Skip to main content
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology logoLink to Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
. 2026 Aug 7;14:1794001. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2026.1794001

Bioinspired functional materials for biomedical applications

Yi Wu 1, Sihang Ren 1, Dan Zhang 1,*
PMCID: PMC13494271  PMID: 42630568

Abstract

Bio-inspired materials, derived from the structures and functions of natural organisms, have shown significant promise in biomedical applications. This review highlights recent advances in three major classes of bio-inspired functional materials-hydrogels, bioceramics, and biomimetic metals-with emphasis on their design principles, structural characteristics, and applications in disease detection, targeted therapy, and biomimetic implants. By examining natural models such as plant surfaces, animal tissues, and microbial systems, we discuss how these inspirations have led to materials with enhanced biocompatibility, responsiveness, and mechanical performance. Current challenges and future directions in the field are also addressed.

Keywords: bioceramic, bio-inspired materials, biomimetic implants, disease treatment, hydrogels

1. Introduction

Since the beginning of the 21st century, humanity has witnessed rapid technological advancements. The continuous evolution of electron microscopy and related imaging techniques has enabled researchers to extend their exploration of the natural world from the macroscopic to the microscopic scale. By mimicking the composition, structure, formation processes, and functions of organisms found in nature, researchers have designed and fabricated a wide variety of bio-inspired materials with significant potential for biomedical applications (Ran et al., 2022). This potential is exemplified by the work of Antonios G. Mikos, who developed a highly biomimetic aligned fibrin gel (AFG) scaffold (Chai et al., 2022). Upon transplantation into an injured cerebral cortex, this scaffold effectively promoted the migration, differentiation, and maturation of endogenous neural stem cells, ultimately leading to the restoration of neurological function. Beyond such direct therapeutic applications, these materials often integrate other advantageous traits derived from biological systems, including superior impact absorption (Wan et al., 2022), high-temperature resistance (Saleemi et al., 2022), self-repairing capabilities (Zhang et al., 2024), and biodegradability (Deng et al., 2023). These combined properties enable them to maintain stable performance even under extreme conditions, thereby expanding their application potential across diverse medical scenarios. Despite these remarkable advantages, the clinical translation of bio-inspired materials faces substantial hurdles. Challenges such as difficulties in miniaturization, structural complexity, low production yields, and high manufacturing costs impose economic burdens on their practical application. More critically, potential instabilities in both biocompatibility and mechanical properties raise concerns regarding long-term safety, necessitating further in-depth investigation.

In recent years, the field of bio-inspired materials has witnessed a proliferation of excellent reviews, each offering unique perspectives. For instance, Chen et al. (2022) provided a comprehensive overview of molecular imprinting techniques for creating bio-inspired recognition materials, while Zhang et al. (2022a) explored bioinspired functional surfaces tailored for medical devices. Building upon this body of literature, the present review aims to offer a distinct and integrated perspective by systematically examining and comparing three fundamental material categories: hydrogels, bioceramics, and biomimetic metals. Hydrogels, owing to their ability to mimic the soft, hydrated extracellular matrix, are particularly suitable for soft tissue engineering and drug delivery. Metals provide the essential load-bearing strength required for orthopedic and dental implants. Bioceramics exhibit superior bioactivity and osteoconductivity, making them ideal for bone regeneration applications. This review concisely outlines the historical development and structural characteristics of these three material classes, while also elucidating their applications in disease monitoring, therapeutic interventions, and the design and implementation of human implants.

We acknowledge the importance of hybrid materials, bioinspired polymers, and surface modification strategies; however, these topics are integrated into the discussion of the primary material categories. For example, polymer-ceramic composites are addressed within the bioceramics section, and bioinspired surface functionalization is covered in the section on biomimetic metals. Unlike existing reviews that often focus on a single material category or specific application domains, our approach elucidates the common bioinspired design principles shared by these materials, as well as their unique and complementary roles in addressing diverse biomedical challenges-ranging from soft tissue engineering and hard tissue regeneration to implantable medical devices.

2. Principles of bioinspiration in material design

2.1. Plants

Plants serve as a rich source of inspiration for material design, offering lessons that span multiple levels of biological complexity-from fundamental metabolic functions to sophisticated environmental response mechanisms. At the most fundamental level, plants demonstrate how to harness energy from the environment. Photosynthesis, the process by which leaves convert solar energy into chemical energy, has directly inspired the development of artificial photosynthetic systems, including bio-inspired solar cells and panels (Barber and Tran, 2013). This represents a fundamental functional biomimicry approach. The ability to efficiently capture and convert energy from the environment is a critical frontier for biomedicine. It inspires the development of self-powered implantable medical devices, such as pacemakers or neural stimulators, which could harvest energy through biocompatible photovoltaic or photocatalytic skin, thereby eliminating the need for repeated surgeries to replace depleted batteries. This principle is essential for the long-term functionality of future therapeutic implants and micro-robots. Moving beyond function to interfacial properties, the lotus leaf exemplifies how surface architecture can dictate material performance. Its remarkable self-cleaning property, arising from micro- and nano-scale hierarchical structures coupled with low-surface-energy wax crystals, has inspired the design of superhydrophobic surfaces that prevent biological fluid adhesion and reduce infection risk in medical devices (Liu et al., 2017).

At the highest complexity level, certain plants exhibit integrated sensing-actuation systems for environment-triggered responses. Banksia seed pods exemplify this: they store seeds dormant for up to 15 years, releasing them only after two distinct rainfall signals (Eder et al., 2018). This controlled release is enabled by the pod’s hierarchical architecture and compositional heterogeneity. When temperatures exceed 45 C, surface wax melts-sealing dry-induced micro-cracks-while the inner endocarp softens, priming rupture upon subsequent humidity increase. This process relies on coordinated action of cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, wax, and tannin (Huss et al., 2018) (Figure 1). The Banksia pod thus provides a blueprint for soft robots and intelligent drug delivery systems that sense environmental cues and execute controlled release. These examples collectively delineate a progressive hierarchy in bio-inspired design. This progression underscores that materials must not only possess appropriate bulk properties but also exhibit smart, environment-responsive behaviors for applications such as targeted drug delivery and adaptive implants.

FIGURE 1.

Panel A shows a seed pod with a region of interest circled and x, y axes labeled in orange. Panel B presents a close-up three-dimensional scan of the seed pod using x, y, and z axes. Panel C displays a grayscale cross-section of the seed with exocarp, mesocarp, and endocarp layers color-coded, each connected by a line to corresponding circular X-ray diffraction patterns labeled Ex, Me, En. Panel D contains three time-sequenced three-dimensional images of the seed pod splitting along its axis, labeled t0, t1, and t2.

Banksia seed pod and its inspiration for smart drug delivery systems (Huss et al., 2018). (A) Spatial orientation of a (B). attenuata follicle on the mature fruit cone. (B) Directions of the three cutting planes. (C) Internal structure and organization of (B). attenuata follicle tissue. (D) Time-resolved opening and composition of specialized follicle tissue. t 0: before heating; t 1: after some minutes of heat exposure; t 2:after a longer period of heating. This hierarchical, stimuli-responsive opening mechanism has inspired the design of smart drug delivery systems and soft robotic actuators that sense environmental cues and execute controlled release in response to specific triggers such as temperature, pH, or humidity.

2.2. Animals

In addition to plants, animals provide a rich source of design principles. For mechanical resilience, nature offers numerous solutions for impact resistance and energy dissipation. The mantis shrimp, for instance, accelerates its dactyl club to 20 m/s within 3 m to shatter mollusk shells, generating enormous impact energy (Weaver et al., 2012). Similarly, bighorn sheep collide at speeds of 9 m/s without fracturing their horns (Huang et al., 2017), while insect and crustacean exoskeletons resist static extrusion and low-speed impact (Rivera et al., 2020). Biological teeth and bones further exemplify long-term durability, requiring exceptional wear and fatigue resistance over decades of use. These mechanical paradigms have inspired synthetic analogs. By mimicking the helicoidal fibre layup of the mantis shrimp exoskeleton, researchers demonstrated that controlling the printing direction in each layer can significantly enhance the out-of-plane strength and impact toughness of 3D-printed plates (Garg et al., 2023; Long et al., 2022). This material holds promise for bone tissue implants and aerospace applications. Similarly, 3D-printed bionic composite plates mimicking conch shells, beetle exoskeletons, and nacre were fabricated, and drop tower tests revealed that all three designs exhibited superior low-velocity impact resistance compared to monolithic plates (Wan et al., 2022) (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

Panel A displays a layered schematic inspired by Strombus gigas shell, showing a photo of the shell, a microstructure image, and a 3D render of a composite block with labeled layers and a close-up of parallel wavy patterns. Panel B presents a schematic based on another shell structure, including a cross-section image, microstructural detail, a composite block render with curled motifs, and a layered diagram labeled with angles. Panel C illustrates an abalone shell-inspired design with a shell photo, a brick-like microstructure, a composite block render, and a schematic of staggered brick layers. All panels show 75 millimeter by 75 millimeter by 8 millimeter composite blocks with red zoomed insets emphasizing structural features.

Biological structural motifs inspiring impact-resistant composite materials (Wan et al., 2022). (A) Bio-S: Conch Shell Mimetic Design: (a) Natural microstructure of the conch shell (Strombus gigas). (b) Schematic of the Bio-S specimen model. (c) Local architectural features of Bio-S. (d) Side view of the Bio-S layered structure. (B) Bio-B: Beetle Exoskeleton Mimetic Design: (a) Natural microstructure of the beetle exoskeleton. (b) Schematic of the Bio-B specimen model. (c) Local architectural features of Bio-B. (d) Side view of the Bio-B layered structure. (C) Bio-N: Nacre Mimetic Design: (a) Natural microstructure of nacre. (b) Schematic of the Bio-N specimen model. (c) Local architectural features of Bio-N. (d) Side view of the Bio-N layered structure. These biological architectures evolved for optimal impact resistance and energy dissipation, have inspired the design of synthetic composites for load-bearing orthopedic implants, protective coatings, and aerospace materials requiring high toughness and damage tolerance.

In wet environments, barnacles and mussels inspire diverse adhesion strategies with significant clinical relevance for tissue adhesives, which offer advantages over sutures-reduced pain and no need for stitch removal (Petrone et al., 2015; Li et al., 2022a) (Figure 3). At the molecular level, Yahao Liu et al. designed a self-healing polyurethane integrating mussel-inspired catechol motifs with dynamic disulfide bonds (Liu et al., 2021). It achieves 98.4% self-healing efficiency in 6 h at ambient temperature and retains 98.1% efficiency after 2 h in 60 °C water, suitable for protective coatings and flexible sensors. Beyond chemistry, researchers mimicked the formation mechanism of mussel adhesives-liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) followed by maturation. Engineered proteins with mammalian low-complexity domains underwent LLPS, forming dense amyloid nanofiber coatings on diverse surfaces (Teflon to microfluidics) over wide pH (3-11) and salt ranges, exhibiting strong underwater adhesion (Cui et al., 2019). Addressing the clinical challenge that most adhesives fail in humid physiological environments, Lee et al. developed a polyallylamine-based adhesive with excellent wet adhesion and autonomous recovery, making it suitable for surgical wound closure (Lee et al., 2021). These examples illustrate a progression from chemical mimicry to mechanism replication and clinical translation.

FIGURE 3.

Panel A shows a composite illustration of a mussel with labeled anatomical features such as threads, plaques, groove, plaque gland, and distal depression; inset circles display microscopic images of a thread cuticle, thread core, and thread plaque. Panel B is a graphic depicting the formation and release of adhesive proteins from an Asian green mussel, showing molecular interactions above an underwater substrate. Panel C presents a schematic of bioadhesive production using gene fusion of E. coli curli and barnacle cement proteins, with steps including protein purification, self-assembly into nanofibers, conjugation with xanthan gum, and application as a bioadhesive.

Marine organisms inspiring wet-adhesive biomaterials for tissue repair. (A) Morphology of mussel byssus. (a) Mussel secreting threads onto plexiglass via foot. (b) μ-CT of iodine-stained foot (ventral view), showing internal glands and groove. Threads form by protein secretion into ventral groove. (c) Single thread schematic with SEM images: cuticle (3 μm), fibrous core (5 μm), adhesive plaque (50 μm) (Priemel et al., 2017). (B) The adhesive secreted by Asian green mussels (Petrone et al., 2015). (C) Modular design of a barnacle-inspired living-cell adhesive. Drawing key inspiration from barnacle cement, the CsgA-cp19k fusion protein was designed by incorporating barnacle cement protein (cp19k) into the E. coli curli system (CsgA). The fused gene was cloned into pET vectors for protein purification and curli formation. Purified CsgA-cp19k self-assembles into amyloid nanofibers with strong adhesion. On cell surfaces, it forms a recombinant curli network. Combined with xanthan gum, engineered E. coli yields a self-regenerating living-cell bioadhesive (Li et al., 2022a). The protein chemistry and secretion mechanisms of mussel and barnacle adhesives—which enable strong, durable underwater attachment—have directly inspired the development of surgical tissue adhesives, wound sealants, and wet-surface coatings for biomedical implants, offering alternatives to sutures with reduced pain and no need for stitch removal.

2.3. Microorganisms

In addition to animals and plants, microorganisms have also provided abundant inspiration. Their motor capacities and responsiveness to external stimuli can be harnessed for the precise transport and assembly of drugs or genes. For example, the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is a unicellular green alga with flagella, allowing it to move freely in a liquid environment. Drawing inspiration from this, Weibel et al. adsorbed drugs on their surface, and then precisely controlled the direction and speed of motion using specific wavelengths of light (Shchelik et al., 2021). This approach enabled the directional transport and release of the particulate cargo. Moreover, Martel et al. controlled the direction and speed of motion of Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense using the external magnetic field, allowing it to carry the medicine and transport it exactly to the intended location (Felfoul et al., 2016). Furthermore, sperm cells are loaded into the magnetic microcap containing doxorubicin, enabling them to be magnetically guide and transport and release drugs together for the treatment of cervical and ovarian cancers (Xu et al., 2020).

As summarized in Figure 4, these examples from plants, animals, and microorganisms illustrate a progressive hierarchy in bio-inspired design. From fundamental energy conversion and surface engineering to complex environmental response systems, mechanical resilience, wet adhesion, and finally, precision delivery systems inspired by microorganisms. Together, these examples across different levels of biological complexity offer valuable inspiration for developing advanced biomedical materials.

FIGURE 4.

Infographic illustrating principles of bioinspiration in material design, divided into segments for anti-biofouling, soft robotics, wound healing, tough materials, fixation, tissue adhesion, and drug delivery, with example organisms or structures such as lotus leaf, Ecballium, spinach thylakoid, hornet, bee, suction-cup, sperm, virus, and bacteria arranged around a central circle.

Principles of bioinspiration in material design.

3. Hydrogel

3.1. Historical development of hydrogels

The hydrogel is a polymer with a hydrophilic group, consisting of three-dimensional polymer network and plenty of water. Its network structure can absorb plenty of water to expand, and it is insoluble in water (Ho et al., 2022). The research and application of hydrogels have undergone many important developments. The history of hydrogels dates back to 1894 when the concept of “hydrogel” was first introduced to describe the colloidal gel. Later, DuPont scientists reported the synthesis of poly-2-hydroxyehtyl methotrexate hydrogel in 1936 (Das et al., 2021). In the 1950s, Otto Wichterle and Drahoslav first synthesized PHEMA (poly-2-hydroxyethyl methotrexate), a materials not only absorbs a lot of water, but also exhibits good biocompatibility. This is the first attempt to design polymers for human use that meet biocompatibility criteria and apply them to the production of contact lenses (Kopecek, 2009). At that time, scientists started to design and synthesize a large number of hydrogels, which became a hot spot, and explored the synthesis and properties of polymer materials. At the conclusion of the 20th century, scientists initiated research into smart hydrogels that possess the ability to respond to diverse environmental stimuli, such as temperature, pH values, light, and magnetic fields. These hydrogels are known as stimulus-responsive hydrogels, and their development has brought a revolutionized fields such as drug controlled release, smart sensors, flexible wearable devices and other fields. In 1992, Hoffman was the first to report a hydrogel capable of responding to multiple stimuli. The hydrogel is constituted by Nisopropyl acrylamide (NIPAM), acrylic acid and divinyl silicone rubber (Das et al., 2021). In the 21st century, the rapid progress in nanotechnology has given rise to the development of composite hydrogels, designed to fulfill contemporary requirements.

By combining hydrogels with nanometer materials, these composites gain enhanced functionality and capabilities. Novel functional properties are imparted to these hydrogels by embedding nanometer materials into the hydrogel matrix. For example, inspired by mucus secretion mechanisms, Feng et al. developed a novel magnetically responsive semi-convertible hydrogel (MSCH). Magnetically responsive gelatin and amino-modified Fe3O4 nanoparticles were embedded into the covalent network of PVA. Under the influence of a magnetic field, the triple helix structure of gelatin was disassembled and driven by the force of magnetic particles, while the covalent network maintained the integrity of the hydrogel structure and enabled it to switch between gel state and sol state (Gao et al., 2024). The material can be used for artificial joint implantation, soft robots and reducing friction and wear.

3.2. Classification of hydrogels

Based on their source, hydrogels can be classified into three categories: natural, semi-synthetic polymeric, and synthetic hydrogels. Natural hydrogels are obtained from various natural polymer substances, including hyaluronic acid, chitosan, alginate, and collagen (Yuan et al., 2023). Owing to its notable benefits in terms of biocompatibility and biodegradability, natural hydrogels demonstrate significant potential for applications within the biomedical domain. However, its widespread application is constrained by factors such as its inferior mechanical properties, limited stability, variability between batches, and the high degree of processing complexity. In future developments, the integration of 3D printing technology with other materials holds potential to significantly augment the properties of natural hydrogels and broaden their range of applications. Synthetic hydrogels are made from synthetic polymer materials that can be of customized design to meet specific requirements, offering controllable mechanical properties and chemical stability. Semi-Interpenetrating Polymer Networks (Semi-IPNs) involve the integration of an extra polymer, which may be uncross-linked or partially cross-linked, into a polymer network that has already undergone cross-linking. This structure provides semi-polymeric hydrogels with stability of cross-linked networks and the mobility of uncross-linked polymers to exhibit unique physical and chemical properties (Mehta et al., 2023). In the future development, hydrogels are anticipated to become increasingly intelligent, versatile, and eco-friendly. The application range of hydrogels will be further expanded to promote the progress in many fields (such as healthcare, environment and energy) through interdisciplinary research and technological innovation. Solving the current challenges in mechanical properties, stability and large-scale production will be an important direction of future research, too.

3.3. Crystallisation

Hydrogels can be classified into amorphous, crystalline, or semi-crystalline forms based on their structural characteristics. Amorphous hydrogel refers to a type of hydrogel where polymer chains are arranged in a disordered manner, without the formation of crystalline region within its network structure. In amorphous hydrogels, a three-dimensional network is generally established through either physical or chemical cross-linking among long-chain polymers. Due to their disordered structure, the hydrogel exhibits high flexibility and good water absorption (Ho et al., 2022). For example, Amir Erfani et al. mixed the antibody with sodium alginate solution to make an antibody with no fixed form. This method can not only maintain the stability of biological agents, but also provide convenient injection forms (Erfani et al., 2023). Crystalline hydrogel refers to a type of hydrogel where polymer chains arranged in a highly ordered manner, forming crystalline region in the network structure of hydrogel. The crystallization region is a regular structure formed by the polymer segments through strong interactions between molecules. This region is characterized by high hardness and strong stability (Matsuda et al., 1994; Shi et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2014a). Semi-crystallin hydrogel feature both crystalline and amorphous regions within their network structure. The hardness and strength of the material are attributed to its crystalline regions, whereas the amorphous regions enhance its flexibility and facilitate water absorption. This partially crystalline structure allows semi-crystallin hydrogels to achieve a balance between mechanical properties and swelling properties. For example, Fengcai Lin et al. designed an ionic conductive hydrogel with a dual network structure composed of polyurea (PU) and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), referred to as PU/PVA-Li hydrogel. When subjected to external pressure, the physical interactions between PU and PVA chains, such as intermolecular/intramolecular hydrogen bonds and π-π stacking are disrupted. As a result, the energy is absorbed and dissipated. The hydrogel’s integrity is preserved by the highly crosslinked PU network, preventing any cracks from forming. The hydrogel possesses not only exceptional strength but also remarkable toughness and resistance to fatigue (Lin et al., 2023).

3.4. Surface functional groups

The functional groups in hydrogels are specific chemical units linked to the polymer chains of the hydrogel’s polymer network. They not only determine its chemical properties of the hydrogel, but also have an important influence on its physical properties and biological properties. For example, functional groups can regulate its hydrophilicity (Table 1), degree of cross linking and mechanical strength to influence its performance in different environments. By carefully designing and selecting different functional groups, the structure and properties of hydrogels can be precisely tailored to meet the needs of specific applications. The hydrogel is of extensive application potential, such as in drug release, tissue engineering, wound dressing, environmental remediation and other fields based on such customization capabilities (Olad et al., 2018; Peng et al., 2012; Zain et al., 2018; Zamani and Taherzadeh, 2010).

TABLE 1.

Functional groups on hydrogel surfaces and their functions and applications.

Functional groups Characterizations Related applications References
-OH Hydrophilic, creates hydrogen bonds with water molecules to preserve its moist state Wound Dressing Ho et al. (2022)
-COOH Weakly Acidic, pH responsive, Strongly Ionic Drug controlled release system
Wound monitoring
Cheng et al. (2023)
-NH2 Weakly basic group, interact with other functional groups, forming amide or imine bonds Fluorescent markers
Disease detection
Mehta et al. (2023)
-SO3H Hydrophilic, Absorbability Catalytic, Water purification
Hygroscopic materials, Adsorbent
Sajjadi et al. (2024)
-CHO Biofunctionalization of modified hydrogels Drug controlled release system
Self-healing hydrogel
Li et al. (2024)

4. Bioceramics

4.1. History of bioceramics

Bioceramics are a class of ceramic materials employed within the biomedical domain for their excellent biocompatibility, durability, and mechanical properties. They are extensively employed in fields such as orthopedics, traumatology, dentistry, and tissue engineering. In 1969, Hench first introduced the concept of “Bioactivity,” which refers to the ability of a material to form chemical bonds with surrounding tissues in the body (Hench and Paschall, 1973). This concept, which revolutionized the development of bioceramics, prompted researchers to design a range of bioactive ceramic materials. Following this, Hench developed bioactive glass (Bioglass), which can directly bond with bone tissue in the body and is extensively used in bone repair and regeneration (Hench, 1988). This innovation represented a crucial milestone in the realm of bioceramics, propelling advancements in the field of biomedical materials. Subsequently, hydroxyapatite (HA) (George et al., 2022), bioactive ceramics (Wang et al., 2024), and zirconia (ZrO2) (Bannunah, 2023) were successively introduced. By the 1990 s, biodegradable ceramic materials, such as calcium phosphate ceramics (Navarro et al., 2004), and bioceramic composites (Sivakumar et al., 2023) had emerged. These materials combine the advantages of different materials, enhancing toughness and mechanical strength while maintaining good biocompatibility and degradability. Entering the 21st century, the development of bioceramics has entered a new phase, with research focusing on personalized medical applications, such as smart bioceramics and the integration of bioceramics with 3D printing technology.

4.2. Classification of bioceramics

Bioceramics can be categorized according to their interactions with biological tissues, their physicochemical characteristics, and the specific fields of application (Table 2). The main categories include inert bioceramics, bioactive ceramics, biodegradable ceramics, bioinert composite ceramics, smart bioceramics, and nanostructured bioceramics. These materials' unique properties, such as biocompatibility, bioactivity, and mechanical strength, make them essential components in implants and tissue engineering. They provide dependable solutions specifically for the medical domain, especially in the fields of orthopedics and dentistry. As technology advances, the application range of bioceramic materials will expand further, fostering the development of more advanced and personalized medical solutions.

TABLE 2.

Classification of bioceramics and their applications and characteristics.

Category Examples Applications References
Bioactive Ceramics Hydroxyapatite Bone repair, bone replacement, bone fillers, implants Tanner (2010)
Bioactive glass (BGs) Tissue scaffolds, bone replacement, craniofacial and dental surgery Fernandes et al. (2017)
Tricalcium phosphate Tissue replacement, periodontal tissue repair, oral-maxillofacial reconstruction, bone fillers, drug delivery systems Dorozhkin (2010)
Bioinert Ceramics Aluminum oxide Artificial joints, dental implants, dental coatings Keppler et al. (2020)
Zirconium oxide (ZrO2) Crown and bridge supports, coatings Sethu et al. (2017)
Silicon carbide ceramics (SiC) Femoral head wear-resistant coatings, Sensing applications Liu et al., 2024, Zhang (2022)
Biodegradable Ceramics β-Tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) Bone fillers, bone repair, drug delivery Huang et al. (2024), Wu et al. (2023)
Dicalcium phosphate dehydrate (DCPD) Bone fillers Sheikh et al. (2015)
magnesium phosphate ceramics (MgP) Bone repair, Modular fabrication, metal protective coatings Sarkar (2024)
Smart Bioceramics Temperature-responsive ceramics Liquid recovery, oil-water separation Yin et al. (2022)
Magnetic-responsive ceramics Drug delivery systems Zhang et al. (2022)

4.3. Microstructure of bioceramics

The microstructure of bioceramics, including factor such as porosity, particle size, and distribution, directly influences the material’s mechanical properties, bioactivity, and degradation behavior (Ginebra et al., 2018). The porous architecture of bioceramics is essential for their use in bone tissue engineering. Such structure not only promotes cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation but also facilitates the growth and infiltration of blood vessels and new bone tissue into the bioceramic, thereby enhancing the material’s biointegration. The pore size and connectivity affect the material’s degradation rate and bone integration capability. Ideal bioceramics typically have a highly interconnected porous structure, featuring pore diameters that span from 100 to 500 μm, to effectively support bone regeneration (Von Doernberg Et Al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2014b). Nanometer-scale particles can offer a larger surface area, promoting bioactivity. For example, CaP with a microporous structure exhibits higher osteogenic potential and even greater osteoinductive capacity,than its non-microporous counterpart (Barradas et al., 2010).

5. Biomimetic metals

5.1. History of biomimetic metals

Biomimetic Metals is an interdisciplinary process that combines materials science, engineering, biomedicine, and bionics. The research and application of biomimetic metals are primarily focused on developing metallic materials with properties similar to human tissues for biomedical implants, such as bone plates, bone screws, dental implants and artificial joints. The practice of employing biomimetic metals can be traced to the second century AD, when early European civilizations began implanting iron teeth into human skeletal structures (Su et al., 2018). Moving forward to the 1940 s, cobalt-chromium alloys, stainless steel and titanium began to be used as medical implants. However, traditional metallic materials have limitations, such as corrosion caused by the physiological environment, which can lead the diffusion of metal ions into surrounding tissues, and causes toxicity and side effects. Additionally, the difference in Young’s modulus causes the so-called “stress shielding,” which may result in implant loosening (Wu et al., 2017), thereby limiting their long-term application. As known of biomaterials and human tissue properties deepened, scientists began designing biomimetic metal materials by mimicking the structures and functions found in nature. The focus of research shifted towards enhancing biocompatibility by altering the surface properties of metallic materials. For instance, Implants made of titanium alloy often incorporate hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings on their surfaces to substantially enhance osseointegration (Lacefield, 1988). Entering the 21st century, the research and application of biomimetic metals have rapidly advanced, with new material technologies and biomimetic design concepts continually being introduced, enhancing the diversity and optimizing the performance of biomimetic metallic materials. This includes porous metal materials and magnesium alloys (Zhang et al., 2022b). The Young’s modulus of magnesium alloys (41–45 GPa) closely matches that of human bone (40–57 GPa), effectively mitigating the stress shielding effect (Yan et al., 2020). The development of modern biomimetic metals not only brings their mechanical properties closer to those of biological tissues but also makes progress in terms of intelligence and multifunctionality, including smart biomimetic metals, composite biomimetic metal materials, and 3D printing technology (Lv et al., 2021).

5.2. Surface characteristics of biomimetic metals and classification of biomimetic metals

Currently, biomimetic metals can be categorized into two groups based on their reactivity within the human body. The first category is non-degradable medical metallic materials, which primarily include medical stainless steel, titanium and titanium alloys, rare refractory and precious metals, as well as shape memory alloys. These biomimetic metals retain their structure and function in the body over the long term without being gradual degradation or absorption by the biological environment, making them ideal for use in various long-term implants and medical devices (Su et al., 2018). For example, the Paragon stent made of Ni-Ti memory alloy, is used to treat coronary artery disease (Bakhshi et al., 2011). The other category is degradable medical metallic materials, which mainly include medical magnesium and magnesium alloys, iron alloys, and zinc alloys (Zhang et al., 2022c). A notable example is the Lekton Magic stent, typically made of Mg, is conveyed to the location of the vascular injury via the bloodstream, where it expands the vessel and then degrades on its own, avoiding the need for a second surgery and the inability to perform CT scans (Li et al., 2022b).

Metal surface roughness refers to the irregularities of the microscopic morphology of the metal surface and is usually used to describe the smoothness or unevenness (Bosshardt et al., 2017). Surface roughness has a significantly affect on the biological performance of biomimetic metals. Technologies like laser surface texturing (LST) and 3D printing (3DP) have the capacity to modify the macroscopic surface properties of metals, whereas sandblasting and acid etching are capable of creating intricate surface details at the microscopic level.

Plasma spraying and anodizing processes can further modify surface morphology at the nanoscale (Elias and Meirelles, 2010; Feller et al., 2015; Nagasawa et al., 2016). Surface treatments designed to produce rough textures can improve the primary fixation and stability of implants. In contrast to smooth ones, they offer superior mechanical interlocking at the bone-implant interface, thereby enhancing their interaction. Additionally, the use of textured surfaces on implants can boost the interface area with the surrounding tissue, thereby accelerating tissue healing. For example, in dentistry, using nano-modified titanium alloys increases surface roughness (Souza et al., 2019). However, a rougher implant surface tends to accumulate bacterial plaque more readily, thereby elevating the risk of peri-implantitis. Therefore, surface roughness must be achieved between enhancing biological activity and mitigating plaque accumulation (Lang and Jepsen, 2009).

Surface wettability, quantified by contact angle, critically governs the interfacial interactions between metallic biomaterials and the biological environment (Huhtamäki et al., 2018). A low contact angle indicates hydrophilicity (promoting spreading), while a high angle indicates hydrophobicity (repelling liquids). Wettability profoundly influences cell adhesion, protein adsorption, and blood compatibility, key determinants of implant performance (Feller et al., 2015). However, optimal wettability is application-dependent: hydrophilic surfaces enhance osseointegration for orthopedic implants, whereas hydrophobic surfaces minimize bacterial adhesion and infection risk (Valiei et al., 2022). To address these competing needs, wettability can be tailored through coatings, chemical treatments, or nanostructuring. A notable example is the SLActive titanium surface, which achieves superhydrophilicity via controlled chemical treatment, significantly improving implant-bone bonding efficiency (Souza et al., 2019). This demonstrates how fundamental wettability-biology insights translate into clinically optimized surface modifications.

To address diverse clinical needs, biomimetic functionalization techniques, such as surface coatings, nanostructuring, and chemical modifications, endow metallic materials with specific functions like cell adhesion, antibacterial properties, and tissue regeneration. Drawing inspiration from the lotus leaf, the study of superhydrophobic surfaces has been widely pursued for applications in engineering and biomedicine, due to their capability to decrease protein adsorption and prevent platelet adhesion and activation (Barthlott and Neinhuis, 1997). Researchers fabricated a superhydrophobic titanium surface using femtosecond laser ablation technology, effectively preventing bacterial adhesion (Aceti et al., 2022). The nanopatterned structure found on cicada wings exerts physical forces on bacteria, resulting in the disruption of bacterial cells. This mechanism was suggested by researchers Ivanova et al. (2013) and Pogodin et al. (2013), who later drew inspiration from it to produce titanium dioxide nanowire arrays on titanium implants, to regulate their antibacterial activity and osseointegration functions (Ivanova et al., 2013; Pogodin et al., 2013).

6. Bio-inspired materials for biomedical diagnosis and therapy

6.1. Disease detection

Disease detection can identify abnormalities at early stages, allowing for timely interventions that effectively reduce disease severity, transmission risk, and mortality rates. Therefore, a robust monitoring system is essential. Traditional methods of disease detection include laboratory testing, imaging, clinical manifestations and medical history. With advancements in biomaterials research, the emergence of bio-inspired materials offers more sensitive, real-time, and personalized tools for disease monitoring, driving progress in medical diagnostics and public health management.

Compared to bulk materials, nanomaterials possess a higher surface-area-to-volume ratio, making them increasingly adopted in various nanotechnological and nanomedical applications. For example, the detrimental impacts of ultraviolet (UV) radiation on human skin are widely acknowledged, highlighting the importance of accurate UV level detection. In recent years, spectroscopy based on surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) has received extensive acclaim in the field of biosensing due to its outstanding sensitivity and selectivity. However, current SERS-based detection systems still face challenges in accurately detecting low and excessive levels of ultraviolet (UV). To overcome this challenge, designing nanostructures with high sensitivity and a large surface area is crucial (Park et al., 2023). Fabrication of nanostructures with numerous nanogaps and the formation of SERS substrates capable of accommodating high concentrations of analytes with a larger surface area are vital to addressing these limitations. In this study, scientists took inspiration from the morphology of Asterias forbesi (commonly known as the Forbes sea star) to enhance the performance of SERS substrates. The body and legs of the Forbes sea star have numerous protrusions, resembling structures that maximize the SERS effect by creating nanoscale hotspots. To replicate this structure, scientists enhanced the SERS effect by fabricating small-scale gold nanoparticles (GNPs) within a gold-silver bimetallic structure framework, mimicking the legs and protrusions of Asterias forbesi. Additionally, nanoparticles of iron oxide at the nanoscale level possess an intrinsic peroxidase-like activity, which is akin to that of natural enzymes, enabling their application in the oxidation of organic substrates for wastewater treatment or as a detection instrument. Based on this discovery, researchers devised an innovative immunoassay technique, utilizing antibody-modified magnetite nanoparticles that fulfill three roles: capturing, isolating, and identifying (Gao et al., 2007). These nanoparticles exhibit versatility, simplicity in production, and robustness, making them powerful tools with extensive potential applications in the fields of medicine, biotechnology, and environmental chemistry. Vitamin D has been identified as an important biological marker for diverse ailments, including rheumatoid arthritis, cancer, and cardiovascular diseases. Nonetheless, the sensitivity of vitamin D detection still requires enhancement. The villi of the small intestine increase the surface area of the intestinal wall, facilitating particularly efficient absorption of nutrients and enhancing digestive secretions. Drawing inspiration from the architecture of villi, researchers have crafted a biomimetic sandwich-type surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) aptamer sensor utilizing silver nanovilli (AgNVs) for the exceptionally sensitive and selective detection of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (Kim et al., 2021). The densely packed nanovilli significantly enhances the Raman signal, making detection limit of this sensor being ten times lower than that of conventional methods such as plasmon-induced resonance and electroanalytical sensing. Inspired by the natural biosynthesis of complex minerals, researchers have also developed novel sensors with higher sensitivity, greater selectivity, and improved biocompatibility. These biominerals include silica found in diatoms and sponges, calcium carbonate shells in mollusks and coccolithophores, magnetosomes in magnetotactic bacteria, and hydroxyapatite in bones and teeth. These biominerals possess distinctive physicochemical characteristics, offering considerable capacity for biosensing applications. Diatom shells, which are species-specific biosilica structures with intricate geometric patterns, exhibit significant potential for biosensor applications due to their complex nanostructured morphology, high surface area, and species-specific architecture. Additionally, the porous nature of diatom biosilica allows the effective immobilization of biomolecules such as enzymes, antibodies, and DNA probes, thereby enhancing the sensitivity and specificity of biosensor devices. These natural structures can significantly amplify the surface plasmon resonance of self-assembled silver nanoparticles (NPs) deposited on their surfaces, functioning as optical amplification lattices. This amplification significantly enhances the sensor’s sensitivity in SERS, an efficient approach for molecular discovery based on unique light interactions. Initially, researchers coated clean diatom frustules (Pinnularia sp.) on glass slides. Next, the frustules were amino-modified to promote strong electrostatic interactions with subsequently adsorbed silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). Subsequently, goat anti-mouse IgG antibodies were selectively bound to the silver NPs. Finally, bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used to seal off non-specific attachment points. The introduction of gold plasmonic nanoparticles co-labeled with antibodies and signal-enhancing molecules like DTNB further amplified the SERS signal. The designed sensor demonstrated high selectivity for the analyte, binding exclusively with the target molecule (mouse IgG), and exhibited sensitivity exceeding that of conventional SERS sensors by 100-fold (Abdelhamid et al., 2024). Squire et al. later employed the same diatoms in fluorescent imaging immunoassays to detect cardiovascular disease biomarkers (Squire et al., 2019). The structural design of viral capsids also offers substantial inspiration for creating nanomaterials. Plant viruses, which are non-infectious to humans, typically exhibit complete uniformity in composition and size. For instance, the Tobacco Mosaic Virus (TMV), a helix-shaped viral particle exhibiting helical symmetry, is a virus with a single positive-polarity strand of RNA that contaminates tobacco and other solanaceous plants (Bruckman et al., 2014). The TMV capsid forms a molecular nanoscale cylinder with specified amino acid sites on its external surface. Steinmetz and colleagues created a dual-modal optical and MRI probe based on TMV, specifically targeting VCAM-1 (vascular cell adhesion molecule-1) receptors within atherosclerotic deposits within an ApoE−/− mouse model. Chemically altered TMV, carrying Cy5, chelated Gd ions, and near-infrared dyes, was employed for focused visualization, demonstrating excellent visualization performance and good biocompatibility. This experiment demonstrated that by aiming at the cellular molecular receptors located on stimulated endothelial cells, large and effective payloads could be transported to areas of atherosclerotic plaque formation.

In addition to nanostructures, the multi-chamber structure of cells has inspired for the design of novel bioinspired materials. For example, molecular detection of HIV is crucial for the early diagnosis of HIV patients and for antiretroviral therapy, yet achieving simple and sensitive molecular detection remains a challenge. Inspired by the multi-chamber structure of living cells, researchers have proposed an artificial cascaded reaction system utilizing nanoporous membrane separation to enhance the compatibility of CRISPR-mediated multi-enzyme reactions (Li et al., 2023). By integrating this separated cascade reaction system with a microfluidic platform and glucose biosensing technology, a bioinspired, CRISPR-mediated cascade reaction (CRISPR-MCR) biosensor has been developed for HIV molecular detection. This system has achieved a detection sensitivity of 43 copies of HIV DNA plasmid and 200 copies of HIV RNA. Furthermore, scientists have derived inspiration from parasites. In 2024, Shahar Bracha utilized rods and dense particles of Toxoplasma gondii to deliver MeCP2 to neurons in the mouse brain, successfully breaching the blood-brain barrier (Bracha et al., 2024).

Pathogen-inspired carriers enable precise drug delivery, but safety must be engineered into their design. Taking Toxoplasma gondii as an example, attenuated strains are used to prevent uncontrolled proliferation, and therapeutic proteins are designed for release only within target cells (Bracha et al., 2024). Similarly, viral vectors such as adeno-associated virus (AAV) face challenges including immunogenicity and risks of genome integration. To address this, peptide-mediated delivery systems like HIV-TAT derivatives allow transient protein introduction without viral components, reducing long-term off-target effects (Allen et al., 2022). Bacterial carriers incorporate multiple safety features, such as dependence on nutrients not found in nature and the incorporation of suicide switches that trigger self-destruction under specific conditions (Choi et al., 2025). Immune responses must also be carefully managed; for instance, Listeria monocytogenes effectors (LLO, ActA) coated on synthetic cargoes can induce actin-driven expulsion from macrophages, minimizing lysosomal degradation and cytotoxicity (Van Staden et al., 2024). Finally, rigorous in vitro and preclinical studies are essential to establish drug safety and appropriate dosing regimens (Audouard et al., 2021; Eberhard et al., 2025).

6.2. Wound monitoring

Chronic wounds that are difficult to heal present a substantial biological, psychological, social, and financial strain on individuals and the healthcare infrastructure (Zhao et al., 2016). Currently, commonly used clinical wound dressings include bandages (Mohandas et al., 2019), foam sponges (Alven and Aderibigbe, 2020), and alginate dressings (Cressman et al., 1988). However, these traditional materials have several limitations. First, they often lack sufficient breathability, hindering the provision of an ideal oxygen exchange environment, which can impede wound healing. Second, changing these dressings can cause intense pain for the patient and may tear newly formed tissues, leading to secondary injury. Additionally, these dressings are limited in their ability to prevent microbial infections, leaving the wound vulnerable to bacterial invasion and potentially triggering allergic reactions, which can further exacerbate the condition. Most importantly, these materials typically struggle to maintain the necessary moist environment for the optimal, thereby delaying the healing process. Therefore, there is a need to develop more effective and targeted dressings to address the complex demands of chronic wounds (Alven and Aderibigbe, 2020). Hydrogel dressings, due to their moisture retention and adhesion properties, can address these issues and are widely used in wound care. However, traditional hydrogel dressings still require daily changes for visual wound assessment. Inspired by nature, researchers have engineered hydrogels that respond to stimuli. For example, receptors in human skin convert external stimuli into electrical signals, mimosa plants fold their leaves in response to touch, apple skins curl spontaneously as that dry, the “transpiration-guttation” phenomenon in plants, and the color-changing behaviors of chameleons and octopuses for self-protection (Su et al., 2015). These innovative hydrogel dressings can be combined with flexible wearable materials to respond to environmental factors such as pH, temperature, or color, thereby enabling real-time monitoring of the wound (Jin et al., 2024).

PH-responsive hydrogels are a category of stimulus-responsive system that react to changes in wound pH. Normal skin has a pH ranging typically from 4 to 6. When the skin is damaged, the pH initially decreases slightly and then rises, eventually returning to the normal range (5.5-6.5). However, in chronic wounds with inflammation, the pH remains in the alkaline range. Based on this principle82, Yuange Zong and colleagues have attached a near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent probe to the hydrogel network structure via an amide bond, forming an NIR fluorescent PIL-CS hydrogel. The NIR imaging device measures the fluorescence intensity of the hydrogel, providing a direct response to the pH at the wound site (Zong et al., 2023). Additionally, phenol red (a pH indicator) and two glucose-sensitive enzymes (GOx and HRP) were encapsulated in a zwitterionic polycarboxybetaine (PCB) hydrogel dressing, which can detect both pH and glucose levels (Zhao et al., 2020). Additional progress in this area pertains to hydrogels that are responsive to glucose. These hydrogels encompass hydrogels containing glucose oxidase (GOX), hydrogels with Concanavalin A (Con A) systems, and systems with phenylboronic acid groups (PBA). These glucose-responsive hydrogels are employed for the regulated release of therapeutic agents such as insulin in reaction to alterations in glucose levels (Chen et al., 2023). Temperature also plays a significant part in wound monitoring. For example, Qian Pang and colleagues developed a dual-network, temperature-responsive ionic conductive hydrogel with excellent stretchability, fast temperature responsiveness, and good conductivity. This was achieved by introducing a polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)/tannic acid (TA)/Fe3+ cross-linked network into the N,N-methylene bisacrylamide (MBAA) cross-linked poly (N-isopropylacrylamide-co-acrylamide) (P(NIPAAm-co-AM)) network (Pang et al., 2022). The hydrogel’s conductivity responds to environmental temperature changes, making it useful for temperature monitoring in wounds. Furthermore, Pang and his team created a novel hydrogel with a dual-layer design: the top layer is composed of flexible electronic components, which are encased in polydimethylsiloxane and feature an integrated temperature sensor as well as ultraviolet (UV) light-emitting diodes. An antibacterial hydrogel responsive to UV radiation comprises the lower layer. Temperature data gathered by the embedded sensor is then transmitted wirelessly to a smartphone via Bluetooth (Pang et al., 2020). These responsive hydrogel dressings, combined with embedded circuits and wireless communication technology, allow real-time monitoring of the wound microenvironment, furnishing medical practitioners with critical wound data to assess healing progress.

Furthermore, inspired by the feathers of hummingbirds and the exoskeleton of weevils (Fu et al., 2018), researchers have applied structural color to wound monitoring, utilizing its sensitivity to external environmental changes to alter the microstructure of materials. This approach facilitates non-invasive, real-time tracking of wound healing processes. For example, Wang’s team proposed a structural color ionic hydrogel, which is made from a polyacrylamide-poly (vinyl alcohol)-polyethyleneimine-lithium chloride (PAM-PVA-PEI-LiCl) inverse opal scaffold, combined with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-mixed methacrylated gelatin (GelMA) hydrogel on the surface. This material exhibits different structural colors under varying pressures and degrees of extension. The team then combined electrical stimulation (ES) with the structural color ionic hydrogel patch (SCIHP) for monitoring wounds in diabetic mice, finding that as the duration of ES increased, the SCIHP changed from red to green, possibly related to the temperature increase in SCIHP caused by the applied voltage. Additionally, Wang incorporated polymers of N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM) and acrylic acid (SA) into the synthetic inverse opal structure. This hydrogel dressing demonstrated shape memory effects during heating and cooling, allowing for reversible shape changes, with corresponding changes in structural color. Near-infrared irradiation enabled remote control of the hydrogel dressing’s shape and structural color changes (Wang et al., 2022). Moreover, a dressing was developed by combining polyacrylamide (PAM), silk fibroin (SF), poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly (styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT, PP), and graphene oxide (GO). This dressing can closely adhere to the human body, simulating the sensory function of the skin, and displays significant color changes during stretching and bending, transmitting information to electronic apparatus for processing and feedback (Zhang et al., 2021). In addition, Bin and colleagues, inspired by the wet adhesion of spider webs and the structural color phenomena in chameleons, developed a self-reporting bioadhesive patch. This dressing not only demonstrates strong adhesion but also enables monitoring of its adhesiveness and the healing process through changes in structural color (Kong et al., 2022). Besides temperature, pH, and glucose, local levels of lactate and uric acid may be promising candidates for future research. Future work could improve smart dressings by increasing the diversity of monitoring indicators, refining algorithms for clinical wound outcomes, developing smarter medical plans for patients, and performing data analysis to examine the severity and distribution patterns of acute and chronic wounds.

6.3. Disease treatment

6.3.1. Targeted therapy

Targeted therapy is a precise medical approach aimed at targeted eliminating of cancerous cells or specific diseased cells by identifying and attacking particular molecular markers or pathways while minimizing damage to normal cells (Saeed et al., 2023). Drug delivery technologies based on bioinspired materials are developed by mimicking the structures and functions found in nature, creating carriers capable of efficiently delivering drugs. These carriers leverage the intelligent characteristics of biological systems, such as targeting and responsiveness, to accurately identify diseased tissues and release drugs upon reaching the target location, thereby achieving therapeutic effects. Compared to traditional drug delivery systems, bioinspired material-based drug delivery technologies not only improve drug delivery efficiency but also significantly reduce systemic side effects, making treatments more precise and effective. They are widely applied in the treatment of cancers, infectious diseases, and chronic conditions (Karimi et al., 2016).

6.3.2. Biomimetic pathogen delivery systems

Viruses serve as natural carriers of genes, capable of transferring biological information across diverse species. Viral drug delivery utilizes the natural infection mechanisms of viruses, with their pathogenicity removed through genetic engineering, and therapeutic drugs or genes are loaded into them (Karimi et al., 2016; Petrov et al., 2022). Once the virus enters the target cells, it can release the carried drugs or genes to exert therapeutic effects (Karimi et al., 2016). Inspired by this, Dong X et al. assembled silver nanoparticles onto the capsid proteins of M13 bacteriophages, utilizing the targeting function of the phages and the antibacterial effects of the nanoparticles, overcoming the limitations of traditional antibiotic treatments. This system precisely regulates the gut microbiota and remodels the tumor immune microenvironment, thereby inhibiting the growth of colorectal cancer (Dong et al., 2020). Additionally, Yoon Jung Hwang et al. constructed an engineered T7 bacteriophage that, by loading specific peptides, targets murine melanoma cells and carries a gene expressing granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) to achieve targeted therapy. The findings showed that this engineered phage effectively suppressed tumor progression in animal models (Hwang and Myung, 2020). Not only can bacteriophages serve as excellent carriers, but bacteria can also be genetically engineered to achieve targeted drug delivery, showing great potential in treating diseases such as cancer. Bacteria exhibit characteristics such as hypoxia tolerance, chemotaxis, and high permeability, and their flagella and chemotaxis receptors can target hypoxic tumor regions (Wang et al., 2023). Examples include reported bifidobacteria (Li et al., 2022c), E. coli (Yang et al., 2024), and Salmonella typhi (Wall et al., 2010). Additionally, magnetotactic bacteria containing magnetite or greigite-based magnetosomes can target hypoxic and necrotic tumor areas for targeted drug delivery. For instance, magnetotactic bacteria modified with nanoliposomes, guided by an external magnetic field, were able to deliver 55% of the drugs to hypoxic regions of colorectal cancer (Felfoul et al., 2016; Taherkhani et al., 2014). While pathogen-based drug delivery has strong targeting ability and high delivery efficiency, it also presents some limitations, including potential immunogenicity, possible host immune responses, genomic instability, and limited survival time in vivo. Moreover, the complex preparation and purification processes may affect its feasibility and safety in clinical applications (Karimi et al., 2016).

6.3.3. Biomimetic cell membrane nanodelivery systems

Exogenous drugs often face limitations such as triggering immune responses that lead to inflammation or rejection, causing tissue incompatibility or damage, which can affect efficacy and safety. They may also be rapidly cleared or metabolized, shortening their half-life in the body and thereby impacting therapeutic effectiveness. Additionally, it can be challenging for these drugs to precisely reach target tissues or cells, leading to reduced efficacy. Biomimetic cell membrane nanodelivery systems involve isolating the cytoplasm and cell membrane of specific cells (such as erythrocytes, platelets, stem cells, and cancer cells) and encapsulating drug nanoparticles (such as polymer nanoparticles, liposomes, or metal nanoparticles) within the separated cell membrane to form a core-shell structure. This structure retains the cell membrane’s structure and functions while encapsulating the drug within the membrane to protect its activity (Li et al., 2019; Liao et al., 2024; Raza et al., 2024). Inspired by this, Diana Dehaini and colleagues fused red blood cell membranes with platelet membranes and coated them onto poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles, termed [RBC-P]NPs. This hybrid membrane coating technology not only enhances stability and biocompatibility but also imparts specific functions of red blood cells and platelets to the nanoparticles, such as acetylcholinesterase activity and the ability to target tumor cells (Dehaini et al., 2017). Additionally, surface proteins on cancer cell membranes can specifically interact with cells at tumor sites, achieving efficient homologous targeting, concentrating the medication specifically at the tumor area and lessening its influence on surrounding healthy tissues.

For example, Zou and colleagues designed a delivery system based on glioblastoma, where they fused glioblastoma cell membranes with mitochondrial membranes to simultaneously recognize tumors and mitochondria, extending the circulation half-life of Gboxin from 0.47 h to 4.90 h (Lu et al., 2022; Zou et al., 2023). However, the preparation process for biomimetic cancer cell membrane drug delivery systems is relatively complex, and their safety still needs to be evaluated in clinical applications. Moreover, Xu and colleagues developed a dopamine-based biomimetic nanodelivery system that leverages the anti-ROS (reactive oxygen species) properties of platelet membranes. This system can accurately target brain hemorrhage sites, mimicking the natural hemostatic function of platelets and repairing damaged blood vessels (Xu et al., 2023).

6.4. Biomimetic implants

6.4.1. Bone

Bone is a robust structure found in the bodies of vertebrates, primarily composed of 70% calcium phosphate and 30% collagen (Figure 5). It not only exhibits exceptional mechanical properties but also serves as a reservoir for calcium, phosphorus, and other ions within the body. Bone tissue is categorized into two primary types: cortical bone and cancellous bone. The porosity of cortical bone typically falls within a range of 5%–15%, whereas the porosity of cancellous bone can be significantly higher, reaching values of 40%–95%. These characteristics contribute to the anisotropic and complex layered structure of bones, enhancing their strength and toughness (Meng et al., 2023a). When bone tissue is taken out surgically because of trauma, infection, tumors, or developmental issues, it can cause significant bone defects. The primary treatment options include autologous bone grafting, allogeneic bone grafting, and the implantation of artificial bone repair materials. Autologous and allogeneic bone grafts face challenges such as limited donor availability and immune rejection. Consequently, bio-inspired artificial bone materials have emerged as viable alternatives (Munir et al., 2021; Yu et al., 2022). In designing artificial bone materials, it is essential to emulate the layered configuration and composition of natural bone. For example, hydroxyapatite (HA), which resembles the composition of bone, can be coated onto the surface of titanium alloy implants to enhance osseointegration capabilities (Lacefield, 1988).

FIGURE 5.

Panel A illustrates hierarchical structure of bone from whole bone to osteonal microstructure, lamellae, extrafibrillar matrix, and fibril, with annotations showing features such as Haversian canal, lamellae, and collagen arrangement. Panel B presents a series of images visually comparing the cross-sectional structure of a lotus root, progressing from whole root, cross-sections, to detailed zoomed-in microstructure, highlighting structural similarities to bone.

(A) Structure of human cortical bone (Zimmermann et al., 2016). (B) Structure of lotus root (Barrett et al., 1990).

Inspired by the adhesion mechanisms of mussels in natural systems, nano-hydroxyapatite was spontaneously modified onto porous PEEK through solution immersion, resulting in the formation of PEEK-PHA. This scaffold not only exhibits bone integration capabilities, owing to the characteristics of the polydopamine coating, PEEK-PHA but also can spontaneously assimilate lysozyme (Lys). The results of antibacterial test showed that the antibacterial rates of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus were 96.1% and 98.7%, respectively (Yu et al., 2022). Furthermore, inspired by the layered structure of nacre, Huijun Sun and colleagues developed a hydroxyapatite (HA)/polymer composite that mimics the microstructure of cortical bone using a bidirectional freeze-casting method. In this design, HA acts as rigid “bricks” embedded within a flexible polymer “mortar,” creating a microstructure similar to a brick wall. This layered arrangement effectively dissipates stress, enhancing the fracture resistance of the material (Tabrizian et al., 2023). Moreover, inspired by the porous internal structure of lotus roots, a biomimetic lotus root AKT bioceramic scaffold was constructed using 3D printing, with a porosity of up to 80% and mechanical strength exceeding 30 MPa. This scaffold can meet the requirements for non-load-bearing bone tissue repair. The parallel multi-channel structure facilitates nutrient transfer and material exchange between the scaffold and the bone defect microenvironment, significantly promoting bone tissue regeneration within the scaffold (Zhu et al., 2016).

In addition to these, the hinge of bivalves can withstand hundreds of thousands of repetitive opening and closing motions during their lifetime. In light of this, academician Yu Shuhong et al. investigated the layered design of mineralized tissues in the hinge of the bivalve pleated crown mussel to make the tissues deformable and fatigue-resistant. It is anticipated to be utilized for artificial implants (Meng et al., 2023b).

6.4.2. Heart

As the origin of life, healing the heart has long been a cherished aspiration of the medical community. With the aging of the population, rheumatic valvular disease has become an increasingly common cause of cardiovascular disease prevalent, leading to approximately 250,000 deaths each year (Marijon et al., 2012). The primary causes of the disease include acute rheumatic fever, rheumatic carditis, and the inflammatory exudation and adhesion of the valve and its base. Clinicians therefore replace diseased valves with transcatheter prostheses by means of endovascular approaches such as transfemoral, transapical, transjugular, and transatrial approaches. The initial procedure of transcatheter heart valve replacement (THVR) was executed in the year 2002 (Bui et al., 2021). Since then, materials for heart valves have undergone numerous iterations, incorporating various soft segments such as polyether, polyester, polysiloxane, and polycarbonate. Due to the limitations of traditional heart valve materials. For instance, mechanical valves require lifelong anticoagulation, while biological valves degrade due to calcification within 7–8 years (Goode et al., 2025; Prabhu et al., 2025). So recent research has addressed these gaps by developing biomaterials that simulate the anisotropic strength, elasticity and regenerative potential of natural valves (Boehm et al., 2023; Snyder and Jana, 2023).

The production strategy for bio-inspired materials primarily considers two aspects: structure bionic and performance bionic. Structural biomimetics aims to simulate the physical structure of natural tissue ECM, while performance biomimetics aims to design regenerative tissue with similar properties to native valves on the basis of structure (Marino et al., 2025; Wall et al., 2010). Recent research has developed biomimetic heart valves that replicate the hierarchical structure and mechanical properties of native valves using advanced textile technologies, electrospinning, and 3D printing. These designs achieve graded stiffness, anisotropic strength, and tissue-like compliance (Boehm et al., 2023; Hussein et al., 2020; Sennewald et al., 2025). For example, textile-based valves with biomimetic fiber arrangements (e.g., PVDF, PCU) mirror native collagen and elastin alignment, achieving burst pressures >460 N/m and pressure gradients as low as 3.02 mmHg-meeting ISO-5840 standards while outperforming native tissue mechanically (Boehm et al., 2023). Similarly, Biohybrid scaffolds combine synthetic fibers with electrospun polymers to replicate the trilayered valve histology (fibrosa, spongiosa, ventricularis), achieving anisotropic elasticity (Chen et al., 2025; Freystetter et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2025). The polylactic acid/GelMA anisotropic nanofiber scaffold, fabricated by electrospinning combined with thermal stretching technology, achieved a fiber orientation degree of 0.8, which increased cell spreading efficiency from 8.6% to 62%. This scaffold successfully mimicked the mechanical microenvironment of native valves and guided orderly cell growth (Chen et al., 2026). At the level of surface modification, Functional biomimicry involves surface modification and ECM-mimetic composition. Incorporating unmodified hyaluronic acid (HA) into fibrin scaffolds reduces leaflet retraction by 25% (Lei et al., 2021). H2-N2 plasma treatment significantly enhanced the hydrophilicity and cell adhesion of PCL scaffolds without altering their mechanical properties, providing an optimized interface for the growth of human mesenchymal stem cells (Lutter et al., 2026). A more promising clinical approach involves coating elastin-like recombinamer onto thermoplastic polyurethane stent struts via dual electrospinning, with the electrospun fibers extending into the lumen to form thin leaflets. The resulting bicuspid valve exhibits extremely low platelet adhesion, no hemolysis, and excellent hemodynamic performance (Arcuti et al., 2026). At the level of surface functionalization, the biomimetic erythrocyte membrane-camouflaged nanoplatform targets endothelial cells via CD144 antibodies and continuously releases 2-deoxy-D-ribose from the PLGA core to activate the EGFR-MAPK pathway, achieving the formation of a confluent endothelial monolayer within 14 days in a rat model (Qiu et al., 2026). Compared with surface functionalization strategies, the endogenous regeneration approach goes a step further: it is no longer confined to interface modulation, but instead guides in situ tissue regeneration through the material itself. Acellular scaffolds like the HCCV use polycaprolactone (PCL) matrices to recruit host cells for endogenous regeneration, avoiding cell-based therapy challenges (Yacoub et al., 2023).

However, Tissue-engineered heart valves face durability challenges, as cyclic loading over years can induce damage at high-stress regions such as commissures and suture lines (Bhat et al., 2025; Mao et al., 2025; Martin and Sun, 2017). Accelerated wear testing simulates decades of use within months—polymer valves tested at high frequency have remained functional beyond 50 million cycles, although test conditions do not fully replicate physiological environments (Martin and Sun, 2017; Ponnaluri et al., 2023). Computational models, including finite element analysis, help predict stress distribution and potential crack initiation advances in materials, such as modified polymer valves, have demonstrated resistance to calcification and maintained integrity after millions of test cycles (Rotman et al., 2020). Design modifications, including stent geometry optimization and anti-calcification coatings, further contribute to extended valve durability (Kuang et al., 2020). In addition, emerging 3D-printed prototypes (e.g., TRISKELION silicone valve) achieve regurgitation fractions (22.26%) and pressure gradients (9.93 mmHg) comparable to commercial bioprostheses (Tschorn et al., 2022). Given the limitations of current testing methods, integrating accelerated wear tests, computational simulations, 3D printing technology, and real-time monitoring may provide a more reliable strategy for predicting long-term valve performance (Marino et al., 2025).

Figure 6 provides an overview of the biomedical applications of bio-inspired materials discussed in this review, including disease detection, targeted therapy, and biomimetic implants, illustrating how nature-inspired design translates into functional solutions across the healthcare spectrum.

FIGURE 6.

Infographic illustrating applications of bioinspired functional materials, including disease detection, wound monitoring, and tissue regeneration. Visual sections show examples such as ultrasensitive detection using nanoparticles, smart wound dressings monitoring temperature and pH, artificial heart valves mimicking biological structures, 3D-printed bone scaffolds, and immune cell membrane vesicles targeting pathogens. Central circular infographic connects these applications to bacteria, viruses, bone, heart, and tissue engineering.

Applications of bioinspired functional materials.

7. Discussion

This article reviews three primary categories of biomimetic materials: hydrogels, bioceramics, and biomimetic metals, emphasizing their design principles, structural characteristics, and biomedical applications. These examples demonstrate that biologically inspired designs can provide significant therapeutic advantages. Nonetheless, numerous challenges hinder their clinical translation. For instance, the large-scale, cost-effective production of biomimetic structures remains problematic. Additionally, the long-term metabolic pathways and immune responses associated with the degradation products of biomimetic coatings or degradable metals in the body are not yet fully understood. Furthermore, there is a lack of specialized evaluation criteria.

To address these issues, future research should concentrate on: (1) multi-scale simulation and design, which integrates computational materials science and machine learning to predict the relationship between structure and performance, thereby accelerating material selection; (2) dynamic and smart materials that can respond to changes in the body’s microenvironment, such as pH, enzymes, and mechanical signals, to facilitate on-demand treatment; (3) large-scale manufacturing, exemplified by 3D printing, which can produce complex, patient-specific designs and is also amenable to large-scale production; (4) self-decision-making bioelectronic systems that combine flexible sensors with smart materials to create a treatment system capable of autonomous perception, decision-making, and intervention; and (5) specialized evaluation standards and regulatory science aimed at establishing criteria for biomimetic materials that prioritize producibility and regulatory compliance.

8. Conclusion

This review systematically examines hydrogels, bioceramics, and biomimetic metals—their design principles, structural features, and applications in disease detection, targeted therapy, and implants. By mimicking nature, these materials achieve enhanced biocompatibility and functionality. Despite challenges in manufacturing and safety, integrating multidisciplinary approaches and advanced fabrication technologies will enable bio-inspired materials to transcend mere imitation, offering superior solutions for precision medicine.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the “1 + X”Research Project of the Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University (2024ZDJH 01PT125). Young Medical and Nursing Staff Clinical Technical Competency Improvement Program (Medical Special Project) (Grant No. 2024LCJSYL18).

Footnotes

Edited by: Ranjith Kankala, Huaqiao University, China

Reviewed by: Anna Sandak, InnoRenew CoE, Slovenia

Qi-Wen Chen, Central South University, China

Gururaj Fattepur, KLE Technological University, India

Author contributions

YW: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Project administration, Conceptualization, Writing – review and editing. SR: Writing – review and editing, Methodology, Supervision, Conceptualization, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Visualization. DZ: Investigation, Writing – review and editing, Writing – original draft, Formal Analysis, Visualization.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Abdelhamid M. A. A., Ki M.-R., Pack S. P. (2024). Biominerals and bioinspired materials in biosensing: recent advancements and applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25 (9), 4678. 10.3390/ijms25094678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aceti D., Daskalova A., Angelova L., Filipov E., Sotelo L., Andreeva A., et al. (2022). Optimization of titanium and titanium alloy surface properties by ultra-short laser processing for improved antibacterial characteristics. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2240, 012040. 10.1088/1742-6596/2240/1/012040 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Allen J. K., Sutherland T. C., Prater A. R., Geoffroy C. G., Pellois J. P. (2022). In vivo peptide-based delivery of a gene-modifying enzyme into cells of the central nervous system. Sci. Adv. 8 (39), eabo2954. 10.1126/sciadv.abo2954 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alven S., Aderibigbe B. A. (2020). Chitosan and cellulose-based hydrogels for wound management. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (24), 9656. 10.3390/ijms21249656 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Arcuti D., Mansi S., Biebl D., Reuter M., Grab M., Rodríguez-Cabello J. C., et al. (2026). A versatile engineering platform for the fabrication of prosthetic venous valves using electrospinning. Adv. Healthc. Mater, e04851. 10.1002/adhm.202504851 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Audouard E., Rousselot L., Folcher M., Cartier N., Piguet F. (2021). Optimized protocol for subcutaneous implantation of encapsulated cells device and evaluation of biocompatibility. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9, 620967. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.620967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bakhshi R., Darbyshire A., Evans J. E., You Z., Lu J., Seifalian A. M. (2011). Polymeric coating of surface modified nitinol stent with POSS-nanocomposite polymer. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 86 (1), 93–105. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.03.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bannunah A. M. (2023). Biomedical applications of zirconia-based nanomaterials: challenges and future perspectives. Molecules 28 (14), 5428. 10.3390/molecules28145428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Barber J., Tran P. D. (2013). From natural to artificial photosynthesis. J. R. Soc. Interface 10 (81), 20120984. 10.1098/rsif.2012.0984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Barradas A. M. C., Yuan H., van Blitterswijk C., Habibovic P. (2010). Osteoinductive biomaterials: current knowledge of properties, experimental models and biological mechanisms. Eur. Cells and Materials 21, 407–429. 10.22203/ecm.v021a31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Barrett J. S., Wahl R. L., Wagner J. G., Brown R., Fisher S. J. (1990). Investigations into the route of uptake and pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneally-administered monoclonal antibodies: I. Transdiaphragmatic blockade of the terminal lymphatics in the rat. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 31 (6), 365–372. 10.1007/bf01741408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Barthlott W., Neinhuis C. (1997). Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 202, 1–8. 10.1007/s004250050096 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bhat S. S., Kim J. H., Karnik S., Bagheri M., Dasi L. P. (2025). Long-term mechanical durability of Inspiris RESILIA surgical aortic valves. Ann. Thorac. Surg. Short. Rep. 3 (2), 373–378. 10.1016/j.atssr.2024.11.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Boehm C. A., Donay C., Lubig A., Ruetten S., Sesa M., Fernández-Colino A., et al. (2023). Bio-Inspired fiber reinforcement for aortic valves: scaffold production process and characterization. Bioeng. (Basel) 10 (9), 1064. 10.3390/bioengineering10091064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bosshardt D. D., Chappuis V., Buser D. (2017). Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions. Periodontol. 73 (1), 22–40. 10.1111/prd.12179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bracha S., Johnson H. J., Pranckevicius N. A., Catto F., Economides A. E., Litvinov S., et al. (2024). Engineering Toxoplasma gondii secretion systems for intracellular delivery of multiple large therapeutic proteins to neurons. Nat. Microbiol. 9 (8), 2051–2072. 10.1038/s41564-024-01750-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bruckman M. A., Jiang K., Simpson E. J., Randolph L. N., Luyt L. G., Yu X., et al. (2014). Dual-modal magnetic resonance and fluorescence imaging of atherosclerotic plaques in vivo using VCAM-1 targeted tobacco mosaic virus. Nano Letters 14 (3), 1551–1558. 10.1021/nl404816m [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bui H. T., Khair N., Yeats B., Gooden S., James S. P., Dasi L. P. (2021). Transcatheter heart valves: a biomaterials perspective. Adv. Healthcare Materials 10 (15), 2100115. 10.1002/adhm.202100115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chai Y., Zhao H., Yang S., Gao X., Cao Z., Lu J., et al. (2022). Structural alignment guides oriented migration and differentiation of endogenous neural stem cells for neurogenesis in brain injury treatment. Biomaterials 280, 121310. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen H., Guo J., Wang y., Dong W., Zhao Y., Sun L. (2022). Bio‐inspired imprinting materials for biomedical applications. Adv. Sci. 9, e2202038. 10.1002/advs.202202038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen Y., Wang X., Tao S., Wang Q., Ma P., Li Z., et al. (2023). Research advances in smart responsive-hydrogel dressings with potential clinical diabetic wound healing properties. Mil. Med. Res. 10 (1), 37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen Y., Wu Q., Cao W., He H., Ding M., Zhou X., et al. (2025). Fiber-reinforced zwitterionic elastomer composites for artificial heart valves. J. Mater Chem. B, 13 (26), 7679–7690. 10.1039/d5tb00980d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen B., Ma N., He H., Wang L., Guo C., Butcher J. T., et al. (2026). Pro-regenerative anisotropic nanofiber heart valve scaffold by inducing directional cell growth. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 706, 139599. 10.1016/j.jcis.2025.139599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cheng R., Xu M., Zhang X., Jiang J., Zhang Q., Zhao Y. (2023). Hydrogen bonding enables polymer hydrogels with ph‐induced reversible dynamic responsive behaviors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (23), e202302900. 10.1186/s40779-023-00473-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Choi Y. N., Kim D., Lee S., Shin Y. R., Lee J. W. (2025). Quadruplet codon decoding-based versatile genetic biocontainment system. Nucleic Acids Res. 53 (1), gkae1292. 10.1093/nar/gkae1292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Cressman M. D., Hoogwerf B. J., Moodie D. S., Olin J. W., Weinstein C. E. (1988). HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Cleve Clin. J. Med. 55, 93–100. 10.1016/s0065-3233(01)56003-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Cui M., Wang X., An B., Zhang C., Gui X., Li K., et al. (2019). Exploiting mammalian low-complexity domains for liquid-liquid phase separation-driven underwater adhesive coatings. Sci. Adv. 5 (8), eaax3155. 10.1126/sciadv.aax3155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Das S. K., Parandhaman T., Dey M. D. (2021). Biomolecule-assisted synthesis of biomimetic nanocomposite hydrogel for hemostatic and wound healing applications. Green Chem. 23 (2), 629–669. 10.1039/D0GC03010D [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Dehaini D., Wei X., Fang R. H., Masson S., Angsantikul P., Luk B. T., et al. (2017). Erythrocyte–platelet hybrid membrane coating for enhanced nanoparticle functionalization. Adv. Mater. 29 (16), 1606209. 10.1002/adma.201606209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Deng T., Gao D., Song X., Zhou Z., Zhou L., Tao M., et al. (2023). A natural biological adhesive from snail mucus for wound repair. Nat. Commun. 14 (1), 396. 10.1038/s41467-023-35907-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Dong X., Pan P., Zheng D., Bao P., Zeng X., Zhang X. (2020). Bioinorganic hybrid bacteriophage for modulation of intestinal microbiota to remodel tumor-immune microenvironment against colorectal cancer. Sci. Adv. 6 (20), eaba1590. 10.1126/sciadv.aba1590 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Dorozhkin S. V. (2010). Bioceramics of calcium orthophosphates. Biomaterials 31 (7), 1465–1485. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Eberhard J. N., Shallberg L. A., Winn A., Chandrasekaran S., Giuliano C. J., Merritt E. F., et al. (2025). Immune targeting and host-protective effects of the latent stage of Toxoplasma gondii. Nat. Microbiol. 10 (4), 992–1005. 10.1038/s41564-025-01967-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Eder M., Amini S., Fratzl P. (2018). Biological composites-complex structures for functional diversity. SCIENCE 362 (6414), 543–547. 10.1126/science.aat8297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Elias C. N., Meirelles L. (2010). Improving osseointegration of dental implants. Expert Review Medical Devices 7 (2), 241–256. 10.1586/erd.09.74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Erfani A., Reichert P., Narasimhan C. N., Doyle P. S. (2023). Injectable hydrogel particles for amorphous solid formulation of biologics. Iscience 26 (8), 107452. 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Felfoul O., Mohammadi M., Taherkhani S., de Lanauze D., Zhong Xu Y., Loghin D., et al. (2016). Magneto-aerotactic bacteria deliver drug-containing nanoliposomes to tumour hypoxic regions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11 (11), 941–947. 10.1038/nnano.2016.137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Feller L., Jadwat Y., Khammissa R. A., Meyerov R., Schechter I., Lemmer J. (2015). Cellular responses evoked by different surface characteristics of intraosseous titanium implants. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 171945. 10.1155/2015/171945 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Fernandes J. S., Gentile P., Pires R. A., Reis R. L., Hatton P. V. (2017). Multifunctional bioactive glass and glass-ceramic biomaterials with antibacterial properties for repair and regeneration of bone tissue. Acta Biomater. 59, 2–11. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Freystetter B., Grab M., Grefen L., Bischof L., Isert L., Mela P., et al. (2022). Combining 3D-Printing and electrospinning to manufacture biomimetic heart valve leaflets. J. Vis. Exp. 181, e63604. 10.3791/63604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Fu F., Shang L., Chen Z., Yu Y., Zhao Y. (2018). Bioinspired living structural color hydrogels. Sci. Robotics 3 (16), eaar8580. 10.1126/scirobotics.aar8580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Gao L., Zhuang J., Nie L., Zhang J., Zhang Y., Gu N., et al. (2007). Intrinsic peroxidase-like activity of ferromagnetic nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnology 2 (9), 577–583. 10.1038/nnano.2007.260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gao F., Jiang H., Wang D., Wang S., Song W. (2024). Bio‐inspired magnetic‐responsive supramolecular‐covalent semi‐convertible hydrogel. Adv. Mater. 36 (29), 2401645. 10.1002/adma.202401645 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Garg A., Belarbi M.-O., Chalak H. D., Li L., Sharma A., Avcar M., et al. (2023). Buckling and free vibration analysis of bio-inspired laminated sandwich plates with helicoidal/Bouligand face sheets containing softcore. Ocean. Eng. 270, 113684. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113684 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. George S. M., Nayak C., Singh I., Balani K. (2022). Multifunctional hydroxyapatite composites for orthopedic applications: a review. ACS Biomaterials Sci. and Eng. 8 (8), 3162–3186. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ginebra M.-P., Espanol M., Maazouz Y., Bergez V., Pastorino D. (2018). Bioceramics and bone healing. EFORT Open Reviews 3 (5), 173–183. 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Goode D., Dhaliwal R., Schmidt J., Mequanint K., Mohammadi H. (2025). A novel approach to flow visualization through mechanical heart valves. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H. 239 (6), 584–590. 10.1177/09544119251342868 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Hench L. L., Paschall H. A. (1973). Direct chemical bond of bioactive glass‐ceramic materials to bone and muscle. J. Biomedical Materials Research 7 (3), 25–42. 10.1002/jbm.820070304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Hench L. L. (1988). Bioactive ceramics. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sciences 523 (1), 54–71. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb38500.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ho T. C., Chang C. C., Chan H. P., Chung T. W., Shu C. W., Chuang K. P., et al. (2022). Hydrogels: properties and applications in biomedicine. Molecules 27 (9), 2902. 10.3390/molecules27092902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Huang W., Zaheri A., Jung J. Y., Espinosa H. D., McKittrick J. (2017). Hierarchical structure and compressive deformation mechanisms of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) horn. Acta Biomater. 64, 1–14. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Huang L., Zhang S., Bian M., Xiang X., Xiao L., Wang J., et al. (2024). Injectable, anti-collapse, adhesive, plastic and bioactive bone graft substitute promotes bone regeneration by moderating oxidative stress in osteoporotic bone defect. Acta Biomater. 180, 82–103. 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.04.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Huhtamäki T., Tian X., Korhonen J. T., Ras R. H. A. (2018). Surface-wetting characterization using contact-angle measurements. Nat. Protoc. 13 (7), 1521–1538. 10.1038/s41596-018-0003-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Huss J. C., Schoeppler V., Merritt D. J., Best C., Maire E., Adrien J., et al. (2018). Climate-Dependent heat-triggered opening mechanism of banksia seed pods. Adv. Science Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Ger. 5 (1), 1700572. 10.1002/advs.201700572 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Hussein N., Voyer-Nguyen P., Portnoy S., Peel B., Schrauben E., Macgowan C., et al. (2020). Simulation of semilunar valve function: computer-aided design, 3D printing and flow assessment with MR. 3D Print Med. 6 (1), 2. 10.1186/s41205-020-0057-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Hwang Y. J., Myung H. (2020). Engineered bacteriophage T7 as a potent anticancer agent in vivo . Front. Microbiol. 11, 491001. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.491001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Ivanova E. P., Hasan J., Webb H. K., Gervinskas G., Juodkazis S., Truong V. K., et al. (2013). Bactericidal activity of black silicon. Nat. Commun. 4 (1), 2838. 10.1038/ncomms3838 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Jin S., Mia R., Newton M. A. A., Cheng H., Gao W., Zheng Y., et al. (2024). Nanofiber-reinforced self-healing polysaccharide-based hydrogel dressings for pH discoloration monitoring and treatment of infected wounds. Carbohydr. Polymers 339, 122209. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.122209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Karimi M., Mirshekari H., Basri S. M. M., Bahrami S., Moghoofei M., Hamblin M. R. (2016). Bacteriophages and phage-inspired nanocarriers for targeted delivery of therapeutic cargos. Adv. Drug Delivery Reviews 106 (Pt A), 45–62. 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Keppler A. M., Saller M. M., Alberton P., Westphal I., Heidenau F., Schönitzer V., et al. (2020). Bone defect reconstruction with a novel biomaterial containing calcium phosphate and aluminum oxide reinforcement. J. Orthopaedic Surgery Research 15 (1), 287. 10.1186/s13018-020-01801-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Kim W., Park J., Kim W., Jo S., Kim M., Kim C., et al. (2021). Bio-inspired Ag nanovilli-based sandwich-type SERS aptasensor for ultrasensitive and selective detection of 25-hydroxy vitamin D3. Biosens. Bioelectron. 188, 113341. 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Kong B., Liu R., Cheng Y., Shang Y., Zhang D., Gu H., et al. (2022). Structural color medical patch with surface dual‐properties of wet bioadhesion and slipperiness. Adv. Sci. 9 (31), 2203096. 10.1002/advs.202203096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Kopecek J. (2009). Hydrogels: from soft contact lenses and implants to self‐assembled nanomaterials. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 47 (22), 5929–5946. 10.1002/pola.23607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Kuang D., Lei Y., Yang L., Wang Y. (2020). Preclinical study of a self-expanding pulmonary valve for the treatment of pulmonary valve disease. Regen. Biomater. 7 (6), 609–618. 10.1093/rb/rbaa035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Lacefield W. R. (1988). Hydroxyapatite coatings. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sciences 523, 72–80. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb38501.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Lang N. P., Jepsen S., and Working Group 4 (2009). Implant surfaces and design (working group 4). Clin. Oral Implants Res. 20 (S4), 228–231. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01771.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Lee J. N., Lee S. Y., Park W. H. (2021). Bioinspired self-healable polyallylamine-based hydrogels for wet adhesion: synergistic contributions of catechol-amino functionalities and nanosilicate. ACS Appl. Mater. and Interfaces 13 (15), 18324–18337. 10.1021/acsami.1c02141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Lei Y., Bortolin L., Benesch-Lee F., Oguntolu T., Dong Z., Bondah N., et al. (2021). Hyaluronic acid regulates heart valve interstitial cell contraction in fibrin-based scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 136, 124–136. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.09.046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Li H., Jin K., Luo M., Wang X., Zhu X., Liu X., et al. (2019). Size dependency of circulation and biodistribution of biomimetic nanoparticles: red blood cell membrane-coated nanoparticles. Cells 8 (8), 881. 10.3390/cells8080881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Li F., Ye L., Zhang L., Li X., Liu X., Zhu J., et al. (2022a). Design of a genetically programmed barnacle-curli inspired living-cell bioadhesive. Mater Today Bio 14, 100256. 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Li W., Zhang Z., Liu J., Wang B., Pu G., Li J., et al. (2022b). Nanodrug-loaded Bifidobacterium bifidum conjugated with anti-death receptor antibody for tumor-targeted photodynamic and sonodynamic synergistic therapy. Acta Biomater. 146, 341–356. 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.05.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Li Y., Wang Y., Shen Z., Miao F., Wang J., Sun Y., et al. (2022c). A biodegradable magnesium alloy vascular stent structure: design, optimisation and evaluation. Acta Biomater. 142, 402–412. 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.01.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Li Z., Uno N., Ding X., Avery L., Banach D., Liu C. (2023). Bioinspired CRISPR-mediated cascade reaction biosensor for molecular detection of HIV using a glucose meter. ACS Nano 17 (4), 3966–3975. 10.1021/acsnano.2c12754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Li D., Tohti M., Fu Y., Zhang Y., Xiong Z., Li J., et al. (2024). Aldehyde group pendant-grafted pectin-based injectable hydrogel. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 264 (Pt 1), 130453. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.130453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Liao J., Gong L., Xu Q., Wang J., Yang Y., Zhang S., et al. (2024). Revolutionizing neurocare: biomimetic nanodelivery via cell membranes. Adv. Mater. 36 (26), 2402445. 10.1002/adma.202402445 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Lin F., Zhu Y., You Z., Li W., Chen J., Zheng X., et al. (2023). Ultrastrong and tough urushiol-based ionic conductive double network hydrogels as flexible strain sensors. Polymers 15 (15), 3219. 10.3390/polym15153219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Liu H., Liu S., Jiao J., Lu T. J., Xu F. (2017). Trichomes as a natural biophysical barrier for plants and their bioinspired applications. Soft Matter 13 (30), 5096–5106. 10.1039/c7sm00622e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Liu Y., Zheng J., Zhang X., Du Y., Li K., Yu G., et al. (2021). Mussel-inspired and aromatic disulfide-mediated polyurea-urethane with rapid self-healing performance and water-resistance. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 593, 105–115. 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Liu H., Zhang X., Xu N., Han C., Wu N., Wang B., et al. (2024). Progress of one-dimensional SiC nanomaterials: design, fabrication and sensing applications. Nanomaterials 14 (2), 187. 10.3390/nano14020187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Long L., Lim E. W. L., Sun Z., Wang J., Tay T. E., Tan V. B. C. (2022). Improving strength and impact resistance of 3D printed components with helicoidal printing direction. Int. J. Impact Eng. 169, 104320. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104320 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  81. Lu G., Wang X., Li F., Wang S., Zhao J., Wang J., et al. (2022). Engineered biomimetic nanoparticles achieve targeted delivery and efficient metabolism-based synergistic therapy against glioblastoma. Nat. Commun. 13 (1), 4214. 10.1038/s41467-022-31799-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Lutter G., Schütrumpf J., Seiler J. A., Jesaitis L., Schneider V., Kersten H., et al. (2026). Improved surface properties and enhanced cell adhesion on Poly-ε-Caprolactone for heart valve tissue engineering applications via H(2)-N(2) plasma treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 27 (4), 1957. 10.3390/ijms27041957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Lv Y., Wang B., Liu G., Tang Y., Lu E., Xie K., et al. (2021). Metal material, properties and design methods of porous biomedical scaffolds for additive manufacturing: a review. Front. Bioengineering Biotechnology 9, 641130. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.641130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Mao P., Jin M., Li W., Zhang H., Li H., Li S., et al. (2025). In silico trials of prosthetic valves replicate methodologies for evaluating the fatigue life of artificial leaflets to expand beyond in vitro tests and conventional clinical trials. Biomedicines 13 (5), 1135. 10.3390/biomedicines13051135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Marijon E., Mirabel M., Celermajer D. S., Jouven X. (2012). Rheumatic heart disease. Lancet 379 (9819), 953–964. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61171-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Marino S., Alheijailan R., Alonaizan R., Gabetti S., Massai D., Pesce M. (2025). Cardiac tissue bioprinting: integrating structure and functions through biomimetic design, bioinks, and stimulation. Gels 11 (8), 593. 10.3390/gels11080593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Martin C., Sun W. (2017). Transcatheter valve underexpansion limits leaflet durability: implications for valve-in-valve procedures. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 45 (2), 394–404. 10.1007/s10439-016-1738-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Matsuda A., Sato J. i., Yasunaga H., Osada Y. (1994). Order-disorder transition of a hydrogel containing an n-alkyl acrylate. Macromolecules 27 (26), 7695–7698. 10.1021/ma00104a027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  89. Mehta P., Sharma M., Devi M. (2023). Hydrogels: an overview of its classifications, properties, and applications. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 147, 106145. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Meng M., Wang J., Huang H., Liu X., Zhang J., Li Z. (2023a). 3D printing metal implants in orthopedic surgery: methods, applications and future prospects. J. Orthop. Transl. 42, 94–112. 10.1016/j.jot.2023.08.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Meng X. S., Zhou L. C., Liu L., Zhu Y. B., Meng Y. F., Zheng D. C., et al. (2023b). Deformable hard tissue with high fatigue resistance in the Hinge of bivalve Cristaria plicata. SCIENCE 380 (6651), 1252–1257. 10.1126/science.ade2038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Mohandas A., Kumar S., Raja B., Lakshmanan V.-K., Jayakumar R. (2019). Exploration of alginate hydrogel/nano zinc oxide composite bandages for infected wounds [Corrigendum]. Int. J. Nanomedicine 14, 2607–2608. 10.2147/IJN.S79981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Munir M. U., Salman S., Javed I., Bukhari S. N. A., Ahmad N., Shad N. A., et al. (2021). Nano-hydroxyapatite as a delivery system: overview and advancements. Artif. Cells, Nanomedicine, Biotechnol. 49 (1), 717–727. 10.1080/21691401.2021.2016785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Nagasawa M., Cooper L. F., Ogino Y., Mendonca D., Liang R., Yang S., et al. (2016). Topography influences adherent cell regulation of osteoclastogenesis. J. Dent. Res. 95 (3), 319–326. 10.1177/0022034515616760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Navarro M., del Valle S., Martínez S., Zeppetelli S., Ambrosio L., Planell J. A., et al. (2004). New macroporous calcium phosphate glass ceramic for guided bone regeneration. Biomaterials 25 (18), 4233–4241. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Olad A., Pourkhiyabi M., Gharekhani H., Doustdar F. (2018). Semi-IPN superabsorbent nanocomposite based on sodium alginate and montmorillonite: reaction parameters and swelling characteristics. Carbohydr. Polymers 190, 295–306. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.02.088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Pang Q., Lou D., Li S., Wang G., Qiao B., Dong S., et al. (2020). Smart flexible electronics‐integrated wound dressing for real‐time monitoring and on‐demand treatment of infected wounds. Adv. Sci. 7 (6), 1902673. 10.1002/advs.201902673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Pang Q., Hu H., Zhang H., Qiao B., Ma L. (2022). Temperature-responsive ionic conductive hydrogel for strain and temperature sensors. ACS Appl. Mater. and Interfaces 14 (23), 26536–26547. 10.1021/acsami.2c06952 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Park H., Chai K., Kim W., Park J., Lee W., Park J. (2023). Asterias forbesi-inspired SERS substrates for wide-range detection of uric acid. Biosensors 14 (1), 8. 10.3390/bios14010008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Peng Z., Li Z., Shen Y. (2012). Influence of chemical cross-linking on properties of gelatin/chitosan microspheres. Polymer-Plastics Technol. Eng. 51 (4), 381–385. 10.1080/03602559.2011.639830 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  101. Petrone L., Kumar A., Sutanto C. N., Patil N. J., Kannan S., Palaniappan A., et al. (2015). Mussel adhesion is dictated by time-regulated secretion and molecular conformation of mussel adhesive proteins. Nat. Commun. 6, 8737. 10.1038/ncomms9737 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Petrov G., Dymova M., Richter V. (2022). Bacteriophage-mediated cancer gene therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23 (22), 14245. 10.3390/ijms232214245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Pogodin S., Hasan J., Baulin V. A., Webb H. K., Truong V. K., Boshkovikj V., et al. (2013). Biophysical model of bacterial cell interactions with nanopatterned cicada wing surfaces. Biophysical Journal 104 (4), 835–840. 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.12.046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Ponnaluri S. V., Sacks M. S., Manning K. B. (2023). The accelerated transcatheter heart valve testing environment: Loading, motion, and fluid dynamics. J. Biomechanical Eng. 145 (3), 031005. 10.1115/1.4056291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Prabhu N. K., Aykut B., Mensah-Mamfo M., Overbey D. M., Turek J. W. (2025). Partial heart transplantation: early experience with pediatric heart valve replacements that grow. Circulation 151 (20), 1477–1490. 10.1161/circulationaha.124.072626 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Priemel T., Degtyar E., Dean M. N., Harrington M. J. (2017). Rapid self-assembly of complex biomolecular architectures during mussel byssus biofabrication. Nat. Commun. 8, 14539. 10.1038/ncomms14539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Qiu X., Li G., Wan W., Li J., Yan G., Wang S., et al. (2026). Targeted 2-Deoxy-D-Ribose delivery by biomimetic nanoplatform activates EGFR for accelerated heart valve endothelialization. Adv. Science Weinheim 13 (6), e14170. 10.1002/advs.202514170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Ran C., Wang J., He Y., Ren Q., Hu H., Zhu J., et al. (2022). Recent advances in bioinspired hydrogels with environment‐responsive characteristics for biomedical applications. Macromol. Biosci. 22, 2100474. 10.1002/mabi.202100474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Raza F., Zafar H., Jiang L., Su J., Yuan W., Qiu M., et al. (2024). Progress of cell membrane-derived biomimetic nanovesicles for cancer phototherapy. Biomaterials Sci. 12 (1), 57–91. 10.1039/d3bm01170d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Rivera J., Hosseini M. S., Restrepo D., Murata S., Vasile D., Parkinson D. Y., et al. (2020). Toughening mechanisms of the elytra of the diabolical ironclad beetle. Nature 586 (7830), 543–548. 10.1038/s41586-020-2813-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Rotman O. M., Kovarovic B., Bianchi M., Slepian M. J., Bluestein D. (2020). In vitro durability and stability testing of a novel polymeric transcatheter aortic valve. ASAIO J. 66 (2), 190–198. 10.1097/mat.0000000000000980 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Saeed R. F., Awan U. A., Saeed S., Mumtaz S., Akhtar N., Aslam S. (2023). “Targeted therapy and personalized medicine,”Cancer Treat. Res. 185, 177–205. 10.1007/978-3-031-27156-4_10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Sajjadi M., Nasrollahzadeh M., Sattari M. R., Ghafuri H., Jaleh B. (2024). Sulfonic acid functionalized cellulose-derived (nano) materials: synthesis and application. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 328, 103158. 10.1016/j.cis.2024.103158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Saleemi S., Aouraghe M. A., Wei X., Liu W., Liu L., Siyal M. I., et al. (2022). Bio-inspired hierarchical carbon nanotube yarn with ester bond cross-linkages towards high conductivity for multifunctional applications. Nanomater. (Basel) 12 (2), 208. 10.3390/nano12020208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Sarkar K. (2024). Research progress on biodegradable magnesium phosphate ceramics in orthopaedic application. J. Mater. Chem. B 12 (35), 8605–8615. 10.1039/D4TB01123F [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Sennewald C., Pilgrim J., Aibibu D., Gereke T., Schegner P., Cherif C. (2025). Woven solutions for tissue engineering: next-generation heart valves from fiber to function. Am. Heart J. Plus 59, 100604. 10.1016/j.ahjo.2025.100604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Sethu S. N., Namashivayam S., Devendran S., Nagarajan S., Tsai W.-B., Narashiman S., et al. (2017). Nanoceramics on osteoblast proliferation and differentiation in bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 98, 67–74. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.01.089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Shchelik I. S., Molino J. V. D., Gademann K. (2021). Biohybrid microswimmers against bacterial infections. Acta Biomater. 136, 99–110. 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.09.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Sheikh Z., Zhang Y. L., Grover L., Merle G. E., Tamimi F., Barralet J. (2015). In vitro degradation and in vivo resorption of dicalcium phosphate cement based grafts. Acta Biomater. 26, 338–346. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.08.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Shi S., Xu T., Wang D., Oeser M. (2020). The difference in molecular orientation and interphase structure of SiO2/shape memory polyurethane in original, programmed and recovered states during shape memory process. Polymers 12 (9), 1994. 10.3390/polym12091994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Sivakumar P. M., Yetisgin A. A., Demir E., Sahin S. B., Cetinel S. (2023). Polysaccharide-bioceramic composites for bone tissue engineering: a review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 250, 126237. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.126237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Snyder Y., Jana S. (2023). Strategies for development of synthetic heart valve tissue engineering scaffolds. Prog. Mater Sci. 139, 101173. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Souza J. C. M., Sordi M. B., Kanazawa M., Ravindran S., Henriques B., Silva F. S., et al. (2019). Nano-scale modification of titanium implant surfaces to enhance osseointegration. Acta Biomater. 94, 112–131. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Squire K. J., Zhao Y., Tan A., Sivashanmugan K., Kraai J. A., Rorrer G. L., et al. (2019). Photonic crystal-enhanced fluorescence imaging immunoassay for cardiovascular disease biomarker screening with machine learning analysis. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 290, 118–124. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.03.102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Su B., Gong S., Ma Z., Yap L. W., Cheng W. (2015). Mimosa-inspired design of a flexible pressure sensor with touch sensitivity. Small 11 (16), 1886–1891. 10.1002/smll.201403036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Su Y., Luo C., Zhang Z., Hermawan H., Zhu D., Huang J., et al. (2018). Bioinspired surface functionalization of metallic biomaterials. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 77, 90–105. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Tabrizian P., Sun H., Jargalsaikhan U., Sui T., Davis S., Su B. (2023). Biomimetic nacre-like hydroxyapatite/polymer composites for bone implants. J. Functional Biomaterials 14 (8), 393. 10.3390/jfb14080393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Taherkhani S., Mohammadi M., Daoud J., Martel S., Tabrizian M. (2014). Covalent binding of nanoliposomes to the surface of magnetotactic bacteria for the synthesis of self-propelled therapeutic agents. ACS Nano 8 (5), 5049–5060. 10.1021/nn5011304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Tanner K. E. (2010). Bioactive ceramic-reinforced composites for bone augmentation. J. R. Soc. Interface 7 (Suppl. l_5), S541–S557. 10.1098/rsif.2010.0229.focus [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Tschorn P., Schröter F., Hartrumpf M., Kühnel R. U., Ostovar R., Albes J. M. (2022). Engineering a new polymeric heart valve using 3D Printing-TRISKELION. Med. Kaunas. 58 (11), 1695. 10.3390/medicina58111695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Valiei A., Lin N., McKay G., Nguyen D., Moraes C., Hill R. J., et al. (2022). Surface wettability is a key feature in the mechano-bactericidal activity of nanopillars. ACS Appl. Mater. and Interfaces 14 (24), 27564–27574. 10.1021/acsami.2c03258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Van Staden A. D. P., Visser J. G., Powrie Y. S. L., Smith C. (2024). Harnessing microbial effectors for macrophage-mediated drug delivery. ACS Omega 9 (16), 18260–18272. 10.1021/acsomega.3c10519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. von Doernberg M.-C., von Rechenberg B., Bohner M., Grünenfelder S., van Lenthe G. H., Müller R., et al. (2006). In vivo behavior of calcium phosphate scaffolds with four different pore sizes. Biomaterials 27 (30), 5186–5198. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Wall D. M., Srikanth C. V., McCormick B. A. (2010). Targeting tumors with salmonella Typhimurium-potential for therapy. Oncotarget 1 (8), 721–728. 10.18632/oncotarget.206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Wan M., Hu D., Pei B. (2022). Performance of 3D-Printed bionic conch-like composite plate under low-velocity impact. Mater. (Basel) 15 (15), 5201. 10.3390/ma15155201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Wang Y., Zhang Z., Chen H., Zhang H., Zhang H., Zhao Y. (2022). Bio-inspired shape-memory structural color hydrogel film. Sci. Bull. 67 (5), 512–519. 10.1016/j.scib.2021.10.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Wang W., Yu W., Li G., Huang H., Song X., Yu L., et al. (2023). Engineering versatile nano-bacteria hybrids for efficient tumor therapy. Coord. Chem. Rev. 488, 215178. 10.1016/j.ccr.2023.215178 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  138. Wang J., Zhang L., Wang K. (2024). Bioactive ceramic-based materials: beneficial properties and potential applications in dental repair and regeneration. Regen. Med. 19 (5), 257–278. 10.1080/17460751.2024.2343555 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Weaver J. C., Milliron G. W., Miserez A., Evans-Lutterodt K., Herrera S., Gallana I., et al. (2012). The stomatopod dactyl club: a formidable damage-tolerant biological hammer. SCIENCE 336 (6086), 1275–1280. 10.1126/science.1218764 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Wu T., Yu S., Chen D., Wang Y. (2017). Bionic design, materials and performance of bone tissue scaffolds. Materials 10 (10), 1187. 10.3390/ma10101187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Wu H., Wei X., Liu Y., Dong H., Tang Z., Wang N., et al. (2023). Dynamic degradation patterns of porous polycaprolactone/β-tricalcium phosphate composites orchestrate macrophage responses and immunoregulatory bone regeneration. Bioact. Mater 21, 595–611. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.07.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Xu H., Medina-Sánchez M., Zhang W., Seaton M. P. H., Brison D. R., Edmondson R. J., et al. (2020). Human spermbots for patient-representative 3D ovarian cancer cell treatment. Nanoscale 12 (39), 20467–20481. 10.1039/d0nr04488a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Xu C., Pan Y., Zhang H., Sun Y., Cao Y., Qi P., et al. (2023). Platelet‐membrane‐coated polydopamine nanoparticles for neuroprotection by reducing oxidative stress and repairing damaged vessels in intracerebral hemorrhage. Adv. Healthcare Materials 12 (26), 2300797. 10.1002/adhm.202300797 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Yacoub M. H., Tseng Y. T., Kluin J., Vis A., Stock U., Smail H., et al. (2023). Valvulogenesis of a living, innervated pulmonary root induced by an acellular scaffold. Commun. Biol. 6 (1), 1017. 10.1038/s42003-023-05383-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Yan W., Lian Y. J., Zhang Z. Y., Zeng M. Q., Zhang Z. Q., Yin Z. Z., et al. (2020). In vitro degradation of pure magnesium-the synergetic influences of glucose and albumin. Bioact. Mater 5 (2), 318–333. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.02.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Yang S., Sheffer M., Kaplan I. E., Wang Z., Tarannum M., Dinh K., et al. (2024). Nonpathogenic E. coli engineered to surface display cytokines as a new platform for immunotherapy. Res. Square 3. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4031911/v1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  147. Yang X., Chen Y., Wu Q., Yang H., Duan G., Fu Q., et al. (2025). Electrospun anisotropic fiber reinforced composites for artificial heart valves. J. Mater Chem. B 13 (12), 3918–3929. 10.1039/d4tb02329c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Yin K., Wang L., Deng Q., Huang Q., Jiang J., Li G., et al. (2022). Femtosecond laser thermal accumulation-triggered micro-/nanostructures with patternable and controllable wettability towards liquid manipulating. Nano-Micro Lett. 14 (1), 97. 10.1007/s40820-022-00840-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Yu D., Lei X., Zhu H. (2022). Modification of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) physical features to improve osteointegration. J. Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B 23 (3), 189–203. 10.1631/jzus.B2100622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Yuan N., Shao K., Huang S., Chen C. (2023). Chitosan, alginate, hyaluronic acid and other novel multifunctional hydrogel dressings for wound healing: a review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 240, 124321. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Zain G., Nada A. A., El-Sheikh M. A., Attaby F. A., Waly A. I. (2018). Superabsorbent hydrogel based on sulfonated-starch for improving water and saline absorbency. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 115, 61–68. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.04.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Zamani A., Taherzadeh M. J. (2010). Effects of partial dehydration and freezing temperature on the morphology and water binding capacity of carboxymethyl chitosan-based superabsorbents. Industrial and Eng. Chem. Res. 49 (17), 8094–8099. 10.1021/ie100257s [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  153. Zhang H., Han D., Yan Q., Fortin D., Xia H., Zhao Y. (2014a). Light-healable hard hydrogels through photothermally induced melting–crystallization phase transition. J. Mater. Chem. A 2 (33), 13373–13379. 10.1039/C4TA02463J [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  154. Zhang J., Luo X., Barbieri D., Barradas A. M. C., de Bruijn J. D., Van Blitterswijk C. A., et al. (2014b). The size of surface microstructures as an osteogenic factor in calcium phosphate ceramics. Acta Biomater. 10 (7), 3254–3263. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Zhang H., Guo J., Wang Y., Sun L., Zhao Y. (2021). Stretchable and conductive composite structural color hydrogel films as bionic electronic skins. Adv. Sci. 8 (20), 2102156. 10.1002/advs.202102156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Zhang L., Liu G., Guo Y., Wang Y., Zhang D., Chen H. (2022a). Bioinspired functional surfaces for medical devices. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 35 (1), 43. 10.1186/s10033-022-00708-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  157. Zhang T., Wang W., Liu J., Wang L., Tang Y., Wang K. (2022b). A review on magnesium alloys for biomedical applications. Front. Bioengineering Biotechnology 10, 953344. 10.3389/fbioe.2022.953344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Zhang Y., Li J., Habibovic P. (2022c). Magnetically responsive nanofibrous ceramic scaffolds for on-demand motion and drug delivery. Bioact. Mater. 15, 372–381. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.02.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Zhang Q., Zhang C., Li Y., Zhang X., Tian D., Jiang L. (2024). Self-repairing humidity-adjustable anisotropic adhesion switch for smart manipulation. ACS Nano 18 (29), 19324–19331. 10.1021/acsnano.4c05747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Zhang W. (2022). A novel ceramic with low friction and wear toward tribological applications: Boron carbide-silicon carbide. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 301, 102604. 10.1016/j.cis.2022.102604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Zhao R., Liang H., Clarke E., Jackson C., Xue M. (2016). Inflammation in chronic wounds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17 (12), 2085. 10.3390/ijms17122085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Zhao Y., Du X., Jiang L., Luo H., Wang F., Wang J., et al. (2020). Glucose oxidase-loaded antimicrobial peptide hydrogels: potential dressings for diabetic wound. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 20 (4), 2087–2094. 10.1166/jnn.2020.17189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Zhu Y., Wang C. J., Mynors D. (2016). Applications and engineering analysis of lotus roots under external water pressure. Appl. Bionics Biomechanics 2016 (1), 2386982. 10.1155/2016/2386982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Zimmermann E. A., Schaible E., Gludovatz B., Schmidt F. N., Riedel C., Krause M., et al. (2016). Intrinsic mechanical behavior of femoral cortical bone in young, osteoporotic and bisphosphonate-treated individuals in low- and high energy fracture conditions. Sci. Rep. 6, 21072. 10.1038/srep21072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Zong Y., Zong B., Zha R., Zhang Y., Li X., Wang Y., et al. (2023). An antibacterial and anti‐oxidative hydrogel dressing for promoting diabetic wound healing and real‐time monitoring wound pH conditions with a NIR fluorescent imaging system. Adv. Healthcare Materials 12 (24), 2300431. 10.1002/adhm.202300431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Zou Y., Sun Y., Wang Y., Zhang D., Yang H., Wang X., et al. (2023). Cancer cell-mitochondria hybrid membrane coated gboxin loaded nanomedicines for glioblastoma treatment. Nat. Commun. 14 (1), 4557. 10.1038/s41467-023-40280-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES