The American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) is a multidisciplinary association dedicated to advancing the safe and effective use of ultrasound in medicine through professional and public education, research, development of clinical practice parameters, and accreditation of practices performing ultrasound examinations.
The AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of Peripheral Arterial Ultrasound Using Color and Spectral Doppler was revised by the AIUM in collaboration with other organizations whose members use ultrasound for performing this examination(s) (see “Acknowledgments”). Recommendations for personnel requirements, the request for the examination, documentation, quality assurance, and safety may vary among the organizations and may be addressed by each separately.
This practice parameter is intended to provide the medical ultrasound community with recommendations for the performance and recording of high‐quality ultrasound examinations. The parameter reflects what the AIUM considers the appropriate criteria for this type of ultrasound examination but is not intended to establish a legal standard of care. Examinations performed in this specialty area are expected to follow the Parameter with the recognition that deviations may occur depending on the clinical situation.
This practice parameter is intended to assist practitioners performing noninvasive evaluation of the peripheral arteries using color and Doppler waveform analysis ultrasound. The sonographic examination of patients with peripheral vascular disease will, in general, complement the use of other physiologic tests, such as pressure measurements, plethysmographic recordings, and continuous wave Doppler. In selected cases a tailored examination is used to answer a specific diagnostic question. Although it is not possible to detect every abnormality, adherence to the following practice parameter will maximize the probability of detecting most of the abnormalities that occur in the extremity arteries.
Indications
The indications for peripheral arterial ultrasound examination include, but are not limited to, the following:
The detection of stenoses or occlusions in segment(s) of the peripheral arteries in symptomatic patients with suspected arterial occlusive disease. These patients could present with recognized clinical indicators, such as claudication, rest pain, ischemic tissue loss, aneurysm, or arterial embolization. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18
The monitoring of sites of previous surgical interventions, including sites of previous bypass surgery with either synthetic or autologous vein grafts. 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25
The monitoring of sites of various percutaneous interventions, including angioplasty, thrombolysis/thrombectomy, atherectomy, or stent placement. 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31
Follow‐up for progression of previously identified disease, such as documented stenosis in an artery that has not undergone intervention, aneurysms, atherosclerosis, or other occlusive diseases.
The evaluation of suspected vascular and perivascular abnormalities, including such entities as arteritis, fibromuscular dysplasia, masses, aneurysms, pseudoaneurysms, arterial dissections, vascular injuries, arteriovenous fistulae, thromboses, emboli, or vascular malformations. 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37
Mapping of arteries before surgical interventions. 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42
Clarifying or confirming the presence of significant arterial abnormalities identified by other imaging modalities.
Evaluation of arterial integrity in the setting of trauma.
Evaluation of patients suspected of thoracic outlet syndrome, such as those with positional numbness, pain, tingling, or a cold hand.
Temporal artery evaluation for temporal arteritis and/or to localize temporal arterial biopsy for suspected diagnosis of temporal arteritis. 33 , 34
Additional uses of Doppler ultrasound can include preoperative mapping for dialysis access and postoperative follow‐up (see the AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of Ultrasound Vessel Mapping Prior to Dialysis Access Creation 45 and the AIUM Practice Parameter for the Performance of Vascular Ultrasound for Postoperative Assessment of Dialysis Access 46 ).
Qualifications and Responsibilities of Personnel
Physicians interpreting or performing this type of ultrasound examination should meet the specified AIUM Training Guidelines 47 in accordance with AIUM accreditation policies. 48
Sonographers performing the ultrasound examination should be appropriately credentialed 49 in the specialty area in accordance with AIUM accreditation policies. 48
Physicians not personally performing the examination must provide supervision, as defined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Code of Federal Regulations 42 CFR §410.32, 50 which is available from the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Request for the Examination
The written or electronic request for an ultrasound examination must originate from a physician or other appropriately licensed health care provider or under the provider's direction. The clinical information provided should allow for the performance and interpretation of the appropriate ultrasound examination and should be consistent with relevant legal and local health care facility requirements.
The sonographic examination consists of grayscale imaging and spectral Doppler waveforms in the appropriate arterial segments. Color Doppler should be used to improve detection of arterial lesions by identifying sites of narrowing and changes in color associated with stenoses and to guide placement of the sample volume for spectral Doppler assessment. 10
Specification of the Examination
Appropriate Techniques and Diagnostic Criteria
Specific sonographic techniques must be tailored to the clinical indication, the different arterial segments studied, and the specific pathology being evaluated. Diagnostic criteria for stenosis differ between native and postoperative and postprocedural arteries.
Velocity measurements are derived from angle‐corrected spectral Doppler waveforms obtained from longitudinal images. Every attempt should be made to acquire images in which the angle created by the direction of blood flow and the direction of the ultrasound beam is kept at ≤60°. Velocity estimates made from images using larger angles are less reliable.
There are published spectral Doppler criteria for velocity ratio, absolute velocity, pulsatility indices, and acceleration time. One or more criteria may be used. The criteria may be validated for some but not all arterial segments (eg, acceleration time has been studied in the iliac and common femoral arteries). Waveform shape, presence or absence of turbulence, and direction of flow may be described for appropriate indications.
For arterial stenoses, color Doppler should be optimized to detect narrowing of the lumen and high velocity in the stenotic region.
Peripheral Arterial Disease
Physiologic tests of the arterial system, such as ankle brachial index (ABI), segmental pressure, continuous wave Doppler, and plethysmographic waveform analysis, are other arterial examinations performed to determine the presence and degree of arterial disease and/or to identify patients appropriate for imaging. 1 , 37 , 51 These studies are complementary and not equivalent to the sonographic examination.
The ABI may help evaluate the hemodynamic consequences of lower extremity arterial disease. A contemporaneous ABI, along with imaging supports the imaging findings or may suggest nonvisualized disease, or if discrepant, helps avoid pitfalls.
Representative longitudinal color Doppler and/or gray scale images along with angle‐corrected spectral Doppler waveforms with velocity measurements should be documented for each normal arterial segment.
Suspected abnormalities should be documented with longitudinal gray scale and color Doppler images. Transverse images may be helpful. Documentation of flow abnormality can be performed by obtaining cine clips.
Angle‐corrected spectral Doppler waveforms should be obtained from longitudinal images and include sites proximal to, at, and distal to sites of suspected stenosis. The sonographer/technologist should evaluate the vessel thoroughly throughout the stenosis to determine the highest peak systolic velocity (PSV). The highest PSV within the abnormal segment should be compared with velocities in the proximal and distal normal segments. Velocities should generally rise in a stenosis unless the stenosis is unusually long or the stenosis is quite severe.
The highest angle‐corrected PSV in a stenosis should be recorded from a longitudinal image. A spectral Doppler waveform with velocity measurements should be recorded in the normal arterial segment 1–4 cm proximal (upstream) to a suspected stenosis. A waveform distal to a stenosis should be recorded because it is helpful to document a drop in velocity beyond the stenosis and poststenotic disturbed flow/turbulence. Distal abnormalities, such as a poststenotic tardus parvus waveform, are signs of hemodynamic significance. If present, collateral branches should be recorded and documented including direction of flow within the reconstituted artery.
The location of any diseased or occluded segment(s) should also be documented. Estimated lengths of diseased or occluded segments may be helpful.
Gray scale and color and spectral Doppler evaluation of the following arterial segments should generally be performed as indicated whether or not a stenosis is present or suspected. Documentation of stenosis requires additional images. The accessible portion of the entire vessel or the arterial segment(s) of interest should also be evaluated because stenoses may occur in different or multiple sites.
-
Lower extremity
- Common femoral artery
- Proximal deep femoral artery
- Proximal superficial femoral artery
- Mid superficial femoral artery
- Distal superficial femoral artery above the knee
- Popliteal artery PSVs above and below the knee
If clinically appropriate, gray scale and color and spectral Doppler imaging of the common and external iliac, tibioperoneal trunk, anterior tibial, posterior tibial, peroneal, and dorsalis pedis arteries should be performed.
A focused or limited examination may be appropriate in certain clinical situations.
-
2Upper extremity
- Subclavian artery
- Axillary artery
- Brachial artery
If clinically appropriate, gray scale and color and spectral Doppler imaging of the innominate, radial, and ulnar arteries and the palmar arch should be performed.
In cases of suspected thoracic outlet syndrome, provocative testing should be performed. See the Appropriate Use Criteria for Peripheral Vascular Ultrasound and Physiological Testing Part I: Arterial Ultrasound and Physiological Testing. 52
A focused or limited examination may be appropriate in certain clinical situations.
Evaluation of Surgical and Percutaneous Interventions
Bypass grafts
An attempt should be made to scan the full length of any arterial bypass graft using gray scale and color Doppler.
Representative longitudinal color Doppler and/or gray scale images should be documented for normal segments.
Angle‐corrected spectral Doppler waveforms should be obtained from longitudinal images.
Angle‐corrected spectral Doppler waveforms and PSV measurements should be documented in the native artery proximal to the graft anastomosis, at the proximal anastomosis, at representative sites along the graft, at the distal anastomosis, and in the native artery distal to the anastomosis.
Suspected abnormalities should also be imaged with longitudinal gray scale ultrasound. Representative longitudinal color and/or gray scale images of stenoses should be documented. Transverse images may be helpful.
Angle‐corrected spectral Doppler waveforms should be obtained from longitudinal images proximal to, at, and distal to sites of suspected stenosis. The sonographer/technologist should evaluate the graft conduit and the contiguous segments of the native arteries carefully along the entire length of the stenosis to determine the highest PSV.
The highest angle‐corrected PSV in a stenosis should be recorded from longitudinal images. A spectral Doppler waveform with velocity measurements should be recorded in the normal arterial segment 1–4 cm proximal (upstream) to a suspected stenosis. A waveform distal to a stenosis should be recorded because it is helpful to document a drop in velocity beyond the stenosis and poststenotic disturbed flow/turbulence. Distal abnormalities, as well as a poststenotic tardus parvus waveform, are signs of hemodynamic significance. The presence of low PSVs and low‐resistance waveforms within an otherwise normal graft should be noted because this can imply an increased risk of graft occlusion.
Endovascular Interventions
An attempt should be made to sample the site of arterial interventions as well as the segment immediately proximal (upstream) and distal (downstream) to the site of intervention. Stents should generally be scanned longitudinally along their entire length by gray scale and color Doppler, and representative images within the stent should be obtained. Transverse images may be useful to document stent distortion or luminal narrowing by the outside plaque.
Representative longitudinal color Doppler and/or gray scale images should be documented. All velocity measurements must be obtained from a longitudinal image.
Angle‐corrected spectral Doppler waveforms obtained from a longitudinal image and PSV measurements should be documented in the native artery proximal to the intervention, at representative sites within an area of intervention (eg, proximal stent, mid stent, distal stent), and in the native artery distal to the intervention.
Angle‐corrected spectral Doppler waveforms should be obtained from longitudinal images proximal to, at, and distal to sites of suspected stenosis. The sonographer/technologist should evaluate the vessel thoroughly throughout the stenosis to determine the highest PSV.
The highest angle‐corrected PSV in a stenosis should be recorded from a longitudinal image. A spectral Doppler waveform with PSV measurements should be recorded in the normal arterial segment 1 to 4 cm proximal (upstream) to a suspected stenosis. A waveform distal to a stenosis should be recorded because it is helpful to document a drop in velocity beyond the stenosis and poststenotic disturbed flow/turbulence. Distal abnormalities, as well as a poststenotic tardus parvus waveform, are signs of hemodynamic significance.
Other
Suspected soft tissue abnormalities in proximity to arteries
The entire area of a suspected soft‐tissue abnormality should be imaged. Spectral and color Doppler should be performed to document the presence or absence of blood flow in the region of the suspected abnormality.
Pseudoaneurysms
In evaluating patients with suspected pseudoaneurysms, the sonographer/technologist should evaluate vasculature and adjacent soft tissues in transverse and longitudinal planes, using color Doppler, at, above, and below the arterial puncture site because the vessel may have been punctured at or several centimeters away from the skin wound. For example, for evaluation of the groin area, Doppler interrogation should be performed from the distal external iliac artery to the proximal superficial femoral artery. Imaging in the longitudinal plane must also be obtained with representative color and spectral Doppler images.
When a pseudoaneurysm is identified, the overall size of the pseudoaneurysm sac, the size of the residual lumen (in cases of partially thrombosed pseudoaneurysm), and the length and width of the communicating channel (neck) should be documented with appropriate gray scale and/or color Doppler techniques. Spectral Doppler waveforms should be obtained in the communicating channel to demonstrate bidirectional “to‐and‐fro” flow.
In case of therapeutic intervention, color and/or spectral Doppler may be used as a guide to therapy and as a means of documenting therapeutic success. 37 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56
When present, the size and location of hematomas should be documented.
The presence of hematomas should be documented and differentiated from pseudoaneurysms with Doppler image optimization to demonstrate absence of flow.
Abnormal communication between artery and vein (arterio‐venous fistula)
Color and spectral Doppler may be used to document the location of abnormal vascular communications. Spectral Doppler waveforms should be documented from the artery proximal to, in the area of, and distal to abnormal communications. Flow within the fistula should be recorded if found. A spectral Doppler waveform from the draining vein should be documented above and below the fistula.
Color Doppler is particularly useful for identifying the level of such communications because the flow disturbances in a fistula often create color Doppler signals in the adjacent soft tissue from transmitted vibrations and pressure changes (color bruit).
Peripheral aneurysms
The location of aneurysms should be documented. The widest diameter of the artery or aneurysm should be measured (outer wall to outer wall) on gray scale images in short axis of the lumen. If present, patency of the vessel and the presence of intraluminal thrombus should be documented with gray scale and color and spectral Doppler images.
Documentation
Accurate and complete documentation is essential for high‐quality patient care. Written reports and ultrasound images/video clips that contain diagnostic information should be obtained and archived, with recommendations for follow‐up studies if clinically applicable, in accordance with the AIUM Practice Parameter for Documentation of an Ultrasound Examination. 57
Equipment Specification
Peripheral arterial sonography should be performed with a linear array or curved array transducer equipped with pulsed Doppler and color Doppler capability (power Doppler may be used if needed). A linear array transducer helps visualize vessels with better resolution than most curved array transducers. The transducer should operate at the highest clinically appropriate frequency, recognizing that there is a trade‐off between resolution and penetration.
Equipment performance monitoring should be in accordance with the AIUM Routine Quality Assurance of Clinical Ultrasound Equipment. 58
Quality and Safety
Policies and procedures related to quality assurance and improvement, safety, infection control, and equipment‐performance monitoring should be developed and implemented in accordance with the AIUM Standards and Guidelines for the Accreditation of Ultrasound Practices. 48
ALARA Principle
The potential benefits and risks of each examination should be considered. The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle 59 should be observed for factors that affect the acoustical output and by considering transducer dwell time and total scanning time. Further details on ALARA may be found in the current version of the AIUM's publication Medical Ultrasound Safety. 60
Infection Control
Transducer preparation, cleaning, and disinfection should follow manufacturer recommendations and be consistent with the AIUM's Guidelines for Cleaning and Preparing External‐ and Internal‐Use Ultrasound Transducers Between Patients, Safe Handling, and Use of Ultrasound Coupling Gel. 61
Equipment Performance Monitoring
Monitoring protocols for equipment performance should be developed and implemented in accordance with the AIUM Standards and Guidelines for the Accreditation of Ultrasound Practice. 48
Collaborative Subcommittees
AIUM
John Stephen Pellerito, MD
ACR
Gowthaman Gunabushanam, MBBS, MD, Chair
Constantine Burgan, MD
Laurence Needleman, MD
SRU
Jill A. Jones, MD
Harriet J. Paltiel, MD
AIUM Expert Advisory Group
AIUM Clinical Standards Committee
Rachel Bo‐ming Liu, MD, FACEP, FAIUM, chair
Margarita V. Revzin, MD, MS, FSRU, FAIUM, vice chair
Tracy Anton, BS, RDMS, RDCS, FAIUM
Creagh T. Boulger, MD, FAIUM
John R. Eisenbrey, PhD, FAIUM
Rob Goodman, MB, BChir, FAIUM
Ethan J. Halpern, MD, FAIUM
Oliver Daniel Kripfgans, PhD, FAIUM
Juliana Gevaerd Martins, MD
John Stephen Pellerito, MD, FACR, FAIUM, FSRU
James M. Shwayder, MD, JD, FAIUM
Jean Lea Spitz, MPH, CAE, RDMS, FAIUM, FSDMS
Original copyright 2006; Revised 2019, 2014, 2010, 2025; Renamed 2015
Acknowledgments
This parameter was developed by the AIUM in collaboration with the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU). We are indebted to the many volunteers who contributed their time, knowledge, and energy to developing this document.
None of the authors have a conflict of interest to disclose.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
- 1. Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Associations for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease) – summary of recommendations. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17:1383–1397; quiz 1398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, et al. Inter‐society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 33:S1–S75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Lowery AJ, Hynes N, Manning BJ, Mahendran M, Tawfik S, Sultan S. A prospective feasibility study of duplex ultrasound arterial mapping, digital‐subtraction angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography in management of critical lower limb ischemia by endovascular revascularization. Ann Vasc Surg 2007; 21:443–451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Nuffer Z, Rupasov A, Bekal N, Murtha J, Bhatt S. Spectral Doppler ultrasound of peripheral arteries: a pictorial review. Clin Imaging 2017; 46:91–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bradbury AW, Adam DJ. Diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease of the lower limb. BMJ 2007; 334:1229–1230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Collins R, Burch J, Cranny G, et al. Duplex ultrasonography, magnetic resonance angiography, and computed tomography angiography for diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease: systematic review. BMJ 2007; 334:1257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. de Vries SO, Hunink MG, Polak JF. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves as a technique for meta‐analysis of the diagnostic performance of duplex ultrasonography in peripheral arterial disease. Acad Radiol 1996; 3:361–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Eiberg JP, Grønvall Rasmussen JB, Hansen MA, Schroeder TV. Duplex ultrasound scanning of peripheral arterial disease of the lower limb. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010; 40:507–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Hingorani AP, Ascher E, Marks N, et al. Limitations of and lessons learned from clinical experience of 1,020 duplex arteriography. Vascular 2008; 16:147–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Spronk S, den Hoed PT, de Jonge LC, van Dijk LC, Pattynama PM. Value of the duplex waveform at the common femoral artery for diagnosing obstructive aortoiliac disease. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42:236–242. discussion 242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Talbot SR. Assessment of upper extremity arterial occlusive disease. In: Pellerito JS, Polak JF (eds). Introduction to Vascular Ultrasonography. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2012:262‐280. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Zierler RE. Ultrasound assessment of lower extremity arteries. In: Pellerito JS, Polak JF (eds). Introduction to Vascular Ultrasonography. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2012:294‐306. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Mustapha JA, Saab F, Diaz‐Sandoval L, et al. Comparison between angiographic and arterial duplex ultrasound assessment of tibial arteries in patients with peripheral arterial disease: on behalf of the Joint Endovascular and Non‐Invasive Assessment of LImb Perfusion (JENALI) Group. J Invasive Cardiol 2013; 25:606–611. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Sultan S, Tawfick W, Hynes N. Ten‐year technical and clinical outcomes in TransAtlantic Inter‐Society Consensus II infrainguinal C/D lesions using duplex ultrasound arterial mapping as the sole imaging modality for critical lower limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2013; 57:1038–1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Crawford JD, Perrone KH, Jung E, Mitchell EL, Landry GJ, Moneta GL. Arterial duplex for diagnosis of peripheral arterial emboli. J Vasc Surg 2016; 64:1351–1356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Crawford JD, Robbins NG, Harry LA, et al. Characterization of tibial velocities by duplex ultrasound in severe peripheral arterial disease and controls. J Vasc Surg 2016; 63:646–651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Shaalan WE, French‐Sherry E, Castilla M, Lozanski L, Bassiouny HS. Reliability of common femoral artery hemodynamics in assessing the severity of aortoiliac inflow disease. J Vasc Surg 2003; 37:960–969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Favaretto E, Pili C, Amato A, et al. Analysis of agreement between duplex ultrasound scanning and arteriography in patients with lower limb artery disease. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2007; 8:337–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Fasih T, Rudol G, Ashour H, Mudawi A, Bhattacharya V. Surveillance versus nonsurveillance for femoro‐popliteal bypass grafts. Angiology 2004; 55:251–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Ferris BL, Mills JL, Hughes JD, Durrani T, Knox R. Is early postoperative duplex scan surveillance of leg bypass grafts clinically important? J Vasc Surg 2003; 37:495–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Gerhard‐Herman M, Gardin JM, Jaff M, et al. Guidelines for noninvasive vascular laboratory testing: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Vascular Medicine and Biology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2006; 19:955–972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Hodgkiss‐Harlow KD, Bandyk DF. Ultrasound assessment during and after carotid and peripheral intervention. In: Pellerito JS, Polak JF (eds). Introduction to Vascular Ultrasonography. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2012:307‐323. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Visser K, Idu MM, Buth J, Engel GL, Hunink MG. Duplex scan surveillance during the first year after infrainguinal autologous vein bypass grafting surgery: costs and clinical outcomes compared with other surveillance programs. J Vasc Surg 2001; 33:123–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Stone PA, Armstrong PA, Bandyk DF, et al. Duplex ultrasound criteria for femorofemoral bypass revision. J Vasc Surg 2006; 44:496–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Abu Dabrh AM, Mohammed K, Farah W, et al. Systematic review and meta‐analysis of duplex ultrasound surveillance for infrainguinal vein bypass grafts. J Vasc Surg 2017; 66:1885–1891.e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Pellerito J, Polak JF. Ultrasound assessment during and after carotid and peripheral intervention. In: Pellerito JS, Polak JF (eds). Introduction to Vascular Ultrasonography. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2020:345. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Back MR, Novotney M, Roth SM, et al. Utility of duplex surveillance following iliac artery angioplasty and primary stenting. J Endovasc Ther 2001; 8:629–637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Uberoi R, Sarker B, Coleman J, Mudawi A, Ashour H. Duplex follow‐up of aorto‐iliac stents. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002; 23:331–335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Baril DT, Rhee RY, Kim J, Makaroun MS, Chaer RA, Marone LK. Duplex criteria for determination of in‐stent stenosis after angioplasty and stenting of the superficial femoral artery. J Vasc Surg 2009; 49:133–138; discussion 139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Langenberger H, Schillinger M, Plank C, et al. Agreement of duplex ultrasonography vs. computed tomography angiography for evaluation of native and in‐stent SFA re‐stenosis – findings from a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81:2265–2269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Kawarada O, Higashimori A, Noguchi M, et al. Duplex criteria for in‐stent restenosis in the superficial femoral artery. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 81:E199–E205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Gornik HL, Creager MA. Aortitis. Circulation 2008; 117:3039–3051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Tatò F, Hoffmann U. Giant cell arteritis: a systemic vascular disease. Vasc Med 2008; 13:127–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Lai K‐L, Chen H‐H, Lan J‐L, Chen D‐Y. Ultrasonography of large‐vessel vasculitides. J Med Ultrasound 2012; 20:72–78. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Olin JW, Gornik HL, Bacharach JM, et al. Fibromuscular dysplasia: state of the science and critical unanswered questions: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014; 129:1048–1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Burke BJ. Ultrasound in the assessment and management of arterial emergencies. In: Pellerito JS, Polak JF (eds). Introduction to Vascular Ultrasonography. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2012:324‐339. [Google Scholar]
- 37. Paulson EK, Kliewer MA, Hertzberg BS, O'Malley CM, Washington R, Carroll BA. Color Doppler sonography of groin complications following femoral artery catheterization. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165:439–444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Ascher E, Hingorani A, Markevich N, et al. Role of duplex arteriography as the sole preoperative imaging modality prior to lower extremity revascularization surgery in diabetic and renal patients. Ann Vasc Surg 2004; 18:433–439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Avenarius JK, Breek JC, Lampmann LE, van Berge Henegouwen DP, Hamming JF. The additional value of angiography after colour‐coded duplex on decision making in patients with critical limb ischaemia. A prospective study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002; 23:393–397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Grassbaugh JA, Nelson PR, Rzucidlo EM, et al. Blinded comparison of preoperative duplex ultrasound scanning and contrast arteriography for planning revascularization at the level of the tibia. J Vasc Surg 2003; 37:1186–1190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Marti X, Romera A, Vila R, Cairols MA. Role of ultrasound arterial mapping in planning therapeutic options for critical ischemia of lower limbs in diabetic patients. Ann Vasc Surg 2012; 26:1071–1076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Wain RA, Berdejo GL, Delvalle WN, et al. Can duplex scan arterial mapping replace contrast arteriography as the test of choice before infrainguinal revascularization? J Vasc Surg 1999; 29:100–107; discussion 107–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Baetz L, Satiani B. Palmar arch identification during evaluation for radial artery harvest. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2011; 45:255–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Rodriguez E, Ormont ML, Lambert EH, et al. The role of preoperative radial artery ultrasound and digital plethysmography prior to coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 9:135–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine . The AIUM practice parameter for the performance of ultrasound vessel mapping prior to dialysis access creation. J Ultrasound Med 2022; 41:E16–E20. 10.1002/jum.15876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine . AIUM practice parameter for the performance of vascular ultrasound for postoperative assessment of hemodialysis access, 2024 revision. J Ultrasound Med 2024; 43:E39–E49. 10.1002/jum.16549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine . Training Guidelines. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine website. Accessed March 3, 2023. https://www.aium.org/resources/training-guidelines.
- 48. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine . Standards and Guidelines for the Accreditation of Ultrasound Practices. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine website. Accessed March 3, 2023. https://www.aium.org/resources/official-statements/view/standards-and-guidelines-for-the-accreditation-of-ultrasound-practices.
- 49. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine . Employment of Credentialed Sonographers. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine website. Accessed March 3, 2023. https://www.aium.org/resources/official-statements/view/employment-of-credentialed-sonographers.
- 50. 42 CFR § 410.32 – Diagnostic x‐ray tests, diagnostic laboratory tests, and other diagnostic tests: Conditions. U.S. Government Publishing Office website. Accessed April 24, 2023. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CFR-2021-title42-vol2/CFR-2021-title42-vol2-sec410-32/summary.
- 51. ACCF/ACR/AIUM/ASE/ASN/ICAVL/SCAI/SCCT/SIR/SVM/SVS/SVU [corrected] 2012 appropriate use criteria for peripheral vascular ultrasound and physiological testing part I: arterial ultrasound and physiological testing: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation appropriate use criteria task force, American College of Radiology, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nephrology, Intersocietal Commission for the Accreditation of vascular laboratories, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Interventional Radiology, Society for Vascular Medicine, Society for Vascular Surgery, [corrected] and Society for Vascular Ultrasound. [corrected]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60:242–276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Kang SS, Labropoulos N, Mansour MA, et al. Expanded indications for ultrasound‐guided thrombin injection of pseudoaneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2000; 31:289–298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Feld R, Patton GM, Carabasi RA, Alexander A, Merton D, Needleman L. Treatment of iatrogenic femoral artery injuries with ultrasound‐guided compression. J Vasc Surg 1992; 16:832–840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Kang SS, Labropoulos N, Mansour MA, Baker WH. Percutaneous ultrasound guided thrombin injection: a new method for treating postcatheterization femoral pseudoaneurysms. J Vasc Surg 1998; 27:1032–1038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Malgor RD, Labropoulos N, Gasparis AP, Landau DS, Tassiopoulos AK. Results of a new human recombinant thrombin for the treatment of arterial pseudoaneurysm. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2012; 46:145–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Paulson EK, Sheafor DH, Kliewer MA, et al. Treatment of iatrogenic femoral arterial pseudoaneurysms: comparison of US‐guided thrombin injection with compression repair. Radiology 2000; 215:403–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine . AIUM practice parameter for documentation of an ultrasound examination. J Ultrasound Med 2019; 39:E1–E4. 10.1002/jum.15187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine . AIUM Routine Quality Assurance of Clinical Ultrasound Equipment, version 2. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine website. Accessed March 23, 2003. https://www.aium.org/docs/default‐source/aium‐publications/rqa2.pdf.
- 59. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine . AIUM Official Statement: As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) Principle. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine website. Accessed March 23, 2023. https://www.aium.org/resources/official‐statements/view/as‐low‐as‐reasonably‐achievable‐(alara)‐principle.
- 60. Medical Ultrasound Safety. 4th ed. Laurel, Maryland: American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; 2020. Accessed June 25, 2024. https://www.aium.org/resources/mus. [Google Scholar]
- 61. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine . Guidelines for Cleaning and Preparing External‐ and Internal‐Use Ultrasound Transducers and Equipment Between Patients as well as Safe Handling and Use of Ultrasound Coupling Gel. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine website. Accessed March 23, 2023. https://www.aium.org/resources/official‐statements/view/guidelines‐for‐cleaning‐and‐preparing‐external‐‐and‐internal‐use‐ultrasound‐transducers‐and‐equipment‐between‐patients‐as‐well‐as‐safe‐handling‐and‐use‐of‐ultrasound‐coupling‐gel. [DOI] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
