Abstract
The bacterial pathogen Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis) emerged as the etiologic agent of mastitis in cattle during the early 1960’s. Concurrent with the emergence of M. bovis, Holsteins in the US were undergoing intensive genetic selection for increased milk production. Comparison studies with unselected Holsteins have found an association with selection and increased susceptibility to disease. More recently, M. bovis was identified as the cause of epizootics of severe, chronic respiratory disease in American bison (Bison bison). In cattle, M. bovis causes chronic respiratory disease and is associated with the bovine respiratory disease complex while in bison, M. bovis is considered a primary pathogen. The objective of this study was to characterize and compare the transcriptomic response of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from contemporary Holsteins (CH), unselected Holsteins (UH), and bison at 24 hr following in vitro M. bovis infection. The greatest and fewest number of differentially expressed genes (DEG) were observed in UH and bison, respectively. Ingenuity pathway analysis of DEG identified the genotype-specific expression of pathways involved in cytokine and chemokine response, neutrophil degranulation, and antigen processing and presentation. This study is the first to characterize how PBMC transcriptomic responses to in vitro M. bovis infection differ by genotype (CH vs. UH) and species (Holstein vs. bison). These findings provide insight into observed differences in clinical disease between bison and cattle and highlight the effects of primary selection for milk production on Holstein responses to M. bovis.
Keywords: bison, Holstein, Mycoplasma bovis, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, transcriptomics
Introduction
Mycoplasma bovis (M. bovis) is a small, wall-less bacterium that is a significant pathogen of multiple ruminant species including cattle (Bos taurus) and bison (Bison bison). First identified in 1961 from a severe outbreak of mastitis in a dairy herd (1), M. bovis is now endemic in most major cattle-producing countries worldwide (2, 3). The first cases of M. bovis infection in bison were reported in 1999 (4) and M. bovis is now recognized as a significant threat to bison ranching and restoration (5). Despite both ruminant species being susceptible to M. bovis infection, distinct differences in pathogenesis have been observed. In cattle, M. bovis is frequently associated with the multifactorial bovine respiratory disease (BRD) complex (6) causing pneumonia, arthritis, and otitis media in calves and yearlings and mastitis in dairy cows. Conversely, M. bovis is recognized as a primary pathogen in bison (7, 8), frequently associated with high mortality epizootics of chronic respiratory disease in managed herds. In bison, M. bovis is reported to cause a plethora of clinical syndromes including polyarthritis, pharyngitis, laryngitis, pleuritis, pericarditis, and reproductive disorders. Further, adult animals frequently present with clinical disease and recent studies show asymptomatic infection of bison calves is common (9). Genomic analysis of cattle and bison M. bovis isolates did not identify specific virulence factors or mutations that would impact the contrasting disease phenotypes observed in each ruminant species (10), which suggests that species-specific differences in the host response underlie the divergent etiology, pathogenesis, and clinical disease syndromes.
Concurrent with the emergence of M. bovis as a pathogen of cattle in the 1960’s, Holsteins in the US were undergoing intensive genetic selection for increased milk production (11). The resulting contemporary Holstein (CH) produces greater milk yields than the previously unselected Holstein (UH) population; however, this genetic selection has altered immune, metabolic, and endocrine functions that are hypothesized to have detrimental effects on animal health and reproduction (12, 13). In 1964 the University of Minnesota established an unselected control line, now known as UH, by breeding cows to sires of average milk production of the mid 1960’s (14, 15). Genomic analyses comparing the CH to the UH identified changes in approximately 40% of the genome between the genetic lines, with significant changes in genomic loci associated with genes involved with immunity (13, 16). The functional effects of this selection have been demonstrated by experimental challenge studies that found increased immune function in UH as compared to CH (17, 18). Following intravenous lipopolysaccharide administration, UH produce increased proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels and had reduced milk bacterial counts following intramammary challenge with Escherichia coli (18). Further, stimulation of whole blood with heat-killed bacteria from UH resulted in greater production of IL-1β and IL-6 (19).
To further investigate the ruminant immune response and characterize the effects of host genomic background on M. bovis infection, we compared the transcriptomes of M. bovis infected peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) isolated from CH, UH, and bison by RNA sequencing (RNAseq). Our data demonstrated that PBMC from both genotypes of Holsteins have a greater transcriptional response than bison to M. bovis infection. The transcriptional responses of both UH and bison PBMC to M. bovis infection were characterized by increased expression of genes involved in Th1 immunity and proinflammatory signaling pathways. Our studies demonstrated that the transcriptional responses of M. bovis infected PBMC differs by species and between Holsteins genotypes.
Materials and methods
Animals
Seven lactating, primiparous contemporary and unselected Holstein cows were housed and managed under the same conditions at the National Animal Disease Center dairy facility. Cows were all between two and three years of age and between 63 and 152 days in milk. Five female bison, approximately two years of age, were housed at the National Animal Disease Center in Ames, IA. All procedures were evaluated and approved by the National Animal Disease Center Animal Care and Use Committee.
Isolation of bovine and bison peripheral blood mononuclear cells
Holstein and bison PBMC were isolated from whole blood collected via jugular venipuncture into syringes containing 2x acid citrate dextrose buffer. Blood was diluted 1:2 in Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (DPBS) (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) and layered onto pre-loaded Sepmate tubes (Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) containing 15 ml of Lymphoprep (Stem Cell Technologies). Filled Sepmate tubes were centrifuged for 15 minutes at 1,200 x g at room temperature. The top plasma layer was then removed and the buffy coat transferred into a clean 50 ml conical tube. Recovered cells were washed in DPBS and pelleted by centrifugation at 300 x g for 10 minutes at room temperature. Ammonium chloride potassium lysis (ACK) buffer was used to remove contaminating red blood cells. Cells were again washed in DPBS and pelleted by centrifugation at 300 x g for 10 minutes. PBMC were filtered through a 40 μM strainer, pelleted by centrifugation at 300 x g for 10 minutes, and resuspended in complete RPMI 140 (cRPMI) (ThermoFisher) containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 nM L-glutamine, 1% essential amino acids, 1% non-essential amino acids, 1% sodium pyruvate, antibiotic/antimycotic solution (ThermoFisher), and 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol (Sigma Aldrich, Burlington, MA). Cell counts and viability were obtained by using a ViCell Blue cytometer (Beckman Coulter, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The volume of PBMC suspension was adjusted to obtain a final concentration of 107 cells/ml.
Mycoplasma bovis
The M. bovis isolate NADC1 was used for infection of PBMC. Axenic cultures of NADC1 were grown in in PPLO broth (BD Diagnostic Systems, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) supplemented with 10g/L of yeast extract (BD Diagnostic Systems), and 20% horse serum (v/v) (ThermoFisher) for 48 hrs at 37 C, 5% CO2 and aliquots were stored at -80 C. Prior to infection, a frozen aliquot of NADC1 suspension was thawed and cultured in 3 ml PPLO broth at 37 C, 5% CO2 for 20 hrs. The M. bovis inoculum was quantified by performing serial ten-fold dilution in DPBS and plating 5 µl in triplicate on PPLO agar plates. The plates were incubated at 37 C, 5% CO2 for 72 hr prior to enumeration.
Infection of PBMC and RNA isolation
For in vitro experiments, 100 μl of PBMC suspension from each of the 7 Holsteins/genotype and each of the 5 bison were used to seed wells of a 96-well plate (1x106 cells/well). The NADC1 inoculum was prepared by pelleting bacterial cells, from 3 ml PPLO cultures, by centrifugation at 15,000 x g for 20 min. The pellet was resuspended in cRPMI media and 100 μl of inoculum was used to infect PBMC at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of approximately 0.5. An additional 100 μl of cRPMI was added to mock infected wells. Cells were incubated for 24 hrs at 37 C, 5% CO2. Following the incubation period, PBMC were pelleted by centrifugation at 400 x g for 5 minutes at 4 C. The supernatants were removed and the cells were lysed by adding 100 μl/well TRIzol reagent (ThermoFisher) and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. Cell lysates were transferred to clean 0.2 ml tubes and stored at -80 C. Purification of RNA was performed using the Purelink RNA Mini kit (ThermoFisher) according to manufacturer’s instructions.
RNA sequencing and differential gene expression analysis
Library preparation was performed using the Illumina Stranded mRNA Library Preparation Kit and Sequenced on a P2 flow cell on the NextSeq 1000 (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) to generate 100-bp paired end reads with an average of 22.06 million reads per sample. RNA samples from each of the 19 animals used in this study were not pooled prior to use in library preparation. Tools at galaxy.scinet.usda.gov were utilized to analyze the sequenced reads. Quality control checks were performed with FastQC v0.12.0. TrimGalore v0.6.5 was used to remove adapters and reads with a phred score below 20 prior to alignment on the Bos Taurus ARS-UCD 2.0 or Bison UMD 1.0 genome assemblies, respectively, with HISAT2 v2.1.0 (20). Raw counts were generated with FeatureCounts v.2.0.1 (21) and differential gene expression (DEG) was performed using DeSeq2 v2.11.40.6 (22). DEG were considered significant if log2FC > |1| and Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate < 0.05. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) by Qiagen was used to determine canonical pathways associated with the differentially expressed genes (DEG) in each host type. Raw sequence data is available on GenBank (PRJNA 1439942).
Results
Differential gene expression in M. bovis infected CH, UH, and bison PBMC
To compare the responses to M. bovis infection of each cattle genotype and bison, RNAseq was performed on PBMC 24 hrs post-infection. Volcano plots showing the number of upregulated and downregulated DEG were generated for CH (Figure 1A), UH (Figure 1B), and bison (Figure 1C). The number of significant DEG (P < 0.05) in M. bovis infected PBMC compared to uninfected PBMC in contemporary Holsteins (CH), unselected Holsteins (UH), and bison were 3904, 4871, 2714, respectively. Of the 3904 significant DEG in CH, 1651 were upregulated while 2253 were downregulated (Supplementary Table 1). The greatest number of DEG were observed in M. bovis infected UH PBMC where out of a total of 4871 DEG, 2018 DEG were upregulated while 2853 DEG were downregulated (Supplementary Table 2). The lowest number of DEG were observed in M. bovis infected bison PBMC where out of a total of 2714 DEG, 1212 DEG were upregulated and 1502 DEG were downregulated (Supplementary Table 3). As expected, the transcriptomic response of PBMC to M. bovis infection was more similar between Holstein genetic lines. CH and UH shared 2291 common DEG where only 129 CH DEG and 296 UH DEG overlapped with bison (Figure 1D). Interestingly, 382 DEG were common between all three genotypes. A list of all unique and shared DEG by genotype is provided in Supplementary Table 4.
Figure 1.

Mycoplasma bovis induced differential gene expression in PBMC from contemporary Holsteins, unselected Holsteins, and bison. Volcano plots show differential gene expression in contemporary Holsteins (A), unselected Holsteins (B), and bison (C). Significant genes (Benjamini–Hochberg FDR p < 0.05) downregulated are shown in green, while upregulated genes are shown in red. Genes that are not significantly differentially expressed are shown in grey. The number of DEGs shared between genotypes is plotted in the Venn diagram (D).
In CH, the two most significant DEG were SLA, encoding for Src-like adaptor protein, involved in the negative regulation of T-cell receptor signaling (23), and KCNN4, encoding for the Potassium Calcium-Activated Channel Subfamily N, Member 4, is important for the formation of multinucleate giant cells (24). Others include CROCC (Ciliary Rootlet Coiled-Coil), MTG1 (Mitochondrial Ribosome Associated GTPase1), AGER (Advanced Glycosylation End-Product Specific Receptor), and NRADD (Neurotrophin Receptor Associated Death Domain) (Supplementary Table 1). The most significant DEG in UH were CROCC, FRMD8 (FERM Domain-Containing Protein 8), ABTB2 (Ankyrin Repeat and BTB/POZ Domain-Containing Protein 2), and LENG8 (Leukocyte Receptor Cluster Member 8) (Supplementary Table 2) all of which were downregulated. In bison PBMC, ABCC3 (ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily C Member 3), LOC1050040, SLC44A3 (Solute Carrier Family 44 Member 3), and LOC1049881 were the most significant DEG following M. bovis infection (Supplementary Table 3).
Comparative pathway enrichment in M. bovis infected CH, UH, and bison PBMC
Analysis of significantly enriched pathways further revealed the divergent transcriptional responses between Holstein genetic lines and bison PBMC. A total of 529, 589, and 266 pathways were significantly enriched (P < 0.05) in CH (Supplementary Table 5), UH (Supplementary Table 6), and bison (Supplementary Table 7) PBMC, respectively. Enriched pathways with increased expression in M. bovis infected CH PBMC were primarily involved with innate immune cell function and signaling including neutrophil degranulation while those with decreased expression were involved in wound healing, IL-17A signaling, and osteoarthritis pathways (Figure 2; Supplementary Table 5). Enriched pathways observed in M. bovis infected UH PBMC were similar in CH however differences in expression level were observed between the two genotypes. The neutrophil degranulation pathway had slightly reduced expression levels in UH as compared to CH while pathways involved in the adaptive immune response against intracellular pathogens (class I MHC mediated antigen processing and presentation, bacterial pathogen pattern recognition receptor signaling) and cytokine signaling (interferon signaling, pathogen induced cytokine storm signaling) were upregulated in UH as compared to CH (Figure 2; Supplementary Table 6). In contrast to both Holstein genotypes, the transcriptome of M. bovis infected bison PBMC was characterized by significantly enriched pathways involved with cytokine and chemokine signaling and classical macrophage activation and a decrease in the neutrophil degranulation pathway (Figure 2; Supplementary Table 7). The bison PBMC response had the greatest expression of genes comprising the signaling pathways for interferon α/β, pathogen induced cytokine storm, IL-17, cachexia, and the macrophage classical activation.
Figure 2.

Heat map of the top pathways across all three genotypes based on p value and z score are shown. Positive z scores indicating pathway activation are shown in orange while negative z scores indicating pathway inhibition are shown in blue. Greater shading indicates a greater magnitude of activation or inhibition.
Species-specific differences in the upregulation of the pathogen induced cytokine storm signaling pathway
The pathogen induced cytokine storm signaling pathway (PICSS) showed increasing DEG by genetic lineage following M. bovis infection of CH (Figure 3), UH (Figure 4), and bison (Figure 5) PBMC and species-specific differences in DEG comprising the PICSS primarily encode for immune signaling molecules, their receptors, and transcription factors. Bison PBMC had the greatest number of significantly upregulated interferon, cytokine, and chemokine genes reflecting broad activation of immune signaling. In bison PBMC, type I and type II interferons, IFNB1 (1.95 log2FC) and IFNG (4.23 log2FC), were upregulated while only IFNG was observed to be upregulated in UH (3.86 log2FC). Interestingly, only bison PBMC displayed an increase in TNF (3.28 log2FC), encoding the pro-inflammatory signaling molecule TNF-α which is consistent with the activation of the cachexia pathway (Figure 2). Compared to Holsteins, bison PBMC (Figure 5) showed increased expression of multiple cytokines including IL1A (5.87 log2FC), IL2 (2.03 log2FC), IL6 (7.9 log2FC), IL10 (2.42 log2FC), IL17A (6.51 log2FC), IL21 (3.93 log2FC), and IL23A (3.04 log2FC). Increased expression of IL12A and IL22 was observed in both UH and bison PBMC, although bison PBMC demonstrated greater expression of IL12A and IL22 (3.48 and 6.27 log2FC) as compared to UH (2.04 and 2.1 log2FC). Genes encoding chemokines involved in macrophage recruitment, CCL2 (2.23 log2FC) and CXCL10 (1.94 log2FC), were upregulated in UH while CCL5 was only upregulated in bison (3.08 log2FC).
Figure 3.

Differential gene expression post Mycoplasma bovis infection in contemporary Holstein PBMCs within the canonical IPA pathway “Pathogen Induced Cytokine Storm Signaling Pathway”. Downregulated genes are shown with green fill, while upregulated genes are shown with pink fill. The greater the upregulation or downregulation, the darker the fill. A molecule activity predictor tool predicts downstream activity based on significant differential gene expression. Predicted activation is shown in orange, and predicted inhibition is shown in blue. The more confident the prediction, the darker the fill. Solid lines represent direct relationships, while dashed lines represent indirect relationships.
Figure 4.

Differential gene expression post Mycoplasma bovis infection in unselected Holstein PBMCs within the canonical IPA pathway “Pathogen Induced Cytokine Storm Signaling Pathway”. Downregulated genes are shown with green fill, while upregulated genes are shown with pink fill. The greater the upregulation or downregulation, the darker the fill. A molecule activity predictor tool predicts downstream activity based on significant differential gene expression. Predicted activation is shown in orange, and predicted inhibition is shown in blue. The more confident the prediction, the darker the fill. Solid lines represent direct relationships, while dashed lines represent indirect relationships.
Figure 5.

Differential gene expression post Mycoplasma bovis infection in bison PBMC within the canonical IPA pathway “Pathogen Induced Cytokine Storm Signaling Pathway”. Downregulated genes are shown with green fill, while upregulated genes are shown with pink fill. The greater the upregulation or downregulation, the darker the fill. A molecule activity predictor tool predicts downstream activity based on significant differential gene expression. Predicted activation is shown in orange, and predicted inhibition is shown in blue. The more confident the prediction, the darker the fill. Solid lines represent direct relationships, while dashed lines represent indirect relationships.
Upregulation of chemokine receptors was most pronounced in Holsteins. CH showed increased expression of CCR1 (1.6 log2FC), CCR5 (2.64 log2FC), CXCR3 (1.46 log2FC), and IL6R (1.6 log2FC) (Figure 3). CCR1 (1.65 log2FC), CCR5 (3.25 log2FC), CXCR3 (1.03 log2FC), IL6R (1.5 log2FC), IL12RB2 (3.27 log2FC), and IL18R1 (2.03 log2FC) were upregulated in UH PBMC, while CXCR1 (-1.72 log2FC) and CXCR2 (-1.05 log2FC) were downregulated (Figure 4). DEG chemokine receptors in M. bovis infected bison PBMC included IL18R1 (2.16 log2FC) and IL23R (1.08 log2FC). Interestingly, the expression of CXCR4 was increased in CH (1.21 log2FC), UH (1.38 log2FC), and bison (1.1 log2FC) PBMC following M. bovis infection.
The differential expression of transcription factors critical for development of inflammatory and T cell responses were also influenced by M. bovis infection in ruminant PBMC. All three genotypes CH, UH, and bison demonstrated increased expression of RORC, the gene that encodes RORγt, which is critical for differentiation of Th17 cells. Bison PBMC (Figure 5; Supplementary Table 3) also increased TBX21 expression (1.84 log2FC). In both Holstein genotypes, the transcription factor STAT1 was upregulated though expression was higher in UH (2.54 log2FC) compared to CH (1.93 log2FC). In contrast, both Holstein groups demonstrated significant downmodulation of NFκB2 (-1.06 log2FC), encoding the NFκB p100 subunit (CH: -1.06 log2FC, UH: -1.12 log2FC) whereas the gene was upregulated in bison PBMC (2.2 log2FC). Surprisingly, increased expression of SOCS3 was observed in UH (1.07 log2FC) and bison (2.13 log2FC).
M. bovis infection of ruminant PBMC increased expression of genes involved in apoptosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis. Increased expression of CASP8 (CH: 1.25 log2FC, UH: 1.9 log2FC) and GSDME (CH:1.84 log2FC, UH: 2.62 log2FC), involved in apoptosis, were observed in both genotypes of Holsteins. Conversely, TNFSF10, critical for apoptosis, and MLKL, involved in necroptosis, were both upregulated in UH and bison (Supplementary Tables 2, S3). Bison also had increased expression of NLRP3 (1.82 log2FC), a central component of the inflammasome involved in pyroptosis, for which differences in expression were not noted in Holstein PBMC.
Discussion
This analysis demonstrates that cattle and bison PBMCs have fundamentally different transcriptomic responses to M. bovis infection. In our analysis, Holstein PBMC had the greatest transcriptomic response to M. bovis infection with the largest number of DEG being observed in UH PBMC. Our data suggest that following M. bovis infection of CH in Holstein PBMC, the greatest upregulation occurred in SLA, encoding for the Src-like adaptor protein (SLAP) that when expressed in T cells interacts with the T cell receptor and inhibits the activation of the transcription factor AP-1, which is important for cytokine expression (25). In contrast, KCNN4, which encodes a calcium activated potassium-ion channel, was the most downregulated gene in CH. Inhibition of KCNN4 expression in T lymphocytes has been shown to reduce T cell production of TNF-α and IFN-γ (26). Interestingly, the activation of KCNN4 by AP-1 has been shown to skew the differentiation of T helper cells towards a Th1/Th17 phenotype (27). The FRMD8 gene product is critical for cytokine secretion, including TNF-α, of macrophages (28) and was significantly downregulated in UH PBMC suggesting the production of certain proinflammatory mediators is reduced in UH PBMC. In bison, IL-6 and TNFRSF4 expression was upregulated potentially impacting T cell responses. IL-6 is a multifunctional pro-inflammatory cytokine produced by lymphocytes and macrophages that is important for the initiation of systemic inflammatory responses, antibody production, and T-cell development (29). TNFRSF4 encodes the OX40 receptor (CD134) which is involved in the clonal expansion and survival of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells often enhancing immune responses while conversely suppressing regulatory T cell activity (30).
Pathway analysis further revealed differences in the immune response between genotypes. The neutrophil degranulation pathway was significantly upregulated in Holsteins as compared to bison. Caseonecrotic lesions, comprised primarily of macrophages, neutrophils, and lymphocytes, are frequently observed in the lungs of M. bovis infected calves (31, 32). Neutrophil degranulation is important for elimination of pathogens though excessive degranulation can lead to immunopathology (33). Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) signaling is activated in response to M. bovis infection in bovine cells (34), promoting neutrophil degranulation and chemotaxis (35), and infection of bovine neutrophils increases elastase production (36). Further, M. bovis can degrade neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) via expression of the membrane nuclease mnuA (37) reducing bacterial clearance and potentially promoting bacterial growth and increasing tissue damage (38). Upregulation of the neutrophil degranulation pathway in Holsteins, compared to bison, suggests differences in the host response.
Genotype and species differences in the adaptive immune response may be represented by the upregulation of the Class I MHC-mediated antigen processing and presentation pathway was upregulated in UH PBMC. Antigen presentation through the class I pathway activates CD8+ T cells and is essential for clearance of intracellular pathogens (39). As M. bovis has been shown to invade and persist in bovine turbinate cells (40) and macrophages (41, 42) an effective CD8+ T cell response could hypothetically resolve intracellular M. bovis infections. In contrast to Holsteins, bison had significant activation of the cachexia signaling pathway. Cachexia is a chronic wasting condition associated with loss of muscle and adipose tissue (43) from unresolved inflammation and prolonged pro-inflammatory cytokine expression, including IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ, and TNF-α (44). This may correlate with disease pathogenesis in bison as loss of body condition is a frequently observed clinical sign in infected bison (9) and increased expression of genes involved in cachexia represent a putative molecular mechanism for disease pathogenesis in this species.
Pathogen induced cytokine storm is caused by immune dysregulation resulting in systemic inflammation affecting multiple organ systems associated with bacterial (45) and viral infections (46). Cytokine storms are associated with increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines including IFN-γ, IL-1, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, and TNF-α (47). We observed that bison PBMC significantly upregulated the expression of these pro-inflammatory cytokines following M. bovis infection while UH PBMC produced a more focused Th1-type response with upregulation of IFN-γ, IL-12, IL-22, CCL2, and CXCL10 while increased expression of IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α were not observed. The Th1-type cytokine profile observed in M. bovis infected UH PBMC may hypothetically increase the clearance of M. bovis infected host cells thereby reducing bacterial reservoirs and dissemination. Further, the lack of IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α upregulation suggests that UH are less likely to develop cytokine storms. In our study, CH PBMC did not upregulate cytokine gene expression despite previous studies showing bovine monocytes produce IL-10, but not IFN-γ or TNF-α, following M. bovis infection (48) which may be accounted for by methodological differences including the detection assay utilized, which measures the protein level rather than transcript, and a higher MOI. Future experiments, including a time-course comparing multiple MOI, may identify differential expression of IL10. The production of pro-inflammatory cytokines associated with cytokine storm by bison PBMC begins to provide mechanistic insight linking the host response to the severe clinical disease observed in M. bovis infected bison though further studies are required.
More broadly, Holstein PBMC upregulated the expression of several chemokine receptors, including CCR1, CCR5, CXCR3, and CXCR4, involved in leukocyte trafficking to sites of infection. CCR1 mediates T cell migration, by binding chemokines CCL3 and CCL5, to sites of infection and is critical for Th2 cytokine production (49); suggesting a mechanism for the observed Th2 cytokine profile in the lungs of M. bovis infected calves (50). CCR5 is a receptor for the chemokines CCL4 and CCL5 and has been shown to be important for the recruitment and maintenance of CD4+ T cells in the lungs of Mycoplasma pulmonis infected mice (51). CXCR3 binds three ligands, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11, and promotes migration of activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to infected tissue (52) though was also required for the accumulation of regulatory T cells at sites of inflammation (53). Bison and both Holstein genotypes upregulated CXCR4 expression in response to M. bovis infection. CXCR4 is expressed on the surface of proliferating cells (54) and has been shown to be upregulated on CD4+ T cells in children with severe Mycoplasma pneumonia infection (55). Interestingly, increased concentrations of the CXCR4 ligand, CXCL12, were observed in the lungs of Mycoplasma pneumonia infected mice (55). Further, inhibitor treatment downregulated the surface expression of CXCR4 reducing the concentrations of inflammatory cytokines (55) suggesting the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis is involved in the T cell response to M. bovis infection in large ruminants. Our data showed species-specific increases in the expression of multiple chemokine receptors, which have not been previously described in the host response to M. bovis. However, additional studies are required to further characterize chemokine receptor expression and their role in M. bovis disease pathogenesis.
Analysis of the PICSS pathway identified species-specific upregulation of DEG critical in the function of multiple programmed cell death pathways. Intriguingly, multiple genes required for inflammasome signaling, and initiation of programmed cell death pathways, show species-specific differential expression. Bison PBMC upregulated TNFSF10, FADD, NLRP3, and MLKL following M. bovis infection. TNFSF10 encodes TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) in activated PBMC inducing apoptosis (56) or, alternatively, necroptosis (57). NLRP3 inflammasome priming occurs through pathogen- and damage- associated molecular patterns receptors and requires FADD and caspase-8 binding to initiate programmed cell death pathways (58) and cytokine production (59). MLKL, mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein, mediates necroptosis through oligomerization and permeabilization of the plasma membrane (60). Stimulation of cells by TRAIL or by interferons (61) can induce MLKL mediated necroptosis in the absence of caspsase-8 (62), resulting in the release of damage associated molecular patterns (63). NLRP3 inflammasome activation can have protective or pathogenic effects during bacterial infection and it is currently unclear how NLRP3 functions during M. bovis infection in ruminants. Previous studies have shown NLRP3 activation increases the production of IL-1β and IL-6, the infiltration of myeloid cells, and is associated with increased tissue damage in the lungs of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infected mice (64, 65). Further studies will be required to elucidate species-specific activation of programmed cell death pathways and their contributions to bacterial clearance, disease resolution, and pathology.
Both genotypes of Holstein PBMC upregulated CASP8 and GSDME in response to M. bovis infection. CASP8 encodes for caspase-8, an initiator of apoptosis required for cleavage of subsequent caspases resulting in programmed cell death (66), and prevents the induction of necroptosis and associated immunopathology (67, 68). Additionally, caspase-8 has been shown to induce the synthesis of pro-IL-1β in Salmonella Typhimurium infected murine macrophages (69). GSDME encodes for gasdermin E, a pore forming protein, that has been shown to facilitate IL-1β release (70). Previous studies have demonstrated that Holstein PBMC produce IL-1β in response to stimulation with lipopolysaccharide and lipoteichoic acid, with greater production observed in UH PBMC (19, 71). Our study suggests IL-1β may be dependent on caspase-8 and gasdermin E functions though additional studies are required to elucidate species- and genotype-specific differences in IL-1β production.
The extensive selection of Holsteins for increased milk production concomitantly impacted CH immunogenetics thereby compromising responses to bacterial pathogens. Intensive selection for milk yield produced CH with decreased heterozygosity in major histocompatibility (MHC) regions, including class I bovine leukocyte antigen (BOLA)-A and class II BOLA-DRB2 and BOLA-DQA1 (13). A reduction in BOLA diversity could negatively impact antigen presentation potentially blunting the magnitude or breadth of T cell responses. IL-18R was affected by selection though functional effects on immune responses in Holsteins are currently unknown. IL-18R is expressed on myeloid and lymphoid cells where it induces pro-inflammatory cytokine production, including IFN-ϒ (72) though IL-18R signaling is linked to protective (73) or pathologic immune responses (74). Recent studies have highlighted the impact of Holstein selection on immunity to bacterial pathogens. Lippolis et al. (17) found UH to have lower milk somatic cell and E. coli counts following intramammary challenge compared to CH and Cousillas-Boam et al. (18) demonstrated increased serum TNF-α and IL-6 concentrations in UH after lipopolysaccharide treatment. Further, ex vivo stimulation of Holstein PBMC found increased production of IL-1β and IL-6 in UH (19, 71). These studies support the hypothesis that selection for increased milk yield compromised the immune response to bacterial infection in CH and suggest the UH genotype is immunologically more robust. Continued research, including in vivo challenge studies, is required to further identify the effects of genotype on bacterial infection outcomes in Holsteins.
Sexual dimorphism of the immune response influences outcomes following infection including the manifestation of clinical signs and immunopathology. In general, females mount stronger immune responses against infection compared to males, however, are more prone to develop inflammatory and autoimmune diseases (75). Dairy and bison herds are intensively managed and predominantly comprised of female animals (76) thus our study exclusively utilized PBMC from female Holsteins and bison. Bison cows predominantly exhibit clinical signs and have increased mortality rates compared to calves and adult bulls in affected herds (76–78) suggesting sexual dimorphism of the immune response potentially impacts M. bovis epidemiology and clinical outcomes. Estrogen receptors are expressed by myeloid and lymphoid cell types and can regulate the expression of TLR, cytokine, and chemokine genes, including IL-1, IL6, and IL-10 (79–81). Females have greater numbers of CD4+ T cells that produce significantly greater levels of TNF, IL-6, IL-17, and IFN-ϒ. In cattle, heifers produced greater concentrations of TNF-α, compared to bulls, following lipopolysaccharide challenge despite bulls exhibiting more severe clinical signs (82). Further, a bovine herpesvirus-1, Mannheimia haemolytica coinfection increased circulating leukocytes in heifers compared to bulls (83). The data presented herein may have resulted in the activation of different gene signaling pathways, particularly the PICCS and cachexia pathway, had bull PBMC been tested. These findings suggest cows, in particular bison cows, may be at higher risk for complications following M. bovis infection.
Holsteins and bison display observable differences in M. bovis clinical disease and epidemiology. Though the respiratory disease caused by M. bovis is variable, in cattle M. bovis is primarily associated with polymicrobial BRD causing chronic bronchopneumonia, polyarthritis, and otitis media mainly in calves and yearlings (84, 85). M. bovis is a primary pathogen of bison causing caseonecrotic pneumonia and disseminated, systemic disease with lethargy and loss of body condition common in moribund animals (7, 8, 86). In contrast to cattle, clinical signs are largely absent in bison calves while most clinical signs and mortalities are observed in adult females (78, 86), though recent data suggest bulls may be equally affected (76). Our results begin to provide context for the species-specific clinical signs and epidemiology. Upregulation of genes involved in cachexia and PICSS suggest these factors may contribute to the lethargy and loss of body condition observed in bison, though further research is required to comprehensively elucidate the molecular mechanisms contributing to M. bovis disease and immunopathology in large ruminants. Additionally, future studies comparing the transcriptomic response of male and female bison to M. bovis infection will provide context on sex as a factor for severe disease in bison.
Development of novel vaccines is imperative to control M. bovis in bison. Vaccination studies have shown markedly differing responses to experimental vaccines between Holsteins and bison. Briggs et al. (87) demonstrated intranasal vaccination with a modified-live Mannheimia haemolytica expressing the M. bovis antigens EF-Tu and Hsp70 successfully reduced lung bacterial loads in Holstein calves while a similar study evaluating the same vaccine in bison reported no differences in lung bacterial loads or pathology (88) demonstrating the dichotomy of responses between Holsteins and bison. Recently, we reported that an injectable subunit vaccine comprised of recombinant M. bovis Elongation Factor Tu and Heat Shock Protein 70 reduced lung bacterial loads and lung lesion formation in vaccinate bison (89). Transcriptomic analysis of serially collected blood samples found upregulation of TBX21, required for type I immunity, and PAX5, a transcription factor required for B cell differentiation and significant enrichment of pathways involved in T cell differentiation, cell adhesion, viral infection, and the adaptive immune response (90). Following challenge, increased expression of genes comprising modules for Fcϒ receptor mediated phagocytosis, NK cell cytotoxicity, and lysosome activity were observed. These data show the adjuvanted protein subunit vaccine promotes Th1 type immune response, hypothesized to be beneficial for M. bovis infection in large ruminants, in the absence of upregulation of pathways associated with immunopathology, including PICSS and cachexia.
M. bovis is a unique bacterial pathogen of cattle and bison that severely impacts animal health and causes significant economic losses. Despite the detrimental impact of M. bovis on the health of cattle and bison, effective intervention strategies for M. bovis, particularly in bison, are lacking. The current study represents the first comparison of CH, UH, and bison PBMC transcriptomic responses following M. bovis infection. These data further support the hypothesis that intensive selection of Holsteins for increased milk-production during the 1960’s, concurrent with the emergence of M. bovis, altered the immune response to bacterial pathogens. Additionally, this study demonstrates the host response of bison to M. bovis infection differs from that of Holsteins with the gene expression profiles providing initial mechanistic evidence for the differences in clinical disease and epidemiology observed between bison and cattle. Further comparisons of host responses of susceptible species will provide increased understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying the dichotomy of clinical maladies and may be beneficial in the development of novel intervention strategies for both species.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Dr. Paola Boggiatto, William Boatwright, Jr., and Lilia Walther and Nicholas Otis in the NADC Genomics Core for assistance with these works. The authors acknowledge and thank Dr. Danielle Buttke for sharing her expertise and knowledge of bison ranching and veterinary medicine. Any mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This research was funded by the USDA-ARS intramural research program (Project Numbers 5030-32000-236-000-D and 5030-32000-238-000-D).
Footnotes
Edited by: Syed M. Faisal, University of Michigan Medical School, United States
Reviewed by: Benedetta Amato, University of Bristol, United Kingdom
Dennis B. Bela-ong, Gyeongsang National University, Republic of Korea
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, PRJNA 1439942.
Ethics statement
The animal study was approved by National Animal Disease Center Animal Care and Use Committee. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
BK: Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Conceptualization, Investigation. KS: Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization. JS: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. SO: Resources, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. RD: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. DH: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. DN: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. RS: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The authors RS, RD declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1873273/full#supplementary-material
References
- 1. Hale HH, Helmboldt CF, Plastridge WN, Stula EF. Bovine mastitis caused by a Mycoplasma species. Cornell Vet. (1962) 52:582–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Nicholas RA, Ayling RD. Mycoplasma bovis: disease, diagnosis, and control. Res Vet Sci. (2003) 74:105–12. doi: 10.1016/s0034-5288(02)00155-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Dudek K, Szacawa E. Mycoplasma bovis infections: occurrence, pathogenesis, diagnosis and control, including prevention and therapy. Pathogens. (2020) 9:994. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9120994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bras AL, Suleman M, Woodbury M, Register K, Barkema HW, Perez-Casal J, et al. A serologic survey of Mycoplasma spp. in farmed bison (Bison bison) herds in western Canada. J Vet Diagn Invest. (2017) 29:513–21. doi: 10.1177/1040638717710057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Agriculture USDo . Information needs assessment for NAHMS bison 2022 study: brief summary of results used to guide study development (2023). Available online at: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/bison-2022-needs-assess-sum-brief.pdf (Accessed June 2, 2026).
- 6. Perez-Casal J. Pathogenesis and virulence of Mycoplasma bovis. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. (2020) 36:269–78. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2020.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Janardhan KS, Hays M, Dyer N, Oberst RD, Debey BM. Mycoplasma bovis outbreak in a herd of North American bison (Bison bison). J Vet Diagn Invest. (2010) 22:797–801. doi: 10.1177/104063871002200528 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Dyer N, Hansen-Lardy L, Krogh D, Schaan L, Schamber E. An outbreak of chronic pneumonia and polyarthritis syndrome caused by Mycoplasma bovis in feedlot bison (Bison bison). J Vet Diagn Invest. (2008) 20:369–71. doi: 10.1177/104063870802000321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Buttke DE, Kaplan BS, Bragg TK, Jones LC, Malmberg JL. Mycoplasma bovis in North American bison (Bison bison): history, advances, and challenges. Front Ecol Evol. (2026) 13. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2025.1689117 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kumar R, Register K, Christopher-Hennings J, Moroni P, Gioia G, Garcia-Fernandez N, et al. Population genomic analysis of Mycoplasma bovis elucidates geographical variations and genes associated with host-types. Microorganisms. (2020) 8:1561. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8101561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Capper JL, Cady RA, Bauman DE. The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944 compared with 2007. J Anim Sci. (2009) 87:2160–67. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-1781 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Weber WJ, Wallace CR, Hansen LB, Chester-Jones H, Crooker BA. Effects of genetic selection for milk yield on somatotropin, insulin-like growth factor-I, and placental lactogen in Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. (2007) 90:3314–25. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-899 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ma L, Sonstegard TS, Cole JB, VanTassell CP, Wiggans GR, Crooker BA, et al. Genome changes due to artificial selection in U.S. Holstein cattle. BMC Genomics. (2019) 20:128. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5459-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Hansen LB, Young CW, Miller KP, Touchberry RW. Health care requirements of dairy cattle. I. Response to milk yield selection. J Dairy Sci. (1979) 62:1922–31. doi: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(79)83524-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Cole JB, VanRaden PM. Symposium review: Possibilities in an age of genomics: The future of selection indices. J Dairy Sci. (2018) 101:3686–701. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Kim ES, Cole JB, Huson H, Wiggans GR, Van Tassell CP, Crooker BA, et al. Effect of artificial selection on runs of homozygosity in U.S. Holstein cattle. PloS One. (2013) 8:e80813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Lippolis JD, Putz EJ, Reinhardt TA, Casas E, Weber WJ, Crooker BA. Effect of Holstein genotype on immune response to an intramammary Escherichia coli challenge. J Dairy Sci. (2022) 105:5435–48. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-21166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Cousillas-Boam G, Weber WJ, Benjamin A, Kahl S, Heins BJ, Elsasser TH, et al. Effect of Holstein genotype on innate immune and metabolic responses of heifers to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration. Domest Anim Endocrinol. (2020) 70:106374. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2019.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Brink AA, Weber WJ, Lippolis JD, Cole JB, Rendahl AK, Caixeta L, et al. Effect of Holstein genotype on ex-vivo interleukin-1beta response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS), lipoteichoic acid (LTA) and heat-killed Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. (2023) 258:110573. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2023.110573 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C, Bennett C, Salzberg SL. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol. (2019) 37:907–15. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. (2014) 30:923–30. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. (2014) 15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Sosinowski T, Pandey A, Dixit VM, Weiss A. Src-like adaptor protein (SLAP) is a negative regulator of T cell receptor signaling. J Exp Med. (2000) 191:463–74. doi: 10.1084/jem.191.3.463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kang H, Kerloc'h A, Rotival M, Xu X, Zhang Q, D'Souza Z, et al. Kcnn4 is a regulator of macrophage multinucleation in bone homeostasis and inflammatory disease. Cell Rep. (2014) 8:1210–24. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Tang J, Sawasdikosol S, Chang JH, Burakoff SJ. SLAP, a dimeric adapter protein, plays a functional role in T cell receptor signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1999) 96:9775–80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.17.9775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Reich EP, Cui L, Yang L, Pugliese-Sivo C, Golovko A, Petro M, et al. Blocking ion channel KCNN4 alleviates the symptoms of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in mice. Eur J Immunol. (2005) 35:1027–36. doi: 10.1002/eji.200425954 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Teng J, Jia Z, Gao F, Guan Y, Yao L, Ma C, et al. AP-1 activates KCNN4-mediated Ca2(+) signaling to induce the Th1/Th17 differentiation of CD4(+) cells in chronic non-bacterial prostatitis. Cell Biol Toxicol. (2024) 41:18. doi: 10.1007/s10565-024-09967-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kunzel U, Grieve AG, Meng Y, Sieber B, Cowley SA, Freeman M. FRMD8 promotes inflammatory and growth factor signalling by stabilising the iRhom/ADAM17 sheddase complex. Elife. (2018) 7:e35012. doi: 10.7554/eLife.35012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Tanaka T, Narazaki M, Kishimoto T. IL-6 in inflammation, immunity, and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. (2014) 6:a016295. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Croft M, So T, Duan W, Soroosh P. The significance of OX40 and OX40L to T-cell biology and immune disease. Immunol Rev. (2009) 229:173–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.2009.00766.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Baquero M, Vulikh K, Wong C, Domony M, Burrows D, Marom D, et al. Effects of inflammatory stimuli on responses of macrophages to Mycoplasma bovis infection. Vet Microbiol. (2021) 262:109235. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2021.109235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Hermeyer K, Buchenau I, Thomasmeyer A, Baum B, Spergser J, Rosengarten R, et al. Chronic pneumonia in calves after experimental infection with Mycoplasma bovis strain 1067: characterization of lung pathology, persistence of variable surface protein antigens and local immune response. Acta Vet Scand. (2012) 54:9. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-54-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Brostjan C, Oehler R. The role of neutrophil death in chronic inflammation and cancer. Cell Death Discov. (2020) 6:26. doi: 10.1038/s41420-020-0255-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Yang J, Liu Y, Lin C, Yan R, Li Z, Chen Q, et al. Regularity of toll-like receptors in bovine mammary epithelial cells induced by mycoplasma bovis. Front Vet Sci. (2022) 9:846700. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.846700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Armstrong CL, Miralda I, Neff AC, Tian S, Vashishta A, Perez L, et al. Filifactor alocis promotes neutrophil degranulation and chemotactic activity. Infect Immun. (2016) 84:3423–33. doi: 10.1128/iai.00496-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Jimbo S, Suleman M, Maina T, Prysliak T, Mulongo M, Perez-Casal J. Effect of Mycoplasma bovis on bovine neutrophils. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. (2017) 188:27–33. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2017.04.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Mitiku F, Hartley CA, Sansom FM, Coombe JE, Mansell PD, Beggs DS, et al. The major membrane nuclease MnuA degrades neutrophil extracellular traps induced by Mycoplasma bovis. Vet Microbiol. (2018) 218:13–9. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Cacciotto C, Alberti A. Eating the enemy: Mycoplasma strategies to evade neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) promoting bacterial nucleotides uptake and inflammatory damage. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23:15030. doi: 10.3390/ijms232315030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Maksymowych WP, Kane KP. Bacterial modulation of antigen processing and presentation. Microbes Infect. (2000) 2:199–211. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(00)00268-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Burki S, Gaschen V, Stoffel MH, Stojiljkovic A, Frey J, Kuehni-Boghenbor K, et al. Invasion and persistence of Mycoplasma bovis in embryonic calf turbinate cells. Vet Res. (2015) 46:53. doi: 10.1186/s13567-015-0194-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Zhang H, Lu S, Chao J, Lu D, Zhao G, Chen Y, et al. The attenuated Mycoplasma bovis strain promotes apoptosis of bovine macrophages by upregulation of CHOP expression. Front Microbiol. (2022) 13:925209. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.925209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Suleman M, Prysliak T, Clarke K, Burrage P, Windeyer C, Perez-Casal J. Mycoplasma bovis isolates recovered from cattle and bison (Bison bison) show differential in vitro effects on PBMC proliferation, alveolar macrophage apoptosis and invasion of epithelial and immune cells. Vet Microbiol. (2016) 186:28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.02.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Ferrer M, Anthony TG, Ayres JS, Biffi G, Brown JC, Caan BJ, et al. Cachexia: A systemic consequence of progressive, unresolved disease. Cell. (2023) 186:1824–45. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.03.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Webster JM, Kempen L, Hardy RS, Langen RCJ. Inflammation and skeletal muscle wasting during cachexia. Front Physiol. (2020) 11:597675. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.597675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Pechous RD, Sivaraman V, Price PA, Stasulli NM, Goldman WE. Early host cell targets of Yersinia pestis during primary pneumonic plague. PloS Pathog. (2013) 9:e1003679. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Kash JC, Tumpey TM, Proll SC, Carter V, Perwitasari O, Thomas MJ, et al. Genomic analysis of increased host immune and cell death responses induced by 1918 influenza virus. Nature. (2006) 443:578–81. doi: 10.1038/nature05181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Fajgenbaum DC, June CH. Cytokine storm. N Engl J Med. (2020) 383:2255–73. doi: 10.1056/nejmra2026131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Mulongo M, Prysliak T, Scruten E, Napper S, Perez-Casal J. In vitro infection of bovine monocytes with Mycoplasma bovis delays apoptosis and suppresses production of gamma interferon and tumor necrosis factor alpha but not interleukin-10. Infect Immun. (2014) 82:62–71. doi: 10.1128/iai.00961-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Schaller MA, Kallal LE, Lukacs NW. A key role for CC chemokine receptor 1 in T-cell-mediated respiratory inflammation. Am J Pathol. (2008) 172:386–94. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.070537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Rodriguez F, Castro P, Poveda JB, Afonso AM, Fernandez A. Immunohistochemical labelling of cytokines in calves infected experimentally with Mycoplasma bovis. J Comp Pathol. (2015) 152:243–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2015.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Sun X, Jones HP, Hodge LM, Simecka JW. Cytokine and chemokine transcription profile during Mycoplasma pulmonis infection in susceptible and resistant strains of mice: macrophage inflammatory protein 1beta (CCL4) and monocyte chemoattractant protein 2 (CCL8) and accumulation of CCR5+ Th cells. Infect Immun. (2006) 74:5943–54. doi: 10.1128/iai.00082-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Groom JR, Luster AD. CXCR3 in T cell function. Exp Cell Res. (2011) 317:620–31. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.12.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Koch MA, Tucker-Heard G, Perdue NR, Killebrew JR, Urdahl KB, Campbell DJ. The transcription factor T-bet controls regulatory T cell homeostasis and function during type 1 inflammation. Nat Immunol. (2009) 10:595–602. doi: 10.1038/ni.1731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Bianchi ME, Mezzapelle R. The chemokine receptor CXCR4 in cell proliferation and tissue regeneration. Front Immunol. (2020) 11:2109. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Wang K, Guo L, Zhang Y, Yang H, Zhao Z, Du H, et al. Dual-phase study of CD4(+)CXCR4(+) T cells in Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia: clinical correlations in children and therapeutic exploration with tofacitinib in mice. Immunobiology. (2025) 230:153136. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2025.153136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Jouan-Lanhouet S, Arshad MI, Piquet-Pellorce C, Martin-Chouly C, Le Moigne-Muller G, Van Herreweghe F, et al. TRAIL induces necroptosis involving RIPK1/RIPK3-dependent PARP-1 activation. Cell Death Diff. (2012) 19:2003–14. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2012.90 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Sun L, Wang H, Wang Z, He S, Chen S, Liao D, et al. Mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein mediates necrosis signaling downstream of RIP3 kinase. Cell. (2012) 148:213–27. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Gurung P, Anand PK, Malireddi RK, Vande Walle L, Van Opdenbosch N, Dillon CP, et al. FADD and caspase-8 mediate priming and activation of the canonical and noncanonical Nlrp3 inflammasomes. J Immunol. (2014) 192:1835–46. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302839 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Kelley N, Jeltema D, Duan Y, He Y. The NLRP3 inflammasome: An overview of mechanisms of activation and regulation. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:3328. doi: 10.3390/ijms20133328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Galluzzi L, Kepp O, Kroemer G. MLKL regulates necrotic plasma membrane permeabilization. Cell Res. (2014) 24:139–40. doi: 10.1038/cr.2014.8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Thapa RJ, Nogusa S, Chen P, Maki JL, Lerro A, Andrake M, et al. Interferon-induced RIP1/RIP3-mediated necrosis requires PKR and is licensed by FADD and caspases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2013) 110:E3109–18. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1301218110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Holler N, Zaru R, Micheau O, Thome M, Attinger A, Valitutti S, et al. Fas triggers an alternative, caspase-8-independent cell death pathway using the kinase RIP as effector molecule. Nat Immunol. (2000) 1:489–95. doi: 10.1038/82732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Kaczmarek A, Vandenabeele P, Krysko DV. Necroptosis: the release of damage-associated molecular patterns and its physiological relevance. Immunity. (2013) 38:209–23. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Segovia JA, Chang TH, Winter VT, Coalson JJ, Cagle MP, Pandranki L, et al. NLRP3 is a critical regulator of inflammation and innate immune cell response during Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Infect Immun. (2018) 86:e00548-17. doi: 10.1128/iai.00548-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Zhu M, Lu Y, Wei Y, Hong F, Ji J, Song L. The NLRP3 inflammasome activation boosts lung injury, inflammation, and macrolide resistance in mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Cytokine. (2025) 195:157014. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2025.157014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Pang J, Vince JE. The role of caspase-8 in inflammatory signalling and pyroptotic cell death. Semin Immunol. (2023) 70:101832. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2023.101832 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Newton K, Wickliffe KE, Dugger DL, Maltzman A, Roose-Girma M, Dohse M, et al. Cleavage of RIPK1 by caspase-8 is crucial for limiting apoptosis and necroptosis. Nature. (2019) 574:428–31. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09979-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Alvarez-Diaz S, Dillon CP, Lalaoui N, Tanzer MC, Rodriguez DA, Lin A, et al. The pseudokinase MLKL and the kinase RIPK3 have distinct roles in autoimmune disease caused by loss of death-receptor-induced apoptosis. Immunity. (2016) 45:513–26. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.07.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Man SM, Tourlomousis P, Hopkins L, Monie TP, Fitzgerald KA, Bryant CE. Salmonella infection induces recruitment of Caspase-8 to the inflammasome to modulate IL-1beta production. J Immunol. (2013) 191:5239–46. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1301581 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Zhou B, Abbott DW. Gasdermin E permits interleukin-1 beta release in distinct sublytic and pyroptotic phases. Cell Rep. (2021) 35:108998. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Brink AA, Weber WJ, Lippolis JD, Cole JB, Godden SM, Seykora A, et al. Effect of Holstein genotype on ex-vivo cytokine response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and lipoteichoic acid (LTA) during the periparturient period. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. (2022) 251:110463. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2022.110463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Kaplanski G. Interleukin-18: Biological properties and role in disease pathogenesis. Immunol Rev. (2018) 281:138–53. doi: 10.1111/imr.12616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Pedra JH, Sutterwala FS, Sukumaran B, Ogura Y, Qian F, Montgomery RR, et al. ASC/PYCARD and caspase-1 regulate the IL-18/IFN-gamma axis during Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection. J Immunol. (2007) 179:4783–91. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.7.4783 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Ghose P, Ali AQ, Fang R, Forbes D, Ballard B, Ismail N. The interaction between IL-18 and IL-18 receptor limits the magnitude of protective immunity and enhances pathogenic responses following infection with intracellular bacteria. J Immunol. (2011) 187:1333–46. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1100092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Klein SL, Flanagan KL. Sex differences in immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. (2016) 16:626–38. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Martin KA, Browne AS, Buttke DE. Mycoplasma bovis outbreaks in United States bison (Bison bison) herds: A case-control survey. Prev Vet Med. (2025) 243:106597. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4990698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Bras AL, Barkema HW, Woodbury M, Ribble C, Perez-Casal J, Windeyer MC. Risk factors for Mycoplasma bovis-associated disease in farmed bison (Bison bison) herds in western Canada: A case-control study. Prev Vet Med. (2016) 129:67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.05.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Bras AL, Barkema HW, Woodbury MR, Ribble CS, Perez-Casal J, Windeyer MC. Clinical presentation, prevalence, and risk factors associated with Mycoplasma bovis-associated disease in farmed bison (Bison bison) herds in western Canada. J Am Vet Med Assoc. (2017) 250:1167–75. doi: 10.2460/javma.250.10.1167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Kovats S. Estrogen receptors regulate innate immune cells and signaling pathways. Cell Immunol. (2015) 294:63–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2015.01.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Lengi AJ, Phillips RA, Karpuzoglu E, Ahmed SA. Estrogen selectively regulates chemokines in murine splenocytes. J Leukoc Biol. (2007) 81:1065–74. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0606391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. de Bree LCJ, Janssen R, Aaby P, van Crevel R, Joosten LAB, Benn CS, et al. The impact of sex hormones on BCG-induced trained immunity. J Leukoc Biol. (2018) 104:573–8. doi: 10.1002/jlb.5ma0118-027r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Carroll JA, Burdick Sanchez NC, Hulbert LE, Ballou MA, Dailey JW, Caldwell LC, et al. Sexually dimorphic innate immunological responses of pre-pubertal Brahman cattle following an intravenous lipopolysaccharide challenge. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. (2015) 166:108–15. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2015.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Burdick Sanchez NC, Broadway PR, Carroll JA. Sexual dimorphic innate immune response to a viral-bacterial respiratory disease challenge in beef calves. Vet Sci. (2022) 9:696. doi: 10.3390/vetsci9120696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Maunsell FP, Woolums AR, Francoz D, Rosenbusch RF, Step DL, Wilson DJ, et al. Mycoplasma bovis infections in cattle. J Vet Intern Med. (2011) 25:772–83. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2019.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Caswell JL, Archambault M. Mycoplasma bovis pneumonia in cattle. Anim Health Res Rev. (2007) 8:161–86. doi: 10.1017/S1466252307001351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Buttke DE, Schwartz K, Schwalbe E, Killion H, Sondgeroth KS, Kaplan BS, et al. Mycoplamsa bovis outbreak and maintenance of subclinical infections in an exposed cohort of juvenile American bison (Bison bison). J Wildl Dis. (2025) 61(3):563–73. doi: 10.7589/jwd-d-24-00117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Briggs RE, Billing SR, Boatwright WD, Jr., Chriswell BO, Casas E, Dassanayake RP, et al. Protection against Mycoplasma bovis infection in calves following intranasal vaccination with modified-live Mannheimia haemolytica expressing Mycoplasma antigens. Microb Pathog. (2021) 161:105159. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2021.105159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Kaplan BS, Dassanayake RP, Chriswell BO, Boatwright WD, Jr., Olsen SC, Palmer MV, et al. A modified-live Mannheimia haemolytica expressing Mycoplasma bovis EFTu and Hsp70 induced systemic and mucosal antibody responses in American bison but failed to fully protect against Mycoplasma bovis challenge. Vet Microbiol. (2025) 309:110680. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2025.110680 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Kaplan BS, Dassanayake RP, Briggs RE, Kanipe CR, Boggiatto PM, Crawford LS, et al. An injectable subunit vaccine containing Elongation Factor Tu and Heat Shock Protein 70 partially protects American bison from Mycoplasma bovis infection. Front Vet Sci. (2024) 11:1408861. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1408861 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Goldkamp AK, Kaplan BS, Menghwar H, Kanipe CR, Boggiatto PM, Crawford LS, et al. Transcriptional profiles of vaccine-induced protection in bovine herpesvirus-1 and Mycoplasma bovis-challenged bison. Front Vet Sci. (2025) 12:1667623. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1667623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, PRJNA 1439942.
