Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2026 Aug 10;148(32):34058–34065. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6c09867

Geminal Difunctionalizations of Aliphatic Ketones and Aldehydes Enabled by Thioacetal Activation and Deep Electroreduction

Nicholas I Cemalovic †,‡, Andrew J Ressler †, Ruchira S Hariharan †, Samantha N MacMillan †, Song Lin †,‡,*
PMCID: PMC13495754  PMID: 42619154

Abstract

In this work, we identify dithioacetals as synthetically accessible, redox-active, and traceless activating groups that enable the electroreductive transformation of aliphatic ketones and aldehydes. This strategy effectively converts these carbonyl compounds into dianion equivalents to undergo deoxygenative gem-difunctionalization with various electrophiles. Faradaic control was achieved over reaction chemoselectivity, allowing for the combinatorial construction of densely functionalized silanes, boronates, and germanes.


graphic file with name ja6c09867_0009.webp


Carbonyls are prevalent functional groups in nature and ubiquitous across commodity chemicals, materials, and pharmaceuticals. Their central role as synthetic linchpins has profoundly shaped the development of organic synthesis. Canonical carbonyl functionalization reactionsincluding Grignard additions, Wittig olefinations, and metal hydride reductionsremain among the most widely practiced synthetic operations. In contrast, far fewer methods enable the net deoxygenative geminal difunctionalization of carbonyl compounds, a strategy that would convert planar carbonyl motifs into densely substituted, electronically distinct C­(sp3)-centers. Such methods would provide direct access to diverse chemical space from abundant carbonyl feedstocks, with broad implications for synthetic and medicinal chemistry.

Existing approaches for carbonyl difunctionalization most often treat carbonyl compounds either as formal dications undergoing successive nucleophilic addition or as dipolar synthons that engage in both nucleophilic addition and electrophilic trapping (Scheme A). By contrast, an umpolung strategy that renders carbonyls as formal dianions capable of successive electrophilic substitution would unlock fundamentally new disconnections. Recent contributions from König, Li, and our laboratory have established methods to generate a carbanion equivalent from carbonyl-derived intermediates by means of metal catalysis, photochemistry, or electrochemistry, enabling monofunctionalization (Scheme B, upper). Given the instability of unconjugated carbanions, existing methods primarily focus on the transformation of conjugated carbonyl compounds, with few examples capable of converting ketones to the corresponding carbanions. Moreover, a strategy enabling carbonyl groups to serve as dianion equivalents via successive activations has not yet been realized.

1. Background and Proposed Transformation.

1

Recently, our group reported the net difunctionalization of unactivated aldehydes and ketones through cyanophosphate activation, wherein cyanohydrin O-phosphates undergo cathodic reduction to generate stabilized nitrile anions competent in coupling with a second electrophile (Scheme B, lower). Consequently, this strategy requires installation of an anion-stabilizing group to facilitate successive electroreduction, incorporating the cyano group into the product. The substrate scope and accessible products are therefore intrinsically linked to the activation mode. To decouple the activation strategy from the synthetic target, we sought to develop an electroreductive cross-electrophile coupling platform that employs a traceless carbonyl activation mode capable of sustaining iterative reduction, enabling a diverse scope of geminal difunctionalizations of electronically unactivated ketones and aldehydes (Scheme C).

To this end, we first evaluated a series of aldehyde derivatives in a model electroreductive gem-disilylation reaction (Scheme ). Electrolysis of native benzaldehyde (A1) delivered gem-disilane 1 in only 24% yield, with significant competitive pinacol coupling observed. In contrast, both cyclic and acyclic acetal derivatives (C1–E1) afforded 1 in improved yield (61–76%). We also investigated dithioacetal analogs (B1 and F1) and identified thiophenol-derived F1 as the optimal substrate, giving rise to 1 in quantitative yield. Notably, we found that this activation strategy was also applicable to electronically unactivated 3-phenylpropionaldehyde. Under the same conditions, all derivatives (A2–E2) furnished gem-disilane 2 in poor yield (5–19%) with the exception of thiophenol derivative F2, which furnished 2 in 77% yield.

2. Activation Strategy.

2

a Yields determined by 1H NMR of crude reaction mixtures. TPPA, tris­(pyrrol­idino)­phos­phor­amide.

Dithioacetals are bench-stable compounds that are commonly used as protecting groups for aldehydes and ketones. They are conveniently prepared via a single condensation step, which we later demonstrate can be performed in situ before applying electrolysis. Dithioacetals are often employed in umpolung-type alkylation reactions due to their ability to stabilize α-anionic intermediates. This stabilization is attributed to strong polarization and hyperconjugation. In addition, C–S bonds in thioethers are generally considered to be reductively labile owing to the low-lying σ* C–S, which have been shown to cleave to form stabilized carbanions using stoichiometric metal reductants or electrochemistry from electronically activated substrates (e.g., benzylic thioethers). These features make dithioacetals ideal activating groups for the desired deoxygenative difunctionalization of carbonyl compounds, allowing for successive reductive C–S cleavage and substitution. This strategy overcomes the need for native anion-stabilizing groups such as aryl, vinyl, or cyano, substantially expanding the scope of suitable substrates.

To enhance the operational simplicity, we develop a streamlined one-pot sequence to generate gem-disilane products directly from commercially available carbonyls (Scheme ). Using THF as solvent and Me3SiOTf as the catalyst, benzaldehyde afforded dithioacetal rapidly using 2.2 equiv PhSSiMe3 donor, whereas longer reaction times were required for aliphatic aldehydes as well as ketones. Upon addition of trimethylsilyl chloride (TMSCl), direct electrolysis of the resultant mixture afforded the desired benzylic gem-disilane 1 in 93% yield.

3. Disilylation Reaction Using In Situ Activation.

3

a Reaction using isolated dithioacetal. Isolated yields are reported in this scheme, with 1H NMR yields denoted with parentheses.

We then carried this one-pot disilylation using a panel of carbonyl-containing compounds. Cyclic and acyclic aliphatic ketones afforded gem-disilanes 3 and 4 in 70% and 89% yield, respectively. Benzaldehyde derivatives containing N-methyl-indole (5), carbamate (6), ferrocene (7), and trimethoxy aryl ether (8) functionalities were suitable substrates as well. Notably, disilane 8, which was isolated in 60% yield, was used by O’Shea in a diastereoselective olefination to complete the synthesis of marine natural product combretastatin A4 and investigational compound DMU-212 by leveraging the reactivity of in situ generated α-silyl carbanions. Using modified conditions disclosed by Bandar, we also achieved three-component coupling of disilane 8 to afford polyfunctionalized pyridine 9 in 21% yield.

We propose the following stepwise activation pathway for the disilylation (Scheme A, Y = SPh). First, dithioacetal I-A undergoes reductive cleavage of the C–S bond to unveil α-S-stabilized radical I-A-I. This radical is further reduced to α-S-stabilized anion I-A-II, which reacts with a silyl electrophile to generate II-B. Subsequent reductive cleavage of the remaining C–S bond and radical-polar crossover affords a α-Si-stabilized carbanion II-B-II, which can be trapped by a second equivalent of silyl electrophile to afford the gem-difunctionalized product II-C.

4. Mechanistic Proposal and Reaction Progress Analysis.

4

a Assay yield determined by GC-FID. Reduction potentials determined by square wave voltammetry.

To further investigate the stepwise desulfurative cross coupling of dithioacetals with TMSCl, cyclic and square wave voltammetry were conducted; dithioacetal F1 was shown to be reduced at −2.1 V (current onset potential vs Fc/Fc+), while putative intermediate α-silyl thioether 10 was reduced at a more cathodic potential (−2.5 V). Given this marked potential difference between F1 and 10, we reason that the selectivity of the difunctionalization process is likely under faradaic control, wherein conversion of F1 to 10 would precede that of 10 to 1. Indeed, reaction monitoring revealed that passing 1.8 F/mol of charge resulted in the selective formation of 10 in 91% yield with little gem-disilane 1; the latter was observed as the main product in 92% yield only after passing additional charge for a total of ≥5 F/mol (Scheme B). Armed with this information, we reasoned that selective, two-step synthesis of mixed gem-difunctionalization products could be achieved using two different electrophiles, contingent upon the development of selective monodesulfurative functionalization reactions.

To this end, we first developed a desulfurative silylation to prepare secondary and tertiary α-silyl thioethers (Scheme A). Employing aliphatic dithioketal 11 as a model substrate, we obtained optimal conditions to afford 12 in 92% yield with 10% over-reduced byproduct 3, using a sacrificial Mg anode and Pt cathode, tetrabutylammonium perchlorate as electrolyte, and THF:TPPA (7:1) as the solvent mixture (entry 1). Inclusion of TPPA was essential, as when conducted in neat THF, the reaction suffered from high, unstable cell potentials and poor conversion (entry 2). The use of a platinum cathode delivered higher conversion than graphite (entry 3). Notably, the use of LiClO4 electrolyte resulted in no reaction, possibly via promotion of silyl chloride reduction via Lewis acid activation (entry 4). No reaction occurred in the absence of electricity with and without activated magnesium metal, supporting that this transformation is largely electrochemically driven and not a result of an in situ generated reducing metal species (entries 5 and 6).

5. Mono-Silylation Reaction .

5

a Yields in panel A were determined by 1H NMR of crude reaction mixtures. Isolated yields are reported in panel B with crude 1H NMR yields denoted with parentheses. n.d. denotes product was not detected.

We then evaluated the scope and functional group tolerance of the mono-silylation reaction (Scheme B). Cyclic ketones of various ring sizes (13, 17, 22, 24) underwent reductive silylation smoothly, featuring pyran (24), ester with enolizable α-positions (13), and Weinreb amide (17). Furthermore, aldehyde-derived substrates bearing N-Me-indole (21), benzothiophene (23), boronate (14), chloroarene (16), and carbamate (18–20) functionalities were tolerated. Exploration of other electrophiles including dimethylchlorosilane (24), phenyl­dimethyl­chloro­silane (19), and trimethylgermanium chloride (20) also demonstrated generalizability. α-Silyl thioether 10, which has been shown to undergo TBAF-catalyzed Michael addition (26), can also undergo a novel electrochemical Peterson-type olefination to yield 25 in currently moderate yield.

Recognizing the synthetic utility of organoboronates, we next developed a complementary set of electrochemical conditions to extend this electroreductive strategy to desulfurative mono-borylation (Scheme A). Through de novo reaction discovery and optimization (SI Section 3), we obtained the desired α-boryl thioether 27 in 77% yield using a stainless-steel cathode, magnesium sacrificial anode, and lithium bis­(tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonyl)­amide (LiTFSI) in dimethoxyethane (DME) electrolyte solution (entry 1). HBpin was found to be the optimal electrophile; MeOBpin performed poorly while B2pin2 was unreactive under these conditions (entries 2 and 3). This reaction was found to be sensitive to current density, where lower current of 2.5 mA gave poor conversion (entry 4). Running the reaction without passing electricity or with activated Mg powder alone gave no conversion, and additional no-electricity controls with Li metal as a chemical reductant led to full consumption of F2 and generation of diborylated byproduct 28 in 37% yield (entries 5–7). This distinct chemoselectivity under chemical versus electrochemical reduction conditions (entries 5 vs 1) highlights the unique capability of faradaic control in the latter.

6. Mono-Borylation Reaction.

6

a 5 F/mol charge applied. Yields in panel A were determined by 1H NMR of crude reaction mixtures. Isolated yields are reported in panel B with crude 1H NMR yields denoted with parentheses.

A representative scope of α-boryl thioethers was subsequently obtained (Scheme B). Aldehyde-derived substrates containing α-cyclopropyl (37), carbamate (37), alkynyl silane (31), siloxy (32), pyran (39), and chloroarene (29) functionalities underwent the transformation with synthetically useful yield. Cyclic and acyclic ketone-derived substrates containing 1,1-difluoro (34), aryl ether (35), spiroketal (33), and thioether (30) moieties were tolerated. α-Boryl thioethers 37 and 39 underwent conversion to the corresponding BF3K salt in 84% and 95% yield, respectively. By passing excess charge, exhaustive borylation of N-aryl morpholine-containing dithioacetal afforded diboronate 36 in 68% yield.

Upon establishing faradaically controlled, selective monofunctionalizations and exhaustive bisfunctionalizations, we then explored the potential of sequential cross coupling to access gem-heterodifunctionalized compounds from dithioacetals (Scheme A). Silylation of α-silyl thioether 15 with dimethylchlorosilane generated aliphatic gem-heterobissilane 41 in 61% yield. Analogous reaction with trimethylgermanium chloride afforded α-silylgermane 42 in 64% yield. Silylation of α-boryl thioether 27 with TMSCl afforded α-silyl boronate 43 in 79% yield. Treatment of 27 with trimethylgermanium chloride afforded α-germylboronate 44 in 94% yield.

7. Heterodifunctionalization Sequences.

7

a 10 F/mol charge applied. Isolated yields are reported in panels A and B, with crude 1H NMR yields denoted with parentheses.

α-Silyl boronates and related gem-bismetalloids are useful reagents with limited synthetic access, and fully α-substituted variants are especially challenging to obtain. To address this challenge, we applied our strategy to various ketone-derived substrates (Scheme B). For example, α-boryl thioether 33 underwent silylation to furnish tetrasubstituted silyl boronate 45. Here, another carbonyl protecting group, a cyclic acetal, stayed intact. α-Germyl hydrosilane 46, N-Boc piperidine-containing α-silyl boronate 47, gem-heterobissilane 48, α-germyl boronate 49, and trimetalloids 50 and 51 can each be accessed via tandem desulfurative difunctionalization in synthetically useful yield. Notably, all of these products arose from a common retrosynthetic disconnection, showing our electroreductive platform as a general entry to combinatorial, diversity-oriented synthesis.

During reaction development, we found that TPPA as a cosolvent was crucial for achieving high yields in reactions conducted in THF (Scheme A, entries 1 and 2) but was unnecessary when DME was used as the solvent. Chronopotentiometry studies showed that the inclusion of TPPA in THF provided lower and more stable cathodic and anodic potentials (Figure A), in line with previous findings that TPPA prevents electrode passivation. We studied interactions of TPPA with anodically generated Mg2+ by 31P NMR, revealing a slight chemical shift change postelectrolysis, consistent with coordination to a Lewis acid (SI Section 5). Furthermore, colorless crystals deposited on both electrodes postelectrolysis, which were identified by X-ray crystallography as MgCl2(TPPA)2 (Figure B). Coordination by TPPA would render Mg2+ more difficult to reduce. Indeed, investigation of the electroreduction of Mg­(OTf)2 by linear sweep voltammetry validated this hypothesis (Figure C). Thus, TPPA suppresses the electroreduction of anodically generated metal salts at the cathode surface, deepening the effective reductive potential accessible in THF. In contrast, DME alone can chelate with Mg2+, leading to more stable electrode voltages and efficient electrolysis.

1.

1

Role of TPPA in deep electrolysis in THF.

In conclusion, we disclose an electrochemical strategy for the formal deoxygenative gem-difunctionalization of ketones and aldehydes via dithioacetal activation. We anticipate that this unified strategy to access aliphatic metalloids from carbonyl compounds will enable applications across synthetic, materials, and biological contexts. More broadly, this work establishes redox activation of aliphatic carbonyls as a general platform for modular, faradaically controlled, and iterative difunctionalization and opens new opportunities for reductive electrochemistry on electronically unbiased substrates.

Supplementary Material

ja6c09867_si_001.pdf (29.1MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM130928), Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar Award, Bristol Myers Squibb Unrestricted Grant in Synthetic Organic Chemistry, and National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (DGE-2139899 to N.I.C.). This work made use of the Cornell University NMR Facility, which is supported in part by National Science Foundation through MRI award CHE-1531632. We thank Dr. Yi Wang, Dr. James McGettigan Jr., and Nguyen Le (Cornell University) for meaningful discussions and Bofei Wang (Cornell University) for reproducing experiments.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.6c09867.

  • Experimental procedures, optimization of reaction conditions, characterization data, and copies of NMR spectra (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Reviews on the prevalence of carbonyl-containing functional groups:; a Ertl P., Schuhmann T.. A Systematic Cheminformatics Analysis of Functional Groups Occurring in Natural Products. J. Nat. Prod. 2019;82:1258–1263. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.8b01022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b McGrath N. A., Brichacek M., Njardarson J. T.. A Graphical Journey of Innovative Organic Architectures That Have Improved Our Lives. J. Chem. Educ. 2010;87:1348–1349. doi: 10.1021/ed1003806. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Reviews on the historical impact of carbonyl functionalization reactions:; a Brown H. C., Ramachandran P. V.. Sixty Years of Hydride Reductions. ACS Symp. Ser. 1996;641:1–30. doi: 10.1021/bk-1996-0641.ch001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Vedejs E.. The 1979 Nobel Prize for Chemistry. Science. 1980;207:42–44. doi: 10.1126/science.207.4426.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Seyferth D.. The Grignard Reagents. Organometallics. 2009;28:1598–1605. doi: 10.1021/om900088z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Massaro L., Neigenfind P., Feng A., Kuehn G., Attard F. C., DeSanti A., Collins M. R., Bravo M., Twumasi R. K., Chen D., Bolduc P. N., Nicastri M., Emmanuel M. A., Oderinde M. S., Palkowitz M. D., Zheng X., Hunter A. C., Harper K. C., Tyrol C. C., Mykhailiuk P. K., Kawamata Y., Baran P. S.. Triply Convergent Ni-Electrocatalytic Assembly of 1,1-Diaryl Cyclobutanes, Azetidines and Oxetanes. Nat. Chem. 2026;18:326–334. doi: 10.1038/s41557-025-01990-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. For select reports on deoxygenative functionalization of aldehydes and ketones via sequential substitution, see:; a Wang L., Zhang T., Sun W., He Z., Xia C., Lan Y., Liu C.. C–O Functionalization of α-Oxyboronates: A Deoxygenative gem-Diborylation and gem-Silylborylation of Aldehydes and Ketones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:5257–5264. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b02518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Shi D., Wang L., Xia C., Liu C.. Synthesis of Secondary and Tertiary Alkyl Boronic Esters by gem-Carboborylation: Carbonyl Compounds as Bis­(electrophile) Equivalents. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018;57:10318–10322. doi: 10.1002/anie.201804684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Wang L., Sun W., Liu C.. Cu-catalyzed Deoxygenative gem-Hydroborylation of Aromatic Aldehydes and Ketones to Access Benzylboronic Esters. Chin. J. Catal. 2018;39:1725–1729. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63139-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Singh D. K., Prasad S. S., Kim J., Kim I.. One-Pot, Three-Component Approach to Diarylacetonitriles. Org. Chem. Front. 2019;6:669–673. doi: 10.1039/C8QO01419A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; e Li J., Wang H., Qiu Z., Huang C.-Y., Li C.-J.. Metal-Free Direct Deoxygenative Borylation of Aldehydes and Ketones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:13011–13020. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c03813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Wang D., Zhou J., Hu Z., XU T.. Deoxygenative Haloboration and Enantioselective Chloroboration of Carbonyls. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:22870–22876. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c11024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. For reviews on umpolung, see:; a Seebach D.. Methods of Reactivity Umpolung. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1979;18:239–258. doi: 10.1002/anie.197902393. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Wang S., König B.. Catalytic Generation of Carbanions through Carbonyl Umpolung. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021;60:21624–21634. doi: 10.1002/anie.202105469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Dai X.-J., Li C.-C., Li C.-J.. Carbonyl Umpolung as an Organometallic Reagent Surrogate. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021;50:10733–10742. doi: 10.1039/D1CS00418B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Li C.-J.. HOME-Chemistry: Hydrazone as Organo-Metallic Equivalent. Pure Appl. Chem. 2023;95:465–474. doi: 10.1515/pac-2022-1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang S., Cheng B.-Y., Sršen M., König B.. Umpolung Difunctionalization of Carbonyls via Visible-Light Photoredox Catalytic Radical-Carbanion Relay. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:7524–7531. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c00629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. For select reports, see:; a Wang H., Dai X.-J., Li C.-J.. Aldehydes as Alkyl Carbanion Equivalents for Additions to Carbonyl Compounds. Nat. Chem. 2017;9:374–378. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Chen N., Dai X.-J., Wang H., Li C.-J.. Umpolung Addition of Aldehydes to Aryl Imines. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017;56:6260–6263. doi: 10.1002/anie.201610578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Yan S.-S., Zhu L., Ye J.-H., Zhang Z., Huang H., Zeng H., Li C.-J., Lan Y., Yu D.-G.. Ruthenium-Catalyzed Umpolung Carboxylation of Hydrazones with CO2 . Chem. Sci. 2018;9:4873–4878. doi: 10.1039/C8SC01299G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Tang J., Lv L., Dai X.-J., Li C.-C., Li L., Li C.-J.. Nickel-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling of Aldehydes with Aryl Halides via Hydrazone Intermediates. Chem. Commun. 2018;54:1750–1753. doi: 10.1039/C7CC09290C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Cao D., Li C.-C., Zeng H., Peng Y., Li C.-J.. C­(sp3)–C­(sp3) Bond Formation via Nickel-Catalyzed Deoxygenative Homo-Coupling of Aldehydes/Ketones Mediated by Hydrazine. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:3729. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23971-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Cheng R., de Ruiter G., Li C.-J.. Cobalt-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling of Umpolung Carbonyls with Alkyl Halides Under Mild Conditions. Chem. Commun. 2022;58:11563–11566. doi: 10.1039/D2CC04302E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. For electroreductive deoxygenative transformations from our group, see:; a Guan W., Chang Y., Lin S.. Electrochemically Driven Deoxygenative Borylation of Alcohols and Carbonyl Compounds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145:16966–16972. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c03418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Lee C. W-C., Lagueux-Tremblay P.-L., Jia Z., Lin S.. Regioselective Electrochemical Borylation of Oxygenated Allylic Electrophiles: Method Development and Synthetic Applications. ACS Cent. Sci. 2025;11:1959–1968. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.5c01074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Ressler A., Martinez Alvarado J., Hariharan R., Guan W., Lin S.. Deoxygenative Functionalization of Alcohols and Carbonyl Compounds via Electrochemical Reduction. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2025;64:e202510069. doi: 10.1002/anie.202510069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tan Z., Zhang H., Xu K., Zeng C.. Electrochemical Radical– Polar Crossover: A Radical Approach to Polar Chemistry. Sci. China. Chem. 2024;67:450–470. doi: 10.1007/s11426-023-1735-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. For elegant reports from Nagib limited to aldehydes, see:; a Zhang L., DeMuynck B. M., Paneque A. N., Rutherford J. E., Nagib D. A.. Carbene reactivity from alkyl and aryl aldehydes. Science. 2022;377:649–654. doi: 10.1126/science.abo6443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b DeMuynck B. M., Zhang L., Ralph E. K., Nagib D. A.. Cyclopropanation of Unactivated Alkenes with Non-Stabilized Iron Carbenes. Chem. 2024;10:1015–1027. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2024.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Ngo D. T., Garwood J. J. A., Nagib D. A.. Cyclopropanation with Non-Stabilized Carbenes via Ketyl Radicals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146:24009–24015. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c07388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang Y., Wang B., Lin S.. Deoxygenative Cyanofunctionalization of Aldehydes and Ketones Enabled by Electrochemical Reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147:36992–36998. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c13173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. For select reviews, see:; a Yan M., Kawamata Y., Baran P. S.. Synthetic Organic Electrochemical Methods Since 2000: On the Verge of a Renaissance. Chem. Rev. 2017;117:13230–13319. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Moeller K. D.. Using Physical Organic Chemistry to Shape the Course of Electrochemical Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2018;118:4817–4833. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Park S. H., Ju M., Ressler A. J., Shim J., Kim H., Lin S.. Reductive Electrosynthesis: A New Dawn. Aldrichimica Acta. 2021;54(1):17–27. [Google Scholar]; d Zhang W., Guan W., Martinez Alvarado J. I., Novaes L. F. T., Lin S.. Deep Electroreductive Chemistry: Harnessing Carbon- and Silicon-Based Reactive Intermediates in Organic Synthesis. ACS Catal. 2023;13:8038–8048. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c01174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Masson G., Claraz A.. Recent Advances in C­(sp3)–C­(sp3) and C­(sp3)–C­(sp2) Bond Formation through Cathodic Reactions: Reductive and Convergent Paired Electrolyses. ACS Org. Inorg. Au. 2022;2:126–147. doi: 10.1021/acsorginorgau.1c00037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. For reviews on deoxygenative functionalization of aldehydes and ketones, see:; a Seebach D.. Generation of Second-ary, Tertiary, and Quaternary Centers by Geminal Disub-stitution of Carbonyl Oxygens. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011;50:96–101. doi: 10.1002/anie.201003823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Li J., Huang C.-Y., Li C.-J.. Deoxy-genative Functionalizations of Aldehydes, Ketones and Carboxylic Acids. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022;61:e202112770. doi: 10.1002/anie.202112770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. For reviews on dithiane umpolung chemistry, see:; a Yus M., Najera C., Foubelo F.. The Role of 1,3-Dithianes in Natural Product Synthesis. Tetrahedron. 2003;59:6147–6412. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4020(03)00955-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Gröbel B.-T., Seebach D.. Umpolung of the Reactivity of Carbonyl Compounds through Sulfur-Containing Reagents. Synthesis. 1977;1977:357–402. doi: 10.1055/s-1977-24412. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. For select studies on α-thiocarbanions, see:; a Castejon H., Wiberg K. B.. Stabilization of Carbanions. 1. Origin of the Increased Acidity of Dimethyl Sulfide As Compared to Dimethyl Ether. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994;116:10489–10497. doi: 10.1021/ja00102a016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Lehn J. M., Wipff G.. Stereoelectronic effects. 5. Stereoelectronic properties, stereospecificity, and stabilization of α-oxa and α-thia carbanions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976;98(24):7498–7505. doi: 10.1021/ja00440a007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Bernasconi C. B., Kittredge W. K.. Carbanion Stabilization by Adjacent Sulfur: Polarizability, Resonance, or Negative Hyperconjugation? Experimental Distinction Based on Intrinsic Rate Constants of Proton Transfer from (Phenylthio)­nitromethane and 1-Nitro-2-phenylethane. J. Org. Chem. 1998;63:1944–1953. doi: 10.1021/jo9719463. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Poutsma M. L.. The Radical Stabilization Energy of a Substituted Carbon-Centered Free Radical Depends on Both the Functionality of the Substituent and the Ordinality of the Radical. J. Org. Chem. 2011;76:270–276. doi: 10.1021/jo102097n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Streitwieser A., Bors D. A.. Theoretical Study of Carbanions and Lithium Salts Derived From Dimethyl Sulfone. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986;108:1397–1404. doi: 10.1021/ja00267a006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; f Pross A., DeFrees D. J., Levi B. A., Pollack S. K., Radom L., Hehre W. J.. Theoretical Approach to Substituent Effects. Structures and Stabilities of Carbanions XCH2 . J. Org. Chem. 1981;46:1693–1699. doi: 10.1021/jo00321a034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; g Bernardi F., Csizmadia I. G., Mangini A., Schlegel H. B., Whangbo M., Wolfe S.. Irrelevance of d-Orbital Conjugation. I..alpha.-Thiocarbanion. Comparative Quantum Chemical Study of the Static and Dynamic Properties and Proton Affinities of Carbanions Adjacent to Oxygen and to Sulfur. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975;97:2209–2218. doi: 10.1021/ja00841a036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; h Streitwieser A., Williams J. E.. Ab initio SCF-MO Calculations of Thiomethyl Anion. Polarization in Stabilization of Carbanions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975;97:191–192. doi: 10.1021/ja00834a035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; i Lehn J. M., Wipff G.. Stereoelectronic Effects. 5. Stereoelectronic Properties, Stereospecificity, and Stabilization of.alpha.-Oxa and.alpha.-Thia Carbanions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976;98:7498–7505. doi: 10.1021/ja00440a007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; j Epiotis N. D., Yates R. L., Bernardi F., Wolfe S.. A Theoretical Analysis of the Factors Determining the Conformation and Stabilities of Oxy- and Thiocarbanions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976;98:5435–5439. doi: 10.1021/ja00434a004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; k Streitwieser A., Ewing S. P.. Equilibrium Ion Pair Acidities of Dithianes in Cyclohexylamine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975;97:190–191. doi: 10.1021/ja00834a034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. For metal-mediated desulfurization, see:; a Kuwajima I., Abe T., Atsumi K.. Reductive Silylation Reactions of Sulfide. A Facile Conversion of Carbon-Sulfur Linkages into Carbon-Silicon Ones. Chem. Lett. 1978;7:383–386. doi: 10.1246/cl.1978.383. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Kennedy N., Lu G., Liu P., Cohen T.. Reductive Lithiation in the Absence of Aromatic Electron Carriers. A Steric Effect Manifested on the Surface of Lithium Metal Leads to a Difference in Relative Reactivity Depending on Whether the Aromatic Electron Carrier Is Present or Absent. J. Org. Chem. 2015;80:8571–8582. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.5b01136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. For electroreductive desulfurative transformations, see:; a Schultz-von Itter N., Steckhan E.. Electroreductive Cleavage of Carbon-Sulphur Bonds in Dithioacetals. Tetrahedron. 1987;43:2475–2484. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)81653-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Kuzmin J., Röckl J., Schwarz N., Djossou J., Ahumada G., Ahlquist M., Lundberg H.. Electroreductive Desulfurative Transformations with Thioethers as Alkyl Radical Precursors. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023;62:e202304272. doi: 10.1002/anie.202304272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Kuzmin J., Margarita C., Winter J., Lundberg H.. Electrochemical Desulfurative Borylation of Thiols, Disulfides, Thioethers, and Thioacetals. Nat. Commun. 2026;17:632. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-67363-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Goossens E., Maity P., Momoli C., Shatskiy A., Roeckl J., Ahumada G., Palombi L., Lundberg H.. Electroreductive Desulfurization of Thioacetals. ChemElectroChem. 2026;13:e70240. doi: 10.1002/celc.70240. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Evans A. E., Truesdale K. L., Grimm K. G., Nesbitt S. L.. Thiosilanes, a Promising Class of Reagents for Selective Carbonyl Protection. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977;99:5009–5017. doi: 10.1021/ja00457a020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Das M., O’Shea D. F.. Z-Stereoselective Aza-Peterson Olefinations with Bis­(trimethylsilane) Reagents and Sulfinyl Imines. Org. Lett. 2016;18:336–339. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b03519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Reidl T. W., Bandar J. S.. Lewis Basic Salt-Promoted Organosilane Coupling Reactions with Aromatic Electrophiles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:11939–11945. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c05764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. For select reports of α-silyl carbanions, see:; a Staden L. F. v., Gravestock D., Ager D. J.. New Developments in the Peterson Olefination Reaction. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002;31:195–200. doi: 10.1039/a908402i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Han Y., Ma Y., Keresztes I., Collum D. B., Corey E. J.. Preferential Geminal Bis-silylation of 3,4-Benzothiophane Is Caused by the Dominance of Electron Withdrawal by R3Si over Steric Shielding Effects. Org. Lett. 2014;16:4678–4679. doi: 10.1021/ol502348y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Brinkman E. A., Berger S., Brauman J.. I..alpha.-Silyl-Substituent Stabilization of Carbanions and Silyl Anions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994;116:8304–8310. doi: 10.1021/ja00097a042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lu L., Siu J. C., Lai Y., Lin S.. An Electroreductive Approach to Radical Silylation via the Activation of Strong Si–Cl Bond. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:21272–21278. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c10899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. For select reports on alkylgermane synthesis and reactivity, see:; a Ahrweiler E., Selmani A., Schoenebeck F.. Base-Catalyzed Remote Hydrogermylation of Olefins. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2025;64:e202503573. doi: 10.1002/anie.202503573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Queen A. E., Selmani A., Schoenebeck F.. Hydrogermylation of Alkenes via Organophotoredox-Initiated HAT Catalysis. Org. Lett. 2022;24:406–409. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c04088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Selmani A., Schoenebeck F.. Anti-Markovnikov Hydrogermylation of Alkenes via Lewis Acid Catalysis. Synthesis. 2023;55:1792–1798. doi: 10.1055/a-2036-3868. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Schoetz M. D., Deckers K., Singh G., Ahrweiler E., Hoeppner A., Schoenebeck F.. Electrochemistry-Enabled C-Heteroatom Bond Formation of Alkyl Germanes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146:21257–21263. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c08008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Biddle M. M., Reich H. J.. Studies on the Reactive Species in Fluoride-Mediated Carbon–Carbon Bond-Forming Reactions: Carbanion Formation by Desilylation with Fluoride and Enolates. J. Org. Chem. 2006;71:4031–4039. doi: 10.1021/jo0522409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. For select reports of silylboronate synthesis using traditional methods, see:; a Li H., Shangguan X., Zhang Z., Huang S., Zhang Y., Wang J.. Formal Carbon Insertion of N-Tosylhydrazone into B–B and B–Si Bonds: gem-Diborylation and gem-Silylborylation of sp3 Carbon. Org. Lett. 2014;16:448–451. doi: 10.1021/ol403338s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Qi W.-Y., Zhen J.-S., Xu X.-H., Du X., Li Y.-H., Yuan H., Guan Y.-S., Wei X., Wang Z.-Y., Liang G., Luo Y.. Base-Mediated Borylsilylation/Silylation of Ammonium Salts with Silylborane. Org. Lett. 2021;23:5988–5992. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c02066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Civit M. G., Royes J., Vogels C. M., Westcott S. A., Cuenca A. B., Fernández E.. Strategic Trimethylsilyldiazomethane Insertion into pinB-SR Followed by Selective Alkylations. Org. Lett. 2016;18:3830–3833. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b01840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Watanabe K., Nagao K., Ohmiya H.. Deoxygenative Geminal Silylboration of Amides Using Silylboronates: Synthesis and Use of α-Boryl-α-Silylalkylamines. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024;63:e202411990. doi: 10.1002/anie.202411990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e La Cascia E., Cuenca A. B., Fernández E.. Opportune gem-Silylborylation of Carbonyl Compounds: A Modular and Stereocontrolled Entry to Tetrasubstituted Olefins. Chem. A Eur. J. 2016;22:18737–18741. doi: 10.1002/chem.201604782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Sun W., Hu Y., Xia C., Liu C.. Recent Advances in the Synthesis and Transformation of gem-Borylsilylalkanes. New. J. Chem. 2021;45:14847–14854. doi: 10.1039/D0NJ01344G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. For select reports of α-boryl carbanions, see:; a Fernández E.. α-Boryl Carbanions: The Influence of Geminal Heteroatoms in C–C Bond Formation. Chem. Rec. 2024;24:e202300349. doi: 10.1002/tcr.202300349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Hong K., Liu X., Morken J. P.. Simple Access to Elusive α-Boryl Carbanions and Their Alkylation: An Umpolung Construction for Organic Synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:10581–10584. doi: 10.1021/ja505455z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Matteson D., Arne K. H.. Carbanions From.alpha.-Phenylthio Boronic Esters as Synthetic Intermediates. Organometallics. 1982;1:280–288. doi: 10.1021/om00062a009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rafiee M., Abrams D. J., Cardinale L., Goss Z., Romero-Arenas A., Stahl S. S.. Cyclic Voltammetry and Chronoamperometry: Mechanistic Tools for Organic Electrosynesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2024;53:566–585. doi: 10.1039/D2CS00706A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Peters B. K., Rodriguez K. X., Reisberg S. H., Beil S. B., Hickey D. P., Kawamata Y., Collins M., Starr J., Chen L., Udyavara S., Klunder K., Gorey T. J., Anderson S. L., Neurock M., Minteer S. D., Baran P. S.. Scalable and Safe Synthetic Organic Electroreduction Inspired by Li-ion Battery Chemistry. Science. 2019;363:838–845. doi: 10.1126/science.aav5606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ja6c09867_si_001.pdf (29.1MB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of the American Chemical Society are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES