Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1996 Mar;65(2):375–388. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-375

Effects of cocaine on briefly signaled versus completely signaled delays to reinforcement.

D J Walker 1, M N Branch 1
PMCID: PMC1350153  PMID: 8851538

Abstract

Key pecking by 4 pigeons was maintained by a multiple schedule consisting of two variable-interval 60-s schedules wherein each food presentation followed a nonresetting 27-s delay that was either briefly signaled at its outset or completely signaled. Brief-signal duration was adjusted so that response rates maintained by the briefly and completely signaled delays of reinforcement were similar. In general, acute administration of small to intermediate doses (0.3 to 3.0 mg/kg) of cocaine produced either small increases in response rates in both components or no change, and larger doses (5.6 to 13.0 mg/kg) decreased response rates. Chronic (i.e., daily) cocaine administration (10.0 mg/kg) resulted in tolerance to the rate-decreasing effects in both components. Cocaine's effects were generally similar whether delays were completely or briefly signaled. Discontinuation of cocaine administration and subsequent removal of the delay signals also had similar effects in both components of the multiple schedule. Taken together, these results are consistent with the view that the two types of delay signals were equally effective in maintaining responding during the variable-interval schedules.

Full text

PDF
375

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beninger R. J., Hanson D. R., Phillips A. G. The effects of pipradrol on the acquisitionof responding with conditioned reinforcement: a role for sensory preconditioning. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1980;69(3):235–242. doi: 10.1007/BF00433088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Branch M. N. Consequent events as determinants of drug effects on schedule-controlled behavior: modification of effects of cocaine and d-amphetamine following chronic amphetamine administration. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1979 Sep;210(3):354–360. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Branch M. N., Dearing M. E. Effects of acute and daily cocaine administration on performance under a delayed-matching-to-sample procedure. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1982 May;16(5):713–718. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(82)90223-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Branch M. N. Rate dependency, behavioral mechanisms, and behavioral pharmacology. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Nov;42(3):511–522. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Catania A. C., Reynolds G. S. A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3 Suppl):327–383. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-s327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cohen S. L., Branch M. N. Food-paired stimuli as conditioned reinforcers: effects of d-amphetamine. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Sep;56(2):277–288. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. FERSTER C. B. Sustained behavior under delayed reinforcement. J Exp Psychol. 1953 Apr;45(4):218–224. doi: 10.1037/h0062158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Files F.J., Branch M.N., Clody D. Effects of methylphenidate on responding under extinction in the presence and absence of conditioned reinforcement. Behav Pharmacol. 1989;1(2):113–121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kelleher R. T., Morse W. H. Determinants of the specificity of behavioral effects of drugs. Ergeb Physiol. 1968;60:1–56. doi: 10.1007/BFb0107250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lattal K. A. Signal functions in delayed reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Sep;42(2):239–253. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Richards R. W. A comparison of signaled and unsignaled delay of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Mar;35(2):145–152. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Robbins T. W., Koob G. F. Pipradrol enhances reinforcing properties of stimuli paired with brain stimulation. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1978 Mar;8(3):219–222. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(78)90308-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Robbins T. W. The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: effects of pipradrol, methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and nomifensine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1978 Jun 15;58(1):79–87. doi: 10.1007/BF00426794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schaal D. W., Branch M. N. Responding of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of signaled-delayed reinforcement: effects of delay-signal duration. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Jan;53(1):103–121. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schaal D. W., Branch M. N. Responding of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of unsignaled, briefly signaled, and completely signaled delays to reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Jul;50(1):33–54. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schama K. F., Branch M. N. Tolerance to cocaine's rate-increasing effects upon repeated administration. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Jul;62(1):45–56. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schuster C. R., Dockens W. S., Woods J. H. Behavioral variables affecting the development of amphetamine tolerance. Psychopharmacologia. 1966;9(2):170–182. doi: 10.1007/BF00404721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schuster C. R., Thompson T. Self administration of and behavioral dependence on drugs. Annu Rev Pharmacol. 1969;9:483–502. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.09.040169.002411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sizemore O. J., Lattal K. A. Dependency, temporal contiguity, and response-independent reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Jan;27(1):119–125. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES