Skip to main content
PMC home page
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1989 May;79(5):607–612. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.5.607

The effect of occupational, marital and parental roles on mortality: the Alameda County Study.

P Kotler 1, D L Wingard 1
PMCID: PMC1349503  PMID: 2705597

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of combining marital, parental, and occupational roles upon 18-year risk of mortality from all causes. The respondents were 3,700 participants in the Human Population Laboratory cohort ages 35-64 who completed a comprehensive health and psychosocial questionnaire in 1965 and were followed for mortality status through 1982. Employment status and type of employment were not found to predict mortality risk among women. Contrary to the multiple roles hypothesis, there was virtually no impact upon mortality of increasing numbers of children among employed women, except possibly among single working parents. The major impact of children was felt by housewives who had significantly elevated risks when a child was present in the home or when they had four or more children. Neither the number of children nor the presence of a child in the home affected mortality risk of men. Controlling for a variety of factors thought to be related to mortality in a logistic regression analysis did not change the foregoing relation.

Full text

PDF
607

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beard C. M., Fuster V., Annegers J. F. Reproductive history in women with coronary heart disease. A case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Jul;120(1):108–114. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Belloc N. B., Arellano M. G. Computer record linkage on a survey population. Health Serv Rep. 1973 Apr;88(4):344–350. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gore S., Mangione T. W. Social roles, sex roles and psychological distress: additive and interactive models of sex differences. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):300–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Haynes S. G., Eaker E. D., Feinleib M. Spouse behavior and coronary heart disease in men: prospective results from the Framingham heart study. I. Concordance of risk factors and the relationship of psychosocial status to coronary incidence. Am J Epidemiol. 1983 Jul;118(1):1–22. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Haynes S. G., Feinleib M. Women, work and coronary heart disease: prospective findings from the Framingham heart study. Am J Public Health. 1980 Feb;70(2):133–141. doi: 10.2105/ajph.70.2.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Johnson C. L., Johnson F. A. Attitudes toward parenting in dual-career families. Am J Psychiatry. 1977 Apr;134(4):391–395. doi: 10.1176/ajp.134.4.391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lewis C. E., Lewis M. A. The potential impact of sexual equality on health. N Engl J Med. 1977 Oct 20;297(16):863–869. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197710202971605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. MANTEL N., HAENSZEL W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959 Apr;22(4):719–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Marcus A. C., Seeman T. E. Sex differences in reports of illness and disability: a preliminary test of the "fixed role obligations" hypothesis. J Health Soc Behav. 1981 Jun;22(2):174–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nathanson C. A. Social roles and health status among women: the significance of employment. Soc Sci Med Med Psychol Med Sociol. 1980 Dec;14A(6):463–471. doi: 10.1016/0160-7979(80)90045-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Verbrugge L. M., Madans J. H. Social roles and health trends of American women. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1985 Fall;63(4):691–735. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Verbrugge L. M. Physical health of clerical workers in the U.S., Framingham, and Detroit. Women Health. 1984 Spring;9(1):17–41. doi: 10.1300/J013v09n01_03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Verbrugge L. M. Recent trends in sex mortality differentials in the United States. Women Health. 1980 Fall;5(3):17–37. doi: 10.1300/j013v05n03_03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Verbrugge L. M. Work satisfaction and physical health. J Community Health. 1982 Summer;7(4):262–283. doi: 10.1007/BF01318959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Waldron I. Why do women liver longer than men? J Human Stress. 1976 Mar;2(1):2–13. doi: 10.1080/0097840X.1976.9937484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wingard D. L. The sex differential in morbidity, mortality, and lifestyle. Annu Rev Public Health. 1984;5:433–458. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.05.050184.002245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wingard D. L. The sex differential in mortality rates: demographic and behavioral factors. Am J Epidemiol. 1982 Feb;115(2):205–216. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Woods N. F., Hulka B. S. Symptom reports and illness behavior among employed women and homemakers. J Community Health. 1979 Fall;5(1):36–45. doi: 10.1007/BF01321569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES