Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: Coord Chem Rev. 2025 Jun 11;542:216764. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2025.216764

Coordination Chemistry of Emerging Meitner-Auger Electron-Emitting Radiometals for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy

Grant J Stec 1, Justin J Wilson 1,*
PMCID: PMC13502091  NIHMSID: NIHMS2204554  PMID: 42639515

Abstract

Targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) selectively delivers radionuclides to cancer cells, leveraging their radioactive emissions to treat primary and metastatic malignancies. Substantial fundamental research in this area has enabled the clinical development of a growing library of radiopharmaceuticals for this application, several of which have become blockbuster cancer drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. To date, these therapeutics have focused on radiometals emitting long-range β− particles and shorter-ranged α particles. More recently, efforts to use a different type of cytotoxic radiation, Meitner-Auger electrons (MAEs), have been undertaken. MAEs are of interest for TRT because they travel very short distances—on the order of nanometers—that enable the possibility of single-cell and subcellular delivery of cytotoxic radiation. This high spatial precision is valuable for the treatment of diffuse malignancies such as lymphoma and leukemia, as well as for inducing unique cell death pathways with efficacy against conventional radiation resistance. As a number of emerging MAE-emitting radiometals are identified and produced, there is a need to develop suitable chelators that can form stable complexes with them so that they can be applied in targeted constructs. This review summarizes the coordination chemistry of emerging MAE-emitting radiometals, which span different regions of the Periodic Table, including the transition metals, main group elements, and lanthanides. In addition, approaches for their production and purification are also described. The major emphasis of this manuscript provides a summary of different chelators and chelation approaches for these novel MAE-emitting radiometals. This comprehensive summary of the coordination chemistry of these radiometals provides a guide for researchers in this area and emphasizes the chelator-design challenges that need to be overcome for their eventual clinical use.

Keywords: chelators, radiochemistry, radiopharmaceuticals, Auger electrons, X-ray crystallography, stability constants

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-2204554-f0001.webp

1. Introduction

Targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) is a therapeutic approach that delivers a cytotoxic radioactive payload selectively to cancer cells [1–3]. This selectivity for cancer cells is afforded by either leveraging intrinsic physiological differences within the tumor microenvironment or by using specific targeting vectors, like antibodies and peptides, that bind to receptors overexpressed on cancer cells [2,4,5]. Early forms of TRT began in the 1940s when β−-emitting iodine-130 and iodine-131 were used for the treatment of thyroid disorders [6]. These treatments used simple iodide salts, leveraging the intrinsic uptake of this anion by the thyroid gland [7,8]. In modern iterations of TRT, the use of more selective, receptor-based targeting vectors, like small molecules, peptides, and antibodies, is preferred because it minimizes off-target effects and presents a more tractable approach for the delivery to different types of cancer. These constructs require that the radiometals of interest be complexed by a chelator, which serves as the attachment point to the targeting vector [9–11].

To date, several TRT drugs have been approved by the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) [4]. These drugs leverage α-emitting radium-223 (223Ra) as [223Ra]RaCl2 (Xofigo®, Bayer, treatment of mCRPC), β−-emitting yttrium-90 (90Y) as [90Y]Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin®, Biogen Idec Inc.), and β−-emitting lutetium-177 (177Lu) as [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE (Lutathera®, Novartis, treatment of GEP-NETs) and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (Pluvicto™, Novartis, treatment of mCRPC). In addition to these three radiometals, a wide variety of others have been investigated for TRT applications in both clinical and preclinical studies [2,12]. In this review, we focus our discussion on an emerging class of radiometals for TRT that deviate from conventional therapeutic α and β− emitters. Specifically, this review summarizes the coordination chemistry of radiometals that emit Meitner-Auger electrons (MAEs, Table 1). The following introductory sections highlight and introduce their therapeutic potential, and the majority of this manuscript presents a more comprehensive summary of their coordination chemistry and the strategies that have been investigated to chelate them for radiopharmaceutical applications.

Table 1.

Meitner-Auger electron-emitting radionuclides discussed in this review.

Radionuclide Half-life MAEs per decay MAE energy (keV/nt)a CEs per decay CE energy (keV/nt)a Gamma energiesb (keV) Applications
58mCo 9.04 h 4.17 3.98 0.99 18.89 <60 Therapy
103mRh 0.94 h 5.88 2.72 0.99 34.97 <60 Therapy
119Sb 38.19 h 23.68 8.86 0.84 16.97 <60 Therapy
135La 19.50 h 12.30 6.57 0 - - Therapy
155Tb 5.32 d 13.95 12.59 0.77 30.82 87 (32.0%)
105 (25.2%)
180 (7.45 %)
Therapy, SPECT
161Tb 6.91 d 10.96 8.94 1.42 39.29 - Therapy
165Er 10.36 h 7.28 7.99 0 - - Therapy, SPECTc
197mHg 23.80 h 19.37 13.50 1.60 203.50 134 (33.5%)
279 (6.1%)
Therapy, SPECT
197gHg 2.71 d 23.18 16.10 0.81 54.15 77 (18.7%) Therapy, SPECT
191Pt 2.80 d 13.27 17.77 0.99 57.09 82 (4.9%)
172 (3.5%)
160 (6.0%)
Therapy, SPECT
193mpt 4.33 d 27.39 10.93 2.99 126.80 - Therapy
195mpt 4.02 d 36.55 23.12 2.78 161.40 99 (11.4%) Therapy, SPECT
201Tl 3.04 d 20.91 14.79 0.91 29.90 167 (10.0%) Therapy, SPECT
a

Total energy of emitted electrons.

b

Only including gamma energies 60–400 keV useful for SPECT imaging.

c

SPECT possible from X-ray photons [136].

1.1. Radionuclides for TRT

In principle, TRT can use radionuclides that emit either α-particles, β−-particles, or low-energy MAEs or conversion electrons (CEs). These three types of particles have different energies and penetration ranges in tissue. Consequently, their linear energy transfer (LET) values, the amount of energy deposited per unit distance traveled, are widely different [9,13,14]. For therapeutically relevant α-emitting radionuclides, the average LET of the ejected α particles is 80 keV/μm, which results from emission energies ranging from 5–9 MeV and pathlengths of 40–100 μm (5–10 cell diameters). By contrast, β−-particle energies span a wider range of values (0.05–2.3 MeV), albeit with a lower magnitude, and can travel much larger distances (0.05–12 mm, 50–1000 cell diameters), resulting in a low LET of 0.2 keV/μm. The large penetration depths of β− particles have found particular value for treating tumors with heterogeneous vasculature and intratumor variability [13,15]. Compared to both α and β− particles, MAEs and CEs provide the most localized energy deposition. These low-energy electrons (1–10 keV) have a moderate LET (4–26 keV/μm), but their short path lengths (2–500 nm) relegate their energy deposition to the cellular and subcellular level [16–20].

In addition to emitting one or more of these three particles, radionuclides for TRT must also have appropriate half-lives (t1/2). Generally, half-lives between six hours and seven days are ideal because they allow for transport and preparation of the radiopharmaceutical while maintaining sufficient activity [21,22]. The other important requirement for the application of radionuclides for TRT is a reliable and high-yielding production and purification route. These factors in the context of MAE-emitting radionuclides have been recently reviewed [23,24]. The final important consideration in the use of radionuclides for TRT is the availability of suitable chelators that can afford a kinetically stable radiometal complex under mild radiolabeling conditions [11,25,26]. This review focuses on chelator-design efforts for MAE-emitting radiometals.

1.2. Meitner-Auger Electrons

The unique physics and properties of low-energy electrons emitted during nuclear decay have received growing interest as therapeutic alternatives to α and β− particles [19,27,28]. MAEs, first reported by Lise Meitner in 1922 and Pierre Auger in 1923 [29,30], are low-energy electrons (<25 keV) emitted from atoms in high-energy core-hole excited states, which can be generated via internal conversion (IC) or electron capture (EC or ε) radioactive decay [20,31,32]. Through IC, when a nucleus decays and transfers energy to an inner-shell electron (K-, L-, or M-shell), that electron, termed a conversion electron (CE), is ejected and leaves behind a core-hole vacancy. In the EC process, a proton-rich nucleus absorbs an electron from one of the core orbitals, resulting in the core-hole vacancy. In both cases, upon relaxation of this high-energy state, its energy can be transferred directly to another core electron, leading to its ejection (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Schematic of Meitner-Auger electron emission process as mediated by both EC and IC decay. Created in BioRender.

The ejected electron, called a MAE, has an energy equal to the difference between the initial vacancy-filling transition and the ionization energy of the shell from which it originated [32]. When the ejected electron originates from a subshell higher than that of the electron involved in the relaxation process it is referred to as a Coster-Kronig electron. A special case of this transition occurs when the vacancy (e.g., in the M shell) is filled by an electron from a higher subshell of the same shell (e.g., also in the M shell). In this case, the transition and ejected electron are termed super Coster-Kronig [33]. However, Coster-Kronig and super Coster-Kronig electrons are subtypes of MAEs and are commonly referred to collectively as MAEs. Because the energies of these ejected electrons are related to specific core-shell excited states, MAE spectroscopy has become a powerful tool for characterizing the elemental composition of materials [34–36]. In the context of nuclear decay, the energies of emitted MAEs are characteristic of the radionuclide, and their low energy can be used for therapeutic applications [20].

Although this review primarily focuses on radionuclides which emit MAEs, CEs, which are ejected during the IC process (Figure 1), can also be leveraged for therapy. These electrons possess higher energies than MAEs (typically >100 keV) and also travel short distances in tissue. In many cases, MAEs and CEs are treated similarly and collectively referred to as low-energy electrons due to their similar radiobiological properties [13,20].

1.3. MAE Radiobiology

Despite carrying substantially less energy than β− particles, the short penetration length of MAEs confers them with a substantially larger LET. Consequently, MAEs can induce DNA damage localized within single cells [19,20,28]. MAEs have also received attention for targeting the cell membrane and other subcellular components [18,37–39]. The very short range and potential to target individual cells makes MAEs particularly well suited for treating circulating tumor cells, which can be used to treat diffuse malignancies like lymphoma and leukemia, and to prevent metastasis [40–46].

DNA damage induced by MAEs can arise from both direct and indirect effects. Indirect DNA damage is mediated by the radiolysis of water, which generates a significant concentration of reactive oxygen species. Although most studies show that DNA damage is more substantial when MAEs are within close proximity to DNA [13,47,17,48–51], some reports suggest that reactive oxygen species, generated from MAE-induced radiolysis in the cytoplasm, can diffuse sufficient distances to damage critical targets, including DNA, leading to cell death [16,52]. Additionally, it is known that radiation damage to the mitochondria can cause mitochondrial apoptosis [53–55], and MAE emitters localized to the cell membrane can effectively kill cells [37–39].

The first investigations of the therapeutic effects of MAEs used radioisotopes of iodine. Both iodine-125 (125I, t1/2, 59.4 days, EC, 23.0 MAEs/decay, 11.96 keV) and iodine-123 (123I, t1/2, 13.3 h, EC, 1.37 MAEs/decay, 7.23 keV) were demonstrated to cause DNA damage, corresponding approximately to one double-strand break per decay, in bacteria and bacteriophages [56,57]. Accordingly, both radioisotopes could also induce cytotoxic effects in mammalian cells [58–62]. Subsequent studies showed that 125I has promising anticancer properties in mice models [63–65], and 125I-labeled 5-iodo-2′-deoxyuridine was used to treat neoplastic meningitis in a patient [66]. Although radioiodine has been invaluable in establishing MAE radiobiology, its radiochemistry typically relies on the formation of covalent C–I bonds, rather than chelation, and further discussion of radioiodine is outside the scope of this review [67,68].

1.4. Bifunctional Chelators

The majority of radioisotopes that possess promising properties for TRT belong to metal ions. Consequently, the formation of radiolabeled constructs with these radiometals requires the use of bifunctional chelators (BFCs). BFCs should ideally form highly stable radiometal complexes under mild conditions, while also providing an additional functional group for covalent attachment to different targeting vectors (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Bifunctional chelators possess a reactive functional group to which a targeting vector can be conjugated prior to complexation with a radiometal. Created in BioRender.

The efficacy of a chelator or BFC with different radiometal ions can be characterized by both the resulting thermodynamic and kinetic stability of the radiolabeled complexes. The thermodynamic stability of a complex can be quantified via the stability constant, KML = [ML]/[M][L], where the concentrations are those of the complex ML, free ligand L, and free metal ion M under equilibrium conditions. This constant, often reported on a logarithmic scale (log KML), is a quantitative measure of the thermodynamic stability of a metal-ligand complex, and it can be measured with several different techniques, including potentiometric and spectrophotometric titrations [11]. These values provide a reliable and convenient metric for comparing the efficacies of different chelators with different metal ions. Although thermodynamic stability measurements are valuable, another important criterion for the use of a complex in vivo is kinetic stability or inertness. The inertness of a complex is more difficult to quantify, especially for comparing systems across different studies and labs, but it is often measured by competing ion and ligand challenge experiments or directly in biologically relevant solutions like saline or serum. Given the many different endogenous chelators, metal ions, and reducing agents in vivo, kinetic stability under relevant conditions must be considered when evaluating the suitability of a metal–ligand complex for therapeutic use.

Bifunctionalization of a chelator requires that it possesses a reactive functional group that can form covalent bonds with targeting vectors (Figure 2). Common functional groups for this application include activated carboxylic acids and isothiocyanates, which can couple to the N-terminus or lysine residues within a protein, furnishing amide and thiourea linkages, respectively [69,70]. Similarly, squaric acid diesters have become popular moieties for conjugating targeting vectors to BFCs because of their enhanced stability compared to isothiocyanates [71,72]. Copper-catalyzed click reactions (Huisgen 1,3-cycloaddition) between alkynes and azides, as well as strain-promoted Diels-Alder reactions, have also been used [73].

For detailed discussion of bioconjugation methods, the reader is referred to other reviews on that topic [10,69,70,74,75]. The goal of this review is to highlight the coordination chemistry and chelators for emergent, therapeutically relevant MAE-emitting radiometals. This review will focus primarily on radiometals that have not been extensively explored. In this context, the chelation chemistry of radioisotopes, like gallium-67 (t1/2 3.3 d, EC, 4.96 MAEs/decay, 6.64 keV), has been thoroughly discussed previously, primarily because of the relevance of gallium-68 as a β+-emitter for PET imaging [76–81]. Likewise, another potentially valuable therapeutic MAE emitter, technetium-99m (99mTc, t1/2 6.0 h, isomeric transition (IT)/β−, 4.41 MAEs/decay, 0.94 keV) [53,55,82–87], has been thoroughly studied for its primary role as a single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging agent [76,88–100]. Lastly, the common SPECT radionuclide indium-111 (111In, t1/2 2.8 days, EC, 7.43 MAEs/decay, 6.88 keV) also has significant potential as a therapeutic MAE emitter, but its coordination chemistry and radiochemistry have been thoroughly covered in earlier literature [11,76,77,90,101]. Because of the numerous review articles on radioisotopes of gallium, technetium, and indium, these radiometals will not be discussed in this manuscript.

1.5. Nuclear Decay Data Sources

Nuclear decay data (half-lives, γ-photon energies and yields, and MAE and CE energies and yields) for all radionuclides discussed in this review (Table 1) were obtained from the International Commission on Radiological Protection DECDATA database compiled by Eckerman and Endo and the most recent corresponding Nuclear Data Sheets [102–135]. Reported MAE and CE values are given as the total energy per decay.

2. Cobalt

Cobalt-59 (59Co) is the only naturally occurring stable isotope of cobalt. Several synthetic radioisotopes of cobalt are accessible, and among these, cobalt-58m (58mCo, t1/2 9.0 h, EC/IT) is of interest for MAE therapy. 58mCo has a promising emission profile of both MAEs (4.17/decay, 3.98 keV) and CEs (0.99/decay, 18.89 keV), as well as a half-life that is suitable for biological applications. Two other cobalt radioisotopes, cobalt-55 (55Co, t1/2 17.5 h, EC/β+) and cobalt-57 (57Co, t1/2 271.7 days, EC) are also of interest for their use in PET and SPECT, respectively, providing the possibility of theranostic Co-based radiopharmaceuticals. The 58mCo isotope decays to ground state cobalt-58g (58gCo), which has a long but not negligible half-life (t1/2 70.9 days) that must be considered for dosimetry [137]. Although the intermediate half-life of 58gCo presents dosimetric complications, its β+ emissions (average energy 201 keV) are potentially useful for PET imaging, conferring 58mCo with theranostic properties [138]. The non-radioactive, naturally occurring 59Co is also a useful NMR nucleus (I=72, γ = 10.1 MHz·T−1). Its chemical shifts, which span a large range of 18,000 ppm, are highly sensitive to its electronic environment, as well as external factors like temperature [139–141]. Because of these properties, 59Co-based magnetic imaging agents have been proposed and are under development [142–144]. 59Co NMR spectroscopy will be discussed in Section 2.4 in the context of BFC complexation [145].

2.1. Production of Cobalt-58m

58mCo can be produced by irradiating nickel targets with fast neutrons through the 58Ni(n,p)58mCo reaction, as well as by the proton irradiation of iron via the 58Fe(p,n)58mCo reaction. These reactions are limited by the natural abundance of nickel-58 (58Ni, 68.1% abundance) and iron-58 (58Fe, 0.28% abundance) [146]. An early study irradiated solid [natNi]NiSO4 with >0.5 MeV neutrons to produce 58m/gCo [147]. This radioisotope was isolated after dissolving the target in acetic acid in the presence of carrier Co2+ ions, allowing its subsequent precipitation. This low-specific activity material was redissolved in HCl or HNO3 and then used for radiolabeling. The relative amounts of 58mCo and 58gCo afforded from this reaction depend on the energy of the neutrons used for bombardment [148]. Because fast-neutron beams are rare, the 58Fe(p,n)58mCo production method, which uses more widely available proton cyclotrons, is more desirable.

This reaction was optimized by using enriched 58Fe electroplated onto silver disks as the target, which was subjected to 1h irradiation with 10.1 MeV proton [137]. The target was then etched with dilute H2O2 in concentrated HCl and passed through an anion exchange column with HCl, affording 58m/gCo with 97% radiochemical yield. With this method, only 0.85% of this activity of the radiocobalt arose from 58gCo with the remainder comprising the desired metastable isomer 58mCo. However, cadmium-107 (107Cd) and cadmium-109 (109Cd) were also produced as byproducts via the action of protons on the silver disks of the target materials.

Deuteron bombardment of enriched iron-57 (57Fe) targets also produces 58mCo through the 57Fe(d,n)58mCo reaction [138]. For this process, targets, prepared by electroplating enriched 57Fe onto silver disks, were irradiated with 8.2 MeV deuterons for up to 2 h, after which nearly pure 58mCo was isolated with less than 0.009% 58gCo. After bombardment, the Fe layer was dissolved in HCl and treated with H2O2 to drive formation of [57Fe]Fe3+. This solution was then diluted in ethanol, eluted sequentially through an anion exchange column and extraction resin, and dried. This process could also recover the costly, enriched 57Fe from the anion exchange column with 94% efficiency after four production runs. A more streamlined approach for this radiochemical separation uses cation exchange instead of anion exchange resin, as this modification retains [58m/gCo]Co2+ while [57Fe]Fe3+ is eluted [149]. This approach is advantageous because it requires substantially less resin to capture the trace amounts of [58m/gCo]Co2+ compared to the macroscopic quantities of the Fe target material that are retained on the anion exchange resin.

Most recently, optimization of the target material for the 58Fe(p,n)58mCo route has led to improved radiochemical isolation of 58mCo [150]. In this study, a siphon-style liquid target comprising an aqueous solution of [natFe]Fe(NO3)3 was irradiated with a 13 MeV proton beam. By using the liquid target, the radioisotopes of Co generated by this reaction could be isolated rapidly by circumventing the slow solid target dissolution step. This faster radiochemical separation is important because it allows for higher ratios of 58mCo to 58gCo to be obtained. Although this study used natFe (91.8% iron-56, 56Fe), which predominately led to cobalt-56 (56Co) via the 56Fe(p,n)56Co reaction, the targetry and radiochemical aspects are applicable for the production of 58mCo.

2.2. Chemistry of Cobalt

Cobalt is a first-row transition metal with ground state electron configuration [Ar]3d74s2; its coordination chemistry is dominated by the Co2+ ([Ar]3d7) and Co3+ ([Ar]3d6) oxidation states. Co2+ has a d7 configuration and forms complexes with coordination numbers (CNs) ranging from 3–8; four-coordinate tetrahedral and six-coordinate octahedral complexes are the most common [151]. Co2+ has an ionic radius of 0.65 Å (CN 4) and is a borderline Lewis acid (η = 8.22 eV, Table 2) according to hard-soft acid base theory (HSAB) [152,153]. Co3+ is a d6 ion, forms complexes with CNs from 4–6 with six-coordinate octahedral complexes being the most common [151], has an ionic radius of 0.625 Å (CN 6) [152], and is a hard Lewis acid (η = 8.9 eV) [153]. Compared to Co2+, Co3+ forms inert complexes, a feature that is conferred by the ligand field stabilization effects of a low-spin d6 ion. As previously mentioned, 59Co is an NMR-active nucleus [140], and consequently 59Co NMR spectroscopy has arisen as a valuable tool to probe the speciation and properties of diamagnetic Co3+ coordination complexes [154–157].

Table 2.

Chemical properties of metal ions discussed in this review.

Ion Ionic radius (Å)a Absolute hardness, η (eV)b
Co2+ 0.65 (LS) 8.22
0.745 (HS)
Co3+ 0.545 (LS) 8.9
0.61 (HS)
Rh3+ 0.665 11.2
Sb3+ 0.76 -
Sb5+ 0.60 -
La3+ 1.032 15.39
Tb3+ 0.923 -
Er3+ 0.89 -
Hg2+ 1.02 7.7
Pt2+ 0.80c 8.0
Tl+ 1.50 7.16
Tl3+ 0.885 10.4

High spin (HS). Low spin (HS).

a

Six-coordinate ionic radii from Ref. [152].

b

Ref. [153].

c

Four-coordinate ionic radius from Ref. [152].

Coordination complexes of Co2+ and Co3+ have found use in various pharmaceutical applications, including antivirals and cancer treatments [158–165]. Significantly, a Co3+ Schiff-base complex Doxovir™ is active against herpes simplex virus and has passed phase II clinical trials as a treatment for herpes simplex virus type 1 [166,167]. Although cobalt-60 has been used for external-beam radiotherapy since the 1950s, interest in cobalt radioisotopes for TRT has recently been renewed [168].

2.3. Acyclic Chelators for Cobalt

A recent study investigated the acyclic, amino-polypyridyl TZTPEN chelator (N1-((triazol-4-yl)methyl)-N1,N2,N2-tris(pyridin-2-ylmethyl)ethane-1,2-diamine, Figure 3) for radiolabeling with 57Co as a surrogate for 55/58mCo [169]. This chelator is an analogue of TPEN (N1,N1,N2,N2-tetrakis[(pyridin-2-yl)methyl]ethane-1,2-diamine, Figure 3), which forms stable complexes with Co2+ (log KML = 16.6) [170]. TZTPEN uses a click chemistry-derived triazole in place of one of the pyridyls of TPEN for Co2+ coordination [169]. The triazole was afforded by the conjugation of this chelator with GE11 peptide, which targets epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [171]. This peptide-conjugate of TZTPEN was radiolabeled with [57Co]CoCl2 at pH 5.5 (using 10−5 M final chelator concentration) for 10 min at 60 °C with microwave irradiation in 5% DMSO. Under these conditions, the radiochemical conversion (RCC) was 99%.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Acyclic TPEN and TZTPEN chelators radiolabeled with [57Co]Co2+. The triazole moiety of TZTPEN is used for targeting vector conjugation.

Once formed, the stability of the [57Co]Co-TZTPEN-GE11 complex in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 5) at 37 °C was investigated. The radio-high-performance liquid chromatography (radio-HPLC) chromatogram of this material revealed two [57Co]Co-labeled complexes with different retention times (corresponding to 83 ± 11% and 17 ± 11% of the 57Co activity). These two signals were attributed to complexes of cobalt in its +2 and +3 oxidation states, suggesting that oxidation occurred during radiolabeling. Based on the redox potential of the related complex [Co(TPEN)]3+/2+ (0.497 V vs. NHE at pH 7) [172], the authors suggested that the majority of the radiolabeled complex contained [57Co]Co2+ with a smaller amount attributed to the [57Co]Co3+ species. This oxidation to Co3+ may be driven by radiolysis of water as was demonstrated earlier in [55Co]Co2+ complexes and will be discussed in Section 2.4 [173]. Although the radiolabeled [57Co]Co-TZTPEN-GE11 complex showed EGFR-specific uptake in vitro, in vivo mouse studies showed significant off-target accumulation, suggesting that the complex is not stable under these conditions [169].

2.4. Cyclic and Bifunctional Chelators for Cobalt

The coordination chemistry of Co2+ and Co3+ is extensive. However, there have only been few studies investigating radiometal chelation with radioisotopes of this metal like 57Co, 55Co, and 58mCo. DOTA, a ubiquitous chelator for many different types of metal ions, has also proven to be effective for Co radioisotopes. For example, the BFC DOTATOC (Figure 4) could be radiolabeled with [57Co]CoCl2. A concentration of 350 μM DOTATOC incubated with 1.6 MBq [57Co]CoCl2 at pH 5.0 (NaOAc buffer) for 30 min at 95 °C afforded a RCC of 99.5% and an apparent molar activity (AMA) of 185 MBq/nmol [145]. To further study the coordination chemistry and stability of [57Co]Co-DOTATOC, unfunctionalized DOTA and a simplified bioconjugate of DOTA containing a single amino acid residue, DOTA-D-PheNH2 (Figure 4), were investigated. Starting from non-radioactive CoCl2, [Co(H2DOTA)] and [Co(DOTA-D-PheNH2)]− were synthesized. The absence of 59Co NMR signals and the purple color of the complexes were attributed to the fact that these complexes contained paramagnetic Co2+ (t2g5eg2, S = 3/2), which did not spontaneously oxidize under aerobic conditions.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

DOTA and its bifunctional derivatives DOTA-D-PheNH2, DOTATOC, and DOTATE. The differences in DOTATOC and DOTATE targeting vectors are highlighted in blue.

This conclusion was further supported by a crystal structure of [Co(H2DOTA)] (Figure 5), which revealed the pseudo-octahedral geometry. This structure shows that only two of the four carboxylate pendent arms bind directly to the Co2+ center. The equatorial Co–N and axial Co–O interatomic distances were very similar at 2.171 and 2.203 Å, respectively, corroborating the lack of a significant Jahn-Teller distortion and confirming the high-spin Co2+ state. In addition, the thermodynamic stability of [Co(DOTA-D-PheNH2)]− was measured via a 57Co radiotracer method and found to be log KML = 19.6 (Table 3). In addition, the kinetic stability of [57Co]Co-DOTATOC was assessed by challenging this complex with a 104-fold excess of DTPA at pH 5.0, revealing the complex to remain >98% intact after 1 week. In human serum at 37 °C, this radiocomplex did show some degradation but with a long half-life of 800 h. Collectively, these results show that DOTA is an effective chelator for radiocobalt ions, even though it does not use all four of its pendent carboxylates for binding.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Crystal structure of the [Co(H2DOTA)] complex (CCDC Number 616730) [145].

Table 3.

Selected stability constants of Co–L complexes.

Ion Chelator logKML Ref.
Co2+ EDTA 16.49 [178]
DTPA 19.3 [179]
TPEN 16.6 [170]
DOTA 19.9 [145]
DOTA-D-PheNH2 19.6 [145]

In a similar fashion, DOTA conjugated to L19K-FDNB, a peptide which binds covalently to vascular endothelial growth factor [174], is an effective chelator for [57Co]Co2+ even though only three of its four pendants bind to the metal center [175]. Building upon these results, DOTATOC was radiolabeled with 58mCo [176]. Incubating DOTATOC (76–127 μM final concentration) with [58mCo]CoCl2 at pH 4.5 at 80–85 °C for 30 min resulted in a RCC >99% with a moderate AMA of 4.1 MBq/nmol. The complex remained stable after radiolabeling for at least 45 h after radiolabeling, showing that it survives the decay of 58mCo to 58gCo, presumably due to the small recoil of this event. Another peptide conjugate of DOTA, DOTATATE (Figure 4), was radiolabeled with 58mCo and 57Co, as well as 111In and 177Lu, and these complexes were used to study the differential biological effects of these radionuclides [177]. Radiolabeling and stability of all complexes was confirmed, and these results were used to verify that [58mCo]Co-DOTATATE is substantially more therapeutically effective than [111In]In-DOTATATE and [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE in vitro, highlighting the promise of 58mCo.

In addition to DOTA, the smaller macrocycle NOTA and its bifunctional derivative NOTA-TRC105 (Figure 6) have also been studied with 58mCo [138]. In this study, NOTA was conjugated to an anti-CD105 antibody known as TRC105 [180]. CD105 is a surface glycoprotein commonly overexpressed in tumor vasculature and has been targeted by vectors such as TRC105 in various pharmaceuticals [181–185]. Treating 0–300 ng NOTA with [58mCo]CoCl2 (pH 7.5, 25 °C, 30 min) leads to successful radiolabeling, affording complexes with an AMA of 26 ± 7 MBq/nmol [138]. Building upon these results, a conjugate of NOTA with an anti-CD105 antibody known as TRC105 [180] was investigated. Using similar conditions (pH 7.5, 25 °C, 2 h), NOTA-TRC105 could be radiolabeled to furnish [58mCo]Co-NOTA-TRC105 in 90 ± 2% radiochemical yield and an AMA of 1.2 MBq/μg after purification by HPLC. The [58mCo]Co-NOTA-TRC105 complex was then used in an in vivo biodistribution study in mice bearing mammary carcinoma xenografts. Successful targeting of the tumor vasculature was observed via PET imaging of the 58gCo daughter, providing further confirmation of the in vivo stability of the 58mCo complex.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

NOTA and its bifunctional derivative conjugated to the TRC105 antibody through a thiourea linker.

BFCs constructed from NO2A, DO3A, and their analogues NODAGA and DOTAGA (Figure 7), were radiolabeled with [55Co]Co2+ and [57Co]Co2+ [186]. These chelators were conjugated to the RM26 peptide, an antagonist to gastrin-releasing peptide receptor overexpressed in prostate and breast cancers (Figure 7) and then treated with [55Co]Co2+ or [57Co]Co2+ (pH 5.5, 90 °C by microwave heating, 3 min) to afford complexes with RCCs of >98% for all four of the BFCs. Their kinetic stabilities were assessed by challenging them with a 1,000-fold excess of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) at room temperature, revealing them to remain >99% intact after 1 h.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

The RM26 peptide is conjugated to NO2A and DO3A through a PEG2 linker and to NODAGA and DOTATGA through the terminal amide of the pendant.

As noted in the TZTPEN-GE1 discussion in Section 2.3, radiocobalt complexes can exist in both the +2 and +3 oxidation states under the conditions used for radiolabeling [169]. In fact, the ability of cobalt to cycle between these two oxidation states under biological conditions has been leveraged to create oxygen-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging probes [187]. Unsurprisingly, the Co2+/3+ redox chemistry should have important implications on radiopharmaceutical agents based on this metal ion.

This hypothesis was investigated in more detail via a series of three NOTA- and DOTA-based chelators that were studied with [55Co]Co2+/3+ [173]. Prior investigations involving these chelators demonstrated that their Co2+ complexes could be oxidized with oxygen or excess H2O2. This process could readily be interrogated via UV-vis spectroscopy that shows the diagnostic 520 nm d-d transition of Co3+ [145,187,188]. Accordingly, radiolabeling of NODAGA, NO2A, and DOTA with [55Co]CoCl2 in the presence of excess H2O2 afforded their oxidized [55Co]Co3+ complexes, which was verified via HPLC retention time comparisons to their non-radioactive analogues. Notably, [55Co][CoDOTA)]− was found to be spontaneously reduced to the [55Co][Co2+(DOTA)]2− species, a property which could be attributed to its more positive redox potential [189,190].

Model BFCs of the three chelators were then prepared by linking them to a tryptophan (W) residue, furnishing NODAGA-W, NO2A-W, and DO3A-W (Figure 8). Tryptophan was chosen for the increased lipophilicity it confers to the complexes, its convenient spectroscopic absorbance, and its 1.07 V (vs. NHE) redox potential that is far from the electrochemically relevant window of Co2+/3+ redox examined in this study. Although the cobalt complex of DO3A-W complex remained in the +2 oxidation state, the complexes of NO2A-W and NODAGA-W were spontaneously oxidized by air at a rate that correlated with their redox peak potentials. By comparison, the radioactive [55Co]Co2+ complexes were oxidized to a much larger extent under similar conditions compared to their non-radioactive analogues. The authors posited that this effect was due to the radiolytic generation of ROS in solution.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

NODAGA, NO2A, and DO3A conjugated to tryptophan (W) by an amide bond to the −NH2 group.

Lastly, the authors investigated these ligands in PSMA-617-conjugated derivatives. Specifically, the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) conjugates of DO3A and NOTA were investigated because these ligands stabilize Co2+ and Co3+, respectively, allowing the effect of metal oxidation state on biodistribution to be assessed. Both complexes showed good biodistribution with high tumor uptake. Furthermore, radio-HPLC metabolite analysis of urine showed that within the [55Co][Co2+(DOTA-PSMA-617)]− and [55Co][Co3+(NODAGA-PSMA-617)] complexes, the Co2+ and Co3+ oxidation states were maintained in vivo. Thus, with appropriate ligands, either oxidation state of radiocobalt ions can be used for nuclear medicine.

In addition to the macrocyclic chelators discussed above, the bicyclic chelator diaminosarcophagine (DiAmSar, Figure 9) has also been radiolabeled with [55Co]Co2+ [191]. DiAmSar was radiolabeled with [55Co]Co2+ at pH 8 and elevated temperature (80 °C) for 4 h to give an AMA value of 45 ± 9 MBq/nmol [191]. Higher pH solutions afforded higher AMA values as a consequence of the lower extent of protonation of the ligand under these conditions. Mass spectrometry of the non-radioactive [natCo]Co-DiAmSar complex revealed the Co ion to attain the +3 oxidation state, which results from exposure to oxygen. Stability studies revealed this complex to remain >95% intact in both human serum or in the presence of greater than 5 × 104 excess of EDTA at 37 °C over 96 h. After demonstrating the suitability of DiAmSar, it was conjugated to the SR142948 neurotensin receptor antagonist for targeted applications (Figure 9) [192]. This conjugate was radiolabeled with [55Co]Co2+ in a sodium gentisate solution, a known radioprotectant to help prevent radiolysis of the complex [193–195], giving 87% radiochemical yield after purification. In this case, the [55Co][Co3+(DiAmSar-SR142948)]3+ complex was obtained, in part due to the radiolysis products of gentisate that can accelerate the oxidation of Co2+. Overall, this study established precedent for the DiAmSar chelator for use with radioisotopes of cobalt.

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Diaminosarcophagine (DiAmSar, R = H) and the SR142948 neurotensin receptor antagonist to which it is conjugated via an amide bond.

3. Rhodium

The rhodium-103m (103mRh) radionuclide is the decay product of both ruthenium-103 (103Ru, t1/2 39.3 d, β−-decay) and palladium-103 (103Pd, t1/2 16.99 d, EC). As such, 103mRh can be obtained from generators using either of these longer lived parent radioisotopes, as has been proposed since the 1970s [196,197]. 103Ru can be obtained as a fission product of uranium-235 (235U) and can also be made in a reactor from enriched ruthenium-102 (102Ru) through the 102Ru(n,γ)103Ru reaction. 103Pd can be made either with reactor or cyclotrons, via the 102Pd(n,γ)103Pd, 103Rh(p,n)103Pd, and 103Rh(d,2n)103Pd reactions.

As of yet, no chelators have been explored specifically with 103mRh. There have been a handful of studies, however, on chelation approaches for the therapeutic β−-emitter rhodium-105 (105Rh, t1/2 35.4 h, 1 β−/decay, 306 and 319 keV γ-photons), and these efforts are likely to be amenable for use with 103mRh MAE therapy.

3.1. Production of Rhodium-103m

The neutron bombardment of natRu has been investigated using both Ru metal and RuCl3 as targets. Their dissolutions in H5IO6 afforded [103Ru]RuO4, which was subsequently extracted into carbon tetrachloride and stored as a biphasic mixture in contact with aqueous H5IO6 and HCl to stabilize it. As the [103Ru]RuO4 decays, the [103mRh]Rh3+ partitions from the organic to the aqueous layer [198,199]. For samples generated by the fission of 235U, a similar radiochemical strategy can be applied, but an initial precipitation step is first required to remove other fission products. The handling of 103Ru-based generators is complicated by the intense and high-energy γ emission of 103Ru—the most intense γ photon (0.91/decay) having an energy of 497 keV—which requires significant shielding that is often only afforded by hot-cells [198]. By contrast, 103Pd-based generators circumvent this problem because the γ emissions of 103Pd are less intense (most intense contributes 2.2×10−4/decay) and of lower energy (357 keV). To make 103Pd, palladium targets enriched to 80% 102Pd in the form of [102Pd]PdCl2 or [102Pd]Pd(NO3)2 can be irradiated with thermal neutrons. The resulting [103Pd]Pd2+ can be dissolved in water or low molar HNO3 and then extracted into toluene with 1 mM acetylacetone. The [103mRh]Rh3+ produced from the decay of [103Pd][Pd(acac)2] in toluene can then be extracted into aqueous HCl.

Alternatively, more clinically suitable, 103Pd-based 103mRh generators have more recently been developed that would enable 103mRh elution at the point of care. One approach involves the use of reactor-produced [103Pd]PdCl2, which is chelated by a lipophilic 16aneS4 derivative (16aneS4-C8, Figure 10) and then adsorbed onto a C18 column [200]. As 103Pd decays on this column, the resulting [103mRh]Rh3+ can be eluted with aqueous HCl. A similar generator can also be assembled by loading [103Pd]Pd2+ onto an anion exchange column [201].

Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Lipophilic 16aneS4 derivative (16aneS4-C8) used to immobilize [103Pd]PdCl2 on a C18 column for use as a [103mRh]Rh3+ generator.

3.2. Chemistry of Rhodium

The coordination chemistry of rhodium is dominated by its stable +1 and +3 oxidation states. Mononuclear complexes containing this metal in the −1, 0, +2, +4, and +5 states have been reported but are rare [151,202]. Rh3+ ([Kr]4d6) is a d6 ion with a radius of 0.665 Å (CN 6) and is a borderline Lewis acid (η = 11.2 eV) [152,153], although arguments have been made that it is a soft acid [203]. Its hydrolysis constant (defined as log K but reported here as −log K for comparison to the pH scale) of 3.6 may require acidic media for radiolabeling [204]. It most commonly attains an octahedral geometry, affording low-spin (t2g)6 complexes that are kinetically inert. By contrast, Rh+ is a softer d8 ion that forms square planar complexes. In studying the chemistry of Rh, the use of 103Rh (I = ½, γ = −13.5 MHz·T−1) for NMR spectroscopy is useful, especially when applied with two-dimensional heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence (HMQC) techniques [139,205].

3.3. Acyclic Chelators for Rhodium

Although chelators have not yet been investigated with 103mRh, studies involving the β− emitter 105Rh serve as a logical starting point for developing radioconjugates of this MAE emitter. Some of the earliest examples of chelators radiolabeled with [105Rh]Rh3+ include multidentate amines [206–208], oximes [209], a porphyrin [210], and cysteine [211]. These initial studies, however, required addition of macroscopic amounts of non-radioactive RhCl3 [212]. No-carrier-added radiochemical syntheses were later performed using acyclic diaminedithioether chelators, which gave moderate RCCs of 46–61% [213]. Higher RCCs of >90% were obtained for tetrathioether chelators with terminal carboxylate groups. However, both these classes of chelators required high temperatures of 80–85 °C (refluxing 10% ethanol solutions) to achieve reasonable RCC, which is not amenable for use with many temperature-sensitive biological targeting vectors. The high-temperature radiolabeling in ethanol likely reduces [105Rh]Rh3+ to the more labile [105Rh]Rh+, thereby facilitating ligand exchange [214] before the metal is re-oxidized to the +3 state. This ligand class has been explored extensively [212], and specific key examples are discussed below.

An initial investigation probed the importance of the carbon-chain length, and the resulting differences in chelator size and flexibility, between thioether donors within this ligand class, comparing ethylene and propylene linkers (222-S4-(CH2CO2H)2 and 333-S4-(CH2CO2H2)2, Figure 11). Their coordination chemistry with Rh3+ revealed that the shorter linker ligand gave the cis isomer [RhCl2(222-S4-(CH2CO2H)2]+, whereas the longer linker ligand formed the trans isomer [RhCl2(333-S4-(CH2CO2H)2]+ [215]. In both cases, the terminal carboxylates remained protonated and were not coordinated to the Rh3+ center. Subsequent radiolabeling of these chelators (6–10 × 10−6 M) with [105Rh]RhCl3 at pH 4 at high temperatures (90 °C) led to high RCCs >90% but was less successful at lower temperatures [216]. Their kinetic stabilities in phosphate-buffered saline were also sufficient. [105Rh][RhCl2(222-S4-(CH2CO2H)2]+ remained >95% intact after 5 days, whereas [105Rh][RhCl2(333-S4-(CH2CO2H)2]+ was 80–90% intact after 5 days.

Figure 11.

Figure 11.

Acyclic thioethers radiolabeled with [105Rh]RhCl3.

Given the success of 333-S4-(CH2CO2H)2, it was conjugated to the BBN(7–14)NH2 peptide, which binds to the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor expressed in multiple types of cancer [212,217]. When radiolabeled with [105Rh]RhCl3 at pH 4–5 in refluxing aqueous ethanol, only low RCCs <10% were observed. The authors posited that alternative methods to reduce [105Rh]Rh3+ to [105Rh]+, instead of refluxing ethanol, could improve the radiolabeling efficiency.

In an effort to achieve more facile reduction to [105Rh]Rh+, chelators bearing reducing phosphine moieties were developed [218,219]. Two bis(phosphino-amine) chelators (P2N2Ph6 and P2N2Ph2, Figure 12) and two bis(phosphino-thioether) chelators (P2S2Me2 and P2S2Ph2, Figure 12) were prepared and radiolabeled with [105Rh]RhCl3 [218]. The lipophilicity of the P2N2Ph6 chelator complicated its radiolabeling, which could only be performed in 50% ethanol/chloroform, whereas the less lipophilic P2N2Ph2 chelator could be radiolabeled at similar efficiency but within 10% ethanol. The bis(phosphino-thioether) chelators could also be radiolabeled under these conditions with comparable efficiencies. Like the lipophilic P2N2Ph6, P2S2Ph2 also required an organic cosolvent (acetonitrile) for radiolabeling. The [105Rh]Rh-P2N2Ph2 and [105Rh]Rh-P2S2Me2 complexes were incubated in phosphate-buffered saline at 37 °C, showing negligible decomplexation over 48 h. Compared to the previous studies with the S4-(CH2CO2H)2 chelators, the incorporation of phosphine moieties enabled >90% RCC at milder conditions (pH 5–7 vs. 4–5, 60 °C vs. ≥ 80 °C, 5–10% ethanol vs. ≥40%), but required higher chelator concentrations (10−3 M vs. 10−5 M). These milder radiolabeling conditions should facilitate the use of pH- and temperature-sensitive targeting vectors, but the requirement for higher chelator concentrations will lead to constructs with diminished specific molar activity [212].

Figure 12.

Figure 12.

Bis(phosphino-amine) chelators (P2N2Ph6 and P2N2Ph2) and bis(phosphino-thioether) chelators (P2S2Me2 and P2S2Ph2) radiolabeled with [105Rh]RhCl3.

3.4. Cyclic Chelators for Rhodium

Building upon the linear thioether chelators described above, macrocyclic thiacrown ethers have also been investigated with [105Rh]Rh3+ [220–222]. Among the thioether macrocycles investigated, 16S4-diol (Figure 13) was studied with both stable and radioactive Rh3+ [220]. A crystal structure of [trans-RhCl2(16S4-diol)]+ revealed the Rh3+ center to attain a six-coordinate octahedral geometry comprising four equatorial sulfur donors and two axial chlorides.

Figure 13.

Figure 13.

Macrocyclic thioether 16S4-diol radiolabeled with [105Rh]RhCl3 and the crystal structure of [trans-RhCl2(16S4-diol)]+. Crystal structure reprinted with permission from Ref. [220]. Copyright © 1996 Elsevier, B. V.

Radiolabeling studies with [105Rh]RhCl3 showed complex formation that could be confirmed by matching its electrophoretic migration and chromatographic retention time to that of the non-radioactive [trans-RhCl2(16S4-diol)]+ complex. High RCCs (≥95%, pH 4, 10–15% ethanol) could be achieved with short incubation times, but with the requirement of elevated temperatures (60 min at 80 °C). Alternatively, longer incubation times at lower temperatures (90 min at 64 °C) could also be used to obtain good RCCs. The excellent kinetic stability of [105Rh][trans-RhCl2(16S4-diol)]+ was evidenced by the lack of any decomposition in phosphate-buffered saline over 4 days and only 8% loss after 4 days in human serum at 37 °C. Compared to the acyclic chelators discussed above, 16S4-diol could be labeled at much lower ligand concentration (10−6 M) and is therefore a promising chelator for 103mRh. The 16S4 chelator may also prove useful for other soft radiometals which has been proposed with a recent report of bifunctional 16S4 derivatives [223].

4. Antimony

Naturally occurring antimony comprises two stable isotopes, antimony-121 (121Sb) and antimony-123 (123Sb). The radioisotope antimony-119 (119Sb, t1/2 38.2 h) was first proposed for use as a therapeutic MAE emitter in the early 2000s [224]. Its low-energy emissions (average 8.9 keV/decay) and large number of MAEs (average 23.68 MAEs/decay) make it highly favorable for this application. Antimony-117 (117Sb, t1/2 2.8 h) serves as a promising diagnostic counterpart that emits β+ particles for PET imaging and 159 keV γ photon emission for SPECT [107,225]. The redox chemistry, speciation, biodistribution, and chelation of antimony with a focus on its use in radiopharmaceuticals has been recently reviewed [226].

4.1. Production of Antimony-119

Early production strategies for 119Sb employed the 119Sn(p,n)119Sb reaction, which used 10.1 MeV protons to bombard silver targets that were electroplated with enriched 119Sn [227]. This approach is also successful with clinical cyclotrons that operate in the energy range for producing common radionuclides like 18F, suggesting that access to 119Sb could be widespread [228]. Isolation of 119Sb from these targets is achieved by first dissolving them in concentrated HCl and then treating them with H2O2 to oxidize Sn2+ to Sn4+ and Sb3+ to Sb5+. From here, ion-exchange chromatography can effectively separate the 119Sb from the bulk Sn because of their different oxidation states. The 119Sb isotope can also be produced as a mixture of other Sb radionuclides (denoted 1XXSb) by deuteron irradiation of natural tin (natSn) targets through natSn(d,n)1XXSb and natSn(d,2n)1XXSb reactions [225].

Another approach to production uses a metastable isomer of tellurium-119 (119mTe, t1/2 4.7 days), which ultimately decays to yield 119Sb. The long half-life of 119mTe enables its possible use as 119Sb generators, which can provide a multiweek supply of this radioisotope [229]. Although 119mTe production requires high proton energies (34–68 MeV), it can be produced from naturally occurring antimony (natSb), which comprises 121Sb and 123Sb, through the 121Sb(p,3n)119mTe and 123Sb(p,5n)119mTe reactions, respectively [230]. This generator production approach is limited by the difficult purifications needed to rigorously remove the excess natSb from the target.

4.2. Chemistry of Antimony

Antimony is a pnictogen (group 15) with a ground state electron configuration of [Kr]4d105s25p3. Although antimony usually behaves as a metal and exhibits oxidation states of +3 ([Kr]4d105s2) and +5 ([Kr]4d10), it can also attain negative oxidation states down to −3 [231]. Sb3+ can exhibit weak Lewis base character but is generally considered to be a soft Lewis acid [232–235]. Antimony typically forms complexes with CNs ranging from 3–6 with a six-coordinate ionic radii of 0.76 Å and 0.6 Å for Sb3+ and Sb5+, respectively [152]. Coordination complexes of Sb3+ are often anisotropic, a feature that arises from the stereochemical activity of its 5s2 lone pair. Under biological conditions, Sb5+ can be readily reduced to Sb3+, suggesting that Sb3+ may be more relevant in vivo [236,237]. Antimony in both the +3 and +5 oxidation states exhibits complex speciation in water and is very susceptible to hydrolysis, forming oligomeric and insoluble hydroxides [238]. An additional concern is the oxidation to Sb3+ to Sb5+ by H2O2 formed upon radiolysis of H2O [239–241]. This problem is less significant if radiolabeling processes are rapid [226].

Although the coordination chemistry of antimony for TRT is largely underexplored, antimony compounds are currently used therapeutically for amphotericin-resistant Leishmaniasis, a tropical parasitic disease [242]. Further bioinorganic studies of antimony compounds have investigated their genotoxicity and potential use as chemotherapeutics for cancer and other biological targets which have been reviewed elsewhere [243,244]. Although chelators for applications of antimony in biology are sparse, a vast majority of these complexes rely on thiolates, thiocarbamates, thiocarbazates, and other sulfur-containing ligands that can stabilize the soft Sb3+ ion [245–247,243]. The soft Lewis acidity of Sb3+ gives it a high affinity for endogenous thiols such as glutathione (log KML = 25.2 ± 0.4), which is present at mM concentrations in vivo [248,249]. These properties must be carefully considered when designing chelators for in vivo use.

4.3. Acyclic Chelators for Antimony

Sb3+ forms stable complexes with carboxylate-containing chelators, such as EDTA, DTPA, lactic acid, tartaric acid, and citric acid with log KML values ranging from 7.84–19.5 (Table 4) [250]. Acyclic chelators with both hard and soft donors, such as carboxylates and thiolates, respectively, provide insight on the donor atom preferences of Sb3+. For example, Sb3+ complexes of glutathione and trypanothione show this ion to exclusively bind to the thiolate moieties [245,248,251,252].

Table 4.

Selected stability constants of Sb–L complexes.

Ion Chelator logKML Ref.
Sb3+ glutathione 25.2 [248]
EDTA 19.5 [250]
PCTA 23.2 [253]

The preference of Sb3+ for soft thiolate donors prompted researchers to investigate the ligand trithiol (Figure 14) for 119Sb. The Sb complex of this ligand was prepared from SbCl3, forming the neutral [Sb(κ3-trithiol)] complex (Figure 14) [254]. Its crystal structure shows the Sb3+ ion to attain a trigonal pyramidal coordination geometry consistent with the stereochemical activity of the 5s2 lone pair [255]. The average S–Sb–S angle is 91.5°, and the average S–Sb bond length is 2.444(7) Å. Multiple intermolecular S⋯Sb contacts exist throughout the lattice with an average distance of 3.2960(8), which is shorter than the sum of S and Sb van der Waals radii [256–258]. Notably, the As3+ analogue of this complex shows a much longer average intermolecular S⋯As distance of 3.5369(12), which is comparable to the sum of their van der Waals radii [259]. Therefore, this shorter S⋯Sb interaction highlights the greater Lewis acidity of Sb3+ compared to As3+, as a result of the smaller of stereochemical activity of the Sb3+ 5s2 lone pair [254].

Figure 14.

Figure 14.

Trithiol, its bifunctional derivative trithiol-BFC, and the corresponding crystal structures of their Sb3+ complexes [Sb(κ3-trithiol)] (CCDC Number 1976847) [254] and [Sb(κ3-trithiol-BFC)] (CCDC Number 2071807) [225].

The bifunctional derivative of trithiol (trithiol-BFC, Figure 14) was used for radiolabeling with 1XXSb, and the crystal structure of the [natSb][Sb(κ3-trithiol-BFC)] complex shows similar coordination chemistry to the previous report (Figure 14) [225]. The Sb3+ center attains a trigonal pyramidal geometry with an average S–Sb–S bond angle of 91.6° and average S–Sb bond length of 2.440(8) Å. This angle is much more consistent with an octahedron missing three vertices, as opposed to a tetrahedron missing one vertex, which would give bond angles closer to 109.5°, and is consistent with a known decrease in orbital hybridization for heavy main group elements. Like the structure of Sb(κ3-trithiol), intermolecular interactions between S and Sb are apparent with average distances of 3.4962(2) Å. As noted above, these short distances, which are less than the sum of the van der Waals radii for these elements, indicate that this interaction has strong Lewis acid character.

The trithiol-BFC was successfully radiolabeled with a radioisotopic mixture of [117/119Sb]Sb3+ (8.4 MBq/pmol 117Sb and 42 kBq/pmol 119Sb). Unlike more conventional radiolabeling processes, the procedure used in this study involved the direct incubation of the chelator (10−5 M) with the dissolved target for 30 min at room temperature. This process afforded an AMA of 30 nmol of trithiol-BFC incorporating 5.8 pmol 1XXSb (49 MBq and 240 kBq of 117Sb and 119Sb, respectively). This approach of directly radiolabeling from the unseparated target material is a promising strategy that can streamline the clinical advance of novel radiopharmaceuticals. Although thermodynamic stability constants were not reported, the [117/119Sb]Sb-trithiol-BFC complex shows high kinetic stability when incubated with 25 mM cysteine (91 ± 9% intact after 72 h) and fetal bovine serum (97.5 ± 1.6% after 72 h).

A recent study investigated the hydrotris(methimazolyl)borate (Tm−, Figure 15), which is known to chelate Sb3+ [260,261], for radiolabeling with Sb radioisotopes [262]. A mixture of Sb radioisotopes, comprising antimony-118m, 120m, and 122, was produced from the 10.8–13.1 MeV proton bombardment of natSn targets, which were then subjected to radiochemical processing and separation to yield [1XXSb]Sb5+. Incubation of the radioisotope mixture with 2.8 mM NaTm at room temperature for 1 h at pH <4 afforded a complex with a RCC of 99.5 ± 1.0%. Using isotopically pure [117Sb]Sb5+, obtained from an enriched [117Sn]Sn target, radiolabeling with NaTm also proceeded effectively, giving a complex with AMA of 8.8–33.0 MBq/μmol after incubating at room temperature for 45 min at pH <4. Although [1XXSb]Sb5+ was used for these radiolabeling procedures, it is reduced to the +3 oxidation state by excess Tm− ligand, affording [1XXSb]Sb(Tm)2 as the most likely product. Although [1XXSb][Sb(Tm)2]+ was unstable at pH values of 4 or higher, this complex showed high kinetic stability in the presence of a high concentration of cysteine (25 mM) under acidic conditions (pH 0–1).

Figure 15.

Figure 15.

Hydrotris(methimazolyl)borate (Tm−) chelator and its corresponding [Sb(Tm)2]+ crystal structure (CCDC Number 274857) [261].

The crystal structure of [Sb(Tm)2]+ reveals an Sb3+ center bound two Tm− ligands (Figure 15) [261]. One of the Tm− ligands interacts with Sb3+ in a tridentate κ3 manner, whereas the other binds with only two coordinating sulfur atoms in a κ2 mode. The five-coordinate [Sb(κ3-Tm)(κ2-Tm)]+ complex exhibits a square pyramidal geometry, that is distorted by stereochemical effects from the 5s2 lone pair.

The room-temperature 1H NMR spectrum of the complex exhibits broad peaks, which the authors attributed to fluxionality of the Tm− ligands. The ligand fluxionality, in addition to the exposed Sb3+ center, may explain the significant hydrolytic instability of the radiolabeled [1XXSb][Sb(Tm)2]+ complex [262]. Crystal structures of the halide-bound [Sb(κ3-Tm)(κ1-Tm)X] complexes (X = Br−, I−) were obtained when SbBr3 and SbI3 were used as starting materials. These complexes attain similar square pyramidal geometries with a Sb-bound halide, one Tm− ligand binding in a κ3 mode, and the second Tm− ligand in a κ1 mode. Furthermore, solution studies showed that the iodide complex is in equilibrium with a dimeric [{Sb(κ3-Tm)(μ2-I)I}2] structure, where the κ1-Tm ligand of the mononuclear structure is replaced with two bridging μ2-I ions. Because radiolabeling involved the use of HCl solutions of [1XXSb]Sb3+/5+, similar halide complexes of radioactive Sb may be formed, which should be considered for downstream biological applications. Considering the results of Tm− radiolabeling with [1XXSb]Sb3+ [262], the ligand fluxionality observed by NMR [261], and the anion-dependent crystal structures and equilibria [261], it is clear that Sb–Tm complexes exhibit complicated and dynamic coordination chemistry. Further studies into the composition and speciation of the radiolabeled complexes are necessary to assess the feasibility of Tm− as a chelator for radio-antimony.

Efforts to develop chelators to stabilize the +5 oxidation state of Sb have also been pursued. Compared to this metal in the +3 oxidation state, Sb5+ lacks the stereochemically active lone pair, is a much harder ion, and has a substantially smaller ionic radius (0.6 Å compared to 0.76 Å, CN 6) [250,263,264]. Based on these properties, chelators containing hard anionic donors, instead of soft sulfur donors, were investigated. Solutions of 1 mM of either deferoxamine (DFO), DOTA, or TREN-CAM were radiolabeled with 21 kBq [1XXSb]Sb5+ at 80 °C in pH 4 solution for 60 min. Of these three chelators, only TREN-CAM (Figure 16) could be radiolabeled, as determined via radio-HPLC. Optimization of these radiolabeling conditions showed that slightly lower temperatures (60 °C) and lower ligand concentration (10−4 M) were also effective. The high hydrolytic instability of Sb5+ was reflected by the fact that at slightly higher pH conditions (increasing from 2 to 4 to 6), a significant quantity of an intermediate hydroxide complex with only two coordinated catecholate donors [1XXSb][Sb(H2TREN-CAM)(OH)2]− was observed by radio-HPLC with a retention time shorter than the [1XXSb][Sb(TREN-CAM)]− complex. Consequently, it is important to use precise chromatographic characterization techniques, like radio-HPLC, to verify product formation.

Figure 16.

Figure 16.

Tris-catecholate chelator TREN-CAM and the crystal structure of its [Sb(TREN-CAM)]− complex (CCDC Number 2381819) [265].

Once formed, [1XXSb][Sb(TREN-CAM)]− was shown to be kinetically stable assessed in human serum at 37 °C, exhibiting <4% decomplexation after 72 h. The complex was also stable in the presence of 2.8 mM glutathione over 72 h at 37 °C, reflecting the ability of the TREN-CAM ligand to stabilize the +5 oxidation state. By contrast, under the same conditions, the intermediate [1XXSb][Sb(H2TREN-CAM)(OH)2]− species fully decomposed in the presence of glutathione after 1 day, revealing that hexadentate coordination by the TREN-CAM chelator is needed to prevent Sb5+ reduction. Both the efficient radiolabeling and radiochemical stability of the TREN-CAM complexes of [1XXSb]Sb5+ indicate that further studies to test bifunctional analogues and biological conjugates are warranted.

To further understand the high efficacy of TREN-CAM for Sb5+, further solution and solid-state structural studies were carried out. Notably, the use of Sb K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) elucidated its properties in solution. Within the X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) region, the edge energy was consistent with the +5 oxidation state. The EXAFS region could be modeled using a six-coordinate Sb center with average Sb–O interatomic distances of 1.992(5) Å. A single-crystal X-ray diffraction study of [natSb][Sb(TREN-CAM)]− verified these results (Figure 16), revealing a six-coordinate Sb center interacting with all six catecholate donors in a pseudo-octahedral geometry. The agreement between the CN and average interatomic distances measured by XAS indicate that this structure remains intact in solution. These structural studies provide a launching point for rational chelator design effort for radioisotopes of Sb in the +5 oxidation state.

4.4. Cyclic Chelators for Antimony

As of yet, cyclic chelators have not been investigated for 119Sb, but several reports have characterized complexes of this type with stable Sb3+ salts. Efforts toward the use of DOTA for this application were recently reported. Despite the widespread implementation of DOTA as a highly effective chelator, it was not able to form a complex with Sb3+ under aqueous conditions, presumably due to the extensive hydrolysis of this ion. Using ethanol as a solvent, however, enabled the isolation of [Sb(DOTA)]− [253,266]. Challenging [Sb(DOTA)]− with one equivalent of Bi3+, Y3+, and Sc3+ led to stochiometric displacement of the Sb3+ ion, and treating this complex with two molar equivalents of biologically relevant divalent ions, Ca2+, Mg2+, and Zn2+, resulted in 65%, 55%, and 38% release of Sb3+, respectively [266]. After incubating aqueous solutions of Na4DOTA and SbCl3 for 2 h at 50 °C, the vapor diffusion of ethanol afforded crystals of [Sb(DOTA)]−, apparently avoiding the formation of insoluble oxy-hydroxide species. Within the crystal structure of [Sb(DOTA)]− (Figure 17), the Sb3+ center sits on a crystallographic 2-fold axis, conferring the complex with C2 symmetry. All four macrocyclic N atoms and all four pendent carboxylates coordinate to the Sb3+ center, providing an eight-coordinate N4O4 coordination environment. The N–Sb distances range from 2.4277(11) to 2.4563(11) Å, and the O–Sb distances span 2.5011(10) to 2.6929(11) Å. The unique coordination chemistry of Sb3+ is apparent when comparing to that of the Sc3+ ion [267]. Both ions have similar eight-coordinate ionic radii of 0.87 Å [266], but Sb3+ is softer. Additionally, its electron configuration possesses a 5s2 valence lone pair that can be stereochemically active. These differences are clear when comparing the crystal structures of [Sb(DOTA)]− and [Sc(DOTA)]−. Despite the similar ionic radii of Sb3+ and Sc3+, the O–Sc distances (2.223(2) Å) are substantially shorter than the O–Sb distances of 2.501(1)–2.693(1) Å (Figure 17), while the N–M distances are comparable as is the distortion out of the N4 plane (1.336 Å for both Sc3+ and Sb3+). Therefore, the lability of [Sb(DOTA)]− cannot be attributed to geometric distortion of the DOTA chelator because it is actually less strained than the inert [Sc(DOTA)]− complex. A possible explanation for its poor stability is most likely a mismatch between the HSAB properties of the DOTA carboxylate and soft Sb3+ ion. Hence, chelators bearing softer donors, such as thiolates or thioethers, may be more promising for Sb3+ chelation, as indicated by the relative success of trithiol-BFC.

Figure 17.

Figure 17.

Crystal structures of [Sb(DOTA)]− (left, CCDC Number 2128466) [266] and [Sc(DOTA)]− (right, CCDC Number 984842) [267]. The unit cell of [Sb(DOTA)]− contains both Λ(λλλλ) and Δ(δδδδ) enantiomers; only the Λ(λλλλ) is shown here for clarity. Coordinated K+ ion omitted from [Sc(DOTA)]− structure for clarity.

Another cyclic aminopolycarboxylate PCTA (3,6,9,15-tetraazabicyclo[9.3.1]pentadeca-1(15),11,13-triene-3,6,9-triacetic acid, Figure 18) has also been studied for its ability to bind Sb3+ [253]. The [Sb(PCTA)] complex was formed by mixing equimolar amounts of Sb3+, prepared via the dissolution of Sb2O3 in 6 M HCl to avoid hydrolysis products, and H3PCTA at 2.5 mM concentration in water, adjusting the pH to neutral with NaOH solution, then stirring at 70 °C for 5–7 days. Crystals were then grown from methanol solutions, furnishing two different crystal types. The first contained [Sb(PCTA)], with all three carboxylates deprotonated, cocrystallized with NaCl as [NaCl][Sb(PCTA)], and the second comprised the cationic complex [Sb(HPCTA)]+, with one carboxylate remaining protonated, as the chloride salt (Figure 18). In the [NaCl][Sb(PCTA)] structure, the Na+ ion is coordinated to one of the deprotonated carboxylate arms of the PCTA ligand, giving rise to a six-coordinate Sb3+ center. In the [Sb(HPCTA)]+ structure, the Sb3+ center is also six-coordinate because the protonated carboxylate does not bind to the central ions, but instead hydrogen bonds with a lattice water molecule. Consequently, both crystals show the Sb3+ center to attain a distorted pentagonal pyramidal geometry supported by an N4O3 environment. Only the [NaCl][Sb(PCTA)] crystal, which refined to better residuals, will be discussed. The Sb3+ center is six-coordinate, and the complex forms a distorted pentagonal pyramidal geometry similar to the crystal structure with EDTA [268]. In the absence of cocrystallized NaCl, density functional theory (DFT) calculations show a seven-coordinate structure which the authors state is the most likely coordination environment in the solution phase. The DFT structure shows a nonbonding lone pair of electrons on the metal center consistent with Sb3+ coordination complexes [255]. The pyridyl nitrogen of the macrocycle coordinates Sb3+ with a N–Sb interatomic distance of 2.512(3) Å, a value that is similar to those of the adjacent macrocyclic N donors (N1 and N3), which give rise to an average N–Sb distance of 2.546(3) Å. Notably, the macrocyclic N donor distal to the pyridyl group affords a substantially shorter N–Sb distance of 2.303(3). The O–Sb distances of the two coordinated carboxylates O atoms are 2.148(4) and 2.221(4) Å, whereas the Na-bound carboxylate O atom (O6) is 2.812(4) Å away from the Sb3+ center. The Sb3+ center resides 0.504 Å above the plane formed from by the macrocycle N atoms. The authors note that Sb3+ coordination complexes with EDTA4− [268], HEDTA3− [269], NTA3− (nitrilotriacetate) [270], tartrate [271], and oxalate [272] adopt similar distorted pyramidal structures. These pyramidal structures—originating from the Sb3+ lone pair activity—prevent the donor atoms from completely encapsulating the Sb3+ center and therefore make it vulnerable towards transchelation [253].

Figure 18.

Figure 18.

PCTA chelator and the crystal structures of its [NaCl][Sb(PCTA)] (CCDC Number 2060909) and [Sb(HPCTA)]Cl (CCDC Number 2060910) complexes [253].

To assess the stability of the [Sb(PCTA)] complex, its stability constant was measured via UV-vis titration to be log KML = 23.2(1). Notably, this value is larger than that of [Sb(EDTA)]− (log KML = 19.5), marking it as one of the largest Sb3+ stability constants reported to date [250]. Given the susceptibility of Sb3+ towards hydrolysis, however, [Sb(PCTA)] underwent significant spontaneous and hydroxide-assisted degradation near physiological pH with dissociation half-lives of 82.0, 7.0, and 1.8 s at pH 6.8, 8.0, and 8.6, respectively. The authors attribute the lability of the complex to the situation of the Sb3+ ion above the plane of the macrocycle, as observed in the crystal structures, underscoring this geometric vulnerability for transmetalation and transchelation as a point for optimizing future chelators. Although the PCTA chelator does not appear to be suitable for Sb3+ chelation for radiopharmaceuticals, the coordination chemistry and thermodynamic and kinetic studies performed for this complex provide useful data for future ligand design efforts.

5. Lanthanum

Lanthanum has two naturally occurring isotopes. Stable lanthanum-139 (139La) comprises the majority (99%) with the remaining trace amounts existing as lanthanum-138 (138La, t1/2 1.03 × 1011 years). Among its synthetic radioisotopes, lanthanum-135 (135La, t1/2 19.5 h, EC), which decays to stable barium-135, has gained increasing attention as a MAE emitter for TRT because of its suitable half-life and high yield of MAEs with appropriate energies. Specifically, an average of 12.3 MAEs are emitted per decay with a total kinetic energy of 6.6 keV. Further, the use of stable La3+ as a non-radioactive surrogate for studies of the α-emitter actinium-225 (225Ac)—due to their similar ionic radii and Lewis acidities—has provided preliminary data for its coordination chemistry with BFCs prior to interest in the therapeutic isotope 135La.

5.1. Production of Lanthanum-135

135La can be prepared by proton irradiation of metallic natural barium (natBa, 6.59% in 135Ba) targets predominantly through the 135Ba(p,n)135La reaction using 16 MeV cyclotrons as discussed in a recent review [273]. Purification by cation-exchange resin furnishes >98% radionuclidic purity after letting the irradiated target stand for 12–24 h to allow for the decay of the coproduced, shorter-lived isotopes lanthanum-132, 133, 134, and 136 [274]. The activities of longer-lived isotopes lanthanum-132 (t1/2 4.6 h), lanthanum-133 (t1/2 3.9 h), and barium-135m (t1/2 28.7 h) were significantly less than that of 135La (92%) at end-of-saturation bombardment, and after 20 h, the radionuclidic purity of 135La was 98% [274]. A different purification method was performed involving dissolution of the target in HNO3, precipitation of bulk barium, and isolation of the lanthanum radionuclides on a column [275]. However, this method involves a much shorter decay of the target (2–3 h) prior to dissolution, thus leaving a mixture of lanthanum isotopes, namely 2.47% of the β+-emitting 132La isotope. As this purification route was performed for preclinical studies, the 132/135La mixture was then used to radiolabel DOTA for preliminary imaging and biodistribution studies without improving the radionuclidic purity. 135La can also be prepared from barium-136 (136Ba) through the 136Ba(p,2n)135La reaction. This process uses enriched metallic 136Ba targets for irradiation with 14–30 MeV proton beams [276]. This reaction, however, affords lower yields compared to methods using natBa targets in the same proton energy regime.

Although most of the targets for lanthanum radionuclide production are barium metal, the use of natural and isotopically enriched barium carbonate ([natBa]BaCO3 and [135Ba]BaCO3) has also been investigated [277]. These targets were irradiated with both 11.9 and 23.3 MeV proton beams. The higher-energy protons yielded higher activities but gave a mixture of lanthanum-133 (133La) and 135La. When using a lower-energy 11.9 MeV proton beam, no 133La was observed, giving good radionuclidic purity of 135La, albeit with much lower activities. This trend was observed for both the [natBa]BaCO3 and [135Ba]BaCO3 targets, as well as for metallic natBa targets, with much higher activities afforded by the enriched [135Ba]BaCO3 target. This initial method with BaCO3 targets was further improved via the use of an intermediate proton energy of 16.5 MeV [278]. After dissolution in HCl, Ba2+ was removed by precipitation as BaCl2, and the lanthanide isotopes were chemically purified on a column. Using the [natBa]BaCO3 target, a gamma spectrum of the purified product after 21 h revealed a mixture of radioisotopes, with the majority of the activity arising from 135La. Using this same method with enriched [135Ba]BaCO3 targets, 135La was obtained in high radionuclidic purity with negligible amounts of other lanthanum isotopes after only 30 min from the end of bombardment. This method of Ba2+ precipitation during the purification also enables recycling of the 135Ba to be reused for new targets.

Precipitation and chromatographic purification of lanthanum isotopes from barium target materials are the most commonly used radiochemical separation approaches, but a recent study has reported electrochemical separation by electroplating 132/135La metal onto a platinum anode [279]. After the initial electroplating, the polarity of the electrochemical cell was then reversed to oxidatively remove 132/135La, yielding [132/135La]LaCl3 in >99.99% radionuclidic purity.

5.2. Chemistry of Lanthanum

Lanthanum is the lightest lanthanide, and its ground state electron configuration is [Xe]5d16s2. Like the other lanthanides, it exists almost exclusively in the +3 oxidation state ([Xe]), with only a few examples of air- and water-sensitive molecular complexes of this metal ion in the +2 oxidation state [280,281]. La3+ is the largest lanthanide ion; its six- and eight-coordinate ionic radii are 1.03 and 1.36 Å, respectively (Table 2) [152], and it typically forms complexes with high CNs ranging from 6–12. According to the HSAB principle [232], La3+, like the other lanthanide ions, is a hard Lewis acid (η = 15.39 eV, Table 2) [153]. This property is reflected by its high affinity for oxygen donors, like water and carboxylates. For example, it has a hydrolysis constant (−log K for La3+ + H2O ⇌ La(OH)2+ + H+) of 8.89, suggesting necessary use of neutral or acidic media for radiolabeling, and a relatively high heat of hydration (ΔH° = 6.9 kcal/mol), which may require high temperatures for radiolabeling [282,283]. Based on these properties, La3+ forms stable complexes with chelators containing many oxygen donors [280,281,284].

5.3. Cyclic Chelators for Lanthanum

Unsurprisingly, the ubiquitous DOTA was among the first cyclic chelators to be radiolabeled with [132/135La]La3+ and was investigated because of the high stability constant of the [La(DOTA)]− complex (log KML = 20.7, Table 5) [275,285]. Aliquots of [132/135La]LaCl3 (3.7 MBq, 135La basis) were incubated with increasing concentrations of DOTA (0–250 μM) in aqueous NaOAc buffer (pH 4.5) at 80 °C for 30 min, resulting in a complex with an AMA of 22 MBq/nmol [275]. Using similar radiolabeling conditions but at a slightly higher pH of 5.5, an AMA of 25 MBq/nmol was reported [286]. A separate study reported quantitative [133/135La]La3+ labeling of DOTA (97.9% incorporation) using 2 μM DOTA (pH 4.5, 30 min, 80 °C) [287]. However, another study reported insufficient complexation of [135La]La3+ by DOTA at higher pH (pH 5.5, 80 °C, 30 min) with an AMA value of 0.74 MBq/nmol, suggesting that lower pH is favorable for radiolabeling [288].

Table 5.

Selected stability constants of La–L complexes.

Ion Chelator logKML Ref.
La3+ EDTA 15.5 [178]
DTPA 19.48 [179]
DOTA 20.7 [285]
DO3Apic 21.17 [289]
macropa 14.99 [290]
macrodipa 12.13 [291]
py-macrodipa 14.31 [288]
py2-macrodipa 16.68 [292]

In developing the first TRT complexes with 132/135La, a DOTA derivative bearing one picolinate pendant (DO3Apic, Figure 19) was radiolabeled with 132/135La [286]. Using milder conditions (pH 5.5, 30 min, 25 °C) than those used for DOTA, an AMA of 14 MBq/nmol was obtained. Although this AMA is lower than that obtained for DOTA, DOTA required high temperature (80 °C), which is not desirable for downstream applications [289]. The kinetic stability of [132/135La][La(DO3Apic)]− was also found to be exceptional, as this radiocomplex remained intact in the presence of 1000-fold excess of DTPA for at least 21 days. Given its efficacy, this chelator was also conjugated to a targeting vector (Section 5.4).

Figure 19.

Figure 19.

Macrocyclic chelators for La3+ discussed in Section 5.3.

The expanded macrocycle macropa (Figure 19), which has been used extensively for large α-emitting radionuclides like 212Pb [293], 213Bi [294], 223Ra [265], and 225Ac [295], has also proven to be effective for 132/135La [286]. Although the [La(macropa)]+ stability constant log KML = 14.99 is much smaller than that of DOTA [290], macropa can be effectively radiolabeled with [132/135La]LaCl3, affording a large AMA of 161 MBq/nmol under mild room temperature conditions [286]. A later study reported 98.1% incorporation of [133/135La]La3+ under mild conditions (pH 4.5, 10 min, 22 °C) with 5.7 μM macropa [287]. Like the DO3Apic complex, [132/135La][La(macropa)]+ is also kinetically inert in the presence of 1000 equivalents of DTPA.

An isomer of macropa (macrodipa, Figure 19) and a derivative with a rigidified macrocyclic core (py-macrodipa, Figure 19) form La3+ complexes with moderate stability, as characterized by log KML values of 12.13 and 14.31, respectively. Furthermore, they could be radiolabeled with [135La]La3+ under mild conditions (pH 5.5, 25 °C, 15 min), affording complexes with AMAs of 0.105 and 55 MBq/nmol for macrodipa and py-macrodipa, respectively [288]. Once formed, both [135La]La-macrodipa and [135La]La-py-macrodipa remained stable in human serum at 37 °C for 24 h. Differences were apparent, however, when the kinetic stabilities of the cold lanthanum (natLa) complexes [natLa]La–macrodipa and [natLa]La–py-macrodipa were assessed by challenging them with a 103-fold excess of DTPA. Under these conditions, the half-life of [natLa]La–macrodipa was 1678 ± 33 s, whereas the half-life of [natLa]La–py-macrodipa was substantially longer, 6.3 ± 0.3 days. Thus, py-macrodipa is favorable over macrodipa, both in terms of radiolabeling efficacy and kinetic stability. Insights into these differences can be gleaned from the crystal structures of the two complexes and DFT calculations of their La3+-binding energies. The crystal structures of [La(macrodipa)]+ and [La(py-macrodipa)]+ (Figure 20) reveal them to attain the same conformation and possess similar interatomic distances between donor atoms to the La3+ centers [288,291]. The pyridine group within py-macrodipa, however, provides stronger binding to the La3+ center and a more rigid chelator structure that suggests a higher degree of preorganization. DFT calculations on the binding energy and chelator strain energy support this assertion because they show py-macrodipa has a 21.3 kJ/mol stronger binding energy than macrodipa with La3+, and the chelator stain energy of py-macrodipa is 6.9 kJ/mol smaller than that of macrodipa [288]. Although the strain energy is a thermodynamic parameter, it reflects more restricted conformational flexibility of py-macrodipa, which may result in the improved kinetic stability of its La3+ complex.

Figure 20.

Figure 20.

Crystal structures of [La(macrodipa)]+ (left, CCDC Number 2003601) [291] and [La(py-macrodipa)]+ (right, CCDC Number 2085495) [296].

5.4. Bifunctional Chelators for Lanthanum

Bifunctional versions of DO3Apic (DO2Apic) and macropa were conjugated to a PSMA-binding Glu-urea-Glu peptide derivative (DUPA, Figure 21) [297] and assessed for their ability to bind to radioisotopes of lanthanum [286,298]. The targeting capabilities of these constructs were validated using an in vitro radioactive displacement assay. In this experiment, La(DO2Apic)-DUPA and La(macropa)-DUPA were added to PSMA-expressing PC-3 PiP cells, and their PSMA affinity was verified by showing no displacement from the cells when they were challenged with a clinically validated 99mTc-based MIP-1427 agent [286]. In addition, both BFC complexes were stable to a DTPA challenge over the course of 21 days. Radiolabeling the macropa-DUPA BFC with [135La]La3+ was equally effective as the unconjugated macropa, as characterized by an AMA of 149 MBq/nmol. The DO2Apic-DUPA BFC, however, exhibited poorer radiolabeling properties than DO3Apic, presumably due to conversion of one of the anionic carboxylate donors to a neutral carboxamide. Radiolabeling of DO2Apic-DUPA required elevated temperature (80 °C) to achieve an AMA (13 MBq/mmol) that was comparable to DO3Apic obtained at room temperature (14 MBq/nmol). Macropa has also been conjugated to the well-established PSMA-617 vector for use with radiolanthanum. The resulting macropa-PSMA-617 BFC was quantitatively radiolabeled at 1 μM with [133La]LaCl3 (pH 6, 25 °C, 15 min) giving a large AMA value of 330 MBq/nmol [299], further verifying the suitability of this chelator for La radioisotopes.

Figure 21.

Figure 21.

DO2Apic- and macropa-DUPA bifunctional chelators.

6. Terbium

Terbium has four synthetic isotopes with potential applications within nuclear medicine: terbium-149 (149Tb, t1/2 4.1 h, α-/β−-therapy), terbium-152 (152Tb, t1/2 17.5 h, PET/SPECT), terbium-155 (155Tb, t1/2 5.3 days, SPECT/MAE therapy), and terbium-161 (161Tb, t1/2 6.9 days, β−-/MAE therapy) [300]. Hence, terbium is uniquely poised for use in matched-pair theranostic radiopharmaceutical agents that employ different radioisotopes of the same element to provide both diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. Of these four radioisotopes, 155Tb and 161Tb are promising MAE emitters, which release 13.9 and 10.9 MAEs/decay, respectively. These two isotopes also emit CEs (0.77 and 1.42 per decay, respectively), which may also be useful for therapy over larger distances. Although radiopharmaceuticals based on 155Tb have mostly focused on the use of this radioisotope for SPECT imaging, its high yield (13.9 MAEs/decay) with suitable energies (total energy 13.5 keV), also make it very promising for MAE-based TRT. Likewise, 161Tb has mostly received attention for its β− emissions, which are similar to those of clinically approved lutetium-177 (177Lu), and its low-energy γ photons (74.6 keV (9.8%) and 48.9 keV (14.8%)), which are suitable for SPECT imaging [300,301]. In addition to these emissions, 161Tb also releases short-range CEs (1.4 per decay, 39.3 keV) and MAEs (10.9 per decay, 8.9 keV), which are key contributors to its therapeutic potential [302–304]. In fact, Monte-Carlo simulations predict that the MAEs and CEs make this radioisotope substantially more effective for treating micrometastases compared to conventional 177Lu [300,305–307].

6.1. Production Terbium-155 and 161

Terbium-155 (155Tb, t1/2 5.3 days) can be produced by high-energy (1.4 GeV) proton spallation of natural tantalum (natTa, 99.99% abundant in tantalum-181) targets with advanced mass separation methods. Due to the high proton energies and need for on-line mass separation, production through this route is limited to advanced accelerators such as the ISOLDE and MEDICIS systems at CERN [308]. Alternatively, bombardment with lower, more accessible proton energies (30 MeV) on Gd2O3 targets highly enriched in gadolinium-155 ([155Gd]Gd2O3) by the 155Gd(p,n)155Tb reaction can furnish the desired 155Tb isotope. However, this reaction requires that the target be nearly 100% enriched in 155Gd, which presents a significant hurdle for 155Tb production. To circumvent the need for isotopically enriched targets, the 100% natural abundance of stable terbium-159 (159Tb) as the only native isotope of Tb can be leveraged. In this strategy, natural Tb is irradiated with protons to produce dysprosium-155 (155Dy) via the 159Tb(p,5n)155Dy reaction. However, the excitation function for this reaction reaches its maximum at 48 MeV and consequently requires high proton energies [309]. Subsequent electron capture decay of 155Dy (t1/2 9.9 h) affords 155Tb [309]. Similarly, α-particle bombardment of natural gadolinium (natGd) targets can produce the 155Dy intermediate (152Gd(α,n)155Dy; 154Gd(α,3n)155Dy; 155Gd(α,4n)155Dy; 156Gd(α,5n)155Dy; and 157Gd(α,6n)155Dy), which decays to 155Tb [310]. Although both of these latter strategies are advantageous because they use non-isotopically enriched targets, they are limited because of the requirements for high-energy cyclotrons (66 MeV protons or 60 MeV α-particles) and very efficient radiochemical processes to separate the adjacent Dy3+ and Tb3+ ions [309,310].

The production of terbium-161 (161Tb, t1/2 6.9 days) can be achieved by neutron bombardment of enriched gadolinium-160 oxide ([160Gd]Gd2O3) targets to make gadolinium-161 (161Gd) via 160Gd(n,γ)161Gd, which undergoes β−-decay to 161Tb. Alternatively, natural terbium (natTb, monoisotopic in 159Tb) targets also provide a reactor-based route to 161Tb via 159Tb(2n,γ)161Tb. Although neutron bombardment of 160Gd2O3 can furnish TBq quantities of 161Tb, it requires development of more efficient Gd isotope enrichment strategies to become a viable approach. By comparison, 161Tb produced from natTb is not limited by the target, but it has low AMA because of the inability to isolate 161Tb from the bulk natTb target material and low isotopic purity because the long-lived, β−-emitting isotope terbium-160 (160Tb, t1/2 72.3 days) is also produced. Irradiation of 160Gd with deuterons (160Gd(d,n)161Tb and predominantly 160Gd(d,p)161Gd(ε)→161Tb) has also been reported but is limited by both the need for enriched 160Gd targets and the coproduction of 160Tb. Thus, further efforts in optimizing target enrichment and radiochemical separations are needed to increase the availability of 161Tb.

6.2. Chemistry of Terbium

Terbium is in the middle of the lanthanide series and has a ground state electron configuration of [Xe]4f96s2. Under the aerobic and aqueous conditions typically used for radiochemistry, the only stable oxidation state for this metal is +3 ([Xe]4f8). The half-shell stability of the +4 oxidation state, however, ([Xe]4f7) has also afforded molecular complexes of Tb4+ [311,312], and extensive efforts with strong reductants have yielded isolable Tb2+ complexes under strictly air- and water-free conditions [313]. The position of Tb3+ near the middle of the lanthanide series places it in the region of the so-called “gadolinium break,” a point where the ionic radius contracts enough to afford substantial differences in coordination chemistry between the light and heavy lanthanides. The six-coordinate ionic radius of Tb3+ is 0.923 Å (Table 2), and this ion usually forms complexes with coordination numbers of 8 or 9 and is a hard Lewis acid [152]. The hydrolysis constant (−log K for Tb3+ + H2O ⇌ Tb(OH)2+ + H+) of Tb3+ is 7.60, indicating that radiolabeling should be carried out near pH 7 or lower to avoid extensive formation of unreactive hydroxides [283]. Compared to other lanthanides, Tb3+ has a heat of hydration (ΔH° = 4.1 kcal/mol) intermediate for the lanthanide series—consistent with its position in the middle of the series—and should allow for radiolabeling at mild temperatures [282].

6.3. Acyclic Chelators for Terbium

Much of the acyclic chelator chemistry for terbium radiopharmaceuticals has been dominated by DTPA (Figure 22) due to its ability to rapidly chelate Tb3+ and form a complex with high thermodynamic stability (log KML = 22.71, Table 6) [314]. Although the flexibility of DTPA enables facile chelation of Tb3+ at room temperature, this same feature contributes to the poor kinetic stability of its Tb3+ complexes. Second generation analogues of DTPA have been investigated to improve upon the deficiencies of this ligand for application in radioactive Tb chelation.

Figure 22.

Figure 22.

DTPA and its bifunctional p-SCN-Bn-CHX-A′′-DTPA derivative.

Table 6.

Selected stability constants of Tb–L complexes.

Ion Chelator logKML Ref.
Tb3+ EDTA 17.83 [178]
DTPA 22.71 [179]
DOTA 24.2 [315]
macropa 11.8 [290]
py-macrodipa 12.0 [296]
py2-macrodipa 14.8 [292]

DTPA conjugated to octreotide, a somatostatin analogue which binds to receptors commonly overexpressed in neuroendocrine tumors, was radiolabeled with [161Tb]Tb3+ using conditions previously employed for [111In]In–DTPA-octreotide [316–318]. Using a 40–70-fold molar excess of DTPA-octreotide to [161Tb]TbCl3, the [161Tb]Tb–DTPA-octreotide complex was formed at 25 °C after 10 min with a RCC value ≥95% [317]. The complex showed serum stability up to 24 h. Unfortunately, no other radiolabeling characterization was performed, but this study serves as one of the first reports of a DTPA-based BFC radiolabeled with 161Tb.

Derivatives of DTPA, including CHX-A′′-DTPA, which rigidifies part of the aliphatic backbone with a cyclohexyl moiety, have also been explored for radiolabeling. The bifunctional derivative p-SCN-Bn-CHX-A′′-DTPA (Figure 22) contains a reactive benzyl thiocyanate functional group tethered to CHX-A′′-DTPA for biological target attachment.

As a proof-of-principle of conjugating this chelator to a macromolecule, one study used this reactive handle to attach the BFC to human serum albumin (HSA) to serve as a model for targeting vectors; mass spectrometry analysis showed ~2 chelators per HSA. The construct CHX-A′′-DTPA-HSA (10−5 M) was then radiolabeled using [161Tb]TbCl3 for 1 h at 25 °C [319]. A RCC value of >98% was reported. A control condition of radiolabeling unconjugated HSA showed only 6.0 ± 1.2%, thus indicating that the chelator is required. The [161Tb]Tb-CHX-A′′-DTPA-HSA complex showed good kinetic stability when incubated in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) at 37 °C with >95% of the complex still intact after 24 h. However, incubating in human serum at 37 °C showed ~10% degradation after 24 h, and an EDTA transchelation challenge (103-fold excess EDTA) showed >35% transchelation of [161Tb]Tb3+. Although CHX-A′′-DTPA-HSA exhibited excellent radiolabeling performance, its limited kinetic stability has motivated investigation of other acyclic chelators.

Other acyclic chelators based on the well-studied HOPO class have also been explored [320]. Two HOPO derivatives, octadentate HOPO-O8 and decadentate HOPO-O10 (Figure 23), were successfully radiolabeled at 10−5 M final concentration with [161Tb]TbCl3 at room temperature for 15 min at pH 6. HOPO-O8 gave a higher RCC value of 99 ± 1% compared to 88 ± 10% for HOPO-O10. The corresponding AMAs were 81 MBq/nmol (HOPO-O8) and 85 MBq/nmol (HOPO-O10). Further, the [155Tb]Tb-HOPO-O8 and [155Tb]Tb-HOPO-O10 complexes (using [155Tb]TbCl3 due to isotopic availability) showed remarkable kinetic stability with >98% remaining intact after incubation in human serum at 37 °C for 5 days [321]. As such, HOPO-O8 and HOPO-O10 have arisen as leading chelators for 155Tb and 161Tb and warrant further investigations with bifunctional-targeted analogues [322].

Figure 23.

Figure 23.

Acyclic HOPO-O8 and HOPO-O10 chelators.

6.4. Cyclic Chelators for Terbium

Bifunctional derivatives of DOTA have frequently been used for 155Tb and 161Tb radiolabeling because they form thermodynamically stable complexes with this ion (log KML = 24.2) [315,323,319]. Only recently, however, was the 155Tb-radiolabeling efficacy of the nontargeted DOTA chelator examined. Using the same conditions required to quantitatively form [155Tb]Tb-HOPO-O10 discussed above (pH 6, 80 °C, 15 min), the RCC for labeling DOTA was ~75% at 10−4 M chelator concentration and only ~25% at 10−5 M chelator concentration [321].

Several peptide-conjugated derivatives of DOTA have been radiolabeled with [161Tb]Tb3+, including DOTA conjugated to HSA [319], GA-HSA [319], folate [323,324], and a short somatostatin tetrapeptide (Phe–D-Trp–Lys–Thr–OMe) [325]. These chelators could be quantitatively radiolabeled at slightly acidic pH and at elevated temperatures (40–90 °C) and show relatively high kinetic stability at 37 °C in either human or fetal bovine serum. Radiolabeling under mildly basic conditions (pH 8) could be performed at high temperatures (90 °C) for long reaction times (90 min) [325].

A smaller macrocyclic chelator NETA, which comprises a 1,4,7-triazacyclonane (TACN) macrocyclic core appended with two carboxylic acids and one aminodicarboxylic acid, and its bifunctional 3p-C-NETA (Figure 24) derivative have been investigated with terbium radioisotopes [326,327]. Compared to other macrocycles, 3p-C-NETA is unique because the aminodicarboxylic acid pendant group is multidentate and serves as an acyclic chelator appended to the macrocyclic chelator core. The incorporation of this moiety allows 3p-C-NETA to benefit from the kinetic radiolabeling advantages of acyclic chelators, while maintaining the thermodynamic stability afforded by macrocyclic chelators [300]. The 3p-C-NETA chelator demonstrated large RCC (>95%) when radiolabeled with [161Tb]TbCl3 under mild conditions (pH 4.1, 55 °C, 12 min) and showed no significant decomplexation after incubating at 37 °C in phosphate-buffered saline or human serum for 10 days [328]. It was also conjugated to HSA and radiolabeled using [161Tb]TbCl3 (pH 4.7, 40 °C, 60 min) to give a RCC of >98%, showing compatibility of its mild radiolabeling conditions with conjugated macromolecules [319].

Figure 24.

Figure 24.

Cyclic chelators 3p-C-NETA and DOTI-Me.

The cyclen core of the DOTA and NETA chelators have also been functionalized with different pendent arms and investigated with Tb radioisotopes. A cyclen chelator with methylimidazole pendent arms (DOTI-Me, Figure 24), for example, was radiolabeled with 161Tb [329]. The efficiency of this process was relatively poor, as RCC values of <20% and 90.3 ± 9.7% were obtained even when heating at 95 °C at pH values of <5 and 8.2, respectively. The [161Tb]Tb-DOTI-Me complex showed fair kinetic stability with 93% intact after incubating in human serum at 37 °C for 44 h. These results show that by comparison DOTA, which provided pendent carboxylates, is a better chelator for [161Tb]Tb3+.

In addition to the aza-crown macrocycles, macrocycles with ethereal oxygen donors have also been radiolabeled with 161Tb. The expanded macrocycle 2,2′,2′′,2′′′-(1,10-dioxa-4,7,13,16-tetraazacyclooctadecane-4,7,13,16-tetrayl)tetraacetic acid (crown, Figure 25), which was originally developed for 225Ac, has been demonstrated to be effective for 155Tb and 161Tb [330,331]. Although thermodynamic stability constants for Tb3+ complexes of this chelator have not yet been measured, radiolabeling studies of a crown–octreotate conjugate (crown-TATE, Figure 25) with [155Tb]Tb3+ and [161Tb]Tb3+ (10−4 M crown-TATE in NH4OAc buffer at pH 6.0 for 10 min at room temperature) gave quantitative RCCs. The [155/161Tb]Tb-crown-TATE complexes showed exceptional kinetic stability with >99% of the complex remaining intact after incubating in human serum at 37 °C for 7 days.

Figure 25.

Figure 25.

Cyclic chelator crown and its bifunctional crown-TATE derivative.

Another large macrocycle TRICA (Figure 26), a nonadentate triaza-18-crown-6 with three carboxylate pendants, was recently reported and radiolabeled at room temperature with [161Tb]TbCl3 to afford a complex in quantitative RCC with an AMA of 1 MBq/nmol [332]. The analogous [155Tb]Tb-TRICA complex, which was prepared with the same procedure used for [161Tb]TbCl3, remains 98% intact in human serum at 37 °C over 5 days, reflecting its good kinetic stability. Because Tb3+ is paramagnetic, diamagnetic Y3+ was used in its place for NMR studies. The 1H NMR spectrum of a mixture of TRICA (1.1 equivalents) and Y3+ reveals that two pendent carboxylates bind to the metal ion from one face and the thirds binds from the opposite, analogous to the coordination mode observed in the crystal structure of [Gd(TRICA)] (Figure 26) [333]. By comparison, the 1H NMR spectrum of [La(TRICA)] revealed a higher degree of symmetry, consistent with the three carboxylates all binding on the same face. Because Y3+ and Gd3+ have comparable ionic radii as Tb3+ (1.075 Å, 1.107 Å, and 1.095 Å, respectively, CN 9), the NMR and crystal structure studies from these former metal ions provide a good indication of the properties of [Tb(TRICA)] [152].

Figure 26.

Figure 26.

Cyclic TRICA chelator and the crystal structure of its [Gd(TRICA)] complex (CCDC Number 1283556) [333].

7. Erbium

Erbium (natEr) has six naturally occurring, stable isotopes, erbium-162, 164, 166, 167, 168, and 170, with erbium-166 (166Er) being the most abundant at 33.5%. Synthetically produced erbium-165 (165Er, t1/2 10.4 h) emits 7.28 MAEs/decay with a total energy of 7.99 keV/decay as it decays to stable holmium-165. 165Er is unique because it emits MAEs exclusively, except for a few low-energy X-rays, making its dosimetry easier to determine than for other isotopes. The average MAE energy from 165Er (7.99 keV) is similar to the well-studied cytotoxic iodine-125 (11.96 keV), indicating that 165Er likewise has high antiproliferative potential [20,334–338].

7.1. Production of Erbium-165

Direct and indirect production methods for 165Er have been investigated. Proton or deuteron bombardment of natural holmium (natHo, monoisotopic in holmium-165, 165Ho) can produce 165Er through the 165Ho(p,n)165Er and 165Ho(d,2n)165Er reactions, respectively [339]. Although numerous studies have experimentally measured the cross sections for 165Er production, only a few studies have pursued methods to isolate and purify the [165Er]Er3+ from the holmium targets [25,136,334,339–348].

A comparison of proton (16 MeV beam) and deuteron (17.5 MeV beam) bombardment of metallic natHo foil targets showed that deuteron bombardment (165Ho(d,2n)165Er) yielded larger amounts of activity compared to proton bombardment (165Ho(p,n)165Er). However, the deuteron bombardment also led to a higher level of holmium-166, as an undesired byproduct [339]. Separation of 165Er from the large quantities of natHo is challenging because of the similar coordination chemistry of these two adjacent lanthanides. For these production methods, the dissolved target was eluted through a single LaNthanide 2 (LN2) column, giving a relatively poor separation factor of 2.75. Hence, subsequent studies have shifted towards different target materials and the development of more advanced purification methods.

In another study, [natHo]Ho2O3 pellets were prepared and bombarded with a 13.4 MeV proton beam [334]. The targets were then dissolved in HNO3, and the resulting solution was treated with α-hyodroxyisobutyric, passed through a cation exchange column, and then eluted through a LN3 column with HCl. Although this process afforded a high radionuclidic purity of [165Er]Er3+ (99.9%), a 60-fold excess of natEr remained, which was most likely a consequence of it being a contaminant in the [natHo]Ho2O3 target material

The 12.5 MeV proton irradiation of metallic natHo targets was investigated. After irradiation, the targets were dissolved in HCl and evaporated to dryness, and the resulting residue was dissolved in HCl and passed through a series of three columns [346]. Similar to earlier methods, the first two columns contained a cation exchange resin and LN2 resin. The final third column used was DGA resin. This resin substantially improved the isolation of [165Er]Er3+, which was obtained in 64 ± 2% yield with a Ho/165Er separation factor of (2.8 ± 1.1) × 105.

A related procedure for obtaining [165Er]Er3+ followed the same approach described above, but used a different third column [347]. In this case, the last column (Triskem TK221) could release the [165Er]Er3+ with dilute HCl, affording a solution that is ready for radiolabeling without additional processing. This method provided [165Er]Er3+ in 78.0 ± 5.6% radiochemical yield and achieved a very high separation factor of (1.14 ± 0.25) × 106. This purification method was adopted to prepare [165Er]ErCl3 for radiolabeling of DOTA-PSMA-617 [136].

The production of 165Er via the decay of thulium-165 (165Tm) has also been of substantial interest. In particular, the longer half-life of 165Tm (t1/2 = 30.1 h) could be useful in the assembly of a 165Tm→165Er generator [344,345,348,349]. 165Tm can be produced by both the 166Er(p,2n)165Tm and natEr(d,xn)165Tm reactions. The use of natEr targets bypasses the need for expensive isotopically enriched 166Er but is limited by the coproduction of long-lived thulium-167 (t1/2 9.3 days) and thulium-168 (t1/2 93.1 days) [25,339].

To establish a proof-of-concept for a 165Tm→165Er generator, targets prepared from [natEr]Er2O3 deposited onto aluminum backings were irradiated with 60 MeV α-particles [348]. The target was then dissolved in HNO3, and ytterbium and thulium radioisotopes were affixed to an LN column. After waiting 1 day for ingrowth of the 165Er from the decay of 165Tm, [165Er]Er3+ was eluted in 89% radiochemical purity. Because the thulium within this sample comprised a mixture of thulium-166 (t1/2 7.7 h), thulium-167 (t1/2 9.3 days), and thulium-168 (t1/2 93.1 days) in addition to the desired 165Tm [350], their decay also led to the generation of stable erbium-166, erbium-167, and erbium-168, leading to a decreased specific activity of the therapeutically relevant [165Er]Er3+. Although this study demonstrated a proof-of-principle for a 165Tm→165Er generator, the α bombardment on natEr reaction used to produce 165Tm has a substantially lower cross-section than for proton or deuteron bombardment of natHo, natEr, and enriched 166Er [349].

7.2. Chemistry of Erbium

Erbium is a heavy lanthanide with electron configuration of [Xe]4f126s2. Like the other lanthanides, the coordination chemistry of erbium coordination chemistry is dominated by the +3 oxidation state ([Xe]4f11). Complexes of this ion in the +2 oxidation state can be formed, but only under unique circumstances with rigorously air- and water-free conditions [313]. Er3+ has a narrow f-f emission line at 1.54 μm in the near-infrared, which has made it valuable within applications like telecommunications where it can facilitate optical amplification in fiberoptics [351–353]. This near-infrared emission also lies in the tissue-transparent window, and this feature has been leveraged for Er3+-based photoluminescent biological probes in vitro and in vivo, as recently demonstrated in a Er3+-bacteriochlorin complex [354]. As a heavy lanthanide, Er3+ has a smaller ionic radius of 0.89 Å (CN 6) compared to the other lanthanides discussed in this review [152]. Consistent with its smaller radius, Er3+ has a lower hydrolysis constant (−log K = 7.46 for Er3+ + H2O ⇌ Er(OH)2+ + H+) and heat of hydration (ΔH° = 3.1 kcal/mol) compared to La3+ (Section 5.2) and Tb3+ (Section 6.2) [282,283]. These properties suggest that more acidic conditions, but potentially lower temperatures, should be used for radiolabeling with [165Er]Er3+. Like the other lanthanides, Er3+ is a hard Lewis acid.

7.3. Cyclic and Bifunctional Chelators for Erbium

To date, no acyclic chelators have been radiolabeled with 165Er. The macrocycles DOTA (Figure 4) and crown (Figure 25), and their PSMA-conjugated BFCs, have been radiolabeled with [165Er]ErCl3. In an early study, DOTA-PSMA (4 × 10−5 – 8 × 10−6 M) was radiolabeled with [165Er]ErCl3 (pH 5.7, 80 °C, 30 min), affording RCCs that ranged from 100% at the highest chelator concentration to 49% at the lowest concentration [346]. The highest achievable AMA under these conditions was 82 ± 45 MBq/nmol, and the [165Er]Er-DOTA-PSMA complex showed good kinetic stability with >95% intact after incubating in human serum at 37 °C for 12 h.

In a subsequent study, [165Er]ErCl3-labeling properties were verified, confirming that this radiocomplexation proceeds effectively at high temperature (80 °C), but poorly at lower temperature (37 °C). Collectively, these radiolabeling data are very similar to those for DOTA BFCs and 177Lu (e.g., 177Lu-DOTA-PSMA-617 and 177Lu-DOTATATE with an AMA of 60 MBq/nmol) [355,356], underlying the similar chemistry of these heavy lanthanides [347]. Crown, however, could be radiolabeled at lower concentrations under very mild temperatures (10−6 M, pH 5.5, 37 °C) with this process being quantitative after 60 min. The crown ligand was conjugated to the octreotide peptide, and the conjugate crown-TATE was radiolabeled with [165Er]ErCl3. The radiolabeling proceeded efficiently at the lower-temperature condition (pH 5.5, 37 °C, 30 min), but required a higher chelator concentration (10−4 M) to give an AMA of 345.6 MBq/nmol. Thus, these radiolabeling studies show that crown is superior to DOTA for [165Er]Er3+, mirroring a similar conclusion for its use with [155/161Tb]Tb3+ (Section 6.4).

Despite the poorer radiolabeling properties of DOTA, it has been used to deliver 165Er to prostate cancer. A PSMA-targeting bioconjugate DOTA-PSMA-617 BFC (10−6 M) was quantitatively radiolabeled with [165Er]ErCl3 (pH 5.5, 90 °C, 10 min), giving a large AMA value of 348.8 ± 23.3 MBq/nmol [136]. The [165Er]Er-DOTA-PSMA-617 complex is stable, remaining intact in human serum at 37 °C for 12 h. To assess the PSMA-binding affinity of the radiolabeled construct, it was incubated with PSMA-receptor-expressing LNCaP cells for 4 h. Cellular displacement assays, afforded by challenging the complex with unlabeled PSMA-617, showed that it retained nanomolar affinity for the PSMA.

8. Mercury

Naturally occurring mercury comprises seven stable isotopes, mercury-196, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, and 204, with mercury-202 (202Hg) being the most abundant at 29.7%. Also of importance for coordination chemistry, mercury-199 (199Hg) is an NMR-active nucleus (I = ½, γ = 7.7 MHz·T−1, ~16.9% abundance) [357–360,139].

Two isomers of the synthetic mercury-197 (197Hg) isotope are amenable for MAE-based therapy. The ground state isomer (197gHg, t1/2 2.7 days) and metastable isomer (197mHg, t1/2 23.8 h) are separated by 299 keV and emit 23.2 and 19.4 MAEs per decay with total energies of 16.1 and 13.5 keV, respectively. 197mHg decays to either 197gHg (branching ratio 91%) or 197Au (branching ratio 9%), releasing two γ photons at 134 keV (from 197mHg) and 279 keV (from 197gHg) that are suitable for SPECT imaging [361]. 197Hg had been used for imaging since the 1950s and 1960s, in the form of the radiolabeled mercurial diuretic [197Hg]chloromerodrin. The low specific activities for this compound, however, required chemotoxic doses that led to its removal from the clinic [362–364]. In recent years, more sophisticated productions methods have made high specific activity 197Hg available, renewing interest in its use for imaging and therapy [365].

8.1. Production of Mercury-197m/g

Proton or deuteron irradiation of natural Au (natAu), which exists as monoisotopic gold-197 (197Au), is the most effective way to produce 197m/gHg, in part because it circumvents the need for enriched targets. Although deuteron irradiation to afford the 197Au(d,2n)197m/gHg reaction has higher cross sections, the proton irradiation reaction 197Au(p,n) 197m/gHg is more often used due to the fact that most cyclotrons are currently operating with proton beams [366]. Spallation of lead targets and α-particle irradiation of platinum foils (194Pt(α,n)197m/gHg and 195Pt(α,2n)197m/gHg) have also been used to produce 197m/gHg [367,368]. Highly pure [197m/gHg]HgCl2 can be obtained by chromatographic separation on a LN resin, which is the preferred method over liquid-liquid extractions and other chromatographic separations [369,370].

8.2. Chemistry of Mercury

The most stable oxidation state of mercury under aqueous and aerobic conditions is Hg2+ [236,371]. Hg2+ is classified as a soft Lewis acid (η = 7.7 eV, Table 2) [233], forms complexes with a wide range of CNs from 2–8, and has a six-coordinate ionic radius of 1.02 Å (Table 2) [152]. The large relativistic effects contribute to the large polarizability of this ion, which in turn lead to more covalent Hg2+ ligand bonds [372]. Hg2+ forms particularly strong bonds with soft donors such as phosphorous, tellurium, selenium, and sulfur. In fact, the name mercaptan, often used for thiols, originates from the Latin translation of “mercury capturer.” Despite the HSAB preferences of this ion, Hg2+ can also form stable complexes with harder donors like nitrogen based amines and heterocycles [360]. Owing to its closed shell electron configuration, Hg2+ does not benefit from any ligand-field stabilizing effects and consequently its complexes are typically quite labile, a feature that poses challenges when designing chelators for radiopharmaceutical applications.

In contrast to other divalent metal ions, Hg2+ often forms weaker complexes with macrocycles compared to acyclic chelators, as demonstrated by 199Hg NMR studies [359,372]. The common four-coordinate tetrahedral geometry attained by Hg2+ is difficult for small macrocycles to accommodate, and the enthalpic penalty of chelator distortion to encapsulate the large ionic radius outweighs the entropic favorability of preorganization that is characteristic of the macrocyclic effect [372–376]. However, for macrocycles large enough to accommodate the ionic radius of Hg2+, stable Hg2+ complexes can be formed. Macrocycles can also form particularly stable Hg2+ complexes if they contain soft donor atoms (e.g., thiacrowns) to match the soft Lewis acidity of Hg2+ which will be discussed in Section 8.4 [377,378].

Several reports have demonstrated the success of sulfur-containing macrocyclic chelators for radiolabeling with 197m/gHg, as is discussed below. Although 197m/gHg coordination chemistry is in its infancy for radiopharmaceutical applications, these studies have years of prior work to build upon that was motivated by developing chelators and sensors to mitigate the chemotoxic effects of Hg2+.

8.3. Acyclic Chelators for Mercury

Several acyclic chelators for Hg2+ have been extensively studied and used as potential antidotes for mercury poisoning. One of the most prominent examples is the dithiol 2,3-dimercaptopropanol, also known as British anti-Lewisite (BAL) or dimercaprol (Figure 27), which was also used as an antidote against the organoarsenic chemical warfare agent Lewisite during World War II [379]. The soft sulfur donors on BAL make it a highly effective chelator for Hg2+ (log KML = 25.7, Table 7), and consequently it is currently recommended for the treatment of acute mercury poisoning [380,381]. Similarly, the chelators 2,3-dimercapto-1-propane sulfonic acid (DMPS, Figure 27) and 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA, Figure 27) have been developed and used to treat acute mercury poisoning [382,383]. Like BAL, DMSA forms a remarkably stable complex with Hg2+ (log KML = 28.5 [384]. To date, acyclic chelators have not been investigated with 197/197mHg, but their extensive use as mercury poisoning antidotes suggests that they are worth further investigation for radiopharmaceutical applications.

Figure 27.

Figure 27.

Hg2+ chelators dimercaprol, DMPS (2,3-dimercapto-1-propane sulfonic acid), and DMSA (dimercaptosuccinic acid).

Table 7.

Selected stability constants of Hg–L complexes.

Ion Chelator logKML Ref.
Hg2+ BAL 25.7 [381]
EDTA 22.07 [381]
DMSA 28.5 [384]
DTPA 26.7 [179]
NS4 20.0 [377]
cyclen 23.8 [358]
DOTA 29.0 [358]
DO4S 32.5 [358]
DO3S 32.3 [358]
DO2A2S 31.7 [358]

8.4. Cyclic Chelators for Mercury

The affinity of soft sulfur donors for Hg2+ has prompted a number of studies on the coordination chemistry of thiacrown ethers with this ion (Figure 28) [385,386]. Compared to more conventional azacrown ethers used in radiopharmaceutical applications, thiacrown ethers exhibit distinct coordination chemistry with Hg2+. For example, six-coordinate complexes of thiacrowns typically form octahedral geometries, whereas the azacrowns typically furnish trigonal prismatic environments, a behavior unique to mercury; Cd2+ analogs with azacrowns typically form octahedral complexes [386]. Small thiacrowns, such as 1,4,7-trithiacyclonane (9S3, Figure 28), the thioether equivalent of TACN, consistently form 1:2 coordination complexes of the type [Hg(9S3)2]2+ with a distorted octahedral geometry [386–392]. By contrast, the coordination chemistry of larger thiacrowns is more diverse, affording different products depending on reaction conditions and counteranions. For example, the expanded 14S4 chelator (Figure 28) affords distinct coordination complexes with different salts of Hg2+. HgCl2 gives a dinuclear tetrahedral [(HgCl2)2(14S4)]2+ complex [393], HgI2 forms a polymeric Hg-bridged [HgI2(14S4)]2+ complex with tetrahedral symmetry around the Hg2+ bridge, and Hg(ClO4)2 furnishes a five-coordinate [Hg(14S4)(OH2)]2+ complex of C4v symmetry with an axial water ligand [393,394]. Hence, the counterions should be taken into consideration when using [197m/gHg]Hg2+ salts for radiolabeling.

Figure 28.

Figure 28.

Thiacrown ethers 9S3, 14S4, and NS4 for chelating Hg2+.

More recently, a larger cyclic thioether (NS4, Figure 28) and its coordination chemistry with [197m/gHg]HgCl2 and non-radioactive Hg(NO3)2 were reported [377]. The secondary amine of this chelator was functionalized with a benzylamide to emulate the effects of conjugation with targeting vectors. Although crystal structures of its Hg2+ complex were not obtained, NMR spectroscopy and DFT indicated that all five NS4 macrocyclic donor atoms, as well as the carbonyl O atom of the benzylamide, directly interacted with the Hg2+ ion. Because this chelator bound Hg2+ at low pH, direct potentiometric measurements of the thermodynamic stability of its Hg2+ complex were not possible, but a minimum stability constant of log KML = 20.0 ± 0.05 for Hg2+ complex of the NS4 macrocycle without the benzylamide pendent arm could be determined. Radiolabeling with 197m/gHg at pH 7 for 1 h demonstrated the successful formation of radiometal complexes. At 80 °C, quantitative incorporation of 197m/gHg was achieved at NS4 concentrations of 10−4 M, decreasing to 96.0 ± 0.3% at 10−5 M and 31.3 ± 2.0% at 10−6 M. When radiolabeling was carried out under the milder condition of 37 °C, good RCCs were only obtained when using a high ligand concentration of 10−4 M. At lower ligand concentrations under these conditions, the RCCs were substantially worse, 33.8 ± 2.1% and 0.0 ± 0.0% at 10−5 and 10−6 M ligand concentrations, respectively. To assess kinetic stability, [197m/gHg]Hg–NS4 was incubated with a physiologically relevant concentration of glutathione (2.12 mM) at 37 °C [249]. Under these conditions, 97.2 ± 0.3% and 92.8 ± 0.5% of the radiometal complex remained intact after 10 h and 3 days, respectively, signifying its good stability. Upon incubation in human serum at 37 °C, the complex was substantially less stable, as only 84.7 ± 3.4% and 74.1 ± 7.0% did not degrade after 2 and 24 h, respectively. The high stability of this complex under these various conditions supports the viability of NS4 chelators for Hg-based radiopharmaceuticals, providing an initial ligand scaffold for further optimization.

Following this report, a series of cyclen derivatives, DO4S, DO3S, and DO2A2S, with different numbers of thioether pendent arms was explored for radiolabeling with 197m/gHg (Figure 29) [358]. Titrations of these chelators in the presence of Hg2+ revealed the stability constants to be log KML= 32.5 ± 0.1 (DO4S), log KML = 32.3 ± 0.1 (DO3S), and log KML = 31.7 ± 0.1 (DO2A2S). Notably, these values are all substantially larger than those afforded by DOTA (log KML = 29.0 ± 0.1) and cyclen (log KML = 23.8 ± 0.1), indicating that the soft thioether donors provide significant stabilization to the soft Hg2+ center. In addition, within this series, the presence of more pendent thioethers gives rise to larger stability constants, confirming the importance of matching soft-soft acid-base donor interactions.

Figure 29.

Figure 29.

Cyclen derivatives DO4S, DO3S, DO2A2S, and DO3SAm for chelating Hg2+.

Although crystal structures of Hg-complexes with this series of ligands were not obtained, NMR characterization (1H–1H COSY, 1H–13C HMQC, 1H–199Hg HMQC, and NOESY) was used to understand the coordination environment of the Hg2+ ion. In the [Hg(DO4S)]2+ complex, coupling between 1H nuclei on the thioether pendant and the central 199Hg nucleus, measured via 1H–199Hg HMQC NMR spectroscopy, revealed that all four sulfurs of the thioether pendants and all four nitrogen atoms of the macrocyclic core participate in complexation, providing an eight-coordinate N4S4 environment around the Hg2+ center. Within the DO3S chelator, which only contains three pendent thioethers, NMR analysis of [Hg(DO3S)]2+ suggests that two thioether arms bind to Hg2+ on opposite sides of the macrocyclic core, while the third arm is either uncoordinated or in dynamic exchange with the other bound donors. All four N atoms of the macrocyclic core, however, are coordinated to Hg2+, giving a six-coordinate N4S2 structure. Finally, the NMR spectra of the mixed carboxylate/thioether complex [Hg(DO2A2S)] reveal all four macrocyclic N atoms and pendent arms to directly coordinate to the Hg2+ center to afford an eight-coordinate N4S2O2 structure. Similarly, [Hg(DOTA)]2− exhibits an eight-coordinate N4O4 structure as evidenced by NMR spectroscopy. In contrast to the eight-coordinate environment in solution, the solid-state [Hg(H2DOTA)] crystal structure (Figure 30) reveals the Hg2+ center to attain a seven-coordinate geometry, where one of the pendent carboxylates is protonated and engaging in hydrogen bonding with a lattice water molecule. Two of the other carboxylates bind to the metal ion with Hg–O distances of 2.301(2) and 2.425(2) Å, and the fourth carboxylate is protonated, but still interacts with Hg2+ over a longer Hg–O distance of 2.929(2) Å. These results highlight differences between solution-state and solid-state chemistry, as well as effects of pH and ligand protonation states, that should be considered in whole when assessing metal complex geometries.

Figure 30.

Figure 30.

Crystal structure of [Hg(H2DOTA)] (CCDC Number 2347201) [358].

Radiolabeling of these chelators with [197m/gHg]Hg2+, which was produced from a 197Au target by 197Au(p,n)197m/gHg, was performed using a relatively high concentration (1.0 × 10−3 M) at pH 7 at either room temperature or 50 °C, and RCC values were obtained after incubating for 10 min and 1 h. In addition to the three thioether-appended chelators and DOTA, the N-methyl amido derivative of DO3S (DO3SAm, Figure 29) was studied to investigate the effects of bioconjugation on its radiolabeling efficacy. At room temperature, the RCC of DO3SAm was low at both 10-min and 1-h incubation times, <30% and ~80%, respectively. At 50 °C, however, the RCC increased to 60% after 10 min and >95% after 1 h. The RCC for DO3S remained below 20% and that of DOTA below 1% for all conditions examined. This result was attributed in part to the infancy of 197m/gHg production and the resulting uncertainty in molar activities and potential for contamination by gold from the 197Au target. Despite the low and uncertain radiolabeling performance, kinetic stability studies were examined in human serum. The radiolabeled complexes [197m/gHg][Hg(DO4S)]2+, [197m/gHg][Hg(DO3SAm)]2+, and [197m/gHg(DO2A2S)] all remained ~90% intact after incubating in human serum at 37 °C for 2 h. At longer incubation times, however, significant degradation of all complexes was observed with stabilities of <75% observed after 24 h.

A derivative of DOTA with pendant amides instead of carboxylates (DOTAM, Figure 31) was radiolabeled with [197m/gHg]Hg2+ [395]. The complex of this ligand with non-radioactive mercury has been previously reported, and its crystal structure reveals a six-coordinate environment in which all four macrocyclic nitrogen atoms and two oxygen atoms from adjacent amide pendants coordinate the Hg2+ center (Figure 31) [396]. The authors suggested that the softer nature of the amide pendants of DOTAM may provide a stronger binding affinity for Hg2+ compared to the harder carboxylate pendants of DOTA [395]. Despite this hypothesis, radiolabeling of DOTAM (10−4 M) with [197m/gHg]Hg2+ proceeded with a very low RCC of 5.2 ± 1.7% at high temperatures (pH 5, 80 °C, 1 h), marking only a moderate improvement over DOTA. As discussed below, the bifunctional derivative of DOTAM is substantially more effective.

Figure 31.

Figure 31.

DOTAM macrocyclic chelator and the crystal structure of its Hg complex (CCDC Number 241674) [396].

An 18-membered thiacrown ether was recently reported and used to examine the effects of pendent arms of varying softness: picolinate (N2S4-Pa), pyridyl (N2S4-Py), and thioether (N2S4-Thio) (Figure 32) [378]. A previously reported crystal structure of Hg2+ chelated by the thiacrown macrocycle without pendent arms ([Hg(N2S4)]2+) showed participation of all six macrocyclic donor atoms in coordination of the Hg2+ center [397], reflecting the thiophilicity of this ion [378]. NMR analysis of the complexes of the three chelators with stable mercury revealed substantial differences in their fluxional behavior. For both [Hg(N2S4-Py)]2+ and [Hg(N2S4-Thio)]2+, the resonances of the macrocyclic hydrogens appeared as broad peaks within their 1H NMR spectra at 25 °C. Increasing the temperature to 45 °C led to coalescence of these signals to sharper peaks, revealing the temperature-dependent fluxionality of [Hg(N2S4-Py)]2+ and [Hg(N2S4-Thio)]2+ complexes. By contrast, the 1H NMR spectrum of [Hg(N2S4-Pa)] revealed sharp well-resolved resonances for the macrocyclic hydrogens at 25 °C, indicating a greater degree of rigidity. DFT geometry optimizations of the Hg2+ complexes of these ligands were also investigated. Within these computations, the [Hg(N2S4-Thio)]2+ complex attained a five-coordinate, distorted trigonal pyramidal structure, whereas both [Hg(N2S4-Py)]2+ and [Hg(N2S4-Pa)] adopted six-coordinate, distorted octahedral geometries. In contrast to the [Hg(N2S4)]2+ crystal structure [397], these DFT calculations predicted Hg2+ cannot interact equally with all six macrocyclic donor atoms when the pendent arms are present [378]. Consequently, the DFT-optimized structures of these three ligands show that Hg2+ is situated asymmetrically in the macrocyclic core of [Hg(N2S4-Thio)]2+ and [Hg(N2S4-Py)]2+, a feature that is corroborated experimentally by NMR spectroscopy. The strong coordination of the picolinate arms in [Hg(N2S4-Pa)] is consistent with its more symmetric NMR spectra and was rationalized to be a result of the electrostatic interaction between the negatively charged picolinate pendants and the Hg2+ center.

Figure 32.

Figure 32.

Thiacrown ether N2S4 with different pendent arms.

These structural differences were reflected by the radiolabeling performance of the three chelators. When radiolabeled with [197m/gHg]Hg2+ (pH 7, 80 °C, 1 h), N2S4-Py and N2S4-Thio quantitatively formed complexes with this radiometal at chelator concentrations of 10−4 M. The picolinate ligand N2S4-Pa, however, gave a RCC value of 26 ± 1% at the same concentration under the same conditions. Notably, radiolabeling of N2S4-Thio occurred quantitively even at room temperature (25 °C) and 10−4 M concentration. From these results, the authors suggested that the softer Lewis base character of the thioether pendent arm contributes to its enhanced affinity for [197m/gHg]Hg2+. The kinetic stabilities of [197m/gHg][Hg(N2S4-Py)]2+ and [197m/gHg][Hg(N2S4-Thio)]2+ in human serum at 37 °C were moderate with 71 ± 1% and 76 ± 2% of these complexes remaining intact, respectively, after 1 h. [249]. Another stability study was performed by challenging these complexes with a 106-fold excess mixture of biologically relevant metal ions, ZnCl2, FeCl3, CuCl2, MgCl2, and CoCl2. These studies confirmed the good selectivity of the N2S4 macrocycle for Hg2+, as less than 30% of either underwent transmetallation after 82 h under these conditions. [398]. Although the authors concluded that their previously reported, smaller NS4 chelator is better suited for [197m/gHg]Hg2+ radiolabeling [377], they suggest that the larger N2S4 chelator may be suitable for other soft radiometals such as [111Ag]Ag+, [199Au]Au+, and [201Tl]Tl+ [378].

8.5. Bifunctional Chelators for Mercury

There have been several examples of 197m/gHg bifunctional chelators reported in the literature. An early study in 1992 investigated a trithiamacrocycle with a pendent activated ester moiety (9S3-ester, Figure 33) [399]. Following radiolabeling with [197m/gHg]Hg2+, the complex was conjugated to a rabbit immunoglobulin protein. This bioconjugate was stable in saline for over 24 h but was substantially less stable in serum.

Figure 33.

Figure 33.

Trithiamacrocycle 9S3-ester radiolabeled with [197m/gHg]Hg2+.

DOTAM (Figure 31) and the common bifunctional chelators p-SCN-Bn-DOTA and p-SCN-Bn-DOTAM (Figure 34) were also investigated with 197m/gHg [395]. In comparison to the Hg2+ complex of the non-functionalized DOTAM discussed in the previous section, the 1H NMR spectrum of [Hg(p-SCN-Bn-DOTAM)]2+ showed a sharpening, splitting, and downfield shift of the aliphatic peaks relative to the free ligand, features which the authors attributed to greater structural rigidity of the complex. This conclusion was further supported by variable temperature and 2D NMR studies.

Figure 34.

Figure 34.

Bifunctional chelators p-SCN-Bn-DOTA and p-SCN-Bn-DOTAM.

The p-SCN-Bn-DOTA and p-SCN-Bn-DOTAM BFCs were then radiolabeled with [197m/gHg]Hg2+. In comparison to DOTA, the p-SCN-Bn-DOTA BFC could successfully be radiolabeled with [197m/gHg]Hg2+, achieving a RCC of 70.0 ± 1.1%, under identical conditions (10−4 M, pH 5, 80 °C, 1 h) that fail for DOTA. Likewise, p-SCN-Bn-DOTAM yielded the 197m/gHg complex with quantitative RCC under the same conditions, whereas the non-functionalized DOTAM only achieved a RCC of 5.2 ± 1.7%. Furthermore, radiolabeling of p-SCN-Bn-DOTAM could be achieved at lower chelator concentrations (10−5 M, RCC = 91.6 ± 0.4%) and over shorter times (10−4 M, 10 min, RCC = 85.8 ± 4.7%). Given the unexpectedly improved radiolabeling properties of p-SCN-Bn-DOTA and p-SCN-Bn-DOTAM compared to the non-functionalized ligands, the authors hypothesized that the S atom in the –NCS could stabilize the thiophilic Hg2+ ion. This hypothesis was tested by using phenylisothiocyanate, which lacks a macrocyclic chelating agent. Surprisingly, this compound could be radiolabeled by 197m/gHg with a RCC of 85.7 ± 3.7%. This result suggests that the –NCS groups within p-SCN-Bn-DOTA and p-SCN-Bn-DOTAM are not innocent and likely play a significant, but as of yet unknown, role in binding to [197m/gHg]Hg2+.

To investigate p-SCN-Bn-DOTAM as a bifunctional chelator, it was conjugated to the PSMA-617 vector, and the resulting DOTAM-PSMA-617 was then radiolabeled. The RCC value for [197m/gHg][Hg(DOTAM-PSMA-617)]2+ was reasonably high, 91.3 ± 3.8%, but significantly lower than the quantitative RCC attained by p-SCN-Bn-DOTAM. These results may suggest that the thiourea resulting from the conjugation of the isothiocyanate group is less effective at binding to the Hg2+ ion compared to the -NCS sulfur atom on p-SCN-Bn-DOTAM.

Both [197m/gHg][Hg(p-SCN-Bn-DOTAM)]2+ and [197m/gHg][Hg(DOTAM-PSMA-617)]2+ were incubated (37 °C) in glutathione (50 mM) and human serum to assess their kinetic stabilities. [197m/gHg][Hg(p-SCN-Bn-DOTAM)]2+ was moderately stable in the presence of glutathione (85.9 ± 4.5% intact after 24 h), but underwent significant degradation in human serum with only 67.5 ± 2.9% remaining intact after 24 h. The bioconjugated complex [197m/gHg][Hg(DOTAM-PSMA-617)]2+ was even less stable, with only 58.6 ± 9.6% and 59.6 ± 0.9% of it remaining intact in the presence of glutathione and human serum after 24 h. The poorer stability of the PSMA-617 bioconjugate compared to p-SCN-Bn-DOTAM correlated with their radiolabeling efficacies, further implicating a stabilizing effect afforded by the isothiocyanate group.

9. Platinum

Platinum has five naturally occurring stable isotopes, platinum-192, 194, 195, 196, and 198, with platinum-194 (194Pt) and platinum-195 (195Pt) being the most abundant at 32.9% and 33.8%, respectively. Three radioisotopes of platinum have received interest for Auger therapy: platinum-191 (191Pt, t1/2 2.8 d), platinum-193m (193mPt, t1/2 4.3 d), and platinum-195m (195mPt, t1/2 4.0).

191Pt decays via electron capture to stable iridium-191, emitting 13.27 MAEs and 0.99 CEs per decay with respective average energies of 17.8 and 57.1 keV. This radioisotope has a small branching ratio for γ emission as well (82 keV (4.9%), 172 keV (3.5%), and 360 keV (6.0%)) that make it amenable to SPECT imaging [400]. Despite the potential of this radioisotope, 191Pt has only been studied in several studies, many of which use 191Pt as [191Pt]cisplatin for tracking the in vivo biodistribution of this drug [400–407].

193mPt emits 27.39 MAEs and 2.99 CEs with respective average energies of 10.9 and 126.8 keV through its decay to radioactive 193Pt, which subsequently transforms via electron capture to iridium-193 (193Pt(ε)193Ir, t1/2 50 years). 193mPt emits very few γ photons at an energy suitable for imaging (136 keV, 0.11%). The large number of MAEs per decay, however, has generated attention for its use as a therapeutic radioisotope for MAE-based TRT.

195mPt emits 36.55 MAEs and 2.78 CEs per decay with respective energies of 23.1 and 161.4 keV, decaying to stable 195Pt. Of the platinum isotopes discussed here, 195mPt also emits the largest amount of γ photons (99 keV, 11.4%) suitable for SPECT imaging.

Radioplatinum chemistry has been dominated by radiolabeled cisplatin (cis-[Pt(NH3)2Cl2]) and its derivatives. Since an initial study in 1967 using cis-[191Pt]Pt(NH3)C14 to examine the effects of radiation delivered to bacteria and the first report of [195mPt]cisplatin in a 1974 clinical study, radio-cisplatin has been the focus of numerous studies both in the clinic and in academic research [400–403,408–411]. Cisplatin forms covalent crosslinks with DNA [412,413], and thus radiolabeled derivatives have the potential to deliver short-range MAEs directly to genomic DNA. [400–402,409,411,414].

9.1. Production of Platinum-191, 193m, and 195m

191Pt has been produced since the 1960s by proton bombardment of natural iridium (natIr, iridium-191 (37.3%) and iridium-193 (62.7%)) targets through the natIr(p,xn)191Pt reaction, and this approach is still the primary method for making it [406,408]. 191Pt is then isolated from the iridium target by dissolving in HCl/KCl solution, furnishing [191Pt]PtCl42− in 90–95% radionuclidic purity. As of 2021, 191Pt has also been produced at the CERN MEDICIS facility and is separated from other radionuclides by mass separation [415]. Although this method has proven useful for fundamental research with 191Pt, the ability to generate it from natIr targets on 30 MeV cyclotrons makes it a promising isotope for therapy, based on its potential for large-scale production.

193mPt was first produced by α-particle bombardment on natural osmium (40.8% osmium-192 (192Os)) through the 192Os(α,3n)193mPt reaction [411]. Decades later, this method remains the most successful that has been optimized by using enriched 192Os electrodeposited onto nickel targets [416,417]. The cross-sections for the 192Os(α,3n)193mPt are optimized at α-particle energies from 24–40 MeV. Lower energy α-particle energies of 18–24 MeV afford higher cross section for the 192Os(α,n)195mPt reaction, thus demonstrating that the same target material can be used for producing both of these radioisotopes [416].

9.2. Chemistry of Platinum

Platinum is a third-row transition metal with a ground state electron configuration of [Xe]4f145d96s1. Its coordination chemistry is dominated by the Pt2+ ([Xe]4f145d8) and Pt4+ ([Xe]4f145d6) oxidation states. Pt2+ has an ionic radius of 0.6 Å (CN 4) and a d8 configuration that leads it to adopting four-coordinate, square planar geometries in almost all of its complexes [152]. As a soft Lewis acid (η = 8.0 eV, Table 2) [153], it forms stable bonds with sulfur-based donors like thiols. By contrast, the d6 ion Pt4+ has an ionic radius of 0.625 Å (CN 6) [152] and preferentially adopts octahedral geometries.

Platinum has a long history within medicinal chemistry, and an even longer history in establishing the basic principles of coordination chemistry [414,418]. The antiproliferative properties of the Werner coordination complex cisplatin were first reported in 1965, and approved for clinical use in 1978 [419,420]. Since then, several additional Pt2+-based drugs have been approved worldwide, Pt4+-based drug candidates have also been extensively studied [413]. Thus, many efforts in Pt radiochemistry have been focused on making radioactive analogues of these widely used drugs, as discussed above. In addition to these studies briefly discussed in Section 9, several acyclic chelators and BFCs have also been investigated with radioisotopes of Pt.

9.3. Acyclic and Bifunctional Chelators for Platinum

One of the first acyclic chelators radiolabeled with 191Pt was a bidentate 1-(pyridin-2-yl)methanamine group that was attached to an estrogen agonist [404]. Although radio-HPLC confirmed labeling, comparative structural studies using non-radioactive Pt were not carried out, and therefore the resulting coordination mode in this complex is not known. Another acyclic chelator, ethylenediamine, was attached to an antibody and radiolabeled with [191Pt]PtCl42− to track its biodistribution [421].

Based on the intrinsic DNA-targeting properties of cisplatin, [189/191Pt]cisplatin was synthesized and demonstrated to induce DNA double-strand breaks in cells via its MAE emissions, even though only ~2% of this compound localized to the nucleus [422]. To achieve better nucleus localization, the DNA-targeting dye Hoechst33258 was conjugated to either DTPA or cysteine to bind to [191Pt]PtCl42− and consequently radiolabel the Hoechst33258 conjugate [406]. Although the high denticity of DTPA makes it an unlikely candidate for binding Pt2+, radiolabeling of this free chelator with [191Pt]PtCl42− at 60 °C for 1 h gave RCCs of 70–80%, and the resulting complex was fairly stable in serum with 42% of the radioactive components shown to bind to proteins. In addition, the isolated amino acid cysteine also could be radiolabeled and afford stable complexes of 191Pt. Consequently, both the DTPA-Hoechst33258 and cysteine-Hoechst33258 could furnish 191Pt complexes albeit with low RCCs after high-temperature labeling. These complexes, along with the 111In analogue [111In]In-DTPA-Hoechst33258, were investigated in U2OS cells for their abilities to induce DNA double strand breaks. Overall, these results showed that the 191Pt-labeled complexes afforded more DNA double strand breaks, which may be a consequence of the greater MAE/decay of 191Pt compared to 111In.

Building upon this strategy, another DNA-targeting motif pyrrole–imidazole polyamide (PIP), which binds specifically to the MYCN oncogene, was radiolabeled with 191Pt [407,423]. This compound was constructed by combining the PIP group, a cysteine residue for [191Pt]Pt2+ radiolabeling, a tri-arginine peptide for cell-penetration, and a coumarin dye to enable tracking via fluorescence microscopy. A BFC with a MYCN vector truncated to half of the MYCN chain (GCC-PIP, Figure 35) was also prepared as a control with lower affinity for the target.

Figure 35.

Figure 35.

Bifunctional polypeptide chelator GCC-PIP. The Pt-binding motif is highlighted in blue.

Both compounds were radiolabeled with 4–96 MBq [191Pt]Pt2+ in DMSO containing Tween-80 and ethanol at 45 °C for 60 min to obtain the complexes with 50–70% RCCs. Following HPLC to obtain the complexes with 95% radiochemical purity, they were incubated with neuroblastoma cell lines to assess their biological effects. As expected, the targeted complex [191Pt]Pt-MYCN-PIP was taken up by these cells and accumulated in the nucleus to a much larger extent than the untargeted analogue [191Pt]Pt-GCC-PIP. Consequently, [191Pt]Pt-MYCN-PIP also exhibited greater cytotoxicity and induced more DNA double strand breaks than [191Pt]Pt-GCC-PIP, and its biological activity correlated with MYCN expression levels in a panel of several cell lines. Although these in vitro results were promising, in vivo biodistribution of [191Pt]Pt-MYCN-PIP in mice bearing Kelly tumor xenografts showed poor tumor uptake and accumulation in the lungs and spleen, indicating that further modifications are needed to optimize these complexes [407].

10. Thallium

Thallium has two naturally occurring stable isotopes, thallium-203 (203Tl, 29.5%) and thallium-205 (205Tl, 70.5%). The coordination chemistry of thallium can be investigated by NMR as 205Tl is an NMR-active nucleus (I = ½, γ = 24.9 MHz·T−1) and has been used to characterize ligand binding as well as speciation given the large difference in Tl+ and Tl3+ chemical shifts [139,424,425]. The synthetic isotope thallium-201 (201Tl, t1/2 72.9 h, 20.91 MAEs/decay, 14.9 keV) decays by EC, emitting a γ photon at 167 keV that makes it suitable for SPECT imaging [426]. Based on its valuable MAE and γ emissions, it has been used clinically since the 1970s in the form of [201Tl]TlCl for myocardial perfusion imaging [427,428]. Despite several advantages, [201Tl]TlCl has been largely replaced by technetium-based imaging agents. Shortages in reactor-produced molybdenum-99 (99Mo), needed for 99mTc, over the last decade, led to a brief resurgence in its use [428]. More recently, the therapeutic potential of 201Tl, based on its large MAE yield, has prompted further investigation of this isotope.

10.1. Production of Thallium-201

The earliest reports of 201Tl production used high-energy (400 MeV) protons to bombard mercury-202 (202Hg) targets to initiate the 202Hg(p,2n)201Tl reaction [429]. Lower proton energies of ~30 MeV can be used to produce 201Pb, which decays to 201Tl with a 9.4-h half-life, from enriched 203Tl via the 203Tl(p,3n)201Pb reaction [430]. This production route is one of the most commonly used. The most typical production route involves 30 MeV proton irradiation of copper targets electroplated with enriched 203Tl followed by extraction and/or chromatographic purification [431,432]. In these cases, residual 203Tl from the target is separated from Pb isotopes on a column, and after ~32 h (~3.4 half-lives of 201Pb), the 201Tl formed from the decay of 201Pb is eluted and purified by anion exchange chromatography to remove remaining Pb isotopes [431].

10.2. Chemistry of Thallium

Thallium exists in its Tl+ ([Xe]4f145d106s2) and Tl3+ ([Xe]4f145d10) states. The standard reduction potential for the Tl3+/Tl+ couple is +1.25 V, indicating that Tl3+ is a powerful oxidant [433]. In addition, Tl3+ is also susceptible to hydrolysis, precipitating as solid Tl2O3 at pH 1 [425,434]. Therefore, highly effective chelators are needed to stabilize Tl3+ under biological conditions. The HSAB properties of thallium are dependent on its oxidation state with Tl3+ classified as a hard acid (η = 10.4 eV, Table 2) and Tl+ as a soft acid (η = 7.16 eV, Table 2) [153]. In addition, the ionic radii difference between these two ions is substantial; Tl+ has an ionic radius of 1.5 Å (CN 6), whereas Tl3+ has a six-coordinate ionic radius of 0.885 Å (Table 2). Therefore, it is apparent that very different chelators would be required for Tl3+ compared to Tl+. For example, these metal ions have very different log KML values with the ubiquitous chelators EDTA and DTPA (Table 8) [152,435]. The stability constants of Tl+ and Tl3+ complexes with EDTA and DTPA, both chelators containing hard nitrogen and oxygen donors, show substantially greater stability with the harder Tl3+ ion compared to Tl+ [178,179]. In general, the large ionic radius and low ionic charge of Tl+ gives rise to substantially less stable coordination complexes compared to those of Tl3+. Consequently, researchers have optimized procedures to selectively generate this radioisotope in the +3 oxidation state under mild conditions using Pierce iodination beads [43]. For example, [201Tl]TlCl3 for radiolabeling has been prepared by placing 100 μL [201Tl]TlCl (40 MBq) in a plastic tube with one iodination bead and 10 μL 0.5 M HCl, then vortexing for 10 s [436].

Table 8.

Selected stability constants of Tl–L complexes.

Ion Chelator logKML Ref.
T1+ EDTA 6.5 [178]
DTPA 5.97 [179]
Tl3+ EDTA 37.8 [178]
DTPA 10.9 [179]

10.3. Acyclic Chelators for Thallium

Both EDTA and DTPA have been successful radiolabeled with [201Tl]TlCl3 [437]. A recent investigation explored these radiolabeling reactions in more detail, showing that they can be carried out under mild conditions. The incubation of EDTA (2.4 mM) or DTPA (1.8 mM) with 3 MBq [201Tl]TlCl3 in 0.25 M NH4OAc buffer (pH 5) at room temperature for 5 min is sufficient to form complexes with RCCs of >95% [43]. Both the [201Tl]Tl–EDTA and [201Tl]Tl–DTPA complexes, however, showed poor kinetic stability in human serum, undergoing complete decomposition after 24 h.

More recently, a series of acyclic chelators containing picolinates, H4pypa, H5decapa, H4neunpa-NH2, and H4noneunpa (Figure 36), have been investigated with 201Tl. Although they could not effectively complex the monovalent form [201Tl]TlCl, they were all found to be good chelators for the trivalent [201Tl]TlCl3 [436,438–441]. The four chelators could be radiolabeled with 5–10 MBq [201Tl]TlCl3 in water (pH 5) at room temperature for 10 min, achieving RCCs of >95% [436]. Their kinetic stabilities were assessed in human serum at 37 °C, revealing them to remain between 55–80% intact after 48 h. Insight into the moderate stability of these complexes was gleaned from the crystal structure of the cold thallium (natTl) complex [natTl][Tl(Hpypa)]. Within this structure, eight of the nine donor atoms of pypa coordinate the Tl3+ center, conferring it with an N5O3 environment in a distorted square antiprismatic geometry (Figure 37). The final potential donor atom, a carboxylate, is protonated, preventing its interaction with the Tl3+ center. The authors suggested the lability of this fourth carboxylate increases the vulnerability of Tl3+ towards reduction to Tl+ by decreasing electron density on the Tl3+ center. The proposed reduction to Tl+ as a decomposition pathway was validated by in vitro and in vivo studies that implicated the monovalent ion exchanger Na+/K+-ATPase pump in the observed biological properties of the radiothallium. Consequently, these chelators still require additional optimization for use with 201Tl and must meet the particular challenge of stabilizing the +3 oxidation state.

Figure 36.

Figure 36.

Picolinate-containing acyclic chelators for thallium.

Figure 37.

Figure 37.

Crystal structure of [Tl(Hpypa)] (CCDC Number 2115641) [436]. O4 remains protonated and prevents its interaction with the Tl3+ metal center. The TlCl3 coordinated to O3 is omitted for clarity.

10.4. Cyclic Chelators for Thallium

DOTA has been radiolabeled with [201Tl]TlCl3 under several different conditions. In an early study, [201Tl]TlCl3 was incubated with H4DOTA (~2 mM) at 18 °C for 90 min after flushing with ozone to form [201Tl]Tl3+, giving an RCC value of ~70% [437]. The complex showed moderate stability with ~75% remaining intact after incubation in human serum for 24 h at 37 °C. For comparison, a recent study carried out radiolabeling in the absence of added ozone, by combining 2.5 mM H4DOTA in NH4OAc buffer (pH 5) and 3 MBq [201Tl]TlCl3 at room temperature for 60 min [43]. Although a higher RCC (>95%) was achieved, the complex formed under these conditions showed lower stability in human serum with only 78 ± 12% remaining after 1 h. Thus, it is likely that the ozone present in the reaction mixture plays an important role in stabilizing Tl3+ within the DOTA complex.

To gain a deeper insight on this relevant Tl3+ coordination chemistry, non-radioactive [natTl][Tl(DOTA)]− was characterized by NMR spectroscopy and single-crystal X-ray diffraction [442]. The crystal structure of [C(NH2)3][Tl(DOTA)]·H2O shows an eight-coordinate Tl3+ supported by an N4O4 set of donor atoms (Figure 38). This Tl3+ DOTA complex attains the twisted square antiprismatic (TSAP′) geometry, comprising the Λ(λλλλ)/Δ(δδδδ) enantiomeric pair [443]. This structure is similar to the TSAP′ geometry of [Bi(DOTA)]− and in contrast to the square antiprismatic (SAP) geometry of [Lu(DOTA)]− [444,445].

Figure 38.

Figure 38.

Crystal structure of [Tl(DOTA)]− (CCDC Number 1025647) [442]. The unit cell contains both Λ(λλλλ) and Δ(δδδδ) enantiomers; only the Δ(δδδδ) enantiomer is shown here for clarity.

The conformation of this complex in the solution state was also verified by multinuclear and multidimensional NMR spectroscopy. Furthermore, the dynamics of the complex in interconverting between the enantiomeric forms (Λ(λλλλ) ⇌ Δ(δδδδ)) was examined by variable-temperature 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy, along with 2D 1H–1H COSY and 1H–13C HSQC NMR spectroscopy [446]. The clearest example of this interconversion is seen by the 13C peaks for the two chemically nonequivalent carbon atoms [442]. At low temperature (272 K), there are two distinct 13C doublets at 49.2 and 53.6 ppm corresponding to the two macrocyclic carbons. The peaks are split into doublets due to 205Tl coupling with respective 2J13C–205Tl coupling constants of 156 and 161 Hz. As the sample is heated, these 13C NMR resonances coalesce at ~315 K, resulting in a single 13C–205Tl doublet that signifies a rapid interconversion between the Λ(λλλλ) and Δ(δδδδ) enantiomers.

Line-shape analysis of the variable-temperature 13C NMR signals for these two macrocycle carbon atoms was used to generate an Eyring plot to afford the activation enthalpy (ΔH‡) of interconversion. The ΔH‡ for [Tl(DOTA)]− (66 kJ/mol) is between those for [Bi(DOTA)]− (40 kJ/mol) and [Lu(DOTA)]− (101 kJ/mol). Although there are large differences in activation enthalpies, the small entropic component for [Tl(DOTA)]− and negative entropic component for [Bi(DOTA)]− give similar ΔG‡ values for [Tl(DOTA)]−, [Bi(DOTA)]−, and [Lu(DOTA)]− (59, 63, and 66 kJ/mol, respectively, at 298 K) [442,444,445]. DFT analysis of the Λ(λλλλ) ⇌ Δ(δδδδ) interconversion suggests a two-step process of ring inversion (ΔG‡ = 60.8 kJ/mol) and a rate-limiting arm rotation (ΔG‡ = 67.5 kJ/mol) [442]. Although this high activation energy does limit the interconversion to an extent, the ability of this interconversion to occur at moderate temperatures (NMR resonances coalescence at ~315 K, ~42 °C) may explain the limited kinetic stability at 37 °C [43]; during the ring inversion and arm rotation, the macrocycle N donor atoms and pendent arm O donor atoms elongate, as calculated by DFT, suggesting transiently weakened stability of the complex [442]. Although interpretation of these differences in enthalpic and entropic components of the interconversion across the series of three metal ions was not provided in the original study, it suggests that careful analysis of chelator complex stability is necessary, especially when using chelators for a broad scope of metal ions.

Another class of macrocyclic chelators recently explored for [201Tl]Tl3+ are the texaphyrins [447]. Texaphyrins provide an N5 coordination environment, but with a cavity that is ~20% larger than conventional porphyrins. Consequently, texaphyrins can successfully form stable 1:1 complexes with large di- and trivalent metal ions, such as Bi3+ and La3+ [448,449]. Given the good affinity of texaphyrins for large ions [450], as well as their intrinsic tumor-targeting properties [451], thallium complexes of a micelle-assembling texaphyrin-lipid conjugate were investigated [447]. Spectroscopic analysis verified that Tl+ did not form any complexes with the texaphyrin but that Tl3+ was readily incorporated. Following this initial investigation with cold thallium, texaphyrin-lipid conjugate was radiolabeled with [201Tl]TlCl3, achieving a RCC of 25.5 ± 4.5%. The stability of the resulting radiothallium complex was lacking; it degraded when heated to 37 °C, most likely due to acid-catalyzed decomposition of the imine macrocycle [447,452]. The [201Tl]Tl3+-labeled texaphyrin-lipid complexes were then self-assembled into micellar nanoparticles, with the addition of other lipids (DPPC, cholesterol, and DSPE-PEG2000), for in vitro cell uptake studies. These constructs exhibited poor stability with only 29.1 ± 7.3% of them remaining intact after 72 h at 37 °C and 56.0 ± 1.4% remaining intact at 4 °C over the same time period [447]. It is unclear if degradation was from disassembly of the micelle or decomplexation of [201Tl]Tl3+. Although this texaphyrin analogue was not suitable for [201Tl]Tl3+, other expanded porphyrins or porphyrinoids may be more effective.

As noted above, reduction of Tl3+ is a common decomposition pathway of its coordination complexes. Tl+ is a weak Lewis acid that typically forms poorly stable complexes because of its low charge and large ionic radius. However, several studies have validated the potential of crown ethers for binding to Tl+ [453]. For example, benzo-crown ethers show a greater relative affinity for Tl+ over alkali metal ions compared to aliphatic crown ethers. Furthermore, the use of crown ethers with larger binding pockets is another approach to achieve stronger binding to the large Tl+ [435,453].

Building upon simple crown ethers, cryptands are multicyclic analogues that provide additional donor atoms to stabilize metal ions. Given the efficacy of cryptands for binding to large monovalent cations, Kryptofix 222 (K222, Figure 39) analogues were studied for their abilities to bind to [201Tl]Tl+ [454]. Although radiolabeling standard crown ethers, like 18-crown-6, dibenzo-18-crown-6, and dicyclohexyl-18-crown-6, with [201Tl]Tl+ were unsuccessful, the bicyclic, K222-based cryptand K222-BFC (Figure 39) afforded a [201Tl]Tl+ complex with >95% RCC via a 15 min room temperature incubation of the ligand (125–500 μM final concentration) and [201Tl]TlCl (~1 MBq) in pH 11 water. The highly basic conditions used for radiolabeling were required because the K222 ligand could be protonated even under neutral pH conditions. Although the crystal structure of the Tl+ complex could not be obtained, DFT calculations predicted that its structure possesses an eight-coordinate symmetrically situated Tl+ center.

Figure 39.

Figure 39.

Cryptand K222 and its bifunctional derivatives used for radiolabeling with [201Tl]Tl+.

A bifunctional K222-PSMA derivative (Figure 39) was also studied. Radiolabeling of this analogue using identical conditions as the free cryptand yielded the complex with >98% RCC. To evaluate its kinetic stability under physiological conditions, the [201Tl][Tl(K222-PSMA)]+ complex was incubated in human serum at 37 °C. Initially, 10% of the 201[Tl]Tl+ was lost, but no further decomplexation was observed after 2 h, boding well for its use in vivo. Despite these promising results, an in vitro study looking at the PSMA-mediated receptor uptake of [201Tl][Tl(K222-PSMA)]+ in PSMA+ cells was less successful; similar uptake of the K222-PSMA-617 complex and free [201Tl]TlCl were observed for both PSMA+ and PSMA− cell lines, suggesting that [201Tl]Tl+ dissociates from the cryptand under these conditions.

11. Conclusion and Outlook

The development of new TRT pharmaceuticals is a rapidly expanding field that requires significant interdisciplinary contributions from oncologists, medical physicists, biologists, chemists, and other specialized roles [2]. In this context, coordination chemistry plays a critical role by guiding efforts to develop chelators that can enable the use of different therapeutic radiometal ions, including those with novel radionuclides and distinct types of radioactive emissions.

Currently, the only chelator that is applied for FDA-approved TRT therapeutics is DOTA. Although it is suitable for 177Lu, its efficacy for a wider range of radiometal ions with disparate chemical properties is often not as promising. As explored in this review, metal ions with radioisotopes that are suitable for MAE therapy often have underexplored coordination chemistry. As such, there is a significant need to develop promising chelators for these less-studied metal ions by optimizing for the different HSAB properties, ionic radii, and oxidation states. This need is reflected by a paucity of in vitro and in vivo anticancer studies which cannot be obtained unless the MAE emitters are stably attached to suitable biological targeting vectors.

The studies highlighted in this review provide a reflection on recent efforts to address these challenges. In doing so, the coordination chemistry of a significant portion of the Periodic Table, including the transition metals, main group elements, and lanthanide metals, was discussed. Continued investigations, both fundamental and applied, will drive the development of new chelator types for many of these less-studied metal ions. Given the therapeutic potential of MAEs, this research is an exciting and necessary endeavor to leverage their full potential for the treatment of cancer while also embarking on rich coordination chemistry studies.

Highlights.

  • The unique cytotoxic potential of Meitner-Auger electrons is discussed.

  • Current production and purification strategies of each radiometal are summarized.

  • State-of-the-art cyclic and acyclic chelators for each radiometal are summarized.

  • Chelator radiolabeling conditions with each radiometal are summarized.

  • Chelator design principles and their impact on chelator performance are emphasized.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Institutes of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the National Institutes of Health under the award number R56EB029259. We thank Mr. Kevin Lee, Ms. Jacy Lieberum, and Dr. Madeline Denison for assistance in proof-reading. This manuscript is dedicated to Professor Harry Gray, who has inspired generations of inorganic chemists to push the boundaries of this field.

List of Abbreviations and Acronyms

AMA

apparent molar activity

BFC

bifunctional chelator

Bq

Becquerel, unit of radioactivity

CE

conversion electron

Ci

Curie, unit of radioactivity

COSY

homonuclear correlation spectroscopy

CN

coordination number

DFT

density functional theory

EC (or ε)

electron capture

EXAFS

extended X-ray absorption fine structure

FDA

U.S. Food and Drug Administration

GEP-NET

gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor

HMQC

heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence

HPLC

high-performance liquid chromatography

HSA

human serum albumin

HSAB

hard-soft acid-base

HSQC

heteronuclear single quantum coherence

IC

internal conversion

IT

isomeric transition

LET

linear energy transfer

LN

LaNthanide resin

MAE

Meitner-Auger electron

mCPRP

metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

NOESY

nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy

PSMA

prostate-specific membrane antigen

RCC

radiochemical conversion

SAP

square antiprismatic

SPECT

single photon emission computed tomography

t 1/2

half-life

TRT

targeted radionuclide therapy

TSAP

twisted square antiprismatic

XANES

X-ray absorption near-edge structure

XAS

X-ray absorption spectroscopy

List of Ligand Abbreviations and Acronyms

BAL

British anti-Lewisite (dimercaprol)

DFO

deferoxamine

DiAmSar

diaminosarcophagine

DMPS

2,3-dimercapto-1-propane sulfonic acid

DMSA

2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid

DTPA

diethylenetriamine pentaacetate

DUPA

Glu-urea-Glu peptide

EDTA

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

K222

Kryptofix® 222

NTA

nitrilotriacetate

PIP

pyrrole-imidazole polyamide

TACN

1,4,7-triazacyclonane

Tm

hydrotris(methimazolyl)borate

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Grant J. Stec Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Justin J. Wilson Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Data availability

No data was used for the research described in the article.

References

  • [1].Goel M, Mishra MK, Kumar D, Recent Advances in Targeted Radionuclide Therapy for Cancer Treatment, Chem. Biol. Let. 10 (2023) 544. [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Sgouros G, Bodei L, McDevitt MR, Nedrow JR, Radiopharmaceutical Therapy in Cancer: Clinical Advances and Challenges, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 19 (2020) 589–608. 10.1038/s41573-020-0073-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].James S. St., Bednarz B, Benedict S, Buchsbaum JC, Dewaraja Y, Frey E, Hobbs R, Grudzinski J, Roncali E, Sgouros G, Capala J, Xiao Y, Current Status of Radiopharmaceutical Therapy, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics 109 (2021) 891–901. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.08.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Zhang S, Wang X, Gao X, Chen X, Li L, Li G, Liu C, Miao Y, Wang R, Hu K, Radiopharmaceuticals and their Applications in Medicine, Signal Transduction Targeted Ther. 10 (2025) 1. 10.1038/s41392-024-02041-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Lepareur N, Ramée B, Mougin-Degraef M, Bourgeois M, Clinical Advances and Perspectives in Targeted Radionuclide Therapy, Pharmaceutics 15 (2023) 1733. 10.3390/pharmaceutics15061733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Borges de Souza P, McCabe CJ, Radioiodine Treatment: An Historical and Future Perspective, Endocr. Relat. Cancer 28 (2021) T121–T124. 10.1530/ERC-21-0037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Chapman EM, Evans RD, The Treatment of Hyperthyroidism with Radioactive Iodine, JAMA 131 (1946) 86–91. 10.1001/jama.1946.02870190010003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Hertz S, Roberts A, Radioactive Iodine in the Study of Thyroid Physiology. VII. The Use of Radioactive Iodine Therapy in Hyperthyroidism, JAMA 131 (1946) 81–86. 10.1001/jama.1946.02870190005002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Ramogida CF, Orvig C, Tumour Targeting with Radiometals for Diagnosis and Therapy, Chem. Commun. 49 (2013) 4720–4739. 10.1039/C3CC41554F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Price EW, Orvig C, Matching Chelators to Radiometals for Radiopharmaceuticals, Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 (2014) 260–290. 10.1039/C3CS60304K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Kostelnik TI, Orvig C, Radioactive Main Group and Rare Earth Metals for Imaging and Therapy, Chem. Rev. 119 (2019) 902–956. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Healy A, Ho E, Kuo P, Zukotynski K, A Brief Overview of Targeted Radionuclide Therapy Trials in 2022, Front. Nucl. Med. 3 (2023) 1169650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Kassis AI, Adelstein SJ, Radiobiologic Principles in Radionuclide Therapy, J. Nucl. Med. 46 (2005) 4S–12S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Kassis AI, Therapeutic Radionuclides: Biophysical and Radiobiologic Principles, Semin. Nucl. Med. 38 (2008) 358–366. 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2008.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Borbinha J, Ferreira P, Costa D, Vaz P, Di Maria S, Targeted Radionuclide Therapy Directed to the Tumor Phenotypes: A Dosimetric Approach Using MC Simulations, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 192 (2023) 110569. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Narra VR, Howell RW, Sastry KSR, Rao DV, Auger Electron Emitters as Tools for Elucidating the Location of Primary Radiosensitive Targets, Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 52 (1994) 229–232. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Kassis AI, Molecular and Cellular Radiobiological Effects of Auger Emitting Radionuclides, Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 143 (2011) 241–247. 10.1093/rpd/ncq385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Bavelaar BM, Lee BQ, Gill MR, Falzone N, Vallis KA, Subcellular Targeting of Theranostic Radionuclides, Front. Pharmacol. 9 (2018) 996. 10.3389/fphar.2018.00996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Rezaee M, Hill RP, Jaffray DA, The Exploitation of Low-Energy Electrons in Cancer Treatment, Radiat. Res. 188 (2017) 123–143. 10.1667/RR14727.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Ku A, Facca VJ, Cai Z, Reilly RM, Auger Electrons for Cancer Therapy – A Review, EJNMMI Radiopharm. Chem. 4 (2019) 27. 10.1186/s41181-019-0075-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].(Russ) Knapp FF, Dash A, Introduction: Radiopharmaceuticals Play an Important Role in Both Diagnostic and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, in: (Russ) Knapp FF, Dash A. (Eds.), Radiopharmaceuticals for Therapy, Springer; India, New Delhi, 2016: pp. 3–23. 10.1007/978-81-322-2607-9_1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].(Russ) Knapp FF, Dash A, Therapeutic Radionuclides Decay with Particle Emission for Therapeutic Applications, in: (Russ) Knapp FF, Dash A. (Eds.), Radiopharmaceuticals for Therapy, Springer; India, New Delhi, 2016: pp. 25–35. 10.1007/978-81-322-2607-9_2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Bolcaen J, Gizawy MA, Terry SYA, Paulo A, Cornelissen B, Korde A, Engle J, Radchenko V, Howell RW, Marshalling the Potential of Auger Electron Radiopharmaceutical Therapy, J. Nucl. Med. 64 (2023) 1344–1351. 10.2967/jnumed.122.265039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Filosofov D, Kurakina E, Radchenko V, Potent Candidates for Targeted Auger Therapy: Production and Radiochemical Considerations, Nucl. Med. Biol. 94–95 (2021) 1–19. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2020.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Sadler AWE, Hogan L, Fraser B, Rendina LM, Cutting edge Rare Earth Radiometals: Prospects for Cancer Theranostics, EJNMMI Radiopharm. Chem. 7 (2022). 10.1186/s41181-022-00173-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Boros E, Packard AB, Radioactive Transition Metals for Imaging and Therapy, Chem. Rev. 119 (2019) 870–901. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Radchenko V, Engle JW, Thisgaard H, Status and Future Perspectives of Meitner-Auger and Low Energy Electron-Emitting Radionuclides for Rargeted Radionuclide Therapy, Nucl. Med. Biol. 94–95 (2021) 106. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2021.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Reilly RM, Kassis A, Targeted Auger Electron Radiotherapy of Malignancies, in: Reilly RM. (Ed.), Monoclonal Antibody and Peptide-Targeted Radiotherapy of Cancer, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2010: pp. 289–348. 10.1002/9780470613214.ch9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Meitner L, Über die Entstehung der β-Strahl-Spektren Radioaktiver Substanzen, Z. Phys. 9 (1922) 131–144. 10.1007/BF01326962. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Auger P, Sur les rayons β secondaires produits dans un gaz par des rayons X, Comptes rendus de l’académie des sciences 177 (1923) 169–171. [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Pirovano G, Wilson TC, Reiner T, Auger: The Future of Precision Medicine, Nucl. Med. Biol. 96–97 (2021) 50–53. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2021.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].McGuire EJ, 7 - Auger and Coster–Kronig Transitions, in: Crasemann B. (Ed.), Atomic Inner-Shell Processes, Academic Press, New York, 1975: pp. 293–330. 10.1016/B978-0-12-196901-1.50013-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Coster D, Kronig RDL, New Type of Auger Effect and Its Influence on the X-ray Spectrum, Physica 2 (1935) 13–24. 10.1016/S0031-8914(35)90060-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Briant CL, Messmer RP, eds., Auger Electron Spectroscopy, Academic Press, London, United Kingdom, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Briggs D, Seah MP, eds., Practical Surface Analysis: Auger and X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Wiley, United Kingdom, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Briggs D, Grant JT, eds., Surface Analysis by Auger and X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, IMPublications, United Kingdom, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Pouget J-P, Santoro L, Raymond L, Chouin N, Bardiès M, Bascoul-Mollevi C, Huguet H, Azria D, Kotzki P-O, Pèlegrin M, Vivès E, Pèlegrin A, Cell Membrane is a More Sensitive Target than Cytoplasm to Dense Ionization Produced by Auger Electrons, Radiat. Res. 170 (2008) 192–200. 10.1667/RR1359.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Santoro L, Boutaleb S, Garambois V, Bascoul-Mollevi C, Boudousq V, Kotzki P-O, Pèlegrin M, Navarro-Teulon I, Pèlegrin A, Pouget J-P, Noninternalizing Monoclonal Antibodies Are Suitable Candidates for 125I Radioimmunotherapy of Small-Volume Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, J. Nucl. Med. 50 (2009) 2033–2041. 10.2967/jnumed.109.066993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Paillas S, Ladjohounlou R, Lozza C, Pichard A, Boudousq V, Jarlier M, Sevestre S, Le Blay M, Deshayes E, Sosabowski J, Chardès T, Navarro-Teulon I, Mairs RJ, Pouget J-P, Localized Irradiation of Cell Membrane by Auger Electrons Is Cytotoxic Through Oxidative Stress-Mediated Nontargeted Effects, Antioxid. Redox Signal. 25 (2016) 467–484. 10.1089/ars.2015.6309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Govindan SV, Goldenberg DM, Elsamra SE, Griffiths GL, Ong GL, Brechbiel MW, Burton J, Sgouros G, Mattes MJ, Radionuclides Linked to a CD74 Antibody as Therapeutic Agents for B-Cell Lymphoma: Comparison of Auger Electron Emitters with β-Particle Emitters, J. Nucl. Med. 41 (2000) 2089–2097. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Ochakovskaya R, Osorio L, Goldenberg DM, Mattes MJ, Therapy of Disseminated B-Cell Lymphoma Xenografts in Severe Combined Immunodeficient Mice with an Anti-CD74 Antibody Conjugated with 111Indium, 67Gallium, or 90Yttrium, Clin. Cancer Res. 7 (2001) 1505–1510. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Aghevlian S, Boyle AJ, Reilly RM, Radioimmunotherapy of Cancer with High Linear Energy Transfer (LET) Radiation Delivered by Radionuclides Emitting α-particles or Auger Electrons, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 109 (2017) 102–118. 10.1016/j.addr.2015.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Rigby A, Blower JE, Blower PJ, Terry SYA, Abbate V, Targeted Auger electron-emitter therapy: Radiochemical approaches for thallium-201 radiopharmaceuticals, Nuclear Medicine and Biology 98–99 (2021) 1–7. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2021.03.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Dunn RM, Juweid M, Sharkey RM, Behr TM, Goldenberg DM, Can Occult Metastases be Treated by Radioimmunotherapy?, Cancer 80 (2000) 2656–2659. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19971215)80:12+<2656::AID-CNCR42>3.0.CO;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Bergstrom D, Leyton JV, Zereshkian A, Chan C, Cai Z, Reilly RM, Paradoxical Effects of Auger Electron-Emitting 111In-DTPA-NLS-CSL360 Radioimmunoconjugates on hCD45+ cells in the Bone Marrow and Spleen of Leukemia-Engrafted NOD/SCID or NRG Mice, Nucl. Med. Biol. 43 (2016) 635–641. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2016.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Leyton JV, Williams B, Gao C, Keating A, Minden M, Reilly RM, MicroSPECT/CT Imaging of Primary Human AML Engrafted into the Bone Marrow and Spleen of NOD/SCID Mice Using 111In-DTPA-NLS-CSL360 Radioimmunoconjugates Recognizing the CD123+/CD131− Epitope Expressed by Leukemia Stem Cells, Leuk. Res. 38 (2014) 1367–1373. 10.1016/j.leukres.2014.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Kassis AI, Sastry KSR, Adelstein SJ, Kinetics of Uptake, Retention, and Radiotoxicity of 125IUdR in Mammalian Cells: Implications of Localized Energy Deposition by Auger Processes, Radiat. Res. 109 (1987) 78–89. 10.2307/3576869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Adelstein SJ, Kassis AI, Strand Breaks in Plasmid DNA Following Positional Changes of Auger-Electron-Emitting Radionuclides, Acta Oncol. 35 (1996) 797–801. 10.3109/02841869609104029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Sahu SK, Kortylewicz ZP, Baranowska-Kortylewicz J, Taube RA, Adelstein SJ, Kassis AI, Strand Breaks after the Decay of Iodine-125 in Proximity to Plasmid pBR322 DNA, Radiat. Res. 147 (1997) 401–408. 10.2307/3579495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Kassis AI, Harapanhalli RS, Adelstein SJ, Comparison of Strand Breaks in Plasmid DNA after Positional Changes of Auger Electron-Emitting Iodine-125, Radiat. Res. 151 (1999) 167–176. 10.2307/3579767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Balagurumoorthy P, Xu X, Wang K, Adelstein SJ, Kassis AI, Effect of Distance Between Decaying 125I and DNA on Auger-Electron Induced Double-Strand Break Yield, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 88 (2012) 998–1008. 10.3109/09553002.2012.706360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Gardette M, Viallard C, Paillas S, Guerquin-Kern J-L, Papon J, Moins N, Labarre P, Desbois N, Wong-Wah-Chung P, Palle S, Wu T-D, Pouget J-P, Miot-Noirault E, Chezal J-M, Degoul F, Evaluation of Two 125I-Radiolabeled Acridine Derivatives for Auger-Electron Radionuclide Therapy of Melanoma, Invest. New Drugs 32 (2014) 587–597. 10.1007/s10637-014-0086-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Figueiredo D, Fernandes C, Silva F, Palma E, Raposinho P, Belchior A, Vaz P, Paulo A, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of 99mTc(I) Tricarbonyl Complexes Dual-Targeted at Tumoral Mitochondria, Molecules 26 (2021) 441. 10.3390/molecules26020441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Kam WW-Y, Banati RB, Effects of Ionizing Radiation on Mitochondria, Free Radic. Biol. Med. 65 (2013) 607–619. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Fernandes C, Palma E, Silva F, Belchior A, Pinto CIG, Guerreiro JF, Botelho HM, Mendes F, Raposinho P, Paulo A, Searching for a Paradigm Shift in Auger-Electron Cancer Therapy with Tumor-Specific Radiopeptides Targeting the Mitochondria and/or the Cell Nucleus, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23 (2022) 7238. 10.3390/ijms23137238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Schmidt A, Hotz G, The Occurrence of Double-strand Breaks in Coliphage T1-DNA by Iodine-125 Decay, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Relat. Stud. Phys. Chem. Med. 24 (1973) 307–313. 10.1080/09553007314551141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Krisch RE, Lethal Effects of Iodine-125 Decay by Electron Capture in Escherichia Coli and in Bacteriophage T1, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Relat. Stud. Phys. Chem. Med. 21 (1972) 167–189. 10.1080/09553007214550201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Walicka MA, Adelstein SJ, Kassis AI, Indirect Mechanisms Contribute to Biological Effects Produced by Decay of DNA-Incorporated Iodine-125 in Mammalian Cells In Vitro: Double-Strand Breaks, Radiat. Res. 149 (1998) 134–141. 10.2307/3579922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Chan PC, Lisco E, Lisco H, Adelstein SJ, The Radiotoxicity of Iodine-125 in Mammalian Cells: II. A Comparative Study on Cell Survival and Cytogenetic Responses to 125IUdR, 131IUdR, and 3HTdR, Radiat. Res. 67 (1976) 332–343. 10.2307/3574422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Makrigiorgos GM, Kassis AI, Baranowska-Kortylewicz J, McElvany KD, Welch MJ, Sastry KSR, Adelstein SJ, Radiotoxicity of 5-[123I]Iodo-2′-Deoxyuridine in V79 Cells: A Comparison with 5-[125I]Iodo-2′-Deoxyuridine, Radiat. Res. 118 (1989) 532–544. 10.2307/3577411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Kassis AI, Fayad F, Kinsey BM, Sastry KSR, Taube RA, Adelstein SJ, Radiotoxicity of 125I in Mammalian Cells, Radiat. Res. 111 (1987) 305–318. 10.2307/3576987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Onoue R, Watanabe H, Ono M, Hoechst-Tagged Radioiodinated BODIPY Derivative for Auger-Electron Cancer Therapy, Chem. Commun. 59 (2023) 928–931. 10.1039/D2CC05405A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Sahu SK, Wen PYC, Foulon CF, Nagel JS, McL P. Black, S.J. Adelstein, A.I. Kassis, Intrathecal 5-[125I]Iodo-2′-Deoxyuridine in a Rat Model of Leptomeningeal Metastases, J. Nucl. Med. 38 (1997) 386–390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Wilson T, Pirovano G, Xiao G, Samuels Z, Roberts S, Viray T, Guru N, Zanzonico P, Gollub M, Pillarsetty NVK, Reiner T, Bargonetti J, PARP-Targeted Auger Therapy in p53 Mutant Colon Cancer Xenograft Mouse Models, Mol. Pharmaceutics 18 (2021) 3418–3428. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Thisgaard H, Halle B, Aaberg-Jessen C, Olsen BB, Therkelsen ASN, Dam JH, Langkjær N, Munthe S, Någren K, Høilund-Carlsen PF, Kristensen BW, Highly Effective Auger-Electron Therapy in an Orthotopic Glioblastoma Xenograft Model using Convection-Enhanced Delivery, Theranostics 6 (2016) 2278–2291. 10.7150/thno.15898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Rebischung C, Hoffmann D, Stéfani L, Desruet MD, Wang K, Adelstein SJ, Artignan X, Vincent F, Gauchez AS, Zhang H, Fagret D, Vuillez J, Kassis AI, Balosso J, First Human Treatment of Resistant Neoplastic Meningitis by Intrathecal Administration of MTX Plus 125IUdR, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 84 (2008) 1123–1129. 10.1080/09553000802395535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Nurhidayah W, Setyawati LU, Daruwati I, Gazzali AM, Subroto T, Muchtaridi M, Future Prospective of Radiopharmaceuticals from Natural Compounds Using Iodine Radioisotopes as Theranostic Agents, Molecules 27 (2022) 8009. 10.3390/molecules27228009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Adelstein SJ, Kassis AI, Bodei L, Mariani G, Radiotoxicity of Iodine-125 and Other Auger-Electron-Emitting Radionuclides: Background to Therapy, Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 18 (2004) 301–316. 10.1089/108497803322285062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Brechbiel MW, Gansow OA, Backbone-Substituted DTPA Ligands for Yttrium-90 Radioimmunotherapy, Bioconjugate Chem. 2 (1994) 187–194. 10.1021/bc00009a008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Lattuada L, Barge A, Cravotto G, Giovenzana GB, Tei L, The Synthesis and Application of Polyamino Polycarboxylic Bifunctional Chelating Agents, Chem. Soc. Rev. 40 (2011) 3019–3049. 10.1039/C0CS00199F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Wurm FR, Klok H-A, Be Squared: Expanding the Horizon of Squaric Acid-Mediated Conjugations, Chem. Soc. Rev. 42 (2013) 8220–8236. 10.1039/C3CS60153F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].Morgan KA, Wichmann CW, Osellame LD, Cao Z, Guo N, Scott AM, Donnelly PS, Tumor Targeted Alpha Particle Therapy with an Actinium-225 Labelled Antibody for Carbonic Anhydrase IX, Chem. Sci. 15 (2024) 3372–3381. 10.1039/D3SC06365H. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [73].Zeng D, Zeglis BM, Lewis JS, Anderson CJ, The Growing Impact of Bioorthogonal Click Chemistry on the Development of Radiopharmaceuticals, J. Nucl. Med. 54 (2013) 829–832. 10.2967/jnumed.112.115550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [74].Cardinale J, Giammei C, Jouini N, Mindt TL, Bioconjugation Methods for Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, in: Lewis JS, Windhorst AD, Zeglis BM. (Eds.), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2019: pp. 449–466. 10.1007/978-3-319-98947-1_25. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [75].Fay R, Holland JP, The Impact of Emerging Bioconjugation Chemistries on Radiopharmaceuticals, J. Nucl. Med. 60 (2019) 587–591. 10.2967/jnumed.118.220806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [76].Liu S, The Role of Coordination Chemistry in the Development of Target-Specific Radiopharmaceuticals, Chem. Soc. Rev. 33 (2004) 445–461. 10.1039/B309961J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [77].Wadas TJ, Wong EH, Weisman GR, Anderson CJ, Coordinating Radiometals of Copper, Gallium, Indium, Yttrium, and Zirconium for PET and SPECT Imaging of Disease, Chem. Rev. 110 (2010) 2858–2902. 10.1021/cr900325h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [78].bin Othman MF, Mitry NR, Lewington VJ, Blower PJ, Terry SYA, Re-Assessing Gallium-67 as a Therapeutic Radionuclide, Nucl. Med. Biol. 46 (2017) 12–18. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2016.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [79].Blower PJ, Cusnir R, Darwesh A, Long NJ, Ma MT, Osborne BE, Price TW, Pellico J, Reid G, Southworth R, Stasiuk GJ, Terry SYA, de Rosales RTM, Chapter One - Gallium: New Developments and Applications in Radiopharmaceutics, in: Hubbard CD, van Eldik R. (Eds.), Advances in Inorganic Chemistry, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, 2021: pp. 1–35. 10.1016/bs.adioch.2021.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [80].Price TW, Greenman J, Stasiuk GJ, Current Advances in Ligand Design for Inorganic Positron Emission Tomography Tracers 68Ga, 64Cu, 89Zr and 44Sc, Dalton Trans. 45 (2016) 15702–15724. 10.1039/C5DT04706D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [81].Clore J, Scott PJH, [68Ga]PSMA-11 for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-Positive Lesions in Men with Prostate Cancer, Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 24 (2024) 565–582. 10.1080/14737159.2024.2383439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [82].Pedraza-López M, Ferro-Flores G, Mendiola-Cruz MT, Morales-Ramírez P, Assessment of Radiation-Induced DNA Damage Caused by the Incorporation of 99mTc-Radiopharmaceuticals in Murine Lymphocytes Using Single Cell Gel Electrophoresis, Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 465 (2000) 139–144. 10.1016/S1383-5718(99)00221-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [83].Häfliger P, Agorastos N, Spingler B, Georgiev O, Viola G, Alberto R, Induction of DNA-Double-Strand Breaks by Auger Electrons from 99mTc Complexes with DNA-Binding Ligands, ChemBioChem 6 (2005) 414–421. 10.1002/cbic.200400210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [84].Haefliger P, Agorastos N, Renard A, Giambonini-Brugnoli G, Marty C, Alberto R, Cell Uptake and Radiotoxicity Studies of an Nuclear Localization Signal Peptide−Intercalator Conjugate Labeled with [99mTc(CO)3]+, Bioconjugate Chem. 16 (2005) 582–587. 10.1021/bc0500084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [85].Tavares AAS, Tavares JMRS, 99mTc Auger Electrons for Targeted Tumour Therapy: A Review, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 86 (2010) 261–270. 10.3109/09553000903564083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [86].Maucksch U, Runge R, Wunderlich G, Freudenberg R, Naumann A, Kotzerke J, Comparison of the Radiotoxicity of the 99mTc-Labeled Compounds 99mTc-Pertechnetate, 99mTc-HMPAO and 99mTc-MIBI, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 92 (2016) 698–706. 10.3109/09553002.2016.1168533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [87].Costa IM, Siksek N, Volpe A, Man F, Osytek KM, Verger E, Schettino G, Fruhwirth GO, Terry SYA, Relationship of In Vitro Toxicity of Technetium-99m to Subcellular Localisation and Absorbed Dose, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (2021) 13466. 10.3390/ijms222413466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [88].Alberto R, Kyong Pak J, van Staveren D, Mundwiler S, Benny P, Mono-, Bi-, or Tridentate Ligands? The Labeling of Peptides with 99mTc-Carbonyls, J. Pept. Sci. 76 (2004) 324–333. 10.1002/bip.20129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [89].Correia JDG, Paulo A, Santos I, Re and Tc Complexes with Pyrazolyl-Containing Chelators: From Coordination Chemistry to Target-Specific Delivery of Radioactivity, Curr. Radiopharm. 2 (2009) 277–294. 10.2174/1874471010902040277. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [90].Chakraborty S, Liu S, 99mTc and 111In-Labeling of Small Biomolecules: Bifunctional Chelators and Related Coordination Chemistry, Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 10 (2010) 1113–1134. 10.2174/156802610791384243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [91].Kharissova OV, Méndez-Rojas MA, Kharisov BI, Méndez UO, Martínez PE, Metal Complexes Containing Natural and Artificial Radioactive Elements and Their Applications, Molecules 19 (2014) 10755–10802. 10.3390/molecules190810755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [92].Tsirul’nikova NV, Podmareva ON, Metal Complexes with Ethylenediaminedicarboxylic Acids and Their Derivatives, Promising Pharmacological and Diagnostic Agents, Pharm. Chem. J. 48 (2015) 738–743. 10.1007/s11094-015-1184-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [93].Akbar MU, Ahmad MR, Shaheen A, Mushtaq S, A Review on Evaluation of Technetium-99m Labeled Radiopharmaceuticals, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 310 (2016) 477–493. 10.1007/s10967-016-5019-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [94].Papagiannopoulou D, Technetium-99m Radiochemistry for Pharmaceutical Applications, J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 60 (2017) 502–520. 10.1002/jlcr.3531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [95].Martini P, Pasquali M, Boschi A, Uccelli L, Giganti M, Duatti A, Technetium Complexes and Radiopharmaceuticals with Scorpionate Ligands, Molecules 23 (2018) 2039. 10.3390/molecules23082039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [96].Boschi A, Uccelli L, Martini P, A Picture of Modern Tc-99m Radiopharmaceuticals: Production, Chemistry, and Applications in Molecular Imaging, Appl. Sci. 9 (2019) 2526. 10.3390/app9122526. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [97].Costa B, Ilem-Özdemir D, Santos-Oliveira R, Technetium-99m Metastable Radiochemistry for Pharmaceutical Applications: Old Chemistry for New Products, J. Coord. Chem. 72 (2019) 1759–1784. 10.1080/00958972.2019.1632838. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [98].Shahzad K, Majid ASA, Khan M, Iqbal MA, Ali A, Recent Advances in the Synthesis of (99mTechnetium) Based Radio-Pharmaceuticals, Rev. Inorg. Chem. 41 (2021) 151–198. 10.1515/revic-2020-0021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [99].Kuznetsov VV, Poineau F, German KE, Filatova EA, Pivotal Role of 99Tc NMR Spectroscopy in Solid-State and Molecular Chemistry, Commun. Chem. 7 (2024) 259. 10.1038/s42004-024-01349-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [100].Narra VR, Sastry KSR, Goddu SM, Howell RW, Strand S-E, Rao DV, Relative Biological Effectiveness of 99mTc Radiopharmaceuticals, Med. Phys. 21 (1994) 1921–1926. 10.1118/1.597230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [101].Beraldo H, Pharmacological Applications of Non-Radioactive Indium(III) Complexes: A Field Yet to be Explored, Coord. Chem. Rev. 419 (2020) 213375. 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213375. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [102].Eckerman K, Endo A, ICRP Publication 107. Nuclear Decay Data for Dosimetric Calculations, Ann. ICRP 38 (2008) 7–96. 10.1016/j.icrp.2008.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [103].Bhat MR, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=57, Nuclear Data Sheets 85 (1998) 415–536. 10.1006/ndsh.1998.0021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [104].Nesaraja CD, Geraedts SD, Singh B, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=58, Nuclear Data Sheets 111 (2010) 897–1092. 10.1016/j.nds.2010.03.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [105].Junde H, Xiaolong H, Tuli JK, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=67, Nuclear Data Sheets 106 (2005) 159–250. 10.1016/j.nds.2005.10.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [106].De Frenne D, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=103, Nuclear Data Sheets 110 (2009) 2081–2256. 10.1016/j.nds.2009.08.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [107].Blachot J, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=117, Nuclear Data Sheets 95 (2002) 679–836. 10.1006/ndsh.2002.0007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [108].Symochko DM, Browne E, Tuli JK, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=119, Nuclear Data Sheets 110 (2009) 2945–3105. 10.1016/j.nds.2009.10.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [109].Singh B, Rodionov AA, Khazov YL, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=135, Nuclear Data Sheets 109 (2008) 517–698. 10.1016/j.nds.2008.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [110].Nica N, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=155, Nuclear Data Sheets 160 (2019) 1–404. 10.1016/j.nds.2019.100523. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [111].Reich CW, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=161, Nuclear Data Sheets 112 (2011) 2497–2713. 10.1016/j.nds.2011.09.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [112].Basunia MS, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=191, Nuclear Data Sheets 195 (2024) 368–717. 10.1016/j.nds.2024.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [113].Shamsuzzoha Basunia M, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=193, Nuclear Data Sheets 143 (2017) 1–381. 10.1016/j.nds.2017.08.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [114].Huang X, Kang M, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=195, Nuclear Data Sheets 121 (2014) 395–560. 10.1016/j.nds.2014.09.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [115].Huang X, Zhou C, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=197, Nuclear Data Sheets 104 (2005) 283–426. 10.1016/j.nds.2005.01.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [116].Kondev FG, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=201, Nuclear Data Sheets 187 (2023) 355–578. 10.1016/j.nds.2023.01.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [117].Singh B, Chen J, Nuclear Structure and Decay Data for A=165 Isobars, Nuclear Data Sheets 194 (2024) 460–877. 10.1016/j.nds.2024.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [118].Khazov Yu., Rodionov A, Kondev FG, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=133, Nucl. Data Sheets 112 (2011) 855–1113. 10.1016/j.nds.2011.03.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [119].Khazov Yu., Rodionov AA, Sakharov S, Singh B, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=132, Nucl. Data Sheets 104 (2005) 497–790. 10.1016/j.nds.2005.03.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [120].Katakura J, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=125, Nucl. Data Sheets 112 (2011) 495–705. 10.1016/j.nds.2011.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [121].Chen J, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=123, Nucl. Data Sheets 174 (2021) 1–463. 10.1016/j.nds.2021.05.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [122].Blachot J, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=111, Nucl. Data Sheets 100 (2003) 179–346. 10.1006/ndsh.2003.0016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [123].Lalkovski S, Timar J, Elekes Z, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=105, Nucl. Data Sheets 161–162 (2019) 1–353. 10.1016/j.nds.2019.11.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [124].Browne E, Tuli JK, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=99, Nuclear Data Sheets 145 (2017) 25–340. 10.1016/j.nds.2017.09.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [125].Basunia MS, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=59, Nucl. Data Sheets 151 (2018) 1–333. 10.1016/j.nds.2018.08.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [126].Junde H, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=55, Nucl. Data Sheets 109 (2008) 787–942. 10.1016/j.nds.2008.03.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [127].Singh B, Chen J, Nuclear Structure and Decay Data for A=149 Isobars, Nucl. Data Sheets 185 (2022) 2–559. 10.1016/j.nds.2022.10.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [128].Chen J, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=138, Nucl. Data Sheets 146 (2017) 1–386. 10.1016/j.nds.2017.11.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [129].Singh B, Rodionov AA, Khazov YL, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=135, Nucl. Data Sheets 109 (2008) 517–698. 10.1016/j.nds.2008.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [130].Nica N, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=160, Nucl. Data Sheets 176 (2021) 1–428. 10.1016/j.nds.2021.08.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [131].Martin MJ, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=152, Nucl. Data Sheets 114 (2013) 1497–1847. 10.1016/j.nds.2013.11.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [132].Shamsuzzoha Basunia M, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=193, Nucl. Data Sheets 143 (2017) 1–381. 10.1016/j.nds.2017.08.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [133].Baglin CM, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=168, Nucl. Data Sheets 111 (2010) 1807–2080. 10.1016/j.nds.2010.07.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [134].Singh B, Chen J, Nuclear Structure and Decay Data for A=167 Isobars, Nucl. Data Sheets 191 (2023) 1–464. 10.1016/j.nds.2023.08.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [135].Baglin CM, Nuclear Data Sheets for A=166, Nucl. Data Sheets 109 (2008) 1103–1382. 10.1016/j.nds.2008.04.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [136].Saeedi Saghez B, Rodríguez-Rodríguez C, Esquinas PL, Merkens H, Bénard F, Radchenko V, Yang H, First Preclinical SPECT/CT Imaging and Biodistribution of [165Er]ErCl3 and [165Er]Er-PSMA-617, EJNMMI Radiopharm. Chem. 9 (2024) 90. 10.1186/s41181-024-00312-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [137].Thisgaard H, Elema DR, Jensen M, Production and Dosimetric Aspects of the Potent Auger Emitter 58mCo for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Small Tumors, Med. Phys. 38 (2011) 4535–4541. 10.1118/1.3608905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [138].Valdovinos HF, Hernandez R, Goel S, Graves S, Barnhart T, Cai W, Nickles RJ, Auger Electron-Based Targeted Radioimmunotherapy with 58mCo, A Feasibility Study, AIP Conf. Proc. 1747 (2016) 080006. 10.1063/1.4954126. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [139].Mason J, Appendix: NMR Properties of the Elements, in: Multinuclear NMR, Plenum Press, New York, 1987: pp. 521–561. [Google Scholar]
  • [140].Goodfellow RJ, Group VIII Transition Metals, in: Multinuclear NMR, Plenum Press, New York, 1987: pp. 521–561. [Google Scholar]
  • [141].Kirby CW, Puranda CM, Power WP, Cobalt-59 Nuclear Magnetic Relaxation Studies of Aqueous Octahedral Cobalt(III) Complexes, J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996) 14618–14624. 10.1021/jp9614254. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [142].Ozvat TM, Peña ME, Zadrozny JM, Influence of Ligand Encapsulation on Cobalt-59 Chemical-Shift Thermometry, Chem. Sci. 10 (2019) 6727–6734. 10.1039/C9SC01689A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [143].Üngör Ö, Ozvat TM, Ni Z, Zadrozny JM, Record Chemical-Shift Temperature Sensitivity in a Series of Trinuclear Cobalt Complexes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 (2022) 9132–9137. 10.1021/jacs.2c03115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [144].Üngör Ö, Sanchez S, Ozvat TM, Zadrozny JM, Asymmetry-Enhanced 59Co NMR Thermometry in Co(III) Complexes, Inorg. Chem. Front. 10 (2023) 7064–7072. 10.1039/D3QI01641B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [145].Heppeler A, André JP, Buschmann I, Wang X, Reubi J-C, Hennig M, Kaden TA, Maecke HR, Metal-Ion-Dependent Biological Properties of a Chelator-Derived Somatostatin Analogue for Tumour Targeting, Chem. Eur. J. 14 (2008) 3026–3034. 10.1002/chem.200701264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [146].Barrett KE, Houson HA, Lin W, Lapi SE, Engle JW, Production, Purification, and Applications of a Potential Theranostic Pair: Cobalt-55 and Cobalt-58m, Diagnostics 11 (2021) 1235. 10.3390/diagnostics11071235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [147].Lazzarini E, Fantola Lazzarini AL, On the Survival of Co(III) Complexes to Deexcitation by Internal Conversion of the 58mCo Coordinating Atom, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 39 (1977) 207–211. 10.1016/0022-1902(77)80001-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [148].Passell TO, Heath RL, Cross Sections of Threshold Reactions for Fission Neutrons: Nickel as a Fast Flux Monitor, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 10 (1961) 308–315. 10.13182/NSE61-A15372. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [149].Lin W, Aluicio-Sarduy E, Barrett KE, Barnhart TE, Mixdorf JC, DeLuca MC, Engle JW, Separation of Cyclotron-Produced Cobalt-55/58m from Iron Targets Using Cation Exchange Chromatography with Non-Aqueous Solvents and Extraction Chromatography, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 200 (2023) 110980. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.110980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [150].Mues genannt Koers L, McNeil SW, Radchenko V, Paulssen E, Hoehr C, Production of Co-58m in a Siphon-Style Liquid Target on a Medical Cyclotron, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 195 (2023) 110734. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.110734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [151].Cotton FA, Wilkinson Geoffrey, Murillo Carlos A., Bochmann Manfred, Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, 6th ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • [152].Shannon RD, Revised Effective Ionic Radii and Systematic Studies of Interatomic Distances in Halides and Chalcogenides, Acta Cryst. A32 (1976) 751–767. 10.1107/S0567739476001551. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [153].Pearson RG, Absolute Electronegativity and Hardness: Application to Inorganic Chemistry, Inorg. Chem. 27 (1988) 734–740. 10.1021/ic00277a030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [154].Śmiłowicz D, Metzler-Nolte N, Bioconjugates of Co(III) Complexes with Schiff Base Ligands and Cell Penetrating Peptides: Solid Phase Synthesis, Characterization and Antiproliferative Activity, J. Inorg. Biochem. 206 (2020) 111041. 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2020.111041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [155].Lawrence MAW, Holder AA, Assessing the Stability of the Co(I) Species of Two Mononuclear Dichlorocobalt Compounds Bearing 2,2′-bipyridine and trans-2-(2′-quiolyl)methylene-3-quinuclidione via 59Co NMR Spectroscopy, Electrochemical, and Catalyzed Proton Electroreduction Studies, Inorg. Chim. Acta 441 (2016) 157–168. 10.1016/j.ica.2015.11.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [156].Blower PJ, Levason W, Luthra SK, McRobbie G, Monzittu FM, Mules TO, Reid G, Subhan MN, Exploring Transition Metal Fluoride Chelates – Synthesis, Properties and Prospects Towards Potential PET Probes, Dalton Trans. 48 (2019) 6767–6776. 10.1039/C8DT03696A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [157].Pham CT, Barnard I, Nguyen HH, Abram U, Koch KR, Cobalt(III) Metallacryptates and Their Guest Cation-Exchange in Solution Monitored by 59Co NMR, Inorg. Chem. 59 (2020) 1183–1192. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b02864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [158].Böttcher A, Gray HB, Meade TJ, Simon MI, Takeuchi T, Irreversible Enzymatic Inhibition by Cobalt Chelate Complexes, J. Inorg. Biochem. 59 (1995) 221. 10.1016/0162-0134(95)97327-M. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [159].Chang EL, Simmers C, Knight DA, Cobalt Complexes as Antiviral and Antibacterial Agents, Pharmaceuticals 3 (2010) 1711–1728. 10.3390/ph3061711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [160].Kar K, Ghosh D, Kabi B, Chandra A, A Concise Review on Cobalt Schiff Base Complexes as Anticancer Agents, Polyhedron 222 (2022) 115890. 10.1016/j.poly.2022.115890. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [161].King AP, Gellineau HA, Ahn J-E, MacMillan SN, Wilson JJ, Bis(thiosemicarbazone) Complexes of Cobalt(III). Synthesis, Characterization, and Anticancer Potential, Inorg. Chem. 56 (2017) 6609–6623. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [162].Woods JJ, Rodriguez MX, Tsai C-W, Tsai M-F, Wilson JJ, Cobalt Amine Complexes and Ru265 Interact with the DIME Region of the Mitochondrial Calcium Uniporter, Chem. Commun. 57 (2021) 6161–6164. 10.1039/D1CC01623G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [163].Bigham NP, Wilson JJ, Investigation of Cobalt(III) Cage Complexes as Inhibitors of the Mitochondrial Calcium Uniporter, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 26 (2023) e202200735. 10.1002/ejic.202200735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [164].Heffern MC, Yamamoto N, Holbrook RJ, Eckermann AL, Meade TJ, Cobalt Derivatives as Promising Therapeutic Agents, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 17 (2013) 189–196. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.11.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [165].Bajema EA, Roberts KF, Meade TJ, Cobalt-Schiff Base Complexes: Preclinical Research and Potential Therapeutic Uses, in: Carver PL(Ed.), Essential Metals in Medicine: Therapeutic Use and Toxicity of Metal Ions in the Clinic, De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston, 2019: pp. 267–301. 10.1515/9783110527872-011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [166].Böttcher A, Takeuchi T, Hardcastle KI, Meade TJ, Gray HB, Cwikel D, Kapon M, Dori Z, Spectroscopy and Electrochemistry of Cobalt(III) Schiff Base Complexes, Inorg. Chem. 36 (1997) 2498–2504. 10.1021/ic961146v. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [167].Schwartz JA, Lium EK, Silverstein SJ, Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Entry is Inhibited by the Cobalt Chelate Complex CTC-96, J. Virol. 75 (2001) 4117–4128. 10.1128/jvi.75.9.4117-4128.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [168].Van Dyk J, Battista JJ, Almond PR, A Retrospective of Cobalt-60 Radiation Therapy: “The Atom Bomb That Saves Lives,” Med. Phys. Int. (MPI) History of Medical Physics (2020) 327–350. [Google Scholar]
  • [169].Gé LG, Danielsen MB, Nielsen AY, Skavenborg ML, Langkjær N, Thisgaard H, McKenzie CJ, Radiocobalt-Labeling of a Polypyridylamine Chelate Conjugated to GE11 for EGFR-Targeted Theranostics, Molecules 30 (2025) 212. 10.3390/molecules30020212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [170].Anderegg G, Hubmann E, Podder NG, Wenk F, Pyridinderivate als Komplexbildner. XI. Die Thermodynamik der Metallkomplexbildung mit Bis-, Tris- und Tetrakis[(2-pyridyl)methyl]-aminen, Helv. Chim. Acta 60 (1977) 123–140. 10.1002/hlca.19770600115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [171].Li Z, Zhao R, Wu X, Sun Y, Yao M, Li J, Xu Y, Gu J, Identification and Characterization of a Novel Peptide Ligand of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor for Targeted Delivery of Therapeutics, FASEB J. 19 (2005) 1978–1985. 10.1096/fj.05-4058com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [172].Xie Q, Fu Q, Cui H-B, Luo B-H, Liu W-Q, Qiao R, Ren Y-J, Chen F, Zhang H-X, Long J-Q, Influence of the Flexible Tetrapyridines on Electrocatalytic Water Oxidation by Cobalt Complexes, Polyhedron 189 (2020) 114731. 10.1016/j.poly.2020.114731. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [173].Lin W, Śmiłowicz D, Joaqui-Joaqui MA, Bera A, Zhong Z, Aluicio-Sarduy E, Mixdorf JC, Barnhart TE, Engle JW, Boros E, Controlling the Redox Chemistry of Cobalt Radiopharmaceuticals, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63 (2024) e202412357. 10.1002/anie.202412357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [174].Marquez BV, Ikotun OF, Parry JJ, Rogers BE, Meares CF, Lapi SE, Development of a Radiolabeled Irreversible Peptide Ligand for PET Imaging of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, J. Nucl. Med. 55 (2014) 1029–1034. 10.2967/jnumed.113.130898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [175].Mastren T, Marquez BV, Sultan DE, Bollinger E, Eisenbeis P, Voller T, Lapi SE, Cyclotron Production of High-Specific Activity 55Co and In Vivo Evaluation of the Stability of 55Co Metal-Chelate-Peptide Complexes, Mol. Imaging 14 (2015). 10.2310/7290.2015.00025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [176].Thisgaard H, Olesen ML, Dam JH, Radiosynthesis of 55Co- and 58mCo-Labelled DOTATOC for Positron Emission Tomography Imaging and Targeted Radionuclide Therapy, J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 54 (2011) 758–762. 10.1002/jlcr.1919. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [177].Thisgaard H, Olsen BB, Dam JH, Bollen P, Mollenhauer J, Høilund-Carlsen PF, Evaluation of Cobalt-Labeled Octreotide Analogs for Molecular Imaging and Auger Electron–Based Radionuclide Therapy, J. Nucl. Med. 55 (2014) 1311–1316. 10.2967/jnumed.114.137182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [178].Anderegg G, Critical Survey of Stability Constants of EDTA Comoplexes, in: Anderegg G. (Ed.), Critical Survey of Stability Constants of EDTA Complexes, Pergamon, 1977: pp. 1–36. 10.1016/B978-0-08-022009-3.50004-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [179].Anderegg G, Arnaud-Neu F, Delgado R, Felcman J, Popov K, Critical Evaluation of Stability Constants of Metal Complexes of Complexones for Biomedical and Environmental Applications, Pure Appl. Chem. 77 (2005) 1445–1495. 10.1351/pac200577081445. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [180].Shiozaki K, Harada N, Greco WR, Haba A, Uneda S, Tsai H, Seon BK, Antiangiogenic Chimeric Anti-Endoglin (CD105) Antibody: Pharmacokinetics and Immunogenicity in Nonhuman Primates and Effects of Doxorubicin, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy 55 (2006) 140–150. 10.1007/s00262-005-0691-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [181].Haruta Y, Seon BK, Distinct Human Leukemia-Associated Cell Surface Glycoprotein GP160 Defined by Monoclonal Antibody SN6, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 83 (1986) 7898–7902. 10.1073/pnas.83.20.7898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [182].Gougos A, Letarte M, Primary Structure of Endoglin, an RGD-Containing Glycoprotein of Human Endothelial Cells, J. Biol. Chem. 265 (1990) 8361–8364. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)38892-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [183].Bernabeu C, Conley BA, Vary CPH, Novel Biochemical Pathways of Endoglin in Vascular Cell Physiology, J. Cell. Biochem. 102 (2007) 1375–1388. 10.1002/jcb.21594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [184].Seon BK, Haba A, Matsuno F, Takahashi N, Tsujie M, She X, Harada N, Uneda S, Tsujie T, Toi H, Tsai H, Haruta Y, Endoglin-Targeted Cancer Therapy, Curr. Drug Discov. 8 (2011) 135–143. 10.2174/156720111793663570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [185].Liu Y, Paauwe M, Nixon AB, Hawinkels LJAC, Endoglin Targeting: Lessons Learned and Questions That Remain, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (2021) 147. 10.3390/ijms22010147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [186].Mitran B, Thisgaard H, Rinne S, Dam JH, Azami F, Tolmachev V, Orlova A, Rosenström U, Selection of an Optimal Macrocyclic Chelator Improves the Imaging of Prostate Cancer Using Cobalt-Labeled GRPR Antagonist RM26, Sci. Rep. 9 (2019) 17086. 10.1038/s41598-019-52914-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [187].Yu M, Bouley BS, Xie D, Enriquez JS, Que EL, 19F PARASHIFT Probes for Magnetic Resonance Detection of H2O2 and Peroxidase Activity, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 10546–10552. 10.1021/jacs.8b05685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [188].Tsitovich PB, Spernyak JA, Morrow JR, A Redox-Activated MRI Contrast Agent that Switches Between Paramagnetic and Diamagnetic States, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52 (2013) 13997–14000. 10.1002/anie.201306394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [189].Joyner JC, Reichfield J, Cowan JA, Factors Influencing the DNA Nuclease Activity of Iron, Cobalt, Nickel, and Copper Chelates, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (2011) 15613–15626. 10.1021/ja2052599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [190].Joyner JC, Cowan JA, Targeted Cleavage of HIV RRE RNA by Rev-Coupled Transition Metal Chelates, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (2011) 9912–9922. 10.1021/ja203057z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [191].Lin W, Fonseca Cabrera GO, Aluicio-Sarduy E, Barnhart TE, Mixdorf JC, Li Z, Wu Z, Engle JW, Radiolabeling Diaminosarcophagine with Cyclotron-Produced Cobalt-55 and [55Co]Co-NT-Sarcage as a Proof of Concept in a Murine Xenograft Model, Bioconjugate Chem. 35 (2024) 412–418. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.4c00043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [192].Gully D, Labeeuw B, Boigegrain R, Oury-Donat F, Bachy A, Poncelet M, Steinberg R, Suaud-Chagny MF, Santucci V, Vita N, Pecceu F, Labbé-Jullié C, Kitabgi P, Soubrié P, Le Fur G, Maffrand JP, Biochemical and Pharmacological Activities of SR 142948A, a New Potent Neurotensin Receptor Antagonist, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 280 (1997) 802–812. 10.1016/S0022-3565(24)36482-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [193].Edwards WB, Liang K, Xu B, Anderson CJ, Achilefu S, Synthesis and Radiolabeling of a Somatostatin Analog for Multimodal Imaging, in: Proc. of SPIE, 2006: p. 609703. 10.1117/12.648096. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [194].Kronauge J, Barrett J, Qi J, Mok H, Hunter D, Bensimon C, Oelsner S, Norenberg J, Anderson T, Gallo S, Hiller S, Joyal J, Lee N, Gourevitch M, Babich J, Formulation Comparisons and Pharmacokinetics of High Specific Activity Ultratrace 131I-Iobenguane (mIBG) for Therapy, J. Nucl. Med. 48 (2007) 296P. [Google Scholar]
  • [195].Carollo A, Papi S, Chinol M, Lutetium-177 Labeled Peptides: The European Institute of Oncology Experience, Curr. Radiopharm. 9 (2016) 19–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [196].Bernhard H, Lieser KH, Abtrennung von 103mRh von 103Pd in Form eines Isotopengenerators, Radiochim. Acta 13 (1970) 134–138. 10.1524/ract.1970.13.3.134. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [197].Mamadaliev N, Levin VI, Malinin AB, Rhodium-103m Generator, Radiokhimiya 20 (1978) 772–775. [Google Scholar]
  • [198].Skarnemark G, Ödegaard-Jensen A, Nilsson J, Bartos B, Kowalska E, Bilewicz A, Bernhardt P, Production of 103mRh for Cancer Therapy, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 280 (2009) 371–373. 10.1007/s10967-009-0529-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [199].Bartoś B, Kowalska E, Bilewicz A, Skarnemark G, 103Ru/103mRh Generator, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 279 (2009) 655–657. 10.1007/s10967-008-7346-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [200].Jensen AI, Zhuravlev F, Severin G, Magnus CB, Fonslet J, Köster U, Jensen M, A Solid Support Generator of the Auger Electron Emitter Rhodium-103m from [103Pd]Palladium, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 156 (2020) 108985. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2019.108985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [201].Ohya T, Ichinose J, Nagatsu K, Sugo Y, Ishioka N, Watabe H, Itoh M, Minegishi K, Zhang M-R, Production of Auger-Electron-Emitting 103mRh via a 103Pd/103mRh Generator Using an Anion-Exchange Resin, Radiochim. Acta 112 (2024) 37–43. 10.1515/ract-2023-0238. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [202].Jardine FH, Rhodium: Inorganic & Coordination Chemistry, in: Encyclopedia of Inorganic Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2005. 10.1002/0470862106.ia206. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [203].Hancock RD, Martell AE, Hard and Soft Acid-Base Behavior in Aqueous Solution: Steric Effects Make Some Metal Ions Hard: A Quantitative Scale of Hardness-Softness for Acids and Bases, J. Chem. Educ. 73 (1996) 654–661. 10.1021/ed073p654. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [204].Banyai I, Glaser J, Read MC, Sandstroem M, Slow Proton Exchange Kinetics in Aqueous Solutions of Hexaaquarhodium(III): Influence of the Second Hydration Sphere, Inorg. Chem. 34 (1995) 2423–2429. 10.1021/ic00113a025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [205].Ernsting JM, Gaemers S, Elsevier CJ, 103Rh NMR Spectroscopy and its Application to Rhodium Chemistry, Magn. Reson. Chem. 42 (2004) 721–736. 10.1002/mrc.1439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [206].Pillai MRA, John CS, Troutner DE, Labeling of Guman IgG with Rhodium-105 Using a New Pentadentate Bifunctional Ligand, Bioconjugate Chem. 1 (1990) 191–197. 10.1021/bc00003a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [207].John CS, Pillai MRA, Lo JM, Troutner DE, Labeling of Proteins with 105Rh, Int. J. Rad. Appl. Instr. A 40 (1989) 701–705. 10.1016/0883-2889(89)90081-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [208].Pillai MRA, Lo JM, John CS, Troutner DE, Labeling of Proteins Using [105Rh]Rh-4-(p-aminobenzyl)-diethylenetriamine, Int. J. Rad. Appl. Instr. B 17 (1990) 419–426. 10.1016/0883-2897(90)90111-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [209].Venkatesh M, Schlempe EO, Jurisson SS, Ketring AR, Volkert WA, Corlija M, Preparation of 105Rh Labeled Monoclonal Antibody (MAb B72.3) Using Aminobenzylpropyleneamineoxime as the Bifunctional Chelating Agent; Comparison to 131I Labeled MAb B72.3, Radiochim. Acta 85 (1999) 157–163. 10.1524/ract.1999.85.34.157. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [210].Pillai MRA, Lo JM, Troutner DE, Labeling of Hematoporphyrin with 105Rh and Binding Studies with Human Gamma Globulin, Int. J. Rad. Appl. Instr. A 41 (1190) 69–73. 10.1016/0883-2889(90)90132-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [211].Lo JM, Pillai MRA, John CS, Troutner DE, Labeling of Human Serum Albumin with 105Rh–Cysteine Complexes, Int. J. Rad. Appl. Instr. A 41 (1990) 63–67. 10.1016/0883-2889(90)90131-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [212].Feng Y, Phelps TE, Carroll V, Gallazzi F, Sieckman G, Hoffman TJ, Barnes CL, Ketring AR, Hennkens HM, Jurisson SS, Chemistry and Radiochemistry of As, Re and Rh Isotopes Relevant to Radiopharmaceutical Applications: High Specific Activity Radionuclides for Imaging and Treatment, Dalton Trans. 46 (2017) 14677–14690. 10.1039/C7DT02407J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [213].Akgun Z, Engelbrecht H, Fan K-H, Barnes CL, Cutler CS, Jurisson SS, Lever SZ, The Complexation of Rhodium(III) with Acyclic Diaminedithioether (DADTE) Ligands, Dalton Trans. 39 (2010) 10169–10178. 10.1039/C0DT00813C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [214].Rund JV, Basolo F, Pearson RG, Catalysis of Substitution Reactions of Rhodium(III) Complexes. The Reaction of Aquopentachlororhodate(III) Ion with Pyridine, Inorg. Chem. 3 (1964) 658–661. 10.1021/ic50015a011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [215].Goswami N, Alberto R, Barnes CL, Jurisson S, Rhodium(III) Complexes with Acyclic Tetrathioether Ligands. Effects of Backbone Chain Length on the Conformation of the Rh(III) Complex, Inorg. Chem. 35 (1996) 7546–7555. 10.1021/ic960952z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [216].Goswami N, Higginbotham C, Volkert W, Alberto R, Nef W, Jurisson S, Rhodium-105 Tetrathioether Complexes: Radiochemistry and Initial Biological Evaluation, Nucl. Med. Biol. 26 (1999) 951–957. 10.1016/S0969-8051(99)00070-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [217].Gonzalez N, Moody TW, Igarashi H, Ito T, Jensen RT, Bombesin-Related Peptides and Their Receptors: Recent Advances in Their Role in Physiology and Disease States, Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 15 (2008) 58–64. 10.1097/MED.0b013e3282f3709b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [218].Cagnolini A, Ballard B, Engelbrecht HP, Rold TL, Barnes C, Cutler C, Hoffman TJ, Kannan R, Katti K, Jurisson SS, Tetradentate Bis-Phosphine Ligands (P2N2 and P2S2) and Their Rh(III), Ni(II) and 105Rh Complexes: X-ray Crystal Structures of trans-[RhCl2(L2)]PF6, [Ni(L2)](PF6)2 and μ-O2SO2-[Ni(L5)]2(PF6)2, Nucl. Med. Biol. 38 (2011) 63–76. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [219].Smith CJ, Higginbotham C, Katti KV, Volkert WA, Rhodium-105 Complexes of Polydentate, Aqueous-Soluble, Phosphine Ligands: New Radiochemical Developments towards Radioimmunotherapy, Phosphorus, Sulfur, Silicon Relat. Elem. 144 (1999) 481–484. 10.1080/10426509908546286. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [220].Venkatesh M, Goswami N, Volkert WA, Schlemper EO, Ketring AR, Barnes CL, Jurisson S, An Rh-105 Complex of Tetrathiacyclohexadecane Diol with Potential for Formulating Bifunctional Chelates, Nucl. Med. Biol. 23 (1996) 33–40. 10.1016/0969-8051(95)02012-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [221].Li N, Eberlein CM, Volkert WA, Ochrymowycz L, Barnes C, Ketring AR, Comparisons of 105Rh(III) Chloride Complexation with [14]aneNS3, [14]aneN2S2 and [14]aneN4 Macrocycles in Aqueous Solution, Radiochim. Acta 75 (1996) 83–96. 10.1524/ract.1996.75.2.83. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [222].Li N, Struttman M, Higginbotham C, Grall AJ, Skerlj JF, Vollano JF, Bridger SA, Ochrymowycz LA, Ketring AR, Abrams MJ, Volkert WA, Biodistribution of Model 105Rh-Labeled Tetradentate Thiamacrocycles in Rats, Nucl. Med. Biol. 24 (1997) 85–92. 10.1016/S0969-8051(96)00177-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [223].Straathof NJW, Magnus CB, Zhuravlev F, Jensen AI, Novel Bifunctional [16]aneS4-Derived Chelators for Soft Radiometals, Molecules 26 (2021) 4603. 10.3390/molecules26154603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [224].Bernhardt P, Forssell-Aronsson E, Jacobsson L, Skarnemark G, Low-Energy Electron Emitters for Targeted Radiotherapy of Small Tumours, Acta Oncol. 40 (2001) 602–608. 10.1080/028418601750444141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [225].Olson AP, Ma L, Feng Y, Najafi Khosroshahi F, Kelley SP, Aluicio-Sarduy E, Barnhart TE, Hennkens HM, Ellison PA, Jurisson SS, Engle JW, A Third Generation Potentially Bifunctional Trithiol Chelate, its nat,1XXSb(III) Complex, and Selective Chelation of Radioantimony (119Sb) from its Sn Target, Inorg. Chem. 60 (2021) 15223–15232. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [226].Grundmane A, Radchenko V, Ramogida CF, Chemistry of Antimony in Radiopharmaceutical Development: Unlocking the Theranostic Potential of Sb Isotopes, ChemPlusChem 89 (2024) e202400250. 10.1002/cplu.202400250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [227].Thisgaard H, Jensen M, 119Sb—A Potent Auger Emitter for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy, Med. Phys. 35 (2008) 3839–3846. 10.1118/1.2963993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [228].Thisgaard H, Jensen M, Production of the Auger Emitter 119Sb for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy Using a Small PET-Cyclotron, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 67 (2009) 34–38. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [229].Bennett KT, Bone SE, Akin AC, Birnbaum ER, Blake AV, Brugh M, Daly SR, Engle JW, Fassbender ME, Ferrier MG, Kozimor SA, Lilley LM, Martinez CA, Mocko V, Nortier FM, Stein BW, Thiemann SL, Vermeulen C, Large-Scale Production of 119mTe and 119Sb for Radiopharmaceutical Applications, ACS Cent. Sci. 5 (2019) 494–505. 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [230].Mosby MA, Birnbaum ER, Nortier FM, Engle JW, Cross Sections for Proton-Induced Reactions on natSb up to 68 MeV, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., B 412 (2017) 34–40. 10.1016/j.nimb.2017.08.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [231].Fischer RC, Antimony: Inorganic Chemistry, in: Encyclopedia of Inorganic and Bioinorganic Chemistry, 2016: pp. 1–13. 10.1002/9781119951438.eibc0011.pub2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [232].Pearson RG, Hard and Soft Acids and Bases, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 85 (1963) 3533–3539. 10.1021/ja00905a001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [233].Pearson RG, Hard and Soft Acids and Bases, HSAB, Part 1: Fundamental Principles, J. Chem. Educ. 45 (1968) 581. 10.1021/ed045p581. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [234].Pearson RG, Hard and Soft Acids and Bases, HSAB, Part II: Underlying Theories, J. Chem. Educ. 45 (1968) 643. 10.1021/ed045p643. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [235].Maroulis G, Cluster Size Effect on the Electric Polarizability and Hyperpolarizability in Small Antimony Clusters SbNn, n=1,2 and 4, Chem. Phys. Lett. 444 (2007) 44–47. 10.1016/j.cplett.2007.07.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [236].Carbo-Bague I, Ramogida CF, Emerging Therapeutic Radiopharmaceuticals and Their Theranostic Pairs, in: Encyclopedia of Inorganic and Bioinorganic Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2021: pp. 1–34. 10.1002/9781119951438.eibc2763. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [237].Boreiko CJ, Rossman TG, Antimony and its Compounds: Health Impacts Related to Pulmonary Toxicity, Cancer, and Genotoxicity, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 403 (2020) 115156. 10.1016/j.taap.2020.115156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [238].Tian Q, Xin Y, Yang L, Wang X, Guo X, Theoretical Simulation and Experimental Study of Hydrolysis Separation of SbCl3 in Complexation–Precipitation System, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 26 (2016) 2746–2753. 10.1016/S1003-6326(16)64370-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [239].Alpen EL, Radiation Chemistry, in: Radiation Biophysics, 2nd ed., Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, 1998: pp. 104–131. [Google Scholar]
  • [240].Quentel F, Filella M, Elleouet C, Madec C-L, Kinetic Studies on Sb(III) Oxidation by Hydrogen Peroxide in Aqueous Solution, Environ. Sci. Technol. 38 (2004) 2843–2848. 10.1021/es035019r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [241].Shan J, He M, Lin C, Ouyang W, Liu X, Simultaneous Electrochemical Determination of Sb(III) and Sb(V) in Water Samples: Deposition Potential Differences and Sb(III) Photooxidation Characteristics, Sens. Actuators B Chem. 305 (2020) 127454. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.127454. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [242].Morizot G, Jouffroy R, Faye A, Chabert P, Belhouari K, Calin R, Charlier C, Miailhes P, Siriez J-Y, Mouri O, Yera H, Gilquin J, Tubiana R, Lanternier F, Mamzer M-F, Legendre C, Peyramond D, Caumes E, Lortholary O, Buffet P, Antimony to Cure Visceral Leishmaniasis Unresponsive to Liposomal Amphotericin B, PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. (2016) e0004304. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [243].Hadjikakou SK, Ozturk II, Banti CN, Kourkoumelis N, Hadjiliadis N, Recent Advances on Antimony(III/V) Compounds with Potential Activity Against Tumor Cells, J. Inorg. Biochem. 153 (2012) 293–305. 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2015.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [244].Ge R, Sun H, Bioinorganic Chemistry of Bismuth and Antimony: Target Sites of Metallodrugs, Acc. Chem. Res. 40 (2007) 267–274. 10.1021/ar600001b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [245].Yan S, Ding K, Zhang L, Sun H, Complexation of Antimony(III) by Trypanothione, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39 (2000) 4260–4262. 10.1002/1521-3773(20001201)39:23<4260::AID-ANIE4260>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [246].Tiekink ERT, Antimony and Bismuth Compounds in Oncology, Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 42 (2002) 217–224. 10.1016/S1040-8428(01)00217-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [247].Sharma P, Perez D, Cabrera A, Rosas N, Arias JL, Perspectives of Antimony Compounds in Oncology, Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 29 (2008) 881–890. 10.1111/j.1745-7254.2008.00818.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [248].Sun H, Yan SC, Cheng WS, Interaction of Antimony Tartrate with the Tripeptide Glutathione, Eur. J. Biochem. 267 (2000) 5450–5457. 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01605.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [249].Pastore A, Federici G, Bertini E, Piemonte F, Analysis of Glutathione: Implication in Redox and Detoxification, Clin. Chim. Acta 333 (2003) 19–39. 10.1016/S0009-8981(03)00200-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [250].Filella M, May PM, Critical Appraisal of Available Thermodynamic Data for the Complexation of Antimony(III) and Antimony(V) by Low Molecular Mass Organic Ligands, J. Environ. Monit. 7 (2005) 1226–1237. 10.1039/B511453E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [251].Yan S, Li F, Ding K, Sun H, Reduction of Pentavalent Antimony by Trypanothione and Formation of a Binary and Ternary Complex of Atimony(III) and Trypanothione, J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 8 (2003) 689–697. 10.1007/s00775-003-0468-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [252].Hansson I, The Molecular and Crystal Structure of Antimony Hydrogen Bis(thioglycollate), Acta Chem. Scand. 22 (1968) 509–517. [Google Scholar]
  • [253].Tóth-Molnár E, Lihi N, Gál GT, De S, Bombicz P, Bányai I, Szikra D, Dénes E, Tircsó G, Tóth I, Kálmán FK, Exploring Cyclic Aminopolycarboxylate Ligands for Sb(III) Complexation: PCTA and Its Derivatives as a Promising Solution, Inorg. Chem. 60 (2021) 14253–14262. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [254].Moaven S, Watson BT, Thompson SB, Lyons VJ, Unruh DK, Casadonte DJ, Pappas D, Cozzolino AF, Self-Assembly of Reversed Bilayer Vesicles through Pnictogen Bonding: Water-Stable Supramolecular Nanocontainers for Organic Solvents, Chem. Sci. 11 (2020) 4374–4380. 10.1039/D0SC00206B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [255].Ohyama R, Takahashi M, Takeda M, Study on Stereochemical Activity of Lone Pair Electrons in Sulfur and Halogen Coordinated Antimony(III) Complexes by 121Sb Mössbauer Spectroscopy, Hyperfine Interact. 161 (2005) 99–111. 10.1007/s10751-005-9172-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [256].Bondi A, van der Waals Volumes and Radii, J. Phys. Chem. 68 (1964) 441–451. 10.1021/j100785a001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [257].Bondi A, van der Waals Volumes and Radii of Metals in Covalent Compounds, J. Phys. Chem. 70 (1966) 3006–3007. 10.1021/j100881a503. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [258].Batsanov SS, van der Waals Radii of Elements, Inorg. Mater. 37 (2001) 871–885. 10.1023/A:1011625728803. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [259].DeGraffenreid AJ, Feng Y, Barnes CL, Ketring AR, Cutler CS, Jurisson SS, Trithiols and Their Arsenic Compounds for Potential Use in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiopharmaceuticals, Nucl. Med. Biol. 43 (2016) 288–295. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2016.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [260].Garner M, Reglinski J, Cassidy I, Spicer MD, Kennedy AR, Hydrotris(methimazolyl)borate, A Soft Analogue of Hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borate. Preparation and Crystal Structure of a Novel Zinc Complex, Chem. Commun. (1996) 1975–1976. 10.1039/CC9960001975. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [261].Dodds CA, Reglinski J, Spicer MD, Lower Main-Group Element Complexes with a Soft Scorpionate Ligand: The Structural Influence of Stereochemically Active Lone Pairs, Chem. Eur. J. 12 (2006) 931–939. 10.1002/chem.200500677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [262].Gé LG, Møller MS, Chen C, Castillo VC, Langkjaer N, McKee V, Dam JH, McKenzie CJ, Thisgaard H, Exploring a Tristhione Scorpionate Ligand as a Suitable Chelator for the Theranostic Pair Antimony-119 and Antimony-117, EJNMMI Radiopharm. Chem. 9 (2024) 75. 10.1186/s41181-024-00297-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [263].Tella M, Pokrovski GS, Stability and Structure of Pentavalent Antimony Complexes with Aqueous Organic Ligands, Chem. Geol. 292–293 (2012) 57–68. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.11.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [264].Tella M, Pokrovski GS, Antimony(V) Complexing with O-Bearing Organic Ligands in Aqueous Solution: An X-ray Absorption Fine Structure Spectroscopy and Potentiometric Study, Mineral. Mag. 72 (2008) 205–209. 10.1180/minmag.2008.072.1.205. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [265].Abou DS, Thiele NA, Gutsche NT, Villmer A, Zhang H, Woods JJ, Baidoo KE, Escorcia FE, Wilson JJ, Thorek DLJ, Towards the Stable Chelation of Radium for Biomedical Applications with an 18-Membered Macrocyclic Ligand, Chem. Sci. 12 (2021) 3733–3742. 10.1039/D0SC06867E. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [266].Chen C, Sommer C, Thisgaard H, McKee V, McKenzie CJ, Facile Transmetallation of [SbIII(DOTA)]− Renders it Unsuitable for Medical Applications, RSC Adv. 12 (2022) 5772–5781. 10.1039/D2RA00642A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [267].Pniok M, Kubíček V, Havlíčková J, Kotek J, Sabatie-Gogová A, Plutnar J, Huclier-Markai S, Hermann P, Thermodynamic and Kinetic Study of Scandium(III) Complexes of DTPA and DOTA: A Step Toward Scandium Radiopharmaceuticals, Chem. Eur. J. 20 (2014) 7944–7955. 10.1002/chem.201402041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [268].Fun H-K, Shanmuga Sundara Raj S, Razak IA, Ilyukhin AB, Davidovich RL, Huang J-W, Hu S-Z, Ng SW, Aminoguanidinium (Ethylenediamine-N,N,N’,N’-tetraacetato)antimonate(III) Monohydrate, Acta Cryst. C55 (1999) 905–907. 10.1107/S0108270199002310. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [269].Li D, Zhong G-Q, Synthesis and Crystal Structure of the Bioinorganic Complex [Sb(Hedta)]·2H2O, Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2014 (2014) 461605. 10.1155/2014/461605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [270].Popov AM, Davidovich RL, Li IA, Skul’beda AV, Hu S-Z, Cytotoxic and Antitumor Activity of Antimony(III) Nitrilotriacetate Complexes M2SB(Nta)(HNta)·nH2O (M=NH4, Na; n=1, 2), Pharm. Chem. J. 39 (2005) 119–121. 10.1007/s11094-005-0097-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [271].Gress ME, Jacobson RA, X-ray and White Radiation Neutron Diffraction Studies of Optically Active Potassium Antimony Tartrate, K2Sb2(d-C4H2O6)2·3H2O (tarter emetic), Inorg. Chim. Acta 8 (1974) 209–217. 10.1016/S0020-1693(00)92617-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [272].Poore MC, Russell DR, The Crystal Structure of the [Sb(C2O4)3]3− Ion. A Sterically Active Lone Pair in Six-co-ordination, J. Chem. Soc. D (1971) 18–19. 10.1039/C29710000018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [273].Nelson BJB, Andersson JD, Wuest F, Radiolanthanum: Promising Theranostic Radionuclides for PET, Alpha, and Auger-Meitner Therapy, Nucl. Med. Biol. 110–111 (2022) 59–66. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2022.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [274].Fonslet J, Lee BQ, Tran TA, Siragusa M, Jensen M, Kibédi T, Stuchbery AE, Severin GW, 135La as an Auger-Electron Emitter for Targeted Internal Radiotherapy, Phys. Med. Biol. 63 (2017) 015026. 10.1088/1361-6560/aa9b44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [275].Aluicio-Sarduy E, Hernandez R, Olson AP, Barnhart TE, Cai W, Ellison PA, Engle JW, Production and In Vivo PET/CT Imaging of the Theranostic Pair 132/135La, Sci. Rep. 9 (2019) 10658. 10.1038/s41598-019-47137-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [276].Khomenko IA, Kormazeva ES, Bogomolova TV, Furkina EB, Novikov VI, Aliev RA, Proton-Induced Nuclear Reactions on Barium-136 for the Production of the Medically Relevant Radionuclide Lanthanum-135, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 139 (2024) 1121. 10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-05917-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [277].Nelson BJB, Ferguson S, Wuest M, Wilson J, Duke MJM, Richter S, Soenke-Jans H, Andersson JD, Juengling F, Wuest F, First In Vivo and Phantom Imaging of Cyclotron-Produced 133La as a Theranostic Radionuclide for 225Ac and 135La, J. Nucl. Med. 63 (2022) 584–590. 10.2967/jnumed.121.262459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [278].Pedersen KS, Deville C, Søndergaard U, Jensen M, Jensen AI, Improved Procedures for Production and Purification of 135La from Enriched [135Ba]BaCO3 on a 16.5 MeV Cyclotron, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 192 (2023) 110612. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [279].Chakravarty R, Patra S, Jagadeesan KC, Thakare SV, Chakraborty S, Electrochemical Separation of 132/135La Theranostic Pair from Proton Irradiated Ba Target, Sep. Purif. Technol. 280 (2022) 119908. 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119908. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [280].Cotton S, Coordination Chemistry of the Lanthanides, in: Lanthanide and Actinide Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, United Kingdom, 2006: pp. 35–60. 10.1002/0470010088.ch4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [281].Huang C, Bian Z, Introduction, in: Huang C(Ed.), Rare Earth Coordination Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte Ltd, Singapore, 2010: pp. 1–39. 10.1002/9780470824870.ch1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [282].Bertha SL, Choppin GR, Hydration Thermodynamics of the Lanthanide Ions, Inorg. Chem. 8 (1969) 613–617. 10.1021/ic50073a041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [283].Brown PL, Ekberg C, Scandium, Yttrium and the Lanthanide Metals, in: Hydrolysis of Metal Ions, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co., Weinheim, Germany, 2016: pp. 225–324. 10.1002/9783527656189.ch8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [284].Wang R, Zheng Z, Rare Earth Complexes with Carboxylic Acids, Polyaminopolycarboxylic Acids, and Amino Acids, in: Huang C. (Ed.), Rare Earth Coordination Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte Ltd, Singapore, 2010: pp. 91–136. 10.1002/9780470824870.ch3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [285].Tóth Ė, Brücher E, Stability Constants of the Lanthanide(III)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N′,N′′,N′′′-tetraacetate Complexes, Inorg. Chim. Acta 221 (1994) 165–167. 10.1016/0020-1693(94)03964-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [286].Aluicio-Sarduy E, Thiele NA, Martin KE, Vaughn BA, Devaraj J, Olson AP, Barnhart TE, Wilson JJ, Boros E, Engle JW, Establishing Radiolanthanum Chemistry for Targeted Nuclear Medicine Applications, Chem. Eur. J. 26 (2020) 1238–1242. 10.1002/chem.201905202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [287].Nelson BJB, Wilson J, Andersson JD, Wuest F, High Yield Cyclotron Production of a Novel 133/135La Theranostic Pair for Nuclear Medicine, Sci. Rep. 10 (2020) 22203. 10.1038/s41598-020-79198-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [288].Hu A, Aluicio-Sarduy E, Brown V, MacMillan SN, Becker KV, Barnhart TE, Radchenko V, Ramogida CF, Engle JW, Wilson JJ, Py-Macrodipa: A Janus Chelator Capable of Binding Medicinally Relevant Rare-Earth Radiometals of Disparate Sizes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 10429–10440. 10.1021/jacs.1c05339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [289].Regueiro-Figueroa M, Bensenane B, Ruscsák E, Esteban-Gómez D, Charbonnière LJ, Tircsó G, Tóth I, de Blas A, Rodríguez-Blas T, Platas-Iglesias C, Lanthanide DOTA-Like Complexes Containing a Picolinate Pendant: Structural Entry for the Design of LnIII-Based Luminescent Probes, Inorg. Chem. 50 (2011) 4125–4141. 10.1021/ic2001915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [290].Roca-Sabio A, Mato-Iglesias M, Esteban-Gómez D, Tóth É, de Blas A, Platas-Iglesias C, Rodríguez-Blas T, Macrocyclic Receptor Exhibiting Unprecedented Selectivity for Light Lanthanides, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (2009) 3331–3341. 10.1021/ja808534w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [291].Hu A, MacMillan SN, Wilson JJ, Macrocyclic Ligands with an Unprecedented Size-Selectivity Pattern for the Lanthanide Ions, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 13500–13506. 10.1021/jacs.0c05217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [292].Hu A, Simms ME, Kertesz V, Wilson JJ, Thiele NA, Chelating Rare-Earth Metals (Ln3+) and 225Ac3+ with the Dual-Size-Selective Macrocyclic Ligand Py2-Macrodipa, Inorg. Chem. 61 (2022) 12847–12855. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c01998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [293].Blei MK, Waurick L, Reissig F, Kopka K, Stumpf T, Drobot B, Kretzschmar J, Mamat C, Equilibrium Thermodynamics of Macropa Complexes with Selected Metal Isotopes of Radiopharmaceutical Interest, Inorg. Chem. 62 (2023) 20699–20709. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c01983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [294].Fiszbein DJ, Brown V, Thiele NA, Woods JJ, Wharton L, MacMillan SN, Radchenko V, Ramogida CF, Wilson JJ, Tuning the Kinetic Inertness of Bi3+ Complexes: The Impact of Donor Atoms on Diaza-18-Crown-6 Ligands as Chelators for 213Bi Targeted Alpha Therapy, Inorg. Chem. 60 (2021) 9199–9211. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [295].Thiele NA, Brown V, Kelly JM, Amor-Coarasa A, Jermilova U, MacMillan SN, Nikolopoulou A, Ponnala S, Ramogida CF, Robertson AKH, Rodríguez-Rodríguez C, Schaffer P, Williams C Jr., Babich JW, Radchenko V, Wilson JJ, An Eighteen-Membered Macrocyclic Ligand for Actinium-225 Targeted Alpha Therapy, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56 (2017) 14712–14717. 10.1002/anie.201709532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [296].Hu A, Aluicio-Sarduy E, Brown V, MacMillan SN, Becker KV, Barnhart TE, Radchenko V, Ramogida CF, Engle JW, Wilson JJ, Py-Macrodipa: A Janus Chelator Capable of Binding Medicinally Relevant Rare-Earth Radiometals of Disparate Sizes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 10429–10440. 10.1021/jacs.1c05339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [297].Chen Y, Foss CA, Byun Y, Nimmagadda S, Pullambhatla M, Fox JJ, Castanares M, Lupold SE, Babich JW, Mease RC, Pomper MG, Radiohalogenated Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-Based Ureas as Imaging Agents for Prostate Cancer, J. Med. Chem. 51 (2008) 7933–7943. 10.1021/jm801055h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [298].Hillier SM, Maresca KP, Lu G, Merkin RD, Marquis JC, Zimmerman CN, Eckelman WC, Joyal JL, Babich JW, 99mTc-Labeled Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer, J. Nucl. Med. 54 (2013) 1369–1376. 10.2967/jnumed.112.116624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [299].Brühlmann SA, Kreller M, Pietzsch H-J, Kopka K, Mamat C, Walther M, Reissig F, Efficient Production of the PET Radionuclide 133La for Theranostic Purposes in Targeted Alpha Therapy Using the 134Ba(p,2n)133La Reaction, Pharmaceuticals 15 (2022) 1167. 10.3390/ph15101167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [300].Van Laere C, Koole M, Deroose CM, Van de Voorde M, Baete K, Cocolios TE, Duchemin C, Ooms M, Cleeren F, Terbium Radionuclides for Theranostic Applications in Nuclear Medicine: From Atom to Bedside, Theranostics 14 (2024) 1720–1743. 10.7150/thno.92775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [301].Van de Voorde M, Van Hecke K, Cardinaels T, Binnemans K, Radiochemical Processing of Nuclear-Reactor-Produced Radiolanthanides for Medical Applications, Coord. Chem. Rev. 382 (2019) 103–125. 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.11.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [302].Müller C, Reber J, Haller S, Dorrer H, Bernhardt P, Zhernosekov K, Türler A, Schibli R, Direct In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of 161Tb and 177Lu Using a Tumour-Targeting Folate Conjugate, Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 41 (2014) 476–485. 10.1007/s00259-013-2563-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [303].Müller C, Umbricht CA, Gracheva N, Tschan VJ, Pellegrini G, Bernhardt P, Zeevaart JR, Köster U, Schibli R, van der Meulen NP, Terbium-161 for PSMA-Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Prostate Cancer, Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 46 (2019) 1919–1930. 10.1007/s00259-019-04345-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [304].Borgna F, Haller S, Rodriguez JMM, Ginj M, Grundler PV, Zeevaart JR, Köster U, Schibli R, van der Meulen NP, Müller C, Combination of Terbium-161 with Somatostatin Receptor Antagonists—A Potential Paradigm Shift for the Treatment of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms, Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 49 (2022) 1113–1126. 10.1007/s00259-021-05564-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [305].Champion C, Quinto MA, Morgat C, Zanotti-Fregonara P, Hindié E, Comparison Between Three Promising β-Emitting Radionuclides, 67Cu, 47Sc and 161Tb, with Emphasis on Doses Delivered to Minimal Residual Disease, Theranostics 6 (2016) 1611–1618. 10.7150/thno.15132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [306].Hindié E, Zanotti-Fregonara P, Quinto MA, Morgat C, Champion C, Dose Deposits from 90Y, 177Lu, 111In, and 161Tb in Micrometastases of Various Sizes: Implications for Radiopharmaceutical Therapy, J. Nucl. Med. 57 (2016) 759–764. 10.2967/jnumed.115.170423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [307].Alcocer-Ávila ME, Ferreira A, Quinto MA, Morgat C, Hindié E, Champion C, Radiation Doses from 161Tb and 177Lu in Single Tumour Cells and Micrometastases, EJNMMI Physics 7 (2020) 33. 10.1186/s40658-020-00301-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [308].Duchemin C, Ramos JP, Stora T, Ahmed E, Aubert E, Audouin N, Barbero E, Barozier V, Bernardes A-P, Bertreix P, Boscher A, Bruchertseifer F, Catherall R, Chevallay E, Christodoulou P, Chrysalidis K, Cocolios TE, Comte J, Crepieux B, Deschamps M, Dockx K, Dorsival A, Fedosseev VN, Fernier P, Formento-Cavaier R, El Idrissi S, Ivanov P, Gadelshin VM, Gilardoni S, Grenard J-L, Haddad F, Heinke R, Juif B, Khalid U, Khan M, Köster U, Lambert L, Lilli G, Lunghi G, Marsh BA, Palenzuela YM, Martins R, Marzari S, Menaa N, Michel N, Munos M, Pozzi F, Riccardi F, Riegert J, Riggaz N, Rinchet J-Y, Rothe S, Russell B, Saury C, Schneider T, Stegemann S, Talip Z, Theis C, Thiboud J, van der Meulen NP, van Stenis M, Vincke H, Vollaire J, Vuong N-T, Webster B, Wendt K, Wilkins SG and the CERN-MEDICIS collaboration, CERN-MEDICIS: A Review Since Commissioning in 2017, Front. Med. 8 (2021) 693682. 10.3389/fmed.2021.693682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [309].Steyn GF, Vermeulen C, Szelecsényi F, Kovács Z, Hohn A, van der Meulen NP, Schibli R, van der Walt TN, Cross Sections of Proton-Induced Reactions on 152Gd, 155Gd and 159Tb with Emphasis on the Production of Selected Tb Radionuclides, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., B 319 (2014) 128–140. 10.1016/j.nimb.2013.11.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [310].Moiseeva AN, Aliev RA, Furkina EB, Novikov VI, Unezhev VN, New Method for Production of 155Tb via 155Dy by Irradiation of natGd by Medium Energy Alpha Particles, Nucl. Med. Biol. 106–107 (2022) 52–61. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2021.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [311].Palumbo CT, Zivkovic I, Scopelliti R, Mazzanti M, Molecular Complex of Tb in the +4 Oxidation State, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 9827–9831. 10.1021/jacs.9b05337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [312].Rice NT, Popov IA, Russo DR, Bacsa J, Batista ER, Yang P, Telser J, La Pierre HS, Design, Isolation, and Spectroscopic Analysis of a Tetravalent Terbium Complex, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 13222–13233. 10.1021/jacs.9b06622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [313].MacDonald MR, Bates JE, Ziller JW, Furche F, Evans WJ, Completing the Series of +2 Ions for the Lanthanide Elements: Synthesis of Molecular Complexes of Pr2+, Gd2+, Tb2+, and Lu2+, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 (2013) 9857–9868. 10.1021/ja403753j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [314].Moeller T, Thompson LC, Observations on the rare earths—LXXV: The stabilities of Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic Acid Chelates, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 24 (1962) 499–510. 10.1016/0022-1902(62)80236-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [315].Cacheris WP, Nickle SK, Sherry AD, Thermodynamic Study of Lanthanide Complexes of 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-N,N′,N′′-triacetic Acid and 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N′,N′′,N′′′-tetraacetic Acid, Inorg. Chem. 26 (1987) 958–960. 10.1021/ic00253a038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [316].Reubi JC, Schaer JC, Waser B, Mengod G, Expression and Localization of Somatostatin Receptor SSTR1, SSTR2, and SSTR3 Messenger RNAs in Primary Human Tumors using In Situ Hybridization, Cancer Res. 54 (1994) 3455–3459. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [317].de Jong M, Breeman WAP, Bernard BF, Rolleman EJ, Hoflande LJ, Visser TJ, Setyono-Han B, Bakker WH, van der Pluijm ME, Krenning EP, Evaluation In Vitro and in Rats of 161Tb-DTPA-Octreotide, a Somatostatin Analogue with Potential for Intraoperative Scanning and Radiotherapy, Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 22 (1995) 608–616. 10.1007/BF01254561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [318].Bakker WH, Albert R, Bruns C, Breeman WAP, Hofland LJ, Marbach P, Pless J, Pralet D, Stolz B, Koper JW, Lamberts SWJ, Visser TJ, Krenning EP, [111In-DTPA-D-Phe1]-Octreotide, a Potential Radiopharmaceutical for Imaging of Somatostatin Receptor-Positive Tumors: Synthesis, Radiolabeling and In Vitro Validation, Life Sci. 49 (1991) 1583–1591. 10.1016/0024-3205(91)90052-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [319].Cassells I, Ahenkorah S, Burgoyne AR, Van de Voorde M, Deroose CM, Cardinaels T, Bormans G, Ooms M, Cleeren F, Radiolabeling of Human Serum Albumin With Terbium-161 Using Mild Conditions and Evaluation of In Vivo Stability, Front. Med. 8 (2021) 675122. 10.3389/fmed.2021.675122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [320].Zhou X, Dong L, Shen L, Hydroxypyridinones as a Very Promising Platform for Targeted Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiopharmaceuticals, Molecules 26 (2021) 6997. 10.3390/molecules26226997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [321].Carbo-Bague I, Li C, McNeil BL, Gao Y, McDonagh AW, Van de Voorde M, Ooms M, Kunz P, Yang H, Radchenko V, Schreckenbach G, Ramogida CF, Comparative Study of a Decadentate Acyclic Chelate, HOPO-O10, and Its Octadentate Analogue, HOPO-O8, for Radiopharmaceutical Applications, Inorg. Chem. 62 (2023) 20549–20566. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [322].Deri MA, Ponnala S, Kozlowski P, Burton-Pye BP, Cicek HT, Hu C, Lewis JS, Francesconi LC, p-SCN-Bn-HOPO: A Superior Bifunctional Chelator for 89Zr ImmunoPET, Bioconjugate Chem. 26 (2015) 2579–2591. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [323].Müller C, Zhernosekov K, Köster U, Johnston K, Dorrer H, Hohn A, van der Walt NT, Türler A, Schibli R, A Unique Matched Quadruplet of Terbium Radioisotopes for PET and SPECT and for α- and β−-Radionuclide Therapy: An In Vivo Proof-of-Concept Study with a New Receptor-Targeted Folate Derivative, J. Nucl. Med. 53 (2012) 1951–1959. 10.2967/jnumed.112.107540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [324].Müller C, Reber J, Haller S, Dorrer H, Bernhardt P, Zhernosekov K, Türler A, Schibli R, Direct In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of 161Tb and 177Lu Using a Tumour-Targeting Folate Conjugate, Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 41 (2014) 476–485. 10.1007/s00259-013-2563-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [325].Moiseeva AN, Aliev RA, Osipov VN, Khachatryan DS, Preparation of 155Tb-Labeled Short Somatostatin Analog, Russ. Chem. Bull. 72 (2023) 2249–2254. 10.1007/s11172-023-4022-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [326].Chong H, Garmestani K, Ma D, Milenic DE, Overstreet T, Brechbiel MW, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel Macrocyclic Ligands with Pendent Donor Groups as Potential Yttrium Chelators for Radioimmunotherapy with Improved Complex Formation Kinetics, J. Med. Chem. 45 (2002) 3458–3464. 10.1021/jm0200759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [327].Song HA, Kang CS, Baidoo KE, Milenic DE, Chen Y, Dai A, Brechbiel MW, Chong H-S, Efficient Bifunctional Decadentate Ligand 3p-C-DEPA for Targeted α-Radioimmunotherapy Applications, Bioconjugate Chem. 22 (2011) 1128–1135. 10.1021/bc100586y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [328].Ahenkorah S, Murce E, Cawthorne C, Ketchemen JP, Deroose CM, Cardinaels T, Seimbille Y, Fonge H, Gsell W, Bormans G, Ooms M, Cleeren F, 3p-C-NETA: A Versatile and Effective Chelator for Development of Al18F-Labeled and Therapeutic Radiopharmaceuticals, Theranostics 12 (2022) 5971–5985. 10.7150/thno.75336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [329].Hierlmeier I, Marino N, Schreck M-V, Schneider L, Maus S, Barrett K, Kretowicz M, Engle JW, Pierri G, Ezziddin S, Bartholomä MD, Radiochemistry and Complex Formation of the Cyclen-Derived Chelator DOTI-Me with Mn2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Ga3+, In3+, Tb3+, and Lu3+, Inorg. Chem. 63 (2024) 19468–19481. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c03571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [330].Yang H, Zhang C, Yuan Z, Rodriguez-Rodriguez C, Robertson A, Radchenko V, Perron R, Gendron D, Causey P, Gao F, Bénard F, Schaffer P, Synthesis and Evaluation of a Macrocyclic Actinium-225 Chelator, Quality Control and In Vivo Evaluation of 225Ac-crown-αMSH Peptide, Chem. Eur. J. 26 (2020) 11435–11440. 10.1002/chem.202002999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [331].Wharton L, McNeil SW, Merkens H, Yuan Z, Van de Voorde M, Engudar G, Ingham A, Koniar H, Rodríguez-Rodríguez C, Radchenko V, Ooms M, Kunz P, Bénard F, Schaffer P, Yang H, Preclinical Evaluation of [155/161Tb]Tb-Crown-TATE—A Novel SPECT Imaging Theranostic Agent Targeting Neuroendocrine Tumours, Molecules 28 (2023) 3155. 10.3390/molecules28073155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [332].Fiaccabrino D, Masvikeni T, Jaraqde Guadalupeemada-Peláez M, Orvig C, Schaffer P, H3trica: Versatile Macrocyclic Chelator for [225Ac]Ac3+ and [155/161Tb]Tb3+ Theranostics, Inorg. Chem. 63 (2024) 13911–13923. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c01180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [333].Chen D, Squattrito PJ, Martell AE, Clearfield A, Synthesis and Crystal Structure of a Nine-Coordinate Gadolinium(III) Complex of 1,7,13-Triaza-4,10,16-Trioxacyclooctadecane-N,N’,N”-Triacetic Acid, Inorg. Chem. 29 (1990) 4366–4368. 10.1021/ic00347a007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [334].Gracheva N, Carzaniga TS, Schibli R, Braccini S, van der Meulen NP, 165Er: A New Candidate for Auger Electron Therapy and Its Possible Cyclotron Production from Natural Holmium Targets, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 159 (2020) 109079. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2020.109079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [335].Bodei L, Kassis AI, Adelstein SJ, Mariani G, Radionuclide Therapy with Iodine-125 and Other Auger–Electron-Emitting Radionuclides: Experimental Models and Clinical Applications, Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 18 (2003) 861–877. 10.1089/108497803322702833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [336].Adelstein SJ, Kassis AI, Baranowska-Kortylewicz J, Van Den Abbeele AD, Mariani G, Ito S, Potential for Tumor Therapy with Iodine-125 Labeled Immunoglobulins, Int. J. Rad. Appl. Instr. B 18 (1991) 43–44. 10.1016/0883-2897(91)90044-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [337].Higashi Y, Ma Y, Matsumoto K, Shiro A, Saitoh H, Kawachi T, Tamanoi F, Chapter Seven - Auger Electrons and DNA Double-Strand Breaks Studied by Using Iodine-Containing Chemicals, in: Tamanoi F, Yoshikawa K. (Eds.), The Enzymes, Elsevier Inc., Cambridge, MA, 2022: pp. 101–115. 10.1016/bs.enz.2022.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [338].Sastry KSR, Biological Effects of the Auger Emitter Iodine-125: A Review. Report No. 1 of AAPM Nuclear Medicine Task Group No. 6, Med. Phys. 19 (1992) 1361–1370. 10.1118/1.596926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [339].Vaudon J, Frealle L, Audiger G, Dutillly E, Gervais M, Sursin E, Ruggeri C, Duval F, Bouchetou M-L, Bombard A, Da Silva I, First Steps at the Cyclotron of Orléans in the Radiochemistry of Radiometals: 52Mn and 165Er, Instruments 2 (2018) 15. 10.3390/instruments2030015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [340].Tárkányi F, Hermanne A, Király B, Takács S, Ditrói F, Baba M, Ohtsuki T, Kovalev SF, Ignatyuk AV, Study of Activation Cross-Sections of Deuteron Induced Reactions on Erbium: Production of Radioisotopes for Practical Applications, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., B 259 (2007) 829–835. 10.1016/j.nimb.2007.01.287. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [341].Tárkányi F, Hermanne A, Takács S, Ditrói F, Király B, Kovalev SF, Ignatyuk AV, Experimental Study of the 165Ho(p,n) Nuclear Reaction for Production of the Therapeutic Radioisotope 165Er, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., B 266 (2008) 3346–3352. 10.1016/j.nimb.2008.05.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [342].Tárkányi F, Hermanne A, Takács S, Ditrói F, Király B, Kovalev SF, Ignatyuk AV, Experimental Study of the 165Ho(d,2n) and 165Ho(d,p) Nuclear Reactions up to 20 MeV for Production of the Therapeutic Radioisotopes 165Er and 166gHo, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., B 266 (2008) 3529–3534. 10.1016/j.nimb.2008.05.123. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [343].Tárkányi F, Takács S, Hermanne A, Ditrói F, Király B, Baba M, Ohtsuki T, Kovalev SF, Ignatyuk AV, Study of Activation Cross Sections of Proton Induced Reactions on Erbium for Practical Applications, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., B 266 (2008) 4872–4876. 10.1016/j.nimb.2008.08.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [344].Tárkányi F, Takács S, Hermanne A, Ditrói F, Király B, Baba M, Ohtsuki T, Kovalev SF, Ignatyuk AV, Investigation of Production of the Therapeutic Radioisotope 165Er by Proton Induced Reactions on Erbium in Comparison with Other Production Routes, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 67 (2009) 243–247. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [345].Zandi N, Sadeghi M, Afarideh H, Evaluation of the Cyclotron Production of 165Er by Different Reactions, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 295 (2013) 923–928. 10.1007/s10967-012-2116-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [346].Da Silva I, Johnson TR, Mixdorf JC, Aluicio-Sarduy E, Barnhart TE, Nickles RJ, Engle JW, Ellison PA, A High Separation Factor for 165Er from Ho for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy, Molecules 26 (2021) 7513. 10.3390/molecules26247513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [347].Saghez BS, Yang H, Radchenko V, High Separation Factor, High Molar Activity, and Inexpensive Purification Method for the Production of Pure 165Er, Inorg. Chem. 63 (2024) 5330–5340. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c03166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [348].Aliev RA, Khomenko IA, Kormazeva ES, Separation of 167Tm, 165Er and 169Yb from Erbium Targets Irradiated by 60 MeV Alpha Particles, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 329 (2021) 983–989. 10.1007/s10967-021-07865-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [349].Kormazeva ES, Khomenko IA, Unezhev VN, Aliev RA, New Data on Ho(α,x) Reactions and the Aspects of 167Tm and 165Er Production for Medical Use, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 331 (2022) 4259–4269. 10.1007/s10967-022-08464-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [350].Kormazeva ES, Khomenko IA, Unezhev VN, Aliev RA, Experimental Study of α-Particle Induced Reactions on Natural Erbium for the Production of Auger-Emitters 167Tm, 165Er and 169Yb, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 177 (2021) 109919. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.109919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [351].Mears RJ, Reekie L, Jauncey IM, Payne DN, Low-Noise Erbium-Doped Fibre Amplifier Operating at 1.54 μm, Electron. Lett. 23 (1987) 1026–1028. 10.1049/el:19870719. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [352].Desurvire E, Simpson JR, Becker PC, High-Gain Erbium-Doped Traveling-Wave Fiber Amplifier, Opt. Lett. 12 (1987) 888–890. 10.1364/OL.12.000888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [353].Becker PM, Olsson AA, Simpson JR, Erbium-Doped Fiber Amplifiers: Fundamentals and Technology, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • [354].Wang T, Wang S, Liu Z, He Z, Yu P, Zhao M, Zhang H, Lu L, Wang Z, Wang Z, Zhang W, Fan Y, Sun C, Zhao D, Liu W, Bünzli J-CG, Zhang F, A Hybrid Erbium(III)–Bacteriochlorin Near-Infrared Probe for Multiplexed Biomedical Imaging, Nat. Mater. 20 (2021) 1571–1578. 10.1038/s41563-021-01063-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [355].Hennrich U, Kopka K, Lutathera®: The First FDA- and EMA-Approved Radiopharmaceutical for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy, Pharmaceuticals 12 (2019) 114. 10.3390/ph12030114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [356].Rahbar K, Bode A, Weckesser M, Avramovic N, Claesener M, Stegger L, Bögemann M, Radioligand Therapy with 177Lu-PSMA-617 as a Novel Therapeutic Option in Patients with Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer, Clin. Nucl. Med. 41 (2016) 522–528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [357].Zee DZ, Singer CP, O’Halloran TV, Chemical-Shift Standards for 199Hg NMR Spectroscopy, 25 Years Later, Inorg. Chem. 61 (2022) 13657–13661. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c02183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [358].Tosato M, Randhawa P, Asti M, Hemmingsen LBS, O’Shea CA, Thaveenrasingam P, Sauer SPA, Chen S, Graiff C, Menegazzo I, Baron M, Radchenko V, Ramogida CF, Di Marco V, Capturing Mercury-197m/g for Auger Electron Therapy and Cancer Theranostic with Sulfur-Containing Cyclen-Based Macrocycles, Inorg. Chem. 63 (2024) 14241–14255. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c02418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [359].Bach RD, Vardhan HB, A Mercury-199 NMR Study of the Complexation of Methylmercury with Thia-Crown Ethers. The Absence of a Macrocyclic Ligand Effect, J. Org. Chem. 51 (1986) 1609–1610. 10.1021/jo00359a046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [360].Bebout DC, Bush JF, Crahan KK, Bowers EV, Butcher RJ, Sterically Demanding Multidentate Ligand Tris[(2-(6-methylpyridyl))methyl]amine Slows Exchange and Enhances Solution State Ligand Proton NMR Coupling to 199Hg(II), Inorg. Chem. 41 (2002) 2529–2536. 10.1021/ic011209w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [361].Freudenberg R, Apolle R, Walther M, Hartmann H, Kotzerke J, Molecular Imaging Using the Theranostic Agent 197(m)Hg: Phantom Measurements and Monte Carlo Simulations, EJNMMI Physics 5 (2018) 15. 10.1186/s40658-018-0216-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [362].Greif RL, Sullivan WJ, Jacobs GS, Pitts RF, Distribution of Radiomercury Administered as Labelled Chlormerodrin (Neohydrin®) in the Kidneys of Rats and Dogs, J. Clin. Investig. 35 (1956) 38–43. 10.1172/JCI103250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [363].Matricali B, Brain Scanning by Means of 197Hg-Labelled Neohydrin, Psychiatr. Neurol. Neurochir. 72 (1969) 89–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [364].Walther M, Preusche S, Bartel S, Wunderlich G, Freudenberg R, Steinbach J, Pietzsch H-J, Theranostic Mercury: 197(m)Hg with High Specific Activity for Imaging and Therapy, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 97 (2015) 177–181. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [365].Broussard LA, Hammett-Stabler CA, Winecker RE, Ropero-Miller JD, The Toxicology of Mercury, Lab. Med. 33 (2002) 614–625. 10.1309/5HY1-V3NE-2LFL-P9MT. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [366].Lebeda O, Červenák J, Revised Cross-Sections for Formation of Theranostic 197m,gHg in Proton- and Deuteron-Induced Reactions on 197Au, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., B 478 (2020) 85–91. 10.1016/j.nimb.2020.05.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [367].Gloris M, Michel R, Sudbrock F, Herpers U, Malmborg P, Holmqvist B, Proton-Induced Production of Residual Radionuclides in Lead at Intermediate Energies, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., A 463 (2001) 593–633. 10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00174-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [368].Despotopulos JD, Kmak KN, Shaughnessy DA, Production and Isolation of 197m,gHg, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 317 (2018) 985–989. 10.1007/s10967-018-5927-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [369].Walther M, Lebeda O, Preusche S, Pietzsch H-J, Steinbach J, Theranostic Mercury Part 1: A New Hg/Au Separation by a Resin Nased Method, AIP Conf. Proc. 1845 (2017) 020023. 10.1063/1.4983554. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [370].McAlister DR, Horwitz EP, Characterization of Extraction of Chromatographic Materials Containing Bis(2-ethyl-1-hexyl)phosphoric Acid, 2-Ethyl-1-Hexyl (2-Ethyl-1-Hexyl)phosphonic Acid, and Bis(2,4,4-Trimethyl-1-Pentyl)phosphinic Acid, Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 25 (2007) 757–769. 10.1080/07366290701634594. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [371].Randhawa P, Olson AP, Chen S, Gower-Fry KL, Hoehr C, Engle JW, Ramogida CF, Radchenko V, Meitner-Auger Electron Emitters for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy: Mercury-197m/g and Antimony-119, Curr. Radiopharm. 14 (2021) 394–419. 10.2174/1874471014999210111201630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [372].Bebout DC, Mercury: Inorganic & Coordination Chemistry, in: Encyclopedia of Inorganic Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2005. 10.1002/0470862106.ia131. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [373].Holloway CE, Melnik M, Mercury Coordination Compounds: Classification and Analysis of Crystallographic and Stuctural Data, Main Group Met. Chem. 17 (1994) 799–885. 10.1515/MGMC.1994.17.11-12.799. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [374].Kodama M, Kimura E, Ring-Size Effects of Macrocyclic Ligands on Complex Stabilities. Mercury(II) Complexes of Twelve- to Fifteen-Membered Cyclic Tetra-Amines, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. (1976) 2335–2338. 10.1039/DT9760002335. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [375].Kodama M, Kimura E, Equilibria of Complex Formation Between Several Bivalent Metal Ions and Macrocyclic Tri- and Penta-Amines, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. (1978) 1081–1085. 10.1039/DT9780001081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [376].Jones TE, Sokol LSWL, Rorabacher DB, Glick MD, Encircling of Mercury(II) by a Macrocyclic Ligand: X-ray Crystal Structure of 1,5,9,13-Tetrathiacyclohexadecanemercury(II) Perchlorate, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. (1979) 140–141. 10.1039/C39790000140. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [377].Randhawa P, Gower-Fry KL, Stienstra CMK, Tosato M, Chen S, Gao Y, McDonagh AW, Di Marco V, Radchenko V, Schreckenbach G, Ramogida CF, Selective Chelation of the Exotic Meitner-Auger Emitter Mercury-197 m/g with Sulfur-Rich Macrocyclic Ligands: Towards the Future of Theranostic Radiopharmaceuticals, Chem. Eur. J. 29 (2023) e202203815. 10.1002/chem.202203815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [378].Randhawa P, Stienstra CMK, Chen S, Gao Y, Schreckenbach G, Radchenko V, Ramogida CF, Development of Thiacrown Ligands for Encapsulation of Mercury-197m/g into Radiopharmaceuticals, Dalton Trans. 53 (2024) 18983–18997. 10.1039/D4DT02427C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [379].Vilensky JA, Redman K, British Anti-Lewisite (Dimercaprol): An Amazing History, Ann. Emerg. Med. 41 (2003) 378–383. 10.1067/mem.2003.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [380].Longcope WT, Luetscher JA Jr., Calkins E, Grob D, Bush SW, Eisenberg H, Clinical Uses of 2,3-Dimercaptopropanol (BAL). XI. The Treatment of Acute Mercury Poisoning by BAL, J. Clin. Investig. 25 (1946) 557–567. 10.1172/JCI101738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [381].Coates RL, Jones MM, Stability Constants of the Hg2+-BAL Complexes, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 39 (1997) 677–678. 10.1016/0022-1902(77)80586-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [382].Rafati-Rahimzadeh M, Rafati-Rahimzadeh M, Kazemi S, Moghadamnia AA, Current Approaches of the Management of Mercury Poisoning: Need of the Hour, DARU J. Pharm. Sci. 22 (2014) 46. 10.1186/2008-2231-22-46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [383].Vasken Aposhian H, Maiorino RM, Rivera M, Bruce DC, Dart RC, Hurlbut KM, Levine DJ, Zheng W, Fernando Q, Carter D, Aposhian MM, Human Studies with the Chelating Agents, DMPS and DMSA, J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. 30 (1992) 505–528. 10.3109/15563659209017938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [384].Fang X, Hua F, Fernando Q, Comparison of rac- and meso-2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic Acids for Chelation of Mercury and Cadmium Using Chemical Speciation Models, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 9 (1996) 284–290. 10.1021/tx950096o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [385].Cooper SR, Rawle SC, Crown Thioether Chemistry, in: Bioinorganic Chemistry, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1990: pp. 1–72. 10.1007/BFb0058195. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [386].Grant GJ, Mercury(II) Complexes with Thiacrowns and Related Macrocyclic Ligands, in: Atwood DA. (Ed.), Recent Developments in Mercury Science, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006: pp. 107–141. 10.1007/430_014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [387].Blake AJ, Holder AJ, Hyde TI, Reid G, Schröder M, Mercury Thioether Chemistry: The Synthesis and Structure of [Hg([9]aneS3)2](PF6)2 ([9]aneS3=1,4,7-Trithiacyclononane), Polyhedron 8 (1989) 2041–2045. 10.1016/S0277-5387(00)80501-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [388].Helm ML, Combs CM, VanDerveer DG, Grant GJ, Homoleptic Group 12 Metal Complexes of Macrocyclic Thioethers: The Crystal Structures of Bis(1,4,7-trithiacyclodecane)M(II) Perchlorate: M(II)=Zinc(II), Cadmium(II), Mercury(II), Inorg. Chim. Acta 338 (2002) 182–188. 10.1016/S0020-1693(02)01016-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [389].Setzer WN, Guo Q, Grant GJ, Hubbard JL, Glass RS, VanDerveer DG, 1,4,7-Trithiacyclononane as a Tridentate Ligand for Complexation of Heavy-Metal Ions: Synthesis and Complexation Studies of Mesocyclic and Macrocyclic Polythioethers IV, Heteroat. Chem. 1 (1990) 317–325. 10.1002/hc.1990.1.4.317. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [390].Pickardt J, Shen J, Metallkomplexe mit 1,4,7-Trithiacyclononan: Kristallstrukturen von [CdI2·C6H12S3]2 und [Hg(C6H12S3)2](HgI3)2, Z. Naturforsch. B48 (1993) 969–972. 10.1515/znb-1993-0720. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [391].Helm ML, VanDerveer DG, Grant GJ, Mercury Complexes with Thiacrowns: The Crystal Structure of Bis(1,4,7-trithiacyclodecane) Mercury(II) Hexafluorophosphate, J. Chem. Crystallogr. 33 (2003) 625–630. 10.1023/A:1024954028516. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [392].Helm ML, Helton GP, VanDerveer DG, Grant GJ, Mercury-199 NMR Studies of Thiacrown and Related Macrocyclic Complexes: The Crystal Structures of [Hg(18S6)](PF6)2 and [Hg(9N3)2](ClO4)2, Inorg. Chem. 44 (2005) 5696–5705. 10.1021/ic050500z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [393].Alcock NW, Herron N, Moore P, Comparison of the Different Modes of Bonding of the Macrocycle in μ-(1,4,8,11-tetrathiacyclotetradecane-S1S4;S8S11)-bis[dichloromercury-(II)] and Aqua(1,4,8,11-tetrathiacyclotetradecane)mercury(II) Perchlorate by X-ray Structural Analysis, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. (1978) 394–399. 10.1039/DT9780000394. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [394].Galešić N, Herceg M, Sevdić D, Structure of Diiodo(1,4,8,11-tetrathiacyclotetradecane)mercury(II), Acta Cryst. C42 (1986) 565–568. 10.1107/S0108270186095380. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [395].Randhawa P, Carbo-Bague I, Davey PRWJ, Chen S, Merkens H, Uribe CF, Zhang C, Tosato M, Bénard F, Radchenko V, Ramogida CF, Exploration of Commercial Cyclen-Based Chelators for Mercury-197m/g Incorporation into Theranostic Radiopharmaceuticals, Front. Chem. 12 (2024) 1292566. 10.3389/fchem.2024.1292566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [396].Hancock RD, Reibenspies JH, Maumela H, Structural Effects of the Lone Pair on Lead(II), and Parallels with the Coordination Geometry of Mercury(II). Does the Lone Pair on Lead(II) Form H-Bonds? Structures of the Lead(II) and Mercury(II) Complexes of the Pendant-Donor Macrocycle DOTAM (1,4,7,10-Tetrakis(carbamoylmethyl)-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane), Inorg. Chem. 43 (2004) 2981–2987. 10.1021/ic030277a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [397].Blake AJ, Reid G, Schröder M, Mercury Macrocyclic Complexes: The Synthesis of [Hg([18]aneN2S4)]2+ and [Hg(Me2[18]aneN2S4)]2+. The Single Crystal X-ray Structure of [Hg([18]aneN2S4)](PF6)2·4/3H2O, Polyhedron 9 (1990) 2931–2935. 10.1016/S0277-5387(00)84203-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [398].Ho M-L, Chen K-Y, Lee G-H, Chen Y-C, Wang C-C, Lee J-F, Chung W-C, Chou P-T, Mercury(II) Recognition and Fluorescence Imaging In Vitro through a 3D-Complexation Structure, Inorg. Chem. 48 (2009) 10304–10311. 10.1021/ic901613s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [399].Blower PJ, Smith RJ, Jolley C, 83. Thiamacrocyclic Bifunctional Chelators for Labelling Antibodies with Chemically ‘Soft’ Radiometals, Nucl. Med. Commun. 13 (1992) 231–232. [Google Scholar]
  • [400].Areberg J, Björkman S, Einarsson L, Frankenberg B, Lundqvist H, Mattsson S, Norrgren K, Scheike O, Wallin R, Gamma Camera Imaging of Platinum in Tumours and Tissues of Patients after Administration of 191Pt-Cisplatin, Acta Oncol. 38 (1999) 221–228. 10.1080/028418699431654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [401].Areberg J, Wennerberg J, Johnsson A, Norrgren K, Mattsson S, Antitumor Effect of Radioactive Cisplatin (191Pt) on Nude Mice, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 49 (2001) 827–832. 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)01419-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [402].Areberg J, Johnsson A, Wennerberg J, In Vitro Toxicity of 191Pt-Labeled Cisplatin to a Human Cervical Carcinoma Cell Line (ME-180), Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 46 (2000) 1275–1280. 10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00543-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [403].Baer J, Harrison R, McAuliffe CA, Zaki A, Sharma HL, Smith AG, Microscale Syntheses of Anti-Tumour Platinum Compounds Labelled with 191Pt, Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 36 (1985) 181–184. 10.1016/0020-708X(85)90064-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [404].DiZio JP, Carlson KE, Bannochie CJ, Welch MJ, von Angerer E, Katzenellenbogen JA, Estrogen Platinum-Diamine Complexes: Preparation of a Non-Steroidal Estrogen Platinum-Diamine Complex Labeled with Platinum-191 and a Study of Its Binding to the Estrogen Receptor In Vitro and Its Tissue Distribution In Vivo, J. Steroid. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 42 (1992) 363–373. 10.1016/0960-0760(92)90141-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [405].Bates PI, Sharma HL, Murrer BA, Bernard CFJ, McAuliffe CA, The Synthesis of 191Pt Labelled JM216, An Orally Active Platinum Anti-Tumour Agent, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 48 (1997) 469–476. 10.1016/S0969-8043(96)00267-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [406].Obata H, Tsuji AB, Kumata K, Sudo H, Minegishi K, Nagatsu K, Takakura H, Ogawa M, Kurimasa A, Zhang M-R, Development of Novel 191Pt-Labeled Hoechst33258: 191Pt Is More Suitable than 111In for Targeting DNA, J. Med. Chem. 65 (2022) 5690–5700. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c02209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [407].Obata H, Tsuji AB, Sudo H, Sugyo A, Hashiya K, Ikeda H, Itoh M, Minegishi K, Nagatsu K, Ogawa M, Bando T, Sugiyama H, Zhang M-R, Novel Auger-Electron-Emitting 191Pt-Labeled Pyrrole–Imidazole Polyamide Targeting MYCN Increases Cytotoxicity and Cytosolic dsDNA Granules in MYCN-Amplified Neuroblastoma, Pharmaceuticals 16 (2023) 1526. 10.3390/ph16111526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [408].Renshaw E, Thomson AJ, Tracer Studies to Locate the Site of Platinum Ions Within Filamentous and Inhibited Cells of Escherichia Coli, J. Bacteriol. 94 (1967) 1915–1918. 10.1128/jb.94.6.1915-1918.1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [409].Smith PHS, Taylor DM, Distribution and Retention of the Antitumor Agent 195mPt-cis-dichlorodiammine Platinum (II) in Man, J. Nucl. Med. 15 (1974) 349–351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [410].Obata H, Minegishi K, Nagatsu K, Ogawa M, Zhang M-R, Synthesis of No-Carrier-Added [188,189,191Pt]Cisplatin from a Cyclotron Produced 188,189,191PtCl42− Complex, Sci. Rep. 11 (2021) 8140. 10.1038/s41598-021-87576-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [411].Lange RC, Spencer RP, Harder HC, The Antitumor Agent CIS-Pt(NH3)2Cl2: Distribution Studies and Dose Calculations for 193mPt and 195mPt, J. Nucl. Med. 14 (1973) 191–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [412].Brouwer J, van de Putte P, Fichtinger-Schepman AM, Reedijk J, Base-Pair Substitution Hotspots in GAG and GCG Nucleotide Sequences in Escherichia Coli K-12 Induced by cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum (II), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 78 (1981) 7010–7014. 10.1073/pnas.78.11.7010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [413].Johnstone TC, Suntharalingam K, Lippard SJ, The Next Generation of Platinum Drugs: Targeted Pt(II) Agents, Nanoparticle Delivery, and Pt(IV) Prodrugs, Chem. Rev. 116 (2016) 3436–3486. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [414].Rosenberg B, Platinum Complexes for the Treatment of Cancer: Why the Search Goes On, in: Lippert B. (Ed.), Cisplatin: Chemistry and Biochemistry of a Leading Anticancer Drug, Verlag Helvetica Chimica Acta, Zurich, Switzerland, 1999: pp. 3–27. 10.1002/9783906390420.ch1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [415].Bernerd C, Johnson JD, Aubert E, Au M, Barozier V, Bernardes A-P, Bertreix P, Bruchertseifer F, Catherall R, Chevallay E, Chrysalidis K, Christodoulou P, Cocolios TE, Crepieux B, Deschamps M, Dorsival A, Duchemin C, Fedosseev V, Fernier P, Heines M, Heinke R, Khalid U, Khan M, Khan Q, Lambert L, Mamis E, Marsh BA, Marzari S, Menaa N, Munos M, Pozzi F, Prvakova S, Ramos JP, Riccardi F, Rinchet J-Y, Rossel RE, Stora T, Thiboud J, Vollaire J, Van Den Bergh V, Wojtaczka W, Production of Innovative Radionuclides for Medical Applications at the CERN-MEDICIS Facility, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., B 542 (2023) 137–143. 10.1016/j.nimb.2023.05.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [416].Hilgers K, Coenen HH, Qaim SM, Production of the Therapeutic Radionuclides 193mPt and 195mPt with High Specific Activity via α-Particle-Induced Reactions on 192Os, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 66 (2008) 545–551. 10.1016/j.apradiso.2007.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [417].Uddin MS, Hermanne A, Scholten B, Spellerberg S, Coenen HH, Qaim SM, Small Scale Production of High Purity 193mPt by the 192Os(α,ߙn)-Process, Radiochim. Acta 99 (2011) 131–135. 10.1524/ract.2011.1807. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [418].Peyrone M, Über die Einwirkung des Ammoniaks auf Platinchlorür, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 51 (1844) 1–29. 10.1002/jlac.18440510102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [419].Rosenberg B, can Vamp L, Krigas T, Inhibition of Cell Division in Escherichia Coli by Electrolysis Products from a Platinum Electrode, Nature 205 (1965) 698–699. 10.1038/205698a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [420].Hill JM, Speer RJ, Loeb E, MacLellan A, Hill NO, Khan A, Clinical Experience with Cisplatinous Diammine Dichloride, in: Hejzlar M, Semonský M, Masák S. (Eds.), Advances in Antimicrobial and Antineoplastic Chemotherapy, University Park Press, University Park, PA, 1971: pp. 255–257. [Google Scholar]
  • [421].Muns JA, Montserrat V, Houthoff H-J, Codée-van der Schilden K, Zwaagstra O, Sijbrandi NJ, Merkul E, van Dongen GAMS, In Vivo Characterization of Platinum(II)-Based Linker Technology for the Development of Antibody–Drug Conjugates: Taking Advantage of Dual Labeling with 195mPt and 89Zr, J. Nucl. Med. 59 (2018) 1146–1151. 10.2967/jnumed.117.206672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [422].Obata H, Tsuji AB, Sudo H, Sugyo A, Minegishi K, Nagatsu K, Ogawa M, Zhang M-R, In Vitro Evaluation of No-Carrier-Added Radiolabeled Cisplatin ([189,191Pt]Cisplatin) Emitting Auger Electrons, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (2021) 4622. 10.3390/ijms22094622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [423].Yoda H, Inoue T, Shinozaki Y, Lin J, Watanabe T, Koshikawa N, Takatori A, Nagase H, Direct Targeting of MYCN Gene Amplification by Site-Specific DNA Alkylation in Neuroblastoma, Cancer Res. 79 (2019) 830–840. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-1198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [424].Blixt J, Glaser J, Solymosi P, Toth I, Equilibria and Dynamics of Tl(edta)X2− complexes (X=Halide, Pseudohalide) Studied by Multinuclear NMR, Inorg. Chem. 31 (1992) 5288–5297. 10.1021/ic00051a022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [425].Glaser J, Advances in Thallium Aqueous Solution Chemistry, in: Sykes AG(Ed.), Advances in Inorganic Chemistry, Academic Press, 1995: pp. 1–78. 10.1016/S0898-8838(08)60115-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [426].Early PJ, Sodee DB, Principles and Practice of Nuclear Medicine, 2nd ed, Mosby, St. Louis, 1995. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130000793968869888. [Google Scholar]
  • [427].Ritchie JL, Trobaugh GB, Hamilton GW, Gould KL, Narahara KA, Murray JA, Williams DL, Myocardial Imaging with Thallium-201 at Rest and During Exercise. Comparison with Coronary Arteriography and Resting and Stress Electrocardiography, Circulation 56 (1977) 66–71. 10.1161/01.CIR.56.1.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [428].Pagnanelli RA, Basso DA, Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with 201Tl, J. Nucl. Med. Technol. 38 (2010) 1–3. 10.2967/jnmt.109.068593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [429].Church LB, Caretto AA Jr., Study of (p,xn) Reactions at 400 MeV, Phys. Rev. 178 (1969) 1732–1742. 10.1103/PhysRev.178.1732. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [430].Lebowitz E, Greene MW, Fairchild R, Bradley-Moore PR, Atkins HL, Ansari AN, Richards P, Belgrave E, Thallium-201 for Medical Use, J. Nucl. Med. 16 (1975) 151–155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [431].van der Walt TN, Naidoo C, Recovery of 201Tl by Ion Exchange Chromatography from Proton Bombarded Thallium Cyclotron Targets, Radiochim. Acta 88 (2000) 185–188. doi: 10.1524/ract.2000.88.3-4.185. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [432].Sattari A, Kamalidehghan M, Shirazi B, Shafie M, Mirzaie M, Dependence of Quality of Thallium-201 on Irradiation Data, Int. J. Radiat. Res. 1 (2003) 51–54. [Google Scholar]
  • [433].Losev VV, Gallium, Indium, and Thallium, in: Bard AJ, Parsons R, Jordan J. (Eds.), Standard Potentials in Aqueous Solution, 1st ed., Routledge, New York, 1985: pp. 237–247. [Google Scholar]
  • [434].Tóth I, Győri B, Thallium: Inorganic Chemistry, in: Encyclopedia of Inorganic Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2005. 10.1002/0470862106.ia241. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [435].Inoue Y, Ouchi M, Hakushi T, Molecular Design of Crown Ethers. 3. Extraction of Alkaline Earth and Heavy Metal Picrates with 14- to 17-Crown-5 and 17- to 22-Crown-6, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 58 (1985) 525–530. 10.1246/bcsj.58.525. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [436].Rigby A, Firth G, Rivas C, Pham T, Kim J, Phanopoulos A, Wharton L, Ingham A, Li L, Ma MT, Orvig C, Blower PJ, Terry SYA, Abbate V, Toward Bifunctional Chelators for Thallium-201 for Use in Nuclear Medicine, Bioconjugate Chem. 33 (2022) 1422–1436. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.2c00284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [437].Hijnen NM, de Vries A, Blange R, Burdinski D, Grüll H, Synthesis and In Vivo Evaluation of 201Tl(III)–DOTA Complexes for Applications in SPECT Imaging, Nucl. Med. Biol. 38 (2011) 585–592. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [438].Price EW, Cawthray JF, Bailey GA, Ferreira CL, Boros E, Adam MJ, Orvig C, H4Octapa: An Acyclic Chelator for 111In Radiopharmaceuticals, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 (2012) 8670–8683. 10.1021/ja3024725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [439].Spreckelmeyer S, Ramogida CF, Rousseau J, Arane K, Bratanovic I, Colpo N, Jermilova U, Dias GM, Dude I, de Guadalupe Jaraquemada-Peláez M, Bénard F, Schaffer P, Orvig C, p-NO2–Bn–H4neunpa and H4neunpa–Trastuzumab: Bifunctional Chelator for Radiometalpharmaceuticals and 111In Immuno-Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging, Bioconjugate Chem. 28 (2017) 2145–2159. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b00311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [440].Li L, de Guadalupe Jaraquemada-Peláez M, Kuo H-T, Merkens H, Choudhary N, Gitschtaler K, Jermilova U, Colpo N, Uribe-Munoz C, Radchenko V, Schaffer P, Lin K-S, Bénard F, Orvig C, Functionally Versatile and Highly Stable Chelator for 111In and 177Lu: Proof-of-Principle Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Targeting, Bioconjugate Chem. 30 (2019) 1539–1553. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [441].Hu A, Keresztes I, MacMillan SN, Yang Y, Ding E, Zipfel WR, DiStasio RA Jr., Babich JW, Wilson JJ, Oxyaapa: A Picolinate-Based Ligand with Five Oxygen Donors that Strongly Chelates Lanthanides, Inorg. Chem. 59 (2020) 5116–5132. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c00372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [442].Fodor T, Bányai I, Bényei A, Platas-Iglesias C, Purgel M, Horváth GL, Zékány L, Tircsó G, Tóth I, [TlIII(dota)]−: An Extraordinarily Robust Macrocyclic Complex, Inorg. Chem. 54 (2015) 5426–5437. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b00458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [443].Aime S, Botta M, Ermondi G, NMR Study of Solution Structures and Dynamics of Lanthanide(III) Complexes of DOTA, Inorg. Chem. 31 (1992) 4291–4299. 10.1021/ic00047a016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [444].Csajbók É, Baranyai Z, Bányai I, Brücher E, Király R, Müller-Fahrnow A, Platzek J, Radüchel B, Schäfer M, Equilibrium, 1H and 13C NMR Spectroscopy, and X-ray Diffraction Studies on the Complexes Bi(DOTA)− and Bi(DO3A-Bu), Inorg. Chem. 42 (2003) 2342–2349. 10.1021/ic0261272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [445].Aime S, Barge A, Botta M, Fasano M, Danilo Ayala J, Bombieri G, Crystal Structure and Solution Dynamics of the Lutetium(III) Chelate of DOTA, Inorg. Chim. Acta 246 (1996) 423–429. 10.1016/0020-1693(96)05130-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [446].Platas-Iglesias C, The Solution Structure and Dynamics of MRI Probes Based on Lanthanide(III) DOTA as Investigated by DFT and NMR Spectroscopy, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2012 (2012) 2023–2033. 10.1002/ejic.201101164. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [447].Wulfmeier KM, Cheng MHY, Cai Z, Terry SYA, Abbate V, Blower PJ, Zheng G, Reilly RM, Synthesis and Characterization of Thallium-Texaphyrin Nanoparticles and Their Assessment as Potential Delivery Systems for Auger Electron-Emitting 201Tl to Cancer Cells, Mol. Pharmaceutics 22 (2024) 242–254. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c00873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [448].Preihs C, Arambula JF, Lynch VM, Siddik ZH, Sessler JL, Bismuth– and Lead–Texaphyrin Complexes: Towards Potential α-Core Emitters for Radiotherapy, Chem. Commun. 46 (2010) 7900–7902. 10.1039/C0CC03528A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [449].Sessler JL, Mody TD, Hemmi GW, Lynch V, Synthesis and Structural Characterization of Lanthanide(III) Texaphyrins, Inorg. Chem. 32 (1993) 3175–3187. 10.1021/ic00066a032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [450].Preihs C, Arambula JF, Magda D, Jeong H, Yoo D, Cheon J, Siddik ZH, Sessler JL, Recent Developments in Texaphyrin Chemistry and Drug Discovery, Inorg. Chem. 52 (2013) 12184–12192. 10.1021/ic400226g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [451].Arambula JF, Preihs C, Borthwick, Derric, Magda D, Sessler JL, Texaphyrins: Tumor Localizing Redox Active Expanded Porphyrins, Anti-Cancer Agents Med. Chem. 11 (2011) 222–232. 10.2174/187152011795255894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [452].Sessler JL, Murai T, Lynch V, Cyr M, An “Expanded Porphyrin”: The Synthesis and Structure of a New Aromatic Pentadentate Ligand, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110 (1988) 5586–5588. 10.1021/ja00224a062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [453].Ouchi M, Hakushi T, Cation Binding by Thallium(I) Selective Crown Ethers, Coord. Chem. Rev. 148 (1996) 171–181. 10.1016/0010-8545(96)01208-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [454].Frei A, Rigby A, Yue TTC, Firth G, Ma MT, Long NJ, To Chelate Thallium(I) – Synthesis and Evaluation of Kryptofix-Based Chelators for 201Tl, Dalton Trans. 51 (2022) 9039–9048. 10.1039/D2DT01074G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No data was used for the research described in the article.

RESOURCES