Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1989 Mar;79(3):332–333. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.3.332

Coverage gaps in seat belt use laws.

J K Wells 1, A F Williams 1, M Fields 1
PMCID: PMC1349560  PMID: 2916722

Abstract

Some seat belt use laws exempt occupants in certain seating positions and in certain types of vehicles, or both. A state-by-state analysis was conducted of the extent to which passenger vehicle occupants killed before the laws went into effect would have been covered by the laws subsequently passed. Only five states had laws that covered all passenger vehicle occupants; the majority excluded 4 to 8 per cent and six states excluded 14 per cent or more. More inclusive laws can reduce injuries and save lives.

Full text

PDF
332

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Lund A. K., Pollner J., Williams A. F. Preliminary estimates of the effects of mandatory seat belt use laws. Accid Anal Prev. 1987 Jun;19(3):219–223. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(87)90005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Teret S. P., Jones A. S., Williams A. F., Wells J. K. Child restraint laws: an analysis of gaps in coverage. Am J Public Health. 1986 Jan;76(1):31–34. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.1.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES