Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2026 Aug 19;139(9):235. doi: 10.1007/s00122-026-05345-z

Genome-wide linkage and association mapping identified a novel candidate gene, TaGLK-A1, underlying fructan content in wheat grain

Zhankui Zeng 1,2, Yue Zhao 1, Junge Bi 1, Qunxiang Yan 1, Wei Zhang 3, Feng Chen 4, Chunping Wang 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13490229  PMID: 42618798

Abstract

Key message

A nuclear-localized G2-like transcription factor, TaGLK-A1 (TraesCS7A02G539600), was identified as a strong candidate gene for grain fructan content in wheat using GWAS, linkage mapping and transcriptome analysis.

Abstract

Fructans, a type of natural polysaccharides or oligosaccharides polymerized from fructose molecules, play important physiological roles in crops and confer great health benefits to humans. In this study, we detected 78 stable loci associated with fructan content across all 21 wheat chromosomes across three environments and in the BLUE, explaining 4.4–10.0% of the phenotypic variance by a genome-wide association study (GWAS) using 243 wheat cultivars and advanced lines genotyped with the Axiom wheat 660 K single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array. Among these, a significant locus of fructan content was localized in a 4.02 Mb interval (713.87–717.89 Mb) on chromosome 7AL, designated QGfc.hkd-7A. QGfc.hkd-7A was validated in 164 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) from a cross between Avocet and Chilero in five environments using diversity array technology (DArT), which was tightly linked to DArT markers SNP2260399, 3575400, SNP3028492, SNP100415949, 3533474 and 100091413, accounting for 16.4–24.6% of the total phenotypic variance in the RIL population. Favorable allele of QGfc.hkd-7A significantly increased grain fructan content by 10.5% (P < 0.01) compared with lines carrying unfavorable alleles. To further validate QGfc.hkd-7A, we generated differential gene expression profiles using RNA-seq for high-fructan (AC6012) and low-fructan (AC6361) lines from the Avocet/Chilero population. TaGLK-A1 (TraesCS7A02G539600), a differential expressed gene (DEG), was subsequently cloned and sequenced from both genotypes. Sequence comparison of the full-length TaGLK-A1 cDNA (1545 bp) revealed a single SNP at position 109 causing a proline (CCA) to threonine substitution between Avocet and Chilero. Subcellular localization analysis confirmed that the G2-like transcription factor encoded by TaGLK-A1 localizes to the nucleus. Transactivation assays revealed that it lacks intrinsic transcriptional activation activity, suggesting it may function as a transcriptional repressor or require cofactors for regulatory function. These results provide a novel and strong candidate gene for fructan content and a forward genetics strategy for gene discovery in molecular breeding.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-026-05345-z.

Introduction

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) provides an important source of dietary fiber for humans (Liu et al. 2023; Zhang et al. 2022). Fructans, one of the major components of the dietary fiber, are beneficial for human intestinal health because they promote the proliferation of beneficial bacteria while preventing the growth of detrimental bacteria (Ford et al. 2014). Dietary fructans also play an active role in regulating the metabolism of serum glucose and lipids (Dapa et al. 2022; Dehghan et al. 2014; Desai et al. 2016). Nevertheless, as FODMAPs (fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols), fructans may trigger gastrointestinal symptoms in sensitive individuals, including those with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) (Gibson et al. 2014). In addition, fructans rather than gluten have been implicated in some cases of self-reported non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) (Biesiekierski et al. 2013; Skodje et al. 2018). Beyond their dietary significance, fructans are important factors in many physiological processes in wheat development, where they serve as osmotic regulators to conserve carbohydrates and affect grain yield (Ribeiro et al. 2022).

Fructans are carbohydrate polymers consisting of a sucrose unit linked to one or more fructose units by glycosidic bonds (Ávila-Fernández et al. 2023; Roberfroid and Delzenne 1998) and are classified into five main classes (inulin, levan/phlein, graminan, neoinulin and neolevan) according to the degree of polymerization (DP) and types of glycosidic bonds (Harrison et al. 2012; Van den Ende 2013). In wheat, fructans include branched graminan- and linear levan-type forms (Al-Sheikh Ahmed et al. 2020) with a low DP, ranging from 4 to 10 (Wardlaw and Willenbrink 1994). Their metabolism is regulated by fructosyltransferases (FSTs) and fructan exohydrolases (FEHs) (Veenstra et al. 2017; Vijn and Smeekens 1999).

Fructans are the major components of water-soluble carbohydrates (WSCs) in stems (McIntyre et al. 2012), acting as osmoregulators and playing important roles in defense against multiple stresses (Ehdaie et al. 2006; Xue et al. 2008; Zhang et al. 2009). Several studies have shown that the remobilization of fructans is extremely important under drought conditions (Joudi et al. 2012; Kühbauch and Thome 1989), in which reserved carbohydrates in stems are remobilized from vegetative tissues to developing wheat grains (Palta et al. 1994; Yang et al. 2016, 2020). Fructans also play an osmoregulatory role under cold, salt, waterlogging and heavy metal stress (Frossard et al. 1989; Gibson 2005; Kerepesi and Galiba 2000; Ohtake et al. 2006). In addition to the regulation of metabolic and physiological processes, fructans are also important for wheat grain development. The fructan content in wheat grains varies across three development stages during grain filling and maturation, viz. peaking at up to 30% of dry weight (5 days post-anthesis), decreasing during the rapid starch accumulation phase (2–3 weeks post-anthesis) and stabilizing at 0.7–2.9% of total dry weight in mature grains (Pepler et al. 2006; Shewry et al. 2012; Paradiso et al. 2008; Gara et al. 2003; Cimini et al. 2015; Verspreet et al. 2013; Huynh et al. 2008a).

With the rapid development of molecular biotechnology, many reports on quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping and cloning of genes involved in fructan metabolism in plants have been published (Bian et al. 2018; He and Huang 2013; Kawakami and Yoshida 2002; Márquez-López et al. 2022). QTL mapping for fructan content in wheat grain was first reported by Huynh et al. (2008b), who detected eight QTLs on chromosomes 2B, 2D, 3B, 5A, 6D and 7A using a doubled haploid (DH) population, in which QGfc.aww-6D.2 and QGfc.aww-7A.1 had the greatest effects, accounting for 17% and 27% of the total phenotypic variance, respectively. The fructan synthesis gene (6-SFT) was isolated from common wheat aiming at revealing the mechanisms underlying resistance to adverse environmental conditions (Gao et al. 2009). This gene was mapped to chromosome 4A using a recombinant inbred line (RIL) population (Yue et al. 2011). Eleven QTLs for fructan content in wheat grain were mapped to chromosomes 1B, 2A, 2B, 2D, 3D, 4B, 6B, 6D, 7A and 7B, accounting for 4.1–27.4% of the phenotypic variance (Zeng et al. 2020). In another study, 82 additive QTLs explaining 0.02–16.1% of the phenotypic variance in the accumulation and transport of fructan in wheat stems and leaves were detected on all wheat chromosomes except 1A and 5D. The epistatic QTLs explaining 0.8–14.1% of the phenotypic variance in fructan transport-related traits were mapped to 21 wheat chromosomes (Lv 2019). In addition, the fructan 1-exohydrolase (1-FEH) gene was cloned, and KASP markers were developed for wheat breeding (Fu 2020).

High fructan content in wheat grain is important for increasing both fructan intake by humans and the resistance of wheat seedlings to adverse stresses (Kerepesi and Galiba 2000). The objectives of this study were to 1) discover new marker–trait associations for fructan content in wheat grain using GWAS, 2) validate the important QTL through linkage mapping, 3) analyze differentially expressed genes via transcriptomic approaches and identify candidate genes for the new QTL, and 4) clone this candidate gene and perform regulatory network analysis to elucidate its potential involvement in fructan metabolism in wheat grain.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

A diverse panel of 243 wheat cultivars and advanced lines (designated “CH population”) was used for GWAS. These lines were released or developed between 2014 and 2020 in the Huanghuai wheat region of China and represent recent widely used wheat breeding resources. This population was previously used for studies on water-extractable arabinoxylan, Fusarium crown rot and black point (Li et al. 2024; Lv et al. 2020; Yang et al. 2019).

A biparental RIL population with 164 F6 lines (designated “AC population”) derived from a cross between Avocet and Chilero via the single-seed descent method was obtained from the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) (Basnet et al. 2014).

Field trials

The CH population was planted at the experimental station of Mengjin County (34°83'N, 112°58'E) during the 2019–2020 and 2020–2021 cropping seasons and at the farm of Henan University of Science and Technology (34°35'N, 112°25'E) during the 2020–2021 cropping season.

The AC population was planted at the experimental station of Luoning County (34°42'N, 111°66'E) in 2019–2020, at the experimental station of Mengjin County during the 2019–2020 and 2020–2021 cropping seasons, and at the farm of Henan University of Science and Technology in 2019–2020 and 2020–2021.

Field trials were performed in randomized complete blocks with three replications. Each plot was 1 m long, comprising 10 rows with a row spacing of 25 cm. Field management was performed in accordance with local wheat cropping practices. No major pest- or disease-related problems occurred during the field trials.

Phenotypic evaluation

After harvest, the grains of each wheat cultivar were dried to approximately 11% moisture content. Wheat grains (5 g) were selected from a well-mixed sample, and each sample was subsequently milled via a tissue grinding apparatus (MM400, RETSCH) for 30 s to obtain whole wheat flour. To determine the fructan content, the whole wheat flour was weighed, and 0.1 g was transferred to a 10-mL centrifuge tube. Then, 10 mL of distilled water was added to the centrifuge tube, and the sample was incubated in a water bath at 80℃ for 60 min. The sample was centrifuged at 6000 r/min for 5 min, and 0.5 mL of the supernatant was mixed with 0.5 mL of distilled water in a test tube with a glass stopper. A total of 1.5 mL of 0.5 g/L resorcinol solution and 1.5 mL of 0.216 g/L ferric ammonium sulfate–hydrochloric acid solution were added to the tube, followed by incubation in a water bath at 80℃ for 50 min. The sample was allowed to cool to room temperature, followed by absorbance measurement at 473 nm. Three independent measurements of fructan content were taken on each sample. The best linear unbiased estimate (BLUE) was calculated and used in the subsequent statistical analysis.

Phenotypic data analysis

Statistical analyses, including descriptive statistical variable analysis, correlation analysis and variance analysis, were performed using SPSS 19.0 software. Graphs were plotted via Origin software, version 2022b, and the “ggplot2” package in R software. The BLUE for each wheat genotype was calculated via the analysis of variance (ANOVA) function of QTL IciMapping software, version 4.2 (http://www.isbreeding.net). The ANOVA function was used to calculate broad-sense heritability (H2) via the following equation (Yan et al. 2022):

H2=σg2σg2+σge2+σε2n

where σg2, σge2, σε2 and n are the genetic variance, the interaction variance between genotype and environment, the residual error variance and the number of environments, respectively.

GWAS

The CH population was genotyped via the wheat 660 K SNP assay, as previously described (Lv et al. 2020; Yang et al. 2019). Details about genotyping, quality control, principal component analysis (PCA) and population structure analysis can be found in Yang et al. (2019). In brief, quality control evaluation of the genotypic data was performed via PLINK software with the thresholds maf 0.02 and geno 0.1 (http://zzz.bwh.harvard.edu/plink/tutorial.shtml) (Purcell et al. 2007). After SNP filtering, 395,783 SNP markers were retained for GWAS.

The combined mixed linear model (PCA + K) was constructed via the GAPIT program of R software (http://www.maizegenetics.net/gapit) (Zhang et al. 2010), and the variance–covariance kinship matrix (K) was generated according to the VanRaden method (VanRaden 2008). To identify additional markers potentially linked to fructan content, a threshold of -log10 (P) = 3 was used to determine statistically significant associations between markers and traits. The significant SNP markers detected in the same linkage disequilibrium (LD) block were merged into a single QTL. The LD values in the A, B and D genomes were 3 Mb, 10 Mb and 3 Mb, respectively (Lv et al. 2020; Yang et al. 2019). A QTL was considered stable if it was detected in at least two environments (Guan et al. 2022).

QTL analysis

Whole-genome genotyping data of 23,526 diversity array technology (DArT) markers on both parents and 164 RILs were generated via the DArT genotyping platform. After quality control, 3,290 DArT markers were used for constructing the genetic map via the QTL IciMapping, version 4.2 (https://isbreeding.caas.cn/rj/index.htm).

QTL mapping was carried out via the inclusive composite interval mapping (ICIM) method in QTL IciMapping, version 4.2. The threshold for the detection of significant QTLs was a fixed LOD value of 3.0.

QTL and gene nomenclature followed the international guidelines for wheat (Boden et al. 2023). The QTL for grain fructan content was designated QGfc.hkd-7A, where “Gfc” follows the trait abbreviation of Huynh et al. (2008a, b) and “hkd” is our registered laboratory code. The strong candidate gene, TraesCS7A02G539600, identified within the QGfc.hkd-7A interval was named TaGLK-A1.

Transcriptome experiment

Lines with high fructan content (AC6012) and low fructan content (AC6361) from the AC population were used for transcriptome analysis. These two lines exhibited significantly different wheat grain fructan contents across five environments and showed clear genotypic differentiation at the closely linked markers in the QGfc.hkd-7A locus region: AC6012 displayed the paternal genotype at all closely linked markers, while AC6361 showed the maternal genotype at the same closely linked markers. The developing grain samples at 15 d post-anthesis were collected from AC6012 and AC6361 and frozen in liquid nitrogen for transcriptome analysis, with three biological replicates. All samples were sent to Biomarker Technologies (Beijing Biomarker Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) for transcriptome sequencing and analysis.

Identification of putative candidate genes

The physical intervals of the identified QTLs were determined via BLAST searches against the reference sequence of Chinese Spring (http://plants.ensembl.org/index.html) using the marker sequences as queries. Candidate genes within the physical intervals of validated loci were extracted from WheatGmap (Zhang et al. 2021; Zhao et al. 2022).

Gene cloning

Amplification of target fragments

DNA amplification was performed using KOD HiFi DNA polymerase to ensure high efficiency and accuracy. A reaction mixture (30 μL) was prepared, consisting of 2 × KOD buffer (15.0 μL), dNTPs (6 nmol, 0.6 μL of 10 mM stock), DNA template (100 ng, 1.0 μL of 100 ng/μL stock), forward primer (Primer F, 0.2 μM final concentration, 0.6 μL of 10 μM stock), reverse primer (Primer R, 0.2 μM final concentration, 0.6 μL of 10 μM stock), KOD FX enzyme (0.8 U, 0.8 μL of 1 U/μL stock) and ddH2O (11.4 μL). The amplification program included an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min, followed by 36 cycles of denaturation at 98 °C for 20 s, annealing at 58 °C for 30 s and extension at 68 °C for 2 min, with a final extension at 68 °C for 10 min.

PCR products were separated via 1% agarose gel electrophoresis under 120 V for 20–30 min. The gel was visualized using the Gel DocTM XR + system (Bio-Rad). The desired band corresponding to the target size was excised from the gel for purification.

Recovery of purified fragments

The GeneJET Gel Extraction Kit (Thermo-Scientific) was employed for DNA recovery. Under UV light, the gel slice containing the target fragment was excised and placed in a pre-sterilized 1.5-mL centrifuge tube with an equal weight of binding buffer. The mixture was incubated at 60 °C for 10 min, followed by centrifugation to remove supernatant. Wash buffer was added twice, followed by centrifugation again to eliminate impurities. The DNA pellet was resuspended in elution buffer and stored at 4 °C.

Cloning and sequencing

Purified PCR products were cloned into competent E. coli cells (Trans1-T1 strain) via a ligation reaction. Following transformation, cells were incubated on ice for 30 min, subjected to heat shock at 42 °C for 30 s and cultured in SOC medium at 37 °C with shaking (200 rpm) for 2 h. Single colonies were selected on LB agar containing appropriate antibiotics and cultured overnight. Positive clones were sequenced using Sanger sequencing by a commercial provider.

Subcellular localization

The constructs 35S:TaGLK-A1-GFP, 35S:BZR1-BFP (nuclear marker) (Zheng et al. 2025) and 35S:SPER-mKATE (endoplasmic reticulum marker) (Nelson et al. 2007) were individually introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101. The three transformed Agrobacterium suspensions were mixed at a 1:1:1 ratio prior to infiltration and infiltrated into tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) leaves. Tobacco plants were grown in a greenhouse at 25 °C with a 16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod in 2025. Fluorescence signals were observed 2 d post-infiltration using a Nikon C2 confocal laser scanning microscope.

Transactivation activity assay

The coding sequence of TaGLK-A1 was inserted into the pGreenII-62sk-GAL4 vector to create the effector construct pGreenII-62sk-GAL4-TaGLK-A1. This construct was co-expressed with the reporter construct pGreenII 0800-GAL4-TATA in Nicotiana tabacum leaves via Agrobacterium-mediated transient transformation, as described by Hellens et al. (2005). The constructs pGreenII-62sk-GAL4-VP16 and pGreenII-62sk-GAL4 were utilized as positive and negative controls, respectively. Luciferase activity was quantified 48 h post-infiltration using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Vazyme), with Renilla luciferase serving as an internal control. The data are presented as means ± standard deviation from three independent biological replicates.

Results

Phenotypic variation and correlation analysis of fructan contents

The fructan content of CH and AC populations was measured in three and five environments, respectively. In the CH population, fructan content in wheat grains ranged from 0.8 to 2.6% and the CV ranged from 11.3 to 15.7% across three environments. Continuous variation was also observed across environments (Fig. 1a), consistent with fructan content being a typical quantitative trait controlled by multiple genes. ANOVA of fructan content across multiple environments revealed that the effects of genotype, environment and the genotype–environment interaction were highly significant (P < 0.001). The broad-sense heritability was 0.69, suggesting that the fructan content was mainly controlled by genetic factors. Correlation analysis revealed significant correlations (P < 0.01) in fructan content across environments, indicating the relative stability of this trait across three environments (Fig. 1b).

Fig.1.

Fig.1

Frequency distribution histogram and correlation analysis of fructan content in the CH population. a Frequency distribution histogram of fructan content in the CH population. b Heatmap of correlation analysis in the CH population. In the CH population, E1, E2 and E3 represent the data from Mengjin County in 2019–2020, Mengjin County in 2020–2021 and the farm of Henan University of Science and Technology in 2020–2021, respectively. The same below

Significant differences in fructan content were observed between Avocet and Chilero, with Chilero demonstrating higher fructan content (P < 0.01) (Table 1). A substantial range of phenotypic variation was evident across all environments, with fructan content ranging from 1.2 to 3.1%. The frequency distribution of fructan content approximated a normal distribution across all environments in the AC population, consistent with a multi-genic nature for this trait (Fig. 2a). ANOVA indicated that fructan content was significantly affected by genotype (G), environment (E) and G × E interaction (P < 0.01). The broad-sense heritability (H2) was 0.77 (Table 1). The fructan content showed significant correlations across environments (Fig. 2b).

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics and ANOVA of fructan contents in the CH and AC populations

Population Environment Avocet (%) Chilero (%) χ¯±SX¯ Range (%) CV (%) ANOVA H2
Genotype Environment G × E
CH population E1 – – 1.4 ± 0.2 0.8–2.1 14.3 51.2** 10,403.4** 22.4 0.69
E2 – – 1.9 ± 0.3 1.2–2.6 14.1 **
E3 – – 1.4 ± 0.2 0.9–2.1 15.7
BLUE-CH – – 1.5 ± 0.2 1.1–1.9 11.3
AC population E4 1.2 1.6** 1.8 ± 0.3 0.9–2.8 14.7 78.2** 1556.6** 22.7 0.77
E5 1.6 1.9** 1.8 ± 0.2 1.3–2.5 13.1 **
E6 1.4 1.6** 1.9 ± 0.3 1.3–2.6 13.6
E7 1.8 2.1** 2.1 ± 0.3 1.6–3.1 12.4
E8 1.2 1.7** 1.9 ± 0.3 1.4–2.6 13.2
BLUE-AC 1.4 1.8** 1.9 ± 0.2 1.4–2.5 9.4

X¯, Mean value; SX¯, Standard error; G × E, genotype-by-environment interaction; “-” indicates no data. “**” indicates significance at P < 0.01. In the AC population, E4, E5, E6, E7 and E8 represent the data from Luoning County in 2019–2020, Mengjin County in 2019–2020, the farm of Henan University of Science and Technology in 2019–2020, Mengjin County in 2020–2021 and the farm of Henan University of Science and Technology in 2020–2021, respectively. BLUE-CH and BLUE-AC represent the BLUE values of fructan content in the CH population and AC population, respectively. The same below

Fig.2.

Fig.2

Frequency distribution histogram and correlation analysis of fructan content in the AC population. a Frequency distribution histogram of fructan content in the AC population. b Heatmap of correlation analysis in the AC population

Significant loci associated with fructan content revealed by GWAS

Using a mixed linear model (PCA + K), significant markers were detected on all 21 wheat chromosomes (Fig. 3). Fifty-six stable loci were detected in two environments and 22 in three or more environments, explaining 4.4–10.0% of the phenotypic variance. Among these, one locus significantly associated with fructan content was mapped to a 4.02 Mb interval (713.87 Mb-717.89 Mb) on the long arm of chromosome 7A, designated QGfc.hkd-7A, and its physical interval (713.87 Mb-717.89 Mb) contains 47 high-confidence genes.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Genome-wide association study (GWAS) results for fructan content. a Manhattan plot showing − log₁₀(P-values) of markers across all 21 wheat chromosomes. For each chromosome, the left segment represents the short arm and the right segment represents the long arm, separated by the centromere position. The horizontal dashed line indicates the significance threshold (P < 0.001, − log₁₀(P) = 3.0). b Quantile–quantile (QQ) plot for fructan content

QTL mapping of fructan content in the AC population

QTLs for wheat grain fructan content were identified on chromosomes 1B, 1D, 2A, 2D, 3A, 6B, 7A and 7B. Most importantly, the QGfc.hkd-7A identified in GWAS was also successfully detected through linkage analysis in the AC population (Fig. 4a). This QTL was tightly linked with the DArT markers SNP2260399, 3575400, SNP3028492, SNP100415949, 3533474 and 100091413, explaining 16.4–24.6% of the phenotypic variance.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Genetic linkage map and analysis of allelic effects of QGfc.hkd-7A in the AC population. a Genetic linkage map of QGfc.hkd-7A. b Analysis of allele effects of QGfc.hkd-7A for fructan content in the AC population across five environments

Allelic effect analysis revealed that lines carrying the favorable allele at the QGfc.hkd-7A locus had significantly higher fructan content than those carrying the unfavorable allele in all environments (P < 0.01), with an average 10.5% increase in grain fructan content (Fig. 4b).

Transcriptome analysis of QGfc.hkd-7A for fructan content in wheat grain

There were 5737 DEGs between AC6012 and AC6361, with AC6012 as the reference background. The distribution of DEGs on 21 wheat chromosomes was shown by transcriptome analysis (Fig. 5a). Two hundred and twenty-six DEGs were detected on chromosome 7A, among which 172 genes were downregulated and 54 were upregulated in AC6361 relative to AC6012 (Fig. 5b). Gene ontology (GO) analysis of 226 DEGs revealed that 33 DEGs were enriched in 15 GO terms related to carbohydrate metabolism (Fig. 5c).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Distribution of DEGs across wheat chromosomes. a DEGs between AC6012 and AC6361 on 21 wheat chromosomes. b DEGs on chromosome 7A. c GO Terms associated with carbohydrate metabolism involving DEGs on Chromosome 7A

Validation and clone of TaGLK-A1

TaGLK-A1 (TraesCS7A02G539600), which is functionally associated with carbohydrate metabolism, was identified as a strong potential candidate gene within the QGfc.hkd-7A interval. Transcriptome analysis revealed 8 DEGs among the 47 high-confidence genes in this interval (Fig. 6a). Through the combination of GWAS, QTL mapping, transcriptome data and public database annotations (http://wheat.cau.edu.cn/wGRN; https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/home) (Chen et al. 2023; Gillies et al. 2012), TaGLK-A1 was prioritized as the most promising candidate (Fig. 6b-c). Furthermore, the expression level of TaGLK-A1 in AC6361 was lower than that in AC6012, and this gene was enriched in the GO:0015144 term (Fig. 5c).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Screening, cloning and characterization of TaGLK-A1. a Eight candidate genes identified by GWAS, linkage mapping and transcriptome analysis. b Gene expression of TaGLK-A1 across tissues. c The expression of TaGLK-A1 at different developmental stages; TPM, transcripts per million. d Cloning of TaGLK-A1 in Avocet and Chilero, M, Marker; A, Avocet; C, Chilero. e Subcellular localization of TaGLK-A1 using tobacco leaves. f Transactivation activity analysis of TaGLK-A1. Experimental group: the effector construct pGreenII-62sk-GAL4-TaGLK-A1; Negative control: the construct pGreenII-62sk-GAL4; Positive control: the construct pGreenII-62sk-GAL4-VP16. NS indicates no significant difference

Full-length amplification primers were designed based on the nucleotide sequence specificity of TaGLK-A1 between two genotypes (Table 2), which showed a single clear band of approximately 1500 bp in Avocet and Chilero (Fig. 6d). Sequencing results showed that the full-length sequences of TaGLK-A1 in both varieties were 1545 bp, consisting of four exons and three introns, which encoded a 338 amino acid protein. A missense mutation was identified at position + 109 bp (C → A) in the coding region, resulting in an amino acid substitution from proline (Pro) to threonine (Thr) (Fig. 6d).

Table 2.

Primer sequences for amplification of TaGLK-A1

Primer Primer sequences (5′–3′)
TaGLK-A1-F AAGCCAAGGGTGGTATGGACAGT
TaGLK-A1-R ATCGCGTGCATAGGTTGGGCTAC

Subcellular localization assays revealed that the GFP-tagged TaGLK-A1 protein co-localized with the nuclear marker BZR1, indicating that TaGLK-A1 is localized to the nucleus (Fig. 6e). Transactivation activity assays revealed that the experimental group (pGreenII-62sk-GAL4-TaGLK-A1) showed no significant difference compared to the negative control (pGreenII-62sk-GAL4), whereas the positive control (pGreenII-62sk-GAL4-VP16) exhibited strong transactivation activity, indicating that TaGLK-A1 lacks transactivation activity (Fig. 6f).

Discussion

Combination analysis of QGfc.hkd-7A for fructan content via multi-omics

Recently, the genetic dissection of complex quantitative traits has been improved through the combined application of GWAS, QTL mapping and transcriptome sequencing (Guo et al. 2019; Zhao et al. 2023). This convergent analytical strategy has emerged as a highly effective way to identify candidate genes in crops, providing greater resolution than any of these techniques alone (Yang et al. 2023; Zhao et al. 2021). In this study, we employed such a multi-pronged genomic pipeline to pinpoint QGfc.hkd-7A, a stable QTL on chromosome 7AL governing wheat grain fructan content. Through the convergent use of GWAS, QTL mapping and transcriptome analysis, we successfully delimited the interval to 4.02 Mb, encompassing eight DEGs. It should be noted that the transcriptome analysis was conducted using only two lines (AC6012 and AC6361) selected solely based on their extreme and stable phenotypic differences across multiple environments, following an extreme phenotype screening strategy commonly used in wheat transcriptome studies (Shi et al. 2024; Wu et al. 2025; Yuan et al. 2023). The cross-validation across multiple environments (H2 = 0.77) demonstrates that our multi-omics approach not only enhances mapping resolution but also effectively distinguishes stable loci from environment-specific signals, offering a robust framework for cloning genes underlying complex metabolic traits.

Identification of candidate genes forTaGLK-A1

Previous studies have shown that fructan accumulation occurs mainly during the first phase of grain development, known as the grain enlargement phase, which lasts two weeks post-anthesis (Pepler et al. 2006; Shewry et al. 2012; Verspreet et al. 2013). During this developmental stage, the acid invertases 1-SST and 6-SFT exhibit high levels of enzymatic activity. These enzymes may actively hydrolyze sucrose and thereby reduce sucrose concentrations and promote fructan synthesis in developing wheat grains while controlling osmotic flow into the developing grain (Verspreet et al. 2013). In this study, we utilized the publicly accessible Expression Atlas database (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/home) to assess eight potential DEGs. The results indicated that only TaGLK-A1 (TraesCS7A02G539600) demonstrated expression patterns consistent with those of fructan biosynthetic enzymes during the initial stages of grain development. However, TaGLK-A1 does not encode a known fructan metabolic enzyme, suggesting that its influence on fructan accumulation may be indirect, potentially through modulating substrate transport or metabolic signaling.

Indeed, fructan metabolism is tightly coupled to sucrose transport and signaling. It has been reported that fructosyltransferase enzymes evolved from acid or vacuolar invertase enzymes through a few mutational changes, and fructosyltransferase and invertase enzymes have similar functions and a high degree of amino acid similarity (Chatterton and Harrison 1997; Veenstra et al. 2017; Vijn and Smeekens 1999). Some fructan exohydrolases and cell wall invertases are closely related (Coninck et al. 2005; Van den Ende et al. 2004; Van den Ende et al. 2002). Although the fructan metabolism pathway has not yet been fully elucidated, sucrose is known to play an important role, and protein kinases and type 2A protein phosphatases are also important components in the sucrose signal transduction pathway to induce fructan synthesis (Martínez-Noël et al. 2006, 2009). TaGLK-A1 (TraesCS7A02G539600) is annotated with the molecular function “carbohydrate transmembrane transporter activity” (GO:0015144), whose child terms predominantly encompass transmembrane transporter activities, including sugar transmembrane transporter, D-glucarate transmembrane transporter and protein–phosphocysteine–sugar phosphotransferase activities. Collectively, these annotations position TaGLK-A1 within the carbohydrate metabolic network that supports fructan biosynthesis.

While the convergent evidence from genomic position, differential expression and sequence variation supports the prioritization of TaGLK-A1 as the primary candidate, it is important to acknowledge that this designation rests on correlational rather than causal evidence. Although integrative genomic approaches frequently identify promising candidates within QTL intervals, the true causal relationship can only be established through subsequent functional validation such as gene silencing, overexpression or genome editing (Lin et al. 2024). In wheat, CRISPR-Cas9-mediated knockout or knock-in has been increasingly employed to confirm the causal role of candidate genes identified through mapping approaches (Waites et al. 2025; Kan et al. 2023). Direct evidence demonstrating that TaGLK-A1 modulates fructan content in planta remains to be established and will be the focus of our future research.

Despite these limitations, the cumulative evidence—including its physical location within the QGfc.hkd-7A interval, its consistent differential expression between high- and low-fructan lines—collectively positions TaGLK-A1 as the strongest candidate gene for wheat grain fructan content. Consequently, we have proceeded with its molecular cloning and functional characterization to explore its potential regulatory role in wheat fructan metabolism.

Cloning and subcellular localization of TaGLK-A1

Previous research has effectively isolated and functionally characterized key fructan metabolic enzymes in wheat, such as 1-SST, 1-FFT and 6-SFT (Kawakami and Yoshida 2002, 2005; Yoshida et al. 2004; Gao et al. 2009; Yue et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2018), demonstrating their involvement in fructan polymerization and stress tolerance through heterologous expression and transgenic validation (Bie 2011; He 2016). However, these studies have predominantly concentrated on structural genes, leaving the upstream transcriptional regulators responsible for directing carbon partitioning into the fructan biosynthetic pathway during grain development largely unexplored. In this study, we successfully cloned TaGLK-A1 (TraesCS7A02G539600), a G2-like transcription factor family member carrying a Pro109Thr substitution. Notably, the temporal expression pattern of TaGLK-A1 during the early stages of grain development exhibits a notable correlation with that of fructan biosynthetic enzymes, suggesting a regulatory role rather than a catalytic one. This observation represents a paradigm shift from traditional enzymatic characterization toward an emphasis on transcriptional regulation, thereby identifying TaGLK-A1 as a critical regulator in the metabolism of grain fructans.

The nuclear compartmentalization of transcription factors is essential for their regulatory roles, as demonstrated by TaDOF6 (Ding et al. 2025), TaNAC47 (Zhang et al. 2016), OsNF-YB1 (Liu et al. 2025) and OsMADS14 (Feng et al. 2022), which are exclusively localized to the nucleus to activate genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism during grain development. In alignment with its classification as a G2-like transcription factor, TaGLK-A1 (TraesCS7A02G539600) was observed to reside exclusively within the nucleus in our subcellular localization assays, precisely co-localizing with the BZR1 nuclear marker. This nuclear localization situates TaGLK-A1 at the core of the fructan metabolic network, facilitating the direct regulation of biosynthetic enzyme expression and linking genetic mapping with the mechanistic regulation of grain fructan accumulation.

The lack of transactivation activity in TaGLK-A1 is not an isolated phenomenon among functional wheat transcription factors. Comparable findings have been documented for several wheat transcription factors, including the heat shock factor TaHsfC3-4 (Ma et al. 2024), C2H2-type zinc finger proteins TaZFP23 (Ye and Tang 2025) and TaZFP8-5B (Huang et al. 2024), as well as various members of the TaBES1 family (Zhang et al. 2025). These proteins, despite their absence of intrinsic transcriptional activation capacity, are integral to stress responses and developmental processes. The absence of self-activation in TaGLK-A1 implies that it may need interacting partners or specific post-translational modifications to fulfill its regulatory role. This observation aligns with the emerging paradigm that transcriptional regulation frequently relies on protein complexes.

Conclusions

In the present study, through the combination of genome-wide association study, linkage mapping and transcriptome analysis, we identified and cloned a novel strong candidate gene, TaGLK-A1, a G2-like transcription factor localized in the nucleus, which is associated with fructan content in wheat grain.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

We would like to extend our special thanks to Dr. Rudi Appels, Dr. Xianchun Xia and Dr. Xinyao He for reviewing this manuscript.

Author Contribution

ZZK and WCP contributed to data collection/curation, formal analysis, investigation, validation and writing the original draft. WCP contributed to conceptualization, funding acquisition, project administration and supervision. ZY, YQX, BJG and ZW contributed to data collection, reviewing and editing of the original draft. CF contributed to materials and reviewing. All the authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32401870), Major Science and Technology Projects in Henan Province (231100110300, 251100110200) and International Cooperation Project of Henan Province (172102410052).

Data availability

The genotype data, phenotype data and mapping files (.xlsx) supporting the QTL analysis are provided as Supplementary_Data_1_LinkageMapping_ICIMapping. The RNA-seq data are provided as Supplementary_Data_2_RNAseq_Expression_Matrix.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

We declare that these experiments complied with the ethical standards in China.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Al-Sheikh Ahmed S, Zhang J, Farhan H, Zhang Y, Yu Z, Islam S, Chen J, Cricelli S, Foreman A, Ende W, Ma W, Dell B (2020) Diurnal changes in water soluble carbohydrate components in leaves and sucrose associated TaSUT1 gene expression during grain development in wheat. Int J Mol Sci 21:8276. 10.3390/ijms21218276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ávila-Fernández Á, Montie S, Rodríguez-Alegría M, Caspeta L, Munguía A (2023) Simultaneous enzyme production, Levan-type FOS synthesis and sugar by-products elimination using a recombinant Pichia pastoris strain expressing a levansucrase-endolevanase fusion enzyme. Microb Cell Fact 22:18. 10.1186/s12934-022-02009-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Basnet B, Singh G, Ibrahim A, Herrera-Foessel S, Huerta-Espino J, Lan C, Rudd J (2014) Characterization of Yr54 and other genes associated with adult plant resistance to yellow rust and leaf rust in common wheat Quaiu 3. Mol Breed 33:385–399. 10.1007/s11032-013-9957-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bian H, Zhong Q, Huang S, Wang L, Yang S, Tian J (2018) Analysis of gene expressions of fructan metabolism key enzymes in garlic under drought stress. Mol Plant Breeding. 16:6770–6776. 10.13271/j.mpb.016.006770 [DOI]
  5. Bie X (2011) Functional analysis of genes coding fructan biosynthesis enzymes in wheat and tabacco. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.
  6. Biesiekierski J, Peters S, Newnham E, Rosella O, Muir J, Gibson P (2013) No effects of gluten in patients with self-reported non-celiac gluten sensitivity after dietary reduction of fermentable, poorly absorbed, short-chain carbohydrates. Gastroenterology 145:320–328, e2. 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.04.051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Boden SA, McIntosh RA, Uauy C, Krattinger SG, Dubcovsky J, Rogers WJ, Xia XC, Badaeva ED, Bentley AR, Brown-Guedira G, Caccamo M, Cattivelli L, Chhuneja P, Cockram J, Contreras-Moreira B, Dreisigacker S, Edwards D, Gonzalez FG, Guzman C, Ikeda TM, Karsai I, Nasuda S, Pozniak C, Prins R, Sen TZ, Silva P, Simkova H, Zhang Y, Wheat I (2023) Updated guidelines for gene nomenclature in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 136:72. 10.1007/s00122-023-04253-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chatterton N, Harrison P (1997) Fructan oligomers in Poa ampla. New Phytol 136:3–10. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1997.tb04725.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen Y, Guo Y, Guan P, Wang Y, Wang X, Wang Z, Qin Z, Ma S, Xin M, Hu Z, Yao Y, Ni Z, Sun Q, Guo W, Peng H (2023) A wheat integrative regulatory network from large-scale complementary functional datasets enables trait-associated gene discovery for crop improvement. Mol Plant 16:393–414. 10.1016/j.molp.2022.12.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cimini S, Locato V, Vergauwen R, Paradiso A, Cecchini C, Vandenpoel L, Verspreet J, Courtin C, D’Egidio M, Ende W, Gara L (2015) Fructan biosynthesis and degradation as part of plant metabolism controlling sugar fluxes during durum wheat kernel maturation. Front Plant Sci 6:89. 10.3389/fpls.2015.00089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Coninck B, Le Roy K, Francis I, Clerens S, Vergauwen R, Halliday A, Smith S, Laere A, Ende W (2005) Arabidopsis AtcwINV3 and 6 are not invertases but are fructan exohydrolases (FEHs) with different substrate specificities. Plant Cell Environ 28:432–443. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01281.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dapa T, Ramiro R, Pedro M, Gordo I, Xavier K (2022) Diet leaves a genetic signature in a keystone member of the gut microbiota. Cell Host Microbe 30:183–199. 10.1016/j.chom.2022.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dehghan P, Gargari B, Jafar-Abadi M, Aliasgharzadeh A (2014) Inulin controls inflammation and metabolic endotoxemia in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized-controlled clinical trial. Int J Food Sci Nutr 65:117–123. 10.3109/09637486.2013.836738 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Desai M, Seekatz A, Koropatkin N, Kamada N, Hickey C, Wolter M, Pudlo N, Kitamoto S, Terrapon N, Muller A, Young V, Henrissat B, Wilmes P, Stappenbeck T, Núñez G, Martens E (2016) A dietary fiber-deprived gut microbiota degrades the colonic mucus barrier and enhances pathogen susceptibility. Cell 167:1339–1353. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ding R, Xiao T, Li S, Qiang J, Zhang H, Chang H, Yan Y, Li X (2025) Wheat endosperm-specific transcription factor TaDOF6 enhances grain development by regulating TaSWEET13h expression and facilitating sugar and gibberellin transport. Front Plant Sci 16:1608090. 10.3389/fpls.2025.1608090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ehdaie B, Alloush G, Madore M, Waines J (2006) Genotypic variation for stem reserves and mobilization in wheat: I. Postanthesis changes in internode dry matter. Crop Sci 46:735–746. 10.2135/cropsci2005.04-0033 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Feng T, Wang L, Li L, Liu Y, Chong K, Theißen G, Meng Z (2022) OsMADS14 and NF-YB1 cooperate in the direct activation of OsAGPL2 and Waxy during starch synthesis in rice endosperm. New Phytol 234:77–92. 10.1111/nph.17990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ford A, Quigley E, Lacy B, Lembo A, Saito Y, Schiller L, Soffer E, Spiegel B, Moayyedi P (2014) Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics in irritable bowel syndrome and chronic idiopathic constipation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 109:1547–1561. 10.1038/ajg.2014.202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Frossard R, Stadelmann F, Niederhauser J (1989) Effects of different heavy metals on fructan, sugar and starch content of ryegrass. J Plant Physiol 134:180–185. 10.1016/s0176-1617(89)80052-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fu L (2020) Genetic dissection of stem water-soluble carbohydrate content in bread wheat and development of molecular markers. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. 10.27630/d.cnki.gznky.2020.000020 [DOI]
  21. Gao X, She M, Yin G, Yu Y, Bie X, Du L, Xu H, Ye X (2009) Isolation and functional determination of fructan biosynthesis enzyme encoding gene 6-SFT from common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Sci Technol Rev 27:70–75. 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7857.2009.23.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gara L, Pinto M, Moliterni V, D’Egidio M (2003) Redox regulation and storage processes during maturation in kernels of &lt;i&gt;Triticum durum&lt;/i&gt;. J Exp Bot 54:249–258. 10.1093/jxb/erg021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gibson S (2005) Control of plant development and gene expression by sugar signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8:93–102. 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gibson P (2015) The evidence base for efficacy of the low FODMAP diet in irritable bowel syndrome: is it ready for prime time as a first-line therapy? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 32:32–35. 10.1111/jgh.13693 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gillies S, Futardo A, Henry R (2012) Gene expression in the developing aleurone and starchy endosperm of wheat. Plant Biotechnol J 10:668–679. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00705.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Guan P, Li X, Zhuang L, Wu B, Huang J, Zhao J, Qiao L, Zheng J, Hao C, Zheng X (2022) Genetic dissection of lutein content in common wheat via association and linkage mapping. Theor Appl Genet 135:3127–3141. 10.1007/s00122-022-04175-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Guo T, Yang J, Li D, Sun K, Luo L, Xiao W, Wang J, Liu Y, Wang S, Wang H, Chen Z (2019) Integrating GWAS, QTL, mapping and RNA-seq to identify candidate genes for seed vigor in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol Breed 39:87. 10.1007/s11032-019-0993-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Harrison S, Xue H, Lane G, Villas-Boas S, Rasmussen S (2012) Linear ion trap MS(n) of enzymatically synthesized 13C-labeled fructans revealing differentiating fragmentation patterns of beta (1–2) and beta (1–6) fructans and providing a tool for oligosaccharide identification in complex mixtures. Anal Chem 84:1540–1548. 10.1021/ac202816y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. He L, Huang X (2013) Cloning of a full cDNA of a fructan exohydrolase (FEH) in garlic (Allium sativum L.). Sci Technol Food Ind 34:154–157+162. 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2013.17.022 [DOI]
  30. He X (2016) Cloning and functional analysis of fructan biosynthesis enzyme genes from relatives of the wheat and optimization of the wheat genetic co-transformation system. Northwest A&F University.
  31. Hellens R, Allan A, Friel E, Bolitho K, Grafton K, Templeton M, Karunairetanm S, Gleave A, Laing W (2005) Transient expression vectors for functional genomics, quantification of promoter activity and RNA silencing in plants. Plant Methods 1:13. 10.1186/1746-4811-1-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Huang L, Xie R, Hu Y, Du L, Wang F, Zhao X, Huang Y, Chen X, Hao M, Xu Q, Feng L, Wu B, Wei Z, Zhang L, Liu D (2024) A C2H2-type zinc finger protein TaZFP8-5B negatively regulates disease resistance. BMC Plant Biol 24:1116. 10.1186/s12870-024-05843-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Huynh B, Palmer L, Mather D, Wallwork H, Graham R, Welch R, Stangoulis J (2008a) Genotypic variation in wheat grain fructan content revealed by a simplified HPLC method. J Cereal Sci 48:369–378. 10.1016/j.jcs.2007.10.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Huynh B, Wallwork H, Stangoulis J, Graham R, Willsmore K, Olson S, Mather D (2008b) Quantitative trait loci for grain fructan concentration in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 117:701–709. 10.1007/s00122-008-0811-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Joudi M, Ahmadi A, Mohamadi V, Abbasi A, Vergauwen R, Mohammadi H, Van den Ende W (2012) Comparison of fructan dynamics in two wheat cultivars with different capacities of accumulation and remobilization under drought stress. Physiol Plant 144:1–12. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2011.01517.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kan J, Cai Y, Cheng C, Chen S, Jiang C, He Z, Yang P (2023) CRISPR/Cas9-guided knockout of eIF4E improves Wheat yellow mosaic virus resistance without yield penalty. Plant Biotechnol J 21:893–895. 10.1111/pbi.14002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kawakami A, Yoshida M (2002) Molecular characterization of sucrose: sucrose 1-fructosyltransferase and sucrose:fructan 6-fructosyltransferase associated with fructan accumulation in winter wheat during cold hardening. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 66:2297–2305. 10.1271/bbb.66.2297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kawakami A, Yoshida M (2005) Fructan: fructan 1-fructosyltransferase, a key enzyme for biosynthesis of graminan oligomers in hardened wheat. Planta 223(1):90–104. 10.1007/s00425-005-0054-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kerepesi I, Galiba G (2000) Osmotic and salt stress-induced alteration in soluble carbohydrate content in wheat seedlings. Crop Sci 40:482–487. 10.2135/cropsci2000.402482x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kühbauch W, Thome U (1989) Nonstructural carbohydrates of wheat stems as influenced by sink-source manipulations. J Plant Physiol 134:243–250. 10.1016/s0176-1617(89)80063-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Li Q, Zeng Z, Zhao Y, Li J, Chen F, Wang C (2024) Genome-wide association study and linkage mapping reveal TaqW-6B associated with water-extractable arabinoxylan content in wheat grain. Theor Appl Genet 137:166. 10.1007/s00122-024-04662-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lin X, Xu Y, Wang D, Yang Y, Zhang X, Bie X, Gui L, Chen Z, Ding Y, Mao L, Zhang X, Lu F, Zhang X, Uauy C, Fu X, Xiao J (2024) Systematic identification of wheat spike developmental regulators by integrated multi-omics, transcriptional network, GWAS, and genetic analyses. Mol Plant 17:438–459. 10.1016/j.molp.2024.01.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Liu Y, Shen K, Yin C, Xu X, Yu X, Ye B, Sun Z, Dong J, Bi A, Zhao X, Xu D, He Z, Zhang X, Hao C, Wu J, Wang Z, Wu H, Liu D, Zhang L, Shen L, Hao Y, Lu F, Guo Z (2023) Genetic basis of geographical differentiation and breeding selection for wheat plant architecture traits. Genome Biol 24:114. 10.1186/s13059-023-02932-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu B, Meng S, Yang J, Wu J, Peng Y, Zhang J, Ye N (2025) Carbohydrate flow during grain filling: phytohormonal regulation and genetic control in rice (Oryza sativa). Integr Plant Biol 67:1086–1104. 10.1111/jipb.13904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lv G, Dong Z, Wang Y, Geng J, Li J, Lv X, Sun C, Ren Y, Zhang J, Chen F (2020) Identification of genetic loci of black point in Chinese common wheat by genome-wide association study and linkage mapping. Plant Dis 104:2005–2013. 10.1094/pdis-12-19-2733-re [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lv B (2019) Genetic dissection of post-anthesis fructan metabolism and remobilization in wheat stems and leaves regulated by drought. Gansu Agricultural University. 10.27025/d.cnki.ggsnu.2019.000114 [DOI]
  47. Ma Z, Zhao B, Zhang H, Duan S, Liu Z, Guo X, Meng X, Li G (2024) Upregulation of wheat heat shock transcription factor TaHsfC3-4 by ABA contributes to drought tolerance. Int J Mol Sci 25:977. 10.3390/ijms25020977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Márquez‑López R, Loyola‑Vargas V, Santiago‑García P (2022) Interaction between fructan metabolism and plant growth regulators. Planta 255:49. 10.1007/s00425-022-03826-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Martínez-Noël G, Tognetti J, Nagaraj V, Wiemken A, Pontis H (2006) Calcium is essential for fructan synthesis induction mediated by sucrose in wheat. Planta 225:183–191. 10.1007/s00425-006-0339-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Martínez-Noël G, Tognetti J, Salerno G, Wiemken A, Pontis H (2009) Protein phosphatase activity and sucrose-mediated induction of fructan synthesis in wheat. Planta 230:1071–1079. 10.1007/s00425-009-1002-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. McIntyre C, Seung D, Casu R, Rebetzke G, Shorter R, Xue G (2012) Genotypic variation in the accumulation of water-soluble carbohydrates in wheat. Funct Plant Biol 39:560–568. 10.1071/fp12077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Nelson B, Cai X, Nebenfuhr A (2007) A multicolored set of in vivo organelle markers for co-localization studies in Arabidopsis and other plants. Plant J 51:1126–1136. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03212.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Ohtake S, Schebor C, de Pablo J (2006) Effects of trehalose on the phase behavior of DPPC-cholesterol unilamellar vesicles. Biochim Biophys Acta 1758:65–73. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Palta J, Kobata T, Turner N, Fillery I (1994) Remobilization of carbon and nitrogen in wheat as influenced by postanthesis water deficits. Crop Sci 34:118–124. 10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183x003400010021x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Paradiso A, Cecchini C, Greco E, D’Egidio M, De Gara L (2008) Variation in fructooligosaccharide contents during plant development and in different cultivars of durum wheat. Plant Biosyst 142:656–660. 10.1080/11263500802411304 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Pepler S, Gooding M, Ellis R (2006) Modelling simultaneously water content and dry matter dynamics of wheat grains. Field Crops Res 95:49–63. 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.02.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira M, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker P, Daly M, Sham P (2007) Plink: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 81:559–575. 10.1086/519795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Ribeiro M, Ferreira D, Siopa J, Rodríguez-Quijano M, Nunes F (2022) Natural variation in the content and degree of polymerization of fructans in wheat: potential for selection of genotypes with beneficial health composition. J Agric Food Chem 70:10929–10939. 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c03686 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Roberfroid M, Delzenne N (1998) Dietary fructans. Annu Rev Nutr 18:117–143. 10.1146/annurev.nutr.18.1.117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Shewry P, Mitchell R, Tosi P, Wan Y, Underwood C, Lovegrove A, Freeman J, Toole G, Mills E, Ward J (2012) An integrated study of grain development of wheat (cv. Hereward). J Cereal Sci 56:21–30. 10.1016/j.jcs.2011.11.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Shi J, Wang L, Wang Z, Li J, Zhang H, Gao X, Wang C, Xia J, Zhao Z, Wang Z, Yang Z, Xu Z, Zhang Y, Fan Z (2024) Comparison of the transcriptome and metabolome of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) proteins content during grain formation provides insight. Front Plant Sci 14:1309678. 10.3389/fpls.2023.1309678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Skodje G, Sarna V, Minelle I, Rolfsen K, Muir J, Gibson P, Veierød M, Henriksen C, Lundin K (2018) Fructan, rather than gluten, induces symptoms in patients with self-reported non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Gastroenterology 154:529–539, e2. 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Van den Ende W (2013) Multifunctional fructans and raffinose family oligosaccharides. Front Plant Sci 4:247. 10.3389/fpls.2013.00247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Van den Ende W, Michiels A, De Roover J, Van Laere A (2002) Fructan biosynthetic and breakdown enzymes in dicots evolved from different invertases. Expression of fructan genes throughout chicory development. Sci World J. 10.1100/tsw.2002.288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Van den Ende W, De Coninck B, Van Laere A (2004) Plant fructan exohydrolases: a role in signaling and defense? Trends Plant Sci 9:523–528. 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.09.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. VanRaden P (2008) Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci 91:4414–4423. 10.3168/jds.2007-0980 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Veenstra L, Jannink J, Sorrells M (2017) Wheat fructans: a potential breeding target for nutritionally improved, climate-resilient varieties. Crop Sci 57:1624–1640. 10.2135/cropsci2016.11.0955 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Verspreet J, Cimini S, Vergauwen R, Dornez E, Locato V, Le Roy K, De Gara L, Van den Ende W, Delcour J, Courtin C (2013) Fructan metabolism in developing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) kernels. Plant Cell Physiol 54:2047–2057. 10.1093/pcp/pct144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Vijn I, Smeekens S (1999) Fructan: more than a reserve carbohydrate? Plant Physiol 120:351–359. 10.1104/pp.120.2.351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Waites J, Achary V, Syombua E, Hearne S, Bandyopadhyay A (2025) CRISPR-mediated genome editing of wheat for enhancing disease resistance. Front Genome Ed 7:1542487. 10.3389/fgeed.2025.1542487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Wang J, He X, Li W, Chen X (2018) Molecular cloning and functional analysis of 1-FFT in wheat relatives. Acta Agron Sin 44:814–823. 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.00814 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Wardlaw I, Willenbrink J (1994) Carbohydrate storage and mobilisation by the culm of wheat between heading and grain maturity: the relation to sucrose synthase and sucrose-phosphate synthase. Aust J Plant Physiol 21:255–271. 10.1071/pp9940255 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Wu L, Wang J, Shen S, Yang Z, Hu X (2025) Transcriptomic analysis of two Chinese wheat landraces with contrasting Fusarium head blight resistance reveals miRNA-mediated defense mechanisms. Front Plant Sci 16:1537605. 10.3389/fpls.2025.1537605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Xue G, McIntyre C, Jenkins C, Glassop D, Herwaarden A, Shorter R (2008) Molecular dissection of variation in carbohydrate metabolism related to water-soluble carbohydrate accumulation in stems of wheat. Plant Physiol 146:441–454. 10.1104/pp.107.113076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Yan Y, Zhang H, Zhang J, Shi X, Geng H, Xiao J, Lu Z, Ni Z, Cong H (2022) Genome-wide association study of grain traits of spring wheat. J Triticeae Crops 42:1182–1191. 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2022.10.02 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Yang D, Li M, Liu Y, Cheng H, Chang L, Cai S (2016) Effect of drought stress on fructan metabolism and translocation in different organs of wheat after anthesis. J Triticeae Crops 36:190–199. 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2016.02.09 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  77. Yang X, Pan Y, Singh P, He X, Ren Y, Zhao L, Zhang N, Cheng S, Chen F (2019) Investigation and genome-wide association study for Fusarium crown rot resistance in Chinese common wheat. BMC Plant Biol 19:153. 10.1186/s12870-019-1758-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Yang L, Ren J, Liu Y, Yin L, Deng X, Wang S (2020) Effect of water deficit and rehydration on the post-flowering assimilate transport and grain filling in wheat. Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin 40:1909–1918. 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2020.11.1909 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Yang L, Liu H, Lei L, Wang J, Zheng H, Xin W, Zou D (2023) Combined QTL-sequencing, linkage mapping, and RNA-sequencing identify candidate genes and KASP markers for low-temperature germination in Oryza sativa L. ssp. Japonica. Planta 257:122. 10.1007/s00425-023-04155-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Ye S, Tang Y (2025) TaZFP 23, a new Cys2/His2-type zinc-finger protein, is a regulator of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth and abiotic stresses. PeerJ 13:e18956. 10.7717/peerj.18956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Yoshida M, Lin D, Kawakami A (2004) A mini exon in the sucrose: sucrose 1-fructosyltransferase gene of wheat. J Plant Physiol 161(11):1277–1279. 10.1016/j.jplph.2004.05.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Yuan C, Miao Y, Zhang H, Liu S, Wang Y (2023) Comparison of gene expression changes in two wheat varieties with different phenotype to stripe rust using RNA-seq analysis. Plant Prot Sci 59:134–144. 10.17221/125/2022-PPS [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Yue A, Li A, Mao X, Chang X, Li R, Jia J, Jing R (2011) Single nucleotide polymorphism and mapping of 6-SFT-A gene responsible for fructan biosynthesis in common wheat. Sci Agric Sin 44:2216–2224. 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.11.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  84. Zeng Z, Wang C, Wang Z, Han Z, Wang L, Lan C (2020) Genetic analysis and gene detection of fructan content using DArT molecular markers in spring bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain. Mol Breed 40:23. 10.1007/s11032-020-1102-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  85. Zhang J, Dell B, Conocono E, Waters I, Setter T, Appels R (2009) Water deficits in wheat: fructan exohydrolase (1-FEH) mRNA expression and relationship to soluble carbohydrate concentrations in two varieties. New Phytol 181:843–850. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02713.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Zhang Z, Ersoz E, Lai C, Todhunter R, Tiwari H, Gore M, Bradbury P, Yu J, Arnett D, Ordovas J, Buckler E (2010) Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 42:355–360. 10.1038/ng.546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Zhang L, Zhang L, Xia C, Zhao G, Jia J, Kong X (2016) The novel wheat transcription factor TaNAC47 enhances multiple abiotic stress tolerances in transgenic plants. Front Plant Sci 6:1174. 10.3389/fpls.2015.01174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Zhang L, Dong C, Chen Z, Gui L, Chen C, Li D, Xie Z, Zhang Q, Zhang X, Xia C, Liu X, Kong X, Wang J (2021) WheatGmap: a comprehensive platform for wheat gene mapping and genomic studies. Mol Plant 14:187–190. 10.1016/j.molp.2020.11.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Zhang T, He Y, DePauw R, Jin Z, Garvin D, Yue X, Anderson W, Li T, Dong X, Zhang T, Yang X (2022) Climate change may outpace current wheat breeding yield improvements in North America. Nat Commun 13:5591. 10.1038/s41467-022-33265-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Zhang Y, Xu Y, Mao Y, Wang M, Li X, Jiang L, Hao J, Zhang D, Ji H, Ma X (2025) Genome-wide analysis of the BES1 gene family reveals their involvement in grain development of Triticum aestivum L. BMC Genomics 26:826. 10.1186/s12864-025-11999-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Zhao Y, Chen W, Cui Y, Sang X, Lu J, Jing H, Wang W, Zhao P, Wang H (2021) Detection of candidate genes and development of KASP markers for Verticillium wilt resistance by combining genome-wide association study, QTL-seq and transcriptome sequencing in cotton. Theor Appl Genet 134:1063–1081. 10.1007/s00122-020-03752-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Zhao F, Tian S, Wu Q, Li Z, Ye L, Zhuang Y, Wang M, Xie Y, Zou S, Teng W, Tong Y, Tang D, Mahato A, Benhamed M, Liu Z, Zhang Y (2022) Utility of Triti-Map for bulk-segregated mapping of causal genes and regulatory elements in Triticeae. Plant Commun 3:100304. 10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Zhao P, Ma X, Zhang R, Cheng M, Niu Y, Shi X, Ji W, Xu S, Wang X (2023) Integration of genome-wide association study, linkage analysis, and population transcriptome analysis to reveal the TaFMO1-5B modulating seminal root growth in bread wheat. Plant J 116:1385–1400. 10.1111/tpj.16432 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Zheng B, Su Y, Chen C, Cao B, Zhou X, Hu S, Liu L, Li X, Che L, Bin T, Feng S, Zhang Y, Li G, Bai C (2025) Brassinosteroid-related transcription factor BZR1 regulates vegetative development and flavonoids biosynthesis in Scutellaria baicalensis. Int J Biol Macromol 308:142383. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.142383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The genotype data, phenotype data and mapping files (.xlsx) supporting the QTL analysis are provided as Supplementary_Data_1_LinkageMapping_ICIMapping. The RNA-seq data are provided as Supplementary_Data_2_RNAseq_Expression_Matrix.


Articles from TAG. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. Theoretische Und Angewandte Genetik are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES