization (SEARCH) for childhood, adolescent, and young adult Hodgkin lymphoma (CAYAHL) group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022;Feb 1 [cited 2025 Jun 10112:317-334. Available from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301621026298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Dosage card—EANM [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jun 17]. Available from: https://eanm.org/publications/useful-resources/dosage-card/
- 48.EANM’24 Abstract Book Congress Oct 19-23, 2024. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging [Internet]. 2024. Sep 1 [cited 2025 Jun 5]; 51(1):1-1026. Available from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00259-024-06838-z [Google Scholar]
- 49. van Rijsewijk ND, van Leer B, Ivashchenko OV, et al. Ultra-low dose infection imaging of a newborn without sedation using long axial field-of-view PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging [Internet]. 2023;Jan 1 [cited 2025 Jun 550:622-623. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36166078/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. van Snick JH, Koopmans KP, Glaudemans AWJM, Stormezand GN, Ivashchenko OV. Fetal dose minimization: ultra-low dose long axial field of view (LAFOV) PET/CT imaging of a pregnant patient. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging [Internet]. 2024;Dec 1 [cited 2025 Aug 2852:370-371. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39096365/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Mostafapour S, Greuter M, van Snick JH, et al. Ultra-low dose CT scanning for PET/CT. Med Phys. 2024;Jan 151:139-155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Saltybaeva N, Krauss A, Alkadhi H. Technical note: Radiation dose reduction from computed tomography localizer radiographs using a tin spectral shaping filter. Med Phys. 2019;Feb 1 [cited 2025 Aug 2846:544-549. Available from:/doi/pdf/10.1002/mp.13353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Bebbington NA, Østergård LL, Christensen KB, Holdgaard PC. CT radiation dose reduction with tin filter for localisation/characterisation level image quality in PET-CT: a phantom study. EJNMMI Phys. 2024;Dec 1 [cited 2025 Aug 2811:100-115. Available from https://ejnmmiphys.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40658-024-00703-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Mostafapour S, Greuter M, van Snick JH, et al. Ultra-low dose CT scanning for PET/CT. Med Phys. 2024;Jan 151:139-155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Teimoorisichani M, Panin V, Rothfuss H, Sari H, Rominger A, Conti M. A CT‐less approach to quantitative PET imaging using the LSO intrinsic radiation for long‐axial FOV PET scanners. Med Phys. 2022;Jan 1 [cited 2025 Aug 2849:309-323. Available from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9299938/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Sari H, Teimoorisichani M, Viscione M, et al. Feasibility of an Ultra-Low-Dose PET scan protocol with CT-Based and LSO-TX–based attenuation correction using a long–Axial-Field-of-view PET/CT scanner. Journal of Nuclear Medicine [Internet]. 2025; Jun 1 [cited 2025;Aug 2866:967-972. Available from https://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/66/6/967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Omidvari N, Cheng L, Leung EK, et al. Lutetium background radiation in total-body PET—A simulation study on opportunities and challenges in PET attenuation correction. Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine. 2022;[cited 2025 Aug 282:963067. InternetAvailable from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9513593/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Guja KE, Nadel H, Iagaru A. Overview and recent advances in 18F-FDG PET/CT for evaluation of pediatric lymphoma. Semin Nucl Med [Internet]. 2023;May 1 [cited 2025 Jun 1053:400-412. Available from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001299822000885 [Google Scholar]
- 59. Montes de Jesus FM, Glaudemans AWJM, Tissing WJ, et al. 18f-fdg pet/ct in the diagnostic and treatment evaluation of pediatric posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders. Journal of Nuclear Medicine [Internet]. 2020;Sep 1 [cited 2025 Jun 1061:1307-1313. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32005775/ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Zhang X, Xiang Z, Wang F, et al. 13N-NH3 myocardial perfusion imaging with reduced scan duration: a feasibility study in the era of total-body PET/CT. EJNMMI Phys. 2025;Jun 512:18. 2025 Dec 1 [cited Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40032742/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Zhang X, Xiang Z, Wang F, et al. Feasibility of shortening scan duration of 18F-FDG myocardial metabolism imaging using a total-body PET/CT scanner. EJNMMI Phys. 2024;Dec 1 [cited 2025 Jun 511:83. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39390229/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Glaudemans AWJM, Gheysens O. Expert opinions in nuclear medicine: Finding the “holy grail” in infection imaging. Front Med (Lausanne) [Internet]. 2023;[cited 2025 Jun 510:Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36923013/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Dias AH, Pedersen MF, Danielsen H, Munk OL, Gormsen LC. Clinical feasibility and impact of fully automated multiparametric PET imaging using direct patlak reconstruction: evaluation of 103 dynamic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT scans. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging [Internet]. 2021;Mar 1 [cited 2025 Aug 2848:837-850. Available from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32894338/ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Wang G, Rahmim A, Gunn RN. PET parametric imaging: past, present, and future. IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci [Internet]. 2020;Nov 1 [cited 2025 Aug 284:663-675. Available from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7983029/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Alberts I, More S, Knapp K, et al. Is long–Axial-Field-of-view PET/CT Cost-Effective? An international health–economic analysis. Journal of Nuclear Medicine [Internet]. 2025;Jun 1 [cited 2025 Aug 2266:954-960. Available from https://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/66/6/954 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT Scanner—Siemens Healthineers—Siemens Healthineers [Internet]. [cited 2023 Nov 23]. Available from: https://www.siemens-healthineers.com/molecular-imaging/pet-ct/biograph-vision-quadra
- 67.uEXPLORER®: Total-body PET/CT | United-Imaging Healthcare [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jun 19]. Available from: https://global.united-imaging.com/en/product-service/products/mi/uexplorer
