Abstract
In two experiments, rats living in a closed economy were offered continuous, concurrent access to four resources: food, water, a nest, and a running wheel. Costs of consuming food and water were imposed with bar-press requirements, and the price of either one or both resources was raised. As the consumption cost increased, less was consumed in each bout of resource use. Bout frequency increased, but not sufficiently to compensate for the fall in bout size, and total intake fell. Food and water tended to be complementary resources, in that as intake of one fell with its price, intake of the other also decreased. This interaction was accounted for by the defense of the ratio of body water to lean body mass. As amount consumed decreased, increases in feed efficiency (weight gain per unit of food ingested) and the use of stored calories compensated for the reduced energy intake. There was evidence of competition between feeding and drinking at the higher costs: When both commodities were expensive, the decline in the intake of each one was greater than when only one commodity was expensive. Although the time spent nesting, running, and in unmonitored activity was adjusted when feeding or drinking took more of the rat's day, there was no particular activity that was sacrificed.
Full text
PDF




















Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Collier G. H., Johnson D. F., CyBulski K. A., McHale C. A. Activity patterns in rats (Rattus norvegicus) as a function of the cost of access to four resources. J Comp Psychol. 1990 Mar;104(1):53–65. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.104.1.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Collier G. H., Johnson D. F., Hill W. L., Kaufman L. W. The economics of the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Sep;46(2):113–136. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Collier G. H., Johnson D. F., Naveira J., Cybulski K. A. Ambient temperature and food costs: effects on behavior patterns in rats. Am J Physiol. 1989 Dec;257(6 Pt 2):R1328–R1334. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1989.257.6.R1328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Collier G., Dnarr F. Defense of water balance in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1966 Feb;61(1):5–10. doi: 10.1037/h0022867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Collier G., Johnson D. F. The time window of feeding. Physiol Behav. 1990 Dec;48(6):771–777. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(90)90225-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Collier G., Levitsky D. Defense of water balance in rats: behavioral and physiological responses to depletion. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1967 Aug;64(1):59–67. doi: 10.1037/h0024800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill W. L., Rovee-Collier C., Collier G., Wasserloos L. Time budgets in growing chicks. Physiol Behav. 1986;37(2):353–360. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(86)90245-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hursh S. R. Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Sep;34(2):219–238. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hursh S. R., Raslear T. G., Shurtleff D., Bauman R., Simmons L. A cost-benefit analysis of demand for food. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Nov;50(3):419–440. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McFarland D. J., Lloyd I. H. Time-shared feeding and drinking. Q J Exp Psychol. 1973 Feb;25(1):48–61. doi: 10.1080/14640747308400322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oatley K., Tonge D. A. The effect of hunger on water intake in rats. Q J Exp Psychol. 1969 May;21(2):162–171. doi: 10.1080/14640746908400209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
